►
Description
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. FOIA – PUBLIC NOTIFICATION OF THIS MEETING HAS BEEN
PUBLISHED, POSTED, AND DISTRIBUTED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE
SOUTH CAROLINA FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT
4. ADOPTION OF AGENDA
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – May 26, 2022 & June 23, 2022
ACTION ITEMS
6. Mr. Wayne Willenberg is requesting a Special Use Permit for a Short-
Term Rental Unit. Property is located at 10 Quiet Cove Way, Ladys
Island. The property is zoned T2-Rural (T2R). Continued from Last
Month’s Meeting.
7. Public Comment (Comments Limited to Three (3) Minutes)
8. Mr. & Mrs. James Ware and Ms. Amanda Dubose are requesting an
Administrative Appeal from the Determination of the Planning
Director that states the Commercial Ferry Operation at 35 Fording
Island Road Ext. does not violate the Community Development Code.
Continued from Last Month’s Meeting.
9. No Public Comment.
10. Mr. John Fingar is requesting a Special Use Permit for a Short-Term
Rental Unit. Property is located at 6012 Morning Mist Drive,
Beaufort. The property is zoned T3-Hamlet Neighborhood (T3HN).
Continued from Last Month’s Meeting.
11. Public Comment (Comments Limited to Three (3) Minutes)
12. Mr. Mike Vaccaro is requesting a Variance from the River Buffer for a
Pool. Property is located at 3 Halandy Lane, Daufuskie Island. The
Property is zoned Haig Point Planned Unit Development (PUD)
13. Mr. Steve Mannon is requesting a Special Use Permit for a Short-Term Rental Unit. Property is located at 113
Sea Pines Drive, St. Helena Island. The property is zoned T2-Rural (T2R).
14. Public Comment (Comments Limited to Three (3) Minutes)
15. Mr. Ryan Hester is requesting a Special Use Permit for a Lodging, Short-Term Rental Unit. Property is located at
27 Mattis Drive, St. Helena Island. The property is zoned T2-Rural (T2R).
16. Public Comment (Comments Limited to Three (3) Minutes)
17. Mr. & Mrs. Greg Giardina are requesting a Special Use Permit for a Lodging, Short-Term Rental Unit. Property is
located at 48 Saltwind Drive, St. Helena Island. The property is zoned T2-Rural (T2R).
18. Public Comment (Comments Limited to Three (3) Minutes)
19. Mr. Bruce Beasley is requesting a Special Use Permit for a Lodging, Short-Term Rental Unit. Property is located
at 1044 Sea Island Parkway, St. Helena Island. The property is zoned T2-Rural Neighborhood (T2RN).
20. Public Comment (Comments Limited to Three (3) Minutes)
21. Mrs. Sally Rock is requesting a Special Use Permit for a Lodging, Short-Term Rental Unit. Property is located at
26 Pineland Avenue, St. Helena Island. The property is zoned T2-Rural (T2R).
22. Public Comment (Comments Limited to Three (3) Minutes)
23. Ms. Heather Baldwin is requesting a Special Use Permit for a Lodging, Short-Term Rental Unit. Property is
located at 80 Sea Pines Drive, St. Helena Island. The property is zoned T2-Rural (T2R). (Removed per Applicant’s
Request).
24. Public Comment (Comments Limited to Three (3) Minutes)
25. Mr. & Mrs. Howard are requesting an Administrative Appeal to the Determination of the Zoning Administrator
to not grant a Dock Permit for a dock that is over 300-feet and located on a Small Tidal Creek. The property is
located at 199 Fripp Point Road, St. Helena Island. (Deferred per Applicant’s Request)
26. No Public Comment
27. Ms. Cheryl Powell is requesting a Special Use Permit for a Short-Term Rental Unit. Property is located at
3008 Cypress Street, Beaufort. The property is zoned T3-Hamlet Neighborhood (T3-HN). (Removed per
Applicant’s Request)
28. Public Comment (Comments Limited to Three (3) Minutes)
29. Mr. Neil Turner is requesting an Administrative Appeal to the Decision to revoke a Zoning Permit at the
Turner’s Marina property for Security Gates. The property is located at 43 Jenkins Road, Hilton Head Island.
The property is zoned C3-Neighborhood Mixed Use (C3-NMU). (Deferred per Applicant’s Request)
30. No Public Comment
Zoning Board of Appeals Agenda – Beaufort County, SC
31. Mr. Jonathan Best is requesting a Variance from Division 4.1.270.A Vehicle Services – Auto Painting/Body Shop
250-feet from any existing residential development, school, or day care. The property is located at 1498
Fording Island Road, Bluffton. The property is zoned C5-Regional Center Mixed Use (C5-RCMU).
32. Public Comment (Comments Limited to Three (3) Minutes)
DISCUSSION ITEMS
33. OLD BUSINESS
34. NEW BUSINESS
35. ADJOURNMENT
A
D
E
C
A
If
we
go
ahead
and
get
started,
I
mean
by
the
time
you
get
there,
we
should
be
up
and
running,
hopefully,
and
again,
it's
our
custom
that
we
begin
our
meeting
by
reciting,
the
Pledge
of
Allegiance,
and
so,
if
I
can
ask
you
guys
to
stand
face,
it
bye
beside
the
pledge,
I
pledge
of
allegiance
to
the
flag
of
the
United
States
of
America
and
to
the
Republic
for
which
it
stands.
One
nation
under
God
indivisible
with
liberty
and
justice
for
all.
Thank
you.
A
Adoption
of
the
agenda
of
the
amended
agenda
so
moved
second,
so
it's
been
probably
made
in
a
second
all
in
favor,
bye
I
approved
the
gender,
our
May
26th
and
June
23rd
meeting
the
May
26
meeting
have
I
think
everyone
was
here
for
that.
For
me,
everyone
had
a
chance
to
look
at
it.
All
right
can
I
get
someone
to
make
a
motion
to
adopt
the
May
26th
meeting.
A
So
probably
made
a
second
all
in
favor
that
was
here
to
adopt
the
June
23rd
meeting
and
we
note
that
Miss,
Jane
and
Miss
who's
wasn't
here
on
that
June
23rd
meeting.
All
right.
Moving
to
item
number
six
note
that
all
applicants
have
10
minutes
to
present
their
case
attorneys
would
give
you
15
minutes
and
no
public
comment.
You
have
up
to
three
minutes.
A
A
A
A
So
it's
been
motion's
been
made
to
disapprove
item
number
six
and
it's
been
properly
made
in
second,
all
in
favor
of
disapproving
the
item
number
six,
especially
useful,
Mr
Wayne
willingberg.
Second,
five
areas
in
your
hand,
thank
you.
So
that
has
been
disapproved
item
number
eight
Mr
and
Mrs
James,
Ware
I
believe
they're
going
to
be
presented
by
Mr
Tom
Taylor.
H
Good
afternoon
nice
to
see
all
of
you
all
again,
I
am
here
today
very
very
proudly,
to
represent
36
homeowners
in
the
Buckingham
sanitation
neighborhood,
which
is
one
of
Beaufort,
County's
oldest
and
most
unique
neighborhoods
located
at
the
base
of
the
Hilton
Head
Island
Bridges.
Everybody
here,
hopefully,
has
seen
it
and
knows
a
little
bit
about
the
history
of
it.
It's
just
an
incredibly
unique
area.
H
Five
years
ago,
the
residents
of
Buckingham
Landing
came
to
the
County's
Aid
and
graciously,
and
over
open-armedly
welcomed
the
emergency
necessity
of
placing
the
daufusky
island
ferry
terminal
in
their
neighborhood.
They
were
promised
by
County
agents
and
by
County
council
members
that
it
was
going
to
be
a
temporary
basis
and,
like
sometimes
happens,
what
was
temporary
turned
into
being
long-term
and
now
appears
to
be
on
the
way
to
almost
five
years
down
the
line.
This
small
neighborhood
is
literally
overwhelmed
with
tourists
and
dafuskie
Island,
a
few
defusky
Island
residents
who
actually
use
the
ferry
service.
H
It
is
by
far
and
away
Hague
Point's
main
source
of
income
is
their
tourists
that
they
bring
through
there
and
we're
going
to
show.
If
you
will
in
a
few
minutes
some
pictures
that
I
think
will
give
you
all
a
little
bit
of
an
idea
of
what
has
happened
over
the
last
five
years.
I
have
provided
you
all
with
both
an
initial
application
and
a
supplement.
I
am
going
to
try
to
not
get
off
point
and
talk
about
what
I
think
has
been
some
intentional
slowing
down
by.
H
Don't
I,
don't
need
to
go
into
y'all
I
know
have
read
the
application
we
made
on
behalf
of
the
neighborhood
association,
a
request
in
March
of
2021
for
a
determination.
It
took
six
weeks
for
the
County's
attorney
staff
to
finally
say
we're
not
going
to
basically
tell
you
you
can
read
it.
We
then
filed
suit.
H
Last
last
June
on
behalf
of
the
36
Property
Owners,
the
county
moved
to
dismiss
it
saying
that
we
had
not
adequately
exhausted
our
administrative
remedies,
judge
goodstein,
tossed
that
and
said
no
there's
a
provision
within
the
code
that
allows
them
to
continue.
But
as
a
matter
of
Last
Resort,
we
filed
this
application
and
went
to
the
well
first.
We
went
to
the
county
and
asked
them
for
an
interpretation,
and
we
asked
Mr
Merchant
to
look
at
it
and
to
determine
that.
H
I
H
H
Sir,
all
right
Mr
Mack,
if
I,
could
just
to
perfect
the
record
I'd
like
it
to
be,
we
would
just
call
it
the
proffer
I.
