►
From YouTube: Baseline Protocol Office Hours
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
A
Yeah
so
I'll
sell
our
design
team
to
put
the
swag
link
on
the
website
next
time
when
they're
back
from
holiday,
the.
A
A
We
should
put
it
on
the
homepage.
Just
make
sense
right,
like
yes,
you'll
you'll
keep
an
eye
on
the
YouTube.
I
suspect
this
is
going
to
be.
I,
didn't
really
publicize
this
one
as
well
as
we
normally
do
so
it's,
but
it's
probably
going
to
be
a
fairly
small
group
and
I'll
just
keep
on
adding
people
and
and
take
a
note
to
promote
this
better
in
the
future.
A
But
you
know,
as
always,
these
are
live
ever
recorded
on
YouTube
for
posterity
and
in
fact
there
might
be
a
lot
of
utility
in
having
a
smaller
group
today,
because
we
can
talk
about
some
of
the
things
that
people
should
know.
So
we
can
do
a
little
bit
of
an
education
session.
That
Stefan
is
on
the
call,
so
we
can
get
some
stuff
on
the
record
and
we
can
also
do
a
nice
intimate
conversation
with
with
Dermot
Jack,
Nick,
Stefan
and
Boris.
A
A
A
B
A
B
A
Hats
for
me
yeah,
so
lots
to
talk
about
do.
Does
I'm
gonna
open
the
floor
just
straight
up
and
I'll
say
as
I
always
do.
Baseline
protocol
is
a
technique
for
using
the
public
main
net
aetherium
or
whatever
becomes
the
ultimate
main
net
of
the
internet
as
a
common
frame
of
reference
for
distributed
systems
to
maintain
consistency
between
records
on
a
record
by
record
basis,
while
also
using
that
process
to
control,
workflow
and
ordering
of
events
in
a
distributed
system,
and
with
that
measure
this
is
good
to
see
you
do.
B
A
Well,
that's
a
great
question.
The
first
thing
that
the
primary
answer
that
is,
that
the
baseline
protocol,
it
might
be
more
correct
to
say
that
it's
that
the
the
reference
implementation
that
we
that
the
initial
three
companies
put
out
used
whisper
and
it
reminds
me
of
the
way
we
put
out
hi
glad
your
fabric
with
Kafka
as
the
as
the
basis
of
the
ordering
system.
A
We
did
that
so
that
we
would
stay
focused
on
the
important
things
which
was
make
doing
really
good
interfaces
for
an
ordering
system,
and
so
that
you
could
put
any
kind
of
conceptions
mechanism
in
it
into
it
and
copy
being
sort
of
crashed
fault
tolerance
it
to
me
when
I
was
running,
that
I
was
like
well
yeah.
Okay,
little
do
crap
Kafka
because
obviously
nobody's
gonna
want
to
keep
Kafka.
A
It's
gonna
obviously
going
to
be
something
else,
but
this
will
beg
to
point,
and
oddly,
in
that
case,
nobody
did
change
I
think
if
they
still
use
copy
I,
don't
think
there
are
introduced,
which
tells
you
a
lot
about
the
motives
right
of
that
particular
platform
which
nothing
wrong
with
that
right.
If
you
I
was
a
you
and
a
few
friends
being
in
a
private
shared
ledger,
and
you
probably
don't
care
right
that
you
have
Byzantine
fault-tolerance
on
the
ordering
service.
A
So
in
this
case
similar
situation,
we
knew
Whisperer
wasn't
going
to
be
the
thing
you're
going
to
use
in
production
for
anything,
but
it
says
hey.
This
is
a
protocol.
This
is
a
technique.
It's
a
specification,
don't
use
the
reference
implementation,
build
on
the
spec
right
and
then
use
the
appropriate
messaging
protocol
for
you.
I
carry
your
kitchen
frankly
yeah,
so
you
know
and
I'm
working
on
quantum
telepathy.
You
know
that's
a
really
great
way
to
get
a
message
to
somebody
without
anybody
else
see
the
message,
so
you
see
the
point.
Does
that
make
sense?
A
B
I
mean
if
you
need
to
agree
on
the
transport
layer
and
you
need
to
agree
and
well
not
on
the
protocol,
because
the
protocol
is
being
defined
by
based
on
that.
