►
From YouTube: Backdrop Weekly - July 19th
Description
Today’s development agenda: http://bit.ly/2Ln2urP
A
All
right
we're
on
air.
It
is
Thursday
July
19.
This
is
a
meeting
to
check
in
on
active
core
development
tasks
to
back
that
CMS
before
we
get
into
our
issues.
I
didn't
want
to
give
a
quick
update
on
contributing
projects.
I
wasn't
here
last
week,
I
was
getting
worked
on,
but
we
have
a
ton
of
new
conserved
modules,
including
anti-bot
elevation
demonstration
site
paragraphs
order,
similar
insight
map.
So
if
anyone
have
been
waiting
for
those
contributors
they're
now
all
in
the
control,
compositor
e-
so
thank
you.
A
Everybody
just
me
doing
all
the
work
on
those
particular
things
for
paragraph
saying,
I'm
a
long
time
coming
and
it's
a
hot
one
that
lots
of
people
want
to
be
using
these
days.
So
fantastic
work,
everyone
they're
getting
those
up
all
right
and
then
I'd
like
to
turn
it
over
to
meet
to
talk
about
all
of
the
issues.
B
B
B
We've
got
two
issues
right
now
that
we
flagged
as
being
higher
portents.
One
of
them
is
an
accessibility
related
issue
with
the
menu
which
is
issued
3195,
and
this
is
a
just
a
minor
issue-
that
the
keyboard
accessibility
of
the
the
menu
on
desktop
is
a
little
weird,
and
so
there's
already
a
pull
request
for
that
one.
It's
already
marked
needs
review.
I.
B
Think
there's
actually
been
some
explanation
about
why
the
change
is
being
made
and
everybody
seems
like
they're
there,
an
agreement
there
I
think
that
ones,
probably
more
on
the
RT
BC
side
of
things
than
the
needs,
reviews
I'd
say
just
needs.
Someone
to
market
is
so
and
then
I
think
it's
ready
for
merging.
B
Now
the
other
one
is
issued
2904,
which
is
a
long-standing
issue.
We've
got
actually
since
1.9
that
we
started
URL
encoding
database
credentials
and
if
your
database
credentials
contained
a
percent
symbol,
things
went
awry,
and
so
we
would
like
to
make
it
so
that
we
notify
users
or
that
percent
symbols
continue
to
work.
The
way
they
did
previously
without
being
URL
encoded,
but
we
send
the
user
a
notification
in
the
status
report
saying
that
their
settings
dot
PHP
file
should
be
URL
encoding
their
database
credentials.
So
that
is
still
a
needs.
B
All
right,
1.11
is
the
next
minor
release
and
that
will
be
September.
15Th
2018
and
we've
got
some
progress
on
a
lot
of
different
initiatives.
Here,
let's
see
one,
that's
we'll
call
it
new
this
week
is
its
new.
This
week
is
being
mentioned
in
the
meetings,
but
it's
been
open,
quite
a
while,
which
is
issued
31:55,
which
adds
a
fourth
type
of
message
to
the
status
messages
that
are
up
at
the
top
of
the
page.
B
So
it
adds
an
info
type
in
addition
to
the
ones
that
are
already
there,
including
Isaac
status,
warning
and
error,
and
so
the
info
type
would
be
used
for
things
that
just
our
informative
type
messages
that
have
a
blue
background
instead
of
a
green
red
or
yellow
one,
and
so
the
status
of
that
is,
it
needs
review.
Take
a
look
at
31:55
to
kind
of
add
that
usability
enhancement
for
another
kind
of
message
that
we
can
use
in
different
situations
that
that
are
appropriate
for
it.
C
Just
literally
I
didn't
realize
that
my
mic
was
open,
but
did
you
hear
that
speech
returned
so
I
just
updated
the
thing
just
a
few
seconds
ago,
there's
a
screenshot
of
made
all
the
messages
be
triple-a,
compliant
as
we're
suggested.
I
did
not
change
the
color
of
the
actual
icons
because
they
look
a
bit
vivid
in
beautiful.
But
if
you
want
me
to
do
that,
I
can
do
that
as
well.
I
think
it's
ready
to
go
back
next.
