►
From YouTube: Backdrop Weekly - Oct 17, 2019
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Right
today
is
October
17th.
This
is
our
weekly
meeting
for
development
tasks
for
Bechtel
CMS.
Before
we
get
into
code
stuff,
I
wanted
to
quickly
welcome
Alex
shapka,
who
recently
applied
for
contributed
model,
maintainer,
ship
and
ported.
The
search
criminal
module
from
Drupal
new
project
releases
this
week
include
this.
B
C
B
Couple
days
ago,
so
it's
great
to
have
that
out
in
the
wild
now
I
think
this
was
also
like.
We
were
a
little
bit
late
in
our
pushing
outs
after
a
minor
release
when
normally
I
wait
two
weeks
and
then
we
push
out
to
all
of
the
various
up
streams
like
Pantheon
and
platform,
and
things
like
that,
and
it
took
us
a
little
bit
longer
than
expected
to
get
out.
One
14:1.
C
B
That
it's
out
those
up
streams
are
now
all
updated,
and
our
demo,
of
course,
when
you
put
the
trial
backdrop,
is
now
using
the
latest
version.
So
that's
great
to
have
gotten
114
one
out
there.
Some
of
notable
fixes
includes
we
fixed
the
display
of
the
header
region
when
you
use
a
flexible
layout
issue,
40
66,
so
that
makes
us
that
the
flexible
layouts
now
look
nice
when
you
use
them
with
the
basis
theme
and
the
headers
that
goes
across
the
top.
B
This
long-standing
issue
that
the
views
is
none
of
operator
has
been
broken
for
a
long
time
issue
36
14.
We
pushed
out
that
effects
finally,
and
we
pushed
out
one
almost
complete
set
of
cross
ports
from
views.
The
big
meta
issues,
36
85
and
all
of
the
cross
ports
from
fuse
3.12
have
been
moved
over.
There's
still
three
remaining
cross
ports
there
to
the
just
need
three
rolls
and
one
that
probably
won't
come
over
at
all,
because
it
might
not
apply
to
two
backdrop
due
to
differences
in
the
config
system,
so
yeah
one
fourteen
one.
B
It
was
great
to
get
those
things
out
there.
All
those
big
kind
of
issues
that
we've
been
talking
about
for
several
weeks
or
sometimes
months,
I've
been
cleared
out,
but
I
was
looking
over
the
list
for
114
to
the
next
version
that
we'll
be
putting
out
just
as
needed,
and
we
didn't
have
any
priority
items
left.
There's
still
flexible
templates,
there's
a
bunch
of
follow-up
issues
in
a
big
meta
and
40:46,
although
that
classes
in
the
header
region
was
the
really
big
item.
That
was
a
an
issue
with
it.
B
So
we
have
so
a
few
more
follow-ups.
There
I'll
set
one
more
follow-ups
that
that
could
be
pursued,
but
I
think
it's
an
open
question
at
this
point.
Like
do,
we
have
other
items
that
are
high-priority
bug,
fixes
that
we
should
start
prioritizing
during
these
meetings
so
open
the
floor.
You
guys
have
any
suggestions
or
anything
bits
we've
been
facing
for
a
long
time
that
has
been
struggling.
B
D
D
If
you
do
rewrite
the
page,
that
the
tokens
aren't
there
when
you
first
do
it
and
then,
if
you
save
the
view
and
then
reopen
there,
and
it's
really
frustrating
for
me
when
I
ran
into
it
this
week,
it's
easy
to
kind
of
get
around
once
you
figure
it
out,
but
if
there's
an
easy
solution,
I'd
have
to
be
happy
to
write
a
full
request,
but
I
don't
I'm
not
sure
how
to
solve
it.
There's
a
little
discussion
there.
A
E
To
fix,
but
it
might
be
better
so
one
thing
that
I
would
like
milestones
is
4125
and
that's
the
capital
capitalization
of
the
labels
in
field
sets.
It's
not
a
high
priority,
but
I
think
it's
an
easy
one
to
get
out
of
the
way.
So
it's
a
a
set
of
three
I
think
issues,
one
of
which
we
nursed
that
sort
of
like
make
it
ought
to
be
working
with
the
admin
y1.
We
got
out
of
the
way.
It
was
the
fact
that
the
labels
for
the
field
sets
were
not
molded
anymore.
E
We
got
that
meant
in
the
previous
in
114
1,
then
it's
this
140
125
and
then
the
other
one
is
that
we
need
to
introduce
some
padding
on
the
elements
that
are
within
its
option
like
in
field
API
fields,
so
that
there's
some
structure,
because
sometimes
you
look
at
the
whole
thing.
It's
like
series
of
checkboxes
already
about
this
that
seem
that
they're
together,
so
there
needs
to
be
some
nesting,
especially
when
you
have
like
the
nested
islands.
I
can't
remember
the
issue
number
for
that
second
issue,
that
I
mentioned
but
yeah.
