►
From YouTube: Board of Adjustment
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
Okay,
the
meeting
will
now
come
to
order.
Welcome
to
the
january
24th
2022
city
of
asheville
board
of
adjustments
meeting.
My
name
is
pratik
bhakta
and
I
am
the
chair
of
this
board.
The
board
of
adjustments
is
a
quasi-judicial
body
that
is
governed
by
the
north
carolina
general
statutes
and
the
city's
unified
development
development
ordinance.
B
We
are
authorized
to
hear
requests
for
variances
from
the
city's
unified
development.
Ordinance
also
referred
to
as
the
udo
appeals
from
final
determinations
made
by
city
city
officials,
charged
with
the
enforcement
of
the
city's
udo
requests
for
reasonable
accommodations
and
other
requests,
as
may
be
provided
in
the
city's
ordinances.
B
All
committee
members
and
staff
are
participating
virtually.
We
appreciate
your
patience
as
we
work
through
committee
meetings
online
and
a
bit
differently.
We
are
streaming
live
on
our
virtual
engagement
hub,
which
is
accessible
through
the
virtual
engagement
hub
link
on
the
front
page
of
the
city
website,
also
linked
on
the
board
of
adjustments
page.
B
I
will
now
go
through
and
introduce
all
the
committee
members
who
are
participating
virtually
please
make
sure
to
mute
your
microphone
if
you
are
not
speaking
and
when
you
have
a
question
or
would
like
to
speak
underneath
your
microphone,
please
remember
to
mute
your
phone
after
you're
done
speaking
community
members.
Does
that
call
your
name?
Please
say
a
quick
hello
bill.
Newman
hi.
B
Okay,
also
with
us
today
is
our
assistant
city
attorney
eric
edgarton.
I'd
also
like
to
thank
anyone
speaking
today.
I'm
sorry.
I'd
also
like
ask
that
anyone
speaking
today,
including
staff,
to
state
their
names
and
titles
for
the
record
before
speaking
and
be
sworn
in,
if
you
haven't
done
so
at
the
beginning,
to
help
our
audience
follow
along
I'll
state
each
section
of
the
agenda
aloud
and
do
a
vocal
roll
call
for
each
vote.
B
Additionally,
I
ask
that
committee
members
raise
their
hand
to
speak
and
I
will
call
upon
them
we'll
begin
with
the
agenda
items.
We
have
two
items,
two
items
that
require
approval
and
the
adoption
of
the
minutes,
and
that's
to
the
july
26
2021
minutes
and
the
november
22nd
2021
minutes,
because
we
did
not
have
a
december
meeting.
B
And
then
we
also
have
two
variance
requests,
which
I
will
state
a
little
bit
later.
Okay,
so
we
now
begin
well,
let's
just
do
the
the
meetings.
Do
I
have
a
motion
on
the
approval
of
the
minutes
from
july
26th.
B
Second,
second,
second,
any
discussion.
D
B
Paul
wazinski
all
right
carter,
webb
all
right
and
I
from
me:
okay
approval
of
minutes
for
november
22nd
2021..
Do
we
have
a
motion.
B
Any
discussion,
none
okay,
roll
call
bill,
newman,
all
right,
godsey,
aye,
all
wazinski,
all
right
carter,
webb,
hi
and
an
eye
for
me
minutes
have
been
approved.
Okay,
now
we
will
begin
the
evidentiary
hearings
for
the
cases
listed
on
the
agenda.
B
In
hearing
cases,
the
board
conducts
a
quasi-judicial
evidentiary
hearing.
That
means
it
is
like
a
court
hearing.
State
law
sets
specific
procedures
and
rules
concerning
how
this
board
must
make
its
decisions.
These
rules
are
different
from
some
other
types
of
land
use
decisions
like
rezoning
cases
which
are
legislative
in
nature.
B
This
board's
decisions
are
constrained
by
the
standards
in
the
udo,
the
city's
udo
and
the
facts
presented
at
the
hearing.
