►
Description
Visit https://beaufortcountysc.gov/planning-commission/agendas/index.html for meeting agendas.
A
Can
everybody
hear
me
all
right?
Sometimes,
in
this
mind,
I
don't
get
close
enough
to
the
mic.
So
if
you
need
to
get
a
little
bit
closer
feel
free
to
do
that,
I
think
you
can
move
okay,
boy,
I
know
it's
been
published,
approve
all
the
minutes
for
February
6th.
A
Are
there
any
corrections,
additions
deletions
to
the
minutes
of
the
meeting
of
February
6.
move
to
accept?
Okay,
with
no
objections,
all
those
in
favor
of
the
minutes
of
February
6.
raise
your
hands
any
dissenting?
No
okay
and
it's
approved
okay,
we're
at
the
part
of
the
agenda
where
citizen
comments
on
non-agenda
items,
citizen
comments
on
non-agenda
items
are
allowed.
A
C
My
name
is
Catherine
sieber.
My
address
is
3900.
Bentley
Drive,
Columbia,
South,
Carolina
29210.
So
I
am
here
honestly,
because
I
feel
like
it's
necessary.
I
am
an
archaeologist.
I
have
a
bachelor's
degree
in
archaeological
science,
a
master's
degree
in
archaeological
science,
I'm
finishing
my
PhD
and
I
have
been
working
in
the
low
country
for
the
last
10
years.
I
am
doing
all
the
archeology
for
historic,
Mitchell,
Freedom
Park
on
Hilton,
Head
and
I've
worked
a
lot
in
the
low
country
in
the
last
seven
years.
C
So
I'm,
the
archaeologist,
who
did
the
archeology
at
Pine,
Island
and
I,
was
at
the
time.
C
D
C
and
so
I
was
specifically
sought
out,
because
I
have
done
work
at
Mitchellville
and
because
I
did
work
in
the
low
country
for
the
last
10
years.
I
was
really
excited
to
do
my
work
at
Pine
Island.
We
went
above
and
beyond
state
standards.
C
So
a
lot
of
times
when
you're
doing
work
with
contractors,
they
would
like
to
take
the
archeology
and
bulldoze
it
push
it
under
the
ground.
It's
not
legally
required
on
private
land
to
save
archeology
and
so
I
was
very
excited
to
work
with
Pine
Island
GC,
because
they
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we
documented
everything
properly.
Everything
has
a
potential
to
be
preserved
and
everything
is
documented.
C
The
state
level,
in
a
way
that
most
developers
would
not
do
over
the
last
few
months,
I
have
watched
this
scenario
play
out
and
I
understand
fully
what
the
what
the
issues
are,
because
I
have
been
working
on
this
for
the
last
two
years
of
my
life,
but
I
think
it's
really
important
to
make
sure
that
you
understand
that
we
went
Above
and
Beyond
in
terms
of
the
science
and
it
was
not
required.
The
work
that
we
did.
We
went
far
beyond
what
is
required
and
I
was
very
proud
to
work
on
that
project.
E
A
D
A
Are
there
any
others
that
have
come
for
you?
No
okay,
all
right,
I!
Guess
we'll
take
ourselves
into
the
action
items
for
the
night
item:
seven
on
the
agenda:
a
text
Amendment
to
the
Community
Development
code,
appendix
b.3,
to
establish
standards
for
short-term
rentals
in
the
fusky
island,
Community
Development
code,
good.
F
F
Short-Term
rental
standards,
so
in
those
standards
the
county
worked
very
hard
and
established
a
process
and
general
standards
for
when
you
can
and
can't
do
short-term
rental.
When.
F
Do
that,
though,
they
kind
of
left
the
community
preservation
districts
alone,
allowed
them
to
kind
of
decide
what
would
work
best
for
them
and
I
think
not
long
ago
in
2021.
You
all
saw
more
recently
want
to
come
across
for
ladies
Island,
so
now
tonight
what
we
have
is
we
have
one
that
is
for
dafuskie
Island,
so
defusky
island
is
similar
in
approach,
but
a
little
different.
F
They
actually
have
a
defoski
island
Council
and
that
Council
has
been
meaning
to
discuss
this
issue
for
about
a
year
now
and
they've
been
going
through
that
process
on
the
island
working
with
staff,
we've
been
out
there
for
some
Community
meetings
and
they
took
a
very
strong
approach
to
being
very
active
in
this
process,
and
there
is
a
member
here
tonight
of
council.
F
If
husky
island
is,
you
know,
obviously
quite
different
than
a
lot
of
other
areas,
considering
it
doesn't
have
a
bridge.
There
are
cars
there,
but
you
cannot
drive
to
the
island.
So
there
were
approaches
taken
or
things
that
were
considered.
That
might
not
have
been
a
part
of
the
mainland's
short-term
rentals.
F
Real,
quick
I
could
just
say
that
a
couple
of
the
things
that
I
would
say
they're
a
little
kind
of
differences
between
their
current
short-term
rental
program.
We
have
county-wide
or
the
following
one.
They
came
to
an
agreement
for
recommendations
for
grandfathering.
Existing
short-term
rentals
that
currently
are
on.
F
To
a
certain
part
or
point
that
if
you
were
operating
and
doing
it
and
met
certain
conditions
that
you
would
be
grandfathered
in
and
you
just
have
to
come
and
apply
for
your
permit,
but
you
still
have
to
be
a
legitimate
operations.
