►
From YouTube: The Baseline
Description
The weekly office hours for the Baseline Protocol open source community. Learn more at https://baseline-protocol.org.
A
Hey
everybody
here
we
are
on
the
baseline
show.
Once
again,
I
think
we've
done
this
now
over
over
a
year
every
week
or
pretty
close
we've
done
a
year
of
these
every
single
week.
So
pretty
excited
to.
I
don't
know
if
this
is
exactly
our
anniversary
for
this
show,
but
it's
it's
it's
getting
there.
It's
good
to
see
everybody.
This
is
a
special
session
for
the
baseline
protocol
open
office
hours.
We
have
a
good
crew
here
talking
about
a
variety
of
things,
most
important
right
now.
A
We've
got
some
muting
to
do
here.
I
got
some
muted
there
jack.
We
have.
We
have
one
nice
announcement.
We
had
our
first
technical
steering
committee
meeting
just
now
reviewing
a
set
of
grant
proposals.
I
think
boris
euron
right
so
boris.
You
were
one
of
the
people
that
proposed
a
just.
B
A
Yeah-
and
here
we
are-
this-
is
this
is
where
you
go
to
baseline
dash
grants
and
the
ethereum
oasis
repo,
and
let
me
see
if
I
can
get
that
a
little
bigger.
A
We
have
a
number
of
grants
that
are
being
voted
right
now.
There
is
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
for
those
who
are
tuning
in
don't
know,
hundred
thousand
dollars
given
by
graciously
by
the
ethereum
foundation
as
a
gift
to
the
baseline
protocol
community
to
fund
r
d
and
enablement
projects.
A
There's
some
variety
of
rules
around
this.
If
you
go
to
the
baseline
protocol,
dot
baseline
dash,
protocol.org
website
you'll
see
right
there.
The
link
right
there
on
the
on
the
main
banner
for
more
information
on
the
grants
program.
So
if
you're
interested,
if
you're
talented
person
in
a
variety
of
ways,
or
not
just
development,
but
also
in
content
production,
if
you're
a
good
technical
writer,
there
is
an
opportunity
to
get
grants
and
to
get
in
on
bounties,
we'll
be
doing
both
grants
and
bounties
there,
and
we
just
voted
on
two
of
them.
A
I
think
the
boats
are
still
coming
in
so
we'll
we'll
tally
those
votes.
I
think
by
we're
running
it
friday
night
and
let
folks,
like
our
friends
here,
know
about
that
when
they,
when
so
boris
you'll,
know
on
friday,
we
hope,
if
you
get
the
grant,
I
think
bishwashri
dan.
A
Who
she's
often
been
on
the
on
these
office
hours
and
she's
from
india
and
there's
a
whole
bunch
of
people
coming
in
from
india?.
A
Now-
and
we
expect
that,
as
that
group
grows,
that
they'll
be
more
of
a
pull
towards
doing
more
meetings
and
events
and
time
zones
that
are
that
are
friendly
to
that
samuratz.
I
think
you're
you'll
be
happy
about
that.
If
I'm
not
mistaken,.
A
Right
now
we
have
a
lot
of
people
here
today
so
with,
unless
there
are
any
other
items
to
discuss.
I
think
we
should
just
jump
right
into
what
we're
here
for
today,
and
that
is
talking
about
the
v1
baseline
protocol
roadmap.
So
I'll
just
give
a
very
brief
overview
of
that.
The
there
are
two
things
about
the
baseline
protocol.
If
anybody's
been
involved
knows
you
have
the
standards
that
are
being
written
and
you
have
a
base
of
code.
A
I
think
I
will
yeah
so
here's
the
repo
and,
if
you
go
in
here,
you'll,
see
core
right
there.
The
core
packages
implement
the
standard
and
and
and
so
the
standard
and
the
core
are
pretty
tightly
connected.
A
What
we
are
going
to
do
in
the
next
several
weeks
is
plan
out
and
execute
or
begin
executing
our
march
to
version
one.
We
are
at
v01
and
we
want
to
get
to
version
one
this
year
and
it
takes
about
six
months
to
ratify
a
standard
through
the
oasis
and
you
know
get
it
to
an
iso
the
ability
to
go
to
iso
as
a
standard,
so
we'd
love
to
have
that
standard
specification
written
in
in
final
draft
really
in
the
summer
time
frame.
A
A
Tom
lyons
was
actually
the
first
grant
award
winner
tom
your
hard
work.
Would
you
like
to
say
a
couple
words
about
that
before
we
get
going.
C
What
can
I
say
grant
is
a
nice
thing.
No.
That
was,
I
think
I
mentioned
this
last
time
we
spoke,
so
the
grant
process
is
pretty
straightforward
and
I've
got
I've,
got
a
mandate
now
to
go
and
do
some
needs
analysis
and
some
guidelines
on
non-technical
content
to
help
the
outreach
team
and
just
scheduling
a
bunch
of
interviews
now
and
actually
kicking
around
the
idea
of
doing
maybe
an
open,
an
open
questionnaire,
but
I'll
I'll
talk.
I
think
that
might
be
interesting
to
get.
C
You
know
the
communities,
the
community's
input
on
a
broader
scale,
so
yeah,
but
anybody
interested
in
a
grant.
I
have
to
say
it's:
it's
a
pretty.
It's
a
pretty
easy
process
to
to
get
that
in.
A
Right
now,
and-
and
would
you
like
to
say
like
what,
how
could
people
be
involved
with
you?
I
know
you're
interviewing
folks
for
yeah.
We
want
to
say
something
about
the
work
and.
C
Yeah,
so
I
mean
look,
I
mean
the
idea,
I
think
is
relatively
straightforward,
so
the
assumption
is
that
to
help
help
baseline
out,
which
we're
gonna
need,
along
with
the
along
with
the
standard
and
the
core
packages
and
all
the
technical
stuff,
we're
probably
going
to
need
a
fair
amount
of
non-technical
content.
You
know
explaining
what
baseline
is,
who
it's
for?
What
it's?
C
What
it's
you
know,
what
use
cases
are,
and
you
know,
sort
of
a
mix
of
thought
leadership
and
probably
a
bit
of
salesy
stuff
to
help
get
help
get
the
word
out,
and
you
know,
talk
to
talk
to
decision
makers,
people
interested
in
in
using
in
in
making
use
of
the
protocol
for
whatever
or
whatever
their
needs.
C
People
who
are
you
know,
you
know,
working
on
on
selling,
baselines,
consulting
services,
etc,
etc.
So
because
this
is
a
open
source
project.