B
Just
commentary
I
looked
at
this
fun
and
went
through
my
local
and
just
turned
off
all
the
text
transforms
uppercase
on
everything
which
would
be
all
five
of
these
items.
All
combined
and
I
wasn't
actually
sure
about
it.
I
felt
like
it
lost
something
like
actually,
you
know:
they're
the
capitalization
was
added
for
design
reasons,
I'm,
sure,
and
so,
but
but
I
also
kind
of
found.
I
don't
know
it
was
it
wasn't
quite
the
homerun
that
I
thought
it
would
be
like
just
blanket
turning
off
all
of
them.
B
C
E
We
sort
of
like
use
the
fields
in
a
table
cater
as
the
field
label,
and
then
you
have
a
series
of
normal
labels
in
the
form
and
then
you
have
those
that
stand
out.
It's
like
yeah
I
think
I
have
some
screeches
I've
been
working
on
another
each
account
right
now,
but
I'll
point
to
that
at
some
point.
We're
going
to
find
it.
So
maybe
it
does
make
sense
to
do
it
for
table
headers
as
well.
But
yeah
I
agree
with
you
that
when
I
disabled
it
for
tops
local
tasks,
it
didn't
make
sense.
E
A
But
a
couple
weeks
ago,
Gregory
created
this
bubs
board,
which
has
like
high-priority
bugs
in
the
left
and
then
all
the
other
bugs
on
the
right
arbitrarily
organized
based
on
whoever's,
organizing
them
at
the
time,
but
this
might
be
a
tool
we
can
use
for
deciding
like
which
bugs
should
become
high-priority
bugs
in
the
next
bug
fix
release
because
done
that
way,
people
are
looking
at
this
board
and
people
are
looking
at.
These
meeting.
A
Agendas
will
be
have
the
same
set
of
priorities,
so
I
just
highlighted
the
three
or
two
of
the
three
that
were
in
the
you
section,
I
added
them.
One
of
them
is
an
issue
that
you
created
me
about
main
page
content
is
sometimes
duplicated,
I
think
this
su
apoyo
outs
and
then
another
one
was
one
Gregory
created
about
how
modules
I'm
cynthia's
that
are
installed
with
the
project.
Installer
cannot
be
updated
with
the
project
installer
and
those
were
the
only
two
high-level
ones
that
I
agreed
with
there's
also
those
other
one
which
we
need.
E
No
one
is
actually
a
blocker
for
a
smaller
nut
bag,
but
that's
tasks
that
I
would
like
to
do.
The
automatic
creation
of
flexible
of
icons
for
flexible
layouts,
which
is
really
cool
so.
E
A
Was
a
little
sloppy
but
I
really
don't
think
anyone's
ever
gonna,
be
like
trying
to
access
that
damage
by
itself,
so
I'm
not
sure,
there's
a
use
case
for
providing
it
to
get
in
because
of
the
other
thing
we
did,
we
can
fix
it
later
if
we
wanted
to
so
anyway.
Anyway,
though,
I'm
I
just
wanted
to
draw
attention.
The
fact
that
we
have
this
bugs
list
thing
this
bugs
board
that
I
think
was
requested
by
dr.
Elmont
created
by
Gargery
about
like
we
have
a
lot
of
bugs,
should
we
maybe
prioritize
them
so.
A
Like
mile
cannon
milestone
candidate
labels,
so
I
was
thinking
there
may
be
a
better
way
for
a
managing
big
bucket
versus
smaller
bucket
would
be
all
bugs
go
in
the
big
bucket
once
they're
labeled,
with
Mouse
from
Kennedy,
it's
going
smaller
and
then
the
ones
that
have
attacked
with
a
mouse
I'm
candidate
going
high
priority.
And
that
way
we
could
totally
automate
the
board,
and
it
would
just
be
a
better
way
for
people
to
see
any
any
given
thing.
A
E
F
E
A
E
So
one
cool
thing
that
I've
discovered
how
this
board
works
is
that,
as
you
progress
issues
from
the
left
to
the
right
with
the
intention
to
go
to
closed
and
fixed,
which
is
actually
automated,
you
can
you
could
the
ones
that
are
in
the
fixed
section,
with
its
back
release
that
we
have.
You
can
archive
them,
and
you
can
do
that
in
bulk,
like
using
the
the
three
dots
at
the
top
of
the
closed
weeks.
E
A
A
E
And
see
how
we
use
the
agenda
and
we
type
the
things
that
we
have
maybe,
instead
of
the
agenda,
we
just
have
this
and
then
we
move
it
around
every
prioritize
it
and
instead
of
having
it
in
the
actual
agenda,
we
can
work
off.
At
least
yeah
I
mean
that's
what
words
are
being
used
for.
My
understanding,
rpms
use
it
a
lot.
