►
From YouTube: The Baseline Protocol - November 2021 General Assembly
Description
Once a month, we use the time normally held for The Baseline show, our weekly office hours, to conduct our public community update. Find out more at https://baseline-protocol.org.
In this update, we will cover the following topics:
Agenda:
1) Standards Team [00:42]
2) Outreach Team [02:59]
3) Sponsorship [06:07]
4) TSC Updates [08:49]
4) Grant Updates [10:41]
5) BL IoT Event Reflection [25:30]
6) Core Devs [35:14]
7) Roadmap [36:25]
A
Everybody
we're
here
baseline
general
assembly
november
session.
We
have
quite
a
community
here
already
and
sorry
we're
a
little
we're
a
little
late
today,
I'm
gonna
turn
it
over
to
sonal
patel,
who
will
be
conducting
this
november
meeting
of
the
baseline
protocol
community
so
I'll.
Take
it
away.
B
All
right,
thanks
john,
so
as
usual,
we'll
go
through
our
normal
community
updates,
we'll
get
a
standards,
update
outreach,
update
sponsorship,
tsc
grants
core
devs
roadmap
and
then
we'll
open
the
floor
to
any
other
topics.
So
to
kick
us
off
andreas.
Can
you
give
us
an
update
on
the
standards
work.
C
Sure,
thank
you
so
now
so
the
standards
working
group
has
resumed
its
work
and
we
have
now
transitioned
to
sort
of
like
aim
a
standards
maintainer
mode
where
we
are
going
to
do.
You
know
some
some,
where
we're
looking
at
issues
that
people
have
raised
and
then
also
reviewing
prs
to
that
are
not
affecting
the
actual
requirements,
but
are
more.
C
Not
cosmetic
in
nature
but
help
the
readability
of
the
of
the
document
overall
until
it
has
been
ratified
as
an
official
draft
by
the
pgb,
which
should
happen
on
the
17th.
C
If
people
are
you
know,
reading
it's,
I
think
it's
coming
up
for
a
vote.
John!
Isn't
that
isn't
that
correct
right?
So
that's
where,
where
where
things
are
at
once,
once
that
what
has
passed
we'll
go
for
the
full
for
the
full
project
standards,
approval
which
which
we
might
be
able
to
pull
off
early
next
year
and
then
we'll
return,
we'll
report
back
on
on
on
where
that
is
where
that
is
going.
C
But
we
are
having
good
discussions
on
on
the
side
also
as
to
you
know
what
is
baselining,
what
is
not
suitable
for
for
baselining,
and
are
we
too
strict
in
certain
parts
of
the
of
the
standards,
so
we're
we're
we're
doing
some
some
real
world
pressure,
testing
of
the
standard,
and
currently
it
has
been
holding
up
quite
well.
B
D
D
Gin
up
the
excitement
and
popularity
and
awareness
not
in
that
order,
but
the
you
know
what
we
want
to
do
is
basically
engage
the
audience,
both
technical
and
non-technical,
a
little
bit
more
of
an
emphasis
on
the
non-technical.
D
Just
because
you
know
we
don't
want
to
be
guilty
of
what
we've
done
before
by
trying
to
lead
with
the
tech
which
you
know
can
be
subject
matter,
that's
impenetrable
to
a
lot
of
the
business
side
of
the
of
the
fence,
so
we
have
right
now
the
the
working
deck
that
a
lot
of
us
and
I
have
put
together.
D
You
know
really
to
capture
the
you
know
the
awareness
and
you
know,
generate
a
course
of
action
and
at
the
same
time,
what
we
want
to
do
is
you
know,
take
the
next
step
to
see
well,
when
people
all
are
very
excited
about
it.
Where
do
they
go
to
find
out
more
information,
and
so
that's
what
we're
trying
to
basically
redo
the
website,
so
it
gives
them
a
nice
clear,
concise
way
of
how
to
go
ahead
and
start
getting
baselining.
D
So
we
pretty
much
set
a
deadline
that
we
should
have
all
of
that
ready
initial
draft
by
the
first
of
december,
and
then
we
want
to
be
able
to
present
the
rest
of
it
to
the
pgb
on
the
8th.
So
that's
where
we
are
right
now.
A
I'd
like
to
make
one
comment
there,
it's
really
great
to
see
the
the
work
and
and
that
it's
you
know
that
lots
of
different
people
are
working
on
this
stuff.
It's
great,
I.
I
hope
that,
as
we,
you
know,
work
towards
explaining
things
for
business
people
that
we
we
don't
commit
to
sin,
that
a
lot
of
things
do
which
is
dumb
it
down.
We
can,
you
know
we
can.
We
can
break
it
down,
but
we
shouldn't
dumb
it
down.
I
think
that's
what
a
lot
of
I
was
just
watching.
A
A
terrible
video
of
you
know
zk
thing,
and
you
know
it
was
actually
a
major
vc
that
was
describing
it.