Obviously,
most
of
that
content
is
probably
going
to
come
or
hopefully
will
come
from
volunteers
or
grant
recipients
like
myself,
and
the
idea
is
to
help.
You
know,
encourage
participation
by
basically
starting
off
with
a
with
a
bit
of
a
needs,
analysis
and
kind
of
a
set
of
guidelines,
and
you
know
basically
a
content
plan.
C
This
is
the
kind
of
stuff
we're
looking
for
you
know
and
if
you
want
to
contribute
on
this
kind
of
content,
this
is
what
you
need
to
do.
This
is
what
we'd
like
you
to
do.
So
that's
sort
of
like
a
step,
one
on,
hopefully
encouraging
a
lot
of
really
great
non-technical
content
from
the
community.
A
Very
good,
I'm
looking
at
some
comments
on
the
thing
already.
We've
got
a
lot
of
comments
already.
I
think
one
was
from
mr
m
asking
about
he's
an
insurance
company
we're
all
stuck
with
private
blockchains,
the
way
to
get
started
with
public
blockchains,
because
gas
price
has
been
a
killer
and,
of
course,
I
think.
A
That's
I'm
glad
that
mr
emily
you've
asked
that
question
because
yeah
one
of
the
things
that's
important
about
the
baseline
protocol
is
that
it's
pretty
gas
minimal
in
that
you're
not
doing
a
lot
on
a
chain
of
any
kind
or
you
know
effectively
a
bulletin
board
for
proofs,
and
you
can
use
fancy
batching
as
I
like
to
call
it
and
other
things
to
kind
of
get
out
of
the
way
of
the
of
the
gas
issue.
A
Of
course,
as
eth2
comes,
I
think
we
have
a
lot
of
headway
and
layer.
2
is
going
to
help
as
well
and
we're
going
to
we're
going
to
talk
about
some
of
those
layer.
Two
issues
on
this
call
and
every
call
this
month
will
be
we'll
be
basically
talking
about
the
road
map.
That's
what
we're
gonna
do
on
this
on
these
calls
calls,
I
think,
do
we
call
them
calls
anymore?
Is
that
still
a
thing
do
we
call
them
calls?
A
I
used
to
I
used
to
get
up
at
five
in
the
morning
when
I
lived
in
california,
and
I'd
have
to
be
on
conference
calls
all
morning,
long
and
all
day
long,
I
would
like.
I
think
there
was
a
week
where
I
didn't
actually
shower,
as
it
got
up
and
that.
C
A
A
So
the
every
every
wednesday
this
week
this
month-
or
I
guess
through
mar
through
may,
we
will
be
discussing
you
know
things
that
we
be
ought
to
be
putting
into
v1
and
folks,
like
sam
and
other
maintainers
are
going
to
be
important
to
that
andreas.
I'm
sure
is
going
to
have
a
lot
a
lot
to
say
about
that
he's
been
working
really
hard
on
the
standard.
I
bet
ana
eso,
frank
who
is
our
standards?
Leader
is
probably
on
the
chat.
She
often
is
hi
anis.
A
If
you're
watching
so
I'll,
be
watching
for
any
comments
you
have
there
on
east
carl.
You
had
a
lot
to
to
think
about
and
say
regarding,
as
I
recall
edi,
so
we
have
a
lot
a
lot
of
things
to
think
about,
but
this
is
gonna
be
a
safe
place
today,
in
particular
to
talk
about
sort
of
the.
What
do
we
not
yeah,
there's
an
old
saying
if
we
only
knew
what
we
didn't?
A
What
we
didn't
know
right
so
can
we
peer
into
the
edges
of
what
we've
defined
as
a
set
of
things
that
this
thing
can
do,
and
can
we
say,
oh
well,
we
forgot
this.
Oh
well,
wait
a
minute.
We
forgot
that
so
everybody
put
on
your
your
happy,
hats
and
and
think
about
and
think
about.
Let
your
mind
wander
through
the
multiverse
of
of
different
ideas.
I
was
tweeting
this
morning.
I
think
I
was
what
I
was
taking.
A
The
walk,
and
I
said
you
know
imagination
is-
is
just
as
evidence
of
being
tapped
into
the
multiverse
right.
So
what
is
you
know
what
what
things
are
we
missing
almost
certain
that
there
are
a
variety
of
things.
Of
course
we
kind
of
need
to
know
what's
in
there.
So
if
you
haven't
gone
to
baseline
protocol.org
and
gone
into
the
repo
and
looked
around
and
looked
at
the
road
map
do
so
sam,
maybe
you
can.
A
And
and
then
we'll
kick
it
off,
please
any
anybody
at
this
point
feel
free
to
chime
in.
D
Hi
john
I'm
first
timer
here,
I'm
sorry
I
have
my
name
is
my
current
company's
name.
My
name
is
mohan,
I'm
bringing
a
fresh,
fresh
set
of
eyes.
I
know
nothing.
I
just
been
going
through
the
specifications
so
enjoying
it,
but
really
I
had
talked
to
kyle
kyle
I'd,
given
me
sort
of
a
rundown
on
things
and
I'm
just
filling
myself
up
going
through.
D
I
think
the
specification
and
then
the
the
swagger
api
set
and
I'm
hoping
that
and
then
looked
at
the
fact
that
you
had
two
connectors
one
was
spreadsheet.
One
I
think
was
a
sap
connector.
If
I'm
not
mistaken
so,
and
then
I
noticed
yesterday,
there
was
some
edis
that
come
out,
so
I'm
just
going
to
be
going
through
them
and
then,
as
I
get
a
little
more,
you
know
plugged
in
I'll
chime
in.
Thank
you.
A
Thanks
mom,
it's
great
to
see
you
love
to
hear
more
about
your
company
and
what
you're
doing
as
well
so
sam.
Do
we
wanna?
Do
we
wanna
throw
anything
up
on
the
screen
or
shall
we
just
kind
of
talk
through
the
stuff
happy
to
throw
anything
on
the
screen?
What
what
are
you
looking
for?
In
particular,
let's
just
get
a
little
primer
right.
So
what?
What
are
the
basics
that
are
going
into
v1
andreas?
A
Maybe
you
can
also
talk
about
the
standards
you
know
and
be
the
standard
bearer
for
the
standards
team
today,
if
you,
if
you,
if
you
can
and
let's
kind
of
just
go
through
the
very
basic
outlines
of
what
of
what
is
on
the
agenda
for
version
one
so,
for
example,
the
persistence
package
needs
work.
B
A
Yeah
we
we
have
connectors
that
are,
that
was
one
of
the
proposals.
Just
this
morning
was
for
connectors
to
a
variety
of
other
systems.
