►
From YouTube: Northern Regional Plan Implementation Committee 9::00 AM
Description
Meeting agendas can be found online at https://beaufortcountysc.gov/northern-corridor-review-board/index.html
A
C
C
Okay,
well,
it's
a
lot
for
you
all
to
remember
up
there
and
we
appreciate
you
if
you're
coming
here,
I'll
get
with
you
in
just
a
second
I'm,
going
to
go
first
for
the
approval
of
the
minutes
from
April
28th
any
comments,
questions
conditions,
if
not
have
emotional.
Yes
in
a
second
okay,
all
those
in
favor
aye
objections.
C
F
Add
the
request
of
nerfect
from
the
meeting
last
month
and
you
asked
to
be
able
to
discuss
this
topic
again
with
scdot,
so
they've
been
invited
virtually
here
to
answer
questions,
there's
not
really
a
formal
presentation
provided
today,
but
it's
really
just
an
opportunity
to
have
a
discussion
and
ask
questions.
We
have
some
deadlines
looming
regarding
this
decision,
so
it's
kind
of
your
that
you've
got
some
great
folks
here
that
can
help
answer
questions,
I
I'll,
let
them
introduce
themselves,
but
you
have
sddot
and
fhwa
representatives
here
today.
I
F
Yes,
I
was
gonna,
say
there
was
a
few
questions
that
have
repeatedly
came
up
and
those
were
included
in
your
agenda.
Packet
and
I've
also
sent
those
to
UNC,
so
they've
seen
those,
but
this
is
kind
of
to
get
the
conversation
started.
We
have
a
few
I
just
to
let
dot.
Folks
know
that
we
have
the
slides
from
what
Christina
provided
on
your
last
trip
down
here
with
the
funding
table
and
I
think
it
was
dated
back
in
February.
So
we
have
those
available.
F
F
G
J
G
F
Yeah
and
I
just
had
a
quite
a
question
in
here,
so
we
do
in
the
last
agenda
that
I
just
sent
out.
We
are
sort
of
preemptively
putting
up
for
approval
on
the
condition
we
remain
one
mpo,
the
current
Lance
boundary.
The
current
Lance
boundary
already
fully
encompasses
both
urban
areas.
There's
really
no
need
to
tweak
it
at
all,
but
we
did
meet
with
the
technical
committee
earlier
this
month
to
see
if
there
were
any
little
surprise
areas
that
maybe
we
did
need
to
tweak
that
boundary.
F
But
no
there
wasn't
anything
that
came
up,
so
we
decided
to
endorse
the
current
boundary
on
the
condition
we
remain
on
mpo.
If
we
do
not
remain
one
mpo,
we
do
there's
some
work.
That
needs
to
be
done.
It
might
be
as
simple
as
drawing
a
line
down
the
middle
of
the
river,
but
Port
Royal
complicates
that
a
little
bit
with
their
annexation,
but
we'll
do
it.
I
know
to
figure
out
how
to
split
the
black
group
and
all
that,
but
there's
that's
something
we
would
have
to
talk
about.
Anyway.
F
We
were
moving
forward
with
because
dot
has
a
deadline
in
terms
of
the
mapping
effort
to
get
these
Maps
a
draft
into
them
as
early
as
possible.
They
were
looking
at
June
1st,
which
were
our
meetings
the
day
after
that,
so
I
I
submitted
our
draft,
but
we
would
like
they're
like
an
endorsement
of
the
actual
map.
I
would
wanted
to
keep
that
process
moving
forward,
regardless
of
what
the
other
decision
is.
Yeah.
E
E
B
C
C
K
C
F
F
Yeah
kind
of
drafted
crudely,
like
I,
said:
we've
just
drew
a
line
through
the
rod
River,
but
we
are
that
we
would
have
to
figure
out
how
to
handle
our
oil,
where
we
went
where
we
would
circle
around
for
Port,
Royal's
annexation,
but
yeah.
That
was
that
was
and
then
so
I.
There
would
be
some
things
that
had.
B
K
F
F
F
K
K
M
M
H
H
J
J
So
there's
a
lot
of
time,
that's
built
in
there
I
heard
somebody
say
well
this
this
doesn't
mean
we
have
to
have
our
plans
and
everything
ready
to
go
right,
and
it's
true
so
there's
a
built-in
lead
time
to
allow
an
MPA
to
develop
a
long-range
plans
and
get
all
the
Staffing
organized
agreements
in
place
to
get
your
tip
in
place.
