►
From YouTube: Homeless Initiative Advisory Committee
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Thank
you
so
much
christina
you're
welcome.
You're
live
now,
have
a
good
meeting.
Thank
you.
Good
morning,
I'm
vice
chair.
Sarah
copley
and
I'd
like
to
welcome
you
to
the
april
29th
homeless,
initiative
advisory
committee
meeting
the
committee
meeting
committee
members
are
participating
virtually
still.
We
appreciate
your
patience
as
we
work
through
the
community
meetings
a
little
bit
differently
on
these
platforms.
A
We
are
streaming
live
on
the
city
of
asheville
virtual
engagement
hub,
which
is
accessible
through
the
virtual
engagement
hub
link
on
the
front
page
of
the
city
of
asheville
website.
I'm
going
to
say
that
again,
we
are
streaming
live
on
the
virtual
engagement
hub
and
that
link
is
available
on
the
front
page
of
the
cdo
bachelor
website.
A
It
is
also
linked
on
the
homeless
initiative
advisory
committee
page.
We
do
have
an
option
for
public
to
listen,
live
by
phone
for
everyone
attending
today.
Thank
you
so
much
and
welcome
I'm
going
to
go
through
our
roll
call.
This
morning
we
do
have
forums
our
current
members
today,
david
bartholomew.
B
C
B
A
A
A
Okay,
so
we
do
need
to
take
a
vote
only
on
accepting
the
consent
agenda,
since
we're
not
reviewing
that
publicly.
So
I'm
just
going
to
go
quickly
through
with
first
names,
if
you
can
say
yes
or
no
to
the
approving
the
consent
agenda.
David.
D
A
E
C
F
Thank
you
good
morning,
david
nash
also
just
want
to
be
sure,
sir.
You
saw
that
he
had
joined
oh
great.
F
F
Good
morning,
all
of
you
glad
to
be
here
with
you,
I
have
just
a
few
updates.
The
first
is
about
the
point.
In
time
count
we
had
hoped
to
be
able
to
share
those
results
out
this
week.
Hope
to
do
a
presentation
with
you
all
needed
a
little
bit
more
time,
so
are
not
going
to
be
able
to
do
that
today,
but
the
plan
is
to
share
those
out
with
the
community
and
city
council
at
the
may
10th
meeting
and
then
happy
to
do
a
detailed
follow-up
at
the
may.
F
Hayek
meeting,
I
think,
that's
a
you
know,
point
in
time.
Count
is
a
really
good
data
set
for
us,
because
it
is
our
most
comprehensive
community
data
set,
even
though
it
does
have
some
limitations,
so
we'll
plan
to
do
a
deep
dive
into
the
2022
point
in
time,
data
at
the
may
kayak
meeting.
Secondly,
I
wanted
to
follow
up
on
the
restructuring
discussion.
F
I
know
that
previously
brian
had
sent
you
all
a
proposal
about
restructuring
hayak
in
order
to
align
more
closely
with
continuum
of
care
guidelines
that
was
prior
to
the
sort
of
overall
discussion
at
the
city
about
boards
and
commissions
and
restructuring.
F
Some
of
that,
and
I
think
we
have
a
couple
of
options
to
explore-
there's
quite
a
bit
for
us
to
work
through
in
that
process,
and
so
just
wanted
to
give
you
all
an
update
that
we
are
going
to
pause
on
a
restructuring
for
the
moment
until
we
can
get
a
little
more
staff
capacity.
At
the
moment
we
are
in
office
of
one,
and
so
until
we
can
get
some
more
more
resources
to
work
with.
We
are
just
going
to
pause
on
that
restructure
and
continue
as
we
have
been
with
hayek.
F
One
thing
that
will
mean
is
that
we
had
asked
the
clerk's
office
at
both
the
city
and
the
county,
to
pause
on
refilling
vacant
seats
on
this
committee
until
we
were
through
that
restructuring
process.
So
we
are
going
to
unpause
that
we're
going
to
get
back
to
refilling
those
seats
so
that
we
can
get
back
to
full
capacity
with
hayak
as
quickly
as
possible
and
so
we'll
be
working
with
both
the
city
and
county.
F
To
do
that,
sarah
is
going
to
talk
a
bit
about
the
nominating
work
group
so
that
we
can
reactivate
those
folks
and
and
get
that
process
underway
and
get
a
full
committee
here
and
then
we
will
certainly
look
to
address
our
structure
in
the
future
and
you
know
in
the
coming
months,
but
in
the
meantime
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
get
back
to
you
full
hayak
and
then
last
thing
for
me
is
just
an
update
about
the
consultant.
F
So,
as
you
know,
we
have
been,
the
city
has
been
working
with
buncombe
county
and
with
dogwood
health
trust.
F
We
collectively
issued
an
rfp
in
february
for
a
consultant
to
address,
to
help
us
address
unsheltered
homelessness
in
particular,
and
to
do
a
real
needs
assessment
and
develop
some
strategies
that
we
can
implement.
That
will
be
really
actionable
proposals
for
that
were
due
march
18th.
We
received
11
proposals
and
our
selection
committee
has
been
staffed
from
the
city
from
the
county
and
from
dogwood.
We
reviewed
those
11
proposals.
We
interviewed
the
top
three
are
our
top
ranked
firms
and
we
interviewed
three
firms
and
have
selected
a
firm
to
recommend.
F
We
are
still
in
the
con
in
the
selection
process
and
in
the
contract
negotiation
phase,
and
so
that
has
to
stay
confidential
for
the
moment.
