►
From YouTube: Backdrop Design & UX - July 18th
Description
Today’s design agenda: http://bit.ly/2ZELAbT
A
We
have
a
couple
of
issues
for
backup,
CMS
org,
the
first
one
is
one
I'm,
not
sure
we've
talked
about
in
this
meeting
before,
but
it's
clean
up
to
the
tribe
backdrop
page.
So
this
is
the
page
that
now
links
from
the
home
page
underneath
the
button
that
says,
try
demo
there's
a
more
ways
to
try
link,
and
it
goes
to
this
other
page.
That's
supposed
to
list
local
environments,
hosted
environments,
demo
environments,
all
of
that
stuff
should
be
there
and
so
Gregory
I
think
you
set
up
this
issue
5:55.
A
A
A
A
Of
the
companies
are
now
using
SVG's
for
their
logos,
and
so
this
is
also
what
sent
me
down
the
path
of
like
how
do
we
upload
an
SVG
into
backtrack
on
having
a
special
feel
the
type
that
is
an
image
that
might
allow
that
or
but
then
we
would
need
to
have
like
all
look.
The
logo
says
SVG
and
it
wasn't
sure
that
would
work
either.
A
B
Going
to
the
thickest
headers
into
accordions
yeah,
it's
just
that.
The
way
that
it's
styled
now
people
might
just
stick
to
the
first
one.
They
have
to
scroll
down
to
get
to
the
other
ones,
and
maybe
we
said
it
would
be
a
good
idea
to
solve
like
make
those
accordions
with
like
sort
of
like
more
buttons
or
no
all
right,
like
a
jump.
A
Yeah,
so
this
I
think
we
had
a
design
for
which
is
why
it's
the
way
it
is
now
another
thing
we
could
do
is
we
could
change
the
sort
order
so
that
it
was
random
and
that
might
make
it
so
that,
like
platform,
isn't
always
the
West
yeah
option.
I,
don't
know
this
is
beyond
my
ability
to
figure
out
how
to
make
it
like.
A
B
A
Just
so
we
can
try
some
things,
but
it
might
be
good
to
get
that
like
designer
feedback
on
it.
I
think.
Maybe
the
easiest
thing
to
do
is
like
you
recommend
is
just
make
it
accordion
for
now,
and
then
we
can
figure
out.
I
just
have
to
find
some
way
to
visually
indicate
that,
like
I,
don't
know,
add
like.
A
A
A
A
A
A
We
will
think
about
it.
Okay,
let's
see
online
backed
up
semester
org.
We
also
have
outstanding
issue
for
how
to
clean
up
the
modules,
themes
and
layouts
pages
and
also
get
up
grade
information
for
how
to
come
from
Drupal
I
have
a
bunch
of
work
on
that.
I
think
this
is
also
in
today's
dub
meeting
agenda
on
a
separate
branch.
I
think.
Maybe
what
I'll
do
is
today,
there's
two
other
things:
I
want
to
work
on.
One
of
them
is
getting
the
issue,
that's
almost
our
TVC
to
our
TBC.
A
That
should
be
really
quick
and
then
the
other
one
is
to
do
the
file
handling
stuff
for
getting
file
entity
in
the
core
and
I'm,
probably
not
going
to
do
all
of
the
things
so
I
might
not
have
time
to
do
this,
but
I'll
see
problem
is
with
this.
Is
that
I
get
so
excited
that
I,
even
though
I
have
like?
Oh,
it's
only
like
a
five-minute
change.
I'll
just
do
this
thing,
but
then
I'm
like
while
I'm
in
here
and
the
nice
try
things.
A
C
A
D
A
Infrastructure
is
there,
so
if
you
have
a
backrub
CMS
to
org
editor
account
and
you
can
edit
a
module,
you
can
edit
it
and
upload
the
file
there
and
it
will
appear
on
backups.
You
must
work
in
in
the
modal
and
stuff
in
the
same
way
that
it
works
for
themes
right
now.