You
need
to
agree
on
the
transport
and
how
do
you
make
sure
you
can
reach
people
publicly
or
do
you
have
a
common
address
book
or
yeah?
How
do
you
make
yourself
reachable
for
others?
That's.
A
B
I'm,
the
CTO
of
the
energy
web
foundation
and
we
are
currently
working
on
something
pretty
similar
to
baseline,
which
is
the
energy
web
decentralized
operating
system
and
pieces
of
that
is
messaging,
and
we
are
working
on
the
infrastructure
on
how
to
create
decentralized
messaging
system
that
incorporates
authentication
and
authorization
based
on
decentralized
identities.
That's.
B
B
A
A
I'll
put
a
little
ad
in
here
by
the
way
I
was
just
on
the
government's
call
for
the
Oasis
project.
Governance
board,
the
PGP,
which
is
the
governing
organization
for
the
baseline
protocol
project.
Currently
an
initiative-
and
you
know
that's
a
that-
is
a
larger
organization
than
just
baseline
right.
He
has
two
or
three
projects
already.
You
know
in
what
they
call
the
etherium
Oasis
project
and
then,
of
course,
Oasis
is
a
venerable
standards
body
that
has
been
it
actually
I.
Think
it's
20
years.
A
If
I
did
my
math
right,
it's
like
20
years,
older
than
Linux
Foundation
about
20
years
older
than
Linux,
but
it's
a
foundation
so
and
so,
and
it's
behind
things
like
sgml,
right,
basic
stuff
and
very
good
standards
by
so,
if
you're
looking
for
a
home
for
the
work,
it's
also
one
of
the
least
expensive
ways
to
get
out
with
quality
governance
so
might
be
way
to
go
right.
And,
of
course
you
know
nobody,
nobody
in
baseline,
nobody
in
any
of
the
Oasis
projects
has
to
pay
a
dime
right.
A
This
is
kind
of
like
public
radio.
You
you
in
the
US
you,
you
know
you
listen,
you
can
do
anything
you
want
for
free,
but
we're
also
going
to
do
a
fun
Drive,
and
so
you
see,
if
you
pick
your
pocket
or
something
but
yeah
you
can
be
on
the
TSC
the
maintainer
is
you
can
do
anything
you
want
without
paying
anything
at
all
ever
so
that's
that's!
That's
one
thing.
So
maybe
your
project,
if
it
sits
nicely
next
door.
A
C
I
think,
first
of
all,
nice
to
meet
you
Misha
heard
a
lot
about
the
energy
web
recently
so
great
to
catch
up
here
in
baseline
as
well.
I
want
to
provide
another
twist,
perhaps
to
the
perspective,
because
in
the
beginning
of
baseline
I
think
that
the
most
promising
part
of
explaining
it
to
those
who
are
interested
in
is
to
actually
build
something
on.
A
C
Public
chain,
but
still
provide
all
the
privacy
and
permission
so
when
you're
asking
about
how
can
people
participate
or
participants
find
each
other
if
everything
is
just
private,
shielded
and
and
hidden,
then,
of
course
this.
This
is
a
point
and
and
when
we
are
at
uni,
bright
are
talking
to
potential
clients
that
are
interested
in
baseline.
There
are
two
two
parts
of
questions
that
we
mainly
get.
The
first
is
all
grade.
C
This
is
what
we've
been
missing:
that's
why
we
formally
build
a
private
chain
solution,
and
but
this
was
wasn't
so
private,
but
because,
as
soon
as
our
consortium
was
like
consisting
of
thousand
members,
then
we
still
have
no
privacy.
So
this
is
the
first
thing
that
that
can
be
tackled
by
baseline,
but
we
also
get
questions
from
the
other
way
around.
C
So,
for
example,
if
somebody
and
the
famous
tracking
and
tracing
Jones
favorite
topic
like
coffee
beans,
racing
on
the
blockchain
and
no
matter,
if
it's
a
proof
of
concept
or
a
proof
of
hype,
but
if
somebody
decided
to
go
for
a
public
blockchain
because
he
wanted
to
to
make
the
information
put
on
chain
public,
then
it's
a
reasonable
question.
