►
From YouTube: Backdrop Design - Oct 10, 2019
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
Today's
October
10
this
meeting
is
a
check-in
on
design
tasks
for
backup,
CMS
design
and
usability
tasks.
To
start,
there
are
two
things
we
would
like
to
improve
on
backdrop:
CMS
org
are
two
major
things.
One
of
them
is
the
try
backdrop
page.
We
have
a
meta
list
of
updates,
just
issue
number
five,
five,
five
and
the
CMS
or
queue,
and
this
one
is
to
clean
up
the
try
backdrop
page
so
now
that
you
can
use
the
live
demo
from
the
homepage,
there's
a
button
there
that
says
other
ways
to
try.
B
B
So
we
could,
if
we
can
figure
out
some
way,
to
fix
that
page
so
that
it's
a
little
bit
more
usable
for
everyone,
or
at
least
consistent
and
I-
think
the
reason
that
we
put
it
in
a
random
so
orders,
because
we
didn't
want
to
give
any
one
way
to
try
more
priority
than
the
others.
But
we
didn't
necessarily
think
through
usability
issues
of
trying
to
go
to
that
page
later
thinking.
You
know
where
something
was
Gregory
had
a
bunch
of
suggestions
there
about
how
to
make
that
better.
B
We
could
do
some
kind
of
a
jump
menu
at
the
top
or
accordion,
so
you
could
always
see
all
of
them
there
a
bunch
of
ways
that
we
can
make
that
page
a
little
more
useful.
So
if
anyone
wants
to
work
on
any
of
those
issues,
number
five.
Five
five
contains
a
bunch
of
suggestions
on
how
to
improve
that.
We
also
want
to
improve
the
modules,
themes
and
layouts
search
experience,
particularly
now
that
people
are
starting
to
search
the
backdrop.
B
See
must
work
site
for
modules
that
they
might
need
to
update
come
in
from
Drupal
it'll
be
great.
If
we
can
get
some
more
information
on
there
about
modules
that
maybe
aren't
needed
anymore,
when
you're
coming
future
for
information
to
update
instructions
on
how
to
use
backdrop,
if
you
used
one
of
the
previous
modules-
and
so
we
have
an
issue
for
that
edition,
number
442
I
have
a
low
branch
that
I
think
has
a
new
video
mode,
but
the
search
functionality
still
needs
some
work.
B
But
if
anyone
wants
to
jump
in
on
any
of
that,
I
think
we
could
also
use.
We've
got
some
better
designs
for
those
pages.
We
could
also
just
have
them
fill
in
it.
So
there's
a
bunch
of
improvements
to
the
search
for
modules,
themes
or
layouts
pages
on
backtrack
semester.
We
of
course,
are
all
years
for
other
improvements
to
doctor
semester,
org
design,
usability
or
even
functionality
wise,
and
if
you
want
to
check
on
those,
you
can
check
on
the
issue:
queue
which
is
backtrack.
Ops
back
drops
a
masterwork.
C
B
B
I
think
those
pages
are
now
using
these
filters
instead,
instead
of
used
search,
so
we
could
definitely
put
it
back,
but
we
should
test
it
first
and
make
sure
that
any
of
our
custom
stuff
that
we
done
to
modify
search
isn't
still
going
to
affect
it.
We
also
had
a
request
at
bag
camp
that
the
search
box.
There
also
searched
the
API
site
in
the
forum
site,
which
is
a
little
bit
more
complicated
because
now
we're
talking
about
craft
site
searching,
we
might
need
something
external
like
solar
to
index.
B
All
of
that
content
at
once
so
I
think
there's
two
steps
there.
One
of
them
is
like
just
get
a
basic
search
working
and
then
we
have
to
follow
up,
which
is
like,
let's
make
this
a
more
comprehensive
search
tool
for
people,
but
yeah
I,
don't
know
if
there's
issues
for
either
of
those,
but
we
could
definitely
create
them.
Yeah.
