►
From YouTube: Backdrop Weekly - July 18th
Description
Today’s development agenda: http://bit.ly/2O0YWOJ
A
C
If
you
want
the
two
sentence
summary,
is
it
just
a
new
contribs
thing
that
is
being
designed
to
sort
of
fix
some
quirks?
It
said
something
about
basic
basis
and
will
fix
a
few
quirky
things
that
I
think
just
make
it
work
better
out
of
the
box
and
hopefully
allow
for
more
sort
of
user
customizations
through
the
UI.
That's.
A
C
A
Great
there's
also
a
new
date,
multi-select
module
and
then
two
weeks
ago,
I'm
not
sure
if
these
were
mentioned
either
we
had
phpexcel
two-factor
authentication,
which
makes
me
really
excited
and
two-factor
authentication
basic
plugins.
So
if
anyone
has
been
chomping
at
the
bit
for
two
factors,
stuff
there's
now
a
bunch
of
code,
there
that'll
be
a
good
start
on
those
which
is
great.
Let's
see,
we
talked
about
vector,
CMS
org
and
the
forum
site
in
the
last
meeting.
I,
don't
think,
there's
any
updates
on
the
translation
site.
I
did
notice.
A
We
had
a
bunch
of
new
translators
which
is
great
every
now
and
then
Olaf
Robson
and
he's
like
there's
people
doing
translations
it
so
excited,
which
is
great.
I
have
a
like
backburner.
I
really
want
the
theme
on
that
site
to
match
the
themes
on
all
of
our
other
sites.
So
if
we
had
anyone
who
wanted
to
spend
some
time
making
a
Drupal
7
theme,
that
could
be
something
that
can
be
done.
Another
thing
we
should
start
thinking
about
how
to
port
the
localization
server
over
to
backdrop.
A
So
maybe
if
you
didn't
want
to
work
on
the
theme,
but
you
wanted
to
work
on
upgrade,
we
have
a
couple
of
controls.
We
need
to
get
working
to
make
that
work
right
for
us
too.
So
some
kind
of
fun
long-term
projects
that
are
for
people
if
you're
interested
and
then
Jeff
isn't
here
but
I
did
want
to
mention
that
we
have
been
talking
about
fixing
the
dragon
bot
in
our
git
er
live
chat.
Lately
cuz,
it
hasn't
really
been
working.
A
A
A
Current
status
of
it
is
there
is
one
poor
request
ready
that
fixes
the
problem.
There
is
another
pull
request:
there's
an
exact
port
from
what
went
into
Drupal.
That
does
not
fix
the
problem.
There
is
another
pull
request
that
contains
patches
or
contains
tests
from
what
went
into
Drupal
and
NASA's,
but
doesn't
test
the
same
things
there's
another
test.
It
does
test
the
same
thing
and
doesn't
pass
a
bunch
of
different
boy
requests
in
various
different
state.
I
know,
I
might
have
spent
seven
hours
just
on
working
on
this
test.
A
For
that
issue,
I,
don't
think
they're
very
important
they're,
not
definitely
not
worth
seven
hours
of
time
for
a
problem
that
we
have
a
fix
for,
but
I
don't
really
know
what
to
do
to
help
move
that
forward.
So
what's
in
my
most
recent
pull
request
is
all
of
the
tests
that
do
pass
and
test
the
correct
things,
but
not
I.
Remove
the
two
tests
that
fails
and
I
don't
know
why
they
fail,
but
they're.
A
So
there's
a
poor
request,
that's
sort
of
like
committable
that
is
missing
the
two
of
two
of
the
most
problematic
tests,
so
I
am
tempted
to
try
and
create
a
follow-up
issue
where
we
can
figure
out
how
to
get
those
last
two
tests
passing
but
I.
Don't
think
they're
important
enough
to
block
the
fact
that
many
back
drop
sites
have
been
broken
for
a
long
time
and
we
should
fix
it.
