►
From YouTube: Backdrop Weekly - Oct 24, 2019
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
This
week
we
had
applications
to
contribute
in
an
important
who
selected
filters
and
a
couple
of
other
modules
in
Matthew
Connerton
who
had
abused
field
View
a
while
ago.
I
don't
think
he
was
properly
thanked
and
I
also
noticed
that
there
is
a
old
issue
from
ops
Tao
about
color
box
node.
That
should
have
been
mentioned
last
week
and
I'm,
not
sure
I,
remembered
to
mention
that
person
last
week,
so
so
yeah
a
new
contributors
pretty
exciting
this
week
in
the
land
of
contributions.
A
A
If
you're
curious
about,
what's
going
on
with
our
backdrop,
CMS
Network
website
properties,
we
talked
about
main
site
and
API
site
briefly
during
the
design
and
usability
meeting.
So
if
you
want
to
watch
that
video,
there
should
be
some
information
there
and
with
that
I
want
to
turn
it
over
to
me
to
talk
about
backdrop
itself.
What's
going
on
there.
B
Okay,
so
let's
see
so
first
thing
on
the
agenda
here
is:
is
this
might
be
a
short
meeting,
but
first
thing
on
the
agenda
is
Vectra.
One
14.2,
which
is
the
next
bug,
fix
release.
114
one
came
out
a
couple
of
weeks
ago
now,
including
a
bunch
of
minor
fixes
that
were
applying
importance
for
the
114
release
and
114.
B
We
don't
have
anything,
that's
like
a
really
high
priority.
The
things
that
we
have
to
highlight
during
this
meeting
include
views
cross
ports
issue.
36
85
is
really
big
Mehta.
There
are
two
remaining
items
on
the
3.12
Gosport
subviews
3.12.
I
put
little
links
to
in
the
agenda,
but
other
than
that
3:12
is
pretty
well
completed,
and
that
means
that
we're
ready
to
kind
of
move
on
to
like
3:13,
which
had
looked
at
that
one
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
Gregory
but
I,
don't
think
that
there's
been
any
start
on
that.
C
B
C
We
didn't
talk
that
much
about
these,
but
yeah
there's
only
two
anything
that
I
don't
know
it's.
My
sorry
I
haven't
revisited
this,
but
I
know
that
I'm
working
on
one
of
them,
which
is
just
a
trade-off
in
just
by
cons,
and
we
have
a
foreword
for
that.
The
Thor
is
another
person
who
was
wearing
while
working
in
one
of
us.
C
Really
sorry
but
yeah,
this
is
quite
a
few
of
them.
There's
about
a
dozen
of
them
that
already
have
separating
she's
filed
that,
and
there
is
oh
yes,
I,
don't
know,
but
now
so
this
one
does
not
have
a
follow-up
issue,
but
there
was
a
recommendation
for
someone
to
make.
The
flexible
layout
templates
are
separate
module.
Maybe
this
is
something
that
we
need
to
discuss
how
everybody
feels
about
it.
C
Unfortunately,
no
it
happened
over
dinner
and
the
general
feeling
there
was
that
so
people
thought
that
it
was
confusing
or
getting
in
the
way,
but
the
people
that
mentioned
that
the
thread
to
be
coding
their
own
templates
and
when
my
my
objection
to
that
not
maybe
they
meant
not
just
be
a
separate
module,
but
also
be
disabled
by
default.
My
objection
to
that
is
that
the
flexible
layouts
feature
or
it
does
it
adds
a
link
that
says
add
flexible
layout.
That's
all
it
doesn't
be
user
interface.
So
I
don't
find
it
to
be
that
interesting.
C
A
Interesting
so
I
had
created
the
last
bullet
on
that
meta.
That
was
like
make
it
possible
to
disable
it
and
it
for
me.
That's
because
I
have
a
use
case
where
I
want
to
give
my
clients
access
to
use
layouts,
but
I
don't
want
them
to
have
access
to
build
their
own
layouts
and
so
I
think
we
need
a
distinction
there
and
I
don't
and
like
on
a
site.
