►
Description
If there is buffering on the YouTube stream, the webcast can be viewed through the council's website https://www.basingstoke.gov.uk/webcast
A
Rally
as
a
settlement
starts
to
relate
with
others
and
the
fact
that
this
will
will
blur
the
settlement
boundaries
and
therefore
his
contrary
to
that
policy,
and
the
other
things
that
I
wanted
to
mention
are
things
that
are
picked
up
in
the
assessment.
That's
been
done
by
the
planning
team.
The
the
first
is
a
belief
from
the
residents
that
this
from
a
highways
perspective,
still
is
not
a
safe
proposal.
We
recognize
that
our
work
has
been
done
to
make
some
recommendations
about
displays,
but
essentially,
we've
got
a
number.
A
We've
got
three
different
access
sites
in
a
very
familiar
in
a
very
short
period.
The
traffic
that
will
come
through
as
a
result
of
this
development
development
will
be
significant.
The
Proposal
is
for
for
three
horses.
You
will
have
seen
from
your
site
visit
that
there
are
already
seven
horses
in
that
field,
so
we
we
believe,
that's
unsafe.
A
The
third
I
think
is
a
consideration
that,
if
this
is
for
for
approval
with
something
that
I
would
ask,
is
taken
into
account
for
the
considerations
we
are
on
the
edge
of
a
nitrate,
vulnerable,
Zone
and
I.
Don't
believe
that
the
considerations
for
a
collection
of
manure
actually
take
account
significantly
of
the
way
in
which
manure
is
proposed
to
be
stored.
I
recognize
that
some
of
that's
picked
up
in
the
assessment,
but
would
ask
that
actually,
the
environment
agency
guidance
is
followed
in
full,
which
I
don't
believe.
The
current
plans
propose.
B
B
Welcome
to
committee,
when
you're
ready,
you've
got
four
minutes.
C
Good
evening,
chair
so
to
counter
against
what
you've
just
heard
there
from
the
objector
the
character
of
the
area,
those
that
were
on
the
site
visit
will
know
that
it's
a
ball
area,
it's
surrounded
by
farm
buildings.
There
is
already
a
riding
school,
the
other
side
of
one
of
the
hedges.
There
are
horses
already
in
and
around
the
area.
I,
don't
think
that's
out
of
character
in
terms
of
a
rural
area.
The
stable
buildings
are
proposed
as
being
low-key.
C
I
can't
see
the
concern
in
in
that
regard
in
terms
of
open
spaces
and
Open
Fields.
There
are
obviously
other
Open
Fields
in
and
around
the
area
and
I.
Don't
believe
that
and
the
question
in
use
will
you
know
for
the
Coalition
of
settlements?
I,
don't
believe
that
that
is
something
that
would
occur
so
I'll
counter
that
one.
The
concerns
there
that
have
been
raised
with
regards
to
highways.
C
Obviously,
highways
have
said
no
objection
to
this
access.
The
axis
is:
is
there
it
had
permission
in
1987.
there's
been
concerns
that
have
been
brought
up
by
other.
You
know
members
of
public
and
concerns
that
have
been
brought
up
with
regards
to
a
possible
enforcement.
Well
that
was
closed
in
2020..
C
There
is
no
enforcement
on
this
site.
There
is
nothing
in
there
which
is
confirmed
in
the
office's
papers.
The
nitrate
Zone
in
terms
of
the
offices
of
the
confirmness
as
well
we're
not
within
the
catchment
area.
C
For
the
nitrate,
you
know
catchment
zones
so
that
we
believe
has
been
addressed
and
obviously
the
officers
have
taken
all
these
things
on
board
and
and
they're
recommending
approval
for
the
for
the
the
keeping
with
the
horseship
just
touching
on
their
in
terms
of
you've
just
been
told,
obviously
that
there
are
horses
already
in
the
field.
Boat
sources
are
grazing,
they're
not
being
kept
there.
C
There
is
a
difference
between
keeping
horses
in
the
field
and
grazing
horses
and
that's
to
do
with
in
terms
of
if
it's
grazing,
it's
eating
the
grass
that's
there.
There
is
concerns
that
that's
been
raised
in
the
update
paper,
we've
the
welfare
of
those
losses.
There
are
people
that
look
after
those
horses
they're
in
there
twice
a
day
to
top
up
water
and
make
sure
they're
being
being
looked
after.
