►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
List
and
comment
on
National
register
nominations.
Additionally,
we
are
charged
with
evaluating
submissions
to
the
Baltimore
County
historic's
tax
credit
program
that
encourages
the
appropriate
maintenance
and
renovation
of
designated
historic
properties
with
the
Commissioners.
Please
introduce
themselves
by
name
and
County
Council,
District
or
representation.
We
can
go
in
the
order
listed
on
the
PowerPoint
screen.
E
A
I
B
A
The
landmarks
preservation
commission
operates
under
the
authority
standards
and
requirements
of
Title
VII
article
32
of
the
Baltimore
County
code.
We
refer
to
the
United
States
Secretary
of
the
Interior
standards
for
rehabilitation
as
administered
by
the
National
Park
Service.
This
is
the
accepted
National
Standard
for
historic
preservation
projects,
our
own,
our
own
Baltimore,
County,
historic
preservation,
design
guidelines
directly
references,
fourth
rate,
the
Secretary
of
interior
standards
for
rehabilitation.
A
We
have
important
preservation
issues
to
discuss
and
debate
at
each
meeting.
If
you
would
like
to
make
comments,
please
limit
your
comments
to
the
specific
application
or
proposal
submission
being
viewed.
We
ask
for
your
assistance
and
understanding
so
that
the
discussions
do
not
digress
as
an
additional
comment.
We
can
all
agree
that
historic
preservation
is
an
important
aspect
of
the
quality
of
life
and
place
that
makes
Baltimore
County
unique.
A
As
a
commission,
we
seek
to
recommend
significant
buildings
in
places
for
landmark
consideration
to
the
County
Council
for
their
final
vote
as
Commissioners.
We
serve
on
the
commission
due
to
our
expertise,
interest
and
passion
for
historic
buildings
and
places
and
review
submissions
based
solely
on
their
Merit.
While
we
may
disagree
in
discussion
voting,
we
continue
to
be
a
collegial
body
that
respects
each
other
personally
and
professionally.
A
E
Just
for
those
who
are
attending
as
applicants
or
members
of
the
public,
when
it's
your
item
or
proposal
that
is
up
stat,
there
are
two
ways
you
can
offer.
Comments
is
by
selecting
by
using
the
chat
feature
by
selecting
host
and
just
send
your
comments
and
you'd
like
to
speak
or
just
if
you
don't
want
to
speak
it
just
send
it.
E
Send
me
your
comment
and
I'll:
read
it
aloud
or
you
can
raise
or
you
can
select
the
raise
your
hand
icon,
which
is
next
to
your
name
and
that'll
alert
me
that
you
would
like
to
speak.
E
In
addition,
the
information
that's
presented
in
this
PowerPoint
is
just
an
overview
of
information
that
was
included
in
all
of
the
applications.
The
LBC
members
are
all
receive
all
of
the
applications
and
everything
that
was
submitted
a
week
prior
to
the
meeting
for
their
review.
So
the
information
in
this
PowerPoint
is
just
used
as
a
summary
to
help
move
the
meeting
along
in
an
organized
manner.
B
E
A
H
E
Dustin,
as
you
get,
who
who
stated
the
motion
and
who
gave
it
Chris.
A
Good
good,
okay,
again
with
Motion
in
front
of
us
Jessica,
could
you
ask
for
The
Voice
vote.
A
J
We
have
agenda
item
number
four:
the
Rocksmith
property
located
at
317
West
Seminary
Avenue
in
Lutherville,
County,
Council,
District
number
three.
This
is
a
non-contributing
structure
in
the
Lutherville
County
historic
district
and
the
owners
would
like
to
make
an
in-kind
asphalt.
Roof
replacement.
J
J
Next
is
agenda
item
number:
nine:
the
overact
property
company
located
at
4832
Butler
Road
in
Glendon,
County,
Council
District
three.
This
is
a
non-contributing
structure
in
the
Glendon
County
historic
district
for
a
commercial
sign
installation
number
10
the
monologue,
LLC
property
located
at
209
Central
Avenue
in
Glendon,
County,
Council,
District
3..
This
is
a
contributing
structure
in
the
Glendon
County
historic
district
myth
number
2210
and
the
owner
would
like
to
create
three
new
window:
openings
remove
and
infill
an
existing
replacement
window
on
the
rear
elevation.
A
Thank
you,
commission
members.
Are
we
all
okay
with
with
the
consent
agenda,
or
does
anybody
have
any
questions
about
any
of
those
items.
K
K
A
Sorry,
okay,
welcome
to
both
of
you.
Thank
you
for
me
and
I
also
approve
it.
So
the
consent
agenda
passes
right
all
right.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
and
then
we
will
con
continue
with
the
the
regular
agenda.
The
final
actions
summaries,
so
that
will
be
the
first
one
will
be
number
five.
Yes,.
J
This
is
the
Keras
property
located
at
504
sudbrook
Lane
in
sudbrook
Park
County
Council
District
number
two.
This
is
a
contributing
structure
in
the
Sudbury
Park
County,
historic
district
and
National
register
historic
district.
The
owner
wishes
to
replace
all
22
windows
on
the
first
second
and
attic
stories
of
the
home,
as
well
as
replace
the
existing
front
entry
door.
Work
item
number
one.
It's
for
the
first
and
second
story
window
replacements.
The
existing
windows
are
vinyl
windows
and
we're
installed
around
1970.
J
The
owner
wishes
to
replace
10
existing
vinyl
windows
on
the
first
store
and
eight
windows
on
the
second
store,
with
new
Marvin
four
over
one
simulated,
divided
light
wood
windows
with
exterior
aluminum
plotting
the
applicant
notes
that
all
the
existing
window
frames
are
the
same
size
except
the
two
smaller
windows
on
the
right
side
elevation.
However,
the
windows
on
the
first
floor
are
two
one
to
two
inches
smaller
than
those
on
the
Second
Story
all
proposed
replacement
windows
will
be
the
same
size
and
will
fit
into
the
existing
frames.
J
The
applicant
referenced
several
neighboring
neighboring
homes
in
sudbrook
park
that
have
original
divide
lights
and
notes
that
the
addition
of
the
lights
would
be
more
in
keeping
with
the
original
Windows
of
the
home.
The
original
Windows
style
is
unknown.
Work
item
two
attic
story:
window
replacements
applicant
wishes
to
replace
the
casement
windows
in
the
Attic
Story,
the
two
gable
end
windows
and
two
in
the
shed
Dormer
on
the
right
roof
slope.
