►
Description
Today’s design agenda: http://bit.ly/2hw8NqS
A
All
right,
we
are
on
air
happy
new
year,
everybody
who's
January,
fifth,
and
we're
going
to
do
a
check-in
on
design
related
test
for
vector,
CMS
I.
C
A
You're
breaking
up
for
a
minute
done
we're
going
to
talk
about
the
new
homepage,
design
which
we're
hoping
to
have
ready
the
same
time
as
dr.
up
16
is
released,
and
then
we're
also
going
to
talk
about
a
bunch
of
features
that
we're
adding
2
16
that
might
need
another
design
or
user
experience
review
between
now
in
release
date.
A
So
backdrop
CM,
esta
org,
homepage
Wes,
it
looks
like
you've
made
a
ton
of
progress
on
us.
I
looked
at
your
paw
request
this
morning
or
your
diff
or
whatever
it
was
that
you
emailed
and
I
got
all
excited,
but
then
I
just
really
wanted
to
see
it
certainly
was
it
asked
how
we
go
about
using
the
dev
site
and
I
didn't
even
know
we
had
one
so
I
can't
answer
the
question.
A
I
think
we're
going
to
need
you
to
tell
us
where
the
server
is
and
how
to
get
access
to
it.
If
you
want
to
throw
a
west
ski
on
there,
I.
C
Can
get
the
matter
of
getting
assess
the
sage
keen
on
there
and
that
should
pretty
much
it.
It
hasn't
been
used
any
time
recently,
so
they'll
probably
need
you
know.
Database
updates
and
code
updates
and
a
lot
of
course
you'll
do
that,
but
it'll
require
some
work
to
actually
get
it
going.
I,
don't
think
it's
been
used
any
time
recently
in.
C
A
West,
you
want
to
talk
about
your
design
stuff
at
all
my
page,
so
oh.
B
B
In
the
air
quotes
because
it's
actually
pretty
much
the
whole
site,
so
yeah,
ok,
I,
think
I
have
all
these
up
now.
Ok,
so
this
one
we
looked
at
nothing's
really
changed.
I
haven't
styled
this
section
because
we
talked
about
changing
that
potentially,
but
I
can
style
it.
If,
if
we
decide
that
we
just
want
to
get
the
site
up,
that's
fine
I,
just
thought
I'd
wait
for
that,
and
then
these
probably
look
a
little
better
than
last
time.
B
So
this
is
all
yeah
cleaned
up
modules.
This
hasn't
really
changed
and
themes
same
thing,
layouts
pretty
much
the
same
thing:
news
I
updated
a
little
bit,
so
I
found
an
issue
in
core
while
basis
in
court
that
I
frames
were
able
to
go
outside
of
their
parent
container.
So
it
a
quick
CSS
rule
for
that
and
also
have
it
here
and
then
added
little
user
images
and
I
thought
it'd
be
cool
to
kind
of
mimic
the
logo
a
little
bit.
A
slice
off
corner
can
I
get
a
feck
going
and
otherwise.
A
D
D
A
There's
a
whole
to
around
that
image.
Information
like
if
you
look
at
a
blog
post,
okay,.
A
Those
are
already
done,
I
think
maybe
we
should
just
like
recycle
as
much
as
we
can.
Okay.
B
Well,
yeah,
so
nothing
crazy,
I
just
made
a
vid
sure
everything
worked.
I
got
rid
of
the
gray
background.
I
thought
it
looked
a
little
funny
and
I
mostly
started.
It
was
easier
for
me
to
just
kind
of
redo
the
layout
and
then
see
what
was
missing
then
try
to
my
great
things,
but
yet,
depending
on
the
page,
some
of
these
I
just
took
CSS
wholesale
and
it
pretty
much
work
so
support
page
I'd
like
to
update
this.
B
E
A
Jen
there's
a
good
click
on
user
guide
is
different
than
done.
Handbook
I
think
there
might
be
a
different
like
submenu
thing.
Well,.
D
B
It
did
it
did
mean
that
I
gave
up
control
of
this
title.
It
would
be
whatever
the
book
outline
title
is,
but
yeah
but
yeah
I,
linked
it
everything
so
yep.
This
is
pretty
simple
stuff.
