►
From YouTube: Boards & Commissions – February 14, 2023
Description
Regular meeting of the Asheville City Council's Boards & Commissions Committee.
Access the agenda and other meeting materials at the City of Asheville website: https://www.ashevillenc.gov/government/city-council-committees/boards-and-commissions-committee/
Participate before and during the meeting on our public engagement hub: https://publicinput.com/KF8453
A
B
Good
afternoon,
everyone
I'm
vice
mayor
Kilgore
and
chair
of
the
board
of
commissions
I'm,
a
committee
and
I'd
like
to
welcome
you
to
the
February
14
2023
remote
meeting.
All
Council
committee
members
and
staff
are
participating
virtually
to
help
our
audience
follow
along
I'll
State.
Each
section
of
the
agenda
allowed.
B
We
are
streaming
live
on
the
virtual
engagement
Hub,
which
is
accessible
through
the
virtual
engagement
Hub
link
on
the
front
page
of
the
City
website.
We
also
have
an
option
for
public
to
Listen
by
phone.
For
those
of
you
out
there
with
us
today,
we'd
like
to
welcome
you
for
today's
meeting.
We
have
the
option
for
all
people
in
the
call
to
call
in
and
come
in,
live
during
the
meeting
to
call
in
and
comment,
Live
use
the
same
number.
B
855-925-2801
meeting
code
9478,
your
phone
will
be
muted
and
you
will
hear
the
meeting
live
at
this
point.
The
speaker
will
be
you.
Speakers
will
need
to
push
the
star
3
to
enter
into
the
speaker.
Queue.
It's
not
like
to
do.
The
Roll,
Call
I
will
go
through
and
introduce
the
committee
members
and
staff
who
are
participating
virtually
Council
Council
and
staff
I'd
like
to
for
you
to
say
a
quick
hello
when
I
announce
your
name:
councilwoman
Antoinette,
Mosley,
hello,
assistant
city
manager,
I
mean
councilwoman
Kim
Rooney
good
afternoon
assistant
city
manager,
Ben
Woody,.
A
B
B
And
first
I'd
like
to
open
a
meeting
with
the
approval
of
January
10
2023
minutes
can
I
get
a
motion?
Okay
now,
second,
okay!
Thank
you!
So
now
we'll
do
a
roll
call
and
councilwoman
Mosley
aye
councilwoman,
Rooney
aye
and
myself
Kilgore
aye.
B
Okay,
at
this
time,
I'd
like
to
check
and
see,
if
there's
any,
do
we
have
anything
one
in
the
queue
for
public
comment.
B
So
we
do
not
have
any
callers,
we'll
move
on
to
the
new
business
and,
at
this
time,
we'd
like
to
actually
present
the
board
appointments
and
vacancies,
and
first
of
all,
we
have
the
Asheville
area
and
Riverfront
development
Commission.
B
We
have
two
vacancies
and
the
this
must
be
a
district,
a
business
or
property
owners
for
this
particular
position,
and
the
chair
recommends
appointment
of
Joe
Falcon
for
appointment
for
the
business
owner's
seat
and
recommends
collecting
additional
applications
and
postponing
the
second
appointment,
which
must
be
a
district
business
or
District
property
owner,
can
I
get
a
promotion
just
removed.
B
B
It's
a
roll
call,
councilwoman
Mosley,
aye,
councilwoman,
Rooney
aye
and
myself
councilman
Kilgore
aye
foreign
committee.
We
did
not
receive
any
applications
so
that
will
be
re-advertised
and
for
the
design
Review
Committee,
the
chair
and
staff
liaison
both
recommends.
The
appointment
of
Michael
McDonald
can
I
get
a
motion.
D
A
B
As
for
the
downtown
commission,
the
chair
and
the
staff
liaison
recommends
extending
the
advertising
to
get
more
applicants.
D
B
D
To
vote
on
that
yeah
on
that
one,
and
we
could
answer
the
question
that
I
had
at
another
date.
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
if
we
do
have
other
vacancies
that
we're
prepared
for
the
next
agenda.
Absolutely
thank.
B
You
is
this
Sarah,
this
is
for
the
design
committee.
Okay,
so
now
we're
talking
about
the
downtown
commission
and
basically,
what
they
did
is
recommended.
The
application
period
get
extended
so
and
I'd
just
like
to
know.
