►
From YouTube: City Council Meeting, February 10, 2015
Description
February 10, 2015
Asheville City Council Meeting
A
It
looks
like
everyone
got
the
message,
but
just
in
case,
if
you're
here
for
the
item
on
the
public
hearings
agenda
for
the
craggy
heart
craigy
Avenue
development,
it
is
now
going
to
be
heard
on
februari
24th,
due
to
an
issue
with
the
notice,
the
notice
some
requirements
all
right.
We
have
one
Proclamation
tonight
and
that
is
a
proclamation
for
claiming
februari
as
seen
Selma
month
and
Councilwoman
Gwen
Wessler
is
going
to
present
the
proclamation.
E
F
Good
afternoon
I'm
Carol
Rogoff
hallstrom
a
veteran
of
the
civil
rights
movement
and
have
been
working
with
three
generations
of
ass
Billy
billions
to
create.
We
hope.
The
Asheville
freedom
school
we've
undertaken
our
first
project
seeing
Selma
and
if
I
may
just
introduce
my
colleagues,
Duane
Barton
Isaac,
Coleman,
Brittany,
Bozeman,
Anthony,
Clegg,
Tiffany,
devil,
oh,
and
we're
going
to
ask
tip
a
tip
Brittany,
a
Nashville,
high
school
student
part
of
our
group
to
accept
the
proclamation
and
to
say
a
few
words
Brittany.
D
Whereas
it
is
fitting
in
proper
to
recognize
the
positive
impact
of
the
civil
rights
movement
on
North,
Carolina
and
Asheville
and
whereas
contained
within
the
city
statement
of
core
values,
is
a
statement.
Asheville
employees,
value
and
respect
a
diverse
community
workforce
and
ideas,
and
whereas
the
teaching
of
the
history
of
the
civil
rights
movement
is
a
positive
good
for
the
community
and
whereas
the
events
that
occurred
in
selma
alabama
before
during
and
after
1965
have
reverberate
throughout
our
history.
D
Now,
therefore,
the
mayor,
Esther
manheimer
up
the
mayor
of
the
city
of
Asheville,
does
hereby
proclaim
februari
2015
as
the
seeing
Selma
month
in
the
city
of
Asheville,
and
encourages
all
citizens
to
support
this
for
the
and
to
commend
that
seeing
selma
group
and
commends
the
ceiling
selma
group
for
their
positive
contribution
to
our
ongoing
discussions
of
civil
rights
and
diversity
in
asheville.
In
witness
there,
where
of
cheese
set
her
hand
and
caused
the
seal
of
the
city
of
Asheville
North
Carolina,
to
be
affixed.
This
third
day
of
februari
2015.
G
First
I
would
like
to
thank
everyone
for
having
us
here.
This
really
means
a
lot
to
us
for
you
guys
to
do
this
so
far.
We
have
served
54
youths
and
have
taken
them
to
see
the
selma
movie
I.
Think
it's
very
important
because
we're
very
detached
with
black
history,
at
least
my
my
age
and
my
group.
We
are,
and
we
really
need
to
bring
that
back,
especially
here
to
Asheville
we're
taking
a
lot
of
kids
to
see
some
and
a
lot
of
them.
G
It
really
impacts
you
about
black
history,
but
also
about
having
the
rights
to
vote
and
taking
advantage
of
those
I
am
actually
going
to
get
registered
because
of
the
movie
it
really.
It
spoke
to
me.
We
are
really
hoping
that
you
guys
can
get
the
word
out.
It's
going
to
be
a
talkback
on
the
twenty-eighth.
A
A
H
E
Do
it-
and
we
also
have
our
assistant
city
attorney
john
maddux
here,
who
is
the
written
this
memo
and
looked
into
this
basically
right?
Now,
we
don't
have
any
rules
or
policies
with
respect
to
how
long
that
we
keep
videos,
whether
we
can
keep
them,
whether
we
can
ever
destroy
them
in
order
to
put
a
policy
in
place
of
any
type.
The
first
step
is
to
consult
with
the
Department
of
Cultural
Resources.
E
If
we
have
a
record
in
our
hand-
and
it
is
not
part
of
their
disposition
schedule-
we
can
never
do
anything
with
it
so
John
and
he
can
elaborate
on
those
communicated
with
the
Department
of
Cultural
Resources.
They
recognize
there
was
not
any
policy,
so
the
first
step
is
actually
what
we
have
done
is
in
order
to
make
this
a
part
of
the
Department
of
Cultural
Resources
policy
that
we
can
adhere
to.
It
has
to
come
before
council
for
approval.
So
what
this
does
is
says
at
a
minimum.
E
You
must
keep
these
videos
for
30
days.
Okay,
it
doesn't
say
how
long
we
have
to
keep
them.
That's
another
discussion
for
another
day
or
at
what
point
we
have
to
destroy
them,
but
this
is
the
first
council
action
that
has
to
take
place
before
we
can
do
anything
else.
So,
as
I
said,
this
is
the
first
thing
and
all
it
says
is
we
have
to
keep
them
for
at
least
30
days
and
then
after
that,
we'll
consider
you
know
the
remainder
of
the
policy
and
John.
Where
are
you
good
at
anything
dad.
H
So
as
we're
going
forward
and
looking
at
moving
forward
with
body
cameras
and
other
sort
of
video
things,
it's
obviously
not
tenable
to
archive
everything.
That's
ever
created
in
that
way,
and
also,
as
far
as
being
able
to
protect
civil
liberties
and
remove
things
that
aren't
of
you
know
any
sort
of
criminal
criminal
investigation
to
make
sure
that
those
are
disposed
of.
Correct.
E
All
we
know
right
now
or
what
we'll
know
after
tonight
is
that
we
have
to
keep
them
at
least
30
days
and
after
that,
we'll
come
back
and
I
think
the
staff,
the
police
interim
chief,
will
come
back
with
some
recommendations.
First
consideration
about
you
know
how
long
that
we
don't
keep
them
anymore.
If
you
will
a
date
after
which
we
just
we
would
unequivocally
destroy
them.
Is
that
correct,
okay
and.
B
I
On
I
raised
the
question
with
Department
cultural
resources,
where
they
want
to
evaluate
these
videos
to
see
if
they
were
something
they
would
want
to
add
to
the
State
Archives
or
hold
on
to
outside
anything.
We
decided
to
do
they
didn't
express
a
lot
of
interest
in
that
I've.
Certainly
revisit
that
with
them
again
prior
to
us.
Taking
any
ashes
do
away
with
these
things
permanently
mean
they
do.
