►
From YouTube: Landmarks Preservation Commission Meeting, July 9, 2020
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
We
can
go
in
the
order
listed
on
the
powerpoint
screen,
so
rob
again
isn't
here,
I'm
throwing
in
for
rob,
as
vice
chair,
I'm
mitch
kellman
and
I'm
an
executive
appointment.
B
C
C
I
mean
everybody
unmute.
If
you're
gonna
talk.
A
Okay,
thank
you
all
now,
let's
recite
the
pledge
of
allegiance.
A
Thank
you.
The
landmark
preservation
commission
operates
under
the
authority
standards
and
requirements
of
title
vii,
article
32
of
the
baltimore
county
code.
We
refer
to
the
united
states,
secretary
of
the
interior
standards
for
rehabilitation
as
administered
by
the
national
park
service.
A
We
have
important
preservation
issues
to
discuss
and
debate
in
each
meeting.
If
you
would
like
to
make
comments,
please
limit
your
comments
to
the
specific
preservation
submission
being
reviewed.
We
ask
for
your
assistance
and
understanding
so
that
the
discussions
do
not
digress
as
an
additional
comment.
We
can
all
agree
that
historic
preservation
is
an
important
aspect
of
the
quality
of
life
and
place
that
makes
baltimore
county
unique.
A
As
commissioners,
we
serve
on
the
commission
due
to
our
expertise,
interest
and
passion
for
historic
buildings
and
places
and
reduce
emissions
based
solely
on
their
merit.
While
we
may
disagree
and
discussion
and
voting,
we
continue
to
be
a
collegial
body
that
represents
each
other
personally
and
professionally.
A
Just
a
few,
let's
take
care
of
some
preliminary
items.
Miss
merritt.
Are
there
any
changes
to
the
preliminary
agenda.
A
Okay,
moving
on
to
the
next:
are
there
any
changes
to
the
minutes
of
the
june
11th
meeting.
H
No
changes
just
have
to
call
for
a
motion
from
the
camera.
C
B
I
A
Okay
minutes
get
approved.
We
have
six
consent
agenda
items
this
this
month.
Keller,
could
you
could
you
describe
the
those
percentage
items?
Jenna?
Excuse
me,
the
the
consent
agenda
items
and
give
the
planning
staff
recommendations.
H
Yes,
so
the
first
is
agenda
item
number
five,
the
kryzewski
property
at
93,
dunkirk,
road
in
rogers,
forge
it's
a
contributing
structure
in
the
rogers,
forge
national
register
historic
district.
The
proposal
is
for
part,
two
approval
for
the
removal
of
an
original
oil
boiler
and
the
installation
of
a
new
gas
boiler.
H
Staff's
recommendation
is
to
vote
to
issue
a
certificate
of
appropriateness
citing
national
park
service,
technical
preservation,
services,
preservation,
brief
number
24,
heating,
ventilating
and
cooling,
historic
buildings
problems
and
recommended
approaches
and
county
code.
112-201
next
is
agenda.
Item
number:
six:
the
baltimore
county
bank
at
500
york
road
in
towson.
H
Its
final
landmark
number
300
myth
number
ba
2490.
The
proposal
is
for
exterior
mortar
repointing
around
the
capstone
chimney
and
spot
repointing,
where
necessary,
and
the
repair
of
a
crack
on
the
northeast
corner
of
the
building.
Stock's
recommendation
is
to
vote
to
issue
a
certificate
of
appropriateness
citing
baltimore
county.
His
direct
design
guidelines,
facade
material
pages
five
and
ten
national
park
service,
technical
preservation,
services,
preservation,
brief
number,
two
repointing
mortar
joints
in
historic
masonry
and
county
code,
section
327-403.
H
The
proposal
is
for
the
replacement
of
a
16
by
10
by
8
wood
shed
with
a
10
by
14
foot
replacement
shed
with
duration,
siding
and
an
architectural
shingle
roof
that
shed
will
be
located
in
a
new
location
slightly
north
of
the
existing
ones.
