►
From YouTube: Beaufort County Board of Education Meeting 6PM
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
C
C
This
board
voted
unanimously
to
have
impact
fees,
as
state
statute
allows,
and
I'm
mostly
interested
in
the
discussion
being
around
what
our
next
steps
can
be.
Thank
you,
madam
vice
chair,.
B
D
Thank
you
kathy.
I
can't
hear
you
trisha
came
through
quite
clearly,
but
you
are
not,
and
maybe
it's
just
me.
Okay,
there
you
are.
B
B
We
are
experiencing
a
little
technical
difficulty.
We
will
hold
for
a
minute
to
see
if
we
can
get
it
resolved.
B
Okay,
so
at
this
time
there
doesn't
appear
to
be
any
discussion,
so
we
will
vote
on
the
motion.
The
motion
is.
B
That
I
move
that
the
the
discussion
of
impact
fees
be
taken
off
the
table.
All
those
in
favor,
please
signify
by
saying
I
ingrid
said
I
dr
guade
said
I
is
is
david.
Did
you
say
I.
F
B
Okay,
so
that
would
be
ten
zero
with
dr
wisniewski
absent.
C
Please
so,
madam
vice
chair,
I'm
not
really
sure
the
procedure
now
so
whether
the
discussion
ensues
at
this
time
or
whether
it
will
be
at
the
next
meeting.
So
I'm
not
positive.
I
don't
know
that
staff
is
prepared
to
talk
about
next
steps.
G
C
Impact
fees:
you
know
what
what
where
we
should
go
with
this,
I'm
not
sure
I
just.
I
definitely
want
it
at
least
at
a
minimum
at
our
next
board
meeting.
B
Is
that
does
that
make
sense
to
give
help
in
the
development
of
that
doctor?
I'm
colonel
guyer?
Oh
mr
strippinger.
F
Thank
you.
I
I
think
it
does
make
sense
to
to
have
this
at
the
next
agenda,
but
I
think
before
we
do
that,
I
think
we
need
to
be
real
specific.
What
are
we
looking
for?
I
heard
church
say
next
steps.
F
B
C
Fidget.
Thank
you,
mr
strippinger.
C
We
voted
as
a
board
unanimously
for
impact
fees.
The
county
council
repealed
impact
fees.
So,
as
far
as
next
steps,
I
don't
I
don't
know
what
our
options
are.
So
I'm
looking
to
see
what
are
our
options?
How
do
we
get
it
back
in
front
of
county
county
council?
What
kind
of
time
frame
would
there
would
that
be?
What
would
we
have
to
do
to
get
it
back
in
front
of
county
council
and
have
a
conversation
about
it?
So
those
those
types
of
things,
mr
schrubinger,
okay,.
B
G
B
B
D
D
B
Okay,
you'll
just
have
to
let
us
know,
because
we
are
not
aware
of
it,
go
go
ahead.
Mr
campbell.
H
Yeah,
we
discussed
the
documentation
supporting
the
information
on
in
the
letter,
and
I
think
one
of
the
one
of
the
points
we
can
start
at
is
is
providing
that
documentation
and
a
support
letter.
As
a
as
a
concrete
argument
for
our
support
of
the
impact
fee,
I
mean
it's
clear
that
we
have
supported
it,
but
it's
not
documented
in
terms
of
a
formal
document.
So
that's
that
would
be
one
of
the
points
I
think
we
could
start
at.
B
Okay,
so
at
this
point
we
will
send
it
to
the
administration
to
help
us
determine
next
steps.
Focusing
on
this
fidricus
point
and
mr
campbell's,
you
know
how
do
we
get
it
back
before
county
council?
Is
that
the
next
step
I
mean
do
we?
B
You
know
if
county
council
said
that
the
cogs
were
the
other
municipalities
at
I
don't
know,
that's
a
question:
do
we
appeal
to
them
again
and
say:
can
we
talk
you
into
this
and
or
you
know,
can
you
listen
to
us
and,
and
you
can
go
back
to
county
council?
I
think
those
are
the
types
of
things
that
perhaps
we
we
need
some
guidance
on
colonel
guyer.
A
This
is
a
political
issue.
This
is
not
an
administrative
issue.
This
is
a
political
issue
and
we
have
to
get
the
county
council
and
us
together
to
talk
about
a
solution.
What,
in
my
mind,
what
happened?
Was
county
council
got
out
ahead
of
the
communities
and
their
intergovernmental
agreement,
and
they,
I
think,
perhaps
they
thought
that
by
setting
up
the
impact
fees
on
an
unincorporated,
it
would
provide
impetus
to
the
to
the
communities
to
get
a
intergovernmental
agreement.
A
But
it's
a
bigger
it's
a
much,
much
bigger
issue
and
I
think
politically
we
have
to
ensure
that
we
are
included
in
the
discussion
and
we
have
to
ensure
that
when
and
if
well
not.
If,
but
when
impact
fees
are
re-institu
that
we
are
included
so
to
me,
my
recommendation
would
be
for
the
chair
and
you
can
pick
somebody
or
it
could
be
the
legislative
committee
or
something
have
a
meeting
with
the
county
council
counterparts
and
and
this
work
out
this
political
issue.
I
I
I
concur
with
what
colonel
guyer
just
said.
I
definitely
think
there
there's
a
number
of
things
that
I
see
problematic.
It
seems
to
me
having
attended
the
bluffton
town
council
meeting
in
february
of
this
year
and
having
read
the
newspaper
articles,
the
island
packet
article
that
was
published.
Let's
see
here
on
april,
it
was
updated
on
april
27th
and
the
title
of
that
was
beaufort
county
council,
repeal
school
fees,
money
going
back
to
property
owners
and
then
also
reading
the
bluffton
sun,
which
is
article
on
april
19
2022.
I
I
The
school
impact
fees
when
they're
developed
took
into
account
the
referendum
dollars
so
that
there
would
not
be
double
billing
to
the
to
those
that
were
paying
the
fees
and
that
I
there's
also
this
on
this
misunderstanding
that
this
is
somehow
repetitive
or
repetitive
billing,
and
I'm
not
sure
if
that
was
a
comment.
Mr
cunningham
made
and
other
council
members
agreed
with
him,
and
I
I
don't
understand
that
comment.
They're,
not
repetitive,
they're,
absolutely
separate
and
distinct
from
the
school
bond
referendum
of
2019.
I
I
do
think
it's
a
political
issue.
I
think
also
what
mr
guyer
said
that
I
think
the
county
administrator
thought
by
having
the
unincorporated
areas
of
beaufort
county
sign
on
to
the
impact
fees
that
would
sort
of
twist
the
arm
of
the
municipalities,
I.e,
bluffton
and
hilton
head,
especially
because
those
the
in
hardyville,
but
that
didn't
happen.
I
It
certainly
bluffed
and
dragged
its
feet,
and
I
just
I
just
don't
understand
how
we
can
not
have
the
areas
of
the
county
that
are
having
this
rapid
growth
and
we
absolutely
need
capacity,
increasing
facilities
on
schools
in
those
areas,
I.e
new
schools
or
additional
classrooms
that
are
not
covered
in
our
current
referendum,
and
I
would
be
happy
to
be
involved
with
this
or,
however,
david
durbinger
wants
to
arrange
it.
F
Thank
you
yeah.
I
did
hear
that
thing.
Of
course
I
agree
and
there's
all
kinds
of
story
lines
to
this.
F
When
dick
and
I
went
to
that
meeting
with
the
county
council
and
the
mayors,
you
know
we
we
saw
that
there
were.
There
are
quite
a
few
agendas
at
work,
but
I
agree.
We
need
to
sit
down
and
get
a
straight
answer
from
county
council
there's
just
no
doubt
about
that.
We
get
a
street
answer
from
them
and
we
need
to
be
very
clear
on
our
position
and
one
of
the
answers
we
got
was.
It
was
because
the
towns
weren't
signing
the
iga.
F
So
we
do
need
to
sit
down
with
them
and
certainly
attempt
to
get
a
straight
answer
and
just
and
just
get
it
out
on
the
table
and
see
and
see
what
we
can
do.
If
there's
anything
we
can
do,
I
mean
one
of
the
problems,
of
course,
is
by
statute.
The
county
has
to
carry
this
forward.
We
can't
we
make
our
recommendation,
but
they
have
to
carry
it
forward.
So
I
think
the
next
step
may
be
to
set
up
a
meeting,
but
I
would
before
we
set
that
meeting
up.
F
I
would
like
some
legal
advice
on
some
of
the
things
you
know
what
options
might
be
available
to
us,
like
you
know,
can
they
unrescind?
I
don't
know
if
that's,
if
that's
possible.
F
F
J
In
terms
of
the
meeting,
I
think
that
once
again
I'll
say
this-
I
think
that
both
boards
should
meet
with
county
council,
but
I
definitely
agree
with
the
part
with
the
fact
about
getting
some
legal,
some
some
legal
advice.
I
think
that
that
that
that
is
a
that.
That's
that's
a
very
that's,
a
very
important
step
to
figure
out
how
how
we
can
resolve
it,
but
more
so
I
think
that
it
should
it
shouldn't,
be
just
a
couple
people
going
to
meet
with.
J
What's
a
couple
people
from
there
boy,
I
think
you
should
be
bored
to
board
and
understanding-
and
that's
just
you
know,
that's
that
that
that's
my
that's
my
philosophy
on
things
so
that
everyone
understands
it
and
everyone's
there
and
you
know
what
we
know.
Sometimes
they
said
that
two
heads
are
always
better
than
one.
So
that's
my
stance
on
that.
Thank
you.
K
So
I
I
agree
that
seeking
legal
counsel
would
probably
be
a
very
good
idea
on
this
and
there
are
a
few
legal
counsels
from
what
I'm
told
in
the
in
the
state
who
deal
with
impact
fees,
and
I
know
that
at
least
one
of
the
groups
is
on
your
board
approved
list.