E
So
yes,
my
point
was
that
feel
free
to
remove
issues
from
that
list
entirely
and
or
move
them
around
to
different
columns
and
also
I
thought
that
maybe
four
core
committers,
like
yourself
made
and
Jeff
it
might
help
to
actually
have
a
list
of
you
can
still
filter
by
a
CBC
tag,
but
it
might
be
sort
of
like
helping
you
having
an
overview
of
where
the
banks
start
again.
Focusing
on
the
ICBC
column.
There.
B
All
right
well,
so
the
items
that
we've
got
pulled
out
here
include
a
tea
I'll
run
up
these
briefly,
we'll
see,
let's
see
about
it,
we
talk
about
these
every
week,
but
the
items
that
are
in
the
bug
board
that
are
of
priority
or
of
note
include
installed.
Projects
cannot
be
updated.
So
if
you
use
the
installer
module
but
then
to
install
a
module,
then
apparently
you
cannot
update
it
sometimes,
and
so
this
is
issue
39
97,
just
a
bug
report
doesn't
yet
have
any.
B
It
looks
like
some
people
have
confirmed
that
this
has
happened.
Confirmed
problem
with
updates
has
nothing
to
have
permissions,
so
it's
been
confirmed,
but
there's
no
overt
quest
or
any
code
behind
it.
Yet
so
this
issue,
that
just
means
it's
a
developer,
to
help.
Take
a
look
at
39
97
that
issue
that
Tim
was
talking
about
earlier.
The
replacement
patterns
or
the
tokens
wasn't
showing
up.
On
the
first
loading
of
configuring
view,
that's
issued
1928
also
looked
health,
no
pull
requests
on
that
or
anything.
B
D
Yeah,
just
I
think
there
are
multiple
issues
for
this
and
it
looked
like
it
was
fixed
at
one
point:
I,
don't
know
I
just
remember,
I
did
deal
with
this
in
the
last
week
and
I
looked
it
up
and
there
was
one
ticket
that
looked
like
it
was
fixed,
and
then
there
was
mother.
It's
kind
of
confusing,
but
I
definitely
experienced
it
this
week,
a
couple
of
times:
okay,.
B
So
the
issue
still
exists:
that's
issue
26
91,
so
those
three
items-
those
are
the
one
one
so
kind
of
call
out.
There's
also
the
views
cross
ports
that
pig
met
issue
36
85
that
we're
continuing
to
crank
through
I
think
those
continue
to
have
lots
of
patches
that
are
already
ported,
that
and
lots
of
open
for
requests
that
are
pending
either
review
or
committer
work
of
actually
going
through
and
pushing
this
all
through.
So
in.
E
That
rate
rate
yeah,
we
raise
some
more
four
core
spots
for
the
date
module
and
for
the
link
module.
We
need
to
keep
them
up
tonight
as
well,
they're,
not
as
outdated
as
views
and
as
important
as
includes
the
important
same
they're
equally
important,
but
but
views
is
being
used
everywhere.
It's
integrated
heavily,
so
it's
good
that
we
have
feature
parity,
one
issue.
Another
issue
that
I
would
like
to
mention
is
4072,
which
is
the
the
blocks
that
the
blocks
report
page
listing.
It
uses
new
IDs
instead
of
yeah.
D
E
I'm
not
going
to
classify
as
high
product
is
just
in
the
lesser
you
know
the
least
yeah
it's
just
ugly.
Yes,
not
exactly
so
so.
I
classify
I
put
things
there
when
they're
things
that
people
are
easy
to
come
across
and
it
makes
the
product
to
look
broken
like
without
even
trying
to
do
anything.
It's
just
you
visit
a
page
and
you
see
her
yeah.
B
Okay,
let's
yeah,
let's
move
on
so
we've
got
a
lot
of
some
new
items
now
for
for
bug,
fixes
for
114
to
115
will
be
the
next
minor
version
that
will
come
out.
January,
15th,
2020
and
we've
got
a
slew
of
kind
of
new
features
that
we'd
like
to
get
implemented,
and
some
of
the
advocates
are
not
present
in
this
meeting.
B
So
we'll
kind
of
skim
on
skim
through
some
of
these
things
add
an
image
library,
modal
to
image,
fields,
issue
3297
so
make
us,
so
you
could
select
an
image
from
a
modal
like
you
do
in
the
rich
text
editor
when
you're
using
an
image
field.
It's
a
great
feature.
There's
no
updates!
Yet
Lauren
is
the
advocate
for
this
issue,
but
is
looking
for
help
on
implementation.
B
This
makes
it
so
that
you
can
provide
a
default
menu
item
when
you're,
creating
content
like
if
you
create
a
page
will
automatically
put
it
in
the
primary
menu.
For
example,
this
one
has
a
poor
request.
It
needs
review
right
now,
but
we
need
some
help,
fixing,
maybe
even
writing
and
fixing
tests,
and
it
is
fun.
I,
said.
