►
From YouTube: Beacon Planning Board 9 12 23
Description
The City of Beacon Planning Board Meeting from September 12, 2023
B
A
She
doesn't
need
to
be
oh
great,
so
we're
gonna
start
with
our
Workshop
to
top
the
hour
here
until
7
30,
at
which
point
we'll
start
our
regular
meeting,
where
we
have
one
regular
agenda
item
and
then
shortly
thereafter
we
have
one
Architectural
Review
certificate
of
appropriateness.
So
with
that
John
Clark
will
outline
for
us.
You
may
remember
board.
We
received
a
notice
from
the
municipality
of
Fishkill
around
the
self
storage
along
52.
I
believe
right.
C
They're
going
to
put
a
storage
unit
right
south
of
84
on
the
east
side
of
90
right
before
you
get
to
the
intersection
which
is
just
outside
the
city
and
there's
issues,
I
think,
there's
it's
wet
in
the
back
there's
traffic
in
and
out
problems.
You
know
how
do
you
get
a
driveway
and
turn
left
there
and
all
that
sort
of
thing
so
I
guess
Fishkill
positive
I
was
I
was
surprised
at
that,
but.
C
C
You
yes,
and
nothing
set
in
stone
at
this
point,
but
there's
a
few
things
that
are
going
on
that
sort
of
precipitated
this.
This
idea
that
maybe
we
should
think
about
the
the
rezoning
of
that
stretch
of
the
road
one
is
that
one
of
the
major
car
dealers
is
apparently
moving
out,
which
is
going
to
free
up
a
lot
of
land
and
there's
been
people
who
are
been
coming
into
the
building
department,
with
conceptual
ideas
and
and
right
now,
under
the
zoning
there's
no
specific
other
than
the
bulk
tables.
C
C
And
the
second
thing-
and
this
is
sort
of
I-
think
a
big
deal
for
the
city
is
that
the
the
MTA
right-of-way
that
goes
all
along
the
creek
there
and
right
along
the
back
edge
of
of
those
businesses,
is
now
being
proposed
for
a
rail
trail
which
would
connect
all
the
way
to
Hopewell
Junction
up
to
the
walkway
over
the
Hudson
down.
You
know
it
would
be
a
major
interconnection
of
the
greenway
trail
system
coming
up
from
the
south
and
onto
the
center
of
the
county
and
up
north
and
to
the
South
as
well.
C
So
it's
a
major
bike
in
pedestrian
facility
that
will
be
right
through
there
and
that
could
change
the
character
of
that
area
or
at
least
what
the
city
has
in
mind
for
that
area.
So
they
asked
me
to
take
a
look
at
it
and
come
up
with
some
design
guidelines
and
and
some
new
sort
of
dimensional
standards
and
whatever
so
I've
done.
That
and
I
presented
it
to
the
council.
They
were
favorably
disposed.
They
made
some
suggestions,
some
changes
and
they
said
we'd
be
interested
in
getting
some
initial
feedback
from
the
planning
board.
C
Before
we
put
anything
into
a
local
law
and
sent
it
to
the
public,
so
I'm
here
to
get
your
initial
reactions
and
comments.
So
this
is
the
area
as
it
stands
now.
It's
sort
of
a
mixture
of
light
industrial
to
the
South
going
down.
As
far
as
the
old
talax
plant,
heavy
industrial,
that's
the
right
of
way
of
MTA.
C
A
C
F
C
A
C
C
C
G
C
C
B
H
You
know
some
design
standards,
and
maybe
there
are
things
that
we
you
know.
Maybe
there
are
some
things
that
can
even
be
increased
Beyond
what
they
are.
If
there's
the
potential
for
a
rail
trail,
a
significant
rail
trail
connection,
the
presence
of
the
fishco
creek,
and
this
is
an
example
I'm.
Not
even
you
know,
I'm
just
kind
of
pulling
inside
the
air,
but
maybe
even
some
of
the
minimum
criteria
like
must
have
15.