All
that
takes
time
right.
It
doesn't
happen
overnight,
so
those
are
two
dates
that
I
wanted
to
mention
to
you
and
I
also
think.
E
I
I
have
a
specific
question
as
to
the
schedule
that
was
in
the
last
attachment
and
it
refers
to
it
as
the
census
schedule,
and
it
says
that
October
1st
is
the
date
by
which
a
decision
has
to
be
made
for
establishment
of
a
new
mpo
or
the
August
first
date
or
15th
date.
I'm
sorry
is
that
to
give
you
time
between
August
15th
and
October,
first.
G
H
F
F
I
mean
I
think
we
really
only
have
one
in
this
state,
but
where
there's
one
urban
area
and
did
they
put
an
agreement
in
place
or
anything
like
that
to
make
sure
it's
kind
of
the
funding
sort
of
shared
equally
amongst
the
urban
areas
or
proportionately,
I
I
talked
to
the
Greenville
gpat
and
they
were
not.
They
did
not
have
anything
in
place
like
that.
They
just
it
just
has
worked
that
way.
They've
been,
but
they've
been
two
urban
areas
for
a
very
long
time.
F
G
H
F
I
H
G
I
Yeah,
so
historically,
the
pot
of
money-
that's
going
to
the
nbos
of
cogs,
is
100
based
on
population,
the
only
caveat
really
recently.
In
the
past
few
years,
scdot
commission
approved
having
a
minimum
amount
that
would
go
through
each
region
so
that
minimum
right
now
is
five
million
dollars,
and
that
again
we
don't
anticipate
changing
the
program.
Next
year.
I
That's
the
population
that
we
ultimately
are
trying
to
get
to
for
August
15th
and
that
will
fit
into
that
equation
to
where
we
figure
out.
What's
the
total
number
of
all
those
mpos
for
population
and
then
from
there?
What's
the
number
for
a
population
within
each
mpo
and
then
that'll
be
the
distribution,
with
the
only
caveat
that
each
region
would
get
5
million
accomplished.
I
M
Is
Jared
off
the
side
of
the
screen,
but
to
address
everybody
in
the
room,
so
that's
as
much
as
dot
can
share
where
they're
not
going
to
have
any
more
information
before
June,
1st
or
August
15th.
As
far
as
the
funding
so-
and
this
is
me
reading,
the
tea
leaves-
and
you
guys
can
correct
me
if
I
mistake
something
but
trying
to
speak
on
behalf
of
dot
for
everything
you
may
or
may
not
be
able
to
completely
say.
M
Last
year.
There
is
an
increase
of
funding
in
the
NPO
re
and
the
rebranded
named
the
regional
Mobility
Program,
which
is
the
mpos
and
Cox.
At
the
time
in
October,
secretary
Hall
wrote
a
directive
that
they
are
going
to
increase
the
funding
to
a
minimum
four
million
dollar
for
the
cogs
and
a
minimum
five
point
or
five
million
for
the
mpos.
That
was
before
this
new
creation
of
the
we
have
11
mpos
to
be
a
12th
mpo.
M
If
this
moves
forward
as
a
separate
entity
secondary
Hall
from
my
understanding
does
not
want
to
go
back
on
her
word
just
because
another
mpo
was
established
after
that
letter
was
written,
so
the
Mobility
Program
in
the
past
has
been
138
million
dollars.
Now
it's
growing
I,
Believe,
It's
Over
a
four-year
term
to
238
million
dollars.
M
Inside
of
that,
that's
where
the
five
million
dollar
Reserve
is
going
to
be,
but
also
based
off
formula
funding
as
far
as
population,
so
what
it
means
for
us
at
locally,
our
our
revenue
from
lats
increase
from
a
little
bit
around
five
to
five
point.
Nine
I
believe
is
where
our
current
funding
is.
That's
the
first
round
of
the
first
portion
of
that
100
million
dollar
increase.
So
over
the
next
four
years
there
may
be
potentially
other
increases
as
the
as
they
shake
out
the
population
in
the
exact
formula.