J
The
applicant
notes
that
the
existing
Windows
appear
to
be
original
to
the
home,
as
they
are
simple
wood
hinged
frames
from
a
photo
that
staff
has
provided
from
their
files.
A
four
light
casement
can
be
seen
on
the
front
Gable
end
in
2010
from
the
photos
that
the
applicant
provided.
It
appears
that
the
glass
may
have
been
replaced.
Staff
noticed
what
appears
to
be
would
filler
where
the
mountains
may
have
been
removed.
There
are
no
existing
screens
in
the
windows
and
are
actively
linking
and
lead
lead.
Paint
has
been
detected.
J
The
owner
wishes
to
replace
them
with
four
light:
sdl
casement
windows.
However,
the
owner
is
willing
to
have
the
lead
paint
removed
from
the
windows
re-glaze
and
repair.
The
wrong
wood
framing
if
necessary,
work
item
number
three
is
for
the
replacement
of
the
existing
front
entry
door.
The
owner
wishes
to
replace
the
entry
door
and
security
doors
with
an
Upstate
door,
90
inches
by
36
inches
wood
door
containing
three
lights
over
two
vertical
panels.
Without
the
dential
Shelf,
the
applicant
notes
that
the
condition
of
the
existing
door
is
fine.
J
However,
the
accident
feels
that
the
proposed
replacement
would
be
more
in
keeping
with
the
original
home
staff
has
no
issues
with
the
removal
of
the
security
door
as
it
is
not
compatible
with
the
house.
The
existing
front
door
appears
to
be
an
earlier
replacement
from
the
1930s
or
1940s.
The
colonial
style
does
fit
into
the
vernacular
style
of
the
house,
and
staff
doesn't
necessarily
see
the
need
to
replace
it.
J
If
it's
in
good
condition,
the
proposed
replacement
door
cell
is
more
of
a
Craftsman
Bungalow
Style,
with
two
vertical
panels
and
lights
on
the
top
quarter
of
the
door
and
doesn't
fit
with
the
vernacular
summer.
House
staff
has
included
some
information
on
door
styles
for
the
commission
reference
in
their
meeting
materials
packet.
Our
design
guidelines
state
that
existing
or
original
doors
are
to
be
repaired,
and
if
it
is
deteriorated,
Beyond
repair,
then
the
replacement
must
be
in
kind
and
where
a
historic
or
original
door
has
been
previously
replaced
with
a
historically
inappropriate
door.
J
It
should
be
replaced
with
a
more
appropriate
door
style
staff
feels
the
replacement
door
cell
does
not
adhere
to
our
design.
Guidelines
does
not
recommend
approval
of
that
style.
However,
staff
is
happy
to
assist
the
homeowner
in
selecting
a
more
appropriate
door
style
for
the
house
in
the
Historic.
District
staff
would
like
to
note
that
the
subrick
park
landmarks
committee
have
reviewed
is
in
support
of
the
project
as
proposed
a
letter
indicating
this
was
included
in
your
meeting
materials
packet.
J
So
staff
recommendations
are
as
follows:
to
vote
a
to
vote
to
issue
a
certificate
of
appropriateness
for
work
item
one
and
two,
as
proposed
vote
to
issue
a
certificate
of
appropriateness
for
the
removal
of
the
security
door
as
proposed,
but
to
not
issue
a
certificate
of
appropriateness
or
notice
to
proceed
for
the
replacement
of
a
front
door
and
sites,
Baltimore,
County,
historic
design,
guidelines,
windows
and
doors
pages,
one
through
eight
county
code
sections
327405.
J
E
To
comment
yes,
Tina
carrises
online
phenomena,
you're
unmuted,
Miss
Karis.
Yes,
thank.
N
I
would
appreciate
some
guidance
on
the
door
selection
to
as
to
something
that
would
be
more
appropriate,
but
I
would
love
to
change
the
door
as
is,
and
I
was
not
clear
on
the
recommendation
for
the
third
floor
windows.
E
Yeah
so
stop
recommended
approval
for
both
window.
The
main
house
windows
and
the
attic
stories.
N
Oh
great,
okay,
thank
you
yeah!
So
that's
great!
If
I,
if
you
could
help
me
with
an
appropriate
door
selection
that
would
be
terrific.
A
And
I
I
believe
we
can
aren't
there
some
guidelines
that
you
can
forward
to
them
to
her
Caitlyn
and
Jessica.
If
it
would.
E
A
I
I
think,
if
the,
if
the
commissioner
is
willing
to
make
this
promotion,
that
we
would
consent
to
the
recommendations
and
then
also
delegate
Authority
for
Action
to
our
professional
staff,
Caitlin
and
Jessica
for
the
door,
perhaps
with
one
one.
Commissioner,
added
to
that
to
break
a
tie,
you
have
three
people.
You.
E
Can
go
to
an
issue,
a
certificate
of
appropriateness,
with
the
condition
that
the
final
door
style
exactly
with
staff
and
and
then
the
updated
design
will
be
sent
to
us
prior
to.
A
Yes,
precisely
what
I'm
suggesting
yes,
so
so,
first,
though
Commissioners
any
questions
or
thoughts,
any.
G
Yeah
I
just
had
a
question
about
the
condition
of
the
existing
door.
That
you're
wanting
to
replace
is.
Is
that
a
factor
in
why
you're
wanting
to
replace
it
or
is
it
more
a
style
issue.
N
L
B
N
A
Next
door,
so
any
other
questions.
Commissioners.
A
G
Yeah
I'll
offer
emotions
so
I
offer,
and
so
I
reckon
make
a
motion
to
vote
to
issue
a
certificate
of
properties
for
work
item
one
and
two,
as
proposed
vote
to
issue
a
certificate
of
appropriateness
for
the
removal.
The
security
door
is
proposed
and
vote
to
issue
a
certificate
of
appropriateness
for
the
replacement
of
the
front
door,
on
the
condition
that
the
style
is
approved
by
staff.
A
Sec.
Okay,
thank
you.
Thank
you.
Ed,
thank
you
Phoebe.
Then
we
can
do
a
roll
call
vote.
Could
you
call
out
Jessica
Phoebe.
H
D
J
A
And
Miss
Karis
thank
you
for
being
with
us
tonight,
and
the
staff
will
be
in
touch
with
you
going
forward
on
the
door.
Thank.
J
Agenda
item
number
six:
this
is
the
colic
property
at
9301
old,
Harford
Road
in
Parkville,
County
Council,
District
number
three.