Staff's
recommendation
is
to
vote
to
issue
a
certificate
of
appropriateness,
citing
baltimore,
county,
historic
design,
guidelines,
fences
and
landscape
pages.
Two
and
five
and
county
code
section
327,
403
agenda
item
number:
eight:
is
the
hereford
high
school
barn?
It's
at
17,
301
york
road
in
hereford.
H
Its
final
landmark
number
132
myth
number
ba
2643.
The
proposal
is
for
the
replacement
of
a
corrugated
panel
roof
with
a
standing,
seam
metal
roof,
the
replacement
of
existing
gutters
with
six
inch,
half
round
gutters
repair
and
replacement
of
wood,
siding
installation
of
gooseneck
lighting
and
repointing
of
stone
foundation
on
the
east
facade.
H
Staff's
recommendation
is
to
vote
to
issue
a
certificate
of
appropriateness,
citing
baltimore,
county
historic
design,
guidelines,
roof
pages,
six,
eight
and
nine
facade
material
pages,
two
ten,
two:
five:
seven
and
ten
fences
and
landscape
page
five,
national
park
service,
technical
preservation,
services,
preservation,
brief
number,
two
reporting,
mortar
joints
in
historic
masonry,
buildings,
national
park
service
preservation,
brief
number,
four
roofing
for
historic
buildings
and
county
code,
section
327-403,
the
next
agenda.
The
next
consent
agenda
item
is
item
number
10..
H
It
is
the
hunt
smith
house
and
setting
the
ham
property
at
12656
manor
road
in
parkton.
Its
final
landmark
number
149
ca
2114..
The
proposal
is
for
the
replacement
of
an
existing
concrete
sidewalk
with
a
wider
brick.
Walkway
staff's
recommendation
is
to
vote
to
issue
a
certificate
of
appropriateness,
citing
baltimore,
county,
historic
design,
guidelines,
expenses
and
landscape.
F
H
2
county
code,
section
32743,
the
final
consent
agenda
item
is
agenda.
Item
number
11,
the
richter
property
at
5161;
viaduct
avenue
it's
a
non-contributing
structure
in
the
relay
county,
historic
district.
The
proposal
is
for
the
installation
of
a
four
foot:
wood
paddock
fence
in
the
rear
yard.
Staff's
recommendation
is
to
vote
to
issue
a
certificate
of
appropriateness,
citing
baltimore,
county,
historic
design,
guidelines,
expenses
and
landscape.
Page
four
and
counties
code,
section
327-403.
A
Thank
you
very
much.
Is
there
anyone
present
that
wishes
to
speak
against
the
approval
of
these
consent
items,
and
I
don't
know
if
anybody's
online,
but
I'm
gonna
assume
that
nobody
is
here
to
speak
against.
I
will
then
ask
the
commission
members:
does
anybody
any
members
like
to
have
a
discussion
on
any
of
these
items.
A
If
there's,
if
nobody
wants
to
have
a
discussion,
is
there
a
motion
to
approve.
A
We
have
two
two
items
for
overview
and
discussion.
The
first
is
four
item
four
and
I
know
we're
all
familiar
with
it,
because
I
think
it's
been
mission
twice.
So
this
is
the
this
is
the
kelly
property
kr.
Can
you
describe
this
again
for
us.
G
No,
it's
all
right,
so
this
is
a
kelly
property
at
4948
tulip
avenue
in
relay,
which
is
a
it's
a
non-contributing
structure
in
the
relay
county,
historic
district.
So
this
proposal
is
amended
plan
for
the
x-pac
f,
x-code
of
a
30
by
40
and
a
half
foot
metal
garage,
and
it
has
a
code
enforcement
correction
notice
of
the
cv20085.
G
So
at
the
alpc
meeting
the
commission
reviewed
and
reviewed
this
application
for
this
garage,
a
fully
enclosed
metal
garage
and
then,
at
the
june
lpc
meeting
the
commissioner
dude
plans
to
amend
the
garage
by
installing
vinyl
siding
and
adding
a
window
on
the
elevation
that
faces
the
rear
of
the
dwelling
at
4948
tulip
avenue.
