►
From YouTube: Weekly Developer Meeting - March 11, 2021
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Hello
internet,
it
is
march
11
2021,
and
this
is
the
weekly
backdrop
developer
meeting.
We
get
together
every
week
to
talk
about
the
latest
things
in
backdrop,
probably
an
extra
special
meeting
in
a
little
way
here,
because
it's
the
one
directly
before
backdrop
live
that
gets
started
tomorrow,
very
exciting.
A
Let's
go
ahead
and
do
a
little
introductions.
I'll
start,
my
name
is
nate
lampton,
I'm
a
core
committer
and
I
live
in
oakland
california,
joseph.
Can
you
introduce
yourself
next.
B
B
C
Hi
tim
erickson
dear
with
minnesota
all
busy
with
backdrop
live
this
week
so
which
is
tomorrow,
see
everybody
there
jason.
D
E
I'm
justin
christopherson,
I'm
in
denver
colorado
and
I
help
out
with
some
infrastructure
tasks
here
and
there.
A
A
F
F
A
Great
thanks
for
being
here
all
right-
let's
see
so
normally
jen
goes
through
the
intro
portions
of
this.
So
I'll
try
to
do
my
best
here
updates
from
the
project
management
committee.
I
do
not
believe
there
are
any
public
announcements
to
be
made
at
this
time.
A
Let's
see
contributed
project
updates.
I
didn't
prepare
this
portion
at
all,
so
we
might
come
back
to
it
at
the
end.
To
give
an
update
on
contributed
projects
yeah,
it
looks
like
there's
one
two,
three,
four:
five:
six:
six
or
seven
new
contrib
projects,
which
is
very
exciting
if
jen
shows
up
I'll,
let
her
enumerate,
which
ones
those
are.
A
A
In
the
backdrop,
cms.org
issue
queue
last
we
heard
we
had
merged
this
change,
that
supports
more
data
in
the
info
files
and
we'll
store
that
information
onto
the
project
nodes
on
backdrop
cms.org,
but
I
believe
it
has
still
yet
to
be
deployed.
There's
not
been
a
comment
in
the
issue
saying
that
it
has
so
I
think
that's
where
we
are.
A
And
let's
see,
lastly,
the
event
site
tim,
I
would
love
it
if
you
could
give
an
update
on
the
events
site
and
how
well
that
is
working
for
preparation
of
backdrop
live.
C
So
the
event
site
itself:
it's
needed
some
work,
it's
been,
we've
had
registrations
live,
so
people
have
been
registering.
That
seems
to
be
working.
Okay,
a
few
things
that
we
will
smooth
out
for
next
time.
We
had.
C
A
better
schedule
at
scheduling
and
other
features
on
the
site,
and
some
work
has
been
done
in
just
the
last
24
hours
and
I
think
we'll
get
some
more
done
before
we
start
tomorrow
in
terms
of
viewing
the
schedule
in
the
meantime,
there's
a
google
doc
with
a
schedule
and
that's
listed
on
on
the
event
site,
and
we
also
have
our
mural
that
people
have
been
using
as
well.
C
A
A
So
even
the
website
issues
aside
the
spreadsheet
full
accolades
for
its
organization
and
for
detail
there.
C
C
A
A
A
A
A
A
Let's
see,
I
also
wanted
to
pull
up
this
week,
a
trio
of
accessibility
issues
that
we
don't
normally
talk
about,
but
there's
been
a
lot
of
activity
as
of
late,
so
I
think
it
would
be
worth
mentioning
the
progress
that
is
happening
on
some
interesting
issues.
That's
just
come
up
recently,
a
lot
of
so
so.
A
The
kickoff
issue
that
started
all
of
this
in
a
way
was
that
we
had
a
new
user
named
mustafa
dogon,
78
post
issues
post
an
issue
about
the
layout
ui
interface
for
dragging
and
dropping
blocks
is
not
keyboard
accessible.
A
So
that
issue
is
four
nine
four
one
and
doc
walmart
and
others
have
been
doing
a
huge
amount
of
work
making
it
so
that
the
blocks
interface
is
keyboard,
accessible
and
then,
on
top
of
that,
making
it
so
that
it
is
also.
A
Accessible
from
a
screen
reader
perspective,
so
there's
a
follow-up
issue
on
top
of
that
one
4985
for
supporting
aria
live
areas.
