►
From YouTube: Board of Education Policy Committee 10:30AM
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
A
In
addition,
we
have
chair
david
stribinger
and,
let's
see
you
have
to
move
this
over,
we
have
angela
middleton
and
ingrid
vogtwright
in
the
room
with
us.
Right
now
we
have
our
administrative
assistant,
robin
cushingberry,
ms
alice
walton
and
wendy
cartwright
wow.
What
an
august
group!
Thank
you
all
for
coming
and
attending
and
right
now,
committee
members.
We
need
an
approval
of
the
agenda.
C
A
A
Public
comments,
thank
you
all
right.
Approval
of
the
october
25th
2021
committee
meeting
minutes.
Do
we
have
a
motion
to
do
so?
I
move.
We
approve
the
minutes
from
october
25th
2021
a
second
okay,
any
discussion
about
those
minutes.
A
A
C
2.23
is
the
policy
that
governs
that
and,
if
I'm
not
mistaken,
this
vote
right
is
the
one
that
bought.
What
is
asking
the
committee
to
look
at
this
so
miss
boatwright.
Would
you
mind
weighing
in
on
your
thoughts
on.
E
A
E
Sure
and
I'm
sorry,
I'm
running
a
little
bit
behind
I'm
going
to
get
set
up
here
yeah.
The
first
thought
I
had
was
that
the
calling
in
for
public
comments-
it's
not
in
our
policy.
I
don't
necessarily
think
it's
a
good
idea
to
continue
doing
that
form
of
a
virtual
meeting
going
forward.
I
think
there's
other
ways
we
can
continue
to
include
people
who
cannot
physically
come
into
the
building.
E
I
have
some
concerns
about
people
calling
in
from
out
of
state
people
calling
in
that
have
do
not
have
the
best
interest
of
beaufort
county
school
district,
and
so
I
thought
this
coming
out
of
the
covid
pandemic
or
back
to
not
having
virtual
meetings
as
much
that'll
be
a
good
time
to
talk
about
it.
I'm
just
not
a
big
fan
of
not
being
able
to
see
the
person,
that's
making
the
public
comments
and
also,
I
think
it
looks
a
little
hokey
to
have
basically
a
phone
and
a
microphone
and
we're
trying.
E
You
know
it
just
seems
like
it's
a
fairly
primitive
and
problematic
approach
to
virtual
meetings.
So
I
was
hoping
to
have
that
discussion
and
then
that
kind
of
led
me
to
looking
at
our
policy
for
it
in
general
and
it
hasn't
been
updated
in
a
while,
and
I
think
that
coming
into
this
election
season,
we
want
to
stay
as
organized
efficient
and
nonpartisan
as
possible.
E
So
I've
been
looking
at
other
districts
and-
and
I
think
that
there's
some
opportunities
to
have
some
discussion
about
how
we
can
set
up
our
public
comments
to
prioritize
beaufort
county
school
res,
our
beaufort
county
residents,
to
keep
it
balanced
to
stay
non-partisan
and
to
keep
people
with
political
agendas
from
essentially
being
so
disruptive
to
our
meeting
process
that
we
can't
get
the
job
done.
That
hasn't
happened
yet,
but
it
is
definitely
happening
across
the
country.
So
those
are
my
initial
thoughts.
A
C
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
I
think,
fundamentally,
I'm
I'm
against
any
kind
of
restriction.
C
That's
going
to
restrict
people
from
giving
public
comments
and
I'll
just
give
some
thoughts
on
it,
one
of
them
being
that
I
recall
maybe
right
when
we
had
first
gotten
on
the
board
or
before
that
that
there
was
actually
some
conversation
about
changing
zoning
for
certain
neighborhoods,
and
so
we
actually
had
some
public
comments
that
were
from
technically
out
of
state
or
out
of
area
that
were
people
who
were
looking
to
move
here
who
had
chosen
a
certain
neighborhood,
and
now
they
were
being
told
that
the
schools
they
thought
their
kids
were
going
to
be
going
into
were
now
going
to
be
different,
and
so
they
came
to
voice
their
concerns.
C
So
I
think
that
when
we
get
into
the
conversation
of
restricting
people
based
on
a
geography
based
on
an
ideology
and
things
like
that,
we
get
into
very
slippery
slope
territory.
So
ultimately,
I
think
the
more
comments,
the
better
we
we
want
people
to
be
engaged
in
the
process.
We
want
people
and
parents
to
be
talking
to
us
and
telling
us
what
they're
seeing
out
there
in
the
public
what
their
experiences
are.
C
We
want
teachers
to
feel
comfortable
to
come
and
give
us
public
comments
so
generally,
I'm
against
any
kind
of
restrictions
on
public
comments
based
on
some
type
of
factor.
I
do
think
that
the
process
and
and
how
people
give
comment
could
probably
be
perfected
in
a
way,
but
I'm
not
for
restricting
people
based
on
type
of
classification.
E
Manager
can
I
respond
real,
quick
to
clarify
something?
Yes,
please,
okay,
so
I
don't
think
we
restrict
it
to
people
I,
but
what
I
want
to
make
sure
happens
is
that
the
people-
and
I
think
it's
not
just
people
who
live
in
beaufort
county,
but
people
that
have
an
interest
in
beaufort
county.
Like
you
said
when
our
last
public
comments,
there
was
a
graduate
of
beaufort
high
from
detroit.
E
Obviously
she
has
an
interest,
but
it's
more
about
prioritizing
people
that
are
that
have
good
faith
efforts
to
provide
input
into
this
school
and
making
sure,
like
you
said
rachel
that
the
our
doctor
was
described,
that
the
process
is
such
that
we
can
some
districts.
In
fact,
a
lot
of
districts,
prioritize
student
comments
that
they're
first
to
go,
and
if
you
think
about
when
we
had
our
our
public
comments,
we
had
about
an
hour's
worth
of
public
comments.
E
E
But
to
that
end
I
would
also
say
most
public
policy
comments
that
I
looked
at
have
a
purpose
statement
and
I
think
we
do
as
well,
but
I
think
that's
kind
of
an
important
starting
point.
What
what
is
the
goal
of
public
comments
and
then
how
do
we
design
a
process
that
meets
those
goals.
A
Thank
you,
miss
boatwright
for
clarifying
mr
scrivener.
F
Thank
you,
I'm
going
to
echo
what
dr
wisniewski
said.
I'm
I
think
everybody
already
knows.
I'm
opposed
to
any
attempt
to
cut
off
all
the
comments
and
we
can
assign
as
much
validity
as
we
want
after
we
hear
the
comment,
so
you
know
if
it's,
if
it's
a
a
wing
nut
on
the
extreme
of
the
political
spectrum,
we
know
that
after
we
hear
the
comment
and
we
just
disregard
it,
I
believe.
F
A
Sorry,
yeah,
you
know,
I'm
I'm
just
question
the
the
question
that
I
have
is
we
have
this
policy
about
how
people
are
to
fill
out
the
public
comment
card
and
I
don't
think
we
really
enforce
this
policy
in
terms
of
requiring
them
to
write
what
topic
they're
going
to
talk
about,
and
we
have
no
way
when
we
do
the
call-ins
to
do
that
either.
Unless,
when
they
email
robin,
they
need
to
write
the
topic
I
I
have.
They
do.
D
A
Those
would
be
the
the
process
issues
that
I
would
say
that
I
think
we
should
hold
people
to
those.
I
know
back
when
I
was
doing
the
responses
to
people
for
doing
their
public
comments,
and
I
would
have
those
blue
slips.
Sometimes
there
was
nothing
written
on
it
as
to
what
they
were.
What
the
topic
was
now
I
always
took
notes.
So
I
knew
what
the
topic
was.