This
is
a
final
landmark
number
244,
Club,
Hill
House
and
the
property
owner
is
proposing
to
expand
a
portion
of
an
existing
one-story
board
in
Baton
1970s
kitchen
Edition,
located
on
the
Southeast
Corner.
This
proposal
originally
came
before
the
commission
at
the
April
14
2022
meeting
of
the
LPC.
J
The
LBC
voted
to
not
issue
a
certificate
of
appropriateness
or
knows
to
proceed
for
the
April
2022
proposal,
as
they
felt
the
design
did
not
need
our
design
guidelines
and
asked
for
better
drawings,
more
photos
and
an
improved
site
plan
to
help
them
Orient
themselves.
With
the
property
and
structure,
the
commission
and
staff
provide
the
following
comments:
to
drop
the
roof
height
slightly
and
setting
the
bill.
J
The
building
line
back
from
the
historic
stone
block
of
the
house
aligning
Windows,
reducing
the
number
of
Windows,
a
labeled
site
plan
that
shows
all
structures,
property
lines,
streets,
neighboring
houses,
location
of
the
proposed
Edition
location
of
driveways
photographs
that
clearly
show
the
entire
structure.
Clearly,
labeled
elevation,
drawings
and
plans
that
show
existing
or
proposed
conditions
that
show
the
entire
structure.
The
applicant
has
returned
to
the
commission
with
revised
plans
and
additional
photos
that
address
the
commissions
and
staff's
Commons
from
April
2022..
J
The
proposal
is
extending
the
footprint
of
the
existing
Edition
and
adding
a
second
Story.
The
addition
will
consist
of
a
mud,
room
and
staircase
on
the
first
floor
and
storage
on
the
second,
it
will
be
clad
with
three
fourths
pressure
treated
plywood
with
one
by
one
strips
to
create
a
board
and
bottom
pattern
to
match
the
existing
irregular
pattern.
On
the
first
and
second
Stories,
the
proposed
windows
are
six
over
six
double
hung:
Pella
black
aluminum,
clad,
divided
lights.
The
window
style
will
match
the
others
on
this
Edition.
J
The
applicant
wishes
to
add
a
salvage
Schoolhouse
Bell
on
the
Block
standing
seam
metal
roof.
The
existing
entry
door
will
be
reused.
The
overall
roof
height
has
been
dropped
by
eight
inches
and
is
set
back
from
the
building
line
of
the
historic
Stone
portion.
The
drop
can
be
seen
in
the
proposed
South
elevation
drawings,
but
not
the
north
and
east
elevations.
It
appears
that
the
drop
is
only
on
the
rear
and
not
the
front.
The
number
of
Windows
have
been
reduced
on
the
East
Elevation
from
two
on
each
floor.
J
To
one
on
each
floor,
the
north
elevation
window
was
moved
to
the
first
floor
and
aligned
with
the
other
windows
on
the
existing
structure.
The
rear,
The,
Irregular,
board
and
batten
spacing
will
be
matched
on
the
proposed
Edition
staff
notes.
The
way
the
structure
is
oriented
on
the
property.
The
location
of
the
addition
on
the
Southeast
corner
is
facing
away
from
old
Harford
Road.
The
most
visible
portion
of
the
house
is
the
northwest
corner.
J
The
proposed
editions,
location
and
heavy
tree
cover,
depending
on
the
time
of
the
year,
will
it
will
not
be
very
visible
from
the
public
right
away.
Staff
is
accepting
of
the
general
location
of
the
addition,
as
it
is:
an
expansion
of
an
existing
Edition
staff
notes
that
while
The
Irregular
pattern,
bored
and
Badness
not
typical
and
looks
out
of
place,
the
pattern
is
following
what
already
exists.
Staff
encourages
the
commission
to
discuss
the
roof
height
drop,
which
only
appears
to
be
on
the
rear
roof
slope,
not
the
entire
roof.
J
In
addition,
Steph
encourages
the
commission
to
discuss
the
visibility
of
the
addition
and
take
that
into
consideration.
When
making
a
decision,
staff
recommends
to
vote
to
issue
a
certificate
of
appropriateness
or
notice
to
proceed,
citing
Baltimore
County
historic
design,
guidelines,
additions
and
infill
Page
Three
county
code,
section
3207405.
A
Thank
you.
Jessica
is
Mr
Miss
Kulik
with
us.
A
C
One
of
the
comments
that
I
had
was
I
do
see.
I
think
I
see
the
drop
in
of
eight
inches
in
both
front
and
back,
but
because
it's
so
minimal,
it's
really
hard
to
see.
C
If
you
compare
the
two
that
it
is
shown
that
it's
dropping
from
the
existing
Ridge
line,
it's
just
really
minimal
and
that's
why
it's
hard
to
tell
and
I
I
guess:
I
just
wanted
to
bring
up
the
fact
that
the
addition
is,
although
it's
building
on
the
on
the
existing
Edition,
that
is
there
it's
starting
to
compete
with
that
volume,
the
stone
volume
and,
though
there's
an
attempt
to
reduce
the
roof
height.
It's
just
not
not
enough.
C
Eight
inches
does
not
seem
like
enough,
especially
I'm
thinking
when
you're
in
the
fields
and
you're
trying
to
line
up
things
you
it
might
end
up
being
even
less
than
that,
but
also
the
fact
that
the
cupola
now
really
competes
in
height
with
the
existing
Stone
chimney.
So
maybe,
if
there's
a
consideration
to
to
lessen
the
roof
by
a
little
bit
more
and
also
remove
the
cupola,
not
not
have
it
be
there.
I
don't
know.
K
H
M
Just
going
back
to
the
reasoning
for
dropping
the
the
roof
line
that
was
to
distinguish
that
from
the
original
roof.
Is
that
yeah
and
my
my
guess
is
that
if
you
drop
it
anymore,
that
it
makes
the
interior
spaces
largely
inhabitable
uninhabitable
or
not
not
very
useful,
I
I
I'm
just
wondering
whether
that's
something
that's
really!
That's
significant,
for
you
know,
I.
M
Think
that
what's
visible
on
the
on
the
house
is
the
the
front
of
it
where
you
see
the
addition
and
the
separation
of
the
stone
and
I'm
not
sure
that
there's
a
significant
value
to
that
on
the
on
the
rear,
but
I'm,
you
know
I'm.
Certainly
no,
you
know
not.
M
A
D
J
This
is
located
at
510
sudbrook
Lane
in
sudbrook,
Park,
County,
Council,
District
number,
two,
it's
a
contributing
structure
in
the
sudbrook
Park
County,
historic
district
and
suburb
Park
National
register
historic
district.