So
I'm
not
able
to
share
any
additional
details
about
that,
but
our
plan
is
to
have
that
announcement.
F
In
the
next
couple
of
weeks,
we
will
be
at
the
may,
10th
city
council
meeting,
asking
council
to
vote
to
accept
funding
from
dogwood
health
trust
for
the
consultancy,
so
that
contract
will
route
through
the
city
of
asheville
but
be
fully
funded
by
dogwood.
So
that
will
be
on
the
council
agenda
on
may
10th
past.
That
point
we'll
be
able
to
finalize
that
contract
have
a
kickoff
meeting
with
the
consultant
and
be
able
to
really
roll
out
what
that
process
is
going
to
look
like
and
what
the
engagement
opportunities
for
the
community
will
be.
F
F
I
really
hope
that
there
will
be
a
lot
of
hayek
engagement
in
this,
but
also
just
a
lot
of
community
engagement
in
this
process,
because
I
think
certainly
we
have
a
significant
need
related
to
unsheltered
homelessness,
but
also
unsheltered
homelessness
doesn't
happen
in
a
vacuum.
It
happens
in
the
context
of
our
community's
service
system
and
all
the
resources
that
we
have
available.
F
So
I
think
this
will
be
really
useful
for
us
in
addressing
not
only
unsheltered
homelessness,
but
you
know
homelessness
across
the
board
in
our
communities,
so
excited
to
be
able
to
share
more
details
with
you
all
as
we
go
forward
and
that's
it
for
me,
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
If
you
have
them.
F
We
do
have
an
anticipated
timeline,
but
I've
I'll
be
better
able
to
answer
that
at
the
may
meeting.
Okay.
G
Thanks
emily
for
those
updates,
I
was
thinking
that
the
point
in
time
count
information
was
due
to
the
the
next
level,
maybe
by
this
date
or
sometime
in
the
next
few
days.
Can
you
speak
to
that
and
then
will
that
information
be
public
prior
to
the
may
10th
meeting,
or
will
it
only
become
public
at
that
may
10th
meeting.
F
Yep
the
high
deadline,
the
federal
deadline
is
today
for
submission,
and
so
that
data
has
been
submitted
to
hud.
I
didn't
it
wasn't
complete
in
time
to
be
able
to
put
together
a
presentation
and
publish
that
in
advance
to
follow
our
public
meeting
laws
and
so
the
the
we'll
be
working
on
rollout
for
those
materials,
but
certainly
at
the
may
10th
meeting
we'll
intend
to
share
that
with
the
community.
So
I
would
imagine
a
few
days
in
advance:
we'll
have
those
data
available.
G
F
I
have
not
seen
that
piece,
so
I
can
tell
you
about
their
real
estate.
Is
it
was
it
about
the
so.
F
Okay,
yes,
so
that
project
is
still
on
track.
They
are
still
under
contract
to
purchase
that
to
create
permanent,
supportive
housing.
The
closing
date
has
been
delayed
related
to
the
need
to
get
an
environmental
assessment
completed,
which
is
david,
actually
may
be
able
to
speak
to
this.
So
so
the
environmental
assessment
is
in
process
we'll
be
waiting
for
hud
approval,
that's
related
to
the
ability
to
access
vouchers
for
those
units
in
the
future
and
so
again
still
on
track,
but
just
waiting
on
that
final
approval
of
the
environmental
assessment.
F
In
the
meantime,
the
hotel
is
continuing
to
operate
as
a
hotel
and
closing
was
I'm
sorry.
I
don't
know
the
exact
closing
date,
but
I
think
it
is
anticipated
to
be
june-ish
sometime
in
the
in
early
summer.
D
E
D
E
A
Thanks
emily
and
thanks
david
any
other
questions
before
we
move
on
to
our
next
agenda
item
all
right.
Thank
you
both
so
much
so
today
we
have
debbie
alford
proxy
for
amy
hopson
she's,
going
to
give
us
an
update
about
committee
place.
Thank
you
so
much
for
coming
today.
Debbie.
We
really
appreciate
your
time
so
I'll
turn
the
floor
over
to
you.
H
Yeah,
absolutely
I
apologize
in
advance
if
I
keep
turning
my
camera
off.
The
internet
at
trinity
places
sometimes
a
little
spotty.
We
have.
H
You
know
like
many
organizations,
many
non-profits
many
businesses
over
the
last
several
years
during
the
pandemic
really
struggled
with
staffing,
and
we
know
that
trinity
place
really
works
best
with
full-time
staff
that
are
able
to
commit
long-term
to
you
know
a
regular
schedule,
and
so
that's
what
we
have
you
know
always
tried
to
strive
for,
and
you
know,
over
the
last
couple
of
years
we
have
lost
and
gained
staff
repeatedly
and
have
really
found
that
we
have
an
awesome
group
of
part-time
folks
that
are
not
able
to
commit
to
a
full-time
schedule.
H
B
H
And
we
are,
you
know,
working
on
serving
out
the
last
couple
of
clients
that
we
have
in
the
house
finding
them.
You
know
a
safe
place
to
be
and
working
with
guardians,
if
that's
css
or
parents
or
what
not
to
to
return
them
to
their
homes,
and
you
know,
work
with
the
community
to
figure
out.
What's
next
for
youth,
experiencing
homelessness.
A
Oh,
that's
a
lot,
I'm
so
sorry,
yeah,
just
I've
been
in
asheville
for
a
long
time
and
in
various
roles
have
referred
a
lot
of
kids
and
families
to
trinity
play.