The
other
thing
that
you
know
again,
I
think
the
process
with
the
the
phone
call-ins.
A
A
I
do
think
that
we
really
need
to
emphasize
that
they
need
to
state
their
name
when
they
get
on
the
phone,
because
a
lot
of
times
robin
will
tell
them,
but
then
they
just
go
right
in
in
to
their
their
spiel.
So
those
would
be
my
comments
at
this
time.
I
understand
where
miss
boatwright
is
coming
from
she's
trying
to
be
a
little
bit
proactive,
I
think,
and
what
she
sees
as
political
things
coming
down
down
the
pipe.
A
I
also
think
we
also
have
rules
that
we
just
regarding
the
the
speakers
that
we
may
need
to
look
at
tightening
up
enforcement
like
they're
they're
supposed
to
refrain
from
racial
comments,
they're
not
supposed
to
make
derogatory
comments
about
specific
individuals.
A
So
I
I
think,
we've
had
that
happen
where
speakers
have
called
out
specific
individuals
and
we
haven't
stopped
it.
We
haven't
said
that's
inappropriate,
so
those
might
be
the
things
that
I
I
think
we
need
to
look
at
and
decide.
Are
we
going
to
have
those
as
policy
as
they
still
are,
and
then,
if
we're
going
to
have
them,
then
we
need
to
do
a
better
job
of
enforcing
them.
So
those
are
my
comments.
G
D
Please
jeff
one
of
the
things
that
that
we're
not
enforcing
is
like
on
a
speaker
card.
We
don't
get
their
address.
D
Some
of
them
just
put
their
names
on
there
and
been
told
in
the
past
not
to
withhold
them
from
speaking,
but
they
don't
fill
out
the
card.
They
just
put
their
name
on
there.
They
might
put
the
topic
on
there.
They
don't
put
their
home
address,
they
don't
put
their
telephone
number,
they
might
scribble
an
email
so
in
in
tightening
up
the
process.
H
Yes,
the
policy
we
have
now
a
probable
comment,
I
think,
is
it's
good.
I
think.
Maybe,
if
we
want
to
add
things
like
robin
just
said,
to
make
sure
that
they
put
the
address
on
you
know,
but
any
other
issues.
I
don't
see.
No,
no,
no,
no
issues
too
much
with
that.
I,
and
and
far
as
it's
calling
out,
we
haven't
had
any
that
I
can
remember
addressing
different
board
members.
We
we
had
a
couple
when
you
were
talking
about
about
the
mass,
but
you
know
those
are
people.
H
You
cannot
stop
people
from
saying
something.
You
know,
and
I
think
sometimes
we
go
a
little
too
far
and
trying
to
control
folks
cannot
do
that.
H
H
E
E
That
is
a
restriction
that
we
already
have.
I
think,
first
of
all,
in
our
current
policy,
there
is
nothing
about
calling
in.
In
fact,
technically,
if
you
read
our
policy,
a
phone
call
in
is
a
violation
of
policy,
so
we
should
add
that,
if
we're
going
to
keep
that.
Secondly,
I
think
we
can
have
virtual
participation
just
like
board
members
do
via
zoom
where
they
could
fill
out.
I
mean
this
is
what
people
are
doing
all
over
the
country
we
use
technology,
they
fill
out
an
online
form
similar
to
a
comment
card
versus
emailing.
E
Our
assist
our
board
assistant,
because
I
have
had
feedback
of
people
that
have
emailed
and
not
received
a
call,
which
means
we're
being
inconsistent,
which
is
a
dangerous
thing
when
you're
trying
to
stay
nonpartisan.
So
I
think
we
could
have
you
know
a
car
that
could
be
filled
out
online.
E
These
are
just
suggestions
that
would
generate
a
receipt
to
the
person
that
their
comments
have
been
received
and
that
they
can
expect
a
zoom
link
and
then
they
can
sit
in
the
waiting
room
of
the
zoom
of
a
zoo
meeting,
just
like
people
in
person
until
they
are
called
by
the
chair,
as
opposed
to
trying
to
call
people,
especially
parents,
who
are
doing
sports
and
pickup
and
dinner
at
6
15
trying
to
keep
their
phone
with
them
until
we
get
to
them.
So
I
am
not
suggesting
that
we
change
our
policy
to
restrict
people's
participation.
E
I
am
suggesting
that
we
use
technology
that
we
streamline
our
policy,
that
we
have
a
purpose
for
our
board
public
comment
as
to
what
we're
trying
to
have
what
the
purpose
of
asking
the
public
to
come
and
feel
free
to
speak
at
our
meetings.
Is
it
to
inform
a
lot
of
people
restricted
to
items
on
an
agenda
which
I
don't
think
is
a
reasonable
restriction?
E
And
then
we
look
at
our
policy
and
make
sure
our
policy
supports
that
the
other
thing
we
do
not
enforce
a
lot
of
our
policy
already.
We
don't
enforce
the
30-minute
limit,
so
if
we're
not
even
going
to
enforce
it
or
talk
about
it,
take
it
out
or
when
it
gets
to
it
at
30
minutes,
there
has
to
be
a
motion
to
keep
going.
So
what
I'm
trying
to
just
be
really
clear
about?
Is
I'm
not
bringing
this
forward?
E
I
am
trying
to
be
proactive
because
there
are
national
movements
afoot
on
both
sides
of
the
political
spectrum.
That
goal
is
to
disrupt
and
deter
school
boards
from
doing
their
business.
If
that
happens
to
us,
we
should
have
a
very
solid
contemporary
post-pandemic
policy
that
will
head
off
where
we
have
to
basically
stop
our
meetings.
If
you
look
at
what's
going
on
and
I'm
sure
you
guys
do
as
well,
I
have
friends
on
school
boards
in
massachusetts,
california,
washington,
texas,
arizona.
E
H
Yes,
you
have
to
understand
also
that
everybody
that
call
in
don't
have
access
to
technology.
H
You
know
so
that's
you,
you
you,
the
majority
majority
of
folks
in
in
my
district,
I
would
say:
don't
have
access
to
to
to
technology.
They
have
on
a
telephone,
but
they
don't
have
access
to
computers.
G
I
Good
morning,
and
in
terms
of
what
mr
camp
I
mean,
what
boris
I
mean,
I'm
missing
with
me.
I
listen
to
what
mr
campbell
and
miss
bull
right
said.
I
I
I
do.
I
don't
really
see
much
need
to
be
done,
but
I
I
do.
I
have
a
problem
with
asking
people
for
their
addresses
because
of
the
fact
that
what
is
that
my
question
is
asking
them
from
an
address
is
something
that
was
done
back
in
the
days
and
a
lot
of
people
take
take
threaten
to
that.
I
Okay,
that
that
that
a
lot
of
people
take
they
take
that
as
a
threatening,
because
back
in
the
days
what
people
would
do
is
get
their
address
and
get
where
they're
working
all
that
information
from
and
and
retired
retaliated
with
them
within
the
community.
So
I
I
really
don't
think
that
really
be
asking
people.
Where
are
where
what
the
address
is.
I
I
can
see
asking
them
what
they
want
to
speak
about,
but
asking
them
where
the
address
that
that's
really
that
that's
really
no
hair,
not
there
that
that
that
doesn't
I
mean
you
know
they
want
to
put
that
down
and
that's
fine,
but
but
that's
not
something
that
that
should
qualify
wherever
you're
going
to
speak
or
not,
because
that's
your
personal
business,
and
that
really
has
nothing
and
nothing
to
do
with
what
at
what
you're
actually
saying.
I
So
I
I
I
I
in
turn
that's
a
bit
much
asking
people
for
the
addresses
and
different
different
things
that
I
think
that
if
they
want
to
put
that,
then
they
then
they
can
be
able
to
put
that.
