►
From YouTube: The Baseline
Description
The weekly office hours for the Baseline Protocol open source community. Learn more at https://baseline-protocol.org.
A
A
We
do
this
every
week
at
noon,
u.s,
eastern
and
now
also
at
in
in
india
on
the
time
zone.
I
think
it's
six
o'clock
saturday
nights
is
that
right,
which.
B
B
A
A
For
those
of
you
who
don't
know
the
baseline
community
go
to
baseline,
protocol.org
and
and
learn
all
you
can
we're
gonna
be
doing
a
big
upgrade
to
that
site
soon,
with
lots,
more
content
and
lots
more
in
the
way
of
documentation
and
tools
and
and
resources
for
people
to
get
going
on
baselining,
and
with
that
we
have
a
couple
of
really
special
guests
today,
dan
burnett
from
the
enterprise
ethereum
alliance
and
guy
martin
dan,
is
the
executive
director
of
the
enterprise
ethereum
alliance
and
guy
martin,
the
exec
managing
director
executive
director.
A
Edie
at
at
the
oasis
open,
I
always
want
to
say
guy
oasis
foundation,
because
it's
easy
for
my
mouth
to
say.
But
I
know
that
that's.
A
C
A
And
other
things.
A
C
A
We
also
have
we
have
jack
wiring
here:
jack
leahy,
ryan,
fish,
alessandra,
gush,
niv
avaram,
a
friend
that
I
haven't
seen
in
a
while
ty
colvard,
lucas
rodriguez,
lauren,
gibson,
sam
stokes,
boris
breslav
and
elliott
harris.
So
we've
got
a
good
panel
here
today,
and
I
hear
that
we're
going
to
get
another
couple
of
folks
in
to
talk
about
an
exciting
demo
that
is
just
about
is
about
to
break
and
I'll
I'll
leave
the
I'll
keep
the
power
to
drive
for
that.
A
But
with
that
dan
guy,
why
don't
you
give
us
an
overview
of
the
big
news
about
eea
and
and
and
the
eea
community
projects.
D
Sure
sure
so
you
may
have
seen
the
announcement.
We
are
we're
pleased
to
announce
or
or
reiterate
that
the
ethereum
oasis,
open
project
is
now
the
eea
community
projects.
D
So
what
that
means
is
that
there
is
of
course
a
you
know:
the
name
change,
but
practically
speaking,
it
means
that
we
are
eea
will
be
taking
over
marketing
of
the
work
we
are
looking
to
see
if
we
can
find
some
additional
collaboration
opportunities.
D
The
governance
is
going
to
remain
exactly
the
same.
So
the
governance
today
for
the
for
for
that
effort,
consists
in
the
project
governing
board,
which
consists
of
members
from
basically
individuals
from
the
sponsor
members,
and
so
that's
remaining
exactly
as
it
is
so
there's
no
change.
Eea
has
no
particular
you
know,
control
or
or
change
in
how
that
works,
and
that's
that's
done
on
purpose.
D
That's
a
very
key
key
aspect
of
this
and
I'm
sure
we'll
get
into
that
a
little
bit
later,
but
I
think
we're
we're
really
excited
because
one
of
the
things
that
I've
noticed
I've
been
doing
standards
for
a
long
time-
and
I
don't
know-
I
don't
know
how
many
of
the
people
watching
this
are
familiar.
With
my
background.
I've
been
doing
web
and
internet
standards
for
more
than
20
years
now
and
one
of
the.
D
If
you
look
at
sort
of
traditional
standards,
development,
it's
been
done
by
companies
with
proprietary
implementations.
They
for
whatever
reason
decide
to
get
together
and
create
a
standard
you're,
never
going
to
see
their
software
right.
So
what
you
do
is
they
come
together?
They
write
a
standard
specification,
they
create
a
test
suite
and
then
they
basically
run
their
implementations
against
that
test,
suite
to
prove
that
they
are
conformant
and
ideally
interoperable,
and
so
the
key
there
is
that
again,
you're
not
going
to
see
their
implementations.
D
But
one
of
the
things
that's
been
happening
more
in
the
ethereum
space
is
work
that
begins
as
a
single
open
source
project.
So
a
single
open
source
project
is
essentially
one
piece
of
software.
Think
of
it
as
one
implementation,
it
may
be
open,
but
it's
one
implementation,
but
then,
at
a
certain
point,
there's
a
desire
for
maybe
other
implementations
that
conform
with
that
one.
D
Maybe
it's
in
another
programming
language,
maybe
it's
again,
someone's
proprietary
implementation
and
you'll
never
see
their
code,
but
you
want
to
make
sure
that
it
works
with
the
the
open
source,
implementation
and
so
going
from
open
source
to
a
standard
is
what
we
saw
with
baseline.
We're
going
to.
D
I
expect
we'll
see
that
in
some
other
areas
as
well
and
so
we're
pleased
with
at
the
ea,
because
now
there's
we
don't
actually
care
how
how
it
happens
right,
whether
it
starts
as
member
projects
that
may
have
proprietary
implementations
or
whether
it
starts
as
an
open
source
project
that
then
grows
to
become
you
know,
to
add
a
standard
on
top,
no
matter
how
you
do
your
standards,
development,
we
we
support
it
and
that's
really
the
that's
really
what
you
should
get
from
this
particular
partnership.
D
There's
a
lot
of
excitement
also,
I
think,
on
the
oasis
side,
because
of
the
way
that
we
did
it
and
I'll.
Let
guy
talk
about
that
and
why
this
is
such
a
great
thing
for
oasis
as
well.
C
Yeah,
absolutely
thanks
dan
and-
and
I
have
to
give
credit
where
credit
is
due.
John-
you
are
a
little
bit.
I
don't
want
to
say
instigator
of
this,
but
I
remember
when
dan
took
over
as
the
executive
director
at
eea,
you
said
you
really
need
to
talk
to
dan.
You
and
dan
are
going
to
share
a
lot
of
common
things
around
community
and
just
the
way
that
that
you
two
think,
and
so
you
may
not
have
been
directly
involved,
but
you
kind
of
poked
in
the
right
direction.
C
So
thank
you
for
that
john
and
when
I
had
my
first
conversation
with
dan
and
this
by
the
way
took
over
gosh.
What
do
we
say
about
10
months
almost
a
year,
just
in
terms
of
making
sure
that
this
was
right
not
only
for
the
two
parties
for
oasis
and
for
eea,
but
also
that
it
was
right
for
the
community.
So
for
those
that
don't
know
my
background
is,
is
primarily
from
the
open
source
side
of
the
of
the
house.
C
I
came
to
oasis
about
about
a
year
and
a
half
ago
now,
and
I've
run
open
source
program
offices
in
places
like
red
hat
and
autodesk
and
samsung,
and
so
community
is
kind
of
ingrained
in
the
way.
