►
From YouTube: Design Review Panel Meeting, January 11, 2023
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Minutes
and
if
there
are
no
Corrections
or
additions,
is
there?
Can
someone
motion
to
accept
the
minutes
as
circulated.
D
A
Hi
so
I
think
that
was
everyone
unanimous
on
the
call.
So
with
that,
the
motion
carries
I'll,
move
on
to
the
opening
statement.
A
So
by
title
for
subtitle
two
part,
one
sections
32-4-203
and
32-4-204,
which
established
the
design
review
panel.
The
DRP
was
established
to
encourage
design
excellence
and
shall
act
in
a
Consulting
and
advisory
capacity
to
the
agents
involved
in
the
process
for
reviewing
development
plans.
A
Building
parking
garages
and
other
structures
are
spatially
and
Visually
integrated
and
suitable
to
their
surroundings
and
proportion
massing
and
type
of
materials
and
colors,
as
well
as
signage
and
other
other
elements
of
Urban
Design.
Plant
materials
are
selected
and
cited
to
define
the
site,
provide
a
theme
frame
of
view,
enhance
architecture
and
Street
character,
improved
microclimate,
provide
transition
between
dissimilar
uses,
screen
views
and
reduce
noise
levels
and
glare
and
carrying
out
its
duties.
A
A
The
panel
will
provide
a
technical
review
of
the
proposed
project
issues
relative
to
zoning
setback,
relief,
environmental
and
storm
water
management
and
traffic
regulations
do
not
fall
under
our
purview
and
are
not
regulated
through
and
and
are
otherwise
regulated
through
appropriate
agencies
responsible
for
those
aspects
of
the
development
plan
review
process.
Again,
we
will
not
be
covering
those
elements
in
the
DRP.
A
The
panel
consists
of
nine
members.
All
are
professionals
with
practical
knowledge
in
the
matters
of
design.
For
the
purpose
of
making
recommendations
on
a
particular
project,
three
members
shall
constitute
a
quorum.
The
attendance
and
comments
of
each
member
will
be
recorded
in
the
minutes
and
shall
be
open
and
open
record
and
available
to
the
public,
along
with
documents
submitted
to
the
Panama
panel
for
inspection
and
copying,
there
will
be
opportunity
for
the
community
to
offer
comments
and
suggestions
at
the
conclusion
of
the
applicant's
presentation.
A
These
comments
will
also
be
included
in
the
written
record
of
the
meeting
when
a
speaker
is
called
up
to
speak.
Please
keep
your
comments
focused
on
design
perspectives
within
your
allotted
two
minutes
time.
If
you're
speaking
on
behalf
of
a
community
group,
you
will
have
five
minutes
at
the
conclusion
of
the
meeting.
The
department
of
planning
will
sum
up
our
recommendations
from
the
panel
before
a
motion
for
a
vote
is
suggested.
Recent
legislation
had
has
changed
the
panel's
recommendations
to
be
advisory
on
the
hearing
officer
and
various
County
agencies.
A
Unless
the
hearing
officer
agencies
find
that
the
panel's
actions
constitute
an
abuse
of
its
discretion
or
are
unsupported
by
the
documentation
and
evidence
presented,
disposition
of
the
plan
will
be
determined
as
either
approved,
approved
with
conditions
or
a
additional
review,
with
a
second
meeting
required
with
that.
That
concludes
the
opening
statement
and
the
items
for
initial
or
continued
discussion
are
35
Walker,
Pikesville
commercial
review
and
the
4100
Maple
Avenue
Forge
Overlook
projects
and
we'll
move
to
the
first
item
item.
One
again
is
the
35
Walker
Avenue
commercial
review
presenter.
E
Good,
my
name
is
Stuart
Macklin
I'm,
the
project
architect
and
project
manager
for
the
job.
We
have
an
existing
two-story
special
education,
Building
located
at
31,
Walker
Avenue,
and
we
are
adding
a
new
three-story
educational
addition
to
the
building.
The
footprint
is
approximately
3
600
square
feet.
E
It's
a
three-story
again
with
the
first
floor
being
an
auditorium
primarily
second
floor,
being
multi-purpose
rooms
and
therapy
rooms
third
floor
being
a
special
special
use
rooms
as
well
as
more
therapy
rooms.
The
building
is
directly
adjacent
to
and
part
of
the
existing
building
and
there
will
be
connections
between
the
existing
and
the
new.
E
There
are
very,
very
few
site
amenities
associated
with
this
there's
some
new
Landscaping
in
the
front
of
the
building,
with
a
sidewalk
to
the
street
itself,
the
there
is
an
existing
playground
in
the
back
of
the
new
edition,
which
was
it's
being
used
by
the
present
building,
and
we
have
a
parking
lot
onto
the
existing
building
as
well.
There
is
no
new
parking
in
this
proposal.
E
E
A
modular
brick
with
a
with
a
a
standard,
mortar
joint,
the
glazing,
is
tinted
just
like
the
existing
building
and
there's
aluminum
trim
and
aluminum
mansard
to
match
the
existing
building,
and
we
have
presented
elevation,
drawings
and
perspective,
drawing
and
as
always,
and
now
we've
been
showing
some
existing
pictures,
even
though
the
other
drawings
and
don't
exactly
match
the
brick,
they
will
be
it's
just
a
matter
of
presentation
and
printing.
E
It
is
Our
intention
to
match
it
as
close
as
possible.
The
there's
a
little
bit
of
lighting
going
on
in
the
back
of
the
existing
building.
There
is
a
little
bit
of
lighting
in
the
front
of
the
existing
building
that
would
be
located
in
the
new
canopy.
The.
What
else
is
there?
Let's
see,
I,
don't
know,
I,
don't
know
what
else.
That's
pretty
conclusive.
Anybody
have
some
questions,
a
big
pleasure
to
answer.
A
E
E
Please
so
that's
the
existing
building
on
this
visual
is
yeah.
You
can
see
it
better.
You
had
to
look
carefully
to
find
out
what's
existing
and
what's
not
on
this
document
right
here,
everything
to
the
right
of
the
darker
glass
and
on
the
right
on
this
one
are
both
that's
the
existing
section.
The
new
section
is
the
taller
section
to
the
left.
The
side
elevation.
E
Please
excuse
me.
While
we
get
other
phone
calls
the
I'm
not
sure
what
else
to
say
it's
pretty
straightforward,
pretty
understandable.
Just
a
second
there
we.
E
Good,
if
you
look
at
there
is
a
there's,
a
designation
on
the
building
on
the
on
the
drawings
that
show
existing
and
new.
If
you
can
make
that
up
depending
on
what
scale
you're
looking
at
it
at.
E
The
perspective
shows
that
there's
a
high
rabbi,
hello,
the
perspective,
shows
it
very
easily
here.
The
dark
glass
is
a
new
front
on
the
existing
part
of
the
building.
Everything
to
the
left
of
that
dark
glass
is
new,
even
though
those
colors
are
not
representative
of
the
exact
colors
of
the
building.
They
will
be
as
close
as
possible
that
we
can
get
to
the
brick
and
to
the
aluminum
and
to
the
glass.
A
Marta
is
there
anyone
signed
up?
Oh
sorry,
first
are
there
any
speakers
from
the
public
who
wish
to
speak.
A
Okay,
thank
you.
If
you
would
then
learn
to
go
on
to
the
staff
report.
G
Okay,
I
will
try
to
share
the
stuff
report.
Please
let
me
know
if
you
can
see
it
see
it
on
the
screen
right
now
or
yes,
you
see
the
stuff
report
perfect.
Thank
you.
So
much
so
we
prepared
our
staff
report
based
on
the
comprehensive
Manual
of
development
policies.
Pikesville
commercial,
revitalization
guidelines,
Pikes
volatilization
action
plan
in
Baltimore,
County
Landscape
manual
in
terms
of
site
design
staff
recommends
approval
of
the
site,
design,
subject
to
the
following
condition:
clarify
and
coordinate
with
the
office
of
zoning.
G
If
any
zoning
actions
are
required
for
this
development
and
if
so,
address
the
actions
form,
an
image
staff
recommends
approval
for
the
form
and
image
open
space
and
landscape
design
staff
requirements.
Approval
subject
to
the
following
conditions:
number
one
clarify
if
any
existing
trees
will
be
removed,
provide
a
detailed
landscape
plan
with
a
list
of
all
proposed
plans.
Considering
native
and
adaptive
plans
number
two
based
on
the
Pikesville
commercial
revitalization
guidelines,
page
2,
when
parking
lots
are
located
adjacent
to
a
road,
a
minimum
10
feet
right,
Landscaping
buffer
between
the
sidewalk
and
parking
lot.
G
Payment
is
to
be
provided.
The
buffer
must
contain
Shrubbery
of
at
least
42
inches
high
and
or
a
garden
wall
or
fence
of
the
same
height.
These
elements
are
to
be
provided
to
screen
the
parking
lot
and
is
located
along
Walker
Avenue,
that
is
located.
Sorry
along
Parker,
Avenue
number
three
provide
bike,
racks
and
label
them
on
the
site.
Plan
number
four:
provide
location
and
enclosure
details
for
the
proposed
dumpster
on
the
site
plan
number
five
refurbish:
the
existing
trans
Transformer
facing
Walker
Avenue
seats,
parking
and
calculus
circulation.
G
The
sidewalk
along
the
entire
property
length,
must
meet
ADA
requirements,
show
and
label
on
the
site
plan
how
the
ede
requirements
are
met
and
signage
and
lighting
staff
recommends
approval
subject
to
the
following
conditions:
number
one
provides
signage
details
for
the
proposed
addition,
including
material
size,
dimensions,
color
and
illumination
number
two
indicate
and
label
on
the
site
plan
any
proposed
Lighting
in
particular,
building
and
parking
lighting
and
Architectural
design
staff
recommends
approval
of
the
architectural
design,
and
this
concludes
our
staff
report.
Thank
you.
Cecily.