You
know,
plantings
and
vegetation.
H
A
natural
Corridor
that
this
is
going
to
be
you
know,
part
of,
and
so
it's
just
like.
That's
just
an
example
of
pulling
something
out
of
the
air,
but
there's
an
opportunity
to
create
something
special
with
some
of
the
recreational
resources
and
natural
features
around
it.
If
you
want
a
little
bit
more
and
we've
had.
C
A
C
So
they
asked
me
to
try
to
come
up
with
some
sort
of
hybrid
District.
I
use
the
linkage
District
design
standards
pretty
much
made
some
minor
tweaks,
but
I
also
allowed
for
things
like
a
drive-through
window
or
a
gas
station
that
would
be
allowed
here.
As
long
as
it
was
say,
you
know
the
pumps
were
behind
the
convenience
store
rather
than
in
front
of
it.
That
parking
has
to
be
to
the
rear.
C
Drive
through
Windows
have
to
be
to
the
side
or
rear
not
to
the
front
Landscaping
in
Front
Street,
trees,
sidewalks,
so
there's
it's
sort
of
they
wanted
to
have
something
there.
That's
still
allowed
for
some
Auto
oriented
uses,
but
made
it
capable
of
having
a
building
like
this
and
blend
it
all
in
and
I.
Think
everybody,
or
there
was
agreement
that
had
a
good
grocery
store,
would
be
a
good
thing
for
that
area.
I
C
So
they
wanted
to
make
sure
that
whatever
we
did
didn't
preclude
a
grocery
store
or
a
a
gas
station
or
a
car
wash
or
things
like
that,
it
just
would
up
to
design
standards
so
that
those
things
would
blend
into
other
sorts
of
buildings
so
that
it
wasn't
all
car
washes
and
Carly
dealers
and
auto
oriented
uses.
There
would
be
a
mix.
A
J
F
C
C
The
way
it's
written
now
I
mean
that's
all
everything's.
In
a
first
draft
sort
of
situation,
I've
already
had
comments
from
the
CAC
and
from
the
council
members.
So
I've
made
some
changes.
You
can
look
at
them
tonight.
If
you
have
we
had
time,
but
they
want
something
to
allow
a
building
like
this
or
promote
a
building
like
this,
but
still
allow
a
grocery
store.
If
it
wanted
to
come
in
or
something
else,
it
would
have
to
be
two-story
along
the
frontage,
but
not
necessarily
the
back.
You
know
that
sort
of.
F
C
B
B
C
B
B
Yeah,
there's
a
lot
of
limitations.
What
I'm
saying
is
there
are
only
a
few
locations
that
a
healthcare
facility
could
physically
locate
in
the
city
right
now
and
they
need
parking.
They
need
a
lot
of
other
things
that
are
in
that
are
provided
in
some
of
the
larger
Lots
here
and
I.
Just
think.
It's
short-sighted
to
prohibit
that.
Certainly.
B
B
H
B
C
But
I
wanted
to
talk
about
the
map.
First,
one
of
the
constraints
of
this
area
is
the
lots
of
relatively
shallow,
and
so
in
order
to
put
in
a
building
like
Conklin,
you
really
sort
of
need
about
150
feet
depth
and
none
of
this
area
has
150
feet:
depth
on
the
east
side,
it's
138
on
average
and
on
the
west
side
it's
90,
which
is
pretty
tight.
If
you're
going
to
put
rear
yard
parking,
lots,
there's
just
not
enough
room
for
them.
So
that's
always
a
constraint.
C
C
E
E
C
C
A
A
C
B
B
I
just
want
to
a
couple
things
I
want
to
say
preface
is
that
during
the
comprehensive
plan,
this
area
was
one
of
the
places
that
generated
a
lot
of
the
income
that
the
city
had
before
Main
Street
was
built
up,
and
there
really
was
a
a
conscious
effort
to
create
and
maintain
a
diverse
economy
and
Beacon,
where
it
wasn't
just
a
residential
Community
right
where
there
were
jobs.