So
yeah,
would
you
like
to
kind
of
take
us
through
what?
What
are
the
basics
that
need
to
go
through
and
in
fact,
while
you're
setting
up
sam
andreas?
Why
don't
you
talk
about
the
standard
and
you
know
what
what
from
the
standards
perspective,
we're
already
thinking
we
need
to
put
in
for
the
v1.
E
Yeah,
thank
you.
Thank
you,
john.
So
we're
doing
something
highly
unusual
in
standards
work.
We
are
writing
a
standard
as
as
as
reference
implementations
are
being
implemented.
So
that
is
highly
unusual.
Typically,
you
write
a
whole
bunch
of
code.
E
Then
customers
complain
because
the
code
because
they
need
to
buy
five
versions
of
the
same
code
and
then
and
then
they
they're
they're
they're,
saying
no
guys.
You
need
to
like
figure
this
out
and
then
there,
the
the
the
different
vendors
saying,
yeah.
Okay,
maybe
and
then
one
of
the
big
customers
are
saying
you
know
what
it's
like.
I'm
gonna
write
it
myself.
E
If
you
can't,
if
you
can't
do
it
because
the
pain
is
too
great,
then
they
all
get
together
and
say:
okay,
let's
talk
about
what
we
have
and
and
and
whose
deck
is
better
better
than
than
than
the
other
stack.
So
that
is
takes
a
long
time
case
in
point.
Tcpip
took
late,
73
till
85
12
years,
and
that's
really
simple,
I
mean
tcpip
is
not
hard
from.
E
Very
hard,
but
you
know
it's
like
so
you
know
standards
take
years.
We
don't
have
that
time,
because
if
you
write
a
standard
and
it
takes
you
three
years
then
whatever
you
write,
the
standards
off
is
already
out
of
date
like
painfully
out
of
date.
So.
C
A
But
then
there's
also,
I
don't
know
how
much
we'll
get
into
it,
but
there's
also
sort
of
higher
layers
like
formats
and
schema
right.
E
Right,
so
so
so
we're
in
the
standards
where
we
we
we
start
off
what
you
need
to.
First
of
all,
you
need
to
all
talk
about
the
same
thing
with
in
the
same
language,
so
that
that's
that
that's
really
important.
You
know
that's
step
number
one
that
takes
a
little
time,
but
it's
really
important,
because
once
everybody
talks
about
the
same
thing
in
the
same
way,
then
that
makes
collaboration
and
especially
interoperability,
a
lot
easier.
E
E
If
you
want
to
achieve
this
particular
goal,
which
you
state
and
define
in
the
in
the
in
the
standard
and
from
there
on
you,
you,
you
take
those
components
and
layers
apart
and
start
defining
the
things
as
as,
as
you
see,
fit
informed
by
ongoing
development
work,
as
well
as
informing
ongoing
development
work
based
on
the
discussions
that
are
had,
and
things
like
what
we're
gonna
do
today
is
go
in
and
and
and
peel
the
onion
you
know
do
an
outside
out
outside
in
view
to
figure
out.
What
are
we
missing?
E
What
are
we
potentially
missing?
What
do
we
need
to
look
at
and
what
do
we
need
to
a
specify
and
be
built
or
build
and
then
specify
right
or
do
it
at
the
same
time?
So
it's
it's.
It's
a
very
different
approach
to
standards,
work
by
the
way,
an
approach
that
other
organizations
are
starting
to
adopt
as
well.
A
By
the
way,
I'm
I'm
broadcasting
the
on
the
on
the
youtube
you'll
see
that
I'm
showing
off
the
the
standards.
The
initial
standards
drafts.
E
So
is
that
is
that
have
I
have
I
have
I
done
enough
of
a
of
a
psa
yeah.
A
E
Right,
so
so
so
so
the
the
the
main
thing
is,
you
need
you
from
the
architecture
need
to
break
down
the
components
that
you
have
around
messaging
privacy.
You
know
how
you
do
the
the
actual
execution
of
the
of
the
of
the
requests
of
the
transactions.
You
need
to
define
what
the
what
the
actors
are
within
within
an
instance
of
of
baseline
and
how
they
work
together.
E
What
do
they
mean
and
then
you
need
to
talk
about
all
all
the
fun
stuff
about
you
know
what,
if
you
have
multiple
instances
running
the
same
thing?
How
can
you
avoid
how
you
make
that
collision
resistant
blah
blah
blah?
So
these
are
all
things
that
are
that
are
that
are
fun
that
need
to
be
thought
through.
How
do
you
define
identity,
especially
identity,
in
a
way
that
is,
that
is,
that
is
not
only
makes
sense
within
within
one
stack,
but
is
what
is
portable,
et
cetera,
et
cetera?
E
How
do
you
ensure
interoperability?
You
know
data
exchange,
schemas,
you
know
it's
like
it's
like.
How
do
you
do
versioning?
How
can
you
discover
things?
You
know
those
are
all
very,
very
important
areas
that
need
to
be
agreed
upon,
because
you
want
to
be
able
to
have
an
ecosystem
of
baseline
instances
that
are,
that
are
interoperable,
that
are
interoperable
and
then,
and
and
and
potentially
can
can
also
spontaneously
form
networks
right.
So
you
can,
you
can
have
you.
E
You
can
have
ephemeral
networks
of
of
baseline
instances
that
that
allow
you
to
to
to
execute,
for
example,
multi-party
compute
in
real
time
trusted
trustless,
multi-party
compute
in
in
real
time.
In
order
to
do
that,
they
all
they'll
need
to.
They
all
need
to
understand
each
other.
A
Right
so,
for
example,
if
jack's
company
provide
is
working
with
a
group
of
companies
that
are
generating
some
baseline
exit
workflow
like
an
invoice
or
something,
but
then
there's
a
financial
organization
or
a
set
of
organizations
that
are,
that
can
do
something
with
that.
Maybe
finance
them
that
are
using
a
different
baseline
compliance
stack.
There
should
be
no
effort
to
make
to
to
have
the
those
two
work
groups
interrupt
right.
E
Yeah
and
if
you're,
if
you're
using
the
same
cryptographic
suite
they
you,
you
should
be
able
to
to
then
smoothly
interoperate,
but
these
are
the
things
that
the
standard
needs
to
to
define
and
say
if
you
want
to
inter-operate.
These
are
the
things
you
all
need
to
agree
upon,
and
if
you
don't
it,
ain't
gonna
work,
so
so
that
those
are
the
those
are
the
those
are
the
key.
Those
are
the
key
thing.
It's
not
just
like.