I
think-
and
so
when
dan
approached
me
and
said,
hey
we're
trying
to
grow
this
ethereum
community,
especially
around
the
standards
piece,
and
do
it
in
a
way
that
that
has
an
open
source
and
an
open
aspect
to
it.
C
This
partnership
at
oasis,
we
kind
of
said
this
actually
makes
a
lot
of
sense
beyond
just
eea,
and
so
the
construct
that
we
came
up
with
managed
open
projects,
which
is
what
what
the
the
new
eea
community
projects
is,
is
now
an
offering
that
oasis
that
we
can.
We
can
use
with
other
nonprofits.
C
So
one
of
the
first
things
that
I
noticed
my
first
six
months
at
oasis
was
that
our
standards,
experience
and
also
kind
of
the
way
we
do
open
source
governance
is
something
that
other
nonprofit
foundations
that
didn't
have
that
kind
of
a
program
like
eea
didn't
could
potentially
be
something
valuable
for
them,
so
we
jokingly
called
it
standards
as
a
service,
but
I
think
this
managed
open
projects
construct
that
came
about
through
this
partnership
and
through
this,
this
long
negotiation
and
work
with
the
eea
is
something
we're
really
excited
about,
because
we
think
it's
it's
something
we
can
offer
of
value
to
to
other
nonprofits
as
well.
A
D
That's
really
pleased.
I
just
wanted
to
add
that
we're
we're
particularly
pleased
because
this
gives
us
the
opportunity
to
say
this
is
the
place
where
ethereum
standards,
development
happens
and
along
the
lines
of
what
guy
said.
That
is
a
great
that's,
a
great
thing
to
be
able
to
offer
in
other
spaces
as
well.
So
you
know
you
can
come
in
and
say:
hey.
You
already
exist
right.
You
already
exist
as
an
entity,
a
known
entity
in
the
space,
and
now
we
can.
D
We
can
lend
and
provide
our
our
expertise
and
background
and
our
reputation
and
ensure
that
it's
done
right.
So
that's
actually
an
important
part
here.
Right
oasis
is
continuing
to
run
this,
so
this
is
not
a
switch
in
in
who's
running
it.
Oasis
is
running
it
according
to
their
processes,
which
are
also
important
with
respect
to
where
the
work
can
go
as
well.
C
Right
and
that's
the
de
joure
bodies,
with
our
relationship
with
with
iso
and
itu
and
other
de
gere
standards
bodies,
things
that
come
out
of
of
this
ea
community
projects
because
they
follow
our
process,
which
has
been
vetted
by
these
other
jury
bodies,
can
go
on
to
become
international
standards.
A
Yeah,
you
got,
you
guys,
know
todd
lewis
right,
the
all
things
open
guy.
A
With
todd
on
linkedin
a
couple
days
ago-
and
it
strikes
me
that
we
are
really
making
headway
for
open
source-
I
mean
we
ought
to
be
on
at
all
things
open
this
year
with
a
keynote.
C
A
A
You
know
it's
not
that
it's
never
been
done
before,
but
I've
never
seen
it
done
at
this
scale
and
I've
never
seen
it
done
with
this
level
of
organization
organizational
support,
and
it
seems
like
it's
a
it's
a
good
bellwether
for
where
things
are
going.
C
Yeah
I
mean
it
really
goes,
speaks
to
something
that
I've
been
kind
of
banging
on.
I
think
in
my
first
year
and
a
half
here
at
oasis,
which
is
the
harmonization
of
open
source
and
open
standards
right.
I
say
this
all
the
time
that
the
the
the
base
level
technologies
that
are
allowing
us
to
have
this
conversation
that
were
developed.
You
know
with
common
standards
and
and
open
source
implementation.
So
how
have
we
gotten
sort
of
away
from
that
as
an
industry?
C
D
Yeah
right
just
a
little
bit
here.
Sorry,
the
webrtc
is
one
of
my
standards
that
that
I
worked
on,
and
so
you
know
that
underlies
a
lot
of
the
peer-to-peer
communications
that
we're
doing
so
you're.
Absolutely
right.
That's
it's!
It's
really!
Wonderful!
D
How
the
the
open
source,
community
and
open
source
work
did
then
you
know
move
into
standards
that
are
allowing
for
all
these
communications
that
we've
relied
on
during
the
pandemic.
C
C
C
Let's
do
a
little
bit
better
job,
stronger
governance,
around
open
source
and
sort
of
thinking
through
that
helping
them
think
more
of
an
interoperability
standpoint
and
let's
take
the
standards
folks
and
say:
look
you
don't
need
two
years
to
put
something
together
right:
let's
do
it
in
a
little
more
iterative
approach,
so
it's
it's!
I
love
the
way
baseline
has
done
it
with
the
api
as
the
bones
of
that
standard,
and
you
know
beginning
to
work
like
that.
A
It's
not
easy
all
right
right,
so
I
mean
I'd
like
to
highlight
andreas
freund
here,
who's,
really
among
you
know
with
along
with
anaiso
francois
bett
is,
is,
is
monitoring
along
on
the
youtube
channel,
as
she
often
does
so
I'll
probably
see
a
comment
from
her
in
a
second
andreas,
and
anna
easton
in
particular,
have
been
sort
of,
and
then
kyle
over
at
provide
have
been
at
this
juncture
point
where
we're
trying
to
write
the
standard
so
that
we
can
get
it
promulgated
by
the
new
year
guy
and
we
we
know
from
chet
that
it's
gonna
take.
A
You
know
that
that
process
is
a
good
six
months,
so
we
want
to
make
sure
we
get
that
out.
Andreas
has
been
writing
his
fingers
off
getting
the
standard
in
which
is
really
hard.
You
have
to
understand
the
technical
nuances
of
what
the
development
work
is
going
on,
which
means
you
have
to
read
the
code
and
well
the
when
there's
code
that
hasn't
been
checked
in
or
is
in
a
big
blob.
A
So
you
can't
read
it
you
get
out
of
sync
with
the
standard
and
you
have
to
really
work
hard
to
keep
things
together,
both
on
the
code
side
and
the
standard
size,
hardest
piece
of
open
source
work,
I've
ever
worked
on
and
and
and
I'm
not
even
at
the
bearing
the
brunt
of
the
load
so
andreas.
Maybe
you
can
talk
a
little
bit
about
your
experience
with
with
this.
You
know
this
connection,
point.
E
Yeah
sure,
thank
you,
john.
It
has
been
a
real
pleasure
to
work
with,
with
with
a
community
on
on
this.
It's
always
what
I
always
like
to
say
is:
like
you
know,
reference
implementations
are
great,
but
standards
should
not.