It
was
like
blockchain
is
like
a
new
kind
of
computer,
I'm
like!
Oh!
No!
No!
No,
you
know,
let's.
D
Rest
exactly
exactly,
and
that
is
you
know
the
main
thing
that's
top
of
mind
with
all
of
us
is
we
are
you
know,
with
this
contact
content
that
we
are
paying
close
attention
as
to
what's
being
heard,
as
opposed
to
what
what's
being
said,
a
lot
of
us
are
veterans
of
you
know
the
blockchain
space,
and
I
think
we
know
the
mistakes
that
we
made
on
that
well-meaning,
but
that
we
tried
to
get
too
much
too
quickly,
and
so
what
we
want
to
do
is
make
sure
that
they
have
a
straight.
A
Carol
is
not
so
I
will
say
that
I
forgive
me,
but
I
don't
have
confirmation
of
whether
we
can
announce
the
two.
There
are
two
new
sponsors
and
a
third
company.
B
A
I'm
sorry
do
we
already
put
them
on
the
website
yep,
okay,
so
they're
on
the
website,
I'm
going
over
there
now.
A
Yeah,
so
the
two
new
ones
and
actually
jack,
would
you
like
to
do
the
honors?
You
were
involved
in
this.
E
A
Very
good,
so
what
I'd
like
to
say
about
this
is
that
this
is.
These
are
sponsors.
These
are
companies
that
have
decided
that
kind
of
like
public
broadcasting,
that
you
know
anybody
can
participate
in
baselining.
But
anybody
can
contribute.
You
don't
have
to
pay
a
thing,
but
the
companies
that
can
pay
can
help
us.
A
You
know,
make
sure
the
community
is
strong
and
vibrant
and
and
has
the
resources
it
needs,
and
arca
and
and
montag
have
done
that
and
we'll
have
them
on
future
events
and
also
we'll
be
featuring
sponsors
in
we're
working
on
something
right
now,
where,
where
we
can
feature
sponsors
for
in
in
on
the
website
to
say,
hey
you're,
these
are
sponsors
that
you
can
reach
out
to
to
help
you
get
baselined,
so
there's
a
real
benefit
to
being
a
sponsor,
but
it
doesn't
get
a
sponsorship
does
not
give
you
control
of
the
standard
or
the
specification
or
or
the
open
source
that's
done
only
by
contributors.
A
B
F
Sure,
thanks
ana,
I
think
we
kicked
off
really
well.
We
we
picked
up
some
very
interesting
issues.
I
don't
know
if
I
can
discuss
everything
here,
but
I
think
the
first
one
being-
and
you
know,
mark
cattle
briefly
touched
upon
that
which
is
synchronizing
our
marketing
efforts.
You
know
outreach
efforts
with
the
releases,
so
I
think
that
is
something
which
we
will
be
picking
up
and
and
and
addressing
very
very
soon
and
and
yeah.
F
There
are
certain
other
points
as
well
on
the
agenda,
so
I
I
think
you've
shared
it
on
the
I
think
you're
trading
agenda
right.
B
John's
sharing
screen
yep,
we
have
11
utsc
members
representing
nine
different
companies,
a
lot
of
unique
views,
backgrounds
and
members.
Part
of
the
group,
but
yeah
we'll
have
a
we'll
have
our
first
official
meeting
since
the
kickoff
coming
this
week,
where
we
have
a
pretty
standard
agenda
to
start
covering
the
road
map
and
items
like
that.
F
B
Thank
you,
and
going
off
of
that,
then
so
into
grants.
So
our
baseline
core
devs
are
applying
for
some
of
the
remaining
grant
funds
and
also,
as
we're
nearing
the
end
of
the
2021
grant
cycle,
I'm
staying
in
close
touch
with
our
grant
recipients
to
get
updates,
as
well
as
write-ups
that
will
be
published
on
our
site
on
some
easy
to
digest
pieces
of
their
work.
So
the
public
can
understand
the
contributions
they've
made
like,
for
example,
the
zk
circuit
for
bonds,
work
that
boris
and
louise
presented
to
us
on
the
september.
B
22Nd
baseline
show
they're
working
on
a
write-up
right
now
that
will
get
published
on
the
site
as
soon
as
possible,
and
also
we
have
michael
carnes
here
with
us
today.
Who
was
a
grant
recipient
for
a
project
he
did
called
publishing
supply
chain,
so
he's
going
to
actually
walk
us
through
some
of
the
work
that
he
completed
so
michael
I'll
hand
it
over
to
you
to
introduce
yourself
and
tell
us
about
the
work
you
did.
G
Thank
you,
nice
to
meet
everybody
and
a
pleasure
to
to
introduce
myself
to
you
it's
a
background
about
maybe
about
a
year
ago.
I
was
approached
by
baseline
to
give
some
information
about
the
publishing
industry
and
see
whether
or
not
there
is
an
opportunity
for
the
application
of
baseline
in
the
publishing
industry.