But
if
they
don't
want
to
put
that,
then
they
should
not
have
to
put
that,
because
I
think
that
is
going
that
is
going
overboard
and
almost
by
violating
the
people
who
were
asking
them
their
personal
business.
You
know
being
elected
and
put
being
alive.
I
Yes
ma'am,
so
you
know
so
and
also
and
in
terms
of
to
also
in
terms
of
technology
technology.
I
do
agree
with
the
cancer,
mr
kim
a
lot
of
people
in
different
areas.
I
Don't
have
technology,
but
in
terms,
if
you
want
to
participate,
then
you
have
to
make
a
sacrifice
so
in
in
terms
of
if,
if
you
say
that
you
want
to
that,
you
want
that,
you
want
to
speak,
then
you
need
to
make
sure
that
you're,
ready
and
available
when
someone
calls
you,
because
I've
had
several
people
who
told
me
oh
well,
you
know
I
I've
been
I've
been
called.
I
I've
been
I've
been
called,
I
mean
I've
actually
speak
and
then
I
got
caught
in
it.
I
Well,
you
know
the
time
frame
that
we,
that,
as
a
board,
we
honestly
tried
to
not
give
the
boy
cred
that
we
tried
to
make
sure
that's
at
that
time
that
we're
that
we're
doing
public
comments.
So
if
you
know
that
you
sign
them,
do
public
comments,
they
say
how
we're
making
a
sacrifice
and
we're
being
there
and
that
person
they
have
responsibilities
too.
I
They
have
to
put
owners
on
themselves
to
be
there
and
be
able
and
willing
to
receive
that
phone
call
so
that
they
can
say
whatever
they
want
to
say
so
right
that
that
is
something
that
I
am
not
you
know
I
I
don't
I
I
I
don't.
I
don't
think,
but
but
I
didn't
get
that
to
the
policy.
If
it's
not
there,
then
I
do
agree
with
mrs
bull
right
on
that.
Thank
you.
Okay,.
A
Thank
you.
We've
had
a
lot
of
discussion
on
this,
so
I
think
the
last
word
dr
wisniewski,
and
then
let's
bring
us
to
some
decision
on
how
to
move
forward.
C
I
was
just
going
to
say
I
agree
with
mr
campbell
on
you
know
the
technology
part
of
it.
I
think
one
of
the
great
things
about
covet
is
that
we
did
see
much
more
public
engagement,
whether
it
was
you
know
something
that
was
people
didn't
all
agree
on.
We
did
have
much
more
public
engagement
and
I
think
the
the
expansion
of
technology
in
our
meetings
has
been
beneficial.
At
least
I
felt
it
was
in
terms
of
the
public
comment
card
and
the
items
that
are
required
to
be
on
it.
C
It
is
presently
one
of
the
components
of
the
public
comment
card
and
I
believe
our
policy
basically
states
that
it
is
the
chair's
discretion
of
whether
or
not
that
person
can
be
heard.
So
if
we
want
to
change
that
policy
or
revisit
it,
I
think
that's
the
area
that
we
would
need
to
look
to.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you
everybody.
We
have
heard
a
lot
of
comments
about
this.
If
I
do
not
believe
it's
a
something
that
we
can
change
within
this
committee
meeting,
but
perhaps
we
could
have
just
a
policy
committee
meeting
just
on
revising
the
policy,
maybe
to
include
the
fact
that
the
phone
in
could
be
available,
but
have
more
of
a
discussion
on
what
a
policy
change
could
look
like
we're
talking
about.
Maybe
prioritizing
comments,
putting
into
our
policy
being
able
to
phone
in
have
a
purpose
statement
on
the
public
comment.
G
A
Email
address
can
the
whole
process
be
changed,
and
so
I
would
suggest
that
perhaps
we
dedicate
one
policy
committee
meeting
just
to
delve
into
the
actual
wording
with
the
committee's
approval.
Perhaps
I
could
work
on
a
draft
to
bring
forward
that
might
include
some
of
these
and
then
we'd
at
least
have
something
to
work
from
any
thoughts
on
where
to
go
forward
on
this.
C
Madam
chair,
yes,
my
only
comment
would
be
if,
if
there
is
a
draft
with
any
changes
that
it
be
done
with
track
changes,
so
we
can
see
the
difference
between
the
original
and
and
the
draft.
A
Yeah
excellent
suggestion
I
know
molly
included
in
the
chat
that
if
we
were
to
go
with
a
zoom
link
invitation
that
there
could
be
some
technology
concerns
with
that.
So
with
the
committee's
approval,
if
I
could
work
with
molly
and
robin
and
just
kind
of
bring
forward
a
draft
so
that
we
could
you
know
our
present
policy
include
some
of
these
concerns
that
were
voiced
today
and
then
we
would
have
something
tangible
from
which
to
work
with
next
time.
A
A
A
This
was
something
that
I
believe
you
brought
up
during.
A
Committee-
and
so
it
is
now
being
brought
forward
to
the
committee
here.
So
if
you
would
like
to
speak
to
this.
I
Oh
wow,
oh
y'all,
we
all
are
just
not
getting
to
this.
I
thought
I
thought
y'all.
Maybe
I
had
met
about
this
already.
Basically,.
A
Advice,
jack
for
everybody's
edification,
the
policy
committee
last
met
in
october,
and
not
all
the
members
of
that
policy
committee
are
currently
on
this
policy
committee,
so
it
is
now
just
just
coming
to
it
and
I'm
so
thankful
that
you're
on
the
phone
with
us,
so
that
you
can
bring
up
your
concerns
with
this
particular
policy.
A
G
I
Well,
I
believe,
mr
all,
due
respect
that
the
night
that
that
that
that
that
the
board
chose
to
send
it
to
the
policy
that
you
were
there
now.
I
think
I
spoke
to
it
that
night
in
terms
of
what
exactly
what
exactly
I
mean
the
the
court.
The
question
is:
what's
the
policy
for
for
a
board
member
to
to
basically
to
have
a
community
meeting
on.
A
Okay,
so
so
yes,
sir,
I'm
just
you
know
whenever
we
have
a
a
new
meeting
about
something,
it's
good
to
have
the
history.
So
so
thank
you
for
sharing
that
with
us.
So
basically
you're
asking
about
oe8.7.
A
I
My
my
question
is,
I
mean
my
my
statement
is
as
clear
as
day
and
in
terms
of
what
I'm
asking
my
my:
what
is
the
process
and
how
does
the
board
interpretate
board
a
board
member
using
board
members
to
use
the
facilities,
the
whole
community
meeting
to
do
their
job?
I
A
So
that's
why
again,
just
as
in
mrs
bilbright
requested
this
particular
item,
she
was
able
to
explain
what
exactly
she's
looking
for.
So
I'm
just
asking
for
some
guidance
here,
mr
smith
on.
Is
it
o
oe87.
A
That
you
want
an
additional
comment
or
policy
sub
policy
put
in
here
that
board
members
are
not
required
to
follow
this
and
that
board
members
are
have
have
total
access
to
school
buildings
for
board
member
reasons.
I'm
just
asking
for
you
to
give
us
a
starting
point
here.
I
Was
I,
as
a
board
member,
I
I
was
trying
to
have
a
a
community
meeting
with
what
was
really
what
was
the
with
my
district
and
I
I
I
was
up
against
a
whole
bunch
of
of
left
to
right
every
every
turn
there
was
there
was
that
there
was
a
problem,
and
you
know
and
in
turn
I
should
be
able
to
use
the
public
facility
where
I,
where
I'm
a
elected
official,
at
to
have
a
commercial
meeting
to
get
feedback
and
and
understand
what
the
community
has
have
to
say
and
said
at
every
turn.