E
I
was
gonna
help
with
that
last
weekend.
I
couldn't
find
the
time.
Maybe
this
weekend
might
be
the
time,
and
so
what
happened
is
because
we've
changed
the
defaults
for
the
AIDS
content
type
and
that's,
what's
being
used
in
the
tests
dear
tried
to
adopt
those
tests.
I
think
that
we
should
switch
those
to
use
the
cost
type
and
that
will
immediately
fix
those
tests,
but
at
the
same
time
we
should
add
new
tests,
including
the
page
type,
to
account
for
that
new
functionality.
E
B
C
B
B
Let's
say
this
is
when
everybody
gives
gets
all
she
patiently
and
like
did
a
lot
of
stuff
this
week,
I
swear
but
I
you
did.
Everybody
did
a
lot
of
stuff
this
week,
so
yeah
I'll
have
my
turn
saying
this
actually
I'll
just
gently:
do
it
signatures
on
digital
packet
or
digital
signatures
on
packages
issue
1992
on
the
advocate
for
this
one?
No
progress
on
this
issue.
E
Were
looking
for
an
excuse,
yeah
I
have
not.
They
did
therefore
1575,
so
we're
we're
left
with
that.
Is
it
almost
got
in
with
114
release,
but
then
we
discovered
that
it
was
breaking
a
few
things,
so
the
last
status
of
that
is
that
document
proposed
I,
think
that
would
be
less
interested
interested
and
say
for
safer,
more
future
plans,
and
we
just
need
to
reflector
it
to
that.
It's
just
that
they
didn't
get
to
do
it.
B
B
G
So
it
the
functionality
is
all
in
there.
There's
only
really
one
problem
with
it
at
the
moment,
and
that's
that
one
of
the
tests
was
I
believe
this
was
the
link
module
would
set
up.
He
would
create
a
node
and
then
try
to
node
load
it
and
if
they,
if
they
used
the
reset
parameter
on
node
loaded,
then
there
would
be
no
field
data
in
the
node
object
if
they
got
returned,
but
if
I
just
removed
the
reset
parameter
on
the
node
leather,
then
everything
worked.
B
Okay,
interesting,
it
sounds
like
I
mean
if
one
of
our
tests
just
coincidentally
caught
that
we
might
want
an
explicit
test
that
checks
like
to
make
sure
no
load
with
and
without
reset
still
returns,
that
proper
information.
Once
we
have
those
caching
system
in
place
right,
yeah,
okay,
but
that's
that
sounds
pretty.
That
sounds
awesome
sounds
really
close
and
the
I
knows.
Oh.
G
D
G
B
G
B
Without
it
like
during
a
node
load,
queries
from
like
at
least
four
tables,
maybe
like
in
the
vicinity
of
like
68
and
then
possibly
more
depending
on
the
type
of
node
it
is,
but
this
would
make
it
so
that
all
node
loads
would
just
be
the
one
cache
query,
and
it's
not
necessarily
like
Joseph's
benchmarks
that
he
posted
you
know
it
might
not
be
like
a
complete
home
run
like
normal
equal,
but
there's
an
advantage
that,
if
you're
not
using
if
using
cache
system
instead
of
loading
from
database
tables,
then
you
can
offload
cache
systems
to
some
other
system.
B
G
G
G
B
B
Yeah
and
one
thing
that
we
discussed
real
briefly
back
at
the
beginning
of
this
issue,
because
it's
really
old,
so
it's
had
some
like
discussions
from
ages
ago-
is
that
I'm
a
little
bit
weird
that
the
field
cache
is
still
there
in
addition
to
the
entity
cache
like
they're,
pretty
redundant
with
each
other,
but
I
see
from
this
implementation.
That
feel
the
way
that
work.
B
If
we
keep
the
way
that
it
is
right
now
and
any
cache
is
kind
of
an
opt-in
system
where
you
have
to
say
I
want
to
have
my
custom
entity
also
use
the
entity
cache
as
opposed
to
just
being
automatically
available
all
the
time.
So
that
could
make
a
good
justification
for
why
we
want
to
keep
the
field
cache
in
addition
to
the
empty
cache,
but
I
really
can't
I,
don't
know,
it
seems
really
one
thing
that
we
have.
You
know
these
layers
of
caching.
That
might
not
be
super
beneficial.
B
G
G
A
We
might
want
to
do
that
in
a
follow-up
issue
where
we
have
more
of
a
discussion
about
like.
Is
anybody
using
the
field
cache?
Is
it
really
important
that
we
keep
it
before
we
remove
it,
especially
if
we're
gonna
do
it
in
a
minor
yeah,
but
my
instinct
is
like
I
would
love
to
get
rid
of
field
cache
and
make
any
cash
on
by
default?
For
everything
and
just
for
simplicity,
it
seems
like
well.
