►
From YouTube: Governance Committee
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Okay
good
afternoon
and
welcome
to
the
governance
committee
meeting,
it's
been
a
long
time
since
we've
had
a
governance
committee
meeting
so
welcome
to
our
new
member
cameroni
and
actually
gwen.
Whistler
is
a
new
member
of
this
committee.
So
all
new.
This
is
funny
my
scripts
here
that
I'm
supposed
to
read.
So
I
have
all
the
correct
information
says
good
morning
anyway,
all
right
good
afternoon.
A
So
all
council
members
who
are
participating
and
staff
who
are
participating
are
obviously
participating
virtually
and
to
help
our
audience
follow
along
I'll
state.
The
section
of
the
agenda
we're
on
our
agenda
is
not
very
long,
so
that
will
be
easy.
We
are
streaming
live
on
our
virtual
engagement
hub,
which
is
accessible
through
the
virtual
engagement
hub
link
on
the
front
page
of
the
city's
website.
A
So
for
those
of
you
out
there
welcome
for
today's
meeting,
you
will
have
the
option
for
people
to
call
in
and
comment
live
during
the
meeting
to
call
in
and
comment
live
use
the
same
number
855-925-2801
meeting
code,
3405
your
phone
will
be
muted
and
you
will
hear
the
meeting
live
at
this
point.
Callers
will
hear
four
more
options.
Please
press
star,
pressing
star
three
will
allow
callers
to
continue
to
listen,
live
and
join
a
speaker
queue.
A
A
C
A
B
A
So
the
next
item
on
our
agenda
is
the
legislative
agenda,
and
this
is
this
is
some
something
that
we
haven't
adopted
every
year,
but
we
sometimes
try
to
do
as
we
head
into
the
legislative
session.
The
north
carolina
legislature
has
just
convened
and
they
are
beginning
their
work.
Their
bill
filing
deadline
is
just
around
the
corner,
so
we
we
are
quickly
putting
together
a
legislative
agenda
so
that
it
will
be
in
the
hands
of
legislators
prior
to
the
bill,
filing
deadlines.
A
So,
and
I
have
had
a
chance
to
speak
with
some
legislators-
I
think
they.
I
believe
they
are
all
aware
that
this
is
happening
right
now
tonight
at
city
council,
and
so
we
are
hopefully
doing
this
in
a
timely
manner.
A
D
Thank
you,
madam
mayor
and
members
of
the
committee.
The
legislative
agenda
is
something
that
we
have
not
always
done
here
in
asheville,
but
in
years
past
we
have
prepared
one
of
these
as
a
means
to
communicate
to
our
local
delegation
about
those
items
that
the
council
has
both
interest
and
a
general
consensus
in
pursuing
at
a
state
legislative
level.
D
So
this
is
absolutely
not
a
comprehensive
list
of
everything
we
could
possibly
be
interested
in,
but,
generally
speaking,
are
those
items
that
we
believe
are
of
the
highest
priority
and
match
up
with
council's
goal
posts
for
what
we
would
like
to
see
achieved,
benefiting
asheville
either
in
terms
of
a
general
statewide
bill,
or
perhaps
a
local
bill
that
may
help
us
specifically
with
some
of
our
primary
priorities
here.
D
First,
on
the
list
that
I'll
just
go
in
order
is
a
request
for
our
legislature
to
reinstate
what
is
often
called
the
smap
funding,
and
that
is
an
acronym
standing
for
the
restoration
of
a
state
maintenance
assistance
program.
This
particular
state
funded
program
is
fairly
instrumental
in
providing
significant
levels
of
funding
for
local,
primarily
urban
transportation
systems,
extremely
important
and
has
been
recently
significantly
defunded
at
the
state
level.
We
believe
that
puts
public
transit
transportation
systems
in
a
fair
amount
of
jeopardy
locally.
D
Secondarily,
on
the
legislative
agenda
is
a
request
also
dealing
specifically
with
transit,
and
this
is
a
request
to
allow
the
city
the
authority
to
hold
a
referendum
on
the
imposition
of
a
city-specific
one-quarter
sales
tax,
the
funds
of
which
would
be
dedicated
to
transit.
It
is
very,
very
common
for
the
majority
of
the
large
transit
systems
throughout
the
state
to
be
funded
by
a
sales
tax
of
this
nature,
and
currently
state
law
allows
for
these
taxes
to
be
imposed
following
a
referendum
at
a
county
level.