If
we
have
a
motion
to
re-advertise
for
this
position,
vice.
D
Mayor
Kilgore
for
point
of
order,
could
we
go
back
and
I
do
realize?
I
asked
a
question.
We
had
a
motion
and
second
for
design
review.
Should
we
move
forward
with
a
vote
I'm
prepared
to
support,
we
made
a
motion
to
approve
or
to
recommend
Michael
McDonald.
Yes,.
B
Yes,
okay,
so
we
get
a
motion
a
second,
so
that
I
could
do
a
roll
call
for
that,
so
hi,
the
councilwoman,
okay,
councilman,
liberally,
hi
and
bye.
Thank
you
Kim.
For
that
appreciate.
It.
B
Okay,
thank
you
now.
The
thing
is,
we
do
have
two
applicants
for
that
position
and
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
none
of
the
council
members
were
interested
in
putting
those
forward.
D
I
think
we
had
some
strong
applicants.
I
think
I
noticed
Bill's
application
from
Urban
three,
and
we
have.
We
often
have
fantastic
applicants
for
our
advisory
boards
and
also
an
opportunity
to
and
bring
more
people
to
the
table
through
increasing
the
length
of
the
invitation,
so
I
do
support
the
recommendation
of
The,
Advisory,
Board
and
staff
to
do
so.
Thank
you.
D
B
You
thank
you
so
for
the
homeless
initiative
advisory
committee,
the
boarding
chair
the
board
chair
and
the
staff
liaison
recommends.
Postponing
that
appointment
also
can
I
get
a
motion.
B
A
B
D
So
I
think,
if,
as
procedurally
and
what
we've
done
in
the
past
is,
if
there
aren't
applications
or
we're
pursuing
some
specific
experience
or
we're
just
going
to
we're
going
to
leave
the
application
process
open,
then
we
we
don't
make
a
motion,
because
our
emotions
around
these
recommendations
are
when
we
have
applicants
that
we
think
the
council
should
appoint.
Otherwise,
we
could
just
make
a
note
that
we're
going
to
pursue
additional
applications,
and
we
can
also
this
is
a
great
opportunity
to
invite
people
to
apply
to
our
advisory
boards.
Thank.
B
You,
okay
and
the
multimodal
Transportation
committee.
We
basically
have
no
recommendations
received
so
we'll
move
on
to
the
neighborhood
advisory
committee.
We
have
two
vacancies
and
the
chair
recommends
the
appointment,
Michael,
Fulbright
and
Jackie
Smith
can
I
get
a
motion
and
a
second
for
this.
Yes,
so
moved.
Second.
D
I
would
make
a
second
for
Fulbright
and
I
believe
it
may
be.
Jake
Smith,
big
Smith.
B
Okay,
thank
you.
Okay,
so
roll
call
internet,
Mosley,
hi
everyone
and
myself
councilman
Gilmore
I.
D
Thank
you
vice
mayor
Kilgore,
so
I
wanted
to
take
a
moment
to
go
back
to.
We
didn't
have
a
recommendation
for
the
multimodal
Transportation
Commission,
but
we
do
have.
It
looks
like
five
applicants
and
in
reviewing
those
applications.
I
realized
that
some
of
the
applications
are
have
been
in
the
queue
for
a
little
while,
for
example,
Elise
martyr
is
on
the
neighborhood
advisory
committee.
Now,
which
is
one
of
the
three
boards
that
Elise
was
interested
in
serving
on.
We
also
have
a
multimodal
Transportation
Commission
representative.
D
That's
a
non-voting
member
of
the
neighborhood
advisory
committee.
So
well
you
have
that
connection
between
neighborhoods
and
multimodal
and
right
now.
Neighborhood
advisory
committee
already
has
that
Connecting
Point,
but
I
wondered
if
Elise
is
still
interested
in
being
on
the
multimodal
as
a
fully
voting
member
and
therefore
serving
on
two
boards
or
if
that
might
mean
that
Elise
doesn't
have
to
be
appointed
to
them.
D
Multimodal
which
was
elise's
first
choice
top
priority,
but
could
instead
actually
be
the
neighborhood
advisory
liaison
so
as
the
liaison
to
Neighborhood
advisory
committee
I'm
committed
to
following
up
with
the
leads
just
to
see
what
the
logistics
are
and
if
Elizabeth's
like
this
world
is
interested
or
maybe
they
want
to
be
able
to
pass
up
a
ton
at
some
point
from
neighborhood
to
that
role.
