►
From YouTube: Planning Commission 6PM
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
C
A
Those
in
favor
aye
aye
any
post,
no
passes
unanimously.
Okay,
anybody
want
to
add
anything
to
the
agenda.
I
guess
I
have
approval.
A
D
A
C
A
Right
we
have
one
action
item
involving
text:
Amendment
changes
recommendation.
So
let's
get
started
with
that.
F
Well,
good
evening,
members
of
the
Planning
Commission
I
just
wanted
to
give
an
overview
of
this
project
and
I.
Think
Mark
is
going
to
do
a
lot
of
the
heavy
lifting
on
the
details
of
this.
These
proposed
amendments,
but
there
are
three
different
sections
that
are
being
amended,
but
they
come.
They
come
as
one
package
and
this
basically
addresses
a
type
of
development
that
we're
seeing
I
would
say
in
large
slots,
conservation-minded
subdivisions,
and
you
know
so
that
when
you
look
at
the
standard.
A
Excuse
me:
oh
we're
trying
to
have
the
meeting
here.
Sir,
do
you
want
to
make.
G
A
H
A
A
H
Is
Frank
cerulli
I'm
in
Shell,
Point?
Okay,
my
question
is
the
yard
burning
laws
that
basically
don't
exist?
I
mean
my
father.
I
was
a
college
professor,
my
father
was
a
zoning
enforcement
officer
as
well
as
a
fire
chief,
and
these
laws
literally
go
back
to
the
60s.
H
You
weren't
allowed
to
burn
in
your
yard
in
the
40s
and
50s
I
believe
you
had
to
have
a
standardized
container,
so
the
current
laws
are
almost
a
century
behind
here
when
I
talked
to
whenever
I
talk
to
someone
fire
person
they're
very
disappointed
that
the
that
these
laws
have
not
been
you
know,
updated
and
recently,
by
the
way
I
called
about
burning
in
woods.
H
Next
to
a
development
and
the
police
said,
the
fire
department
has
to
determine
whether
or
not
it's
legal
and
the
fire
department
said
they
had
no
Authority
in
the
development.
So
I
had
to
call
DHEC
DHEC
did
say
it
was
illegal,
so
they're
doing
something
about
it,
but
South
Carolina
is
one
of
the
worst
states
for
uncontrolled
fires,
and
you
know
there's
other
things
like
building
in
the
Land
Development.
H
That's
one
of
the
things
I
think
on
your
agenda
that
you
know
the
the
filling
is
really
not
really
monitored
for
10
feet.
I
mean
again
all
this
all.
You
know
people
have
built
something
they
built
some
dirt
in.
H
Just
built
and
there's
really
no
laws
against
that,
even
though
we're
only
10
feet.
I'll
give
an
example:
if
you'd
like
New
Jersey
weren't
from
something
called
the
Great
Swamp,
it's
50
five
square
miles.
Rather
it's
within
the
New
York
metropolitan.
H
It's
200
feet
above
sea
level,
but
it
hasn't
been
built
on
since
1964
and
it's
within
again
it's
between
two
of
the
wealthiest
counties
in
the
in
the
United
States
and
within
New
York.
They
could
make
a
fortune,
but
they
don't
because
again
it's
it's.
It's
they're
being.
D
H
Know,
they're
being
responsible,
basically
and
there's
other
things,
I've
seen
I
mean
just
the
loud
mufflers
down
here:
the
no
yearly
inspection
of
cars,
no
helmets
for
Motorcycle
drivers
again
stuff
like
this
I
I,
can't
believe
it
when
I
see
it.
But
my
main,
my
main
goal
was
why
these?
Why
they
and
again
the
firemen
agree
with
me
on
this,
why
these
yard
yard
burning
is
still
allowed.
A
A
Well,
if
we're
not
sure
we'll
find
out-
and
we've
got
your
name
and
you
would
you
believe,
your
contact
information
here,
I
will
and
we'll
we'll
find
out
a
name
that
you
can
move
forward
on
your.
F
Well,
what
you
had
before
you
are
a
series
of
three
amendments
to
three
different
sections
of
the
code
that
address
a
similar
type
of
of
issue
and,
as
I
was
stating
earlier.
This
deals
with
a
very
specific
type
of
residential
development
that
we
see
in
large
Lots
conservation
subdivisions
and
the
idea
is
breaking
up
the
mass
of
a
building.
So
you
have
rather
than
one
a
principal
dwelling,
which
is
one
structure.
You
may
have
that
broken
up
into
several
different
structures
connected
by
breezeways
or
covered
walkways.