I
There
was
question
and
so
at
that
at
that
point
also,
when
I
went
to
to
have
a
meeting,
then
I
got
a
call
from
one
from
the
considerable
facilities
person
and
he
and
he
told
me
that
it
was
not
how
he
he
interpreted
and
also
said
something
about
me,
possibly
getting
ready
to
run
for
office
and
that
that
what
might
be
what
I
want
to
use
it
for.
So
I
don't
think
that
it
should
be
room
for
anyone
for,
for
anyone
or
any
positional.
I
I
mean
for
anyone's
personal
interpretation.
I
think
it
should
be
clear
as
into
whether
or
not
a
elected
official
or
a
school
board
member
should
be
able
to
use
the
building
to
do
community
to
do
the
work
that
they
are
elected
to
do.
I
don't
think
that
no
one
should
get
into
getting
in
the
way
of
that.
If
you
want
to
have
a
community
meeting
at
one
of
the
school
buildings
in
your
district,
then
you
know
in
terms
of
of
of
clear
transparency
and
communication
communication
that
that
that
shouldn't
that's.
I
I
A
So
if
you
could
just
for
saying
before
you
asked
mr
scrivener
to
speak,
I
would
just
like
to
then
read
what
the
policy
says
and
for
my
clarification,
you're
asking
this
committee
to
look
at
that
and
perhaps
exclude
board
members
from
having
to
follow
that
policy.
A
I
No
because
I
I
actually,
I
believe
that
that
that
form
that
you
guys
have
now
is
actually
a
new
form,
because
when
when
when
this
co-conversation
takes
place,
they
didn't
even
really
have
a
real
form.
I
don't
see
the
phone
which
I
have
now,
but
I
I'm
I
I
I
just
wanna.
Let
me
see
what
mr
scripture
said
that
I'm
also
looking
looking
for
the
the
form
myself.
If
you
give
me
a
second
so
this
time,
yes,.
A
F
Yes,
ma'am,
okay,
the
conversation
and
I
think
you
you've
nailed
the
issue.
Mr
smith
feels
that
there
should
be
some
preference
given
to
elected
officials.
I
believe
the
conversation
that
night
was
that
elected
officials
have
to
follow
the
same
guidelines
as
all
other
citizens,
because
when
the
board
is
not
in
session,
that's
what
we
are
we're
just
like
any
other
citizen.
So
there's
a
fundamental
difference
on.
F
What
what
things
are
available
to
a
board
member,
I
believe
the
conversation
was
there's
nothing
special
about
being
a
board
member
when
the
board
is
not
in
session
so-
and
I
think
that's
the
end
of
the
conversation-
and
I
don't
you
know,
will
obviously
will's
got
a
different
opinion
on
that.
He
feels
that
we
we
are
entitled
to
something
special.
F
So
that's
the
fundamental
issue
and
I
I
think
I
think
you're
you're
right
on
it
trisha
do
we
want
to
change
the
policy
to
say
that
board
members
do
not
have
to
follow
the
guidelines
that
are
applicable
to
every
other
citizen,
and
I
mean
I
can
tell
you
there's
no
way,
there's
no
way,
I
would
vote
for
that.
We
need.
You
know
we
strive
not
to
separate
ourselves
from
citizens
so
that
that's
my
complete
recollection.
A
Okay,
thank
you
and
the
ar
for
the
school
district
does
allow
for
school
facilities
to
be
used,
but
everybody
that
requests
to
use
it
has
to
provide
insurance
and
has
to
fill
out
the
appropriate
forms
to
make
sure
that
that
cleanup
is
done.
Security,
insurance
and
damage
repair.
So
it's
not
that
we
as
beaver
county
beaufort
county
citizens,
could
not
apply
to
utilize
the
building,
but
we
would
just
have
to
make
sure
that
we
have
the
insurance
and
everything.
So.
Thank
you,
mr
stravenger.
Miss
robine,
dr
wisniewski.
C
C
So
I
know
that
in
the
past
I've
had
you
know
public
meetings.
You
know
just
kind
of
an
informal
thing
with
my
counterpart
on
county
council
and
we've
done
it
at
the
rec
center
and
that
was
that
worked
out
fine
for
us,
but
that
option
might
not
be
available
to
all
throughout
the
county
of
you
know,
using
the
rec
centers
during
specific
time
periods
or
whatnot.
C
So
I
I
understand
the
the
argument
of
that
where
individuals
are
citizens,
but
I
do
feel
that
there
is
value
in
us
being
able
to
engage
with
our
constituents
and
give
them
updates
and
things
like
that
at
public
forums
or
meetings,
and
if
we
are
doing
that,
we
are
acting
in
our
official
elected
capacity,
just
not
as
the
body.
C
So
I
think
that
I
understand
mr
smith's
concern,
but
I
also-
and
I
also
understand
at
the
same
time,
that
we
also
have
to
abide
by
the
rules
that
are
in
the
ar
and
by
our
policies
and
presently
the
use
of
our
school
facilities
for
public
meetings
and
hearings
is
limited
to
those
units
of
government
or
government
agencies
and
not
to
elected
officials.
C
F
Thank
you,
mr
smith,
alluded
to
another
issue
that
we
have
to
be
cognizant
of,
and
that
is
the
campaigning
none
of
our
facilities
could
use
for
campaigning,
and
that
is
a
difficult
call
sometimes
to
make
about
what
what
is
campaigning.
What
isn't
campaigning,
as
dr
wisniewski
said,
you
know
you
have
a
group
of
citizens
and
they
ask
you
a
question
and
the
way
you
respond
to
that
question.
Some
people
might
say
you're
campaigning,
so
you
know
that.
That's
that's
something
we
just
want
to
avoid.
F
On
on
the
use,
and
I'm
not
aware
of
politicians
being
able
to
use
our
facilities,
I
know
there
was
a
brouhaha
about
some
organization
that
came
in.
I
think
the
whale
branch
and
used
their
facility-
and
we
just
want
to
steer
clear
of
all
that
and
there
are
other
facilities.
I
mean,
there's
library,
as
rachel
pointed
out,
there's
libraries
there's
rec
centers,
there's
there's
other
other
things
you
can
use.
A
Thank
you,
mr
scrivener.
I
do
believe
that
there
were
some
elected
officials
that
did
have
a
meeting
at
saint
helena
elementary
school
not
too
long
ago
for
community
purposes.
However,
I'm
under
the
impression
that
they
went
through
the
process
had
to
fill
out
an
application
had
to
prove
that
there
was
insurance.
A
When
you
have
a
gathering
of
people
there,
you
do
have
to
make
sure
that
the
school
district
does
not
have
any
liability
so,
but
I
do
believe
there
was
that
instance,
and
again
under
the
impression
that
they
went
through
the
process
to
do
so.
Ms
robine,
yes,
I
I
agree.
I
was
looking
at
the
ar
as
well,
and
I
agree
with
rachel's
interpretation
of
it
that
it
says
any
federal
state
or
local
unit
of
government,
meaning
that
the
total
as
a
whole.
A
I
it
also
says
in
that
paragraph,
that
without
charge,
except
for
additional
supervision
and
or
custodial
services,
so
there's
a
charge
involved
as
there
should
be,
because
you
know
when
we
ask
our
people
to
work
overtime
or
extra
hours
for
not
for
our
benefit,
but
for
the
benefit
of
the
group
of
a
different
group.
They
should
be
willing
to
pay
for
that.
I
too,
like
dr
wisniewski,
although
you
know,
I
think
kobe
put
a
halt
to
that.
