►
From YouTube: Backdrop Weekly Dev Meeting - July 11
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
C
B
That,
although
the
job-killing
in
the
trees
for
night
and
then
so,
let's
start
off
with
the,
if
there's
no
updates
from
the
PMC
yet,
but
there
are
many
issues
in
the
queue
to
be
decided
and
I
see
issues
about
making
a
statement
about
the
end
of
life
of
patrick
1.0,
which
is
way
ahead
in
the
future.
But
we
haven't
make
a
clear
decision
of
when
date
wise
or
should
I
put
it,
what
will
be
the
event
that
would
solve
like
signify
the
start
of
factor
of
2.0?
B
B
Community
wise,
there
is
no
new
contributors
this
week,
but
that
we
had
a
few
a
couple
of
applications.
Initial
review
has
been
done,
painting
for
the
maintain
is
through
fix
or
minor
issues,
and
maybe
we'll
have
good
news
next
week
with
regards
to
contributed
projects.
We
have
quite
a
few
new
projects.
We
have
the
touch
of
thing
by
thing.
B
And
website
related
the
tasks.
Let's
see,
we
have
ongoing
issue
about
getting
the
designs
for
modules,
themes
and
layouts
pages
done.
Unfortunately,
there's
not
riveting
and
each
year.
Yes,
we
do
have
the
designs,
it's
just
that
we
need
to
make
some
implementation
or
even
review,
because
it's
been
quite
some
time
since
we
had
those
design
was
back
in
January
2018.
A
B
A
B
B
B
B
B
B
All
right
and
that's
it
for
the
website
related
tasks,
all
right.
Let's
move
on
to
the
interesting
stuff
about
bottom
backrub,
seen
as
the
product,
so
we
have
the
next
bug
fix
release
113
3
coming
up
relatively
soon.
There
is
one
main
issue
that
is
outstanding
and
be
bugging
us
for
a
while.
Now
it's
a
has
to
do
with
the
one.
Is
none
of
operator
being
used
in
views
not
working
properly?
We
have
a
a
pull
request
that
was
working,
the
respective
pull
requests
for
view.
B
7
detects
was
not
working
for
us
and
then
then
filed
a
separate
one
that
one
was
missing
tests,
so
we
incorporated
the
test
from
7.6
one
and
now
at
this
point
is
the
the
respective
ticket
is
three
six
one.
Four
and
it's
it
has
the
label
works
for
me,
but
then
also
needs
work
and
I
think
it
that
that's
on
basically
Vichy
fixing
the
failing
tests.
B
There
is
some
notes
there
from
doctor
what
saying
that
the
tests
were
passing
on
his
local
but
they're,
not
passing
they're
failing
on
those
NCI,
so
it
might
be
something
specific
to
them
or
the
PHP
version,
but
we
haven't
figured
that
that
yet
and
yep
for
that's
the
basically
the
only
pending
issue
there
for
the
next
bug
fix
release
but
built
a
113
three
milestone
tag.
You
can
see
that
for
more.
B
B
Six
actually,
but
yeah
I
think
that
as
soon
as
we
crack
that
views
issue
we'll
get
one
and
yet
the
next
back
release
bug
fix,
released
all
right.
Moving
on
to
the
next
minor
release,
which
is
114
and
that
one
is
scheduled
for
September
15th,
with
the
feature
freeze
being
on
September
1st,
we
have
quite
a
few
pitches.
There
lined
up,
unfortunately,
there's
a
few
people
missing,
so
not
sure
if
we
can
get
an
update,
I'll
try
to
do
my
best
to
summarize
by
looking
at
the
issues
in
this
status.
B
B
B
B
Let's
leave
it
at
its
work,
then
there's
issue
25
68,
which
is
the
introduction
of
support
of
trusted
host
patterns.
This
is
something
that
was
new
for
d8
and
it's
there's
currently
authorized
a
an
issue
in
detour
to
back
port
pass
to
d7,
so
the
way
that
the
ad
implemented,
that
is,
that
it's
sort
of
like
it
stops
the
installation
then
started
from
working.