B
Okay,
those
are
the
main
issues
we
want
to
highlight
for
backdrops,
a
master
org,
there's,
obviously
much
more
in
the
queue.
Any
improvements
are
always
welcome,
but
let's
move
on
to
talking
about
backdrop
CMS
the
product
itself,
so
we
have
a
couple
of
outstanding
usability
issues
and
we
talked
about
some
of
these
in
our
last
meeting.
B
One
of
them
is
the
drop-down
menu
behavior.
So
this
is
a
minute.
Some
people
are
finding
confusing,
especially
the
difference
between
how
it
works
on
desktop
and
on
mobile,
with
drop-down
menus
in
general.
People
tend
to
when
they're
hover
dropdowns
on
desktop
people
tend
to
hover
and
go
all
the
way
down
to
the
bottom
level,
not
clicking
on
the
top
level
items.
So
I
think
there's
been
a
long-standing
request
to
duplicate
the
top
items
in
the
submenu.
B
It
explains
the
way
yeah
and
then
the
second
time
you
click
on.
It
goes
to
the
page
and
I
think
that's
also
sometimes
confusing
for
people
where
you
wouldn't
expect
a
different
behavior
when
you
click
on
the
same
link
twice,
and
so
if
we
were
able
to
duplicate
the
top
link
in
the
child.
That
might
also
fix
that
problem.
So
we
should
prep
because
we're
using
this
smart
menus,
JavaScript
library,
we
should
probably
look
upstream
and
see
if
there's
any
work
going
on
on
this
already.
There
might
not
be,
but
it's
definitely
a
place
where.
C
B
So
the
this
Joker
bear
does
have
the
ability
to
have
different
themes
and
I.
Don't
know
if
any
of
this
will
qualify
for
a
theme
or
if
it
should
be
a
setting,
but
we
could
look
at,
for
example,
some
of
the
other
themes
to
come
with
a
library
out
of
the
box
and
see
if
they
change
any
of
these
behaviors,
because
it
could
be
as
simple
as
giving
them
a
select
list
for,
like
which
theme
do
they
want
and
having
it
work.
That
way,
and
we
might
have
to
add
some
like
useful
text.
B
E
And
I'd
also,
second,
that
it
would
be
nice
to
have
settings
for
it
first,
because,
when
you
change
behavior
now
on
sites
could
be
changed.
That
is
a
danger
and
also
I,
know
this
baby
on
desktop,
which
we
described,
which
one
some
people
want,
but
I
find
it
are
now
annoying
because
they're
too
quick,
we
are,
for
one
click
more
to
go
somewhere
and,
for
example,
in
there
are
some
platforms
like
zebra
and
when
I
have
to
use
it.
I
am
so
annoyed
to
have
to
click
so
often
yeah.
C
I
think
so,
yeah
I
think
that
it's
also
a
so
we're
building
tools
for
site
builders
and
it
comes
down
to
the
end.
Customers
or
the
end
customer
might
be
asking
the
site
builder
to
do
it
that
way,
and
another
customer
might
ask
them
to
do
it
another
way.
So
it
would
be
great
if
we
provided
an
easy
way
for
us
to
accommodate
site
builders
so
that
they
can
accomplish
what
the
task
is
being
asked
like
that
us
that
it's
being
asked
by
their
customers,
no
matter
what
the
customers
preferences.
C
D
B
Could
extra
clicks,
but
that
could
be
really
frustrating
for
people
we,
but
just
like
also
adding
duplicating
links,
places
might
not
add
extra
clicks,
at
least
in
the
desktop
version,
because
we
could
still
get
there
with
hovers.
But
I
don't
know
if
that
means
we
would
be
adding
extra
clicks
on
we'll
just
have
to
see
what
solutions
are
there
I'm
sure
we're,
not
the
only
people
that
have
run
into
this
and
see
what
kind
of
options
we
have
and.
B
C
B
F
B
When
we
first
put
in
the
menu
system,
we
have
this
other
issue
that
was
like,
maybe
make
it
an
API
is
that
we
don't
always
have
to
use
the
same
menu
and
we
haven't
implemented
that
second
part
of
it,
but
we
might
be
hitting
on
some
good
use
cases
here
for
like.
