►
From YouTube: Backdrop Design - Jan 28, 2021
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
We're
live,
so
am
I
starting
yeah
welcome
everyone.
Let
me
do
my
hair,
welcome
everyone
to
this
week's
design
and
ux
meeting.
We
are
recording
this
and
streaming.
It
live.
Oh
and
I.
B
So
there's
this
there's
a
brand
new
thing:
you
decide
whether
video
will
auto
play
or
not,
and
I
have
mine
set
to
autoplay
in
one
browser
and
not
in
the
other.
So,
depending
on,
like
any
given
day
where
I
happen
to
start
the
meeting,
it'll
auto
play
or
not,
but
if
you
can
figure
out
which
browser
it
is
which
is
usually
my
problem,
you
can
usually
turn
that
out.
A
Well
to
anyone
who's
puzzled.
What
just
happened!
The
live
stream
of
youtube
started
playing
in
my
background
and
we
got
a
very
long
delayed
echo,
which
was
not
helpful.
Let's,
let's
try
again,
we
are
live
streaming.
This
is
what
I
was
about
to
say.
A
So,
if
you
don't
want
to
be
on
camera,
please
turn
off
your
camera,
but
we
love
to
have
we
love
to
see
your
faces
and
we
love
to
hear
your
voices
if
you're
watching
the
video
of
this,
please
consider
coming
in
the
future
to
our
live
meeting
and
joining
us,
because
everyone
is
welcome
now
the
agenda,
I
guess
we're
gonna
start
with
our
introductions.
A
Let's
start
with
quick
introductions,
just
your
name,
something
about
yourself
and
then
ask
the
next
person
in
line
or
or
call
on
someone
else
to
come
after
you.
I
will
go
ahead
and
start
I'm
tim
erickson
coming
to
you
from
deerwood
minnesota
and
my
habit
lately
has
been
to
give
the
wildlife
report
outside
my
window
and
it's
quiet
right
now.
The
turkeys
went
by
a
little
while
ago,
but
they're
gone
backdrop
wise.
I'm
just
swamped,
so
I
can't
decide
what
to
talk
about
gregory
go
next.
C
Hello,
please
excuse
any
noises.
There's
some
cooking
noisy
cooking
happening
in
the
background.
I'm
gregory
I'm
joining
from
greece,
usually
in
australia,
but
I
haven't
joined
the
last
one
or
two
weeks
in
any
of
the
design
or
developer
meetings.
So
and
I
haven't
gotten
the
chance
to
watch
any
of
the
recordings,
so
I'm
joining
just
to
catch
up
and
help
any
way.
I
can.
C
B
I
am
jen
lambton
joining
from
oakland
california.
I
don't
have
any
exciting
wildlife
outside
my
window,
but
there
are
a
lot
of
exciting
things
going
on
in
backdrop
land
right
now,
and
I
don't
know
if
we're
going
to
talk
about
them
all
in
today's
meetings
or
not.
So
I
just
want
to
highlight
the
fact
that
tim
made
a
fantastic
survey,
that's
going
out,
and
so,
if
anybody
wants
to
weigh
in
on
which
features
you
feel
like
are
most
important
for
future
versions
of
backdrop.
B
You're
welcome
to
go
to
survey.backgroupcms.org
and
complete
that
we
are
currently
working
on
getting
an
events
website
together
for
backdrop,
live
which
is
coming
up
in
march,
keep
an
eye
out
for
that
a
whole
bunch
of
people
are
doing
a
bunch
of
work
on
documentation
which
is
really
exciting
and,
of
course,
there's
all
the
stuff.
B
That's
going
on
in
backdrop
core,
so
yeah
a
lot
of
really
exciting
stuff
going
on,
and
I
just
want
to
take
a
minute
to
thank
everybody
for
all
of
their
continued
work
on
all
the
cool
stuff.
Phil.
Are
you
here?
Would
you
like
to
introduce
yourself.
D
Hey
phil,
ward
out
of
wichita
kansas.
I
guess
nothing
exciting
to
really
say
about
me
just
kind
of
here
to
see
where
I
can
help
if
possible
and
go
from
there,
tim
or
or
I
guess,
whoever's
leading,
let's
go
ahead
and
take
it
away.
A
Yeah,
that's
everything
so
excuse
me.
I
got
a
bit
of
a
cough
today.
The
next
thing
on
the
agenda
from
the
template
here
is
the
theme
initiative.
Update
luke
is
not
with
us
today
and
I
have
been
communicating
with
him
quite
a
bit,
but
I
don't
recall
any
updates
since
last
week
and
I
think
he
did
give
a
pretty
good
update
last
week.
A
So
I
don't
know
if
anything's
new
has
happened
there,
but
I
know
that
luke
continues
to
work
on
the
the
sort
of
theme
initiative
update
makes
yep,
not,
I
think,
nothing
else
there.
So,
oh
yep,
okay,
so
we
move
on
to
the
the
product,
the
design,
ux
and
design
issues,
and
I
am
just
should
we
just
move
through
this
list
quickly.
