►
From YouTube: Backdrop Weekly - Sept 26, 2019
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
Today
is
September
26,
and
this
is
a
weekly
check-in
for
backdropped
CMS
development
tests.
Before
we
get
into
that,
though,
there
are
three
new
contributed
projects
preferred
text,
format
may
see
it
mosaic
grid
and
komal
global
climate
strike
that
have
come
out
since
last
week's
moving
on
to
backdrop
project
progress
turn
over
to
me
all.
A
Right,
so
all
right
so
backdrop
came
out
backdrop:
114
came
out
about
10
days
ago
on
September
15th
and
we're
currently
in
this
two-week
period,
where
we
haven't
updated
some
of
the
up
streams
yet
because
we're
making
sure
that
there
aren't
any
substantial
regressions
and
the
114
release
thus
far,
it
is
looking
really
good.
We
haven't
had
any
regression
so
to
speak,
although
there
have
been
a
number
of
small
issues
with
some
of
the
new
features
that
we
added
so
114,
one
are
focused
on
the
bug.
A
A
So
what
are
some
of
those
things
so
1:14
one
kind
of
one
of
the
bigger
issues-
and
we
talked
about
this
during
the
design
meeting
just
prior
to
this
one
is
there's
an
issue
with
the
header
and
footer
regions
with
flexible
layouts,
that
they
don't
have
the
same
classes
as
all
of
the
other
out-of-the-box
layouts.
So
if
you
position
the
navigation
and
the
footer
blocks
into
the
header
and
footer,
it
doesn't
have
the
same
styling,
because
those
same
classes
aren't
present
on
flexible
ATS
as
they
are
on
the
out-of-the-box
ones.
A
A
A
A
A
Currently
we
have
a
big
meadow
at
36
85
that
lists
all
the
different
versions,
views
and
the
cross
ports
that
we
need
to
include
over
from
them.
The
current
issue
that
has
a
bunch
of
things
that
are
being
reviewed
is
issued,
3720,
which
is
transports
from
views
312,
and
there
is
a
whole
load
of
new
port
requests
that.
A
New,
but
for
requests
that
have
now
been
RTB
seed,
so
it
basically
seems
like
that's
another
area
in
which
core
committers
can
start
going
through
and
merging
those
only
and
once
one
there
once
312
cross
ports
are
completed.
Then
that
unblocked
some
issues
in
the
next
issue,
because
some
of
the
patches
are
dependent
upon
the
previous
ones.
So
I
want.
B
A
A
B
Rtb
see
that
IRT
BC
to
have
passing
tests.
There
were
like
three
that
needed
work,
I
think
but
I
don't
know,
Gregory's
already
gone
through
and
fixed
them.
This
is
a
week
ago,
so
he
might
have
but
didn't
look
like.
There
was
anything
that
was
failing
test,
so
it
could
be
that
the
thing
that
says
fix
tests,
I
haven't
looked
at
that
patch
and
maybe
it
adds
a
test
or
something
like.
B
A
Okay,
let's
see
other
than
the
views
cross
ports,
and
that
one
particular
issue
with
flexible
answers,
also
a
meta
issue
for
other
flexible
template
follow-up
issues
at
40,
46,
most
of
which
don't
have
any
code
behind
them
yet,
but
our
areas
in
which
it
could
be
improved,
I,
don't
have
anything
else
to
bring
up
during
the
meeting
for
the
114
one
milestone.
Although
there's
as
always
a
lot
of
issues
in
github
that
could
also
be
fixed
in
the
near
future.
A
So
115
115
will
be
the
next
minor
release.
It
will
be
coming
out.
January
15
to
2020,
exciting,
be
working
into
the
new
year
feature
freeze
will
be
January
1st
or
that's
always
what
we
say,
but
bigness
January
brisk
is
a
holiday.
It
probably
actually
be
the
second
and
so
the
features
that
we're
going
to
be
working
on
include
digital
signatures
on
packages.
A
A
From
two
separate
pull
requests
and
two
separate
projects
that
are
in
John
Franklin's
personal
repositories,
so
that
will
make
it
so
that
we
can
work
on
all
four
of
those
modules
together,
as
well
as
deploy
the
contrition
of
code
sign
to
backdrop,
CMS
org,
before
code
sign
is
committed
to
backdrop
core
itself,
so
I
would
path
forward
on
that.
I
think
that
we're
still
in
a
pretty
good
shape
overall
for
functionality
and
I,
don't
think
there's
anything
that
needs
to
be
handed
back
to
John
plain.
A
C
B
Update
is
that
it's
complicated
what
I'm
currently
trying
to
do
is
refactor
the
hook
field,
extra
fields,
section
that
allows
you
to
add
extra
information
to
the
manage
fields
just
like
right
now,
just
let's
say
you
have
a
name
and
a
description
and
then
it
you
can
drag
it
up
and
down.
But
what
I
want
to
do
is
make
the
same
settings
form
that
work
for
real
fields,
work
for
extra
fields,
but
it's
very
complicated,
so
as
I'm
working
on
right
now
involves
not
necessarily
an
API
change.