That's
already
done,
and
we
just
added
this
new
feature.
A
There
can
ever
use
that
new
feature,
because
it's
not
integrated
with
any
of
the
stuff
that's
already
done
and
so
having
the
ability
to
not
have
turn
on
for
them
would
be
good,
but
because
it
was
part
of
an
existing
module.
They
just
got
it
like
their
their
their
ears
in
the
process
for
someone
who
had
an
existing
site
to
be
able
to
leave
it
off
so
I
think
there's
a
use
case
for
that.
I
agree
with
Bo
Gregory
that
I,
don't
I,
wouldn't
want
it
disabled
by
default.
A
I
feel
like
this
is
sort
of
one
of
backdrops,
really
good
selling
features
and
I
think
that
we
should
continue
to
like
polish.
It
and
make
it
something:
that's
really
obvious
for
new
people,
but
I
think,
like
figuring
out
some
way
to
separate
the
different
levels
of
who
layout
access
control
would
be
good
and
making
into
a
module
seems
like
it
might
solve
both
the
problems
of
like
I.
Don't
want
the
feature
at
all
versus
oh
I.
A
Just
want
one
person
to
not
have
access
to
it,
but
I,
don't
know,
I
mean
I,
definitely
think
it's
a
it's
something
we
should
discuss.
Training
into
its
own
module.
Probably
is
also
a
lot
of
work
in
terms
of
moving
code
around
but
I,
don't
know,
I
haven't
looked
at
it
technically,
just
like
perspective,
so.
C
C
A
A
Higher-Level
person,
but
I
think
that
that
is
the
simplest
solution
is
to
have
a
checkbox,
but
that
was
how
Drupal
handled
revisions
right
and
if
you
didn't
ever
want
revisions
on
your
site,
you
had
no
way
to
turn
them
off.
Not
really
frustrating
and
I.
Think
we're
introducing
we're
here
where
it's
like.
Oh
I,
don't
want
I,
don't
want
flexible
template
user
interface,
whatever
on
this
particular
site,
and
you
don't
have
any
way
to
turn
them
off.
A
A
B
So
if
we
wanted
to
do
this
in
phases
at
least
like
if
we
wanted
to
make
it
so
that
there's
permission
as
a
first
step
and
separate
it
up
into
a
cyclic
module,
it's
the
second
step.
We
could
do
that
and
that
yeah
I
don't
feel
really
strongly
about
any
other
than
I
I
agree
that
it
should
be
out
of
box,
enabled
okay,
separate
modules,
permission
or
not,
it
seems
like
neither
those
things
would
do
very
much
harm.
You
know.
A
Okay,
well
I
I
hope
that
we
can
get
some
of
the
feedback
that
was
in
the
forum
into
the
core
issue,
queue
so
that
we
have
it
as
history
for
making
this
decision
going
forward.
But
I'll
I'll,
try
and
remember
how
to
link
in
the
forum
afterwards
to
get
people
to
weigh
in
on
the
particular
thing
here.
But
yeah
I
haven't
read
that
post
so
I'd
be
curious
to
see.
C
Recalling
that
those
answers
and
their
questions
in
the
specific
feedback
for
114
the
the
fact
of
the
fact
that
I
trusted
most
settings
thing
is
confusing
and
people
one
its
want
to
be
able
to
configure
it.
We
have
the
user
interface
came
up.
So
I
think
that
this
is
a
good
issue
to
be
working
towards
I.
Think
we
already
have
an
issue.
Just
don't
know
the
patient
number.
Now
it's
just
a
good.
C
C
A
B
B
B
C
C
C
C
C
B
Yeah,
as
always,
say
my
boiler
plates,
don't
that
114
to
milestone
has
a
bunch
of
our
issues.
You
can
see
the
might
get
home
I.