That
might
give
us
a
better
picture.
When
we
come
to
our
next
boards
and
commissions
committee
meeting
on
which
vacancies
we
have
and
who's
willing
to
be
in
that
position.
D
B
Thank
you
very
much,
Kim
appreciate
you
following
up
on
that.
At
this
time
we
do
have
a
presentation
from
the
sustainability
advisory
committee
and
energy
environment.
We
have
Tim
Orman,
who
will
be
doing
that
presentation
this
morning.
C
Good
afternoon
everybody-
and
it's
not
quite
a
presentation-
it's
more
of
a
summary
of
a
proposed
resolution
just
to
keep
it
simple.
In
the
evolution
of
Stacy,
the
sustainability
advisory
committee
on
energy
and
in
the
environment,
there
have
been
some
changes
over
the
many
years.
It's
been
in
existence
and
one
of
the
changes
that
we're
requesting
is
to
have
all
of
our
appointments,
be
at
large
appointments
so
that
we
can
focus
on
particular
Target
issues
and
with
the
the
appropriate
expertise.
C
Currently
we
don't
have
those
qualifications
on
the
board,
but
we
do
have
other
qualified
members
that
are
well
suited
to
the
working
groups
that
we
have.
So
that's
the
the
first
aspect
is
to
have
all
of
our
appointments
at
large
to
give
more
flexibility,
and
then
the
second
is
is
just
a
simplification
of
our
committee
name
from
sustainability,
advisory
committee
on
energy
and
the
environment
to
Simply
sustainability,
advisory
committee,
and
we
think
that
that
is
helpful
and
that
it
broadens
our
scope.
C
Some
of
our
our
issues,
let's
say
with
with
regard
to
community
resilience,
are
kind
of
maybe
broadened
Beyond,
Just,
Energy
and
the
environment.
So
those
are
the
two
requests
in
this
resolution
and
I'd
be
happy
to
respond
to
any
questions
you
have.
D
Thank
you
so
I
will
say,
though
a
name
change
is
appreciated,
and
this
broadened
scope
is
certainly
understood
over
the
years.
I
have
appreciated
that
the
sexy
name
has
made
me
have
to
thank
every
single
time
about
energy
in
the
environment,
so
the
complexity
has
required
me
to
focus
I
wonder
if
that
has
had
the
same
effect
for
our
community.
D
Can
you
speak
a
little
bit
more
to
the
areas
of
the
scope
that
maybe
you
feel
like
Stacy
hasn't
yet
been
able
to
do
that
inreach
or
Outreach
around,
and
what
we
could
expect
to
see
all
in
the
future
work
plans.
Because
of
the
broaden
scope?
Do
you
have
a
picture
of
that
yet
or
maybe
in
the
future?.
C
So,
currently
we
have
three
working
groups:
each
with
three
members
of
CC,
one
of
the
new
ones
that
we're
excited
about
is
a
storm
water
and
green
infrastructure
working
group,
the
second
one
we're
calling
Community
resilience,
then
the
third
is
energy
and
carbon,
and
so
these,
the
one
particularly
that's
Community
resilient,
does
doesn't
necessarily
fall
in
the
categories
strictly
of
energy
and
environment,
although
it's
all
connected
of
course.
C
So
that's
where
we
are
now
in
in
the
future,
I
guess
who
knows
we?
We
do
think
that
there'll
be
more
focus
on
resilience
in
general,
especially
with
regard
to
climate
change,
and
so
this
was
kind
of
a
maybe
a
two-for-one
resolution.
Since
we
were
we're
already
going
to
request
about
the
at-large
appointments,
we
thought
might
that
might
be
also
beneficial
just
to
simplify
the
name,
but
I
do
appreciate
what
you
shared
and
it
does
help
to
to
Think
Through.
D
Thank
you
for
that
answer.
I
really
appreciate
that
so
I
wonder
now
that
there's
going
to
be
a
specific
subgroup
around
storm
water,
we
have
some
Regional
storm
water
activity
groups
happening
and
forming
that
are
looser.
We
have
a
storm
water
recommendation
that
it's
kind
of
seen
that
that
work
is
maybe
at
a
finished
place,
but
we
definitely
know
that
it
needs
some
action
points
and
revisiting.