D
These
do
exist
in
a
few
places
currently
in
the
state,
but
they
are
all
done
via
local
legislation,
allowing
cities
or
counties
to
establish
such
a
board.
Currently
asheville
does
not
possess
this
authority,
but
we
believe
it
would
be
an
excellent
step,
moving
us
again
towards
our
continuing
reimagining
of
public
safety
and
fostering
ongoing
community
input
and
oversight,
as
well
as
transparency
with
our
police
department.
D
The
next
item
on
the
list
is
something
that
we've
been
dealing
with
now
for
a
few
years
off
and
on,
which
is
a
request
to
reform
the
local
occupancy
tax.
These
are
the
funds
that
directly
fund
the
tourism
development
authority
here
in
asheville,
and
it's
something
that
we
believe
two
significant
reforms
could
be
made
on
which
would
drastically
improve.
D
I
think
the
utilization
of
the
funds
that
are
collected
one
would
be
to
alter
the
amount
of
funds
that
are
currently
allocated
specifically
towards
the
advertising
budget,
for
the
tda
as
opposed
to
transit
or
excuse
me,
tourism,
related
projects
and,
in
addition
to
this,
a
request
to
reform
the
allowance
for
which
that
remaining
portion
could
be
utilized
for
at
present.
D
We're
only
allowed
with
the
tda's
approval
to
spend
those
sort
of
funds
on
capital
projects
that
advanced
tourism
interest
and
we
believe,
advancing
and
expanding
that
world
of
potential
expenditures
would
also
be
a
tremendous
assistance
to
the
city.
D
The
next
item
on
the
agenda
is
more
of
a
technical
amendment,
but
as
many
people
know,
and
as
those
watching
can
see,
we're
currently
holding
virtual
meetings
prior
to
the
establishment
of
a
state
of
emergency
from
the
governor's
office
and
some
legislation
that
came
out
of
general
assembly
in
conjunction
with
the
state
of
emergency,
was
the
allowance
to
hold
these
types
of
virtual
public
meetings
prior
to
the
declaration
of
emergency.
That
authority
was
not
specified
in
north
carolina
law.
D
We
believe
it's
been
a
highly
effective
tool
under
certain
circumstances
to
be
able
to
continue
public
business
while
still
providing
access
to
the
public
in
the
maximum
extent
possible.
So
we're
asking
for
a
clarification
in
the
existing
law
to
allow
local
municipalities
either
throughout
their
own
declarations
of
emergency
or,
as
they
see
fit,
to
continue
to
conduct
virtual
meetings.
D
Finally,
one
more
additional
technical
amendment
again,
this
stems
from
one
of
the
changes
that
we've
dealt
with
during
the
coven
19
pandemic,
which
involves
the
rules
for
voting
following
public
hearings.
Currently,
there
is
a
very
disjointed
process
that
requires
meetings
to
occur.
Two
meetings
to
occur
before
you
can
vote.
D
This
is
actually
contrary
to
all
other
items
that
public
bodies
currently
vote
on
at
the
same
meetings.
We
would
still
have
the
public
hearing
under
this
proposal.
We
would
still
accept
all
public
input
but
be
able
to
actually
vote
at
the
same
meeting,
as
has
always
been
the
case
in
the
past
and
is
currently
the
case
for
all
other
action
items
on
the
agenda.
D
So
those
are
the
items
that
we've
included
on
the
proposed
legislative
agenda
agenda
for
this
committee
and
later
on
council's
consideration,
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions
that
the
committee
would
have
about
this
or
the
process.
I
will
add
that,
if
approved,
we
will
be
affording
it
immediately
to
all
the
members
of
our
local
delegation
and
thanking
them,
obviously
for
their
service,
but
asking
for
their
support
in
moving
these
initiatives
forward
through
the
general
assembly.
A
Okay,
thanks
brad,
and
this
if
this
passes
out
of
this
committee
it
will.
It
is
scheduled
to
be
heard
on
the
agenda
this
tonight
city
council
meeting,
which
is
now
less
than
two
hours
away.
So
are
there
any
questions?
Comments?
Yes,
gwen.
B
A
couple
questions
brad:
do
we
have
any
idea
why
the
general
assembly
did
this
this
legislation
around
public
comments,
I
mean-
was
it
I
mean
I'm
just
trying
to
get
a
sense
of
that
like
did.
They
think
that
people
didn't
have
an
opportunity
to
weigh
in
or.