The
board
hears
and
considers
evidence
presented
at
the
hearing
and
applies
the
center's
standard
set
forth
in
the
state
law
and
the
city's
ordinance.
The
board
must
base
its
decisions
upon
competent
material
and
substantial
evidence
presented
at
the
hearing.
If
you
will
be
speaking
as
a
witness,
please
focus
on
the
facts
and
standards,
not
personal
preferences
or
opinions.
B
Participation
is
limited.
The
meeting
is
open
to
the
public.
Everyone
is
welcome.
To
watch
parties
have
rights
to
fully
participate.
Parties
may
present
evidence
call
witnesses
and
make
legal
arguments.
Witnesses
may
testify
as
the
facts
to
which
they
are
competent
to
testify
so
long
as
those
facts
relate
to
the
legal
standards.
In
addition,
lay
or
non-expert
witness
testimony
is
limited
to
facts,
not
opinions
for
certain
topics.
This
board
needs
to
hear
opinion
testimony
from
expert
witnesses.
B
These
topics
include
projections
about
impacts
on
property
values
and
projects,
projections
about
impacts
on
traffic
safety
for
various
requests.
A
four-fifths
vote
of
the
board
is
required
to
grant
the
variance
for
all
other
hearings
and
matters,
including
the
adoption
of
the
minutes.
The
decisions
will
be
made
by
the
simple
majority
vote
of
the
board.
Witnesses
must
swear
or
form
their
testimony,
and
at
this
time
we
will
administer
the
oath
for
all
individuals
who
intend
to
provide
witness
testimony.
B
Do
you
solemnly
swear
or
affirm
that
the
evidence
you
shall
give
to
the
board
in
this
action
shall
be
the
truth,
the
whole
truth
and
nothing
but
the
truth.
I
do.
I
do
all
right.
We
have
two
items
on
the
agenda.
The
first
is
a
petitioner
james
reilly
on
behalf
of
the
owners,
michael
mcnulty
and
cherry
mcnulty,
and
james
riley
are
for
requesting
a
reverence
of
the
front
side
and
corner
set
back
development
standards
found
in
section
7-8-6-f-5.
B
Setback
standards
of
the
udo
of
a
property
of
a
send
new
single
family
house
at
property
located
at
999
club
street.
The
second
will
be
the
petitioner
aaron
ryba
on
behalf
of
the
owner.
Elizabeth
cherry
is
requesting
a
variance
to
the
maximum
walking
distance
found
in
section
7-11-2
e-2
remote
parking
of
the
u-d-o
located
at
17
cherry
street.
E
You
chair,
thank
you
board
for
being
here
today.
I
hope
everybody
had
good
holiday
and
a
happy
new
year,
so
tyler's
getting
it
up
here
on
the
screen
for
us,
so
it
is
an
unaddressed.
Hence
the
999
club
street,
we'll
assign
an
address
once
the
house
is
a
property,
is
developed
next
slide.
Please
thank
you.
E
As
the
chair
just
read
out,
and
so
the
property
is
rm8
and
these
zoning
requirements
are
a
15
foot
for
the
front,
a
six
feet
on
side
and
a
seven
and
a
half
corner
side
setback.
E
So
here's
the
zoning
map,
the
area
to
the
north
is
the
i240
right
of
way.
It's
unzoned,
the
kind
of
the
large
area
to
the
left
is
rad
nt
rad
river.
So
that's
a
new
district.
That's
not
colored
in
hence
the
clear
coloring
our
properties
in
the
center
of
the
screen.
The
small
triangle
which
is
rm8
and
the
adjacent
properties,
are
the
same
zoning
classification
next
slide.
Please
here's
a
closer
in
aerial
map.
E
Next
slide,
please,
and
so
we've
kind
of
got
kind
of
here
to
the
left
of
the
frame
is
the
existing
home.