It
may
stay
the
same.
M
M
If
we
don't
split,
our
5.9
million
dollar
May
grow
in
the
future,
as
they
fully
fill
out
this
238
million
dollar
revamp
program,
so
it
could
grow
to
six
seven,
eight
million
dollars
more
than
likely
it
would
not
grow
to
10
million
dollars.
So
what
you
have
is
a
is
a
difference
in
funding
a
gap
funding
basically
just
assume
it's
it's
eight
million
dollars
is
what
we
eventually
grow
to
as
lats
that's
one
entity.
So
the
difference.
M
What
we're
talking
about
is
two
million
dollars,
I'm,
not
sure
I
wasn't
part
of
the
county
or
part
of
when
the
mpo
was
incredited
in
2015
or
2016.,
but
in
essence
they
took
into
account
all
the
growth
in
the
area.
So
it
goes,
the
urbanized
area
is
just
Bluffton
and
Hilton
Head
is
how
it
got
established,
but
the
study
area
got
included
all
the
way
to
95
to
include
Hardeeville
and
all
the
way
north
of
the
broad
to
include
a
city
of
Beaufort,
Royal
and
unincorporated.
M
M
Whoever
had
the
forethought
to
to
include
the
study
area
for
the
whole
region
was
buried,
but
ahead
of
their
time.
So
if
anybody
was
in
that
in
this
room,
congratulations
you
did
a
fantastic,
so
the
big
answer
is
is
two
million
dollars?
Is
nothing
to
sniff
at?
That
is
a
lot
of
money,
but
is
that
two
million
dollars
worth
the
sacrifice
in
the
regional
coordination?
M
L
M
M
It
just
happened
to
happen
now
so
yeah
that
threshold-
and
this
is
the
part
that
dot
I
think
is
researching.
We
don't
have
a
final
answer
on
is
that
5.9
million
dollars
that
we're
current
receiving
is
that
based
off
the
urban
area,
just
the
Bluffton
Hilton
Head
urban
area,
or
is
it
off
the
entire
study
area
so
potentially
if
it
was
only
based
off
the
urban
area?
Now
we
have
more
urban
area
to
add
to
our
urban
area
within
lats
and
potentially.
K
M
M
Just
the
urban
area,
okay,
so
we
would
not
necessarily
grow
in
urban
areas
with
the
same
as
one
so.
The
growth
that
we
would
have
is
whatever
the
long-term
5.9
million
dollar
grows
do
over
the
next
four
years,
whether
that
stays
the
same
or
whether
that
grows
I.
Don't
know
that
I
know
the
answer
and
I'm.
L
Not
sure
if
the
Latinos
stands,
I'm
sorry
I
think
what
I
was
trying
to
pinpoint
and
Dot
might
have.
This
is
that
I
heard
something
when
we
met
earlier
on
over
at
El
Cog
regarding
getting
all
the
mpos
to
that
the
priority
has
been
getting
all
the
mpos
to
that
five
million
dollar
floor
and
and
moving
forward,
the
priority
is
going
to
be
ramping
up
funding
for
them
for
the
for
the
urbanized
areas.
I
It's
based
off
population
and
historically
has
been
based
off
population
I.
Think
DNT
is
looking
and
evaluating.
If
that's
a
long-term
calculation
model
I,
don't
know
that
they've
answered
that
question,
but
that
I
believe
is
how
stuff
has
been
distributed
in
the
past.
Is
that
accurate,
Joe
and
Lop?
I
H
H
M
K
K
M
J
In
this
state,
so
there's
an
mou
right
now
between
Greenville
and
Spartanburg
and
Anderson.
So
there's
to
help
with
that
Regional
coordination,
piece
right,
so
I
think
if
you
guys
were
to
create
to
an
mou
regardless,
would
be
a
really
important
tool
to
have
but
Jared's
point
and
at
least
been
also
you
know
kind
of
well
I'll
stated
this
is
that
you're
gonna
have
to
have
two
long-range
plans.
You're
gonna
have
to
have
two
separate
tips:
you're
gonna
have
two
different
policy
committees.
J
B
F
B
What
is
the
estimate
if
we,
if
we
stay
together
and
the
funds
are
split
up?