So
I
acted
on
that
and
produced
a
grant
request
which
was
approved
sometime.
G
I
think
it
was
in
march,
maybe
maybe
a
bit
later
than
that
the
idea
was
to
understand
what
areas
of
the
publishing
industry
baseline
might
be
applied
to,
and
the
two
areas
that
I
put
in
the
application
were
around
the
management
of
metadata
and
and
the
potential
application
to
the
rights
and
royalties
processes.
G
So
the
publishing
industry
in
this
in
the
us
is
about
a
35
billion
dollar
business.
It's
not
particularly
large
relative
to
quite
a
few
other
industries.
G
It's
also
a
industry
that
is
slow
to
adopt
new
technology
and
therefore
it
has
a
lot
of
kind
of
antiquated
process,
driven
processes
that
make
certain
parts
of
the
industry
quite
inefficient.
In
the
application
of
metadata
the
opportunity
there
would
potentially
be
to
exert
better
control
over
the
management
of
metadata.
G
That's
transmitted
from
the
owner
of
the
content,
which
would
be
normal
cases,
would
be
a
publisher
that
metadata
would
describe
all
the
information
about
the
the
book
or
the
content
item
that
is
being
is
part
of
the
supply
chain
and,
ultimately,
part
of
a
sale,
and
that
information
is
transmitted
to
intermediaries,
as
well
as
retailers
and
the
biggest
retailer
would
be
amazon.
G
Much
of
that
data
is
is
updated
routinely
and
therefore,
there's
there's
some
aspect
of
control
that
needs
to
take
place
to
make
it
viable
make
it
up
to
date.
Make
sure
that
everybody
has
the
right
information
right,
pricing,
right,
availability,
all
that
type
of
stuff.
So
so
that
was
one
thought
there
and
then
the
second
one
on
the
rights
and
royalties
is
the
ability
for
the
better
control
again
of
the
disbursement
of
royalty
payments
to
rights,
holders
and
rights
holders.
G
Most
most
likely
are
going
to
be
a
publisher,
but
they
could
be
also
people
who
have
contracted
with
a
publisher
like
an
author
or
an
illustrator
or
some
other
content
provider
that
would
be
receiving
checks
based
on
the
sale
of
that
that
content.
G
So
those
were
the
two
kind
of
areas
that
I
I
looked
at.
My
background
is
in
I've,
been
in
the
industry
for
more
than
20
years
as
an
executive
and
run
companies
that
have
managed
rights,
royalties
processes,
either
as
a
a
publisher
or
actually
a
software
vendor,
providing
the
solution
to
publishers
and
I've
also
run
a
company
that
managed
metadata.
G
So
I
had
some
experience
in
this
space,
so
I
interviewed
about
eight
or
nine
people
as
part
of
this
initial
phase
of
the
project
to
draw
some
information
about
what
might
be
of
of
might
might
resonate
with
with
these
folks
who
know
more
about
this,
and
I
think
ultimately,
what
I
found
was
that,
because
of
some
of
the
embedded
resistance
to
adopting
new
technology
and
some
of
the
things
that
folks
on
this
call
have
talked
about
in
terms
of
making
the
case
for
something,
that's
quite
technical.
G
That
there
would
be
a
little
bit
of
quite
a
bit
of
resistance
to
adopting
something
like
baseline
for
the
metadata
side
of
things,
probably
wouldn't
be
able
to
make
a
business
case
around
that.
That
would
be
compelling.
G
As
you
probably
know,
the
the
market
is
fairly
structured
in
terms
of
some
very,
very
large
players
like
a
random
house
or
simon
schuster.
Those
companies
might
be
companies
that
might
adopt
something
like
this.
They
might
be
able
to
make
a
business
case,
but
beyond
those
top,
you
know
5
10,
maybe
15
players.
While
there's
a
vast
number
of
smaller
players,
those
those
companies
probably
wouldn't
wouldn't
participate.
It
wouldn't
make
sense
for
them,
so
so
the
business
case
there
would
be
probably
fairly
narrow.
G
On
the
royalty
side,
though,
there
may
be
some
opportunity.
This
is
a
situation
where
there's
you
know.
Dispersants
are
often
times
to
a
large
large
group
of
people
and
there's
a
lot
of
inefficiencies
here
and
there's
the
aspect
of
visibility
and
control.
That
is
important.
So
that's
an
area
that
would
require
a
little
bit
more
research,
there's
folks,
actually
in
that
space.
That
know
a
lot
more
about
this.
G
Have
experience
with
experimenting
with
with
this
type
of
application,
there's
been
some
misstarts
and
and
some
some
other
efforts
that
haven't
quite
worked
out.
That
would
need
exploring,
but
that's
kind
of
where
we
are
with
this.