D
I'm
a
bit
confused
myself,
several
city
attorneys
and
county
attorneys
throughout
the
state
have
debated
this.
We've
we've
sought
the
council
of
school
government
as
well
as
members
with
connections
within
the
general
assembly.
I
I
believe
there's
the
possibility
that
this
could
have
been
an
oversight.
D
This
bill
was
put
together
very
rapidly
in
order
to
respond
to
the
pandemic
and
allow
these
types
of
public
meetings
to
continue,
but
it
does
seem
to
be
contradictory
to
the
allowance
to
vote
at
the
same
meeting
on
all
other
agenda
items
right,
so
we
believe
that
they
wanted
to
allow
for
public
comments,
but,
quite
frankly,
many
municipalities
in
the
state
are
currently
voting
at
the
same
meetings
anyway.
So
we
think
that
clarification
on
this
item
would
help
consistency
throughout
the
state.
Okay,.
B
A
Get
we
haven't
had
we've
had
discussions
about
it,
but
there
has
so
far
not
been.
This
has
not
been
a
priority
for
the
county,
and
you
know,
I
think
part
of
the
problem
for
the
county
is
that
it?
You
know
when
we
were
talking
about
this.
Over
a
year
ago,
we
were
on
the
heels
of
the
scandal
involving
the
av
tech
quarter,
sales
quarter,
sales,
tax
and,
and
I
would
offer
their
you
know-
the
distinction
here.
A
The
quarter
cent
sales
tax
used
for
a
b
tech
was
actually
it
was
a
statute
statute
that
allowed
a
referendum
on
a
quarter
cent
sales
tax
for
the
use
of
something,
but
it
was
somewhat
open-ended
and
and
required
the
implementation
of
the
county
at
their
discretion.
I
mean
really.
Whereas
what
we're
talking
about
here
is
a
quarter
cent
sales
tax
for
transit
and
there
are
tight
guidelines
for
how
the
money
can
be
spent
it
can.
A
It
is
not
open-ended
a
future
council
could
not
at
their
discretion
change
how
the
money
was
spent.
It
has
to
be
spent
not
only
on
transit,
but
it
has
to
be
spent
on
transit
services
that
enhance
our
current
services.
So
we
can't
even
use
it
to
displace
funding
that
that
we're
currently
using
so
it
would,
it
would
have
to
be
dedicated
to
only
providing
increased
transit
services.
It's
a
very
narrow,
very
narrow
allowance.
A
So
and
that's
not
a
problem
for
us,
because
we
have
a
transit
master
plan
that
calls
for
all
kinds
of
enhancements
to
our
transit
services,
and
we
think
the
estimate
of
how
much
money
this
would
bring
in
would
would
get
pretty
close
to
covering
those
expenditures,
but
not
not
even
all
of
that
enhancement.
That's
been
planned
for
in
our
transit
master
plan.
B
Okay-
and
I
I
think
I
probably
know
the
you
know-
senator
edwards
has
put
in
that-
or
you
know
suggested-
that
any
municipality
that
reduces
its
funding
for
its
police
department
should
be
defunded
in
another
area.
B
A
I
mean,
I
certainly
think
we
could
add
to
this
and
add
our
you
know
state
our
opposition
to
that
legislation
and,
in
addition
to
that,
the
legal
municipalities
has
already
made
some
public
statements
about
that
legislation
and
their
concerns
about
it.
Also
it's
unintended
consequences.
A
You
know
I
think,
for
in
senator
edward's
mind
it's
intended
only
to
be
targeted
at
cities
who
quote
unquote,
defund
the
police,
but
in
reality
there
are
municipalities
that
may
have
expenditures
one
year
like
buying
police
vehicles
and
then
their
budget's,
not
as
large
the
next
year,
and
it
may
have
the
unintended
consequence
of
punishing
those
cities
as
well
or
cities
that
are
suffering
financially
and
their
budgets
are
just
atrophying.
Naturally,
from
from
you
know,
smaller
revenue
sources.
A
So
so
I
think
we
could
add
that,
but
I
do
want
to
make
sure
people
know
that
the
organizations
that
lobby
on
behalf
of
cities
are
also
working
hard
on
this
issue.
I
spoke
with
representative
brian
turner
last
night
and
he
he
believes
that
the
leadership
will
probably
bring
that
legislation
forward
for
a
vote.
A
It
may
not
be,
you
know,
go
all
the
way
to
enactment,
but
but
it
may
be
debated
at
least
and
considered
for
a
floor
vote.