That's
like
a
a
section
of
the
page
where,
if
you
put
text
into
it,
then
a
screen
reader
will
announce
what
text
is
placed
inside
of
that
area
and
we're
using
that
functionality
to
provide
an
api
to
make
it
so
that
when
certain
things
occur
from
javascript,
you
can
tell
the
screen
reader
to
say
a
particular
thing
to
help
inform
the
action
of
what
has
occurred.
A
So
a
good
example
of
this
might
be
when
a
dialogue
opens,
it
might
be
useful
to
tell
the
user
hey.
A
dialogue
has
opened
because
they're
unable
to
actually
see
what
has
happened
on
the
screen,
so
you
can
explain,
what's
happening
on
the
screen,
rather
than
them
needing
to
figure
it
out
based
on
changes
in
like
input
or
elements,
or
something
like
that.
A
So
both
of
those
issues
are
pretty
exciting.
4941,
I
believe,
needs
review.
There
was
a
little
bit
of
discussion
about
whether
it
should
be
118
or
119.
I
think
considering
this
is
a
ux
improvement.
That
alone
would
make
it
a
118,
candidate
or
possible
to
put
in,
but
it's
also
from
an
accessibility
standpoint,
just
a
bug,
so
that
definitely
qualifies
it
for
being
into
n118.
A
The
aria
live
announcements,
though
issue
4985
pretty
clearly
is
a
new
api,
but
it
is
also
an
accessibility
improvement,
so
I'm
a
little
bit
on
the
fence
about
where
that
one
lives.
If,
if
4985
turns
out
to
be
like
a
requirement
for
4941,
then
they
might
both
go
in,
but
I
haven't
had
fully
thought
that
one
out
yet-
and
I
would
love
to
hear
if
anybody
else
has
an
opinion
on
that-
let's
see
andy
you're
here,
I'm
not
sure.
If
there's
anything
you'd
like
to
say
in
particular
about
these
issues.
F
Yeah
the
issue:
four,
nine,
four
one.
As
you
said
it's
just
going
to
allow
us
to
use
the
the
block
add
page
with
the
keyboard.
I
think
that
by
itself
would
be
useful
and
I
think
mustafa
logan
78.
F
She
had
a
similar
name
agrees
that
you
know
just
allowing
the
keyboard
operation
is
going
to
be
useful
but,
like
you
say,
I
think
it
would
be
more
helpful
if
you
could
use
the
the
announcing
functionality
to
help
with
that,
because
currently,
if
you,
if
you
move
a
block,
if
you
press
the
up
button,
for
example,
if
we
committed
what
we
have
now
in
4941
and
you
move
a
block,
it's
still
pretty
difficult
for
you
to
know
where
the
block
moved
to.
F
That
would
be
my
preference
of
my
recommendation.
I
think
I
think
it
probably
should
be
the
best
thing
to
do,
because
right
now,
mustafa
did
say
at
some
point
in
the
discussion
that
there
were
other
people
who
he
knew
had
looked
at
backdrop
as
a
possibility,
but
being
unsighted
users.
They
were
hesitant
to
start.
So
I
think
it
would
be
helpful
and
not
just
helpful.
I
think
we
ought
to
do
it
if
it's
unusable
for
certain
population.
I
think
we
should.
We
should
try
and
fix
it
as
a
bug.
A
And
I
didn't
quite
process
what
you
said
there
fully
do
you
think
that
both
of
these
issues
should
be
merged
into
118.
F
I
think
the
the
the
api
is
going
to
make
the
keyboard
navigation
more
useful,
currently
keyboard
navigation,
it
does
work,
but
it
doesn't
announce
what
actions
you're
performing.
So
it's
still
going
to.
A
Okay,
that's
clear
yeah
that
that
sounds
sounds
fair
to
me.
We
can
discuss
more
if
there's
any
concerns
there
in
the
issue.
A
Thank
you
for
your
work
on
that,
thanks
mustafa
for
participating
and
filing
these
issues,
I
can't
tell
you
how
valuable
it
is
to
have
actual
users
telling
us
about
the
way
they
use
the
software,
especially
when
it
differs
substantially
from
the
way
that
we
use
the
software
that
helps
us
get
a
much
better
understanding
of
issues
that
we
may
not
be
aware
of
at
all.