So
I'm
seeking
information
about
whether
you
would
like
it
to
be
a
board
request
for
legal
counsel
or
you'd
like
administration
to
take
that
make
that
step,
and
you
know
administratively.
K
So
I
know
there's
been
some
distinction
in
the
past
and
I
just
want
to
see
which
way
you'd
like
to
go
with
that.
I
Yes,
thank
you.
Yes,
thank
you
tanya.
I
I
think,
since
it's
a
joint
venture,
but
the
board
is
the
one
that
had
to
vote
to
bring
the
school
impact
fees
forward
to
county
council,
so
I
think
the
legal
representation
should
be
for
the
boar.
You
know,
primarily,
I
guess
you'd
say
the
board
first
and
and
the
district
second,
although
we
obviously
have
the
same
interests
in
this
matter
and
so
we're
not.
We
just
need
one
one
legal
group
representing
the
two
of
us.
B
I
Yeah,
yes,
so
I
move
that
the
board
of
education
seek
legal
guidance
on
next
steps
for
school
impact
fees.
B
B
Any
other
discussion,
okay,
so
call
the
question.
The
motion
on
the
floor
is
that
the
board
of
education
seek
legal
guidance
for
the
next
steps
for
school
impact
fees.
Since
county
council
recently
repealed
school
impact,
beads
all
those
in
favor
say
I,
I
all
those
opposed.
K
Well,
I
am
a
little
clear,
more
clear
minded
this
morning
or
this
after
this
evening
that
I
was
yesterday
evening.
So
I'm
glad
I
have
to
start
a
little
earlier.
That's
great
news
and
I'm
not
going
to
do
a
long
presentation
for
you
today,
you've
already
received
in
our
last
meeting
a
lot
of
the
details
of
our
budget.
I
also
want
to
mention
that
those
presentations
are
on
our
website.
K
We
made
sure
and
and
the
easiest
way
to
get
there
is
to
go
to
the
search
engine
and
type
in
budget
and
there's
a
the
top
fold.
Top
link
is
current
fiscal
year
budget
and
it
will
take
you
to
the
three
or
four
presentations
we've
had
so
far
over
the
next
last
couple
of
months.
After
today's
meeting
we'll
get
the
handouts
and
today's
presentation
as
well
up
on
the
site,
so
any
viewing
audience
or
anyone
who
wishes
to
search
for
that
is,
is
welcome
to
do
that
on
our
website.
K
So
last
night,
one
of
the
speakers
in
public
comment
mentioned
about
what
is
about
what
is
the
problem
we're
trying
to
address,
and
so
that
kind
of
resonated
with
me.
What
is
the
budget
trying
to
accomplish
this
year,
and
so
the
problem
is
recruiting
and
retention,
and
so
that
is
the
primary
theme
of
this
budget
the
priority.
The
main
goal
of
this
is
to
address
that
issue
of
teachers,
professionals
and
classified
administrative
staff
as
well,
and
so
we
believe
that
this
budget
recommendation
does
that.
K
So
on
the
first
slide
of
the
powerpoint,
I
am
going
to
just
give
kind
of
a
little
recap
of
our
presentation
on
the
prior
meeting,
and
I
just
want
to
talk
about
first,
the
employee
compensation.
K
So
this
is
the
first
slide
of
the
powerpoint
robin.
If
you
could
flip
over
to
that,
I'm
sorry
and
want
to
reiterate
that
this
budget
recommendation,
the
budget
recommendation
of
stat
administration
is
a
four
thousand
dollar
increase,
plus
a
step,
and
that
is
based
on
the
original
governor's
recommendation
and
the
original
senate
house.
K
This
is
also,
I
believe,
on
page
eight
of
the
handouts
if
you'd
like
to
follow
along
through
there,
so
I'll
be
referencing.
The
handouts
that
we've
provided
and
those
provide
a
little
more
narrative
detail
of
the
of
the
items
that
I'm
going
to
be
referencing
in
the
powerpoint.
K
K
The
addition,
in
addition
to
the
teachers,
four
thousand
dollar
increase,
we
are
proposing
to
add
a
26th
step
to
the
teacher
salary
schedule.
So
it's
one
step.
We
do
have
some
information
on
the
cost
of
additional
steps
in
the
handout
as
well,
but
bus
drivers
are
state
mandated.
There
is
a
state
mandated
increase
of
five
percent.
K
That
would
be.
There
would
be
a
step
increase
for
those
for
that
category
of
employees
as
well,
and
then
all
other
employees
would
have
a
proposed
to
be
a
three
percent
increase
cost
of
living
increase,
plus
step
in
anticipation
of
a
classified
and
administrative
salary
study
that
will
be
brought
to
the
board
early
in
the
next
school
year.
So
there
will
be
more
information
to
come
as
as
that
information
becomes
available
from
our
outside
consultant.
K
K
K
Is
for
a
four
mil
increase
at
this
time,
so
when,
in
our
last
meeting
you
the
board
members
requested
some
reductions
in
the
current
budget,
they
asked
for
us
to
sort
of
that.
That's
the
april
22nd,
I'm
sorry!
K
Okay,
all
right,
so
it
seems
that
we
didn't
have
you
don't
have
the
powerpoint
that
I'm
referring
to
so
would
you
help
us
get
that
to
robin
and
somehow
that
didn't
didn't
get
to
you?
Reductions
are
in
so
I'll.
Just
refer
straight
to
the
handouts,
then
that
might
be
easier
on
page.
K
On
page
10
of
the
handouts
is
the
list
of
reductions.
There
are
instructional
support,
they
are
operational
support
and
those
reductions
are
primarily
in
the
areas
primarily
in
areas
that
requested
increases
in
the
budget,
so
we
reduced
based
on
historical
spending,
so
we're
not
decreasing
budgets
unless
there
were
requests
to
do
so.
K
There
are
reductions
in
the
require
in
the
increased
request,
so
legal
food
travel
supplies
and
other
services
to
name
a
few
in
that
category
and
those
amounted
to
about
eight
hundred
thousand
dollars
in
a
reduction
in
personnel
services
of
about
800
000
as
well,
and
those
are
primarily
due
to
the
new
funding
model
changes.
K
K
Also,
there
was
a
just
last
week
or
so.
The
there
was
a
new
sport
approved
by
the
high
school
league
anytime,
a
new
sport
is
approved
at
the
high
school
level.
There
does
seem
to
be
some
interest.
I
talked
to
the
lead
athletic
director
and
there
was
definitely
some
interest
in
several
of
our
high
schools,
and
so
this
budget
supports
about
a
200
000
startup
cost
for
stipends
startup
equipment
and
for
a
new
sport
that
would
be
added
to
to
our
high
schools.
K
In
addition
to
that,
we
were
asked
to
bring
a
sick
leave
payout
program
proposal
as
well.
So
there
is
a
placeholder
in
this
budget
of
1.5
million
dollars.
K
This
plan
is
to
increase
teacher
retention
increase
instructional
time
and
to
reduce
substitute
teachers,
and
so
that
that
play
that
plan
we
have
placed
in
1.5
million
dollars
into
this
budget,
utilizing
the
savings
in
the
other
categories.
K
So,
in
addition
to
these
reductions
and
the
sick
leave
payout
plan,
those
reductions
were
taken.
We've
provided
a
second
model
or
a
second
option,
so
those
the
items
that
I've
just
mentioned
are
have
been
incorporated
into
both
options,
so
the
reductions
and
the
sick
leave
payout
plan
edition
are
both
in
both
options
that
are
before
you
today.
K
So
the
alternative
budget
proposal
is
a
2
000
teacher
salary
increase
and
it
is
rolling.
The
2500
of
the
locality
supplement
into
the
teacher
salary
schedule,
which
provides
a
savings
of
3.2
million
dollars,
decreases
our
millage
request
to
a
1.7
mill
request,
and
the
goal
is
really
to.
K
If
this
option
is
minimizing
the
tax
payer
minimizing
the
impact
on
taxpayer
and
also
to
utilize,
make
stipends
that
we
already
have
available
to
our
supplements
that
we
already
have
available
to
teachers,
putting
them
moving
them
into
a
permanent
status
of
the
teacher's
salary
schedule.
So
that
does
have
a
savings,
and
so
is.
It
is
considered
to
be
the
alternate
or
option
two
proposal
this
evening.
K
This
slide
is
a
summary
of
the
2023
increases
that
were
on
the
screen
before
us
today,
and
the
only
change
from
the
original
proposal
is
in
the
employee
compensation
line.
It
does
bring
that
down
by
the
savings
of
3.2
million.
So,
as
you
see
there
at
the
bottom,
one
proposal
is
a
297.1
million
dollar
requested
budget.
The
other
is
293.9
million.
K
It
is
in
a
powerpoint
that
was
provided,
but
I'll
there
is.
The
details
are
in
a
summary
in
the
large
slit
sheet
that
I
handed
out
to
you
just
now,
so
the
the
alt
one
slide.
K
We
might
as
well
move
to
that
to
the
large
handout.
I
think
that
might
be
that's
best
at
this
point,
all
right,
so
in
your
one
page
handout,
it
is
page
13.
I
believe,
let's
see
here,
page
12
of
your
handout.
There
are
two
options.
The
left
is
the
original
in
blue
and
the
alternate
proposal
is
in
the
yellow,
orange
color
on
the
right
so
just
to
walk
through.
I
lined
them
up
horizontally,
so
that
you
could
could
follow
the
same
changes
that
were
made
throughout.
B
I
K
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Yes,
so
the
increases
in
the
budget
are
22.9
million
in
both
versions.
You'll
see
the
revisions
that
we
just
spoke
about
are
the
addition
of
the
sick
leave
payout
plan.
The
sick
leave
payout
plan.
We
do
not
have
a
specific
proposal
for
you
this
evening.
I
believe
that
it
does
need
further
conversation.
K
There
are
several
options
we
could
go
with,
and
I
think
it
does
need
me
more
research.