Just
let's
see
how
many
issues
right
now
there
are
46
issues
in
that
list
right
now,
most
to
much
have
all
requests,
which
is
great,
so
there's
a
whole
bunch
of
things.
There's
like
five
or
six
of
them
that
are
are
to
be
seat,
so
a
little
better
work
to
do
there,
but
yeah
something
great.
B
So,
let's
move
on
to
115
115
is
the
next
minor
version
of
backdrop
will
be
coming
up.
January
15th
2020,
like
the
future
breeze
like
January.
First,
let's
say:
we've
got
one
two,
three
four
five
six
items
here
to
discuss
the
first
one
is
Auto
menu
settings
in
core
issue.
1610,
you
know
be
Panda
is
not
here
at
the
moment,
but
did
you
guys
by
chance
cover
this
in
the
last
meeting
where
he
was
here?
No
okay.
A
Look
at
that
issue
today,
though,
he
pushed
a
new
poor
request
that
fix
some
of
the
issues
that
I
pointed
out
last
time,
which
is
good
I
had
a
thought,
though,
or
he
had
a
thought
that
I
hadn't
thought
about
right
now,
when
you
create
a
page
and
you
check
the
box
to
put
it
into
a
menu,
it
Auto
populates
the
title
field
and
then
later
on.
If
you
change
the
title
of
the
post,
it
doesn't
ever
change
that
menu
link
again
and
part
of
that
I.
A
Think
is
good,
because
if
you
had
like
a
really
long
page
title
and
you
wanted
the
menu
link
to
be
nice
and
short,
you
want
those
to
remain
separate,
but
we
now
have
the
option
to
pre
populate
this
title
using
a
token,
and
so
there
was
a
question
of
like
do.
We
update
the
title
every
time
the
content
changes
or
do
we
leave
it
the
way
it
is
now
where
the
title
is
a
distinct,
separate
piece
of
information
that
isn't
automatically
syncing
I.
C
Haven't
taken
the
recent
common-sense
changes
in
that
thing,
what
you're
describing
now
sounds
like
the
same
problem
that
we
had
it
we
solved
with
the
earth
or
L,
or
was
it
the
thing,
the
feature
that
we
persist?
I
thought
of
assist
module
which
had
a
checkbox
and
remembered
that,
whether
you
wanted
the
U
of
L
to
be
a
automatically
updated
or
they
have
it.
Like
my
name,
we
can
think
it's
something,
so
we
could.
A
C
A
E
A
A
Like
is
now
and
I.
A
C
A
A
C
D
D
C
Okay,
well
that
same
subject
at
some
point:
I
mentioned
this
and
I'm
not
sure
how
everybody
felt,
so
we
are
doing
that
for
Images
specifically,
so
we
called
that
an
image
library.
It
is
the
intention
to
eventually
have
that
via
files
library
and
use
it
for
files,
uploading
files
that
reusing
files
that
have
already.
A
Using
the
rich
text,
editor
I
would
probably
want
a
different
button
for
a
video,
so
I
might
want
a
different
browser
for
that.
I.
Don't
know
like
how
people
put
in
PDFs
so
far.
What
we've
seen
is
like
using
the
link
dialog
to
link
to
them,
but
I
think
it
would
be
better
to
study
how
people
use
it
and
figure
out
what
we
want
our
long
term.
Maybe
a
solution
to
be.
We
obviously
have
Drupal
as
a
reference,
and
we
can
look
at.
A
C
We
don't
have
a
emitter
issue
for
that
out
three
to
one.
The
reason
why
I'm
mentioning
this
is
because,
as
I
said,
we
work
in
the
agency
that
I
work
for
we
work
with
government
agencies
and
these
people
that
are
lured
loading,
a
lot
of
documents
and
PDFs,
and
things
like
that
on.
Besides,
not
so
many
videos
but
documents
and
the
respective
modules
that
have
been
used
in
this
seven
piece
room
and
the
core
media
functionality
for
the
eight
they
offer
that
they
do
have
some
bodies,
some
machines,
but
that's
what
they
do.