The
homeowner
would
like
to
remove
an
existing
12
by
18
ground
level
deck
and
replace
it
with
a
new
20
by
30
deck,
elevated
eight
feet
above
ground
with
the
underneath
portion
of
the
deck
to
be
used
for
parking.
The
deck
is
to
be
located
off
the
rear
of
the
home,
which
sits
on
an
approximately
1.2
acre
lot.
J
J
In
addition,
the
commission
felt
that
the
February
submission
had
insufficient
information
and
asked
that
the
application
the
applique
provide
the
following
items
when
the
proposal
returns
a
complete
site
plan
to
show
existing
and
proposed
property
conditions,
including
all
driveways
walkways
structures,
property
lines
and
streets,
complete
elevation
drawings
that
fully
show
the
proposal
and
its
relationship
to
the
main
house
and
additional
information
on
how
the
proposal
is
consistent.
With
the
district,
a
simple
site
plan
was
included
as
well
as
engineering
plans
that
show
partial,
elevations
and
photos
simulated
renderings.
J
The
current
proposal
is
identical
to
the
previous
submission
in
size
and
location.
However,
from
the
submitted
renderings,
the
proposed
side
in
color
and
material
has
been
updated
to
match
the
existing
color
of
the
main
house
using
shingles
instead
of
flatness
staff
notes.
Some
inconsistencies
between
the
engineering
drawings,
the
simulated,
renderings
and
materials
list
submitted.
The
details
from
the
engineering
drawings
include,
the
deck
structure
will
be
constructed
of
pressure,
treated
pine,
adjustable
steel,
Jack
posts
and
PT
glue
on
beams
with
concrete
footings.
Asphalt
will
be
laid
at
the
base's
support
vehicle
storage.
J
The
size
will
be
sheathed
in
plywood
covered
with
lettuce
on
three
sides,
and
three
entry
doors
will
be
placed
on
the
front
facade.
The
proposed
height
of
the
deck
is
eight
feet
with
an
additional
three
feet:
deck
railing
for
a
total
height
of
11
feet.
The
deck
floor
will
be
covered
with
composite
decking
board
material.
J
The
applicant
did
not
provide
a
clear
narrative
description
of
the
proposed
work
that
outlines
the
correct,
exterior
material
information.
The
list
provided
and
the
information
on
the
simulated
photo
renderings
are
not
consistent.
Staff
asked
the
commission
to
clarify
the
exterior
materials
that
the
applicant
is
proposing
and
that
they
are
updated
on
the
plans
to
reflect
what
is
to
be
built.
J
The
Sudbury
Park
landmarks
committee
has
reviewed
the
proposal
and
raised
several
concerns
on
the
structure,
size
and
compatibility
with
the
neighborhood
and
historic
home,
but
some
of
these
were
addressed
via
email
and
they
unanimously
voted
to
support
the
project.
A
copy
of
this
letter
was
included
in
your
meeting
materials
packet
overall
staff
is
accepting
of
the
general
location
and
appreciates
that
is
not
directly
connected
to
the
house.
The
exterior
material
change
from
lattice
to
shingles
is
a
great
Improvement.
J
However,
staff
still
has
concerns
over
the
size
and
feels
that
more
elevation,
drawings
and
more
details
are
needed.
A
garage
or
deck
of
this
size
is
not
tip
typical
in
suburb
Park,
since
the
construction
is
in
close
proximity
to
the
house,
elevation
drawings
should
show
the
proposed
structure
and
its
relationship
to
the
existing
house.
Staff
would
like
to
see
a
rendering
of
the
proposed
structure
as
seen
from
the
front
or
the
street.
The
photo
simulations
make
it
seem
like
it
will
be
visible
through
the
side
porch.
J
In
addition,
staff
has
concerns
not
necessarily
an
LPC
issue
over
potential
runoff
from
the
interior
asphalt
floor,
since
it
has
a
deck
flooring.
Water
will
trickle
down
to
the
interior.
The
potential
runoff
could
impact
the
main
House's
foundation
and
cause
water
issues
to
the
sides
of
the
structure
itself.
The
LPC
in
the
past
is
less
stringent
in
its
review
of
deaths
because
they
are
considered
to
be
reversible,
as
stated
in
our
design,
guidelines,
fences
and
Landscapes
page
four
decks
are
generally
open
and
simple
structures.
J
However,
this
is
more
substantial
and
feels
more
permanent
than
a
typical
debt
if
it
is
closed
off
and
will
have
an
asphalt,
4
and
should
be
viewed
as
an
accessory
structure
rather
than
a
deck
staff,
urges
the
commission
to
discuss
the
structure,
size
and
compatibility
with
the
district
as
well
confirmed.
The
proposed
materials
staff
recommendation
is
to
vote
to
not
issue
a
certificate
of
a
program
is
or
knows
to
proceed,
citing
Baltimore,
County,
historic
design,
guidelines,
fences
and
Landscapes
pages,
one
through
five
county
code,
section
327405.
A
A
Do
you
have
do
you
have
anything
you'd
like
to
add?
As
the
commission
starts,
its
deliberations.
I
I
mean
I
gave
everything
that
that
they
are
requested
for
I
mean
I
even
changed
the
material
to
everything,
especially
treated
as
for
what
they
wanted
and
I.
Don't
know
what
else
if
I
mean,
if
you
want
anything
else,
I'm
I'm
willing
to
see
what,
if
it's
possible
for
me
to
do
it
but
I
think
I.
Think
at
this
point,
I
give
everything
that
was
asked
of
me
and
because,
based
on
that,
the
sad
book
comedy
unanimously
I
approved
it
for
your
further
approval.
F
I
I
have
a
couple
of
issues.
How
could
you
bring
bring
up
the
that?
Yes,
that's
the
elevation.
Well
I
go
back
to
that
one.
What
I
have
a
concern
with
is
I
assume
you're
going
to
have
beams
and
columns
and
you're
going
to
have
something
like
a
2x12
running
across
and
then
you're
going
you're
going
to
do
a
tell
me
how
you're
going
to
do
the
flooring.
Is
it
just
Deck,
with
with
gaps
between
it,
that
that
the
water
will
run
onto
your
car
and
onto
the
inside
face
of
the
walls?
I
It's
going
to
be
tongue
and
groove,
we
I
have
the
same
kind
of
material
on
the
on
the
poach.