A
A
bit
have
had
constituent
meetings
and
we
use
the
libraries
and,
I
believe,
there's
libraries
in
all
of
our
districts,
so
that
would
be
an
area
to
to
look.
A
I
do
think
that
you
know
we
have
a
process
in
place
and
it
does
require
you
know
people
to
go
through
the
process
and
apply
and
prove
that
they
have
what's
requested
of
people
of
any
citizen
who
would
want
to
use
our
building.
Thank
you,
mr.
I
I
First
off,
let
me
start
off
by
addressing
the
thing
that
mr
scripture
said
in
terms
of
the
the
campaigning
a
staff
member
should
have
never
made
a
comment
about
me
campaigning
or
having
community
meetings
or
when
I,
when
I
thought
it
was
the
time
that
I
would
need
to
have
community
community
members.
I
I
thought
I
thought
that
that
was
very
detrimental
and
and
very
slanderous,
but
anyways.
But
needless
to
say,
I
think
that's
a
slippery
slope
to
go
down
to
trying
to
understand
river
river.
There
forever
they're
campaigning,
and
I
think
we
all
take
an
oath
of
office
to
be
to
be
quite
to
be.
Quite
frankly,
I
believe
that
we
all
take
off
of
office
and
if
we're
going
in
the
school
beating
our
school
building
and
and
we're
having
a
community
meeting-
and
it
should
be
wrestling.
I
In
reference
to
what,
in
reference
to
what,
what
the,
what
the
community
is
mean
towards
the
school
board
stuff,
then
I
don't
think
that
that
there's
that
there's
no
room
for
for
the
there's,
no
room
for
interpretation
and
and
and
and
clearly
that's
why.
I
brought
that,
because
there's
room
left
for
interpretation
from
staff
and
also
my
question
is
too
dr
rodriguez
has
a
as
a
superintendent.
He
has
community
meetings.
Does
he
go
through
the
same
policy
who
approved
his
community
town
halls
when
he
happened
as
a
superintendent,
so
the
so.
I
A
Okay,
so,
mr,
what
is
it
you
would
like
this
policy
committee
to
change
if
you
could
bring
that
forward
and
then
the
committee
can
determine
whether
or
not.
I
I
So
that's
so
that's
a
challenge
for
me
as
an
elected
official
as
a
school
board
member
and
in
which
we
have
school
buildings,
which
I
should
be
able
to
use
so
so
when
y'all
said
that
yeah
that,
without
witnessing
that
she
was
able
to
go
and
use
the
public
library
along
with
her
person,
then
that's
that's
different,
because
also
that
they
have
you.
They
have
utilization
on
the
county
council
side
that,
obviously
we
don't
have,
but
also
we've
had
we.
I
know
that
we've
had
county
council
members
to
have
meetings.
I
I
I
I
My
job
is
to
be
transparent
and
meet
with
them
and
meet
with
the
community.
So
I'm
not
going
to
tell
you
because
yeah
somebody
had
their
money,
I'm
not
going
to
tell
you
how
to
do
it.
I'm
just
saying
that
we
should
we
should
we
should
be
able
to
as
board
members
to
meet
each
other
to
be
aware
to
where
we
should
be
able
to
trust
each
other
to
do
exactly
our
job
point
blank
period.
Thank
you.
A
So,
to
clarify,
mr
smith,
as
I
understand
it,
you
are
as
any
board
member
is
allowed
to
use
the
school
site
if
they
go
through
the
process
of
obtaining
insurance
of
requisitioning
it
finding
the
date.
So
excuse
me,
sir,
so
that
is
my
understanding,
my
recollection
from
our
operations
committee
that
that
schools
are
open
to
us
to
do
that.
If
we
go
through
the
process-
and
that
was
my
recollection,
as
you
just
stated-
we,
yes,
as
elected
officials,
we
have
to
abide
by
the
state
ethics
commission.
A
We
all
have
to
listen
to
what
the
state
ethics
commission
tells
us,
and
one
of
them
is.
We
can
use
no
school
district
resources
while
campaigning.
So
that
is
the
fine
line
that
we
are
walking
right
here,
but
to
your
point,
community
meetings,
you,
but
you
know,
we're
all
elected
officials.
We
all
should
abide
by
the
rules
by
the
state
ethics
commission.
So
again,
well,
everybody's
heard
what
you
said
so,
ms
robin
dr
wisniewski,
any
suggestions
on
how
to
move
forward
or
not
to
move
forward
with
changing
this
policy.
A
Kathy,
I
feel
the
policy
already
allows
for
this.
If
we,
you
know,
follow
the
procedure
as
a
citizen,
okay,
doctor
was
nasty.
C
I
agree,
madam
chair.
I
think
that
the
policy
allows
for
use
and
if
we
follow
the
you
know
the
regulation
and
we
we
do
everything
that
is
outlined
on
whatever
the
form
is,
then
we
can
utilize
the
facility
it.
It
sounds
like,
and
please
someone
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
and
that
you've
asked
madam
chair-
that
if
there
is
a
specific
change
being
proposed
by
mr
smith,
that
you
would
like
that
either
done
specifically
right
now
in
the
meeting
or
in
writing.
C
But
it
sounds
like
there
is
no
specific
language
that
is
being
presented
today.
So,
as
I
sit
here,
I
think
that
it,
the
policy
and
regulation,
provides
for
it.
Thank
you.
C
A
So
thank.
I
Where
does
the
insurance
come
from?
Does
the
board
have
insurance
for
this?
Because
if,
as
if
I'm
in
my
elected
capacity,
then
I
should,
I
shouldn't
be
trying
to
figure
out
where
the
insurance
is
coming
from
or
do
we
have
board
insurance?
And
I
don't
know
about
it
that
will
allow
me
to
rent
this
venue.
A
That's
an
excellent
question,
mr
smith,
and
I
would
recommend
why
don't
you
send
an
email
to
dr
rodriguez
and
you
can
find
out
from
mr
odding
or
or
jennifer.
G
A
The
risk
manager-
so
that's
an
excellent
question.
So
could
we
ask
that
you
follow
through
with
that
and
email,
dr
rodriguez,
and
ask
about
that.
I
No,
I
no.
I
don't
think
that
I'm
asking
the
policy
committee,
because
the
policy
committee
is
where
this
was
brought
to,
and
I
believe
that
is
the
policy.
Now,
I'm
still
asking
the
policy
to
commit
to
continue
to
work
on
this
because
the
the
I
I
there
is
there
is.
You
asked
a
question
and
I
I
also
I
gave
you
another
another
another
another
question
mr
winneski
said
unless
he
she
just
said:
unless
you
have
a
per
something
specifically-
and
I
just
gave
you
something
specifically
as
an
insurance.
I
So
when
renting
and
renting
it
under
my
official
title
where,
where
where
did
the
insurance
come
from
and
also
where
does
the
payment
come
from
as
well
as
in
custodian,
because
the
last
time
I
I've
seen
that
both
times
that
the
elected
officials
had
it,
I
didn't
see
not
once
you
stole
it
in
the
building.
So
you
know
I'm
I'm
a
little
confused
to
how
we're
saying
the
policy
is
effective.
I
The
things
that's
in
this
policy
is
not
being
done,
so
I'm
I'm
I'm
a
little
baffled
by
not
the
unwillingness
to
to
to
work
and
get
this
done.
F
If
you
want
it
assigned
to
the
committee,
then
you
know
bring
it
to
the
full
board
and
the
full
board
can
assign
it
to
the
committee.
But
you
got
to
be
careful.
The
position
you're
taking
and
really
well
is
untenable.
I
I'll
do
respect
scripture.
I
don't
think
that
I
was
assigning
it
out
what
I,
what
I
stated
was
that
mrs
dr
wineski
stated
that
mr
smith
is.