F
So
this
ordinance
is
addressing
an
issue
where
it
helps
facilitate
that,
in
addition,
several
years
ago
in
2019
staff
initiated
Amendment
and
we
brought
to
the
Planning
Commission
that
we
originally
had
in
the
ordinance
a
provision
for
guest
house
and
then
also
a
provision
for
accessory
dwelling
units.
At
that
time,
staff
had
concerns
about
a
growing
number
of
short-term
rentals,
and
so
we
decided
to
bring
forward
what
we
felt
was
closing
a
loophole
and
only
allowing
one
accessory
dwelling
unit
for
property.
F
What
we
realized
that
there
was
some
adverse
impact
on
that
that,
in
in
many
of
these
similar
kind
of
large
lot
conservation
communities
you
have
you
know,
people
were
building
guest
houses
as
as
part
of
that
development,
and-
and
so
we
looked
into
the
issue
and
what
we're
bringing
forward
is
an
opportunity
for
somebody
who
has
a
certain
minimum
acreage
threshold
to
be
able
to
introduce
a
second
accessory
dwelling
unit.
F
The
third
item,
addressing
that
concern
about
short-term
rentals,
is
tightening
up
language.
That
would
only
allow
one
short-term
rental
per
property
so
that
one
of
the
concerns
we
had
as
staff
was,
if
you
open
up
additional
guest
houses,
then
somebody
could
maybe
even
up
front
look
at
a
way
to
kind
of
develop.
You
know
principal
dwelling,
several
guest
houses
and
then
have
them
all
rented
out
and
so
we're
trying
to
address
unintended
consequences.
F
I'm
going
to
let
Mark
Davis
go
into
the
details
of
the
proposed
amendments
that
I
wanted
to
be
able
to
provide
that
framework.
It's
it's
kind
of
an
unusual
set
of
amendments,
but
it
is
addressing
a
very
real
issue
for
certain
developments
in
this
County,
and
so
that's
why
staff
is
initiating
this
and
bringing
it
forward
all.
B
Rob
was
saying
is
that,
while
you
have
there's
three
different
sections
here,
they're
all
kind
of
synergistically
working
together
in
order
to
achieve
a
certain
report,
so
while
they're
they're
similar
sections
and
they're
similar
things
we're
going
to
discuss,
and
we
can
take
them
to
any
order
that
you
all
might
like,
they
all
work
together.
So
I
just
want
to
make
sure
piece
them
together.
You
could
ask
questions.
D
B
B
First
me
just
you
all,
listen
to
me
trying
to
explain
this
for
10
minutes.
We
can
pull
up
some
pictures.
We
can
talk
about
the
text
and
we
can
just
jump
right
into
it.
Well,.
A
H
A
G
B
Get
I
can
yeah
and,
through
your
questions,
I'll
try.
My
best
I
think
Rob's
opening
was
to
try
to
open
that
up
to
understand
a
little
bit
about
the
history,
so
I'll
just
kind
of
go
back,
so
the
county
used
to
allow
a
guest
house
and
it
and
it
removed
that
allowance-
and
this
was
kind
of
in
regards
to
its
concern
with
when
short-term
rentals
are
starting
to
heat
up
and
renting
short-term
rentals
there.
B
So
that's
really
one
of
the
main
Foundation
points
to
this,
but
in
addition
to
it,
while
looking
at
it
regarding
the
architecture
of
structures
and
some
of
the
ways,
certain
things
available,
pumps
and
pictures
and
examples,
this
ability
to
allow
the
massing
of
one
large
structure
of
a
house
kind
of
get
broken
up
and
be
connected
with
roofline
connections
has
always
been
something
that
we
as
jurisdictions
all
throughout.
The
counties
have
always
dealt
with.
B
So
what
we've
done
here-
and
we
can
talk
about
that
first
or
we
can
talk
about
that
last-
because
that's
probably
one
of
the
more
complicated
ones
that
helps
provide
what
we
call
codifying
the
situation
to
give
staff
a
very
clear
Direction
on
how
to
administer
these
types
of
homes
or
architecture
or
when
something
works
or
when
something
doesn't
work.
B
So
that's
essentially,
the
goal
here
is
to
provide
clear
direction
for
staff
on
an
everyday
basis
on
very
complicated
things
that
we
have
to
administer
and
then
that
the
zoning
department
has
people
constantly
coming
in
that
door.
Asking
questions
Builders
trying
to
build
stuff,
Architects
trying
to
design
stuff,
and
we
don't
really
have
the
best
clear
guiding
language
on
some
of
these
matters.
This
is
going
to
provide
that.
A
D
A
B
It
might
get
focused
in
certain
parts
of
the
county
only
instead
of
it
being
something
that
can
be
offered
county-wide.