A
Thank
you
Martin
for
going
through
that
I'd
like
to
move
on
to
the
panel
comments
at
this
time
and
I'm
just
going
to
call
and
order
I'm
sorry
moment
here,
let's
see
Mr
Khan,
do
you
want
to
start
us
off
with
the
discussion.
B
I
think
that
I
certainly
agree
with
essentially
everything
that's
in
the
staff
report.
The
only
thing
that
seems
a
potential
concern
is
the
parking
spaces
required
and
being
clear
that
we
meet
the
code
requirements
for
that
or,
if
not,
that,
there's
a
fair
explanation
for
that.
But
I
think
that
the
remainder
of
the
comment
seem
seem
accurate.
B
Thing
I
would
be
specific
about
is
exactly
how
the
how
the
masonry
will
match
and
whether
there's
a
way
to
define
that
more
carefully
for
the
purpose
of
the
record.
But.
C
C
Too
agree
with
the
staff
report,
I
think
just
two
items,
one
is
the
and
it's
in
the
staff
report
is
the
large
tree
shown
on
the
site.
Plan
right
in
front
of
the
building.
Edition
seems
like
that
tree
may
be
difficult
to
be
preserved.
I
think.
C
Tree
protection
should
be
shown
and
documented
in
this
drawing
set,
and
then
the
second
comment
is
the
sidewalk
along
Walker
Avenue.
It
says
it's
a
variable
with
sidewalk
the
existing
building
looks
there's
a
a
long
strip
area
between
the
sidewalk
and
the
and
the
curb,
but
this
is
showing
a
sidewalk
up
against
the
curve,
so
that
transition
seems
a
little
abrupt.
So
just
a
little
more
thought
should
be
I'll,
probably
put
on
the
plan
and
have
that
sidewalk
actually
ties
in
up
to
the
adjacent
existing
building.
A
Thank
you,
Mr
sorry,
Ms
Fox.
K
Yes,
I
I
agree
with
the
staff
report
and
Matt
on
the
tree.
I
was
looking
at
the
one
of
the
photos
included
in
the
presentation.
It
looks
like
a
new
landscape
and
streetscape
was
provided,
and
it's
hard
to
tell
if
that
second
tree
is
still
there
or
not,
and
it's
also
hard
to
tell
what
those
shrubs
are
to
match.
K
I,
don't
think
it's
really
screening
the
parking
or
the
drive
I'll
access
in
front
of
the
building,
and
it
also
looks
like
that.
Sidewalk
has
a
lifting
area,
which
is
an
ADA
concern,
so
hopefully
that'll
be
included
in
some
of
the
repairs,
but
other
than
that
it
looks
good.
So
those
are
my
comments.
K
L
Hello,
everyone
I,
don't
know
what
I
really
miss,
but
I
the
the
presentation
looks
fine
to
me
I.
The
only
comment
I
have
is
well
there's
two
comments.
One
is
the
the
new
brick.
Hopefully
it
will
be
a
match,
typically
with
the
age
of
the
building.
Sometimes
that's
not
really
what's
going
to
happen,
but
I
just
want
to
make
that
a
point.
I'm
sure
you
know
others
have
made
that
point,
the
other.
L
The
only
other
thing
is
probably
looking
at
the
front
elevation
and
looking
at
the
at
the
right
way
of
the
existing
stair
is
and
there's
the
the
the
vertical
glazing.
Maybe
is
probably
a
a
need,
or
or
maybe
a
proposed
glazing
on
that
new
stair
Tower,
that's
adjacent
to
the
new
entry,
maybe
maybe
some
thought
can
be
put
there
to
to
begin
to
mimic
the
existing
steer
Tower
as
the
to
kind
of
tie
this
entire
facade
together.
L
You
know
out
over
outside
of
that
everything
else
looks
fine
to
me,
yeah
I,
guess
the
only
other
concern
is
at
the
roof.
Is
there
I
guess?
Is
there
anything
else
that
the
owner
is
looking
to
do
on
that
roof?
Other
than
it
could
be
a
roof,
I
I
didn't
see
an
actual
roof
plan,
so
I'm
just
taking
that
to
be
a
a
roof
and
not
any
type
of
roof,
Terrace
or
anything
for
pedestrian
use.
That's
all.
A
If
the
applicant
can
just
speak
to
that
question,
I
don't
think
there
was,
but
I
don't
think
I
did
see
a
plan
either.
Is
there
anything
other
than
mechanical
on
the
roof?
No.
E
The
we
will
have
mechanical
on
the
roof
of
we'll
have
proper
screening
as
well
right,
okay,
okay,
can
you
address
it?
Any
other
questions.
L
That
that's,
it
I
mean
the
roof,
the
the
Brick
and
the
the
potential
of
additional
glazing
on
that
new
stair
Tower.
A
Okay,
understood
Mr
isafaro.
M
Hi
good
evening
could
Martin
please
go
back
to
the
site
plan.
M
That
one's
great
yeah,
thank
you
so
so
I
have
I,
have
three
comments:
all
advisory
in
nature,
I,
don't
need
any
kind
of
response,
and
this
will
not
be
in
the
motion.
J
F
M
One
between
the
existing
rectangular
building
and
the
new
proposed
building
there's
a
pretty
significant
storm
drain
that
runs
down
there.
M
M
Number
two:
it
appears
that
you're
also
building
over
a
lot
line,
so
there
may
be
some
zoning
relief
or
zoning
actions
needed
there.
So
I
did
I
did
see
a
comment
in
the
the
county
staff
report
to
that
and
then
number
three
on
the
landscape
plan.
It
appears
that
you're
proposing
planting
units
instead
of
specific
landscape
species,
so
I
I,
would
ask
you,
on
the
staff
level,
to
refine
the
plan
to
show
exactly
what
you
are
proposing
again
all
advisory.
And
that
concludes
my
comments.
A
Okay,
thank
you,
Joe
all
right.
My
only
comments,
I
mean
I,
do
agree
with
the
other
panelists
and
the
that
the
staff
comments
cover
quite
a
bit
of
it.
My
particular
considerations
were
the
sidewalk
and
then
the
roof,
but
I
think
my
comment
on
the
roof
is
more
aesthetic
I.
Think
I
heard
you
mention
that
the
roof
would
be
the
color,
the
green
color
that
is
shown
in
the
rendering,
not
the
bronze
color,
that
it
currently
is
or
is
shown
in
the
elevation,
is.
E
Typical
1975
mansard,
aluminum
and
ribbon
building
yeah.
A
Yeah,
not
my
favorite
roof
form
but
I
understand
you're.
You
know
it
is.
E
Not
mine
either,
but
we're
gonna
match
it
up
and
people
are
driving
down
the
street
and
hopefully
say
well.
That
looks
like
one
building.
That's
what
we.
A
Want
right
makes
sense:
okay,
well,
very
good.
I,
don't
have
any
other
comments
so
with
that
I'll
ask
one
of
my
other
panelists
to
make
a
motion.
If
there's
no
further
discussion
is
there
anyone
who
would
like
to
take
the
lead
on
emotion.
B
I
have
one
more
question:
if
I
might
that
the
Lots
would
have
to
be
consolidated,
do
what
is
being
proposed,
and
so
the
rest
of
the
question
is:
why
isn't
the
landscape
requirement
along
Walker
Avenue
actually
needing
to
be
extended
all
the
way
across
the
property,
since
It
ultimately
is
going
to
be
one
property.
A
E
You're
suggesting
that
the
the
the
area
to
the
right
and
left
of
the
main
driveway
be
landscaped
as
well
is
that
is
that
what
I'm
hearing.
B
E
Correct
we
can
take
a
look
at
that
very
easily
right
now
we
I
believe
Rabbi.
They
use
that
one
area
as
a
security
spot
for
the
security
officer.
I
N
Okay,
this
is
Jennifer
and
I
did
want
to
point
you
out
to
the
panelists
that
we
did
comment
on
this
in
our
staff
report.
So
if
you're
saying
you
concur
with
within
our
staff
report,
they
will
have
to
address
those
comments
related
to
Landscaping
from
our
staff
report.
A
Okay,
thank
you
Jen
for
that
clarification,
okay,
I
think
those
are
all
good
points
then.
So
would
someone
like
to
forward
emotion.
L
A
A
I
think
the
one
that
I
heard
was
the
the
existing
tree
just
a
question
about
it.
So
unless
I
don't
have
any
objections
to
that
motion,
does
any
any
of
the
other
panelists
want
to
add
in
any
additions
to
the
staff
report,
comments.
A
Thank
you
so
with
that
the
Motions
on
the
table
will
move
to
a
vote
all
in
favor,
say
I
to
approve
the
application
based
on
the
conditions
of
the
staff
report.
That's
the
motion
on
the
table.
Unless
planning
staff
has
any
objections,
will
move
to
a
vote.
B
A
Right
and
I
so
I
think
that's
that's
all
of
us,
so
that
is
unanimous
and
the
motion
so
carries.
Thank
you
presenters
for
going
through
your
project
and
good
luck
with
the
renovations.
Thank
you.
H
Hi
Cecily
I'm,
sorry
I
think
I
missed.
It
is
this
to
be
reviewed
administratively.
A
A
Thank
you
and
we'll
move
on
to
item
number
two,
which
is
the
4100
Maple
Avenue
Forge
Overlook,
which
is
coming
back
to
us
I'd
like
to
read
one
statement
before
we
move
on
to
the
presenter's
presentation
all,
and
also
note
that
Joe
yusafaro
is
part
of
the
development
team,
so
he's
going
to
recuse
himself
as
from
joining
the
panel
in
discussions.
A
A
Her
said
Bill
regulations
it
mandates
that
each
building
or
development
be
reviewed
by
the
design
review
panel
for
context
within
the
community
in
which
it
is
proposed.
With
that
statement,
I'll
ask
the
presenters
for
the
project
to
proceed
with
your
presentation.
J
O
Good
evening,
everybody
I'll
make
a
quick
reintroduction
just
to
get
us
started.