Ultimately,
the
commission
voted
not
to
issue
a
certificate
of
appropriateness
or
notice
to
proceed
up
for
either
proposal.
G
At
the
dune
meeting,
the
commission
recommended
the
garage
be
modified
in
a
way
that
it
looks
more
like
a
a
barn
and
less
like
a
garage
as
as
a
reminder,
the
garage
has
a
standard
door
and
an
eight
foot
by
eight
foot
wide
roll-up
garage
door.
G
Following
the
commission's
previous
suggestions,
the
applicant
is
now
proposing
the
following
alterations:
to
remove
10
feet
off
the
length
of
the
garage
for
overall
size
of
30
by
30,
with
the
same
height
of
14
and
a
half
feet
clad.
The
garage
in
t11
plywood
siding
to
paint
a
beige
to
match
the
house
install
two
single
hung:
vinyl
windows,
the
elevation
that
faces
the
rear
of
the
dwelling,
replace
the
roll-up
garage
door
with
a
carriage
style
door.
G
The
replacement
door
would
be
constructed
by
the
applicant
out
of
wood
and
would
feature
windows
at
the
top
consistent
with
other
garage
door.
Styles
commonly
found
in
relay
on
on
june
25th
2020,
a
technical
committee
composed
of
mr
brennan,
mr
kellman
and
mr
weston
visited
the
site
with
miss
merritt,
ms
bensley
from
staff,
and
that
with
the
applicant
mr
ryan
brown
and
his
father,
mr
michael
brown,
at
the
meeting,
the
plans
were
reviewed
and
members
of
the
technical
committee
discuss
ways
to
improve
upon
the
proposal.
G
The
technical
committee
provided
recommendations
that
the
garage
be
resided
with
true
tongue
and
groove
board
and
bat
wood
siding
running
the
full
height
of
the
structure.
So
there
are
no
horizontal
cuts
or
horizontal
or
a
horizontal
femticious
clobbered
siding
like
a
hearty
plank.
G
The
technical
committee
further
recommended
the
use
of
the
proposed
carriage
doors,
along
with
a
single
entry
door,
with
a
transom
to
match
the
height
of
the
adjacent
carriage
door.
Additionally,
the
technical
committee
would
like
to
see
a
single
32
inch
by
16
double
hung
six
over
six
window
on
the
south
elevation,
which
faces
the
rear
of
the
dwelling
at
49
48
school
of
avenue.
A
copy
of
the
report
is
included
with
the
meeting
material
that
you
all
received
overall.
G
The
proposal
is
moving
in
the
proper
direction.
Removing
10
feet
of
the
garage
allows
for
less
of
the
rear
yard
to
be
covered
and
makes
it
not
as
visible
from
magnolia
avenue.
Although
our
design
guidelines
do
not
typically
allow
for
vinyl
windows,
staff
feels
the
vinyl
windows
on
the
structure
are
accessible,
as
the
property
itself
is
non-contributing
and
was
constructed
in
the
1940s
1940s.
G
In
addition,
the
garage
is
located
in
the
rear
of
the
yard
and
the
windows
will
have
a
limited
visibility
from
the
public
right
away.
Staff
agrees
with
the
technical
committee's
recommendations
and
feel
that
it
will
make
the
structure
more
appropriate
with
the
district
in
terms
of
design
and
size
recommendation
is
to
vote
to
issue
a
notice
to
proceed
with
the
following
conditions:
that
the
length
of
the
structure
be
reduced
by
10
feet
of
proposed.
G
The
structure
be
resized
with
true
tongue
and
groove
board
and
battened,
with
siding
with
no
horizontal
cuts
or
with
a
horizontal,
feminist,
cementitious
collaborative
siding.
The
carriage
door
be
installed
in
place.
The
roll-up
garage
door
is
proposed.
The
garage
should
have
a
single
entry
with
a
transom
to
match
the
height
of
the
adjacent
carriage
door
on
the
south
elevation.