The
only
thing
I
intended
to
ask
Mr,
Matt
or
excuse
me,
Mr
Merchant,
was
of
his
September
20th
21
letter
to
me.
He
had
indicated
that
the
county
would
need
this
time
60
days
to
contact
all
the
appropriate
parties,
gather
all
the
evidence
and
make
careful
review
of
all
the
facts.
H
Clearly
that
is
not
the
case,
and
if
you
all
read
the
supplemental
memorandum,
you'll
know
that
the
actual
finding
by
this
zboa
in
2008
was
that
it
was
the
commercial
restaurant
that
was
the
use
of
the
property.
The
dock
is
not
a
land
use
in
itself.
It
is
solely
associated
with
and
related
to
the
business
of
the
land.
H
It
serves,
in
other
words,
as
an
amenity
to
the
restaurant,
but
does
not
involve
any
independent
commercial
use,
and
then
the
last
and
most
important
thing
that
was
in
this
board's
variance
of
which
the
county
now
relies
is
the
provision
that
the
dock
is
an
incidental
amenity
or
practice.
This
variance
as
granted
is
not
a
use
variance.
This
board
never
gave
a
use
variance
for
that
property.
That
property
is
zoned
residential.
H
Out
of
this
is
a
slap
in
the
face
literally
to
the
residents,
but
they
went
ahead
and
have
gone
with
it,
and
we
are
here
today
begging
this
board
to
look
at
this
and
under
understand
that,
as
with
any
of
the
historic
neighborhoods
in
Beaufort
County,
we
have
worked
over
the
years
to
try
to
protect
them.
The
Buckingham,
Landing
Community
preservation
plan
provides
this
is
the
it
is.
H
The
essence
of
this
to
the
intent
of
this
plan
is
to
conserve
the
existing
residential
neighborhood
and
to
improve
the
quality
of
life
and
public
safety
for
their
residents.
This
is
a
residential
neighborhood.
There
are
five.
There
are
five
commercial
uses
like
a
bed
and
breakfast
and
the
four
other
ones
that
are
cited
in
here,
but
guys
this
is
Way,
Beyond,
anybody's
use
and
anybody
would
ever
have
envisioned
for
this
to
have
been.
K
I
Chair
German,
my
interest
is
not
authentication
again,
I
would
object
to
using
these
photographs.
This
is
not
the
proper
procedure
on
administrative
appeal.
This
would
be
new
material
does
not
comply
with
the
five-day
rule
in
this
board's
rules
of
procedure
or
submission
of
supplemental
materials
to
the
board
in
advance
of
a
meeting.
This
is
these:
are
brand
new
materials
I've
not
even
seen
them
and
objective
Mr
Taylor
presenting
them
tonight.
A
H
H
I
Mr
chair
members
of
the
board,
this
is
my
first
appearance
before
you
and
so
I
think,
just
very
quickly.
I'd
like
to
tell
you
a
little
bit
about
me.
My
name
is
Danny
Crowe
I'm,
a
lawyer
in
Colombia
I've,
been
a
lawyer
since
1975.
I've
been
representing
municipalities
and
counties
since
1977,
focusing
on
zoning
and
Licensing
issues
I'm.
Currently,
the
City
attorney
for
Casey
The,
General
Counsel
for
city
of
Sumter
and
formerly
general
counsel
for.
I
Now
I
was
one
of
the
blessed
and
lucky
ones
who
had
a
mild
version,
but
I
do
appreciate
your
thoughtfulness
and
continuing
that
hearing
in
June.
Also
Mr
chairman
I
would
like
to
State
for
the
record
my
objection
to
the
materials
submitted
by
Mr
Taylor
that
are
not
based
that
are
not
the
materials
that
were
available
to
the
administrative
agent,
the
planning
director
in
rendering
his
initial
decision
as
I
understand
Community
Development
code,
section
7-7.3.70.
This
appeal
is
limited
to
consideration
of
such
materials,
as
were
considered
by
the
administrative
official
in
the
decision.
I
Therefore,
any
supplemental
materials
would
not
be
appropriate
for
consideration
by
this
board
in
the
event
that
it
also
becomes
an
issue
I'd
like
to
object
in
advance
to
any
attempt
for
a
show
of
hands
or
standing
or
similar
demonstration
of
support
for
the
applicants
here.
That
would
be
inappropriate
and
not
proper
argument
as
well:
the
April
21
2022.
We
have
a
photograph
just
for
general
information
if
you
could
bring
that
up,
not
as
evidence
but
just
to
show
the
board
the
location
of
this
property.
This
property
is
at
35,
40,
Island
Road
in
Bluffton.
I
It
is
just
off
Highway
278
at
the
bridge,
from
Bluffton
to
Hilton
Head
Island.
If
you
look
down
to
the
right
with
a
slightly
different
perspective,
this
is
what
you'd
see
the
sauce
are
shaped.
Buildings
are
the
former
restaurant
that
you've
heard
about
the
White
Road
that
comes
down
the
from
the
left
corner
to
the
middle
of
the
photograph
is
fording
Island
Road,
that's
a
state
maintained
Road.
It
terminates
in
a
public
boat
landing
which
has
been
present
there
for
many
decades,
formerly
I
understand
in
the
past.
I
This
was
the
site
of
a
ferry
to
Hilton
Head
before
the
bridges.
Apparently,
the
the
docket
issue
is
shown
jutting
out
from
the
circular
shape
and
the
upper
middle
down
the
walkway
of
300
feet
to
the
dock.
That
shows
another
boat
present
there.
Now
the
house
of
the
Wares
is
on
the
left
edge
of
the
photograph.
I
Sir,
just
that
and
all
that's
just
for
orientation,
the
parking
that
you
see
presumably
is
used
for
the
public
boat
landing,
as
well
as
for
the
ferry
service.
The
this
property
that's
shown
on
the
upside
of
a
Ford
Island,
fording,
Island
Road
excuse
me,
is
owned
now
by
the
county,
has
been
owned
by
the
county
since
2018..
I
That's
just
for
orientation
again
and
not
for
evidence.
The
April,
21
2022
determination
by
Mr
Merchant
as
director
of
the
planning
and
zoning
department,
is
concise.
It's
clear
and
it's
correct.
It
contains
no
error
and
should
be
affirmed
by
this
board.
The
determination
says
this
property,
which
was
subsequently
acquired
by
the
county,
has
a
County
zoning
permit
for
a
commercial
dock.
The
zoning
permit
is
consistent
with
the
ocrm
construction
and
DOT
permit
on
page
two
of
which
it
states
the
the
permit
is
for
commercial
use
and
the
docking
of
boats.
I
Importantly,
the
County
zoning
permit,
although
it
has
a
space
as
you'll,
see
for
conditions,
state
snow
conditions,
except
that
it's
issued
pursuant
to
the
zoning
board
decision
in
2008
and
in
accord
with
the
ocrm
permit,
has
no
other
conditions
about
the
circumstances.
Under
which
the
permit
is
to
operate,
it
contains
no
restrictions,
no
limitations,
no
expiration
date,
as
pointed
out
by
Mr
Merchant
in
his
April
letter,
a
variance
permit
such
as
this
runs
with
the
land
under
Section
7.2.140
e
of
the
CDC.
I
It
is
not
affected
by
subsequent
change
of
ownership,
so
the
county
gets
the
benefit
of
the
commercial
doc
permit
issued
by
the
county.
When
a
private
party
owned
this
property,
the
County
zoning,
permit
importantly,
is
not
conditioned
on
any
language
of
the
zoning
board.
Order
of
2008
it
could
have
been.
It
could
have
said
this
permit
to
be
used
in
accord
with
the
findings
of
the
zoning
board's
order
of
2008.
I
It
does
not
say
that
when
we
blow
away
the
smoke
from
this
appeal
and
I'm
talking
about
the
applicants,
comments
about
Mr
Merchant
comments
about
his
procedure
for
the
determination,
their
comments
about
me.
Their
references
to
County
lies
and
collusion
between
me
and
Mr
Merchant,
and
the
lack
of
good
faith
by
the
county.
I
When
you
blow
away
that
smoke
and
when
you
remove
the
mirrors,
such
as
the
references
to
the
community
District
zoning
and
the
community
preservation
plan,
which
were
in
effect
and
known
to
the
Zoning
Board
in
2008,
when
it
granted
the
variance
permit
for
a
commercial
dock,
if
you
remove
those
mirrors,
if
you
disregard
this
kind
of
scorched
Earth
language
of
the
litigation,
this
vitriolic
language
about
lies
and
collusion,
lack
of
good
faith.
What
you
are
left
with
is
a
valid
County
zoning
permit
for
a
commercial
dock.
I
That's
what
this
case
really
comes
down
to
when
you
strip
away
all
these
irrelevant
factors.
This
board
cannot
and
should
not.
Now,
13
years
after
the
permit
was
issued,
modify
that
permit
by
either
dissecting
the
language
of
the
order
as
the
appellants
would
urge,
or
by
tying
it
to
a
restaurant
use
for
the
property
that
formerly
was
a
restaurant.
These
were
not
conditions
that
were
placed
on
the
permit
by
the
Zoning
Board
in
2008.
Again,
they
could
have
been,
but
they
were
not.
I
This
is
not
a
situation
in
which
consideration
of
non-conforming
uses
involved,
because
the
dark
and
the
commercial
purposes
of
the
dock,
as
described
in
the
ocrm
permit,
are
expressly
permitted
by
the
variance
permit.
So
the
idea
of
non-conforming
use
does
not
apply.