As
it's
been
well
publicized
go
back
30
years.
There
might
be
something
of
some
historical
significance
there
that
they
might
want
to
evaluate
there.
B
J
I
might
add
we
would
in
terms
of
process,
we
would
police
administration,
city
management
and
City
Attorney's
Office
would
work
with
counsel,
specifically
your
Public
Safety,
Committee
I
would
imagine.
We
would
be
prepared
to
come
there
in
March
and
share
with
you
these
administrative
considerations
about
what
is
good
records
management.
What
what
makes
sense
for
us
to
retain
and
for
what
period
of
time,
for
the
practical
administrative
reasons
they're,
also
not
to
speak
for
the
City
Attorney's
Office,
but
there
are
by
building
consideration
statute
of
limitation
considerations.
J
They
may
also
enter
into
how
long
you
it
would
be
wise
to
keep
such
such
videotapes.
That
will
be
something
for
that
that
we
would
welcome
policy
direction
on
the
other
thing
I
might
mention
since
we've
opened.
This
up
is
that
we
create
our
own
chief
and
city
management
also
will
be
looking
at
just
what
our
video
taping
policies
are.
What
makes
sense
to
be
videotaped
who
gets
them?
Who
should
make
that
call
who
assesses
in
the
situation
and
in
talking
with
interim
chief
Belcher
today?
J
He
indicated
that
it
be
his
preference
for
someone
at
at
least
the
captain's
level,
be
looking
at
the
intelligence
in
the
situation
and
making
some
judgments,
and
we
wouldn't
just
be
empowering
body
who
has
a
camera
go
out
and
take
videotapes.
There
would
be
rhyme
and
reason
to
what
we
do,
as
well
as
internal
procedures
and
processes
to
follow
to
make
sure
we're
doing
this
and
considerate
of
peoples
and
sensitive
to
people's
rights
in
public
Athens
and.
E
One
other
thing
and
John
correct
me:
if
I'm
wrong
this,
what
we're
doing
tonight
is
I
believe
all
the
Department
of
Cultural
Resources
wants
to
know.
Is
that
correct?
It's
great
so
once
we
this,
if
it
is
approved,
is
approved,
then
everything
the
balls
in
the
city's
court
and
we
don't
have
to
go
back
to
the
state.
So
that's
sort
of
why
we're
doing
this
first
is
to
get
their
check
off
and
then
to
move
forward
with
our
own
policy
past
that
and.
K
F
K
Discussing
it
a
little
bit
here,
one
of
the
things
that
I
think
citizens
should
be
aware
of
is
that
archiving
a
lot
of
tapes
becomes
a
real
problem
for
a
city.
I
think
I
heard
that
seattle,
I
believe
it
is,
was
keeping
all
of
their
bodycam
tapes,
all
their
dashcam
tapes,
everything
that
they
had
collected
and
when
a
request,
a
public
information
request,
came
in
they
estimated
that
might
take
three
years
to
go
through
all
of
the
tapes
to
find
the
ones
that
someone
had
asked
for.
So
you
end
up
with
a
real
morass.
A
A
A
If
so,
if
I
understand
this
correctly,
this
is
now
going
to
allow
people
to
back
into
spaces
on
that
in
that
area,
that's
the
only
place
I
know
of
where
we
regulate
angled
parking,
but
but
why
would
we
change
it
to
so
that
the
ordinance
will
now
read
any
vehicle
parking
in
any
parking
space
laid
out
at
an
angle
to
the
curb
Shelby
parked
with
the
front
of
the
vehicle
facing
the
curb?
So
that's
the
old
rule,
except
for
reverse
angle
parking
where
the
back
of
the
vehicle
would
face.
A
The
curb
I
don't
seem
to
me
that
this
is
saying
if
there's
an
angle,
parking
spot
you
have
to
park
with
the
front
facing
in,
except
if
there's
an
angled
parking
spot,
you
can
park
with
the
front
facing
out.
So
don't
really,
why
don't?
We
just
delete
the
requirement?
Is
it
because
there
might
be
I
don't
really
and.
A
L
A
L
M
A
Okay,
so
I
kind
of
haven't
issued
that,
because
I
hear
a
lot
of
people,
it's
we
either
that
or
we
need
to
do
do
better
with
our
signage
in
that
area,
because
people
don't
seem
to
understand
that
they
can't
do
it
because
they
encounter
this
circumstance
where
they're
driving
along
they
see
the
space
and
they
want
it
back
into
it,
and
they
don't
necessarily
intend
to
come
out
of
it
and
turn
against
the
the
grain
of
the
angle.
Mm-Hmm.
L
K
A
A
L
L
C
C
A
C
B
K
A
C
C
N
The
Housing
Trust
Fund
policy
states
that
that
can
be
requested
for
projects
that
are
providing
up,
but
we're
providing
projects
financing
to
projects
that
promise
that
they
will
rent
the
households
at
sixty
percent
of
median
income
or
less
and
generally.
Our
policy
says
that
follows
the
sixty
percent
rent
guidelines,
which
are
the
home
guidelines.
N
This
project
is
promising
to
rent
the
households
at
fifty
percent
of
median
income
or
less
so
it
meets
that
criteria
kyria,
but
it
is
also
looking
at
using
the
HUD
housing
voucher,
rent
limits
in
order
to
be
able
to
house
households
that
have
no
money.
Frankly,
the
hard
to
house
that
are
typically
folks
have
been
chronically
homeless
and
had
has
not
worked
for
them
to
be
in
other
permanent
housing
situations.
C
Which
makes
sense,
we
did
you
know,
number
of
years
ago,
pretty
well
making
a
policy
that
we
will
stay
away
from
the
no
interest,
but
that's
justifiable
I
guess
I
would
probably
like
to
have
a
little
more
description.
You
touched
on
of
what
the
hard
to
house
is.
What
is
that
and
understand
its
chronically
homeless,
but
are
we
talking
about
people
with
mental
or
addictions
or,
and
will
there
be
a
ruler
to
be
on
premises
so
on
premises?
Supervision
of
this.
N
Yes,
these
will
be
persons
who
have,
as
I
said,
have
failed
out
or
have
not
been
able
to
make
it
in
other
permanent
housing
situations,
including
non-supported
public
housing
situations.
Homeward
bound,
is
a
project
partner
and
will
be
providing
supportive
housing
case
management
to
every
person
who
is
housed
in
this
facility
as
part
of
a
condition
of
their
being
housed
there.