That
will
start.
D
B
We
don't
provide
that
clarification
that
I
just
described.
We
will
still
be
dealing
with
these
issues
coming
in
our
door
moving
forward
without.
B
B
A
B
All
right,
so,
let's
just
go
ahead
and
start
we'll
just
run
through
it
and
then
yep.
So
we'll
start
with
that
language.
Now
somebody
who
doesn't
work
in
this.
B
B
D
B
B
These,
which
is
a
roofline
connection
that
connects
to
it,
and
it's
still
considered
part
of
the
primary
structure,
and
it
would
be
subject
to
all
the
primary
standards.
Primary
setbacks
primary
house
placements
and
all
that
kind
of
stuff
provides
flexibility
for
Architects
and
it
provides
flexibility
on
how
you
can
construct
around.
In.
D
B
B
B
B
We
would
be
looking
at
these
things,
so
if
you
do
you
give
a
little
bit
of
flexibility
by
providing
people
to
work
around
that,
but
at
the
same
time
they
have
to
kind
of
Center
it
more
on
their
land,
have
bigger
setbacks
and
get
it
off.
The
sides
and
Rears
in
a
typical
accessory
structure
might
be
able
to
get
permitted
in
public
property.
I.
G
Just
happen
to
have
a
house:
that's
just
exactly
like
this:
okay
living
a
flood
plain
and
for
purpose
of
insurance,
flood
insurance,
I
thought
both
structures
would
be
considered
together,
I
guess,
and
it's
oh
no!
No!
No!
You
need
to
have
a
flood
elevation
for
the
primary
house
and
the
accessory
structure
in
order
to
get
flood
insurance.
I,
don't
know
how
that
plays
into
this
whole
thing,
but
that's.
B
Out
there
yeah
so
can.
A
B
Every
situation
is
different:
there's
no
one
situation.
So
in
order
to
be
considered
a
part
of
the
primary
structure,
you
have
to
meet
all
of
the
requirements
as
identified
in
this
language.
It
has
to
be
finished
in
heat
up
ahead
of
all
spaces
and
it
doesn't
allow
garages
because
sometimes
you
have
garages
and
spaces
above
the
garages.
So.
H
B
Might
be
a
garage
without
a
space
or
a
garage
with
a
space,
so
it
might
be
out
of
garage
and
just
fully
you
know
finish
space.
So
that's
what
that
kind
of
leads
at
that
are
connected
to
the
primary
structure
with
a
roofline
walkway
that
meets
building
codes.
All
this
has
to
meet
building
code,
there's
no,
it's
kind
of
actable.
What
that
kind
of
image
was
shall
be
considered
part
of
their
primary
structure.
B
So
that's
when
that
kind
of
sets
it
up.
The
next
sentence
then
goes
into
what
I
was
saying.
Is
that
if
you
do
this,
then
you
are
now
part
of
the
primary
structure
and
you
are
subject
to
all
the
primary
structure:
development
standards.
Typically,
that's
going
to
be
your
setbacks
and
your
placements
of
your
structures,
that's
kind
of
what
the
middle
of
that
says
just
to
clarify
that
and
then
it
kind
of
closes
out
with
what
these
requirements
are
and
how
far
you
can
take
it.
B
The
walkway
connections
I
have
a
width
of
greater
than
two
or
four
feet.
So
it's
got.
You
can't
just
be
like
people
are
running
a
foot.
It's
going
to
be
usable
wide
space
that
you
can
walk
through
and
as
a
roof
line
like
the
image
that
we
saw
might
not
have
is
be
as
fancy
with
the
rafters,
but
it's
usable
it
can
be
open
or
enclosed.
That
happened
to
be
an
example
of
an
open
one
or
you
can
close
it
and
in
no
ways
in
the
shot
of
the
roof.
B
I
want
you
see
the
combined
length
of
30
linear
feet
so
we'll
get
into
that
in
a
second.
In
addition
to
all
of
these
things,
what's
important
to
understand
is
that
when
people
are
doing
this
in
the
matters,
so
if
we
go
back
to
the
metals
that
is
subject
to
primary
structure,
setbacks
and
other
building
placements
there's
and
shall
match.
D
B
Primary
structure,
architectural
design
and
material-
but
it's
not
like
this-
is
some
building
and
then
you're
just
grabbing
something
in
it's
a
holistic.
Looking
type
of
thing
all
we're
doing
is
providing
flexibility,
providing
Architects
and
Landscape
Architects
a
little
bit
of
movement
on
how
they
can
place
structures
online.