We
just
don't
have
it
hooked
up
to
automatically
pull
from
the
info
file,
because
that
is
maybe
about
to
change
how
that's
done
yep,
because
if
all
T'pol's
green
chats
will
want
that
to
be
the
same
across
and.
C
A
Should
not,
that
is
a
bug,
and
we
should
note
that
somewhere
I
backed
up
Cena
at
work.
Okay,
again,
it's
probably
not
likely
to
get
fixed
until
we
replace
the
single
with
multiple
things.
So
for
the
time
being,
I
would
definitely
edit
the
note
on
back
trips.
You
missed
organ
replaced
image
there
manually,
that's
all
good
short-term
effects,
Jenna.
A
B
C
A
A
So
we'll
have
to
look
into
that
and
that
should
be
fairly
easy
to
change
in
project
module
because
we
already
have
it
for
themes
like
that's,
a
much
easier
change
than
going
from
single
to
multiple.
So
that
might
be
something
we
could
do
first,
but
I
haven't
looked
a
project
module
in
a
while
no
guarantees.
Theoretically,
it
seems
easy.
A
B
A
I
think
that
issue
needs
some
more
feedback
to
I'm,
not
sure
if
you
guys
have
looked
at
it
recently,
but
trying
to
figure
out
how
to
continue
to
support
the
same
single
screenshot.
We
have
now
plus
also
adding
the
addition
have
multiple
screenshots.
How
do
we
define
that?
Like?
Do
we
just
say
these
things
have
to
be
in
the
screenshots
folder,
or
do
we
say,
but
then,
wherever
the
heck,
you
want
inside
your
project
and
you
have
to
discuss
by
effect
a
path
the
same
way.
A
We
have
the
current
one
and
if
we're
gonna
say
they
have
to
be
in
a
screenshots
folder.
Why
do
we
make
people
like
defined
specifically
the
file
names?
We
could
figure
those
out
and
then
do.
We
want
people
to
love
people
to
control
like
the
order
they
appear
in,
because
then
it
might
be
good
to
say.
Okay,
here
are
all
the
file
names
may
want
them
in
this
order.
That
might
be
good
for
that.
A
B
B
A
B
A
A
Here's
the
URL,
here's
the
caption
here
so
whatever
we
would
need
to
come
up
with
some
other
way
to
map
them
like
we
could
have
an
array
called
captions
and
the
order
would
have
to
exactly
match
the
array
of
screenshots
but
yeah,
so
it'll
be
a
little
Messier
for
us
than
it
would
be
for
Drupal
8,
but
are
they
allowing
that
for
Drupal
7?
To
do
you
know,
I,
don't
know
well,
I'll,
take
a
look
and
see.
C
B
D
A
Removed
to
the
approval
process
on
Drupal
that
work,
so
there's
like
two
different
levels
like
one
of
them
as
being
like
authorized
to
get
something
or
other,
and
then
there's
just
anyone
can
create
anything.
So
if
you're
in
anyone
that
can
create
anything.
As
long
as
someone
adds
you
as
a
maintainer
to
an
existing
project,
you
can
have
access
to
it.
It's
like
get
trusted
user
role,
thing
that
if.
B
A
C
Can
I
so
kind
of
bring
up
a
forums
issue
that
could
be
pretty
quick
care?
Is
it
in
gen
I,
don't
know
if
you
saw
this
gregory's
commented
on
it
right
now
in
the
forums
users
can
edit
they're
approached,
but
they
question,
but
they
can't
edit
comments.
I
can
because
I
have
access.
Is
that
you
know
if
that
was
ever
intentional,
or
is
that,
like
a
backward
or
you
know.
C
A
C
A
Both
edit
comments
I
think
we
should
turn
it
on.
We
might
need
to
I
mean
you
can
see
it
as
an
admin
like
does
it
look?
Is
that
edit
button
ugly?
It
would
be
my
concern
cuz
we
did
similar
I'm,
making
the
like
comments.
Pretty.