There
handbook
simple
stuff,
oh
yeah,
I
think
I
showed
this
off
last
week.
The
navigation
here
and
module
page
pretty
similar
I,
think
I
changed
the
border
styled
match.
I.
B
Also
removed
some
cases
of
text
transform
upper
case
if
I
find
that's
less
legible
I
tried
to
make
those
headings
or
whatever
they
were
stick
out
in
a
different
way.
But
if
that's
not
cool
I
can
such
it
and
then
thinking
that
I
used
that
same
style,
but
they
can
go
to
the
circle.
If
we
want
and
I
might
have
already
shown
this
page
services,
cuz
I
just
stole
what
was
already
made
basically
and
I.
Think.
D
B
D
B
B
A
A
So
so,
if
we
can
make
sure
it's
like
an
accent
and
not
a
main
color
anywhere,
that
would
be
great
like
at
least
the
last
blue,
the
better
soon,
maybe
not
bad
yeah
and
I.
Don't
know
how
I
only
use
it
well.
That's
gonna
affect
the
homepage
like
I'm,
not
sure
the
homepage
will
work
with
grey
there,
but
just
in
general,
like
you
too,
we
don't.
We
don't
want
that
confusion
so.
A
Yeah
I
do
too
and
I
also
like
it
like
I,
was
looking
at
the
homepage,
thinking
about
I'm,
so
not
a
designer,
but
I
was
like
what,
if
we
just
swapped
the
grey
and
blue
that
like
rather
than
having
this,
like
gray
advanced,
we
had
like
blut
like
I,
think
that
might
be
the
right
volume
of
view
of
blue,
even
though
it
like
I'm
gonna
talk.
A
Don't
look
good
that
way,
because
my
brain
doesn't
work
like
that,
but
just
like
if
it
was
like
an
accent,
color
and
not
like
a
main
color
I
think
that
blue
works
really
well
with
the
greys
yeah
one.
D
A
A
A
E
A
B
A
I
did
have
a
meeting
yesterday
with
a
with
our
brand
guy
and
specifically
around
email
newsletter
stuff.
He's
gonna
write
our
newsletter
content
for
us,
but
I
also
told
him.
We
were
working
on
the
redesign
he
offered
to
like
I'm
like
work
close
enough
now
that
we
can't
like
change,
really
very
much,
but
he
offered
to
do
a
like
Rubio
when
we're
done
and
if
he
thinks
there's
like
something
little
we
can
fix
like.
If
he's
like.
A
Oh
you
know
this
cutout
image
corners
way
better
than
that
horrible
circle
thing
reason
before
right:
yeah
for
to
do
a
little
review
for
it,
so
cool.
B
A
B
No,
this
is
good.
Yeah
I
moves,
yeah
every
worked
a
couple
things,
but
there's
way
less
I
think
customization
I,
don't
know
I
I'd
be
interested
in
discussing
like,
or
maybe
it's
just
a
blog
article,
how
how
I?
How
I
put
this
together
like
how
I
thought
about
it,
because
I
think
it's
interesting
to
kind
of
hat
the
multiple
ways
to
go
about
and
do
something
it's
a
little
different
in
backdrop
than
his
and
drupal,
obviously,
and
I
yeah
I,
don't
know
yeah
I.
B
I
think
yeah
I
it
doing
this
strengthened
my
opinion
that
I
want
to
try
and
have
a
front
end
format.
That's
a
front-end
architecture,
that's
more
around
utility
classes
than
it
is
custom
styling
as
I.
I
added.
If
you
remember
my
utility
class
file
from
basis
we
were
removed.
I
added
it
into
our
sub-theme
yeah.
E
A
B
Yeah,
that's
why
I
was
thinking
that
and
bootstrap
is
a
utility
class
front-end
architecture,
so
kind
of
the
only
yeah.
The
only
thing
that
bothered
me
and
I
try
to
do
it
when
we
put
in
bootstrap,
but
we
ended
up
not
doing
it
for
good
reason,
but
that
it
doesn't.
It
doesn't
fit
into
a
naming
convention
that
most
a
utility
class
architectures
use,
but
that's
fine.
B
It's
just
a
little
sad
makes
my
friend
an
architect
little
sad
Manor
in
my
heart,
so
yeah
I'll
add
that
blog
post
to
the
list
of
things
I'm
trying
to
do
no
rash
on
that
good.