G
Elevation
authority
for
action,
we're
citing
the
baltimore
county,
historic
guidelines,
additions
and
infill
pages
four
through
seven
and
fences
and
landscape,
page
five,
and
also
counting
code,
section,
327,
403
and
32
7405..
A
Thank
you,
caitlyn
is,
is
the
owner
or
applicant
online
if
they
would
like
to
add
any
or
comments.
B
I
Can
you
hear
me?
Yes,
sir
there's
nothing
else
we
need
to
add.
I
think
everything
worked
out
great.
I
was
really
appreciative
of
them
coming
out
and
looking
at
it
and
guiding
us
through
this
change
and
process,
so
we're
just
thankful.
They
came
out
and
helped
guide
us
through
it.
I
Okay,
oh,
I
do
have
one
more
comment.
If
it
does
get
approved,
I
want
to
know
if
we
could
get
a
few
months
to
get
the
construction
done
just
because
the
weather
has
been
really
really
hot
and
getting
my
father
out
there
and
all
to
help.
Do
it
it's
just
going
to
be
tough.
A
Well,
that's
that
that's
something
we
can
all
discuss
right
now.
I
would
ask
any
if
there's
any
commission
members
that
would
like
to
discuss
this
or
go
around
and
see
if
there's
comments,
I
have.
C
I
C
C
H
Just
to
make
note
that
that
picture
is
just
a
rendering
there's
no
fence
proposed
for
installation.
There
is
a
fence
located
behind
the
garage
but
they're
not
proposing
any
new
fence
or
to
increase
the
height
of
the
existing
sensor.
It's
just
a
rendering
that
the
applicant
provided
to
us
to
kind
of
show
what
they
were
looking
at.
C
E
No,
I
think,
we're
covered
by
what
it
says
in
the
motion
or
excuse
me
the
recommendation
right.
You
do
know
that
the
recommendation
is
for
one
window
and
the
rendering
shows
two
which
like
which
is
fine.
C
Well,
the
recommendation
is
one
window
and
one
and
one
of
those
windows
would
become
a
door
he's
talking
about
a
door,
a
garage
door
with
a
transom
to
match
the
height.
I
assume
that's
the
door
and
when
the
window
would
be
replaced
and
the
one
closest
to
the
garage
door
and
then
the
one
window
am
I
assuming
correctly,
it's
not
what's
shown
in
the
drawing,
but
I'm
assuming.
H
So
the
the
drawing
on
the
the
proposed
mock-up
on
the
right
hand,
side
of
your
screen
right
now-
is
what
the
applicant
was
proposing
for
the
july
meeting.
Staff's
recommendation
is
based
off
of
the
site
visit
and
what
we,
along
with
the
technical
committee,
thought,
was
the
most
appropriate.
So
that
is
why
the
photo
and
the
recommendation
differ.
Yes,
you're
correct
that
the
one
window
towards
the
left
would
stay.
F
I
I
do
have
a
comment.
I
think
that
I
can
live
with
that.
I
think
it's
an
improvement
from
what
is
there
now
and
I
just
wonder
like
I,
I
wasn't
aware
of
this
site
visit
and
this
technical
committee.
I
don't
know
if
I
missed
the
email
or
something,
but
I
really
like
to
have
gold.
H
Marina
was
asking
about
the
technical
committee.
Typically,
technical
committees
are
open
to
the
whole
commission
in
this
situation,
because
of
coronavirus
staff
didn't
feel
that
extending
the
invite
to
the
whole
commission-
and
you
know
possibly
having
10
people
interested
in
attending-
was
the
most
appropriate
way
to
go
about
it.
H
Instead,
we
chatted
with
some
of
the
commissioners
who
have
seen
the
project
all
the
way
through
and
rob
mitch,
and
chris
were
the
ones
that
were
able
to
attend
in
the
future.
One's
life
is
normal
again,
technical
committees
visits
will
be
open
to
everyone.