This
I
gathered
a
fair
amount
of
information
about
this,
which
I
I
wrote
up
and
sent
in
to
to
john
some
of
you
on.
G
The
call
might
be
aware
that
microsoft,
through
with
eny,
is
working
on
an
initiative
to
improve
the
dispersion
disbursement
of
royalties
to
xbox
rights
holders,
those
folks
who
have
created
software
for
xbox
and
and
manage
that
process,
so
they're
working
on
a
custom
process
based
on
something
similar
to
baseline,
and
that
would
be
something
that
would
be
a
good
industry
example
for
something
that
might
be
leveraged
going
forward.
So
that's
that's
a
summary
of
what
what's
happened
so
far,
I'd
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
D
Mike
I
got
a
question,
would
you
say
the
publishing
industry,
you
know
general
in
in
general?
Is
you
know,
embracing
you
know,
innovation,
new
ways
of
doing
things.
G
G
The
content
kind
of
package
broken
apart
in
many
instances,
you
know
where
you
might
have
sold
the
full
journal
or
full
textbook
now
you're
you're
working
around
since
it's
trying
to
sell
the
parts
of
that.
You
know
the
chapters
and
images
and
things
of
that
sort,
so
so
that
type
of
activity
is
happening,
but
it's,
I
would
say
it
it's
less,
driven
by
the
publisher
than
it
is
by
the
marketplace
and
by
the
the
retailers
you
know
principally
being
amazon
right.
G
So
yes,
there's
innovation
there,
but
I
wouldn't
say:
there's
a
lot
of
that
innovation
driven
by
by
the
publisher.
If
that
makes
sense.
E
Michael,
have
you
looked
at
the
innovations
you
know
in
you
know,
coming
from
the
nfd
space
for
managing
sales,
royalties
and
so
on
as
john's
got
this
other
project
as
well
called
the
tree
trunk.
You
know
protocol
for
nfts
right,
but
there
seemed
to
be
a
lot
of
synergies
between
the
two.
G
So
I
I
participate
in
a
kind
of
a
large
list
serve
for
one
of
a
better
term
on
on
with
folks
that
you
know
talk
about
things
like
that
and
talk
about
innovation
and
things
that
are
going
on
in
the
industry,
and
the
nft
thing
has
garnered
a
lot
of
comments
in
the
last
six
to
12
months,
as
you
might
have
mentioned,
and
there's
a
fair
amount
of
skepticism
about
how
that
might
work
in
the
publishing
space,
not
saying
it
won't.
G
But
it
did
come
up
in
in
the
interviews
that
I
had
that
you
know
if
you
owned
kind
of
a
token
that
maybe
that
would
be
the
opportunity
for
you
to
to
dividend
that
or
even
separate
that
into
pieces,
so
that
if
you
owned
a
piece
of
of
a
royalty,
you
could
make
it
break
to
break
it
down
into
pieces.
G
E
One
I
I
suppose
one
way
of
looking
at
it
is,
you
know
there
is
a
lot
of
dubious.
You
know
value
propositions
in
that
space,
but
one
way
of
leveraging
is
it
is
to
actually
drive
the
conversation
you
know
towards
you
know,
actual
value
which
would
come
from
people.
You
know
industries
like
yours
right,
so
I
I
what
I
was.
What
I'm
trying
to
say
is
that
you,
you
may
not.
A
Absolutely
if
I
could
say
michael,
I
kind
of
agree
with
you
on
the
skepticism
people
tend
to
pick
up
on
these
buzz
words,
not
understand
the
underlying
technology
and
say
nfg.
Let's
that's
the
new
panacea
I
I
did
put
in
the
chat
and
I'll
put
it
on
the
zoom
chat
as
well
an
article
that
was
written
before
we
were
really
talking
a
lot
about
nfts.
A
Where
yeah
I
mean,
there's,
there's
it
really.
We
have
to
focus
on
the
business
model
yeah
right.
It's.
E
A
A
you
know,
an
author
that
has
a
juicy
agent
my
agent
doesn't
like
to
deal
with,
nor
does
the
publisher
like
to
deal
with
dispersing
money
to
17
or
20
or
100
different
authors
for
a
single
book
when
they
just
got
three
dollars
in
from
the
sale.
A
A
Thank
you
for
look.
I
I
want
to.
I
want
to
thank
you
for
the
effort
and
thanks
for
coming
on
the
the
general
assembly
happy.
H
A
We'll
be
posting
them
and
the
tsc
sonal.
If
we
can
get
that
to
the
tsc,
I
think
they
already
have
it.
We
will
vote
on
the
grant
at
the
next
meeting
and
that'll,
be
it.
G
And
if
anybody
wants
to
reach
out
to
me
separately
feel
free
happy
to
have
a
conversation,
if
you
want
any
background
information
or
have
any
ideas
you
want
to
suggest
to
me,
I'd
be
happy
to
follow
up.
A
Cool
one
last
point
on
this,
and
I
think
this
would
have
been
good
for
your
research
that
we
something
we
have
today.