So
but
again,
that's
not
actually
a
planning
consideration
in
terms
of
this
application.
C
That's
before
you
I
think
the
the
only
other.
The
other
thing
that
I
I
would
like
to
kind
of
bring
up
is
is
is
like
I
say
in
terms
of
these
visibility
displays
and
the
and
the
and
the
the
concerns
that
have
been
raised,
the
road
itself
it
it's
used
regularly
by
the
commercial
yard
so
also
in
around
those
areas.
C
So
there
are
lots
of
vehicle
movements
that
are
already
happening,
and
this
is
for
personal
use
in
terms
of
the
applicant's
own
horses
and
he
lives
the
other
side
of
the
field.
So
in
terms
of
vehicle
movements
and
taking
horses
in
and
out
of
that
site,
it
won't
be
happening,
but
highways
have
said
there
is
no
objection
in
that
regard
and
therefore
I've
asked
you
to
please
approve
this
application.
Thank
you.
B
Okay,
thank
you
very
much.
Any
questions
for
Mr
Cottrell
Council,
full.
D
Thank
you
chat.
Yeah.
Can
you
just
clarify?
You
just
mentioned
that
this
is
for
private
use,
but
in
the
application
it
says,
there's
an
all-weather
riding
school
is
that
a
commercial
operation.
C
No,
it's
purely
simply
for
the
applicants
to
be
able
to
exercise
their
own
horses
and
practice
riding
in
around
the
area.
Members
of
the
family.
There
are
young
children
and
things
in
the
family
and
they
want
to
be
able
to
ride
in
their
own
riding
school,
and
there
is
one
the
other
side
of
the
Hedge
foreign.
C
C
F
I
am
thank
you
very
much
Jay
good
evening
committee.
Thank
you
for
giving
me
the
opportunity
to
speak
to
this
item.
As
we
can
all
see
from
the
officer's
report.
This
application
has
a
long
history
of
previous
application
and
has
been
refused
for
good
reason.
Those
are
also
laid
out,
of
course,
in
the
report
I'm
here
with
the
support
of
my
fellow
award
counselors,
the
parish
council
and
local
residents,
to
ask
you
to
do
the
same
to
this
application.
F
F
Look
at
the
objections
you
have
in
front
of
you
from
the
Parish
Council
next
door,
neighbors
to
the
development
at
little
waifood
farm
and
18
others
from
residents
in
Dean's,
Lane,
White,
Hart,
Lane,
pamber,
Road
and
monk
Sherborne
Road.
Indeed,
every
major
road
in
this
small
village
residents
are
of
the
same
view
as
local
residents
who
love
and
know
where
they
live.
They
are
telling
you
what
they
know
to
be
true
and
what
I'm
sure
you
saw
on
your
site
visit.
F
This
is
open
and
undeveloped,
Countryside,
which
is
at
the
heart
of
the
character
of
Charter
alley,
indeed,
that
this
Northern
side
of
Charter
alley
is
without
doubt
the
most
prominent
open
impactful
on
the
character
of
The
Village
or
you
can
see
from
White
Hartley
Dean's
Lane
Mount
Sherman
Road
is
Open,
Fields,
trees,
hedgerows
and
The
Farmhouse.
All
the
way
to
the
common,
this
Countryside
and
environmental
objective,
that's
already
been
discussed,
is
enshrined
in
the
wooden
Saint
Lawrence
Parish
neighborhood
plan
exactly
for
applications
of
this
nature
to
protect
that
character
to
protect
those
open
views.
F
The
introduction
of
built
form
to
this
prominent
location
on
the
edge
of
Charter
alley
will
be
harmful
to
the
character
and
appearance
of
the
surrounding
area.
We
all
walk
our
Wards
when
I
walk
down
white
heart
Lane.
This
is
the
view
that
I
have
that
gives
me
the
character
of
the
village
of
Charter
alley.
I.
Ask
you
to
refuse
it.
G
H
So
the
deafen
of
definition
of
PDF
would
include
summer
question
uses
in
buildings,
but
it
wouldn't
necessarily
necessarily
mean
the
whole
of
the
land
would
be
classed
as
Brownfield.
It
would
be
subject
to
an
assessment,
so
but
yes,
equestrian
sites
and
stable
buildings
would
be
classed
as
Brownfield.