I
know
it's
been
almost
three
months
since
we
were
back
here
before
our
last
panel
with
that's
Meg,
knobs,
New,
Year
celebration.
So
just
remind
everybody
who
we
are
I'm.
O
Brandon
rou
with
bowler
joining
me
tonight
on
behalf
of
the
development
team,
is
Mark
Levy
and
Jamie
Frazier
with
Rock
Realty
they're,
the
developer,
Jeff
Henneman
and
Ruth
landsman
with
Henneman
Architects,
the
architect
for
the
project
and
then
Jason
vittori
with
Smith
Schmidt,
Landings
Council,
as
well
as
Eric
McWilliams
in
that
pool
house
here
with
Bullard.
O
So
we're
back
here
before
you
tonight
to
present
the
updates
that
we've
made
to
the
proposed
purpose-built
student
housing
community
since
that
October
DRP
meeting
and
we're
asking
for
a
favorable
recommendation
from
the
panel
for
the
proposed
Community.
This
is
the
first
step
in
a
long
process,
a
long
development
process
through
the
county
and
we're
excited
to
to
continue
through
I'm,
going
to
make
a
brief
presentation
that
will
highlight
the
revisions
that
we've
made
since
that
first
trp
meeting
back
in
October.
O
O
And
I
reflected
in
the
updated
pattern
book
that
was
submitted
in
December
and
that
I
believe
smart
is
sharing
on
the
screen
Mark.
Could
you
quickly
just
flip
to
tape
42
of
that
pattern
book
and
while
she's
pulling
that
up
from
a
high
level
standpoint,
the
revised
pattern
book
provides
additional
Clarity
on
sections
and
topography
and
elevation
changes
throughout
the
community.
O
It
provides
additional
Clarity
on
the
site,
Furnishings,
fencing
lighting
bike
racks
bus
stops,
as
well
as
some
additional
Clarity
on
the
entrance
signage,
all
of
which
was
requested
back
in
October.
O
Thank
you,
Marta,
so
page
42
here
is
an
overall
rendering
of
the
updated
layout
from
a
layout
and
really
an
amenity
area.
Standpoint
on
touch
just
high
level.
What
the
changes
have
been
made
since
October
through
now
to
the
community.
O
Most
of
the
changes
are
reflected
in
what
I'll
call
a
Southern
portion,
which
is
the
area
that's
outlined
in
red
on
this
page,
so
so
quickly,
touching
on
those
the
size
and
orientation
of
the
four
apartment,
buildings
have
been
adjusted
and
and
slightly
and
the
parking
areas
have
been
modified
accordingly.
O
Surface
parking
areas,
I
should
say
the
building
and
service
part
of
the
modifications
have
allowed
for
additional
amenity
space
to
be
created,
which
I
know
is
a
point
of
discussion
and
a
request
made
by
in
October
by
the
panel
and
staff,
specifically
the
amenity
area,
between
a
buildings
A
and
B,
which
is
I'll
call
it
on
the
left
side
of
of
that
southern
portion
has
been
expanded
and,
additionally,
two
amenity
areas
have
been
proposed
in
the
vicinities
of
building
C
and
D.
O
Further,
the
five
Town
Homes
were
previously
proposed
at
the
community.
Entrance
with
US-1
have
been
removed
from
The
Proposal.
These
were
on
the
northwest
corner
of
the
US-1
and
Avalon
Ridge
Road
opportunity,
Boulevard
intersection.
O
That
area
will
be
a
storm
water
facility
in
the
future
and
then,
finally,
the
two.
What
I
call
sticks
of
town
homes
that
are
just
to
the
north
of
that,
along
on
the
other
side
of
Avalon
Ridge
Road
are
now
proposed
as
rear
loaded
units,
meaning
they
have
a
two-car
garage
and
driveway
on
the
back
side
away
from
Avalon
Ridge
Road.
O
So
the
development
team
was
in
receipt
of
the
or
is
in
receipt
of
the
planning,
Department's
staff
report
that
for
the
January
11th
meeting.
So
today's
meeting.
O
With
that,
we
have
prepared
a
few
supplemental,
exhibits
and
updates
that
address
and
provide
additional
Clarity
based
on
those
recommendations
identified
in
that
latest
staff
report.
So
Marta,
if
you
could
share
those
supplemental
PDF
that
was
sent
over
I,
should
have
like
nine
or
so
slides.
If
I
recall
correctly,.
G
O
Yeah
awesome,
thank
you
cool,
so
we'll
flip
through
these
and
just
go
through
what
the
these
are
and
again.
These
are
updates
to
the
December
pattern
book,
so
there
weren't
any
holistic
changes
to
layout
or
anything
along
those
lines.
We've
just
provided
additional
Clarity
and
in
response
to
some
of
the
questions
and
recommendations
identified
in
that
January
11th
today's
staff
report
for
planning.
O
So
here
on
on
page
four,
we
we've
updated
the
project
description
to
properly
reflect
the
number
of
bus
stops,
as
well
as
clarify
the
management
plan
that
will
be
required
to
make
sure
that
this
is
a
purpose-built
student
housing
community
go
to
the
next
slide.
Please.
O
On
this
slide,
we
have
highlighted
the
three
amenity
spaces
to
further
clarify
where
those
amenity
spaces
are,
and
additionally,
this
slide
also
shows
the
bus,
shelter
and
it's
one
of
three
bus
shelters
proposed
at
the
three
bus
stops
throughout
this
purposeville
student
Community,
purpose-built
student
housing
community
next
slide.
Please.
O
This
slide
has
been
updated
just
to
show
the
two
bus
shelters
at
the
two
bus
stop
locations
there
on
the
just
the
northern
side
of
that
purposeville
student
housing
community
next
slide,
I
think
you
can
skip
the
next
two
and
go
so
I.
Think
it's
page
25
would
be
what
it
is.
O
Awesome,
thank
you
so
so
this
is
a
updated
schematic
of
the
the
money
entrance.
Monument
sign,
that's
down
at
the
intersection
of
Route
1
and
Avalon
Ridge
Boulevard
heading
into
the
community.
From
the
pattern
book
to
here.
We
just
added
some
additional
material
information
and
then
as
well
as
dimensional
information
to
help
identify
scale
and
height
of
and
size
of
of
the
sign.
Next
page,
please.
O
These
next
three
slides
going
are
similar
to
what
you've
seen
in
the
December
pattern
book
that
was
submitted
for
this
meeting,
but
further
provide
additional
labels
and
and
and
Clarity
on
the
site.
Furnishings
site
features
in
each
one
of
these
amenity
areas.
So
this
one
specifically
is
the
area
that's
been
enlarged
in
between
buildings,
A
and
B.
O
And
this
is
the
other,
the
second
new
amenity
area,
that's
on
to
the
east
of
building
d
next
page,
please.
O
Of
this
slide
just
provides
further
clarification
on
the
location
of
the
bike
racks
that
are
proposed,
as
well
as
the
number
of
bike
spaces.
If
you
would
call
that
at
each
of
those
locations,
the
two
that
are
on
the
northernmost
point
are
part
are
at
the
two
bus
stops
and
then
on
the
southern
portion
of
the
five
locations.
One
of
those
is
at
the
bus
stop
and
the
other
four
in
front
of
the
the
apartment
buildings
next
slide.
Please.
O
Thank
you,
and
this
is
I'll-
call
it
an
updated
cross
section,
but
this
page
43
was
included
in
the
development
or
excuse
me
the
pattern
book
with
the
December
submission.
O
All
we
have
done
is
added
elevation
marks
to
help
convey
the
topographic
change
across
these
respective
sections
and
I
believe
that
is
it
on
this
slide
Mark.
If
you're
able
to
go
one
tab
back
on
your
your
screen
on
your
PDF
Adobe,
meaning
the
yeah
perfect.
Thank
you.
O
These
are
two
additional
sections
that
we
have
cut
in
response.
Based
on
the
the
recommendations
in
the
staff
report.
These
are
two
sections
that
are
are
through
the
different
different
townhome
areas:
I'll
call
it
section,
A
A
is
the
portion
or
is
the
section
that's
cut
through
called
Avalon
Ridge
Road
in
the
southern
section.
O
So
what
you're
looking
at
is
on
the
left
side,
Avalon,
Ridge,
Boulevard,
the
town
homes
with
a
rear
loaded
garages
and
as
you
proceed
to
the
right
of
the
section,
the
driveways
and
then
and
then
surface
parking
and
then
ultimately,
the
environmental
features
on
the
right
side
and
then
on
the
section.
O
Bb
is
the
section
cut
through
the
northern
portion:
I'll
call
the
stub
road,
but
miners
Way
Extension
that
shows
the
townhome
and
their
their
proximity
and
their
typographic
relationship
between
the
two
sides
of
that
road
and
I
think
that
that
should
be
it
for
the
slides,
I
guess
with
that
I
think
we've
covered
the
updates
from
the
October
meeting
as
well
as
provide
some
additional
Clarity.
That
I
believe
address
the
planning
departments,
January
11th
staff
report.
O
So
at
this
point
I'll
turn
the
virtual
mic
back
over
to
the
panel,
but
our
team
is
here
to
answer
any
questions
and
that
you
may
have
and
appreciate
your
time
this
evening.
Thank
you.
N
N
O
I
I
mean
the
conditions
from
from
the
the
prior
meeting.
I
think
that's
what
we
were
touching
on
with
the
and
happy
talk
through
it
so
to
the
conditions
were
related
to
the
recommendations
in
the
October
staff
report.
O
With
with
that,
there's
there's
requests
on
clarification
on
the
how
the
use
will
be
regulated.
We
include
that
in
the
project,
description
and
I
can
and
Jason
Victoria's
here
to
answer
any
questions
related
to
that
providing
accurate
elevations
in
sections.
So
this
slide
here
and
as
well
as
the
one
we
shared
previously
on
page
I
think
was
43.
O
also
provide
that
Clarity,
hopefully
to
show
the
topographic
relationship
of
the
proposed
community,
the
amenity
space,
so
one
identifying
and
labeling
it.