There
were
industrial
zoning.
There
was
light
industrial
zoning.
B
There
were
commercial
areas,
it
was
a
wide
diversity
and
I
think
we
have
to
be
really
careful
that
we're
not
removing
one
of
the
areas
where
a
certain
segment
of
of
business
use
can
occur
right
entirely
because
the
highest
value
for
any
of
these.
If
there's
residential
allowed
in
these
areas,
the
highest
value,
there's
Millions,
you
know-
maybe
three
million
reasons
why
somebody's
going
to
build
residential
in
an
area
if
they
are
given
the
choice
of
anything
right.
So
it's
not
an
idea
that
they
can
do
anything.
B
It's
the
idea
that
there's
a
preponderance
of
the
work
is
going
to
be
residential
right.
So
we
need
to
be
aware
of
that.
Take
that
into
account
when
we're
analyzing
this
and
we
need
to
have
hard
data
we
need.
You
know
like
a
build
out
analysis.
We
need
test,
fits
and
some
other
things
so
that
we
can
make
a
rational
judgment
as
to
how
extensive
this
is,
what
its
impact
is
in
the
city
and
also
I
think
that
it
wasn't.
B
C
C
C
B
C
Know
sure
this
is
the
start
of
the
process.
Okay,
but
I
just
wanted
to
assure
you
at
this
point
at
least
the
zoning
is
designed
so
that
the
ground
floor
has
to
be
commercial,
so
you're
not
losing
that
commercial
base,
you're
losing
a
car
dealer,
but
you're
gaining
five
or
six
extra
stores
on
that.
You
know
that
area
that
used
to
be
a
car
lot
and.
B
A
On
Kevin,
just
just
real
quick,
the
city
council
has
asked
the
city's
planner
to
share
some
recommendations
and
that's
what
he's
done
and
so
to
be
fair.
As
John
mentioned.
This
is
the
start
of
the
process,
we're
responding
to
the
recommendations
without
what
I
would
consider
the
presupposition
that
it's
a
fatal,
complete
yeah
right
so
I.
C
C
F
C
At
the
comprehensive
plan
and
I
found
four
areas
where
52
is
talked
about,
two
of
them
have
what
I
would
suggest
you
would
want
to
change
the
language
in
it
because,
essentially,
it
says,
leave
it
alone,
and
this
is
obviously
not
leaving
it
alone.
But
facts
have
changed,
especially
the
rail
trail
element
has
changed.
That's
a
big
difference
between
a
abandoned
rail
Corridor
and
a
recreational
resource
that
has
Regional
implications.
F
G
G
Especially
given
that,
as
things
stand
right
now,
this
FAA
zoning
District
would
just
be
applicable
to
the
area
we're
looking
at
part
of
that
is
GD
where
manufacturing
wouldn't
be
allowed.
But
what,
if
manufacturing
and
Industrial
duties
became
either
affirmative
use
of
ourselves
for
our
permittedness
or
a
special
that
we
use
Yes.
G
C
The
proposed
use
table
changes
and,
at
the
first
pass,
we
essentially
left
everything
with
the
same
as
GB,
so
there'd
be
nothing
that
taken
away
from
GB.
What
has
been
added
is
at
the
as
the
last
industrial
or
manufacturing
use
has
been
added
to
that
District
so
that
you
would
have
the
option.
I
mean
I've
suggested,
be
a
special
permit
by
the
planning
board.
C
A
C
E
C
C
Yeah,
so
a
hospital
or
nursing
home,
as
defined
in
the
in
the
back,
which
is
more
of
a
regional
type
facility
with
emergency
services
and
things
like
that.
Anything
else
would
be
covered
under
office,
personal
service,
retail,
anything
like
Medical,
Offices
or
urgent
care,
or
any
of
that
sort
of
thing
would
be
allowed
here.
When.
A
A
B
C
C
A
J
F
J
A
C
F
C
B
Very
many
places-
that's
not
true.