She
misses
chris.
Just
asked
me
to
clearly
bring
something
forward,
and
so,
as
I
thought
about
what
she
said,
then
what
I
brought
forward
was
the
insurance
and
and
and
if
that's
the
case
and
the
and
the
policy
committee
is
handling
it.
Then
mr
fritters
took
the
owners
to
put
the
onus
on
me
to
get
that
done
and
forever.
G
A
G
H
A
A
A
This
also,
I
believe,
was
something
that
you
asked
for
oe
8.10.
If
I
may
illuminate
everyone
what
this
says.
A
A
That
final
approval
of
school
names,
mascots
and
colors,
is
the
sole
responsibility
of
the
beaufort
county
board
of
education
b.
Schools
may
not
be
named
for
individuals
see
adjunct
facilities,
including
athletic
facilities,
may
be
named
for
individuals
as
specified
in
the
district
administrative
regulations
and
d.
The
board
has
the
right
to
change
the
name
of
any
facility
or
adjunct
facility
when
it
deems
it
is
in
the
best
interest
of
the
district
to
do
so.
A
Okay,
so
again,
mr
smith,
if
you
could,
if
you
could,
please
give
us
a
little
background
as
to
why
you
asked
this
to
go
to
policy
committee.
I
I
do,
I
don't
think
I
remember
me
asking
this
to
go.
I
think,
there's
something
this
boat
right
about,
I
believe,
actually
go
to
policy
committee.
A
F
Oh,
thank
you.
I
think
there
is
an
issue
where
the
ar
is
inconsistent
with
this
with
this
policy
and,
I
believe,
miss
voter.
I
might
have
pointed
that
out
because
the
the
the
ar
says
it
it's
restricted
to
new
schools,
and
it's
not
it's
not
consistent
with
this
warning.
So
there's
there's
an
issue.
E
Great,
yes,
I
actually
brought
this
forward.
I
suggest
this
a
while
ago,
when
we
looked
at
the
robert
smalls
leader,
changing
it
from
international
academy
to
leadership
academy,
and
I
made
the
comment
at
the
time
that
we
really
don't
have
a
procedure
for
changing
mascots.
E
So
I
remember
bringing
that
up
and
I
don't,
I
think,
part
of
the
problem
here
and
some
of
the
discussion
that
was
had
with
reference
to
the
depiction
of
the
mascot
was
more.
We
don't
really
have
a
policy
about
depictions
of
mascots
and
logos,
so
I
think
those
two
things
maybe
are
getting.
E
I
think
it'd
be
smart
to
have
a
policy
for
changing,
mascots
or
names,
because
that
can
get
into
some
very
dicey,
emotional
areas,
and
I
think
that's
actually,
you
know
taking
it
a
step
further
to
look
at
if
we
want
to
have
a
policy
about
how
mascots
are
depicted,
which
I
think
would
fall.
I
think
we're
using
the
term
logo
which
I'm
not
sure,
if
that's
the
totally
correct
term,
but
I
think
see
those
as
two
slightly
separate
or
one's
a
more
full
investigation
of
of
the
other
issues.
G
C
E
C
Thank
you,
madam
chair
two
things.
One
is.
If
the
ar
is
inconsistent,
we
probably
need
to
have
administration,
look
at
that
and
see
if
there's
any
edits,
that
need
to
be
made
to
bring
it
in
line
with.
What's
here
in
our
policy,
I
know
that
I
pointed
out
in
our
meeting
when
we
had
this
conversation
recently
that
the
the
precursor,
at
the
beginning
of
the
of
10,
says
that
committees
appointed
to
recommend
school
names,
understand
that
and
then
a
talks
about
names,
mascots
and
colors.
C
B
A
This
boat
right,
nope,
okay,
anybody's
headed-
I
don't
see
okay.
So
what
I'm?
What
I'm
hearing?
That's
a
it's
a
good
point,
dr
wisniewski,
that
the
ar
that
goes
along
with
this
policy.
It
definitely
needs
to
be
consistent
with
what
the
policy
is
and
you're
suggesting
that.
A
C
Okay.
My
recommendation
recommendation
would
be
to
have
another
meeting
on
this
where
we
have
a
copy
of
the
current
ar,
so
we
can
mesh
that
against
this
and
then
make
oe810
more
clear
and
then
put
the
interpretation
of
that
back
onto
the
the
administration.
So
I
don't.
I
don't
think
we
have
the
ar
here
in.
A
C
A
A
I
would
agree
so
that
we
can
and
if
we,
if
I
could
assign
some
homework
as
a
former
teacher
that
I
am
if
we
could
just
really
look
at
that
before
prior
to
our
next
meeting
and
come
with
ideas
of
how,
how
we
understand
and
where
it
should
go
and
so
on,
that
would
be
very
helpful,
david
goodbye.
A
The
next
item
on
our
robust
agenda
is
nepotism,
a-r-h-r-s,
six
staff,
ethics
and
ms
bilbray
hey.
E
E
So
just
to
you
know,
so
the
policy
committee
understands
what
I'm
talking
about
the
nepotism
ar
is
more
aggressive
and
has
some
problems
in
my
opinion
that
we
talked
about
operations
compared
to
what
the
state
nepotism
standard
is,
and
I
think
the
extra
language
that
we
put
in
there
conflicts
with
oe,
4.3
and
oe
4.3
is
says
that
personnel
will
select
the
most
highly
qualified
and
best
suited
candidates
for
all
positions,
based
upon
experience,
formal
education
credentials
and
certifications
appropriate
for
the
position
assigned
sufficient
staff
to
meet
the
needs
of
each
school.
E
So
my
point
was
that
the
nepotism
policy
that
includes
a
provision
that
teachers
may
not
work
in
the
same
building
could
lead
to
another
qualification
in
terms
of
who
you're
related
to
or
who
you're
married
to
in
our
personnel
selections.
So
that
was
my
point
in
terms
of,
and
one
thing
that
this
policy
committee,
one
at
some
point
wayne
can
talk
about.
E
Is
you
know
we
don't
want
to
get
involved
with
ar
unless
someone
can
point
out
that
there's
a
policy
violation
right,
that's
kind
of
what
I've
been
told,
so
I'm
not
sure
going
forward
if
these
kinds
of
issues
will
come
up
again
and
the
policy
committee
would
have
an
opportunity
to
decide
if
they
want
to
get
involved
or
if
that's
something
different.
So,
but
that's
the
background
on
this,
I
didn't
request
to
be
sent
to
policy.
Someone
on
executive
committee
did,
I
believe,.
E
A
Okay,
miss
rabbi,
I
was
just
gonna
say
I
have
to
disagree
with
you
on
this
one
right.
I
don't
think
there
is
a
disconnect.
I
think.
Certainly
we
don't
want
immediate
family
members
to
be
having
supervised
the
authority
to
the
other,
but
I
don't
think
that's
what
you're
talking
about.
I
think
you're
talking
about
c
but
c,
does
allow
for
family
members
to
work
in
the
same
building.
A
In
fact,
I
was
just
at
hilton
head
middle
school
yesterday
and
there
was
a
a
woman
who
is
now
a
bms
at
a
different
school,
but
she
worked
at
hilton
head
middle
school
when
her
mother
taught
there.
So
there
are
allowances
for
that.
It's
just
the
immediate
the
super
they
have
to
get
the
approval
of
the
superintendent.
A
Choosing
not
to
to
to
exercise
this,
and
perhaps
for
reasons
known
to
them.
E
Okay,
yeah-
and
this
is
I'm
sorry
I'll
just
jump
in
this-
is
very
much
the
discussion
we
had
in
operations.