This
this
option
provides
the
highest
level
of
payout
possible,
and
so,
if,
if
another
alternative
option
were
to
be
chosen,
then
the
savings
could
shift
over
to
the
classified
salary
and
and
admin
classified
salary,
study
implementation,
and
so
it
would
allow
us
to
do
either
implement
a
little
sooner
or
at
a
higher
percentage,
perhaps
as
a
phase-in
for
that
plan.
K
Additionally,
there's
the
new
sport
provided
by
the
high
school
league,
the
operational
reductions
and
special
revenue
utilization
are
in
both
both
versions.
The
differences
are
in
red
on
the
right
and
they
are
this
it.
So
this
plan
is
a
teacher
salary
increase
of
2000
and
moves
the
2500
of
locality
into
the
base
salary.
So
that
would
be
a
savings.
K
The
2
000
is
a
4.2
million
dollar
savings.
Rolling
the
2
500
in
would
be
retirement
only
so.
Retirement
benefits
are
in
the
neighborhood
of
22
23,
and
so
the
cost
of
that
is
a
retirement
cost
of
1
million
dollars
to
to
the
district.
K
So
in
in
that
version,
there
is
a
3.2
million
dollar
savings
in
the
total
expenditure
budget.
So,
instead
of
a
four
mil
increase
in
the
original,
it
would
be
reduced
by
reduced
by
2.3
mills
to
a
level
of
an
in
a
request
of
of
1.7.
K
So
just
want
to
note
that
there
are
benefit
pros
and
cons
for
both
and
I've.
I've
done
my
best
at
indicating
which
those
are
they're
more
subjective,
so
those
are,
but
I'm
sure
you
all
will
have
additional
comments
about
which
ones
other
other
advantages
or
disadvantages
of
each
of
the
each
of
the
versions.
K
Basically,
the
new
starting
teacher
salary
and
the
original
proposal
is
43
066.
K
The
no
new
base
teacher
salary
in
the
alternative
proposal
is
500.
Greater
the
new
teacher
salary
in
the
original
proposal,
with
all
compensation
included
in
with
the
locality,
is
forty.
Eight
thousand
sixty
six
dollars
and
the
alternative
proposal
is
forty:
six
thousand
sixty
six
dollars
so
there's
some
some
differences
there.
So,
basically,
the
original
proposal
provides
larger
compensation
package
for
teachers.
K
In
total
it
brings
the
teacher
salary
closer
to
the
goal
of
50
000,
where
or
about
two
thousand
dollars
away.
It
does
provide
some
flexibility
in
time
in
times
of
economic
volatility.
I
believe
that
in
the
next
couple
of
years
we're
going
to
have
some
harder
times
than
we've
had
in
the
next
and
from
a
financial
perspective
economic
perspective,
and
we
want
to
be
prepared
for
that.
K
It
does
move
our
the
needle
on
on
our
ranking,
which
is
one
of
the
goals
we
wanted
to
be
in
the
top
five
of
the
school
districts
in
south
carolina
in
terms
of
the
starting
teacher
salary,
and
it
does
move
us
to
a
position
that
I
believe
can
get
is
has
the
potential
for
getting
us
there
again.
It
is
a
moving
target,
so
we
won't
know
until
the
everyone
has
finished
their
budgets
and
submitted
their
salary
schedules
to
the
state,
but
I
do
believe
it
moves
it
up
significantly
up
the
scale.
K
It
addresses
inflation,
so
our
inflation
last
I
talked
to
you.
It
was
8.5.
I've
heard
comments
of
11
inflation
at
this
point,
so
this
allows
us
to
bring
those
salaries
up
to
a
level
in
the
13
range
of
increases.
K
And,
lastly,
if
we
do
have
the
opportunity,
if
our
our
current
year,
revenue
projections
come
in
greater
than
what
we
project
right
now
we
have
the
opportunity
to
lower
that
millage
before
millage
setting
in
august.
So
we
have
the
opportunity
to
go
in
with
a
four
mil
request
and
in
the
end
of
july
or
mid
august,
we
see
that
revenues
are
coming
in
a
million
dollars,
more
a
million
and
a
half
more.
K
We
have
the
potential
to
go
back
and
say:
well,
I
think
we
could
live
with
three
mills
instead
of
four
potentially
or
some
number
to
that
effect.
So
we
current
watch
it
on
a
week
on
a
monthly
basis
and
they
will
cooperate
with
us
if
we
ask
for
a
bi-weekly
basis,
and
so
we
can
get
information
mid-month
and
their
county
treasurer's
office
has
been
very
generous
at
giving
us
that
information
when
needed.
K
So
on
the
second
alternative
version,
some
some
advantages
of
this
model
that
half
of
them
half
the
locality,
becomes
a
permanent
increase
it
resulting
in
an
increase
in
retirement
wages
for
teachers,
so
you're,
taking
a
a
somewhat
temporary
supplement
and
making
it
a
permanent
part
of
the
teacher's
salary
and
becomes
part
of
their
retirement
wages.
K
Since
there
is
a
new
base
teacher
salary,
it's
about
five
hundred
dollars
more,
it's
slightly
higher
in
terms
of
the
ranking
on
the
base
teacher
salary
schedule
when
compared
to
other
school
districts
in
the
state
there
is
a
smaller
overall
budget
increase
and
the
savings
to
taxpayers
would
you
would
have
the
impact
on
taxpayers
would
be
more
like
a
forty
one
dollar
per
year,
increase
on
a
four
hundred
thousand
dollar
home,
and
some
disadvantages
of
this
approach
would
be
that
the
total
compensation
package
is
two
thousand
dollars
less
for
teachers
and
would
result
in
less
take-home.
K
Pay
will
take
us
longer
to
get
to
that
fifty
thousand
dollar
mark
because
we're
at
more
at
forty
six
thousand
and
really
we
don't
have
the
millage
flexibility.
If
we
start
low
with
a
millage
number,
we
can't
go
up,
we
can
only
go
down
or
stay
where
we
are
so
there
is
no
real
opportunity
to
change
any
millage
at
that
point
once
that
has
been
established
at
that
level,
so
I'm
going
to
pause
there,
and
so
that's
kind
of
a
deep,
a
lot
of
lot
of
information
and
see.
A
Can
I
make
a
comment
before
we
start
the
discussion?
A
G
A
A
I
believe
the
most
important
thing
that
I
have
seen
in
the
last
three
years
in
this
budget
discussions
was
going
to
these
meetings
and
listening
to
our
employees
and
listening
to
the
public
listening
to
parents
and
so
on.
So
I
I
I
cannot
support
not
having
at
least
like
we
have
in
the
past
the
north
of
the
broad
in
the
south
of
the
broad
community
meeting
everybody's
invited
stand
in
line
and
we
listen
and
then
come
back
and
finalize
which
budget
we're
going
to
go
with.
C
Thank
you
so
tanya.
When
is
the
senate
going
to
decide?
The
house
wants
the
4
000
increase?
The
senate
wants
2
000..
So
what
when
are
they
going
to
decide.
K
Your
guess
is
as
good
as
mine,
so
that
was
one
of
the
points
I
wanted
to
make
this
evening.
So
so,
as
far
as
the
legislature
is
concerned,
of
course,
the
governor
originally
recommended
a
four
thousand
dollar
increase,
so
that
is
a
forty
thousand
dollar
salary.
Minimum
salary
for
teachers
that
is
would
be
mandated
under
that
model
that
has
passed
a
bill
has
been
created
by
the
house
and
passed.
K
So
what
that
means
is
that
all
school
districts
in
the
state
would
have
a
minimum
salary
of
forty
thousand
dollars
if
you're
already
above
that
amount,
you
would
not
be
required
to
go
up
the
full
four
thousand
dollars
or,
if
you're
near
that,
you
would
only
be
required
to
go
to
four.
So
forty
thousand
excuse
me.
K
So
if,
if
the
sentence
version
is
a
two
thousand
dollar
mandate
and
the
senate
has
passed
that
bill
as
well,
so
at
this
point
I
actually
made
some
notes
and
I
don't
think
it's
on
my
legislative
update
slide.
K
The
the
after
the
senate
has
passed
their
bill.
It
goes
back
to
a
conference
committee,
so
it's
members
of
the
house
and
the
senate
come
together
and
based
on
the
last
update
I
received
from
my
school
business
official
association
that
may
3rd
through
5th
the
bill
would
be
returned
to
conference
committee,
so
that's
yesterday
through
tomorrow
and
then
may
10-12.
K
The
conference
committee
would
provide
a
report
and
a
budget
to
the
governor
so
by
the
end
of
next
so
next
thursday
by
next
thursday
or
a
decision
should
be
made
whether
that's
extended
or
not.
I
I
don't
know
the
bills
are
pretty
far
apart
at
this
point,
there's
one
main
debate
that
is
pretty
significant:
there's
a
billion
dollar
tax,
rebate,
income,
tax
rebate,
discussion
and
that's
a
major
sticking
point
in
both
deliberation,
both
the
house
and
the
senate
and
the
deliberations
are
going
to
be
intense.
K
I
would
I
would
assume
so,
but
again
these
are
the
38
000
and
40
000
are
the
minimums
that
are
in
those
our
current
salary
schedule
with
the
locality.
K
Excuse
me,
our
current
minimum
salary
schedule
with
the
three
percent
cost
of
living
that
the
board
passed
on
march.
25Th,
I
believe,
is
39.
K
F
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
tanya.
The.
I
know
that
the
sickly
payout
program
hasn't
been
worked
out
to
the
level
of
detail
that
we
need,
but
my
understanding
is
that
will
increase
the
new
teacher
salary
with
locality.
If,
in
fact,
we
have
some
payout
on
on
60,
is
that
a
correct
impression.
K
Sick
leave
payout
is
not
subject
to
retirement.