G
The
problem
with
any
cache
the
way
it
works
now
and
like
the
way
I
worked
in
Drupal
7,
was
it
the
module
providing
the
entity
had
to
create
a
table
for
the
cache
to
be
in
or
or
a
memcache
bucket.
If
you
were
using
that,
and
if
you
don't
create
that
table
or
bucket,
then
you
get
errors
when
it
tries
to
access
the
cache
so
yeah,
unless
unless
we
want
to
come
up
with
some
system
that
automatically
creates
and
deletes
tables
as
it
finds
your
entity
info.
E
A
G
Yeah
yeah,
that's
that
was
kind
of
what
I
was
thinking.
It's
like
if
we
just
used
one
and
it
would
be
huge
yes,
yeah,
they've,
basically
duplicate
all
your
entity
tables
and
all
your
field,
tables,
yeah
and
I
have
a
site
that
I
work
on
that
I
know
would
have
like.
If
that
was
done,
that
way,
we
would
have
a
single
table.
That's
over
200
gigabytes.
B
E
Well,
we
will
over
here
on
that
just
very
last
thing.
Just
for
my
benefit.
What
would
be
the
use
case
of
keeping
the
separate
field
crashes?
So
is
it,
for
example
like
when
used?
It
was
a
product
practical
example.
If
I'm
using
a
view
that
spits
out
specific
fields,
that's
when
it
was
gonna
be
used,
whereas
the
entity
caches
forth
or
when
displaying
form
entities
in
the
same
thing
that
beat
or.
B
Currently,
if
you
use
of
you
it
loads
the
whole
note,
even
if
you
just
pull
out
one
or
two
fields,
and
so
so
it
doesn't
matter
whether
you
use
a
display
mode
or
pull
out.
One
field,
though
always
use
it'll,
always
load
the
whole
node
every
time,
and
so
the
I
don't
think
of
any
situation
and
where
the
field
cache
is
used
outside
of
a
note
load.
It's
almost
always
I
mean,
as
far
as
I
know,
always
guys.
A
B
Use
just
part
of
the
entity
load,
then
it
says:
okay,
let's
get
the
fields
from
the
cache,
so
as
far
as
I
can
see
they're
like
completely
redundant,
if
we
can
make
it
so
that
entity
cache
was
available
on
all
entities,
but
right
now
it's
it's
not
necessarily
the
case.
So
for
ones
that
are
contribute,
art
makes
its
own
entities
or
something
like
that,
but
flagged
module.
I
pay
for
the
example
where
it's
not
expecting
the
entity
to
be
cashed,
and
so
it
might
be
making
some
assumptions
not
the
way
that
it
works.
Yeah.
C
G
E
G
D
E
B
D
B
D
It's
right,
if
you
can
do
I,
don't
know
if
you
can
give
us
access
or
if
you
can't
do
that
to
degree
account
whatever
and
yeah
I
think
David
Radcliffe
could
probably
get
the
get
her
thing
going
or
the
Dragonfly
tricks
pretty
quickly.
He's
got
time
right
now.
He
just
needs
that
and
where
does
he
have
a
plan
to
move
it
to
another
service
site?
D
E
B
A
F
A
A
A
A
You
have
to
ask
somebody
who
knows-
and
you
have
to
know
who
to
ask
who
knows
which
is
really
hard,
and
it
sounds
like
we're
coming
up
with
some
technical
solutions
like
using
one
Casper
to
manage
passwords,
but
we
also
need
some
human
solutions
like
how
to
new
people
to
the
project
know
who
to
ask
about
like
getting
access
to
Twitter
or
something
like
that.
So
fantastic
recommendation
was
made
to
create
points
of
contact
page.
We
bounced
around
various
different
ideas
for
names
of
it.
A
Somebody
recommended
leadership,
but
I
didn't
really
want
to
call
it
leadership
because
I
don't
nest.
I
think
this
stuff
has
anything
to
do
with
leading
it's
more
like
volunteer
opportunities,
and
so
I
wanted
to
be
sort
of
more
open
everyone,
but
family
is
what
we
should
call
it
I'm,
calling
it
roles,
responsibilities
and
points
of
contact,
but
that's
obviously
open
for
change.
A
And
then
we
also,
it
was
recommended
that
we
add
core
repository
information,
but
I
think
we
might
have
that
documented
somewhere
else.
So
I'm
just
going
to
try
and
see
if
I
could
dig
that
up
and
put
it
in
here,
or
at
least
maybe
link
to
another
page
where
we
might
have
all
the
information.
Google
Drive
documents
is
something
that
comes
up
a
lot
for
this
meeting
like
if
you
want
to
add
aggenda
items
so
I
think
having
general
people
you
can
ask
for
access
to
it.
A
I
think
the
way
it's
set
up
is
that
anyone
who
has
access
concret
anyone
else
access.
So
it's
just
going
to
put
a
list
of
names
of
like
these.