Thank.
G
You
I've
got
a
supplemental
not
on
that
topic,
but
on
page
one,
one:
zero
and
the
third
paragraph
down
it's
being
made
clear
that
this
is
a
private
School.
However,
if
you
work
look
at
the
English,
the
proposed
development
is
a
private
question
used
rather
than
commercial
use
and
is,
as
such,
a
small
scale.
Business
writing
School.
G
H
B
Okay,
any
more
questions:
Council
Faulkner.
D
H
Previous
used
application,
so
you
can
see
that
there's
a
so,
it's
moved
to
the
eastern
part
of
the
site.
It
doesn't
relate
to
the
agricultural
buildings
that
are
positioned
in
the
top
are
just
under.
The
number
19
is
where
the
development
is
is
now
proposed,
also
just
minding
the
heart,
the
access
that
it
was
proposing.
Previously,
that
is,
a
single
Lane
access
on
a
three-point
road.
So
the
new
access
is
on
a
two-way
traffic
road
with
adequate
sight
lines,
whereas
that
is
on
a
one-way
and
was
was
extremely
tight.
H
So
there's
quite
some
significant
changes
and
the
level
of
built
form
significantly
reduced
from
so
the
so.
This
proposal
amends
the
proposals
by
reducing
the
amount
of
built
form
to
one
stable
block,
whereas
that's
got
two
and
then
another
store
and
provides
three
Stables,
a
storage
and
attack
room
all
covered
within
one
building
and
moves
the
so
moves
the
access
as
well.
So
so,
generally,
overall,
there's
been
quite
significant
changes,
since
this
refusal.
B
B
E
Thank
you,
chair
I
mean
it
is.
It
is
a
agricultural
equestrian
in
the
in
the
countryside.
Now
he
is
a
an
improvement
on
the
last
application.
Let's
just
be
honest
in
three
years,
they
have
moved
considerably
why
it's
taken
them
three
years,
I
don't
know,
but
it
is
a
private
Paddock
for
private
use.
We
are
conditioning
the
fact
that
it
cannot
be
a
business
and
had
we
had
houses
here,
we'd
have
all
been
up
in
arms,
I
think,
but
this
has
Council.
E
As
bound
has
said,
it
gives
the
views
we're
not
losing
a
lot
of
the
views.
A
lot
of
them
will
be
retained.
Yes,
there
will
be
a
built
form
within
the
the
application
site,
but
in
reality
there
is
nothing
in
this
on
which
to
hang
a
refusal,
and,
let's
be
honest,
there
are
other
buildings
with
like.
If
you
go
to
photograph
B,
which
was
on
there
earlier
I,
don't
know.
E
If
you
can
do
that
yeah,
you
can
see
the
you
can
see
the
built
form,
so
that
is
really
close
to
this
application
site
and
I.
Think
on
that
basis,
that
is
agricultural.
This
is
equestrian.
I
think
it
is
a
supportable
application
in
its
current
form
and
therefore
I'm
happy
to
move
the
officer's
recommendation
as
it
stands.
B
Thank
you.
We
have
a
move.
Do
we
have
a
second,
though,
because
that
Council
bounded?
You
wished
a
second
councilor.
How
surrounded
you
want
and
to
add
anything?
Okay.
So
we
have
moved
and
seconded
motion
in
favor
of
the
recommendation
and
move
to
vote.
Those
in
favor.
Please
show.
B
J
B
J
Decision,
thank
you
chairman
to
confirm
that
item
is
approved
as
per
the
agenda
paper.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
B
Okay:
item
number
four
land
adjacent
to
Orchard,
House
Ball
Hill,
which
would
have
the
introduction
please
thank.
H
You
chat:
this
is
a
application
for
permission
in
principle
for
four
dwellings.
Originally,
it
was
submitted
for
five,
but
it's
now
been
reduced.
So
it's
a
minimum
of
four
maximum
of
four.
The
application
is
just
to
consider
land
use
occasion,
development
as
similar
with
the
previous
one
Indica.
H
An
indicative
layout
has
been
submitted,
which
shows
how
four
dwellings
could
be
positioned
with
two
at
the
front
of
the
two
at
the
front
of
the
site
and
two
near
the
back
in
terms
of
an
update.
A
further
letter
of
objection
has
been
received,
raising
concerns
that
have
already
been
addressed
within
the
offices
report.