There
will
also
be
supportive
services
provided
by
may
heck,
so
there
will
be
health
clinics
at
one
site.
N
There
will
be
recovery
group
clinics
on
site
and
there
will
be
a
variety
of
other
supportive
services
to
serve
individuals,
households
that
have
mental
health
disabilities,
who
have
physical
disabilities,
who
have
been
struggling
with
addiction
and
recovery
also,
unlike
other
supported,
housing
developments.
This
will
not
require
credit
check,
so
this
will
be
able
homeward
bound
will
actually
be
making
the
decision
about
which
households
will
qualify
for
the
for
this
okay.
C
N
C
A
C
Colleagues
that
are
serving
an
agency
dino
this
thing
inside
now
it
just
is
coming
out
us
without
a
lot
of
the
confessions
without
a
lot
of
description.
It
leaves
me
somewhat
still
hanging
there
with
what
happens
with
the
the
other
units,
and,
just
you
know,
I
just
worry
about
putting
something
like
this
next
to
a
neighborhood
that
ends
up
in
private
hands
or
into
something
later
on.
The
Jan.
H
If
I
may
yeah,
one
of
the
really
exciting
things
about
this
is
the
broad
partnerships
that
are
engaged
in
it.
Buncombe
county
is
coming
in
with
money
for
operations
here,
Mission
Hospital
is
in
homeward
bound
is
in
the
developer.
Ward
Griffin
is
all
in
I
think
that
what
you're
talking
about
is
what,
if
this,
what
if
homeward
bound
like
you
said
god
forbid,
goes
under
who
takes
over
management
and
how
do
we
guarantee
that
this
maintains
and
safely
maintains
itself
and
I
have
a
sense
of
confidence
and
security?
C
You
know
I
think
the
two
hundred
thousand
dollars,
because
that's
a
lot
of
money-
oh
that's,
probably
not
as
significant
to
me,
is
the
what
ifs
I.
Guess,
though,
where
would
our
position
be
on
the
two
hundred
thousand
dollars?
Are
we
third
or
fourth
or
somewhere
way
down
the
line
on
the
payback
of
this?
Should
it
not
work
if.
B
C
D
D
So
basically,
what
we're
saying
here
is
we're
only
going
to
give
out
cash
at
this
point,
cash
up
to
whatever
balance
we
have
and
and
then
more
money
once
that,
once
the
the
fund
balance
generates
either
through
cash
in
fund
cash
inflows
due
to
the
new
budget
or
if
some,
if
some
properties
get
sold
or
whatever,
but
is
it
am
I?
Am
I
understanding
this
kind
of
the
cash
flow
as.
D
N
N
Even
if
no
funds
were
allocated
to
the
fund
this
year,
income
earned
during
the
current
year
would
be
sufficient
to
make
up
that
full
amount
of
cash.
Due
to
this
loan
commitment,
so
we're
not
going
to
be
in
a
cash
deficit
situation
and
will
not
allocate
cash
that
we
don't
have
for
these
loans.
Okay,.
H
Are
really
great
questions
and
we
get
to
see
this
stuff
month
after
month
at
hcd,
but
those
are
all
really
really
solid.
Questions.
I'm
couldn't
be
more
excited
about
the
partners
that
we
have
on
both
of
these.
Are
you
know,
Jeff.
You
did
a
great
job
outlining
Oak
Hill,
all
those
fifty
percent
of
area,
median
income
or
below
twenty
four
units,
but
also
a
see
Kirk
booth
here
and
his
12
units
of
the
of
those
12
units,
also
in
west
asheville.
H
Six
of
those
are
at
eighty
percent
of
median
or
below,
and
another
six
or
a
sixty
percent
of
median
or
below.
So
these
are
private
developers
really
putting
their
shoulders
to
the
wheel
to
make
affordable
housing
happen
here
in
the
city
and
I'm,
just
really
grateful
to
be
able
to
partner
with
them
and
to
be
able
to
make
this
trust
fund
do
what
it's
to
do.
A
A
Pet
all
right
I
have
a
motion.
A
second
is
there.
Anyone
wishing
to
comment
on
the
motion
to
approve
the
consent
agenda-
okay,
good
all
those
in
favor,
please
say:
aye
any
opposed
all
right,
we're
moving
into
presentations
and
reports.
The
first
is
a
presentation
regarding
the
food
halls.
The
action
plan
update
and
Joey,
pretty
krobinson
from
will
make
the
presentation.
B
O
O
One
area
in
which
we've
seen
some
progress
is
in
eliminating
barriers
for
farmers
markets
and
we
have
lowered
the
fees
by
seventy-five
percent
and
we've
also
shorten
the
approval
process
in
the
hopes
that
more
farmers
markets
have
an
easier
time
starting
up
in
in
the
community.
We've
also
renewed
the
lease
for
the
city
market
farmers
market
for
both
their
summer
and
winter
markets.
In
fact,
the
city
holds
for
leases
of
city
property
that
support
food
production
and
food
access.
O
O
The
city
also
passed
the
AG
amendment,
which
supports
residential
agriculture
in
two
main
ways.
One
is
that
it
allows
garden
sheds
or
other
structures
to
be
built
on
lots
that
don't
have
a
primary
structure.
So
if
you
have
an
extra
lots,
an
empty
lot,
there
does
not
need
to
be
a
house
in
order
to
put
up
a
garden
shed
or
greenhouse
or
other
type
of
structure
like
that.
O
The
Food
Policy
Council,
whom
I've
been
working
a
bit
with,
has
given
given
us
this
great
opportunity
to
connect
with
Buncombe
County
on
an
online
health
dashboard
that
they
are
putting
together
with
a
variety
of
organizations.
All
of
us
are
putting
putting
our
data
together
and
and
together
that
collective
data
is
going
to
help
tell
the
story
of
our
local
progress
on
our
local
food
accessibility.
O
So
we
will
be
providing
a
data
that
we've
already
collected
or
that
we
collect
on
a
regular
basis
to
help
populate
this,
along
with
lots
of
other
organizations
in
the
community.
Of
course,
we
have
some
opportunities
for
making
more
progress
that
are
coming
up
on
the
horizon.
The
US
cellular
center
at
the
time
of
the
food
policy
action
plan
was
adopted,
was
already
in
contract
with
a
food
service
provider,
but
that
contract
is
expiring.
This
June,
and
so
as
I,
spoke
with
cellular
center
staff.
O
They
let
me
know
that
they
are
working
on
making
sure
that
the
RFP
process
makes
it
easy
and
clear
that
local
food
is
encouraged
and
wanted
by
people,
companies
that
are
looking
to
hold
that
contract
with
us
and
the
compost.