I
mentioned
immediately
to
the
left,
and
this
is
trade
street
looking
northeast.
So
this
kind
of
small
green
area
is
our
subject
lot.
It's
fairly
small,
it's
2300
square
feet,
which
is.
C
E
Acres,
so
a
very
small
parcel.
The
minimum
lot
size
in
this
sony
district
is
four
thousand
as
a
way
the
report
just
to
hit
some
highlights
from
our
staff
report.
E
E
And
then
I'm
just
going
to
kind
of
run
through
here,
the
the
applicant's
exhibit
it's
not
prevent
its
case,
but
just
show
mr
reilly
has
provided
what
shows
five
foot
being
the
south
east
facing
trade.
E
Street,
it's
just
a
right-of-way,
that's
been
opened
and
then
the
western
line
is
a
four
foot
sign
set
back
to
that
jason
home
next
slide.
Please
here's
a
tax
map,
that's
provided
and
next
slide.
Please-
and
this
is
another
one,
as
I
references
the
report
of
adjacent
homes
in
the
area,
mr
raleigh
has
a
set
survey.
E
It
appears
the
home
immediately
to
the
left
or
west
may
comply.
I
don't
have
a
line
there,
but
you'll
see
three
other
homes
on
the
properties,
so
you
can
see
on
the
survey
that
are
across
the
streets
and
there
is
a
15
foot,
foot
building
line
or
set
back
line
that
kind
of
cuts
through
the
three
homes.
So
that's
what
that
represents
just
as
a
way
of
referring
to
that
the
other
homes
in
the
area.
E
As
mr
riley
mentioned
to
me,
other
homes
are
non-conforming,
so
this
does
show
the
extent
of
that
pattern
in
the
immediate
vicinity.
E
I'll
let
the
applicant,
but
he
has
a
couple
sanborn
maps
from
the
early
1900s
next
slide,
please
that
was
1970
1925
next
slide,
please
again
and
then
here's
a
survey
of
the
property.
So
we
we
do
have
a
good
survey
provided
and
it
does
show
the
approximate
building
envelope
based
on
the
current
setbacks.
E
Again,
this
whole
property
is
23.99,
so
I
haven't
computed
that
up,
but
it's
probably,
mr
all,
you
can
answer
when
we
get
to
testimony,
but
I
bet
it's
less
than
a
thousand
square
feet.
It's
probably
a
few
100
square
feet.
I'm
not
really
sure
you
may
know
that
it's
a
triangle
next
slide.
E
Please
and
then
the
applicant
has
provided
a
few
pictures
here,
I'll
just
kind
of
advance
through
fours
of
adjacent
homes
that
we
just
seen
on
the
prior
aerial
survey,
that
kind
of
shown
adjacent
homes
and
how
close
they
were
to
the
right-of-way
keep
advancing.
Yes,
thank
you
tyler.
This
is.
He
has
a
label
with
the
address
as
well.
E
Okay
and
then
the
applicant,
the
next
four
slides
are
his
elevations.
We
can.
We
need
to
stop
right
here
and
we
can
let
mr
riley
explain
it,
but
I'll
go
back
to
the
report
and
just
mention
that
we
do
have
like
we've
talked
about
in
one
of
the
case
adjusting
building
lines
where
we
can
average
the
front
setback
for
properties.
E
If
thing
if
other
homes
on
the
same
side
of
the
street
are
also
less
than
the
required
like
in
this
case,
15.,
what's
unique
here
is
that
we
have
intervening
right-of-ways
to
the
north
and
obviously
right
away
across
the
streets.
We
have
homes
across
the
street,
so
that's
not
the
same
face,
and
that
is
also
only
applicable
to
the
front
building
setback
line.
So
I
cannot
do
anything
with
rear
side
or
corner
side
with
that
provision
in
article
10,
I
think
I
have
it
cited
710
to
e,
so
for
lack
of
better
ability.