E
You
know
reference
in
any
way,
shape
or
form
any
implementations,
or
you
know
they
need
to
be
agnostic
to
to
implementations,
even
though
everybody
who's
been
in
the
business
for
a
little
while
knows
that
standards
can
can
be
written
in
such
a
way
with
certain
implementations
or
at
least
implementation
approaches
in
mind.
A
Oh
my
gosh,
I
remember
I
was
an
observer
to
the
ultra
wide
band
standards
argument
between
what
is
it
motorola
and
I
think
microsoft
was
in
there
and
and
texas
instruments
and
they
all-
and
they
were
all
playing
shenanigans
with
trying
to
get
the
w
uwb
standard
written
in
a
way
that
favored
each
of
them
the
most
and
it
took
an
extra
like
decade
to
get
a
uwb
out.
Because
of
that
it
could
be
tricky.
Is.
D
Politics
in
a
technology
domain-
that's
how
I
I
describe
it.
Usually
you
have
to.
If
you
don't
have
a
technical
background,
that's
table
stakes.
You
can't
even
begin
if
you
don't
have
the
the
technical
background
to
be
able
to
comprehend
the
conversations,
but
but
there
are,
and
particularly
the
more
players
that
get
involved
and
the
more
implementations
you
get.
D
The
more
of
this
you
get
where
you'll
have
people
who
begin
to
argue
for
a
particular
thing
in
the
standard
and
that's
actually
because
of,
of
course,
a
business
need
that
they
have,
but
they
also
know
that,
if
it's
done
in
this
particular
way,
it
can
harm
their
competitors
prospects.
D
And
so
you
know
you
need
to
understand
that,
and
particularly
as
an
editor,
it's
especially
challenging
to
you
need
to
be
able
to
understand
when
someone's
doing
that
right
and
know
that
this
is
going
to
have
these
implications
and
make
sure
that
the
group
is
aware
of
it,
so
that
you
know
the
the
good
the
the
proper
result
comes
out
at
the
end
that
works
for
everyone.
A
I
think
that
that's
the
case
on
the
on
the
code
side
as
well
right,
so
I
remember
early
on
it
we're
just
fortunate.
For
example,
you
know
when
kyle
thomas
started
working
so
hard
on
the
code
side
of
it
and
other
companies
that
you
know
had.
You
know
had
other
projects.
You
know
they
kind
of
launched
it
and
they
had
to
go
off
and
do
some
things
in
the
interim.
A
Kyle
really
stepped
into
the
gap
and
and
built
up
a
lot
of
stuff,
and
if
he
had
wanted
to,
he
could
have
made
that
so
so,
not
agnostic
so
specific
to
what
he
wanted
to
do.
But
he
didn't
right.
You
know
with
little
nudging
he
was
able
to
you
know
we
were
able
to
build
pretty
nice
nicely
abstract
interfaces
that
didn't
require
any
particular
piece
of
proprietary
code.
We
still
have
work
to
do
there.
F
A
Know
hell
or
high
water,
we
will
do
it
and
v1
will
be
strongly.
You
know
biased
towards
not
being
biased.
E
So
one
one
interesting
thing
in
the
in
the
standard:
it
is
it
the
the
the
standard
has
been
written
in
a
way
that
looks
towards
the
future.
E
So
there
is
going
to
be
a
significant
focus
on
interoperability,
because
the
development
in
especially
in
the
ethereum
community
is,
is
going
towards
towards
layer,
two
implementation,
and,
if
you,
if
you,
if
you
take
a
step
back
and
look
at
baseline,
you're,
basically
saying
well,
it
is
kind
of
like
a
layer
two,
even
though
it
doesn't
scale
yet,
but
it
it.
It
has
all
the
requirements
for
an
enterprise
to
be
able
to
adopt
it
while
at
the
same
time
utilizing
ethereum
mainnet.
E
That
is
very,
very
similar
to
to
the
layer,
2
ecosystem.
E
In
ethereum
not
only
ethereum,
but
primarily
ethereum,
and
there,
the
big
challenge
is
that
usability,
especially
interoperability,
is
becoming
a
significant
challenge,
because
what
has
been
possible
right
now,
especially
with
d5
protocols,
as
as
more
and
more
protocols
move
to
layer,
two
you're
creating
more
and
more
islands.
E
So
the
hope
is
that
the
ethereum
community
can
take
can
can
learn
from
the
baseline
standard
and
how
interoperability
is
defined
and
and
suggested
to
be
implemented
also
from
a
requirements.
Point
of
view
that
they
will
that
it
will
allow
to
have
to
have
a
robust,
growing
and
flourishing
ecosystem
of
of
layer.
Two,
because,
let's
face
it
without
layer,
layer
two,
you
know,
ethereum
isn't,
isn't
gonna
go
anywhere.
A
Referring
to
eth2
and
all
the
sharding
and
all
the
all,
the
other
stuff,
plus
the
the
layer,
two
stuff,
it's
all
kind
of
becoming
one.
E
Right
so,
and,
and
and
and
their
interoperability
is,
is
really
a
big
problem
and
looking
into
the
community
there
is.
There
is
also
there's
very
little
focus
on
that.
For
obvious
reasons,
everybody
needs
wants
to
get
get
their
stuff
done,
but
the
the
that
leads
to
you
know
short-sightedness,
and
we
hope
that
you
know
this
standard
can
can
help,
educate
and
and
make
people
aware
of
of
of
the
challenges
and
the
solutions
that
that
that
they
can
that
they
can
that
they
can
implement
because,
right
now,
it's
all
over
the
place.
A
Right
yeah,
so
I've
got
a
question
for
samrat
and
also
maybe
for
alessandro.
If
you
guys
are
willing,
you
know
samurai,
you,
you
work
in
the
in
in
the
indian
solution
development
market
and
you
know
what
is
what
are
these
standards?
And
you
know
these
back
in
the
day
right,
open
source.
You
basically
do
a
de
facto
standard
like
java
was
a
de
facto
standard.
You
know
nobody
did
standards
work
for
that
for
a
long
time.
Dan
can
tell
a
lot
about
that,
but
you
know.
A
Ultimately,
we
do
now
have
some
standards
around
that,
but
in
the
early
days
they
just
wrote
some
code
and
got
people
behind
it
and
that
became
kind
of
a
defacto
standard,
but
very
much
oriented
towards
whatever
sun
wanted
and
then
ultimately
ibm
such
how
do?
How
do
you
see
standard
slash,
open
source
development
infecting
your
business
in
in
really
the
heartland
of
this
kind
of
work?
I
mean.
A
G
Wait
so
you
know,
I
see
dan
smiling
on
that
one,
so
so
yeah,
I
think
you
know
two
parts
to
your
question.
One
is,
of
course,
how
how
is
the
community
looking
at
this
and
the
second
one?
How
can
it
really
shape
up?