If
we
get
to
a
limitation
of
walk
this
menu
can
do.
We
could
revisit
that
issue
and
say
we,
maybe
we
need
to
swap
it
out
a
little
something
else.
I
would
love
to
do
some
investigating
on
this
menu.
First
I
guess
it
is.
B
D
C
B
G
C
B
All
right
other
things
that
we
should
talk
about
for
usability
on
backdrop
of
product.
One
of
them
is
this
long
outstanding,
promoted
modules
on
installer
issue,
every
time,
I
think
about
this
I
kind
of
wonder
where
it
is
that
we
get
stuck
I,
wonder
if
it
might
be
good
to
update
to
the
parent
issue
just
so
that
every
time
we
go
to
revisit
it
we'll
know
like
okay.
These
are
these
are
the
steps
we
need
to
do.
This
is
where
we're
stuck
right
now,
because
there
are
a
lot
of
moving
pieces
to
that.
B
C
B
C
C
C
C
C
B
Thing
too,
is,
if
maybe
like
he
could
document
how
its
set
up.
We
have
other
people
have
access
to
the
server
they
just
don't
know
what
to
check
for
so
maybe
we
just
need
like
a
readme
file
on
there,
something
that's
like
meeting
the
concepts
that
are
supposed
to
be
running
and
then
that
way
anyone
could
log
in
and
work
on
it.
But
right
now,
because
he's
ended
up
in
his
salon.
Who
knows
how
it
works.
B
G
Ux
issues:
it's
just
there's
an
issue
for
it.
There's
been
a
little
discussion.
It's
there
I
just
think.
We
just
need
a
little
more
feedback,
though,
with
behavior
text
for
flexible
layouts,
I
found
to
be
very
confusing.
I've
done.
A
poll
I
put
I
just
posted
a
link
in
I
posted
a
pull
request
with
some
alternative
text,
but
it's
really
draft
I'd
love
feedback.
So
I
don't
know
we
need
to
talk
about
it
right
now.
I,
just
like
that.
B
B
B
C
C
B
Okay,
yeah
I,
remember
running
into
that.
Like
you
created
that
issue
or
something
similar
at
least
talked
about
it
right
after
installing
module
went
in
and
I
was
like.
Oh
yeah,
that
looks
like
a
good
idea
and
then
put
the
back
of
my
mind.
Come
in
at
one
point:
I
demoed,
it
I,
don't
remember
if
it
was
in
a
training
or
I'm
just
showing
someone
and
I'm
like
this
is
terrible
and
then
I
went
and
found
your
issue
and
I'm
like
of
course
Gregory
sorry
but
yeah.
B
It's
it's
like
this
amazing
feature
that
you
don't
you
don't
notice,
there's
a
problem
with
it
until
you
have
to
explain
it
to
someone
and
then
you're
like
oh
yeah,
I,
guess
that's
a
little
weird
he's
buttons
say
the
wrong
things.
They
take
it
like
in
strange
order.
Yeah.
C
The
pull
request
for
it
was
really
like
consolidating
things.
We'd
used
the
code
and
the
logic
that
we
required
just
to
go
from
one
page
to
another,
and
it
was
just
chuck
it
in
a
fieldset
and
that's
it
because
the
second
page
was
not
doing
anything
actually
was
just
providing
information
on
what
to
do
with
translation
files.
Okay,.
B
C
Started
working
on
it
today
afresh
and
one
comment
that
I
have
to
this
is
related
to
the
next
meeting
with
that
meaning.
Maybe
we
definitely
rewrote
it.
The
the
change
that
fixed
the
pl
files,
the
detection,
because
again
I
had
to
sort
of
like
my
newly
applied
to
fix
the
single
line
of
the
ledges
and
since
we're
on
the
last
iteration
of
things
that
I
was
fixing
on
that
issue.
C
Maybe
I
don't
know,
but
specifically
for
being
stutter.