So,
let's
add
that
all
right.
B
I
would
just
I
would
just
suggest
that
we
add
something
along
those
lines.
You
know
just
again
to
that,
we're
paying
attention,
and
I
think
it's
I
mean,
as
you
indicate
since
the
league
is
also
in
agreement
with
us.
I
just
think
adding
our
name
to
it
would
help.
C
Yes
and
thank
you
gwen
for
bringing
those
issues,
as
I
think
about
what
it
means
to
be
responsible
for
our
tax
dollars
and
to
use
them
responsibly
for
our
core
city
services,
including
public
safety
in
general.
C
We
have
a
responsibility
here
that
our
budget
plans
and
policies
meet
the
needs
of
our
community
and
the
fact
that
one
word
might
get
in
the
way.
I
just
think
about
a
city.
That's
like
shrinking
or
changing
to
a
different
way
of
doing
things
might
be
affected.
If
we
have
a
chance
to
stand
with
others,
I
think
it's
wise.
C
I
do
have
a
couple
other
questions,
but
do
we
need
to
offer
anything
more
to
brad
for
instruction
on
that
before
it
can
come
to
council
tonight?.
A
D
Yes,
and
and
when
we
make
that
motion
just
for
a
record,
if
we
can
include
as
part
of
the
motion
with
the
addition
of
a
request
to
oppose
senate
bill
100.
C
Okay,
that
sounds
good
so
before
we
make
that
motion,
can
I
ask
some
questions
about
the
rest
of
it?
Okay,
let's
go
back
to
the
restoration
of
state
maintenance
assistance
programming,
so
I
did
some
research
to
figure
out
what
are
some
other
groups
in
western
north
carolina
that
might
be
affected
by
this
and
henderson
county
with
the
apple
country.
Transit
system
also
relies
on
smap
funding.
So
if
we
can
go
past
a
local
bill
and
coordinate
with
our
neighbors
here
in
western
north
carolina,
I
think
it'll
have
some
greater
strength.
C
So
I'm
not
sure
what
the
impact
is
on
henderson,
but
if,
if
we
have
a
chance
to
coordinate
efforts,
I
think
that'll
strengthen
our
argument
for
the
quarter
cent
sales
tax.
I
think
it's
important
for
us
to
stand
with
our
new
senator
julie,
mayfield.
C
We
might
want
to
do
the
same
thing
with
this
map
and
see.
If
there's,
we
can
go
beyond
a
local
bill.
C
So
if
there's
a
way
to
expand
language
around
that
for
a
quarter
cent
sales
tax
for
transit-
I
don't
know
if
it's
possible
to
go
through
the
league
of
municipalities
or
an
organization
like
that,
so
that
we
can
see
if
there
are
other
cities
seeking
to
do
that,
because
just
for
asheville
being
able
to
expand
service,
as
we
know,
means
being
able
to
go
ahead
and
do
the
fiscal
year
two
of
the
transit
master
plan,
so
that
south
asheville
has
more
frequent
service.
C
C
C
A
This
is
on
the
quarter,
cent
sales
tax
for
transit,
so
this
is
one
of
the
items
that
has
been
discussed,
at
least
by
metro
mayors
in
the
last
couple
of
years,
because
it
is
desired
by
other
cities
across
the
state.
There
has
been
discussion
about
whether
whether
we
could
try
to
get
statewide
legislation.
That
would
be
the
goal,
but
there
hasn't
been.
A
There
hasn't
been
movement
on
that
and
all
and
and
quite
frankly,
we're
kind
of
collateral
damage
in
the
big
fight,
the
legislature's.
Having
with
the
triangle
the
triangle
counties
over
light
rail,
which
is
you
know
anyway,
not
that's,
not
our
issue,
but
so
I
think
that's
been
an
impediment,
but
it's
definitely
it's
definitely
an
agenda
item
for,
for
the
the
large
metro
cities
across
the
state.
C
Okay-
so
I
don't
know
if
we
want
to
like
have
a
step
after
that,
but
I
would
like
for
us
to
somehow
pursue
that.
Maybe
that's
not
our
fight
yet,
but
just
for
all
of
north
carolina
having
a
great
new
deal
in
a
way
to
support
people
being
able
to
move
equitably
without
use
of
fossil
fuels
should
be
a
good.
C
Yes,
that
sounds
great
okay,
so
moving
on
to
the
authority
for
establishment
of
civilian
oversight,
I
really
appreciate
the
language.