If
you
go
back
to
the
previous
picture,
the
poach
originally
historically
has
the
same
kind
of
a
tongue
and
groove
material,
but.
I
No,
if
you
see
the
poach,
you
see,
the
poach
has
two
levels
right:
the
ground
level.
Actually
talking
about
the
deck.
That's
yes,
the
the
poach.
The
deck
is
going
to
have
the
same
kind
of
of
flooring
as
the
porch
has,
where
it's
going
to
be
tongue
and
groove,
the
the
boats
are
going
to
be
tongue
and
grooves.
So
it's
it's
not
going
to
leak
water
through
it.
Oh
yes,
it
will.
Yes,
I'm
and
I'm.
Okay.
A
I
I
Not
yeah
I'm
not
trying
to
make
this
a
what
a
waterproof
place:
I'm
I'm
I'm,
mostly
looking
for
protecting
from
Sun
and
and
the
sun
Sun's
heat.
So.
F
It's
not
too
bad.
If
we
go
back
to
that
other
elevation,
please
the
one
that
shows
the
front
go
back
next,
one
there
there!
Well,
if
you
have
two
by
you,
know
framing
material
of
two
by
tens
or
something
that
frame
across
the
thing.
You
don't
have
enough
room
there
to
get
that
to
fit
in
I,
don't
believe
unless
I
don't
see
any
wall
sections
or
any
details
that
show
how
that's
going
to
work
but
I.
I
The
drawing
has
that
the
drawing
has
the
right
right
measurements
on
the
drawing
so.
I
Let
me
see
if
you
can
blow
this
out
the
drawing
the
the
picture
on
the
center
top,
and
this
was
done
professionally
by
the
Reisterstown
Lumber
Company.
You
see
that
it
says
eight
feet
and
then,
on
top
of
that,
yes,.
F
I
I
M
F
The
this
elevation
more
than
the
other
I,
was
always
looking
at
the
right
one,
which
shows
no
dimension.
F
Yes,
so
it
has
enough
room
for
a
dimension
of
the
of
structure,
I'm
very
concerned
about
having
a
just
a
tongue
and
groove
deck
and
nothing
below
it.
That's
I
think
you're
asking
for
this
won't
last
long,
the
interior
walls,
water
will
drip
through
water
will
Leach
through
under
your.
F
If
you
have
vehicles
in
there,
I
hope
you
don't
care
about
the
finish
on
them,
but
the
other
thing
I
care
about
is
the
walls
which
I
think
are
going
to
rot
relatively
quickly
inside,
because
there's
no
waterproofing
on
the
inside
part
of
those
walls
and
there's
water
dripping
down
the
face.
So
I'm
I
think
it's
someone
that
knows.
D
So
this
this
is
all
going
to
have
to
go
through
zoning
and
get
a
variance
to
be
constructed
at
which
point
you're
going
to
need
a
full
set
of
architectural
drawings.
So
I
I
guess
go
ahead
and
get
started
with
that.
F
I
F
C
I
I
would
like
to
add
on
to
that
session
that
the
drawings,
in
fact
call
it
a
deck
and
a
garage,
and
it's
clearly
a
garage
because
you're
parking
cars
there,
so
you
know
I
mean
so
I
was
gonna,
say
the
zoning
is
important
and
the
fact
that
if,
if
LPC
was
to
consider
this
as
a
garage,
the
whole
additions
and
the
guidelines
for
additions
and
infill
and
how
the
face
of
the
garage
sits
behind
that
that
side
elevation
is
important.
I
C
So
that's
I
mean
I,
think
that's
critical
in
terms
of
understanding
kind
of
what
what's
going
on
between
these
two
and
if,
if
we
consider
the
the
heights,
the
doors
like
Ed
was
mentioning
the
height
of
the
doors
and
the
structure,
and
then
the
decking
you're
really
going
to
be
much
taller
with
that
railing.
So
the
relationship
between
the
the
side,
courses
of
the
of
the
house
and
this
deck
in
the
back
is
going
to
be
very
different.
So.
C
You
might
find
out
that
you'll
be
more
once
you
know
the
structure,
because
you
might
need
like
deeper
ldls
with
with
that
whole
big
doors
going
through
there,
so
maybe
go
with
zoning.
First
see
what
you
know
with
the
whole
garage
and
I
yeah
I
would
not
call
it
a
deck
if
it's
not
if
it
has
enclosed
underneath.
H
A
All
right
so
so
I'm
hearing
some
sentiment
from
the
Commissioners
to
follow
staff's
recommendation
with
some
advice:
Mr
Francis,
that
might
help
you
in
in
putting
this
together
in
a
little
more
complete
fashion
and
also
prevent
you,
some
problems
with
zoning
and
maybe
have
a
conversation
with
them.
As.
M
A
So
is
there
a
commissioner
who
would
like
to
present
a
motion.
C
C
K
A
Thank
you,
Wendy
Jessica.
Can
we
continue
to
vote.
F
L
Are
you
on
muted
Scott,
thanks
Lily,
yes,
Ray.
J
M
L
A
L
J
Right:
moving
on
to
agenda
item
number
11,
the
best
tree
of
St
James,
Episcopal
Church
property
located
at
3100
Moncton
Road.
My
ladies
Manor
County,
Council
District
number
three.
This
is
a
contributing
structure
in
my
ladies
Manor
National
register,
historic
district
and
final
Landmark
list
number
27,
St
James,
Protestant,
Episcopal,
Church,
St,
James
Church
was
added
to
the
final
landmarks
list
in
1978,
The
Brick
Church
was
constructed
in
a
Maryland
vernacular
interpretation
of
Georgian
ecclesiastical
architecture
was
initially
finished
in
1755.
J
extensions
were
added
in
the
18th
19th
and
20th
centuries.
The
applicant
wishes
to
replace
the
existing
cedar
shingle
roof
with
a
new
copper
roof.
The
proposed
roof
will
consists
of
15-inch
hand-forned
pans,
with
approximately
one
inch
high
double
locked,
random
transverse
seams.
The
applicant
did
provide
a
Photoshop
image
of
the
church
with
an
aged
copper,
roof
material
in
the
application.
In
addition,
an
additional
photo
of
the
copper
roofing
material
was
submitted.
The
application
notes
that
the
half
round
sacracy
has
always
had
a
flat
seam
metal
roof.
J
The
applicant
feels
that
the
longevity
of
a
copper
roof
will
outlasts
a
singer
seed
or
shingles
or
composite
cedar
shingle.
In
addition,
the
applicant
notes
that
copper
standing
seam
grooves
were
used
on
buildings
in
the
mid-18th
century.