We
have
cleaned
it
up
a
little
bit
lately.
A
So
it's
I
haven't,
checked
all
of
these
issues
in
advance
to
see
where
they're
at
or
if
anything's
happened
in
the
last
week,
the
promoted
modules
themes
on
installer.
Do
we
have
any
news
there?
Anybody.
C
There
hasn't
been
any
movement
right
yeah.
Lately
we
generally
decided
that
this
is
a
good
thing
to
happen,
and
so
we
can
promote
things
without
adding
them,
having
to
add
them
in
core
and
solicit
people,
testing
that
certain
modules,
like
the
relation
relations,
one
yeah,
soliciting
testing,
so
that
they
can
get
faster
into
core,
but
no
activity
lately.
B
There
has
been
some
related
stuff
going
on.
You
know,
doc.
Wilmot
is
trying
to
get
a
test
site
set
up
where
he
can
do
some
work
on
project
module
and
though
that
is
not
directly
related
to
this
issue.
Having
an
environment
where
we
can
test
project
module
would
make
this
move
forward
faster.
So
I
think
that
that
will
help
that
will
benefit
if
we
can
get
it
figured
out.
A
Well,
I'm
just
I
mean
I
agree
and
that's
exciting
that
there
is
other
stuff
happening,
but
I
also
would
like
to
make
them
sort
of
met
a
point
that
the
last
update
on
this
issue
is
may
2019
the
specific
issue,
and
we
might
want
to
look
at
thinning
some
of
these
off
the
agenda
until
they
get
some
action
again.
The
next
one
is
the
move,
the
clear
log
messages
button
to
the
bottom
of
the
d
blog.
A
How
about
this
is.
This
is
the
one
that
I
think
yeah
the
one.
A
C
A
C
A
No
there's
not,
I
think,
like
peter
asked
about
that
in
the
last
week
he's
like
how's
this
coming
in
the
pmc
and
I
sort
of
fessed
up
to
the
fact
that
it's
not
that
we
we
really
need
to
get
it
going,
and
I
think
all
it
needs
is
a
pmc
member
to
create
an
issue
for
it
right.
A
So
just
anyone
I
I
understand
I,
I
am
a
member
of
the
pmc,
but
this
is
the
first
time
we've
ever
done.
A
This
is
that
I
know
of
so,
but
my
understanding
of
the
process
right
now
is
that
basically
any
member
of
the
pmc
can
open
up
an
issue
for
this
sort
of
like
in
the
core
issue,
queue
the
pmc
sort
of
requires
that
somebody
advocate
for
an
issue
and
they
sort
of
move
the
discussion
along
and-
and
I
think
that's
what's
waiting
right
now
and
I'm
pretty
sure
the
only
reason
nobody
has
done.
That
is
just
that.
A
We're
all
swamped,
because
I
have
been
thinking
about
getting
that
issue
created
and
I
just
haven't,
and
I
if
jen
doesn't
beat
me
jenner,
gregory
doesn't
beat
me
to
it.
I
will
try
to
get
this
issue
created.
Part
of
my
hesitancy
in
doing
it
is,
I
feel,
like
I
have
to
reprocess
the
issue
in
my
head
and
understand.
A
B
You
mentioned
him
that
this
is
the
first
time
that
we've
escalated,
a
contribute
issue.
I'm
not
sure,
that's
true,
but
I
don't
think
we
had
a
formal
process
for
escalating
the
contribution.
I
think
we
just
had
like
open
issues
in
the
pmcq
and
talked
about
stuff,
but
I
was
looking
at
our
issue
templates.
What
might
really
help
this
is
if
we
had
a
pmc
issue
template
that
was
specifically
for
escalating
and
contribute
issue.
B
B
How
effective
it
is
and
if
that's
going
to
help
us
going
forward.
A
C
B
A
So,
let's
make
notes
a
little
better
notes
about
what
the
next
steps
are
so
next
step
for
this
one,
the
d
blog
one
is
a
template
in
the
pmc
issue.
Queue.
A
Elevating
or
escalating
do
you
just
edit
it?
I
don't
care.
C
A
A
I'm
not!
I
don't
think
this
is
one
I've
been
following
real
closely
looks
like
nothing,
no
updates
for
the
last
since
august
of
2020,
so
I'm
going
to
suggest
unless
somebody
has
something
important
to
say.
We
move
on
sort
available,
updates,
page
45.75.
C
A
Yeah
we
have
one
for
today
and
it's
dated
properly.
So
if
you,
if
the
one
you're
looking
at,
says
the
wrong
date,
that
was
my
screw
up
yeah
I
had
both
of
them
open
when
I
was
doing
it,
so
I
must
have
copied
the
wrong
link.
A
Yeah
the
sort
available
updates
45.75
has
this
one
had
any
updates
lately,
no
well
december
2020,
so
a
little
while
back.