So.
C
B
How
are
they
just
dump
my
opinions?
It's
that
Drupal's
media
management
is
like
overly
abstract
for
what
a
lot
of
people
need.
Things
like
if
you
just
need
to
embed
a
video
in
a
rich
text.
Editor
like
Drupal
is
preceded
with
media
because
it's
like,
oh
this,
solves
the
embedding
problem
for
all
types
of
the
beds,
but
it
doesn't
really
just
completely
like
complicated
way
like.
Oh,
you
want
to
post
to
Twitter
embed.
B
Well,
you
make
a
Twitter
media
item
and
then
you
embed
the
Twitter
media
item
inside
of
it
and
just
the
coming
things
like
Twitter
and
beds,
or
even
YouTube,
videos
like
as
standalone
entities
that
then
end
up
in
a
media
browser
and
get
threaded
all
together
as
though
they
were
the
same
type
of
thing.
I'm
trying
to
be
just
a
very
strange
way
of
even
thinking
like
that
I
I,
agree,
yeah
and
I
mean
it's
extraordinarily
flexible
because
you'll
be
able
to
do
things
like
put
additional
fields
on
your
YouTube
videos.
F
C
B
A
A
C
B
Yeah
I
agree
that
image
feels
like
it's
gonna,
be
great,
that
we
have
the
ability
to
browse
and
select
images
like
with
thumbnails
and
I.
Like
that,
it's
a
it's
a
it's
an
own,
its
own
view,
so
you
can
specify
the
thumbnail
size
that
you
want
to
customize
it
to
show
images
and
then,
if
we
can
have
exactly
that
same
thing,
but
for
files,
then
that
would
be
wonderful.
You
know,
but
but
with
a
different
view,
you
know
and
it's
not
a
Media
Browser.
C
Not
that
we
mentioned
files
related
things,
it
was
mentioned
a
few
weeks
ago
on
Twitter
and
I
finally
go
to
test
it
a
couple
of
weeks
ago,
the
the
feature
that
we
added,
where
you
can
attach
images
from
your
phone
to
file
fields
via
the
capture
in
capturing
images
via
the
camera.
It's
been
working
for
iOS,
I've,
tested
it
on
an
iPhone
and
an
iPad,
and
it's
broken.
It
works
still
on
Android,
so
I'll
file
a
file
as
initial
for
that,
but
yeah
someone
mentioned
it,
but
yes,
it
is
broken.
It
has
been
working.
B
Let's
see,
except
we've
got
signatures
on
packages,
digital
signatures
on
packages,
issue
1992
part
of
our
automatic
updates
initiative,
so
we've
been
hung
up
for
a
long
time,
oh
and
I'm.
The
advocate
for
that
so
nepeta
on
that
is
that
we've
been
hung
up
on
this
issue.
For
a
long
time.
There
was
just
one
small
code
change
that
I
wanted
to
make,
but
we
had
to
make
it
like
four
different
places
and
so
I
con
tired
of
waiting
on
that
cuz.
It
really
was
it
just
a
unnecessary.
A
B
That's
where
code
sign
will
have
project
module
integration
and
it
it
shouldn't,
should
live
in
project
module
itself,
so
I
went
ahead
and
merged
that
to
that
control
and
I
pulled
his
code
for
code
sign
from
the
three
different
places
that
code
sign
lives
in
and
I
put
it
on
to
one
or
cause
story,
but
I
haven't
pushed
it
up
to
backdrop
contribut
so,
hopefully
later
today,
I'll
push
that
up
and
so
we'll
have
all
the
related
design
modules
in
can
trip.
You
can
put
that
onto
backdrop.
B
Cms
don't
work,
but
before
we
do
that,
I'm
gonna
fix
this
little
problem.
That
I
have
with
we've
got
unnecessary
pound
signs
in
like
an
info
hug
and
that's
my
only
real
complaint
about
it.
