►
From YouTube: Equity & Engagement Committee – January 17, 2023
Description
Regular meeting of the Asheville City Council's Equity & Engagement Committee.
Access the agenda and other meeting materials at the City of Asheville website: https://www.ashevillenc.gov/government/city-council-committees/equity-and-engagement-committee/
Participate before and during the meeting on our public engagement hub: https://www.publicinput.com/i2446
A
B
Thank
you
good
afternoon,
I'm
Shanika
Smith
I'm,
the
chair
of
the
new
equity
and
engagement
committee,
I'd
like
to
welcome
you
all
to
our
January
17
2023
remote
meeting.
All
Council
committee
members
and
staff
are
participating
virtually
to
help
our
audience
follow
along
I
will
state
each
section
of
the
agenda
aloud.
We
are
streaming
live
on
the
virtual
engagement
Hub,
which
is
accessible
through
the
virtual
engagement
Hub
link
on
the
front
page
of
the
city
website.
B
We
also
have
the
option
for
the
public
to
listen,
live
by
phone
for
those
who
of
you
out
there
listening
hello
for
today's
meeting.
We
have
the
option
for
people
to
call
in
and
comment
live
during
the
meeting
to
call
in
and
comment
live
and
use
the
same
number
855-925-2801
meeting
code
2689
your
phone
will
be
muted
and
you
will
hear
the
meeting
live
at
this
point.
Speakers
will
need
to
press
star
3
to
enter
the
speaker
Queue
at
this
moment.
B
B
B
C
Perfect,
thank
you
so
much
council
member
Smith
and
welcome
everyone
to
this
first
meeting
of
the
equity
and
engagement
committee.
As
you
may
recall,
at
the
November
15th
city
council
meeting,
the
revised
city
council
committee,
scope
was
approved
and
is
a
part
of
those
revisions.
The
new
equity
and
engagement
committee
was
established.
C
So
the
purpose
of
today's
presentation
is
just
to
talk
through
that
scope
of
this
new
committee
and
then
also
provide
some
some
brief
items
that
we're
considering
for
future
agendas
and
get
some
preliminary
feedback
from
you
for
a
work
plan,
and
the
plan
is
to
come
back
at
the
February
21st
meeting
to
have
a
more
detailed
discussion
with
this
committee
on
future
agenda
items
that
will
be
folded
into
that
work
plan
for
facilitated
Advanced
planning
purposes.
You
can
turn
to
the
next
slide.
C
Please
Katie,
so
key
takeaways
that
equity
and
engagement
committee
was
created
to
ensure
the
equity
and
the
provision
of
City
resources
and
livelihood
needs
of
the
entire
Community.
This
committee,
like
other
Council
committees,
is
comprised
of
three
members
of
the
city
council
and
is
scheduled
to
have
a
standard
meeting
time
on
the
third
Tuesday
of
the
month
at
1
pm.
We
can
of
course
make
adjustments
to
that
as
availability
may
change
throughout
the
year,
City
staff
will
work
with
the
committee
members
to
develop
a
work
plan
to
help
facilitate
Advanced
planning
for
future
agendas.
C
Next
slide,
please
Katie,
so
just
to
really
quickly
go
through
the
composition
of
the
new
committee.
We've
got
three
members
chaired
by
council
member
Shanika
Smith.
C
So
as
a
quick
reminder
of
that
scope
that
was
adopted
back
in
November,
the
committee
will
review
policy
updates
and
make
policy
recommendations
that
ensure
fairness
and
equity
in
the
provision
of
City
resources
and
livelihood
needs
of
all
community
members
and
groups
and
will
ensure
an
equitable
community
that
provides
community
members
with
the
opportunity
to
be
informed
and
engaged
in
the
policy
making
process
next
slide.
C
So
I'm
not
going
to
read
through
this
entire
list,
but
these
are
some
of
the
policy
topics
that
were
adopted
with
that
action
that
was
taken
back
in
November.
So,
for
example,
on
your
agenda
today,
you've
got
an
update
from
Brenda
Mills
as
well
as
Christine
Edwards
related
to
some
upcoming
action.
We're
going
to
ask
Council
to
take
for
reparations.
We
actually
plan
on
having
a
standing
reparations
agenda
item
to
provide
updates
to
this
committee
on
the
progress
that
the
community
reparations
commission
is
making.
C
We
also
have
a
presentation
today
from
Rachel
Taylor
Rachel
Taylor
is
going
to
be
providing
an
update
on
the
Strategic
partnership
funds,
which
you
can
see
the
bullet
for
the
Strategic
partnership
investment.
So
this
list
is
what
provided
the
the
start
of
a
work
plan
that
staff
has
drafted
in
future
slides
I'm,
going
to
talk
about
some
of
the
other
upcoming
items.
We
have
that
are
aligned
with
these
policy
topics
that
were
approved
by
city
council
back
in
November
next
slide.
Please
Katie.
C
So
part
of
the
reason
for
the
revised
city
council
committee
structure
was
to
ensure
alignment
with
City
council's
priorities,
and
while
you
could
easily
tie
the
equity
and
engagement
to
multiple
city
council
strategic
priorities,
we
did
want
to
highlight
that
that
closest
tie
to
two
of
your
strategic
priorities,
including
neighborhood,
resilience
and
reparations
next
slide.
Please
Katie
so
really
quickly
and
again
we're
going
to
have
a
more
detailed
dive
into
a
proposed
work
plan
items
at
your
February
meeting,
but
wanted
to
let
you
know
right
now.
C
What
we're
planning
for
the
February
agenda
includes
an
overview
of
that
work
plan
and
to
get
feedback
from
you,
so
we
can
hopefully
get
that
locked
in
at
the
February
meeting.
We're
also
going
to
have
Dallas
hitch,
provide
an
update
on
hybrid
meetings
and
Community
engagement,
Academy,
both
of
which
are
associated
with
that
arpa
funding
that
was
awarded
for
those
purposes.
C
As
I
previously
mentioned,
we
do
plan
on
having
a
standing
agenda
item
associated
with
reparations.
The
primary
focus
at
next
month's
meeting
would
be
discussing
the
progress
we've
made
on
the
scope
of
work
for
the
audit.
In
response
to
that
immediate
recommendation
and
Brenda
Mills
and
Christine
Edwards
are
going
to
provide
some
details
on
that
on
the
next
agenda
item
that
we
have
for
today's
committee
meeting.