What's
happening,
is
they're
consolidating
so
they're,
building,
outpatient
feeder
facilities
for
the
chains
at
Westchester
and
other
ones
that
are
building
Regional,
smaller
mid-sized
things
that
will
then
pass
hospitals
down
to
their
medical
centers.
So
there
is
a
lot
of
there's
still
a
lot
of
medical
construction
happening
inside.
C
A
C
F
B
A
B
F
K
Good
evening,
good
evening,
Taylor
Palmer
with
the
law
firm
of
Cuddy
Invader
on
behalf
of
the
applicant.
Thank
you
for
scheduling
this
meeting
just
for
us.
We
really
appreciate
it.
Of
course,
we
do
appreciate
your
times,
we'll
try
and
be
efficient
tonight.
I
am
joined,
of
course,
by
our
project,
architect,
Jaclyn
Tyler
who's,
getting
the
plans
up
on
the
board
from
next
of
creative
and
our
engineer,
Mike
morganti
of
Arctic
and
Sultan
Consulting.
K
The
applicant
who
welcomed
the
newest
Beacon
resident
two
weeks
ago,
is
also
here
with
us
this
evening,
so
she
had
her
since
I've
had
a
baby.
Second
born.
Yes,
wonderful!
So
no
speaking
wrestling
since
we're
last
before
you
back
on
August
8th,
the
planning
board
did
close
the
public
hearing
at
that
point,
and
then
the
applicant
prepared
a
supplemental
submission
to
your
board
dated
August
29th.
It
did
include
responses
to
the
public
and
the
board.
K
Of
course,
the
negative
Declaration
was
adopted
on
this
project
back
in
July
and,
of
course,
we
received
variances
from
the
zoning
board
back
in
also
in
July,
as
we
detailed
in
our
submission
and
Jacqueline
of
course
walked
through
some
of
the
more
substantive
changes,
but
we
did
widen
the
width
of
the
entrance
of
the
driveway
and
we
reduced
to
the
maximum
extent
possible.
So
we
can
still
maintain
safe
maneuvering
through
that
area,
and
we
did
enhance
the
Landscaping
at
the
entrance
to
the
site.
That
was
a
big
with
the
board.
K
K
We
also
added
design
details
of
the
retaining
wall
on
the
plans.
We
did,
of
course,
update
significantly
the
landscaping
and
then
now
I'll
choose
my
word
of
last
month,
but
the
North
and
South
End
walls
have
also
been
revised
to
reflect
the
Gable
and
vocabulary,
which
was
a
new
architectural
word.
That
was
added
to
my
vocabulary.
We
did
do
test
bits,
we
added
a
bench
and
then
we
updated
seasonal
Landscaping
as
well.
K
So
in
addition
and
again
Mike
and
Jacqueline
can
go
through
these
just
limited
changes
quickly
with
the
board,
but
there
were
some
items.
We
did
have
a
chance
to
review
the
draft
resolution.
That's
before
you
I
know,
council
is
probably
running
in
the
door
shortly.
She
did
say
she's
gonna,
be
here
at
7
30,
so
I
can
just
test
for
her.
F
J
J
I
would
note
that
there's
not
an
extensive
amount
of
Frontage
on
the
particular
portion
of
the
building.
The
the
space
to
the
right
hand.
Side
actually
is
still
close
enough
to
one
of
the
doors
to
the
facility,
but
the
two
other
spaces
in
loading
area
were
moved
over
reports.
The
left-hand
side
of
the
parking,
that's
where
the
building,
if
Jacqueline,
could
you
bring
up
the
site
plan?
J
J
L
Four
entrances
at
the
back
of
the
building
right,
so
each
of
these
stores
has
their
own
interest.
Sorry
not
store
each
of
the
office
spaces
each
have
their
own
entrance
off
the
rear.