What
is
the
estimate
of
what
we
would
get
this
coming
year
as
a
as
a
group?
They
don't
have
answers
yeah.
So
the
answer
all
we
have
right
now
is
the
5.9
million
dollars
and
it
could
go
up.
It
could
go
down
because
there's
other
entities
in
the
state
doing
the
same
exercise
and
then
the
existing
mpos
have
grown
and
shrank
as
well.
B
So
basically,
they've
got
to
put
all
that
data
back
into
the
machine
and
let
the
machine
spit
out
the
answer
and
until
they
get
all
the
boundaries
established,
they
don't
know
what
that
that
they
don't
have
the
data,
but
we
do
know
that
each
one
will
get
a
minimum
of
five
million.
That's
the
only
this
coming
cycle.
M
We
know
and
had
secretary
Hall
and
D.O.T
not
wrote
that
letter.
That
would
not
be
a
guarantee.
She
could
change
her
mind
and
they
can
change
that
letter
tomorrow
with
the
new
funding
but
Noah
and
secretary
Hall
I.
Don't
think
she
would
like
to
go
back
on
what
she
said
as
her
apology
after
one
year
of
it
being
in
place.
So
you
have
basically
the
word
of
secretary
Hall
and
D.O.T
saying
that,
regardless
of
all
these
changes,
we're
going
to
try
to
stick
to
that,
because
that
was
what
we
said
a
year
ago
before
these.
M
A
Three
million
and
four
million
in
our
two
npos.
The
only
thing
that
we
have
that's
given
guarantee
is
the
letter
and
direction
that
secretary
called
put
out
last
October
and
that
letter
is
only
good
for
a
year
or
is
it
good
for
till
the
next
sentence?
You
could
change
their
mind
tomorrow
and
write
a
new
letter
and
coming
out
of
the
new
minimum
based.
F
M
A
B
And
I'm
appreciative
of
the
lats
folks
for
having
that
foresight.
Jared
to
your
point,
you
know
creating
the
the
map,
as
they
did
and
certainly
not
trying
to
create
any
more
work
for
for
Stephanie
and
crew.
I
guess
my
you
know
when
I
raise
the
objection
of
the
soloco
or
the
question
it
was.
You
know
two
to
four
million
dollars
a
year
is
nothing
to
sneeze
at
given
to
all
of
the
priorities
that
we
have.
B
A
A
K
K
M
I
would
offer
one
additional
comment,
so
really
there's
no
I,
don't
know
if
this
is
for
action
or
what
it
is
on
on
the
agenda
and
I.
Don't
know
if
there's
ready
for
a
position
to
be
taken,
but
by
the
end
of
June
we
need
to
provide
dot
an
answer
and
by
we
it
is
Beaufort
County,
Port
Royal
and
the
town
of
city
of
Beaufort
Town,
Fort
Road.
Those
three
have
to
answer
to
dot.
M
Those
three
also
affect
the
southern
municipality,
so
that
decision,
even
though
they
don't
have
any
weight
in
the
decision
they're
affected
by
the
decision,
that's
made
north
of
fraud.
So,
as
Stephanie
mentioned
with
lats
from
the
technical
committee
to
the
policy
committee,
there
was
a
recommendation
similar
to
a
staff
recommendation
to
a
council.
The
council
doesn't
have
to
take
that,
but
staff
made
a
position.
N
is
for
Council
to
decide
upon.
So
that's.
M
B
This
Northern
Regional
group
to
take
a
position
and
provide
that
same
whatever
your
position
is
and
provide
that
letter
of
support
one
way
or
the
other
to
those
three
municipalities
in
a
short
order.
So
they
can
have
at
least
two
touch
points
to
base
their
decision
off
to
give
dot
an
answer
by
the
end
of
June.
B
Well,
I
would
I
mean
I.
It's
listed
as
a
presentation
item,
so
I'm
a
little
nervous
about
taking
action
on
them,
but
I'll
and
Mike
speak
up.
If
you
feel
differently
Scott,
you
too,
it
seems,
like
the
consensus
says
it
makes
sense
to
stay
together
because
you
know
two
to
four
million
dollars
a
lot
of
money,
but
in
the
context
of
the
infrastructure
projects
we've
got
across
the
region.
What's
the
number
seven
800
million
dollars?