You
can't
be
running
a
short-term
rental
out
of
a
tent.
You
know:
that's
not
going
to
get
grandfathered
in
addition
to
that.
F
They
considered
and
looked
at
having
what
would
be
a
maximum
occupancy
in
these
short-term
rentals,
because
if
all
primarily
all
of
these
homes
will
be
served
by
well
and
septic,
not
water
and
sewer,
and
then
outside
of
that
it
really
kind
of
came
down
into
districts
and
Zoning
districts
and
kind
of
matching
how
the
counties
were,
as
they
have
some
districts
that
are
primarily
well
and
septic.
F
That
would
be
considered
more
of
the
rural
areas,
residential
historic
district,
so
where
they
have
it
as
a
special
use,
meaning
that
somebody
could
apply
for
it
and
it
goes
through
a
special
use
process
and
has
a
zoning
board
public
hearing
for
people
to
come
and
speak
for
or
against
some
of
the
districts
that
are
higher
in
intensity.
Similar
to
like
mixed
use,
districts
that
already
have
the
ability
to
have
some
of
these
non-residential
Commissioners,
these
will
be
where
they're
permitted
uses
the
idea
to
defusky
was.
F
B
F
Try
to
explain
it
and
I
you
know:
I
can
do
my
best
to
answer
any
questions
that
you
might
have,
but
Beth
here
is
a
member
of
council.
I
think
would
be
more
than
happy
to
really
kind
of
get
into.
Maybe
this
is
a
process
that
they
had
or
the
island
or
what
they
went
through
over
the
last
year.
To
get
to
this
point:
okay,.
D
D
D
F
F
That
would
require
a
trip
in
this
room.
Well,.
A
G
A
The
consideration
of,
if
access
to
from
the
residents
or
from
people
own
property
to
and
from
Beaufort
County
needs
to
be
part
of
the
process
for
approval,
some
consideration,
whether
it's
a
zoom
call
or
whether
it's
a
I,
just
note
that,
because
I
think
that
that
might
be
an
unnecessary
hardship
for
them.
Sure.
F
A
D
D
A
I
I
The
council
as
a
whole
was
dragged
through
the
proverbial
mud
on
social
media.
Our
motives
are
integrity
and
our
loyalty,
and
sometimes
our
sanity
was
questioned.
Our
island
is
small
about
550
year-round
residents,
which
makes
these
issues
much
more
personal,
Dar.
The
fusky
island
Association
for
responsible
renters
is
a
group
formed
specifically
to
promote
short-term
rentals.
Every
member
has
a
personal
or
monetary
stake
in
the
outcome
of
this
recommendation.
I
I
Once
di
council
members
and
dar
spoke
with
planning,
our
new
mandate
was
simply
stated.
We
needed
to
answer
two
questions
regarding
strs:
where
do
you
want
them,
and
how
do
you
want
them?
It
was.
After
this
meeting
the
council
chair,
wrote
the
final
draft,
which
was
presented
at
the
December
2022
council
meeting
after
much
debate
and
discussion.
The
document
that
you
see
before
you
was
the
final
recommendation.
I
I
I
The
island
has
gone
through
a
seismic
shift
first
high-speed
internet
and
then
a
worldwide
pandemic
occurred
shortly
after
the
island
provided
a
safe
haven
for
those
looking
to
escape
and
provide
a
sense
of
normalcy
to
people
who
now
found
they
could
work
from
home.
People
saw
the
opportunity
to
purchase
a
home
and
then
the
ability
to
rent
out
that
home
to
help
defray
the
cost.
It
was
a
win-win
for
everybody,
however,
for
our
Island
neighborhoods,
they
began
to
see
the
shift
in
activity
which
impacted
the
use
of
their
neighborhoods
and
the
use
of
their
homes.
I
I
It
is
the
only
way
to
not
limit
strs
by
allowing
those
owners
to
use
strs
as
a
way
to
defray
the
cost
of
ownership
provide
for
tourism
to
take
place,
while
at
the
same
time
allowing
neighborhoods
a
final
say
in
how
their
neighborhoods
develop
as
a
council.
Our
mandate
is
simple.
This
is
from
our
bylaws
to
pool
efforts
which
shall
enhance
the
values
and
protect
the
Investments
of
all
property
owners
and
residents
and
to
accommodate
responsible
growth
while
maintaining
the
character
and
preserving
the
culture
of
defusky
Island.
I
So
we
have
the
council,
as
I
said
in
the
beginning,
our
island
has
been
split
on
this
issue
on
this
issue.
We
have
a
large
contingency
that
wants
strs
in
additional
use,
and
then
we
have
Island
neighbors
that
want
basically
no
str's
to
stop
the
proliferation.
So
the
only
way
we
could
see
forward
was
to
use
special
use
permitting.
I
A
I
D
D
I
D
A
All
right
are
you
John,
okay
and
you're,
the
other
council
member.
Did
you
want
to
add
anything
to
this?
Do
you
have
anything
to
add
to
those
please
come
on
up
again,
introduce
yourself.
G
Good
evening
I'm
John
Schartner
I
have
been
on
the
fusky
council
for
12
years.
I
was
just
re-elected
for
another
three.
A
three-year
term
I
was
on
the
codes
committee
when
they
updated
the
codes
that
were
passed
by
Beaufort
County
in
2018
from
the
codes
committee
this
past
year
handling
the
short-term
rentals
Beth.