Similarly,
consideration
of
whether
this
restaurant
use
was
discontinued
is
not
relevant,
because
this
is
not
a
non-conforming
use
issue.
I
This
appeal
is
not
about
whether
the
restaurant
use
was
discontinued,
but
it's
about
whether
the
zoning
permit
for
a
commercial
dock
remains
valid,
and
it
does
also
I
think
it's
important
to
mention
that
this
is
not
a
situation
of
the
county.
Taking
advantage
of
a
neighborhood
in
the
wake
of
Hurricane
Matthew
in
2016,
action
was
required
to
maintain
the
ferry
service
to
defusky
Island.
I
The
County
zoning
permit
and
the
OCR
in
permit
or
a
commercial
doc,
allow
the
dock
to
be
utilized
for
commercial
purposes.
That
is
the
effect
of
the
zoning
board's.
2009
variance
permit
the
County
planning
and
zoning
department
requests
that
this
board
uphold
the
determination
of
Mr
Merchant
that
the
ferry
service
is
a
lawful
use
because
of
that
County
zoning
permit.
I
M
See
Dennis
Neal,
it's
nice
to
see
you
I
live
not
very
far
from
there,
so
I'm
kind
of
familiar
with
with
the
area
when
the
people
who
come
to
get
on
the
ferry.
This
is
not
exactly
right.
Next
to
where
people
live,
is
it,
that
is,
they
would
have
to
walk
from
where
they
Park
a
half
a
half
a
block
on
whatever
to
someone's
home,
which
they
should
not
do.
M
I
mean
I'm,
not
saying
that,
but
I
don't
know.
If
there
was
any
problem
when
the
restaurant
you
know
was
there
was,
did
it
bother
the
people
in
the
community?
I,
don't
know
you
know
so.
I
I
don't
see
where,
where
the
community
is
being
overwhelmed
by
the
by
the
picture
and
by
the
area,
if
the
people
walk
over
to
it,
yes
I
understand
that,
and
maybe
there
should
be
some
kind
of
signs
or
punishment
or
something
for
them
to.
You
know:
walk
over
on
somebody's
private
property.
M
K
H
M
H
M
They
could
be
yes,
whether
they
were
or
not,
I,
don't
know,
but
any
any
time
you
have
some
kind
of
a
business,
a
commercial
business.
That's
not
very
far
from
a
residential
area.
People
are
gonna
walk
and
that's
not
good
I'm,
certainly
not
advocating
that,
and
maybe
there
should
be
some
kind
of
you
know
not
offense,
but
some
kind
of
a
thing
to
say.
You
know
this
is
private
property
and
you
cannot
come
on
it.
You
know
what
you
know.
What
I'm
saying.
H
Yes,
I
do
the
county
will
admit.
Mr
Nielsen
I
believe
that
the
restaurant
is
all
is
in
the
Buckingham
Landing
preservation
district
and
is
a
residential
zoning,
except
for
the
bootstrapping
that
they
want
this
board
to
buy
into
it
is
all
residential.
And
yes,
they
were
not
happy
with
the
restaurant
and
I'm
sure.
There
were
plenty
who
were
glad
when
they
abandoned
it.
H
H
What
has
happened
is
the
county
has
entered
into
money,
making
contracts
with
Hague
point
and
more
than
90
percent
of
the
people
they
are
moving
are
paying
tourists
whose
money
goes
into
Hague
Point's
pocket
and
who
then
pay
the
county
a
portion
for
that
contract.
But
that's
really
the
guts
of
this.
If
this
was
just
the
fusky
island
people,
these
neighbors
would
not
have
a
problem
with
it.
H
H
F
H
Mr
chairman,
the
commercial
operation
should
not
be
going
on
in
the
neighborhood,
but
this
neighborhood
graciously
allowed
it
to
be
used,
and
they
have
done
so
and
I
guess,
I'm
speaking
for
them,
and
maybe
I
shouldn't
I'm
just
saying
that
if
it
was
truly
those
people
from
defusky
who
don't
have
to
pay
Miss
whose
money
actually
because,
if
you're
a
resident
of
dafusky,
it's
part
of
what
the
county
services
are
for,
dafusky
I
believe
still.
It
was
when
I
set
up
there,
but
it's
the
tourists
who
pay
the
money.
But
you
know
Mr
judgment.
H
We
certainly
do
not
believe
the
ferry
should
be
running
from
there.
One
of
the
things
that
I
didn't
say
but
which
is
Incorporated
in
here
of
course,
is
under
the
county.
Cdc
Pinckney
island
is
designated
as
the
ferry
terminal
point
it's
written
in
the
ordinance
and
that's
where
at
least
it
should
be.
M
Well,
yeah,
the
lawyer:
oh
cool,
yeah,
I'm.
Sorry,
yes,
I'm!
Sorry,
I'm!
Sorry,
forgive
me,
please
I'm!
Sorry,
I
get
all
right!
I
get
confused!
My
question
is:
is
that
I
believe
that
the
permit
was
issued
when
in
2017?
Is
that
correct?
Something
like
that?
When
was
it
the
permit?
The
apartment
was
issued
in
2009
2009.
M
M
I
So
there
was
not
a
need
to
use
another
embarkation,
debarkation
Point
before
Hurricane
Matthew
hit
the
point
that
was
being
used
for
the
ferry
at
that
time
in
February
of
2017,
the
service
relocated
to
Buckingham
Landing,
with
a
lease
between
the
ferry
operator
and
Mr
Roller,
who
you've
heard
about
who
owned
the
property.
At
that
time,
the
property,
the
roller
property
then
went
into
foreclosure.
I
J
I
M
The
works,
however,
it's
a
difficult
answer
to
it.
However,
if
you
are
a
a
resident
there-
and
there
is
somewhat
of
a
of
a
period
that
it's
going
to
be
some
other
place,
they
they
may
be
more
willing
to
accept
it
than
if
they
have
no
idea.
You
know
it
could
be
a
hundred
years
from
now
that
that
you
changed
the
dock.
You
know
what
I'm
saying,
in
other
words,
it's
like
putting
out
we're
gonna
we're
gonna
move
it.
M
You
know,
that's
the
County's
plan,
you
know
so
well,
you
can
tolerate
it
till
you
move
it,
but
if
you
don't
know
when
you're
going
to
move
it
and
that
could
be
25
years,
that
ain't
gonna
that
ain't
gonna
work
too
well
for
the
residents.
However,
you
know
if
you
do
move
it
say
in
a
reasonable
amount
of
time,
the
residents
may
be
less.
I
I
do
appreciate
what
you're
saying
those
efforts
are
underway.
I
don't
want
to
get
into
too
much.
There
has
been
some
public
action
by
the
County
council
with
regard
to
those
locations
and
finding
other
locations
is
underway.
I
can
say
that
I
know
the
county
would
like
to
have
moved
more
quickly
as
well.
I
do
want
to
respond
to
one
thing:
I'm
advised
that
the
county
pays
for
this
public
ferry
service
to
the
ferry
operators.
I
C
I
have
a
question
you
are
relying
on
the
doc
permit
that
was
issued
by
ocrm,
which
is
a
state
agency
that
says
it's
a
commercial
doc,
but
our
document
from
the
variance
says
that
it's
just
it's
not
a
use,
variance
and
that
the
dock
is
incidental
to
the
use
of
the
restaurant
and
I
think
that
we
should
rely
on
our
own
zoning
board
of
appeals
action
instead
of
what
was
written
on
the
ocrm
permit,
which
was
probably
not
coordinated.
With
the
zoning
board
of
appeals
ruling
I.
I
Do
thank
you
I
understand
exactly
what
you're
saying
we
are
relying
on
the
County
zoning
permit,
which
should
be
in
your
it's.
The
third
document.
Under
the
information
the
planning
director
reviewed
that
zoning
permit
has
a
place
for
conditions.
It
refers
to
the
zbo
zboa's
approval
of
the
dot
variants
on
July
24
2008
for
the
ocrm
permit.
C
C
I
J
I
I
And
I
wouldn't
go
that
far.
There
is
no
restriction
on
the
OCR
M.
It
says
on
page
the
second
page
of
the
ocrm
permit
document,
not
the
actual
construction
permit.
It
says
the
purpose
of
this
work
is
stated
by
the
applicant
is
for
commercial
use
and
the
docking
of
boats
so,
and
that
was
the
application
before
the
bcoa
in
2008
by
roller.
At
that
time
it
was
for
that
commercial
use,
a
commercial
dock
that
was
that
was
I,
think
clear,
so
the
the
as
pointed
out
by
Mr
Merchant
and
his
determination
in
April.
I
This
was
a
validly
issued
zoning
permit
for
our
commercial
doc.
It
was
consistent
with
the
ocrm.
It
was
not
tied
to
the
language
of
the
order
of
the
bzoa.
There
were
no
conditions
or
restrictions
or
limitations
put
on
it
by
the
permit
or
by
the
order
are
directed
by
the
order
of
the
bzoa
to
be
put
on
the
permit.
So
it's
a
valid
permit.
That's
still
in
effect,
and.
A
F
M
N
I
My
view
is
that
that
would
be
the
effect
of
this
variance
permit.
That
was
granted
this
this
permit
for
our
commercial
dock,
so
it
was
granted
by
because
the
purpose
of
a
commercial
dock
would
be
commercial
purposes.
That's
the
ocrm
definition
of
commercial
Dock
and
that's
sort
of
the
rational,
reasonable
relationship.
So
in
granting
the
variance
in
2008,
the
zoning
board
allowed
a
commercial
Dock
and
then
allowed
commercial
uses
for
the
doctor.