So
very.
A
Okay
and
then
another
issue
on
top
of
this
one
that
was
raised
just
as
a
part
of
the
discussion,
just
as
a
comment
that
the
permissions
page
also
is
really
difficult
to
navigate
for
unsighted
users.
A
The
way
that
the
permissions
page
appears
currently
is
that
it
reads
the
label
of
the
permission
and
then
it
just
says:
check
box,
checked,
check
box,
unchecked,
check
box,
checked,
check
box
unchecked,
and
you
have
to
count
the
number
of
check
boxes
and
remember
the
order
of
your
rolls
in
order
to
know
which
checkbox
applies,
to
which
role
it
actually
turns
out.
It
depends
on
what
software
you're,
using
sometimes
it'll,
read
the
table
header,
and
so
that
can
give
you
some
indication
depending
on
what
screen
reader
you're
using
but
other
screen.
A
Readers
do
not
read
the
top
of
the
table.
So
we
have
this
issue
four,
nine,
eight,
seven
to
start
using
aria
role
or
aria
attributes
to
properly
label
each
one
of
those
check
boxes.
A
This
was
a
regression
caused
by
caused
by
usability
improvement
that
it
used
to
be
in
drupal
7
that
drupal
7
would
print
an
invisible
element
in
front
of
each
checkbox,
but
that
was
had
its
own
frustrating
problems,
because
if
you
tried
to
control
f
to
find
a
particular
permissions
on
the
page,
the
permission
name
was
repeated
for
each
checkbox
and
it
would
not
highlight
anything
on
the
page
because
it
was
a
hidden
element.
A
The
world
of
accessibility
has
moved
forward
quite
a
bit
and
invisible
elements
might
have
been
the
best
tool
that
we
had
a
decade
ago.
But
since
then,
the
introduction
of
aria
attributes
and
the
improvements
to
screen
readers
have
really
come
a
very
long
way
making
it
so
that
we
have
new
options
available
to
us.
So
4987
is
an
exploration
of
how
we
can
use
aria
attributes
to
make
those
check
boxes
more
accessible
to
screen
readers.
A
I'll
continue
doing
the
product
update
jen.
I
skipped
over
the
contrib
modules,
though,
if
you
would
assemble
a
list,
then
we
can
do
a
little
announcement
of
the
new
contrib.
A
Modules
next
up,
I'm
gonna
move
on
to
119
the
next
minor
version,
but
if
anyone
has
any
other
accessibility
issues
that
they
would
like
to
bring
up
while
we're
on
this
topic,
I'll
pause
for
a
second.
If
anyone
would
like
to
interject.
A
Okay,
let's
move
on
to
119,
then
so
119
119
will
be
coming
out.
May
15
2021
future
freeze
around
may
1st
first
issue
that
we
have
here
and
all
of
these
issues
are
driven
by
having
an
advocate
for
a
particular
issue,
and
then
we
talk
about
them
every
week,
trying
to
get
them
to
move
forward
a
little
bit.
A
We
continue
to
need
a
front-end
developer
working
on
this
problem,
maybe
not
a
front-end
developer,
but
we
need
a
developer
on
issue
3293
that
the
way
dialogues
work
in
this
particular
case
is
complicated
when
it
comes
to
the
way
that
they
interact
with
views
exposed
filters.
So
this
continues
to
need
some
help.
A
Next
up
is
advanced
caching,
support
for
cache
tags
and
a
dynamic
max
age.
Cache
header
issue,
4127
joseph,
is
the
advocate
for
this.
I
know
that
it's
needed
review
for
several
weeks
now,
I'm
not
sure
joseph.
If
there
are
any
other
updates,
you
would
like
to
note
here.
A
A
No
okay,
it's
gonna
be
a
quick
update
here.
Adding
support
for
relationships
to
layout
contexts,
issue
2134.,
doc.
Wilmot
is
the
advocate
for
this
issue.
Last
we
looked
at
this.
It
has
some
minor
renaming
that
needs
to
be
done
on
some
of
the
classes.
A
F
A
Excellent
before
we
move
on
from
that
one,
I
thought
that
I
saw
another
issue
that
you
were
going
to
advocate
advocate
for
as
well,
but
I
don't
have
that
on
the
agenda.
