►
From YouTube: 2022/03/31 Backdrop Outreach
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
All
right,
we're
now
live
on
youtube.
Today
is
thursday
march
31st,
and
this
is
our
fortnightly
community
outreach
meeting
before
we
get
into
the
agenda.
We
should
go
around
and
do
some
quick
introductions.
I
like
to
do
popcorn,
where
one
of
us
will
do
an
introduction
and
then
randomly
select.
Someone
else
to
introduce
themselves
keeps
everyone
on
their
toes
I'll.
Have
me
I'll
be
happy
to
go
first.
A
My
name
is
jen
lampton
joining
from
oakland
california
and
it's
nice
weather
here
today
after
a
week
of
rain,
so
a
few
days
of
rain,
that's
it
for
me
how
about
martin.
B
D
Okay,
my
name
is
sarvesri
and
I'm
in
walnut
cove
north
carolina
and
I'm
interested
in
getting
more
people
into
backdrop
and
helping
them
to
learn
it.
Let's
see
that
means
tim,
I
think.
E
Yeah,
my
name
is
st
paul
tim
in
deerwood
minnesota,
and
things
are
here
outside
right
now,
which
last
week
there
was
one
of
them.
I
got
the
whole
clock
today.
So
that's
good
news,
and
otherwise
I'm
just
really
busy.
E
Let's
just
go
ahead
and
start
with
the
the
the
robert
your
the
spam
update.
How
goes
the
spam
wars.
C
Oh,
I
feel
like
zalinsky
against
the
russians.
C
Yeah,
that's
hot.
Turning
up
my
mic
see,
maybe
that's
better
much
better.
Okay,
thanks,
sorry
about
that
magic
of
settings
with
one
of
their
own
anyhow
on
the
spam
topic
so
a
bit
over
a
week
ago,
we
tried
some
new
things.
We
put
a
new
honeypot
field
on
the
user
registration
form
which
had
this
very
nice
friendly
question.
C
What
what's
your
interest
in
backdrop
took
off
the
biography
which
we
had
been
using
as
sort
of
a
span,
detection
and
what's
been
happening?
Is
that
both
spammers
and
and
potentially
real
people?
C
Just
put
like
a
one
word
answer
in
the
honeypot
field,
you
know
faster
or
the
cms,
and
so
it's
not
a
real
good
discriminator,
but
also
the
interesting
thing
is.
We
can
still
detect
most
of
the
spammers
because
they
still
go
in
and
put
their
spam
in
the
biography
field,
and
since
it's
no
longer
on
the
user
registration
form,
that
actually
means
they
have
to
get
their
account
and
then
come
back
and
log
in
and
then
put
it
in
the
the
bio
field.
C
I
still
kill
them,
but
our
honeypot
field
isn't
really
adding
a
whole
lot
of
discrimination
in
this
case,
in
fact,
we
could
probably
just
go
back
to
allowing
the
bio
so
solicit,
maybe
other
things
to
try
I'll
mention.
Someone
had
suggested
that
we
install
anti-bot
that
was
used
very
well
and
when
I
went
to
install
it,
I
found
it's
already
installed
and
has
been
active
since
2018.
C
So,
presumably
that's
been
protecting
us
from
pure,
robotic
submissions
and
what
we're
getting
are
click
workers
how
to
so.
What
other
steps
are
there?
We
could
take
to
create
barriers
for
standards
that
don't
create
barriers
for
real
people.
This
solicit
input.
D
C
E
D
C
Yeah
I
thought
about
that,
and
but
it
is
unfriendly.
D
C
Yeah,
rather
than
saying
you
will
be
deleted,
it
might
be
enough
just
to
say
this
is
moderated
by
hu.
This
is
human
moderated
and
you
know,
and
let
people
let
the
click
workers
draw
their
own
inference.
Certainly
the
the
deletion
hasn't
hasn't.
You
know
stopped
people
from
from
using
from
submitting,
even
though
delete
them
all
the
time.