This
is
a
highly
unusual
situation.
N
I
N
I
J
N
Court
of
appeals
decision
in
helker
is,
as
that
use
being
determined
by
what's
primary
to
to
the
property,
and
it
seems
the
County's
taking
the
position
that,
because
the
commercial
dock
was
granted,
it
could
makes
all
the
other
stuff
feel
relevant
effectively.
The
abandonment
of
the
purpose-
and
everything
is
to
that.
What's
the
point
of
having
any
of
the.
N
You're,
relying
on
the
zoning
boards
of
P
decision
to
Grant
the
permit
when,
in
that
order,
we
expressly
state
that
hey.
This
is
not.
This
permit
is
not
granted.
The
variance
is
not
granted
as
a
use
variance
and
that
the
dock
is
just
incidental
to
it,
but
it
kind
of
feels
like
a
trojan
horse
there
well.
I
I
think-
and
this
is
a
good
question
but
I
think
it's
clear-
that
the
zoning
Board
in
2008
could
have
said
when
it
granted
the
permit.
The
granting
of
this
permit
is
conditioned
on
the
continued
activity
of
the
restaurant.
It
did
not
do
that,
so
you
have
a
commercial
doc
permit
that
stands
alone
and
is
valid.
That's
the
situation.
A
A
N
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
L
L
N
L
C
F
L
He
was
issued
as
a
County
permit.
You
know
so.
There's
no
CRM
permit
for
the
doc,
there's
also
a
County
permit
for
the
doc
and
the
reason
that
the
county
issues
a
permit
is
that
we
have
a
doc
ordinance
that
governs
on
small
title
Creeks,
both
the
maximum
length
that
the
dock
could
be,
but
it
also
restricts
commercial
stocks
on
small
title
creatures,
and
that
is
what
the
zboa
in
their
decision
in
2008
allowed
for
a
commercial
dock
in
that
location.
So.
L
Because
that
what
that
determination
was
made
to
a
variance,
it
has
a
different,
we
do
not
treat
that
as
the
same
way.
We
would
treat
a
use
in
a
use,
there's
a
certain
period
of
Abandonment
and
then
that
non-conforming
use
ceases.
You
know
it
no
longer
exists
with
the
commercial
dock,
which
was
issued
under
a
variance
variance,
goes
with
the
property
and
there,
unless
there's
conditions
stipulated
the
the
variance
that
that
permission
as
a
commercial
doc
does
not
go
away
regardless
of
of
whether
there's
a
period
when
it's
not
being
used.
L
We
looked
at
the
action
of
the
zboa
in
the
minutes
and
we
looked
at
the
the
County's
permit
and
I
spoke
with
Hillary
Austin
about
the
nature
of
the
order
and
from
my
understanding
that
order
is
meant
to
justify
the
decision
of
the
zboa.
But
it
is,
but
no,
the
cboa
in
2008
placed
no
conditions
on
the
issuance
of
that
variance
and
there's
no
conditions
in
the
County
permit.
L
L
N
L
L
A
L
I
The
next
move
by
the
planning
director
would
be
to
move
for
reconsideration
by
the
board,
if
that
fails
to
appeal
the
board
decision
to
the
Circuit
Court
and
move
to
stay,
the
litigation
pending
the
outcome
of
the
appeal
to
Circuit
Court
of
the
this
board's
decision.
So
it
would
be
even
more
interlaced
with
the
lawsuit.
If
that
were
the
result,.
H
A
N
A
N
A
Okay,
so
there's
a
motion
on
the
floor
to
reverse
and
it's
been
second,
so
all
in
favor
of
the
motion,
that's
on
the
floor.
So
so,
when
we
reverse,
and
just
out
of
clarity
that
doesn't
send
the
this
this
case
back
to
the
county,
when
we
reverse
it
that
just
we
we
don't,
we
make
Clarity
on
on
those
seven.
What
is
the
seven
steps
that
that
they
should
be
considering?
N
A
A
I
A
Q
All
right
good
evening,
ladies
and
gentlemen,
my
name
is
Mike
Vaccaro
I'm,
representing
Craig
and
Kelly
Turner.
They
are
my
clients
I'm
an
architect.
I
live
and
work
in
Beaufort
County
I'm,
a
Hilton
Head
based
architect,
I've,
been
here
for
I've,
moved
to
Hilton
Head
in
2001
and
opened
my
practice
in
2003,
with
a
focus
on
funny
enough
to
fusky
Island,
hopefully
not
as
controversial
as
this
last
item.
Q
One
was
built
I
believe
in
the
late
80s
late
90s,
it's
a
strange
little
hammock
I
mean
the
the
whole
little
island
is,
you
know
less
than
a
couple
acres
and
it
really
is
affected
by
the
increase
in
the
ocrm
setback
requirements
that
have
occurred
over
the
years,
the
when
the
when
the
project
was
plaited.
Originally
the
setbacks
were
20
feet
now,
the
now
the
buffer
is
60
feet
and
I.
Think
that
you
guys
this
is.
This
is
my
first
time
in
front
of
this
board,
so
forgive
any
protocol
issues.
Q
I
think
you
guys
have
probably
seen
you
know.
Many
people
come
in
with
wanting
a
pool
and
going
past
the
buffer,
and
all
of
that
this
and
I've
been
involved
in
some
of
those.
In
the
past
too,
and
I've
worked
with
Hillary
on
other
projects
and
I've.
You
know
my
intention
is
always
to
keep.
You
know,
keep
those
pools
well
well,
past
the
buffer,
and
you
know
20
plus
years,
I've,
never
brought
a
project.
You
know
in
front
of
this
board
for
requesting
the
buffer
variants
until
this
one.
Q
Q
Q
The
zoning
is
clear
in
in
what
they
State
and
this
you
know
this
is.
This
is
a
a
very
clear
case
in
the
zoning.
Clearly
states
that
you
need
to
have
you
know
an
excessive
burden
to
to
ask
for
these
pools
or
ask
for
variance
of
the
buffer
and
and
I
understand
the
importance
of
the
river
buffer.
You
know
for
for
runoff
and
drainage
and
as
an
architect
I'm
looking
at
designing
these
projects.
Q
Q
Q
Q
One
is
because
I
you
know
I'd
have
to
start
getting
Hague
Point
setback
variances,
and
then
we
get
into
the
ocrm
setback
on
the
south
side
of
the
island
which,
on
on
the
on
lot,
one
I
came
in
2020
and
we
had
you
know
we
had
that
issue
on
the
South
Side
and
speaking
with
Hillary
about
this.
You
know
she.
She
basically
said
in
Hillary.
You
know
we'll
speak
up
if
I
were
to
push
the
house
back
they'd
be
there
would
be
from
the
zoning
board.
Q
You
know
we
pushed
the
pool
back
so
I.
It
really
didn't
want
to
make
like
an
L-shaped
house
and
ask
for
a
variance
on
the
house,
because
you
know
quite
frankly,
Common
Sense
tells
me
that
that
creates
a
lot
more
runoff
and
you
know
the
purpose
of
the
OCR
and
buffer.
You
know
not
only
the
vegetative
buffer,
but
you
know.
Q
In
my
understanding
and
practices
is
for
the
runoff
into
the
waterways,
and
you
know
where
we
set
this
house
and
pool
I,
think
you
know
from
a
professional
standpoint:
I've
been
working
at
hay
Point
since
2004.,
you
know,
I've
done
40
houses
there
I'm
very
familiar
with
this
specific
parcel,
these
specific
houses.
You
know
this
this
little
specific
hammock.
Q
Q
It's
not
I.
Don't
feel
that
this,
if
you
were
to
Grant
this
variance,
it
does
not
negatively
impact
either
of
the
two
neighbors.
In
fact
the
neighbor
to
the
west.
This
pool
is
in
line
with
their
pool
and
that
I
don't
know.
You
know
I
think
that
was
that
house
was
built
in
the
90s
and
it
was
you
know,
I,
don't
know
if
that
had
a
variance
or
anything,
but
you
know
there's
a
pool
there.
Now
the
house
to
the
east
is
past,
where
the
pool
would
be
so.
Q
Q
C
Q
Q
Q
Yeah
yeah,
the
the
50
foot
length
for
is,
is
a
part
of
that
50
foot
length
is
the
18
feet
of
the
width.
So
you
know,
you've
got
the
leg
of
the
L.
Is
the
the
full
length
is
50
feet?
The
you
can
kind
of
see
the
the
kind
of
the
traditional
rectangle
pool
is
is
set
there
and
then
the
the
leg
that
comes
off
is
32
feet
additional.
So
you
have
a
few.
You
end
up
with
a
50
foot
length
which
is
a
lap.
A
Q
Big,
the
big
thing
that
was
of
concern
you
know
to
me
in
designing
this-
wasn't
necessarily
minimizing
the
encroachment
in
the
setback.
It
was
doing
what's
right
for
this
island
itself.
This
neighborhood,
you
have
the
massing
of
the
tool,
so
I
could
have
I
mean
what
I
feel
that
we've
pushed
the
house
as
far
south,
as
is
practically
good
for
this
little
four
lot.
Neighborhood.
Q
J
Q
At
this
point,
it's
undetermined,
you
know
these
plans
are
schematic.
You
know
it
could
be
impervious
material.
The
in
you
know
the
pool
deck
is
going
to
be.
The
main
contributor
to
you
know,
hurting
the
runoff
situation,
and
you
know
we
I
would
work
with
the
county
and
my
clients
to
make
that
pool
deck.
You
know
of
a
previous
material
into
during
normal
conditions.
The
pool
itself
will,
you
know
not
contribute
to.