We
also
are
looking
at
potentially
having
some
Advisory
board
annual
report
updates.
C
One
of
the
things
we're
going
to
be
looking
at
doing
across
the
board
for
Council
committees
is
having
more
opportunity
for
Council
committees
to
have
direct
interfaces
with
boards
and
commissions
that
are
most
closely
aligned
with
the
scope
of
that
Council
committee.
So
we're
tentatively
looking
at
potentially
having
African-American
Heritage
commission
human
relations,
commission
and
then
the
neighborhood
advisory
committee
provide
an
update
on
their
annual
report
and
an
overview
of
some
of
their
planned
work
plan
items
for
the
upcoming
year
in
March.
C
We'll
have
a
strategic
partnership
fund
application,
consideration
process
and
Rachel
Taylor
is
going
to
provide
some
additional
details
on
that
item
as
a
part
of
her
agenda
item
later
on.
In
today's
meeting,
we're
also
going
to
receive
some
neighborhood
matching
grants,
updates
and
that'll
be
from
dawa
hitch
just
giving
an
overview
on
where
we
are
with
our
currently
funded
funded
programs
and
then
also
talking
about
the
upcoming
schedule
for
the
next
election
process.
C
We
have
also
tentatively
scheduled
to
have
a
disparity
study,
update,
which
will
be
provided
by
our
community
and
economic
development
department
and
then
we'll
have
that
standing
reparations
update
in
April
Dao
plans
on
providing
an
update
on
the
upfit
to
community
spaces,
which
was
also
funded
with
arpa
funding.
C
We'll
provide
a
biannual
report
on
analytics
language
and
accessibility,
that'll
also
be
led
by
by
our
Cape
team,
and
then
we'll
have
that
standing
reparations
update
in
May
Dallas
plans
on
providing
an
update
on
our
upcoming
National
Community
survey,
and
then
we
will
also
have
that
standing
reparations,
update,
So
based
on
those
key
policy
topics
that
I
provided.
That's
how
we
arrived
at
these
items,
but
we
do
have
several,
as
you
can
see
from
this
list,
important
items
that
we
do
plan
on,
bringing
forward
to
this
committee
over
the
next
couple
of
months.
C
Next
slide,
please
Katie,
and
then
we
do
have
a
couple
of
items
that
we
haven't
identified
when
specifically
we're
going
to
put
it
on
a
future
agenda.
But
we
do
want
to
make
sure
that
we
provide
you
with
an
overview
of
some
of
the
great
work
that
Brenda's
team
is
doing
on
the
policy.
Equity
analysis
team
that
we
have
internally.
So
that'll
be
included
on
a
future
agenda.
C
An
update
on
racial
healing
grants,
periodic
updates,
as
progress
is
made
on
the
disparity
study,
also
updates
on
where
we
are
with
ADA
compliance,
lgbtq
plus
policy
considerations,
as
well
as
climate
Justice,
and
we
know
climate
Justice
will
also
be
covered
under
the
environment
and
Safety
Committee.
But
I
want
to
bring
this
to
this
committee
whenever
it's
particularly
focused
on
issues
associated
with
Equity.
C
Next
slide,
please
Katie.
So,
just
to
reiterate,
this
committee
was
created
to
ensure
equity
and
the
provision
of
City
resources
and
livelihood
needs
of
the
entire
Community.
The
committee,
as
our
all
city
council
committees,
is
comprised
of
three
members
and
is
scheduled
to
meet
regularly
on
the
third
Tuesday
of
the
month
at
1
pm,
and
then
staff
is
going
to
work
collaboratively
with
committee
members
to
develop
a
work
plan
that
will
help
facilitate
Advanced
planning
for
future
agendas
and
we'll
have
a
deeper
dive
into
that
work.
C
Plan
discussion
at
our
February
21st
equity
and
engagement
committee
meeting,
and
so
that
concludes
what
I
had
planned
to
share
happy
to
answer
any
questions
or
take
any
feedback.
You
have
at
this
time
regarding
what
we
have
planned,
in
particular
for
the
February
equity
and
engagement
committee
meeting.
B
D
Thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
name
a
few
things
that
I'm
hearing
from
Community.
If
we
could
go
back
to
the
key
takeaways
just
so,
we
have
a
frame
of
reference
for
my
first
set
of
questions.
One
is
I
noticed
throughout
the
presentation.
I
heard
a
lot
about
how
the
city
is
going
to
work
on
equity
and
provision,
so
that
tells
me
that
there's
a
lens
on
equity
on
the
output,
but
I'm
not
sure
how
we're
going
to
get
to
the
heart
of
addressing
the
disparities
in
our
social
determinants
of
Health.
D
If
we
don't
have
also
have
an
input
feature
that
goes
beyond
just
public
comment
in
this,
so
I
wondered
if
an
example
might
look
like
we
did
a
point
system
rubric
in
our
arpa
covid-19
relief
funds
and
now
that
we're
close
to
allocating
most,
if
not
all,
of
those
funds.
D
We
had
a
conversation
at
the
beginning
of
those
allocations
about
what
would
it
look
like
to
go
back
and
make
sure
that
our
goals
of
addressing
disparities
and
access
to
funding
and
how
we
got
into
the
lack
of
equity
in
our
previous
funding
Cycles?
If
we
could
look
back
at
covid-19,
arpa
relief
funds
as
an
example
of
measuring,
if
our
process
was
just
like
the
fairness
part,
where
we're
just
kind
of
go
by
demographic,
or
were
we
going
to
use
that
historic
funding
to
get
to
the
heart
of
historic
harm?
D
D
A
recent
intention
around
Equity
through
the
provision
and
an
opportunity
to
go
back
and
see
if
it
actually
happens,
so
that
could
go
in
our
work
plan,
maybe
for
the
fall,
and
the
second
example
would
be
our
emergency
and
Disaster
Response
protocols.
I
know
that
we're
working
on
that
with
the
water
outage,
but
also
our
climate
Justice
initiative.
Outreach
and
I
wondered
if
this
group,
because
we
have
the
amazing
staff
that
we
do
working
with
us
on
our
work
plan.
D
If
we
could
get
some
more
details
about
what
that
response
is
going
to
look
like
I
know
with
the
two
on
one
feature
that
we
partnered
with
there
was
an
opportunity
for
text
in
only
for
text
out,
and
my
understanding
is
that
it's
related
to
the
North
Carolina
state
budget
for
our
2-1-1
response.