E
E
F
F
I
tried
on-site
parking
outside
of
the
envelope
of
the
house,
but
again
that
has
to
meet
setback
requirements
and
that
left
a
very
small
footprint
and
we
had
a
buyer
for
this
lot
a
few
years
ago
who
actually
tried
to
get
financing
for
a
house
that
was
triangular
in
shape
and
fit
the
setbacks,
and
it
was
very
cost
prohibitive
for
him
to
construct
it,
and
the
lender
turned
that
down.
It
was
like
a
300
square
foot
house
by
the
time
you
try
to
add
a
second
floor.
F
Your
stair
well
eats
up
most
of
your
gains
for
the
second
floor,
so
it
was
pretty
much
a
no-go
in
that
approach,
and
so
looking
at
the
lot
and
trying
to
design
a
house
that
fit
in
with
the
neighborhood,
it
quickly
became
apparent.
No
matter
how
I
tried
it,
the
the
answer
to
the
house
was
to
incorporate
a
garage
space
into
it
into
the
envelope
and
setbacks,
and
I
didn't
want
to
create
a
garage
scape
on
the
main
thoroughfare,
which
is
trade
street
all
the
homes
there
have
porches
and
windows
addressing
the
streets.
F
F
Well,
you
got
this
one
is
ours
proposed,
keep
going
and
it's
based
largely
on
the
scale
and
proportions
of
that
house,
which
is
directly
across
the
street,
which
is
about
three
or
four
feet
off
the
edge
of
the
of
the
street
pavement,
probably
a
little
closer
to
the
actual
right-of-way,
so
we're
very
sensitive
in
trying
to
design
a
house
that
was
sympathetic
and
compatible
with
the
neighborhood.
F
F
If
we
won
a
griffin
award
for
the
restoration
of
a
house
behind
this
greenhouse
that
was
a
large
historic
home
falling
off
the
hill
we
designed
and
built
oliver's
house,
which
is
down
on
robert
street,
some
might
be
aware
of
it's
a
big
pink
stucco
house
with
the
tower
and
did
another
renovation
of
the
industry,
and
we
we
always
try
to
add
to
the
neighborhood
when
we
build
something.
F
So
and
we
really
worked
through
every
iteration
of
design,
we
could
before
we
settled
in
on
on
our
footprint,
and
if
we
want
to
scroll
to
the
elevations,
we
can
talk
about
them
quickly.
Again,
you
can
see
that
comparison
there
and
I'm
pointing
at
my
screen,
which
doesn't
help
you
guys
at
all.
You
can
see
it's
got
a
small
front
porch
on
the
right.
That's
two
stories
to
help:
it
address
the
streetscape
and
windows
addressing
the
primary
streetscape
and
trying
to
keep
it
in
scale.
F
It's
a
very
tight
lot,
but
we're
just
trying
to
exercise.
You
know
the
right
to
build
a
home
on
a
piece
of
property
and
we're
just
asking
for
the
same
requirements,
our
setbacks
that
our
our
neighbors
enjoy
and
we're
providing
all
the
parking
required
by
the
city
and
hope
you
all
take
this
into
consideration
and
can
approve
this
today.
B
F
And
then,
if
you
want
to
go
to
the
next
elevation,
this
is
again
kind
of
facing
club
straight
trade
street,
looking
east
on
the
diagonal
street
and
then
the
next
one.
F
Okay,
we
might
have
skipped
that
up
back
up
one
that
one
you
can
see
that
one's
looking
west
and
we
tried
to
incorporate
a
bunch
of
windows
into
that
side.
To
take
advantage
of
the
river
views
down
below
this
house
will
have
some
of
the
nicest
views
in
town
between
the
river
and
looking
out
towards
the
patton
avenue
bridge.
D
Yeah
there
we
go,
the
two-car
garage
is
going
to
exit
onto
club
street
they're,
going
to
be
backing
out
prior
to
actually
having
their
side
view,
mirror
or
visibility
to
get
out
onto
club
street,
which
I
know
there's
I
don't
think,
there's
any
activity
on
club
street.