A
A
Yeah,
perhaps
that's
what
I'm
thinking
right
now:
okay,
I
it
might
have
been
that
it
might
have
been
the
the
drag
and
drop
keyboard
improvements.
A
Okay,
sorry
about
that,
gregory
is
not
here
today.
He
is
the
advocate
for
this
next
issue.
Merging
the
update
pages
for
core
modules
themes,
layouts
all
into
a
single
page
issue
is
27.
14.
A
looks
like
there
hasn't
been
any
updates
in
the
past
couple
of
weeks
there.
So
I
don't
think
there's
any
update
there.
A
Next
up
is
preventing
urls
or
email
addresses
from
turning
into
links,
issue
1926
or
an
older
one.
Bw
panda
is
the
advocate
for
this
one
peter.
Could
you
give
us
an
update.
H
Yep,
so
this
issue
is
about
the
what's:
it
called
the
convert
urls
into
links,
text
filter.
So
with
that
enabled
when
you're
typing
in
some
text
you
put
in
a
url
or
an
email
address,
and
that
filter
will
automatically
convert
that
into
a
link
and
that's
great
and
that
works.
But
there
are
times
where
you
might
not
want
a
url
or
a
email
address
made
into
a
link
where
it
can
be
clicked
on
sort
of
thing.
H
So
this
issue
is
about
doing
that
and
it
does
that
by
just
adding
like
a
regular
expression
to
the
filter
that
filters
out
any
email
addresses
or
links
that
have
a
class
of
no
link
surrounding
that
and
that's
currently
working
from
my
testing.
So
I
just
need
to
review.
Like
for,
like
the
poor
request,
needs
review
code
review
and
some
more
testing,
I
think
olaf
tested
it
and
said
work
to
him.
H
A
Cool
one
thing
I
would
love
to
hear
I
I
know
I
participated
in
this
issue
all
the
way
back
when
it
was
open
in
2016
a
couple
of
times
as
well.
I'm
not
sure
if
it
probably
was
the
seek.
Editor
had
already
been
added
at
that
point,
and
I
think
that
this
primarily
applies
to
sites
that
aren't
using
a
rich
text
editor.
A
But
I'd
love
to
understand
the
use
case
that
you're
experiencing
like.
If,
if
you
are
using
a
rich
text,
editor
and
automatic
link
translation
is
happening
or
just
getting
an
understanding
of
the
scenario
that
you
might
be
in.
I
I
know
you
said
that
you
know
if
you
don't
want
something
to
become
a
link,
but
I
guess
I'm
trying
to
figure
out
what
the
editorial
experience
is
where
you
might
have
that
filter
on,
but
not
wanted
to
actually
activate
what
kind
of
site
that
would
be.
H
So
I
think
this
came
up
like
I
opened
this
issue
back
in
2016.
I
think
the
result
was
when
I
was
writing
an
article
on
my
blog,
so
I've
just
got
this
filter
enabled
for
my
body
field,
because
I
just
have
that
enabled
normally.
H
If
I
want
to
like
put
in
a
link
to
backdrop
website
or
something
like
that,
that
works,
but
for
this
particular
one
I
was
putting
in
like,
I
think
it
was
like
a
how-to
or
a
demo
or
something
of
backdrop
like
oh
and
you
can
like
do
this
and
your
email
address
you
just
put
in
something
like
info
example.com
or
something.
So
it
was
like
a
dummy
email
address
that
I
was
referring
to
or
a
dummy
url
just
to
give
an
idea
of
what
something
could
import
or
something
I
can't
remember.
H
But
so,
while
there
was
other
links
on
the
page
that
I
needed
to
be
turned
into
links
in
the
same
body
field,
there
was
this
one
particular
link
or
email
address.
So
I
didn't
want
to
be
clicked
on,
because
it
looks
like
a
dummy
one,
and
there
was
no
way
to
get
around
that.
I
sort
of
explained
in
the
original
post
of
this
of
this
issue
that
you
can
get
around
it
by
either
disabling
the
filter
or
creating
a
new.
H
What
are
they
called
text
format
instead
of
like
full
html
or
whatever
it's
called?
You
can
create
a
new
one
like
unlinked
or
something,
and
then
just
have
that
filter
disabled
for
that
particular
text
format
and
you
can
sort
of
switch
when
you
need
to.