D
So
if
deaf
and
hearing
impaired
persons
didn't
have
the
same
access
to
Water
Resources,
that's
just
one
way
that
we've
been
able
to
identify
a
gap,
but
we
might
be
able
to
use
that
one
example
to
kind
of
go
a
little
bit
further
and
where
there
might
be
folks
who
don't
have
easy,
affordable
access
to
the
internet,
for
example,
to
be
able
to
get
updates
and
more
accurate
information.
And
then
the
last
thing
I
have
in
that
bucket
is
translation
during
budget
input.
D
So
we
know
that
this
has
been
brought
up
a
few
times.
Is
this
budget
cycle,
one
where
we
have
some
of
those
resources
for
Community
engagement,
to
have
either
services
for
deaf
and
hearing
impaired,
folks
and
or
translation
services?
For
folks
who
English
is
not
their
primary
language
and
so
I'm
hoping
to
bring
some
examples
of
where
we
know
that
there's
gaps
in
communication,
we
know
that
we've
made
an
effort
with
the
arpa
really
funds.
C
So,
thank
you
so
much
for
that
feedback,
and
the
short
answer
is
yes
to
your
point
on
wanting
to
make
sure
that
we've
got
translation
services
during
the
budget.
I
know
dawa
had
planned
on
coming
forward
in
April
with
an
update,
but
I
know,
April
would
probably
be
too
late
just
given
how
far
along
we'll
be
in
the
budget
process.
C
So
what
I
can
ask
is
to
look
at
her,
maybe
providing
some
preliminary
information
at
the
February
meeting
on
that
topic,
just
so
that
you've
got
it
and
then
I've
written
down
your
suggestion
on
that
assessment
from
arpa
and
then
also
looking
at
the
Emergency
Operations
plan
and
continuity
of
operations
plan.
I
know
the
contract
is
going
to
be
brought
forward
to
city
council
at
your
January
24th
meeting
for
consideration,
but
that's
just
assigning
the
contract
to
the
vendor.
So
still
a
ton
of
work
is
going
to
happen
from
that
point.
C
So
I
can
work
with
Jeremy
Knighton.
Who
is
the
project
manager
for
that
to
identify
when
the
most
appropriate
time
in
the
development
of
the
EOP
and
continuity
of
operations
plan
would
be
to
have
that
conversation
with
you
more
specifically,
around
accessibility
of
the
information
and
Disaster
Response
protocols
as
they
pertain
to
communication?
So,
yes,
we
will
look
at
folding
those
into
an
agenda
and
and
all
work
between
now
and
our
February
meeting
to
find
out
when
it
makes
the
most
sense
to
have
those
programmed
in
for
your
feedback.
D
I
am
getting
some
feedback
from
community
members
around
the
need
to
be
proactive
in
advancing
human
and
civil
rights
protections
as
we
look
at
the
convening
of
a
North
Carolina
General
Assembly,
but
it
also
came
to
attention
to
look
at
ways
to
advance
and
protect
Reproductive
Rights
and
the
expansion
of
Medicaid
once
again,
because
we
don't
have
the
social
determinants
of
Health
listed
in
our
scope
of
work.
If
we
end
up
with
this
Committee,
just
taking
a
snapshot,
maybe
that's
enough-
maybe
that's!
D
The
goal
of
this
group
is
to
take
a
snapshot
of
where
we're
at,
but
if
we
just
end
up
at
the
same
place
after
this
committee
has
convened,
I
think
that
would
be
a
disservice
to
all
of
our
time
and
energy,
but
also
on
the
Public's
expectations
that
we
would
do
something
meaningful
to
address
disparities
in
our
community.
D
So
that
being
really
just
kind
of
like
an
overarching
concern,
I
would
say
that
a
action
step
might
look
like
what
are
the
tools
at
hand
that
we
have
to
address,
measuring
disparities
and
measuring
the
harm
that's
being
done
through
our
policies
and
that
sort
of
like
the
way
that
we
do
the
the
Outreach
or
the
availability
of
funds,
and
that
one
tool
that
I've
been
able
to
identify
is
if
we
were
to
add
equity
and
sustainability
to
every
staff
report.
D
Not
that
we're
going
to
measure
it
correctly
the
first
time,
but
that
we
should
start
measuring
it
and
start
compiling
data
so
that
when
we
go
back
and
review
outcomes,
whether
it's
arpa
covid-19
relief
funds
or
strategic
partnership
funds
that
we
have
begun
a
process
of
measurement
that
might
get
us
farther
in
our
work
moving
forward
and
definitely
give
us
something
to
come
back
to
and
review.
As
we
look
at
our
work
in
the
future.
C
Sure,
and,
and
so
we'll
bring
forward
the
draft
work
plan
for
your
feedback
at
the
February
meeting.
We
can
certainly
make
tweaks
it's
intended
to
be
a
dynamic
document
and
just
kind
of
thinking
through
the
equity,
as
well
as
sustainability
lenses
for
the
work
that
we're
doing.
One
thing
that
we
could
do
a
much
better
job
of
being
proactive
in
communicating
with
Council
on
is
how
we're
doing
that
from
the
onset
of
projects.
So
we
have
an
equity
assessment.
C
We
have
a
sustainability
assessment
that
actually
goes
into
the
project
Charters
and
has
to
be
signed
off
on
prior
to
work
commencing.
So
what
I'd
love
to
do
is
let
you
know
kind
of
how
we
go
through
that
current
assessment
and
then
get
feedback
from
this
committee
on
things
that
we
may
want
to
tweak
for
those
projects
that
we're
already
working
on
and
that
ties
back
into
that
policy.
C
Equity
analysis
team
that
I
mentioned
and
so
I
think
it's
a
great
way
to
get
some
feedback
from
from
this
committee
and
all
also
let
you
know
the
work
that
we're
doing
in
this
space
by
no
means
to
say
that
that
we're
doing
everything
that
we
could
be
doing,
but
just
to
get
some
feedback
from
the
from
the
committee
on
on
ways.
We
could
improve
on
that
work
that
we
already
have
underway.
So
thank
you
for
that
feedback.
C
D
B
E
Okay,
thank
you,
madam
chair,
and
welcome
everybody.
I'm
gonna.
Do
a
few
introductions
and
I'll
get
into
the
presentation
around
our
recommendation
for
the
audit.
First,
we
have
with
us
Christine
Edwards,
who
is
the
owner
operator
of
Civility
localized,
and
she
is
also
our
project
manager
for
reparations.