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure.
Can
we
see
club
street
again
just
to
make
sure.
D
E
D
F
I'm
assuming
that
the
gentleman
that
built
the
little
house
behind
this
property
there's
a
little
dwelling
in
back
an
adu
that
was
built
within
the
last
few
years.
I'm
assuming
you
must
have
gone
through
some
type
of
driveway
permit
application.
D
F
D
E
Yeah
miss
godsey.
All
I
see
is
the
the
permit
to
construct
the
the
adu
in
the
very
back
at
19
club
street,
the
most
northern
house
here,
the
smaller
one
and
then
the
the
renovation
at
19
club,
the
proper
principal,
and
then
there
was
some
demolition
work
on
the
21,
which
is
the
vacant
lot
here.
Okay,
so
that's
the
only
permit
history
I
see
but
yeah
and
with
the
private
maintenance.
E
Obviously
they
would
need
some
sort
of
grading
permit,
I'm
not
sure
if
ken
putnam,
the
transportation
director
would
you
know
we'll,
have
them
check
about
modification
on
wits
as
you're
saying,
because
that
turning
radius
may
be
very
oblique
and
just
to
maneuver
in
you're
going
to
be
careful
so.
E
Yep
so
we'll
we
can
talk
with
ken
and
it's
also
possible
that
when
they're
privately
maintained
streets,
sometimes
with
private
maintenance,
we
don't
do
driveway
permits
on
those
if
they're
private.
But
I
can
we
can
make
sure
that
either
it's
directly
across
and
it's
probably
lines
up
with
the
other
drawing
provided.
You
know
the
maximum
amount
of
backing,
so
it
doesn't
also
get
a
house
to
the
north
immediately.
D
B
Thank
you,
miss
cutty,
any
other
further
questions
for
mr
riley
or
mr
hurley.
B
None,
okay.
Do
we
have
any
public
comment,
any
callers.
B
B
I'm
going
to
close
public
comments
and
open
it
up
to
the
board
for
discussion.
I'm
seeking
a
motion.
B
Second,
okay:
let's
got
see
a
second
okay,
we
have
motion
a
second.
Do
we
have
any
further
discussions?
B
Okay,
bill,
newman.
D
B
Paul
wazinski
hi
harder
web
hi
and
I
for
me
motion
is
granted.
B
Thank
you,
and
so
we're
gonna
move
on
to
our
next
petitioner
aaron
raeva
on
behalf
of
owner
elizabeth
jerry.
B
Okay,
let
me
administer
the
oath
real
quick
for
you.
Do
you
solemnly
swear
or
affirm
that
the
evidence
you
shall
be
giving
the
board
in
this
action
shall
be
the
truth,
the
whole
truth
and
nothing
but
the
truth.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
E
Thank
you,
aaron
I'll
run
through
the
the
slideshow
here
in
the
staff
report,
real
quick
for
you,
so
this
one
is
for
17
cherry
street
north.
I
just
have
cherry
street
here,
but
it's
a
basically
to
do
with
remote
parking.
E
So
when
you're
having
either
new
development
or
redevelopment
with
substantial
improvement,
which
is
the
case
here,
we
have
a
substantial
improvement
to
the
value
of
the
building.
It
requires
full
compliance
with
the
site
udo.
I
think
some
of
you
are
familiar
with
that
requirement
and
you
must
provide
parking
on
site
or
within
500
feet,
maximum
walking
distance
and
that's
not
a
as
the
crow
flies
500.
E
It's
like
how
the
pedestrian
would
walk,
and
so
the
request
here
is
to
actually
extend
or
lengthen
that
allowance
from
a
500
foot
requirement
to
in
this
case,
1254,
which
is
approximately
a
quarter
mile
and
the
property,
is
on
cherry
street,
which
is
kind
of
between
montford
avenue
and
broadway.