C
Something
else
that
we
started
doing
was
tracking
ip
addresses
and
the
the
ones
that
have
been
deleted.
Those
ip
addresses
have
never
repeated.
C
So,
potentially
you
know
they're
they're
moving
around
they're
using
tor
or
something
that
they're
not
coming
from
the
same
like
they're
they're
messing
their
address,
so
we
so
blocking
ip
addresses
probably
is
not
going
to
make
a
big
dent.
If
we
were
to
start
that.
E
My
gut
reaction
is
that
this
is.
There
is
no
solution
like
what
what
you
do.
Is
you
fight
it,
the
best
you
can,
but
the
idea
other
than
full
moderation,
which
we've
also
talked
about
right,
which
is
just
moderating
who
can
get
on,
and
I
think
you
know
I'm
against
that
unless
it
were
a
real
crisis,
and
I
think
other
people
have
expressed
that
as
well,
that
we
really
want
to
make
it
easy.
E
Well,
I
don't
know
I
mean
one
of
the
things
that
we
could
do
is
step
back
and
look
at
a
little
bit.
What
and
why
we're
providing
these
and
talk
more
about
that.
That
might
be
helpful,
but
in
general,
if
we're
trying
to
get
people
to
sign
up
on
our
site,
you
want
to
keep
the
the
resistance
as
little
as
possible.
I'm
personally
skeptical
that
any
kind
of
message
we
put
up
is
going
to
voluntarily
stop
them.
E
B
B
Does
this
word
exist
in
there
or
you
you
could
do
it
either
way
you
could
say:
does
it
contain
this
or
you
could
say,
does
it
not
contain
this
and
and
all
it
was
doing
then?
If
so
I
I
did
a
simple
proof
of
concept
whereby,
if
they
didn't
mention
backdrop
or
in
in
the
thing
then,
instead
of
creating
it
it
it
it
sent
them
a
message
but
block
blocks
the
account
but
sent
them
a
message
saying.
Thank
you
for
your
registration.
B
This
will
be
reviewed
by
a
moderator
in
due
time,
so
the
person
getting
that
isn't
going
to
know
that
they're
getting
any
special
treatment
because
it
doesn't,
it
doesn't
tell
them
that
they're
being
treated
as
spam.
It
just
says
that
they
might
think
that
that's
the
normal
process
so
that
that
could
just
make
it
a
bit
easier
in
the.
E
I
think
the
problem
they're
going
to
run
into
is
that
we
can't
do
that
perfectly
right,
so
we're
either
going
to
allow
some
spam
through
or
we're
going
to
block
some
legitimate
people
from
getting
in,
and
I
think
that's
inevitable
right,
because
I
just
can't
imagine
what
the
perfect
rule
would
be,
and
I'm
not
sure
you
know
it
isn't
that
we
have
a
flood
of
spam
right
now.
So
if
we
don't
want
to
block
some
legitimate
people,
I
think
is
our
objective,
which
means
that
you
know
for
me.
E
I
would
always
err
on
the
side
of
letting
the
spammers
get
through
and
just
deal
with
them,
and
I'm
not
you
know.
The
question
is:
how
bad
is
this
bad
problem
and
you
know,
is
making
it
a
little
bit
less.
Even
that
big
of
a
you
know
is
that
that
helpful?
My
understanding
is
that
it's
a
couple
of
people
a
day
is
that
correct
or
where
are
we
at
right
now
with?
How
big
is
it?
It's.
D
A
lot
so
you
could
maybe
take
the
most
egregious
spams,
look
for
keywords
and
those
like
escort
services
or
something
and
pull
those
out
immediately
with
a
rule.
I
think
that
that
might
cut
back
on
some
of
it.
C
That
would
still
catch
only
a
small
fraction,
and
maybe
I
should
start
posting
the
the
spammer
lists
in
that
in
that
issue,
to
give
some
data
before
I
kill
them
and
make
them
go
away,
but
it's
really
diverse.