It
would
be
like
burn
here's,
a
big
tab
in
the
middle
of
your
comment
or
something
but
yeah.
We
can
also
fix
that
later.
We
would
just
need
an
issue.
Yep
I
defer
to
Tim.
A
That
it
is
hard
to
edit
a
comment
even
as
an
administrator,
and
so
we
might
want
to
do
a
little
like
UX
cleanup
on
that
and
make
sure
there
is
a
button
or
a
link
or
something
right
there,
but
we'll
see
what
we'll
see
what
Tim
finds
yep
and
that's
something.
Actually,
that
should
probably
be
a
core
issue.
D
B
D
B
B
B
A
A
Issue
is
to
set
up
like
a
comment
and
globally
for
all
content
types
so
that
you
don't
have
to
add,
like
individual
fields
per
content
type,
unless
you
specifically
want
it,
but
I
think
that
we
decided
that
was
too
hard.
Those
too
much
API
changed
so
maybe
need
to
revisit,
but
I
don't
know.
If
there's
a
settings
issue,
maybe
there
is,
we
could
find
it
find
out
yep
all
right,
moving
on
back
drop
the
product.
A
So
our
first
issue
here
is
one:
that's
actually
not
currently
scheduled
for
114
thanks
to
our
new
my
stone
procedure,
but
I
think
it's
on
that's
important
to
mention
anyway,
and
that
is
getting
promoted
modules
on
the
installer.
So
because
we
were
just
talking
about
looking
at
project
module
anyway
about
the
screenshots
business.
A
A
We
already
are
that's
already
and
I.
Think
a
handful
of
our
modules
on
backed
up
semester
are
flagged
with
it
and
I
think
the
new
use
for
modulus
themes
and
layouts
pages
take
that
into
account
too,
but
I
just
need
to
figure
out
how
that
translates.
The
data
we
put
in
the
project,
feed
but
I
think
it's
probably
in
the
issue.
I'll
go
reread
it
yeah.
B
A
C
It's
I
think
kind
of
stalled
with
you
and
or
the
group
the
basically
the
stall
is
the
the
background
is
creating
the
feed
from
Metro.
Org
and
Jeff
has
some
questions.
Okay
about
like
what
to
date.
You
know
I
just
opened
up
the
issue
and
it's
stuff,
like
you
know
they,
the
naming
of
the
URLs
and
stuff
the
defeated.
Should
it
end
in
dot
JSON
or
is
it
API
dot
news
dot
JSON?
He
just
needs
to
know.
C
A
C
A
I
feel
like
I,
have
opinions
that
my
opinions
might
not
be
super
important
I
think
it
would
probably
be
good
for
us
to
look
at
like
other
similar
api's
in
the
world
and
be
like
what
is
the
convention
for
having
a
JSON
API?
Do
you
end
it
in
jcn?
Do
you
start
it
with
Slash
api
and
just
see
if
there's
like
a
common
pattern
or
if
there's
one,
we
prefer
when
we
don't
prefer
I,
don't
know
I
feel
like
it
should
end
in
Jason,
but
I.
B
A
I
think,
like
the
only
issue
with
making
this
decision,
is
that
it's
gonna
set
a
precedent
for
anything
else
that
we
want
to
have
a
feed
off
of
our
website
ingested
into
app
on
like,
and
so
it
would
be
good
to
not
have
to
change
that
later.
Yeah,
okay,
so
strong
feeling
about
it,
but
I
feel
like
it
might
be
one
slightly
more
important
than
a
lot
of
the
other
things.
We're
like.
Let's
just
try
it
and
get
it
done
in
time.
I'm
like
it
might
affect
other
things.
I'm.
C
Sure,
but
a
good
outcome
of
this
little
discussion
is
that
something
I
could
do
is
just
do.
Even
if
I
don't
have
an
opinion
is
do
a
little
bit
of
research
on
what
other
people
are
doing
on
what,
though
yeah
I
don't
know,
I'll
look
and
see
if
there's
I
reread
the
questions
and
see
if
there's
something
I
can
do
I.