D
Has
there
been
some
Outreach
from
the
Stacy
group
as
you're
forming
this
storm
water
work
group
to
be
able
to
do
Outreach
in
the
community?
That's
already
had
some
of
that
work
established.
Will
you
be
working
with
the
documentation
that's
already
available,
or
is
there
a
goal
to
start
fresh
from
where
we
are
now
and
create
a
new
work
plan
around
it?.
C
That's
a
great
question
or
a
great
series
of
questions.
We
definitely
want
to
build
on
the
history
of
what's
been
done,
what's
been
successful
and
what
remains
undone,
we
understand
there
was
a
stormwater
task
force
that
had
some
good
momentum
and
ideas.
I,
don't
think
it
really
had.
Maybe
the
ability
to
carry
out
the
recommended
actions.
C
D
I
would
make
a
move
or
I
move
to
recommend
that
we
accept
the
recommendations
both
on
changing
the
membership
categories
of
the
committee
to
at
large
and
the
name
chain
to
sustainability
advisory
committee.
Well,.
B
B
That's
true
thanks,
but
now
we'd
like
to
move
on
to
our
quarterly
appointment,
a
proposal
that
will
be
done
by
service
Santa,
Claus.
A
All
right
so
hello,
everybody
I,
am
Sarah
gross
I'm.
The
deputy
clerk
Jerry
and
I
work
closely
on
this
preparing
this.
Unfortunately,
she
couldn't
be
with
us
today,
but
please
know
that
she's
a
big
part
in
pulling
all
this
together,
all
right.
So
what
it
is
the
clerk's
office
we
are
proposing
that
we
move
the
boards
and
commission's
appointments
from
currently
monthly
to
a
quarterly
process.
The
purpose
we've
heard
this
feedback
from
board
chairs
and
Boards,
but
also
just
in
an
evaluation
of
our
current
processes
within
the
clerk's
office.
A
This
first
meeting
introducing
the
idea
we're
not
looking
to
make
any
action,
but
we
do
want
to
get
your
feedback
with
the
hopes
of
bringing
it
back
in
at
our
March
meeting
for
a
vote
of
support.
If,
if
we're
there
and
then
for
and
then
next
I
want
to
just
note
that
we
did
do
an
equity
inclusion
assessment
and
nothing
surface,
so
just
starting
off
all
right.
Looking
at
our
current
process,
where
we're
at
right
now,
as
this
committee
is
very
aware,
we
do
the
council
conducts
appointments
every
month.
A
This
allows
for
roughly
two
weeks
of
advertising
the
board
vacancies
and
three
to
four
days
for
board
chairs
and
if
the
time
allows
for
the
full
committee
to
make
a
recommendation
that
comes
to
this
Council
committee
and
then
to
council
for
appointments.
It
is
a
quick
turnaround
also
for
the
administrative
side,
compiling
and
processing
all
the
applications
so
and
currently,
where
we're
at.
We
are
seeing
a
number,
a
increased
number
in
resignation,
as
well
as
a
decreased
number
in
applications,
so
hoping
to
approve
upon
that.
A
What
we
are
proposing,
what
that
would
look
like
again,
going
from
monthly
appointments
to
quarterly
looking
at
potentially-
and
this
is
tentative
making
appointments
in
January
April
July
October.
Would
you
anticipate
that
there
may
be
some
exceptions,
including
our
state
mandated
boards
looking
at
their
their
state
mandated
legislation,
but
also
Causeway
judicial
boards
and
Urgent
appointments
that
may
come
up
as
necessary?
So
it's
not
hard
and
fast,
but
we'd
like
to
stick
to
the
quarterly
and
also
in
your
attached
documents.
A
Additionally,
on
those
off
months,
we
would
hope
and
propose
to
do
a
more
robust
and
regularly
scheduled
trainings
for
new
board
members.
So
what
that
could
look
like
if
we
have
a
cohort
of
new
members
in
January
holding
a
new,
a
new
member
orientation
or
training
in
the
the
following
months
during
that
span.
A
So
again,
we
kind
of
create
a
cohort
of
new
members
who
go
through
the
process
together
and
then
likewise
hope
to
expand
our
Outreach
really
take
the
time
to
look
at
hard
to
fill
seats
and
do
more
targeted
and
expand
the
Outreach
there
so
proposed
Highline
again
this
meeting,
we
are
proposing
the
ideal
looking
for
some
feedback
from
the
committee
and
then
in
March.