It's
like
gardening's
won
this
garden
in
service,
and
I
mean
I
joke
about
the
escort
service
in
the
online
casinos,
but
it's
electrician
and
real
estate,
just
all
over
the
place.
Yeah
there's,
usually
a
decent
fraction
of
them,
are
aren't
in
vietnamese
or
what
looks
like
an
indian
language.
C
E
E
E
I
don't
know
I
mean,
I
think
this
is
so
now
we're
talking
about
backdrop.org
right,
our
two
primary
sites
where
we've
had
to
deal
with
this
and
a
backdrop.org
in
the
forum
where
we
actually
seem
to.
I
haven't
seen
hardly
any
spam
posts
lately,
I'm
sure
there
are
spam
accounts
and
I
don't
know
if
anybody's
actually
monitoring
the
spam
accounts
on
the
forum,
but,
like
I
haven't
seen
any
posts
come
through.
It
used
to
be
that
almost
every
day,
we'd
have
one
or
two,
and
I
feel
like
in
the
last
month
or
so.
C
I
don't
think
so,
but
but
how
would
we
detect
someone
who's
moving
ip
addresses
for
each
account.
A
Yeah,
so
it
depends
on
how
right
like,
if
they're,
using
a
cdn
and
like
one
browser
session
it
would,
it
would
be
like.
Oh
sorry,
we
can.
You
know
you're.
A
Only
this
browser
is
only
allowed
to
create
one
site
a
day,
but
if
they're
really
using
like
sophisticated
emulator
software,
where
every
time
they
fire
up
a
new
browser
window,
it's
in
a
vm
on
a
cdn
like
they're
they're,
going
to
be
very
good
services
that
do
this
link
worker
stuff
that
aren't
that
we're
not
going
to
catch,
because
you
know
they
know
all
of
the
secrets
and
they're
going
to
get.
A
D
Well,
if,
if
they
know
that
it's
not
going
to
work,
if
we
tell
them
that
this
is
moderated,
whether
whether
we
do
moderate
it
fully
or
not,
we
can
post-
and
this
is
fully
moderated
on
that
form,
then
that
would
discourage
them
probably
from
well.
A
A
We
want
need
to
post,
go
and
they're
just
paid
by
like
how
many
posts
they
so
we'd
have
to
do
something
that
would
be
troublesome
enough,
that
it
would
make
it
up
to
the
people
who
are
making
decisions
about
like
which
websites
do
we
post
all
of
this
garbage
onto,
and
I
don't
know
if
just
showing
a
message
to
the
person
whose
pa
form
is
gonna,
do
any
good.
It
would.
A
Something
like
you
know,
they're
not
actually
seeing
those
posts
show
up
right
because
robert's
deleting
them.
They
eventually
be
like
well
we're
not
getting
paid
by
the
client
to
post
this
stuff
because
it's
never
showing
up.
So
then
that
might
sort
of
trickle
down
to
the
person
who's
actually
doing
the
work
and
be
like
okay,
we're
going
to
take
this
site
off
of
our
list,
because
it's
not
getting
us
anywhere
and.
D
E
Okay,
well,
I
don't
know
where
to
go
with
this
conversation
I
mean
I
yeah,
it
should
yeah.
E
I
don't
know,
I
wonder
getting
a
single
sign-on
will
help
us
at
least
reduce
the
the
ports
of
entry,
because
right
now
we've
got
multiple
sites
that
we
have
to
combat
spam
on.
So
that
would
be
one
step
that
would
help
us
I'm
looking
right
now.
I
don't
know.
If
robert
are
you
watching
just
backdrop.org,
or
are
you
also
watching
the
forum.
E
I
know
in
the
past
olaf
has
helped
with
backdrop.org
and,
for
example,
there
was
a
spam
post.
Yesterday,
that's
gone
so
somebody
deleted
it.
So,
and
I
I
sometimes
do
that,
but
I
know
other
people
do
as
well.
Actually
yeah
it
looks
like
olaf
has
been.
I
think
it's
usually
all
of
rye.