A
A
I
did
add
a
couple
of
new
ones
coming
up
here
in
a
minute,
so
we
will
have
a
few
issues
to
talk
about.
Hopefully
others
have
other
ideas,
cleanup
page
title
block,
let's
see
if
anything's
happening
there.
A
Nope
not
since
september.
A
So
I
went
ahead
and
stuck
two
on
the
agenda
that
have
been
getting
some
talk
and
I
don't
think
we've
talked
about
them
in
a
meeting
yet
so
well.
One
of
these
has
a
pr
but
they're,
somewhat
related
the
first
one
is.
Olaf
has
brought
up
this
issue
about
a
new,
hidden
path,
content
type
and
that
one
is
getting
a
lot
of
attention
right
now
in
part.
A
Let
me
just
mention
sort
of
jump
ahead
and
say
this
sort
of
came
from
emerge
from
I
mean
that
idea
has
been
floated
on
its
own,
but
it
came
up
recently
because
of
the
next
one
which
I
opened,
which
was
the
idea
of
replacing
the
current
promoted
content
block
on
the
front
page
of
the
of
sort
of
the
default
layout
with
with
a
node
that
well
with
a
node
and
and
olaf,
when
he
saw
my
issue,
said
well,
I'd
love
to
have
a
hidden
path,
content
type
which,
if
we
were
to
do
if
we
were
to
replace
the
promoted
content
with
the
node,
we
could
use
this
new
content
type
for
that.
A
So
that's
sort
of
the
relationship
between
them,
but
I
think
we
can
talk
about
them
independently
because
they
both
stand
on
their
own
and
I
just
wanted
to
see.
There
seems
to
be
a
lot
of
interest
in
this
idea
of
an
out
of
a
third
content
type
by
default,
but
I'm
not
sure
how
strong
it
is
or
if
I
don't
know,
yeah
so
jen,
you've
only
weighed
in
marginally
on
this
issue.
Do
you
have?
What
are
your
thoughts
on
this
one
yeah.
B
B
I
feel
like
it
would
be
really
helpful
as
a
learning
tool
for
people
who
would
need
to
know
how
to
do
that,
but
I'm
also
a
little
bit
worried
that
it's
going
to
be
in
the
way
for
those
50
of
sites
for
people
who
don't
need
it
and
they'll
just
have
to
remove
it.
That
said,
removing
things
is
a
lot
easier
than
adding
them,
so
I'm
sort
of
like
on
the
fence
about
it.
I
added
a
label
to
that.
Issue
needs
usage
metrics.
B
I
think
this
might
be
really
helpful
if
we
could
check
and
see
how
many
existing
sites
have
enabled
a
pathless
content
type
at
all.
That
might
help
inform
that,
because
maybe
it's
more
than
50
of
sites
have
used
it.
C
I
think
I
think
that's
one
of
the
use
cases
sorry
to
interrupt
then,
where
the
because
the
feature
is
not
as
not
common,
it's
commonly
understandable.
I
should
say
people
don't
use
it,
so
the
metrics,
I'm
not
sure
like
so.
The
goal
for
this
issue
is
to
make
it
easier
for
people
to
understand
that
a
that
feature
exists
and
how
it
can
be
used.
The
fact
that
it's
not
being
used
is
might
not
be
like
user's
message,
might
might
not
help
as
much
yeah
yeah
go
ahead.
Sorry,
I
just.
A
Yes,
I
I
I
mean.
I
strongly
believe
that
most
users
would
be
completely
unaware
of
this
sort
of
as
an
option,
and
I
think
the
reason
both
of
these
issues
have
come
up
is
that
people
we've
been
getting
a
fair
number
of
people
asking
to
do
something
like
this
and
not
understanding
how
and
being
confused
and
like
that's
the
motivation
sort
of
for
adding
a
node
to
the
front
page
was
that
we've
had.
A
I
would
say
it's
like
one
of
the
most
frequent
questions.
I've
run
into
in
the
last
six
months.
Is
people
being
confused
about
how
to
how
to
make
a
custom
front
page,
and
so
my
suggestion
was
to
put
a
node
on
the
front
page,
because
people
just
aren't
getting
that
they
can
do
that,
and
this
would
make
it
easier
and
then
I
think,
for
a
similar
reason.
A
B
Yeah,
I
think,
there's
probably
some
other
stuff
we
can
do,
though,
that
would
help
cleaning
up.
The
text
on
that
checkbox
is
something
that
we've
intended
to
do
since
it
went
in
it's
just
a
hard
thing
to
explain,
hidden
text
on
a
checkbox,
I'm
not
sure
that
building
something
that
most
people
need
and
putting
it
in
the
way
is
the
right
solution
to
this
problem.
Maybe
it
is,
I
don't
know
I'm
like
50
50
on
it,
so
I
don't
feel
strongly
either
way.