That's
used
around
civilian
oversight,
so
I
am
recently
aware
of
a
coalition
of
north
carolina
general
assembly
representatives
that
may
have
coordinated
a
statewide
legislation
on
draft
for
this
a
few
years
ago.
I
couldn't
find
any
specifics,
but
I
don't
want
us
to
miss
the
opportunity
for
a
statewide
bill,
and
part
of
this
is
the
reason
it's
showing
up.
C
So
much
in
my
comments
today
is
because
a
lot
of
times
we
get
singled
out
in
western
north
carolina,
and
I
think
that
we're
missing
an
opportunity
to
build
that
coalition
together,
if
it's
already
floating
around
or
if
they're,
if,
if
I
can
get
some
help
finding
out
where
that
came
from
before,
ultimately
with
public
safety
as
a
core
service
of
the
city
of
asheville,
this
has
to
be
more
than
just
a
sounding
board
for
complaints.
C
So
it
does
seem
like
civilian
oversight
is
part
of
it,
but
if
we
can
add
some
language
around
the
like
oversight
of
policy
and
procedure,
I
think
that
would
get
to
the
spirit
of
my
concern.
D
Thank
you
for
those
comments.
Councilwoman
rony,
let
me
say
also
that
with
the
legislative
agenda,
you're
seeing
just
a
very
general
overview
without
going
too
much
into
the
details.
But
what
we
can
say
with
regard
to
this
particular
item
is
my
office
has
been
working
closely
with
numerous
stakeholders
over
several
months
now.
D
Actually
developing
proposed
specific
bill
language
on
this
that
we
hope
to
be
able
to
share
in
advance
with
the
goal
of
essentially
trying
to
incorporate
support
and
a
coalition
among
multiple
municipalities
throughout
the
state
in
order
to
advance
a
general
bill.
That
would
not
be
specific
to
asheville,
but
would
allow
this
authority
to
be
provided
to
cities
throughout
the
state
if
they
chose
to
utilize
it
and
many
of
the
tools
that
you're
talking
about
are
some
of
the
very
things
that
we
are
incorporating
into
this.
I
will
say
it
is.
D
It
is
always
a
bit
of
a
compromise,
because
there
are
multiple
groups
that
have
interest
in
these
things
that
we
try
to
have
a
little
bit
of
give
and
take.
So
you
can't
always
request
with
some
of
these
more
difficult
bills.
Everything
that
you
want,
but
we
have,
I
think,
made
considerable
headway
with.
D
I
will
commend
some
of
the
local
police
groups
and
their
support
to
allow
for
expanded
access
to
things
like
body
cam
footage
personnel
records
in
the
review
of
some
of
the
cases
that
would
come
before
that
body
and
we
hope
to
be
able
to
expand
that
as
much
as
possible
with
the
goal
of
having
a
body
with
a
true
meaningful
force
behind
it
and
one
that
gives
a
certain
amount
of
power
and
transparency
to
the
community
where
we
feel
like
would
pay
the
biggest
dividend
for
all
sides
concerns.
D
So
we're
looking
at
some
of
those
very
things.
The
bill
that
you
mentioned
actually
was
floated
several
years
ago.
It
did
not
make
it
very
far
for
the
general
assembly,
but
we
actually
used
that
as
our
starting
point.
When
we
began
drafting
language
that
we
thought
would
actually
be
an
improvement
over
that
deal.
That
is
much
more
tailor-made
to
providing
a
greater
deal
of
access
to
the
board
of
some
of
the
materials.
We
think
they
would
need
to
be
able
to
make
very
good
individual
decisions,
as
well
as
policy
recommendations.
A
I
think
that
bill
was
house
bill
193
in
the
2015
session.
That
sounds
right.
C
I
also
have
one
thing
about
the
occupancy
tax,
so
knowing
that
we
have
to
move
past
the
minimum
of
33
to
66
split
to
the
next
step
of
a
50
50
split
at
minimum,
because
we're
embarrassingly
behind
on
addressing
our
infrastructure
needs
for
our
residents,
workers
and
visitors.
One
would
think
that
if
you
know
the
system
and
the
city
and
the
way
to
move
around,
a
city
worked
well
for
the
people
who
lived
and
worked
here.
C
It
would
work
even
better
for
the
people
who
visited
here,
but
I
think
we
also
need
to
have
something
in
here
that
addresses
representation.