So
you
know
my
heart's.
Definitely
with
you
guys
how
I
think
two
parts
I'm
just
going
to
jump
in
if
anybody
wants
to
raise
your
hand
I'll
try
to
do
my
best
to
pay
attention.
A
I
do
you
know
the
clients
and
the
staff
here
are
both
of
concerned.
So
maybe
debbie
can
you
tell
us
what
some
transition
plans
are
for
people
who
would
normally
refer
to
you?
Where
are
those
children
going
now.
H
You
know
able
to
to
pass
out
to
folks
that
are
calling
us,
because
we
still
have
our
phone
lines
available
and
so
we're
able
to
provide
some
some
counseling
when
folks
are
in
need
we're
trying
to
refer
folks
to
other
options
in
the
area,
whether
it's
youth
respite
homes
or
you
know,
for
example,
elida
has
some
great
resources
for
youth,
and
so
we're
trying
to
to
put
together
that
network
for
folks
caring
for
children
is
still
in
the
community,
doing
foster
care
and
will
remain
doing
that
work
as
well
as
our
intensive
in-home
family
case
management
program
that
we
have,
and
so
we
are
still
very
much
involved
in
western
north
carolina
and
can
serve
families
through
those
other
programs
as
well,
and
so
a
lot
of
community
members
have
asked
you
know
what
can
we
do
in
this
time?
H
And
I
think
our
response
is
to
consider
becoming
a
foster
parent.
That
is
the
real
need
in
this
community
and
we
need
foster
parents
that
are
willing
to
to
work
with
teenagers.
That's
you
know.
The
large
population
that
we
were
serving
at
trinity
place
was
was
teenagers
that
didn't
you
know
fit
in
anywhere
else,
and
so
we
need
foster
families
that
are
that
are
willing
to
do
that
work.
H
As
far
as
staff
goes,
you
know
we
are
working
with
them
to
to
find
them
other
places
to
to
work.
We've
gotten
several
really
awesome
non-profits
that
have
reached
out
to
us
about
any
staff
that
may
be
looking
for
jobs
again.
A
lot
of
our
staff
are
part-time
at
this
point,
so
it's
just
a
few
that
we're
trying
to
to
help
find
those
permanent
positions
and
we've
given
the
staff
as
much
notice
as
we
could
so
that
it
would
help
with
that
transition
as
well.
H
A
Thank
you
so
much
debbie
yeah.
I
think
it's
really
a
huge
consideration
for
our
committee.
Looking
to
the
future,
you
know
we
have
some
financial
decisions
to
make
on
this
committee.
We
we're
looking
to
appoint
new
members
and
certainly
any
startup
projects.
A
I
can
tell
you
from
the
grant-making
side
they're
just
not
not
really
able
to
be
pulled
off,
so
I
think
it's
going
to
be
an
interesting
year
to
see
how
we
reconfigure
and
I'm
so
sorry
that
one
of
the
early
victims
of
that
the
staffing
shortages
is
trinity,
place
for
sure
so
debbie.
If
I
could
be
any
help
to
you
and
your
staff
or
any
of
the
committee
cam,
please
don't
hesitate
to
reach
out
to
me
or
emily.
A
A
A
Okay,
thank
you
so
much
debbie.
Well.
This
is
a
way
into
our
next
agenda
item.
I
do
need
a
vote
before
we
get
to
that
I'll.
Give
you
a
little
description.
A
So
our
part
of
our
restructuring
also
that
we
started
at
the
beginning
of
this
year.
We
do
have
five
openings
and
we've
established
some
work
groups,
but
before
we
need
to
do
that,
we
need
to
dissolve
our
subcommittees
formally
with
a
vote.
I
did
want
to
let
this
committee
know
that
we
have
some
really
active
members.
I've
already
been
contacted
by
people
who
have
volunteered
to
be
on
the
nominations
committee
that
will
be
chaired
by
jennifer
t
made
up
of
jason,
desai
myself
and
emily
ball.
Thank
you
guys.
A
So
much
we're
going
to
be
tackling
that
right
away.
I've
sent
the
openings,
so
our
bylaws
state
that
we
need
to
have
representatives
from
certain
aspects
of
the
community,
and
you
can
see
how
important
that
is
right,
like
just
looking
at
the
screen
here
and
the
different
systems
that
we
touch.
So
we
really
want
to
recruit
to
that.
We
also
want
to
recruit
with
an
equity
model
and
that's
including
the
types
of
organizations
and
businesses
that
are
represented,
so
be
looking
for
the
nominations
committee
to
really
get
started
in
the
next
month.
A
Some
unusual
members,
some
committee
members,
there's
a
wonderful
representative
from
the
asheville
police
department.
That's
engaged
with
communities,
but
there
are
some
protocols
to
having
staff
city
and
county
staff
on
work
groups,
so
we're
going
to
figure
that
out
that's
to
be
decided
probably
next
week,
we'll
also
finalize
the
finance
work
group.
So
if
anybody
again
wants
to
be
on
any
committee
that
you've
heard
please
contact
myself
or
emily,
these
are
almost
set.
But
if
I
can
have
a
vote
to
formally
dissolve
our
subcommittees,
I'm
gonna
just
go
through
the
breakdown.
A
E
B
D
A
E
A
F
I
can
speak
to
this
a
bit,
so
there
are
three
formal
subcommittees
that
were
established.