A
We
hope
to
come
back
with
any
kind
of
revisions
that
we
might
talk
about
today,
or
even
that
we
hear
from
board
chairs
board
members
and
stakeholders
in
the
next
month
or
so
to
come
back
to
this
committee
for
a
vote
of
support.
This
does
not
need
to
go
to
the
full
Council
because
it
is
more
or
less
operational
so,
but
we
did
think
it
was
very
important
for
this
committee
to
approve
or
support
this.
A
What
would
be
a
big
change
so,
if
approved
or
if
supported
in
March
April,
we
would
hope
to
do
a
communication,
slash
out
campaign
Outreach
to
notify
those
who
would
be
affected
and
what
to
expect
moving
forward
and
with
that,
the
proposed
change
could
be
effective
for
what
we're
calling
the
summer
cycle
in
which
we'd
be
advertising
in
April.
For
those
vacancies
to
make
appointments
in
July
so
you're.
Seeing
that
expanded
Outreach
there.
A
All
right
so
just
some
key
things
that
we
that
we
would
measure.
How
is,
is
this
working
some
metrics
to
chat
to
that
we
would
be
tracking.
Of
course,
the
application
is
received.
The
number
of
representations
received
also
tracking
how
many
trainings
are
held
and
the
attendance
that
we
are
getting
for
the
trainings,
also
really
thinking
about
how
how
volunteers
are
brought
to
the
table
so
we're
working
currently
on
adding
a
question
to
the
application
form.
A
How
did
you
hear
about
boards
and
commissions
so
hopefully,
that'll
provide
more
information
and
we
can
again
Target
some
Outreach
also
using
that
member
survey
I'll
talk
more
at
the
end
of
this
meeting
about
the
survey,
but
using
some
base
data
from
that
it
was
recently
closed
in
January.
So
they're
all
note
that
79
of
the
members
surveyed
or
who
responded
indicated
that
they
would
benefit
from
some
additional
training.
A
Also,
looking
at
the
qualitative
data
or
the
comments
received
about
training,
it's
very
clear
that
the
current
structure,
it
is
inconsistent
and
and
based
that
it
varies
from
board
to
board
and
then,
of
course
we
would
come
back
evaluate
after
a
year
or
so
ask
the
committee
how
how
it's
feeling
Steph
Liaisons,
board,
chairs
and
stakeholders
is
this
working,
so
yeah
I
think
so
that's
what
we
are
proposing
again
going
from
the
monthly
to
quarterly,
with
the
hopes
that
ideally
we'd
be
making
the
process
more
efficient
and
effective
building
in
more
time
for
those
recommendations
from
chairs
and
boards
and
providing
for
a
more
robust
training
as
well
as
expanded
Outreach.
B
D
Sarah,
thank
you
for
bringing
this
I
really
appreciated.
The
way
that
you're,
looking
at
maybe
moving
at
the
speed
of
community
on
this
I.
Think
there's
a
lot
of
possibility,
like
you
said
in
having
groups
of
people,
be
an
appointment
together
and
also
an
opportunity
there
to
look
at
like
cross
work.
D
For
example,
there's
been
a
lot
of
conversation
about
the
downtown
commission,
the
multimodal
commission,
when
they
do
those
joint
meetings
seeing
how
their
scope
overlaps
and
how
they
can
support
their
advisory
roles,
but
also
I,
think
there's
what
I'm
hearing
is
now
that
we're
having
some
more
in-person
events,
the
chairs
have
missed
the
opportunity
to
gather
together,
and
so
that
might
be
another
way
for
us
to
build
that
Community
within
our
advisory
boards,
especially
as
we
were
looking
at
restructuring
and
I.
D
Think
there
was
a
bit
of
a
morale
dip
like
why
would
I
apply
to
an
Advisory
Board?
That's
getting
ready
to
be
folded,
so
I
think
that
this
is
another
opportunity
to
say:
hey
we're
all
in.
We
need
your
participation,
but
there's
another
added
benefit.
So
I
wonder.
Maybe
when
we
bring
this
back
for
review,
could
we
get
a
list
again
or
the
same
list
that
you're
using
for
outreach
and
then
specifically,
look
at
monthly
publishing
dates
because
I'm
thinking
of
like
La
noticia
Urban
news,
some
of
our
resources
that
folks
use?