C
So
I
had
some
time
available
when
was
it
actually
yesterday
giving
the
time
difference,
because
I'm
referring
to
australia
and
my
colleagues
there
two
days
ago,
I
solicited
the
help
on
the
company
that
I
work
for,
like
slack,
and
I
was
being
very
vague
with
the
way
that
I
was
asking
things
so
not
to
lead
people
towards
with
regards
to
what
answers
they
gave,
and
I
sort
of
like
vaguely
explained
that
I
need
a
name
or
a
use
case
for
things
that
should
not
be
accessed
individually,
but
when
they
form
a
group
with
like
in
the
context
of
building
websites.
C
Of
course,
always-
and
I
solicited
help
with
regards
to
naming
that
and
how
people
would
sort
of
like
what
what
they
would
use
it
for
so,
and
I
got
answers
from
front
enders
developers,
project
managers,
so
both
people
that
use
build
sites,
but
also
people
that
don't
and
and
a
ux
expert
as
well.
So
she
had
a
comment
on
the
second
paragraph
of
that
sorry.
The
second
sentence
of
that
help
text
said
that
it
was
confusing,
but
she
didn't
have
a
suggestion
at
the
moment
it
would
come
back
so
yeah.
C
The
mere
fact
that
we
have
a
huge
chunk
of
text
there,
explaining
what
it
does
sort
of
like
hints,
that
it's
a
difficult
thing
to
to
explain
or
use
as
well.
A
Okay,
well,
I
don't
know
that
we're
gonna
solve
anything
in
this
today,
but
I
felt
like
it
were
worth
talking
about
in
a
discussion
because
there's
a
lot
of
discussion
going
on
in
github
and
I
would
encourage
other
people
to
join
into
this
discussion,
because
this
is
one
of
those
that
it's
a
lot
it's
right.
Now,
it's
less
of
a
technical
discussion.
A
More
so
is,
should
we
do
it
and-
and-
and
I
raised
another
question
which
I
don't
have
an
answer
for
myself-
which
is
that
obviously?
Well
I
I
to
me
at
least
it's
obvious
that
we
want
to
limit
the
number
of
default
content
types
for
some
of
the
reasons
jen
mentioned,
and
so,
if
we
were
to
add
a
third
one,
you
know.
Is
this
the
right
one
to
add
right-
and
I
think
that's
worth
discussing
so
far
nobody's
come
up
with
a
better
suggestion,
so
yeah.
C
So
in
terms
I'll
reiterate
what
I
said
on
that
issue,
with
with
regards
to
adding
value
to
the
product
and
making
things
easier,
a
commonly
used
thing
is
building
slides,
but
that's
very
hairy
like
I
predict
that
would
need
a
third-party
library.
So
it's
not
a
good
use
case
when
it
comes
to
overhead
of
maintaining
things
yeah.
C
I
liked
olaf's
sort
of,
like
use
case
of
you,
know,
just
a
contact
sort
of
like
a
thing
that
can
be
used
as
a
snippet
or
whatever
we
end
up,
calling
it
and
putting
it
on
the
side.
Just
the
contact
task
block
or
whatever
sounds.
C
A
I
think
there's
a
number
of
use
cases
jen
mentioned
faq,
sometimes
just
that
home,
page
or
or
info
blocks
right
anytime.
You
want
to
create
a
node
that
you
want
to
make
it
easier
for
the
content
editor
to
edit.
You
want
to
create
a
custom
block,
but
you
want
the
content
editor
to
be
able
to
edit
it.
This
is
a
great
use
case,
as
you
just
create
a
node
for
the
block,
because
it's
much
easier
for
content
editors
to
edit
nodes
and
blocks.
B
Yeah
or
any
block
you
want
to
field
on
like
an
image
in
a
block,
something
like
that,
and
I
think
that
there
are
a
lot
of
simpler
use
cases
that
don't
require,
like
the
view
whether
it's
a
a
q
page
or
a
slideshow
or
whatever.
But
again
it's
the
kind
of
thing
where,
like
I,
maybe
added
a
fieldable
block
type
on
one
site
out
of
all
of
the
sites
that
I
built
in
backdrop.
B
Even
though
it's
a
concept,
that's
easy
for
people
to
get,
I'm
not
going
to
use
it,
but
at
the
same
time,
like
a
lot
of
the
websites
that
I
build,
I
don't
ever
use
the
post
content
type
either,
but
it's
there
and
I
just
ignore
it
and
it's
fine
to
ignore
so
yeah.
It's
definitely
the
kind
of
thing
where
it's
like.
I
think
I
I
added,
or
I
think
there
was
a
label
and
it
needs
more
feedback.
B
It'll,
be
good
to
see
what
other
people
think,
especially
in
terms
of
what
they
are
using
on
their
sites
like
if
they
are
using
fieldable
blocks.
Maybe
I'm
not
a
good
example
of
that
or
if
you
know,
if
there's
something
that
would
make
this
click
better
for
people
like
a
better
example,
it
would
make
it
click
like
oh,
like
if
everybody
comes
and
says
I
want
to
block
like
drupal
8
has
it
then
I
think
a
field
will
block.