Welcome,
Christine,
thank
you
and
then
we
have
the
chair
of
the
reparations
commission.
Community
reparations
commission,
Dr,
Dwight,
Mullen,
hi,
Dr
Mullen.
How
are
you
good
and
then
we
have?
E
Last
but
not
least,
our
wonderful
Vice
chair,
Mr
Juana
little,
who
serves
also
with
Dr
Miller
and
the
community
reparations
commission
hi
dewana
Hi.
How
are
you
doing
good
all
right
so
Katie?
If
you'll
pull
up
the
presentation,
we'll
get
going.
E
So
next
slide
so
we're
coming
to
you.
This
is
our
response
to
the
city
and
county
to
the
recommendation
that
was
voted
on
by
the
community
reparations
commission
December
5th.
So
we're
going
to
look
at
a
few
initial
takeaways
and
then
we'll
talk
a
little
bit
more
around
the
recommendation
provided
to
us.
So,
like
I
said,
December
5,
they
passed
an
immediate
recommendation
to
end
for
the
harm,
seizing
repetition
of
institutional
processes
that
led
to
racially
disparate
outcomes.
The
recommendation
also
called
for
the
city
and
county
to
conduct
an
official
audit.
E
E
The
city,
council
and
County
Commissioners
are
being
asked
to
consider
the
adoption
of
a
resolution
authorizing
their
respective
staff
to
develop
a
scope
of
work
that
will
lead
to
the
selection
of
a
firm
to
conduct
the
requested
audit
and
then
a
bond
resolution.
Approval
city
and
county
staff
will
work
with
the
community
recommend
record.
Excuse
me
Community
reparations
commission
to
develop
a
scope
of
work
for
the
audit,
select
a
firm
and
then
review
and
prioritize
remediation
opportunities
cited
in
that
audit.
E
The
scope
of
work,
the
audit,
firm
selection
process,
review
and
prioritization
will
be
discussed
monthly
at
our
community
Recreations
commission
meetings
next
slide,
so
the
December
5th
immediate
recommendation
overview
so
I'm
going
to
do
a
really
quick
overview
of
that
recommendation.
I
think
most
of
you
have
read
it,
but
it
recommended
that
the
city
encounter
provide
assurance
and
take
effective
measures
to
end
ongoing
and
current
harms
due
to
intentional
and
unintentional
policies,
programs,
practices
and
procedures.
E
It
recommended
that
the
city
and
county
promote
and
enforce
codes,
conduct
and
ethical
norms
and
take
on
ongoing
measures
to
Foster
the
following
confidence:
building
between
government
and
African-Americans
truth
seeking
mechanisms
and
processes.
Timely
accountability
of
the
dispensation
of
recommendations.
E
Next
slide,
please,
it
describes
the
community
reparations
commission
vote
taken
on
December
5th,
improving
the
immediate
I'm,
sorry
I'm,
sorry,
so
our
draft
city
and
county
resolution
I'm
going
ahead
of
myself.
My
apologies,
the
draft
city
and
county
resolution
overview
so
we're.
This
describes
the
community
reparations
commission
both
taken
on
December
5th,
approving
the
immediate
recommendation.
It
summarizes
the
call
to
conduct
an
official
audit
to
ensure
compliance
with
federal
and
state
laws,
as
we
spoke
about
before
that,
and
that
this
that
we
have
ceased
to
inflict
further
harm
on
the
African-American
Community.
E
So
a
general
timeline
that
we
have
for
you.
Of
course,
December
5
was
the
adoption
of
the
immediate
recommendation
by
the
reparations
commission
from
December
6
through
January
6th,
our
city
and
county
staff,
developed
an
information
implementation
plan
and
drafted
a
resolution.
January
9..
E
We
reviewed
at
the
implementation
plan
and
discussed
the
draft
resolution
with
the
commission
January
17th,
we're
here
with
you
today,
asking
for
your
approval
to
move
this
forward
to
city
council,
January
24
city
council
will
consider
adoption
of
the
draft
resolution
and,
respectively
February
7
County
Commission
will
consider
the
same
adoption
of
the
draft
resolution.
We
will
go
back
to
the
community
reparations
commission,
February
20th,
March,
20
city
and
county
staff
will
finalize
the
scope
of
work
with
the
community
reparations
commission
at
the
meeting.
E
Looking
at
Spring
to
finalize
and
advertise
solicitation
and
select
for
select
the
firm
to
conduct
the
audit
the
summer
of
2023
finalized
the
audit
and
review
and
prioritize
recommendations
ongoing.
We
will
do
monthly
updates
and
feedback
sessions
with
the
community
reparations
commission
and
coordinate
impact
Focus
areas
as
well
as
this
committee
next
slide,
so
key
process
components.
The
scope
of
work
is
a
detailed
description
of
the
word,
the
Milestones,
the
timeline
necessary
to
fully
complete
the
audit.
E
The
solicitation
is
the
public
advertisement
for
vendors
to
view
our
review
scope
of
work
and
submit
responses
that
will
be
vetted
to
consider
the
best
qualified
firm
to
conduct
the
audit
and
provide
the
findings
report.
The
audit
report
will
be
a
detailed
overview
of
key
findings
from
the
audit
prepared
by
the
selected
firms
and
it
details
recommendations
on
policy
and
operational
revisions
and
to
ensure
succession
of
further
harm.
E
The
evaluation
and
prioritization
city
and
county
staff
and
coordination
with
the
commission
will
review
the
findings
from
the
audit
report
prioritize
opportunities
to
ensure
cessation
and
prevention
of
future
harm,
and
then
the
audit
resources
funding
to
conduct
the
audit
would
come
from
previously
approved
city
and
county
reparations
resources
and
I
believe
that
is
the
last
slide
and
I
will
take
any
questions
that
you
may
have
regarding
this.
We
do
have
pristine
Edwards
here
from
stability
localized
and
our
chair,
and
vice
chair,
Dr,
Dwight,
Mullen
and
Mr
Wana
little.
B
I
wanted
to
know
from
either
person
when
you're
a
determinant
of
the
scope
of
an
audit
I
mean
it
can
be
very
broad
just
from
the
conversations
that
you've
had
as
a
commissioned
Collective
or
with
your
focus
groups.
I'm
wondering
if
you
can
kind
of
give
us
some
direction
about
what
you
think
the
scope
of
the
audit
should
be.