C
C
B
Looks
it
looks
pretty
similar?
Actually,
it
looks
like
it's
just
the
yeah
it
just
bumped
up
a
little
bit
contrast,
wise,
cool,
okay,
great,
so
I
guess
the
that's.
A
little
ambitious
getting
in
color
changes
this
time,
but
you
know
it
seems
like
if
we're
all
moving
together
than
great,
if
we
get
stuck
then
separating
it
out,
might
might
be
advisable.
A
A
A
D
So
3105
has
progress
that
enables
us
to
do
those
updates
through
the
UI
and
need
some
work
there
around
what
to
do
with
authorized
dot
PHP,
whether
we're
gonna,
remove
it
or
make
it
compatible
with
updating
core
through
through
update
module,
well
packaged
shining
1992.
Primarily,
that's
me
and
the
there's
proof
of
concept
work
there
and
we
got
a
look
at
where
we're
gonna
truck
ahead
with
sodium
or
use
existing
package
signing
open
SSL,
and
then
that
needs
some
work.
D
B
That
is
shown
on
the
front
end
or
to
give
administrative
themes
the
ability
to
load
certain
CSS
files
on
the
front
end
of
this
site.
That
has
certain
problems
involved,
including
doing
a
really
pretty
hefty
reset
on
all
of
the
CSS
to
prevent
front-end
CSS
from
accidentally
modifying
the
administrative
portions
of
the
page.
B
Basically,
that
I
think
node
module
is
responsible
for
adding
the
CSS
for
the
node
preview
and
just
happens
to
look
like
seven
and
I
think
that
the
considerations
thereof
like
always
working
well,
regardless
of
the
front
end
theme,
probably
isn't
comprehensive.
So
what's
there
right
now
is
basically
kind
of
just
a
temporary
arrangement,
I
think
until
we
can
come
up
with
a
better
solution
there,
so
those
are
kind
of
the
options
that
we
have
laid
out.
B
But
it's
funny
that
we're
stuck
on
this
issue
because
of
a
like
a
CSS
or
front-end
or
UX
presentation
problem,
not
because
of
a
technical
one,
so
yeah
we
could
use
some
additional
thoughts
there.
Any
front-end
there's
that
have
particular
thoughts
as
to
how
we
could
go
about
managing
administrative
CSS
on
the
front
end
thoughts
would
be
more
common,
appreciated,
they're
in
issue
30
62
for
the
node
preview.
B
Let's
see
other
other
issues,
tags
for
modules,
issue
number
37
still
in
progress,
this
one
we're
just
looking
at
making
it
so
that
modules
can
have
tags
in
addition
to
categories
that
one
still
needs
re-rolling.
We
had
a
reroll
that
was
a
little
too
broad
in
its
application,
so
we
really
just
need
one
that
just
adds
the
tags
and
doesn't
substantially
revamp
pretty
much
anything
else
so
status
that
one
it
still
needs
work
issue
28
87.
B
This
is
a
small
enhancement,
relatively
speaking,
that
the
issue
is
to
use
exif
data
when
an
image
is
uploaded
to
automatically
rotate
the
image
so
that
it
is
the
correct
orientation
that
one
has
been
rear
old
in
this
past
week,
thanks
Graham
72
for
taking
that
one
on
again,
and
we
just
need
some
review
on
that
new
implementation,
which
turns
that
option
to
automatically
rotate
images
into
a
per
field,
setting
in
the
same
manner
as
automatically
resizing
images,
is
a
per
field.
Setting
so
needs
review
on
that
one.
B
Let's
see,
I
haven't
looked
at
this
one.
The
rich
text
editor
file,
upload
issue.
31
34
adds
the
capability
to
reuse
a
file
when
selecting
an
image
in
seek
added
and
are
in
the
rich
text.
Editor
Jen.
Do
you
take
a
look
at
this
one
before
the
meeting
I
think
you
may
have?
Could
you
give
the
update
oh
plate?
Are
we
seeing
cats
right
now.
B
Okay
looks
like
okay,
so
we
have
been
seeing
some
some
some
action
here.