Our
current
sickly
payout
plan
does
not
only
vacation
days
are
part
of
those
are
are
subject
to
retirement
withholdings,
so
technically
they
would
not
increase
retirement
wages.
Sickly
payout
would
not
increase
retirement
wages
for
employees.
F
I'm
it
wasn't
aiming
at
the
retirement,
so
much
as
I
was
in
the
pocket.
F
Yes,
and
the
theory
is
that
that
each
year
teachers
would
be
able
to
cash
in
some
of
their
unused
sick
time
is.
That
is
that
the
concept.
K
Yes,
there
are
two
parts
to
the
proposal.
One
would
be
that
employees
retiring
would
be
able
to
cash
in
their
days
at
a
rate
that's
higher
than
the
current
ten
dollars
a
day,
and
the
second
part
is
that
employees
who
lapse
days
or
lose
days
annually
would
be
able
to
be
compensated
for
the
lost
days.
K
D
Thank
you.
I'm
sorry,
I
feel
like
I've
been
looking
at
all
these
financial
documents
and
I'm
starting
to
lose
the
thread
just
a
little
bit.
Can
you
clarify
the
locality
supplement
between
the
two
look
at
the
the
the
blue
budget?
The
original
proposal
leaves
the
locality
as
is,
and
the
gold
budget
moves
2500
into
the
base
salary
is
that
am
I
understanding
that
correctly.
K
Yes,
so
it
would
remain
with
so
the
locality
supplement
would
become
to
2500,
so
instead
of
teachers,
for
example,
currently
received
2500
in
december
2500
in
may,
it
would
move
to
1250
in
december
and
1250
in
may
and
then
their
their
take-home
pay
on
a
on
a
bi-weekly
basis
would
increase
by
2500
divided
by
26
paychecks,
whatever
that
about
a
hundred
dollars
a
month.
Is
that
about
a
hundred
dollars,
a
payday
hundred
dollars
a
payday?
K
D
My
kind
of
my
other
question
is:
there's
no
white
budget
or
green
budget
that
has
a
full
lookout
that
we're
the
the
entirety
of
the
locality
is
moved
in,
because
that
does
go
to
where
we
end
up
on
the
rankings
right.
K
That
there
is
no
proposal
today
that
provides
that,
but
it
is
certainly
possible
that
it
could
be
a
third
option.
Obviously
the
idea
was
that
it,
this
was
a
less
drastic
change
and
that
those
who
are
you
know
really
looking
for
that.
Chris,
that
bonus
right
before
the
holidays
or
right
before
the
summer
break,
would
still
have
the
opportunity
for
that
supplement,
but
just
at
a
lesser
rate
and
but
to
take
advantage
of
that
in
their
bi-weekly
wages.
K
D
Yeah,
like
I
was
just
trying
to
remember,
it
seemed
like
we
had
talked
about
that,
but
they're
starting
to
blur
a
little
bit
and
then
my
other
question,
if
you
don't
mind,
is
how
much
flexibility
do
I
don't
understand?
Also
this
compensation
analysis,
that's
going
to
come
out.
Some
figures
have
kind
of
been
floated.
How
do
you
accommodate
that
in
the
budget?
I
mean
what,
if
it
comes
in
with
the
inflation
and
all
this
much
higher
like
in?
How
are
we
gonna?
K
So
my
experience
with
compensation
and
salary
studies
is,
it
has
been.
We
had
one
several
years
ago.
I
don't
know
the
correct
year.
It
typically
has
required
us
to
do
it
phase
it
in
over
a
series
of
years,
possibly
two,
possibly
three
years
so
without
knowing
the
total
impact.
K
Before
the
study,
the
study,
obviously
is
not
has
not
been
finished,
it
was
expected
to
come
out
and
the
study
is
expected
to
be
presented
to
staff
or
the
board
in
in
the
summer
I
put
a
placeholder
of
approximately
2
million
plus
benefits,
which
is
about
2.6
million.
I
believe
into
this
budget
to
accommodate
for
some
portion
of
that.
If
it
were,
it
may
be
paid.
K
If
we're
not
finalizing
the
numbers
into
the
fall,
it
could
be
begun
in
january
or
or
there
are
multiple
options
that
could
occur
as
far
as
implementation,
but
without
knowing
I
did
in.
We
made
sure
that
at
least
some
compensation
was
start
put
in
the
budget
as
a
placeholder
for
a
partial
implementation.
J
Describe
the
first,
let
me
start
off
by
saying
thank
you
for
putting
all
your
hard
work
and
your
staff
into
this
budget.
I
know
this
is
a
lot
going
into
this
and
happened
with
having
the
way
from
the
state
and
all
that
it
definitely
makes
decisions
hard,
especially
when
it
comes
to
us.
But
one
of
my
questions
is
when
we
first
started
a
few
minutes
ago,
when
you
started
out
this
in
terms
of
the
bus
drivers.
I
know
a
couple
years
ago.
We
had
them
on
each
step.
J
We
had
the
money
step
increase,
but
then,
due
to
covert,
we
kind
of
backed
off
that
because
we
were
trying
to
do
it
in
in
and
basically
in
phases,
and
you
were
saying
that
the
state
is
now
off
is
now
telling
us
to
go
up
on
final
on
five
percent.
D
K
K
And
we
had
five
year
five
percent
last
year.
Okay
last
year
was
a
mandated
five
percent
increase,
and
this
year
is
an
also
an
additional
five
percent
increase,
as
we
have
been
on
step
increase
a
step
schedule
for
a
few
years
now
with
bus
drivers.
I
I
think
it's
been
several
years.
Actually
all
of
the
classified
employees
were
put
on
a
step
several
years
ago,
so
they
are
receiving
step.
J
Right
so,
and
in
terms
of
the
step
that
we
voted
on,
I
think
when
I
first
got
on
the
board.
This
is
just
in
terms
of
the
step
that
we
voted
on
and
also
in
terms
of
the
step
that
the
state
is
giving.
How
is
that
affecting
or
how?
How
is
the?
How?
How
does
that
look
in
turn
in
terms
of
what
we
propose,
what
what
we've
pushed
as
well
as
the
state?
J
Are
we
just
saying
that
what
what
what
we
voted
on,
what
the
state
voted
on
is
encompasses
more
or
less
or
or
are
we
just
putting
it
in
together?
We
pop
pocketing
and
putting
it
in
as
one
well.
K
This
past
past
year
or
the
current
year
that
we're
in
we
bus
drivers
received
a
five
percent
increase
right.
Then
the
board
voted
on
us
on
march
25th
for
a
three
percent
cost
of
living
increase
for
all.
So
they
receive
that
as
well,
and
then
they
will
receive
five
percent
instead
of
three
percent.
During
the
new
year,
where
the
classified
administrators
will
receive
three
bus
drivers
will
receive
five
right
plus
a
step.
J
J
J
K
In
my
opinion-
and
I
would
certainly
I've
been
with
the
district
for
many
years
and
having
two
salaries-
you
would
have
to
have
two
salary
schedules
in
order
to
accomplish
that,
so
I
don't
believe
that
providing
an
option
for
one
way
or
the
other
would
be
would
be
allowable
by
the
state
department.
It
would
be
very
confusing
very
confusing
for
each
individual
for
our
staff
to
be
having
those
elections
removed
and
and
added
back,
and
so
I
think
it
in
this
case
it
needs
to
be
all
all
or
none.
K
J
K
She
was
planning
on
going
into
teaching
in
the
upstate
and
then
looked
at
the
teacher
salary
schedules
across
the
state
and
saw
that
buford
at
that
time
was
number
one.
So
she
came
to
beaufort
and
she's
still
here.
So
that's
the
kind
of
thing
we
need
to
do
that.
That's
getting
people's
attention
that
that's
what
we
need
to
focus
on
in
order
to
get
get
good
people
get
highly
qualified
people
and
have
them
stay
here
for
a
long
time.
So,
and
so
that's
something
that
was
really
was
powerful
to
me.
K
G
I
I
Thank
you
so
as
as
you
know,
tanya
previously
in
our
discussions,
I
I
really
would
like
to
see
the
locality
supplement
as
part
of
the
teacher
salary,
so
one
we
get
credit
for
it
when
we
are
compared
to
other
school
districts,
salary
to
salary,
it's
not
something
that
has
to
be
voted
on
annually
by
the
school
board.
So
it's
a
sure
thing
once
it's
rolled
into
the
salary
and
there's
the
advantage
for
the
employees
that
they're
also
now
getting
retirement
benefits
on
that.
I
So,
and
I
see
how
you,
as
already
brought
up
by
this
boat
boatwright's
comments
that
you
know,
you've
got
half
in
there
at
this
point
as
as
a
sort
of
segue
into
eventually
doing
the
whole
thing.
So
do
you
know
a
couple
things:
the
new
new
base
teacher
salary,
so
this
would
be
in
the
alternate
budget,
43
566..
I
Where
is
that
now
on
that
list
you
gave
us
like
a
meeting
or
two
ago.
K
It
would
be
near
the
top,
but
I
do
know
that
greenville
is
proposing
a
two
thousand
dollar
increase
to
bring
them
to
forty
four
thousand.
Five
hundred
and
fifteen,
I
believe,
is
the
number-
and
I
do
know
that
fort
mill
is
also
proposing
a
two
two
thousand
dollar
increase
and
they
were
number
two
on
the
list,
so
it
would
place
us
hopefully
in
the
top
five,
but
really
like.
I
said
it's
a
moving
target.
I
know
at
least
one
other.
D
I
Fairfield
scroll
down
again,
I'm
robin
because
on
the
alternate
proposal
you
have
that
I
believe
the
con
was
2
000,
total
compensation.
Oops
can't
see
it.
I
Okay,
total
compensation
package-
2000
less,
but
isn't
it
real?
Isn't
it?
Wouldn't
it
really
be
less
than
2
000
because
they
are,
they
are
now
getting
retirement
benefit.
You
haven't
taken
that
into
account
in
that.