I
I
thought
that
the
the
most
common
use
case
is
to
add
another
language
or
another
couple
of
languages.
So,
instead
of
having
a
job
down
there,
maybe
we
would
have
a
a
series
of
checkboxes
sorry
radio
buttons
unless
the
list
becomes
bigger
than
like
a
randomly
chosen
number
3
there,
but
yeah
I.
Don't
think
that
people
will
be
installing
like
5
or
10
languages.
The
most
common
use
case
would
be
just
a
couple
of
mannequins
doing
the
Installer.
C
So
yeah
anyway,
these
are
things
that
I
would
like
feedback
with
and
then
I
can
update
the
pull
request
and
then
all
that
false
or
gets
annoyed
by
the
fact
that
I
mean
I
understand
that
it
has
been
brought
up
another
time.
So
we
currently
have
the
field
sets,
have
capitalized
letters
on
their
labels,
and
this
was
also
brought
up
in
the
entry
that
we
recently
fixed
with
the
the
available
which
followed
filters
for
foreign
body,
but
the
text-
and
we
just
exclusively
sorry
just
specifically
for
these
field
sets.
We
made
it
lowercase,
but
yeah.
C
It's
some
more
cases
from
these
coming
up.
It's
just
it
emphasizes
things
that
shouldn't
be
emphasizing
it
specific
ranges,
so
I'm
not
sure
if
we
should
file
a
an
issue
against
the
7
admin
theme
to
just
make
it
lower
case
in
general,
for
the
entire
17
or
if
we
would
treat
it
on
a
case
by
case
scenario,
yeah.
B
D
B
Don't
know
if
this
is
only
done
in
seven.
We
should
make
sure
we're
not
doing
it
in
core
also,
but
it
could
be
really
confusing
for
people
or
highlighting
things
that
shouldn't
be
highlighted
where
I
think
that
we're
gonna
know
in
that
interface,
when
something
does
need
more
emphasis,
we
can
update
that
easily.
B
B
C
C
C
A
Yeah
I
think
that
would
be
great.
I,
when
you
said
that
and
I've
ever
experienced
this
a
couple
of
times,
looking
at
that,
looking
at
our
all
uppercase
fields
and
titles
and
thinking
like
if
it
was
if
it
was
causing
a
problem
for
usability
or
accessibility,
readability,
there's
all
kinds
of
things,
so
you
know
doing
a
quick
search.
It
doesn't
take
a
whole
lot
of
investigation
to
find
out
that
that's
kind
of
bad
idea.
A
Like
all
our
previous
letters,
it's
fortunately
already
a
lot
of
great
aggregation
of
like
people
that
have
had
the
same
question
and
then
the
same
kind
of
results,
there's
something
it's
not
overwhelming.
You
know,
like
I,
think
if
you
had
a
good
design
case
for
it
in
limited
circumstances
that
might
kind
of
be
okay,
but
it's
it's
generally
not
good.
I.
Think.
C
C
A
E
So
currently,
looking
at
this
17
and
it's
really
a
lot
of
uppercase.
B
E
C
And
then
a
final
Heaven
file
definitive
way
they
think
a
final
goal,
maybe
for
115,
is
to
provide
a
dark
version
of
the
seven
at
the
end,
because
this
is
a
lot
of
like
there's
a
trend
for
everybody
to
just
especially
the
people
that
are
environmentally
cautious
or
yeah.
It's
fine!
Sorry,
it's
battery
consuming
for
people
working
on
mobile
as
well
so
yeah
or
playing
some
people,
just
fine
engine.
B
C
B
A
It's
totally
you're
right.
It's
totally
invoke
right
now,
but
it's
also
funny
that
it's
still
super
subjective
and
it's
almost
never
the
Falls
still,
because
I
think
that
the
initial
impression
is
that
people
still
prefer
the
lighter.