G
Lot
of
argumentative
debates,
certain
debates
on
the
subject:
the
codes
committee
was
made
up
of
three
council
members.
The
chairman
of
the
codes
committee
was
a
council
member.
She
hand-picked
most
of
the
committee.
There
were
apprised
of
our
architects
construction
contractors.
G
I
also
had
two
members
of
the
committee
that
owned
and
operate
a
codes
writing
company
and
they
helped
us
write
our
codes
before
in
a
new
Tiger
Island.
So
the
coach
was
the
strs
was
a
big
problem,
so
the
the
code
committee
didn't
know
exactly
too
much
about
what
sdrs
were.
So
we
got
a
lot
of
information
from
other
states
around
other
cities
how
they
were
handling.
We
put
out
three
different
surveys
that
were
conducted
and
made
by
the
company
that
does
code
writing
and
three.
G
Those
three
surveys
were
put
out
and
66
60
between
60
and
60
percent
of
the
respondents
said
they
favored
the
short-term
rentals,
with
condition
permits.
Three
three
different
surveys
went
out
three
different
times.
It
came
back
with
the
same
ratio,
so
the
codes
committee
put
together
a
code
for
the
short
terms
with
the
recommendation
of
conditional
permits.
G
G
G
We
were
against
the
the
special
permits
because
it
pits
one
neighbor
against
the
other.
If
Mr
Smith
doesn't
want
Mr
Jones
to
have
a
short-term
rental,
he'll
come
up
here
and
say:
I,
don't
like
this
I,
don't
like
that,
then
you
create
animosity
in
The
Neighbors
Mr
path.
As
you
are
correct,
you're
saying
it
is
a
very
hardship
for
us
to
get
up
here.
You
do
the
special
permits
we
have
to
come
up
here.
Talk
to
you
go
back,
then
it's
appealed
myself.
G
I've
taken
me
four
months
to
get
a
a
permit
or
zoning
permit
to
open
up
a
store,
I'm
fortunate
I
work
for
Hague
point
I
can
get
on
your
boat
at
any
time,
but
it's
taken
me
four
or
five
times
to
get
up
here,
just
to
get
that
one
little
permit.
I
can't
imagine
what
it'd
be
like
for
these
people
to
come
up
here
and
try
to
get
a
permit
for
their
short-term
rentals
Beth
is
right.
G
We
need
tourism,
that's
the
flood
of
our
community
and
we
just
would
like
for
you
all,
to
reconsider
the
permit
use
and
make
it
conditional.
Thank
you.
A
F
F
F
So
I
think
that's
kind
of
what
the
account
the
Council
on
Council
was
trying
to
balance
I
think
Beth
mentioned
you
had
some
that
do
want
it.
You
don't
want
it
and
that
compromise
at
the
end
was
getting
to
that
special
use
to
allow
for
some
type
of
public
input.
F
That's
how
we
do
it
in
the
rest
of
the
county,
but
the
rest
of
the
county.
You
can
get
here
by
a
car.
So
if
access
is
an
issue
or
it's
that
type
of
thing,
I
think
that
goes
back
to
it's
a
procedural
thing
and
what
Rob
was
saying
regarding
the
zoning
and
board
of
appeals
and
whether
or
not
that
board,
and
that
chairman
would
allow
for
some
special
Zoom
for
these
to
be
a
part
of
that.
F
But
that
is
there
just
like
you
all
have
yours
and
you
all
make
your
choice
and
you
decide
how
yours
that's
there,
business
I,
don't
feel
comfortable,
saying
that
they
would
absolutely
allow
that
or
not
allow
it
because
ultimately,
I
mean.
Wouldn't
you
agree
that
that's,
ultimately
the
zoning
board's
decision
to
allow
and
how
they
manage
and
run
their
meetings.
It's.
A
A
Okay!
All
right.
There
were
a
couple
of
pieces
corresponding
that
Mr
Steward,
mentioned
I
think
we
might
want
to
delve
into
that
just
a
little
bit
and
this
by
the
way
came
to
the
county.
So
it
becomes
a
matter
of
the
official
records
of
the
county
will
be
so
recorded.
A
One
piece
of
Correspondence
was
from
a
Deborah
Smith,
and
the
other
correspondents
was
from
Leanne
mcjunkin
Coulter
from
the
council,
also
as
I
say,
both
will
be
entered
into
the
record
and
be
part
of
the
public
records
that
we
keep
on
on
these
issues.
Any
any
questions
relating
to
that
you
would
care
to
ask
regarding
the
correspondence
you
received
and
all
members
of
the
commission
have
seen
the
correspondence
or
any
questions
at
all.
If
anybody
left
before
we
take
the
issue
back
to
ourselves,.
A
No
okay,
okay
for
discussion
amongst
Council
Planning
Commission
members.
Are
there
any
discussion?
Yeah.
J
K
J
It
feels
like
to
me
same
here.
You
know
if
the
football
game
you
see
the
score,
you
have
an
idea
here.
You
don't
have
any
scoring
to
tell
you
what's
going
on.
Apparently
this
whole
thing's
been
going
on
for
over
a
year
and
it's
going
back
and
forth
and
back
and
forth
back
and
forth
and
so
I
don't
think.
I
can
do
any
justice
to
this
without
knowing
more
information.
What.