G
K
2500
rolled
in
would
be
subject
to
a
nine
percent
retirement
withholding
at
which
would
be
about
225
or
so
yeah.
I
Okay,
when
we,
when
the
six
board
members
went
up
to
the
state
house
last
week
and
when
tom
davis
talked
to
us,
he
he
his.
I
His
comments
were
all
on
the
new
funding
formula
and
he
specifically
made
a
point
of
saying
that
you
know
the
house,
you
know
had
the
four
thousand
dollar
increase
for
the
teacher
salary,
whereas
the
senate
there's
they
were
proposing
the
two
thousand
dollar
increase
in
the
salaries
for
teachers,
but
he
he
said
that
the
senate
proposal
allowed
for
more
flexibility
for
school
districts
to
you
know,
move
the
money
where
they
really
needed
to
have
the
money,
and
I
believe,
another
big
difference
between
the
house
and
and
senate
funding
formulas.
I
K
On
that,
I'm
sorry
there
is
a
proposal.
G
K
The
senate
proposal:
I
believe
they
are
moving
proposing
to
move
the
teacher
supply
reimbursement
from
275
dollars
to
300.
So
I
want
to
make
that
point
as
well,
so
that's
an
increase
for
they
will
put
dollars
in
the
hands
of
teachers.
We
give
that
in
the
form
of
a
real
check
and
they
can
spend
it
on
supplies
for
their
classrooms.
K
C
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Vice
chair
robine,
so
tanya,
I'm
looking
at
the
blue
budget,
and
you
know
your
opening
remarks
is
what
what
are
what's
our
purpose,
to
recruit
and
retain
okay.
C
So
when
you
look
at
all
that,
we've
talked
about
over
the
past
couple
weeks
and
and
today
tell
me
tell
me
if
I've
got
this
comprehensively
three
percent
retroactive-
okay,
so
that
should
be
in
teachers
and
by
the
end
of
the
school
year,
right
june,
10th,
okay,
so
the
beginning
to
begin
this
summer,
recommending
a
four
thousand
dollar
salary
increase.
G
C
C
C
C
Correct.
Yes,
two
thousand
dollar
retention
and
recruitment
bonus
that
if
you
stay
by
november
fifteenth
if
we
were
to
approve
this
today,
that
two
thousand
dollars
would
be
paid
out
right
around
the
holidays.
Yes,
along
with
this
1250,
which
would
be
32
15
50
right,
yes,
which
is
more
than
the
2500
typical
stipend.
C
Do
you
see
where
I'm
going
with
this,
that
that
would
lessen
the
blow
of
putting
half
the
stipend
into
salary,
keeping
the
half
the
stipend
as
a
locality
supplement,
but
then
using
these
esser
funds?
You
know
this
is
a.
I
think
this
is
a
fabulous
way
to
use
these
essar
funds.
So
tell
me
what
you
think
about
that.
So.
K
So
one
my
initial
point
is
that
it
would
cost
a
cost
of
a
million
dollars
additional
expenditures,
so
we
could
either
add
it
to
this
budget
increase
the
millage
reduce
something
else
in
the
expenditures,
so
that
is
an
option.
K
And
it
would
bring
the
teacher
salaries
up
to
the
base
salary
to
forty
five
thousand
sixty
six
dollars.
Forty
five
thousand
five
hundred
and
sixty
six
is
that
right,
yep
and
the
overall
would
be.
C
E
G
C
You're
nodding,
but
what
are
your
thoughts.
C
0.7
so
then
the
proposed
millage
increase
would
be
4.7.
Yes
and
tell
me
again,
please
you,
you
told
us
before
what
is
our?
Oh,
madam
vice
chair,
I'm
sorry,
I'm
just
okay!
You
you!
You
told
us
before
that
we're
allowed
how
much
in
our
millage
8.3
8.3.
Yes,
so
we'd
still
have
a
roll
back
of
3.6.
C
E
H
G
H
H
C
H
H
H
I
don't
know
what
the
other
counties
are
doing,
I'm
not
sure,
I'm
sure
I'm
not
sure
they
have
the
flex
that
we
have,
but
I
you
know,
I
think
we
ought
to
be
give
them
a
real,
fair
feel.
That's
that's
my
thought
about
it.
I
think
this
is
an
opportunity
to
to
change
the
impact
in
beaufort
county.
You
know
what
we
feel
about
teachers.
We
are
the
10th
largest
county.
I
think,
and
we
are
50
something
in
salary.
B
Oops,
if
I,
if
I
could
just
interject
here
and
then
I'm
gonna,
get
back
to
the
queue,
but
I
I
think
that
we're
at
a
time
in
our
community
now,
where
our
community
recognizes.
I
truly
believe
this,
the
shortage
of
teachers
and
how
their
children
are
being
impacted
by.
You
know
the
number
of
classes
that
aren't
being
covered,
and
I
think
we
have
to
do
what
we
can.
B
You
know
to
to
show
that
we're.
We
want
to
bring
teachers
here
and
one
way
that
we're
going
to
get
quality
teachers
here
and
fill
those
spots,
because
our
constituents,
our
students,
need
qualified
teachers
in
those
spots
is
we've
got
to
take
teachers,
salaries
seriously,
and
we
have
to,
I
think,
to
use
mr
smith's
words
put
our
money
where
our
mouth
is.
B
So
that's
my
comment
and
I'll
colonel
dyer
you're.
Next,
in
the
queue.
A
A
A
A
And
for
that
we
can
get
the
two
thousand
dollars
more
for
the
teachers.
That's
a
no-brainer
as
far
as
I'm
concerned,
and
if
you
know-
and
I
think
you'd
ask
that
property
owner
is
he
going
to
raise
his
rate
five
dollars?
No,
I
mean
that's.
This
is
chump
change
and
I-
and
I
know
it's
terrible
to
say:
taxpayers
are
getting.
You
know
our
chump
change,
but
55
a
year
is
what
we're
talking
about,
and
it's
2
000
a
year
for
the
teacher
that
that
man-
that's,
I
was
doing
math.
A
A
E
D
Thank
you.
You
know
as
someone
that
works
in
hr
for
a
small
business.
It's
you
know
when
you're,
when
you're,
looking
at
your
budget,
raising
salary
and
raising
benefits,
it's
it's
a
it's
a
tough
equation,
but
my
my
well,
I
would
support.
I
think
we
need
to
if
we
can,
for
teacher
salaries
is
not
just
because
of
inflation.
There
was
an
article
that
hilton
head
island
had
the
15th
highest
rent
increase
in
the
nation.
We
were
the
only
place
in
south
carolina
in
the
top
20.
beaufort
county.
D
I
think
they
said
31
percent
increase
in
rent.
So
when
you
factor
in
the
fact
that
for
some
you
know
whatever
reason
the
pandemic,
the
lifestyle
and
colonel
got
a
400,
000
dollar
home
and
see
pines
no
way,
not
even
kinda.
So
I
think
we
recognize
that
if
we
want
the
teachers
to
live
in
our
community-
and
we
want
them
to
have
one
of
the
you
know,
as
a
daughter
of
two
teachers,
teaching
should
be
a
reasonable
lifestyle.
D
It
should
not
be
a
45
minute
commute
because
you
can't
afford
to
live
anywhere
near
where
you
work
right.
So
one
of
the
benefits-
I
think
people
do
want
to
live
here,
but
that
we
have
to
it's
not
even
competing
with
the
other
districts.
I
do
believe
that
beaufort
county
has
gotten
so
high
in
terms
of
rent
that
we
need
to
do
whatever
we
can
to
get
the
teachers
to
a
point
where
they
can
afford
an
apartment.
D
I
mean
that's
really
what
we're
talking
about,
and
we
heard
the
gentleman
the
science
teacher
from
robert
smalls
last
night
talking
about
people
losing
roommates
and
having
to
move,
I
mean
it
is
dire
on
the
on
the
housing
costs.
I
think,
in
addition
to
the
inflation
we
need
to
recognize
that
beaufort
county
is
in
a
uniquely
difficult
housing
crunch
and
that's
going
to
make.
L
L
Yes,
it's
hard
for
them
to
live.
It
makes
no
sense
for
a
teacher
to
have
to
be
in
the
classroom
nine
hours
a
day
then
go
home
and
then
work
a
part-time
job
and
with
rents
going
up
over
30,
30
30
plus
percent
come
on.
We
have
to
do
better
and
again
miss.
Mr
smith
said
something
that
we
need
to
do
put
our
money
where
the
mouth
is:
let's
go
ahead
and
give
them
money
and
as
a
taxpayer,
yes,
I
will
pay
whatever.
L
J
Could
you
kind
of
help
me
walk
me
through
in
terms
of
the
sick
pay?
How
will
we
roll
that
out?
What
what
will
that
look
like.
K
That
plan
is
not
fully
developed.
I
think
we
need
some
conversations
more
about
it,
so
that
the
board
sees
a
few
scenarios,
and
so
I
think
that
requires
a
little
more
attention
than
than
the
time
we
had
for
the
budget
conversation.
So
I
may
put
a
placeholder
in
so
that
we
have
some
options
and
we
have
a
an
amount
to
work
with.
B
M
Thank
you
miss
robin,
and
I
think
what
I
was
going
to
chime
in
and
it's
been
said,
but
it
is
it's
along
the
lines
of
what
you
were
talking
about,
miss
robin
and
then
what
miss
miss,
bilt,
wright
and
miss
middleton
hit
upon,
which
is-
and
I
think
our
community
not
only
obviously
wants
us
to
have
the
greatest
opportunity
at
attracting
talent
and
attracting
teachers,
but
I
think
they
also
want
them
to
be
able
to
live
right
here
in
the
community.
M
F
N
N
It
seems
to
me
that
every
time
salary
goes
up,
rent
goes
up,
so
maybe
we
need
to
sit
down
and
talk
to
the
realtors
and
the
folks
that
are
running.