Pre-Pandemic
one
is
the
housing
subcommittee
that
david
just
referenced?
One
is
a
services
and
resource
subcommittee,
and
one
is
a
community
mobility
subcommittee.
F
None
of
those
have
been
meeting
during
the
pandemics.
So
I
think
the
discussion
for
you
all
is
you
is
whether
you
want
to
sort
of
reinvigorate
those
and
carry
on
or
if
you
want
to
formally
dissolve
those
look
at
the
immediacy
of
these
work
groups
and
then
kind
of
step
back
and
look
at
what
what
standing
subcommittees
make
sense
going
forward.
The
difference
between
subcommittees
and
work
groups
is
that
subcommittees
are
subject
to
open
meeting
laws,
they're
formed
and
dissolved
by
vote,
as
opposed
to
a
work
group
which
is
just
a
less
formal
structure.
A
And
usually
time
limited
work
groups
are
usually
with
in
the
calendar
year
of
appointments
just
typically
and
that's
to
really
respect
the
the
work
group
subcommittee
dividing
line
so
there
are,
there
are
going
to
be
so
for
definitely
we
want
to
have
our
finance
materials
be
public.
Things
like
that.
So.
E
A
D
G
A
It
does
the
intent
was
to
dissolve
to
formally
dissolve
to
establish
work
groups,
but
you
know
even
from
this
discussion,
I
would
guarantee
you
that
this
is
the
first
I've
heard
of
this
other
subcommittee.
I
did
any
other
members.
Have
you
heard
about
this
or
worked
with
this
during
your
time
in
hayek?
It
just
sounds
like
a
pretty
important
working
group,
but
you
know
you
mentioned
david
nash,
the
assignment
of
committee
members.
A
A
So
we're
we've
just
touched
on
three
different
home
and
housing,
homelessness,
prevention
projects
and
those
are
just
getting
started.
What
else
is
in
the
pipeline
that
we're
not
aware
of
necessarily
because
everyone's
been
limited
to
me
during
covid.
I
So,
just
for
my
understanding,
what
I'm
hearing
is
a
motion
to
dissolve
subcommittees,
except
for
the
housing
subcommittees,
while
gaining
more
information
on
the
scope
and
work
of
the
housing
subcommittee.
Yes,
thank
you.
G
I
No,
then
that's
one
of
the
things
is
by
having
a
work
group:
it's
not
an
official
appointment
of
an
appointed
board,
but
also
then
you
can
bring
in
other
outside
expertise
into
the
group.
So
you
have
some
more
flexibility.
F
Can
I
offer
a
consideration
you
might
consider,
including
dissolving
the
housing
subcommittee
in
line
with
the
others
and
reconstituting
that
as
a
work
group,
so
that
it
could
be
more
immediately
actionable
and
could
include
you
know
additional
folks
from
the
community?
I
don't
think
that
the
scope
of
activity
needs
to
look
different
in
that
work
group.
Just
the
sort
of
formality
of
the
structure
would
change.
A
A
Could
I
have
a
committee
member
make
a
motion
to
dissolve
all
the
working
all
the
subcommittees
in
favor
adoption
work
groups.
B
A
Thank
you
david.
Thank
you
jason,
so
we
will
formally
dissolve
the
subcommittees
and
establish
work
groups.
I
do
want
to
make
special
mention
of
the
housing
working
group
that
is
yet
to
be
established.
I
will
follow
up
with
you
on
that.
Yes,.
A
E
C
E
A
10
13,
yes,
thank
you.
The
nursing
unanimously
passes
to
dissolve
the
subcommittees
and
established
working
groups,
as
mentioned,
and
now
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over
to
emily
for
really
the
meat
of
our
program
today,
we're
digging
into
the
system
performance
measures.
We
first
started
discussing
those
last
month
and
thankfully
emily
has
come
up
with
an
absolutely
great
presentation
for
us
to
more
deeply
understand.
So
this
informs
our
work,
particularly
as
we
look
to
our
nominations.
Committee,
work,
group
and
finance
work
group.
C
F
Go
ahead
to
the
next
slide,
so
we,
as
you
know,
we
have
talked
about
system
performance
measures
several
times
in
this
group,
but
wanted
to
really
give
you
sort
of
a
thorough
picture
of
what
those
metrics
are
and
where
the
data
come
from
and
what
the
significance
of
them
are,
so
that
we
can
have
this
good
information
baseline
to
inform
work
going
forward.
F
So
today
we're
going
to
look
at
background
purpose
and
use
both
federally
and
locally
the
process,
the
limitations
goals,
what
the
framework
actually
is
and
then
we'll
look
at
our
results
that
were
recently
submitted.
I
believe
in
february
for
fy21
and
then
talk
about
next
steps.
Next
slide,
so
some
basic
background
on
the
system
performance
measures.
F
All
of
this
is
language
directly
from
hud,
so
system
performance
measures
are
a
tool
that
are
used
to
do
this,
so
provide
a
focus
on
viewing
the
local
homeless
response
as
a
coordinated
system
of
homeless
assistance
options,
as
opposed
to
homeless
assistance
programs
and
funding
sources
that
operate
independently
in
a
community.
To
facilitate
this
perspective,
the
act
now
requires
communities
to
measure
their
performance
as
a
coordinated
system.
In
addition
to
analyzing
performance
by
specific
projects
or
project
types,
so
the
idea
is
that
you
know
again,
as
I
said
earlier,
about
unsheltered
homelessness.
F
None
of
this
happens
in
a
vacuum.
