►
Description
0:21 - Call to Order
0:35 - Roll Call
1:03 - Minutes
1:42 - Public Input
2:03 - Petitions and Communications
2:08 - A. Bay County Prosecutor - Vacancies
11:13 - B. Community Corrections - 2022 Grant Application
11:52 - C. Office of Criminal Defense - 2022 Grant Application
12:44 - D. Director of Administrative Services - Veteran Affairs Office Space
13:49 - E. Personnel Director - Vacancies
18:18 - F. Director of Department on Aging - Memorandum of Understanding
18:56 - G. Office of Assigned Counsel - January/February 2021 Reports
19:36 - Referrals
19:42 - Unfinished Business
19:49 - New Business
19:55 - Miscellaneous
20:00 - Announcements
20:03 - Adjournment
D
D
A
D
A
A
G
A
F
A
H
The
one
individual
has
approximately
shy
of,
I
think
20
years
experience
as
an
assistant
prosecutor
and
the
other
has
approximately
I
believe,
10
years
as
an
assistant
prosecutor
in
two
different
jurisdictions
within
michigan,
so
based
on,
I
suppose,
trying
to
be
proactive.
I
had
people
that
I
was
interviewing
and
I
knew
I
had
two
spots.
H
A
A
E
A
H
A
Absolutely
and
I
understand
the
question
and
I
think
other
people
had
the
same
question
as
well,
so
I'm
glad
that
you
voiced
it
because
I
know
that
I
did
so.
I'm
glad
that
you
brought
it
up
so
nancy,
then,
should
we,
if
we're
looking
at
this
position,
it
shouldn't
say
that
it's
going
to
be
a
line
item
63
648,
but
instead,
which
which
do
you
want
us
to
consider
both
of
these
positions
at
this
time?
Or
are
we
to
only
consider
the
one
position
at
one
higher
rate
of
pay.
E
A
A
B
Who
originally
made
the
motion,
I
believe,
will
need
to
amend
his
emotion
to
reflect
that
the
the
assistant
prosecutor,
that
she's
asking
for
in
here,
be
put
at
the
higher
rate,
which
would
be
the
73
860,
and
then
we
would
also
tag
on
to
that
that
the
other
prosecutor
that
we
already
approved
to
be
hired
has
a
change
rate
of
77
000
and
whatever
dollars.
It
is.
So
it
would
be
up
to
mr
coonan
to
modify
his
motion.
E
I
had
my
hand
up
too:
I
don't
I
don't
have
a
problem
with
the
one
that
is
open,
but
the
other
one
that
you're
looking
at
in
june.
Things
can
change
between
now
and
june,
and
this
individual,
who
has
maybe
the
10
years
of
experience
and
would
warrant
the
higher
wages.
Maybe
that
goes
away.
Why?
Wouldn't
we
just
address
that
one
in
june
or
whenever.
H
H
I
would
probably
have
to
repost
the
position
and
I
would
go
back
to
the
board
and
ask
for
what
would
be
appropriate
at
the
time
because
you
never
know
who's
going
to
apply
and
who
you're
going
to
interview
and
who
will
work
in
the
office.
So
I
wouldn't
hold
the
board
to
that
dollar
amount.
If
that
person
told
me
that
they
no
longer
were
seeking
a
position
with
me,
I
don't.
E
A
B
B
And-
and
I
agree
with
kim
I'm
just-
I
know
that
nancy's
got
her
back
up
against
the
wall
and
trying
to
fill
these
positions
and,
if
telling
this
individual
that
may
come
on
in
june,
that
this
is
what
the
pay
scale
would
be
and
it
locks
it
in.
I
think
that
that's
the
better
way
to
go,
so
I
agree
with
kim
on
making
the
modification
and
I'll
support
that.
E
D
B
A
F
A
A
A
B
A
C
A
B
C
F
A
Let's
see:
9-1-1
central
dispatch,
health
department,
wic
typist
clerk
office
of
criminal
defense,
legal
secretary
from
our
sheriff's
office,
a
corrections
officer
and
a
corrections
sergeant,
both
full-time
positions,
drain
office
for
a
heavy
equipment
operator,
a
full-time
physician
and
a
juvenile
home
youth
development
worker.
That
is
a
part-time
position.
D
B
B
A
That
position,
I'm
sorry
was
listed,
was
also
listed.
I
believe,
on
that
same
the
previous
one.
It
is
a
new.
It's
a
new
position.
That's
grant
funded.
It
was
listed
on
the
same
piece,
so
if
we
need
to
change
anything
as
far
as
that
vote
goes,
I'm
not
sure,
but
that
was
one
of
the
last
items
that
was
actually
on
that
same
petition.