So,
although
there
is
the
main
entrance
which
gives
you
access
to
the
residential
and
to
the
main
space,
so
you
can
access
the
building
here
and
come
into
the
residential
Lobby
or
you
can
come
in
this
entrance
and
walk
to
the
corridor
to
get
to
the
internal
entrances.
L
There
are
also
external
entrances,
so,
for
instance,
this
parking
space
right
here
is
located
directly
adjacent.
That's
why
I
was
trying
to
show
it
on
here
directly
adjacent
to
this
entrance
for
this
office
space
so
they're
they
actually
are
dispersed
across
the
back
and
we
do
have
entrances
to
each
of
these
spaces.
L
A
J
J
That
parking
space
needs
to
come
into
a
landing
at
grade
and
then
I
have
to
ramp
up
when
I
ramp
up
I
have
to
ramp
up
to
a
five
by
five
Landing.
That
five
by
five
Landing
won't
sit
where
that
door
is
it'll,
actually
be
the
the
one
on
12
slope.
Getting
to
that
doorway
there,
which
is
why
I
did
not
choose
that.
J
F
E
E
D
E
J
A
J
F
J
J
J
J
J
E
J
J
A
J
A
E
C
J
J
D
J
C
K
There's
typically
a
John
Clark,
napkin
sketch
that
helps
me
with
this
cheat
sheet.
Is
there
a
suggestion
location?
We
don't
object
to
the
concept
we've
discussed,
the
we
know
that's
been
discussed
throughout,
of
course,
but
that's
something
the
board
sees
fit
and
it's
appropriate
here.
It
still
works
for
the
shared
parking
analysis,
so
it
you
know
if
there
are,
if
there
is
an
area
that
you're
you're
considering
then
I
think
we
could
incorporate
that
into
this
plan.
I.
C
C
K
F
H
C
K
K
Additional
Green
Space
right
at
that
the
most
prominent
location
entering
the
site
and
if,
at
any
point
there
is
a
demand
driven
by
this,
this
issue:
that's
why
we
land
bank
it
they
have.
It
has
to
be
built
in
a
way
that
it
could
immediately
be
turned
into
parking
lot.
So
if
it
is
you're,
absolutely
right,
Mr
Jensen,
if
there
is
an
issue
and
it's
and
it's
brought
to
the
attention
of
the
city,
this
has
to
be
built
out.
K
A
Yeah
again,
my
support
of
this
comes
especially
in
context
of
the
concerns
expressed
by
those
and
again,
the
the
residences
are
actually
up
north
of
this
throat
right,
but
at
the
same
time,
we're
adding
planted
area
we're
adding
green
space,
we're
adding
visual
coverage
by
land
banking,
those
bases
in
that
location.
At
my,
in
my
estimation,
it's
a
benefit
and.
A
C
G
K
And
we
had
spoken
and
I
may
just
deploy
off,
that
we
had
spent
with
our
traffic
consultant
who's,
not
here,
but
with
callers
engineering
about
the
concept,
and
they
said
with.
There
was
no,
they
didn't
hit
a
threshold,
but
we
said
we
anticipate
between
four
and
six
being
a
potential
and
they
had
no
issue
with
four
to
six.
So
I
don't
know,
I,
think
you're.
The
numbers
that
you're
presenting
was
Jensen
I
think
are
appropriate.
It
too
makes
sense,
but
if
the
board
is
controlling,
you
know,
if
you
see
more
I.
A
K
A
K
It's
Peak
and
then
also
that
it
has
to
be
constructed.
So
if
there
is
any
impact,
they're
they're,
looking
at
this
from
a
collective,
but
as
far
as
the
that
you
put
up
the
on-street
parking
spaces,
we
don't
take
credit
for
those
in
our
parking
analysis.
So
there's
availability,
I
know
we
take
it.
We
take
credit
of
it,
but
we
don't
and
that
so
it's
all
it's
mixed
into
the
formula.
K
Well,
we
can
say
we
are
providing
on
site,
as
distinct
from
what's
available,
is
how
I
it
all
plays
into
the
so
those
six
spaces
on
the
street
are
factored
into,
how
that's
being
calculated.