B
B
M
That
we
we,
the
County
city
of
Port,
Royal
and
city
of
Beaufort,
County
Portland,
all
past
the
same
resolution
yeah
so
I
definitely
could
take
a
crack
of
that
and
send
that
to
staff
for
all
the
staffs
to
review
and
if
that's
appropriate,
then
each
of
the
staffs
could
load
it
to
their
councils.
For
for
this
June
of
whether
Northern
Regional
rights
to
let
her
support
or
not.
K
First
question
is:
do
we
have
we
have
enough
information
to
move
forward
with
a
recommendation
and
still
would
have
to
go
back
to
this
effective
entities
or
decision
by
the
board
and
Council
I'd
be
concerned?
Because
of
the
way
the
agenda
is
written
to
do
a
formal
vote
today?
That
would
be
just
you
know.
We
certainly
can
walk
around
the
table
and
voice
our
opinions
and
I'll
I'll
support
where
the
title
for
Royal
is
the
same
as
the
city
of
Beaufort.
K
At
this
point
in
time,
we
believe
it's
beneficial
to
stay
as
one
and
we
do
have
it
as
an
action
item
on
Friday
week.
It
is
an
action
item
at
lots
and
I
will
be
there
as
well
together
there
we'll
commit
to
all
first
to
our
council
meeting
in
June
as
well,
but
our
meeting
is
later
in
the
month
due
to
some
scheduling
conflicts.
So
it's
20
22nd.
M
K
Could
take
out
action
in
June,
regardless,
whether
it's
next
week
or
in
the
next
three
weeks,
I
think
that
would
still
meet.
We
have
Council
the
County
council,
members
and
and
I
assume
your
recommendation
to
County
Council
is
what
one
one
now
and
I
assume
County
Council
is
supporting
Jared's
recommendation
yeah.
A
C
A
K
G
L
Single
I'm
saying
stayed
only
the
10-year
period
right
now
we're
going
to
be
doing
comprehensive
plan
updates.
At
the
same
time,
we
need
to
be
doing
all
the
long-range
planning
update
or
wanting
to
planning
for
a
new
mpo
so
as
as
planning
staff
in
the
town,
I
think
it'd
be
on
Facebook.
If
you
want
to
take
that
on
yeah.
I
Robin,
if
you
want
to
I
mean
you
know,
I
I
fully
agree
that
our
transportation
issues
are
more
Regional,
that
they've
ever
been
I.
Think
it's
just
you
know.
Continuing
to
work
cooperatively
across
the
region
is
the
best
option
and
I
and
I
think
it's
a
Noah's
point.
You
know
and
also
I
think
councilwoman
Howard
mentioned
that
we
have
kind
of
10
years
to
see
how
this
works
and
whether
this
approach.
L
And
then
we'll
be
have
a
round
of
comprehensive
plans
late
in
this
decade
and
hopefully
that'll
inform
I
would
recommend
having
a
discussion
about
Whitwell
spending,
though
equivalent
funding,
just
because
it
I
mean
we
have
the
connection,
but
it
really
is
sort
of
two
Transportation
networks
in
one
region,
so
it
I
would
just
go
into
the
conversation
at
last
with
that
Gabby
on.
Please
just
have
the
discussion
and
see
how
people
feel
the.
B
B
F
Maybe
it
was
Hardeeville
is
already
part
of
Bluffton
West
there's
like
a
30
000..
Her
population
is
30
000,
not
enough
to
hit
that
50
000
Mark.
That
fhwa
looks
for
they're
coming
up
close,
so
this
discussion
could
be
happening
again
when
hardyville
yeah
for
sure
and
again
they're
already
Incorporated.
The
alignments.
C
F
H
G
C
B
Npc
is
anybody
yeah,
so
the
city
of
Beaufort,
we've
had
councils
had
two
work
sessions.
We'll
talk
about
the
parole
leadership
talk
with
some
County
leadership.
The
city
of
Beaufort
is
going
to
stand
up
our
own
Planning
Commission,
but
we're
also
going
to
combine
our
design
review
board
with
our
Planning
Commission.
The
goal
is
to
create
a
more
comprehensive
review
for
development
projects,
we're
also
lowering
the
threshold
for
design
review
projects
for
all
commercial
projects
to
go
in
front
of
our
planning
and
design
review
board.