F
F
Everyone,
council
members,
so
in
terms
of
the
scope
of
this
audit,
we're
really
wanting
to
look
at
governance,
city
and
county
sort
of
policies,
programs,
initiatives,
documents,
anything
that
has
been
detrimental
or
discriminatory,
and
so
that's
what
I
understand
that
they're
looking
for
but
they're
I
think
it's
a
policy
program
initiatives,
but
also
sort
of
that
economic
impact
as
well
so
I'll
also
sort
of
defer
to
Dr
Mullen
to
speak
on
this,
because
I
know
that
he
had
some
strong
opinions
on
this
as
well.
G
Yeah,
thank
you
for
inviting
me.
I
really
appreciate
the
chance
to
talk
informally
about
this.
Is
that
one
of
the
reasons
for
the
requests
in
terms
of
the
stop
stop
the
harm
resolution
was
was
that
the
data
was
not
forthcoming,
that
the
focus
areas
needed
to
offer
database
recommendations
back
to
City
Council
on
Tech,
County,
Commission,
and
so
one
of
the
reasons.
G
There
were
many
reasons
for
it:
redundancy,
duplicity,
the
complexity
of
the
questions,
the
availability
of
the
information,
and
so
we
thought
that,
rather
than
shotgunning
it
from
five
different
areas
of
concern
that
we
should
focus
it
in
one
effort
to
answer
our
questions
and
and
and
and
address
a
second
major
issue.
G
It's
not
just
availability,
but
also
the
information
that
was
being
used
by
the
reparations
commission
and
the
folk
Series
has
been
basically
unofficial
data
and
it's
been
from
a
variety
of
sources,
ranging
from
studies
that
have
been
a
part
of
a
Professional
Organization
to
student
research.
G
Efforts
as
as
that
made
up
the
state
of
black
Asheville
data
source,
and
so
the
combining
of
those
efforts
in
one
audit
effort
would
not
only
make
it
official,
but
it
were
also
kind
of
unified,
as
well
as
being
a
third
party
that
offers
it
as
opposed
to
data
being
offered
by
one
of
the
affected
parties
and
that,
and
so
the
the
data
request
was
there
but
I
think
just
as
important
as
the
data
requests
in
the
audit
are
the
cessation
of
harm
that
are
that's
ongoing.
G
That
was
a
major
concern
of
many
of
the
of
several
of
the
Commissioners
as
well
as
it's
coming
up
in.
In
a
couple
of
the
economics
a
couple
of
the
focus
areas,
particularly
Economic
Development,
in
that
there
were
ongoing
current
measures
that
were
that
were
happening,
things
that
were
happening,
that
from
past
Behavior
are
going
to
produce
disparate
outcomes
by
race.
G
What,
for
example,
produces
the
disparities
in
end
of
course,
and
end
of
grade
exams
by
the
Asheville
City
Schools
Brooklyn,
County
Schools,
the
behavior,
and
the
ongoing
policies
that
are
being
enacted
by
the
Department
of
Transportation,
with
the
construction
of
highways
that
affect
Legacy
communities
in
our
in
our
in
our
city?
G
And
then
there
were
some
other
areas,
but
they
were
ongoing
with
health
and
wellness,
for
example.
So
the
idea
of
cessation
of
harm
the
stopping
of
the
harm
wasn't
just
for
when
the
data
is
collected,
and
you
wouldn't
you
witness
it
sometime
this
summer.
There
was
also
the
idea
of
that.
There
would
be
some
immediate
response
from
city
and
from
County
to
to
stop
the
harm.
Do
you
want
to
am
I
am
I
covering
that?
Well.
H
Yeah,
a
big,
a
big
component
of
it
was
also
the
financial
audit
and
so
like
yeah.
We
want
the
data
and
all
of
that,
but
I
think
the
financial
audit
is
just
as
important,
and
so
we
want
all-encompassing
Audi.
That
looks
at
all
of
the
things,
because
the
harms
that
the
harness
are
the
harms.
H
You
know
what
I
mean
so
as
we
think
about
that
and
as
y'all
just
read,
seeing
the
overview
of
what's
being
submitted
to
city
council
I
would
ask
that
city
council
actually
see
the
full
recommendation,
because
the
stop
the
Harms
that
is
excluded
from
the
resolution
and
what
was
just
presented
is
a
statement
around
and
I'm.
Just
read
it
because
I'm
looking
at
it
so
that
y'all
can
understand
the
statement
that
we
talked
in
our
last
commission
meeting
about
being
included
which
addresses
the
things
that
Dr
Moss
was
just
talking
about.
H
It
said
it
is
also
recommended
that
Assurance
is
be
given
that
effective
measures
are
taken
that
end
continuing
violations
of
access
to
equity
and
Education
Health
and
Wellness
housing,
Economic,
Development
and
Justice,
and
so,
like
that's
a
major
part,
because
we
expected
to
do
this
work
and
to
look
at
reparations
and
ways
of
correcting
past
harms.
While
the
harms
are
still
continuing
to
happen.
H
C
Sure,
thank
you,
council,
member
Smith
and
Vice
chair
little
I
just
wanted
to
really
quickly
share
my
screen,
given
the
feedback
that
you
provided
at
the
reparations
commission
meeting,
we've
actually
revised
the
resolution
to
reflect
the
language
that
you
just
read
out
loud.
So,
if
you'll
give
me
just
a
second
I'll,
pull
up
that
language,
just
so
that
this
group
and
I
apologize.
C
If
this
is
small
but
wanted
to
give
this
group
the
opportunity
to
see
that
revised
language,
so
Vice
chair
little
the
language
you
just
read
is
highlighted
here
and
we
did
lift
that
from
the
immediate
recommendation
that
was
passed
on
December
5th,
and
so
we
have
updated.
The
resolution
accordingly
and
I
believe
Christine
sent
that
out
to
the
commission
just
to
ensure
that
we
reflected
it
appropriately.
Based
on
what
we
heard
at
this
month's
meeting.
G
There
were
two
other
aspects
regarding
scope
that
can
be
assumed,
but
I
think
it
needs
to
be
articulated.
G
One
is
that
when
we
talk
about
race
and
racially
disparate
outcomes,
we
assume
also
that
we're
talking
about
gender,
but
not,
but
no
I
I
want
to
make
sure
we're
understanding
that
the
things
that
talk
about
race,
don't
necessarily
describe
what
happens
to
African-American
women
and
as
we
as
we
look
to
professionalize
our
research
and
our
data.