E
Thanks
tyler,
you
see
here
in
the
very
center
very
small,
parcel
cb1
and
directly
to
the
south
and
kind
of
that
gray.
Shading
is
downtown,
that's
cbd.
E
So
that's
probably
important
to
know
because
that's
where
the
parking
location
is
proposed
is
down
the
cbd,
so
any
use
down
there
doesn't
have
to
be
parked.
So
if
they
want
to
designate
parking
and
a
parking
lot
and
cbd,
then
they're
not
really
technically
displacing
any
required
parking
or
that
on-site
use
use
there.
E
E
And
so
here's
a
closer
in
as
you
can
see,
the
the
structure,
which
is
kind
of
a
single
family
house-
that's
been
converted
in
the
past,
occupies
pretty
much
the
center
of
the
lot
next
slide.
The
other
thing
two
to
note
here
is
that
in
cb1
you
cannot
have
parking
in
any
of
the
required
setbacks.
So
that's
going
to
kind
of
preclude
this
front
yard
here
as
we're
looking
to
the
right
of
the
home
and
also
to
the
left,
this
grass
yard.
So
pretty
much,
you
can't
develop
a
parking
area.
E
The
other
thing,
too,
is
with
commercial
parking.
You
cannot
back
in
and
out,
like
we've
just
seen
with
the
residential
development.
You
just
can't
pull
in
and
back
out
and
create
like
this.
What
I
call
a
free-for-all,
whip
in
and
out,
ribbon,
curb
cut,
and
so
that's
kind
of
where
they're
kind
of
stuck
with
in
the
redevelopment
is
that
we
require
it
to
be
on-site,
parking
or
500
feet
and
tyler
go
back
to
the
zoning
map.
E
E
And
as
you'll
note
in
the
center
there's
a
large
parking
lot
directly
across
from
this,
that's
within
the
ncdot
right
away
of
240..
I
did
check
with
kent
putnam.
That's
a
parking
lot!
That's
available
for
parking.
It's
kind
of
first
come
first
serve
right
now,
so
they
don't
encumber
or
promise
any
particular
number
of
spaces
to
a
business.
E
So
if
the
the
patrons
for
this
business
happen
to
look
up
and
get
a
spot
there,
they
could
it's
just
something:
that's
not
dependable,
or
we
can
encumber
to
provide
aaron's
applicant,
a
guaranteed
parking
number
there
directly
across
the
street.
So
just
to
kind
of
let
you
know
that
tyler.
Will
you
move
back
to
the
site
plan
that
you
were
going
to?
I'm
sorry?
E
A
E
Snip
of
his
existing
site
plan-
that's
pretty
much.
What
we
just
looked
at
in
the
street
view
photo
in
the
aerial
I
see
kind
of
that
existing
back
out
parking
residential
style
driveway
here
in
the
upper
left
next
slide,
and
so
here's
the
updated
site
plan
proposed
site
plan.
As
you
can
see,
we
have
a
large
front
set
back.
I
believe
15
feet
in
the
front
and
then
he
has
an
addition
here
on
the
west
and
some
other
service
area,
life
safety,
improvements
on
the
rear.
G
E
G
Okay,
well,
thank
you
ricky,
for
that
introduction
in
just
want
to
thank
the
members
of
the
board
for
for
being
here
today
and
taking
time
out
of
your
day
and
serving
so.
I
think
ricky
did
a
great
job
at
teeing
up
really
the
the
issue
that
we're
dealing
with
on
the
site.
G
The
the
nature
of
the
occupancy
of
this
structure
being
substantial
is
again
triggering
full
site
compliance
and
being
that
we're
not
in
central
business
district,
we
we
are
required
to
provide
a
certain
number
of
off-site
parking
spaces,
and
really
the
the
challenge
here
is.
Is
that
the
way
the
building
is
cited?