That
we
didn't
have,
then,
is
a
much
more
clear
articulation
of
what
the
point
is,
which
is
you
know,
I
think,
we'll
be
able,
in
future
grant
projects
to
be
able
to
say
look
for
this
pattern.
A
The
pattern
that
we
didn't
really
equip
you
to
look
for
is
where
there
are
where
we
need
to
prove
that
multiple
parties,
usually
more
than
two,
are,
have
consistent
information
and
and
prove
attributes
of
that
information
without
revealing
the
information
the
metadata
or
the
trace
information
involved
in
moving
that
data
around
to
certainly
outsiders
or
even
participants
in
parts
of
the
workflow
that
aren't
in
that
immediate
work
set.
E
A
So
that's
you
know,
or
the
short
version
of
that
is
coordination
under
zero
knowledge.
You
know
that
is
a
very
specific
pattern
and
it
does
actually
bring
up
a
lot
of
specific
ideas
in
each
industry.
We
talk
to
now
very
doable
things
so
going
forward.
I
think
that
might
be
something
we
can
equip
with
future
research
where,
where
do
you
need
to
coordinate
without
letting
anybody
have
the
you
know
without
revealing
the
information.
A
B
All
right
thanks
so
much
mike
and
nick
before
you
have
to
drop.
I
want
to
call
on
you
and
ask
how
the
iot
event
was.
I
Thanks
tonal,
the
iot
event
in
santa
clara
last
week
was
good.
It
was
very
well
organized.
The
expo
floor
was
lightly
attended.
I
was
there
for
about
two
hours.
My
session
was
scheduled
to
be
about
20
minutes.
I
I
started
with
the
little
bit
video,
which
was
very
well
received
john
and
then
dove
into
the
the
standard,
deck
positioning,
of
course,
for
the
smart
cities
and
the
iot
conference
that
we
were
at
there
were
a
few
follow-up
questions
with
respect
to
how
people
get
involved,
pointing
them
back
to
the
website
and
things
of
that
nature.
I
Overall,
it
was
a
pleasant
and
good
experience.
I
wish
the
conference
was
a
little
more
focused.
You
know
it
being
a
baseline,
not
clear,
blockchain
topic
in
an
iot
conference.
I'm
not
sure
a
lot
of
people
understood
why
they
should
attend
or
why
they
would
come
to
that
session
versus
the
session
next
door.
I
That
was,
you
know,
very
specific,
around
an
iot
device
being
rolled
out
by
technicolor,
or
what
have
you
right
so
just
something
to
be
aware
of
we're
going
to
do
a
debrief
with
jane,
hopefully
sometime
this
week,
if
not
early
next
week,
if
we
can
make
calendars
online,
but
I
would
encourage
everyone
to
to
note
get
familiar
with
the
materials
get
comfortable
delivering
them
and
I
have
an
updated
version
of
the
deck
that
has
the
video
embedded
in
it
in
a
more
transportable
format,
I
think,
is
the
way
to
put
it.
I
The
original
file
was
so
big
so
for
their
infrastructure.
They
wanted
it
a
little
bit
tighter,
so
I'll
make
sure
to
get
that
uploaded
to
the
share
and
we'll
have
access
to
that.
So
it's
a
great
opportunity.
It
was
nice
being
in
the
real
world
talking
to
real
people.
It
wasn't
as
good
as
heath
atlanta,
because
heath
atlanta
was
very
focused
on
a
you
know,
a
narrower
kind
of
domain
set
and
frankly,
there
were
probably
more
people
at
east
atlanta.
A
Yeah
covet
is
doing
a
number
on
all
these
events.
Still
to
this
day,
every
single
one
I
hear
about
is
lightly
attended
is
a
kind
way
of
putting
it.
I
will
say
that
I
think
that
nick
thanks
for
for
taking
one
for
the
team
and
doing
that,
I
really
appreciate
we
know
how
busy
you
are
with
building
the
new
business,
the
baseline
business,
that
you're
building.
A
So
it's
gonna
be
super
exciting
when
you
launch
that,
but
the
I
think
going
forward,
there's
there's
one
area
that
we
really
do
need
to
focus
on
is
not
so
much
iot
but
messaging
right.
So
I'm
I'm.
A
I
can
report
that
we're
in
conversations
in
connection
now
with
the
chairs
of
the
of
like
amqp
and
other
messaging
protocols,
probably
start
approaching
kafka,
and
I
could
see
even
see
a
future
where
so
anywhere
they're
going
is
where
we
want
to
go,
because,
if
you're
doing
messaging,
you're
probably
doing
if
you're
doing
multi-party
messaging
you're,
probably
into
a
sp,
you
know
transformation
projects
that
could
use
baselining.