But
again
the
situation
is,
if
you
want
to
have
some
links
in
a
one
field
that
are
clickable
and
then
other
links.
H
Not
then
that's
where
you
can
come
up
with
this
issue,
and
this
can
happen
with
like
ck
editor
or
anything
else
like
on
my
blog,
I
use
markdown.
So
I
don't
have
any
sort
of
button
editor
type
thing
I
just
used
like
type
in
markdown,
and
this
would
be
the
same
thing
like
if
you
just
type
in
a
link
in
markdown
and
then
this
filter
will
convert.
That
you'll
also
want
a
way
of
like
disabling
that
somehow
so
yeah.
A
I
was
gonna
ask
about
escaping
using
code
tags,
but
looks
like
we've
had
that
discussion
previously
already,
so
I'm
not
going
to
bring
it
up
again.
It's
funny
how
my
thought
my
immediate
thought
process
like
what
about
this.
I'm
like.
Oh,
I
already
raised
that
issue
like
three
years
ago,
so
I
will
refer
everybody
if
you're
interested.
Why
not
use
code
tags
or
wrap
it
in
escaping
tags?
A
Including
myself,
a
note
to
self
read
the
issue
to
get
familiar
with
that
again:
okay,
great,
that
pull
request
currently
needs
review,
slash
testing
thanks
peter
and,
lastly,
an
issue
that
I'm
advocating
for
issue
2833.
This
was
a
follow-up
from
a
change
in
menu
paths
for
editing
roles,
issue
48.99.
A
That
issue
has
already
been
merged
into
the
one.x
branch
for
119.,
a
follow-up
task
that
we've
been
wanting
to
do
ever
since
we
introduced
backdrop
deprecated
go
to
which
is
our
backdrop
go
to
deprecated
there
we
go,
which
is
a
helpful
function
to
just
redirect
from
one
path
to
another
and
log
to
watchdog,
at
the
same
time,
telling
site
administrators
that
their
code
is
using
a
deprecated
path.
A
Issue
2833
is
a
enhancement
on
top
of
that
function
to
make
it
so
that
we
have
a
an
approach
to
do.
Redirects
that
include
wild
cards
such
as
role
names,
content
types,
anything
that
uses
a
placeholder
in
its
menu
path.
John
franklin
has
been
reviewing
that
frequently,
which
I've
been
appreciating
issue
2833.
A
I
think
that
he
wanted
to
market
rtbc,
but
he
is
not
familiar
with
that
tagging
stuff
as
rtbc,
so
he
marked
it
works
for
me,
but
that
needs
a
change
record,
but
I
think
that
it's
really
probably
ready
to
go.
If
I
get
a
second
rtbc
on
that,
that
would
be
appreciated.
A
Oh
something
else,
that's
just
worth
not
noting
it's
not
in
the
agenda,
but
adding
or
allowing
attributes
to
be
added
to
backdrop,
add
css.
So
when
we
have
a
a
link
tag
that
includes
a
style
sheet
up
at
the
top
of
the
page,
we
can
now
add
custom
attributes
to
individual
css
files.
A
This
is
an
issue
that
herb
dual
was
advocating
for,
but
he
both
became
an
advocate
and
we
completed
it
in
the
same
week,
so
that
will
have
not
been
mentioned.
Otherwise,
in
these
meetings,
the
usefulness
of
this
comes
up
when
you're,
using
a
css
file
that
may
need
something
like
an
api
key
from
a
third-party
site.
A
good
example
of
this
might
be
loading
a
custom
font
that
is,
that
has
pricing
attached
to
it
or
yeah.
A
A
All
right,
that's
it
for
the
119
update
initiative,
updates,
documentation,
updates
kind
of
unofficial
initiative
peter
you
are
the
lead
on
this.
I'm
not
sure.
If
you
have
anything
you
would
like
to
mention
regarding
the
doc
site
this
week.
A
Okay,
telemetry
telemetry
initiative
is
to
start
collecting
more
information
about
how
people
are
using
backdrop
and
record
that
information
into
usage
statistics.
On
backdrop,
cms.org
tim,
you
are
the
initiative
lead
on
that.
Is
there
any
update
for
this
week.