You
know
damaging
runoff.
Q
Q
That
that
deck
is
eight
feet
wide
and
it's
three
feet
wide
on
the
side
on
the
on
the
water
side
of
the
pool,
but
the
the
deck
itself,
the
sun,
the
sun
deck
part
of
the
deck
is
only
eight
feet
wide.
Could
you
narrow
that
up
bring
that
bowl
in
a
little
more
of
you
know,
obviously
anything
is
possible,
but,
yes
that
could
be
narrowed.
Q
R
C
Q
Hillary
informed
me
that
that
would
be
an
acceptable
variance,
but
the
pool
would
not
be
acceptable
and
I
mean
I
I
completely.
You
know
understand
on
you
know,
there's
there's
on
paper
and
then
there's
on
site,
and
you
know
it
this.
This
pool
is
about
the
same
size
as
the
neighbor
pool,
so
I
mean
you
kind
of
hear
the
gas
when
you
say
50
feet
or
you
know,
residents
are
cool
enough,
but
most
of
that
you
know
that
could
happen.
Q
You
know
whether
we
had
that
variance
or
not
it's
just
you
know.
Trying
to
get
sun
and
I
mean
I.
Think
the
big
issue
and
I
mean
Hillary,
told
me:
I
had
a
50
50
shot
of
getting
getting.
You
know
a
variance
approval
on
this
I
think
the
big
thing
would
be.
If
you
know
if
this
was
something
that
you'd
Grant,
the
variance
to
you
know,
one
caveat
would
be
to
you
know,
really
provide
extensive
mitigation
for
runoff
and
we
would,
you
know,
be
more
than
willing
to
do
anything
and
everything's
possible.
Q
Well,
I
mean
you
know
one
thing
that
we
had
to
do
on
lot:
one,
for
instance,
we
you
know
I
I
did
get
the
variance
on
not
one,
but
that
was
for
a
house
and
in
my
opinion,
a
house.
You
know
a
roof.
Runoff
is
much
worse
than
a
pool.
Runoff
I
mean
everything's
going
to
run
into
the
pool
on
a
on
a
typical
situation
and
get
filtered
out
through
the
pumps.
What
we
did
in
that
case
was
just
we
addressed
it
with
rain
Gardens.
Q
You
know
and
I
I,
don't
know
how
else
we
could
potentially
address
it,
but
I
mean
we
would
be
willing
to.
You
know
to
work
with
the
county
and
you
know
create
a
situation
where
we
didn't.
You
know
having
this
pool
in
this
particular
spot
within
this
particular
buffer
would
not
do
any
harm
to
you
know
the
Waterway
and
and
what
the
ocrm
buffer
is
intended
to.
When
did
your
clients
buy
the
property
I
believe
they
bought
it
in
2019
or
2020.?
So
the
buffers
were
definitely.
Q
And
when
I
started,
this
design
I
had
already
designed
the
house
on
lot
one
and
already
had
to
go
through
that
variance
process.
We
didn't
get
to
this
point.
It
was
the
zoning
committee
of
approved
that
variance
with
administratively
so
I
knew
that
I.
You
know,
I
knew
I
knew
in
this
project
that
there
was
a
good
chance
that
we'd
be
coming
to
this
meeting
and,
and
my
my
clients
have.
You
know
advised
me
that
they,
you
know,
would
like
to
see.
Q
You
know
what
our,
what
our
chances
are
and
I
mean
I
I,
guess
what
I'm
saying
is.
You
know,
I
understand
the
rules
and
I
understand
that
I'm
asking
for
a
variance,
but
I
just
you
know,
want
to
make
it
clear
that
my
opinion
as
an
architect
that
works
in
this
community-
and
that
is
you
know,
I've
been
on
this
land-
is
that
this
is
the
appropriate
sighting
and
appropriate
position
and
appropriate
design
for
this
parcel,
and
you
know,
I
would
like
to
work
in
any
way
to
mitigate
any
runoff.
Why.
Q
The
the
the
pool
is
designed
for
two
functions,
he's
got,
you
know
your
regular
swimming
pool,
which
is
of
average
size.
It's
you
know,
18
feet
is,
you
know,
I'd,
say
probably
16
to
20
feet
is
an
average
width
for
a
pool.
Nowadays,
in
my
experience
and
32,
feet
is
not
a
long
pool,
but
the
50-foot
kind
of
leg
that
goes
that
that
goes
into
the
house
is
for
swimming
labs
and.
C
Q
C
You
know
right
and
we
we
like
to
work
with
applicants
when
you're
in
a
tight
site,
but
we
like
you
to
work
with
us
too,
and
not
encroach
it
as
much
as
you
are
I
mean
I.
Think
that
there's
some
other
options
that
you
could
look
at
to
not
have
you
know,
quite
so
large
of
a
pool
or
reduce
the
debt,
show
us
how
you're
going
to
mitigate
it
with
previous
Paving.
Give
us
examples
of
what
it's
going
to
do.
Q
J
C
Q
Q
Q
You
know
my
clients
have
approved
it
that
it
doesn't.
You
know
it
doesn't
negatively
affect
the
the
two,
the
two
neighbors
but
I
need
to
mitigate.
You
know,
you
know,
of
course
it
could
get
smaller
and
it
could
get
eliminated
and
you
don't
have
any
any
variance
at
all.
But
you
know
just
knowing
the
knowing
the
parcel
you
know,
knowing
the
two
adjacent
houses
and-
and
you
know
considering
the
that
you
know
whatever
I
do-
is
going
to
require
a
variance.
A
A
Q
A
E
It
shows
no
hardship
for
this
pool.
There's
nothing.
This
pool
is
an
accessory
to
a
home,
and
the
home
is
the
most
important
thing
they
are
able
they're
supposed
to
be
able
to
build
a
home.
The
house
sits
at
50
feet
right
now,
but
this
huge
pool
is
sitting
23
feet
from
the
critical
line
taking
up
all
of
the
buffer
for
a
pool.
This
pool
can
be
redesigned,
maybe
even
move
it
to
30
feet
to
35
feet,
but
there's
no
hardship
for
a
pool.
It's
a
want.
E
E
A
A
C
Q
Q
Q
On
it
tonight,
well,
I
I
mean
I,
just
don't
have
the
confidence
and
I
don't
want
to
and
I
don't
want
to
risk
my
my
clients
Time
by
having
a
failed
vote
so
I
guess
what
I'd
propose
that
I'll
do
is
I'll.
You
know
I'll
go
back
and
see
if
I
can
compromise,
but
I
I.
Just
you
know,
I,
don't
know
how
much
of
a
compromise.
A
S
I
appreciate
this
is
Steve
Madden
here,
and
can
you
hear
me?
Okay,
yeah,
yes,
I
certainly
appreciate
the
board
providing
the
ability
to
have
this
meeting
it's
not
quite
as
efficient
as
being
there
and
if
you
could
be
there,
but
and
also
understand
that
it's
not
normal
protocol,
so
I
do
appreciate
the
board
being
able
to
have
it
so
we're
here
to
try
to
get
a
special
use
permit
for
short-term
rental
for
113
Pines
Drive,
but
over
in
Saint
Helena
Island.
S
So
we've
been
through
the
process
and
understand
that
the
staff
review
team
have
actually
reviewed
some
some
of
those
items
and
found
that
that
there
was
actually
a
covenant
over
in
Copperfield
area
that
we
weren't
aware
of
and
apologize
for
that.
You
know
when
we
bought
the
house,
we
weren't
married
declare
of
any
covenants.
Usually
when
you
have
an
HOA
or
something
of
that
nature.
You
know
they
present
those
covenants
and
things.
S
So
you
know
we
didn't
pay
any
HOA
fees
or
any
of
that
that
nature
so
wasn't
aware
that
there
were
covenants
not
not
to
be
an
excuse.
Actually,
when
we
filled
out
the
form,
there's
a
little
block
there
that
asks
hey.
Are
there
any
covenants
and
we
went
online
tried
to
find
some.
You
know
that
were
available
and
couldn't
find
any
in
the
public
either.
So
you
know
based
upon
what
the
previous
owners
had
stated
and
what
we
couldn't
find.
We
didn't
think
there
was
nonetheless
they're
they're.
S
S
If
I
look
at
the
Covenant
one
that
appears
to
be
of
issue,
it
states
about
whether
or
not
that
you
have
a
residential
that
all
tracks
of
land
and
coffin
Point
are
supposed
to
be
used
for
residential
agricultural
persons.
Only
and
no
structure
shall
be
placed
or
permitted
to
remain
on
any
lot
other
than
the
single
family,
dwelling
or
outbuilding
structures
designed
for
incidental
use
such
as,
and
they
give
examples
of
private
garage,
Guest,
House,
Greenhouse,
shed
house
or
war
of
which
there's
none
of
those
on
on
our
property,
so
I'm.
S
Assuming
that
they're
making
the
tie
that
you
know
by
doing
a
short-term
rental,
but
you
don't
need
the
criteria,
obviously
not
agriculture,
that
it
must
be
for
not
meet
the
term
residential
I.
Don't
know
if
there's
a
comment
on
that,
but
that's
what
I
can
only
assume,
because
I
think
when
we
meet
everything,
I
actually
think
I
meet
presidential
as
well.
N
C
S
S
Where
area
serves
as
a
residence
house
dwelling
or
Abode,
which
it
certainly
is,
so
you
know,
there's
no
tie
there
really
to
do
saying
a
short-term
rental
is
a
commercial
use,
so
I
think
I
still
meet
the
the
Covenant.
That's
there
and
you
know
when
you're
read
it.