You
know
as
an
independent,
open
source
standard
that
one
you
know
I'll
pick
that
one
up
first,
so
I
think
the
way
you
know
the
way
ubuntu
linux
or
or
you
know
the
way
ibm
had
to
get
get
behind
linux,
to
sort
of
establish
it.
G
Even
for
that
matter,
you
know
from
the
blockchain
world
hyperledger
coming
out
of
linux
linux
foundation,
and
but
now,
if
you
go
to
a
new
blockchain
developer,
they
will
always
say
that
it's
an
ibm
product
so
the
way
they've
sort
of
adopted
it
and
and
gave
ease
of
development
given
ease
of
development.
I
think
that
was
a
big
name
will
have
to
come
behind
us
as
well.
I
think
you
know
within
this
group
we
have
a
good
forum,
so
that
part
is
checked.
G
Definitely
so
I'm
sure
when
we
come
out
with
our
releases
and
with
the
kind
of
partnerships
that
we
already
have,
we
will
see
adoption
within
our
partner
organizations.
You
know,
for
example,
servicenow
sap,
microsoft,
you
know
being
the
enablers
of
a
lot
of
businesses
business
transactions,
so
that
is
number
one
which
I
see
getting
established
and
and
taking
off
that
phase.
Talking
about
these
standards
getting
established
or
being
used,
I
think
for
sure
I
it's
it's
a
developers
market.
G
You
know,
as
you
said,
india
is
the
development
hub
for
the
world,
so
we
will
see
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
adoption.
A
lot
of
good
fintech
products
have
also
come
out
of
india,
so
we
will
see-
and
you
know
even
ethereum
world,
for
example.
Look
at
the
how
you
know
a
big
mass
of
of
ethereum
developers
are
contributing
from
india
and-
and
I
definitely
see
that
this
community
is
going
to
take.
G
You
know
it's
going
to
grab
baseline
with
both
hands
and
and
convert
it
into
something
really
beautiful
for
us,
so
so
yeah.
I
think
it's
it's
it's
very,
very
positive.
It
looks
very,
very
positive
and,
with
the
you
know,
with
the
announcement
that
we
make
today
or
the
announcement
that
we
are
discussing
today,
I
think
it
is
just
gonna
strengthen
you
know
the
efforts
which
can
go
behind
establishing
this
language.
G
So
that's
what
my
view
is.
You
know
any
other
comments
here.
B
G
Totally
totally,
you
know
thanks
thanks
so
much
so
I
think
we
are
off
to
a
good
start.
I
got
I
got
some
calls
from
really
good
guys
wanting
to
participate.
They
they
just
need
on-ramp
material,
so
I
think
we
need
to
create
more
videos
way
faster
and
I
you
know
I
really
love
the
script
that
you
started.
Writing
john.
A
Of
of
the
for
the
baseline
protocol
to
kind
of
a
quick
explainer
video
like
we
did
with
hyperledger
fabric
years
ago,
by
the
way
nick,
you
really
do
get
credit
for
being
up
at
5
30.
In
fact,
you
know
just
for
everyone's
information.
In
september,
we
are
going
to
be
doing
the
tsc.
The
technical
steering
committee
vote
for
the
11
members
of
the
technical
steering
committee,
including
my
position
as
chair
and
I'm
nominating
nick
criticos.
B
I
welcome
the
nomination,
but
I
don't
think
that
I'll
run,
I'm
I'm
pretty
busy.
I'm.
A
Kidding
but
yeah,
so
no
I'm
not
going
anywhere
but
I'll
I'll
fight
you
for
it
alessandra.
What's
your
your
thought,
you
know
working
for
a
company
like
yours.
How
do
these
stan?
How
does
standards
and
open
source
together
you
know
impact
your
development
in
your
life
and
your
products
have
any
thoughts
on
that.
F
Yeah,
so
so
standards
are
definitely
yeah,
not
it's
on
one
side.
We
are
talking
about
adaption,
so
if
we
have
the
right
standards
in
place,
we
are
also
able
to
to
get
a
better
adoption
about
topics,
but
it's
also
about
securing
our
development
in
a
way
right.
F
So
if
we
are
exploring
new
opportunities,
new
technologies
and
going
in
in
one
direction
and
afterwards
we're
finding
out
that
we
developing
off
track,
especially
on
topics
where
we
talk
about
blockchain
and
cooperation
and
then
working
together,
collaboration
on
it
and
that's
a
risk
for
us,
it
would
be
a
high
risk.
Let's
say
this
way
and
that's
why
we
definitely
taken
care
about
standards.
It's
a
huge
important
topic
for
us.
F
It's
also
interesting
to
see
and
learn
from
the
others.
I
think
that's
a
good
part
here
in
the
oasis
baseline
community
here
is
that
we
see
also
getting
input
from
the
outside
what
they
thought
about
how
to
solve
specific
problems.
So
we're
breaking
a
little
bit
decibels
here
or
not
only
a
little
bit
but
we're
breaking
the
silos,
and
this
really
ensures
that
we
are
getting
in
the
direction
of
being
future
proof
and
not
only
developing
something
isolated
for
collaboration
and
finding
out
after
five
years
that
we
maybe
choose
the
wrong
direction.
B
A
Companies
like
yours
will
be
instrumental
in
all
this
because,
in
particular,
unlike
a
lot
of
open
source
projects
where
you've
got
an
npm,
you
go
and
install
it.
You
know
it's
a
it's
a
runtime,
you
do
it.
It's
pretty
simple
one
of
the
things.
That's,
I
think.
Actually,
one
of
the
most
confusing
things
for
newcomers
to
baselining
is
they're
walking
in
expecting
some
kind
of
a
run
time.
That
does
a
thing
and
we're
like.
No,
no,
it's
a
technique.
It's
a
design
pattern.
A
It's
an
approach
and
and
here's
some
code
that'll
help
that,
but
it's
not
exactly
the
same.
So
that's
much
more
on
to
standards.
People.
I
think
folks,
like
that
and
standards
get
that
in
open
source.
There's
some
education
to
do
there
and
I
think
we're
always
working
to
be
better
about
it.
D
Actually,
I
wanted
to
comment
on
exactly
that
that
that
that
is
why
a
standard
is
appropriate
here
right.
If,
if
you
create
an
implementation,
an
implementation
doesn't
necessarily
mean
it
has
to
become
a
standard
right.
D
You
write
a
piece
of
software
and
it
works
okay,
but
but
when
you
have
a
design
pattern,
when
you
have
a
need
for
multiple
implementations
that
need
to
interact,
that's
when
you
should
talk
about
standards
and-
and
it
really
is
the
sign
of
increased
maturation
in
a
space
right
to
to
be
interested
in
a
standard
because
now
you're
saying
it's
not
just
my
product,
it's
not
just
my
project
right!