Like
sorry,
the
majority
of
people
still
really
prefer
the
white
appearance
and
then
I
think
there's
a
very
vocal,
smaller
group
that
really
likes
dark
modes,
and
so
it's
like
developer
appeasing,
basically
across
the
board,
that's
happening
like
with
dark
modes,
although
maybe
I
think
the
proliferation
might
be
increase
in
popularity
slightly
too,
but.
A
C
B
A
I
would
require
some
work
to
do
that,
because,
right
now
our
color
schemes
are
like
changing
where
there
are
already
colors
rather
than
like.
You
know
like
where
it's
blue,
then
you
could
change
it
to
green,
but
we
don't
have
any
accommodation
for
I
mean
we
could
you
know
for
flipping
everything
like
where
it's
white
or
darken
words.
A
That,
basically
just
means
that
you'd
have
to
have
the
ability
to
change
almost
every
color
on
the
entire
page,
because
you'd
need
to
be
able
to
each
want.
Colors,
like
you
know,
the
actual
text
on
the
page,
the
heading
colors,
the
background,
colors
I
mean
it'd,
be
like
everything
which
means
you
could
make
an
entire
site
where
everything
was
red
and
they
would
just
get
a
big
red
page
or
something
like
I,
don't
know,
and.
C
B
G
It's
under
the
design
section
addresses
the
ticket
number
and
I
guess
so.
I
was
kind
of
phasing
out
exactly
what
I'm
dressing.
For
me,
I
mean
it's
given
me
a
little
bit
of
feedback.
My
big
question
is
what
we
can
do
in
a
minor
release
in
terms
of
like
CSS
basis
like
this
is
something
I
might
how
what
we're
talking
about
now.
Relations
just
talking
about
I,
have
no
idea.
G
C
No,
it's
just
step,
one
is
to
add
it
to
the
agenda
so
that
it
can
be
brought
up,
because
we
we
obviously
like
we
added
a
half
a
dozen
issues
now,
and
we
obviously
want
to
tackle
them
soon
as
we
can,
but
as
soon
as
they
are
as
long
as
they're
in
the
agenda,
they
will
be
perked
up,
and
since
this
is
a
design
issue,
I
just
record
that
and
mention
that
we
should
add
it
to
the
agenda.
Yeah
well,.
G
C
G
I
mean
I
think
there's
sort
of
some
ideas
about
how
to
solve
this.
The
problem
is,
can
we
solve
it
and
they
sort
of
implied
that
we
could
I'm?
Just
like
it's
to
me,
it's
really
unclear
what
we
could
do
to
change
the
CSS.
You
know
you
know
in
basis
when
that
could
affect
existing
sites.
I'd
get
some
feedback
on
that
anything
like
there's
another
issue
after
this.
B
Two
ideas,
one
of
them
is,
we
can
use
a
theme
setting
and
I
think
we
have
our
main
theme
settings
in
basics
right
now,
but
we
could
add
one
that
would
be
something
like
header,
logo,
background,
color
style
or
something
better
name
for
that,
and
we
can
provide
options
that
are
like
always
provided
a
background.
Color
never
provide
a
background
color
or
provide
a
background
color
only
on
mobile
and
based
on
whether
one
of
those
three
are
selected.
B
We
can
add
a
class
in
pre-process
to
either
the
header
region
or
the
global
page
variable
like
a
body
wrapper
or
whatever,
and
then
we
could
have
the
CSS
in
existing
style
sheets.
That
would
change
the
behavior
based
on
whether
that
class
was
there
or
not
so
leave
the
default
as
it
is
now.
But
then,
if
there's
an
additional
class
that
says
like
no
style,
it
could
remove
it
or
you
could
start
with
nothing
new
classes
there
at
it
and
then
add
that
class
by
default.
C
G
B
Yeah
I
just
gave
you
two
ways
to
do
it.
A
third
way
it
would
be
to
based
on
this
steep
setting
value,
add
a
new
style
sheet,
and
so
that
so
she
wouldn't
even
be
loaded
for
anyone.
That
already
has
the
site
I've
done
when
they
have
anyone
added.