Eight
people
should
have
access
ask
one
of
them,
but
if
you
know
anyone
else
has
access,
they
can
also
give
you
access
and
then
all
this
external
service
thing
to
like
I
think
this
might
be
where
we
can
put
the
paragraph
about
like
use
this
one
password.
A
Thank
you
one
password
for
giving
us
a
free
open-source
account,
but
here
are
all
people
you
can
ask
if
you
want
to
help
with
any
of
these
things,
so
it's
more
like
the
person
responsible
than
just
like
technical
access,
but
as
I
mentioned
before,
we
started
this
meeting,
trying
to
figure
out
all
the
stuff
that
goes
in
this
list.
It's.
A
Fill
it
in,
but
yeah
I
think
it's
a
fantastic
idea
to
document
this
and
make
just
everything
a
little
bit
more
open
that
way.
Anyone
who
wants
to
know
with
anything
will
have
one
person
or
two
people
they
can
contact
about
it
rather
than
being
like
ask
into
the
ether
of
dinner
about
who's
in
charge
of
it.
Another.
E
Thing
that
was
mentioned,
a
couple
of
things
is
like
who
has
access
to
the
API
side
data?
It
starts
with
that
that
caming
up,
but
we're
coming
up
for
Peter
as
he
was
trying
to
update
things
another
one
is
who
who
sort
of
like
is
looking
after
the
country
to
for
new,
maintain,
there's,
you
know
moving
things
forward.
That
would
be
mean
possibly
someone
else
to
help,
and
also
maybe
we
should
also
have
preferable
means
of
contact.
E
D
A
So
maybe
I
won't
put
the
automatic
contact
form
list,
but
I
will
put
the
list
and
then
I
came
afterwards
to
something
like
ping,
these
people
in
get
er.
So
it's
your
user
name.
That'll
work.
Yes,
although
your
it
could
be
that
some
people's
backdrop,
you
see
my
soror
name,
isn't
the
same
as
their
github
name
and
that
might
not
match
so
we'll
have
to
wait
for
now.
It's
probably
fine,
but
once
we
get
like
our
single
sign-on
thing,
working
will
have
the
github
name
and
we'll
be
able
to
be
like
Gregory,
pink.
E
E
A
E
D
A
Modify
your
user
profile
form
to
ask
people
your
preferred
method
of
being
contacted.
Okay,
but
yeah
I
think
this
is
a
fantastic
idea,
so
Jason,
thank
you
for
bringing
this
up.
That
issue
that
you
originally
created,
number
74
in
the
backed
up
seems
to
work.
A
You
also
included
a
section
about
adding
and
maintain
a
text
file
back
to
back
topic
or
I
move
to
that
issue
over
the
backdrop
core
cutes
that
we
have
the
discussion
over
there,
but
everything
else
I
think
we
should
address
here
with
who
to
contact
for
what
and
if
we
have
anything
else
that
comes
up
from
that.
In
that
issue
conversation
about
other
things,
we
can
cut
other
things
we
might
need
to
know
for
people
who
especially
want
to
get
involved
with
stuff.
We
should
put
that
in
this
issue
too.
A
So
if
you
do
like
I,
don't
know
how
I
mean
the
maintainer
thing
is
gonna
work
out,
but
if
you
need
to
contact
someone
specifically
about
something
in
car,
I
mean
I
would
imagine
you're
not
allowed
to
contact
someone
specifically
that's
not
to
create
an
issue,
but
if
it
turns
out
that
you
are,
we
should
put
that
in
here
too.
So,
whatever
results,
we
end
up
with
from
this
conversation,
should
I'll
get
at
in
here,
so
that
we
have
one
place
for
everybody
to
find,
whoever
it
is
they're
trying
to
reach,
for
whatever
reasons
yeah.
A
E
A
C
C
A
Like
questions
like
who
manages
the
Pantheon
stuff
and
the
answer
is
like
well,
there
isn't
any
Pantheon
stuff
that
gets
managed.
It
all
goes
through
github,
but
I
still
feel
like
that
question
is
valid
great,
so
I
feel
like
it
might
be
good
to
have
like
a
FAQ
section
at
the
bottom.
About,
like
you
know,
do
does
backdrop
have
reddit
account
or
something
just
so
that
people
know
that
no,
it's
just
an
individual
person
and
it's
this
person
nothing
well.
A
A
E
A
E
E
A
I,
don't
remember:
I
went
through
this
like
like
six
months
ago
now.
It
would
be
good
if
we
could
get
some
like
API
tools
to
to
fix
everything-
that's
already
in
there,
but
yeah
I
think.
The
way
it's
set
up
is
that,
like
the
original
creator
should
be
the
author,
the
bug
squad
and
security
team
are
both
administrators
and
then
all
of
those
people
have
commit
access
to
the
project.
So.
E
A
Optimally
like
transfer
their
own
project
in
they
can
choose
to,
like
accidentally
release
their
ownership
of
it
and
I.