If
trust
that
hospitals
have
not
been
specified
and
for
existing
installations,
it
will
throw
a
white
screen
with
saying
something
along
the
lines
that
this
domain
is
not
authorized.
B
What
this
website
we
have
taken
a
less
intrusive
approaching,
a
batch
of
where
we
support
I'll,
allow
people
to
specify
trusted
host
patents,
and
the
most
that
we
do
is
just
throw
a
warning
in
their
status
bytes
in
the
site
status
page,
but
we
do
not
prevent
the
installer
or
stop
the
site
from
working
if
that
is
not
set.
In
other
words,
we
support
it,
but
do
not
enforce
it.
That
is
apparently
sitting
in
needs
review.
It's
been
there
well.
B
B
B
We
could
use
more
testing
there
than
just
to
flush
out
the
images
I
mean
that
all
the
boxes,
the
check
boxes
on
the
to-do
list
have
been
checked.
Not
all
of
them,
but
yeah
like
95%
of
Batman
next
step
document
mentioned,
is
start
writing
tests.
We
have
two
months
ahead
of
us.
It
should
be
enough
to
finish
that
off.
There
were
many
ideas
for
improving
that
and
yeah.
There
will
be
I'm
sure,
follow-up
issues.
Sorry
think
you
wanted
to
say
something.
A
B
D
B
B
B
B
All
right
really
really
amazing
work
there.
It's
time
that
I,
try
that
feature
out
and
really
like
excited
I
think
it's
sort
of
like
their
flagship
features
for
the
next
release.
All
right-
and
the
other
really
amazing
feature
is
that
we
are
working
on
having
yes,
I
use
a
backdrop
news
block
on
the
dashboard.
This
will
be
useful
so
that
the
purpose
for
that
is
to
communicate
recent
community
news
and
new
releases
in
the
user
interface
of
a
central
place.
A
For
that
one
yeah,
all
right,
yeah,
you
look,
you
go
ahead
here.
My
understanding
is
that
jeffrey
is
doing
all
the
work.
I'm
just
advocating
I'm
talking
a
lot
and
he's
working,
but
I
understanding
is
that
we
need
to
get
the
feed
working
on
that
rhetoric.
It's
the
next
step
and
there's
some
decisions
that
have
to
be
made
and
I.
Think
if
I
understand
correctly,
that
they're
kind
of
gem
is
the
blocker
right
now
like
we
need
Jen
to
make
some
decisions
about
the
feed
and
and
then
we
can
get
moving
again.
A
C
B
B
Ship
feature
the
other
one:
yes,
there's
other
awesome
ones.
That
goth
is
this:
there's
always
in
the
backlog.
As
I
said,
I
have
a
couple
of
weeks
of
vacation
coming
up
and
there's
always
a
thing
that
was
on
the
list
about
getting
saved
draft
into
core
which
would
streamline
the
the
solid
authoring
experience
when
it
comes
to
just
changing
what
do
they
call
it
workflows
in
these
seven
and
eight
yeah,
but
that's
not
officially
in
the
agenda.
One
of
the
the
other
issues
needs
to
be
finish.
B
There
is
a
milestone
also
for
that
on
gear.
1.14.
Let's
quickly
see
what's
the
status
for
that
yeah
there's
seven
items
there.
Currently,
none
of
them
is
actually
done,
they're
all
open,
and
then
we
do
have
an
item
for
115
which
will
be
coming
on
January
15
2020,
but
currently
we
haven't
decided
on
any
milestones.
There's
no
sorry
than
many
issues
on
that
and
that's
it.
So
there
is
a
section
here
where
we
allow
for
general
discussion
and
open
Q&A.
A
There
we
go
I
had
my
tabs
all
messed
up
and
couldn't
get
to
the
mute
button,
yeah
they're
in
the
in
the
newsfeed
Jeff
this
pay
attention
there.
Let's
talk
about
having
a
block
that
are
having
the
block,
be
configurable
right
and
you
could
use
it
for
other
things,
and
we
decided
not
to
do
that.
But
then
I
went
ahead
and
created
this
contributing
or
contribute
dashboard,
plus
four
additional
blocks
that
people
might
want
to
use.