J
J
F
J
F
B
D
A
F
The
ordinance
was
drafted
originally
by
the
county,
and
then
the
fusky
island
Council
took
the
original,
short-term
rental
ordinance
and
made
it
suitable
more
to
how
they
felt
it
would
fit
to
fusky
Island,
and
then
they
passed
that
that's
what
they
voted
on
and
passed
it
forward
to
planning
department
to
just
what
we
like
to
call
codify
it
and
make
it
format
it.
And
that's
what
you
have
that's
where
we
are
tonight.
A
Yeah,
yes,
just
to
clarify
a
little
bit
history
on
that
we
looked
at
the
Str
requirements
for
Beaufort
County
Mainland
back
in
2020
and
provided
an
extensive
list
of
detail
which
is
outlined
in
30.1.4
I,
believe
of
the
code.
I
could
be
wrong
on
that
number,
but
they're
it's
extensive,
because
I
went
through
that
code
and
compared
it
to
what
the
fusk
Allen
had
and
I
saw
some
differences
that
you've
mentioned
so
yeah.
It
was
it
extensive
development
that
was
approved
by
this
commission
back
in
2020
for
the
mainland
and.
A
A
B
A
F
H
B
L
A
L
F
B
L
F
A
A
Water
is
wide
and
we've
entertained
changes
to
the
difficult
times
you've
gone
through
and
re-establishing
some
of
the
coding
out
into
Muskie
Allen,
and
this
is
a
furtherance
of
those
issues.
So
I
think
we've
heard
all
that
we
anybody
that
wanted
to
speak
further.
That.
D
F
D
F
F
F
D
G
D
F
Of
answering
questions
on
insurance,
but
if
you
have
a
house,
you
have
to
insure
it,
especially
if
you
have
a
mortgage
note
on
that.
F
L
I
L
A
I
And
to
answer
your
question
about
tourism,
we
have
550
year-round
residents.
Last
count.
We
were
told
200
000
people
come
to
visit
every
year,
okay,
dafusky!
That's.
A
I
B
I
I
G
A
L
Troubled
by
the
arbitrary
nature
of
this
500
000
and
then
I
heard
a
ten
thousand
dollar
fee
or
cost
to
maintain
a
five
hundred
thousand
dollar
liability
policy.
It
seems
very
arbitrary,
no
one
seems
to
know
what
the
cost
is.
I'm
I
have
difficulty
supporting
this
without
at
least
some
further
information
on
whether
that
is
in
fact
reasonable
or
is
it
honorous.
A
And
we
can,
in
our
consideration
for
approval,
we
can
put
that
down
as
a
condition
and
make
it
conditional
on
appealing
the
public
liability
insurance
or
reviewing
the
public
liability
insurance
policy.
We
could
do
that.
We
can
do
that.
We
can't
set
it,
but
we
can
make
that
a
condition
of
our
approval.
F
A
F
A
Well,
I
want
to
be
fair
to
the
community.
We
want
to
be
fair
to
the
community
in
total,
so
yeah.
F
So
if
you
all
have
a
concern
with
a
particular
portion
of
that
language,
like
you're
speaking
on
that
I,
would
you
all
can
do
it?
I
would
recommend
moving
it
forward
if,
when
it
gets
to
council
to
your
point,
if
it
gets
so
changed
the
point
where
they
think
that
it
needs
to
come
back
to
you
to
look
at
it
for
a
new
recommendation
we
can
take
upon.
We
can
look
at
that
at
that
time.
It's
hard
to
know.
If
that's
going
to
happen.
A
A
B
A
D
A
So
I
mean
the
thing
is
we
we
can
ask
these
people
to
come
forward.
If
we
feel
that's
necessary,
one
appears
to
be
a
residents,
they
say
the
other
one
appears
to
be
a
member
of
council
and
we've
got
two
members
of
council
here.
The
records
will
note
the
objection
of
the
private
resident.
A
L
Yes
right
right,
none
of
us
know
right,
and
it
could
be
that
it's
so
economically
unfeasible
that
we
are
really
voting
to
say
we're
going
to
permit
it,
but
it
is
going
to
have
to
pay
a
horrible
insurance
penalty
to
do
it,
in
which
case
we're
really
saying
we're.
L
I
I
there
just
isn't
enough
information,
Rob
I'm,
sorry,
but
this
just
lacks
homework.
I
mean
I,
we
don't
know
and
I
can't
vote
for
what
I
don't
know
so
I
moved
to
table
it
and
ask
our
staff
and
or
the
petitioners
to
resolve
this
issue
and
bring
us
back
solid
packs
that
we
can
vote
on
in
a
more
definitive
manner.
J
H
I
would
just
like
to
speak
on
behalf
of
the
process.
Okay,
we've
worked
with
the
defusky
island
Council
for
over
a
year.
There
are
a
group
that
is
on
the
island.
You
know
I
mean
they
represent
Island
issues
and
the
recommendations
that
they
brought
forward
match
very
closely.
What
we
already
have
in
the
code
right
and
I
guess
I
would
like
to
I
asked
the
Planning
Commission
to
consider.
H
B
H
A
D
A
D
Okay,
good
our
four
special
permit
and
again
special
permit
and.
D
H
Well,
from
the
staff
standpoint,
we
worked
with
the
defusky
island
Council
because
they're
a
group
that
is
voted
on
the
island
to
look
after
Island
matters,
the
other
group,
it's
my
understanding,
is
more
of
an
industry
group
of
people
who
represent
short-term
rentals
that
our
staff
worked
with
the
defusky
island
Council
in
these
recommendations
or
what
they
voted
to
bring
forward.