E
How
do
I
manage
a
work
group
so
with
the
participants
in
a
workflow,
but
it's
also
because
I'm
dealing
with
cryptography,
it's
like
it's
like
which
cryptography
am
I
using?
What
version
of
it
right?
Am
I
using
it
as
a
as
a
jw?
You
know,
am
I
using
you
know
signature
algorithms
as
a
jwk
as
a
jws
do
I
do
you
know
it's
like
it's
like.
E
These
are
all
nuances
that
that
are
lost
on
most
people,
because
people
most
people
are
not
familiar
with
that,
but
if
they
are
not
agreed
upon,
should
I
ain't
gonna
work.
A
Right
so
thanks
andreas,
that's
that's
really
good
I'll
say
that
the
the
the
work
has
gone
very
well
on
the
standards
team.
So
far,
a
very
good
team-
and
at
this
point
it's
again
it's
coming
down
to
you-
know
really
drafting
the
the
essential
parts
of
the
of
the
standard
and
making
sure
that
those
are
consistent.
A
Vice
versa,
with
the
with
the
the
core
implementation
and
that
that's
around
the
api,
so
I've
I've
put
the
link
in
both
chats
for
anybody
that
wants
to
follow
along
I'd,
really
encourage
everybody
to
read
that
stuff.
If
you
can
anybody,
that's
that
has
a
dog
in
the
hunt
as
it
were,
for
making
sure
that
your
company
can
get
what
it
needs
out
of
baselining
mehran.
I
know
I
see
you
there.
You
know.
A
I
think
one
of
the
interesting
questions
is
what
are
things
in
the
standard
and
in
the
core
that
are
going
to
need
to
be
there
to
work
for
work
well
with
things
like
sap.
A
So
I'm
sure
you'll
have
lots
of
thoughts
on
that,
and
I
know
boris
you're
working
a
lot
on
on
zero
knowledge
circuits
you're
using
narc,
but
as
as
we
discussed,
it
would
be
important
that
any
you
know
any
zero
knowledge
circuit
component,
proprietary
or
open
source
should
be
able
to
operate
as
long
as
it's
compliant
with
the
standard
right.
E
E
Yeah
can
can
anybody
do
a
trusted
setup?
It's
like
how
do
I
know
that
you
that
you're,
that
you're
you're
you're
still
not
keeping
the
toxic
waste
around
and
and
are
and
are
screwing
scoring
everybody
and
their
cousin
over,
oh
and
by
the
way,
because
all
other
stacks
are
using
that
suddenly
you
have
a
solar
wind
right,
it's
like
and-
and
I
mean
a
solar
wind
squared
right.
E
A
A
Yeah,
I
don't
think
we've
even
talked
about
it.
I
can
imagine
a
couple
of
angles
on
that
right.
One
is
so
we've
already
identified
a
thing
that
we
should
be
adding
to
the
list
for
v1
is
what
do
you
do
about
that?
What
do
you
do
about
trusted
setup
and
it
could
be
a
should
not
you
could
say,
or
it
could
be
a
if
you
do
that.
If
you
have
a
certain
type
of
trusted
setup,
then
you
must
inform
right.
A
There
must
be
a
you
know,
a
message
passed
to
all
work
group
counterparties,
informing
them,
maybe
that,
but
these.
E
Are
the
kinds
of
things
that
you
might
be
using
one
trusted
setup
right,
there's
a
there's,
a
public
ser
ceremony
that
baseline
service
providers
are
doing
just
just
as
was
done
with
with
in
in
late
2019,
with
pretty
much
every
single
l2
that
is
currently
operating
in
on
on
on
the
ethereum
mainnet
is
using
the
same
cryptosuite.
E
Why?
Because,
because
it
allows
you
to
a
higher
performance,
you
can.
You
can
squeeze
a
lot
more
circuits
into
into
that
and
you
and
you
you
need
a
public
public
publicly
verifiable
trusted
trusted
trusted
trusted
setup.
So
so
the
question
is:
are
we
are
we
recommending
that
if
you
have,
if
you
need
a
trusted
setup,
there
are
other
other
schemes
that
do
not
require
a
trusted
setup,
their
performance
trade-offs,
size
trade-offs.
What
are
we
gonna
do?
Are
we?
You
know
it's
like
it's
like
there.
E
There's
there
are
there
are
there
are
50
000
things
to
sunday
that
implementers
need
to
think
about,
and
the
standards
team
needs
to
do
recommendations
for
those
implementers,
because
if
we
screw
that
one
up
you
know
you
could
you
could
potentially
could
potentially
open
up
a
barn
door
where
you're,
not
where
you
really
didn't
want
to.
A
Right
on
okay,
so
that's
the
pretty
big!
You
know
high
level
overview
of
standards,
there's
a
ton
of
work
and
we
have
a
standards
meeting
every
thursday
if
you're
interested
in
that
work-
and
you
have
a
you
know
again,
if
you
have
a
product
or
a
company
or
solutions
firm
that
needs
this
stuff
to
work
in
a
certain
way.
A
In
order
for
you
to
do
your
job
or
to
sell
new
business
on
the
baseline,
you
know
moniker.
I
guess
then
you're
going
to
want
to
be
involved
in
that,
because
you
do
not
want
to
be
caught
unawares.
A
So
we've
already
had
some
really
good.
I've
got
to
say
it's
very
impressive,
how
little
contentiousness
we've
seen
so
far
in
that
work.
I
hope
I'm
not
gonna,
as
as
the
heat
turns
up,
there's
gonna
be
there's
gonna,
be
points
of
view
and
we're
gonna
have
to
work
them
out,
but
we
have
an
excellent
excellent
leader
in
anaeso
frank,
who
really
knows
how
to
run
a
team
so
we'll
go
over
there,
hey
carl.
I
know
you,
you
had
a
lot
of
thoughts
now
if
we
want
to
switch
over
to
you
know.
A
C
A
Really
right
in
a
nutshell:
that's
what
it
does
it.
You
know,
and
it
uses
a
machine
that
is
holding
on
to
proofs
to
make
sure
that
we
can
verifiably
confirm
that
anybody,
wanna
wanna,
offer
a
different
way
of
summarizing
the
work.
D
John,
I
have
a
question
if
nobody
else
asks
or
comes
charged-
and
I
have
a
question
to
follow
with
respect
to
that.
A
D
D
Is
there
a
consistency
aspect
where
you're
looking
at
simply
as
data?
So
do
two
organizations
have
the
same
data?
You're?
Not
if
you
look
outside
of
of
supply
chain,
you
know
objects
that
that
flow
between
organizations
and
you
look
at
it
at.