So
you
can
either
do
it
with
classes
where
you
add
a
new
class
of
anyone
running
the
current,
so
it
doesn't
get
the
class.
But
if
you
change
the
setting
it
it
gets
added
or
you
could
do
it
without
entirely
a
stylesheet
get
at
it
and
I.
B
G
C
B
Well,
it's
this.
It
only
gets
added
with
the
one
setting
I
don't
know
and
we'll
have
to
see
what
the
code
looks
like,
but
I
can't
imagine
it
being
more
than
like
background
colored
there's.
If
there's
this
line,
don't
like
this
one
is
and
then
I
would
either
have
media
queries
that
would
allow
it
to
do
it
on
mobile
or
not
on
mobile
or
not,
but
it
still
shouldn't
oh
I,
don't
think
we'll
be
facing
any
I
mean
I,
don't
know.
B
Cuz
I
haven't
seen
the
code
I,
don't
think
there'll
be
anything
else
with
like
positioning
with
I.
Don't
know,
I,
don't
know
what's
on
there
now,
so
we'll
have
to
see
what
your
code
comes
up
with
but
like
in
my
mind,
I
imagine
it's
one
line
in
reality
could
be
more
like
15,
but
I
still
think
that's
not
enough
to
tip
to
about
an
entirely
new
style
sheet.
I
think
if
we'd
have
other
issues
that
we
should
solve
them
in
other
like
if
we
need
other
team
settings,
we
could
do
that
too.
B
G
What
I
was
getting
at
was
that
if
there
were
multiple
issues
involved,
changing
defaults,
but
we
don't
necessarily
get
like
a
honey.
Is
there
a
way
to
do
that
in
a
in
an
additional
style
sheet,
so
that
we
would
add
one
thing
it
only
gets
used
for
like
new
sites
or
something
and
and
it
it
just
sort
of,
makes
this
change.
And
then
we
could
bundle
a
number
of
issues
together
where
we
can
actually
make.
B
B
G
G
B
C
B
C
B
B
So
we've
got
like
three
things
going
on
that
are
hard
like
number
one.
We
need
to
do
do
this
in
a
backwards
compatible
I.
Never
do
we
need
to
do
it
in
a
way
that
works
with
color
module
and
number
three,
probably
everyone's
it
anyway.
So
do
we
rarely
do
something
at
all,
yeah
I
would
I,
would
I
I
think
Tim.
If
we
want
to
go
with
a
hidden
setting,
we
can
do
that,
but
I
think
maybe
it
should
be
some
like
a
summer.
B
We
can
point
people
that,
like
here's
the
Jason
file,
that
contains
the
thing
that
says
true
unfortunate
or
false,
and
even
if
that
documentation
lives
somewhere
like
on
the
API
site,
we
might
be
able
to
put
something
in
like
theme
settings
for
basis,
that's
like
if
you
installed
your
site
before
January
1st
20
22
here,
if
you
want
to
disable
this
thing,
yeah
that
is,
it
is
good
question
is
whether
we
need
that
this.
G
B
C
By
the
way,
by
the
way,
well
testing
the
the
color
of
module
in
bases
and
see
that
we
have
a
problem,
it's
a
plum
version
of
the
color
set
where
the
menu
is
not
like.
It's
on
a
black,
the
main
the
top-level
menu
thing
is
black
up
on
me
purple
and
it's
like
not
visible.
What
do
you
call
it?
The
area
thing
is
not
there
in
the
contrast
is
not
good.
C
C
B
Great
so
one
more
thing
before
we
move
back
into
design
issues,
we
have
one
thing
left
on
or
a
usability
thing,
and
that
was
creating
a
theme
function
for
the
combination
of
both
human
and
machine
names
for
things.
This
is
one
that
I
think
Gregory.
You
brought
up
initially
and
then
I
ran
into
it
immediately
after
he
brought
it
up.
B
When
I
was
working
on
the
file
entity
listing
there
was
a
girl,
geez
I
wish
I
had
that
function
that
doesn't
exist
and
we
do
have
a
whole
bunch
of
places
that
do
inconsistently
across
before
so
I.