B
That
are
you
know
in
in
planning
or
in
development
right
now
understand,
and
so
for
us
to
have
our
own
Planning
Commission
that
have
experts
in
our
code
that
we
can
train
that
can
work
directly
with
our
staff,
we're
also
making
some
staff
changes
and
bringing
in
Architects
and
Senior
planners
trying
to
ramp
that
up
in
addition
to
140
Plus
Code
changes
over
the
next
nine
nine
months.
So
we
fully
intend
to
stay
with
the
MPC
until
Port
Royal
can
stand
up
their
own
Planning
Commission
or
some
plan
to
run
concurrently.
B
B
So
citizens
still
have
an
opportunity
to
come
and
share
concerns
and
I'm
glad
to
see
Mary
Ryan
here,
because
when
I
look
at
the
nurpic
sort
of
membership
and
the
purpose
of
nerve
Bank,
that's
where
the
other
rationale
for
standing
up
or
unplanning
drb,
because
we
have
this
committee
I
think
we've
all
made
a
commitment
to
re-establish
the
Norbit
meetings,
but
I
would
go
as
far
as
suggesting
that
military
maybe
have
a
formal
seat
on
the
nurbic
committee,
because
I
really
think
they
used
to
have
an
ex-officio
seat.
Today,
right
am
I,
correct.
Yes,.
K
K
B
Maybe
suggest
between
now
and
next
month,
Mary
Ryan.
If
you
talk
to
your
folks
and
we
put
some
thought
into
it,
but
again,
I've
been
given
how
important
military
operations
to
our
community
and
how
big
of
a
sort
of
stakeholder
you
are
I
think
having
a
formal
seat
at
this
table.
If
it's
appropriate,
maybe
there's
some
government
regulation
that
prohibits.
K
You
from
doing
that,
but
if
not
I,
would
welcome
the
military
to
the
table,
but
I
I
would
suggest
that
the
public
comment
be
moved
to
this.
If
the
MP,
if
the
MPC
breaks
down
it,
is
going
away,
let's
be
realistic
at
this
point,
then
I
suggest
that
this
become
the
body
with
an
agenda
item
every
month
for
public
comment.
We
can
add
that
for
next
month's
agenda,
discuss
together
as
a
team,
because
again
you
know
either
that
or
all
councils
have
to
add
that
to
their
meeting.
It
can't
just
be
on
one.
K
So
we
each
got
to
have
a
section
in
our
meetings
for
public
comment
or
there
needs
to
be
a
single
location
and,
of
course,
especially
if
they
take
it
here,
yep,
especially
if
we
add,
as
an
ex-official
member
I,
think
this
would
be
the
appropriate
place
to
move
that.
I.
Think
that's
how
that
conversation
originally
happened.
Going
to
the
to.
A
K
E
K
K
B
Thank
you.
Do
we
need
a
resolution
on
the
membership?
Do
you
think
that's
already
part
of
the
organization
or
what
yeah
I
think
she
needs
to
check
yeah?
Do
we
need
to
approve
that
yeah
all
right
regarding
next
month's
agenda?
Is
there
a
particular
item
on
the
action
of
the
potential
agenda
topics
that
you
want
to
bring
to
in
front
for
next
month
any
additions.
B
B
B
So
yeah
I
think
it
was
a
coast
guard,
but
we
we
researched
the
other
bridges
in
the
state
and
there
are
some
more
favorable
opening
schedules
that
seem
to
have
the
similar
traffic
counts
that
we
do
so
I.
Don't
think
it's
unreasonable
to
ask
them
to
give
us
the
same
schedule
at
Sullivan's,
Island
Bridge
does
and
then
some
type
of
maybe
notification
and
but
I
do
think
it's
going
to
take
some
political,
some
political
will
to
maybe
push
the
schedule
down
on
some
of
the
folks,
we'll.
A
Could
give
a
report
back
from
soloco
because
we're
going
to
talk
about
growth
boundaries
next
month?
Yeah,
okay,
just
give
a
report
back
and
then
besides
I,
don't
know
that
we're
need
to
review
our
growth
boundaries
north
of
the
broad
at
this
point,
but
I
can
at
least
report
back
what
they're
doing
yeah
yeah
all.