This
whole
idea
of
a
sort
of
Jason
configurable
block,
though,
does
that
I'm
curious.
A
D
We
just
have
to
define
what
what
our
specification
for
the
Jason
to
look
like,
because
it
will
only
work
if
we
know
what
we're
getting,
but
so,
if
we
define
that
specification,
basically
in
your
crib
module
like
as
part
of
the
reading
or
documentation,
somehow
just
say
this
is
the
things
that
we
expect,
that
that
and
then.
D
B
I
think
it's
a
really
good
place
to
like
this
country
project
to
have
blocks
available,
and
then,
if
we
we
see
that
people
are
using
a
specific
block,
we
can
move
it
from
the
country
module
into
core
and
then
because
we
can
specify
in
the
dot
info
file
of
that
module
system,
module
versions.
Then
we
can
release
at
the
same
time
that
we
release
a
core
version.
B
A
C
A
I'm
gonna
try
and
do
and
once
I
get
that
one
working
then
I,
maybe
kind
of
release
for
that
any
spoilers.
What
what
is
that
is
about?
Well,
it's
it
it's
what
I
pitched
for
the
actual
dashboard,
which
is
rather
than
just
having
like
may
I,
add
a
new
post
or
add
a
new
page.
I
also
wanted
a
link.
Next
to
it.
That
said,
manage
existing
content
of
that
type
and
basically
all
it'll
do
is
just
go
to
the
content
page,
but
it'll
be
pre-filtered
right.
A
B
I'm
wondering
if,
instead
of
creating
new
blocks,
you
can
hook
on
the
existing
blocks
and
extend
the
functionality.
This
may
be
yeah,
but
it
would
make
it
harder
to
mess
things
up
there.
How
do
not
harder
a
bit
more
elaborate,
I
would
say
again:
it's
it's
I'm
really
excited
about
that.
It's
a
playground
for
adding
new
what
you
call
it
looks
for
the
dust
but
making
it
more
useful
for
people.
Okay,.
B
B
D
Yep
yeah
there's
the
the
docker
image
is
backdrop,
ops,
slash
backdrop
docker
and
I
guess
that
one
doesn't
and
there's
some
there's
an
issue
there.
That
says
it
doesn't
work.
I,
don't
know
exactly
what
doesn't
work
means,
but
I
haven't
analyzed
it,
but
there
is
that
and
that's
where
a
lot
of
this
discussion
is
stemming
from
and
then
there's
a
drupal's
version
of
that
which
is
I.
Don't
that's
under
his
personal
repo,
which
I
guess
works,
pretty
well
I
spun
that
up
one
really
quickly
one
time
and
it
worked.
D
B
D
It
he
he
can
I
think
his
his
target
is
different
than
what
the
the
the
origination
of
the
original
backdrop.
Docker
image
was
an
image
that
Kalibak
capelin
and
news
and
Cala
box
is
going
to
be
deprecated
very
soon
and
Lando
is
a
successor,
and
it's
just
not
using
that
image.
So
so,
like
that
use
case
is
kind
of
gone.
That
doesn't
mean
there
are
other
use
cases
for
this
image,
but,
for
example,
the
Tom
and
pol
are
have
two
other
use
cases
so
they're
making
their
own
things
that
satisfy
their
use
case.
B
D
It's
a
matter
of
defining
what
the
purpose
of
this
thing
is
in
getting
the
people
that
are
collaborating
on
to
agree
to
that,
so
that
we
know
what
what
our
direction
and
the
collaboration
is.
Cuz
there's
you
know,
there's
just
the
the
kind
of
purpose
of
backdrop.
Docker
is
not
really
to
do
anything
is
to
provide
an
image
that
has
the
things
the
server
back.
That
can
run
backdrop.
Okay,.
D
B
D
I
understand
it,
so
we
need
to
like
come
to
some
consensus
on
that,
so
there
any
issue
specific.