It's
like
okay!
Well,
if
that's
the
kind
of
tie
that
you
want
to
make,
then
even
a
long-term
rental
you
know
would
fall
under
that
condition
that
you
couldn't
land
out
by
the
year.
You
know
so
I
realized.
T
A
S
E
The
way
short
term
lodging
short-term
rental
is
listed
in
our
ordinance.
It's
left
it's
not
listed
under
residential
uses,
it's
listed
under
offices
and
services
and
that's
listed
along
with
hotels,
bed
and
breakfasts.
So
we
consider
that
a
transient
use
of
commercial
use-
the
house
is
still
a
resident,
it's
still
a
house,
but
the
use
people
come
in
and
go
in
and
come
in
and
going
that's,
not
a
residential
use.
That's
a
commercial
use.
He
gets
a
business
license.
E
N
E
N
Question
well,
no
I,
just
I
think
I
have
a
different
interpretation
and
opinion
as
to
what
constitutes
and
how
the
how
the
courts
interpret
what
a
case
law
offended.
A
single
family
residential
still
allows
for
leasing
of
a
property,
and
if
you
have
covenants
and
there
it's
going
to
allow
unless
the
covenants
expressly
prohibit
that
the
they're
going
to
determine
to
allow
the
freest
and
best
use
of
the
property.
N
And
so
just
because
something
says
single
family
residential
does
not
mean
that
leasing
is
prohibited
and
the
fact
that
we
and
if
and
unless
there
was
a
specific
Prohibition
in
the
covenants
as
to
hey
short-term
leasing,
is
not
allowed
and
expressly
a
Court's
going
to
interpret
that
as
to
allowing
short-term
Leasing
places.
I've
had
to.
E
E
I
am
but
I'm
not
allowed
to
give
a
permit,
that's
contrary
to
covenants
and
restrictions.
I
don't
go
looking
for
them,
but
when
I'm,
given
notice,
I
have
to
look
at
them
and
if
it
says
residential
use,
only
if
short-term
rental
fell
under
residents,
then
no
problem,
it
falls
under
offices
and
services.
That
is
not
a
residential
use.
U
N
U
Hillary's
aside,
Hillary
is
interpreting
the
CDC
correctly,
but
short-term
rentals
are
a
relatively
new
phenomenon
that
didn't
exist
whenever
we
wrote
the
community
development
code,
so
you
have
to
take
that
into
consideration.
I,
don't
think
you
know
have
we
had
short-term
rentals
back
in
2014.
Whenever
we
wrote
those
definitions,
then
you
know
it
might
have
been
clear,
but
we
are
going
to
seek
a
legal
determination
from
our
attorneys
on
what
that
means
and
how
far
that
residential
statute
would
go
in
covenants
restrictions.
But
you
you
raise
a
great
point
because.
D
J
K
I
live
at
117,
Sea,
Pines
and
I
agree,
as
the
previous
person
said
that
we
live
there,
it's
a
very
peaceful
community,
it's
quiet,
it's
residential,
it's
beautiful
piece
of
Paradise
in
a
mystical
place,
it's
it's
but
having
these
people
come
and
speed,
and
litter
and
drive
super
fast
down
our
dirt
road
and
create
all
of
this
dust
for
us.
Let
their
animals
run
free
on
the
beach
they're
four-wheelers
on
the
beach.
K
It's
it's
just
not
acceptable,
and
it
just
feels
that
we
that
live
there,
protect
our
world
so
much
with
our
Turtles
and
and
our
beautiful
environment
that
it
doesn't
get
that
appreciation
from
renters,
specifically
short-term
rentals
that
are
treating
it
like
a
playground
to
just
have
the
beer
and
toss
out
the
cans
and
let
their
kids
run
free
and
Barefoot
and
just
be
crazy.
So
that's
my
point.
Thank.
V
No
longer
lived
there,
my
husband
and
I
left
there.
Last
month,
after
30
years
there,
his
father
started
coffin,
Point,
Plantation
in
1953,
and
put
covenants
and
restrictions
on
them.
When
people
didn't
even
know
what
Covenant
restrictions
were,
they
did
expire
in
1975
and
they
were
put
back
on
these
people
come
to
our
neighborhood
or
what
was
our
neighborhood
and
they
don't
care
they.
They
don't
care
when
they
set
off
fireworks
all
night
long
and
they
don't
care
when
their
dogs
run
loose
and
they
don't
care
when
their
kids
are
drunk
driving.
V
Golf
carts
and
golf
carts
that
are
trucked
in
the
majority
of
the
roads
in
coffin,
Point
Sea
Pines
is
not.
One
of
them
are
private
other
than
the
Avenue
of
Oaks
and
part
of
mcteer.
Those
roads
are
maintained
solely
by
the
residents
in
coffin
point
we
didn't
buy,
they
didn't
buy,
to
have
a
holiday
in
next
to
us.
The
these
people
are
there
like.
They
said
for
a
playground
for
their
vacation
they're
paying
for
it.
So
they
don't
care
about
anything
else,
and
you
say
well
call
the
police
and
complain
well.
V
We
all
know
how
that
goes
and
being
from
law
enforcement
background.
What's
the
emergency,
when
you
call
and
say
they're
shooting
off
fireworks,
someone's
shooting
a
gun
off
across
the
road,
so
you
don't
really
want
to
borrow
bother
a
chair
Stephanie
when
there
aren't
a
whole
lot
of
them
out
on
the
island,
but
it
it's
not
right.
This
is
a
residential
area.
It's
where
people
live.
We
finally
have
gotten
several
families.
In
there
with
young
children,
people
moved
across
the
street
from
us
with
five
children.
V
They
were
letting
them
go
down
to
the
beach
us
wait
a
minute,
their
vacation,
rentals
down
there,
you
don't
know
who's
in
those
houses.
They
didn't
realize
that,
and
these
people
don't
look
at
the
covenants
and
restrictions
that
run
with
the
land
they
they
are
not
tied
to
the
HOA.
They
run
with
the
land
and
our
HOA
at
coffin.
Point
Plantation
is
voluntary,
a
whole
sixty
dollars
a
month
and
I'll.
V
V
W
Hood
and
also
the
property
management
company
I
have
contacted
and
called
out
the
police
three
times
for
this
specific
property.
They
fire
off
fireworks.
They
were
drunken
disorderly,
The
Neighbors
in
the
direct
Neighbors,
which
are
right
next
door
to
them
are
terrorized
absolutely
terrorizers,
an
elderly
woman
across
the
street.
That
is
afraid
to
call
the
police
I
was
not
afraid
to
call
the
police.
There
are
three
Neighbors
in
the
neighborhood.
W
We
all
have
little
golf
carts
and
we
will
get
up
in
the
middle
of
the
night
at
two
o'clock
in
the
morning
and
drive
to
113
Sea
Pines
and
surround
the
property
and
wait
for
the
police
to
come.
I
have
personally
visited
their
property
management
company
three
times
there
was
no
one
at
their
office
and
when
you
do
get
a
hold
of
them,
they
do
nothing.
W
Now
that
same
property
management
company
manages
two
other
properties
where
they
set
off
fireworks
in
in
this
neighborhood
within
within
half
a
mile
of
this
house,
and
they
caught
the
marsh
on
fire
twice.
All
of
this
can
be
verified
with
the
police
departments
and
the
fire
departments.
They
are
terrorizing
us
as
residents.
We
pay
taxpayer
money.
In
fact,
every
three
months
we
get
out
and
we
pick
up
all
the
trash
on
the
road
from
our
house
all
the
way
out
to
Sea
Pines,
all
the
way
out
to
Sea
Island
Parkway.
W
We
are
active
in
our
community,
we
love
where
we
live.
We
do
I'm
sorry,
it
was
a
bad
investment.
You
purchased
a
property
where
people
live
and
people
care
about
where
they
live,
but
the
people
that
drive
in
for
their
vacations
and
their
drinking
and
firing
off
fireworks
till
four
o'clock
in
the
morning
and
waking
us
all
up
and
that's
on
a
Tuesday
night
I
can't
even
tell
you
what
happens
on
a
holiday
weekend.
It
is
misery,
it
is
absolutely
misery
and
they're
terrorizing
us.
There
is
no
accountability
for
it.
W
There
are
no
postings
inside
the
properties
to
say
no
fireworks
allowed
turn
off
your
lights.
We
have
Turtles,
there's
a
there's
an
or
there
where
we
all
commonly
turn
off
our
lights.
If
we
live
on
the
beach,
so
the
turtle
don't
get
confused,
not
the
renters.
They
don't
not
the
not
the
short-termers
they
got
spotlights
on
outside.
They
they
over
Park
they've
got
they're
parking
on
the
neighbors
parking
because
they
don't
have
enough
parking
and
they
honestly
they
just
don't
care.
They
just
don't
care
one
of
the
other
ones.
W
W
They
said
no,
no,
it's
a
two-bedroom
house
and
they
had
30
people
staying
in
a
two-bedroom
house
for
four
days,
and
this
is
our
neighborhood
We
Live
Here,
We,
Live
Here,
full
time
and
I
can't
and
and
it's
it's
middle
of
the
night,
it's
all
night
long
and
it's
every
weekend
and
it's
every
Tuesday
and
it's
every
Wednesday.
Please
thank.
M
I
just
have
one
one
comment:
I
believe
we
received.
This
is
a
public
comment,
not
mine,
but
what
we
received
as
a
public
company.
Okay
go
ahead.
We
received
two
I
believe
it
was
two
letters.
Oh
yes
from
two
individuals,
yes
I,
don't
know
where
which
one
they
were
talking
about,
but
they're
on
St,
Helena,
right.