It's
now.
D
D
It's
saying
we're
building
a
standard
so
that
we're
going
to
grow
the
pie
for
everybody
instead
of
just
growing
your
particular
slice,
and
when
you
do
that
everyone
benefits
and
you
actually
get
increased
network
effects
from
the
the
broader,
the
broader
adoption
and
the
broader
usage
that
can
dwarf
having
one
player
be
primary
by
preventing
a
standard
in
the
end.
Having
that
broader
ecosystem
just
makes
an
enormous
enormous
difference
going
forward
and
it's
interesting
on
you
know.
Andreas
was
talking
about
interoperability.
D
I
think,
what's
going
to
be
fascinating,
when
you
talk
about
layer,
two
interoperability
and
that's
now
we're
getting
away
from
baseline
itself,
but
it
would
be
when
we
start
talking
about
layer,
threes,
it's
the
layer,
threes
that
need
layer,
two
interoperability
right.
It's
your
dex
aggregators,
who
are
gonna
care,
a
lot
about
how
the
dexes
work
to
make
sure
that
they
can
integrate
together.
D
And
so
I
think
you
know
baseline's
a
little
bit
different
because
it's
you
don't
have
the
competitors
at
least
yet,
quite
yet
in
the
baseline
space.
But
but
it's
good
to
start
here
and
it's
good
to
show
the
community
what
can
be
done
by
starting
from
from
a
paradigm
with
some
implementations,
as
you
say,
john,
with
some
with
a
paradigm
with
some
code,
a
little
bit
of
like
sample
code
and
see
where
you
can
go
from
there.
A
Yeah,
I
think
that's
one
of
the
things
that
v1
will
we'll
we'll
have
a
lot
of
really
major
on
is
yeah.
Here's
the
tools,
here's
a
testing
kit,
here's
the
here's,
your
npm,
there's
yeah!
All
that
stuff
is
will
be
in
there.
I
know
let's
see
is
or
anybody
from
provideon
yeah
lucas
and.
A
Jack,
I
you
know
my
understanding
is
that
a
lot
of
that
stuff
is
gonna.
A
lot
of
the
stuff
that
they're
working
on
will
go
into
the
open
source
as
well,
so
that
even
even
the
the
tools
that
they're
you
know,
they're
providing
will
go
open,
source
and
you'll
be
able
to
inspect
those
and
deal
with
it.
So
the
more
that
we
you
know,
and
then,
of
course
there
will
be
proprietary
things
around.
A
Okay,
I'm
I'm
thinking,
bishwasher
and
kyle
are
somewhere
in
the
green
room,
but
trying
working
out
their
their
demo
for
the
excel.
So
let's
just
say
that
the
excel
spreadsheet
demo
they're
yeah,
unless
they
don't
get
on
that
we're
gonna
demo
today
are
there
anything?
Is
there
anything
else?
Guy
and
dan
you'd
like
to
say
about
about
this
new
development?
I
guess
we
can.
We
can
plug
sponsorship
right,
we
can
say
hey.
A
You
know
if
you're,
that
you
should,
if
you're
a
company
of
any
size,
getting
involved
with
the
enterprise
ethereum
alliance
as
a
member
is
a
great
thing.
It
doesn't
cost
that
much
and
if
you're,
you
know
it's
certainly
affordable
for
every
every
size
of
company
and
and
then,
if
you
want
to
sponsor
and
support
open
projects
as
well.
I
know.
C
A
C
Yeah,
we
should
actually
kind
of
comment
on
that,
because
I
know
there's
been
some
confusion
about
with
this
partnership
of
oh
well.
Okay,
do
I
join
the
ea
to
support
this?
Do
I
join
oasis
to
support
this,
and
our
answer
is
yes
and
or
or
both
right?
You
mentioned
if
you
want
to
do
member
driven
types
of
things
around
these
ethereum
standards
joining
edas
is
perfect
for
that.
If
you
want
to
support
this
open
projects
effort
and
have
a
seat
on
the
project
governing
board,
then
you
sponsor
sponsor
that
through
oasis.
C
So
I
think
you
know
we.
There
was
a
lot
of
kind
of
conversation
early
on
about
what
this
would
look
like
from
a
financial
and
and
sort
of
a
sponsorship
standpoint,
and
I
think
we've
come
to
with
dan
and
his
team.
We've
come
to
kind
of
this
great
conclusion
of
you
know
if
you're
going
to
sponsor
member
driven
work
going
to
eea
is
a
perfect
way
to
do
that.
D
Right
from
the
from
the
ea
perspective,
we,
you
know
the
we
give
the
same
answer
whether
you
wanted
to
contribute
to
the
work
or
whether
you
wanted
to
support
the
work
right,
and
that
was
to
become
a
member
and,
of
course,
with
the
community
projects.
They
are
community
projects,
okay,
so
to
contribute
to
the
work.
You
do
not
need
to
be
a
member
of
anything.
You
just
have
to
sign
a
license
agreement.
A
D
Or
anything
like
that
to
contribute,
but
to
but
to
support
it
to
to
you
know,
financially
support
the
work.
The
way
you
do,
that
is
through
being
a
sponsor
and
so
we're
you
know
we're
we're
happy
either
way.
We
we
want
to
see
all
of
this
work
supported,
and
so
I
think
the
way
guys
said
it
is
is
right.
D
If
you,
if
you
just
you,
have
to
decide,
you
know
what
is
it
that
you're
trying
to
accomplish
if
there's
something
that
you
need
to,
you
need
to
contribute
in
a
particular
way
or
or
in
particular,
you
want
to
determine
what
goes
in
right.
D
If
you
look
at
the
community
projects,
the
determination
of
what
goes
in
in
the
end
is
made
by
the
community
it's
made
by
the
tse,
which
is
elected
from
those
who
have
contributed
on
the
on
the
ea
member
project
site
it's
made
by
the
members.
Ultimately,
it's
the
members
who
are
deciding
what
it
is
that
actually
goes
into
a
particular
standard,
but
but
support
you
know,
support
whichever,
whichever
is
appropriate
for
you
and
for
the
work
that
you
you're
interested
in
doing.
D
We
believe
there's
strong
value,
strong
value
in
supporting
both,
and
we
encourage
everyone
to
do
it.
Thank
you,
john,
for
pointing
out
that
the
the
membership
cost
is
not
that
great
on
the
ea
side
and
the
sponsorship
cost.
Correspondingly
is
not
that
great
on
the
oasis
side.
So
this
is
really
you
know
it's
really
quite
affordable.
I
can't
tell
you
how
much
at
small
startups
that
I've
worked
for
I've
had
to
pay
for
memberships
to
standards
organizations
or
to
buy
specs,
which
we're
so
far
away
from
requiring
that
which
is
what.