How
this
can
be
achieved
within
a
baseline
environment
and
I.
Think
that
messaging,
and
also
on
the
concept
of,
say,
permission
phone
book
where
you
can
match
the
actual
identities
to
the
participants
of
a
process.
C
This
has
to
be
something
that
has
to
be
a
very
central
part
of
the
baseline
protocol,
or
at
least
the
of
chain
systems
that
are
agreeing
to
baseline
their
processes.
At
least
those
have
to
have
some.
Let's
call
it
magic
mapping
in
the
in
the
middleware
layer,
where
you
can
actually
find
your
baseline
participants
that
you
want
to
do
business
with
so
without
going
into
detail
of
the
pros
and
cons
of
different
messaging
protocols.
C
A
That
would
be
bad,
so
you
want.
We
want.
You
know
a
phone
book
where
those
attributes
would
be
quite
nice
and
we're
calling
for
that,
but
it
would
be
out
of
scope
for
this
particular
project
to
be
in
charge
of
it
all
right
and
then,
as
far
as
personal
identity
is
concerned,
you
know
the
the
not
only
are
we
not
into
that,
but
I
mean
to
say
even
the
misconception
of
us
being
involved
in
it
in
any
way
led
to
horrors
on
the
internet.
A
B
So
you
want
to
know
that
this
particular
user
you're
communicating
with
is
part
of
the
organization
that
you
wanted
to
communicate
with
and
that
they
have
received
permission
from
that
organization
to
do
what
you
want
them
to
do,
with
the
information
that
you
sent
so-
and
this
is
exactly
what
di
DS
are
for
I
mean
it's,
it's
secure
way
to
create
claims
and
to
approve
claims
and
then
to
create
a
public
repository
of
these
claims
and
the
claim
can
be
private.
They
can
be
public,
you
can
do
selective
disclosure
of
attributes.
B
A
You
wouldn't
need
baseline
protocol
for
that
you'd
want.
You
might
want
zero
knowledge
proof
for
that,
and
that's
a
good
distinction.
I
people
who
listen
to
my
stuff
will
probably
roll
their
eyes
of
stuff
as
before.
But
you
know
zero
knowledge.
Proof
that
was
succinct
kind
of
Fineman
way
of
describing
that,
for
me,
is,
is
Richard
Fineman,
so
good
at
explaining
Clark
concepts.
The
best
way
I
can
explain.
Ck
is
I've,
got
a
secret
I'm
gonna
prove
to
you.
I
have
the
secret
without
telling
you
what
the
secret
is
right.
A
Baselining
is
we
have
a
secret
some
set
of
us
and
we're
going
to
make
sure
that
we
have
the
same
secret
without
telling
the
middleware
any.
That
is
going
to
help
us
with
that
anything
about
the
secret
and
anyone
looking
at
the
middleware,
the
ledger
or
what-have-you
would
not
know
that
we
had
a
secret
at
all
mmm-hmm,
so
slightly
different
right.
It
still
uses
a
little
bit
of
zero
knowledge
sauce.
You
know,
and
but
very
in
a
very,
very
kind
of
boring,
specific
way
right.
A
It's
not
like
magic,
math,
right,
semantics,
math,
but
it's
but
it's
repeatable.
It's
the
same
thing:
it's
basically
just
a
sameness
engine
that
saying
yeah
you're
the
same
I,
don't
know
what
you're
saying
about,
but
you
now
you're
this
you're
still
the
same.
Oh
now,
the
new
thing
is
the
same,
and
it's
the
same
based
on
rules
from
the
thing
that
was
the
same
before
right.
So
you
now
you
have
workflow
continuity
right,
but
that's
a
little
different.
A
Does
that
make
sense,
I,
don't
think
I've
ever
contemplated
it
I,
don't
think
anybody
I
know
on
the
project
is
ever
contemplated.
The
idea
that
somebody
in
a
company
would
use
the
I
suppose
you
could
but
Steph
I,
don't
know
what
you
think
about
that
as
a
way
of
identifying
yourself
as
a
user
without
identifying
yourself.
A
C
Very
exciting,
although
I
think
in
in
classical
b2b
integrations
it's
not
so
much
the
individual
who
is
communicating
and
exchanging
process
data,
but
it's
rather
more.