It
looks
like
primarily
where
we
are
right
now
is
another
UX
related
issue
that
the
styling
of
the
thumbnail
presentation
is
currently
being
worked
on,
and
so
there's
some
suggestions
about
styling
and
how
we
can
make
that
look.
Aesthetically
better
Graham
has
been
going
through
and
updating
to
match
his
expectations
of
how
the
the
thumbnails
should
appear,
and
so
so
that's
coming
along
pretty
well.
B
Boy,
ok,
let's
see
other
issues
related
to
file
man
and
more
of
file
entity
module
in
core
issue.
1448
is
a
meta
issue
and
dr.
Elmont
has
been
pushing
forward
on
one
of
the
sub
issues
there,
which
is
making
it
so
that
file,
entities,
support
bundles
and
through
side
effect
that
also
support
fielding
and
so
he's
been
making
substantial
progress
on
that
issue.
26:32
I
think
it
would
definitely
appreciate
additional
assistance
there.
Although
at
this
point
it's
not,
it's
not
really
quite
production-ready,
I
think
he's
just
getting
it
close
to
to
working.
B
There
he's
also
stated
they
thinks
it
might
be
too
ambitious
for
1.11
that
functionality,
because
it's
a
pretty
substantial
set
of
changes.
So
anyway,
there
is
progress
moving
forward
on
that
issue,
even
if
it's
not
going
to
be
a
1.11
enhancement,
let's
see
and
then.
Lastly,
three
issues
that
I
don't
think
you've
seen
activity
in
the
last
week.
B
B
The
meta
issues
check
those
issues
for
individual
updates,
because
there's
been
a
number
of
issues
that
either
are
currently
started
that
have
pole
requests
or
that
need
a
little
bit
of
work
and
also
ones
that
are
actually
in
like
an
estate
that
they
they
need
active,
reviewing
and
could
potentially
be
ready
at
any
time.
All
right.
There's
also
the
github
issue,
tracker,
of
course,
for
also
all
other
1.11
issues.
The
111
milestone
on
github.
For
more
areas
of
action,
that's
it
for
the
core
update
done.
D
E
C
E
B
D
B
D
C
D
Don't
think
there's
any
canonical
database
yet,
but
there
is
a
server.
So
if
you're,
if
you
I
think
at
this
point,
you
can
just
download
the
code
base
and
install
it
and
you'll
have
a
sufficient
data
set
because
there's
no
like
actual
content
in
there
right
now.
Okay,
but
if
you
do
need
a
database,
you
can
contact
layer
in
until
you
can
grab
stuff
from
the
server.
Thank.
C
C
Well,
there's
things
that
I
on
on
their
agenda
as
well
as
let
me
see
that
I
always
forget
so
automatic
a
star
and
the
project
browser
that
they're
building
and
the
other
one
that
I
do
not
care
about
is
a
it's
called
project
messaging
channel
in
core.
So
they
intend
to
bring
in
a
feature
that
would
allow
sending
messages.
Sort
of
like
I
am
inclined
to
call
them
emotional,
but
anything
important
that
the
Drupal
Association
or
any
news
or
Drupal
Pony
things
will
be
communicated
via
the
platform.
B
C
C
B
B
That
there's
been
always
been
a
kind
of
valid
concern
that
you
know
right
now.
We
can
frequently
run
into
bottlenecks
where
we
need
certain
reviewers
or
certain
core
maintainer
x'
to
do
like
merging
of
particular
issues
or
certain
tasks
that
require
Jenner,
I
particulars,
direct
intervention
and
ways
that
we
can
alleviate
that
we
definitely
neither
of
us
want
to
be
solely
responsible
for
any
particular
task,
and
so
we've
been
trying
to
well.
We've
wanted
to
delegate
pretty
much
everything
as
much
as
possible,
or
at
least
share
that
responsibility
amongst
multiple
people.
B
A
So
this
is
just
something
that
was
brought
up
before
we
started
the
meeting
that
there
are
still
points
in
our
general
workflow,
where
we
get
to
something
where
we
didn't
need
feedback
for
action
from
URI,
and
we
don't
want
that
to
be
the
case.
So
we
need
to
figure
out
what
those
bottlenecks
actually
are
like.