D
Iso-
and
it
did
right-
you
know
we're,
no,
you
don't
have
to
pay
to
get
us
to
get
a
spec.
Okay,
that's
just
yeah.
We
just
don't
work
that
way.
Okay,
but
you
know
it's
really
not
that
much
and
I
don't
want
to
sound
like
a
salesman
here,
but
frankly
I
I
get.
I
actually
get
asked
why
we
don't
charge
more
and
it's
oh.
D
Yeah
we
we
get
that
question
too,
and
you
know
we
may
have.
We
may
go
up
at
some
point
because
you
know
we
haven't
raised.
We
haven't
raised
our
you
know
our
membership
prices
in
oh,
my
gosh.
D
Ever
since
we
started
you
know,
so
I
hear
that
there's
this
thing
called
inflation
yeah,
so
maybe
that'll
happen
one
of
these
days,
but
but
no
it's
it's
really
not
that
expensive
either
way,
and
so
you
know
thanks
for
the
plug,
we're
we
we
would
love
to
have
support
of
both
kinds
of
work,
and
we
we
welcome
you.
If
you
have
work
that
you
want
to
do
standards
work,
you
want
to
do,
bring
it
to
either
of
us
and
we
will
help
you
figure
out.
C
Yeah,
I
think
that's
a
great
a
great
great
point,
dan
that
that
you
know
because
of
this
partnership.
We
actually
have
no
problem.
If
something
comes
to
us
and
we're
like.
Oh
actually,
you
know
what
that
makes
more
sense
at
eea,
and
I
know
you
have
the
same
feeling
that
if
you
something
comes
to
you
and
you're
like
really,
this
should
be
a
community
thing
that
you
send
it
to
us
and
we
we
work
through
it.
So
this
is
part
of
part
and
parcel
of
this
partnership
that
we've
created.
D
A
All
right:
well,
it's
this
that's
great
thanks!
Guy
and
dan.
Please
come
on
or
as
often
as
you
like,
you
know,
we'd
love
to
have
you
on
the
on
the
baseline
show,
and
if
you
want
to
get
up
at
8
30
in
the
morning
on
saturdays,
you
can
hang
out
with
summerhead,
and
these
are
always
published
samurai
and
I
are
getting
pretty
good
at
publicizing
these
or
publishing
the
the
youtube
link
early.
So
you
should
be
able
to
get
up
there.
A
Okay,
so
yeah
I'll
buy
more
time
for
kyle.
I
keep
on
getting
these
pings
yeah.
Do
we
need
a
little
more
time?
One
more
time
they're
like
in
the
green
room,
doing
something
I
guess,
but.
D
My
technical
background
was
computer
speech
recognition
and
I
I
just
I'll,
never
forget
the
days,
but
you
know
graduate
school
employment.
Everything
I'll,
never
forget
all
the
demos
that
we
had
to
do
for
that
and
live
demos
are
just
like
they're,
just
the
worst
people,
don't
really
understand,
just
how
how
much
can
go
wrong
in
a
live
demo?
When
you
have
it's
worked
perfectly
for
you
know
every
day
for
a
week,
everything
is
right.
D
You
go
to
do
the
demo
and
it
fails
so
actually
getting
a
live
demo
to
work
is
there's
a
lot
more
work
that
goes
into
it
than
than
people
realize.
I
definitely
appreciate
those
who
who
try
to
do
live
demos-
it's
yeah,
there's
an
art
to
it,
and
we
used
to
say
that
the
demo
gods,
you
know,
are
never
never
supportive.
So
you
know
it's.
It's
really
impressive.
Those
who
who
go
to
do
that
first.
A
C
My
story
on
that
is
that
I
worked
at
sun
microsystems
for
a
time
back
in
the
day
and
we
did
a
java
car,
so
a
gm
ev1
that
had
a
ton
of
via
you
know
what
was
iot
or
I
guess
you
know
we
ripped
the
rip,
the
carpets
out
put
ethernet
and
it
was
crazy,
had
a
bunch
of
of
connectivity
demos
and
it
would
be
inevitable
that
I'd
be
trying
to
demo
this
thing
to
a
executive
from
shell
or
gm
or
somebody
and
it
would
you
know
things
would
go
wrong.
C
You're
like
it
was
just
working
like
it
was
just
working
for
the
past
week
and
what
happened,
who
changed?
Actually
what
what
happened
is
we
finally
got
another
car
and
we
had
one
of
the
cars
was
always
the
in
process
working
car,
the
other
one
was
the
stable
demo,
don't
change
anything,
because
inevitably
it
was
oh
somebody
put
some
code
in
there
that
we
weren't
expecting
and
crap.
Now
it
did
something
completely
different
than
it
hadn't
done
in
the
past
week
and.
D
B
Be
like
when
I
was
at
oracle,
we
ran
a
whole
week
called
top
gun,
which
was
focused
on
just
getting
sales
consultants
to
be
able
to
demo
live,
and
it
was
a
hardcore
week
over
350
people.
And
inevitably
you
know
you
still
had
problems.
People
start
moving
to
click
bait
or
you
know
the
the
screen
cams
or
clickable
demos.
After
that,
right
and.
C
That's
why
you
don't
do
live
demos.
We
actually
had
this
problem
where
all
of
our
sales
people
at
sun
were
like.
Oh
hey,
can
you
ship
the
car
across
the
country
to
wherever,
like?
Do
you
realize
what
it
is
to
ship
a
vehicle,
because
we
did
it?
We
shipped
it
to
the
we
shipped
it
from
the
g
for
the
auto
show
in
detroit,
and
that
was
painful.
So
we
finally
got
to
the
point
where
we
recorded
a
video.
A
Yeah,
I
think
I
think
the
new
the
new
demo
problem
for
enterprise
blockchain,
at
least
for
last
five
years,
has
been
everything
went
right
with
the
demo
and
the
executive
who
had
to
sign
off,
went
yeah.
I
got
one
of
those
thanks.
That
was
the
end
of
the
yeah.
You
didn't.
Why
didn't
you
do
that
with
sas
right?
So,
at
least
with
you
know,
with
what
we're
doing,
with
blockchain
demos
or
baseline
demos
we're
we're
moving
towards,
hopefully
something
that
well.
A
Actually,
it's
so
boring,
you
don't
need
to
demo
it
it's
just.
It
just
works.
It's
part
of
the
part
of
the
whole
thing.
Okay,
so
I
I
just
put
the
link
in
the
in
the
chat
for
the
for
the
script
yeah,
so
we're
we're
doing
a
script
for
for
a
three,
a
3d
animated
explainer
of
baselining.
A
It's
called
the
little
bit
it's
how
we
saved
a
little
piece
of
information
from
becoming
a
big
problem
in
a
connected
world
and
we're
we're
we're
shooting
that
right
now,
we've
got
a
really
great
3d.