In
most
cases
it's
still
just
another
middleware.
So,
for
example,
if
you
connect
to
sa
piece,
then
most
probably
as
a
PPI
stakes
will
just
exchange
data
and
the
permission
layer
on
which
individual
individual
of
the
on
company
side
has
access
to
this
data.
C
Once
it's
crossed,
the
middleware
layer
is
in
the
hands
of
the
of
the
company
who
runs
the
ERP,
but
I
think
it's
it's
exciting
in
in
those
cases
where,
for
example,
you
do
some
kind
of
shielded
communication
between
two
enterprises
and
then
a
third
party
like
a
regulator,
steps
in
because
they
want
to
have
a
certain
reporting
or
inside
on
some
aggregated
data
of
a
business
process.
Perhaps
for
cross-border
clearance
or
something
like
that,
and
then,
of
course,
the
identity
mapping
has
to
be
somehow
in
a
verifiable
way.
C
I
don't
see
it
straight
at
the
home
at
the
b2b
communication,
but
perhaps
at
those
situations
where
third
parties
get
in.
So
it's
very
exciting
and
another
proof
of
that
baseline,
understandable.
As
a
as
a
pattern
or
as
a
set
of
patterns
could
also
be
extended
in
a
way
that
there
are
additional
patterns
that
are
applied
to
it,
so
very
exciting,
I
have
to
think
about
it.
More
yeah.
A
That's
cool,
maybe
maybe
we
can
be
good
neighbors
on
this,
and
and
also
if
you
guys,
you
know,
find
that
this.
The
the
baseline
protocol
is
a
good
abstraction
and
generalization
for
what
you're
doing-
and
you
can
you
know,
but
you
know
right
on
the
on
that
on
that
wave,
yeah
I've
got
five
hundred
actives
I.
Think
more
now
checked
a
week
ago.
It
seems
to
go
up.
You
know,
I
consistent
basis,
so
you
know
we'd
love
to
have
you.
It's
an
openly
governed,
open
source
initiative
right.
So
somebody
asks
you
know,
white
white.
A
You
know
why
aren't
there
more
this
kind
of
person
or
that
kind
of
person
of
all
I
show
up
we're
going
to
be
welcoming
we're
gonna
love!
You
in
you,
you
know
you
work
in
your
own,
enlightened
self-interest,
so
you
know
take
that
gnashing
equilibrium
perspective
and
you
know
don't
do
work
that
isn't
in
your
interest.
But
you
know,
like
you
know
bright,
you
can
draw
a
fairly
straight
line
between
more
baselining
and
more
you
to
break
because
unit
bright
is
an
integrator
right.
It
makes
sense.
A
Chain
link
is
another
one:
where
you're
going
to
need
references
to
data
that
doesn't
get
you
into
non-determinism
trouble
as
different
systems
execute
different
lines
of
code
right.
So
if
you've
got
a
time
lookup
on
a
base
lined
package
writing
a
base
lined
code
package
which
you
can
write,
Python
right,
you
get
the
right
pipe,
I,
thon
script.
It
says
blah
blah
blah.
Do
this
and
everybody's
got
to
do
the
same
and
they've
got
to
get
the
same
result
and
if
there's
a
time
lookup
in
them
everyone's
going
to
get
the
different
result.
A
I'm
gonna
write
so
a
good
example
of
where
you
can
draw
a
straight
line
to
companies,
but
do
Oracle
stuff
like
Jane
Lee.
You
know,
consensus
is
a
product
company
and
we
provide
infrastructure
and
asset
management.
So
when
you
want
to
decide
to
finally
tokenize
something
like
a
baseline
invoice,
you
might
want
to
use
codify.
If
you
are
baseline,
enabling
your
product
like
s,
AP
or
more
it'll,
you
might
want
to
use
pegasus
or
empirical,
because
you're
gonna
need
it.
You're
gonna
need
a
gateway
to
them.