Like.
A
A
cool,
a
cool
thought
process
that
you've
got
to
go
through
and
it
might
be
really
useful
for
other
people
too.
Maybe.
B
B
A
You
can
do
that
with
you,
don't
necessarily
need
to
have
in
version
control,
but
you
can
do
it
with
your
like
local
settings
file.
You
can
set
up
as
many
levels
as
you
want
and
just
change
where
points.
So
if
we
can
think
of
dev
as
like
the
deploy
collection
like
it's
going
to
be
staging
when
it
gets
on
production,
you
can
choose
whether
you
want
that
to
be
your
local,
live
or
not.
B
Well
then,
if
it's
my
if
locals
on
track,
then
how
would
I
get
it
to
the
next
level
of
thing
unless
I
make
the
dev
server
behave
more
like
the
prod
server
and
then
it
would
be
straightforward.
Yeah.
B
A
I
would
say,
because
we
don't
have
a
server
currently
I
do
whatever
is
easiest
for
you
so
like
if
it's
easiest
for
you
to
just
throw
it
on
your
existing
server.
Just
do
that
and
that
way
we
can
get
it
up
and
see
it
and
not
have
to
worry
about
like
getting
credentials,
making
a
new
lent
out
or
doing
whatever
and
I'll
just
send
you
a
new
sanitized
databases
today,
and
you
can
throw
that
out.
There.
A
Okay,
just
made
myself
a
note
to
actually
remember
to
do
that
all
right,
I
love
it
I'm,
really
excited.
Thank
you
for
doing
all
the
work
on
that.
It's
been
fantastic,
so
other
stuff.
We
wanted
to
talk
about
today
or
issues
for
backdrop
16
that
might
need
a
designer's
eye
feedback
and
it
looks
like
Nate's
added
a
ton
of
them
in
here,
which
is
great.
The
hamburger
menu
I
know
Wes.
A
You
wrote
a
bunch
of
code
for
this
I
think
for
backdrop,
CMS
org
and
we
kind
of
stripped
it
back
to
what
the
smart
menus
library
recommended,
mostly
because
I
couldn't
get
it
working
and
knew
that
the
recommended
code
worked,
but
I
figure.
If
we
could
get
it
working,
we
could
put
it
in,
but
as
soon
as
I'm
like
it
works
and
like
put
it
in
Nate's
like
oh,
my
god,
it's
ugly
styling.
C
That
is
yeah.
Oh
hang
on
hey!
Let
me
let
me
show
a
screen
share
and
show
you
what's
worth
talking
about.
So
here's
the
issue
where
we
added
hamburger,
styling
issue
2369,
which
you
can
see
is
marked
as
fixed
now,
but
here's
the
end
result
is
that
when
you
configure
block
there's
now
a
check
box
here
that
says:
display
menu,
toggle
button
on
small
screens
and
you
toggle
button.
Okay
and
the
end
result
is
actually
really
nice,
like
I,
really
like
so
this.
C
This
is
on
this
block
here,
that
is
home
and
about
and
as
you
get
smaller,
you
know
now.
Yay
menu
toggle
button,
which
is
great
a
huge
improvement
actually
being
able
to
have
that
option
without
need
to
do
any
additional
work,
and
then
this
menu
itself
courses,
the
you
know,
hierarchical
menu
thing
that
we
have
fits.
If
this
work,
hi
Oracle
it
would
expand
and
contract.
You
know
individual
items.
C
The
biggest
thing
needs
design
help
on
this.
Actually
is
the
placement
of
these?
What
I'm
call
secondary
links
this
now,
because
this
is
not
a
menu
block,
well
I'm,
even
if
it
were.
It
would
be
very
strange
to
have
two
collapsible
menus,
so
just
our
default
styling
here
regarding,
like
a
you,
know,
the
primary
menu
which
it's
stuff
is
now
hidden
and
the
secondary
menu
whose
links
are
now
you
know
getting
the
focus
so
so
part
of
that.
B
That
that
was
a
that
was
really
hard
to
get
worked
out
for
backdrop.
Cms
that'll
work
and
one
of
the
things
I
ran
into
making
basis
was
when
I
tried
to
make
the
header
really
slick
and
cool
at
every
break
point.