A
So
we
should
figure
out
what
pieces
are
missing
and
make
sure
that
we
have
redundancy
and
all
of
the
things
that
we
do
so
that
you
know
if
Nate
and
I
aren't
around
for
a
month.
Action
doesn't
grind
to
a
halt
contact
up.
We
have
other
people
who
are
able
to
pick
up
the
pieces
and
make
sure
the
thing
is
carried
forward.
A
So
I
think
we've
got
we
sort
of
have
a
basic
outline
of
you
know
who's
in
charge
of
making
decisions
on
the
leadership
page,
but
we
don't
have
a
lot
of
the
day-to-day
action
stuff
identified
and
we
don't
have
a
you
know.
If,
if
Nate
isn't
around,
we
need
response.
He
is
authorized
to
speak
on
us
a
half
to
something
like
that.
C
Similar
thing
that
has
happened
is
it's
not
only,
it
doesn't
have
only
to
do
with
the
product
itself
and
code,
getting
reviewed
or
committed.
Another
thing,
for
example,
was
the
contribute
and
applications
and
I
did
raise
my
hand,
but
for
the
past
year
and
a
half
I
didn't
have
as
much
time
as
I
used
to
I.
A
I
thought
we
actually
handled
that
pretty
well
Gregory
when
I,
you
know
realized
that
you
weren't
gonna,
have
time
to
take
over
I
started,
taking
over
the
queue
and
then
when
you
came
back,
I
was
like
oh
you're
here.
Do
you
want
this
back,
which
I
think
is
fine,
but
there
are
things
like
that
that
I
think
anyone
who
is
part
of
the
backdrop
project
could
take
over
if
they
only
had.
You
know
the
confidence
to
do
it
or
the
blessing
from
someone
where
it's
just
something
needs
to
get
done.
A
Someone
wants
to
do
it,
raise
your
hand,
and
you
can
do
it
and
we'll
make
sure
you
have
whatever
tools.
You
need
a
river
access,
I
think
it's
just
something
that
most
people
don't
even
think
about
just
being
a
role
and
if
we
could
write
that
down
and
say
like
these
are
things
that
you've
helped
with
there
might
be
more
people
who
are
like.
C
My
my
personal,
my
personal,
so
Jason
mentioned
that,
because
maybe
he
he's
not
around
now,
you
say
if
he
has
something
specific
in
his
mind,
but
my
personal
perspective
was
that
when
I
had
time,
I
just
got
to
do
things.
Someone
designated
me
as
the
single
person
being
responsible
for
something
I
wouldn't
feel
comfortable
like
because
I
know
that
my
life
constrains
time
constraints.
You
know
it
allowed
me
to
be
totally
it's
possible.
Look
I
would
feel
stressed
about
I.
Think
I
wanted
this
to
be
fun.
Sorry
for
being
realistic,
yeah
no.
A
I
mean
it
that
makes
sense
that
it's
you
I
mean.
Not
only
do
you
want
to
be
fun,
but
it's
it's
better
when
you
have
a
team
of
people
so
that
if
any
one
of
you
has
questions,
then
you
are
people
talk
about
it
so
I
think
like
we
have
a
security
team,
we
might
want
a
set
of
other
teams.
Like
a
welcoming
committee,
great.
F
A
Words
like,
oh,
you
want
to
be
on
the
well
community.
That
sounds
really
fun.
What
do
you
do?
You
say
hello?
They
can
see
you
later
yeah.
You
know,
I.
Think
I.
Think
that
that
also
you
know
it
would
give
people
a
little
bit
more
sense
of
community
like
you're
working
with
these
people
and
less
and
less
pressure
in
terms
of
like
you're,
the
only
one
that
gets
answered,
no.
F
A
At
the
issues,
if
someone's
already
answered,
you
don't
have
to
do
anything,
someone
has,
it
hasn't
answered
one
answer,
and
now
everyone
else
knows
that's
your
issue
and
only
if
you
don't
respond
for
a
week
or
more
will
someone
else
pick
up
the
conversation
so
I
think
you
know
every
team
can
have
its
own
rules
about.