B
Is
the
right
thing
to
do
because
they're
coming
from
that
perspective
of
like
andrew
blade,
I
could
do
this
and
I
can't
do
it
and
backdrop
from
like.
Well,
you
can't
we
just
it's
different
and
having
an
example
of
how
it's
different
would
be
good,
so
yeah,
I
think
we
just
would
need
some
way
to
for
it
to
be
clear
from
the
interface
what's
actually
happening.
B
C
Unless,
unless
we
call
that
custom
blocker
custom
text,
but
again
we
can
add
images,
I
don't
know
in
the
wizardwick
for
custom
vlogs,
so
it
makes
it
a
bit
yeah.
What
I
found
interesting
was
teams
one
of
team's
last
comments
in
that
queue.
We
were
saying
to
add
sort
of
like
if
we
are
to
do
this,
we
should
add
something
that
adds
value
to
the
product
and
something
that
to
this
day,
has
not
been
done
in
drupal,
8
or
drupal.
C
9
is
the
which
made
a
great
difference
in
backdrop
where
the
drop
down
menus,
so
we
we
were
contemplating
on
whether
we
should
add
it
or
leave
it
in
contrib,
and
it
makes
a
really
good
like
a
strong
feature
out
of
the
box.
C
A
Anyway,
I
muted
myself,
jan,
I
think
you
so
like
my
question.
One
reason
not
to
do
this
would
be
that
there
might
be
a
better
content
type
that
we
needed.
I
think
what
you
really
alluding
to
is
another
reason
maybe
not
to
do
this
is
that
it
might
be
a
different,
better
solution
for
like
feel
so
are
you
suggesting
that
like
fieldable
blocks
would
be
different
but
fulfill
the
same
role
as
this,
and
if
we
were
to,
if
we
were
to
actually
add
fieldable
blocks,
we
wouldn't
really
need
this.
B
C
A
B
A
B
E
B
C
Another
oh
go
ahead.
A
crazy
idea
is
that
if,
if
people
coming
from
drupal
8,
when
they
try
to
add
blocks,
they
try
searching
fieldable,
we
have
dummy
results,
returned
which
are
not
blocks
and
say.
Are
you
looking
for
field
overall
blocks?
This
is
how
you
can
do
it
and
link
to
documentation
to
do
it,
but
it
sounds
a
bit
hacky
and
you
know.
A
So
I
I'm
going
to
make
another
point
which
is
well
and
it
might
address.
My
concern,
which
is
like
is
if
there
were
a
different
solution
that
we
might
be
implementing
later.
One
of
the
things
about
adding
a
content
type
to
core
is.
It
is
just
part
of
the
install
profile
right,
so
it
could
be
removed
easily
and
it
isn't,
you
know,
never
affects
existing
sites.
A
A
A
Well,
yeah
I
mean
yeah.
We
could
make
a
decision
that
we
never
want
to
do
that.
I
would
be
opposed
to
that
decision.
I
would
say:
we'd
be
cautious
about
doing
it,
but
yeah,
let's
roll
into
the
next
one,
just
quickly
too,
which
is,
I
think,
in
a
similar
status,
which
is
just
something
under
discussion
right
now
which,
but
because
these
two
over
they
overlap
in
a
lot
of
ways.
A
They're
both
just
changes
to
the
install
profile
they're,
both
kind
of
intended
to
help
people
see
what's
possible,
and
that
is
that
removing
the
promoted
content
block
and
replacing
it
with
well.
A
Part,
I
guess
the
removing
the
promoted
content
block
is
less
sure
and
this
the
idea
was
to
put
a
a
node
block
on
the
front
page
as
the
primary
content
and
with
a
note
saying
here,
you
can
edit
your
front
page
by
editing
this
block,
or
this
node,
the
removing
the
promoted
content
was
sort
of
assumed.
Although
the
biggest
objection
I
think
to
this
idea,
is
that
we're
sort
of
we're
removing
the
one
visible
view
which
people
also
like
to
expose
so.
B
I
also
think
there's
some
value
in
having
something
familiar
to
people
and,
if
you're,
coming
from
any
version
of
drupal
you're
used
to
seeing
that
river
of
nodes
on
the
home
page
and
if
we
take
that
away
it,
it
sort
of
it
the
thing
with
people
like
okay.
I
know
that
if
I
promote
a
note
it's
going
to
appear
on
the
home
page
and
then
I
have
to
figure
out
how
to
undo
that
I
mean.
Maybe
everybody
does
figure
out
how
to
do
that,
but
at
least
it's
unknown
to
start
with.
B
But
if
you
start
with
backdrop
and
you're
like
okay,
well,
there's
nothing
here
that
is
familiar
to
me.
That
might
also
be
a
problem.
So
that's
that's
a
little
concerning
for
me
too.
It's
just
making
it
less
familiar.