F
A
C
S
J
P
P
A
Y
A
A
E
A
C
A
Z
Hi
Mr
chairman
board
members,
so
we
are
unfortunately
on
the
crossing
point
area
we're
at
the
coffin
Point
area.
It
was
48
salt,
wind,
so
basically,
our
we're
addressing
the
issue
of
the
covenants
and
restrictions
that
the
wording
of
the
single
family
residence
really
does
not
have
any
explicit
restrictions
on
short-term
rental
activity
in
this
neighborhood
it
does
not.
Z
It
does
not
cover
short-term
rentals,
as
specifically
so
I,
don't
see
how
that
Covenant
really
can
apply
to
this
in
general
property
laws
in
South
Carolina
are
in
favor
of
the
free
use
of
property
and
the
absence
of
any
explicit
restrictions.
Short-Term
rentals
should
the
activity
of
them
should
be
allowed
and
have
been
allowed
in
the
area.
Many
there
are
many
in
the
area
that
have
been
approved
and
I'm
sure
they
all
are
zoned
for
single
family
residents
as
well.
Z
Also,
regarding
in
the
in
the
staff's
recommendation
letter
that
we
got
on
the
18th
paragraph,
five
states
that
the
Prof
the
proposed
use
may
have
an
adverse
effect
I'm
guessing
on
the
the
community
in
2021
we
rented
for
25
weeks.
In
that
time,
the
county
accepted
our
our
higher
six
percent
property
tax
rate
for
non-primary
residents.
We
paid
a
two
percent
lodging
rate
on
all
short-term
rental
activity:
sales
tax
on
all
short-term
rental
activity.
Z
Z
The
house
is
actually
at
a
price
point
for
people
who
are
there
to
just
enjoy
the
nature,
and
we
we
have
it's
it's
a
four
bedroom,
but
we
they
actually
only
have
it
rented
I
believe
for
eight
people.
We
do
not
allow
large
amounts
of
people.
Our
management
company
is
natural
Retreats
and
we
do
have
a
couple
of
the
people
who
work
for
natural
Retreats
actually
live
in
our
area.
Z
They
actually
live,
they
are
our
neighbors,
I
would
say
at
least
three
of
them
since
we
had
started
with
them.
Are
our
neighbors
and
they're
very
concerned
about
the
other,
neighbors
and
and
offending
anybody
in
the
neighborhood?
We
do
have
neighbors
directly
to
the
left
of
us,
and
then
we
have
a
neighbor
across
the
street.
We
have
an
empty
lot
next
to
us.
On
the
other
side,
those
two
neighbors
we
they
have
our
numbers,
they
have
natural
Retreat
numbers.
They
know
they
can
contact
us
24
7.
Z
Z
Z
We
want
to
be
able
to
give
back
to
what
we
think
makes
the
community
so
great,
and
these
these
oh,
what
I'm
these
organizations
they
use.
They!
Sorry,
let
me
just
read
it.
We
do
realize
that
we
have
some
that
we
do
realize
that
some
have
concerns
over
possible
environmental
impacts
and
would
like
to
propose
a
resolution.
The
above
name
charitable
organizations
are
located
on
Saint
Helena
Island.
Z
They
do
provide
like
the
cultural
and
the
historical
for
locals
for
the
for
locals
and
for
tourists
alike,
and
they
provide
preservation
for
the
community
and
support
to
the
community.
So
we
feel
like,
although
we
have
not
experienced
or
had
any
negative
impacts,
that
we
know
of
from
our
short-term
rentals,
only
really
good
things
about
people
saying
how
much
they
love
the
area
and
enjoyed
our
little
private
beach.
That
our
house
has.
Z
J
Z
Do
have
the
deed,
I
don't
really
see
anything
specifically
towards
that,
but
I
do
see
that
we
see
the
covenants.
We
understand
it's
in
there,
but
I
believe
that
same
wording,
single
family
dwelling
is
in
that's
the
Zoning
for
everyone
who
has
been
approved
and,
like
I
said
we
have
people
in
the
area.
Still
that
are
doing
short-term
rentals
I,
don't
see
much
different
I
do
hear
they're
very
dramatic
explanation
of
some
of
the
stuff
that
has
been
going
on
in
the
neighborhood
and
and
I
I.
Z
J
AA
Z
G
Z
That's
what
that's
what
we
were?
Yes,
that's.
What
that
was
kind
of
the
confusion
like
what's
29
days
versus
30
days
for
us,
but
yes,
that's!
Obviously
we
can
because
of
the
covenants,
doesn't
really
say
anything
specifically
short-term
long
term
I
just
assumed
it
covers
both,
but
I
realize
that's
up
for.
A
Z
N
Although,
although
I
might
agree
with
your
interpretation
of
single
family,
dwelling,
I
think
that
you're
applying
for
a
special
permit
under
the
County
ordinance,
which
clarify
that
classifies
as
anything
less
than
30
days
to
be
a
commercial
use.
And
hopefully
that's
some
discongruency-
that
the
county
can
clear
up
at
some
point.
But
I
think
that
the
ordinance
is
fairly
clear,
which
you're
going
for
them.
That
makes
sense.
A
G
A
O
A
O
O
Okay,
all
right
with
respect
to
the
fact
that
they
have
not
had
any
knowledge
of
of
sheriff
activity.
The
sheriff
has
been
called
to
that
house
on
two
occasions,
one
for
fireworks
on
the
beach
and
one
for
one
of
their
tenants
drove
down
my
neighbor's
driveway
across
his
backyard
and
into
my
yard
in
the
middle
of
the
night.
O
O
The
the
roads
are
private
salt
winds,
a
private
driveway,
the
vacationers
that
you
have
heard
about
tonight
that
are
coming
here
that
have
a
little
regard
for
anything
are
coming.
If
they're
staying
in
a
200
to
a
500
house,
they're
bringing
six
cars
about
to
six
cars,
somebody
said
30
people
in
a
yard,
they're
tearing
up
our
roads.
O
T
If
you
haven't
been
out,
there
is
a
two-track
one
lane
Sandy
road,
which
makes
it
very
attractive
for
the
residents
that
live
there,
and
it
has
a
tough
time
with
ambulances,
fire
trucks,
service
vehicles
of
all
kite
types
that
have
to
Traverse
that
road
to
serve
the
residents
that
are
there
now,
when
you
start
adding
people
to
to
what's
already
there,
it's
a
dead
end
Street
with
no
turn
around
at
the
end
of
it.
So
fire
trucks
have
a
just
a
heck
of
a
time
getting
around
it's
great
for
the
residents.
T
We
all
have
our
own
way
of
using
our
own
driveways
and
things,
but
when
we
talk
about
new
people
and
lots
of
new
people
coming
in
as
I
see
on
eight
salt,
wind,
the
neighbor's
house,
it's
just
filled
all
the
time
and
the
other
comments
I've
heard
about
not
only
fireworks
but
just
all
night
activities.
They
come
down
from
all
over
the
country.
T
Eight
salt,
wind
I
have
my
own
fence
for
my
dog
kennel
and
things
of
that
nature,
which
I
had
to
put
in
once.
I
moved
into
the
house
because
of
the
residence
that
or
the
people
that
come
in
and
use
eight
salt,
wind
I've
really
am
against
any
additional
multi-family
VRBO
type
structures
going
on
salt
wind.
It's
a
limited
access
and
it's
unsafe.
Thank.
R
Hi
good
evening,
ladies
and
gentlemen,
my
name
is
Robert.
Lochran
I
live
in
68
Avenue
of
Oaks.
You
come
right
down
my
road
to
get
to
their
Road.
This
isn't
personal
for
anybody.
We'd
love
it
here
and
there's
a
reason
why
we
live
here,
but,
let's
be
honest,
30
days
31
day,
long-term
rental,
you're
part
of
our
community
I
suppose
you
know
we
have
renters
in
our
community
they've
been
there
two
three
four
years:
it's
really
just
the
three
and
four
day
deal.
That's
it's
a
grieve
issue.
Yeah.
R
R
Their
tenant
their
their
guests,
as
they
call
them,
they're
they're,
paying
them
500
a
night
to
enjoy
the
beach,
but
they
are
also
causing
lots
of
problems
calling
the
police
for
fireworks
because
we
think
that
it
might
be
fireworks
or
could
be
got
gunshots,
we're
not
sure,
but
two
in
the
morning
you
call
the
police
dogs
Unleashed,
which
is
an
or
a
violation
of
I,
think
state
law
running
up
and
down
and
doing
their
business
on
this
really
nice
Beach,
but
I
think
it's.
The
ccnrs
are
in
effect
they're
they're,
pretty
plain.
R
R
J
R
AB
AB
We
have
turned
150
acres,
basically
not
all
of
it,
but
most
of
it
into
a
Bird
and
Animal
Sanctuary.
Currently
this
last
three
months
we
have
got
nine
loggerhead
turtle
nest
and
Birds
constantly
are
populating.
We've
got
Eagles,
we've
got
Osprey
right
in
front
of
the
house.
It's
nature.
We
love
it.
We're
here
for
that
rental
I
speak
to
them.
Rental
people
right
now
have
brought
their
Golf
Course
into
the
middle
of
this
property,
buried
them
in
the
mud.
AB
AB
J
AA
Assault
wind
to
begin
with.
I
know:
John
mentioned
the
roads.
Our
road
is
a
glorified
walking
path.
You
can.
It
is
just
wide
enough
in
most
areas
of
it
to
get
one
car
down
so
once
you
start
adding
more
cars
to
it
and
they
say
their
their
house
sleeps.