You
know
who
takes
your
possibility,
which
occasionally,
which
response
which
asks
but
I
like
the
idea
of
having
teams
in
Los
Angeles
but
yeah
you're.
A
F
C
You
know
like
even
less
was
preoccupied
for
quite
some
time
and
then
he
returned
like
it
happens
to
everybody
like
we
might
be
booked
or
more.
You
know
real
life
happens,
but
yeah.
If
there
is
I
guess
to
avoid
the
the
similar
situation
with
d7
in
th
and
people,
you
know
saying
how
this
should
happen.
If
that
should
happen,
I
guess
it's
perfectly
fine.
They
have
two
groups
of
people,
the
ones
that
seek
more
responsibility,
and
if
these
people
are
ready
to
volunteer
themselves
as
being
the
designated
people
for
doing
tasks,
then
that's
fine.
C
But
personally,
because
I'm,
a
old
grounder
as
well
like
I,
like
the
contributor
everywhere,
whatever
like
I,
might
get
sick
of
a
thing
and
then
jump
to
another.
I
would
also
like
I
say:
have
the
flexibility
of
having
people
to
just
you
know,
jump
in
and
randomly
say:
oh
I
have
three
hours
this
weekend
and
I
want
a
movie
so
that
yeah.
B
Yeah
I
think
your
point
Gregory.
Ultimately,
more
people
like
and
maybe
not
more
people,
but
you
know
even
better
use
of
the
people
that
we
already
have
like
getting
those
people
to
do
particular
tasks
or
jobs
would
would
help
quite
a
bit
because
it's
not
a
lot
of
work
and
in
some
cases,
like
the
contribu
system,
like
there's,
not
a
lot
of
complexity,
there
either
too
to
the
process,
and
it's
actually.
B
The
process
is
documented
fairly
well
like
what
you
need
to
do,
of
course,
because
our
programmers
will
also
probably
look
for
technical
solutions
to
problems.
You
know
increasing,
increasing
automation,
I
know
that
we've
talked
about
automating
code
review
for
quite
a
while,
like
that
process
could
be
much
more
automatic.
Have
we
had
more
integration
between
github
and
backdrop,
CMS
org?
B
B
I
am
a
member
of
the
core
committers
team,
I'm,
a
member
of
whatever
team,
and
when
they
do
that,
they
basically
sign
up
for
some
kind
of
communications,
maybe
a
mailing
list
or
something
of
that
nature
kind
of
like
the
security
mailing
list.
Well
that
mean
there's
an
Associated
email
address
that
is,
like
you
know,
or
way
of
sending
to
that
group
of
people.
Hey
we're
short
on
reviewers
right
now
for.
B
Contribute
to
that
group,
and
we
can
also
formally
make
lists
of
those
people
saying
these
are
the
people
you
can
reach
out
to
for
contribute
views
that
sort
of
thing
and
then
then
that
would
do
a
dual-purpose,
hopefully
of
formalizing,
that
role,
because
it
would
be
listed
somewhere
and
also
making
it
so
that
we
could
coordinate
those
people
as
a
group
and
reach
out
to
them
and
communicate
with
them.
Tation.
C
So,
just
to
recap,
you
can
watch
the
video
after
the
fact,
but
just
to
recap
so
that
you
can
chime
in
I
was
wondering
if
you
had
anything
specific
in
your
mind
when
you
were
proposing
the
specific
like
if
there
was
something
that
you
specifically
wanted
to
be
more
peril
or
organize
it
a
little
bit
better.
But
I
personally
expressed
the
opinion
that
I
would
like
to
have
the
I
contributor
event
in
various
parts.
F
Really
have
any
specific
thing:
it
was
just
more
of
like
several
times
that
there
have
been
like
like
I,
I
I,
follow
the
the
issue
queue
I
get.
You
know
the
email
notices
when
the
stuff
happens,
I,
don't
necessarily
contribute
and
I.
Don't
necessarily
read
all
of
them,
but
I
see
stuff
happening
in
there
are
times
I've
noticed
is
like
okay.
You
know,
people
are
waiting
for
feedback
and
it's
not
happening.
It's
been
three
or
four
or
five
days
and
that's
like
there
should
be.