B
Because
right
now
we
passed
an
array,
but
the
array
only
has
the
two
values
I'm
trying
to
make
it
work.
So
we
can
pass
all
the
other
values
that
we
passed
a
regular
field
so
that
we
can
have
the
settings
form
and
all
the
stuff.
That's
in
the
settings
form
in
there,
so
I
don't
think
it's
requiring
API
change,
but
right
now
it
only
listens
for
the
two
values
that
aren't
there.
B
Hopefully,
this
will
also
make
it
so
that
we
can
move
like
the
title
settings
and
the
description
settings
off
of
the
content
type
configure
form
and
on
to
the
content
type
fields
form
that
those
two
things
also
need
settings
and
can't
have
them
now,
when
they're
on
there
so
I
think
it's
good.
It's
gonna
be
a
good
change.
We
need
it
in
other
places
too.
So,
hopefully,
I
can
get
it
done
right.
It's
messy
mm-hmm.
A
So
yeah
interesting
yeah
doesn't
surprise
me
that
that
does
seem
like
a
big,
a
big
problem.
It
might
also
be
interesting.
You
know
dr.
Elmont
had
the
initial
suggestion
of
just
having
a
link
over
to
the
other
page
like
instead,
and
that
might
be
a
good
halfway
point
where,
if
you
get
to
the
point
of
you,
can
just
have
the
configuration
form
like
open
and
close,
but
then
it
just
links
over
to
the
other
page
like
that
would
be
better
than
the
situation
right
now,
where
it's
like
they're,
not
associated
together,
yeah.
B
I
tried
that,
but
I
can't
get
anything
in
there
right
now.
I,
don't
description,
so
I
figured
if
I'm
gonna
make
it
work
for
settings
form.
I
might
as
well
just
load
the
whole
form.
So
we'll
see
it
right
now.
It
seems
like
it's
not
gonna,
be
very
different,
whether
it's
a
link
or
a
form,
but
once
I
get
it
done.
It
might
seem
very
different.
B
A
There
I
don't
think,
there's
any
code
behind
this,
yet
he
has
supposed
to
a
screenshot.
It
looks
kind
of
like
file
field
sources
where
you're
allowed
to
select
from
library
only
opens
up
a
dialog
and
yeah.
It
looks
like
a
nice,
simple
suggestion,
but
we'll
see
about
implementation,
like
things
might
get
a
little
bit
gnarly
there
I
think.
C
A
B
Just
this
week
me
WP
Anna,
wants
to
adopt
this
issue,
which
is
fantastic,
I
think
this
started
where
I
had
originally
created
an
issue
that
was
like
I
really
want
basic
pages
to
have
the
checkbox,
where,
like
add
to
menu
chops.
By
doing
and
like
so
that
when
you
create
a
page,
it
doesn't
go
into
the
content,
content
Orphanage.
It
goes
into
the
menu
system
somewhere.
B
Oh
that's,
interesting,
I
didn't
know
that
module
existed,
but
it
did
seem
to
exactly
match
the
thing
that
I
had
requested,
and
so
he
created
an
issue
for
Auto
menu
settings
in
core
I.
Think
we
titled
it
or
something
so
I
think
it's
a
great
idea.
I
think
there
might
be
a
lot
more
features
in
the
Drupal
7
control
module.
Then
maybe
we
need
in
core,
but
I
haven't
looked
at
it
in
detail,
so
if
all
it
is,
is
the
ability
to
set?
Do
you
want
this
in
the
menu
yet
or
not?
A
B
A
Yeah
and
it
hasn't
been,
no
one
has
confirmed
you
know
like
you
know:
it's
marked
a
milestone
candidate,
but
it
hasn't
been
been
moved
into
the
milestone.
Yet
so
yeah
Jen
I
think
that
if
you
have
the
capacity,
if
you
could
evaluate
that
and
see
you
know
that
seems
core
appropriate
like
that
would
be
helpful.
Cuz
it
I'm,
not
really
sure
it
seems
like
I
could
get
really
complicated
coming.
A
B
B
So
we
talked
about
this
last
week
and
I
think
we
decided
that
it
wasn't
ready
to
be
a
core
candidate
because
Nate
didn't
want
it
in
for
but
I
just
wanted
to
bring
it
up
again
just
so,
we
get
some
more
feedback
on
the
issue.
After
the
meeting
there
were
a
couple
of
people
and
the
issue
that
are
like
wait.
Why?
Why
don't?
B
We
think
this
is
a
good
four
core
and
I
noticed
after
that
that
it
was
included
in
Drupal,
8,
core
and
so
I
added
the
triple
feature:
parity
I
didn't
to
the
feature:
parity
project
and
I
just
wanted.
Anyone
who
wants
image
telethons
to
be
able
to
go
and
weigh
in
on
that
issue.
I
probably
won't
get
in
the
next
version,
even
though
it's
mostly
ready,
but
it
couldn't
get
in
the
one
after
that,
if
people
still
want
it
so.
B
A
B
A
C
B
B
C
C
I'm,
just
gonna
bring
up
kind
of
a
random
old
issue
that
I
just
wanted
to
get.