We
can't
do
that
from
a
you
need
to
provide
40
you're,
giving
us
40.
those
six
spaces
on
street.
Just
help
us
justify
that
in
proximity
to
the
site
we
have
available
on
parking.
G
C
C
J
J
A
J
J
F
G
J
J
J
A
D
A
J
G
A
C
C
A
B
One
impact
will
be
that
it'll
be
less
visible
from
people
that
aren't
familiar
with
the
city,
so
it
won't
be
used
casually
by
casual
visitors
or
infrequent
visitors.
This
is
all
going
to
be
mainly
I
would
imagine
mainly
used
by
people
that
come
to
this
destination
and
parking,
and
not
it's
not
even
very
convenient
to
people
that
are
driving
from
inside
the
city
to
go
downtown
I'm,
assuming
that
these
spots,
like
many
of
the
other
larger
lots
that
are
in
private
Lots,
won't
be
heavily
used.
Those
are
not
visible.
People
don't
see
them.
H
Okay
with
knowing
that
we
can
get
them
if
we
need
them
and
I
assume.
You
know
that
the
tenants
of
the
office
pieces
could
drive
this
if
they
felt
like
I
mean.
Is
it
a
complex
process
for
to
to
convert
them
back
to
spaces?
If
you
have
a
tenant
that
says,
can't
fit
my
clients
in
the
parking
lot
in
a
very
complete
griping
that
they
have
to
go
find
spaces
on
the
street
I
mean.
Is
it?
Is
it
a
onerous
or
complex
process
to
convert
them.
H
H
D
K
A
L
So
again,
my
name
is
Jacqueline
Tyler,
Nexus,
creative,
the
architect
for
the
project.
At
the
last
meeting,
we
were
requested
to
look
at
the
two
ends
and,
as
you
will
see
on
the
North
End,
we
were
able
to
complete
the
full
Gable
end
on
this
portion.
We
were
in
communication
with
the
building
inspector
and
this
would
be
treated
similar
to
a
bulkhead,
given
the
fact
that
it's
not
actually
part
of
the
roof.
L
It
is
an
end
wall,
so
we
were
able
to
complete
that
full
Gable
there
at
the
end,
and
then
you
will
see
on
the
South
End
there's
the
retaining
wall.
You
were
speaking
about
on
the
south
end.
We
have
Incorporated
a
Gable
in
towards
the
back.
We
are
keeping
this
portion
open
in
regards
to
the
pergola
so
that
we
do
have
full
360
views.
L
A
L
M
A
B
It's
a
it's
an
improvement,
I
think
that
we've
gone
over
this
and
there's
been
significant
improvement
over
time.
The
one
thing
that
that
I
would
suggesting
I
brought
this
up
before
I.
Just
I
felt
like
this.
The
Architectural
Review
portion
of
this
and
some
of
the
land
use
aspects
like
the
fact
that
it
doesn't
meet
the
sidewalk
in
the
way
that
the
rest
of
Main
Street
does,
and
there
wasn't
anything
to
compel
that
use
right
in
the
in
this
in
the
zoning
in
the
transition
zone.
B
C
Well,
this
is
in
the
transitional
district
and
in
the
transitional
District.
It's
supposed
to
be
sort
of
a
a
bridge
between
the
residential
district,
with
bigger
setbacks
and
the
commercial
Main
Street
district,
with
no
setbacks
and
actually
they're
required
to
have
a
10-foot
minimum
setback
in
this
District.
So
it
can't
be
up
to
the
sidewalk
well,.
B
E
B
H
C
F
A
It's
noted
and
look
we're
all
going
to
have
different
approaches
towards
where
we
think
parts
of
the
comprehensive
plan
parts
of
the
zoning
could
use
Improvement
and
we're
going
to
differ
on
certain
aspects
of
it.