You
know,
because
you
know
I
mean,
there's
nothing
wrong
with
a
person
making
a
profit
but
jesus
christ.
You.
G
N
When
you're
killing
people
that
don't
make
sense
and
then-
and
you
know-
and
I
know
people
don't
want
to
hear
that-
I
mean
you-
don't
have
to
gouge
people
pocket
book
just
to
make
a
profit.
You
know
because
when
you
die
you
know,
I
can't
take
it
with
you.
You
know
it
just
doesn't
make
doesn't
make
sense
to
me
and
and
and
and
we
can
teach
you
society
can
go
up
to
60,
000
or
70
000
and
the
people
that
rent
there
they're
gonna
go
up.
You
know
there
has
to
be
a
or.
N
Some
point
a
cutoff
point
somewhere
and
maybe
we
need
to
sit
down
with
this,
the
chamber
of
commerce
and
the
realtors
and
talk
to
them.
You
know
that's
all.
I
am.
A
Madam
chair,
how
do
you
want
to
proceed?
What
we
could
do
is
vote
for
the
original
proposal,
but
make
a
motion
and
say
here's
the
original
proposal
and
get
a
vote
and
if
it
and
then,
if
they
don't
get
six
votes
for
it,
go
to
the
set.
Read
the
second
motion:
how
do
we
choose
which
proposal
we're
going
to
go
out
and
give
to
the
community
and
the
open
the
community
session.
K
K
Might
get
one
of
my
colleagues
does
anyone
I
think
I
have
a
copy
of
that
can.
May
I
have
that.
K
Okay,
just
a
couple
more
slides,
I'd
like
to
go
to
slide
eight
in
the
presentation,
so
we
already
talked
about
the
legislative
update
as
part
of
the
budget
process.
Administrative
rule
os2
requires
that
annual
approval
of
both
the
operating
budget
which
we're
going
to
look
at
for
next
budget
meeting,
but
also
the
debt
service
budget.
So
tonight
I'm
not
asking
you
to
vote
on
this,
but
I
do
want
you
to
see
it
for
the
first
time
and
then
we'll
see
it
again
on
the
next
meeting.
K
The
debt
service
budget
comes
from
a
synopsis
or
a
summary
from
brian
nurik,
the
compass
municipal
advisors
and
it's
based
on
the
principal
and
interest
payments
that
are
coming
due
over
the
course
of
the
next
school
year
or
a
budget
year.
So
those
total
expenditures
of
principal
and
interest
will
be
88.2
million
dollars.
Those
are
already
established
and
may
include
any
upcoming
bond
issues
that
we
may
make
that
will
be
paid
back
in
the
next
school
year
as
well.
K
This
so
these
are
based
on
these
numbers
are
based
on
the
long-term
financing
plan,
you've
already
seen
during
our
debt
day,
presentation
in
march,
and
it
maintains
the
current
millage
and
debt
service
of
36.3.
So
no,
we
are
not
requesting
any
change
in
that
millage.
The
projected
fund
balance.
We
always
look
at
the
december
fund
balance
in
debt
service
because
we
have
fall
interest
payments.
So
you
can't
look
at
june
30th
and
think
that
oh
well
well,
we
have
excess.
We
do
not.
K
We
have
to
have
enough
in
the
fund
balance
at
june
in
order
to
pay
our
september
interest
payments.
So
the
low
point
is
we
generally
try
to
keep
it
around
5
million
at
december
31.
and
this
budget
accomplishes
that
so
in
the
handout.
There's
a
detail
if
you're
interested
in
looking
at
the
details
of
the
numbers
for
those
of
you
who
like
to
see
the
math
behind
the
numbers
and
those
are
on
page
seven,
all
right,
the
the
next
slide.
K
K
K
K
And
the
last
thing
is
that
our
budget
readings
with
county
council
have
been
postponed.
They
really
were
looking
for
an
approved
budget
prior
to
first
reading
and
we're
waiting
on
a
couple
other
budgets
for
fire
districts.
I
believe
so
in
the
interest
of
having
finalized
budgets
coming
from
the
municipalities
or
the
fire
districts
and
the
school
district.
K
K
So
one
other
note
I
wanted
to
make
is
that
the
locations
of
those
have
actually
already
been
set
and
they're
all
on
the
nor
the
northern
side
of
the
river.
So
the
first
meeting
on
the
23rd
will
be
at
the
rec
center
burton
wells,
recreation
center
and
the
other
two
readings.
The
second
and
third
reading
will
be
at
county
council
chambers.
K
So
I
will
send
an
information
out
to
principals
for
those
who
might
be
interested
in
attending.
May
23rd
is
a
graduation
night
for
bluffton
high
school,
so
that's
first
reading
so.
B
B
Miss
crosby,
I
have
a
question
on
page
eight
of
the
debt
service
budget.
Yes,
it
says
projected
fund
balance
at
12.
31
23
is
23
the
correct
year,
or
should
it
be
22.
B
So
it's
a
whole
year
in
advance.
Yes,
okay,
the
year
following,
yes,
all
right,
one
other
thing
that
I
before
we
move
forward
with
emotion.
I
feel
that
since
I
know
that
rachel
expressed
last
evening
that
she
had
questions
and
she
was
going
to
share
them
with
you,
I
think
that
I
as
a
board
member,
would
like
to
hear
what
her
questions
were
and
what
the
responses
are,
so
that
oh,
she
did.
Oh,
I
didn't
see
it.
Sorry,
okay,
my
my
problem.
K
Well,
I
didn't
see
the
email,
but
it
was
a
busy
day
today.
She
had
some
good
questions.
I
don't
recall
all
of
them,
but
I
do
recall
one
was
about
the
board's
budget.
There
appeared
to
be
an
increase
and
the
increase
was
actually
she
mentioned
an
increase
of
approximately
150
000.
K
The
difference
is
actually
due
to
savings
in
in
fiscal
year
2021
and
those
savings
were
due
primarily
to
covet,
so
there
wasn't
as
much
travel
in
the
board's
budget,
and
so
we
do
expect
that
to
return
and
to
be
having
those
the
travel
that
we
were
experiencing
prior
to
covid.
So
that's
the
reasoning
behind
the
majority
of
that
increase.
K
She
had
some
great
questions
regarding,
like,
as
you
did
this
evening,
just
trying
to
understand
the
various
options
that
were
available
to
us
and
understanding
the
pros
and
cons
and
kind
of
just
gaining
a
better
understanding
of
those
and
also
the
sick
leave
payout.
She
had
a
sim
question
similar
to
mr
smith,
and
that
is
those
were
answered
and
also
they're
a
proposal.
J
Yes,
ma'am
in
terms
of.
J
About
this,
in
terms
of
what
mr
campbell
said,
I
I
think
that
is
very
important.
The
same
way
how
we
send
letters
out
for
different
things
in
about
the
council.
I
think
you
know
when
you
hear
about
you,
see
email,
you
see,
you
go
different
meetings.
I
I
see
it
very
concerning
that.
J
We
have
these
relative
groups
that
are
leading
these
discussions
in
our
area,
so
I
I
think
it
would
be
awesome
for
us
to
maybe
possibly
even
you
know,
to
foster
as
the
school
board
that
we
see
is
important
to
have
teachers
here
for
us
to
start
leading
the
discussion
into
you
know
we
need
some
type
of
understanding,
some
type
of
of
capping
when
it
takes
off
three
I
mean
when
it
goes
up
three
three,
four.
Thirty
three
percent.
I
think
I
wanna
have
the
percent.
J
I
think
that
make
a
long
story
short.
I
think
that
we
should
have
a
meeting
with
the
with
with
the
the
relatives
or
we
should
start
somewhere
or
we
could
maybe
remember
whether
it's
a
committee,
wherever
it's
the
board
level,
we
should
start
figure
out
what,
where,
where
we
want
to
go
and
not
not
just
talk
about,
because
I
think
I
don't
want
that
to
fall
on
deaf
ears.
I
think
that
now
is
the
appropriate
time
to
go
ahead
and
get
that
ball
rolling.
J
J
Sure
sure
sure.
J
Simply
simply
creates
a
meeting
with
the
realty
association,
and
I
mean
how
we
guess
we
have
to
figure
that
out.
I
mean
what.
J
Right
well,
okay,
there
we
go
so
I
proposed
that
the
school
board
that
the
school
board
invites
the
the
relatives
association
leadership
group
to
to
to
have
a
meeting.
J
To
to
to
to
to
these
to
discuss
the
the
the
cost
of
living,
the
cost
of
living
in
beaufort
county.
N
The
realtors
and
the.
D
Thank
you.
There
was
a
little
bit
of
feedback
on
my
end,
so
I'd
like
to
see
the
motion
writing
because
I
wasn't
100
sure
I
caught
it
and
then
my
other
question.
You
say
the
chamber:
aren't
there
there's,
I
know,
there's
the
beaufort
regional
chamber,
which
is
sort
of
north
abroad
and
then
there's
the
hilton
head
chain.
I
don't
know
how
many
chambers
there
are
or
if
there
is
one
parent
chamber,
can
someone
clarify.
J
H
But
we
ought
to
better
start
thinking
about
that,
because
that's
going
to
remain
a
problem
in
beaufort
county
and
if
it's
an
enticement
to
bring
in
new
teachers
a
part
of
it
is,
they
will
eventually
secure
housing
because
we
got
it
kind
of
built
into
a
plan,
and
I
think
in
the
long
term
that
would
help
that
would
help
the
teachers
decide
to
relocate.
But
it
also
helps
to
sustain
the
teachers
here
once
they
got
here
and
I
don't
know
what
it
would
look
like.
H
I
don't
know
what
kind
of
funds
it
would
take,
but
in
collaboration
with
the
realtors
or
the
chamber,
I
think
that's
where
we
ought
to
be
beginning
to
start
thinking.
If
we're
gonna,
we're
gonna
sustain
the
the
culture
of
the
area
in
terms
of
in
terms
of
public
schools,.