Feasibility
study
is
also
underway
right
now,
and
we
are
expecting
that
information
to
come
back
sometime
this
spring.
So
you
should
hear
about
that
soon
as
well.
O
Another
opportunity
that's
listed
in
the
action
plan
is
to
incorporate
edible
landscaping
into
parks
and
greenways,
and
since
the
action
plan
has
been
adopted,
the
parks
department
has
considered
and
used
edibles
more
often
than
prior
to
that.
However,
at
this
time
there
are
insufficient
resources
to
manage
a
significant
landscaping
program
on
parklands,
primarily
at
this
point,
with
the
resources
existing
resources
that
we
have.
It
requires
that
we're
planting
to
the
minimum
requirements
on
parklands
and
as
few
maintenance
needs
as
possible
and
oftentimes
edibles
do
not
quite
meet
that
requirement.
O
I
presented
this
update
at
P
ed
last
month
and
a
couple
of
questions
came
up,
so
I
wanted
to
make
sure
to
have
those
answers
for
you
tonight.
The
first
one
was
about
fire
marshal
inspections
and
why
we've
been
seeing
increased
fire
marshal
inspections
at
farmer's
markets
in
the
community.
I
spoke
with
development
services,
and
the
inspections
are
indeed
a
safety
issue.
Every
week
the
farmers
markets
take
down
and
are
put
up
and
take
down
the
entire
market.
There
are
a
lot
of
farmers
that
will
have
a
cooler
or
refrigeration
system.
O
There
are
also
places
that
are
created
or
that
are
making
food
and
selling
hot
food,
and
so
there's
a
lot
of
electrical
that's
going
on
within
within
the
markets,
and
it
changes
every
time.
So
our
policy
is
that
we
do
these
inspections
every
time
and
we
are
becoming
more
consistent
with
enforcing
that,
which
is
why
we're
seeing
additional
inspections.
O
However,
the
inspection
fees,
even
though
they
pay
for
every
one
of
the
inspections
when
they
get
their
permit,
we
figure
out
how
many
times
they'll
be
open
and
what
those
inspection
fees
are
that
is
all
combined
into
their
original
fee
and
that
is
reduced
by
seventy-five
percent.
So
they're
not
getting
increased
any
increased
cost
to
these
inspections
beyond
what
they
were
supposed
to
beginning.
In
the
first
place,
the
other
question
that
came
up
was
about
the
recommended
species
list
for
commercial
property,
and
where
are
we
with
this
thing?
O
So
I've
been
working
with
the
tree
key
members
of
the
tree,
Commission
and
staff,
and
we've
come
up
with
a
procedure
that
gives
the
tree
Commission
the
ability
to
be
the
keeper
of
the
species
list,
and
they
are
the
ones
that
are
able
to
decide
on
recommendations.
And
so,
if
a
different
organization
from
the
community
has
some
suggestions,
they
can
bring
that
to
the
tree
Commission.
O
The
tree
Commission
can
then
decide
in
their
opinion
whether
or
not
something
should
be
recommended,
and
let
us
know
why
and
that
list
will
go
to
staff
and
then
staff
in
a
timely
fashion
will
respond
about
the
things
that
are
on
their
recommendation
list.
Whether
or
not
we
can
include
those
and,
if
not,
why
we're
not,
including
those
so
that
it's
very
clear
to
everybody.
O
What
the
reasonings
are
I'm
going
to
be
presenting
about
that
procedure
on
there
or
at
their
meeting
on
Monday
and
we're
also
in
the
process
of
setting
up
a
meeting
with
tree
commission
members
and
staff
to
discuss
their
most
recent
recommendations
and
see
what
we
can
come
up
with
with
that,
so
staff
has
made
significant
progress,
I
think
on
the
action
list.
We
continue
to
look
for
opportunities
to
increase
the
the
items
on
action
list
that
we're
addressing
and
I
want
to.
Just.
O
P
Everyone
I'm
Laura
chiam
I'm
with
the
health
and
education
cluster
for
the
Food,
Policy
Council
and
I
just
wanted
to
elaborate
a
little
bit
on
what
Joey
was
talking
about
with
the
healthy
living,
healthy
living,
metrics
initiative
right
now.
So
basically,
the
chip
process
has
also
begun
using
the
results
based
accountability
framework
which
serves
as
the
basis
for
the
online
scorecard
software
that
she
was
talking
about
to
assist
in
determining
the
best
measures
that
we're
going
to
be
identifying.
P
So
our
working
group,
which
has
about
close
to
50
organizations
right
now,
has
met
two
times
and
right
now
we're
working
on
establishing
a
third
time
for
us
to
go
ahead
and
meet
so
we're
just
kind
of
really
getting
into
the
nitty-gritty
of
identifying
what
best
measures
to
use
for
that
and
then.
Secondly,
what
we're
most
excited
about
is
we're
right
now,
working
on
establishing
partnerships
with
both
ASAP
and
also
with
un
cas
their
nutrition
department
with
dr.
Amina
botada,
and
then
also
a
few
students
that
are
under
her
right
now.
P
This
Friday,
we
have
a
meeting
with
working
towards
formalizing
that
partnership
with
UNCA
and
we'll
just
continue
to
keep
you
guys
updated
on
how
that
progress
goes
and
what
we
can
do
to
support
you
all
and,
and
vice
versa.
So
that's
kind
of
where
we
are
right
now,
thanks
for
inviting
us
to
come
and
speak
to
you
guys.
P
H
It's
so
great
to
see
that
Food
Policy
Council
keep
its
momentum
going
and
to
really
work
towards
establishing
these
metrics,
because
I
think
that
heading
towards
food
action
plan
to
point
o
at
some
point
and
be
able
to
have
it
be
data-driven
and
to
be
able
to
have
some
real
firm
markers
is
going
to
be
helpful
for
establishing
those
policies.
I
did
have
a
couple
of
questions,
Joey
well.
H
A
H
One
of
the
things
that
this
council
approved
and
last
year's
CDBG
funding
I
just
wanted
to
point
that
out
as
well.
You
were
talking
about
the
edibles
in
parks.
Rights-Of-Way
I
was
just
wondering
about
growing
partnerships
around
that
another
book
of
fruit
nut
club,
the
probably
the
best
name
club
in
the
county,
is
working
with
Buncombe,
County
and
they've
got
a
whole
they've
got
a
bunch
of
trees
planted
at
one
of
the
parks
out
west
and
I'm,
just
wondering
where
we
are
and
building
that
kind
of
partnership.