D
We
were
missing
deadlines
about
the
time
it
would
be
in
print
it's
kind
of
pointless,
because
we've
already
filled
the
vacancies
and
what
I
would
tell
folks
is
what
we
keep
your
application
on
file
for
a
year,
but
I
think
we
have
a
really
an
important
opportunity
here
to
re-look
at
those
monthly
publishing
dates
and
also
whenever
we
have
been
doing
in
the
past
I
know
with
the
transit
committee.
D
We
did
some
work
around
making
sure
the
notices
were
for
English
as
a
second
language
participants,
and
if
we
are
in
a
position
in
the
future
of
also
having
American
sign
language
as
an
option
for
accessibility,
then
we
can
do
another
round
of
Outreach.
For
that
updated
information
that
we're
now
doing
quarterly.
We
now
have
an
extended
application
period.
That's
another
way
to
get
back
on
people's
radar
with
new
information
to
help
like
float
to
the
top
of
folks
attention.
D
So
if,
once
again,
if
we
could
just
bring
back
that
list
of
Outreach
and
look
specifically
for
monthly,
publish
public
publication
dates
and
then
the
other
thing
is,
are
we
still
doing
Equity
101
training
for
board
members.
A
Currently,
no,
however,
we've
already
connected
with
Equity
inclusion,
team
and
part
of
what
the
orientation
would
be
regularly
scheduled.
Marcos
would
be
there
to
give
like
that
high
overview,
so
that
is
included
in
every
orientation
as
well.
A
The
way
it's
built
right
now,
it's
the
same
same
right.
However,
that
is
that's.
B
A
good
yeah
yeah
that
is
I
was
thinking
about
the
part
in
the
presentation
where
you
said
to
allow
more
time
to
review
applications.
B
A
B
Very
good
point
I
think
so
too,
because
that
was
that's.
That's
basically.
What
Sarah
first
told
me
about
it.
That
was
what
I
really
liked
about.
It
was
giving
us
time
to
actually
spend
more
time,
selecting
the
actual
people
for
the
board.
So
that
way
we
could
actually
vet
them.
B
You
know
properly
and
also
we
could
communicate
with
them
and
sort
of
you
know
get
and
so
that
we
can
more
of
us
have
a
better
understanding,
not
only
for
us,
but
for
them
it's
what
they're
getting
into
or
what's
expected
so
I'm
really
hopeful
with
this
particular
process.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
E
I
think
that
once
the
the
application
period
will
be
so
long
now,
which
is
super,
then
that
will
give
the
staff
the
clerk's
office
staff
more
time
to
give
counsel
to
review.
So
you
won't
just
get
it
on
Friday
and
have
to
make
your
decisions
on
Tuesday.
E
D
And
I
did
hear
this,
but
I
just
wanted
to
like
bring
that
into
the
spotlight
that
if
we
end
up
in
a
situation
where
we
don't
want
to,
we
don't
want
our
timeline
to
mean
that
advisory
boards
are
having
struggles
getting
a
quorum.
So
if
we
do
have
a
situation
where
there's
a
need,
a
specific
need
that
we're
prepared
to
address
it
I
know
especially
for
our
quad-side
judicial
boards.
That'll
be
a
concern,
but
I
certainly
wouldn't
want
us
to
while
we're
trying
something
new
not
be
a
little
flexible
while
we're
settling
in
absolutely.
D
Yeah
so
there's
been
issues
in
the
past
and
thinking
of,
like
the
transit
committee,
only
had
seven
meetings
last
year.
So
if
they
have
people
leaving
faster
than
we're
filling
because
they
don't
even
have
meetings
and
people
feel
like
they're
not
able
to
fully
participate,
then
you
get
to
a
meeting
and
you
don't
have
enough
people
because
it's
there's
been
like
a
leakage
of
of
members.
But
if
those.
D
That
is
always
my
question.
It's
just
not
been
my
experience,
so
what
has
been
happening
is
that
we
have
told
groups
that
we
don't
have
a
quorum
because
they
don't
the
members,
aren't
showing
up
or
aren't
in
the
meetings
and
then
they
have
to
meet
to
be
able
to
remove
members,
but
they
can't
remove
members.
They
don't
have
a
quorum.
So.