Think
that
also
has
caught
a
bunch
of
people
up
so
I
know
we
had
an
issue
where
it
was
like
use
the
bots
to
fix
all
of
this,
but
even
if
we
could
just
like
use
an
API
call
once
I
think
fix
it
like
once
a
month
or
something
even
if
we
can't
get
the
bot
to
do
it
every
time.
A
That
would
be
huge
too,
at
least
in
terms
of
like
making
sure
that
everybody
always
has
the
access
that
they're
supposed
to
have
to
it,
but
yeah
I
think
in
general
it
would
be
good
to
do
a
high
level
overview
of
like
have
changed
the
way
they
do
this
recently.
Is
there
something
we
could
be
doing
better
because
I
have
no
idea
if
it's
changed
as.
E
E
We
do,
but
it's
gonna
be
a
really
old
one
at
the
point
where
it
was
discussed,
the
decision
of
the
top
of
my
head
was
that
it's
too
soon
we're
a
small
community.
There's
no
issue
at
this
point.
Everyone
has
access
to
everything
so
like
yeah,
it
was
a
trusting
thing,
but
now
we
are
growing.
My
concern
is
that
we
might
have
been
overly
eager
people
committing
things
and
creating
releases
and
if
you
create
a
release
that
that
ends
up
in
the
project
browser
so.
A
Damn
it
looks
like
you're,
adding
new
stuff.
Does
that
I
don't
know
who
is
owning
it?
Somebody
was
adding
new
stuff
to
the
issue
to
the
TBA
section.
Is
there
anything
we
talked
about
today?
D
Well:
okay,
I
added
that
before
the
meeting
that
was
just
editing
at
a
minute
ago,
I'm
just
explaining
it
I,
don't
know
if
we
have
time
to
talk
about
it.
Maybe
somebody
wants
to
talk
to
me
about
it.
After
the
call.
This
is
it's
an
old
outstanding
issue,
but
it's
current
for
me
because
I'm
trying
to
move
like
features
between
multiple
sites
and
I've
been
experimenting
which
sort
of
config
recipes
that
I
can
just
start
moving
from
one
site
to
another
but
I.
D
You
know
I'm
running
into
the
limitations
of
that
as
I'm
figuring
out
this
for
myself,
I
wouldn't
be
doing
it.
You
know,
and
I,
like
my
config
recipes
I
was,
can
I
share
these
with
other
people.
How
would
I
do
it
because
there,
because
of
the
trouble?
It's
not
an
existing
thing,
so
basically
I'm
just
looking
for
advice
on
what
other
people
think
the
best
way
right
now
to
do.
D
They
should
I
want
to
know
if
a
queue
features
I
want
to
move
from
one
site
to
another,
and
I
want
to
do
this
in
a
way
that
I
can
share
with
other
people
other
than
myself
with
what
do
people
think
should
I
be
making
a
module
for
that
like
an
FAQ
module
that
creates
a
content
type
or
is
not
really
about
it.
Now
we
could
push
on
it
or
people
could
talk
to
me
offline
about
it.
It's.
E
Really
short,
like
maybe
in
the
next
five
minutes,
if
you
have
that
off
the
top
of
my
head
again
with
regards
to
the
respective
issue
about
recipes
that
we
started
a
I
guess
the
decision
was
made
that
was
made
temporarily
at
least
was
that
these
things
do
not
have
to
be
projects
and
do
not
have
to
be.
There
will
be
copy-paste
things,
but.
A
C
A
C
A
I
think
immediately,
whatever
you're
doing
right
now,
Tim
is
probably
the
only
thing
you
can
do,
because
there
isn't
a
better
solution.
But
if
you
wanted
to
look
at
like
what
happened
in
that
module
for
like
how
it
manually
install
this,
that
might
be
a
good
reference
for
another
option.
I,
don't
think
it's
the
best
path
forward.
I
think
we
need
something
more
like
features
that
already
knows
those
dependencies
and
how
to
put
it
together.
So.
D
One
thing
is
I
created
like
a
content
type
in
a
view,
feature
firts
and
I.
Thank
you.
I
created
a
content
type
some
field,
some
field,
instances
in
the
view
and
I
found
that
I
couldn't
just
randomly
upload
those
one
at
a
time
because
they
had
to
be
in
an
order.
Yeah,
but
I
found
that
if
I
exported
all
of
my
config
drop
those
into
it,
then
reinstalled
it,
then
it
would
do
it
itself.
D
So
if
there
were
a
way
to
automate
it,
that
would
be
gone
but
again
I
that's
hard
to
share
with
anybody
else
right
now.
On
the
other
hand,
I
could
just
create
a
module
that
does
this,
but
I
don't
know.
If
that's
that's
frowned
upon.
Is
it
frowned
upon
to
like
have
like
encrypt
module
that
just
creates
a
content
type.