As
do
I
have
the
same
truth
that
another
organization
is
using,
so
that
could
be
just
the
records
in
the
in
an
air
table,
and
you
know
database
or
is
that
well
within
the
domain
of
what
consistency
does
100.
D
A
No
they
to
be
that
they
ought
to
be
sponsoring.
Frankly,
I
I
think
I
ought
to
give
them
a
call,
or
some
one
of
the
oasis
people
will
but
yeah
the
air
table
is
a
good
example.
One
of
the
grant
proposals
today
is
to
baseline
excel.
A
You
know
with
with
you
know
so,
with
plugins
there's
already
a
set
of
earlier
plugins.
That
probably
need
a
little
updating
at
this
point
that
lime
chain
and
others
did
around
google
sheets
what's
cool-
is
that
you
can
actually
lock
up
those
sheets
too.
So
you
can
actually
say
well
this.
This
row
is
baselined
with
microsoft
dynamics
and
it's
you
can
ui,
you
can
lock
it
up.
You
know,
as.
D
A
E
Yeah
this
is
this
is
a
great
example,
john
of
of
of
where
you
need
different
implementation
options.
Then
what
what
currently.
A
E
Exists
right,
it's
like
it's
like
if
I
baseline
a
row
and
then
I'm
thinking,
oh,
I
want
to
baseline
this
and
that
and
then
I
multiply
that
by
the
number
of
spreadsheets
that
are
out
there.
I
just
I
just
I
just
and
now
I'm
I'm
I'm
uttering
my
favorite
line.
I
just
blew
up
my
neck.
A
A
E
Yes,
you
did
because
of
just
the
data
that
you
just
dumped
on.
However,
there
are,
there
are
zero
knowledge
type
methods
that
you
can
use
where
you
can
have
trillions
of
rows
being
quote-unquote
baselines,
ensuring
data
integrity
without
without
data
spamming,
mainnet
and
in
a
very
commons,
oriented,
sensible
and
gentle
way.
You
still
use
ethereum
mainnet.
A
Right
now
can
I
so
can
I
make
a
sorry
go
ahead?
Well
well,
and
this
is
kind
of
what
I
was
hoping
for
when
you
were
discussing
this
it.
I
was
reminded
that
and
sam
this
is
where
we're
gonna
get
interesting.
A
I
was
reminded
of
a
feature
requirement,
so
what
we
really
want
to
be
doing
here
is
throwing
out
and
you
can
put
them
on
chat.
You
can
say
I'd
like
to
talk
about
this
problem
or
that
thing
or
this
feature,
or
this
non-functional
requirement
it
has
to
have
this
kind
of
performance
vector
it
has
to
be
this
maintainable
or
you
know
I
used
to
work
on.
You
know
all
the
ilities
for
a
company
right.
You
know
maintainability
scalability,
you
know
kind
of
keeping
track
of
all
that
stuff.
A
In
this
case
you
know,
there's
both
functional
and
non-functional
requirements
to
to
make
this
work,
and
I'm
gonna,
I'm
just
gonna
offer
two
of
them
and
if
you're
watching
on
youtube
you'll
see
these
pop
up-
and
you
know
we
actually
have
some
of
these
issues
already,
but
I'll
be
a
little
redundant
here
and
put
in
debasing
and
rebasing.
A
That
is,
if
you
know
there
needs
to
be
and
a
way
to
get
a
signal
that
you've
been
debased.
That
is,
your
version
of
the
record,
is
no
longer
consistent
with
what
the
proof
would
tell
you.
It
should
be,
and
the
ability
to
re-synchronize
by
getting
that
back.
You
know
getting
the
original
data
run
a
session
with
the
original
counterparties,
either
one
or
more,
and
there
may
be
other
schemes
for
that
as
well.
That
people
can
come
up
with.
A
A
You
know
the
the
baseline
in
order
to
baseline.
You
need
to
be
able
to
do
this.
You
don't
want
to
make
the
mistake
of
having
something
where
you
you
can't
go
back
and
forth
on
an
agreement.
For
example,
you
want
to
be
able
to
say
that
hey.
I
just
did
this
purchase
order,
oh
yeah,
but
you
got
something
wrong.
A
I
need
you
to
change
it
if
you're
locked
in
and
can't
change
that
or
if
it's
not
easy,
that
would
be
not
okay,
so
that
feature
needs
to
be
there
and
now
that
I've
thrown
a
couple
of
them
out.
What
does
that
give
you
guys
the
thoughts
about
mehran?
You
have
any
thoughts
about
interop
about.
You
know
what
it
needs
to
do
with
sap.
C
Time
now
another
yeah-
I
was
thinking
about
two
points.
One
andreas
said
that
previously
there
were
implementations
and
then
standard,
and
now
we
are
working
standard
and
implementation
at
the
same
time,
so
I
think
we
really
have
to
get
more
involved
in
different
implementations,
because
that's,
maybe
is
the
main
way
to
know
what
we
don't
know.
C
So,
that's
kind
of
not
to
myself
as
well.
Yeah.
A
C
A
Already
in
like
several
of
the
of
the
existing
known
professional
implementations
that
are
going
out
there,
in
other
words,
yeah,
as
far
as
I
know,
we're
working
on
one
ourselves,
so
we
haven't
disclosed,
but
there's
I
think
the
coca-cola
one
kona
is
involves
sap.
C
Yeah,
well
that
that's
another
team
in
sap,
so
it's
it's
sap
is
huge.
You
know
there
are
a
lot
of
teams,
so
from
our
team.
We
also
have
to
get
more
involved
with
the
implementation.
I
think
that
helps
to
kind
of
describe
all
those
missing
points
in
the
standard
as
well
and
about
the
example
of
excel
or
what
you
mentioned
for
debasing
and
rebasing
and
versioning.
C
I
was
thinking
what
I
kind
of
missed
in
the
baseline
was
when
there
is
only
a
bilateral
agreement
when
there
are
only
two
parties
that
they
want
to
interact
with
each
other.
C
A
Well,
I'm
writing
this
down,
because
you're
you're
bringing
up
something
interesting
which
is
related
to
that
which
is
in
an
end
right
now,
a
bilateral.
You
know
you
can
construct
multilateral.
That
is,
you
know
many
different
counterparties
in
a
workflow,
but
you
right
now
can't
can
only
do
bilateral
work
steps
and,
if
again,
if
anybody's
confused
about
those
two
words
go
back
to
the
documentation.
It's
all
right
there.
A
You
know
the
cardinality
here
is
that
you
have
work
groups,
work,
fl
flows
and
work
steps
in
a
baseline
scenario
and
and
and
yeah
so
it
work
step
is
all
bilateral.