A
A
C
I
mean
we
had
some
kind
of
a
road
show
afterwards
showcasing
what
we
did
there
and
the
main
outcome
for
for
us
as
uniprot
was
what
I
had
told
before
that
now
people
are
asking
how
they
can
migrate
their
existing
blockchain
concepts
or
proof
of
concepts
or
MVPs
to
be
baselined,
and
it's
interesting
discussions
going
on
there
and
I
think
still.
The
most
value
will
be
if
there
will
be
more
demos
or
showcases
or,
of
course,
real-world
projects
that
show
how
to
use
the
baseline
protocol
and
educate
the
world
about
it.
C
A
A
Yeah
so
chef
I'll,
why
don't
we
talk?
Are
there
questions
that
we
need
to
look
at
I
mean
there's
always
the
token
question,
and
maybe
we
can.
Maybe
we
can
go
on
the
record
here
about
that
right.
So
I
know
that
you
know
that
there's
there's
a
importantly
nuanced
conversation
about
tokens
when
it
comes
to
baselining.
It
needs
to
be
understood
right
that
the
baseline
protocol
is
is
about
treating
the
main
net
as
a
legit
component
of
old-school
corporate
IT
and
business
IT
right.
A
So
folks,
in
that
space,
aren't
really
you
know
they
don't
most,
don't
know
that
much
about
tokens
or
crypto
or
any
of
that
kind
of
stuff,
and
indeed
a
lot
of
companies
and
for
probably
a
very
long
time,
aren't
going
to
be
able
to
hold
crypto
to
pay
for
gas.
It's
a
eutherian.
So
all
of
that
stuff
is
a
subtractive
way
and
they're
not
interested
they're
interested
in
good
security,
good
good,
middleware,
good
messaging
layers,
all
that
kind
of
stuff
and
and
getting
rid.
B
A
A
The
promise
of
having
the
maintenance
as
sort
of
our
silo
of
last
resort,
is
appealing
to
IT
people
and
CISOs
and
other
folk
as
long
as
we
can
do
it
in
a
way
that
is
not
giving
out
information
that
can
be
used
by
our
competitors
to
look
like
one's
competitors
to
you
know,
figure
out
their
volumes
or
there
some
other
information.
That
would
be
bad
for
them
to.
For
you
know,
so
that's
the
mean.
That's
the
main
point
of
baselining.
A
C
Heard
of
that
yeah-
that's
great
yeah,
of
course,
I
mean
if
you
just
think
of
either
as
transaction
cost
for
paying
gas.
It's
also
a
token
and
I
also
agree
that
the
business
people
of
an
integration
process
perhaps
do
not
want
to
care
so
much
about
crypto,
not
on
technical
level
and
also
not
on
other
side
effects
that
come
with
rumors
like
okay.
This
is
blockchain,
so
this
is
exactly
the
same
like
Bitcoin,
so
you
know
you're
all
paying
your
weapons
with
cryptocurrencies
and
I.
Actually.
C
You
have
to
you
have
to
build
something
meaningful
around
it.
I
mean,
for
example,
the
the
UNEP
right
token
is
not
directly
associated
with
say
baseline,
but
we
use
the
token,
as
as
the
one
access
point
to
bundle
all
the
services
that
we
as
an
integrator
offers.
So
with
a
unified
token,
you
can
pay
for
the
integration
transaction
between
s
AP
and
a
smart
contract,
and
you
can
on
top
pay
for
the
resulting
transaction
costs
in
whatever
blockchain
I
mean
baseline,
is
very
aetherium
based,
but
a
unified.
C
We
started
with
offering
blockchain
a
different
blockchain
as
a
target
for
our
generation,
so
it
just
totally
makes
sense
to
have
something
that
bundles
the
crypto
related
services
that
come
after
your
integration
point
and
if
you
are
using
an
S
AP
and
you
just
want
to
baseline
it,
you
don't
have
to
care
what
kind
of
transaction
costs
or
integration
costs
are
in
the
text
deck.
You
just
want
one
entry
point,
and
this
is
something
that
your
token
can
perfectly
do,
because
you
have
it
automated
it's
a
piece
of
software.
C
It's
easier
than
writing
an
invoice
with
Microsoft,
Word
and
waiting
for
the
payment
to
appear
on
your
bank
account.
So
I
think
talking
is
nothing
that
anybody
who
wants
to
make
use
a
business
use
of
blockchain
should
be
afraid
of
it's
the
other
way
around.