While
this
is
true,
it
is
more
commonly
seen
on
high
style
churches
than
in
large
urban
areas
than
on
Rural
churches
flat
seam
metal
roofs
were
common
on
domes
and
brown
architectural
elements
in
the
18th
century.
Copper
roofing
was
imported
from
England
during
that
time
and
was
not
readily
available
in
rural
areas.
Wood
shingles
are
most
likely.
J
The
original
material
used
on
the
church,
Department
of
planning
records,
show
that
the
roof
was
replaced
in
the
1840s
1940s
1970s
and
early
2000s.
The
earliest
photo
we
have
on
file
is
from
halves.
Documentation
from
the
1930s
which
show
wood,
shingle
roof.
The
replacement
of
the
existing
wood
shingles
with
a
copper
standing
seam
roof
doesn't
follow
our
historic
preservation,
design
guidelines
on
page
8
of
the
roofing
chapter
of
our
design
guidelines,
existing
Historic,
Roofing
Materials,
must
be
retained
and
repaired.
J
If
cannot
be
repaired,
it
must
be
replaced
in
kind
in-kind
means
using
the
same
material
or
choosing
an
alternative
material
where
the
appearance,
texture,
color
and
other
visual
qualities
are
similar
to
the
existing
roof
material.
In
addition,
our
guidelines
state
that
the
LPC
may
consider
a
different
material
if
the
original
material
is
no
longer
available,
the
existing
material
is
not
original
or
the
roof
is
not
visible
from
the
street.
J
Regardless
any
decision
to
use
an
alternative
material
should
be
weighed
against
the
primary
concern
of
maintaining
the
building's
historic
and
Architectural
character,
as
stated
in
the
national
park,
services
preservation.
Brief
number
four
roofing
for
historic
buildings,
roofs
and
its
materials
are
character,
defining
features
on
historic
structures
and
are
often
indicative
of
the
architectural
style
and
era
that
the
structure
was
built.
A
material
change
greatly
impacts
the
overall
visual
appearance,
diminishing
its
historical
and
Architectural
Integrity.
J
This
will
be
very
noticeable
when
you
go
from
the
textured
appearance
of
the
wood
shingle
roof
to
the
bright,
smooth,
shiny
and
vertical
lines
of
the
standing
sea
metal
roof.
While
staff
understands
the
applicant's
concerns
of
future
roof
maintenance,
the
current
proposal
doesn't
mean
our
historic
guidelines.
An
in-kind
replacement
using
wood
shingles
are
a
composite
or
synthetic
wood.
Shingle
would
make
the
proposal
consistent
with
our
historic
guidelines
and
maintain
the
architectural
Integrity
of
the
church
staff,
asked
the
commission
to
discuss
alternative
materials
while
weighing
against
the
concern
of
maintaining
the
building's
historic
and
Architectural
character.
E
Church
with
us
this
evening,
yes,
the
applicant
Reverend
Joe
Cochran-
is
online
and
I'm
going
to
mute
and
you're
unmuted.
P
Well,
I
have
with
me
our
Junior
Warden
Don
greenelwald,
a
parishioner
at
the
church
who
oversees
our
physical
plant,
all
facilities
here
at
St,
James,
and
so
we're
both
here
tonight,
seeking
approval
for
the
copper
roof.
What
the
staff
has
covered
I
think
is
in
in
is
in
keeping
with
what
we've
submitted
and,
as
I've
said,
in
our
application.
P
For
us
this
is
a
stewardship
issue,
a
long-term
maintenance
issue,
and
we
believe
that
the
copper
roof,
even
though
we
haven't
seen
a
copper
roof
on
this
building
before,
would
be
in
keeping
with
the
with
the
time
the
building
was
built.
I
understand
this
is
a
rural
Church.
P
You
know
the
example
I
think
of
is
a
church
that
has
a
copper
roof
that
was
built
in
the
1740s
as
Christ
Church
Philadelphia
and
obviously
that
was
in
the
middle
of
a
large
urban
area,
but
we're
hopeful
that
we
can
get
approval
for
a
copper
route
because
it
will
help
to
maintain
the
building
into
the
next
Century,
we're
told
by
our
contractor
this.
Could
this
roof
could
last
us
70
to
100
years,
and
so
we're
hoping
for
that
kind
of
longevity.
P
In
the
roof
for
the
parish
and
for
the
building,
we're
also
mindful
that
the
copper
roof
is
going
to
be
more
expensive
than
Cedar,
though
Cedar
is
quite
expensive
these
days,
and
so
you
know
normally
when
I
would,
if
I
were
approaching
a
project
like
this
I
would
think.
Copper
is
out
of
our
range
of
ability,
Financial
ability,
but
Cedar
is
so
expensive
these
days,
that
the
price
points
are
pretty
close,
we're
20
or
30
000
more
to
put
the
copper
on
than
Cedar.
P
So
the
pricing
is
interesting
these
days
and
has
helped
us
to
think
well.
If
we
could
put
copper
on
that,
would
really
really
help
to
maintain
the
building
for
a
long
time.
A
One
that
had
come
up
a
previous
conversations
was
how
detailed
a
history
do
you
have
of
the
church?
Is
there
a
potential
that
there
was
a
copper
roof
sometime
in
the
history
of
the.
P
Church
yeah,
you
know,
we
think
probably
not
I
mean
we're.
We
are
confident
there
was
some
kind
of
medal
in
the
Sacristy,
which
is
on
the
back
side
of
the
church
and
out
of
view
of
the
road,
but
on
the
main
part
of
the
church.
P
We
don't
have
any
evidence
that
there
was
ever
a
metal
roof
on
it.
So
no
we
don't
have
that.
We
suspect
it's
always
been
some
kind
of
wooden
shingle.
What
kind
of
wood
I'm
sure
that
depended
over
time?
P
When
we
first
approached
this
project,
one
thing
I
looked
at,
it
initially
was:
okay.
Was
there
ever
copper
or
copper,
standing,
seam
roofs
even
used
in
the
18th
century,
and
my
limited
research
indicated
they
were
and
I
have
no
reason
to
doubt
what
the
staff
has
said,
and
that
is
that
these
were
roofs
that
were
put
on
in
mainly
urban
areas.
P
So
again,
I
guess
I
would
say.
No.
We
don't
have
any
evidence
that
there
was
a
standing
sea
metal
roof
on
the
building
other
than
on
the
Sacristy.