Otherwise,
it
looks
really
good.
So
hopefully
we'll
get
a
little
bit
of
progress
there
in
the
near
future,
and
the
current
plan
again
is
to
put
this
control
on
backdrop.
C
Again,
nor
days
whatever
one
assist,
it
should
be
early
like
easy,
not
necessarily
required.
Now.
The
mass
coming
of
that
issue
over
last
comments
is
that
dr.,
what
suggested
that
we
do
it
in
a
less
intrusive
way
were
in
a
way
that
has
less
chances
to
great
things.
It's
just
that
115
is
a
couple
of
months
and
one
is
on
focusing
on
back
faces
right
now.
I
think
that
the
second
half
of
November,
maybe
start
of
December
I'll,
start
working
again
on
that,
but
it
should
be
it's
straightforward
and
it's
almost
not
in
with
114.
B
Okay,
let's
see
recent
news
block
on
dashboard
issued
thirty
five
sixty
six
st.
Paul
Tim
is
the
advocate
for
this,
but
he's
not
present
and
the
status
on
this
one
is
that
there's
been
no
activity
on
the
issue
since
last
week,
so
I'm
just
move
on
to
the
next
one,
which
is
move
contents
of
the
manage
file
display
issue,
48:31,
gem
Lampton
you're,
the
kid
collect
any
updates,
I.
B
B
C
C
The
the
port
of
the
rest
basically
respected
module
that
back
ported
Drupal's
cache
tags
into
g7.
Would
we
like
to
include
that
something
like
that
in
backup,
or
would
it
be
complicated
things
and
I
understand
that
it's
out
of
the
box?
Unless
we
do
something
specific
with
for
things
like
nodes,
I
guess
it
won't
provide
anything
out
of
the
box.
It
will
be
in
the
configuration,
but
at
least
it
will
provide
things
that
site
builders
can
use
I'm,
not
sure
how
anybody
everybody
feels
about
that.
I.
A
Definitely
think
we
should
run
in
cache
tags,
but
I
don't
think
we
should
put
it
in
without
it
doing
anything.
So
I
would
love
to
see
us
trying
to
figure
out
if
we
can
update
like
no
clear
HT.
Is
it
just?
You
know
one
example,
something
like
that
where
we
can
put
it
in
and
then
we
can
iterate
and
have
additional
commits
are
like
use
cache
tags
on
user
queries,
use
hash
tags
on
temporary
use,
hash
codes
on
whatever.
C
Reasons
why
I'm
mentioning
it
one
obvious
is
that
it
solves
a
few
issues,
but
that
we
otherwise
require
doing
caches
sort
of
like
automates
things,
and
it
does
it
in
a
way
that
makes
sense
that
it
sort
of
like
keeps
things
that
are
constantly
displayed
in
a
certain
way
tasks,
and
then
it
only
updates
the
bits
of
the
pages
that
need
to
be
updated
and
it
totally
makes
sense,
there's
articles
that
mention
how
it
works
and
how
it
can
be
implemented
online.
So
that's
a
great
resource
when
someone
mentioned
something
I
discovered
it.
C
C
B
Okay
sounds
good;
okay,
that's
it
for
the
product
update.
We've
got
general
discussion
items
I've
got
a
suggestion
that
started
last
week
that
we
might
want
to
discuss
now
that
is
possibly
considered
changing
the
weekly
meeting
time
or
making
it
so
that
somehow
people
and
more
geographically
diverse
areas
can
be
in
some
meeting
of
some
kind.
A
C
A
A
A
A
C
B
C
E
A
C
Yeah,
so
this
didn't
there's
two
things
to
consider:
if
you
do
it
on
a
weekday,
it
will
work
for
certain
people,
but
it
might
not
work
for
us
because
they
both
might
be
at
work
yeah.
If
you
do
it
on
a
weekend.
