►
From YouTube: Planning Board Meeting and Public Hearing July 16, 2020
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
C
C
C
A
I
I
A
H
C
I
D
C
H
D
D
A
F
F
A
F
F
I
F
F
D
I
A
F
F
J
J
Road
in
parkton,
the
johnson
property
located
at
600,
said
brook
road,
said
brook
park,
hunt,
schmidt
house
and
setting
ham
property
located
at
12,
656
manor
road
in
parkton
and
the
reichter
property
located
at
5161
viaduct
avenue
in
relay.
The
lpc
also
voted
to
issue
one
notice
to
proceed
to
the
following
property:
the
kelly
property
located
at
4948
school
of
avenue
in
relay,
and
that
does
it.
H
A
B
B
The
recent
county
council
legislation
of
interest
to
the
board
includes
bill
55-20.
The
cares
act,
title
iii,
funding
emergency
measure
for
the
purpose
of
amending
the
2019-2020
current
expense
budget
by
appropriating
to
the
gifts
and
grants.
Special
revenue
fund
money
is
derived
from
federal
funds
made
available
to
the
county
through
the
maryland
department
of
aging.
F
F
That
was
scheduled
for
today,
so
we'll
go
ahead
and
begin
welcome
everyone,
the
public
hearing
for
the
baltimore
county
cycle,
38
water
and
sewage
master
plan
amendments
is
now
called
to
order.
The
hearing
is
to
consider
amendments
to
the
water
and
sewage
plan.
My
name
is
scott
phillips.
I'm
the
chairman
of
the
board.
F
A
F
F
F
At
this
time,
I
will
call
on
those
of
you
who
have
completed
the
online
registration
posted
on
the
board's
website
to
speak
on
these
topics
in
order
to
get
you
registered
those
who
wish
to
provide
written
testimony
during
the
hearing.
So
by
typing
your
comments
to
the
host
in
the
chat
box
and
the
comments
will
be
read
to
the
board
members
during
the
hearing.
F
And
procedures
for
speaking
during
the
hearing,
please
remember
to
limit
your
comments
to
three
minutes
or
less
all.
Right
now
I
know
there
were
a
few
individuals
who
signed
up.
I'm
gonna
ask
staff
to
give
me
a
little
assistance
was
the
first
person
to
speak
miles
and
if
you
could
list
the
first
three.
B
F
E
Can
everybody
hear
me
we
can
now?
Yes,
okay!
Thank
you,
mr
chairman,
thank
you,
mr
muellenberger,
and
and
members
of
the
planning
board.
I'm
chris
mudd,
I'm
an
attorney
at
venable,
I'm
representing
along
with
mr
thaler,
who's
speaking
after
me,
the
the
owner
of
the
property
at
1400
west
seminary
avenue,
which
is
one
of
the
requests
in
the
master,
water
and
sewer
plant
amendment.
E
Our
application
and
materials
generally
speak
for
themselves.
But
I'll
give
you
a
brief
explanation.
The
subject
property
that
we're
talking
about
is
approximately
47
acres,
zoned,
dr1
and
entirely
within
the
urtle.
I
should
say
that
the
property
actually
has
lands
that
extend
beyond
the
earth.
Limits
of
our
request
are
entirely
within
the
urtle.
I
E
The
property's
been
zoned
dr1
and
inside
the
urtle
for
20
years,
and
it
has
not
been
developed
for
20
years,
but
a
proposal
to
to
develop
this
property
is
underway
and
the
designation
to
w3s3
is
being
requested
as
part
of
that
it.
It
is
a
natural
designation
to
provide
here,
given
it
that
it
that
it
has
the
dr1
zoning
and
is
within
the
urtle.
It's
immediately
adjacent
to
properties
that
are
served
by
public
water
and
sewer
both
to
the
east
and
to
the
south,
and
all
of
the
reviewing
agencies
have
recommended.
E
In
favor
of
the
request.
The
department
of
planning
did
request
that
a
portion
of
that
47
acres,
which
is
subject
to
a
conservation
easement
on
the
far
west
side
of
the
property
that
that
be
excluded
from
the
designation,
and
we
have
no
issues
with
that
and
in
fact
it
would
be
excluded
from
any
development
request
that
gets
filed.
E
G
Can
you
hear
me
no
yeah
yep,
you
can
hear
me.
Oh.
Thank
you
very
much,
mr
chairman,
members
of
the
board
my
pleasure
to
be
here
david
taylor
from
diaz
thaler
and
associates.
I
just
want
to
concur
what
mr
mudd
has
said.
This
is
a
property.
That's
inside
the
ertl
inside
the
metropolitan
district.
It's
been
zoned,
dr
for
at
least
20
years.
There's
water
and
sore
adjacent
to
the
property
on
two
sides.
G
There's
a
covenant
that
an
agreement
with
the
community
as
to
how
the
property
is
to
proceed.