D
A
So
I'm
hearing
some
sentiment
from
the
Commissioners
in
agreement
with
our
staff
that
the
wood
Roof
sounds
like
would
be
more
consistent.
Historically
any
any
other
Commissioners
want
to
weigh
in
on
that.
M
I
may
have
one
one
other
question:
they
also
make
copper
shingle
roofs
where
you
could
get
the
texture
of
you
know,
of
a
shingle,
but
but
the
durability
of
copper.
Is
that
something
that
you've
considered
and
and
I
don't
know
if,
if
that's
something
that
would
be
a
possible
marriage
of
of
both
ideas,.
P
M
But
I
mean
they
are
basically
they're
prefabricated
kind
of
interlocking
shingles
right.
It
might
be
a
little
bit
more
labor
I'm,
not
sure
that
it's
a
whole
lot
more
material.
P
M
Don't
know
how
much
you
know
what
the
the
staff
thinks
about
that,
but
I'm
just
thinking
that
that
might
might
be
an
option
that
could
you
know
blend
the
two
two
concerns
there.
F
M
F
F
What's
been
there
probably
forever
so
I
I
think
although
I
I,
don't
you
know,
I
sympathize
with
what
you're
saying
Chris
but
I
I
I'm,
just
thinking
this
is
such
a
it's
such
a
wonderful
building
and
it's
in
great
shape
and
it
just
it
needs
a
new
roof
and
I
think
I
I
think
it
should
be
this.
The
the
cedar
shingles
I.
O
O
You
know
if
you
think
that
you
know
20
or
30,
20
or
25
years
as
far
into
the
future.
Well,
it
really
isn't
and
we're
looking
at
a
diminishing
Parish,
we're
looking
at
diminishing
attendance,
we're
looking
at
people
that
have
hair
the
color
of
us
and
that's
keeps
going
down
and
down
and
down.
So
we're
very,
very
cognizant
of
the
future,
and
we
want
to.
We
want
to
keep
Saint
James
as
it
is,
and
the
best
way
to
do
it
would
be
to
put
on
a
a
roof
that
would
last
way
into
the
future.
F
With
some
guidelines
that
we
are
supposed
to
follow
and
I'm
I
mean
Chris's
direction
is
something
I
and
I.
Sympathize
with
and
I
would
love
to
say.
Yes,
it's
a
great
idea,
but
I
mean
it
will
give
you
the
texture,
but
it
won't
give
you
the
you
know
initially
it'll
be
shiny,
copper,
as
it's
shown
as
you're,
showing
that
the
sample
on
this
it's
up
on
the
screen
now.
H
F
M
F
Bow
to
the
the
other
commissioners.
A
Just
to
kind
of
piggyback
on
Ed's
comments,
thank
you
for
your
thought
of
trying
to
preserve
the
building
into
the
future.
We
confront
those
conversations
monthly
in
in
our
work,
but
there
is
a
balance
between
preserving
you
know,
just
putting
up
concrete
over
everything
and
a
metal
roof
over
a
historic
structure
and
the
balance
of
maintaining
it
as
a
historic
structure.
Pleasing
to
the
eye
and
consistent
with.
A
History
of
the
building,
what
I
am
hearing
from
the
Commissioners
and
I
I'm
catching
the
sense?
The
meeting
right
is
that
perhaps
a
little
more
research
might
be
appropriate
on
on
some
sort
of
shingle
and
some
sort
of
maybe
a
synthetic
shingle
that
that
might
also
have
some
some
extra
durability.
A
F
A
E
Don't
have
to
follow
our
recommendations
if
you
don't
want
to
approve
the
replacement,
then
if
you
wanted
the
applicant
to
look
into
different
types
of
synthetic
or
composite
shingles
or
other
Alternatives
like
if
they
can
do
that
as
well,
I.
D
Would
say
that
if
you
pick
the
wrong
synthetic
material,
you
could
be
even
worse
off
than
doing
this
in
Copper
there
there's
a
wide
variety
of
and
grades
of
synthetic
shingles,
and
some
of
them
really
miss
the
mark,
because
there's
not
a
lot
of
variation
in
color.
So
you
get
this
really
monochromatic
thing
that
doesn't
resemble
a
natural
material
at
all.
Yeah.
A
So
so,
as
as
some
proposal
to
approve
this
staff
recommendation
is
sitting
out
there
with
Alice
second,
but
the
other
option,
as
Caitlyn
offered,
is
to
change
that
just
to
say
we
will
not
issue
a
certificate
of
appropriateness.
We
can
change
the
motion
at
this
point,
since
it
does
not
have
a
second.
C
So
can
we
can
we
choose
to
only
make
a
issue
only
with
in-kind
replacement.
A
M
That's
dismissing
of
possible
option
of
a
of
a
synthetic,
then.
Is
that
correct.
A
If,
if
we
decline
to
accept
the
recommendation
and
decline
to
do
a
certificate
of
appropriateness
at
all
and
just
quiet
frankly,
it
starts
with
clean
the
Clean
Slate.
They
can
come
back
with
whatever
they
choose,
but
the
conversation
is
tended
toward
in
kind
wood
or
something
that
would
have
the
same
appearance
and
durability.
F
A
Essentially,
what
we're
asking
for,
if
we
decline
it
with
the
the
thoughts
and
minutes
that
they've
heard
tonight,
it
is
with
the
provision
I.
Guess
that
we're
we
would
like
you
to
have
a
new
roof.
We
just
want
it
to
be
appropriate
and
durable
for
you,
and
so
we
we
suggest
you,
you
do
a
little
more
work
and-
and
we
also
thank
you
for
the
work
you
have
done-
I
understand
you've
already
done
quite
a
bit
and
have
a
great
sense
of
the
history
of
the
building
which
we
appreciate
today.
A
P
G
I
have
one
question
before
we
make
the
motion,
though,
and
is
that?
Is
there
a
timeliness
in
terms
of
the
roof
replacement
from
the
church's
perspective.
O
G
G
A
G
Okay,
so
I
can
just
make
a
motion.
Okay,
so
my
my
motion
would
be
to
vote
to
us
to
a
certificate
of
appropriateness
for
the
replacement
of
the
existing
roof,
with
the
conditions
that
the
material
be
an
in-kind,
wood
shingle
that
matches
the
existing
size,
texture
and
other
visual
qualities.
So
it
does
not
include
the
wood
composite.
It's
just
the
wood,
the
in
kind,
wood.
D
A
L
Yes,
Ray,
yes,
Chris
Weston,
yes,
first.