I
Yeah
the
the
idea
of
synchronizing
systems
of
record
under
zero
knowledge
using
a
collection
of
technologies
right
and
one
of
those
technologies,
just
happens
to
be
a
blockchain-
was
very,
very
well
received.
You
know
it
didn't.
You
know
it
was
leveraging
the
maturity
of
some
of
these
other
technologies
right,
like
messaging,
for
example,
and
was
very
well
received.
D
One
of
the
big
things
that
you
run
into
with
a
lot
of
these
smart
cities,
these
initiatives,
you
know
like
moby
and
some
of
the
other
ones,
is,
you
know,
you're
gonna,
have
you
know
a
lot
of
different
services
that
are
going
to
be
organized?
D
You
know
around
you
know
a
particular
user
or
group
of
users
and
whether
it's
going
to
be
parking
or
tolling
or
you
know,
paying
a
ride
share
services.
All
of
that
you
know
the
challenge
that
you
run
into
over
there
is
the
consumer
is
going
to
want
to
pay
for
all
those
services
in
a
single
transaction
and
making
sure
the
allocations
are
done.
That's
that's
the
holy
grail
because
a
lot
of
times,
you're
dealing
with
you
know,
local
municipalities,
which
are
not
always
the
most
responsive.
D
You've
got
a
lot
of
bureaucracy
that
you
have
to
navigate
and
stuff,
and
so
that's
really
kind
of
the
holy
grail
is
you
know,
and
within
the
messaging
and
stuff
I
mean
organizing.
All
of
that.
H
Preserving
way,
I
think,
that's
really
the
huge
differentiator
in
a
number
of
these
different
industries,
notably
applying
that
from
an
iot
perspective.
You
know
that's
such
a
driver
of
kind
of
the
future
of
these
analytics
from
a
supply
chain
perspective,
or
so
many
different
areas
that
we're
seeing
these
different
use.
Cases
start
popping
up
from.
J
I
Yeah,
I'm
looking
for
new
ways
to
deal
with
my
hair
and
you're,
giving
me
lots
of
inspiration.
H
I
They
they
just
get
more
and
more
awkward.
You
know
I'm
at
the
phase
now
where
I
can
just
go
back,
and
I
don't
know
if
you
wouldn't
recognize
me
I'd
look
like
cousin
it.
If,
if
I
let
it
go
wild.
H
I'll
keep
bringing
something
totally
totally
new
each
one.
Each
baseline
show
love
it.
H
Nick
you
were
talking
about
from
an
iot
perspective,
yeah
for
sure,
and
it's
been
interesting
to
actually
hear
some
of
a
lot
of
recent
use
cases
that
we're
seeing
from
baseline
perspective
around
iot
there's
been
three
just
in
the
last
two
weeks
that
have
surfaced
relative
to
applying
just
just
the
one
wanting
to
find
ways
to
operationalize
their
business
in
a
huge
way
that
being
a
huge
driver
of
it
and
then
number
two
like
getting
closer
to
autonomous
procurement
operations
in
terms
of
effect.
And
so
it's
been
interesting.
Seeing
that
really
surface
recently.
I
Yeah
and
a
lot
of
iot
solutions
are
really
kind
of
ecosystem
related
right.
One
iot
provider
is
unlikely
to
have
the
whole
end-to-end
solution,
yet
the
re-total
value
is
recognized
when
you
can
bring
the
data
together
to
make
better
decisions,
ultimately
right
and
being
able
to
bring
that
data
together
using
multiple
iot
providers.
Sharing
data
in
a
non-threatening
way
right
under
zero
knowledge
is
a
great
way
to
do
that.
H
Yeah
yeah
absolutely
kale.
If
I
ask
you
a
question
where,
where
do
you
see
the
ability
to
apply
some
baseline
in
perspective
within
the
microsoft
stack,
notably
from
like
an
iot
perspective,.
J
I
mean
that
stack
we
build
over
there,
we
call
it
sweet.
The
iot
suite
has
been
very
much
not
centralized
like
for
lack
of
a
better
term
like
most
of
that's,
built
by
open
source
components
right
so
the
ingestion
side,
all
the
way
through
to
insights
right.
The
whole
flow
between
like
an
iot
device
from
the
security
aspect
and,
as
I
mentioned,
like
data
flow
again
to
how
we
store
it
and
then
how
we
analyze
it.
J
It's
all
pretty
much
an
open
stack
store,
so
a
source,
so
basically
it's
very
easy
to
kind
of
plug
in
components
there.
So
I
could
see
on
every
level
that
that
could
kind
of
plug
in
the
ones
I
just
mentioned
there,
but
probably
the
ones
around
data
sharing
would
be
like
locating
fruit
or
yeah
yeah
yeah.
H
It's
interesting
actually
you're
talking
about
kind
of
a
little
bit
of
the
traditional
web
2
world
if
you
will
and
the
composability
that
can
be
layered
on
from
that
regard
and
we're
seeing
that
the
such
driver
of
kind
of
this
movement
from
a
web
3
perspective
the
bill
that
the
composability.