B
Perhaps
it
could
be
a
future
agenda
topic.
Dr
grads
can.
B
I
Yes,
are
you
hear
me?
Okay,
so
one
is
we're
getting
off
topic
here.
We're
today
we're
supposed
to
be
discussing
the
budget.
You
know
we've
been
I'm
not
going
to
support
this
motion.
I
think
we're
getting
into
totally
different
territory
here,
and
you
know,
we've
been
elected
by
by
the
community
to
oversee
the
education
of
public
school
students
in
beaufort
county.
I
don't
I
am.
I
actually
do
do
manage
rental
real
estate
and
I
don't
think
we
need
to
be
as
a
school
board.
I
L
K
L
Know
when
I'm
not
an
economist,
I
know
that
the
interest
rates
are
going
up
and
the
sales
are
slowing
down.
We
can't
tell
somebody
what
to
rent
their
property
for
even
if
we
meet
with
these
organizations,
they're
just
going
to
give
us
a
forecast
of
they're
going
to
tell
us
what
they're
seeing
in
the
market.
You
know
how
many
houses
are
being
sold,
because
with
that
bluffton
ad
hoc
growth
committee,
we
had
some
of
the
the
realtors
associations,
the
president
and
the
vice
president
come
and
talk
to
us.
L
You
know
about
the
growth
and
how
many
houses
are
being
sold
they
I
don't.
I
can't
support
it
because
there's
nothing
that
they
can
tell
us
or
nothing
that
we
can
do,
but
this
market
will
shift
it's
not
going
to
be
a
seller's
market
forever
and
whenever
there's
a
seller's
market,
the
rents
go
up
because
houses
are
being
sold
and
people
are
trying
to
capitalize
on
all
this
money,
that's
floating
around
in
this
economy.
B
Okay,
mr
strippinger.
F
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
I
I
agree
that
I
think
this
is
outside
of
our
purview.
I
think
we
need
to
refocus
on
the
budget
and
the
simple
answer
is:
we
need
to
give
the
teachers
the
maximum
amount
of
take-home
pay
that
we
can
do,
but
all
this
other
stuff
you
know
is
out
of
our
control.
That's
that's
within
our
control.
We
need
to
give
the
teachers
as
much
money
as
we
can
give
them
and
vote
on
moving
that
forward
and
not
get
distracted
by
this
stuff.
B
Thank
you,
mr
earl
campbell.
Then
I'd
like.
G
N
B
Okay,
at
this
point,
I'd
like
to
call
the
question.
B
B
A
I
moved
at
the
beaufort
county
board
of
education
support
budget
option
number
three,
which
includes
a
four
thousand
dollar
increase
to
teacher
salaries
and
moving
twenty
five
hundred
dollars
from
the
locality
supplement
into
the
base
teachers.
Salaries
to
allow
the
administration
to
seek
community
input
for
the
2022-23
budget.
J
C
J
B
Okay,
all
right
any
other
comments,
all
right,
so
the
motion
reads:
I
moved
at
the
school
board,
invite
no
wrong
motion.
E
B
Okay,
the
motion
is
that
beaufort
county
board
of
education
support
budget
option
number
three,
which
includes
a
four
thousand
dollar
increase
to
teacher
salaries
and
moving
two
thousand
five
hundred
dollars
from
the
locality
supplement
into
the
base
teachers
salary
to
allow
the
administration
to
seek
community
input
for
the
2223
budget.
B
I
do
have
a
question:
should
that
say:
four
thousand
dollar
increase
to
the
beginning
to
the
first
step,
teach
yourself
to
beginning
teach,
because
it
the
way
it
reads
the
way
it
reads.
It
sounds
like
every
teacher.
B
E
A
A
It
open
for
discussion.
Yes,
I
move
that
the
beaufort
county
school
district
provides
each
current
full-time
employee
who
remains
employed
by
the
district
on
november
15
2022,
a
two
thousand
dollar
retention
bonus,
each
new
full-time
employee
hired
after
today's
date
will
receive
a
2
000
recruitment
bonus
if
they
remain
employed
by
the
district
on
november
15
2022
funding
not
to
exceed
six
million
dollars
will
be
utilized
by
the
federal
esser
program
that
provides
covid
impact
relief.
C
Thank
you.
I
think
this
is
fabulous.
I
absolutely
am
supported
this,
but
miss
crosby.
I
wanted
to
throw
an
idea
out
to
you.
C
K
So
so
you're
suggesting
to
move
use
instead
of
moving
indirect
costs
into
the
general
fund
operating
budget
you
to
utilize
those
in
esser
on
the
additional
year
of
supplements
on
the
return.
So
how.
C
How
much,
how
much
is
it
this
costs
almost
close
to
six
million
dollars?
Yes
to
do
this
and
we
have
for
indirect
costs
9.8.
Basically,
some
of
it's
already
been
used.
C
A
C
So
dick
excuse
me
so
I
mean
yes,
the
s.
Refunds
will
still
be
there,
but
some
of
them
are
already
getting
encumbered.
So
that's
my
you
know
when
you
already,
when
you
put
it
out
there,
that
this
is
what
you
want
to
use
the
funds
for
then
you've
already
put
it.
You
know,
so
I
just
throw
it
out
there
to
to
the
to
the
team
here
to
see
whether
or
not
it's
even
a
possibility,
because
I
can't
think
of
a
better
use
of
esser
funds.
So.
K
Yes,
so
in
fact,
100
of
the
funds
are
actually
committed
to
something
there.
We've
budgeted
every
line
item
to
something
as
you
you
see
in
their
in
our
reports
each
month.
So
in
order
to
accomplish
the
most
recent
we
we
put
dual
modality
in
and
that
cost
a
couple
million
dollars
as
well,
and
then
this
proposal
is
for
six
million,
as
we
shift
away
from
the
originally
proposed
activities
that
were
budgeted,
we
have
to
trim
off
each
of
each
some
categories
in
other
areas.
K
This
year
we
were
able
to
do
that
because
we
are
not
taking
as
much
indirect
cost
transfer
into
the
general
fund
in
the
current
year
to
lessen
the
kind
of
offset
the
excess
tax
revenue
that
we
are
expecting.
K
So
that
saved
us
a
couple
million
dollars
that
we
were
able
to
reallocate
to
some
of
the
initiatives
that
have
already
been
approved,
I'm
reluctant
to
recommend
a
second
year
because
we
haven't
yet
hit
a
full
summer
of
summer
institute
summer
reading
summer
school,
with
all
schools,
all
students
that
are
eligible
or
interested
present.
K
So
I
I
would
rather
have
a
great
idea
of
what
that
major
cost
is
going
to
be.
In
addition
to
that,
we
should
see
construction
of
some
of
the
hvac
units
and
water,
baller
bottle
filler
stations
and
some
of
the
capital
improvements
that
will
be
coming
as
well.
So
I
don't
want
to
commit
to
six
million
dollars
is
pretty
high
price
tag
for
a
second
year,
so
it
it
worries
me
a
little
to
commit
that
and
then
not
have
enough
for
some
of
the
activities
that
we
had
originally
put
in
place.
So.
C
K
I
just
didn't
know
what
did
I
went
back
and
noticed
that
the
recommendation
that
I
sent
to
the
board
did
not
have
a
dollar
amount
in
it,
so
I
made
sure
to
check
with
denise
matson
our
director
of
special
revenue,
who
indicated
that
six
million
was
the
amount
that
we
budgeted.
So
I
apologize
for
that.
C
No,
no,
that's
fine,
that's
fine,
but
that
I
mean
that's
that
is
higher
than
I
expected,
and
so
anyway,
when
this
conversation
is
being
had
next
year.
I
hope
that
if
there
is
some
consideration
for
that,
so.
K
That's
all
we
can
separate
the
spending
for
this
particular
bonus
in
a
separate
pay
type.
So
we
know
exactly
how
much
we
spent
through
the
course
of
the
year
and
then
I
think
when
we
get
a
a
about
six
more
months
under
our
belts,
we
can
see
where
we
are
and
have
a
better
idea
of
what
we're
going
to
have
remaining.
So
we
always
have
the
option
to
go
back
and
do
it
again.
K
I
it
just
concerns
me
a
little
to
go
ahead
and
commit
to
that
when
we
really
want
to
look
at
funding.
However,.
C
Valid
that's
fair.
I
just
would
reiterate
that
I
can't
think
of
any
greater
use
of
these
esser
funds
than
to
support
that,
and
I
don't
believe
this
was
an
acceptable
usage.
When
this,
when
it
was
first
put
out
right,
we
weren't
we
were
told
way
back
when
that
escrow
fund
couldn't
necessarily
be
used
for
a
teacher
bonus.
K
K
Who
indicated
that,
if
you
had
a
particular
purpose,
then
you
can
do
what
we're
looking
for.
D
Sorry,
a
little
slow
on
the
mute
button,
so
this
kind
of
is
in
line
with
my
questions
from
yesterday.
In
terms
of,
as
I
understand
it,
the
employees
have
until
may
15th
to
return
their
contracts,
after
which
I
assume
there'll
be
a
flurry
of
hiring.
D
So
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I
understand
sort
of
the
the
progression,
because
this
does
have
a
clause
in
it
that
says
anybody
hired
after
today
and
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we
haven't
hired
a
bunch
of
people
who
are
going
to
be
like
wait
that
we're
sort
of
we're
timing
this
correctly
with
that
with
that
date.
So
if
someone
could
just
reassure
me
that
that's
kind
of
what
happens.
K
Is
anyone
on
yeah
alice,
walton
or
I
don't
know
if
dr
rodriguez,
you
can
address
that?
If,
if
no
one
knows.
K
M
Thank
you,
I
think
miss
boatwright.
If
I
understand
you
correctly,
what
you're
trying
to
ensure
is
that
anybody
who
has
been
hired
for
next
year
prior
to
today
would
still
be
eligible
for
that
recruitment.