Do.
A
Yes,
yes,
all
right,
we
have
a
motion
for
table
and
we
had
a
second
but
being
no
further
further
discussion.
All
those
in
favor
of
the
motion
to
table
raise
their
hand.
D
A
D
A
A
J
Mean
how
about
the
idea
of
since
the
vacation
season
is
about
it
could
be
occur.
The
difficult
they're
getting
on
and
off
the
Island.
Would
it
be
possible
for
the
whole
Council
to
go
to
duplicity,
Island
and
meet
some
of
these
people
and
get
some
feedback
from
them?
They.
B
J
F
D
B
A
J
F
I
don't
so
you're
that
would
be
a
motion
to
table,
because
you
can
do
that
once,
but
you've
already
voted
on
and
it
failed
and
then,
in
that
time
period
you
could
meet
with
them.
So
something
that's
very
important
again
is
that
you
all
have
the
document
we've
had
discussion.
There
are
concerns
that
some
of
you
might
have
and
they're
all
about.
F
Entitled
to
their
concerns
of
whatever
language
it
is
I
think
we've
heard
some
for
the
purposes
of
procedures,
the
idea
of
moving
something
forward
in
a
recommendation
and
making
it
very
clear
what
your
concerns
are
to
move
forward
on
to
the
next
step,
which
is
County
Council,
who
will
ultimately
make
the
decision
remember
this
is
just
a
recommendation.
They
will
then
also
have
an
opportunity
at
the
committee.
F
J
This
insurance
certificate-
and
the
second
thing
was
the
the
two
Divergent
documents
that
we
have
in
front
of
us.
One:
four
one
against.
F
B
D
A
E
A
H
G
H
Yes,
this
project
has
a
little
bit
of
History
to
it,
but
I'll
just
quickly
go
over
the
the
facts
of
of
this
resounding,
but
also
remind
you
of
something
that
came
forward
about
six
months
ago.
The
applicant
is
Richard
cooler.
This
is
located
on
OCT
Highway
at
the
intersection
of
170
and
462..
It's
very
close
to
Old
Fields.
H
If
you're
familiar
with
that
area
along
170
and
the
size
of
the
property
is
2.81
Acres,
currently
zoned,
rural
or
TT
Rural,
and
the
proposed
zoning
is
C4.
Community
Center
mixed
use
this
piece
of
property,
the
cooler
property-
if
you
remember
this
came
forwards
back
in
June
of
2022
and
I
realized
that
not
all
of
you
were
here
at
that
time.
At
that
time,
what
was
being
proposed
was
resounding
of
the
entire
97
Acres.
H
At
that
time,
staff
recommended
denial,
and
one
of
the
things
that
we
asked
the
applicant
to
consider
was
that
that
particular
rezoning
in
the
area
was
not
consistent
with
our
comprehensive
plan
and
that
the
only
way
that
we
could
entertain
a
rezoning
in
that
area
was
to
consider
what
we
have
in
our
code
is
a
place
type
overlay
district,
and
so
that
was
our
recommendation
at
that
time.
H
We
actually
did
work
with
with
their
designer
a
little
bit
in
in
what
what
that
meant,
but
in
the
meantime,
and
if
you've
been
following
County
Council
last
month,
recommended
to
move
forward
with
the
purchase
of
that
property
that
one
of
the
things
that
they're
looking
for
is
a
permanent
site
for
a
law
enforcement
center.
They're
currently
out.
You
know
long
have
been
outgrowing
the
facility
they
have
here
in
Beaufort
and.
F
H
That
was
good
so
since
that
time
now
the
county
has
stepped
in
because
of
its
location
on
a
170
Corridor
between
northern
and
southern
they're.
Now
considering
that
property
for
law
enforcement
center,
this
so
there's
an
unusual
shape
to
the
property.
H
If
you
look
at
your
at
the
map
attached
to
the
staff
report-
and
this
all
came
about
in
2000
or
early
2000s,
when
170
was
widened,
this
used
to
be
a
T
intersection
where
170
came
into
462,
and
that
was
rounded,
and
so
now
you
have
two
Remnant
Parcels
across
the
way
from
the
majority
of
the
cooler
track.
One
of
them
is
currently
zones,
C4,
Community,
Center,
mixed
use,
and
our
recommendation
is
to
bring
forward
this
remaining
parcel.
H
Some
of
the
justification
has
to
do
the
the
Kohler
family
is
holding
on
to
the
tract
because
of
the
unusual
shape
of
the
property.
The
the
rural
zoning
renders
it
with
very
little
use
for
that
property
and,
in
addition,
on
this
side,
we're
looking
more
because
these
two
are
surrounded
on
three
sides
by
Jasper
County.
They
have
this
intersection
as
a
future
commercial
node,
and
so
this
change
of
zoning
would
be
consistent
with
the
towns
or
for
Jasper
counties.
H
A
Can
share
with
that
I
was
at
the
location
that
a
piece
of
land
is
right
in
front
of
right
behind
it.
There's
a
a
road
and
I'm
an
ace
Academy
is
right.
There.
M
The
current
zoning
that
2.62
is
that
what
the
acreages.
H
Yeah
I
I
think
they
would
have
you
know,
given
the
acreage
and
the
unusual
shape
of
the
parcel
I'm
going
to
be
a
very
small
strip.
Mall.