10
letters
of
support
have
also
been
received
which
those
areas
of
those
highlighting
points
which
are
in
the
update
paper.
H
The
application
is
recommended
for
approval
and
a
list
of
the
documents
and
details
the
TDC
application
are
listed
within
the
agenda
paper.
Thank
you.
B
D
Thank
you,
chair
yeah,
the
reasons
for
approval
number,
one
on
page
145
references,
The,
Five-Year,
land,
Supply
issue
in
previous
applications.
We
were
established
that
in
the
Aon
B,
unless
there
are
exceptional
circumstances
that
we
shouldn't
have
development
and
this
isn't
in
the
neighborhood
plan
either.
So.
J
Thank
you
Jim.
If
I
could
just
pick
that
up
the
reference
to
development
not
being
appropriate
in
AO
and
B's
is
in
respect
of
whether
it's
major,
whether
the
local
planning
Authority,
consider
it
to
be
major
development
and
lovely.
Obviously,
given
the
scale
of
the
scheme
here
for
up
to
four
dwellings,
it's
not
considered
to
be
major
development
in
the
context
of
the
armb.
G
You
jet
just
a
quick
question,
page
153
previous
planning
history.
G
Can
you
confirm
it
was
this
site
that
was
withdrawn
on
7th
of
October
21
and
it
was
precisely
this
site.
H
Yes,
it
was,
but
it
was
for
larger
and
included
part
of
the
pad
if
we
get
that
yeah,
so
it
included
land
to
the
east
as
well.
So
it's
not
just
so
this
this
this
Slither
of
strip,
is
the
bit
that's
got
buildings
on
the
area
included
an
extra
bit
of
land
with
the
paddock
which
had
no
buildings
on
so
it's
just
confined
the
site
to
our
existing
built
form
lies.
E
H
So
the
they've
tried
to
evidence
through
this
application.
H
But
basically
there
are
agricultural
buildings
there
that
we
consider
at
the
moment,
with
the
evidence
that
we've
got
there's
not
enough
to
say
that
these
are
commercial
buildings,
they're
agricultural
buildings,
which
then
would
not
be
previously
developed
land.
But
there
are
buildings
there.
So
in
the
context
of
the
character
of
the
area
and
the
location
of
development
and
with
the
less
short
lack
of
housing,
five-year,
housing
and
Supply,
we
consider
this
site
suitable
in
our
current
sort
of
policy
contacts
and.
E
B
Okay,
it's
being
moved
and
seconded
those
in
favor
of
the
recommendation.
Please
show.
B
J
B
B
Welcome
to
development
control
committee
when
you're
ready
press
the
button
you're
right
you'll
have
four
minutes.
Thank
you.
L
Good
evening,
everyone,
as
you've
already
heard
the
the
application
is
recommended
for
approval
biopsies
and
on
behalf
of
Mr
and
Mrs
well,
I'd
also
like
to
endorse
this
recommendation.
L
These
which
are
being
used
as
grainstorms
and
for
keeping
of
high
value
farm
equipment
of
course,
need
to
be
monitored,
as
well
as
being
protected
from
rural
crime.
The
diversification
of
the
equestrian
relates
and
rate
operations
of
the
applicants.
Traditional
Center
of
operations
of
Park
Farm,
which
itself
is
a
success
story,
has
resulted
in
Mr
and
Mrs
small
now
managing
the
operation
of
brown
down
Farm,
whilst
their
sons
have
taken
on
the
management
of
the
operations
at
Park
farm
and
they're.
L
In
this
case,
the
proposal
will
achieve
15
biodiversity
net
gain
against
a
policy
that
requires
10
gain
and
only
own
only
on
larger
sites.
The
Proposal
goes
above
and
beyond
this
requirement.
The
Proposal
will
also
achieve
nutrient
neutrality,
noting
that
the
government
allow
themselves
advising
that
this
requirement
should
not
apply
to
new
housing.
The
fact
that
the
proposal
will
achieve
neutrality
again
is
positive
in
this
context,
also
just
to
correct
an
error
in
the
committee
report.
No
Hedges
are
to
be
removed
to
facilitate
the
access.
I
L
L
G
Thank
you,
chairman
I,
like
several
other
members
on
this
committee,
have
been
around
on
this
development
in
control
for
some
years,
and
we've
had
several
agricultural
buildings
submitted
during
that
time.