C
A
I
mean
I
I
hear
your
I
you
hear
your
point
jen,
but
I
mean
to
me
like
the
value
of
having
that
that
stream
on
the
front
page
is
a
little
bit
speculative.
I
can
see
where
that
might
be
value,
whereas
this
is
something
we're
that
we're
getting
really
hard.
Like
we've
had
several
questions
in
the
forum
we've,
it's
come
up
in
the
it's
coming
up
repeatedly
that
people
don't
understand
how
to
add
yeah
a
front
page.
B
B
I'm
not
sure
that
changing
the
things
that
are
there
on
the
thing
that
nobody
understands
is
gonna
help
very
much
with
the
thing
that
nobody
understands,
but
I
do
think
that
there
is
value
in
adding
a
static
text
node
to
the
home
page,
because
if
people
want
that,
having
it
done
for
them
is
going
to
be
valuable,
I
think
there's
other
things
we
can
do
to
make.
That
homepage
thing
better.
The
homepage
scenario
better
and
I
was
in
the
middle
of
creating
some
follow-up
issues
too.
B
I
think
there's
some
very
simple
things
like
if
somebody
makes
the
front
page
not
the
front
page,
we
disable
the
home
page
layout,
just
like
stuff
like
that
that
you
know
we
can
tell
from
configurations
what
is
intended
and
we
can
make
the
interface
more
accurately
reflect
that
and
then
also
having
a
clear
indication
of
like
which
layout
you're
looking
at
from
the
front
end
on
the
back
end,
we've
had
a
long-standing
issue
about
that,
like
how
do
you?
How
do
you
get
to
edit
from
the
you
know?
B
A
A
It's
only
one
way
to
you
know
to
help
people,
but
since
since
there's
at
least
interest
in
exploring-
and
I
think
we're
far
from
deciding
this
yet
and
possibly
doing
both-
I
played
around
a
little
bit
with
how
to
make
that
work
and
I'm
kind
of
stuck
like
what
would
the
front
page
look
like
with
both,
and
so
I
sharing
my
screen
and
I'm
looking
at
a
default
backdrop
site
with
the
front
page,
and
I'm
just
wondering
if
anybody
has
any
quick
ideas
and
if
not
right
now
later
add
them
to
the
issue
but
like
where
would
we
put.
B
I
think
this
might
roll
into
design
like
we
call
the
designer,
but
this
is
a
really
common
thing,
like
most
of
the
sites
that
I
build
on
the
homepage
right
now
they
usually
have
some
text,
it's
usually
a
block
or
whatever
that's
just
a
block
of
text
area
of
text,
and
then
they
also
have
a
bunch
of
listings
and
they're,
usually
distinguished
by
like
different
colored,
stripes
or
background
areas
or
regions,
and
I
think
that
we
could
do
that
pretty
easily
on
the
homepage.
A
A
I
think
we're
almost
there
that
replaces
that
and
again
we
don't
need
to
we're
still
considering
not
replacing
it,
but
so
this
was
the
alternative
idea,
which
was
that,
instead
of
the
your
first
post,
it's
welcome
to
your
site
a
great
place.
To
start
configuring,
your
new
site
is
with
your
home
page
layout,
and
then
it's
like
you
can
edit
this
this
this
node
to
change
your
front
page.
D
Quick
question
I
haven't
heard
anybody
talk
about
it
and
I
have
not
run
across
anything.
There's,
probably
an
issue
on
it
outstanding.
Has
there
been
any
discussion
in
the
past
about
redoing
the
textual.
B
B
E
B
Can't
find
it
on
the
page
so
yeah,
I
think
drupali
did
a
pretty
good
job
of
making
those
more
obvious.
So
they
don't
only
only
show
up
on
hover,
but
we
also
had,
I
think,
a
bigger
discussion
about
wordpress
is
it
has
like
a
in
the
toolbar
at
the
top?
They
have
a
way
that
you
can
like
edit
any
post
from
the
same
location.
D
D
Okay
and
I
think
in
in
all
this
discussion,
some
of
this
is
going
to
go
back
into
the
contextual
links
of
being
able
to
edit
that
pathless
node
editing
blocks,
etc.
You
know
from
my
experience,
I've
got
a
guy
that
he's
in
his
60s.
I've
been
doing
his
website
stuff
for
years,
and
I
can
show
him
how
to
use
those
contextual
links
and
two
three
days
later:
hey
phil.
Can
you
show
me
how
to
do
that?
Again?
I
forgot.
D
A
Yeah
and
kristin
yep,
okay,
that
seems
like
we're
discussing.
Let's
move
on
what
else
we
have
on
our
agenda,
so
I
don't
know
that
anything.
Is
there
none
of
these
design
issues,
I
think,
have
seen
any
progress.
Lately.
A
There
was
some
discussion
about
the
making
changes
to
css
safely
that
sort
of
stalled,
and
I
had
proposed
that
that
might
be
an
issue
that
we
also
elevate
to
escalate
to
the
pmc.