A
Yes
and
again,
thank
you,
pastor
and
and
your
the
team.
We
appreciate
your
thoughts
and
and
working
with
us
on
it.
I.
F
Had
one
other
thought
our
I
haven't
seen
them
in
my
lifetime,
but
Cypress
shingles
are
those
possible
I.
Don't
I
mean
Cyprus
is
a
wood.
E
Theater
or
something
Cyprus
whatever,
as
long
as
it,
you
know
the
size,
texture
and
all
the
visual
qualities
are
similar
to
what
exists.
Any
wood
species
would
be
acceptable.
F
F
Be
a
little
more
expensive,
but
it
might
be
longer
lasting.
I
know
the
new
Fast
growth
Woods
they're
doing
are
just
not
lasting
long
at
all
anymore,
so
maybe
another
species
of
wood
might
be
better.
Thank.
M
A
That
thought
and
again
thank
you
to
the
team
from
the
church
for
for
joining
us,
and
then
our
professional
staff
will
be
in
touch
and
you
can
be
in
touch
with
them
on
the
ultimate
type
of
food
you
choose
and
then
under
item
number
12
Jessica.
Yes,.
J
This
is
our
last
agenda
item
the
O'hara
property
located
at
1603
South
Rolling
Road
in
relay
County
Council
District
number
three:
this
is
a
contributing
structure
in
the
relay
County
historic
district
and
the
owner
wishes
to
add
two
items
to
a
previously
submitted
part.
Two
tax
credit
application
that
the
LPC
approved
in
2021.
The
additional
items
include
to
install
a
seller
door
and
make
in-con
Replacements
to
a
rear,
porch
and
or
patio
roof
structure.
It's
a
work
item
number
one
for
the
seller
dorm.
The
seller
opening
is
located
on
the
rear
kitchen
Edition.
J
It
is
currently
covered
with
a
makeshift
wood
door.
The
applicant
is
proposing
to
install
a
steel,
Gordon
hinge,
bulkhead
door,
work,
number
work,
item
number
two
for
the
patio
roof
and
columns
the
real
patio,
metal,
roof
and
column
is
located
off
the
rear
in
the
L
between
the
main
house
and
the
rear
kitchen
L
Edition.
The
roof
structure
is
currently
deteriorated
and
falling
down.
J
There's
currently
only
one
remaining
wood,
dork,
fluted
column
and
is
being
supported
by
temporary,
supports
the
applicant
wishes
to
remove
the
existing
roof
structure
in
Wood
column
and
reconstruct
the
roof
using
in-kind
materials.
The
new
roof
will
be
covered
with
metal,
sheeting
and
supported
by
two
new
round
Wood
columns.
No
additional
information
about
the
condition
of
the
remaining
wood
column
was
provided
from
the
photos.
It
looks
repairable,
the
replacement
columns
per
pose
doesn't
match
the
existing
there's,
no
fluting
and
the
door
Capital
doesn't
appear
to
have
the
dimensions
of
the
design.
A
Thank
you
Jessica.
So
we
have
before
is
the
proposal
from
the
staff.
The
column
is
the
main
main
point
where
they
want
a
review
of
that
and
brought
into
line
with
the
existing
column.
Any
any
commissioner
questions
or
comments.
C
I
didn't
see
in
the
application
any
discussion
on
what
the
what
the
ceiling
of
this
porch
will
be
because
they
will
remove
it
all.
So
maybe
if
we
write
the
motion
to
include
our
recommendations
on
replacing
it
in
kind
with
well
with
seated
boards.
E
The
evidence
online,
if
you
would
like
to
clarification.
Q
H
Q
I
I
would
only
guess
that
was
around
I
would
say
just
guessing
and
a
little
bit
of
knowledge
of
of
the
way
it
was
constructed
in
the
material
that
it
was
probably
built
when
the
addition,
which
is
the
rear
structure
that
is
outside
of
the
building-
and
that
looks
like
in
addition
to
the
kitchen
and
and
they
probably
added
that,
along
with
the
patio
that's
there
currently,
the
the
metal
roof
on
top
is
covered
with
just
a
regular
rolled
roofing
material
like
shingles
today,
foreign
so
I
think
they
they
did
a
makeshift
repair
job
to
try
and
extend
the
life
of
the
existing
metal
roof,
so
metal,
roofs.
Q
H
Q
Q
Obviously-
and
you
know
we
can
put
some
supports
underneath
of
that,
the
other
one
was
just
completely
falling
apart
and
then
it
just
it
just
fell
off
so
I
I
just
didn't
really
examine
the
the
condition
and
whether
or
not
it's
gonna
you
know
stay
stay
together
as
we
disassemble
the
the
roof.
That's
there.
A
Ready
for
motion
all
right
or
do
we
want
to
do-
we
have
more
to
talk
about.
G
For
a
motion,
so
I
would
move
to
follow
staff
recommendations
to
vote
for,
to
issue
a
certificate
of
appropriateness
with
the
following
condition
that
for
work
item,
two
that
the
existing
column
be
repaired
instead
of
replaced
if
possible,
and
that,
if
a
replacement
of
the
the
replacement
of
the
missing
column
match
the
existing
bought
in
size,
dimension,
style
or
other
visual
qualities,
and
that
product
information
about
the
replacement
column
be
submitted
to
staff
and
and
I'll.
G
Add
that
if
the
existing
column
is
in,
you
know
such
deteriorated
shape
that
the
replacement
column
that
in
Additionally
you
know
match
what
was
there.
C
A
H
D
Q
Thank
everyone,
but
I
just
wanted
to
clarify.
We
didn't
talk
about
item
one,
but
that
was
just
approved
right.
L
Q
A
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
We
also
have
a
property.
It
was
viewed
for
tax
credits,
just
I'm
not
going
to
speak
to
that
or
Caitlyn
I.
E
Can
do
it,
I'll
give
Jessica
a
Break,
so
we
reviewed
one
tax
credit
application
that
had
an
MHT
part.
Two
approval
for
the
HVAC
system,
replacement
at
seven
zero,
zero,
three
York
Road,
which
is
a
contributing
structure
in
the
stonly
National
registered
historic
district,
and
that
was
it
for
last
month
and
no
other
business
for
final
remarks.
A
Appearing
none.
Thank
you
all
of
course,
but
can
we
have
a
motion
to
end
the
meeting
special
thanks
to
Caitlin
and
Jessica
for
working
through
it
all
and
presenting
it
for
us,
we
appreciate
that
motion
to
end
move
that
we
end
the
meeting
in
a
second.