So
it's
it's
interesting
to
see
how
these
worlds
are
starting
to
kind
of
collide.
B
Thanks,
nick
all,
right
so
back
to
our
general
assembly
agenda,
we
have
a
few
more
items
and
then
we'll
open
the
floor
so
really
quickly.
I'll
cover
the
cord
ups,
which
I've
given
updates
on
in
the
last
few
baseline
shows.
So
I
won't
repeat
too
many
details.
But
since
the
last
general
assembly
in
october,
we've
had
about
40
core
devs
joining
the
community,
joining
the
meetings
and
working
on
blips
and
on
the
meeting
monday
that
we
had
karthik
walked
through
the
architecture
and
code
of
baseline
from
a
very
basic
perspective.
B
But
we
just
asked
him
to
kind
of
take
us
through
baseline
from
the
beginning
and
how
the
code
works
for
somebody
who's
just
starting
to
look
at
the
code.
So
he
hosted
that
session
for
us
and
right
now,
I'm
working
with
jack
waring
and
we
are
getting
a
video
put
up
on
our
youtube
that
can
serve
as
an
artifact
for
developers
or
those
looking
to
understand
the
technology
moving
forward
and
also
moving
forward.
We'll
start
featuring
some
of
our
core
devs
in
upcoming
sessions.
Having
them
show
us.
B
A
Sure
so
again,
the
tsc
is
really
going
to
take
on
a
lot
of
heft
with
regard
to
the
road
mapping.
A
So
if
anybody
is
really
interested
in
what
we're
building
going
forward,
what
additional
features,
what
integrations,
how
everything's
structured
docs
tools
we
were
on
a
previous
call,
in
fact,
the
one
that
made
us
almost
late
to
this,
where
we
mehran
shekhari
from
sap
led
a
whole
session
on
what
things
constitute,
baselining,
what
things
don't
and
how
systems
like
sap,
you
know,
can
approach
practical
applications.
It's
quite
an
exciting.
A
I
quite
like
that
session
and
one
of
the
questions
was:
what
do
we
need
to
do
in
2022,
and
I
I
my
reaction
is
tools,
tools,
more
tools,
tools,
docs
and
tools,
truffle,
like
tools,
ganache,
like
tools
and
and
mostly
developer
friendly
tools
and
oddly
enough
developer
friendly,
doesn't
mean
gui's,
developer,
friendly
means
npm
and
really
really
clear.
A
Here's
a
library
of
code
that
I
you
can
understand,
deploy
test
fool
around
with
and
then
start
imagining
what
you
can
do
with
it
and
I
sure
hope
that
that's
what
we're
about
to
be
delivering
by
the
end
of
the
year
on
a
number
of
fronts,
both
the
base,
ledger
and
unibrite
and
can
circle
folks,
as
well
as
the
provide
folks
and
and
a
variety
of
other
folks
that
are
not
associated
with
those
guys
and
that's
really
important
because
standard
a
standard
that
only
has
one
implementation,
isn't
a
standard
right.
A
So
it's
important
that
that
we
also
really
focus
on
many
different
ways
of
deploying
a
baseline
pattern.
I
was
looking
at
matter
labs
today
and
saying
you
know
what
some
parts
of
matter
labs
you
could
see
implemented
in
a
baseline
design
pattern,
so
that
was
kind
of
an
interesting
thought
again
yeah.
What
would
it
look
like
if
you,
if
your
kafka
came
with
baseline
pattern,
features
what
if
your
mq
or
amqp
or
nats?
A
In
fact
you
know
nats
is
one
of
the
founding
organizations
of
baseline.
So
maybe
we
ought
to
go
back
to
that
and
say:
hey!
You
know
what
would
what
would
it
look
like
if,
when
somebody
got
nets
that
you
know
they
just
saw
hey,
I
can
I
can
verify
you
know,
consistency
and
correctness
and
attributes
of
unseen
information
under
zero
knowledge
right
because
you
can't
baseline
without
messaging.
A
So
that's,
I
think,
there's
a
lot
to
do
on
the
road
mapping
side.
If
people
out
there
are
interested
in
what
are
we
going
to
do
next
and
how
do
we
prioritize
it?
You
don't
have
to
be
on
the
tsc
to
do
that.
You
don't
have
to
be
on
a
core
devs.
Actually,
the
probably
the
fastest
way
to
get
involved
is
through
core
devs,
so
core
devs
will
be
working
things,
we're
going
to
set
up
working
groups,
we're
going
to
prioritize
work
and
and
then
on
the
tsc.
A
It's
real
real
working
group
at
this
point
because
we
have
decisions
to
make
about
where
we're
going
to
prioritize.
What
are
we
going
to
spend
money
on
and
who
are
we
going
to
raise
more
money
from.