It
was
too
opinionated
and
hard
to
override
so
I
yeah.
This
will
take
some
thought.
Work
to
like
come
up
with
something
that's
better,
but
also
like
not
annoying
to
have
to
work
to
something
yeah.
C
At
least
initially,
you
know
the
this
header
menu
right
here
that
my
accountant
logout
is
actually
part
of
the
header
block,
which
means
that,
at
least
relating
to
the
site
title
the
logo,
which
I
don't
have
turned
on
right
now,
and
these
links
we
can
move
them
around
relative
to
each
other
really
easily.
At
least
I
really
wish
that
when
you
went
down
those
would
appear
above
the
logo
like
these.
E
E
B
Shared
my
new
Oh
Photoshop
sucks,
so
I
gotta
share
my
whole
screen
all
right,
so
this
this
box
up
here
so
I
am.
D
E
D
E
In
and
instead
of
displaying
all
to
drop
down
for
the
past,
it
just
displays
the
login
information
or
just
creates,
or
just
has.
If
someone
can't
do
any
admin
tasks
all
does
it
show
that
stuff
that
you
have
in
the
think
they're
so
and
make
that
all
part
of
like
the
admin,
menting
toolbar
thing
so
yeah
yeah,
that's.
That
would
be
my
preference,
because
that
and
then
you
can
just
turn
that
on
and
off
to
like
should
like
some
sites
want
people
to
login.
E
B
E
E
C
D
C
Have
some
reservations
about
that
approached
just
that
the
admin
bar
is
right
now
it's
like
literally
administrative,
that
it
makes
it
so
it's
like
as
a
team
or
as
a
site
builder
or
whatever
you
just
don't
worry
about
it.
Just
it
does
its
job
and
it's
purely
functional
and
it's
not
really
relevant
to
the
appearance
of
your
site
but
yeah.
C
If
we
started
with
blowing
it
for
everybody,
anonymous
users
included,
assuming
that
you
know
that
the
site
wanted
to
allow
anonymous
users
to
log
in
the
first
place
it
starts
making
at
the
admin
bar
into
being
kind
of
a
you
know,
a
user
bar
you
know
just
like
for
everybody
to
use,
and
it
becomes
a
part
of
that.
The
design
of
your
site,
which
I
would
be
worried
about
women.
C
A
When
you
have
like,
if
the
majority
of
your
users
are
not
admins
where
it's
like,
they
have
their
own
things,
they
need
to
do
that.
Are
not
administrative
tasks
like
you
have
a
I,
don't
know
like
a
community's
life,
just
majority
of
what
I
built
there's.
Usually
only
one
I've
been
on
the
site:
you're
not
taking.
A
Something
is
really
not
important
at
all,
which
is
this
admin
bar
and
you're,
throwing
it
in
the
face
of
everyone
on
the
site
where
what
they
really
need
are
links
that
are
customized
for
them
and
because
that
man
menu
is
something
that
you
aren't
supposed
to
touch.
You're
gonna
get
people
throwing
all
sorts
of
kinds
of
stuff
in
there.
A
That's
gonna
like
break
weight,
and
it's
just
going
to
be
kind
of
a
nightmare
in
terms
of
taking
something
that
right
now,
it's
kind
of
an
afterthought
where
you
don't
design
it,
you
don't
change
the
content
or
now
I've
abuse
like
I
want
to
put
stuff
in
there.
For
my
users,
you're
like
no,
that's
not
for
your
users.
It's
for
your
admins.
It's
kind
of
a
we
I'd
like
well.
E
A
A
And
Lord
majority
of
the
people
on
your
site.
Don't
do
any
of
that
they're,
your
users
they're
your
site,
visitors
there,
your
customers
there,
whatever
they
don't.
There
are
many
responsibilities
on
managing
the
website,
but
they
still
need
to
log
in
and
they
need
their
own
tools
like
oh
I
want
to
manage.
You
know
my
list
of
stuff
right
where
maybe
it's
stuff
they're
buying
or
its
comments,
they're
posting
or
whatever,
like
that's,
not
a
management
task
that
shouldn't
be
tied
to
admin
bar
in
any
way.
Okay,.