A
Think
that
would
also
be
good
to
get
needs
an
opinion
on
this,
because
he's
built
a
lot
of
api's
in
Drupal,
seven,
six,
whatever
to
see
like
II,
you
know
what
I
don't
know
if
there
had
been
Jason
or
what-have-you,
but
just
like
I
said
like
what
all
about
builds
did
what's.
The
common
convention
might
also
be
good
for,
like
specific,
while
experience
and
I've
only
ever
done
stuff
that
I've
used,
so
it
doesn't
really
matter
or
anyone
else
right.
B
A
A
C
A
Okay
and
then
the
last
issue
we
have
on
here
is
configured
it
and
that's
just
something:
I
want
to
work
on
today
to
get
it
was
RT
BC,
but
then
we
changed
it,
and
so
now
it's
not
our
to
BC
anymore,
so
it
just
needs
a
little
modification.
It's
like
a
test
update
or
something
that's
something
not
very
complicated.
A
I
tried
to
do
it
last
week
at
the
camp,
but
then
I
got
camped
and
then
we
don't
have
any
other
issues
specifically
marked
for
114,
but
we
have
a
lot
of
issues
marked
for
113
that
if
they
get
to
an
RVT
status
could
be
slated
or
either
the
next
release
or
the
next
major
release,
depending
on
how
big
they
are.
So
if
you're
particularly
interested
in
user
experience,
those
are
good
places
to
look.
B
A
There
is
an
issue
for
that.
That's
like
create
a
theme
function
for
human
and
machine
name,
but
it
it
modifies
a
pattern
we
already
had
in
court.
That's
not
use
because
views
is
doing
it
a
weird,
one-off
way,
so
I
think
it
matches
the
content
type
form
where
it's
like,
like
all
the
content,
type
name
parenthesis
small
machine
name,
and
it
says
in
name
colon,
but
we
couldn't
put
that
in
views
because
we
didn't
have
enough
corazon
space,
because
these
columns
are
really
big.
B
B
B
A
B
A
B
A
A
A
A
A
C
I
know
we
need
to
wrap
up.
Is
there
anything
else
important?
Or
can
I
because
let
me
just
quick
ten
we
I
have
I've
had
a
number
of
comments
about
things
like
in
basis.
They
had
room
that
I
I
find
sort
of
problematic,
but
some
of
them
I
don't
know
if
they
really
could
be
fixed
because
it
would
break
other
people's
sites,
partly
that's
Mike.
The
reason
for
my
theme
Tatsu
and
is
to
sort
of
correct
a
lot
of
these
things
that
I
think
would
work
better
and
that
and
I'm
just
one
I
guess.
C
A
C
A
Wanted
to
fix
that
we
could
add
that
as
a
setting
where,
on
old
backdrop
sites,
it
would
be
set.
That's
like
you
special
background,
color
on
heading
and
then
for
new
sites
that
checkbox
will
be
unchecked
and
they
would
install
without
it.
So
I
think
any
time
you
have
a
thought
like
that.
It
is
super
valid
to
write
in
the
issue
queue
and
we
can
figure
out
how
we
can
do
it
in
a
way.
That's
backwards
compatible.
So
we
don't
break
those
existing
sites
that
bothers.
D
B
C
Well,
I
have
been
intending
to
like
I
mean
we
talked
about
him
at
and
then
on
Tuesday,
some
of
the
things
as
I
was
doing.
My
demo,
I
just
sort
of
commented
on
them
and
I've
been
thinking
about
doing
issues
for
a
number
of
them.
But
then
it's
like
a
not
clear
some
of
them
like
how
easy
they
are
to
fix
right
now
and
if
the
better
solution
isn't
really
just
to
contribute
something.
Well.
C
A
Put
down
all
your
thoughts
and
then,
as
it
becomes
clear,
which
ones
are
actionable,
we
can
spin
off
the
sub
issues
and
link
them
together.