There
was
I
commented
on
it
up
by
the
week
or
two
ago
there
was
an
issue
about
like
complete
maintainer
from
several
years
ago.
That
was
just
floating
out
there
and
I
was
wondering.
Did
anything
ever
happen
with
that?
It's
like?
Is
there
a
decision
not
to
have
maintainer
or
did
that
just
hone
in
maintainer
x'
or
you
know
the
core
system
or
whatever
you
know?
I
think
there
were
like
specific
modules.
A
Yeah,
I
think
the
I
would
then
I
wasn't
feeling
up
to
post
an
official
response
on
that,
but
it's
kind
of
that
we
have
so
a
few
committers
at
this
point
that
it
didn't
seem
right
to
push
them
into
a
particular.
You
know
box
of
capabilities.
It's
just
like
right
now,
if
you're
a
committer,
it's
great,
if
you
have
a
specialization
in
one
area
and
that
would
be
fine
to
be
a
corps
commander,
but
we
wouldn't
restrict
you
from
weighing
in
other
areas.
At
this
point,
I
think
it's
a
matter
of
volume.
I
think.
C
And
I
bring
it
up,
not
that
like
advocate
for
it
more
so
just
because
I
stumbled
across
it
and
it's
like
I,
don't
know
what
the
answer
to
this
is.
It
might
be
helpful
to
just
put
like
I
and
I'll.
Do
this
I'll
just
sort
of
summarize
what
you
just
said,
which
is
well,
this
hasn't
been
ruled
out:
it's
kind
of
on
hold
because
we
don't
really
have
the
people
for
it
right
now,
yeah
that
makes
sense.
Yep.
A
That's
exactly
what
I
was
thinking:
okay,
I
also
found.
My
answer
to
your
previous
question
looks
like
you:
can
I
try
to
get
up
just
typing
in
a
couple
of
different
filters
if
you
use
the
filter,
commenter
:
and
then
your
handle
commenter,
that
has
won
t
and
it
er
I'm
a
jerk,
that's
an
actual
word,
but
that
works
to
find
issues
on
which
you
have
commented.
A
You
know
what's
not
on
the
agenda,
though,
is
that
that
camp
is
next
week
and
it
might
be
good
just
to
recap
our
schedule
for
the
week
of
bad
camp
and
the
events
that
are
going
to
be
happening
either
of
you.
Two
are
probably
better
suited
to
cover
that
than
myself,
though,
so
you
guys
want
to
take
a
shot
it
outlining
the
schedule.
I
will.
B
Try
and
writing
this
in
in
there
at
the
same
time
as
well,
so
on
Wednesday,
which
is
the
first
day
of
bad
camp,
we
have
a
half
day,
training
that
goes
from
1:00
p.m.
to
5:00
p.m.
and
after
noon
on
Thursday
we
have
a
full
day
mini
camp
which
will
go
from
8:30
ish
cue,
5
p.m.
then
we
have
on
Thursday
night
party,
which
will
be
6:00
p.m.
onward.
B
Hold
on
I
gotta
figure
out
what
it
is
if
a
reservation
at
Victory
point
cafe,
which
is
a
boardgame
location
where
they
also
haven't,
had
food
and
drinks.
So
it
is
all
ages,
family-friendly,
gaming
location,
which
should
be
fun.
Of
course,
playing
games
is
also
optional.
You
wanna
play
games,
that's
totally
fine
and
that
we
have
a
reservation
for
15
people,
but
the
venue
is
pretty
big.
So
if
we
get
more
people
than
that,
it
should
be
fine
to
adjust.
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
we
had
a
table,
it's
a
number
and
then
on.
B
Have
a
session
which
is
the
backdrop
past
and
future
talk
that
Nate
did
last
year,
bad
camp.
That's
been
updated
for
all
the
stuff
that
we've
done
since
then,
which
is
pretty
cool,
then
on
Sunday
a
time
and
location
TVD
we're
hoping
to
have
a
sprint,
but
I'm
thinking,
it'll,
probably
be
something
like
10
a.m.
and
maybe
our
house.
B
C
A
great
blog
post
by
Obadiah
that
dropped
that
org.
So
if
you
need
to
repeat
that
go
check
out
the
blog
post.
A
Okay,
alright,
that's
it
for
this
week's
meeting.
I
think
I'm
excited
to
see,
hopefully
a
lot
of
our
participants.
People
watching
this
video
later
hum
excited
to
see
a
lot
of
you
guys
in
person
next
week
and
if
you're
not
coming
to
bed
cam,
that's
totally
filling
I
would
yeah
I'm,
just
yeah
I'm
excited
it's
we're
gonna
have
all
these
people
and
at
the
same
time,
like
you
know,
our
online
community
is
growing
so
much
it's
just
great
people
everywhere.
Another.
B
A
That
Bart
post
hasn't
been
put
out
yet
has
it
I
don't
want
heroes
OneNote
today,
oh
there
you
go
with
I,
probably
what
BW
Panda
became
an
advocate.
I!
Guess
you
probably
read
it
amazing:
okay,
awesome!
Well,
thanks!
So
much
everybody
thanks
so
much
everybody
out
there
on
the
internet
and
talk
to
you
guys
later.