We
provided
some
supplements
a
better
show
and
better
identify
where
those
three
locations
are,
as
well
as
provide
additional
amenity
spaces
on
the
Eastern
side
of
Avalon,
Bridge
Boulevard,
so
there's
two
spaces
near
C
and
D
as
well
as
enlarging
The
Space,
Between,
A
and
B
the
types
of
fencing
proposed
that
is
included
in
the
updated
pattern
book.
O
There
are
two
different
types
of
fencing
proposed:
one
of
topic:
retaining
walls,
one
where
there
aren't
retaining
walls
where
a
safety
condition
isn't
as
isn't
as
Paramount
as
a
retaining
wall
touched
on
open
space.
We
have
added
crosswalks,
as
was
requested
by
staff
bike.
Racks
have
been
identified.
I
think
we
went
through
that
as
well
as
a
cut
sheet
for
the
proposed
bike,
rack
related
to
Bicycle
Pathways
to
protect
Lanes.
If
designated
on
the
plans,
which
was
one
of
the
comments
from
the
last
response
student
last
staff
report,
there.
I
O
No
bicycle
Pathways
proposed
internal
to
the
community,
I
will
say,
based
on
the
initial
submission
to
sha,
for
the
the
what
we
call
phase
one
of
this,
the
182
Townhomes.
It
will
be
a
bike
path
along
US-1
that
will
be
added
along
that
Frontage.
O
Further
recommendations
from
that
October
or
conditions
from
the
October
meeting
light
locations
have
been
identified.
In
the
pattern
book.
There
was
a
request
for
wayfinding
signage
or,
however,
in
our
experience
and
these
types
of
of
communities,
we
finding
signage
and
typically
need
it.
If
you
live
in
the
community,
you
know
how
to
get
to
the
amenity
space.
O
Next
to
you,
you
know
where
your
parking
lot
is,
but
we
have
provided
that
entrance
Monument
sign
to
welcome
into
people
to
the
community
and
then
finally,
from
an
architectural
design
standpoint,
the
main
comment
was
related
to
providing
those
additional
detail
on
the
sections
in
the
topographic
change
and
how
that
relates
across
those
those
buildings
and
have
ever
have
presented
those
but
I
touched
on
it.
Jennifer.
N
Yeah
I,
you
know
it
would
have
been
a
little
preferable.
We
haven't
even
presented
our
staff
report
yet
so
you
presenting
kind
of
these
exhibits,
are
a
little
premature.
The
the
community
hasn't
had
a
chance
to
see
our
staff
report
so
I.
Don't
think
they're
going
to
really
know
what
you're
speaking
about
that's
fine
thank.
A
You
so
yeah
so
Jennifer
I
do
imagine
I
know
we'll
get
to
the
staff
report.
The
you
know
I
mean
I
I'm,
okay
as
chair.
If
we
reverse
order,
if
we
read
through,
have
you
read
through
the
staff
report
prior
to
the
community
speaking
I
know,
there
are
likely
folks
signed
up
and
we've
had
some
materials
from
the
community
that
have
been
submitted
to
us.
So
if
procedurally,
that
can
happen,
I
I
think
as
the
chair
I'd
be
fine
with
having.
N
G
G
Perfect,
so
we
prepared
our
staff
report
based
on
Bill
number
616
6121,
adopted
by
the
County
Council
on
June
7
2021,
and
also
based
on
comprehensive
Manual
of
development
policies,
Baltimore
County
Landscape
manual,
Baltimore,
County
master
plan
2020
and,
as
I
mentioned
already
bill
number
6121
in
terms
of
site
design
staff
recommends
approval
of
the
site,
design
intent
and
offers
the
following
comments.
Number
one
perjury
submission
clearly
indicate
how
the
purpose-built
student
housing
will
be
regulated.
G
G
Stuff
cannot
recommend
approval
the
open
space
elements
subject
to
the
following
conditions:
number
one
demonstrate
label
and
provide
additional
amenity
open
space
areas
within
the
proposed
development,
specifically
for
building
C
and
D,
and
the
town
home
area
to
the
north.
Clearly
label
all
proposed
amenities
on
the
site
plan
such
as
benches
bike,
racks,
Street
furniture,
trash
receptacles,
past
shelters
and
all
other
proposed
amenities,
number
two
top
and
bottom
wall
elevation
numbers
for
all
proposed.
Retaining
walls
are
hard
to
read.
G
However,
on
the
page
22
of
the
pattern
book,
it
shows
three
bus
stop
locations,
please
provide
by
us
top
shelters
for
all
three
and
show
and
label
all
of
them
on
the
site.
Plan
number
three:
the
project
should
meet
all
applicables
design
guidelines
outlined
in
the
complete
Street
design
manual
number
four
provide
sidewalks
along
Washington
Boulevard
and
Ridge
Avenue
number
five
provided
acquired
parking
calculations
for
this
development
in
regards
to
signage
and
lighting
staff,
recommends
approval,
subject
to
the
following
conditions:
number
one
clarify
on
which
page
of
the
pattern
book
lighting
locations
are
provided.
G
Number
two
provide
the
materials
and
the
high
dimension
for
the
proposed
entrance.
Monument
sign
in
regards
to
architectural
design.
Staff
cannot
recommend
approval
of
the
architectural
design
based
on
the
following
number.
One
provide
accurate,
elevations,
cross-sections
and
perspectives
for
each
proposed
on
home
group
and
for
the
buildings,
A
B,
C
and
D
to
demonstrate
the
changes
in
Greek
of
the
topography
to
be
able
to
make
a
proper
evaluation
of
the
proposed
architectural
design.
G
Number
two
for
the
resubmission
clearly
indicate
how
the
purpose
built
student
housing
will
be
regulated,
will
faculty
reside
in
any
of
the
proposed
units
and
final
recommendation
at
this
time,
staff
cannot
recommend
approval
of
the
forge
Overlook
project
until
all
of
the
above
mentioned,
conditions
and
comments
are
addressed,
and
this
concludes
the
stop
report.
A
Thank
you
Martha.
So
now,
we'll
move
on
to
the
opportunity
for
the
public
to
speak.
Are
there
speakers
that
are
signed
up?
Yes,.
G
We
have
Mr
Michael
McAuliffe,
who
is
representative
of
health
or
Improvement
Association.
Let
me
let
him
in
I
just
need
a
quick
second,
absolutely.
P
Yes,
I
can,
through
my
phone
I'm,
looking
at
you
through
my
computer,
but
listening
through
my
phone,
some
technical
difficulties,
but
I
can
hear
you.
G
F
P
You,
okay,
do
I
understand
that
this
project
has
not
been
approved.
As
per
this
DRP
meeting.
P
P
P
N
I
would
like
to
clarify,
though,
however
Cecily
for
the
panel's
edification,
the
Baltimore
County
open
space
requirements
as
per
the
County
requirements
are
not
within
the
purview
of
this
panel.
They
can
certainly
weigh
in
as
to
whether
there
is
appropriate,
open
space
allocated
for
the
proposed
development,
but
the
technical,
open
space
requirements
will
be
reviewed
at
the
development
plan
stage.
When
this
Forge
Overlook
development
plan
has
to
go
back
through
the
county
review
process.
P
G
P
Yes,
if
you
could
I'm
going
to
go
to
open
no,
yes,
how
about
the
one?
That's
called
phase
two
beds
and
parking
spaces,
BR
and
ml
okay.
So
some
notes
on
here
it
highlights
the
deficiencies
in
the
parking
spaces
versus
the
beds.
P
There's
527
beds
proposed
for
this
total
project.
Only
489
parking
spaces
proposed
so
there's
a
large
deficiency
there
on
the
lower
end,
it's
not
as
bad,
but
on
the
upper
end
where
these
town
homes
are
being
presented,
there
is
no
on-street
parking.
There
are
only
parking
two
parking
spots
allotted
for
each
of
these
units,
one's
in
the
driveway
and
one
is
in
the
garage.
P
Okay
and
since
we're.
I
P
About
those
units
up
there,
I'd
like
to
like,
actually
you
open
the
meeting
up
with
the
definition
of
a
purpose-built
student
housing,
so
I'd
like
to
actually
read
it
some
of
my
time
here
to
read
that
and
the
definition
of
a
dormitory
is
a
building
used
for
the
housing
of
students,
both
undergraduate
and
graduate
or
resident
counselors
or
advisors,
and
it
is
located
on
campus,
so
purpose-built
student
housing
is
just
about
identical.
P
Only
it's
office
off
of
Campus
purpose-built
student
housing
is
a
building
that
is
designed
for
the
primary
purpose
of
housing,
students,
both
undergraduate
and
graduate
resident,
counselors
and
advisors.
So
these
dormitories
and
purpose-built
student
housing
is
supposed
to
have
students
only
there
is
no
mention
of
Faculty
I.
Think
faculty
is
a
notion
that
was
introduced
during
the
developers,
initial
presentation
and
I
think
it's
a
it's
a
suggestion
that
these
houses
in
the
ml
section
can
be
town
homes
for
faculty
where
that
is
not
true.
P
This
is
for
students
only
and
all
of
these
buildings
should
be
set
up
for
students.
This
property
in
the
ml
is
not
allowed
to
have
townhouses
on
it
and
they
are
townhouses.
They
are
not,
they
are
not
built
in
the
spirit
of
this
law,
so
I
do
want
to
get
that
straight
that
we
have
to
stop
talking
about
the
faculty
living
here.
P
P
That
was
one
of
the
main
points
right
there.
It
is
very
deficient
in
open
space.
This
plan
suffers
from
an
extreme
deficiency
of
open
space
and
recreational
space.
If
the
goal
is
to
attract
students,
then
the
outdoor
spaces
should
be
should
mimic
those
of
a
University
campus.
This
does
not
students
desire,
Open
Spaces
to
kick
a
soccer
ball,
throw
a
frisbee,
hit
a
baseball
or
form
a
game
of
flag
football.