D
Make
sense
either
comment
commit
the
tests
comment
it
out
the
two
that
fail.
We
have
to
do
there
and
then
follow
the
follow-up
so
that
we
don't
like
if
we
leave
it
as
a
follow-up
issue.
You
might
get
lost
in
time,
but
if
it's
there
in
code,
so
mumble
notice
it
yeah
I,
just
add
them
but
comment
them
out.
Yeah.
A
Great
there
are
a
bunch
of
other
bugs
in
backdrop.
Obviously,
we
have
inherited
all
the
same
bugs
from
triple
plus
a
few
of
our
own.
If
you're
interested
in
working
on
them
there's
a
whole
bunch
that
are
tagged
for
the
one
13-3
milestone
of
those.
There
are
a
whole
bunch
that
also
already
have
pull
requests
that
maybe
just
need
to
be
brought
up
up
to
brought
up
to
date
or
tested.
C
C
D
I
tested
it
as
well,
it
works
for
me,
so
what
it
does
currently
is.
It
puts
all
the
orphan
blocks
in
the
last
region
of
the
new
template
available,
which
is
better
than
what
we
have
now
making
them
disappear,
and
we
can
have
a
follow-up
to
make
it
prettier
or
make
a
dummy
region
where
those
go
I
did
that
look
that
code
change
is
very
small,
bad
lines
of
code.
That's.
D
C
A
D
A
So
we
have
with
me
there's
like
one
meta
issue,
the
links
to
all
of
the
cross
court
issues
and
then,
with
all
of
the
other
modules,
we
have
one
meta
issue
that
mentions
all
the
modules
that
need
met
us.
How
many
of
these
do
you
think
we
should
put
in
the
agenda
should
be
just
put
the
main
one.
That's
like
this
is
all
the
stuff
we
need
to
work
on,
or
should
we
put
the
sub
ones
that
list
all
of
them
and
she
is
marjan,
I.
Think.
D
That
we
should
go
sequentially
like
maybe
at
the
first.
What
we've
done
with
views
is
like
we
bust
together,
maybe
what
you
call
it
minor,
sorry,
bad
versions
from
d7,
one
or
two
of
them,
depending
on
how
many
commits
the
hand.
So
if
we
get
the
first
one
that
gets
us
say
from
716
to
717
or
something
like
that
to
the
next
one
and
once
that's
finished,
then
we
move
to
the
other.
D
So
if
we
add
one
there,
that's
good
I
think
that
I've
reached
to
a
point
like
I've
created,
pull
requests
for
most
of
them,
at
least
for
the
first
couple
ones.
So
if
we
close
all
the
linked,
if
we
merge
all
the
all
the
linked
pull
requests
for
for
one,
then
we
can
replace
that
one
in
the
agenda
with
the
next
one.
Okay,.
A
Let's
go
I'm
a
little
concerned
about
doing
it
that
way,
because
I
feel
like
that,
might
slow
down
our
progress.
I,
don't
know
how
you
feel
about
it.
If
it's
more
important
for
you
to
just
make
sure
one
of
them
gets
closed,
then
to
have
all
of
them,
because
I
feel
like
there's
a
bunch
of
stuff,
that's
getting
merged
all
the
time
that
doesn't
really
matter
what
issue
it's
in
like.
If
a
oh
yeah,
it's
good,
they'll
merge.
It
then.
D
C
D
A
A
A
I
am
still
stuck
on
that
I
haven't
worked
on
it
in
the
last
week,
but
last
time
I
did
work
on
and
I
was
having
a
problem
with
the
file
uploader
crashing,
but
I
got
some
of
the
widget
settings
moved
around
so
baby
steps
and
then
Gregory
trusted
host
patterns.
Is
this
one
RGB
see
it's
closed?
No.
D
No,
it's,
it
means
review
absolutely
so
the
as
I
mentioned
in
previous
the
meetings
that
the
current
implementation
is
less
intrusive
than
d8.