D
D
I
mean
we
could
and
the
same
thing
could
happen
with,
and
in
that
case
it's
like
the
multimodal
and
Transit,
but
I,
don't
I,
don't
think.
We've
had
as
many
issues
human
relations
commission
would
be
one
where
it's
like,
if
they're
having
attendance
issues
in
the
most
recent
case,
because
people
didn't
know
they
had
been
appointed.
D
But
if
we're
having
attendance
issues
and
it's
leading
to
issues
with
Quorum
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
keeping
an
eye
on
that
like
to
make
sure
our
processes
are
set
up
for
people's
success.
So.
B
While
we're
on
that
subject
and
not
related
to
changing
our
our
times,
isn't
the
rule,
if
someone
on
a
commission
is
absent
or
more
don't
they
have
to
attend
75
percent
of
the
meetings
do
we
have
to
do
anything
to
determine
if
people
actually
do
that,
and
maybe
that's
something
we
could
take
out
of
the
chairs
hands.
A
But
so
this
is
a
good
opportunity
just
to
put
oh
so
this
75
attendance
rule
is
in
the
rules
or
procedures
for
all
boards
and
commissions,
and
it
says
exactly
that
it
must
attend
to
75
percent.
A
How
that
staff
is
taking
attendance
in
the
clerk's
office
will
ask
for
attendance
from
time
to
time,
but
there's
not
a
real
way
to
consider
when,
when
it
is
time
to
remove
to
remove
members
for
lack
of
attendance
right
now,
the
practice
is
this
chair
or
the
staff
member
first
reach
out
to
the
member.
Is
there
any
barriers
to
attendance?
How
can
we
help
and
sometimes
it
they
might
just
reply
with
I'm
ready
to
resign?
But
if
that
doesn't
happen,
we
don't
have
a
clear
way
of
removing
them.
A
So
what
we
are
doing
currently
is
the
clerk's
office
will
write
the
letter.
Please
let
us
know
if
this
is
an
error.
You
have
been
removed
from
a
scene,
X
Out
of
X
meetings,
but
so
it's
a
it's
a
little
gray
right
now.
For
those
reasons,
one
of
our
other
long,
not
long
term,
because
this
work
plan
for
the
clerk's
office,
we
hope
to
bring
forward
our
rules
of
procedures
for
boarding
commission
and
clarify
a
handful
of
things
that
are
actually
in
there.
This
being
one
of
them.
So.
B
A
First,
we
asked
them
to
reach
out
to
get
an
understanding
why
they
are
unable
to
attend,
and
then
what
it
would
come
down
to
for
removal
is
it'd,
be
on
the
agenda
for
the
committee
to
vote
to
remove
the
the
member
for
a
lack
of
attendance.
Okay,
the
committee.
A
B
And
that's
one
thing:
I
will
say
that
I
would
like
it
probably
more
or
less
that
we
do
control
that,
because
what
happens
on
the
boards
it
becomes.
It
could
become
contentious
for
members,
sometimes
when
that
action,
when
they
have
to
take
that
particular
action
and
I,
think
that
if
it's
something
that
actually
the
boards
and
commissions
actually
look
into
it
make
sure
that
you
know
that
it's
coming
from
us
and
not
coming
from
members
of
that
particular
award.
So.
C
B
D
Kim
sorry,
yeah
I
think
that's
one
of
the
things
that
I
was
thinking
of,
but
also
there
are
there's
our
advisory
boards
and
then
there's
the
state
mandated
or
quasi-judicial
boards,
so,
for
example,
in
the
past.
Hopefully
we
don't
have
to
do
this
again.
Board
of
Education
we
can
appoint,
but
we
can't
remove.
So
it
might
help
me
to
understand.
Are
there
boards
that
we
appoint
members
to
that?
We
can't
remove,
and
usually
that
would
be
through
some
sort
of
legislation
or
resolution
rules.
D
So
I
know
that,
for
example,
the
hrca
has
a
resolution
in
place,
and
so
whenever
we
want
to
make
a
change
there
we
have
to
like
amend.
Our
own
resolution
would
be
an
example
of
where
it
gets
a
there's.
Different
rules
for
different
groups
and
I
get
the
Des
y
I
just
want
to
make
sure
for
once
we're
moving
to
quarterly.
We
don't
if
we're
ready
to
be
flexible
if
we
find
that
folks
are
in
a
stuck
spot
because
I
don't
think
that's
the
goal.