I'm
I'm,
in
agreement
with
with
John,
just
in
terms
of
the
fact
that
it's
this
is
a
different
character,
different
quality,
a
different
part
of
Main
Street
adjacent
to
residential
I,
don't
agree
with
you,
but
that's
not
what
we're
talking
about
here
right
now.
The
zoning
is
the
Zoning
for
this
lot.
A
E
A
K
Thank
you,
Mr
chairman,
just
for
one
Comics
that
don't
take
the
planning
board
attorney
was
here.
The
board
did
include
a
condition
just
to
try
and
look
at
the
Ada
location
of
the
spaces
to
try
and
potentially
Flex
we're,
not
removing
any
or
we're
hoping
that
we
can
modify
the
landscaped
Island
closest
to
the
the
end
of
the
parking
spaces
behind
the
building
to
try
and
adjust
that.
So
that
was
something
that
was
mentioned.
K
I,
don't
think
we
had
any
other
substance
of
discussions
like
we'd
spoken
with
the
attorney
with
regard
to
sort
of
the
the
automatic
termination
language
of
the
shared
parking
analysis.
So
there's
a
shared
parking,
that's
being
you
know,
provided
to
allow
this
to
work,
there's
an
automatic
termination.
If
there's
a
change
of
use.
K
Just
for
the
record,
we
wanted
to
make
it
clear
that
office
to
office,
so
Taylor's
law
office
to
Jennifer's
law
office
is
not
going
to
trigger
that
change
of
use
to
negate
or
automatically
terminate
commercial
to
commercial
office
to
office
is
not
the
change
of
use.
It's
going
from
a
law
office
to
McDonald's.
You
know
again,
I'm
just
being
that's.
K
F
K
Oh
sorry,
I've
been
I
didn't
mean
to
interrupt.
We
did
have
one
change,
that's
the
most
important
about
40
square
feet,
so
we
did
on
the
first
page.
There
was
a
there's.
All
A
lot
happened
at
the
exact
numbers,
but
I
think
we
can
change.
We
can
fix
this
issue
of
what
our
square
footage
distinction.
There
was
a
reference
on
Mr
Russo's,
comment
memo
and
on
our
plans,
but
ultimately
the
gross.
K
The
growth
is,
what
controls
your
parking
analysis
rather
than
the
amount
of
commercial
square
footage,
so
the
actual
number
is
supposed
to
be
699.
990,
sorry,
we're
going
this
is
what's
in.
The
resolution
presently
is
dealing
with
square
footage
rather
than
gross
square
footage,
so
the
the
gross
square
footage
would
be
eight
thousand
seventy
one
gross
square
feet
which
is
no
matter
how
you
skin
this
other
cat.
A
M
E
A
H
H
A
A
E
E
E
C
But
generally
we
ask
that
the
extra
month
mountains
replicate
the
pattern,
that's
on
the
existing
building,
which
I
think
is
six
over
six
and
and
so,
instead
of
having
the
muttons
between
the
glass
or
on
the
inside,
you
want
to
have
them
on
the
outside,
so
that
they
actually
look
like
full,
divided
lights.
Okay,.
A
I
G
I
B
Stated
but
it's
I'm,
no
libertarian,
but
I
find
it
one
of
the
things
that
happens
when
you
do
have
a
review
process
like
this
is
that
people
tend
to
be
more
conservative
if
they
don't
do
things
like
purples
right
and
things
that
make
very
Lively
places
in
other
cities
and
Lively
parts
of
Beacon.
It's
an
observation,
yeah.
C
There's
a
provision
in
the
in
the
code
that
allows
for
fiber
cement
siding,
but
it
has
to
be
smooth
finished
rather
than
textured
grain.
Okay,
because
that
looks
like
vinyl,
siding
sure
and
painted
Lumber
collabored
actually
is
smooth.
It's
doesn't
you
don't
see
the
grain
once
it's
painted,
oh
the
one
you
you
showed,
has
a
grain
factor
to
it
and
you're
going
to
have
to
use
the
smooth
smooth
version
of
that
and.