Animator
did.
A
Seo
sem
only
problem
but
yeah
it's
it's
starting
to
shape
up
nicely.
It's
it's
a
little
bit
humorous,
but
should
get
the
story
home,
which
is
we're
not
putting
data
on
a
blockchain,
we're
not
putting
data
out
of
blockchain.
Don't
talk
about
putting
data
on
a
blockchain
we're
using
the
blockchain
to
keep
data
in
other
things
in
a
state
of
synchronicity
okay.
So
I'm
going
to
ping
one
more
time
talk
amongst
yourselves,
I'm
going
to
try
to
get
kyle
and
bishwashree
on
here.
A
A
That's
what
I
should
be
doing,
let's
see
who
we
got
here,
sam,
we
got
ryan
how
we
doing
on
on
bri
too.
B
It's
it's
going
pretty
well
we're
up
to
the
point
where
we
can,
by
hitting
a
single
api
endpoint,
can
create
a
new
workflow
which
will
write
a
zero
knowledge
circuit
and
compile
it
and
then
deploy
a
couple.
Smart
contracts.
A
Right
on-
and
I
see
that
thanks
thanks
for
that,
sam
ty
colvard,
you
said
that
you
got
some
updates
lauren.
B
Hey
everyone,
so
my
name's
tyler
I've
known
john
for
a
little
over
a
year
now-
and
I
am
a
pharmacist,
a
pediatric
pharmacist
by
training
here
recently
me
and
lauren
have
been
doing
some
exciting
stuff,
just
making
connections
and
building
bridges,
and
so
me
and
her
have
a
couple
of
meetings
coming
up
to
speak
with
both
the
pharmacists
that
I
know
in
the
outpatient
setting,
as
well
as
a
pharmacist
on
the
inpatient
setting
who's.
H
Yeah
thanks
tyler
yeah.
I'm
just
really
excited
to
be
able
to
connect
in
the
pharmaceutical
space
because,
as
as
john
had
mentioned
last
week,
we're
trying
to
get
some
interviews
and
some
stories
on
what
goes
wrong
in
invoicing,
because
we
have
the
or
john
and
nick
have
the
vision.
H
You
know
to
be
able
to
utilize
baseline
protocol
in
various
industries,
and
I
am
focused
on
the
invoicing
side
so
again,
if,
if
there
are
any
industries
that
anyone
on
the
call
today
or
listening
in
from
youtube,
if
you
can
think
of
a
if
you
come
from
an
industry
that
you
that
you
think
that
you
would
like
to
be
interviewed
or
you
want
to
connect
me,
I
would
love
to
speak
with
you.
H
So
just
feel
free
to
send
me
a
message
on
the
slack
channel
and
yeah
just
looking
for
really
lots
of
stories.
So
thank
you.
I.
A
Love
that
story
you
came
up
with
or
that
you
gave
me
the
other
day.
You
want
to
highlight
that
one
at
all
that
was
very
insightful.
A
H
Sure
yeah,
so
what
I
found
out
with
someone
who
worked
in
the
accounting
side
for
a
large
restaurant
chain
was
that
they
deal
a
lot
with
accounts
payables
and
something
that
a
problem
they
would
have
with
their
invoicing
is
that
when
they
that
their
landlords
that
they
would
have
to
pay
out,
rent
and
pay
out
this
community
service
fee
for
when
they
would
rent
in
those
areas
oftentimes,
it
seems
that
landlords
send
them
the
wrong
invoice.
H
You
know
their
accounts,
payables
clerks,
just
key
in
the
wrong,
even
the
wrong
company
that
that
would
also
be
on
the
same
shopping
center
premise.
So
this
is.
H
A
That
was
the
one
that
was
quite
interesting
to
me
was
this
this,
and
this
is
where
you
know:
good
good,
zero
knowledge,
circuits
and
good
good
cross-company
automation
can
really
help
is
is
where
yeah
you're
you're
billing
somebody
for
something
that
they've
already
paid
for
and
yeah.
I
found
that
to
be
that
resonated
with
me.
A
I've
seen
that
before
a
lot,
so
I
was
really
glad
to
see
that
you've
found
that
kind
of
example,
with
that
good
good
pivot
over
to
kyle
and
dishwasher,
shall
we
shall
we
do
the
demo
I've
I've
informed
our
friends
over
at
microsoft,
they're
in
a
meeting
right
now,
but
they're
they're
keen
to
to
watch
the
video
yeah.
I
A
I
And
before
we
get
started,
I
just
want
to
say
really
awesome
work
by
biswashfree
on
this
excel
stuff.
It's
really
humbling
to
work
with
such
smart
people
in
the
community
and
to
see
the
community
grow
in
the
way
it
has,
and
this
is
getting
fun.
So
thanks,
miss
watchful
for
for
putting
this
together.
A
All
right
guys
take
it
away
if
you
want
to
share
screen
I'll.
Give
me
a
second
I'll
I'll.
A
A
B
B
A
We
really
needed,
like
a
professional
editor
in
this,
in
this
in
the
show
now
hey
nick.
Can
you
put
that
in
the
budget.
A
I
J
Live
yeah,
you
guys
can
see
my
screen
yep.
So
that's
the
new
excel
add-in
right
there.
So
what
you?
What
I'm
running
this
baseline
stack
locally,
so
here
in
my
ide,
I'm
running
it
so
after
I
run
it
now.
I
can
log
in
from
here.
A
While
you
guys
are
doing
this,
that
that
bishwashree
is
an
awardee
of
the
of
the
of
the
or
the
ethereum
foundation
grant
for
baselining,
which
is
a
hundred
thousand
dollar
grant
and
bishwashri,
is
now
submitting
this
work
for
to
to
be
given
her
award.
J
So
here
we
have
a
button
for
start
to
start
baselining.
So
what
you
just
need
to
do
is
click
that
and
for
this
particular
table,
currently
all
the
records
the
entire
table
will
get
baselined
later
on.
We
can
move
on
and
like
ensure
that
only
like
parts
of
it
does,
but
for
now
the
entire
table
will
get
baseline.
So
we
first
need
to
put
the
primary
key
just
to
let
the
I
don't
know
what
is
the
primary
key
column
for
it,
so
I
do
that
I've
already
done
it.
I
Yeah,
so
it's
another
thing
to
note
is
like
or
like.
I
think
a
next
step
would
be
on
on
the
primary
key,
like
to
the
point
of
primary
key
mapping,
is
being
able
to
sort
of
map
how
you
want
to
do
translations
between
the
data
model
in
the
workflow
that
you're
joining
and
the
and
you're
in
your
local
spreadsheet.
So
I
think,
there's
another
another
iteration
coming
in
here
as
well.
But
sorry
this
was.