It
actually
can
make
things
easier
if
it's
designed
and
built
properly.
It's.
A
Treated
correctly,
I
like
the
way
you
guys
treat
it
right.
It's
not
you're,
not
it's
store
value
kind
of
thing.
For
you,
it's
it's
it's
kind
of
like
when
I
was
a
kid
and
went
to
the
video
arcade
I
couldn't
pay
in
game
tokens
right.
So
exactly.
C
It's
it's
a
it's
a
dime
that
you
put
in
the
Machine
and
then
the
Machine
works,
and
if
the
machine
stops
working,
then
you
put
in
another
dime,
but
you
don't
have
to
care
about
all
the
small
machines
inside
the
machine.
So
that's
our
idea
of
abstracting
from
say
a
specific
block
chain
or
a
specific
integration
that
goes
over
two
layers
or
over
ten.
The
user
shouldn't
care
about
that.
He
just
should
have
a
dedicated
entry
point,
for
example
to
baseline
Ness
a
P.
A
B
A
Right
now,
so,
let's,
let's
talk
about
that
Stefan
you
again,
you've
you've
got
a
lot
of
experience
in
this.
Using
you
know,
the
you
know,
vibrate
connector
to
sa
PSAP
is
pretty
serious
about
security
so
and
then
we
moved
at
and
then
we
integrated
with
Dynamics
and
they're
pretty
serious
about
security.
Where
do
you
see
any?
A
Let's,
let's
be
real?
Look
folks,
I
mean
you
know,
I
offered
you
if
you're
a
C
so
and
we're
not.
You
know
this
is
an
office
hours.
It's
not
a
selling
activity.
Let's
be
straight
up.
Are
there
any
issues?
Where
are
you?
We
have
to
worry
about
it?
So
if
you
ever
see
so-
and
you
were
thinking
about
using
s,
ap
or
you've
got
SVP
and
you
wanted
a
baseline
with
Dynamics.
What
do
you
want
to
be
thinking
about
in
terms
of
security?
I
mean.
C
Presently
I
know
I'm
more
like
a
Software
Architect,
so
perhaps
not
the
domain
expert
in
this
area.
I
I
see
that
risk
is
considered
to
have
the
wrong
level
of
abstraction
so
with
every
new
technology.
If
there
is
a
company
deciding
for
a
specific
way
to
go,
for
example,
base
lining
their
processes,
they
see
the
risk
that
everything
everything
changes
like
in
the
next
six
months
and
they
have
to
pay
all
these
development
hours
again,
because
there
was
some
protocol
change.
C
So
that's
why
we're
also
coming
back
to
the
demo
that
we
showcased
with
sa
P
dynamics.
We
thought
it
is
so
important
to
provide
a
small
reduced
domain
model
that
all
parties
agree
on
instead
of
already
directly
working
on
protocol
level
and
then
seeing
that
the
next
update,
perhaps
crashes,
things
on
the
in
the
end.
So
the
the
main
risk
that
I
see
for
companies
going
for
a
new
middleware
is
the
lack
of
abstraction
and
that's
what
we
all
should
work
on.
C
That's
why
it's
so
great
to
have
many
participants
in
working
or
providing
stuff
to
the
protocol
so
that
you
can
actually
ensure
that
the
level
of
abstraction
is
at
least
enough
for
all
those
who
participate
and
they
can
rely
on
that
level
and
then
the
protocol
level
is
one
level
below.
So
this
is
the
main
risk
that
I
see
and
it
can
be
tackled
quite
easily.
If
you
do
things
right
so.
A
A
A
C
I
mean
that's,
that's
the
the
nice
thing
about
decentralized
solution
in
that
case
is
that
you
can
build
a
complete
tech.
Stack
I
mean
Kyle
from
provide,
would
be
the
perfect
guy
to
explain
this
in
detail
and
is
that
the
complete
text
stack,
including
all
the
the
baseline
containers
needed
to
drive
a
baseline
process,
are
completely
in
the
hand
of
the
participating
companies.