We
made
it
so
that
there
is
a
warning,
not
an
error
in
the
start
of
spades.
It
lets
people
know
that
this
feature
is
supported.
If
there
are
trusted
hosts
specified,
it
lists
them
there.
It
doesn't
allow
you
to
edit
them
through
the
UI,
yet
that
we
left
that
as
a
follow-up,
perhaps
and
they're,
considering
it
for
Drupal
as
well
and
in
Drupal
they're,
also
backporting
into
d7.
A
And
I
think
yeah
I
had
another
question
about
that
issue.
But
I
don't
remember
now
what
it
was
next
issue:
configurable
layout
templates,
I.
A
D
Have
you
started
moving
things
around?
He
asked
a
few
questions
about
moving
a
thing.
It
was
a
things
into
and
doctored
admin
dot
a
and
C
file,
yes,
or
something
like
that,
but
his
last
his
last
changes
I
think
when
he
attempted
that
broke
things
like
I
broke
the
PR
sandbox
again,
ok,
but
yeah.
He
needs
to
fix
those.
It
was
just
moving
things
around
and
then
he
said
that
he
has
a
couple
of
months
ahead
of
him
to
work
on
the
tests.
A
D
A
A
And
then
my
last
one
is
recent
news
block
which
I
think
we
just
talked
about
in
the
design
meeting.
Where
let
me
see
if
I
can
recap
this.
It
looks
like
everything's
functioning,
but
we
just
need
some
decisions
on
what
the
API
for
micropsia
at
work
needs
to
look
like
yep,
so
Jeff
I
know
did
a
bunch
of
work
on
that.
So
thank
you,
Jeff
for
putting
in
a
bunch
of
time
and
then
I
know
how
much
people
have
been
testing
it.
A
D
E
A
C
Surprise,
yep
two
things
an
easy
one:
night
I'd
like
to
schedule
another
service
point,
Saturday
of
that
everyone
is
interested,
just
opened
up
like
suggestions
and
when
you
can
pick
me
and
get
her
or
something
or
if
you
have
ideas
now,
that's
fine,
but
you
know
something
in
the
next
couple
of
weeks.
The
I'll
just
leave
that
out
there.
If
I
don't
hear
anything
from
anybody,
I
might
just
declare
a
weekend.
A
Saturday
I'm,
assuming
Saturdays
are
best
for
something
like
that.
C
The
other
thing
is
I.
Can
I
figured
out
with
somehow
how
to
control
the
setting
for
that
in
the
theme?
So
I
can
have
a
theme
setting
that
says
which,
but
if
we
do
that,
then
we've
still
got
the
header
block.
That
also
has
a
UI
that
might
actually
even
be
in
conflict
with
the
theme
setting
I.
Think
I
don't
know
so
that.
A
Way,
I'll
always
read
the
current
value
out
of
the
database,
so
you
could
like
change
it
in
one
place.
Then
we
want
to
look
at
in
the
other
place,
it
would
still
say
what
it
currently
was,
but
it
would
give
you
two
interfaces
to
control
the
same
thing:
I'm,
not
sure
that
bad
thing
that's
kind
of
what
we're
doing
all
over
rest.
Your
backdrop,
anyway,
the
bigger
problem
is
the
by
default
option
where
you
wanted
to
do
that
when
you
turn
the
theme
on
because
of
the
install
issue,
so.
C
A
C
This
might
be
where
I
ended
up
with
conflicting
like
it.
If
I
said,
if
I
set
the
default
value
in
the
theme
to
main
menu
and
I
enabled
the
theme
it
would
display
the
main
menu
and
in
the
theme
it
would
say
that
that's
the
current
menu
I.
Don't
remember,
though,
I
have
a
feeling,
though,
that
if
I
went
to
the
header
block,
the
header
block
still
indicated
that
it
was
using
the
user
menu,
even
though
it
wasn't,
but
I'm
not
sure.