I
know
that
people
consider
weekends
holy,
but
I
think
that
if
you
do
it
on
a
weekend,
it's
easier
for
someone
to
stay
up
late.
C
C
So
just
just
things
to
consider
I
was
thinking
that
maybe
it
could
be
just
every
in
the
first
weekend
of
each
month
or
something
like
that.
But
yeah
we
don't
have
to
make
a
decision
now.
It's
just
things
to
think
about,
and
since
since
more
people
are
requesting
it
and
you
have
more
people
joining
the
community,
I
would.
A
A
A
And
that's
sort
of
maybe
we
can
get
the
other
one
to
do
like
all
of
Europe
and
Melbourne
on
a
better
time,
so
something
that,
like
everybody,
cannot
attend
one
meeting
fairly
easily
and
if
we
need
to
move
this
like
current
time
in
order
to
make
the
other
one
be
able
to
get
like
exactly
the
other
half
of
the
world
or
something
I'm
totally
fine
with
that.
Yes,
that.
C
A
I
mean
I
think
so
my
general
take
on
is
like
every
meeting
right
now
is
sort
of
like
an
open
thing
at
the
end,
where
you
can
throw
in
anything
and
I.
Think
that
if
there's
something
urgent
that
you
want
to
talk
about
and
there's
people
there,
you
want
to
talk
about
it
with,
then
you
you
should
be
able
to
do
that.
A
I
think
it
would
also
be
good
if,
like
we
had
a
weekly
meeting
agenda,
that
could
be
shared
across
both
meetings,
so
that
if
somebody
at
the
like
monthly
catch-up
wants
to
add
something
that
we
then
also
talked
about
that
week
or
we
want
to
add
something
that
they
talked
about.
But
you
know
whenever
that
is
just
so
that
we
have
some
sort
of
shared
tool
to
be
able
to
continue
the
conversations
across
both
groups
of
people,
yep
I,
think
that
would
be
great
yeah
yeah.
C
I
was
just
looking
for
ways
to
make
the
community
and
the
product
more
inclusive.
So,
even
though
I
don't
speak,
any
RTO
languages
try
to
fix
issues
that
deal
does
my
take
is
that
even
in
Drupal,
things
are
broken.
Maybe
RTL
is
being
neglected
so
that
bit
of
the
community
might
have
you
know
at
some
point
given
up
and
I.
Don't
want
that
to
be
a
thing
in
in
my
truck.
C
That's
why
most
of
the
times
it's
there's
a
full
request
that
touches
on
the
user
interface
I,
try
to
switch
the
interface
to
RTL,
so
in
general,
this
effort
here,
but
making
the
that
meetings
time
accessible
to
all
the
time
zone,
plus
things
like
that,
but
keeping
in
mind
people
that
living
there
living
in
other
parts
of
the
world
I
think
it's
a
good
way
to
community.
You
know
City
yeah,.
B
Yeah
I,
like
the
once
a
month
thing
I
would
like
I
was
kind
of,
say,
I,
think
for
it
to
be
effective,
like
people
want
to
commit
to
it,
and
that
might
mean
like
Jen
and
I
or
fortune
or
I
I'd
like
to
make
it
so
that
you
know
we
wouldn't
need
to
be
present
or
maybe
have
a
somebody
new
that
was
officiating
those
you
know,
European,
Time
or
or
Australia
time.
Yeah.
B
Yeah,
so
the
idea
of
a
twelve
hours,
for
it
is
interesting,
like
that,
would
be,
let's
say,
like
1:00,
1:00
or
2:00
a.m.
here,
which
would
make
it
be
9:00
or
10:00
a.m.
and
Europe
generally
and
7:00
p.m.
and
you're
at
there
in
Australia,
which
seems
like
that
would
be
pretty.
That
would
be
pretty
interesting,
pretty
adequate.
You
actually.
B
C
But
it
could
be
just
up
once
a
month
for
people
that
work
in
businesses
that
are
flexible
with
that
or
you
could
go
to
work
early
and
just
start
attending
from
there
and
be
there
so
once
a
month,
maybe
some
people
can
make
that
sacrifices.