The
reason
I
bring
that
up.
D
I
know
that
it
was
our
goal
to
make
sure
that
a
majority
of
members
present
could
vote
on
whether
or
not
they
stayed
virtual
and
I'm
just
going
to
go
ahead
and
give
the
example.
The
human
relations
commission
met
in
person,
but
didn't
have
a
super
majority
present
to
vote
on
whether
or
not
they
should
be
virtual,
and
one
of
the
reasons
was.
There
are
many
barriers
to
meeting
in
person,
including
Transportation
or
child
care.
D
So
the
past
two
meetings
of
the
hrca
there
have
been
two
very
young
members
of
the
committee
there,
which
has
been
absolute
joy
and
it
was.
It
was
very
clear
to
me
that
we
want
everyone
to
be
able
to
be
at
the
table
and
we
also
need
to
look
at
those
barriers
to
participation
and
if
Child
Care
can
be
possible
because
I
want
everyone
to
be
fully
present.
D
So
I
don't
think
it
was
our
intention
to
force
people
not
to
be
able
to
have
virtual
meetings
with
our
goal,
but
what
it
resulted
in
is
it
made
it
really
hard
for
people
to
participate
and
they
couldn't,
like
their
vote,
didn't
count
because
they
couldn't
get
a
majority.
So
that's
why
I
want
to
just
make
sure
that
our
goal
is
at
the
front
for
people
to
be
able
to
participate.
D
B
Well,
if
we
have
no
more
questions,
then
of
course
we'd
like
to
move
on
to
Sarah
to
give
us
a
annual,
updated.
A
Annual
reports
yeah
so
just
a
quick
update
as
the
council's
aware
that
boards
and
commissions
are
required
to
submit
an
annual
report
to
council
every
year.
These
are
due
at
the
end
of
January,
so
linked
here
in
your
agenda
is
the
compiled
reports,
including
when
we
pulled
out
the
recommendations
just
to
make
it
to
clarify
the
recommendations
that
are
coming
to
city
council.
So
this
is
just
an
update.
I
wanted
to
call
some
attention
to
that.
A
D
I
know
the
transit
committee
is
going
to
submit
a
report.
It
ultimately
goes
up
to
the
multimodal
commission.
That's
just
one
example:
are
we
anticipating
that
other
reports
may
come
in
where
it
says
no
report
submitted.
A
Potentially
we
did
we,
we
asked
if
there
was
a
tentative
timeline
if
they
didn't
submit,
but
answer
your
question.
Yes,
there
could
certainly
be
some
added
if
they're
not
currently
there,
and
if
that
were
to
happen,
we
could
do
a
email
saying
this
has
been
added,
so
you're
notified
okay,.
D
Because
I
know,
in
the
past,
we've
seen
Greenway
committee
recommendations
and
even
though
they're
a
subcommittee
of
multimodal
it's
been
in
this
list,
and
it
wasn't
this
time.
That
said,
we
have
a
very
long
list
of
recommendations
here
and
I'm
very
grateful.
A
Thank
you
so
last
update
I
have
been
mentioning
the
boarding
commission
member
survey
for
the
past
month.
It
did
close
at
January
31st.
This
survey
went
out
too,
as
I
had
previously
mentioned
to
350
some
current
and
past
up
to
10-year
border
commission
members.
We
had
a
62
or
64
percent
response
rate,
which
is
excellent.
So
a
lot
of
great
information
in
in
there
I
have
linked
the
dynamic
report
which
is
compiled
by
public
input
just
for
an
overview
of
results,
but
there's
a
lot
of
analysts
to
be
done.
A
Yet
the
realignment
working
group
is
still
meeting
and
has
formed
a
sub
subcommittee
to
do
to
do
that
deeper
dive
and
analyst,
with
the
hopes
and
goal
of
making
recommendations
to
council.
So
some
TBD
we're
still
you
know,
doing
a
deeper
dive
ourselves
to
see
what
can
Surface
and
if,
if
there's
any
recommendations
for
other
revisions
to
be
made
so
a
TBD
for
now.
But
it
is
a
really
informative
report
and
we
have
some
great
responses
without
no
over
500
qualitative
or
comments
in
there.
So
some
good
reading.
B
Thank
you,
Sarah,
and
at
this
time
do
we
have
any
one
of
the
speaker
group.