A
Not
surprising,
with
with
backdrop,
live
taking
all
of
our
focus
all
right.
The
last
one
is
ready
to
wear,
but
that
initiative
is
winding
down
is
being
completed
and
I
think
that's
it.
We
skipped
over
the
contrib
update
section
at
the
beginning.
Jen
do
you
want
to
give
us
an
update
on
new
contrib
modules
this
week.
G
G
No,
it's
a
module
user
time
zone
tokens
which
is
the
new
one.
Tim
was
talking
about
earlier,
an
svg
image
support
which
I'm
excited
about
for
backdrop
in
general,
so
lots
of
great
stuff
going
on.
A
Very
cool:
well,
that's
the
end
of
the
agenda.
If
we
would
like
to
discuss
anything,
we
kind
of
open
the
floor
here
for
general
questions
and
answers
or
discussion
jack.
I
see
that
you
have
joined
us
nice
to
see
you.
I
A
C
C
We
have
well,
as
of
last
check.
We
had,
I
think,
32
registrations
we
had
about
50
or
60.
For
the
previous
backdrop
live.
I
think
we
were
around
60,
but
we
that
was
a
bigger
event
and
we
promoted
it
a
little
heavier.
So
the
30
that
we
32
we
have
now-
and
I
expect
we'll
get
more-
I
mean
if
we
get
to
40.
C
I
think
that's
pretty
good,
the
the
the
wet,
as
I
mentioned
earlier,
the
the
website
has
been
working
for
registration,
we're
trying
to
get
it
cleaned
up
a
little
bit
more
for
the
event
itself
in
terms
of
helping
with
the
schedule.
C
C
Jack,
and
I
were
talking
earlier
about
a
little
bit
about
sort
of
safety
during
the
event
making
sure
we
don't
get
interrupted
by
zoom
bombers
or
anything,
and
I
think
we
have
we've
done.
Okay,
I
think
it's
sort
of
being
cautious
without
blocking
things
down
too
much.
C
We
are
tr,
we
do
need
some
people
and
I
will
be
pinging
people
directly
to
just
sort
of
well
one
to
be
greeters
the
way
that
the
sessions
are
working.
This
time.
I
think
most
of
you
heard
this
before,
but
this
is
going
out
on
the
recording.
C
I
guess
is
that,
rather
than
having
different
zoom
roles
for
each
session,
we're
going
to
have
one
zoom
room
and
breakout
rooms
and
the
most
challenging-
and
I
think
that's
going
to
work
really
well,
except
for
the
fact
that
we
really
need
somebody
in
the
main
zoom
room
at
all
times.
So,
while
well
breakout
rooms
are
happening
and
we
don't
have
people
committed
throughout
the
schedule.
C
So,
if
you're
able
to
commit
to
just
sort
of
being
the
zoom
volunteer-
and
I
think
along
with
that
role-
would
be
kind
of
our-
you
know,
part
of
the
safety
team
which
would
be
being
prepared
to
you
know
deal
with
any
issues
that
come
up.
You
know
unexpected,
and
the
kind
of
thing
that
I
think
is
most
likely
is
just
somebody
that
comes
with
mischievous
purposes
to
disrupt
us.
C
We
have
not
publicly
posted
well,
actually,
john,
that's
just
a
good
point
like
what
are
we
going
to
just
use
our
regular
room,
or
should
we
create
a
special
room
for
zoom?
We
haven't
announced
that
yet
I
think
we're
supposed
to
send
out.
It
was
pointed
out
to
me
that
our
the
registration
process
promised
people
that
they
would
get
an
email
yesterday
or
today
with
more
information.
So
I
think
we
need
to
get
that
out
today
and
that
should
include
a
link
and
where
to
go
tomorrow
morning.
C
So
we
need
to
decide.
Are
we
gonna,
use
this
room
or
create
a
special
one
for
the
event?
Why
don't
we.
I
C
I'm
fine
with
that.
I
don't
see
a
real
downside.
We
last
time
we
were
in
theory,
people
need
to
be
registered
to
participate.
However,
we
did
like
when
people
were
having
trouble
logging
and
we
would
just
share
the
link
and
zoom
or
in
in
tulip.
You
know
so
we
weren't
super
secretive
about
it,
but
we
didn't
like
just
tweet
it
out
so
and
we
don't
intend
to
do
that
this
time.