It
needs
to
go
to
multilateral
so
that
you
can
have
one
work
step.
It's
just.
It
gives
you
more
composability,
but
the
minute
you
do
that
you
you
have
to
you
you're,
getting
into
issues
of
questions
of
griefing
versus
you
know
an
issue
of
not
having
consistency
right.
A
So
if
one
of
the
counterparties
is
not
responsive
it,
you
know
it
just
doesn't
send
back
its
proof,
and
you
say
that
every
counterparty
in
this
particular
work
step
must,
you
know,
send
back
its
signature
and
and
go
back
in
the
proof.
If
you,
if
you
require
that,
on
the
wrong
kind
of
work,
step,
you've
brought
the
entire
workflow
to
a
halt,
so
you
need,
you
know
there
needs
to
be
a
way,
that's
a
feature.
A
I
just
wrote
it
down
and
again
most
of
these
that
I'm
putting
in
are
already
in
the
in
the
issues
list,
but
just
I'm
just
trying
to
illustrate
for
folks
clearly
you're
going
to
want
to
be
able
to
in
in
fabric.
We
call
these
transaction
policies
here.
We
could
call
them
work,
step
policies
that
allow
you
to
decide
on
a
work
step
by
workshop
basis.
You
know
the
balance
of
those
issues.
E
And
one
one
one
one
little
point
here
is
that,
and
this
is
a
plug
for
some
other
work.
That's
going
on
tomorrow.
There
is
going
to
be
a
vote
on
a
on
a
draft
standard
around
a
dlt-based
commercial
and
operational
framework
for
billing
within
telco,
which
is
which
introduces
the
concepts
of
smart
bilaterals
and
smart
omni,
omni
laterals
and
yes,
maran.
You
need
actually
even
for
bilateral
interaction.
E
E
If
you,
for
example,
issue
a
quote
for
a
service
right,
what
happens
often
especially
in
the
tackle
world,
is
that
the
the
the
buyer
accepts
the
quote
from
the
from
the
seller,
and
then
the
operations
team
on
the
seller
side
is
like
no
dude.
You
just
sold
the
service.
That
is
no
longer
existence,
or
we
can't
fulfill
that
requirement.
What
the
heck,
but
your
inventory
said
you
could
it's
like?
Well,
dude
it
changed.
E
You
know
it's
like
it's
like
you're
you're,
you're
you're,
so
so
so
there
are
instances
where
the
ace,
the
the
the
the
the
asynchronous
or
or
non-synchronized
systems
on
on
on
each
side
of
the
bilateral
actually
causes
the
the
the
synchronization
between
between
those
two
organizations
to
fall
out
of
sync,
because
the
buyer
is
going
to
go
where's
my
service-
and
this
is
going
to
like-
did.
A
I
I
see
a
couple:
people
went
off,
maybe
they're
interested
in
talking
about
that.
Could
you
let
us
put
a
link
into
the
chat
about
where,
where
we
can
find
details
on
that.
E
The
votes
coming
up
on
thursday,
what
I'm
gonna
put
is
is
a
link
to
a
white
paper
that
that
that
meth,
so
the
metro,
ethernet
forum
published,
and
so
everybody
can
read
up
about
that
by
the
way.
If
you
actually
look
look
into
the
white
paper,
you
will
recognize
that
option.
One
that's
discussed
is
actually
baseline.
C
E
A
A
A
You
could
just
basically
you
could
just
decide
right:
yeah,
oh
I'm
gonna,
I'm
gonna,
I'm
gonna
baseline
at
the
poa
or
I'm
gonna
do
a
baseline
of
the
poa,
but
I'm
also
gonna.
My
application
stack
is
gonna
say
you
know,
but
I'm
not
gonna
believe
it
until
some
future
other
event
occurs
right
and
that
so
you
could.
You
could
deal
with
it
at
the
at
the
application
level
and
then
the
way
you're
implementing
baselining.
A
Is
there
something
about
baseline
itself?
That
needs
to
be
tweaked
or
is
there
a
feature
or
a
non-functional
requirement?
There.
E
So
the
non-functional
requirement
is,
is
that
it
is
that
the
workflow
is
strictly
deterministic,
that
that
that
takes
care
of
that.
Because
then
you
have
a
quote,
but
the
order
is
not
accepted,
and
if
the
order
is
not
accepted,
then
you
can't
commit
commit
to
the
service
or
you're
not
going
to
commit
to
the
service.
Does
that
require
a
whole
lot
of
back
and
forth
offline
because
people
are
starting
to
yell
at
each
other?
A
Right
on
thanks
for
that,
that's
very
interesting
maharani.
Does
that
begin
to
address
your?
The
other
thing
that
I'm
guessing
maharan
that
you're
going
to
be
interested
in
is,
is
how
do
you
get
to
a
schema
mapping
that
that
will
you
know
without
without
putting
everybody
through
hell
every
time
they
try
to
set
up
a
workflow
that
that
that
will
that
has
a
chance
of
getting
baselined
at
all,
because
you've
got
one
schema
on
one
end
and
another
schema
on
another
right.
C
A
So
that
that,
actually,
that
work
is
going
on
in
the
standards
team
right
now,
you're,
you
I'm
sure
you're
you're
on
the
team,
so
you
should
be
aware
and
yeah
I'm
interested
in
like
what
are
the?
What
are
the
translator
systems
that
you
find
most
appealing?
You
know
in
an
sap
framework
that
you
know
and
how
would
they
interoper?
How
would
they
work
with
this
right?
I've
got
like
mulesoft
or
something
where
I'm
translating
between
different
systems.
C
Yeah
I've
I've
not
worked
on
that
level,
I
would
say
different
tools,
but
so
we
have.
We
usually
have
sap
standard
data
models.
So
usually
there
is
not
that
many
translations
from
different
schemas,
but
I
have
to
see
when
they
want
to
integrate
to
other
networks
what
they
do.
So
since
most
of
the
time
it's
been
a
mutual
integration
just
point
to
point
integration,
I'm
not
sure
if
there
is
a
standard
way
for
all
of
them,
because
again
there
are
different
systems
in
sap
and
each
of
them
might
use
different
tools.
B
Yeah
john
one
other
thing
off
of
that,
and
then
it
was
talked
about.