Many
college
campuses
are
designed
with
such
spaces
and
they
are
usually
centrally
located
and
busy
with
students.
P
This
project
has
no
such
spaces
and
it
needs
them.
The
outdoor
spacious
spaces
should
be
designed
to
attractive
to
students,
as
as
the
student
oriented
indoor
spaces,
the
large
outdoor
space
available
for
the
students,
the
living
units
will
otherwise
be
nothing
more
than
chicken
coops
with
students.
Thank
you
very
much
for
your
time.
A
P
N
Up,
yes,
the
next
person
requested
to
speak
is
Tiffany
Wiseman.
G
Her
in
yes
Miss
Stephanie
Wiseman,
can
you
hear
us?
You
are
unmuted
now
and
you
can
speak.
Yes,
we
can
hear
you.
Q
Okay,
yeah
I
have
a
lot
of
the
same
concerns
as
I
did
as
well.
The
first
time
around
honestly.
What
I'm
looking
at
is
is
not
really
much
change.
It
just
looks
like
they
flipped
the
building
around
a
set
of
sideways.
It's
straight
now
and
I.
Don't
know
if
you
guys
caught
it,
but
they
added
the
fifth
Story
the
two
of
the
buildings
when
it
was
initially
four
stories.
It's
now,
five
I
I
still
have
the
same
concerns
about
the
open
space.
Q
It's
definitely
not
enough
open
space
and
the
layout
of
the
open
space
is
not
what
it
should
be
for
housing
for
students,
and
the
same
thing
is
as
well
with
the
town
homes
I,
don't
understand
why
the
town
homes
are
even
being
Incorporated
in
this
project,
considering
their
four
bedroom
with
garage,
townhouses
I,
don't
see
a
student
living
in
a
four-bedroom
townhouse.
Q
That
sounds
like
it's
something
made
for
a
family,
not
for
students
and
then
the
same
concern
as
I
had
the
first
time
with
the
sidewalks
along
Washington
Boulevard,
so
I
I
think
that's
it
for
me.
I
pretty
much
touched
on
my
main
concern,
so
open
space,
sidewalk
and
the
townhouses
I,
don't
know
we
have
four
bedroom.
Townhouse
is,
for
you
know
a
student
to
live
in.
That
sounds
more
like
a
family
like
for
phase
one
and
that's
all.
A
Thank
you.
Any
additional
speakers.
N
N
N
F
Yes,
I
can.
Can
you
hear
me?
Yes,
terrific
I
would
like
to
make
a
few
more
comments
about
the
open
space.
F
As
you
know,
the
Baltimore
County
code,
section
32
6108
F1
Begins
by
saying,
if
it
is
not
feasible
to
meet
the
open
space
requirement
and
it
talks
about
submit
a
fee
and
lieu
proposal
I
submit
that
it
is
feasible
to
meet
the
open
space
requirements.
The
size
and
number
of
buildings
proposed
is
not
an
inevitable
fact.
It
is
merely
what
the
developer
wants.
F
Certainly,
the
master
plan
building
codes
and
regulations
were
not
written
to
be
circumvented
by
developers,
ability
to
pay
a
little
money
to
the
county
to
get
what
they
want.
Breaking
down
the
costs
over
527
beds
in
the
latest
phase
two
proposal
and
four
beds
equal
one
dwelling
unit,
so
that
makes
132
dwelling
units
thousand
square
feet
of
open
space
are
required
for
each
dwelling
unit,
which
equals
132
000
square
feet
of
open
space.
Just
over
three
acres
is
required
about
ten
thousand
five
hundred
square
feet
of
open
space
is
proposed.
F
F
Now,
ten
thousand
five
hundred
square
feet
of
amenity
open
space
on
this
revised
plan
satisfies
the
open
space
requirements
for
10
units,
leaving
a
122
units
worth
of
open
space
to
calculate
the
fee.
For
so
we
divide
125
122
by
25,
and
you
get
a
rate
of
4.88
and
4.88
times.
5
000
is
24
400
dollars
paying
this
paltry
sum
does
not
improve
the
project
design,
nor
does
it
improve
the
quality
of
life
for
future
reference
residents.
N
H
Yeah
and
no
one
on
my
end
has.
A
L
Okay,
after
really
reviewing
this
project,
the
I'll
I'll
start
with
the
exterior
elevations
they
seem
to
be
very
apropos
and
the
materials
are
are
very
appropriate
for
the
elevations
and
the
facades.
I
guess.
The
only
concern
I
have
pertaining
to
the
elevations
is
on
I.
Guess
it's
Building
B.
L
You
have
indicated
in
that
Gable
area
on
the
a
thin
brick
which
is
fine,
but
you
did
not,
and
you
indicated,
vinyl
siding
on
the
other
three
buildings
in
that
in
that
same
area,
and
it's
it's
from
my
perspective:
it's
not
appropriate.
If
you're
going
to
do
it
for
Building
B,
then
it
should
be
at
the
main
entry.
It
should
also
be
on
the
other
buildings.
L
L
Everything
else
that's
indicated
as
brick
to
item,
and
you
have
noted
on
22,
23
and
24..
The
brick
that's
indicated
on
the
facades,
but
I
really
want
that
to
be
indicated
as
a
brick
veneer
as
opposed
to
a
thin
brick,
a
veneer.
As
indicated
on
that
Gable
surface.
L
Now,
going
through
the
actual
site
plan
on
this
project,.
L
I
I
looked
at
what
you
did
it's
for
the
public
amenities
based
between
c
and
d
and
then
I
looked
at
what
was
done
between
A
and
B,
that
public
amenity
space,
I
I,
think
I
I
heard
you
indicate
that
you
increase
the
square
footage
from
my
perspective.
I,
don't
I,
don't
see
where
you
actually
increase
the
square
footage
of
that
public
Courtyard
concept
between
A
and
B
it
would.
It
would
be
nice
if
it
was
increased,
but
from
from
my
perspective,
it's
it's
not
now.
L
Let's
get
back
to
let's
get
to
C
and
D
I
I
must
I
must
say:
I
I,
I,
I
I
welcome
the
intent
that
was
for
the
the
public
space,
but
amenities,
basically
between
C
and
D.
But
it's
it's
not
enough.
L
I
mean
we
have
you.
You
have
indicated
that
it's
only
a
thousand
square
feet
and
then
to
the
right
of
D.
You
have
indicated
another
public
proposed
admitted
space
now.
The
problems
that
I
have
with
this
is
that
it's
adjacent
to
the
the
dumpster
and
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I,
can't
really
say
that
I'm
I
I
find
that
appropriate.
So
I
would,
from
my
perspective,
that
2500,
that's
adjacent
to
the
dumpsters
should
be
incorporated
within
that
thousand
square
feet
between
Building,
C
and
D.
L
So
we
can
really,
you
know,
have
something:
that's
that's
generous
and
and
appropriate,
as
as
far
as
a
public
open
space
between
the
two
buildings,
you
know,
I
I,
don't
know
if
we
can
get
close
to
the
7
000
square
feet
between
a
and
b.
But
you
know
if
we
can
get
closer,
it
would
be
most
appropriate.
L
That's
that's,
you
know
have
having
that
square
footage
on
the
right
side
of
building
D
adjacent
to
the
dumpster
enclosure
is
just
not
the
best
place
or
location
for
that
public
amenity.
L
I
I
I
I
I,
I
kind
of
look
through
your
your
your
your
your
your
your
atop,
a
wall
bottom
of
wall
elevations
in
on
in
the
Topo
through
this
site,
but
I
really
would
like
to
see
a
more
enlarged
plan
of
of
that
retaining
wall
between
a
and
b
and
the
in
that
Plaza,
and
that
in
that
public
amenities
based,
if
if
you
could
really
blow
that
up
and
and
really
so,
you
know
what's
really
occurring
there.
So
so
so
it's
Crystal
Clear,
you
know!
L
So
if
we,
if
you
really
blow
that
up
and
make
that
an
enlarged
area
that
really
that
the
North
East
the
north
northeast
side
of
that
corner,
where
the
retaining
wall
is
and
then
incorporating
that
public
Plaza
there
into
a
in
a
a
very
enlarged
plan
with
a
partial,
exterior,
elevations
would
be
very
appropriate
and
then
and
then,
when
you
make
the
revisions
to
the
public
amenity
space
between
C
and
D.
L
I
would
do
the
same
here,
because
there's
a
lot
of
of
up
and
down
and
Terrace
and
and
retaining
walls
happening
in
in
this
general
area.
That
needs
to
be
much
more
clear
for,
for
us,
I
would
say
and
I
would
say
just
for
you
also,
so
you
can
really
understand
the
the
ups
and
downs
here,
but
you
know
just
you
know
outside
of
that
everything
else.
From
my
perspective,
you
know
seems
appropriate,
but
you
know
those
really
are
my
comments.
When
it
comes
to
this.
This
discipline
I
mean
I
I.
L
You
know
when
it
comes
to
these
townhouses
I've,
you
know
I
wish
we
could
break
it
up
a
little
bit
more,
but
I
yeah,
I,
I,
I
I
see
the
relevance
of
of
of
of
of
the
in
and
out,
and
you
know
and
and
and
it's
in
the
site
parameters
on
on
this.
But
you
know
if,
if
there
is
a
way
to
like
I
guess
to
introduce
some
some
open
space
there,
that
would
be
appropriate
but
I.
You
know
I
I,
don't
really
have
you
know
much
many
comments
there.
It
seems
like
it,
it
works.
L
So
you
know
my.
My
main
comments
are
pretending
to
go:
Building,
A
and
B
and
and
c
and
d.
Definitely
we
really
need
to
rehash
that
area.
So,
okay
thank.
A
Okay,
I'm
gonna,
ask
that
each
of
the
panelists
kind
of
bullet
point
their
particular.
A
You
know
that's
the
core
of
their
concerns
into
a
concise
bullet.