That
touched
his
fan
on
the
forum
and
deleted.
E
There's
not
there
isn't
like
there
aren't
any
posts.
When
I
look
at
accounts,
it
looks
like
we've
been
deleting
spam
accounts
too,
because
there
are
not
many
new
accounts.
There
are
definitely
some
here
that
are
spam.
E
We
probably
should
delete,
but
I
don't
know
if
they're
posed
anywhere
anyway.
E
D
A
D
C
F
B
I
think
the
next
steps,
possibly
I
mean
I
know
robert,
when,
when
it
was
offered
a
couple
of
weeks
ago,
you
were
wanting
to
sort
of
concentrate
on
it,
while
and
and
just
stick
with
it
yourself,
while
you
kind
of
tried
out
a
number
of
things,
but
it
could
be
if
it
if,
if
we
just
accept
that
we're
going
to
just
have
to
carry
on
blocking
it,
is
it
something
that
should
be
shared
yeah.
I
have
a
couple
of
have
a
couple
of
people
who
who
sort
of
take
share
the
load.
Maybe.
A
Another
another
thought,
too,
is
if
we
made
it
so
that
there
was
less
things
that
those
spammers
could
do
and
you'd
know
more
about
this
than
anyone
else.
Probably
robert
like
right
now,
there's
a
number
of
content
types
that
people
can
create
without
approval.
If
we
made
it
so
the
only
page
they
got
access
to
without
approval
was
the
profile
page.
Is
that
still
too
tempting.
A
Okay,
that
doesn't
help.
C
What
does
it
matter
to
if
someone
has
a
spamming
profile,
except
in
place,
there's
places
where
there's
listings
and
and
then
you
know,
like
people,
advertising
their
services
and
then
those
get
buried
by
the
standard
profiles.
E
I
I
frequently
search
for
web
pages
that
mention
bankrupt.org,
and
sometimes
I
get
referred
back
to
spam
accounts
on
bankrupt.org,
and
I
find
that
so.
My
point
is
that
I
sometimes
find
spam
accounts
through
google
inadvertently,
and
so
that's
one
of
the
dangers
of
having
them
out
there
is
that
people
will
find
them
and
they'll
they're,
clearly
spam,
and
then
it
just
it
looks,
reflects
poorly
on
us
plus.
I
think
it
encourages
more
spammers.
A
So
one
thing
we
could
do
or
two
things,
I'm
thinking
of
things
that
might
help
us
is:
we
could
either
make
it
so
that,
as
a
registered
user,
you
can
create
create
your
account.
You
get
your
profile
and
you
can
edit
it,
but
that
profile
itself
doesn't
get
rendered
until
that
account
gets
approved
so
that
we're
not
preventing
people
from
creating
accounts,
but
we're
just
preventing
the
display
of
their
data,
and
we
could
print
some.
A
Like
this
account
is
currently
under
moderation,
we
could
also
decide
like
what
causes
that
message
to
appear
like
if
there
are
specific
things
that
were
like
we
know,
this
person
is
going
to
be
good
if
they
put
in
like
four
paragraphs
about
like
how
much
they
love
the
backed
up
user
interface
or
something
I
don't
know
what
we
can
detect.
But
if
we
had
something
we
knew
we
could
validate,
they
were
good.
A
We
wouldn't
need
a
human
intervention
and
then
we
could
just
have
all
of
those
accounts
queued
somewhere,
where,
like
once
a
week,
we
could
have
someone
go
through
and
review
them,
so
we
wouldn't
necessarily
need
to
watch
them
every
day,
but
that
might
at
least
like
sort
of
the
burden
on
our
moderators,
where
we're
not
preventing
the
people
from
doing
anything
with
their
accounts,
which
is
preventing
them
from
publishing
anything
that
would
make
it
advantageous
for
them
to
get
access
to
that
account
before
they're
approved,
and
then
I
had
another
idea
was
it
I
don't
remember,
but
something
something
along
those
lines
where
having
all
of
the
moderation
not
on
the
account
creation
itself,
but
on
the
display.