G
There
really
is
a
technical
and
feasibility
condition
to
really
even
provide
any
parking
spaces
that
would
meet
the
commercial
parking
requirements
to
not
put
any
cars
in
the
setback
area
or
right
away
and
also
avoid
backing
that
can
help
into
traffic
as
ricky
mentioned
as
well.
G
So
my
my
client
currently
has
a
relationship
with
public
interest
properties.
G
So
it's
it's
a
known
quantity.
I
think
they're
fully
prepared
to
be
able
to
make
that
walking
distance
from
from
that
location
in
the
central
business
district
over
to
this
location,
I
would
like
to
mention
too,
that
my
client
did
reach
out
to
a
number
of
other
adjacent
properties.
If
you
could
go
back
to
the
zoning
plan,
I
can
kind
of
talk
through
that
a
bit
there
we
go.
G
So,
as
ricky
mentioned,
the
the
only
real
areas
that
are
in
play
to
pursue
a
parking
agreement
is
that
pink,
colored,
cb
1,
that
this
property
is
a
part
of,
and
then
the
adjacent
ncd
to
the
northeast.
G
The
there
is
a
parking
lot
that
is
directly
sort
of
north
along
elizabeth
street.
That
is
owned
by
the
folks
that
own
mow
or
moog,
and
my
client
did
approach
them
initially
and
unfortunately
they
were
not
willing
to
to
provide
any
spaces
for
any
agreement.
G
There's
a
good
bit
of
asphalt
there,
but
they,
I
think,
for
various
reasons,
want
to
maintain
control
of
their
facility
in
their
all
of
their
asphalt
without
any
other
independent
parties
using
that
site.
Unfortunately,
and
there
weren't
any
other
ability,
there
was
no
other
ability
approaching
any
of
the
other
businesses
in
the
ndc
area.
You
know
moog
is
located
over
there.
They
had
already
declined
to
be
interested
to
provide
an
agreement
and
also,
as
you
move
further
up
broadway
you
might.
G
Some
of
you
may
understand
that
there's
construction
going
on
already
on
some
of
the
parcels
up
there
for
some
housing,
so
there's
less
and
less
opportunity
to
provide
parking
within
that
500
foot
walking
distance.
So
that's
a
bit
of
background
that
was
some
of
the
work
we
really
tried
to
get
parking
closer.
G
It
wasn't
wasn't
really
an
option.
We
knew
that
at
some
point
or
from
my
understanding
at
some
point,
perhaps
that
parking
lot
directly
across
from
cherry
street
next
to
the
skate
park
may
become
a
pay
for
feedlot,
at
which
point
that
would
be
the
opportunity
for
my
client
to
be
able
to
purchase
parking
from
that
location.
G
But
it's
not
guaranteed
to
this
point
in
time.
So
again,
I
think
you
know
my
clients
well
aware
of
the
distance.
That's
there.
The
employees
already
understand
the
lot
that's
being
proposed
for
the
agreement,
and
additionally,
my
client
too,
is
committed
to
multimodal
transportation.
They
are
very
interested
in
cycling,
urban,
cycling
and
plan
to
have
bike
parking
at
the
rear
structure,
including
some
e-bikes,
so
they're,
really
they
probably
won't
really
be
using
any
more
than
half
the
required
parking
spaces
that
they
would
need
to
secure.
G
Anyway,
in
addition
to
the
fact
that
current
flexible
office
working
realities
today
considering
pandemic
times,
is
changing
the
way
that
this
office
space
will
be
used,
it
probably
will
be
the
maximum
capacity
as
well.
So
that's
about
all
of
I
have
to
say
so.
I'd
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
B
G
That's
correct:
that's
part
of
what
we're
looking
at
it's
not
set
in
stone.
I
think
it
depends
on
clearly
how
much
it's
going
to
cost,
but
we
did
want
to
go
ahead
and
prepare
to
be
providing
the
maximum
amount
of
parking
that
represent
that
larger
footprint,
which
is
about
2100
square
feet,
yeah
the
current
yeah.