Okay
and
that
way
for
now
maybe
like
these
are
all
the
cool
things
my
theme
is
doing
like
okay,
these
are
moving
in
the
core,
but
some
of
them
so
yeah
a
couple.
B
Of
things
that
that's
one
design,
not
a
specific
design
thing,
but
our
showstoppers
for
people
being
able
to
design
things
is
actual
support
for
SVG
and
animated
gifs
for
websites
and
I
know
that
people
don't
like
them,
but
there
aren't
people
that
are
using
it.
So
neither
backdrop
or
Drupal
or
Drupal
8,
ly,
7
or
8
support
any
of
these
out
of
the
books
like
it
gets
a
bit
tedious,
especially.
B
A
Gifts
will
work
in
Drupal,
7,
8
and
backdrop
as
long
as
you
don't
use
an
image
style.
If
you
leave
the
original
image,
it'll
work
exactly
as
intended,
but
the
problem
is
that
we
are
using
the
GD
image
library,
which
is
a
part
of
PHP
and
the
GD
image
library
does
not
support
retaining
animation
with
gifts
when
you
apply
other
transformations
like
changing
size
or
anything
that
we
have
with
our
image
effects.
A
So
if
you
switch
to
image
magic,
which
I'm
gonna
be
doing
here
in
a
couple
of
my
sites
anyway,
for
other
reasons
you
can
get
the
GDS
you
can
you
can
get
the
animated
gif
support,
I'm,
not
sure
if
that's
ever
gonna
be
an
upstream
change
that
will
go
into
Gd
and
native
PHP,
which
is
unfortunate,
but
it
might
be
good
to
have
some
process
to
better
document.
All
of
this
stuff,
I,
just
I,
don't
know
about
like
do
you
want
animated,
gifs?
A
B
Yeah,
it's
it's
more
serious
than
the
the
animated
gifs
like
I
mean
animated
gifs.
It
is
like
silly
sites,
I
guess,
but
but
this
V
G
is
like
you
have
at
least
what
we
see
in
the
agency
that
I
work
for
is
the
more
and
more
what
you
call
it.
Media
teams
have
like
produce
SVG's
and
they
say
that's
that's
been
interested
it
didn't
it
standard.
Why
not
support
it?
Yeah.
A
A
Also
prefer,
like
there's
a
lot
of
benefit
beneficial
regencies
SVG
like
they're
much
more
performant.
You
only
need
one
image
instead
of
multiple
image
sizes
for
different
browser,
just
like
a
bunch
of
stuff
that
makes
them
better.
Theoretically,
in
the
future,
you
could
CSS
it's
like
style
parts
of
them,
although
that's
not
currently
working
yeah
I
think
it's
definitely
the
future.
We
just
need
to
figure
out
how
to
account
for
it
with
our
current
image
fields,.
B
There's
a
couple
of
modules,
country
modules
that
support
there's
two
problems:
two
major
problems:
whether
it
is
supporting
the
SBG
thing
extension
out
of
the
box,
which
is
the
easy
bit
we
can
change
that
now
then
is
yeah,
rendering
it
and
and
actually
creating
a
thumbnail
for
it.
These
are
so
there's
a
module
that
creates
an
SVG
ease
of
like
field-specific,
which
I
don't
think
we
should
go
down
the
path
we
should
make.
B
B
A
A
That
was
not
because
I
want
to
use
the
same
field
for
everything,
but
yeah
I
will
look
at
the
other
ones
and
see
what
the
solution
is,
because
it
seems
like
everything
our
image
module
is
doing,
is
very
complicated
and
unnecessary
for
SVG's,
and
it
should
be
easy
to
undo
what
it's
already
doing,
but
there
it's
doing
so
much
like
I
could
see
that
being
very
messy
process
like
don't
create
a
thumbnail
just
link
to
the
original
image
right.
It's
the
same
thing.
But
how
do
you
do
that?
Yeah,
okay,
worth
looking
into
okay?