C
So,
let's
create
a
a
special
room
for
the
the
event
anyways
and
then,
if
again,
if
people
can
volunteer
to
help
with
with
sort
of
manage
that,
please
let
me
know
one
you
can't
be
in
a
breakout
room
in
the
main
room
at
the
same
time
with
one
computer,
but
like
I
think,
personally,
I'm
going
to
have
a
a
separate
laptop
so
that
I
can.
C
I
could,
in
theory,
monitor
two
rooms
at
once
by
basically
logging
in
twice
or
I
could
use
my
phone
for
that
and
actually
that's
something
people
could
think
about
is
that
we
could
use
our
phones
is
to
sort
of
monitor
the
main
room
while
listening
in
on
a
breakout
session.
So
that's
one
possibility.
A
A
Zoom
in
this
way,
before
tim,
where
there's
well,
I
mean
I've
used
breakup
rooms
previously,
but
is
it
possible
for
people
to
when
they
join
the
main
zoom?
Do
they
have
to
be
assigned
a
breakout
room
by
the
moderator,
or
can
they
just
join
any
room?
That's
already
broken
out.
C
They
can
just
join
any
room.
Apparently
this
is
a
relatively
new
feature
in
zoom,
but
we
have
tested
it
a
few
times
so
jen
myself,
joseph
jason,
have
had
at
least
two
sessions.
C
It
is
yeah
cool.
You
have
to
turn.
You
have
to
give
people
the
ability
to
join
you
as
as
the
host
you
choose,
whether
to
assign
people
or
whether
to
let
them
join,
but
you
can
set
it
so
that
people
can
join
rooms
and
we've
tested
that
and
it
we
have
had
instances
of
people
sort
of
getting
dropped
from
the
the
entire
zoom
event.
Well,
while
they're
switching
but
for
the
most
part
it
seemed
to
be
working
so
fairly
good.
We
do
recommend
that
everybody
make
sure
their
zoom
app
is
up
to
date.
C
So
yeah,
so
that's
our
plan
and
so
the
basically
the
the
main
room
will
be
the
hallway.
So
you
nate
won't
have
to
set
up
a
laptop
with
a
stuffed
animal
monitoring.
It
like
we
did
last
time,
yeah
anybody
else,
think
of
joseph
jason.
C
C
If
people
want
to
add
topics,
it's
not
too
late,
we
you'll
be
able
to
continue
to
add
topics
to
the
schedule
we
have
some.
I
think
we
have
a
pretty
good
mix.
We
have
a
pretty
decent
schedule,
but
we
really
do
encourage
people
to
think
about
what
what
topics
you
want
to
talk
about
and
go
ahead
and
put
them
on
the
schedule,
and
I
think
that
people
I
still
get
the
sense
that
people
feel
like
they
need
to
in
order
to
put
something
on
the
schedule.
C
They
have
to
have
a
presentation
planned
and
and
all
of
that
and
really
we're
thinking
about
these
like
boss,
you
can
it's
perfectly
appropriate
to
come
there
like.
I
have
to
build
a
multilingual
site
and
I
don't
know
how
so
I'm
going
you
don't
have
to
come
there
and
teach
people
to
do
multilingual.
You
could
come
there
and
say:
let's
talk
about
multilingual,
because
I
have
a
bunch
of
questions,
that's
a
legitimate
use
of
this
schedule
and
personally
I
probably
will
use
it
that
way.
C
So
so,
if
either
go
directly
to
the
spreadsheet
and
add
your
topics
or
just
chat
with
us
and
zoom
up,
and
we
can
help
you
that's
it.
A
Great
one
more
thing,
I'd
like
to
ask
tim
and
I'm
sure
that
this
has
come
up
already
and
I
apologize
I
haven't
been
in
the
other
meetings.
A
A
I
guess
I
can
do
that
and
it
looks
like
everyone
else
has
done
that
as
well.
But
it
doesn't
look
as
though
sure
you
need
an
account
on
the
event
site
in
order
for
any
other
reason.
Well,.
C
It's
a
good
point.
It
hasn't
come
up
before
we
could
do
it
without
requiring
people
to
to
create
an
account,
but
we
wanted
people
to,
because
we
had
hoped
that
there
would
be
other
reasons
that
you
would
actually
log
in.