G
If
you
look
on
the
left,
the
current
structure
is
about
1600
square
feet
and
adding
that
addition
that
single
story
addition
on
the
side,
if
it
is
to
be
proposed
finally
and
then
submitted
for
permanent
review
with
the
city,
would
add
about
another
500
square
feet,
which
is
what
that
that
six
faces
represents.
G
I
I
did
see
that
ricky
had
had
mentioned
in
his
report
that
there'd
be
a
25
reduction
in
parking
available,
which
I
did
not
include
in
the
calculation
that
would
knock
it
down
from
six
spaces
to
five
representing
the
larger
2100
square
foot
building,
but
it
it
may
be
that
dependent
as
this
project
moves
forward,
that
the
number
of
spaces
might
even
be
less
than
that.
Because
then
addition
isn't
necessarily
a
done
deal.
B
G
Yes,
yeah,
if
you
can
zoom
in,
I
believe
this
is
pretty
clear
this
one
sheet
here,
if
you
can
zoom
in
it,
should
stay
pretty
high
resolution
and
you
can
see
the
text
of
it
better.
I
don't
know
if
that's
a
something
you
can
do
on
this
slide.
E
G
G
Yeah,
it's
a
bit
fuzzy
in
my
screen,
but
if
you,
if
you
look
right
below
where
the
addition
is,
there's
a
dimension
and
it
says
set
back
underneath
it-
I
believe
that's
15
feet.
So
that's
you
know
that's
from
there's
a
there's,
a
dashed
line,
it's
hard
to
read
because
it's
so
close
to
the
building
footprint
that
it's
that
exists.
But
that
is
that's
the
side
and
front
yard
setback.
B
B
So
there
really
is
no
place.
You
can
actually
put
parking
without
it
being
in
the
setback.
G
Even
if
there
was
no
addition
proposed,
that's
that's
correct.
G
Currently,
there's
a
I
don't
know:
technically,
it's
a
curd
curb
cut,
but
there's
a
gravel
area.
That's
at
the
rear
of
structure
that
has
been
used
for
pulling
in
and
out
the
issue.
This
this
structure
actually
was
used
previously
for
business
purposes,
but
it
was
not.
It
was
not.
I
guess,
legally
reported
as
such,
so
the
site
was
never
brought
up
to
standards
for
for
the
use
of
parking
to
meet
business
needs.
So
that's
really.
G
What
we're
going
through
here
now
is
is
trying
to
get
this
property
approved
for
that
purpose
and
the
parking
supporting
it
so
technically
because
of
the
lack
of
ability
to
back
out
of
of
a
off
street
business
use
parking
lot.
If
you
could
even
call
that,
there's
technically
no
turnaround
room
that
exists
back
there
for
a
car,
you
can
turn
around
to
be
able
to
get
out
without
backing
out.
C
C
G
Oh,
it's
a
consulting
business,
so
they
you
know
laptops
and
computers,
there's
no
heavy
equipment.
It's
really
a
technical,
consulting
service
that
they'll
be
yeah.
B
Okay,
let's
close
public
comments
and
questions
for
the
boards
thoughts.
B
C
G
C
B
Okay
and
that's
it
on
our
agenda.
B
Nominations:
okay,
other
business
nomination,
election
of
chair
and
last
year
of
2022.
A
Yeah
this
is
paul.
I
moved
to
to
continue
with
mr
bachman
as
the
chair.
B
Okay,
any
any
discussion.
C
C
A
B
The
job
I'll
take
it
to
a
vote
bill
newman,
hi,
suzanne,
godzi.
C
B
Four
votes
to
zero.
Thank
you
guys
and
for
vice
chair.
I
would
firmly
like
to
nominate
mr
paul
wazinski
a
second
second
any
further
discussions
now
we'll
take
it
to
a
vote
bill
newman,
suzanne,
godsey.