The
idea
is
that
we
need
a
strong,
a
strong
service
system
as
a
whole
and
so
want
to
be
measuring
the
performance
of
that
service
system
as
a
whole
across
the
community.
All
of
these
interventions
really
work
together
in
order
to
work
most
effectively.
It's
not
possible
for
it's
not
possible
to
have.
F
You
know
a
high
performing
shelter
only
because
we
need
to
have
housing
options
for
people
to
exit
shelter
into
it's
not
possible
to
have
high
performing
street
outreach
only
because
street
outreach
is
intended
to
connect
people
with
other
resources
in
the
community
that
also
need
to
be
high
performing.
So
the
goal
is
to
look
at
the
the
system
as
a
whole.
F
Again,
the
intent
of
these
selection
criteria
are
to
encourage
continuum
of
care
and
coordination
with
esg
program
recipients
and
other
stakeholders
to
regularly
measure
their
progress
in
meeting
the
needs
of
people
experiencing
homelessness
and
to
report
this
progress
to
hud,
and
this
is
a
competitive
element
in
the
annual
continuum
of
care
program
competition.
So
we
we
are
directly
rewarded
based
on
how
well
our
community
is
performing
in
the
work
of
ending
homelessness,
as
measured
by
these
system
performance.
Metrics
next
slide.
F
F
So
the
goal
here
is
to
use
these
system
performance
measures
locally
to
improve
our
crisis
response
system.
So
what
are
the
data
telling
us
about
where
our
opportunities
are
to
to
do
a
better
job,
ending
homelessness,
improving
that
performance
as
measured
in
these
has
a
direct
result
of
increased
funding
for
our
community
and,
most
importantly,
improving
system
performance
results
in
fewer
people
experiencing
homelessness
next
slide.
F
F
Some
local
limitations
that
we
have
are
that
not
all
service
providers
participate
in
hmis,
although
you
know,
as
you
know,
we
have
been
really
improving
that
having
a
lot
more
participation
in
our
community
and
hmis,
which
is
really
wonderful
at
the
moment,
our
largest
service
provider
that
does
not
participate
in
hmis
is
the
rescue
mission,
but
michael
woods
and
I
have
been
working
on
some
options
around
that
and
it's
possible
that
we
may
be
able
to
get
sort
of
a
system
patch
where
we
can
export
data
from
his
system
to
import
into
hmis.
F
F
The
data
pulled
from
hmis
for
the
system.
Performance
measures
is
specifically
based
on
entries
into
the
system
and
exits
from
the
system,
and
so
what
that
means
is.
F
If
someone
comes
into
a
shelter,
then
there
they
show
up
as
an
entry
into
that
shelter
and
then
when
they
leave
the
shelter
they
are
exited
from
the
system.
There
are
some
project
types
in
our
community
that
are
not
using
that
same
method
of
hmis
data
collection,
so
that's
outreach,
for
example,
day
services
like
a-hope,
so
some
of
our
really
key
data,
particularly
around
unsheltered
homelessness,
is
not
represented
here.
We're
working
on
that
hoping
to
be
able
to
change
that
this
year,
and
then
it's
really
important
to
remember
that
system.
F
Performance
measures
will
always
lag
behind
improvements
in
hmis,
because
we're
always
looking
at
the
prior
federal
fiscal
year.
So
there's
a
look
back
period.
It
will
take
a
bit
to
catch
up
as
our
system
improves
again,
our
goals
are
to
understand
what
system
performance
measures
are
why
they
matter
what
our
current
data
are
and
the
limitations
that
we've
just
talked
about.
F
My
hope
for
today
is
that
we
really
establish
some
baseline
understanding
of
what
our
data
tell
us
in
the
community,
but
also
what
these
system
performance
measures
are
intended
to
represent,
so
that
we
can
use
this
to
inform
kind
of
our
our
thinking
and
our
action
steps
as
we
go
forward
to
really
continually
evaluate
as
we're
looking
at
prospective
projects
or
changes
to
our
service
system.
How
will
this
impact
our
system
performance,
because
that
the
better
our
system
performs
the
more
we're
able
to
end
homelessness
in
our
community
next
slide?.
F
So
this
is
a
very
quick
overview
of
what
the
the
six
system
performance
measures
are
they're.
Actually,
seven
one
is
about
prevention
and
communities
have
not
been
reporting
on
that
the
last
several
years.
So
these
are
the
key
six
system
performance
measures,
so
how
many
people
are
homeless
for
the
first
time,
how
many
people
have
exited
homelessness
but
returned
to
homelessness?
How
long
are
people
staying
homeless?
F
Are
people
increasing
their
employment
and
their
non-employment
income?
What's
the
ability
of
our
system
to
help
people
obtain
and
maintain
housing,
and
then
how
many
people
are
experiencing
homelessness
in
our
community?
So
ultimately,
what
is
the
ability
of
our
system
to
eliminate
homelessness
by
decreasing
the
number
of
people
who
are
homeless
next
slide
so
and
next
slide,
so
we
are
going
to
deep
dive
into
each
of
these
measures
and
what
our
most
recent
submitted
data
were
so
measure
one
length
of
time
that
people
remain
homeless.
F
This
is
looking
at
how
long
people
are
homeless
again,
keep
in
mind.
This
is
all
about
hmis
data
in
our
community.