B
I
think
andreas
mentioned
it
earlier
was
the
the
kind
of
the
the
identity
piece
right,
the
authorization
piece
and
I'm
curious
from
the
group-
if,
if
that's
something,
that's
going
to
be
kind
of
beefed
up
or
focused
on
as
a
as
kind
of
a
pillar
of
baselining,
or
if
it's
going
to
be
more
tangential
and
and
just
kind
of
you
know
something,
that's
in
the
ecosystem
from
our
experience
and
I've
got
a
project
coming
up
involving
trade
finance
where
different
international
sovereigns
are
trying
to
identify
if,
if
their
corporates
can
actually
perform
a
transaction
right
now,
it's
not
just
integrating
their
systems.
B
Point-To-Point,
like
was
just
stated,
there's
usually
like
humans
involved
at
some
part
of
that
workflow
that
either
bless
the
transaction
or
attest
to
it
or
something
and
they
bring
along
their
identity,
essentially
their
digital
identity,
to
integrate
as
part
of
that
transaction
or
add
metadata
as
part
of
that
transaction.
So
I'm
curious,
you
know
what
kind
of
focus
or
or
what
kind
of
implementation
details
are
going
to
be
needed
for
identity
and
digital
identity.
With
regarding
baselining.
A
And
go
more
on
this,
but
we'll
address
it
now,
but
also,
I
think,
there's
a
lot
to
be
covered
there.
One
thing
that
you
know
we
already
have
stipulated
that
we're
going
to
be
supporting
the
did
stan.
A
You
know
w3c
verified
credentials
and
dids,
and
I
think
finally,
after
years
seems
like
it's
going
to
be
a
thing
more
and
more
companies
are
going
to,
you
know,
have
you
know,
be
issuing
those
qr
codes
and
and
we'll
we'll
all
be
in
identity
nirvana
in
a
few
years,
maybe
hopefully
but
we're
going
to
support
that
standard.
A
But
one
of
the
things
that's,
you
know
one
of
the
things
you
can
put
in
that
well-known
file,
for
example
in
or
in
the
payload
of
a
did
is
you
could
put
the
schema
right?
You
could
say
hey
whenever
I
get
this,
you
know
I
could
see
a
standardization
in
particular
industry,
maybe
around
edi
that
says
here
it
I'm
going
to
publish
how
I'm
going
to
treat
your
edi
baseline,
workflow
and
and
that
and
if
I'm,
when
I'm
setting
up
the
work
group,
I
can
imagine
you
know
advanced
tools.
A
You
know
coming
out
from
companies
like
provide
and
companies
like
consensus
and
others
will
will
say:
hey
yeah.
The
latest
feature
is
you
know,
pre
pre-introspection,
on
on
on
baseline
mapping
of
this
particular
record
right
based
on
metadata.
That's
in
the
in
the
metadata
component
of
the
of
the
did.
I
can
see.
B
B
Yeah,
I
think,
there's
a
lot
of
opportunity
there,
because
even
in
the
edi
world
setting
up
a
direct
connection
between
two
trading
partners,
it's
it's
a
it's
a
repetitive
process,
but
there's
usually
some
manual
mapping
involved
right
then,
there's
metadata
that
that
goes
in
that
each
the
buyer
and
seller
tend
to
have
very
specific
to
them.
Right
and
I
see
baselining
is
possibly
replacing
a
lot
of
that
laborious
kind
of
onboarding
sure
so
that
a
lot
of
this
gets
automated.
Unfortunately,.
A
I
I
think
that
and
you're
you're
an
edi
person,
I
think,
a
hell
of
a
grant
proposal.
That
would
be
interesting
if
it
was
written.
You
know
if
it
was
a
good
good,
good,
well-written
grant
proposal.
You
know
I
think
we
could
spend
some
money
on
an
edi.
You
know
pick
your
skin
pick
your
format,
you
know
gs1
or
yeah
at
effect,
whatever
right
or
what
is
x.
B
A
X,
12
right
could
be
you
know
if
somebody
mapped
that
into
a
baseline
process
right.
Where
do
we
need
zero
knowledge
circuits?
For
that?
Where
do
we
need
to
just
publish
the
specifications
for
field
level
requirements
right
so
that
my
sap
system
on
this
side
and
your
dynamic
system
on
that
side
and
your
oracle
netsuite
system
on
that
side?
You
know
need
to
know
that
you
have
to
implement
these
things
in
this
way
right.
That
would
be
pretty.
That
would
be
a
wonderful
project
for
somebody
to
pull
off.
D
John,
can
I
make
a
comment
on
the
schema
mapping
portion
yeah.
My
background
is
from
tickle,
which
was
doing
this
integration
and
message
brokering
and
messaging
in
general,
and
but
more
recently,
some
of
my
colleagues
from
there
have
started
companies
like
workato,
which
is
like
the
high-end
zapier
sure.
If
you
will,
and
so
in
worcado,
I
think
they
they
go
with
the
model
of
recipes.
So
you
have
recipes
that
allow
systems
to
kind
of
find
a
common
up
data
model
or
object
model
on
which
they
operate.
D
D
Whether
there's
something
like
a
recipe
that
that
is
part
of
the
works,
that's
an
object
model,
or
did
you
know
that
you're
talking
about
and
therefore
it
needs
to
be
a
part
of
the
specification
and
you
kind
of
are:
are
we
agreeing
on
this
recipe
and
therefore
okay?
We're
gonna,
you
know
it's
gonna,
be
the
proof.
It's
going
to
be
one
of
the
proof
elements
in
this
in
this
work,
step
or
workflow
right.
A
So
work
auto
if
you're
watching
come
and
join
the
baseline
protocol,
go
to
baseline
protocol.org
and
get
into
the
slack
channel
in
the
upper
right
corner.
There's
a
little
button
there
you
can
get
into
the
slack
channel
you
can
sponsor
you.
Can
you
can
be
part
of
the
team?
That's
a
great
idea,
so
I
wrote
a
couple
of
other
items
down.
Does
anybody
have
a
ensure
workflow
is
strictly
deterministic,
that's
already
in
there
ability
to
go
from
a
baseline
record?
A
To
a
token,
so
I
don't
know
where,
along
the
line,
somebody
was
talking
about
something,
and
I
it
struck
me
that
one
of
the
things
that
is
going
to
be
important
is-
and
this
may
have
some
chain
chain
linking
oracley
type
stuff
involved,
but
in
general
right,
if
you
have
you
know
something
like
ave
or
something
like
you
know,
you
know
an
nft
or
something
like
that.
C
A
Right
now,
the
state
of
the
art
is
to
take
some
information
and
manually
create
an
nft
out
of
it,
and
then
you
can
do
things
like
you
know,
do
lending
and
defy
against
it,
but
it
has
been
pointed
out
a
number
of
times.