F
A
G
C
A
D
Today,
I
wanted
to
share
something
with
other
background
users.
I
see
two
choices,
one
of
which
is
to
just
have
a
project
which
is
just
some
fold
directories
with
a
bunch
of
config
files
and
instructions
on
how
to
do
that.
Yeah.
So
if
I
want
to
do
that,
can
I
do
that
I'm
in
the
contribute.
Your
keyword
do
I
just
put
that
on
my
own
github
account
sure
it's
that
much
because
it's
not
doesn't
fit
into
the
existing
category
of
projects.
Yeah.
A
D
D
And
it
would
be
open,
and
then
that
was
the
other
question
the
other
way
to
do
this
would
be
to
actually
create
a
contributor
which
does,
and
that
is
also
okay.
Any
thoughts
like
we
want
to
name
space,
that's
specially
for
that
kind
of
thing,
or
just
creat.
It
I.
A
E
Yes,
so
really
quick,
we
don't
have
to
discuss
those
one,
the
specific
issue
where
you
mentioned
back
up
in
my
grade
and
configuration
input.
It
might
be
so
that
might
happen.
My
grade
was
working
properly
in
d7,
because
all
you
had
to
do
was
restore
the
database,
but
we
have
to
account
for
configuration
so
that
it
might
be
specific
to
that
module
and
we
might
need
to
solve
it.
E
D
E
E
E
A
E
A
E
F
A
D
There
are
I
mean
so
I,
don't
know
if
it's
a
if
it's
exactly
that
and
I'm
learning
a
lot,
so
I
might
have
a
use
cases
that
there
are
better
ways
around,
but
one
of
the
things
I
ran
into
my
theme
right.
It's
like
I
want
to
lay
out
other
than
the
default
I
want
in
in
Drupal,
and
we've
talked
about
this
before
in
Drupal
7.
You
could
affect
the
layout
with
the
theme
and
there
are
like
things:
I,
don't
like
about
the
current
default
layout
and
I'd
love
to
create
a
theme.
D
A
I
mean
the
way
a
theme
works
is
like
you
can
provide
template
files
that
will
be
used
if
they're
overwriting
exists
and
won't
be
used
to
thing.
They're
overwriting
doesn't
exist,
so
it's
exactly
the
same,
whether
it's
like
oh
I'm,
providing
a
template
file
for
a
content
type
named
article,
but
that
existed
in
Drupal
7.
It
doesn't
exist
when
I
grab.
That
file
is
still
in
my
theme,
my
theme
doesn't
depend
on
there
being
a
content
type
article.
If
the
article
type
is
there,
it'll
use
it
as
art
of
life.
A
Isn't
there
it
doesn't
use
it
it's
exactly
the
same
with
layouts
like
you
have
a
layout
called
box,
and
if
your
site
uses
it,
your
theme
will
override
it.
If
your
site
doesn't
use
your
theme
won't
overwrite
it
because
it
doesn't
exist,
but
it's
there's
a
separation
there
like
needing
to
have
like
Heymann.
It's
everything
in
a
theme,
optionally,
overrides
things
that
may
or
may
not
exist,
but
I
think
the
module
layout
thing.
That's
the
thing
there
might
like
being
a
score
that
we
don't
that
you
guys
think
exists
that
I,
don't
think
exists
over.
D
A
D
Of
how
I've
solved
this
problem
now
is
that
I
wanted
to
use
that
in
my
in
my
install
profile
and
moving
some
blocks
around
using
the
hook
install
in
the
install
profile
and
I'd
love
to
be
able
to
do.
But
what,
if
I,
wanted
to
do
that
with
somebody
that
has
an
existing
site
and
as
far
as
I
know
and
I
research
I've
done
Lisa
recently,
you
can't
run
quick
install
on
the
theme.
Is
that
correct,
so
I
can't
they
just
think
you
don't.
A
A
E
I
mean
I,
haven't
listed,
yeah
I
haven't
flossed
everything
out,
but
it
sounds.
It
sounded
to
me
from
what
Tim
was
expressing
over
the
past
few
months.
I
think
when
not
only
thing
but
others
as
well,
that
if
you
wanted
to
do
something
with
a
theme
and
a
layout,
it
would
have
to
create
a
profile
for
it
to
wrap
things
around
them
and
I
would
like
it
to
not
depend
on
like
we're
asking
people
that
wanna
sort
of
like
have
a
module
and
a
thing
cause
of
like
work.
We
were
telling
them
all
right.
E
A
A
C
A
D
C
D
E
D
A
Solution,
yeah,
especially
if,
like
we
don't
understand
how
all
the
pieces
adequately
interact
like
I,
also
would
love
to
see
the
exact
problem
you're
facing,
rather
than
talking
about
it,
like
in
theory,
because
I
feel,
like
my
theories
and
your
theories
might
not
be
the
same.
We
have
to
talk
not
be
talking
about
same
things.