This
was
just
one
of
those
situations.
We
didn't
feel
it
was
appropriate
to
risk
there
being
15
people
out
to
a
property
that
wasn't.
F
Well,
like
I
remember
that
when
was
that
other
property
that
everybody
was
invited
to
go-
and
you
know.
A
I
think
maybe
that's
something
we
can.
You
know
with
technical,
the
site
visits
and
you
know
more
people
want
to
attend.
I
guess
that's
something
we
can
discuss
internally.
You
know.
C
A
The
one
the
one
thing
I'd
like
to
add
for
this
specific
item
and
and-
and
I
did
go
out,
was
part
of
that.
That
committee
is
that
they
will
have
to
apply
for
their
permit
and
and
and
we'll
have
to
meet
all
the
zoning
requirements.
So
I
want
to
make
the
the
applicant
aware
that
all
zoning
requirements
must
be
met
and
that's
the
height
limitation.
The
building
setbacks
my
coverage
as
far
as
the
rear
yard.
So
all
zoning
requirements
have
to
be
met.
B
I
I
make
the
motion
to
approve,
as
recommended
by
the
technical
technical
committee.
B
H
E
H
Staff
will
be
in
touch
with
you
tomorrow
and
we
can
answer
some
of
those
questions
about
time
frame
and
things
like
that.
But
we'll
we'll
be
in
touch.
A
G
E
G
The
house
is
currently
vacant.
It's
10,
10
bedrooms,
10,
bathroom,
victorian
style
home
in
the
suburb
park,
county
historic
district
that
sits
on
under
2
acres
and
was
previously
used
as
an
assistant
living
facility
in
alf,
the
site,
which
also
includes
the
carriage
housing
greenhouse
was
purchased
purchased
in
november
of
2019
by
ms
johnson,
the
director
of
nursing
of
of
nursing
of
augsburg
village,
who
wishes
to
restore
the
property
and
return
it
to
its
former
youth.
G
As
an
als
in
may
of
2020,
the
owners
came
before
the
lpc
seeking
approval
for
exterior
renovations
to
the
primary
structure
when
the
application
for
that
review
was
submitted,
stack,
also
reviewed
information
proposing
an
ada
ramp
and
information
regarding
rehabilitation
of
the
carriage
house
in
greenhouses.
Those
requests
were
held
off
by
staff
until
drawings
were
received.
Drawings
have
now
been
received
detailing
the
work
proposed
to
take
place
to
restore
the
carriage
house
and
we
can
house
the
work
to
these
structures
includes
the
following.
G
Planar
mortars,
as
required
for
the
carriage
house,
rehab
they're
gonna
reserve,
used
to
it's
story
used
to
be
able
to
use
cited
office
they're
going
to
enclose
the
first
story
of
the
two-story
portico
share
to
provide
additional
square
footage
for
office
space.
This
is
proposed
in
closed.
Space
will
be
sheathed
with
a
hearty
plank
left,
siding
rather
than
square
butt.
G
Wood
shingles
that
are
on
the
original
building
in
efforts
to
be
harmonious
with
the
structure
without
trying
to
replicate
what
is
existing
they're
going
to
install
exterior
doors
and
wall
lanterns
recorded
in
the
plans
on
the
east.
G
Salvation
there
will
be
two
sets
of
french
doors
supposed
in
the
southwest
elevation:
one
set
of
french
doors
on
the
west
elevation
addition,
in
addition
of
a
portico
or
pergola,
with
the
tuscan
stock
columns
off
the
east
or
off
the
west
elevation
to
create
a
covered
porch
over
the
existing
brick
patio
for
the
siding,
they're
going
to
remove
damaged
and
deteriorated
paint
and
crime
replacement
of
shingles
that
are
deteriorated
beyond
repair
in-kind,
repair
of
wood,
siding
with
shingles
trim
and
cram
only
and
they're,
going
to
repaint
it,
which
is
not
under
lpc
lpc's
purview
for
the
windows,
scope,
they're,
going
to
eliminate
moisture
penetration
for
each
window,
according
to
the
manufacturer's
specifications,
remove
excess
layers
of
peeling
paint,
remove
it
from
pair
of
sashes
as
necessary,
including
reglazine
windows.