So,
as
we
come
back
to
making
a
motion,
it
will
make
it
somewhat
simpler,
so
Mr
Stevens
thanks
for
starting
us
off,
and
we
definitely
heard
you're
concern
about
the
ab
building
as
well
as
open
space.
So
if
you
could
just
bullet
those
those
points
specifically
Beyond,
what's
already,
of
course,
we
can
always
refer
to
the
staff
report,
but
beyond,
what's
in
the
staff
report,
if
each
panelist
could
summarize
their
main
concerns.
Okay
with
that,
thank
you
with
that.
K
Yes,
thank
you.
I
Echo,
some
of
the
same
concerns
as
my
fellow
panelists
and
the
staff,
the
staff
report,
I
guess
bullet
point
number
one
would
definitely
be
the
open
space
I,
don't
think.
There's
enough
I
think
there
could
be
more
amenities
added
barbecue
fire
pit
Fields
you
know
this
is,
is
housing
for
the
University
and
marketed
that
way.
K
So
thank
you
for
the
clarification
on
the
amenity
space
areas.
I
think
you
can
do
a
little
bit
more.
Also
I
guess
bullet
point
number
two
would
be
lighting.
Is
there
Lighting
in
the
amenity
space?
Is
there
Lighting
on
the
entrance
feature
signs?
K
K
So
just
a
little
bit
more
detail
on
that
bullet.
Point
number
three
I
see
that
you
have
a
playground.
K
The
playground,
location
to
me
seems
a
bit
unsafe
and
not
centrally
located
it's
in
the
back
of
the
site.
It
seems
private
to
the
townhouses.
It's
also
down.
There's
some
significant
grading
I
see,
there's
a
trail
to
it,
but
I'm
just
worried
that
there's
not
enough
eyes
on
the
street
and
in
the
homes
back
there.
K
So
I
have
some
safety
concerns
with
that
and
number
four
for
the
bullet
point
from
a
regulatory
standpoint,
it
looks
like
there
might
be
some
Wetland
buffer
encroachment
for
the
parking
along
Washington
Boulevard,
the
part
that
extends
past
the
building-
and
there
also
is
an
existing
water
tower.
That's
called
out
on
your
plans
that
appears
to
have
an
easement
around
it.
K
That
looks
like
it's
going
over
the
right-of-way
and
I'm,
not
sure
how
that's
being
act
accessed,
I
didn't
see
any
access
to
that
and
there's
also
townhouse
an
end
unit
townhouse
next
to
it,
with
no
screening,
no
landscape
screening,
so
they're
going
to
be
looking
at
a
beautiful
white
water
tower,
so
I
would
encourage
additional
Landscaping
I
think
everything
else
has
been
covered
in
all
the
reports
and
brought
up
by
some
of
the
community
members.
A
Thank
you
miss
us.
Let's
see
we'll
move
on
to
Mr
Sharma
next,
please.
D
D
A
I
think
I
might
have
missed
something
Mr
Sherman
did
you
ask
to
see
something
else
or
did
you
did.
N
A
You
know
I
mean
in
in
terms
of
secure
I.
Think
it's
the
you
know.
We
do
speak
on
lighting
and
safety
in
terms
of
that
aspect
of
it.
I
don't
know
that
we
can
speak
to
you
know
you
know
security.
Monitoring
such
as
you
know
are
people
allowed
to
put
up
cameras,
for
example
on
their
front
doors
that
sort
of
thing,
but
if
it
has
to
do
with
kind
of
the
public
realm
and
the
kind
of
safety
lighting
that
I
think
does.
A
But
beyond
that,
no
I,
don't
I
mean
I,
don't
think
we've
ever
covered,
whether
or
not
or
how
to
have
video
surveillance.
For
example,
I'm.
N
Going
to
expand
on
this
a
little
further
and
because
this
is
purpose-built
student
housing,
the
developer
is
going
to
have
to
coordinate
with
the
the
institution
on
how
Security
will
be
managed
through
this
development.
In
cooperation
with
the
university
is
my
understanding
how
purpose-built
student
housing
is
to
be
facilitated
unless
I'm
incorrect,
but.
A
R
I'm
just
trying
to
answer
the
question.
Obviously,
following
the
design
review
panel
talking
about
the
layout
of
the
project,
the
architecture
and
all
the
things
you
went
over
at
the
very
beginning
and
then
Miss
Newton,
again
repeated
from
the
Department
of
planning
repeated
the
issues
for
this
is
really
what
does
it
look
like
from
an
aesthetic
standpoint
and
and
ultimately,
when
it
comes
to
security,
we
are
bound
following,
as
is
customary
when
we
go
to
the
DRP
for
any
project,
there's
the
option
of
going
for
a
limit
exemption
or
filing
a
development
plan.
R
We
are
absolutely
filing
a
development
plan,
there's
a
provision
in
the
county
code.
If
you
have
more
than
one
dwelling
unit
being
added
or
some
kind
of
density,
which
we
clearly
do
to
an
approved
development
plan,
you
have
to
go
to
a
hearing
for
the
development
which
will
involve
traffic,
which
will
involve
open
space,
which
is
distinguishable
from
amenity
open
space.
Open
space
has
to
do
with
the
number
of
square
feet,
a
thousand
square
feet
for
every.
J
R
And
that's
a
whole
other
subject
that
we've
kind
of
mixed
and
mingled
amenity,
open
space
and
Open
Spaces
if
they're
two
things-
and
they
are
very
much
two
different
things
amenity
opens
place-
is
typically
only
provided
as
part
of
commercial
development
or
you
know
sometimes
for
certain
residential
projects
and
certainly
we've.
Since
the
last
meeting
we
were
asked
to
add
some
of
the
many
episodes
did
in
this
case.
R
Security
is
also
something
that
I
think
is
going
to
be
addressed
as
part
of
the
management
plan
which
doesn't
get
filed
until
we
file
the
development
plan,
with
the
Department
of
permits,
approvals
and
inspection
per
the
regulation,
section
441
and
the
definition
section
101
of
the
Baltimore
County
zoning
regulations,
all
that's
laid
out
there.
You
know,
and
just
one
other
point
on
the
top
building.
R
Are
one
other
thing
and
buildings
can
take
the
form
of
what
looks
like
a
townhouse
or
what
looks
like
a
multi-family
building?
But
it
expressly
says
in
the
zoning
regulations
for
purpose-built
student
housing,
multi-family
buildings,
which
any
of
us
looking
at
these
buildings
would
call
it
multi-family
housing.
But
it
says
it's
not
that
so.
In
this
case
you
know
the
regulations
are
relatively
new.
I
know.
R
The
design
review
panel
doesn't
necessarily
look
at
these
all
the
time,
because
this
is
the
first
project
for
purpose-built
student
housing
I've
ever
seen,
but
it's
moving
forward
and
I
can
tell
you
all
the
other,
purpose-built
student
housing
or
any
apartments
that
currently
serve
students
of
UMBC.
For
a
market
study
we
did
have
no
amenity
open
space,
so
the
standard
that
okay.
A
A
Questions
we'll
welcome
back
to
you
so
with
that
you
know
just
just
to
give
a
follow-up
to
Mr.
Sharma
I
think
that
abundantly
answers,
the
question
that
security
is
something
that
probably
Falls
outside
of
our
direct
purview
but
will
be
handled
through
management
with
the
university.
A
Okay,
so
then,
let's
move
on
to
Mr
rental.
C
And
thanks
to
several
comments
after
the
previous
comments,
there
is
very
little
information
on
the
Open
Spaces
sections
perspectives
and
other
supporting
materials
would
be
very
helpful
to
understand
the
functions
and
amenities
of
these
spaces.
There's
a
lot
of
grading
happening
here.
It's
very
difficult
to
understand
how
usable
the
spaces
are.
C
C
C
C
It
is
also
very
difficult
to
understand
the
relationship
of
the
site
walls
and
the
grades
and
the
railings
that
are
going
to
be
required
in
some
of
the
submitted
documents.
I
think
further
detail
would
be
needed
to
further
show
this
for
some
of
the
other
comments
and
then
two
last
comments
with
the
detailed
plans.
I
appreciate
the
edition
of
the
bike
racks,
but
it
looks
like
some
of
them
are
not
accommodated
on
the
plans
near
the
bus,
stop
shelters
it
doesn't
it's
not
clear
how
those
would
be
accommodated
on
the
plans.
C
Some
of
the
bus
stop
filters
appear
to
be
located
in
areas
of
steep
slopes
which
may
require
additional
sight
walls
and
then
I
do
as
echoed
in
some
of
the
other
comments.
I
do
appreciate
the
addition
of
the
crosswalks
on
the
site,
but
the
sidewalks
themselves
do
not
connect
to
the
crosswalks.
So
that's
something
that
should
be
addressed
as
well
on
the
next
day.
So.
A
Thank
you,
Mr
Khan,.
B
Thank
you,
I've
support.
Basically,
everything
that
folks
have
said
I
would
only
highlight
some
of
them.
Is
that
I
think
this
amenity
open
space
is
a
really
too
small,
basically
not
fully
developed.
These
are
large
buildings,
and
the
spaces
between
them
are
really
going
to
seem
very
much
more
confined
than
they
might
even
in
a
plan
like
this
and
I
think
that
just
really
needs
further
study
to
work.
Better
agree
that
with
everybody
in
the
staff
report,
the
comments
have
been
made.
A
Okay,
thank
you
and
I'll
reiterate
a
few
points
and
ask
you
a
few
questions
here.
A
Yeah
I
agree
with
I
I
understand
that
there's
you
know
the
difference
between
open
space
at
money,
space
I,
think
where,
in
the
panel
of
some
of
the
community
and
others
are
reacting
to
and
and
plenty
staff
are
reacting
to.
This
is
that
you
know
there
there
may
be
other
calculated
open
space,
but
what
we're
really
lacking
here
is
you
know,
other
recreational
facilities
that
that
should
provide
amenities
to
the
target
audience
of
this
development,
the
students
and
so
when
we
see
that
you
know
I
agree
with
the
panelists.