My.
O
O
H
H
Unaware
members,
and
and
also
just
to
point
out
that
in
the
in
the
report,
it
would
talked
about
the
the
you
do
piece
being
completed,
but
in
a
recognition
that
we've
completed
a
couple
pieces
there,
but
that's
going
to
be
an
ongoing
analysis
as
we
determine
ways
to
improve
policy
to
improve
food
security.
We'll
be
back
around
that
you
do
stuff
and
I!
H
D
A
E
What
we
are
planning
to
do
is
Alex
and
his
folks
I
think
are
going
to
provide
a
tracking
mechanism
throughout
this
session
that
will
be
on
the
council
website.
So
you
can
follow
along
and
see
where
different
bills
are
Alex.
Do
you
have
an
example
of
that
that
you
can
throw
their
up
there
on
the
screen
this
quickly.
E
They're
also
planning
on
doing
a
week
in
review
newsletter
to
let
you
know
what's
going
on
and
then
do
updates
at
council
meeting
as
requested
or
as
needed
right
now,
as
this
as
posted
on
the
website
now
and
I
talked
with
our
lobbyist
jack
resort
yesterday
morning
there
are
just
a
few
bills
right
now
that
are
out
there.
That
might
be
of
concern.
E
The
first
thing
is
the
eminent
domain
bill
which
I
think
the
thought
is
that
it's
going
to
be
approved,
and
that
adds
a
constitutional
amendment
and
some
changes
in
chapter
40,
a
that
say
you
can
only
take
private
property
for
a
public
use,
it
used
to
say
public
use
in
public
purpose.
We
look
back
over
our
prior
takings
and
and
feel
that
you
know,
we've
been
told,
there's
really
nothing
to
be
done
about
it
at
this
time,
but
haven't
seen
any
grape
issues
that
that
will
arises
as
a
result
of
that.
E
The
other
thing
is
the
parking
meters.
There
has
been
concerned
that
unless
there
is
a
specific
provision
allowing
you
to
pay
electronically,
maybe
that
didn't
exist.
People
were
doing
that.
Our
cities
were
doing
that
by
local
bill.
Now
there
is
a
general
bill
for
the
entire
state.
The
other
thing
is
the
aesthetic
zoning
controls
are
back
in
the
mix.
E
A
Adding
on
the
eminent
domain
bill,
I
know
that
part
of
the
committee
discussion
was
a
question
about
land
that
might
have
been
taken
by
a
city
for
some
public
purpose,
say
20
years
ago,
and
now
is
residual,
for
some
reason
is
no
longer
useful
for
that
purpose
that
was
originally
taken.
The
question
was
whether
you
could
then
use
it.
A
You
know
in
our
case
it
might
be
a
situation
where
it's
leverage
for
housing
and
a
private
developer
is
going
to
do
the
housing
or
you
know,
just
as
an
example,
I
guess
some
questions
came
up
in
committee
and
the
unsatisfactory
response
was
well
it'll
come
down
to
intent
and
the
you
know
the
chordal
determine
that.
So
you
know
in
a
case-by-case
basis.
You
know
if
it's
20
years
between
the
taking
and
then
the
use,
that's
in
question
you
know.
A
Clearly,
the
intent
at
the
time
of
the
taking
would
be
different,
but
anyway
the
the
one
of
the
concerns
I
have
is
that
when
the
court
is
looking
at
this
kind
of
legislation,
if
there
is
a
legal
challenge,
all
of
the
chatter
in
committee
and
on
the
floor
is
not
admissible,
and
so
it's
only
within
the
bill.
Language
and
so
I've
encouraged
the
North
Carolina
Metro
mayor's
to
to
at
least
advocate
for
some,
whereas
clauses
that
I'll
be
embedded
in
the
bill
to
indicate
the
intent.
E
I
looked
at
it
as
well
and
I,
don't
know,
I
do
know
that
they're
not
any
changes
to
the
sort
of
statute
of
limitations
for
raising
inverse
condemnation
or
constitutional
claim,
so
hopefully
that
that
would
be
helpful
for
us.
If
there's
something
that
was
taken
a
long
time
ago,
that
there
wouldn't
be
a
mechanism
for
that
to
be
undone.
A
number.
A
You
know
I
continue
to
hear
on
for
cities
and
counties
broadly
the
the
concern
this
session
about
the
discussion
surrounding
the
sales
tax
sales
tax
reform
and
then
sells
the
sales
tax
allocation
formula,
whether
the
there's
going
to
be
a
change
in
the
sales
tax
allocation
formula
to
move
sales
back
to
distribution
away
from
cities
into
more
rural
areas,
so
will
will
be
at
the
table
trying
to
participate
in
that
conversation
as
well.
Many
local
governments
across
the
state
that
are
concerned
with
that
issue.
A
Okay,
but
anything
further.
Anyone
have
any
questions
on
this
topic,
all
right,
we're
going
to
move
into
the
public
hearing
portion
of
our
agenda.
The
first
item
on
the
public
hearings
agenda
item
a
a
public
hearing
to
consider
conditional
zoning
of
property
located
on
broad
street
from
rm16
residential
multifamily
high-density
district
to
cbi,
CZ
community
business.
Q
You
mayor
Mannheimer
members
of
council,
this
is,
as
you
indicated,
a
conditional
zoning
request
to
rezone
property
on
broad
street
from
rm16
to
CB
one
CZ,
I'm
just
to
orient
you
the
subject
property.
It
consists
of
6624
square
feet
located
on
what
will
be
addressed.
It's
currently
a
vacant
piece
of
property.
It
will
be
addressed,
135,
Broad,
Street
and
also
a
portion
of
what
wasn't
unopened
right
of
way.
Q
Q
Well,
let
me
get
back
to
this.
The
property
to
the
east
and
to
the
north
along
Broad
Street,
is
also
zoned
cb1
and
contains
offices,
property
to
the
south,
is
zone
cb1
and
contains
a
restaurant
and
property
to
the
west
is
owned
rm16
immediately.
There
is
a
single-family
home
here,
but,
as
you
move
on
down
broad
street
there
quite
a
number
of
multifamily
structures
in
the
area.
Q
The
proposal
by
broad
properties
LLC,
is
to
construct
a
new
mixed-use
building
it'll
be
two
storeys
in
height
24
feet
to
be
specific
on
the
site,
the
building
will
contain
1,800
square
feet
of
commercial
business
space
on
the
first
floor,
with
1,800
square
feet
of
residential
space.