B
Right
go
ahead
with
the
risk
of
overloading
our
agenda.
Councilman
Bartholomew
and
I
have
also
had
a
conversation
about
the
public
safety
north
of
the
bright
I
understand,
city
manager.
County
Administrator
have
had
a
conversation
as
well
and
I.
Don't
know
if
it
it'd
be
premature
if
Scott
would
kind
of
Look
to
You
by
next
month
to
put
that
on
the
table
over.
That's
a
huge.
D
Subject,
it
is,
but
it
all
starts
with
with
requesting
a
formal
study
of
the
efficiency
in
our
use
of
services
to
be
some
efficiency
gained
with
a
combination
of
some
agencies,
and
so
I
think
that
conversation
needs
to
start
with
the
county
and
the
appropriate
place
would
be
County
Council
to
make
that
request
as
a
large
governing
body
cover
in
the
whole
area.
So
I
think
that's
where
we
need
to
start
and
then
see
where
the
study
takes
the
status
of
that
yeah
you'll.
A
Be
in
position
report
on
that
first,
first,
the
county
would
have
to
commission
a
study
yeah,
so
I'm
looking
to
chair
to
see
turn
I
didn't
see
it
in
the
budget.
I
mean
excellent:
okay
yeah.
We
don't
have
it
as
a
budgeted
item,
but
it
can
be
brought
up,
probably
through
public
facilities
and
Safety
Committee.
If,
if
Council
wants
staff
to
look
at
that,
and
then
we
can
come
back
with
some
recommendations,
recommendations.
B
From
a
city
standpoint
we'd
be
willing
to
participate.
We
think
the
study
is
the
good
first
step
just
to
sort
of
make
sense,
bringing
the
experts
in
and
let
them
make
some
recommendations
about
efficient
Service
delivery,
but
thought
it
was
also
appropriate
to
have
the
town
of
Port
Royal
engaged
in
the
conversation
early
on
I
was
thinking.
Maybe
this
would
be
a
first
good,
stop
talk
about
a
study
and
then
who
sort
of
takes
it
from
from
the
County's
perspective.
A
B
C
M
So
this
is
already
the
as
I
read
the
detail,
not
a
third
bridge,
but
a
replacement
of
the
second
bridge.
Potentially
that
was
contemplated
in
lats,
has
long
range
planning,
study,
I,
think
it's
three
or
four
or
five
years
out,
but
it
was
contemplated.
So
if
there
is
a
desire
for
that,
in
addition
to
just
the
timing,
timing
is
the
short
term
long
term
is:
is
there
a
study
needed
or
not?
There
has
already
been
a
feasibility
studies
like
in
2006
or
eight
and
that
got
loaded
into
2006
sales,
tax,
I.
M
A
B
That
I
think
that
I
think
for
the
ladies
on
plan
that
we
we
all
approved
it
was
it
called
for
a
delay
of
the
of
the
conversation
of
the
third
Bridge.
Meanwhile
working
to
reduce
densities
in
the
rural
parts
of
the
island,
while
trying
to
reorganize
sort
of
the
Village
Center
to
create
more
daily
service
opportunities,
commercial
opportunities
to
lower
the
number
of
trips,
and
the
concern
was
when
we
built
that
third
Bridge,
it
actually
induces
development
demand,
which
just
compounds
our
problems
in
Port
Royal
and
the
City
of
Beaufort.
B
M
If
it
had
some
mechanism
a
problem,
it
would
create
a
very
significant
traffic
backup
in
the
region
and
not
that
you
want
to
study
a
second
replacement
bridge
for
the
sake
of
development,
but
for
the
sake
of
a
contingency
plan
that
would
be
I
think
the
way
to
capture
now
that
it
needs
to
be
done
today
or
tomorrow.
Just
there's.
B
A
level
of
concern
and
I,
you
know,
that's
that's
a
real
fear,
I
mean.
Is
there
a
conversation
with
D.O.T
about
the
condition
of
the
bridge,
the
parts
replacement
plan,
the
standby?
You
know
what
what
is
the
so.
These
are
the
emergency
plans
when
the
SOP,
when
something
like
that
goes
down,
yeah
dot
is
going
to
put
their
full
faith
and
effort
to
keep
that.