A
You
know
some
of
those
areas
between
the
buildings
they
they
may
be
smaller
than
we
think,
but
I
think
what
we've
seen
thus
far,
barring
that
grading
and
some
of
the
access
conditions
that
other
panelists
have
mentioned,
I
think
they're.
You
know
they're
starting
to
be
nicely
developed.
A
I,
just
I
think
there
is
a
substantial
lack
of
recreational
amenity
space
within
the
project.
Currently
so
you
know,
while
it
goes
to
others
to
analyze
the
actual
amenity
space
square
footage
I
think
the
panel's
points
are
clear
on
that
from
all
panelists
saying
you
know
we're
missing
that
component
within
the
current
plan
that
we
have
before
us
I'd
like
to
ask
the
question
related
to
that
is.
A
If
we
could
go
to
and
I
apologize,
I
don't
know
the
exhibit,
but
the
exhibit
that
shows
the
overall
connectivity
to
the
the
surrounding
trail
system.
O
A
Okay,
can
you
walk
me
through
because
I
think
one
of
the
questions
we
had
was
you
know
better
connectivity
to
the
surrounding
and
access
yeah
I
feel
like.
There
are
some
pieces
that
are
still
missing.
I.
Think
I
heard
in
your
presentation
that
you
talked
about
a
shared
use
Trail
along
the
roadway
at
the
entry
I'm,
not
seeing
I
see
how
the
one
oh
gosh
I'm
gonna
have
that
proposed
Trail,
that's
kind
of
looping
around.
How
is
this
all
connected?
A
N
O
O
Oh
yeah,
so
so
from
a
campus
standpoint,
a
shuttle
will
be
provided.
There
will
be
three
bus
stops
they're
not
identified
on
this
plan.
They
are
shown
I
think
on
maybe
the
next
sheet,
one
of
them
on
the
southern
portion,
two
on
the
Northern
portion.
Those
are
alongside
the
sidewalk
system.
O
Sidewalk
system-
that's
proposed
here,
is
highlighted
in
Orange,
which
is
what
provides
The
Pedestrian
connectivity
throughout,
not
just
phase
one,
but
then
also
what
we're
talking
about
here
with
the
purpose-built
student
housing
on
both
the
North
and
the
South,
so
coming
from
campus
you'd
be
able
to
ride
the
bus
to
get
off
at
one
of
the
stops
closest
to
your
to
your
respective
home
and
and
walk
to
to
your
your
unit.
O
J
A
So
sorry,
is
that
a
shared
use
path
and
like
what
are
the
dimensions?
What's
the
what's,
the
is
it
along
the
full
Frontage
of
the
project
site.
O
A
O
So
so
it
will
be
within
the
asphalt.
So
it's
not
a
shared
use.
Path
off
behind
the
curve.
I
think
is
what
you're
alluding
to
it
will
be
a
striped
Lane
within
us
one
part
way
or
roadway
paved
roadway.
It
will
go
the
length
of
the
full
Frontage
so
from
kind
of
center
of
the
page.
Here
the
whole
way
up
through
to
where
it
starts
saying
Washington
along
that
Frontage,
it
will
be
I,
believe
it's
four
or
five
feet
in
width.
O
Sh
has
a
standard
off
the
top
of
my
head.
Don't
recall
what
that
is,
but
it
will
be
proposed
to
meet
Sha's
bicycle
compatibility
standards.
A
O
O
So
they'll
be
striping,
there'll,
be
a
little
a
little
paint
bicycle
marking
that
you
see,
as
you
drive
around
state
roads.
A
Okay
and
then
moving
on
from
that
just
I,
you
know
it's
hard
to
read
this.
So
that's
part
of
the
problem,
the
proposed
trails
that
are
in
the
reddish
color.
How
do
those
are
those
proposed
by
the
project
and
how
do
those
connect
in
I
there's
a
segment
there
on
the
west
side
that
I'm,
not
sure
I,
even
see
how
it
connects
in.
O
O
Actually
that
that
has
since
been
removed
based
on
phase
one
approvals
and
processing
the
the
connection
to
Mabel.
Excuse
me
that
will
connect
down
to
Randall
Avenue,
though.
N
There
was
a
board
of
appeals
decision
and
the
agreement
was
to
remove
that
loop
trail
that
comes
feeds
into
Randall,
Avenue,
okay,.
A
See
it
okay,
thank
you
for
that
clarification.
It
looks
like
some
so
my
next
question
and
is
you
know
for
the
townhouse
architecture?
A
Can
you
walk
me
through
that
because
I'm
not
clear
on
the
exhibits
and
you
know,
and
how
and
how
we
are
to
evaluate
that,
given
the
the
directive
from
the
bill
that
that
I
mentioned
bill,
661-21.
A
And
how
we're
to
review
it?
So
can
you
walk
us
through
the
architecture?
Specifically,
you
know
the
plans
on
who
these
are
geared
towards.
You
know:
are
they
for
faculty
I'd
love
that
answered
definitively
by
the
presenters
so
that
we
all
heard
that
last
time
so
I
think
we
need
to
understand.
You
know
if,
if
these
are
geared
towards
students,
if
there
is
some
idea
that
faculty
will
be
present
or
these
will
be
marketed
to
faculty,
how
will
these
operate
and
walk
us
through
that
for
the
record.
R
I'll,
just
briefly
State
as
the
representative
of
the
team
that
you
know
we're
going
to
get
a
management
company
in
obviously
the
definition
of
a
purpose-built
student
housing,
as
Mr
McAuliffe
pointed
out
just
like
the
definition
of
a
dormitory,
is
to
be
designed
and
marketed
for
housing
of
students,
both
undergraduate
and
graduate
resident,
counselors
or
advisors.
If
somebody
from
a
zoning
determining
Factor
decides,
resident,
counselors
or
advisors
constitutes
faculty,
then
we
may
very
well
Market
to
them.
R
If
there's
a
termination
that
it
does
not
constitute
faculty,
we
would
only
Market
to
undergraduate
and
graduate
students
there's
way
more
capacity.
It
needs
to
be
served
with
undergraduate
and
graduate
students.
Then
we
can
possibly
address
on
this
site,
so
we
are
comfortable
that
that
will
be
sufficient,
but
if
there's
a
way
to
make
it
work
where
faculty
might
be
able
to
benefit
as
well,
we
would
certainly
Endeavor
to
do
that.
I,
don't
know
that
that
has
a
lot
to
do
with
design
versus
being
a
zoning
or
use
issue.
But
that
is
the
plan.
A
Think
you
know
I
mean
this.
Is
you
know,
there's
I
think
it's
well
I
mean
in
my
read
of
it.
It's
pretty
clear,
I'm
sure
you
can
argue
the
point,
but
I
do
think
that
that
slides
into
you
know
other
other
review
categories
than
in
other
requirements.
A
So
I
would
say
honestly
I,
as
the
chair
currently
I
would
say
that
if
that
is
the
case,
we
may
need
to
call
it
back
to
the
DRP,
because
that
changes
quite
a
number
of
the
requirements
that
we
would
be
asked
to
look
at
I
do
have
a
question.
If
we
can
go
to
the
townhouse
elevations,
do
we
have
you
know
front
side,
rear
elevations,
because
I
thought
I
only
saw
the
front
elevations.
O
Sorry
to
interrupt
page
what
you're
looking
at
there
is
a
front
I
think
71
has
a
rear.
73
has
the
sides.
O
That's
on
the
what
I'll
call
the
northern
ones
then
going
down
to
84
are
the
Southern
ones
on
the
11..
84
is
the
front
this.
The
rear
is
92
and
then
the
sides
are
a
95
94.
O
A
Okay,
you
know
I,
so
I,
guess
and
Jennifer.
We
may
need
to
weigh
in
on
this
I'm.
You
know
I'm
used
to
the
pattern
mucks
having
to
include
these.
You
know
kind
of
elevations
and
I
I
know
that
we're
seeing
them
now
that
I
don't
think
we've
fully
reviewed
those
prior,
so
I
guess
I
have
a
couple
I'll
just
to
the
comments
that
I'm,
seeing
or
I'll
relate
my
my
comments
to
those
drawings
that
I'm
seeing
tonight.
A
One
is
the
The
Staggering
of
the
units,
so
they're
Frontage
steps
back
and
forth
back
and
forth
back
and
forth.
I
think
it
would
be
much
more
appropriate
to,
for
example,
step
in
logical
groupings
so
that
you
know
the
ends
of
the
units
protrude
forward,
step
forward
at
the
center
units
step
back
more
like
what
you
would
see
in
traditional
neighborhood
planning,
rather
than
the
staggered
approach
that
you
see
in
Suburban
development.
A
I,
think
you
know
it's
it's
trying
to
digest
this
all
I
think
the
materiality
that
I'm
seeing
here
are,
in
the
other
comments
from
Mr,
Stevens
and
others
of
other
brick.
I
think
seems
appropriate
and
relates
the
townhouse
architecture
to
the
multi-family
architecture,
so
I
think
that's
fine.
I
do
think
that
reloading
those
creates
a
better
approach
on
Avalon,
Ridge
Boulevard.
A
You
know
I,
think
the
so
my
ologist
summarized
for
my
other
panelists
I
know
somebody's
been
keeping
track
of
all
the
bullet
points
to
make
a
motion,
but
I'll
summarize
Mine
by
saying
the
open
space
beyond
the
you
know,
accessibility
and
Grading.
Other
members
have
mentioned
just
the
lack
of
recreational
amenity
space
for
the
user
group
is
notable
the
connectivity
overall
on
the
site.
I
am
not.
You
know
convinced
that
a
bike
lane
on
Route
1,
that's
striped,
only
that's
not
buffered,
some
other
way.
A
That's
only
four
to
five
feet
wide
either
case
for
two-way
traffic,
for
cyclists
riding
both
to
and
from
the
development
is
not
adequate
and
then
the
townhouse
you
know,
Frontage
to
step
in
more
appropriate
ways
to
meet.