The
specification
of
these
public
policy
areas
regarding
their
outcomes
for
African-American
women
need
to
be
need
to
be
included.
G
It
doesn't
it's
it's,
it
doesn't
make
sense,
it's
counterintuitive.
You
would
think.
If
you
talk
about
race,
you
talk
about
African-American
women,
it's
just
not
the
case.
It
needs
to
be
specified.
The
second
area
that
is
assumed
then
and
I
I'm
assuming,
but
it
needs
to
be
articulated,
is
that
when
we
talk
about
audit,
we're
talking
about
the
public
policy,
not
just
in
terms
of
external
outcomes,
we're
also
talking
about
the
origin,
the
internal
workings
of
government
and
so
inside
city
government
inside
County
government.
B
D
So
I
guess
hearing
the
thank
you
both
of
you
have
added
to
this
conversation
when
I
look
at
the
documents
that
are
available
from
the
December
meeting
of
the
community
reparations
commission
which
I
was
able
to
attend
part
of
and
then
compare
them
to
the
documents
in
January,
it
seems
like
we're
we're
missing
a
really
clear
understanding
of
where
the
scope
was
narrowed
and
I
wonder
what
we
might
do.
I
know
this
is
our
first
meeting
of
equity
engagement,
but
is
to
communicate
to
the
full
Council
where
that
scope
was
narrowed.
D
The
concerns
we've
heard
today.
If
there's
going
to
be
changes
to
the
resolution,
could
we
get
a
side-by-side
comparison
of
to
make
sure
that
we're
hearing
what
the
community
reparations
commission
has
asked
of
us
and
that
it
reflects
the
body
of
work
that
we're
about
to
do.
F
Yes,
that's
definitely
something
that
I
could
help
with
as
a
project
manager
and
just
making
sure
that
we're
keeping
track
of
these
documents
and
the
changes
that
are
being
made
for
sure
I'm
trying
to
pull
up
now.
The
last
iteration
of
the
document
that
was
shared
with
the
commission
I
believe
it's
the
most
recent
version,
because
we
send
a
post
meeting
survey
out
and
we're
continuing
to
seek
feedback
and
just
letting
folks
know
we're
coming
to
the
committee
level
on
this
date
we're
coming
before
Council
on
this
date.
D
I
think
one
of
the
things
I've
heard
from
groups
in
the
past
is
when
the
changes
are
made,
but
the
document
looks
the
same.
It's
really
hard
to
have
that
visual
of
what
the
change
looks
like.
So
when
I
look
at
the
January
meeting
documents,
there's
two
links
to
the
same
document.
If
there
are
any
changes
in
between
them,
it
would
be
hard
to
see
so
I
wonder
if
we
might
provide
a
document
beside
it.
C
C
I
do
have
a
quick
question
for
Dr
Mullen,
the
two
items
that
you
mentioned:
the
internal
workings
of
the
city
and
county,
as
well
as
the
impact
to
women
from
from
I
guess
I
want
to
make
sure
do
you
want
us
to
call
those
out
in
the
resolution,
or
would
that
be
more
in
the
scope
of
work
that
is
developed
following
the
adoption
of
the
resolution,
which
will
be
working
with
the
commission
on
that
scope
of
work
for
the
audit
yeah.
G
You're
getting
you're
getting
to
it
right.
That's
exactly
my
like
my
my
question
is
that
it
feels
as
though
it's
a
methodological
and
and
production
issue
in
terms
of
talking
with
the
firm
and
making
sure
that
these
areas
are
covered,
because
it's
assumed
to
me
that
when
you're,
looking
at
disparities,
you're
also
looking
at
disparities
by
gender,
but
I
wanted
to
make
sure
that
that
was
being
covered
and
I
also
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we
weren't
just
picking
it
up.
G
Midstream
that
we
aren't
just
looking
at
the
outcomes
of
Education
we're
looking
at
the
origins
and
The
Originators
of
the
policies
that
produce
those
up
those
outcomes,
and
so
internally
he
is
not
separated
from
what
we
are
doing
externally
and
so
I.
Don't
know
where
to
put
that
efficiently,
but
that
that's
those
are
my
concern.
E
Brenda
and
I
just
want
to
reiterate
that
we
will
be
coming
to
this
commission
to
provide
that
scope
of
work
and
get
your
feedback.
So
we'll
we'll
make
a
note
of
all
the
changes
or
the
stuff
that
you
would
like
to
be
called
out
in
specific
and
if
there's
any
way
in
which
we
can
reword
it
or
put
it
in
a
way
that
gives
you
assurances
that
that
will
be
looked
at,
we'll
be
glad
to
do
that.
B
And
I
would
say
to
Dr
dewalek
I
think
it
belongs
in
both
I
think
as
much
as
we
can
put
in
the
resolution.
It'll
work
as
a
guiding
document
for
the
firm
when
they
determine
what
the
scope
is.
So
if
we
can
have
whatever
present
in
the
resolution
and
in
our
topic
is
conversation
when
we
talk
to
or
speak
with,
the
firm
or
staff
at
least
before
they
go
into
a
firm
selection,
then
I
think
being
represented
in
both
documents
would
be
best.
B
D
D
That
was
like
an
aha
moment
to
back
up
all
the
narrative
data
that
people
saw
as
an
outcome
of
urban,
real
and
redlining,
and
that
was
the
document
that
help
to
inform
how
we
got
to
the
outcome
and
when
I'm
in
the
meetings,
I'm
hearing
a
similar
concern
of
we,
we
can
see
that
the
outcomes
of
say
disparity,
racial
disparities
in
our
education
systems
or
our
health
systems.
D
But
there's
an
ask
for
the
systems
who
have
participated
in
the
harm
to
allow
the
data
to
be
presented
that
informed
how
we
got
to
this
place
and
it
seems
like
there's
whether
it's
like
a
delay
or
a
simple.
We
don't
know
what
the
information
looks
like
is
why
we're
at
this
audit,
so
I
just
wanted
to
ask
like
are,
is
the
are
the
steps
that
we're
taking
today
getting
closer
to
the
data
being
available
for
the
community
reparations
commission
to
make
the
recommendations
that
you
need
to
make.
E
I'll
be
glad
to
answer
that
question.
We
went
through
all
the
the
data
that
we've
been
asked
for
by
the
commission.
We
had
some
clarifying
questions
because
they
were
very
broad.