If
that's
true
I
have
to
test
that
it.
A
D
Recently
added
the
option
for
themes
to
sort
of
like
uninstall
things,
so
this
was
not
available
before
so.
Since
last
time
we
discussed
that
even
before
they
use
a
group,
I
have
a
tub
in
my
browser
open,
but
it's
like
huge.
It
has
to
be
a
mirror
issue.
I
followed
like
three
issues
indeed
or
torg,
touching
things
on
like
profiles
and
things
not
having
dependencies
the
same
way
that
modules
have.
D
A
D
D
D
I've
put
everything
down
like
in
a
you
know:
it's
maybe
30%
done
likely
and
it's
like
lengthy
yeah,
but
there's
a
there's,
multiple
things,
and
these
touches
on
a
problem
that
Peter
BW
Panda
is
having
with
profiles
like
for
sort
of
like
yeah
with
profiles,
where
the
order
of
which
its
modules
are
being
installed
does
not
respect
the
dependencies.
And
then
you
end
up.
A
So
I
feel
like
Tim.
If
I
had
your
problem
and
wanted
to
set
default
values
when
I
installed
a
theme
I
would
this
is
may
not
be
the
approach
you
want
to
go,
but
I
would
create
a
poor
quest
against
core
that
allowed
themes
to
include
an
install
file
and
I
would
apply.
The
patch
and
I
would
write
theme
to
work
with
the
patch
and
then
I
would
push
on
that
issue
until
it
goes
into
work.
That
is
a
good
like
long
term,
maybe
not
such
a
good
short
time
and.
E
A
So
I
think
your
options
would
be
like.
There
are
ways
you
can
hack
things
and
so
like,
rather
than
maybe
maybe
we
should
talk
about
this,
not
on
the
video
I,
don't
want
it.
I
give
all
that
ideas
yeah.
There
are
some
ways
that
you
could
force
those
values
to
be
changed
using
like
config,
yet
config
set
is
sort
of
behind
the
scenes.
That
would
work,
although
maybe
are
not
the
best
way
to
do
it,
and
that
you
could
put
a
little
code
comment.
It's
like
until
teams
get
installed.
A
D
Like
the
fact
that
we
include
a
an
example
of
how
to
use
color
support,
for
example,
import
with
my,
including
that
in
bases
what
I
would
like
us
to
see
eventually
is
as
an
example
friend
what
people
can
do
it
as
a
best
practice.
I
would
like
us
to
have
either
a
sub
theme
of
7
or
basis
in
port,
which
would
sort
of
like
set
the
best
practices
of
how
people
should
be
something.
D
A
A
But
when
I
was
learning,
how
to
theme
I
used
then
and
then
included
that,
like
example,
sub
theme,
thing
which
I
think
worked
really
well
I
think
we
should
do
something
like
that
and
we
could
even
do
it
with
basis
where
we
talk
about
like
these
are
the
things
that
are
intended
to
be
overridden
and
basis.
And
this
is
how
you
structure
your
father
or
whatever
right.
A
A
D
We
were
saying
the
same
thing
with
some,
what
you
call
it
the
admin
bar,
but
a
lot
of
people
seem
to
be
using
the
nav
bar,
not
not
only
backdrop
but
in
Drupal
and
and
they
seem
to
be
I,
don't
know
it's
like
habitual
things
that
it
looks
all
the
style
of
it
is
same
as
every
site
that
they
have
touched
with
the
age
all
rights.
Just
people
prefer
that
yeah.
A
A
D
A
Other
audience,
I
think,
is
kind
of
a
longer
term
thing
where
it's
like
eventually
we're
gonna
stop
getting
people
coming
from
Drupal,
and
we
need
backdrop
to
be
good
enough
on
its
own
that
new
people
will
come
in
and
I
want
them,
not
to
think
the
they
don't
like
this
admin
theme
I
need
to
change
it,
which
is
how
we
got
new
ad
routines
in
Drupal.