G
I
would
just
like
to
make
the
comment
right
now
that
this
is
probably
one
of
the
better
submissions
yeah.
It
ticks
all
the
boxes
as
far
as
I'm
concerned,
especially
when
we
go
through
the
agricultural
reviews
and
their
submitted
as
well
to
reinforce
the
issue.
The
rural
economy
is
quite
important
and
anything
we
can
do
as
a
council
to
support
the
rural
economy.
In
this
case,
maintaining
a
an
ongoing
business
deserves
our
full
support
and
I
would
move
the
officer's
recommendation
for
this
application.
Thank
you.
I
You
chair,
I,
was
no
have
no
hesitation
in
in
following
what
councilman
says
and
seconding
it
it
does.
The
officer
report
justifies
as
far
as
I'm
concerned
the
need
for
this
particular
development.
B
Okay,
it's
been
moved
and
seconded
we'll
move
to
vote
those
in
favor.
Please
show.
B
B
Okay,
next
item
land
to
the
southeast
of
little
Knoll
Hill
in
Kings,
clear
if
we
could
have
the
offer
to
introduce
please
thank.
H
You
chair,
so
this
is
an
another
permission
in
principle,
for
a
minimum
of
one
dwelling
and
a
maximum
of
two
dwellings
to
consider
land
use
location,
an
amount,
an
indicator,
an
indicative
layout,
that's
been
provided,
which
shows
how
to
dwellings
could
be
positioned
within
the
site
in
terms
of
an
update.
Page
211
refers
to
the
proposal
being
one
dwelling,
but
it
is
a
minimum
of
one
and
a
maximum
of
two.
H
B
Thank
you
very
much.
We
appear
to
have
no
speakers
listed
so
counselors.
Do
you
have
any
questions
for
the
officers
councilor
ratican
on.
E
The
on
the
reasons
for
approval
we
now
added
in
that
as
the
current
the
council
cannot
Conway
demonstrate
five-year
housing,
landsplay
I
thought
on
Pips.
It
only
needed
to
be
location,
land
use
and
the
and
the
Quantum
of
development.
So
why
have
we
added
in
that
further
line.
H
I
think
it's
just
adding
that
that
is
the
reason
why
that
that
that
is
because
we
can't
have
a
five
year,
that
we
don't
have
a
five-year
housing
land
Supply
in
place,
that
it
doesn't
that
we're
that
our
policies
are
out
of
date
and
that
we're
just
saying
that
that's
why
our
policies
are.
In
date,
we
may
take
a
different
stance
on
that.
E
Can
I
ask
if
you've
changed
that
because
I
in
in
previous
committee
meetings,
we've
only
had
location,
land
use,
Sunday
and
the
Quantum
of
development?
As
the
reasons
I
mean
I'm,
quite
content
that
that
we
leave
out
of
the
three
but
the
addition
of
that
five-year
housing
land
Supply
issue
almost
gives
green
lights.
Everybody
who
watches
us
they're,
saying
oh
they're,
highlighting
it
themselves.
Let's
stick
in
an
application
because
they
haven't
got
the
housing.
J
J
Our
housing
land
Supply
position
is
relevant
to
the
consideration
of
the
principle
of
development
and
therefore,
given
that
it
is
what
provides
us
with
the
Tilted
balance
for
any
consideration,
and
that
tilty
balance
in
itself
means
that
development
might
not
otherwise
be
acceptable
on
Greenfield
sites
is
acceptable,
then
that
is
a
key
reason
for
us
recommending
approval
in
this
instance,
and
that's
why
it
is
now
included
within
your
reasons,
for
approval
in
your
agenda
paper.
Thank.
B
B
Okay
item:
seven
yes,
councilor
Ben
Willie
will
leave
us
now.
B
Okay,
item
number:
seven:
don't
know
how
that's
pronounced,
actually
papine
papine
Walkers
Road
baucus.
J
Introduction
please
thank
you
chairman.
The
application
is
the
application
for
action
of
a
three-bedroom
dwelling,
Within
part
of
the
garden
of
existing
property,
papine
and
creation
of
a
new
vehicular
access.
There
is
an
update
paper
within
the
update
paper,
which
provides
some
details
of
the
drainage
proposal.