There's
information
also
that
we
can't
gather,
but
we
wanted
to
make
sure
we
understood.
What's
the
question
you're
trying
to
answer
what
is
the
harm
you're
trying
to
redress?
E
They
should
be
all
receiving
information
this
week
in
unless
we
still
have
questions
we
met
with
the
impact
Focus
area.
Facilitators
on
Friday
went
through
that
data.
Actually,
that
should
have
been
being
provided,
but
I
think
there
was
a
little
miscommunication
around
what
we're
doing
so.
We
we
should
have
most
of
it
completed.
F
Yes
and
the
IFA
work
groups
are
going
to
continue
to
work
and
ideate
and
come
up
with
these
project
recommendations
or
initiatives
throughout
these
months,
while
the
you
know,
audit
is
being
scoped
out.
So
this
work
is
continuing
to
happen,
but
I
think
that
this
audit
or
the
resolution
is
going
to
to
Really,
add
to
that
and
help
to
answer
a
lot
of
questions.
B
Thank
you,
I'll
take
dewana
and
then
after
dawana
I'll
entertain
a
motion.
H
One
thing
is
I'm
glad
that
the
data
is
now
being
available,
but
I
also
think
that
there's
a
lot
of
distrust
of
the
data
that
we're
going
to
receive,
given
that
we're
receiving
it
from
perpetuators
and
the
harm,
like
that's
the
reality
and
so,
and
so
the
audit
is
a
way
for
us
to
kind
of
ease.
Some
of
that
concern
around
the
data
and
if
it's
accurate
and
so
I
think
it's
it's
super
important
to
how
we
move
forward
and
how
we
look
at
next
steps.
In
reference
to
our
future
recommendations.
B
D
B
Give
me
some
motion
and
a
second
on
the
floor.
I'll
do
a
roll
call
vote
for
approval,
I,
councilwoman,
Roney,
aye
and
the
motion
carries.
Thank
you
all
for
being
here
with
us
today.
We
look
forward
to
ongoing
conversation
until
we
get
to
the
scope
of
the
audit,
we'll
move
on
to
a
update
from
Rachel
Taylor
she's,
going
to
have
a
discussion
about
the
direction
we're
taking
the
Strategic
partnership
funds.
Thank
you.
A
You
so
yes,
I'm
bringing
an
update
about
the
Strategic
partnership
program.
I've
been
informed
and
made
a
couple
edits
for
our
finance
director.
It
is
not
a
fund,
it
is
a
program,
so
you'll
see
those
changes
throughout
the
PowerPoint
so
KDP
to
go
to
the
next
slide.
A
A
lot
of
this
material
will
be
similar
to
what
was
presented
in
the
December
Housing
and
Community
Development
committee
meeting.
But
since
it's
a
new
committee
and
slightly
different
scope,
it'll
be
great
to
just
touch
base
on
this
program.
So
the
scope
of
the
Strategic
partnership
program
is
to
revise
the
focus
to
focus
on
eliminating
the
opportunity
Gap
in
Asheville
for
low
to
moderate
income
school
age.
Youth.
A
A
So
the
next
steps
to
the
program
will
be
to
continue
the
grant
cycle
while
continuing
to
implement
improvements,
so
we're
presenting
today
to
this
committee
and
we
anticipate
launching
the
application
period
in
February
of
2023
this
year
right
next
slide:
internet,
okay,
so
historically
the
Strategic
partnership
program
has
lacked
a
dedicated,
organizational
and
operational
framework.
A
This
has
resulted
in
constrained
program
management
and
operations
which
impacted
relationships
with
nonprofits
in
our
community
due
to
their
prior
experience
with
this
program.
So
after
it
was
relaunched
last
summer
it
had
a
fun
balance
of
seven
hundred
and
eleven
thousand
dollars.
A
The
program
had
been
caused
for
a
couple
years
in
which,
during
which
it
accumulated
additional
funds,
then
July
of
this
past
summer,
Council
granted
nine
Awards
and,
as
you
can
see
in
this
table
below
what
the
projective
program
balance
for
July
of
2023
is
just
under
six
hundred
thousand
dollars
next
slide.
A
So
here
are
the
list
of
the
awards
from
the
pilot
program.
You
can
see
the
nine
different
organizations
that
were
awarded
their
requested
amount
and
their
awarded
amount.
A
So
the
goals
for
this
program-
and
it's
anticipated
revisions
are
to
reduce
the
burden
on
organizations
during
and
after
the
application
process.
We
also
want
to
issue
grants
into
the
community.
This
was
for
the
pilot
after
a
three-year
pause,
and
we
wanted
to
ensure
that
we
provided
funding
at
amounts
that
allowed
organizations
to
positively
impact
their
target
Service
Groups.
So
that's
why
we
established
that
twenty
thousand
dollar
award
minimum.
A
So
those
revisions
based
on
those
goals
for
the
pilot
were
that
we
confirm
the
program's
scope
establish
that
award
minimum
increased
a
number
the
number
of
subject
matter.
Experts
on
the
evaluation
panel
improve
the
application
process,
which
included
also
an
information
session
and
a
frequently
asked
questions
document,
and
we
also
introduced
grantee,
informed
reporting
requirements
to
help
reduce
administrative
Behavior
barriers
and
also
to
have
since
they
are
the
subject
matter.
Experts
have
them
in
form
those
reporting
process
next
slide
in
the
next
one.
A
One
of
the
the
things
that
we
realized
through
the
pilot
process
was
that
we
wanted
to
highlight
the
legal
framework
for
this
grant
program.
The
statute
that
governs
this
grant
program
is
the
Community
Development
statute,
which
allows
municipalities
to
disperse
funds
to
support
Community
Development
activities
that
serve
a
public
purpose,
that
the
entity,
which
is
the
city
of
Asheville,
would
otherwise
otherwise
be
able
to
provide,
and
so
that
the
person's
served
are
of
low
to
water
income
and
in
section
A2
of
the
statute.
A
It
says
that
programs
concerned
with
employment,
Economic,
Development
crime
prevention,
Child,
Care,
Health,
Care,
drug
abuse,
education
and
Welfare
needs
of
persons
of
low
and
moderate
income.
So
I
just
wanted
to
highlight
that
language,
because
it
informs
the
parameters
of
our
grant
program
and
the
scope
of
which
we
can
operate
next
slide.