One
of
the
things
that
I
that
was
discussed
is
I
to
me
personally,
and
I
think
one
of
our
other
committee
members
said
it.
He
said
that
this
is
sort
of
a
cop-out
on
the
board
to
say
we're
going
to
have
this
policy,
but
the
superintendent
has
the
right
to
approve
it
and
again,
y'all
are
probably
picking
up
on
a
theme
here.
E
I
think,
if
we're
gonna
have
to
have,
if
we're
gonna
have
policy,
it
needs
to
be
implemented
consistently,
because
if
we
have
policy
that
gets
implemented
on
a
case-by-case
basis,
I
think
that
creates
some
significantly
problematic
situations.
E
So,
but
at
any
rate,
I
don't
know
if
that's
because,
like
I
said
operations
which
has
oversight
over
this-
oh
you
know-
I
don't
know
this
oe
and
the
ar.
I
guess,
to
the
extent
that
the
board
has
oversight
over
ars
already
decided
to
bring
to
the
board
this
this
more
discussion.
So
I
guess
we
can
talk
here
about
whether
or
not
the
policy
it
violates
the
policy,
but
we've
already
kind
of
I
don't
know.
Okay,.
A
Well,
can
I
just
respond
to
that?
Please
sorry!
So,
let's
let's
say
we
delete,
let's
say,
and
it's
not
ours
to
delete
it's
in
the
ar.
But
let's
say
we
would
recommend
that
that's
deleted
completely
you're,
still
not
going
to
ensure
that
there's
it's
enforced
the
same
way
because
the
the
principles
have
the
latitude
of
trying
to
hire
who
they
want.
E
A
A
So
misspelt
right
would
you
pose
your
query
again
to
ms
walton.
E
A
Right
because
I
mean
we
already
as
we
discussed
in
operations,
we
know
that
under
hrs
6
to
nepotism,
there
are
certain
things
like
with
the
immediate
family
member.
That
needs
to
be
changed,
because
the
state
has
now
right
changed.
The
definition
of.
A
G
A
Statute
so
you're,
what
I'm
hearing
you
say
is
you
would
like
you
think
it's
important
that
that
kind
of
verbiage
also
be
represented
in
our
policy.
E
E
A
B
And
I
just
want
to
clarify
so
we're
going
to
talk
about
the
revisions
to
staff
ethics,
but
we
discuss
the
senate
our
next
operations
committee
and
go
over.
It
then
correct
us.
I
mean.
A
So
I
mean
we'll.
A
E
We
had
a
motion
to
send
it
to
the
full
board,
to
direct
the
superintendent,
to
bring
the
nepotism
ar
in
line,
and
I
forget
exactly
how
we
worded
it
robin
because
it
you
know
me
to
bring
it
in
line
with
the
state,
nepotism
and
ethics
standard.
E
G
Okay,
my
understanding
was
the
motion,
would
carry
it
to
the
full
board
and
the
full
board
would
request
or
not
request
the
super
to
review
the
current
ar
to
bring
it
into,
but
the
alignment
alignment
with
the
states
with
the
state
after
which
is
it?
Yes,
yes,
that's
where
we
are,
and
so
after
the
board
meeting.
G
I
So
much
walton
just
said
what
I
was
going
to
say.
I
was
just
going
to
state.
I
attended
that
meeting
and
what
is
it
what
the
motion
was,
but
mrs
walton
just
stated
it
very
eloquently
very,
very
well
so
yeah.
A
Thank
you,
sir.
As
rabbi,
yes,
can
I
ask
a
question.
I
thought
whenever
state
statute
changed,
or
there
was
a
thing
that
we
automatically
went
to
our
ars
and
updated
it,
that
it
wasn't
something
that
the
board
has
to
direct
the
superintendent
to
do.
A
A
F
Thank
you
there
yeah,
there's,
there's
the
issue
of
being
in
line
with
the
state,
but
this
particular
issue
about
the
school
building
is
goes
further
than
the
state.
F
F
You
know
we
do
have
to
make
sure
we're
aligned
with
with
the
state.
You
don't
need
a
motion
for
that.
The
motion
really
focuses
on
whether
we
want
to
go
beyond
the
state
requirements
to
talk
about
spouses
in
a
school
building
which
is
fraught
fraught
with
issues,
and
we
know
that
because
we
we
discussed
it
before.
F
You
know,
there's
a
there's,
a
morale
issue
for
everyone
else
in
the
building
they
and
the
prince,
and
that
those
are
the
kinds
of
things.
I
believe
that
the
principal
is
supposed
to
evaluate.
Okay,
you
know:
is
there
an
under
current
of
a
problem
with
the
rest
of
the
teachers,
but
this
this
is
beyond
the
state.
So
just
saying
aligning
with
the
state
doesn't
deal
with
the
issue,
so
that's
why
it's
got
to
go
to
the
board.
I
think
okay.
E
Misspell
right
yeah
and
there
were
just
there-
are
to
mr
vince's
point
two
issues.
One
is
when
I
asked
to
have
this
ar
reviewed.
It
became
apparent
that
I
think
wendy
correct
me.
If
I'm
wrong,
immediate
family
now
includes
brother-in-law's
sister-in-law
mother-in-law.
Is
that
correct?
That's
what
the
change
was
right.
E
So
they've
changed
the
definition
of
they've
expanded,
the
definition
of
immediate
family
which-
and
I
don't
want
to
get
in
this
discussion
but
think
about
it.
If
you
marry
someone
who
happens
to
work
in
the
same,
you
know
it
gets
very
complicated
and
then
you're
right.
There
is
a
special
provision
that
apparently
applies
only
to
personnel
at
beaufort
county
schools.
E
A
Okay,
so
to
move
forward,
ms
grab
right,
it's
coming
to
the
full
board
and,
and
the
disposition
of
this
and
the
the
changes
in
the
ar
will
all
be
done,
then
in
front
of
the
full
board.
Is
there
anything
that
you
are
asking
them
that
the
policy
committee
specifically
do
at
this
time?
No
ma'am,
okay,
miss
rabbi,
I'm
good
okay,
dr
wisnowski,
had
to
leave
so
any
other.
Well,
I
can't
see
anybody
else
from
anybody.
D
G
A
All
right
everybody
then
thank
you.
We
know
we'll
be
bringing
this
topic
up.
Is
it
on
the
agenda
for
this
next
board
meeting.
A
Okay,
excellent,
all
right,
and
lastly,
the
financial
administration
oe
6.16.
A
So
let
me
just
turn
to
this.
A
A
Okay,
I'm
asking
to
bring
this
back
up
again,
because
I
need
to
have
the
ultimate
conversation,
the
definitive
conversation,
to
make
sure
that
this
particular
policy
is
not
in
that
it
doesn't
conflict
with
our
current
practices
or
that
our
practices
don't
conflict
with
this
policy
is
more
accurate.
Mr.
A
I
have
called
on
you
several
times
to
ask
your
interpretation
of
this,
because
it
does
concern
me
that
we
are
currently
with
the
way
we're
doing
our
eight
percent
project
list.
Now,
when
there
are
those
funds
available
that
we
move
the
next
project
up
on
the
list
in
order
to
go
after
our
very
long
list
of
8
project
needs.
A
F
Yes,
ma'am,
you
may
put
me
on
the
spot,
and-
and
you
know
I
I've
tried
to
explain
this
several
times
and
I
just
don't
I'm
not
thinking
clearly
or
something
this
was.
This
was
a
good
rule
prior
to
our
changing
the
way
we
do
eight
percent.
We
changed
the
way
we
do
it.
So
now
we
have
this
below
the
line
projects,
which
is
where
any
unused
funds
go.
So
essentially,
after
you
know,
starting
last
year,
we
don't
have
any
unused
eight
percent
funds.