That's
reflective
of
the
people
of
buncombe
county
that
could
look
like
the
art
sector,
food
and
beverage,
hotel
workers,
homestay
permit
holders
and
those
with
professional
and
lived
experience
outside
of
the
industry.
C
So
I
know
right
now
we're
looking
for
that
like
broad
statement
of
support,
but
are
we
going
to
see
some
language
around
the
seating?
Because
I
know
there's
talk
about
whether
or
not
the
city
will
have
a
say
or
just
the
county,
but
if
we
can
support
that
that
it
should
reflect
the
residents
of
the
county,
then
maybe
we'll
get
closer.
D
So
that
that
is
certainly
one
of
the
other
elements
that
has
been
publicly
debated
lately
and
I'm
happy
to
include
that
as
an
additional
allowance
to
increase
the
requirements
or
excuse
me
to
expand
the
spectrum
of
those
who
could
sit
on
the
board
away
from
just
those
people
who
are
sort
of
directly
owning
a
tourism
or
lodging
business.
And
I
think
that
that's
certainly
on
the
table.
If
this
commission
or
excuse
me,
this
committee
would
like
to
recommend
that
edition.
C
I
would
like
to
see
if
it
would
have
that
sort
of
council
consensus,
so
if
it's
possible
to
bring
that
out
of
this
group,
that
would
be
welcome
and
then
the
last
thing
I
have
is
authority
for
electronic
meetings.
Just
because
we've
been
rooting
for
this.
For
a
long
time,
I've
been
attending
public
meetings
for
seven
years
now,
and
I
just
see
how
this
increases
not
only
accessible
equitable
access
for
participation,
so
that
folks
can
provide
input,
but
also
for
public
service.
C
D
And
if
I
could
add
very
quickly
on
that,
I
think
on
this
particular
item,
it's
it's
worth
noting
that
I
have
been
coordinating
on
this
particular
request
with
multiple
cities
around
the
state
who
are
utilizing
the
same
language
in
their
legislative
agendas
as
well.
So
we
are
not
the
only
ones
at
the
table
who
will
be
asking
for
this
particular
edition.
A
Yeah,
I
would
be
glad
for
that.
I
just
wanted
to
say
kim
on
the
description
of
the
additional
board
members
for
the
tda
seats.
I
don't
know
if
you
want
to
just
sort
of
generally
express
that
we
want
to
see
broader
community
representation
on
the
board
and
kind
of
leave
it
at
that.
I
do
know
that
earlier
drafts
last
year
before
the
pandemic
that
were
being
kicked
around
did
add
seats.
A
For
you
know,
of
course,
all
the
board
seats
have
a
description
that
go
with
them,
but
I
think
it
included
short-term
rental
or
people
from
the
who
might
be
more
on
entertainment
side.
It
was,
it
was
a
different.
You
know
a
different.
It
tried
to
broaden
the
representation
to
include
a
broader
representation
from
the
tourism
economy.
C
D
Like
it
looks
like
it,
I
believe
so,
arts
and
entertainment,
the
services
sector,
as
well
as
homestay.
C
And
I
would
personally
like
to
see
a
goal
of
it
of
the
membership
reflecting
the
mem
like
the
residents
of
buncombe
county.
I
feel
like
the
thing
is
when
we
just
are
leaving
it
to
an
owning
class,
that
we
were
really
leaving
out
some
professional
and
lived
experience
at
the
table.
That
could
help
to
shift
our
narrative
to
like
a
more
holistic.
D
B
So
brad
will
you
will
you
be
providing
kind
of
a
marked
up
copy
so
that
people
can
see
what
changed
between
what
was
on
the
agenda
and
what
we're
going
to
be
voting
on.
D
B
Okay,
well
with
that,
I
would
second
kim's
motion.
A
Okay,
so
we
have
a
motion
in
a
second
and
do
we
have
anyone
in
the
queue
that
would
like
to
speak
on
this
item.
A
And
we
did
not
receive
any
comments
ahead
of
the
meeting,
but
we
do
have
people
signed
up
to
speak
tonight
when
this
item
comes
up
on
the
agenda,
all
right
so
with
that
I'll
just
do
a
quick
roll
call
vote,
councilwoman,
roney,
hi,
councilwoman,
whistler,
hi,
and
then
myself,
I
okay.
So
the
next
item
on
our
agenda
would
be
public
comment,
but
if
we
don't
have
anyone
in
the
speaker
queue
and
unless
they
joined
us
in
the
last
30
seconds,
I
assume
we
don't.
Then
I
will
close
the
close.