On
the
second
floor,
that
will
contain
three
one-bedroom
apartments
and
you.
I
D
Q
The
applicant
has
agreed
to
condition
the
development
to
limit
the
use
of
the
first
floor
to
only
offices
or
instructional
uses,
and
also
to
limit
signage
to
a
maximum
of
10
square
feet
per
sign,
face
and
4
feet
in
height,
recognizing
that
they
are
in
a
residential
area
are
moving
into
a
residential
area.
Access
to
the
site
you
can
see
here
will
be
via
a
14-foot
driveway,
which
leads
to
a
parking
area
containing
six
spaces.
Q
Landscaping
is
compliant
with
one
exception,
and
there
is
a
request
to
condition
the
project
for
reduced
buffer
yard
here
along
the
western
side
of
the
property,
because
there
are
so
many
constraints,
they
want
to
narrow
the
buffer
from
20
feet.
To
10
feet
to
4
feet,
it
will
be
10
feet
here
in
the
front
and
then
go
down
to
four
feet
in
the
back.
There
is
a
fence
on
the
adjoining
property
in
the
rear.
Q
Here
staff
is
supportive
of
this,
because
the
developer
is
proposing
to
provide
all
of
the
required
plantings,
just
not
the
width
there
and
I'm.
Recognizing
again,
this
is
a
very
tight
site
to
work
in
the
project
was
reviewed
by
the
Technical
Review
Committee
in
October
and
was
recommended
to
you
with
conditions.
The
project
didn't
come
to
you
more
quickly
because
the
ability
to
do
three
units
instead
of
two
units
was
contingent
on
you
all
passing
the
density
bonuses
for
cb1
and
the
other
non
residential
districts
which
you
recently
did.
Q
A
A
B
I
move
to
approve
the
conditional
zoning
request
of
broad
properties
LLC
for
property,
located
at
what
will
be
addressed,
135
broad
street
from
rm16
residential
multifamily
high-density
district
2
c-b.
I
CZ
community
business
one
conditional
zoning
and
find
that
the
request
is
reasonable,
is
in
the
public
interest
and
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan
and
other
adopted
plans
in
that
one.
The
proposed
uses
on
the
property
are
in
keeping
with
the
other
uses
in
the
area
and
create
a
good
transition
between
higher
intensity
uses
and
lower
intensity
residential
uses
and
to
the
proposed.
B
A
K
A
Opposed.
Thank
you
all
right.
The
only
other
item
on
our
public
hearings
agenda
public
hearing
to
consider
a
subdivision
with
conditional
zoning
on
property
located
at
141
145
and
149
Courtland
Avenue
from
RS
8
residential
single-family,
high-density
district
to
rm8,
CZ
residential
multifamily,
medium
density,
district,
conditional
zoning
21
allow
the
conversion
of
three
existing
group
home
buildings
into
multifamily
units
and
the
subdivision
of
land
to
locate
those
buildings
on
separate
lots
and
to
to
establish
seven
additional
single-family
home
lots
with
a
change
condition,
request
to
the
landscape
and
open
space
standards.
Again.
Julia
fields.
Q
Q
As
we've
discussed,
there
are
the
three
structures
previously
used
as
a
group
home
and
there
are
a
number
of
trees
and
a
stream
to
the
southern
portion
of
the
property
and
the
property.
If
you
are
familiar
with
it
slopes
down
to
that
portion
of
the
site,
the
plans
are
from
rpm
properties,
LLC
to
subdivide
the
property,
and
you
can
see
the
different
Lots
here
into
two
new
residential
lots.
Seven
of
these
Lots
will
contain
single-family
homes
or
will
be
designed
for
single
family
homes,
and
you
can
see
them
here.
Q
The
other
three
will
contain
the
three
existing
buildings
and
its
proposed
that
these
buildings
will
be
converted
to
have
to
dwelling
units
within
each
of
these
two
structures
and
then
three
units
in
that
particular
structure.
The
buildings
and
there's
some
representative
and
I've
got
them
here.
If
you
want
to
look
at
them,
there
are
some
representative,
elevations
I,
haven't
actually
designed
the
project,
but
it
will
be
designed
again
to
blend
with
the
character
the
surrounding
area,
even
though
this
is
not
part
of
the
Montford
historic
district,
it's
close,
but
it's
not
in
actual
historic
district.
Q
Q
I
think
up
to
about
this
point
on
the
site
they
have.
It
was
requested
by
our
Transportation
Department
to
gain
an
easement
both
on
the
existing
sidewalk,
as
well
as
the
remainder
of
the
property
to
facilitate
any
future
sidewalk
development
that
the
city
might
undertake
and
that
condition
has
been
agreed
to
by
the
developer.
Q
All
city
standards
have
been
met
with
two
exceptions:
one
is
to
the
buffer,
because
this
is
our
m8
and
the
reason
that
this
is
going
to
rm8
is
because
you
have
multiple
unit
structures
here,
but
they,
but
so
the
fact
that
it's
rm8
would
require
a
buffer
to
all
adjacent
rs8
properties
doesn't
make
a
lot
of
sense
because
you'd
be
buffering
mostly
single
family,
but
otherwise
duplex
and
triplex
is
from
other
single-family
homes
and
really
kind
of
carving
that
area
out
from
the
rest
of
the
neighborhood.
So
staff
is
supportive
of
waving.
Q
That
particular
requirement
there
is,
and
they
do
propose
to
leave
a
lot
of
the
vegetation
here
to
the
south
of
the
property.
Anyway,
there
is
also
a
request
to
waive
the
standard.
That's
an
open
space
standard
than
twenty-five
percent
of
the
of
the
that
the
open
space
over
twenty-five
percent
slope
cannot
account
for
more
than
fifty
percent
of
the
needed
open
space.
Again.
If
you
visited
this
piece
of
property,
you
can
see
it's
quite
steep.
There
is
a
the
quantity
of
open
spaces,
provided
it
they
just
can't
meet
this
standard
and
again.
Q
Staff
is
supportive
of
that
particular
condition.
Trc
reviewed
this
project
in
December
and
recommended
it
to
you.
The
Planning
and
Zoning
Commission
review
this
also
at
the
January
meeting.
They
approve
the
major
subdivision
at
that
time.
I'm
contingent
on
the
rezoning
and
unanimously
recommended
the
rezoning
to
you.
The
the
developer
did
attend
a
meeting
of
the
Montford
Community
Association.
There
were
a
few
questions
about
exactly
what
conditional
zoning
was,
but
otherwise
I
think
it's
fair
to
say
that
the
community
was
was
in
favor
of
the
proposal.