M
Right
I
mean
I'm
I'm
concerned
I,
understand
the
general
picture
here,
but
I'm
concerned
I
find
it
a
really
hazardous
coming
from
Beaufort
going
toward
Hilton
Head
on
that
curve,
I
find
it
and
extremely
hazardous.
If
you
want
to
call
an
intersection,
I
mean
traffic
backs
up
on
the
Hilton
Head
area,
side
to
that
traffic,
light
and
I
don't
know,
I
find
it
hazardous
and
I'm
slightly
worried
that
adding
more
commercial
opportunity
there
is
going
to
make
that
intersection
or
merge
even
more
hazardous.
H
H
A
A
H
The
other
side
is
an
abandoned.
It's
the
abandoned
right
away
for
what
used
to
be
170.
A
H
And
I
think
Ace
uses
that
for
Access
did.
A
You
get
any
input
or
feedback
from
Ace
on.
H
This
no,
we
did
not
to
to.
J
And
the
proposed
zoning
you're
saying
here
you
don't
think
it
triggers
a
traffic
impact
analysis.
J
J
A
Agree
with
your
comment:
there
Glenda
there's
been
a
lot
of
congestion
increasingly
on
that
road
and
that's
why
the
traffic
was
put
into
ameliorate.
Some
of
that.
B
B
H
The
the
planned
on
referring
to
Jasper
County
has
kind
of
a
you
know.
A
H
D
A
H
Know
you
basically
have
a
you
know
you
have
the
170
Corridor
with
nodes
commercial
nodes
at
Major
intersections
and
that's
what
the
you
know.
Basically,
what
the
Jasper
County
plan
is
in
the
County's
plan.
We
have
those
Place
types
and
what
has
occurred
here
is
that
because
the
county
is
now,
you
know,
is
looking
to
purchase
the
remainder
of
the
cooler
tract.
There's
not
enough
land
there
to
justify
a
place
type.
You
know
we
were
working
with
them
on
a
was.
D
H
D
If
that's
shopping,
if
there's
a
grocery
store
and
I'm
just
using
an
example,
that's
more
than
15
trips
or
they
wouldn't
build
the
25
000
square
foot
building.
So
I
think
that
you
should
think
carb
I'm
not
chastising
you
or
anything
before
you
make
a
comment
like
that.
To
put
it
in
front
of
us,
it
didn't
come
from
someone
who
has
applied
with
something
yet.
H
There
are
two
you
know,
so
we
have
a
requirement
for
a
traffic
impact
analysis
when
things
come
forward
for
a
zoning
change,
but
we
also
have
a
requirement
when
they
come
forward
with
a
development
plan
and
because
of
the
size
of
this
property,
and
a
lot
of
this
is
speculative.
This
is
a
very
unusual
shape.
H
You
know,
as
far
as
the
types
of
type
of
use
there's
a
long
tail
to
the
property.
That's
probably,
if
anything
it'll
be
used.
You
know
used
up
by
access
or
you
know
it's,
it's
really
hard
to
say
how
it'll
be
used,
and
so,
if
a
plan
came
in
to
the
county,
let's
say
it
was
a
restaurant
or
something
that
would
generate
a
lot
of
traffic.
Then
they
would
still
be
required
to
do
a
traffic
impact
analysis.
When
that
came
forward.
H
A
Just
just
correct
me:
if
there's
not
wrong,
this
is
wrong,
but
a
TIA
recommendation
or
not
having
a
TIA
comes
from
the
traffic
engineering
people.
Correct
I
mean
it's
not
something
that
you
in
the
community
development
planning
department
make
without
their
input.
We.
B
M
Included
absolutely
but
I
mean
it's
very,
very
Dynamic
area,
and
you
know
it's
something
that
I
wish
Kevin
Henley
were
here
because
that's
sort
of
what
he
tries
to
bring
up
all
the
time
about
how
difficult
well.
A
Whole
car
from
problematic,
yes
from
Snake
Road,
all
the
way
on
down.
B
A
A
There
are
also
extensive
plans
for
widening
that
Rogue,
which
I
don't
know
how
it
would
impact
them,
but
widening
170
at
some
time
in
the
future.
It's
in
the
24
Low
Country
Transportation
guidelines
that
entire
Corridor
up
to
462
is
a
major
artery
for
evacuation
and
a
major
artery
Ingress
from
for
vacationers
coming
down.
We
don't
want
to
take
exit
8..
A
J
A
D
F
F
F
A
D
F
E
Mr
chairman
I
make
a
motion
that
we
approve
the
rezoning
of
the
2.81
Acres
from
T2
rural
to
C4
communities
that
are
mixed
use.
Okay,.
K
H
F
B
M
B
B
A
H
Yes,
so
we're
we
want
to
bring
eventually
bring
the
remainder
of
the
conference
a
plan,
but
one
of
the
things
that
we
wanted
to
bring
forward
at
this
meeting,
one
of
the
things
that
we've
been
working
on
as
a
department
and
it's
become
a
theme
in
some
of
our
plans
like
the
ladies
Island
planet
in
particular,
has
been
this
issue
of
transparency.
And
how
can
we
better
relay
information
to
the
public
and
I
think
that
this
is
important
to
the
Planning
Commission,
because
you're,
typically
seeing
zoning
amendments
or
comprehensive.