C
So
you
can,
you
can
select
if
you
want
to
have
it
on
premise
or
if
you
want
to
publish
it
to
your
AWS
cloud
or
edger
and
from
there
it's
just
standard
integration
points
like
a
restful
api,
but
you
don't
have
to
open
on
the
network
security
level.
There's
no,
no
change
compared
to
other
integrations.
When
you
talk
to
sub
s
a
PPI
or
something
so
only
to.
C
A
A
USC,
so
that
was
amazing
and
you
know
we're
working
hard
and
if
any
of
there
are
any
CISOs
out
there,
if
you
know
of
anybody
out
there,
please
get
involved
because
building
security
means
building
it.
First,
we
have
several
areas
of
of
security,
related
topics
in
the
current
roadmap
and
they're
all
enumerated
in
the
baseline
protocol
roadmap
and
I'll.
Put
two
I'll
put
the
link
up
in
a
second.
For
that.
A
One
last
point
about
the
you
know:
just
going
back
before
you
leave
Schieffelin
about
about
the
tokens
and
stuff
I
think
the
other
thing
that
people
do
need
to
know
Nick
I
want
to
bring
this
back
up
is
even
with
gas
yeah
thinking
about
aetherium
and
gas.
Yeah
gases,
you
know,
is
a
crypto
token
or
is
a
you
know.
It
involves
cryptocurrency,
but
the
way
we
think
of
it
is
as
a
way
of
hope
of
solving
the
halting
problem
for
the
IT
issue.
Right
yeah.
A
If
you
write
a
loop
and
it
goes
forever,
you've
brought
the
whole
system
down.
Don't
do
that,
that's
a
fundamental
problem,
so
gas,
you
know
you
run
out
of
gas
and
you
don't
bring
all
system
now
and
from
that
perspective
you
know
we
do
need
to
be
able
to
take
a
company
that
cannot
hold
crypto
and
that
will
be
for
a
long
time
and
say:
hey
yeah,
you
don't
need
to
you're.
Just
gonna
get
an
IT
charge
from
somebody.
Who's
gonna
handle
the
gas
for
you
right.
C
C
Many
people
are
concerned
about
how
should
a
company
get
your
token,
so
they
can
start
bringing
all
their
processes
from
their
ERP
systems
to
blockchain
and
I
always
tend
to
explain
that
this
last
part
on
how
you
get
say:
the
integration,
gas
with
unibrow
token
or
the
etherium
I
guess
this
is
the
last
1%,
because
you
first
have
to
understand
how
to
use
a
blockchain
properly.
It's
not
just
a
data
base,
so
you
can
compare
to
your
existing
database
and
notice
it's
waste
lower.
C
This
is
not
the
point,
so
the
first
99%
are
to
build
the
right
cases
for
for
blockchain
and
then
integrate
them
properly
from
the
system
systems
of
records
that
are
already
there,
and
if
you
cover
that
the
the
last
part
of
using
the
advantages
of
an
automated
software
token
as
a
payment
model,
this
is
really
easy
to
do.
If
you
reach
that
point
that
you
only
have
to
explain
that
talking
part,
then
you
made
it.
A
Everybody
well,
are
there
any
last
questions
before
we
go
and
by
the
way
you
know
this
was
conceived
as
a
thing
for
helping
people
get
up
to
speed
on
being
part
of
the
community.
I
think
I'm
gonna
do
a
video
on
how
to
manage
the
repo
and
just
put
that
up
on
YouTube.
So
people
know
how
to
get
into
the
repo
and
how
to
work
with
the
shoes
and
that
sort
of
thing,
but
I
don't
think
we
have
time
for
that
today.
A
But
you
know
please
reach
out.
The
most
easy
way
to
get
involved
is
just
to
go
to
the
baseline
protocol,
dot,
org
and
and
there's
a
link
to
the
slack
there's
a
link
to
discord
and
all
the
other
channels
of
communication.
We
even
have
a
nice
connector
that
if
you're
on
the
community
chat,
channel
and
slack
you're
pinging
everybody
on
all
the
channel,
the
platforms
which
is
cool
thanks
to
Hudson
Jamison
for
them,
so
get
involved,
come
and
help
with
that.
Thanks,
everybody
and
we'll
see
you
next
week
same
time
same
bat-time
same
bat-channel
thanks.