D
A
Way
those
google
search
results
that,
like
tim,
is
stumbling
across.
Those
pages
won't
be
indexed
until
after
that
account's
approved.
So
if
we
added
no
index
tag
and
a
piece
of
information
prevented
their
profile
content
from
showing
up,
then
even
if
they
tried
to
put
a
link
in
their
username
or
like
nike,
whatever
that
content
still
wouldn't
get
indexed
on
google,
so
that.
A
C
I
have
to
correct
something
I
said
earlier
in
this
that,
because
of
the
way
the
addresses
there
actually
are
quite
a
few
repeat
ip
addresses
in
among
the
spammers
when
I
sorted
them
in
order,
so
ip
address
blocking
scammers
would
be
effective.
C
A
Okay,
so
if
we're
going
to
block
by
ip
address,
we
should
probably
not
do
that
at
the
application
level
like
we
wouldn't
want
to
do
it
from
like
within
backdrop,
but
we
could
do
it
on
the
server.
Let
me
nate
has
the
solution
that
he's
using
this
on
another
one.
Let's
ask
him
about
it
in
the
dev
meeting
and
see
what
he
wants
to
do,
probably
at
the
genex
level
or
something
I
don't
know.
C
A
So
if
you
can
block
the
traffic
before
it
gets
to
the
application,
then
there's
no
strain
on
your
application
whatever,
and
if
you're
trying
to
do
it
in
the
application,
then
it
already
like
bootstraps
the
page
and
is
using
the
application
to
do
the
blocking.
But
if
you
know
you
don't
want
like
any
traffic
from
that
ip
address,
you
can
just
avoid
all
that
traffic.
So
this
is
particularly
important
under
like
a
super
high.
A
You
know
volume
site
because
you
would
want
the
traffic
you
don't
want
affecting
the
traffic
you
do
want
for
the
volume
that
we're
dealing
with.
It's
probably
not
that
bad.
But
if
we
I
mean,
I
don't
know
like,
I
don't
know
what
kind
of
like
view
requests
we're
getting
from
those
ipa
addresses,
but
right
now
we're
getting.
We
know
we're
getting
bad
like
account
creation
content.
A
Those
are
like
form,
submissions
and
data,
but
if
those
people
couldn't
even
see
backdrop
cms.org,
that
might
also
help
be
our
benefit
like
if
you're
a
spam,
creating
company
you're
like.
Let
me
check
out
what
websites
are
out
there,
there's
probably
a
whole
team
of
people
who
do
that,
as
opposed
to
the
people
who
create
the
accounts
and
if.
A
Then
that
would
keep
the
list
too
and
so
yeah
we'd
be
losing
all
of
the
view
traffic,
as
that's
the
you
know,
right,
read
traffic
as
well
as
right
traffic.
So,
but
I
don't
know.
A
A
You
want
to
get
your
phishing
forms
or
whatever
so
we'll
see
if
he
wants
to
do
that
on
backup
semester
too,.
A
We
don't
know
where
they're
coming
from
I
mean
it
is
a
good
question
like
what
are
these
ip
addresses
they're
using?
I
would
imagine
if
they're
sophisticated
enough
to
use
like
unique,
browsers,
showing
unique
ip
addresses
in
order
to
create
all
of
this
stuff
that.
A
They
probably
are
rotating
through,
like
amazon
cloud
servers
or
like
layouts
or
just
you
know,
things
that
you
can
fire
up
for
a
month
and
then
turn
off
and
then
now
that
ip
address
is
no
longer
the
one
that
you
you're
in
trouble
from.
So
it's
tough
because
it's
hard
for
companies
like
amazon
to
stay
on
top
of,
like
which
one
of
these
people,
that's
paying
me
money.
Do
I
like
want
to
turn
away.
A
A
E
That
does
happen.
I
mean
this
fighting
spam
is
a
huge
in
freedom,
spam,
it's
a
huge
industry
and
it's
a
huge
problem
and
everybody's
dealing
with
it.