Is
there
any
issue
specific
for
that
discussion
that
is
going
on
like
or
I'm,
not
aware,
I've
been
kind
of
out
of
the
maintenance
of
that
image
for
a
few
cycles,
as
it
became
just
less
important
to
me,
and
you
know
time,
timeout
constrictions,
so
yeah
I,
don't
know
if
there's
an
issue
specifically
to
like
state
what
the
purpose
that
we.
D
B
B
So
if
someone
created
that
ticket,
where
these
discussions
like
what
like
defining
the
purpose
of
this
image
and
getting
that
on
the
readme,
that
would
be
great
I'm,
not
choice.
Given
I
mean
that
may
be
just
a
very
two
lines
and
start
an
issue
and
pink
Paul
and
Tom,
since
they
seem
to
be
interesting
because
because
discussions
on
Gator
do
tend
to
just
be,
you
know,
swallowed
in
the
warp
of
I'm
sure.
D
B
Then
what
are
the
discussion?
One
thing
that
I
wanted
to
mention
is
that
I've
noticed
over
the
past
month,
at
least
that
there's
a
lot
of
new
people
showing
up
on
Gator
and
that's
exciting,
because
all
of
them
have
really
nice
comments
for
backdrop
and
there's
even
people
that
that
have
tested
backdrop,
maybe
a
while
ago,
maybe
a
few
months
or
maybe
a
year
ago,
and
now
they
they're
sort
of
like
revisit
and
they're
they're
very
excited.
B
One
thing
that
I
need
to
mention
is
that
now
that
we
it's
been
up
quite
quite
some
time,
maybe
a
month
that
we
fixed
the
tag
board
integration
for
a
demo
link.
This
is
really
good
and
people
don't
have
issues
because
I
had
I
was
recommending
that
and
I
kept
being
logged
in
so
I
could
test
it.
But
when
I
had
to
did
the
presentation,
Gold
Coast
people
weren't
able
to
log
in
now,
we
fixed
that.
B
But
there
is
a
remaining
issue
where
people
cannot
test
the
project
browser
which
is
a
pretty
integral
feature
like
a
bit
of
backdrop.
So
I
know
that
this
is
waiting
on
on
mate
to
figure
out,
but
it
would
be
awesome
if
we
could
allow
contribute
Auld.
We
have
a
project
browser.
Do
we
have
an
issue
for
that?
B
Do
you
think,
do
you
know
I,
don't
know
I
think
there
was
an
issue
in
backdrop,
ops,
like
on
the
backdrop
CMS
de
Bourg,
specifically
to
get
the
demo
button
working
and
I'm
pretty
sure
that
it
might
post
a
link
on
the
gear.
I'll
look
for
a
little
poster
for
that,
but
I.
My
impression
is
that
it
was
caused
because
we
got
the
baton
working
with
other.
C
D
D
If
we
start
off
with,
like
I,
don't
know
checkboxes
or
drop
down
menu,
something
for
controls.
Now
that
we
have
the
thrush
integration,
pretty
solid,
this
we
could
script
sure
tugboat
to
get
the
stuff.
That
way,
which
would
be
before,
like
it
spins
up
the
containers,
which
I
think
should
work
but
anyways,
that's
another
path.
It
would
be
cool
to
have
project
browser
working
as
well,
but
there's
kind
of
two
possible
paths.
There,
I
guess
yeah.
B
And-
and
the
other
thing
was
that
maybe
we
could
lock
the
idea
that
ahead
of
my
head
was
that
we
have
a
about
a
less
scary
button
that
says
spin
up
a
quickly
spin
up
a
demo
for
me
and
then
it
has
a
advanced
configuration
because
I
had
this
comment
from
one
of
my
colleagues
because
I
constantly
evangelize
the
best
backdrop
and
then
I
said
look,
the
demo
is
working,
everybody
try
it
out
and
the
comment
he
was
an
advanced
user.
You
just
made
a
comment
for
that.
B
Is
that
what
I
have
to
go
through
the
installer,
which
is
another
thing
so
simply
test
me,
gets
you
up
and
running,
whereas
with
that
you
have
to
go
through
the
installer.
Maybe
there
should
be
just
a
simple
check
box
that,
yes
techniques,
is
there
installer
or
and
just
randomize
everything
and
yet
people?
You
know
yeah.