G
If
required,
install
weather,
stripping
and
repaint
again,
not
lpcs
under
lpc's
purdue
replace
deteriorated
parts
like
sash
locks,
cords
install
aluminum,
storms
and
screens
to
match
the
primary
structure
and
install
appropriate
wood
shutters
where
necessary,
to
match
existing
they're
going
to
install
new
windows
where
necessary,
windows
number
11
at
the
gable
wall,
dormer
on
the
east
elevation
and
number
12
on
the
east
elevation
doorstep
they're
going
to
install
a
new
single
leaf
store
on
the
east
elevation
center,
underneath
the
existing
wall
dormer
and
the
second
story.
G
B
G
Sides,
the
roof
scope,
they're
going
to
install
a
new
asphalt,
shingle
roof,
replace
deteriorated,
deteriorated
gutters
with
half
ground
aluminum
or
galvanized
steel
gutters
with
hidden
hangers
and
rods,
install
downspouts
with
euclids
and
incon
replacement,
submachines,
fascia
and
crowds
behind
gutters.
Overall,
the
staff
fields
of
proposed
plans
are
mostly
consistent
with
a
county's
design
guidelines.
However,
they
feel
that
it
looks
a
bit
too
residential
rather
than
appearing
to
be
a
converted
carriage
house.
G
The
recommendation
is
to
vote
and
to
issue
a
certificate
of
appropriateness,
with
the
condition
that
french
store
doors
instead
be
a
glazed
carriage
style,
doors
and
authority
for
action
to
be
siting
on
baltimore,
county,
historic
design,
guidelines,
windows
and
doors
pages.
One
two:
two
and
four
through
six
ruth's
page
six
through
seven
on
page
ten
and
facade
materials,
page
two
additions
and
and
infill
pages,
four
through
seven
fences
and
landscapes
pages
one
and
then
county
code,
section
327403.
A
Thank
you,
caitlin
is
the
the
applicant
owner
or
represent
patient
person
representing
the
the
property?
Are
they
with
us.
D
G
J
Can
you
hear
me
yeah
yeah
good?
Now,
the
presentation
is
what
we
are
proposing
and
I
understand
they.
They
comment
about
to
be
more
residential
yeah.
J
That
was
a
correct
comment,
so
I
do
like
the
idea
of
a
change
with
the
carriage
style
doors
center
on
that
television,
considering
that,
however,
that
feeling
of
door
was
already
lost
when
they
had
the
new
building
on
that
on
the
front
on
that
television,
but
I
can
see
already,
but
the
carriage
style
door
can
actually
be
a
very
nice
solution
for
that
elevation.
J
That
will
be
the
one
that
faced
the
main
house
and
I
do
like
to
have
a
bigger
door,
because
the
concept
is
again
is
to
open
these
carriage
house
for
as
a
common
room,
a
common
room
that
will
serve
the
the
main
building.
J
So
I
I
agree
with
the
comment
of
the
commission
honestly.
J
Is
I
don't
know
if
I
need
to
add
more.
J
If
I
need
to
add
more
comment
of
you
have
any
requests
or
any
questions.
A
Let's
put
this
up
for
discussion
between
the
commission
members,
anybody
like
to
start
one
of
them
any
of
the
members
like
to
start
with
comments.
J
Oh
sorry,
the
only
the
only
picture
that
we
have
is
the
2002.
That
is,
with
the
original.
The
only
picture
that
I
found
of
the
house-
and
it's
not-
you
can't
see
anymore
of
what
of
what
is
presenting
on
on
what
is
the
situation
now,
except
that
there
was
like
a
tent
that
was
dividing
the
partition
between,
under
the
open
part
that
at
that
time,
probably
instead
to
be
a
wood
part
instead
to
be
still
was
wood.