E
A
Think,
like
there
are
a
lot
of
good
contribs
Aleutians
for
the
kind
of
stuff
you
were
talking
about.
West
were
like
you
want
your
login
links
to
like
not
necessarily
be
a
bar
or
not
be
on
your
page,
like
maybe
you
want
them
elsewhere,
like
we've
there
other
not
in
background
necessarily,
but
there
are
other
like
kinship
solutions
for
like
things
for
your
users,
which
is
something
to
think
about
to
in
terms
of
like
how
do
we
need
to
handle
designing
the
header
region?
It's
like
what
people
don't
want
that
thing.
B
B
D
A
A
Like
no
I
can't
I
can't
look
at
it
like
that,
so
less
of
a
problem
there,
I
guess
yeah.
A
B
A
B
A
B
A
Might
be
there
too,
and
the
JavaScript
might
just
be
winning,
but
we
should
look
at
the
CSS
and
I.
B
A
Css
from
oh
really
mark
menus,
20
via
or
I
mean
I,
don't
know
in
this
particular
case
like
whether
that's
your
CSS
are
there
CSS,
but
I
know
when
they
can
triple
that
I
wrote
it
does
that
same
thing,
but
I
just
stole
their
CSS
I
didn't
yeah.
B
B
A
I
recommend
someone
who
knows
what
they're
doing
looking
at
the
Susa
to
the
guy
ain't,
seeing
what
state
is
in
and
if
it
needs
improvement.
I
also
changed
some
of
the
breakpoints
that
you
were
using,
so
that
it's
kind
of
more
in
line
with
where
the
rest
of
bootstrap
breaks,
which
might
not
be
the
right
place
for
the
menus
to
break
anymore.
But
I
was
having
really
hard
time
reading
them
ramps
or
whatever.
B
Yeah
the
basis
readme
has
everything
listed
in
remsen,
pixels,
FYI,
okay,
I.
Think
that
open
a
lot,
but
the
I
wrote
this
in
an
issue
somewhere,
but
the
menu
going
to
responsive
mode
can
be
you're
going
to
hamburger
mode,
can
be
dynamic
with
JavaScript,
but
also
have
a
non
JavaScript
fall
back
and
I'd
like
to
do
that,
and
it
should
be
core
worthy
that
that
would
be
ideal
because
you
don't
know
how
long
the
menu
is
or
what
else
is
in
the
menu
how
much
space
it
has
so
like
yeah.
A
A
It
looks
like
there
are
two
other
16
issues.
We
should
talk
about,
one
of
them
as
the
template
styling
for
comments.
A
B
B
A
A
B
B
Yeah,
it's
not
even
it's
like
I,
don't
think
anyone's
gonna
notice
and
plus
most
of
our
teasing
the
photo
tag
wrong.
There's
a
header
tag
wrong,
so
it
doesn't
really
matter.
It's
just
gotta
be
nice!
No
I
can
does
the
only
thing
I
could
think
of
that
where
I'd
have
to
take
markups
what
I
meant
to
say:
okay,
well,.
B
Yeah
I
have
no
idea
what
like
herb
duel,
had
a
suggestions
like
okay,
that
works,
I,
don't
I,
don't
know,
and
then
he
had
a
better
one
and
I
didn't
upbeat
the
PR
I,
don't
know
if
Nate
did
or
her
bitter
what
it.
A
A
And
then
we
did
completely
change
around
the
manage
display,
page
and
field,
you
I
to
add
view
modes,
and
so
I
would
just
recommend
anyone
who
hasn't
taken
a
look
at
that
lately,
like
give
backdrop,
had
a
look.
We
had
like
a
three
hundred
some
comment
issue
and
went
back
and
forth
and
tried
a
whole
bunch
of
different
things
and
I.
Think
we
wrecked
it's
something
where
everybody
who
is
participating.
The
issue
is
kind
of
an
agreement
that
it's
good
enough.
Nobody
really
loves
it,
but
it's
it's
filled.
You
I.
E
Going
in-
and
you
know,
messing
with
the
code
has
has
to
learn
more
things
than
just
like.
Oh
these
things
are
the
same.
That
display
mode
of
the
view
mode.