Bonus.
Is
that
right.
D
M
Okay,
the
way
the
way
I
understand
this
motion
is
that
anybody,
in
terms
of
the
recruitment
piece
that
anybody
hired
I'm
gonna,
have
to
excuse
my
eyes
for
a
minute
here.
Let
me
see
if
I
can
enlarge
it.
M
Yeah,
so
the
way
I
understand
the
board's
intention
is
that
anybody
that's
being
hired
for
next
school
year
as
a
new
hiring
is
is,
would
be
eligible
for
this
recruitment
bonus
and.
M
M
Would
be
eligible
for
the
recruitment
recruitment
bonus,
but
miss
walton.
The
way,
that's
how
I
understand
it
is
is
the
board's
intent
here
is
to
compensate
and
to
provide
a
recruitment
bonus
for
any
employee
coming
in
for
next
school
year
and
as
a
retention
bonus
for
any
teacher
that
stays
employed
with
or
any
full-time
employee.
I'm
sorry
any
full-time
employee
who
remains
employed
with
the
district
on
that
november,
15th
date.
D
Yeah,
okay,
I
misunderstood.
I
thought
that
there
was
two
pieces.
There
was
a
retention
piece
for
our
current
employees
and
then
a
recruitment
piece
for
new
employees
that
started
today,
but
the
way
you're
saying
it
is.
If
you
were
hired
in
april
as
a
new
hire,
you
would
then
fall
into
the
category
of
remaining
hired
through
november
15th.
You
would
still
get
the
the
bonus.
M
That's
how
I
understand
the
board's
intent
is
to
is
is
to
have
a
bonus
for
the
purpose
of
keeping
our
employees
and
for
the
purpose
of
recruiting
employees.
So
to
me
they
they
would
all
fall
in
that
umbrella
in
terms
of
eligibility
for
this,
for
this
notice,
that's
how
I
understand
it.
O
Yep,
can
I
add
to
that
we
have
hired
or
offered
to
this
point
about
126
contracts
for
next
school
year
and
those
contracts
have
been
signed
and
dated
they
were
dated
before
this
date,
even
though
their
contracts
technically
don't
begin
until
august.
So
I
don't
know
if
there's
something
technically,
that
we
need
to
change
about
the
motion
that
will
cover
all
of
those
employees.
D
Who
remains
on
november,
15th
yeah
right?
I
think
I
just
read
it
once
once
he
was
talking
about.
I
realized
that
how
I
was
reading
it,
it
just
caught
my
attention
that
new
hires
after
today's
date,
I
was
like
well
apparently
there's
a
hundred
and
some
that
have
already
been
hired
and
should
be.
You
hire
so,
however,
the
board
wants
to
handle
it.
I
kind
of
understand
it
now.
L
K
B
F
I
I
thank
you.
I
I
think
dr
rodriguez
has
a
real,
clear
picture
of
the
board's
intent.
We
can
wordsmith
this
forever,
but
I
don't
think
we
need
to.
I
think
he
was
pretty
clear.
He
gets
it.
He
knows
what
we
want
and
he's
going
to
implement
it.
So
I
I
don't
think
we
really
need
to
spend
a
whole
lot
of
time
trying
to
word
smith.
The
motion.
K
B
Okay,
mr
smith,.
J
I
was
just
going
to
stay
prior
to
this
competition
that,
but
I
was
going
to
say
that
what
mrs
fitzgerald
proposed
a
few
minutes
ago
that
I
I
really
think
that
was
putting
us
putting
our
money
right
outside
my
office,
but
we
also
have
some
other
things
to
think
about,
and
I
just
want
to
let
her
know
that
she
was
not
out
there
by
herself.
I
do
agree
with
that,
but
I
actually
the
reason
why
I
originally
I
told
you
I
didn't
have
a.
J
I
didn't,
have
a
question
again
because
actually
mrs
crosby
answered
my
question
and
and
when
she
said
that
that
the
money
was
out.
Okay,
if
other
things
are
ready,
so
that
you
know
that
I
guess
I
said
afterwards
that
taught
me
back
off
the
ledge,
but
I
was
definitely
with
you
miss
bridges
I
just
want
to
let
you
know
that
I
do
agree
with.
That
was
not
far
fresh
at
all.
So
I
I
definitely
do
appreciate
that.
J
E
B
Let's
tina
yeah.
B
P
His
beaufort
county
school
district
education
paid
off
along
with
his
college
education,
so
my
mike,
so
I
see
how
this
motion
is
both
a
a
retention
and
recruitment
bonus.
My
one
concern
is
so
the
people
that
are
recruited.
M
M
There
are
employees
that
we
hire
part
way
through
the
year
and
and
I
think
the
intent
of
the
november
portion
the
november
date
that's
on
there
is-
is
really
simply
that
we
are
able
to
to
encourage
employees
to
sign
on
with
us
as
early
as
possible
stay
with
us
as
well
right
and-
and
I
think
that
is
the
intent
there.
So
I
mean
I
understand
the
point
you
know
about
somebody
on
november,
14th
or
november
10th
or
or
what
have
you,
but
I
I
get
it
I.
M
I
understand
that
I
think
the
the
intent
as
I
understand
it
from
the
board
is
recruit,
retain
that's
the
bonus
for
people
and
and
we
want
to
keep
them.
M
You
know
we're
talking
about
everybody
who
we
bring
on
for
the
upcoming
year.
That's
how
I
read
it.
If
there's,
if
there's
a
shift
on
that,
you
know
in
terms
of
what
dr
guades
is
talking
about,
I
think
we,
you
know,
that
would
need
a
caveat
in
there
for
that.
C
This
figure
yeah
just
miss
crosby,
just
why
was
november
15th
picked
just
out
of
curiosity,
because.
C
M
I
I
think,
if
you're
trying
to
address
dr
guad's
concern,
I
mean
one
way
would
be
to
say
in
terms
of
new
employees
must
remain
employed
for
for
a
90-day
period
or
something
like
that.
C
G
C
K
That
wouldn't
allow
us
to
provide
the
additional
funding
or
bonus
at
christmas,
so
that
might
be
a
consideration
that
we
were
talking
about
earlier,
as
the
locality
is
reduced.
If
we
chose
a
date
after
the
the
new
year,
it
wouldn't
allow
for
the
christmas
for
the
bonus
of
december.
So
that's
something
to
consider.
B
Okay,
I
don't
see
any
other
hand.
So,
let's
call
the
question.
The
motion
reads:
beaufort
county
school
district
provide
each
current
full-time
employee
who
remains
employed
by
the
district
on
november
15
2022,
a
two
thousand
dollar
retention
bonus.
Each
new
full-time
employee,
hired
af
hired
for
the
2022-23
school
year
will
receive
a
2
000
recruitment
bonus
if
they
remain
employed
by
the
district
on
november
15
2022
funding
not
to
exceed
6
million
dollars
and
will
be
utilized
by
the
federal
esser
program
that
provides
covert
impact
relief.
E
B
Thank
you
so
much
for
all
all
the
work
that
your
team
did
in
compiling
that
I
appreciate
that.
I'm
sorry,
no
10
10
yeah
rachel's,
not
here,
okay.
So
at
this
time
we
have
the
consent
agenda.
Do
we
have
a
motion
to
approve
the
consent
agenda.
B
B
D
Two
meetings
yeah
this
is,
I
think
this
is
gonna.
Go
straight
to
operations.
Committee
have
a
sense,
but
the
daycare
issue
has
been
brought
up
to
me
by
a
few
people,
and
it
was
mentioned
in
the
public
comments,
daycare
or
child
care
for
teachers,
and
I
think
we
can
probably
fold
that
into
operations
committee.
But
I
would
like
to
formally
make
an
agenda
request
to
have
the
board
understand
that
issue
better.
B
Thank
you,
dr
guads,.
E
P
Board,
if
the
board
has
any
legislative
proposals
that
we
want
to
submit
to
the
south
carolina
school
boards
association,
that
would
be
in
the
for
the
2023
legislative
session
and
also
if
we
have
any.
P
Modifications
to
the
south
carolina
school
boards
association
constitution-
and
I
know
both
of
those
things
are
normally
due
on
june
15th
and
we're
probably
going
to
need
lynn
stokes
murray
assistance
like
we
did
use
like
we've,
had
her
help
us
in
the
past.
So
we
don't
have
much
time
really
for
that.
H
J
B
Any
others,
okay,
so
we
have
no
announcements.
Oh.
J
Yeah
we
do
axe,
I
do
have
announcement.
Okay.
Actually
I
have
my
I
have
announcement.
I
would
like
to
as
a
board
member
like
to
recognize
all
teachers
and
let
teachers
know
as
a
board
member
that
I
I
do
appreciate.
I
appreciate
them.
This
is
teacher
appreciation
week
and
you
know
without
the
teachers
it
would
be
no
us-
and
so
I
just
want
to
let
you
just
know
from
the
bottom
of
my
heart.
I
believe
everybody
on
this
board.
We
consent
that
we
appreciate
you.
J
We
we
thank
you
for
everything
that
you
do,
whether
it's
small
or
big,
whoever
is
seen
or
not
not
seen,
because
we
know
teachers
invest
a
lot
of
their
personal
times
and
what
they
do,
and
so
we
just
want
to
let
teachers
know
that
we
do
appreciate
you
and
with
that
we
see
at
the
top,
because
the
bottom
is
definitely
too
crowded.
We
appreciate
your
teachers.
Thank
you.
M
Yes,
mr
smith,
great
job,
I
was
going
to
recognize
in
teacher
appreciation
week
and
our
teachers,
but
in
in
addition
to
that,
I
also
want
to
just
thank
the
hilton
head
symphony
orchestra,
ceo
allen,
jordan,
maestro
john
morris
russell.
M
B
Thank
you,
okay,
so
we
are
down
to
adjournment
so
moved
all
right.
Thank
you.