So
it's
looking
at
how
long
people
are
homeless,
within
our
continuum
of
care
based
on
the
number
of
bed
nights
in
emergency
shelters
or
in
transitional
housing
programs,
and
the
system
is
pulling
data
from
back
to
2012,
to
look
at
length
of
time
homeless
so
again,
keep
in
mind
that
that,
as
we
improve
our
utilization
of
hmis,
there's
going
to
be
a
delay
in
that
catching
up
to
our
system
performance
measures.
F
So
the
data
set
that
we
just
submitted
for
fy21
so
october,
1st
of
2020
through
september
30th
of
2021
that
data
set
included,
861
people
and
for
emergency
shelter.
Only
the
length
of
time
homeless
was
120
days.
F
When
we
add
in
transitional
housing
programs,
the
length
of
time
homeless
was
224
days,
so
pretty
significant,
a
federal
goal
for,
or
a
benchmark
at
the
federal
level
for
communities
that
are
working
towards
functional
zero,
which
means
you
have
people
really
flowing
through
your
system
and
people
are
not
are
not
just
stuck
in
your
system
and
continuing
to
be
homeless.
That
benchmark
is
that
folks
are
homeless
for
90
days
or
less,
and
so
we
certainly
have
some
opportunity
here
when
we're
looking
at
120
days
or
224
days
next
slide.
F
Measure
two,
and
also
let
me
say
you
all,
please
feel
free
to
jump
in
at
any
point.
If
you
have
questions
about
any
of
these,
as
we
go
along
measure,
two
is
about
returns
to
homelessness
from
housing.
So,
after
people
exit
the
system
exit
homelessness
into
permanent
housing,
are
they
staying
housed
or
do
they
return
to
homelessness
again?
So
this
is
looking
at
folks
who
exited
to
housing
in
the
two
years
prior
to
the
report
period
as
well
as
the
report
period.
F
F
Again,
an
exit
from
permanent
housing
can
mean
that
you're
graduating
someone
from
a
program,
so
presumably
they're
continuing
to
be
housed
in
that
unit,
but
are
no
longer
in
hmis
as
a
program
participant
or
could
certainly
mean
that
they
were
exited
from
the
program
for
non-compliance,
but
overall
14
returns
to
homelessness
within
a
two-year
period,
and
this
is
also
measuring
returns
to
homelessness,
meaning
this
person
had
a
new
hmis
entry
as
homeless
in
a
program
across
our
service
system.
A
Well,
this
is
pretty
fascinating,
fascinating
data
for
transitional
housing.
I
think
that's
we.
We
don't
discuss
that
a
lot
in
our
community,
but
look
at
that.
So
it's
what
like
a
you,
had
only
a
10
return
from
the
number
of
exits.
That's
that's!
Okay!
That's
really!
Educational
thanks!
I
don't
want
to
belabor
it.
G
F
Measure
three
is
looking
at
the
number
of
people
who
are
homeless
in
the
service
system.
This
is,
there
are
two
parts
to
measure
three,
so
3.1
is
looking
at
the
change
in
the
number
of
people
experiencing
homelessness
based
on
the
point
in
time
count
not
based
on
hmis
data.
So
you
can
see
our
our
2020
and
2021
data
here
and
we've
been
through
those
before
we'll
have
2022
data
soon
and
then
next
slide.
F
3.2
is
measuring
the
change
in
the
number
of
sheltered
people
who
are
homeless
based
on
hmis
data,
so
again
keep
in
mind
limitations
of
shelter
of
hmis
participation,
but
this
metric
does
deduplicate
to
account
for
people
who
stayed
in
multiple
programs.
So
if
someone
was
in
emergency,
shelter
and
transitional
housing
during
that
time
period,
that
data
is
deduplicated
to
show
the
total
number
of
people
who
are
interacting
with
the
system.
B
F
F
Helpmate
does
not
participate
in
hmis,
because
victim
service
provider
organizations
are
precluded
from
participating
in
hmis
for
confidentiality
and
safety
purposes.
So
this
the
data
available
for
this
measure
are
specifically
from
permanent,
supportive
housing
at
homeward
bound.
So
you
can
see
in
in
2020
they
had
125
participants
in
those
projects.
They
have
more
than
125
people
in
permanent
supportive
housing,
but
this
is
again
specific
to
continuum
of
care,
funded,
permanent,
supportive
housing.
F
A
This
is
a
question
for
david
bartholomew,
david
is
the
was
the
soar
program
active
in
2021?
Does
the
store
program
still
interface
with
homer
bound?
Can
you
give
me
a
little
update
on
that.
D
Yeah
in
buncombe
county,
we
still
do
have
the
sword
program.
We
were,
we
did
lose
an
attorney
in
early
2021
who
was
handling
the
disability,
and
so
there
was
a
little
bit
of
a
lull
while
we
replaced
staff,
but
there
is
a
new
attorney
who's
handling.
All
of
the
sore
referrals.
F
Next
slide,
thank
you
measure.
Five
is
looking
at
people
who
are
homeless
for
the
first
time,
so
that
is
looking
at
folks
who
enter
the
system,
who
do
not
have
any
prior
enrollments
in
hmis
in
the
past
two
years
again
remember
the
limitations
of
our
available
data.
So
if
we
had
a
shelter
program
that
had
not
been
participating
in
hmis
in
the
past
is
now
participating,
we
had
a
person
who
was
in
that
shelter
program
in
the
past
and
has
now
enrolled
in
a
different
program.