J
J
I
don't
know
if,
if
you
can
see
the
on
the
picture
that
I
see
on
the
screen
on
on
my
left,
there
is
like
a
column
that
is
standing
there
and
that
is
a
wood
column,
probably
all
the
column
under
the
the
addition
where
we
moved
and
now
they
are
still.
J
J
J
J
I
don't
see
in
this
in
this
screen
that
I
did
submit
the
drawing
of
the
west
elevation
as
well,
and
in
that
case
I
was
proposing
the
same
just
one
set
of
a
french
door
so
that
the
guest
can
access
to
the
side,
porch
and
then
eventually
to
the
greenhouse,
because
the
idea
is
for
the
guests
of
the
facility
of
the
living
facility
to
use
the
greenhouse
as
a
way
to
entertain,
and
so
it's
very
a
very
strong
presence
for
the
for
the
guests.
J
That's
why
it's
nice
to
open
the
carriage
the
common
space
of
the
carriage
house
to
the
to
the
greenhouse.
D
Well,
in
that
that
elevation
was
actually
in
her
packet,
I
believe
that
was
sent
to
us,
so
it
was
included
in
our
review
materials.
E
I
just
want
to
thank
them
for
the
the
drawings
and
the
work,
and
I
I
also
noted
that
looks
like
the
windows
will
be
saved,
they're
going
to
be
repaired
and,
to
the
maximum
extent
practical-
and
I
think
that's
great,
and
I
really
appreciate
their
effort.
J
D
A
One
thing
that
I
want
to
add:
it's
really
really
separate
from
you
know
the
actual
like
repair
of
the
building.
I
understand
this
was
a
an
assisted
living
facility
at
one
time,
which
probably
had
to
go
in
and
get
a
youth
permit,
and
I'm
just
assuming
that
it
sees
operation
for
a
while.
A
You
may
have
to
go
back
in
to
the
zoning
office
and
get
another
use
permit.
It's
just
advisory
to
you.
They'll
have
their
own
regulations
really
site
requirements
that
are
separate
from
this,
and
it's
just
it's
just
it'd
be
advised
for
you.
That's
all.
J
Yeah
yeah,
we
know
that
and
part
of
the
work
is
because
we
know
that
there
will
be
major
transformation
in
order
to
in
terms
of
space,
also
in
the
main
building,
so
they
will
use
to
be
able
to
be
used,
they
will
need
to
enlarge
bathrooms,
and
so
they
will
lose
some
space
yeah.
We
are
aware
of
the
permit
process.
C
You
can
make
a
motion
if
you'd
like
that'd,
be
great.
Thank
you.
Okay,
there
we
go
vote
to
issue,
a
move
that
we
vote
to
issue
a
certificate
of
appropriateness,
with
the
condition
that
the
french
doors
instead
be
glazed
carriage
style
doors
in
that
same
opening
that
was
or
a
similar
opening.
As
to
what's
shown
on
that
elevation-
and
that's
my
that's
it,
I
guess.
H
So
sorry,
yes,
we
were
on
the.
I
was
talking
that
whole
time,
but
we
were
on
music,
yes,
so
that
was
all
you
all
had
to
vote
and
discuss
tonight.
So
thank
you
for
that.
Just
to
report
on
from
staff
the
minor
property
at
724,
howard,
road
in
said,
brook
park.
The
commission
recently
either
in
may
or
june,
approved
the
replacement
of
three
windows
in
the
kitchen
for
that
property.
H
The
property
owners
reached
out
to
staff
following
the
meeting
wondering
if
that's
something
that
was
taxed
from
the
eligible
and
it
is
the
scope
of
work,
did
not
change
from
the
time
in
which
you
all
approved
it
to
now.
It's
simply
a
different
application
and
it's
now
tax
credit
eligible,
because
the
scope
had
not
changed
or
anything
like
that
staff
felt
comfortable
administratively
approving
on
it.
But
we
just
wanted
to
report
on
it
and
let
you
all
know.
A
Well,
thank
you
very
much.
Is
there
any
other
business.