H
You're
not
necessarily
seeing
the
projects
that
come
forward,
and
so
one
of
the
things
that
we
were
hoping
we
haven't
do
software
that
we're
hoping
that
that
would
be
a
good
way
to
convey
this
information
and
it
didn't
quite
work
out
the
way
we
expected
and
so
we've
lately.
Over
the
last
three
months,
we've
been
working
with
our
GIS
departments
and
Dan
Morgan
is
in
attendance,
I.
H
But
to
set
up
a
an
online
portal
so
that
people
could
look
up
active
projects
either
projects
under
review
or
projects
that
have
been
approved
by
the
county
and
that
are
under
construction,
and
so
that's
what
we've
put
together
here.
This
is
currently
linked
to
the
County's
website
and
the
way
this
works
you
could
either
on
the
far
left
of
the
page.
You
could
either
select
the
type
of
project
right
now.
H
We
have
the
projects
that
have
gone
before
our
design
review
boards
and
you
could
select
the
project
type
over
there
or
in
the
second
column
over.
We
have
all
the
active
projects
listed
individually.
If
you
want
to
click
on
one.
F
F
J
F
F
Usually
you
would
go
to
the
map
and
just
go
where
you
want
to
go,
find
it.
But
if
you
wanted
to
do
a
group
of
search,
that's
you
could
do
you
could
do
all
of
them
that
pulls
the
whole
County
up
and
I
could
just
scroll
through
them
on
the
right
side,
one
by
one.
If
you
want
to
see
everything
that's
going
forward,
we
can
just
go
straight
to
one
click
on
one
and
that
would
pull
up
immediately
right
here.
So
we
can
look
at
everything
there.
F
One
here
it'll
go
straight
to
generate
the
information
and
the
writing
Rings
over
here,
so
there's
multiple
ways
to
search
it,
but
at
the
end
of
the
day
it's
a
it's.
A
driven
application
and
Geo
locate
a
specific
area
because
you
know
something
is
going
there
or
you
could
just
come
here
and
put
on
your
favorite
links.
B
A
A
M
Thank
you.
Yeah
I
have
a
question
yeah,
so
considering
the
text
Amendment
proposal
from
the
county,
Saint,
Helena,
Island
I,
think
one
part
of
that
is
that
private
development
agreements
would
be
permitted
and
they
are
not
now,
and
that
means
that
this
kind
of
data
would
be
excluded,
correct
or
not.
Correct
private
development
agreements
between
the
county
and
the
developer.
H
H
No
any
project
coming
forward
if
it
if
it
was
covered
by
a
development
agreement,
I
mean
the
graves
property,
pepper,
Hall.
Those
are
covered
by
a
development
agreement
that
those
projects
are
up
on
the
website.
M
If
I
went
and
and
where,
for
example,
is
Pine,
Island,
LLC
right
or
Pine,
Island
Golf,
whatever
it's
it's
correct,.
H
Well,
the
the
pro
when
we're
practicing
the
process
when
these
projects
are
triggered-
and
this
is
something
that
we're
working
on,
especially
with
the
SRT,
is
until
they
receive
conceptual
approval.
We
have
a
two-stage
process
concept
and
final
until
they
receive
conceptual
we're
not
going
to
put
anything
on
the
site,
because
we
would
be
putting
on
a
plan
that
maybe
staff
would
be
recommending
changes
to,
and
we
don't
want
to
get
a
plan
out
there.
That
you
know
is
is
not
what.
A
A
I
have
a
question.
It
would
be
helpful
to
me
to
know
other
than
looking
at
the
videos
things
that
we
have
decided
here,
one
way
or
the
other
how
they
were
concluded
either
as
they
flow
through
community
services
and
land
use
committee
or
County
Council
is
there?
Could
there
be
a
subsection
in
there
of
issues
that
came
before
the
Planning
Commission
and
how
they
were
resolved?.
F
F
And
when
they
get
final
approval,
it
would
show
up
here.
Like
you
see,
right
here
is
the
stage
you
can
also
see
where
there's
a
problem
here.
If
we
just
got
approval,
it
would
be
here,
then
they
would
enter
stack,
design
review.
They
would
go
back
for
final
SRT
and
then
officially
improved.
That
then,
would
allow
them
to
get
stamped
drawings
to
go
to
Construction.
F
So
this
is
just
a
process
to
show
people
and
to
Showcase
those
projects
where
they
might
stand,
and
what
we
have
here
is
ones
that
have
been
approved,
ones
that
are
currently
in
a
review
required
staff
from
SRT
seminals,
which
are
development
projects
that
have
Architectural
Components
to
our
buildings
that
require
Architectural
Review.
That
is
what
this
website
is
for.
H
B
M
One
other
thing
Rob
so
on
the
panel
first
to
the
right,
where
the
blue
is
what
Mark
you
were
just
talking
about.
That's
the
end
of
the
timeline
of
this.
That
is
it.
It
does
not
take
in
to
follow
up
on
its
point.
It
does
not
take
into
account
if
it
went
before
the
Planning
Commission
and
the
planning
commissions
recommendation
or
whatever
it
it.
That's
the
end
of
the
timeline
it's
SRT
and
it
ends
there.
Is
that
correct.
H
Well,
it's
two
different
processes,
so
the
reason
we've
focused
on
these
are
projects
that
are,
you
know,
either
going
before
the
staff
review
team
or
the
design
review
boards.
Sure
that
doesn't
follow
the
same
path.
It
doesn't
go
to
the
Planning
Commission
or
to
County
Council.