Think
if
we
can
get
this
function
here,
then
all
of
a
sudden
we'll
be
able
to
make
our
user
interfaces
that
issue
number
3402.
I
suspect
it's
probably
a
good
first
issue,
but
I
have
like
a
feeling
that
creating
the
theme
function
might
be
easy,
but
trying
to
find
all
the
places
where
we're
doing
it
wrong
and
updating.
B
It
might
be
hard,
so
I'm
not
really
sure
how
that's
gonna
go
and
then
more
design
issues.
Somebody
pointed
out,
I
think
this
might
have
been.
You
Tim
that
when
you
try
and
put
two
hero
blocks
on
same
page
in
basis,
you
get
a
little
white
gap
between
them.
I
ran
into
that
the
first
time
I
tried
to
do
a
basis
that
theme
to
or
others
weird
gap,
underneath
the
hero,
block
and
I
would
love
to
see
that
fixed
in
core,
but
again
in
a
way,
that's
exactly
it's
compatible.
B
So
if
we
can
find
just
like
an
move
that
from
one
place
to
another
I,
don't
know
if
you've
looked
into
that
or
not
yeah,
but
issue
number
forty
95
I
think
would
be
a
good
improvement
and
then
SVG
support
in
core.
This
is
something
that
we're
talking
about
a
bunch
of
times.
I
think
is
really
important
for
keeping
backed
up
as
a
modern
CMS.
We
need
to
figure
out
some
way
to
do
SVG
support.
B
There
are
couple
kinship
modules
for
Drupal
seven
there's
a
issue
to
do
a
see,
SVG
support
and
core
for
Drupal
8
I,
don't
know
if
WordPress
does
this
yet,
but
I
think
that
it's
important
for
us
to
figure
out
how
to
do
it,
so
that
our
image
style
thing
doesn't
fire
for
SVG's.
It
just
prints
the
image
at
the
right
style,
the
right
size
and
yeah.
A
little
tweaking
I
think.
C
This
yeah
this
has
been
coming
up,
soft
and
lately
like
there's
a
lot
of
media
or
design
themes
that
provide
these
videos
for
their
designs
and
people
try
to
upload
them
and
it's
like
yeah.
It's
embarrassing
move
it.
So
there's
a
sibling
issue
to
that.
I
think
that
I
filed,
but
I
don't
see
it
linked,
and
that's
that
has
to
do
with
animated
gif
files.
So
so
long
with
that
not
style
is
applied
on
them.
They
don't
lose
their
animation.
B
The
GD
image
library,
on
your
server
and
I
think
that,
like
I've
started
switching
me
using
imagemagick,
because
then
you
can
resize
animated
gifts
and
they
retain
that.
It
also
image
magic
produce
better
compression.
So
you
get
smaller
file
size
which
makes
Google
happier
about
your
image
assets,
but
I
think
that
GD
does
have
some
updates
that
they're
working
on
I
don't
know
how
much
of
this
they're
catching
up
on
but
yeah.
It
would
be
to
see
how
much
we
can
test
for
and
alert
people
about.
B
On
our
end,
where
we
can
say
hey,
this
image
is
in
the
fields
that
might
have
image
styles
on
it,
any
animations
will
be
lost
or
something
like
that
yeah
I
mean
I,
also,
don't
know.
If
we
can
test
the
image
tickets
uploaded
to
see
if
the
original
had
animations
on
it.
So
I'm
not
sure
I'd
want
people
to
see
that
message
every
time
they
upload
any
image,
don't
start
to
ignore
it
and
when
they
have
one
that
needs,
but
so.
B
Of
like
does
this
image
have
animation
on
it
and
could
it
be
displayed
in
a
way
that
you'd
break
the
animations
by
using
an
image
style
and
that's
also
sometimes
tricky
to
figure
out
at
the
field
level,
because
on
the
content
type
you
might
not
have
it,
but
maybe
somewhere
on
a
view.
You
do
have
it
so
yeah
yeah.