J
Confirmative
site
isn't
with
an
area
of
increased
risk
of
flooding,
but
that
the
proposal
is
to
secure
the
surface
drainage,
surface
water,
drainage
scheme
that
has
been
submitted
by
way
of
condition
with
subsequent
informative
note
and
then
with
some
minor
changes
to
other
conditions
already
within
your
agenda
paper
for
the
reason
set
out
therein.
Thank
you,
Jim.
B
E
Council
Vatican
yeah
I'm
happy
to
move
the
recommendation
as
laid
out
by
officers.
B
B
J
M
Thank
you
chair.
Firstly,
just
to
draw
attention
to
one
error
on
the
final
page
of
the
reports
and
apologies
page
289.
The
application
there
list
is
Lantern
north
of
West
of
junipers
was
an
allowed
appeal,
not
dismissed.
So
apologies
just
to
correct
that
the
only
particular
application
draw
members
attention
to
an
appendix
a
was
a
major
appeal
decision
which
was
allowed.
That
was
an
application
member's
Miracle
at
the
central
37
Site
kingsclair
Road.
M
In
very
summary
terms,
the
inspector
found
there
would
not
be
any
harms
to
Heritage
assets
designated
undesignated
or
to
the
in
relation
to
noise
and
disturbance
related
to
the
next
next
door.
Public
House.
The
benefits
of
this
game
are
consider
to
be
housing,
affordable,
housing,
Reese
of
a
bramford
land
in
a
sustainable
location,
acceptable
level
of
multifunctional
green
space
and
therefore
the
decision
was
allowed.
M
It's
the
reminder,
members
in
terms
of
particularly
around
major
decisions,
the
the
appeal
performance,
which
is
obviously
Crisco
in
relation
to
meeting
governments,
performance
requirements,
the
remainder
of
the
reports
at
an
appendix
b
or
other
or
summarizes
all
other
appeals
received
in
that
in
that
quarter.
Adventure.
B
Okay,
so
I
believe
this
item
is
for
noting,
unless
certain
one's
got
any
additional
questions.
Council
ratican.
E
I
don't
know
if
the
officers
have
seen
the
report
in
the
business
of
Gazette,
which
highlighted
the
number
of
overturns
by
us
as
a
as
a
committee.
Would
you
like
to
make
any
comment
on
on
our
placing
on
that
list?.
M
Hey
Cass,
Raskin
I
think
the
any
point
to
draw
many
attention
turns
as
far
as
this
report
is
the
risk
management
part
on
page
281,
which
effectively
sets
out
the
circumstances
whereby
designation
could
be
an
issue
if
performance
criteria
isn't
met.
So
that's
the
purpose
of
bringing
this
report
to
members
is
so
that
you
have
an
idea
of
how
many
appeals
are
being
you
know,
won
or
lost,
and
what
potential
implications
of
those
are.
K
Thank
you,
chair,
I'm,
curious
how
many
objections
are
received
in
the
cases
that
get
overturned,
because
we
had
objections
tonight
of
five
or
six,
which
is
just
over
the
limit.
You
need
I
think
it's
five
in
order
to
come
to
committee,
if
that
limit
were
increased
and
we
by
extension,
increase
the
delegated
powers
of
officers
to
make
decisions,
would
that
help
divert
some
of
these
that
are
getting
overturned
because
we
might
have
things
come
to
committee,
have
an
impassioned
speech
from
a
resident
or
whatever
it
might
be
we're
making
a
poor
decision.
K
M
Thank
cancer
ultimately
that'd,
be
a
metaphor
for
Council,
because
it'd
be
a
change
of
the
Constitution
I
think
in
terms
of
the
different
as
it
works
at
the
moment.
The
different
triggers,
if
you
like
in
terms
of
number
objectives,
is
different
across
the
the
size
of
application,
so
you're
right
for
for
minor
applications
in
most
instances
and
assessment
policy
boundaries.
It's
over
five
objections
outside
it's
it's,
so
it's
it's
four
objections
and
for
major
applications.
Where
there's
this
particular
focus
in
terms
of
performance
criteria.
It's
it's
above
10
objections.
B
Other
questions,
I,
guess
we'll
note
that
report
then,
and
there
being
no
further
business
items,
I'll
declare
this
meeting
close
to
time
tense.
Wait.
Thank
you
very
much
for
attendance
side.