Eight
well,
I
can't
tell
you
how
many
times
when
they've
had
renters
there,
they
they
come
with
no
less
than
three
SUVs.
You
know,
and
you
know
there
weren't
two
people
in
each
of
those.
AA
You
know
the
beaches
just
crawling
with
people
and
that
I
don't
think
they
have
any
explanation
in
their
in
their
rental.
That
tells
them
about
the
beach.
You
know
where,
where
are
they?
Their
renters
can
go
and
cannot
go,
and
particularly
this
time
of
the
year,
we've
got
the
sea
and
Shorebirds
are
nesting
all
over
and
they
love
to
get
in
the
shells.
You
don't
even
see
them
and
they
come
with
their
dogs.
They,
you
know,
assume
that
this
is
a
play
yard
for
them.
AA
A
A
U
F
A
AC
AC
A
A
B
B
B
B
C
F
B
F
B
B
AD
AD
The
environment
is
is
very
conducive
for
what
we
do
in
which
we
have
our
organic
farm
and
we
work
with
the
youth.
So
there
are
lots
of
children
in
our
area
on
the
farm
on
many
occasions
and
the
property.
That's
in
question
was
a
fish
camp
and
we've
had
many
problems
with
that
fish
camp
because
of
in
and
out
residents
short-term
residents
coming
in
and
out
same
thing,
as
other
ladies,
were
saying:
the
fireworks,
the
loud
noises,
the
parties
and
things
of
that
nature.
AD
J
AD
Just
got
the
property
correct
on
you,
and
so,
but
my
concern
is
what
the
other
people
were
saying.
I
want
to
be
proactive
in
our
community
and
I
want
to
make
sure
that
our
community
remains
residential
and
we
get
to
know
our
neighbors.
We
get
to
meet
our
neighbors
and
be
a
part
of
a
neighborhood
and
I.
Don't
like
what
I'm
hearing
that
doesn't
mean
that
this
is
going
to
happen
to
us
and
I.
AD
Don't
know
what
kind
of
Provisions
or
restrictions
a
covenant
has,
but
I
know
that
what
we've
had
in
the
past
from
the
Fish
Camp
residents
that
came
here
I
want
to
see
that
again.
So
I
would
like
to
keep
our
community
Rule
and
residential
and
a
neighborhood,
and
not
a
short-term
rental
back
and
forth,
with
different
individuals
that
are
Rowdy
and
disruptive
and
disrespectful.
AD
C
AD
Yeah
I,
don't
know
what
the
the
what
the
qualifications
for
the
house
being
there,
but
as
a
fish
camp
I,
don't
know
what
what
the
residential
residents
were
required
to
do
or
the
owner
was
required
to
do
in
terms
of
who
comes
and
goes.
But
we
had
problems.
We
called
Sheriff's
Department
a
couple
times
because
of
the
noise
and,
of
course
they
said
well,
they
have
the
right
to
do
whatever
the
gun's
going
off
target
practice.
AE
I'm
Danny,
sun,
west
I
signed
up
also
I'm
here,
because
I
don't
want
him
to
speak
on.
This
he's
got
a
surgery
scheduled
for
assist
on
his
vocal
cords
in
August,
and
my
mama
told
me
I
better,
come
here
up
to
three
minutes.
Thank
you.
Wes
Mr,
chairman
members,
there's
some
other
things
going
on
here
rather
than
resurrect
horse
and
keep
on
kicking
the
horse.
We
got
same
on.
AE
You
know
the
same
issues:
ditto
Plus,
we're
trying
to
square
up
with
this
application
that
we
got
from
County
staff,
thankfully,
that
States
the
co
on
this
property,
in
other
words,
what
the
county
building
official
approved
in
2015
when
it
was
built,
480
square
foot.
One
room
DHEC
gave
that
structure
permission
to
come
in
with
what
you
call
a
cat
box,
septic
system.
Okay,.
J
J
AE
So
now
you've
got
before
you
and
staff
would
have
no
way
to
know.
This
is
a
similar
situation
with
the
covenants.
How
do
you
go
and
find
this
unless
somebody
brings
your
attention
so,
thankfully,
we're
here
tonight
and
thankfully
you
guys
are
hearing
what
we
have
to
say
about
this,
but
DHEC
says
you
can
do
a
forced
pumped
cat
box
system
for
that
one
room.
AE
T
AE
Running
the
same,
keep
doing
whatever
it's
coming
out
of
the
ground:
it's
not
a
traditional
gravity
flow
system
where
it
stops
and
backs
into
the
house.
It's
coming
up
above
the
ground.
This
septic
field
by
the
way
is
too
close
to
the
property
line.
It's
in
the
north
east
corner.
If
you're
looking
at
the
submitted
plaque,
the.
AE
AE
AE
My
father
and
my
mother
have
been
there
since
2014.,
really
they
came
in
and
and
we're
kind
of
camping
with
an
approved
septic
field
since
2008
2006.,
but
anyways
trying
to
fuel
the
neighborhood
out
see
if
they
want
to
move
down
here
permanently.
Move
down
here
permanently.
Did
everything
the
right
way?
AE
What
have
you
and
I'm
on
our
I'm
ironically
up
here
telling
you
don't
let
anything
in
that
area
become
a
short-term
rental,
because
the
only
issue
they
had
with
not
building
down
here
was
man
that
party
house
down
there,
they're
shooting
guns
and
shooting
doing
whatever.
We
don't
know
those
people,
and
so
here
we
are
and
we're
just
we're
kind
of
in
shock.
So
we
appreciate
your
time
and
I
I
can
answer
any
other
questions
and
I
can
submit
documentation
if
needed.
So.
AE
The
rest
of
it
owned
this
on
all
this
documentation
to
the
county
for
approval
to
get
the
CEO
to
get
the
power
cut
on.
You
got
a
screen,
porch
open
screen
ports,
and
then
you
got
a
covered
porch
and
then
you
got
underneath
so
I,
don't
know
how
they're
getting
to
1300
square
feet.
I,
don't
know
who
who
sold
them
that.
But
it's.
AE
J
M
AE
AE
AE
AE
A
E
I,
don't
see
10
people
in
a
480
square
feet,
building
and
I'd
like
to
change
my
recommendation
from
approved
to
disapprove
because
I,
don't
think
the
septic
system
and
the
size
of
the
building
unless
she
can
bring
something
back
from
building
codes
that
they
you
know
added
on
and
and
the
tax
assessor
picks
it
up.
Until
then,
I
would
recommend
this
approval.
Thank.
A
A
J
J
AF
AF
AF
AF
A
AF
I
think
one
of
the
concerns
were-
and
forgive
me,
I
I
I
have
all
the
information
with
me
we're
running
trying
to
get
here
in
time.
We
had
a
work
day
and
try
to
get
here
from
Charleston,
but
I
believe
some
of
the
concerns
were
the
views
of
the
shop
from
a
property
behind
us.
We
didn't
walk
through
it's
pretty
far
away
from
us,
I
think
150
feet
and
there
is
one
heck
of
a
tree
line
back
there,
I
mean
I,
can't
I
didn't
even
know
there
was
properties
back
there.
AF
A
worry
more
than
just
kind
of
an
opinionated
thing
from
people
I
want
to
see
us,
but
we
didn't
spare
any
expense
in
regards
to
what
we
were
designing.
If
you
wanted
to
make
sure
it
felt
like
it
fit
into
the
community,
we
changed
some
of
our
colors
you'll,
see
the
darker
color
image
on
the
front
are
typically,
we
go
with
the
brighter
blue,
but
just
to
kind
of
make
sure
it
Blended
well
into
the
community
with
a
darker
color
just
to
hopefully
appeal
to
you
to
the
city,
for
example,.
AF
AF
A
A
A
C
F
AF
A
AF
Most
all
the
during
the
day
cars
come
into
this
they're
always
going
to
be
behind
the
fence,
but
during
the
day
we
do
pull
the
red
cars
out.
They
are
in
the
enclosed,
fencing
area
just
so
we
can
move
Productions
through
the
buildings,
but
in
the
evening
we
do
store
all
the
red
cars
in
the
building.
So
most
of
you
have
outside
is
inbound
vehicles
and
outbounds.
C
AF
Many
vehicles
yeah,
we
only
schedule
in
about
five
to
ten
Vehicles
a
day
and
all
of
our
customers
are
scheduled,
and
we
do
it
all
through
our
app
be
very
strict
on
that,
because
we
really
can't
process,
but
only
so
many
cars
I
would
say.
On
average
I
mean
when
you
say
back
road
which
road
you're
talking
about
I'm
confused.
C
C
AF
AF
A
AF
A
E
And
The
Body
Shop
the
code
requires
that
it
be
at
250
feet
from
a
residential
and
there's
apartments
behind.
So
my
suggestion
would
be
be
pull
the
paint
booth,
you
know
farther
away
from
the
rear
of
the
property
and
he
submitted
some
extra
stuff
about
the
noise
and
all
that
other
stuff.
So
that
would
be
our
recommendation
that
he
ensure
that
these
things
are
in
place
and
hopefully
there
will
be
no
complaints.
E
Because
he
seems
to
be
taken
he's
going
to
take
the
necessary
precautions
too,
reduce
the
noise,
the
noise
and
older
pollution
so
and
then
the
building
itself,
our
staff,
not
staff
or
design
review
board-
will
look
at
it.
If
he's
changing
anything
he's
changing
the
colors
and
I
guess
this
chimney
thing
will
be
looked
at
and
maybe
hidden
from
278.
So
all
it
has
to
go
through
our
final
development
review
and.