F
They
would
appear
to
be
homeless
for
the
first
time,
but
that
may
not
necessarily
be
true
if
their
data
weren't
tracked
previously
in
2021,
we
showed
819
people
who
were
entering
emergency
shelter,
transitional
housing
or
permanent
housing
and
of
those
684
people
did
not
have
hmis
entries
in
the
past
24
months.
F
G
Emily,
I
do
have
a
follow-up
question
to
that
and
I'm
sorry
if
you've
already
said
this
so
hmis
is
a
system
wide
bigger
than
just
buncombe
county.
So
if
an
individual
was
in
a
shelter,
let's
say
like
in
the
wake
area,
would
they
be
considered
within
the
last
24
months
if
they
had
been
in
another
shelter
or
is
it
only
based
on
whether
or
not
they
are
entered
in
our
501
continuum
of
care
area
considered
in
that
24
months?.
F
It's
only
looking
at
data
in
our
continuum
of
care,
so
if
they
had
had,
there
are
ways
to
do
data
sharing
across
continuum
of
care,
and
if
they
had
been
in
a
program
in
wake,
they
would
already
have
a
profile
created
in
the
system.
But
this
is
really
specifically
evaluating
their
entries
into
programs
within
our
continuum
of
care.
G
And
so
I
do
wonder
is
what
opportunities
would
exist
for
us
to
do
that,
because
I
also
wonder
if
we
are
looking
at
new
unsheltered
under
house.
Or
are
we
looking
at
people
who
are
transient
and
have
moved
from
one
area
to
another
that
are
in
the
system
and
accessing
services
in
another
community,
and
is
that
something
that
we
would
ever
be
able
to
really
look
more
closely
at.
F
Yes,
I
would
say
that's
not
something
that
this
particular
measure
looks
at,
but
that
is
something
that
we
would
be
able
to
look
at.
One
of
the
entry
questions
in
hmis
is
about
the
zip
code
of
your
last
permanent
address
and
also
where
you
stayed
the
night
before
you
entered
this
program.
So
there
are
ways
to
look
at
that
data.
F
Measure
seven
is
looking
at
exits
to
permanent
housing,
so
the
number
of
folks
who
are
exiting
homelessness
into
permanent
housing
and
the
number
of
people
who
are
already
in
permanent
housing
projects
who
retained
that
housing
so
did
not
become
homeless.
Again.
This
is
just
the
data
from
this
past
federal
fiscal
year,
so
the
number
of
folks
who
exited
from
unsheltered
homelessness,
30
people
16
of
those
were
positive
exits,
so
53
success
rate,
emergency
shelter,
transitional
housing
and
rapid,
rehousing
and
again
in
a
rapid
rehousing
program.
F
The
exit
information
would
presumably
mean
that
person
is
continuing
to
be
in
that
unit
they're,
just
no
longer
in
that
particular
program,
636
exits,
41
of
those
were
positive
exits
and
then
in
permanent
supportive
housing,
which
includes
retention
and
99
success
rates,
so
387
people,
382
of
whom
are
still
in
housing.
So
it's
really
strong.
That
means
we
have
really
strong
permanent
supportive
housing
projects
operating
in
our
community
and
certainly
we
have
additional
need
for
more
permanent
supportive
housing,
but
really
great
to
see
that
our
permanent
supportive
housing
is
working.
F
Okay,
next
slide,
so
we
are,
we
have
been
working
with
our
office
of
data
and
performance,
and
you
know
those
folks
were
with
you
all
recently
to
show
the
dashboard
of
the
point
in
time
data
that's
now
up
on
the
city's
website
that
will
be
updated
with
the
2022
data
and
we're
also
looking
to
build
out
from
that
and
include
the
system
performance
measure
data
on
the
city's
website
on
an
ongoing
basis.
F
The
hope
is
that
we
can
get
to
a
point
where
we
have
such
strong
data
and
such
strong
hmis
participation
that
that
a
our
system,
performance
data
can
be
a
really
accurate
reflection
of
what's
happening
in
our
community
and
b,
will
be
able
to
pull
these
metrics
more
frequently
than
once
a
year.
We
can
run
this
report
at
any
point
in
time,
so,
ideally
we'll
get
to
a
place
where
we're
able
to
really
be
evaluating
the
performance
of
our
system
on
a
more
regular
basis
twice
a
year
quarterly.
F
Something
like
that
to
look
at
how
effective
we
are
at
ending
homelessness
and
the
big
opportunity
with
these
data
are
to
to
identify
weaknesses
in
our
system.
You
know
where
are
the
places
that
we
need
to
really
shore
up
our
system's
performance,
so
that
it
is
functioning
more
robustly
able
to
end
homelessness
for
a
greater
number
of
people
and
to
really
keep
that
flow
happening
through
our
system?
F
My
hope
is
that
we
that
we
will
all
you
know,
certainly
in
our
office,
for
you
all
and
for
our
service
providers,
that
the
system
performance
measures
can
be
really
an
intrinsic
part
of
our
culture
in
our
community
that,
as
we
are
looking
at
strategies
and
funding
decisions,
policy
recommendations,
you
know,
for
you
all.
That's
certainly
part
of
your
role
as
we're
looking
at
decision
making
and
recommendations
that
that
were
we're
really
grounded
in
these
system,
performance
measures
and
understand.
F
You
know
to
me:
these
are
things
that
we
have
to
report
on
to
hud.
This
is
a
federal
requirement,
but
the
reason
that
hud
has
identified
these
particular
metrics
is
because
they
are
reflective
of
how
well
we
are
ending
homelessness,
so
there
it
is
not
just
sort
of
a
bureaucratic
process,
but
is
really
kind
of
the
meat
of
the
work
of
ending
homelessness.