How
come
I
can't
navigate
cleanly
around
the
site
and
that's
how
we
got
alternate.
Admin
menus
and
I.
Think
that,
like
there's,
two
different
problems,
one
of
them
is
like.
A
Okay,
you
want
an
app
bar
shirt.
Here
is
important,
a
part
you
can
have
and
I
don't
think
we're
gonna
stop
people
from
using
it.
That's
not
our
job
like
they're
supposed
to
have
easy.
It
guys
do
whatever
they
want,
but
I
think
that
we
should
be
focused
on,
like
the
first-time
user
experience
in
terms
of
like
how
to
improve
admin
bar
how
to
improve
7
like
I,
just
solve
all
the
same
problems
that
the
current
things
solve,
because
we're
not
going
to
change
anyone's
habits,
better
habits
for
new
people,
no.
D
A
Still
need
to
keep
looking
at
like
what
is
it
you
love
about,
add
minimal,
and
can
we
do
that
in
in
seven
in
a
core
and
I
think
that
until
we
get
all
of
them
solved-
or
at
least
you
know
enough
of
themself,
that
people
feel
like?
Oh,
it's
better
to
use
7
than
a
minimal
we're
still
gonna
have
at
minimum
yeah.
D
Now
that
I
mentioned
we
no
I'm,
not
sure
if
it
was
part
of
that
or
it
comes
company
with
a
separate
module
for
that,
but
enough
clarity,
when
you
install
either
one
of
them
or
both
of
them,
you
did
automatically
get
filters
for
most
listings,
which
was
an
old
issue
at
some
point
we
serve
like
explored
or
maybe
I
recommended,
using
the
instant
filter
module,
but
that
was
doing
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
things
that
maybe
we
didn't
want.
So
what.
A
The
search
that's
on
our
modules
page
is
the
code
from
instant
filter
yeah.
The
only
thing
that
we
didn't
include
was
the
filter
for
the
user
permissions
listing
yep
at
the
time.
I
don't
know
if
instant
filter
now
has
more
things,
but
I
think
that
that's
something
that
needs
be
on
our
radar,
like
I,
still
want
that
filter
on.
Yes,.
A
A
C
A
D
Say
that
I
think
the
reason
why
things
don't
get
India
is
that
people
are
more
developer
focused
and
they
just
forget
the
people
that
are
using
the
user
interface.
Sadly,
there
is
a
there
is
a
good
what
you
call
it
initiative
that
is
doing
the
cloud
or
the
new
admin
thing.
This
is
very
good,
but
other
than
that
I
think
it's
being
neglected,
general
architect
saying
how
I
feel
that
the
aid
up
until
eight
point
six
was
like
Imperial
version
honestly
but
yeah.
That's
a
different
topic,
a
different
discussion.
Okay,.
A
D
A
B
I
was
just
gonna
suggest
since
that
CI
server
looks
like
it's
starting
to
be
used,
or
maybe
it's
always
been
used.
I
just
never
noticed.
Maybe
we
should
migrate
to
a
new
house,
that's
similar
to
the
new
hosts
and
backdrop.
For
a
backdrop,
CMS
Norg,
like
a
new
Desiree,
that's
upstate,
well,.
A
A
And
then,
when
Nate
gets
back,
I'll
poke
him
to
look
at
it
and
we
can
see
if
we
can
get
some
more
information
about
like
I,
don't
know
what
it
was
originally
built
for.
That
might
have
been
our
Travis
CI
server
and
if
we're
not
using
Travis
that
CI
because
we're
not
using
this
NCI,
do
we
even
need
a
separate
server
for
that?
Maybe
just
move
them
bot
somewhere
else.
I,
don't
know
I
know.
So
it
would
be
good
to
get
someone
who
has
more
history
on
it
to
help
make
this
decision
yeah.