The
you
know
is
Frontage
as
well
as
connectivity
to
the
street.
Sidewalks
should
be
investigated.
A
The
I
guess
the
other
point
is
I,
do
have
as
a
note.
I
have
hesitation
on
the
offering
these
units
to
faculty
when,
at
least
by
my
read
the
language
is
fairly
clear.
As
already
read
read
out
that
if
these
are
marketed
to
faculty,
I
think
we
would
have
to
look
at.
A
We
would
have
to
look
back
at
this
project
again
so
I
I
mean
those
are
some
critical
points
that
I
have
and
I'll
I'll
go
back
to
the
rest
of
the
panelists
and
ask
if
one
of
one
of
my
colleagues
has
had
a
chance
to
note
down
the
various
concerns
they
could
put
forth
emotion.
A
M
Okay,
so
as
part
of
this
design
team
we've
been
pulling
together
this
package
since
a
month
or
two
before
October,
we
put
together
a
very
thoughtful
package
which
was
submitted
and
reviewed
at
the
October
meeting.
We
got
several
comments
that
we
believe
we
adequately
responded
to.
M
A
I'm
gonna
have
to
this
again
is
moving
into
the
territory
of
Defense,
rather
than
just
explanation
of
the
process.
So
unless
there
is
a
specific,
you
know,
question
that
you're
answering
or
further
information,
that's
being
provided,
I
I
can't
let
you
continue,
especially
since
you've
refused.
A
Yeah,
we'll
be
we'll
be
clear
in
the
motion.
Thank
you.
Okay.
So,
with
that
I'm
going
to
turn
back
to
the
panelists
and
ask
if
there
is
one
of
the
panelists
who
can
move
a
motion,
you
can
start
in.
You
know,
barring
that
I
will
ask
for
us
to
succinctly:
go
around
and
additively
combine
with
and
I
will
tag
one
of
my
fellow
panelists
to
make
a
motion.
A
Thank
you,
Mr
Stevens,
go
ahead,
I'll,
take
notes
and
well
we'll
add
in
anything
that
we
you.
A
I'm,
sorry,
can
you
state
with
your
motion
clearly,
since
we
didn't
do
that
last
time?
If
this
is
approve
approve
with
conditions,
read
our
resubmit
required.
L
So
you
know,
based
on
that
and
and
and
my
comments,
a
bullet
point
one.
The
public
amenity
between
A
and
B
needs
to
be
re-evaluated
and
re-studied
and
to
really
produce
a
more
detail
on
the
the
retaining
walls
and
the
ramps
and
the
steps
and
Etc
just
just
mainly
in
that
North
northeast
corner
of
A
and
B
on
the
building,
the
public
amenity
space
between
C
and
D.
L
That
really
needs
to
be
three
studies.
A
lot
that's
just
way
too
small.
L
E
L
The
exterior
elevations
for
buildings,
a
b
c
and
d,
the
main
entry
Gable
surface,
should
be
a
thin
set.
Brick,
not
vinyl
siding
and
the
balance
of
the
brick,
which
is
indicated
by
number
22,
23
and
24.,
should
be
a
brick
veneer.
L
And
that's
addresses
my
concerns
now
I
I
guess
others
can
add
to
that
like
please.
A
Yeah
I
think
we're
gonna
need
to
go
around
so
Mr
Stevens,
because
we
need
one
person
to
make
a
motion
I'm
going
to
ask
you
to
keep
a
log
of
these
I'm
gonna.
You
know
go
around
as
quickly
as
we
can
and
if
you
can
add
to
the
three
that
you
mentioned
and
add
in
any
additional
or
we'll
start
or
we'll
continue
with
this
sauce.
If
you
can
add
your
I
think
you
had
maybe
was
four
bullet
points.
K
I,
don't
believe,
there's
adequate
lighting,
so
I
would
ask
for
more
lighting
information.
A
Yeah
I
do
I
mean
on
that
last
point:
I
think
that
falls
in
other
folks
purview.
You
know
the
wetlands
encroachment
will
be
reviewed
outside
of
this
panel.
Okay,
as
well
as
the
you're
saying,
specifically
the
encroachment
on
the
Water
Tower
or
any
fall
zone.
Etc
that
that
was
so
I
would
say
should
probably
strike
that
one
from
the
motion
sure:
okay,
okay,
Mr
Sharma,.
A
Okay,
so
those
are
redundant,
not
new,
very
good.
Okay,
Mr
Reynolds.
C
Thanks
Cecily
a
couple
here:
I
think
they
need
to
provide
final
grading
information
related
to
the
building
entries
at
buildings,
A
and
B.
To
clearly
show
accessibility
or,
if
there's
a
need
for
walls
or
stairs
at
open
space
c
and
d.
A
ramp
should
be
provided
to
the
the
open
space.
C
A
Okay,
thank
you.
Mr
Khan,.
B
Because
I
would
add
that
we
should,
as
part
of
this
motion,
which
we've
listed
as
things
that
are
quite
specific,
that
we
should
incorporate
the
comments
from
the
county.
Yes,
as
part
of
the
motion
and
adopt
their
recommendations,.
A
Or
ped
and
bike
Network
off-site
particularly
to
the
campus,
should
be
adequate
for
the
community.
It
is
serving,
namely
students
that-
and
this
is
really
an
add-on
to
some
of
the
other
comments.
I
guess
what
I
have
is
number
five.
The
open
space
concerns
that
Miss
sauce
noted
that
there
needs
to
be
additional
recreational
amenities
space
in
addition
to
the
what
I'll
call
passive
amenity
space
that
has
been
shown
on
the
site
so
far,.
A
Those
would
be
my
two
sorry
and
then
the
last
one
would
be
the
architecture
for
the
townhouses
be
studied
that
the
Staggering
of
the
elevations
be
rethought
to
to
group
those
stepping
of
the
elevation
so
step
the
elevations
in
groups,
rather
than
stagger
them
one
by
one.
A
So
that's
a
mouthful,
so
I
mean
I,
think
Mr,
Stevens
I,
don't
know
if
those
notes
were
appropriate
enough
or
succinct
enough.
If
you
have,
if
you
have
a
good
list,
if
you
could
read
back
through
that,
I
do
think
you
know.
I
would
start
with
the
suggestion
that
Mr
Khan
said
to
reference
those
comments
that
are
conditions
that
are
in
the
staff
report,
okay
and
then
add
to
the
additional
the
additional
comments.
Yeah.
L
N
L
It's
not
approved
so
the
I
I
I
make
a
motion
that
this
project
is
not
approved
and
number
one
is
to
really
to
incorporate
the
comments
from
the
from
the
staff
report
and
incorporate
that
within
this
document
and
I
guess
the
stock.
L
The
actual
bullet
point
list
number
one
would
be
to
incorporate
a
a
well
to
re-study
the
public
amenity
between
a
and
b
in
a
more
detailed
fashion,
especially
that
that
North
northeast
corner
with
the
retaining
walls
and
and
and
the
ramps
and
the
steps
and
the
ETC
bullet
point
two-
is
to
incorporate
the
public
amenity
space
in
between
C
Building,
C
and
D,
and
and
to
transfer
the
the
public
amenity
to
the
right
of
building
D
and
and
in
between
the
dumpster
into
that
middle
portion
of
the
mid.
L
Number
three,
the
bullet
point
three
is
to
incorporate
the
the
thin
brick
within
the
main
entry,
Gable
and
and
and
and
not
have
it,
be
vinyl
siding
the
balance
of
the
brick
on
the
on
the
building,
a
b
c
and
d,
which
is
items
number
22.
23
and
24
should
be
a
brick.
Veneer
item
bullet
point
number:
four:
the
is
not
adequate
site
lighting
that
and
that
needs
to
be
re-studied
bullet
point
number.
Five.
L
There
should
be
more
centrally
located
green
spaces
throughout
the
site
bullet
point
number:
six:
there
should
be
a
a
final
grading,
a
study
done
which
incorporate
all
the
necessary
retaining
walls
or
stairs
on
the
site
about
bullet
point
number:
seven
there
should
be
an
incorporation
of
the
necessary
ramps.
That's
that's
needed
between
Building,
A
and
B
and
within
the
the
well
between
A
and
B
and
bullet.
L
Point
eight
is
is
to
make
make
sure
that
there's
adequate
sidewalks
throughout
the
the
site
plan
bullet
point
number
nine
to
to
to
confirm
and
verify
all
the
bike,
racks
or
or
located
properly
throughout
the
site
and
and
there's
an
adequate
amount
of
bite.
Racks
number
10.
L
The
the
site,
the
connectivity
of
the
sidewalks,
should
be
updated
and
revised
in
conjunction
with
the
the
necessary
crosswalks
on
the
site.
L
Professionals
again,
number
12.
the
the
sites
that
connect
all
the
bike
paths
and
and
the
bike
neck
network
between
the
Camille,
the
the
community
and
the
students
bullet.
Point
number
13..
L
There
is
a
need
to
add
additional
recreational
space
on
the
site
and
that's
it
be
really
studied
bullet
point
number
14
and
the
final
bullet
point
unless
number
14..
A
A
A
Okay,
so
I
do
think:
does
that
clarify
that
Jennifer.
I
A
Think
the
list
was
fairly
clear,
I'm
sure
they
you
know,
some
of
the
comments
could
be
Consolidated.
You
know
the
open
space
or
amenity
space
comments
could
be
Consolidated,
but
I
think
that
is
a
fairly
succinct
and
thoroughless.
Thank
you,
Mr
Stevens,
for
putting
that
together.
If
there's
no
other
clarification
needed
by
staff,
we'll
move,
but
just
ask
Jennifer
Marta.
If
there's
any
further
clarification
needed.
N
A
Okay,
and
and
with
that,
there
is
a
motion
on
the
floor
with
those
items.
14
items
as
part
of
the
motion
and
I'll
ask
for
a
call.
A
A
Okay
hearing
none
I
will
put
the
motion
on
the
floor.
All
those
in
favor
say
aye.