A
And
so
in
December
in
the
Housing
and
Community
Development
Committee,
we
affirmed
the
scope
and
would
like
to
hear
your
feedback
as
well
this
that
the
revised
scope
of
the
Strategic
partnership
grant
program
is
to
eliminate
the
opportunity
Gap
in
Asheville
for
children
and
students,
ages,
K-12
both
low
and
moderate
income.
So
this
Focus
area
is
in
alignment
with
Asheville
City
council's
priorities
of
neighborhood
resilience
and
Equitable
and
diverse
community,
and
that's
where
I
think
local
economy
next
slide
and
next.
A
So
after
we've
gone
through
this
pilot
program
and
as
we
are
thinking
about
launching
into
the
next
round
of
applications,
I
wanted
to
share
some
takeaways
from
our
feedback
that
we
received.
So
shortly
after
the
application
process
for
the
pilot
we
sent
out
a
survey
to
all
31
applicants.
We
received
11
written
responses
and
conducted
three
follow-up
meetings
that
were
requested
and
we
also
solicited
feedback
from
the
evaluation
panel
and
staff
from
across
departments.
A
The
key
themes
from
the
feedback
were
that
the
short
application
period
was
challenging
for
applicants
and
staff
and
that
we
wanted
to
clarify
the
evaluation
process
and
include
more
subject
matter.
Experts
excuse.
A
B
At
the
moment
somehow
councilwoman
Brody
got
kicked
out
of
the
meeting,
so
we
give
her
time
to
rejoin.
Thank
you.
A
Okay
straight
so
yeah,
so
we
wanted
to
clarify
the
evaluation
process
and
including
more
subject
matter
experts
and
also
we
got
feedback
that
the
award
minimum
was
helpful.
But
the
feedback
also
suggested
that
the
minimum
amount
award
amount
could
be
increased
and
another
update
is
that
I,
along
with
staff
from
multiple
different
departments
and
throughout
the
city,
worked
with
the
government
Alliance
for
racial
equity
in
their
NC
Learning
Community
cohort
to
really
apply
the
racial
Equity
tool
kit
and
the
gear
principles
to
this
SPF
grant
program.
A
A
The
applicants
also
presented
to
the
Housing
and
Community
Development
Committee
and
the
evaluation
panel.
So
again
we
received
31
applications
of
which
mine
were
awarded.
The
requested
amount
was
just
under
2
million
dollars
and
again
they
awarded
just
over
375
thousand
dollars
and
the
median
award
amount
requested
was
50
000
and
the
median
award
amount
actually
awarded
was
36
000.,
so
that
kind
of
speaks
to
that
element
of
you
know
is
the
20
000
minimum
high
enough
minimum
or
not
right
next,
so
we
have
eight
fully
executed
agreements.
A
We
have
six
recipients
who
have
received
at
least
one
initial
payment.
Actually
this
has,
it
will
increase
in
the
next
few
days.
Here
the
award
amount
distributed
to
date
is
just
under
a
hundred
and
thirty
thousand.
A
A
So
one
of
the
things
that
this
pilot
program
was
really
helpful
in
understanding
was
especially
because
the
program
had
been
paused
for
some
time
and
through
some
turnover,
this
program
allowed
us
to
really
drill
into
the
data
of
our
operations.
A
So
we
noticed
that
we
can
get
to
make
some
improvements
kind
of
on
the
back
end.
So
the
time
from
receipt
of
the
Grant
application
to
the
award
notification
was
between
15
and
35
days,
depending
on
when
it
was
submitted.
However,
the
medium
days
for
the
agreement
to
be
fully
executed
was
over
90
days.
A
We
did
find
that
we
were
able
to
disperse
payment
fairly
quickly
after
the
award
was
fully
or
the
agreement
was
fully
executed,
and
then
we
did
realize
that
there
were
a
number
of
steps
to
get
to
that
process
to
get
to
that
final
step
of
disbursing
an
award
payment.
A
So
we
have
a
couple
of
recommendations
for
this
next
round
and
that
is
to
lengthen
the
application
period
to
two
months.
We
also
want
to
improve
communication
and
information
sharing
throughout
the
grant
cycle.
Excuse
me:
we
want
to
streamline
the
application
process
and
develop
long-term
program
and
prevents
to
create
a
positive
and
lasting
impact.
A
A
Here's
an
outline
of
our
attention
of
dates
projecting
for
the
upcoming
application
period,
all
right
next.
A
So
again,
our
key
takeaways
are
that
we
are
continuing
to
focus
this
grant
program
on
eliminating
the
opportunity
Gap
in
Asheville
for
a
little
moderate
in
town,
students
that
are
school-aged
youth,
the
grant
program
relaunched
in
the
summer
of
22,
and
that
will
continue
this
current
cycle
while
continuing
to
implement
improvements
and
that's
it
thanks.
D
D
D
So
how
closely
did
the
outcomes
match
the
recommendations
of
our
event
evaluation
panel
moving
forward?
Are
we
going
to
be
convening
an
evaluation
panel
again.
A
So
the
the
short
answer
is
yes:
we're
going
to
convene
an
evaluation
panel,
I'm
hoping
to
broaden
the
scope
of
that,
or
at
least
the
experience
of
the
members
of
that
panel.
A
A
One
of
the
other
kind
of
behind
the
scenes
work
is
really
drilling
down
and
talking
through
what
our
kind
of
evaluative
criteria
are
so
we'll
be
making
some
improvements
to
the
application,
the
evaluation
rubric
and
then
also
talking
through
the
kind
of
buckets
I,
didn't
go
into
it
in
this
presentation,
but
in
the
last
round
you
know
there
are
a
lot
of
factors
that
go
into
creating
the
opportunity
Gap,
which
can
be
quite
Broad,
and
we
noticed
that
specifically
kind
of
that
traditional
education.
A
Focused
programming
was
favored
kind
of
across
the
board
in
the
last
round.
So
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
all
on
the
same
page,
sharing
the
same
definition
in
our
goals
for
this
program.
A
As
far
as
the
evaluation
you
know,
outcomes
versus
what
was
funded
I'll
have
to
go
back
and
look
exactly
at
the
recommendations
from
I,
think
June
or
July,
and
then
compare
with
what
was
funded
but
I.
Think
from
my
memory.
They
were
pretty
well
aligned.
C
B
Okay,
thank
you,
Taylor
I
think
that's
all
for
on
our
agenda.
Is
there
anybody
in
the
speaker
queue
for
public
comment.