We
really.
G
C
Built
them
out
yet
people
should
keep
in
mind,
though,
that
our
goal
for
this
site
is
that
this
is
our
ongoing
backdrop
of
that
site.
So
we
plan
to
use
this
for
things
like
virtual
user
groups
and
and
future
backdrop
lives,
and
so
I
think
we
thought
we
do
want
people
to
log
in
and
create
accounts,
because
we
want
to
use
it
for
these
other
purposes.
G
There
is
also
a
module
we
talked
about
using.
That
would
allow
you
to
register
while
logged
out,
and
it
would
automatically
create
an
account
for
you
and
send
you
a
one-time,
login
link,
but
that
starts
to
be
problematic
for
people
who
already
have
accounts,
and
so
we
figured
the
drupal
community
in
general
is
pretty
familiar
with
creating
an
account
in
order
to
register
for
a
camp,
and
that's
mostly
what
we've
got
here,
and
so
it
would
probably
wouldn't
be
too
much
of
a
hassle
to
ask
people
to
do
it
this
time.
G
I
Cool,
I
was
also
going
to
mention
that
registration
account
creation
module
that's
in
there,
but
also
when
my
coworker
morgan
signed
up.
She
also
felt
very
inspired
to
at
some
point
when
our
workload's
a
little
better
jump
on
with
the
crm
stuff,
because
that
will
help
with
a
lot
of
this
kind
of
like
registration
and
event
type
things,
and
you
know
the
sooner
we
get
that
going.
The
sooner
we
can
kind
of
have
all
that
information
stored
in
one
place
that
can
be
reused,
yeah,
so
we're
trying
it's
still.
C
Larryn
also
volunteered
and
raised
the
issue
of
using
cvcrm
for
for
registration
in
the
future,
like,
after
this
backdrop,
live.
I
I
think
we
wrote
that
off
john.
Forgive
me
if
I'm
just
because
we
were,
we
weren't
quite
sure
how
much
work
would
be
involved
in
using
cvcrm,
but
there
has
been
discussion
about
using
civic
crm
for
other
things
and
it
might
be
the
maybe
that's
the
better
solution.
I
don't
know
so.
G
B
All
right,
you
mentioned
that
that
module
for
registration
account
creation
causes
problems.
If
you
already
have
an
account.
G
I
think
I
think,
there's
a
there's
a
couple
of
ways
that
you
can
choose
to
handle
existing
accounts.
I
might
not
just
all
of
them,
but
I
did
find
a
problem
with
the
one
I
originally
tried
to
use
so
I'll
I'll,
get
it
and
open
an
issue.
If
there's
not
one
already.
Okay,.
C
Jen,
I
don't
know
if
you
noticed,
but
joseph
said
that
he
did
merge
a
bunch
of
the
registration
pull
requests.
Well,
you
probably
would
have
gotten
notified.
G
Yeah
and
I
know
you're
waiting
for
rerolls
on
a
couple
of
those
joseph
and
they're.
Still
in
my
inbox,
I
haven't
given
up
yet
okay.
B
A
Okay,
also,
tim,
then
sorry,
just
one
more
thing:
maybe
I'm
not
reading
the
registration
list
correctly.
Here,
let's
see,
if
I
go
to
events
backdrop
cms.org
there
is
one
registration
form
it
looks
like
and
since
oh
I
see,
these
are
ids
okay,
I
I
got
it
I
was.
I
was
counting
based
on
ids,
not
based
on
numbers.
I
see
so
that's.
A
Well,
backdrop
live
starts
in
pretty
soon.
Is
it.
C
So
it's
6
a.m.
Your
time
yeah,
although
we
don't
have
anything
scheduled
at
6
a.m,
so
it
might
be
that
we
all
have
an
extra
hour
of
sleep
tomorrow.
A
C
A
In
eight
or
nine
hours
is
that
right,
that
seems
really
soon.
A
There
we
go,
yeah,
that'll,
be
the
start
of
the
event
and
for.
G
A
Out
there
yeah
check
out
events.backdropcms.org
for
more
information
thanks
everybody
for
joining
the
meeting.
As
always
and
we'll
be
seeing
lots
of
you
guys
tomorrow.
So
thank
you
and
see
you
guys.