A
R
Don't
have
any
direct
comments,
I
believe
that
this
staff
gave
an
adequate
picture
of
what
we're
trying
to
do,
except
for
the
fact
that
the
developers
aren't
here
today
that
I'm
representing
them
as
a
planner
and
they're
out
of
town
and
they're.
Sorry
to
not
be
here
right
now,
we're
in
the
process
of
due
diligence
and
this
real
estate
deal
the
need
to
understand
the
zoning
requirements
brought
us
to
this
before
the
sale
and
we're
in
the
process
of
trying
to
decide
the
costs
and
the
benefits
of
the
idea
of
purchasing
this
and
its
entirety.
H
H
N
R
Townhouses
with
a
common
area
within
the
building,
but
we
have
had
brief
conversations
with
the
planning
staff
about
the
possibility
of
affordable
housing
and
though
our
decision
hasn't
been
made.
Yet
they
are
relatively
aware
what
the
conditions
are
and
aren't
adverse
to
it.
But,
like
I
said,
this
is
still
a
process
of
trying
to
decide
the
affordability
of
the
entire
project
before
they
move
forward.
B
R
C
A
C
For
the
motion,
I
move
to
approve
the
conditional
zoning
request
of
RPM
properties,
LLC
for
property
located
at
141
145
and
149
Courtland
Avenue
from
RS
a
residential
single-family
high-density
district
to
RMA
CZ
residential
multifamily
medium-density
district
conditional
zoning
and
find
that
the
request
is
reasonable
is
in
the
public.
Interest
is
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan
other
adopted
plans
in
that
the
proposal
supports
the
goal
found
in
the
city's
comprehensive
plan
of
promoting
compatible
adaptive
reuse
of
existing
structures.
The
proposal
supports
the
goal
found
in
the
city's
comprehensive
plan
of
pursuing
compatible
infill
development.
A
B
And
commissions
committee
report-
mayor
first
item,
relates
to
candidate
essay
questions
for
the
City
Schools
Board
of
Education.
Let
me
just
offer
a
little
bit
of
background
in
timeline.
We
are
at
that
point
in
the
cycle
where
there
are
two
vacancies
coming
up
on
the
school
board.
We
have
two
members,
precious
folston
and
Jacqueline
Hallam,
who
are
essentially
terming
out
after
having
sent
served
the
past
six
years
almost
now,
and
so
we
would
appoint
two
new
members
just
to
remind
the
public,
the
timeline
we're
eager
for
good
quality
applicants
to
come
forward
and
apply.
B
The
deadline.
I
believe
is
a
februari
23rd
24th.
That
was
close
the
process
once
we
get
those
applications
and
City
Council
on
our
March
10th
meeting
will
narrow
the
field
down
to
a
certain
number
of
finalists,
perhaps
in
the
range
of
five
or
so,
and
then
we
will
make
our
final
selections
on
March
24th.
Once
the
after
we
approve
these
questions
tonight
Maggie
will
be
burleson.
The
city
clerk
will
distribute
that
will
respond
in
writing
so
that
when
we
make
our
decisions
later,
we'll
have
the
benefit
of
those
elit.
B
Let
me
add
one
other
thing
here:
there's
been
some
coverage
in
the
media
recently
about
the
potential
for
background
checks
being
conducted
for
school
school
board
applicants
and
there's
been
some
energy
put
in
on
the
part
of
our
city
staff,
an
attorney
and
some
of
us
on
the
council
event
conversations
with
people
in
the
community
about
that
and
it's
important
topic.
There's
there
seems
to
be
more
questions
emerging
about.
B
So
there
are
a
series
of
five
questions
that
the
boards
and
commissions
committee
reviewed
council,
I
think,
has
read
through
them
all.
If
we
had
a
chance
to
look
at
them,
they're
kind
of
detailed
on
them,
I'm
not
sure
the
public
would
want
to
hear
them,
but
I
think
we
all
know
what
the
questions
are
there
right
here.
Anybody
in
the
public,
that's
interested
in
them
later
you'd,
be
welcome
to
take
a
look
at
them.
They
have
to
do
with
familiarity
qualifications,
perspectives
on
various
aspects
of
oversight
of
the
school
system.
B
So
that
is
a
suppose.
A
report
and
I
would
ask
for
a
set
of
nods
regarding
the
questions
that
we've
reviewed
as
a
way
to
go
forward.
Okay,
so
that
wraps
that
one
up
the
in
terms
of
boards
and
commissions,
interviews
and
possible
appointments,
there's
a
list
of
five
that
we
would
cover
here
today.
The
first
is
an
appointment
to
one
seat
to
the
only
African,
American
Heritage
Commission.
B
B
The
next
board
is
the
airport
authority
board.
We
have
a
vacancy
there
to
a
point
to.
There
was
one
applicant
Stephanie
Brown,
who
also
is
the
executive
director
of
the
Convention
and
Visitor's
Bureau
boards
and
commissions
Committee
recommends
appointment
of
Stephanie
Brown
I'll
entertain
a
motion
to
lift.
Is
there
a
second
second
okay,
any
discussion
about
that
appointment,
all
those
in
favor
aye
any
opposed.
Okay,
citizens.
Police
advisory
committee
requires
a
south
asheville
resident
resident
appointment.
M
D
B
Civil
service
board
chair,
unlike
most
of
our
other
boards
or
perhaps
all
of
our
other
boards
City
Council
under
the
statute,
actually
must
appoint
the
chairperson
of
the
Civil
Service
Board
and
that
person
must
be
from
among
the
five
members.
Having
interviewed
folks
in
had
discussions,
Alan
coxy
is
the
recommendation
of
the
boards
and
commissions
committee
for
the
chairmanship
of
the
civil
service
for
so
I'll
entertain
that
motion
selmak.
Second,
any
further
discussion
there,
all
those
in
favor
aye
opposed
finally
homeless
inicia
initiative,
Advisory
Committee
one
vacancy
there.
B
A
S
Thank
you
to
appreciate.
My
name
is
Carl,
so
soulsby
I
currently
reside
at
641,
brevard
road
and
my
property
is
zoned,
I,
think
it's
rs8
or
in
a
house
residential
and
we're
at
a
neighborhood
in
transition
and
as
a
matter
of
fact,
I
live
in
the
service
department
of
Anderson
nissan
dealership,
we're
pretty
close
to
it,
and
so
hopefully
that
won't
be
for
too
much
longer.