F
There
is
no
such
thing
as
unused
eight
percent
funds
anymore
because
they
roll
to
the
next
project
under
the
line
before
they
didn't,
and
so
you
had
this
money
sitting
around
and
that's
what
this
motion
was
directed
toward.
That
money
was
just
sitting
there
and
people
were
making
questionable
decisions
on
how
to
use
it.
F
As
soon
as
as
soon
as
we
catch
up
to
to
what
we
decided
to
do
last
year,.
A
I
appreciate
that
for
the
the
minutes
and
for
the
the
people
that
might
watch
or
are
listening
to
this.
So
do
you
have
a
recommendation
on?
Do
you
feel
that
this
policy,
because
I
agree
it-
was
a
fabulous
policy
in
2019?
Okay,
I
believe
it
might
have
been
unanimous
when
it
was
passed.
A
F
I
would
leave
it,
I
would
leave
it
there
in
case.
A
future
board
no
longer
addresses
eight
percent
projects,
the
way
we
are
doing
it
now.
F
So
I
think
this
is
just
a
good
catch-all
that
if
there
is
ever
any
unused
funds,
they
should
roll
forward
the
way
we're
doing
it.
If
we
stay
with
the
with
the
process
that
we
did
last
year,
there
won't
be
any
unused
funds,
but
if
that
process
should
change
in
the
future,
this
would
still
be
good
law.
A
Okay,
miss
rabbi
yeah.
I
I
concur
with
that.
I
think
that
you
know
I
don't
know
there
needs
to
be
an
asterisk.
You
know
in
compliance
with
you
know,
a
statement
in
compliance
with.
A
Let
me
think
about
that
how
this
this
format
that
was
changed
and
approved
by
the
board
did.
Was
there
not?
Was
there
a
motion
about
that
below
the
line?
Didn't
we
have
something
like
that
before
that?
That's
a
good
question,
I,
I
am
not
good
at
just
recalling
specific
motions
and
and
truly
I've
been
the
one
like
a
dog
with
a
bone
on
this
particular
policy
asking
for
clarification.
B
D
A
But
I
remember
having
this
discussion
as
a
full
board
when
we
moved
to
that
below
the
line
and
decided
to
use
these
leftover
funds
unused
funds,
because
there
was
the
concern
at
that
time
that
it
was
in
conflict
with
policy.
So
I
know
we
talked
about
it
as
a
board
and
we
agreed
that
it
was
a
good
use.
A
So
if
there
was
no
vote,
I
don't
just
like
a
to
me
if
we
put
something
in
either
the
policy
statement
or
in
the
the
way
that
a
statement
about
eight
percent
funds,
how
they're
assigned
to
remind
people
after
we're
gone
how
how
what
this,
what
this
meant
right.
That's
that's
what
I'm
thinking
too,
because
being
you
know
what,
if
I
were
to
read
this
you
know,
and
and
if
I
was
not
part
of
this
board-
I
I
would
really
be
concerned
about
it
being
in
conflict
david.
F
Well,
I
I
just
lowered
my
hand
because
I
I
I
can
see
what
clarification
would
help,
but
before
that
I
was
gonna
say
I
think
we're
overthinking
this
you
know
it's,
but
then
I've
thought
about
it.
So
much
that
it
seems
so
clear
to
me.
I
don't
understand
why
you
all
can't
understand
it.
F
F
I'm
not
sure
what
we
call
our
process.
Our
current
process,
the
below
the
line
stuff.
A
A
Okay,
I
would
be
willing,
when
I
work
with
robin
on
the
previous
item.
Why
don't
I
work
with
robin
on
looking
at
going
back
kathy
and
seeing
if
there
was
any
type
of
motion
or
something
regarding
that
and
come
up
with
some
wording
to
bring
back
for
our
next
policy.
G
A
A
So
to
recap.
A
Our
work
today,
I
will
work
with
robin
and
molly
and
create
a
draft
for
gc
2.23
to
see
to
incorporate
some
of
the
thoughts
and
ideas
here
and
we
can
work
on
that
draft
at
the
next
meeting.
Facilities
use
no
change
with
that.
However,
I
will
get
an
answer
to
mr
smith's
question
about
insurance.
D
Word
stuff
yeah:
the
ar
is
not
consistent
with
the
policy,
so
they're
supposed
to
look
at
the
ars
with
the
mascot
right.
A
I've
got
to
do
that
right
now,
so
yeah
staff
will
work
on
that
staff
is
working
on
the
ar
for
nepotism
and
kathy,
and
I
will
both
come
back
with
some.
Maybe
clarifying
wording
for
oe
6.16.
A
Okay,
does
that
encompass
all
of
it,
any
other
thoughts
or
mr
smith,
your
hands
up.
I
Yes
also,
they
mentioned
something
about
paying
there.
Also,
when
you
asked
about
the
insurance,
could
we
see
also
how
we
are
paying
for
it
too
out
of
what
accounts?
How
does
that
work
as
well?
In
terms
of
when
you
look
up
the
information
about
the
insurance,
I
mean
when
you
ask
him
about
the
insurance
about
what?
What
does
that
look
like
in
in.
A
A
I
Yeah,
I
think
I
think
that's
the
full
board
should
need
to
know
about
that.
Not
not
just
me,
I
mean
you
know,
because
that's
very
important,
it's
nice
and
I
don't
think
it's
just
important
for
me
and
as
well
as
the
community.
A
All
right
kathy,
never
mind.
I
was
just
gonna
say
I
think
that
these
structures
put
out
by
the
custodian
by
the
custodial
rate.
I
know
I've
seen
that
before,
but
right
yeah.
No,
I
it
was
my
understanding,
mr
smith.
Perhaps
you
can
clarify
you
are
asking
me
to
find
out
whether
or
not
whether
who
pays
for
the
insurance
and
who
pays
for
that
fee
structure.
Right.
A
A
All
righty
all
right
anything
else
how
about
a
future
meeting
date.
A
A
D
As
well
as
another
leftover
was
the
tax
credit
when
he
was
gonna
find
for
us
from
the
school
boards
association.
It's
their
resolution,
including
that.
D
The
tuition
tax,
credit
and
voucher
it
was
discussion
if
the
exceptional
needs
tuition.
Tax
credit
program
was
what
their
resolution
32
included.
G
B
A
Yeah,
all
right
so
oe4
is
already
on
the
agenda
kathy.
Thank
you
again
and
these
other
items
that
we
just
mentioned.
So
what
about
a
date
for
our
next
meeting.
A
I
would
like
to
have
it
sooner
and
later
so
we
can
dispense
with
these
and
get
them
taken
care
of.
A
And
rachel's
not
able
to
join
us
with
this
so
kathy.
Is
there
any
dates
that
you
cannot
meet?
I
cannot
meet
well.
You
wouldn't
need
that
the
week
that
we
are
on
vacation,
that's
right.
The
school
district
is
closed,
and
so
I
could
meet
on.
Oh
I'm
really
tight
tricia
because
I
could
the
earliest
I
could
meet
really
is
wednesday,
the
27th,
because
after
that.
D
G
A
We
are
that's
right,
I'm
out
of
the
country,
I'm
working
the
heritage,
and
I
have
five
grandchildren
at
my
house
in
this
month.
So
I'm
really
tight
unless
yeah,
okay,
kathy
how
about
we
just
do
this?
How
about
I
asked
robin
just
to
send
an
email
to
rachel
and
you
and
me
and
we'll
we'll
consider
this
we'll
do
it
via
email,
because
that
might
be
the
most
efficient
way:
okay,
okay,
excellent,
okay,
all
right
anything
else
for
the
good
of
the
committee.