J
Now,
what
I'll
try
to
do
is
I
will
update
some
data
here
on
this
line,
as
you
can
see
I'll
make
it
50
instead
of
64,
and
if
you
can
see
it's
sending
a
message.
So
this
is
the
message
that
I
am
sending
to
the
baseline
stack.
I
I
Yeah
and
so
on,
that's
on
the
other
side
of
the
wire.
You
know
I
I
I'm
in
the
work
group
as
well,
and
so
I
you
know,
I
received
a
message
on
my
end
and
so
that's
that's.
It's
pretty
incredible
to
see
just
how
far
how
far
things
have
come
when
you,
you
know
when
you're
running
excel
and
making
changes
and
seeing
what
we
see
here
today,.
B
B
I
B
I
Running
right
now,
yeah,
I
don't
have
it
I'm
just
I'm
just
running
the
raw
stack.
You
know,
yeah.
I've
got
the
messages
coming
across
for
this.
A
I
Yeah
so
yeah,
I
say,
probably
within
by
the
end
of
the
week.
We
can
have
it.
Have
it
marshaled
into
a
proper
pr
against
the
baseline
repo.
I
A
Very
well
any
other
questions.
Folks
now
I
could
do
this
with
sap
as
well
right,
so
I
could.
I
could
take
an
excel,
take
this
and
and
run
an
integration
with
other
things,
other
than
other
excels
right.
I
Yeah
yeah,
it's
this!
It's
the
same
sort
of
yeah.
It's
the
same
pattern,
same
messaging
pattern,
absolutely,
and
so
that's
sort
of
what
I
was
sort
of
getting
at,
but
I
mentioned
earlier
how,
based
on
the
the
workflow,
it
would
be
nice
to
have
a
have
a
way
to
specify
sort
of
like
you
can
specify
the
primary
key
column.
It'd
be
nice
to
specify
you
know
any
any
unmapped
fields
from
the
you
know:
the
workflow
domain
model
to
the
column
names
the
columns
in
the
in
your
spreadsheet
locally.
I
B
John,
I
have
a
question
for
kyle
was
just
curious
in
this
is:
is
there
any
sort
of
on-chain
interaction?
That's
happening,
or
I
know
at
a
minute.
It's
still.
I
It's
still
off-chain,
like
everything
happens
on
on
layer
two
and
yeah
in
this
demo.
We're
not
we're
not
finalizing
any
work,
any
work
steps
to
the
blockchain,
but
I
mean
you,
certainly
you
certainly
could.
If
you
were
a
workstep
required
finality,
then
you
would
see
it.
You
would
see
it
happening
on
chain
as
well,
yeah
and
not
saying
in
the
next
demo.
We
showed
this.
We
can.
We
can
go
through
like
a
more
like
an
actual
multi-step
workflow
we're.
B
I
I
B
B
A
Nick
and
I
were
just
in
a
meeting
reviewing
financials
for
an
overall
company
and
we
have
an
arap
system
and
it
wasn't
like
they
were
generating
that
those
they
were.
They
built
a
big,
elaborate,
excel
spreadsheet
and
it
didn't
come
off
of
the
arap
system
so
to
be
able
to
say,
yeah
verifiably
these,
you
know
what
I'm
showing
on
excel
is
what's
in
our
arip
system
or
with
you
know
or
in
the
other
counterparties.
A
That's
a
big
deal.
It's.
I
A
Gl's
reporting
system
that
goes
into
into
compliance
is
a
big
deal,
because
none.
I
State
machine,
and
so
we
we
we
did
some
security,
so
we,
through
throughout
this
process,
like
we
passed,
we
fortunately
passed
the
spreadsheet
between
us
right
and
I
opened
it
on
my
machine
and
I
was
logged
in
as
biswashtree,
and
I
was
like
wait
a
minute.
This
is
exactly
how
things
go
wrong
and
with
microsoft
excel
you
know,
and
so
what
we?
I
I
I
think,
on
on
what
data
we
marshal
with
with
the
spreadsheet,
alongside
the
spreadsheet,
in
the
context
of
the
act
of
the
add-in,
so
that
I
can
receive
the
spreadsheet
and
open
it,
and
then
I
would
have
to
log
in
as
well
as
myself,
but
then
there's
also
maybe
some
metadata
that
gets
passed
and
alongside
the
sheet,
where
there's
some
hints
on
how
I
uncover
my
account
once
I'm
authorized,
you
know,
can
can
begin.
I
You
know
locally
working
with
massive
spreadsheets,
so
yeah
there's
some
scaling
and
some
security
considerations
that
I
I
sort
of
have
floating
around
in
my
head
and-
and
this
washer
is,
I'm
sure-
has
some
in
hers
and.
A
Easy,
but
this
watch
really
outstanding.
I
can't
wait
to
see
your
next
thing
and
maybe
we'd
like
to
close
this
out
with
a
quick
plug
on
your
company
that
you're
building
in
india
very
excited
about
that,
and
I
think
you
know
I
would
love
to.
If
you
have
anything
you'd
like
to
say
about
it
here
that
you
know
kind
of
make
a
plug
a
shameless
plug.
Hopefully.
J
Silently,
there's
not
much
work
going
on,
but
I'm
hoping
that
all
this
work
that
I'm
doing
here
will
get
slowly
translated
there,
because
this
is
what
I'll
be
mainly
working
with
in
trade
finance,
yeah.
A
I
I'm
sure
I
was
just
going
to
say
that
you
know
I
I
will.
I
would
love
to
support
ms
watcher's
efforts
and
provide
with
will
absolutely
work
with
with,
can
I
say,
the
name
of
the
company.
It's
pretty
awesome.
A
All
right,
we'll
we'll
save
that
for
another
day,
but
bushwasher
is
in
stealth
mode.
Everybody
keep
an
eye
on
this
watchery.
If
you
have
lots
of
venture
capital
money
to
spend,
I
think
you
should
throw
it
into
this
watchery
anyway.
I
Maybe
maybe
we
could
maybe
we
could
come
back,
come
back
in
a
week
or
two
and
show
some
more
on
on.
You
know
the
next
point,
having
a
having
the
other.
You
know
having
a
dual
like
having
both
screens
shown
and
showing
the
back
and
forth
and
seeing
the
the
ux
on
when
this
when
the
cells
update
on
the
other
end,
it's
it's,
some
work's
been
done
there.
It's
it's
pretty
close.
I
It's
actually
no
fault
of
dishwashers
that
that
we
can't
show
that
right
now,
it's
just
maybe
a
week
or
two
we
can.
We
can
hop
on
and
do
it
again.
J
It
took
me
a
little
bit
of
time
to
like
get
used
to
it
so
that
took
about
a
month,
but
after
that
the
main
work
was
done
within
a
month
a
week.
Most
of
the
work
was
done
a
month.