I
wholeheartedly
agree
with
this:
you
have
a
lot
of
the
attributes
of
a
token
in
a
baseline
record.
You've
got
a
degree
of
tamper
resistance.
A
You
have
assurance
that
the
counterparties
that
are
relevant
agree
on
the
data
and
you
and
you
can,
you
know,
go
to
this
proof
to
make
sure
that
there's
been
no
shenanigans.
It's
not
it's
not
tokenized,
but
it's
got
some
token
attributes
and
you
know
for
cs.
Majors
will
remember,
you
know,
hashing
a
hash
is
the
original
token
and
in
fact
that
proof.
D
A
Looks
like
a
hash
and
that's
a
token,
so
it
maybe
it
is
tokenized
and
that
there
is
a
baseline
proof,
a
hash
on
the
main
net.
That
indicates
that
this
has
consistency,
but
that's
not
the
same
as
tokenizing
all
right.
You
want,
if,
god
forbid,
if
you
wanted
to
do
this,
I
don't
know
why
I
would
want
to
put
my
open
data
about
my
private.
B
A
So
that's
one
way
to
to
do
it,
but
in
any
event,
you're
going
to
whether
you're
putting
data
from
that
record
in
the
clear
into
a
token
of
some
kind
on
the
blockchain
for
reasons
that
make
sense-
or
you
want
to
do
something
like
I
just
described-
we
need
some
way
of
getting
from
the
record
to
a
tokenized
event.
So
there's
going
to
be
rules
around
that.
I
think
andreas
has
been
talking
about
that.
A
lot
lately.
A
A
Actually
sorry
yeah
and
that
that,
in
fact,
just
because
we're
in
the
interest
of
time
that
that,
in
fact
that
leads
to
another
thing,
which
is
I'm
going
to
put
it
right
down
here,
if
anybody's
watching
the
youtube,
you'll
see
the
the
screen.
You
know
we
need
what
was
I
gonna
say.
I
think
we're
gonna
need
the
a
mapping
of
or
yeah
integration
of
real
contracts
systems,
in
other
words,
whether
it's
docusign
or
some
other.
A
A
You
could
certainly
baseline
the
business
logic
of
that
contractual
agreement,
and
now
you
have
that
embodied
in
the
ultimate
in
in
the
in
your
termination.
E
No,
no,
no,
no,
no
you're,
you're,
you're,
you're,
you're,
you're,
you're,
absolutely
right,
so
that
actually
has
like
two
very
interesting
components
to
it
because
you
need
to
represent.
Let's
just
take
the
let's
say
you
want
to
issue
a
security
right
that
is
based
on
on
on
some
off
chain
assets.
Right,
it's
like
hey!
E
You
have
you
have
you
know
20
20,
you
know
you
have
the
the
nfts
of
the
of
last
year's
la
lakers,
a
championship
team
right
and
you
want
to
want
to
want
to
securitize
them
right,
and
so,
in
order
to
do
that,
you
need
actually
an
investment
contract,
but
the
investment
contract
is
is
its
own
workflow
right.
E
So
not
only
do
you
need
you
now
you
need
to
to
have
the
nfts
baselined
or
you
need
to
include
them
as
as
as
a
as
a
reference
in
the
investment
contract
and
then
in
that
investment
contract
that
needs
to
be
referenced.
In
the
token
that
represents
the
investment
contract
right.
So
it's
it.
You
have
you're
you're,
now
you're
you're,
combining
multi-party
compute,
ideally
trustless
with
with
with
in
baseline
with
tokenization
and.
E
No,
I
mean
you
have,
but
you
you
you,
you
see
how
how
how
your
you
know
you
won't
get
around
the
complexities
of,
unfortunately,
the
complexities
of
existing
frameworks
that
are
just
like
goddawn
bad.
But
you
know
it's
like
it's
like
it's
it's
your
it's
your
call
whether
you
want
to
go
to
jail
or
not
right.
A
Right
now
I
I
just
we're
getting
to
the
top
of
the
hour
dhruv.
I
saw
you
had
a
point
about
use
cases
ensuring
surveillance
of
variants
of
c19.
Did
you
want
to
elaborate
on
that.
C
Just
I
had
the
idea,
because
I
yesterday
I
was
seeing
a
seminar
organized
by
some
pre-season
genomics
companies
illumina,
which
is
which
those
with
does
large-scale
sequencing
of
genomes,
who
are
finding
the
variants
and
for
like
trying
to
ensure
the
privacy
of
the
tests
of
people
like
people's
pii
data
has
to
be
kept
private
but
but
at
the
same
time
we
can
have
like
their
data
can
be
used
to
to
be
entered
to,
to
try
to
find
out
patterns
of
how
different
period
variants
are
progressing.
C
So
federating
predicted
learning
is
a
very
promising
field
which
is
currently
being
researched
by
ibm
and
other
big
companies.
So.
A
Do
you
have
thoughts
about
what
kind
of
features
or
attributes
baselining
would
need
to
support
in
v1
to
accommodate
that.
C
A
Right
now,
yeah,
let's,
let's
go
into
it
and
again
we're
gonna
have
more
of
these
through
may.
So
let's
talk
more
about
that.
Oh
the
other
one
before-
and
this
was
related
to
your
previous
comment-
dhruv,
I
think
relevant
mapping,
relevance,
mapping
or
even
salience-
maybe
where
you
have
lots
of
fields
perhaps,
but
we're
only
gonna
baseline
field
x
and
y
right.
We're
only
going
to
get
the
these
two
things
that
can
that
can
bring
down
a
lot
of
these
mapping
issues
where
you
might
say
well.
A
A
Yeah
yeah
qed
all
right
any
last
words
this
has
been.
I
don't
know
about
you
guys,
but
I
felt
like
that.
We
got
work
done
today.
That's
fun!
I
like
getting
work
done,
we'll
we'll
tag
this
up
sam.
I
know
I
asked
you
to
to
go
into
the
overview
on
this
stuff,
but
you've
done
like
that
about
10
times
over
on
this
on
these
calls.
So
thanks
for
that,
as
always-
and
we
can
be
bagging
and
tagging
some
of
these
issues,
please
everybody
who's
on
this
call
and
everybody
is
watching.
A
Anybody
cares
about
this
stuff,
go
into
baseline,
dash,
protocol.org
and
go
into
the
repo
and
start
writing
issues,
or
at
least
go
on
to
slack
and
say:
hey
everybody
or
in
the
dev
channel
or
or
in
the
maintainers
group,
go
in
and
say,
hey,
look,
you're
forgetting
a
feature,
and
I'm
gonna
need
this
feature
or
have
you
considered
these
performance
issues?