So
like
just
reporting
them
to
you
know
you
can't
keep
up
with
that.
There
are
these
services
and
I
think,
we're
using
them
where
we
we
do
mark
we
flag
spam
accounts
and
that
supposedly
goes
on
to
a
list
that
sort
of
tracks
fab
accounts
right.
I
think
we
do
some
of
that
already
robert.
C
E
Well,
I
mean
I
do
think
it
turns
earlier
about
blocking
moderating
content
like
I
would
not
want
to
do
that
on
the
forum,
because
that
that's,
that
would
be
too
overwhelming,
and
people
want
to
post
right
away.
We
could
make
the
argument
that
there's
nothing
you
need
to
do
on
bankrupt.org.
E
That
requires
media
right,
it's
urgent
right,
so
you
create
your
account
and
it
could
be
that
we
do
moderate
that,
but
we
need
to.
We
need
to
make
sure
that
we
do
it,
because
I
have
run
into
scenarios
where
I
found
content
on
one
of
our
sites.
E
That's
been
sitting
there
for
six
months
waiting
to
be
moderated
because
we
didn't
have
a
process
in
place,
so
we
just
want
to
avoid
that
situation
and
on
bankrupt.org,
maybe
that
that
really
does
make
sense,
and
you
know
I
just
remembered
we
were
going
to
bring
this
up
in
context
with
civic
crm
right
this,
because
that's
that's,
probably,
maybe
why
you're
so
concerned
about
it
just
because
you're
thinking
about
it
as
we
implement
civic
crm,
the
the
implications
of
letting
spam
accounts
get
through
is
greater,
and
it
might
be
that
it
might
be
that
I
do
re
reverse
my
position
on
moderating.
E
A
That's
why
I
was
thinking
if
there
was
a
way
that
we
could
sort
of
allow
ourselves
to
cue
that
process
of
account
cr
like
review,
without
preventing
that
person
from
doing
anything
so
like.
A
You
do
put
it
on,
like
account
creation
that
person
can't
log
in
until
somebody
comes
and
verifies
their
account,
but
if,
instead
we're
like
you
can
log
in
you
can
create
content.
You
can
do
whatever
just
everything
remains,
unpublished
until
you're
reviewed,
then
we're
not
preventing
the
real
people
from
doing
the
things
they
actually
need
to
do.
We're
just
saying
we're
going
to
review
this
like
next
thursday
or
something,
and
I
feel
like
that
sort
of
buys
us
a
little
more
flexibility
in
terms
of
when
we
need
to
do
the
work.
E
Open,
I
wrote
an
article
recently
for
opensource.com
and
I
created
a
profile
and
it's
and
but
if
I
go
to
my
profile,
it
does
doesn't
it's
empty
and
it's
a
drupal
site
by
the
way,
a
drupal
7
site,
and
I
suspect
that
what
they're
doing
is
exactly
what
you're
talking
about
is
that
I
can
log
into
the
site,
but
they
my
my
profile,
yep
now
it's
there,
so
I
was
able
to
log
in
I
was
able,
like
I
had
to
be
able
to
log
in
to
create
an
article
right,
but
my
article
wasn't
published
and
even
after
my
article
was
published,
my
profile
still
wasn't
visible
even
to
me
and
I
think
that
what
they
do
is
they
just
threw
that
up.
E
So
it's
really
just
exactly
what
you're
describing
is
that
you
can.
I
could
create
an
account
without
any
moderation.
I
could
edit
things
I
could
edit
my
profile.
I
could
go
back
multiple
times
and
edit
my
profile,
but
nobody
saw
my
profile
until
a
human
approved
it
and
now
it's
there
so
yeah
that
might
be
a
good
strategy.
E
Again,
it
isn't
saving
its
work,
it
removes
their
urgency
right,
it's
like
if
we
don't.
If
we
don't
check
spam
for
a
few
days,
nothing
is
getting
posted.