F
Other
people
should
be
allowed
to
move
forward
with
this
it
shouldn't
require.
You
know,
Nate
engines
full
attention
all
the
time
they
should
be
allowed
to
take
a
vacation
or
whatever
just
have
a
life,
and
but
I
felt
like
that.
There
have
been
situations
where
that's
not
been
the
case.
It
was
like
it's
been
like,
okay,
we're
waiting
for
you.
This
is
like.
C
C
Myself
know
how
to
find
my
way
around
task
lists
so
to
say,
not
to
specifically
say
they
issue
queue,
but
if
we,
if
we
manage
to
have
a
more
organized
way
to
say
on
these,
are
the
areas
that
we
are
working
on
and
it's
area
has
these
this
and
that
task.
This
is
where
you
can
find
more
information
if
we
can
sort
of
like
gently
push
people
to
words
where
they
might
be
interested
to
help
with
I
guess,
but
I
don't
have
any
specific
way
to
do
that,
I'm
not
having
it.
F
B
Wonder
it
might
be
well
I,
don't
know
how
much
following
or
how
closely
you
pay
attention.
But
there
are
a
lot
of
issues
that
we've
seen
carried
easily,
maybe
not
easily,
but
start
to
finish.
Without
the
involvement
of
in
some.
In
most
cases
it
gets
to
RIT,
BC
and
then
and
then
I'll
handle
it.
You
know
handle
actual
merging
they're.
All
there
Jeff
I
know
has
done
even
that
part
on
occasion
where
we've
not
been
involved
in
any
way
whatsoever.
B
So
it
is
possible,
but
I
think
that
ultimately,
people
see
us
as
being
like
well
pretty
much
any
question
and
any
problem
can
be
overcome
by
these.
Two
people
makes
it
so
that
we
just
started
the
default
person
for
someone
to
go
to,
and
so
it's
not
that
it's
not
possible
to
for
us
to
move
on
without
our
intervention.
B
A
Changed
with
experience
too,
as
more
people
get
one
spinning
to
back
job
battleship
I.
Think
it's
just
wearing
out,
like
I've,
been
building
production
insights
on
backed
up
since
before
back
jump
was
ready,
so
it's
built
on
it.
So
I'm
pretty
familiar
with
it
and
me,
like
you
know
he
wrote
the
layout
system.
So
if
you
have
questions
about
the
layout
system
like
it's,
it's
easiest
for
him
the
answer,
but
that
doesn't
mean
that,
like
dr.
A
Elmont,
doesn't
know,
answer
that
question:
it's
not
done
a
ton
of
work
on
it
and
they
think
that
that
means
a
lot
of
us
feel
like.
Oh,
you
have
a
question
about
that.
Ask
me
that
doesn't
mean
that
there,
other
people
don't
know
the
answer.
You
just
don't
know
the
other
people
know
the
answer.
Nah
and
I.
Think
that
you
know
I
for
sure
would
want
to
encourage
people
to
keep
mentioning
us
and
issues.
Because
then,
if
we
see
an
email
come
in
and
there's
a
question,
we
know
the
answer
to.
A
We
can't
turn
fight
in
an
answer
it,
but
I
also
wouldn't
want
anyone
who
get
specifically
at
mentions
to
feel
it
obligated
to
answer
every
one
of
those
posts
where
their
feedback
is
what
requested,
because
it
is
a
lot.
You
know
it
won't
become
overwhelming
for
anyone,
but
yeah
I
think
that
as
the
community
grows
and
as
more
people
get
watch
in
two
different
areas,
I've
got
more
circulars
all,
but
so
I
mean
that
upsets
me
is.
C
A
few
thoughts
there,
first
of
all,
we
don't
have.
We
have
not
exposed
the
ability
to
tag
things
to
other
people
like
this.
Only
a
few
people
that
can
tag
issues
in
the
queue
and
in
the
past
people
have
even
been
requesting
like.
Can
we
please
tag
this
and
I
was
able
to
do
because
I
had
that
that
permission,
the
other
thing
is:
if
we
tag
something
has
blocked
it,
it
has
to
be
someone
that,
for
example,
I've
often
saw
doc.
We
would
say
pick
up
a
person's,
really
old
request
and
say
where's.