J
J
But
if
you
look
at
something
like
node.js
or
something,
if
you
go
to
their
website
and
go
to
like
what's
going
on
with
your
releases
in
the
future,
they
have
this
really
nice
thing
that
basically
goes
oh
yeah
by
this
quarter.
We're
doing
this
and
this-
and
this
is
really
like
super
summarized
and
then
yeah
if
I
want
to
go,
get
into
the
guts
of
like
you
know,
what's
john
working
on
what's
karsig
working
on,
what's
the
specific
iot
thing,
that's
great,
but
just
something
to
think
about,
like
I
don't
know
how.
A
Let's
not
think
about:
let's
do
that.
Let's
do
that
and
you're
totally
right
and
again.
I
think
it
comes
from
the
highest
level
down
to
lower
levels,
but
you
know
if
we
can
stay
high
level
to
mid
level
and
put
that
right
on
the
website.
You
know:
there's
a
lot
of
website
redesign.
That's
coming
yeah
gail,
thanks
for
putting
that
up
there,
that
I'll
tweet
that
as
well
the
you
know
we
we
can
start,
we
can
say,
look
tools.
Definitely
wouldn't
you
agree
at
a
high
level.
Tools
are
the
priority.
A
Simple
examples
are
the
priority
for
certainly
the
next
quarter
or
two,
so
we
should
put
that
up
and
say:
okay,
well,
this
kind
of
tool
and
that
kind
of
tool
battleship
is
going
to
be
up.
I
can't
wait
for
battleship.
A
I
can't
wait
to
be
able
to
run
a
baseline,
simple,
two-party,
battleship
game
with
two
local
hosts
running
and
the
code
right
in
front
of
me
with
here's
the
section
for
messaging,
oh
here's
where,
where
we
decided
to
put
nats
in,
but
I
could
put
something
else
in
here's
the
section
for
setting
up
the
work
group
between
the
two
local
hosts-
oh,
I
could
do
that
or
I
could
plug
provide
in
here
to
make
to
make
it
fancy
and
enterprise
ready
right,
yeah
et
cetera,
just
to
keep
it
super
clear
and
right
down
to
I'm.
A
Okay,
I'm
just
running
hashes
on
a
merkle
tree
now
I
understand
merkel,
trees.
Okay,
now
I'm
going
to
do
proofs
on
them
so
that
I
can.
I
can
understand
each
component
of
baselining
in
a
bite-sized
way
at
the
developer
level,
it's
almost
like
the
code
should
should
the
developer
should
experience
the
code
almost
like
a
very
well
done:
slideshow
right,
yeah
concept,
concept
that
builds
on
the
other
concept.
That
comes
you
know
it
should
be
a
building
experience.
A
I'm
sure
you'd
agree
that
that
would
that's
the
first
thing.
We
really
need
to
do
now.
So
roadmap,
that's
a
pretty
obvious
roadmap
component.
A
And
excel,
I
can't
wait
for
the
excel
drop.
I
mean
we've
been
talking
about
it
for
way
too
long.
I
want
it.
I
want
to
be
able
to
deploy
two
case
two
instances
of
excel
and
see
them
baseline,
and
after
that
I
want
to
see
I
want
to
take
a
piece
I
want
to
row
in
a
table
in
excel:
that's
baselined
with
sap
or
at
microsoft
dynamics
or
or
sql
server,
and
we
got
to
get
the
sql
server
guys
back
involved.
B
Yes,
well,
I
can
cover
it
too,
but
yeah
so
for
december,
8th
our
december
general
assembly,
we're
go
we're
going
to
make
that
our
target
date
for
all
of
these
moving
parts
that
we're
discussing
right
now,
so
the
battleship
game,
the
excel
examples.
B
A
A
If
it's
just
a
blog,
that's
fine,
but
you
know
we
should
make
sure
that
there's
a
light
patina
of
quality
control
on
all
of
it.
You
know
it's
an
open
source
community,
so
this
ranges
there
but
yeah
make
sure
that
you
you're
coordinating
with
sonal
and
on
that,
and
anybody
in
the
community
knows
how
to
do
that
through
the
slack.
B
A
B
A
C
B
A
Hey
boris,
I
saw
your
your
your
new
document
to
the
write
up
on.
Let's,
hopefully,
we
can
drop
that
on
the
eighth
as
well
right.
This
is
the
grant
on
on
zero
knowledge
circuits
for
bonds,
which
I
think
are
quite
exciting.
A
I'll
take
the
last
second
to
say
all
of
the
tsc
members
that
came
before
the
current
tsc
group.
Any
you
know
some
people
that
went
from
the
last
one
to
this
one.
But
there
are
several
that
are
not
on
the
new
tsc.
A
They
did
a
tremendous
service,
people
like
anna
isa,
frank
and
and
conor,
and
so
many
others
we're
going
to
be
sending
something
nice
your
way,
and
we
just
want
to
express
our
gratitude
to
you
for
getting
us
where
we
are.