These
things
are
done
at
the
staff
level,
with
some
appointed
boards
like
the
drb
right.
H
That's
the
reason
we
focus
on
this
is
because
getting
the
word
out
on
these
projects
is
sometimes
difficult
because
they're
at
the
staff
level-
and
this
gives
the
the
public
an
opportunity-
and
there
are
when
a
project
goes
to
the
design
review
board.
That's
a
public
meeting,
and
so
part
of
this
is
that
you
know
to
try
to
get
some
interest.
Are
we
rarely
have
public
at
those
meetings
and
this
might
increase?
You
know
people
are
able
to
see
what
projects
are
coming
up.
H
You
know
they
might
be
more
likely
to
come
out
to
those
meetings,
but
as
far
as
things
that
go
before
the
planning,
commissioner,
primarily
zoning,
a
map
and
text
amendments.
Those
are
you
know
you
can
track
those
through
the
agendas
for
the
the
community
community
service.
M
H
Of
course,
yes,
but.
M
Wait
one
other
question:
Rob:
oh
gosh,
I'm
afraid
it
having
a
senior
moment.
It'll
come
back
to
me,
move
forward.
J
All
right
I
would
like
to
know,
as
as
the
process
needs
to
be
updated.
How
long
does
it
normally
take
to
get
the
updates
in?
Is
that,
like
a
a
week,
delay
after
you
find
out
something
or
is.
J
A
F
Is
appreciate
your
skill,
but
the
planning
department
we
want
to
know
if
we
can
build
something,
but
after
we're
done
working
together
and
building
it,
that
we
as
an
apartment
would
be
able
to
manage
the
system.
And
the
answer
is
very
strong.
Yes,
and
so
we
now
that
they
have
built
it.
We
have
the
ability,
at
a
staff
level
without
hiring
an
outside
company
or
a
consultant,
to
completely
manage
this
system
and
then
go
to
Dan
and
his
team
when
we're
looking
at
maybe
adding
something
or
amending
something
we
don't
have
to
exactly.
K
K
G
H
To
two
people
Ian
had
to
leave
early,
but
the
gentleman
who
was
sitting
with
Dan.
He
did
a
lot
of
the
legwork
and
in
our
staff
and.
H
Is
Art
kudos
to
your
work
and
and
she'll
probably
give
me
a
rough
time
tomorrow,
but
Nancy
Moss
from
our
staff.
She
is
very
thorough
in
what
she
does
and
she's
been.
The
person
who
has
entered
the
information
and
I
think
that's
a
kind
of
points
to
both
how
well
our
GIS
Department
set
it
up,
because
she
doesn't
consider
herself
a
computer
expert,
but
she
was
able
to
enter
the
data
and
and
make
it
work.
So
I
think
we
have
a
really
good
system
that
that.
M
We
can
update
and
you'll
roll
it
out
publicly
have
the
communications
director
for
the
county.
M
M
Design
review
they
are
public,
I
know
that
design
review
board,
but
I
was
going
through
some
material
from
the
Planning
Commission
and
SRT,
and
it
said
some
of
the
SRT
meetings
are
not
open
to
the
public.
Correct,
they're,
private
yeah.
H
H
A
M
Right
I
just
would
not
want
people
which
had
the
expectation
as
members
of
the
public
or
interested
activists
to
have
the
expectation
that
SRT
meetings
are
open
to
the
public.
I
mean
I
I
understand
why
they
are
not.
But
that's
why
I
want
to
clarify.
H
Come
yes
because
I've
come
to
some
of
them
and
we
have
we've
allowed
people,
but
you
can't
comment
and,
and
the
reason
and
I
know
that
sounds
Draconian.
But
the
reason
is
that
at
that
point
people
are
following
you
know
the
you
know
the
things
that
are
in
the
codes
you
know
actual
metrics
and
so
whether
somebody
is
required
to
have
100
foot
buffer.
That's
something
that
it's
either
in
the
code
or
it
isn't.
You
know,
and
it's
not
you.
F
F
A
Right
well,
I
guess
we're
at
the
point
of
the
Chairman's
report.
I
just
have
a
couple
of
quick
things
in
recognition.
First
of
all,
I
want
to
welcome
Dennis
Ross
to
the
Planning
Commission,
taking
the
place
I
believe
of
Armand
wall
yeah.
A
So
thank
you
and
welcome,
and
we
look
forward
to
working
with
you
and
go
forward
with
the
training
with
you.
Thanks.
A
She
resigned
for
purposes
of
another
position
and
I
spoke
with
her
before
this
meeting
and
she
identified
that
her
candidacy
for
Director
of
Veterans
Affairs
for
Beaufort
County,
was
unanimously
approved
by
the
legis
State
Legislative
delegation
for
Beaufort
County
and
Jasper
County,
there's
still
some
other
issues
that
are
you
know,
being
dressed
in
terms
of
salary
and
so
on
and
so
forth.
But
congratulations
to
her
for
a
very
responsible
position
for
which
she
is
more
than
well
qualified.
A
We
will
miss
her
service
to
the
Planning
Commission,
but
we
applaud
her
service
to
the
veterans
of
Beaufort
County,
which
there
are
numerous
and
growing.
So
thank
you
very
much
Carolyn.
If
you're
tuning
into
this
thanks
and
I
want
to
thank
you
so
far
for
the
with
the
planning
department
for
the
comprehensive
Plan
update,
you're,
giving
us
I
know
it's
a
little
extra
work.