C
C
We
do
not
have
specific
processes
in
place
for
these
things
they
happen,
but
I
do
not
see
any
harm
in
someone
picking
up
someone
else's
poor
request
and
filing
things.
On
top
of
that,
so
I
guess
it's
gonna
happen,
naturally,
and
for
something
to
be
tagged
as
block,
which
is
where
I
was
getting
at
needs
to
be
both
ways.
C
So
people
might
be
eager
to
sort
issues
out
but
have
like
would
have
this
situation
where
people
in
D
dot
org
used
to
time
issues
as
major
critical
because
they
wanted
to
move
them
along,
but
they
themselves
could
not.
You
know
help
avoid
that
situation
where
people
just
go
and
mark
tickets
as
blocked
where
there's
nothing
to
be
done
or
the
person
who
is
to
work
on
them
does
not
have
time.
Anyways
I'm,
not
sure
if
that
makes
sense
what
I'm
saying
yeah.
B
Well,
I
think
what
you're
saying
is
that
you
get
artificial
inflating
of
things
and
just
or
like
one
log
is
whole,
so
we
make
another
one
that
is
empty,
but
then,
ultimately
that
one
gets
full.
You
know
I
mean
pretty
much.
Anything
I
think
that
is
in
needs.
Review.
Most
of
the
time
is
blocked.
Well,.
C
You
know,
in
other
words,
what
I
was
trying
to
say
is
like
I.
We
do
not
have
any
solution
and
we
it's
good
that
we
acknowledge
the
problem.
I
personally,
do
not
have
any
any
Cogan
solution
right
now,
but
it's
good
that
we
have
these
discussions.
I
really
like
having
these
discussions
every
now
and
then,
and
if
anyone
has
any
good
idea
to
have
it
move
forward
and
then
help
with
these
stuff
like
yeah
Charlie,
just
let's,
let's,
let's
do
whatever
needs
to
be
done
to
to
make
things
easier
for
people
yeah.
B
It's
a
good
bad
problem
to
have
honestly.
It
means
that
our
enthusiasm
for
contributors
is
growing
to
the
point
that
we're
having
these
review
problems
and
we've
structured
the
project
from
the
beginning
to
alleviate
this
particular
problem.
But
we
haven't
had
the
volunteers
to
escalate
like
to
do
to
eliminate
the
bottlenecks,
so
the
project
is
actually
set
up
to
have
a
larger
number
of
reviewers
and
a
larger
number
of
people
that
can
facilitate
solving
these
bottleneck
problems.
But
we
haven't
had
people
fill
those
positions,
yeah.
C
C
And
asking
asking
people
or
having
both
mix
people
being
the
bottleneck
is
not
a
bad
things
like,
as
you
said,
there's
expects
ampuls
of
people
that
have
worked
in
certain
things
in
areas
or
if
you
wanna
ask
something
that
it
has
to
do.
For
example,
with
multilingual
Olaf
has
done
creative
work,
so
he's
the
person
to
be.
C
A
C
But
yeah
Jason
I
would
recommend
like
if
you
can
even
I
personally
do
not
it's
a
personal
choice
that
I
do
not
follow
the
forums
because
I
do
not
have
time
for
everything,
but
I
will
not
say
where.
But
if
you
can
open
a
ticket
and
if
you
have
any
specific
suggestions
like
open
a
ticket
with
aunt
Agatha's
question,
something
like
that
or
suggestion
or
idea,
and
maybe
we
could,
you
know,
have
more
input
and
actually
action
something.
Okay,.
F
Think
also
like
like
there
is,
you
know
the
document
does
identify
the
PMC,
but
I
don't
know
that
it
necessarily
identifies
you
know
what
the
structure
is.
Who
core
committers?
Are
things
like
this?
Who
people
can
which
people
can
be
approached
about
which
problems,
and
that
might
be
something
that
could
be
helpful
as
well?
So
so
then
it's
like
everybody
thinks
oh
well,
I'll,
just
ask
Nate
or
Jen,
because
obviously
they
know,
but
you
know
there
might
be
other
people
that
know
too,
and
you
could
just
ask
him
too
exactly.