A
I
was
suggesting
that
we
that
we
allow
certain,
like
a
a
couple
week
period
where
people
can
get
in
their
ideas
before
we
did
that
we
never
officially
sort
of
called
for
that
discussion,
but
I
don't
know
if
it's
necessary
or
if
we
should
just
escalate,
that
to
the
pmc.
Anybody
have
any
thoughts
on
that.
B
I
did
good
if
we
solicited
feedback
from
more
of
the
community
before
we
kicked
it
to
the
pmc.
Let's
mention
it
in
the
dev
meeting
in
I
don't
know
if
we
want
to
put
it
on
the
forum
or
twitter
or
some
other
place,
that
we
can
kind
of
solicit
feedback
from
people
who
might
not
already
be.
In
that
conversation.
C
Yeah,
okay,
so.
A
Right,
I
think,
what's
really
blocking
things
isn't
so
much
the
fix
for
this
as
the
not
knowing,
if
there'll
be
a
fix
like
if
there's
a
decision,
a
clear
decision
about
which
direction
we're
going
it'll
just
make
it
easier
to
make
other
decisions.
Okay,.
C
Before
we
move
on
just
a
quick,
a
quick
thing
for
the
the
the
matter
that
we're
discussing
before
with
the
home
page-
yes
changing
blocks,
but
how
about
changing
the
layout
to
something
else?
That
has
like
two
columns
or
a
sidebar
or
something
again
without
affecting
all
the
sides,
because
the
the
promoted
content
is
another
form
of
recent
content
right.
C
So
we
can
still
have
that
on
the
sidebar
and
then
have
them,
because
I,
like
teams,
sort
of
like
take
on
hey,
he's
the
the
node,
which
would
be
the
main,
the
main
section
of
the
site.
But
if
we
were
to
keep
the
recent
posts
somewhere,
we
can
call
it
like
featured
articles
and
be
on
the
sidebar.
So
we
we
keep
both
things
and
we
keep
both
people
happy.
But
the
problem.
B
Is
that,
like
the
example
we
have
in
core
is
really
short
because
it's
not
real
content,
but
if
this
were
a
teaser,
it
would
not
fit
in
a
sidebar
like
if
it
were.
You
know
two
paragraphs
of
text
in
an
image
which
is
what
it
usually
is,
and
so
I
would
hate
to
want
to
set
up
a
site
to
a
way
that
if
you
just
entered
content
like
wouldn't
wouldn't
work
anymore,.
C
B
C
B
We
could
play
around
with
it,
though
screens
are
getting
much
bigger
and
much
smaller,
but
also
much
bigger.
We
could
try
like
a
50
50
layout
and
see
what
it
looks
like
with
two
paragraphs
of
text
in
an
image
on
a
big
screen
and
maybe
there's
a
way.
We
could
do
some
fancy
stacking
so
on
smaller
screens.
It
still
ends
up
in
one
column,
but
on,
like
the
extra
large
screen
it
splits
to
two.
C
B
Might
at
least
for
first
impressions
for
people
on
their
computers
be
better
use
of
space.
The
reason
also
might
help
if
we
can
get
the
design
with
the
background
color
in
there
too.
That
might
help
distinguish
like
one
from
the
other.
Another
thing,
too,
is
that
in
this
example,
we
only
have
one,
but
in
reality
I
think
this
view
shows
10..
B
So
if
you
have
10
teasers
and
one
node,
the
just
like
the
difference
in
height
is
going
to
be
really
obvious
and
so
having
the
10
teasers
as
the
main
content
and
something
else
some
like
as
not
the
main
content
in
terms
of
like
space
ratio,
makes
more
sense
so
yeah.
I
just
think
we
need
to
make
sure
that
whatever
it
is
we
come
up
with.
We
can
like
auto,
generate
content
and
not
have
it
look.
C
Yeah,
so
the
reason
why
I
brought
it
up
was
because
of
the
back
of
my
head.
I
always
keep
the
so
we're.
We've
done
a
great
job
from
the
plane,
no
content
added
yet,
which
was
what
d6
and
d7
was
giving
you.
We
have
this,
which
is
more
intuitive.
It
presents
the
features
that
patrol
has,
but
I
always
have
umami
as
a
thing
which
presents
snippets
of.
I
think
it
has
a
series
of
three
blocks
with
content
on
the
side.
C
A
I
don't
I
don't
like
that
comparison,
because
that
umami
is
not
a
start-up.
It's
a
sample
site.
Yes
right,
and
this
is
not
a
sample
site.
This
is
a
default
install
profile.
So
I
don't
think
you
can
compare
the
two
you
know.
Mommy
is
not
used
in
this
way.
That's
not
to
say
that
we
shouldn't
have
something
like
umami,
but
if
we
did
it
wouldn't
be
in
replace
of
this,
it
would
be
a
sample.
C
B
I'm
saying
I
think,
there's
value
in
looking
at
like
mommy
as
a
teaching
tool
and
being
like
what
from
this
tool,
would
make
value
in
my
site
rather
than
an
example
inside,
but
it
is
hard
to
they're.