Just
that
waking
up
in
the
air
in
the
a.m.
split
them
now
or
staying
late
at
the
ends
for
your
guys
and
do
that
on
a
weekly
basis.
It's
a
bit
harder
for
others.
Right
I,
understand
that
ok,.
C
C
It's
the
it's
the
AMS
that
I'm
worried
about.
So
if
you
make
it
mine
in
time
on
a
weekday
in
Europe,
it
conflicts
with
people
starting
work
at
that
time.
So
maybe
some
would
rather
like
I
need
anything
like
at
7:00
a.m.
I
am
more
sensible,
and
maybe
that
would
make
it
more
sensible
for
you
guys
as
well.
Instead
of
being
the
one
again,
it
would
be
like
yeah.
B
C
Less
in
London,
yes,
so
so
I
think
that
this
is
one
day
that
people
in
the
Europe
might
have
to
wake
up
early
and
it
would
be
just
once
a
month
it
works
beautifully
for
people
in
Australia
because
it's
like
once
they
feel
support.
Maybe
they
just
have
to
stay
late.
I've
worked,
but
then-
and
it's
just
inconvenient
for
the
rest
of
you
guys
in
the
US
I
guess
yeah.
A
B
C
B
C
A
Travel
like
if
people
want
to
like
leave
town
Fridays
are
hard.
I,
don't
know.
Sunday's
are
hard
to
cuz.
People
want
to
go
to
bed
early
I,
don't
know
I,
think
I
feel
like
we
should
try
it
like
right
now
we're
in
the
middle
of
the
day
in
the
middle
of
the
week.
Maybe
we
should
try
10
hours
later
on
a
weekend
and
see
how
it
goes.
A
Breger,
you're,
the
only
one
there
we
can
try
a
different
day
of
the
week
and
then,
if
you're,
the
only
one
there
we
can
try
a
different
time
of
day
but
I
think
once
you
try
something
that
everyone
in
Europe
can
get
to
easily,
because
the
US
has
had
it
easy
for
the
last
few
years.
We
should
it's
us
and
easier
for
everyone
else
to
join
so.
C
Okay,
I
think
I
think
that
we
should
make
it
convenient
for
the
your
guys,
but
sometimes
just
me,
maybe
then,
when
in
five
months
six
months
from
now
when
Peter
joins,
it's
gonna
be
just
two
regular
people
in
Australia,
but
most
of
the
other
people
are
in
Europe.
So
maybe
we
should
just
look
to
make
it
convenient
for
the
Europe
guys,
but
now,
okay
and
don't
mind
being
you
know
one's
always
so.
A
C
C
C
A
C
Yes,
yes,
and
it's
like
I'm,
not
gonna,
make
it
personal,
I'm
gonna
ask
questions
like
what
people
usually
do
in
your
region.
What
time
to
start
work
is
it?
Yes,
it's
okay
and
I
know
that
we
are
in
different
locations
and
countries,
but
we
are
in
the
same
profession.
I
take
it
as
in
yes,
I
think
that
most
agencies
do
have
some
minion
source
of
flexibility
with
times
some
people
can
just
take
a
break
from
work
and
then
work
after
that.
C
B
A
C
E
F
C
B
C
It
to
the
agenda
no
discuss
it
now.
I
brought
this
up
during
the
last
meeting,
github
country,
permissions
and
groups.
Now
that
the
community
is
getting
yeah
a
little
bit
bigger.
Maybe
we
should
look
into
these
processes
yeah,
but
there
was
an
issue
for
that
somewhere,
I
think
yeah,
it's
an
old
one
and
you
just
sort
of
like
a
thing
where
we
left
it
out
easy
it
was.
It
was
so
long
ago
there
was.
We
are
still
a
small
community.
It's
not
worth
the
effort!
Well,
yeah.