The
owner
is
now
proceeding
and
we
request
the
board's
approval
of
s3
w3.
That
would
be
appropriate
for
this
property
and
we
believe.
I
believe
that
all
the
staff
comments
are
supported
after
no
comment
questions,
mr
chairman,
that
would
be
all
I
have
thank
you.
F
I
E
E
Sir,
and
actually
one
thing
I
should
point
out
too
is
the
property
is
about
the
development
area
is
about
45
acres,
which
could
yield
45
units.
The
request
would
only
be
for
32
units,
which
is
by
by
limitation
of
the
covenant
that
mr
thaler
mentioned.
So
this
is
actually
quite
a
sprawling
property.
That's
not
any!
E
E
C
E
B
We
have
no
one
else
registered
to
speak.
I
can
read
the
comments
from
two
others
that
were
submitted,
but
if
any
of
the
other
attendees
would
like
to
speak,
I
would
ask
if
they
could
either
send
me
a
message
through
the
chat
or
raise
their
hand,
and
I
will
unmute
them
after
we
read
the
comments
that
were
submitted.
B
B
B
B
B
So
the
green
towson
alliance
wishes
to
comment
on
the
issue
20-03.
This
is
a
91.5
acre
parcel
that
is
proposed
to
change
from
sw7
no
plan
service
to
sw-3
capital
facilities,
service
area
under
county
rules.
Sw3
means
this
parcel
is
eligible
for
service
extensions
and
change
to
fw1
existing
service.
Without
further
amendment
of
the
sewerage
master
plan
or
public
scrutiny,
we
believe
this
rule
should
be
reviewed
number
one
plans
for
this
parcel
are
not
known.
B
We
are
not
aware
of
what
development
is
proposed
for
this
parcel,
but
to
agree
that
the
portion
of
the
property
inside
the
irtl
is
potentially
eligible
for
service.
If
there
there's
no
specific
development
plan
for
this
parcel
at
this
time,
it
would
seem
premature
to
advance
the
service
status
of
this
parcel,
particularly
since
there
would
be
no
further
public
or
planning
board
review
of
the
water
and
sewer
master
plan
service
area
change.
B
As
noted
2,
the
blue
stem
decision,
the
county
board
of
appeals
found
in
recent
decision
issued
on
january
3rd
2020
in
the
matter
of
cpc,
falls
road
that
the
entire
jones
falls.
Sewer
shed
lacks
capacity
for
additional
flows,
as
stated
that
increased
flow
from
the
proposed
blue
stem
development
adds
to
the
already
severely
overburdened
interceptors
in
the
jones
fall
watershed
exacerbating
the
existing
conditions,
which,
in
turn
enhance
the
risk
of
contamination
of
groundwater,
surface
water
and
recreational
facilities,
as
well
as
other
consequences.
B
The
basic
services
map
is
county
policy
and
adopted
by
the
county
police
council
for
the
jones
falls
sewer
shed
study
due
to
express
expressions,
community
and
dpw
doubt
about
adequate
conveyance
capacity
in
the
jones
falls
system.
The
council
county
recently
initiated
a
review
of
close
end
capacities
in
that
system
under
a
contract
to
update
the
previous
2012
study.
More
up-to-date
information
should
be
learned
about
the
system
before
increased
flows
are
permitted
and
added
to
the
new
development.
B
B
Therefore,
they
recommend
that
the
board
defer
action
on
this
amendment
until
the
board
of
public
is
provided
with
more
information
on
the
development
plans
and
the
flows
that
will
be
generated,
the
means
of
serving
the
parcel
and
resolution
of
all
downtime
sewerage
capacity
issues,
particularly
if
it
will
be
served
through
the
jones
falls
sewer
shed,
and
thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
comment.
This
is
a
letter
from
beth
miller,
raj,
gookin,
larry
fogelson
of
the
green
thompson.
B
E
The
designation
of
w3s3
doesn't
guarantee
service,
but
it,
but
it
provides
the
opportunity
for
it,
and
then
it
will
be
our
our
burden
to
demonstrate
that
that
there
is
adequate
capacity
and
ability
to
serve
this
site.
So
I
don't.
I
don't
see
how
those
concerns
necessarily
play
into
this
particular
part
of
the
process.
Thank
you.
F
Thank
you,
and
it
should
be
noted
that
we
are
not
taking
a
vote
on
this
this
evening
and
if
there
is
additional
information
that
anyone
would
like
to
share
on
the
items
that
were
discussed,
you
can
forward
that
information
to
the
department
of
planning
it
will
be
distributed
to
board
members
for
their
review.
Before
our
final
vote
on
this
issue,
I
want
to
thank
everyone
who
joined
us
to
speak
this
evening.
The
planning
board
will
take
into
consideration
all
comments
from
this
evening's
public
hearing.