I
think,
like
you
know,
if
that's
I,
don't
think
that's
going
to
be
the
big
stumbling
block
for
people
to
suddenly
start
developing
things
right.
A
Especially
in
like
yeah
rendering
Anna
Deason
in
different
ways,
there's
a
lot
of
weird
stuff
going
on.
Ok,
so
I'm
going
to
revisit
that
issue.
I
did
a
pull
request
before
we
change
the
UI
around
a
lot
and
there
were
a
ton
of
like
code
comments
and
stuff
to
you,
which
I
actually
thought
was
helpful
because
of
the
code
comments
like
use
whatever
view
mode
and
then
in
the
code
it
says
view
mode
if
we
change
to
say
use,
display
mode.
E
E
A
And
all
right
and
then
there's
another
thing:
I
wanted
to
ask
nate
about
to
he's
not
here
anymore,
but
the
message
style
stuff
that
West
night
we're
talking
about
recently,
where,
like
basis
overrides
the
message
styles,
but
it
does
it
by
overriding
this
horrible
theme
in
theme
file
in
core.
A
That's
like
system
theme
CSS
that
contains
everything,
but
when
you
over
at
that
file
and
that
file
has
like
relative
links
to
images
in
it,
you
have
to
replace
the
like
the
CSS
for
those
with
more
relative
links
to
images
and
that's
really
tricky
and
themes.
Because
then,
when
you
sub
team,
all
of
those
image
links
are
broken,
so
it
just
became
kind
of
a
nightmare
to
just
make
message:
styles,
not
broken
in
a
subtly
and
so
I
know.
I
wish!
A
E
A
So
if
we
were
to
separate
out
the
message
CSS
from
that
theme
file
the
system
theme
CSS
file,
then
people
could
safely
override
all
of
the
CSS
and
system
theme
without
breaking
messages,
but
moving
that
CSS
from
that
file
to
another
file.
This
late
in
the
12
x
cycle
is
likely
to
affect
you
know
every
site
or
any
backdrop
will
have
that
change.
The
question
is
like,
if
somebody
deliberately
overrode
that
file
and
now
we've
moved
the
CSS
out
of
it.
A
They're
not
gonna
have
overridden
that
CSS
unless
they
specifically
overrode
the
selectors,
which
could
be
fine,
I
mean
I,
tend
to
think
that
people
don't
override
message
is
very
often
when
they
do
they
do
it
very
deliberately.
It's
not
something
we
usually
do
by
accident
and
so
I
think
that
even
moving
the
CSS
around
isn't
gonna
hurt
existing
sites,
even
though
it
might
affect
them.
If
anything,
it
would
like
bring
back.
Oops
I
broke
the
images
and
didn't
notice
it
yeah.
A
E
A
A
It
before
people
start
making
too
many
sub
themes
of
this
is
that
will
be
a
better
experience
for
those
people,
oh
so
that
was
kind
of
the
only
thing
where
I
was
like.
We
need
to
fix
this
right
now,
but
then,
at
the
same
time,
I'm,
like
it's
kind
of
you
know,
the
best
possible
fix,
isn't
something
we
would
normally
do
mid-cycle,
but
yeah
I,
don't
know
I'm
kind
of
on
the
fence
or
it's
like
I
feel
like
I.
You
know.
A
A
A
A
A
B
A
B
Like
that
to
you
but
yeah,
if
that's
not
coming
out
anytime
soon,
then
I
guess
I
know
there
are
things
in
basis
that
already
aren't
ie8
friendly
yeah.
A
B
B
A
B
A
Well,
I
think
that's
kind
of
the
goal
is
like
we
want
to
not
have
to
think
about
it
in
the
future,
and
maybe
we
should
say
like
basis,
doesn't
support
IE
or
something
like
that
might
be
good
yeah
accrued.
B
A
Okay,
let's,
let's
bring
that
up
again
at
the
next
meeting,
just
everybody
gets
chance
to
talk
about
it
and
see
if
we're
all
on
board.
But
okay,
let's
see
this
meeting
anything
else,
we
should
talk
about
kind
of
almost
out
of
time.
We
talked
about
a
lot,
though
we
did
good
talking
guys
all
right.
Well,
let's
wrap
it
up
and
we'll
see
you
guys
again
in
10
minutes
or
so
whoo,
okay,
bye,.