The
accounts
will
still
get
created.
E
D
C
E
C
E
E
Yes,
and
we
have
occasionally
found
like
on
our
service
server
people
who
provide
services,
in
fact,
you
know
if
we
went
from
time
to
time.
We've
had
some
like.
You
know,
escort
services
that
we're
advertising
up
back
right.
You
know
it's
backdrop:
service
providers,
they
some
of
them
have
been
there
for
months
and
we,
you
know,
we
just
didn't
notice
them
and
it
will
eliminate
the
possibility
of
that
happening,
which
is
a
good
thing
that
might
be
happening
less
lately.
E
We
spent
most
of
the
meeting
on
this.
Hopefully
it's
been
helpful.
C
Yeah
I'll
throw
some
notes
into
the
issue
too,
of
what
we
talked
about
and
then
maybe
come
up
with
the
next
next
action
to
take,
and
the
next
meeting
will
ask
nate
about
locking
right
now,
I
think
blocking
known
bad
spammers
should
have
a
discernible
effect.
It
won't
catch
everything
because
there's
a
lot
of
solo
spams,
but
it'll
catch.
Some.
B
I
guess
an
easy
and
easy
way
just
to
do
that
would
be
to
have
a
to
to
only
include
ones
in
a
view
that
have
a
particular
role
and
by
the
nature
of
you
approving
them,
you
give
them.
You
give
them
a
role
that
that'll
probably
be
the
simplest
one
to
do
that
without
installing
too
much
other
modules.
E
Yeah,
I've
done
something
like
that
before.
I
think
that
you're
you're
saying
the
implement
that
only
prove
people
could
post
right,
yeah
yeah,
that's
one
way
to
do
that
is
to
just
yeah
exactly
you
have
to
have
us
a
certain.
You
know
an
approved.
We
could
just
pay
a
rule,
call
approved
or
a
role
call
approved
and
you
have
to
be
approved
in
order
to
post
or
create
content,
and
then
we
just
have
to
figure
out
how
to
assign
that
role.
That's
one
solution.
C
Yeah
for
b.org,
it's
just
the
profile
postings
yeah.
You
need
to
have
need
to
come
up
with
a
criteria,
so
maybe
there's
a
role.
That's
equivalent
to
you
can
add
to
your
profile,
then
there's
a
question
of
how
do
we
decide
who
gets
that
role
and
additional
manual
acting
and
to
assign
people
that
role
actually.
A
A
Okay,
that's
the
problem,
but
it
sounds
like
tim,
whatever
module
or
whatever
website
you
are
looking
at
recently,
the
drupal
site
has
a
module
that
controls
that
with
something
it
might
be
fun
to
check
the
source
code
and
see
if
we
can't
figure
out
how
they're
doing
that
we're
asking
them.
I
guess.
A
E
I
mean
if
we
were
creating
the
site
new
you
could
create.
You
could
use
something
like
profile
2,
then
the
profile
becomes
the
content
type
and
then
you
would
have
that
control
number
and
maybe
that's
what
they're
doing
is
they're
using
like
profile
2
or
whatever.
It
was
okay.
We
should
wrap
up.
Yes,
anything
else.
Well,
I
obviously
didn't
have
anything
urgent.
At
the
beginning
of
the
meeting.
E
Tell
you
what
sarvajri
your
question.
I
mean
about
documentation
and
training
I
as
a
community.
I
don't
know
that
anything's
happened
since
we've
last
talked
about
that.
I
have
been
working
on
my
my
backdrop,
class
and
I
have
been.
I
can
update
you
later.
Chevrolet
I've
been
starting
to
write
for
the
last
two
or
three
weeks.
I've
done
I'll.
Send
you
a
link
in
a
minute.
E
Unfortunately,
I've
been
not
as
much
as
I'd
like
so
but
I'll.
Send
you
a
link
in
a
few
minutes
to
show
you
what
what
I've
done?
Okay
put
it
in
I'll
put
it
in
zulu.