They
definitely
are
not
applesauce.
A
C
As
jen
said,
you
present
here
a
only
you
and
I
and
people
that
use
drupal
know
that
this
is
supposed
to
be
like,
if
you
add
more
things,
they're
going
to
be
added
here.
If
I
was
a
newcomer,
I
wouldn't
know
that
this
is
a
view
and
if
I
promote
it,
content
it's
going
to
end
up
there
right.
If
there
were
three
items
or
two
items,
they
would
get
the
idea,
but
now
we
only
have
one.
B
A
B
With
that,
you
could
also
do
a
better
job
of
explaining
that
too,
like
we
have
one
sent
two
sentence
here.
This
is
your
first
post
you
may
edit
or
delete
it,
that's
nice
and
short,
but
it
could
also
say
this
is
your
first
post,
it's
promoted,
that's
why
it
appears
on
the
home
page
or
something
like
that,
and
then
people
go
like.
Oh
you
know.
I
don't
know.
C
C
D
D
You
know
to
kind
of
show
them
kind
of
I
I
guess
just
make
it
easy
for
a
new
user,
so
I
mean
I'm
going
to
go
back
to
the
install
profiles
that
if
we
can
figure
out
a
way
of
getting
install
profiles
that
you
can
choose
between
a
basic,
a
tutorial
or
an
advanced
type
of
setup,.
B
At
the
very
beginning,
right
not
to
allow
anyone
that
option
unless
they
know
what
it
is,
because
asking
people
for
an
install
profile
is
the
first
thing
you
ask
them
before
they've
seen
the
cms
and
that
doesn't
make
any
sense.
So
this
this
install
profile,
we're
looking
at
right
now
needs
to
be
that
beginner
install
profile,
and
only
if
someone
knows
what
an
install
profile
is
and
knows
they
need
a
specific
one.
Would
they
ever
have
the
option
to
add
something
different?
So
I
think
yeah.
E
D
C
That's
that's
the
discussion
that
we
already
had
phil
and
sorry
to
interrupt
you,
but
we
are
looking
for
a
way.
There's
another
issue
that
says:
allow
installation
profiles
to
be
executed
after
the
site
has
been
installed,
might
solve
it
as
in
oh,
yes,
I
got
a
plain
sight
now.
C
I
need
dummy
content
as
well
right
if
we
could
do
that,
allow
it
to
be
added
this
hairy
beats
and
things
that
we
need
to
figure
out
and
that's
why
it
hasn't
been
done
yet,
but
there's
a
very,
very
like
one
of
the
two
digit
or
three
digit
issues,
so
very
early
issue,
which
says:
make
the
installer
a
one
minute,
installer,
adding
any
any
additional
steps
to
the
installer
goes
against
that
goal.
C
D
Well,
yeah,
no,
I
I
yeah,
I
hear
what
you
guys
are
saying
on
that,
I'm
just
kind
of
looking
at
it
from
the
the
demographics
of
who
are
who's
going
to
be
installing
this,
a
new
user
or
an
advanced
user,
and
I
I
guess
we
really
just
can't
cater
to
everyone
exactly
by
doing
what
we're
talking
about
right
now.
The
only
way
to
cater
to
everyone
is
to
break
that
out
into
a
way
that
they
can
choose
different
methods.
D
A
B
But
the
reason
we're
leaning
that
way
is
that
what
the
thing
you're
describing
right
now
is
no
longer
an
install
profile
and
that's
what
we
have
all
like.
An
install
profile
happens
at
the
time
you
install,
and
so
we
all
landed
on
that
same
conclusion,
we're
just
now
calling
it
something
else.
B
D
Yeah
and
recipes
kind
of
enters
into
this
I
mean
I
see,
install
profiles
as
being
a
little
bit
separate
from
recipes,
but
at
the
same
time
it
is
totally
intertwined
with
it.
So
that's
I
mean
that's
another
piece
to
the
the
whole
discussion,
but
I
don't
know.
A
I
agree,
I
think
we
need
to
wrap
up
this
meeting,
though,
is
there
anything
else,
there's
nothing
else
on
the
agenda
that
we
really
need
to
talk
about
today.
Is
there
anything
else?
That's
not
on
the
agenda
that
we
need
to
talk
about
in
this
meeting.
A
I
just
mentioned
that
briefly,
but
it's
worth
reiterating
that
there's
a
lot
of
work
around
documentation
right
now
and
yes,
that
will
absolutely
one
of
the
things
I
keep
coming
back
to
is
that
very
often
we
get
we
get
stuck
debating
a
solution
to
solve
a
problem
without
going
back
and
saying.
Well?
Is
this
really
the
best
solution
to
the
problem
that
really
there
might
be
just
a
better
different
approach
to
solve
the
problem
and
documentation
is
always
a
good
option
at
least
yeah?
Let's,
let's
wrap
this
up
thanks.
Everybody.