F
C
Yeah,
okay,
is:
is
this
data
available
the
spms?
Can
we
drill
down
to
that
by
participant
hmis
participant.
F
F
You
know
for
confidentiality
purposes,
that
data
is
not
publicly
available,
but
hopefully
you
saw
in
the
meeting
materials.
I
did
include
the
full
report
that
we
submitted
to
hud
for
system
performance
measures
and
we
again
are
working
with
our
office
of
data
and
performance
to
get
this
data
on
our
website
and
update
it
on
a
regular
basis,
so
to
look
at
client
level
data.
I
think
that's
something
that
you
and
I
could
work
on
to
pull
hmis
reports
for
your
programs.
A
Well,
thank
you
so
much
for
analyzing
and
digesting
and
and
putting
that
together
for
us
emily.
I
think
that's
really
helpful.
For
me,
I'm
sure,
within
each
of
our
systems
we
can
each
see
sort
of
weaknesses
or
where
we
can
maybe
apply
some
pressures
on
the
lever
in
certain
areas.
So
we'll
be
thinking
about
that
and
again,
if
you
have
any
issues
with
accessing
the
meeting
materials,
please
contact
me
or
emily.
Does
anybody
have
any
initial
takeaways
from
the
data
that
emily
presented
today?
A
Yeah,
it
was
a
lot
of
data,
so
I
again,
I
encourage
us
to
really
become
familiar.
That's
gonna
drive
a
lot
of
our
work,
so
we
we
we
started
last
month,
we've
had
a
deep
dive
now
and
we
can
we'll
be
tackling
it
in
different
ways.
In
our
meetings,
we'll
be
looking
at
the
different
measures,
we'll
look
at
a
different
measure
for
each
meeting
and
also
encouraging
you
to
look
within
your
system.
A
So
I
do
want
to
revisit
our
systems
request
for
data
to
back
that
up
last
month
we
are
going
to
be
working
on
that
going
forward.
We
do
need
to
work
with
the
ceos
and
leaders
of
those
organizations
also
with
our
committee
members
and
we've
started
that
process.
So
I
really
look
forward
to
how
we
can
use
our
different
lenses
to
to
start
tackling
some
of
these
problem
problems.
I
mean
there
was
a.
There
was
like
a
77
jump
in
one
of
the
unsheltered
homeless
numbers
from
20
20
to
20.
A
21
is
what
jumps
out
at
me.
So
you
know
that's
not
just
having
access
to
a
state
id
that's
causing
people
to
not
stay
in
a
shelter.
That's
just
a
large
volume
of
growth
and,
as
we
heard
from
trinity
place,
our
service
providers
are
are
experiencing
pressures
that
many
businesses
of
operation
are
experienced
with
staff
shortages,
not
necessarily
funding
that
is
not
unique
to
trinity
place.
Unfortunately,
many
of
our
service
homeless
service
providers
in
the
system
are
also
experiencing
that.
A
So
I
think
just
looking
at
the
volume
of
numbers,
it's
really
easy
to
see
the
pressure
that's
been
on
the
system.
Yeah
tim.
C
C
The
the
va
measures
a
little
bit
different
in
in
looking
at
at
you
know
the
same,
the
same
metrics
that
we're
talking
about
today,
but
you
know
and
sarah
I
noted
the
same
thing
that
you
did
with
the
transitional
housing
piece
and
the
number
of
you
know
for
folks.
Returning
to
homelessness,
I
mean
those
those
percentages
were
the
lowest
on
the
board
at
10.3
percent.
So
you
know
that's
not
a
piece
I
think
that's
talked
about.
You
know
frequently
enough,
because
that
you
know
really
that
transitional
housing
piece.
C
You
know
better
prepares
folks
to
you,
know,
move
into
into
permanent
housing
and
retain
that
housing.
So
very,
very
interesting
numbers
and
again
thanks
to
emily
for
for
putting
all
that
together.
A
All
right
christine,
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over
to
public
comment
at
this
time
christina
and
her
team
were
working
late
last
night
to
make
sure
that
our
lines
were
open
and
really
appreciate
all
the
effort.
B
Yeah,
thank
you.
So
there
are
no
there's
speakers
in
the
queue
but
they're
just
listening.
They
don't
have
their
hands
raised
to
make
a
comment.
So
we
don't
have
any
comments
at
this
moment.
A
E
Bear
with
me
on
the
moon
from
the
noise.
I
just
wanted
to
remind
or
inform
you.
I
guess
that
I've
been
reappointed
to
the
state
internet
agency
council
on
coordinating.
E
Programs
and
that
group,
which
hasn't
met
much
in
the
last
two
years,
is
going
to
beat
it
for
the
first
time
next
week.
So
I'll
try
to
give
a
report
back.
I
think
the
initial
meetings
will
probably
just
be
around
getting
organized
and
figuring
out
what
we're
supposed
to
do
again,
but
I
think,
and
if
there's
any
information
that
anybody
would
like
for
me
to
convey
in
the
other
direction.
Just
let
me
know.
A
A
All
right,
thank
you,
so
much
for
your
time
again,
two
two
months
in
a
row
with
forum.
I
really
appreciate
everyone's
diligence
as
we
work
through
our
restructuring
and
for
those
folks
that
have
committed
to
being
on
the
work
groups.
I
really
appreciate
your
extra
level
of
involvement.
Our
next
meeting
will
be
may
27
2022.