►
From YouTube: C E3
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
Please
note
that
in
each
of
these
scenarios,
all
schools
would
at
minimum
be
scheduled
for
prioritized
renovations
and
educational
and
equity
enhancement
projects
option
a
is
a
low-cost
solution
to
crowning
moving
additions
at
fifth
district
to
make
room
for
more
students
and
includes
redistricting
across
long
distances
to
balance
enrollment
to
capacity
without
having
to
pay
for
demolition
and
expensive
new
schools.
Limited
resources
are
put
towards
more
extensive
renovations
and
educational
and
equity
enhancements,
benefiting
more
students.
A
Option
b
is
similar
to
option
a
except.
It
also
includes
smaller
additions
at
pretty
boy
and
seventh
district.
To
avoid
redistricting
across
this
large
rural
cluster
option
c
is
a
premium
cost
solution
to
perform
a
historic
reconstruction
of
fifth
district,
with
new
larger
buildings
to
relieve
crowding
and
improve
conditions
at
this
specific
school.
A
The
trade-off
is
that
this
option
commits
county
and
state
investment
in
fewer
campuses,
benefiting
fewer
students
by
using
limited
resources
for
very
expensive
replacement.
Schools
less
would
be
left
for
other
projects,
which
translates
to
longer
timelines
and
severely
skilled
back
renovations,
not
just
within
the
surrounding
area,
but
across
the
entire
county.