S
S
C
S
After
keeping
my
kids
awake
then,
finally,
one
day
I
came
up
here
and
complained,
and
they
did
some
mediation
here
in
this
chamber
and
when
they
did,
they
found
that
mr.
Hodder
needed
to
operate
his
business
or
a
suitable
time
frame.
Well,
that
was
mediation
is
what
I'm
told,
and
so
that
I
received
a
letter
to
that
effect,
and
mr.
S
After
seven
years
of
listening
to
them,
filed
a
noise
ordinance
complaining,
I'm
told
that,
even
though
the
noise
ordinance
itself
does
not
hold
the
criteria
that
there
has
to
be
two
or
more
households,
they're,
not
in
the
ordinance
itself,
but
in
order
to
file
a
complaint
file,
a
complaint
that
will
be
considered
which
I
did
today
I
was
told
that
they
would
not
consider
my
complaint
and
so
I
called
my
attorney
who's
handling.
Another
matter
for
me,
mr.
S
got
chalk
and
he
suggested
that
I
come
up,
speak
to
you,
folks,
the
the
times
when
I,
when
I
figured.
If
they
were
going
to
wake
me
up
at
two
thirty
in
the
morning
I
was
going
to
I
was
finally,
after
seven
years,
I
was
going
to
call
the
APD
and
have
them
come
out
and
I've
wasted,
countless
man-hours
and
been
told
you
have
to
file
a
complaint.
You
have
to
file
a
complaint.
You
have
to
file
a
complaint.
S
I
have
a
nine-page
complaint,
starting
in
december,
the
first
running
through
January,
the
28th
15
of
those
complaints.
They
have
made
concrete
between
the
hours
of
midnight
and
seven
a.m.
and
after
seven
years
they.
Finally,
in
order
to
try
and
pacify
me,
they
turned
a
floodlight
down
which
shown
directly
into
my
bedroom,
and
it
was
like
it
was
basically
about
like
this
and
I
have
complete
shades.
S
They
did
that
to
pacify
me
so
I'm
told
over
and
over
and
over
again
you
have
to
file
a
complaint,
and
so
I
took
the
time
to
document
it
call
the
APD
and
I
really
felt
bad
because
I'm
wasted
man-hours
and
then
I'm
saying
we
can't
hear
your
complaint
because
there
aren't
two
households
there
to
complain
and
so
I'm
asking
myself
what's
wrong
with
this.
You
mean
they
can
do
this
to
me
in
my
home.
S
But
if
there's
not
someone
else,
then
my
rights
really
don't
count
and
then
I'm
told
that
it's
the
City
Council,
who
established
the
criteria
that
there
has
to
be
two
or
more
homes
and
I
feel
like
reasonableness
and
fairness
after
seven
years.
You
know
if
you
won't
stand
up
for
one.
Why
would
you
stand
up
for
two.
D
Well,
a
police
officer
I'm,
the
liaison
for
the
noise
own
transport
and
a
police
officer
can
file
a
complaint.
So
if
the
police
officer
is
telling
you
that
they
can't
file
a
complaint,
they
can
actually
issue
a
ticket.
Well,
I
mean
that's
not
on
the
truth,
so
that
may
be
something
that
we
follow
up
with
the
APD
on
and
then
the
other
question
I
have
is
zoning
wise?
Is
it
okay
for.
E
S
A
S
Spoke
today,
mr.
Maddox,
and
what
I'm
asking
is
I
know
that
your
time
is
very
bad
and
I
was
told
that
you
folks
it
will
take
a
change
of
the
legislation
that
legislation
that
you
folks
make
the
world
and
all
I'm
asking
I've
jumped
through
the
hoops
and
did
the
documentation.
As
a
matter
of
fact,
I've
also
got
on
here.
I've
got
a
letter
from
my
doctor
and
August.
The
22nd
of
2013
I
had
a
heart
attack
and
on
December
the
14th
of
2014.
S
After
my
doctor
had
released
me,
the
stress
became
so
bad
that
I
went
to
the
hospital
after
he
did
not
for
glycerin
thinking.
I
was
having
another
heart
attack.
Now,
I'm
not
a
thin
skinned
person,
but
after
83
nitroglycerine
pills
and
spend
in
a
thousand
dollars
and
the
day
of
the
Mission
Hospital
overstressed.
This
is
unreasonable
and
all
I'm
asking
is
that
you
remove
the
criteria
that
says
there
have
to
be
two
people
that
complaint
from
separate
households,
I'm
willing
to
go
the
mile
and
stand
and
do
the
paperwork.
S
But
you
folks
make
those
regulations
and
nobody
will
go
against
those,
because
that's
what
in
writing?
That's
what's
in
writing
and
I'm.
Just
asking
that
you
rescind
that
criteria
at
least
back
it
down
to
war,
say
he
has
the
right
to
stand
up
and
say.
Look
and
I
saw
one
of
the
guys
in
the
grocery
store
had
that
for
go
the
other
night.
How
many
yards
did
you
make
800
yards?
K
S
H
S
S
You
know
I
mean,
let's
be
real.
You
know
you
can't
make
concrete
without
slamming
backhoe
bucket
on
the
ground,
but
over
the
metal
ladder
down
and
that
siren
that
thing
they've
got
down
there
in
the
hopper
that
they
run.
I
can
hear
it
in
my
bedroom
and
then
they
like
to
blow
the
horns
when
they
go
out
after
I
call
the
APD.
Let
you
know
that
hey
it's
time
to
get
up
and
go
to
work,
yeah
they're,
very
original.
Thank
thank.
A
M
D
I
move
that
the
Asheville
City
Council
go
into
closed
session
for
the
following
reasons:
one
to
prevent
disclosure
of
information,
that's
privileged
and
confidential,
pursuant
to
the
laws
of
North
Carolina
or
not
considered
a
public
record
within
the
meaning
of
chapter
132
of
the
general
statutes.
The
law
that
makes
the
information
privileged
and
confidential
is
the
NC
statute.
D
143
3,
1810
3.
The
statutory
authorization
is
contained
in
north
carolina
general
statute,
143
dash
3
1811,
a
1
and
2
to
consult
with
an
attorney
employed
by
the
city
about
matters
with
respect
to
which
the
attorney-client
privilege
between
the
city
and
its
attorney
must
be
preserved,
including,
but
not
limited
to
a
lawsuit
involving
the
following
parties:
the
city
of
Asheville
vs,
Robert
Frost.
The
statutory
authorization
is
contained
in
north
carolina
general
statute,
143
dash
318
dot11,
a
3
second.