B
What
Rob
said
typically,
there's
a
used
larger
space,
larger
Lots,
where
you
have
room
to
spread
out.
You
know
they're
not
doing
this
in
small
developments.
You
don't
have
the
space.
This
is
on
larger,
a
lot,
usually
conservation,
driven
like
type
developments
or
rural
character
areas.
Somebody
who's
trying
to
develop
a
10,
12
000
square
foot,
lot:
they're
not
going
to
break
their
masking
out
they're,
barely
meeting
their
primaries
anyway.
They're
always
pushing
envelopes
on
that.
So
we
would
expect
it
to
be
on
more
larger
space
and
larger
areas
that
have
the
room
to
work.
B
D
B
Okay,
so
in
this
situation
here's
a
perfect
example
of
a
home
and
if
you
look
on
the
primary
massing
of
the
main
home,
you
see
two
wings
and
then
between
those
you
see
like
little
kind
of
corridors.
Those
would
be
like
a
connection
on
this
situation.
It
looks
like
one
of
them
is
a
garage,
and
one
of
them
just
looks
like
a
another
bedroom
or
Suite.
The
joke.
I
say
is
what
we've
been
making.
Is
this
where
everybody
sends
the
in-laws
or
their
kids?
Let's.
B
Them
over
there,
but
in
that
situation,
what
it
would
be
is
so
there's
two
of
them
there,
and
this
is
important
where
you
have
two
wings
and
there's
two
of
them.
So
when
we
say
combined
length
of
30
feet,
you.
F
B
F
B
B
Some
tree
saves
there
either
kind
of
helping
to
use
within
the
natural
environment,
and
really
you
know
they
have
a
buy
right
to
kind
of
do
a
house
and
that
just
kind
of
created
a
little
bit
more
flexibility
on
how
to
best
use
that
land
and
that
lot
to
maximize
some
moves.
So
that's
all!
This
is
that's
what
this
is
trying
to
achieve,
trying
to
provide
some
flexibility,
but.
B
G
I
B
F
G
F
This
on
okay,
yeah
I,
wanted
to
add
that
we
in
our
code,
we
limit
the
number
or
the
square
footage
of
accessory
structures.
So
if
you
have
a
2,
000
square
foot,
house,
you're
limited
to
you,
know
the
amount
of
additional
building
space
you
could
have
for
a
shed
or
other
accessory
structures,
and
that's
why
this
becomes
an
advantage.
If
you're
able
to
you
know,
have
a
separate
structure
connected
by
a
Breezeway,
that's
counting
towards
your
overall
square
footage
for
your
principal
dwelling.
B
B
That
now
with,
but
with
with
limitations,
you
can't
just
do
this
and
run
something
100
feet
like
it's
part
of
the
primary
yeah.
That's
not
happening.
Do
you,
you
know
we're
still
we're
still
trying
to
create,
provide
flexibility
to
what
Rob
said
is
that's
how
those
things
are
primaries
to
accessory
structures
are
always
a
relationship
to
size
and
percent.
So.
B
B
So
that's
kind
of
what
this
section
of
the
code
is
trying
to
achieve.
Okay
and
we
can
just
move
on
to
the
next
one,
and
then
we
could
use
kind
of
questions
as
the
whole
thing
is
combined
or
we
can
just
focus
on
sections.
I
I
have
one
just
one
question:
this
is
obviously
for
new
construction
too,
but
for
existing
con
construction
that
is
out
there.
Someone
who
has
a
home
decides
they
wanted
to
add
to
it
would
still
fit
under
these
guidelines.
You
know
someone
has
a
home.
They've
got
the
room
where
they
want
to
add
not
the
accessory
structure,
but
they're
saying
they
want
to
have
this
walkway
connected
to
know
that
this
will
fit
into
that,
and
they
would
still
have
to
go
through
the
same
code
as.
B
B
B
So,
let's
move
on
to
the
next
section-
and
this
is
where
kind
of
the
section
that
first
one
was
just
kind
of
a
little
bit
of
a
introduction
to
some
architecture
and
some
masking
some
things.
That's
the
county
and
staff
and
trying
to
get
our
hands
on
for
a
while.
B
So
what
this
is
looking
to
achieve
is
that
if
you
look
under
C,
which
used
to
be
the
density
where
it
read
one
maximum,
one
accessory
dwelling
unit
should
be
putting
a
single
family
resident
lot,
that's
being
stricken,
and
now
it's
basically
reading
that
you
can
have
it
as
follows.
You
can
have
one
just
as
you're
always
allowed
to
up
to
three
acres
have
more
than
three
acres.
B
You
are
now
permitted
to
have
two,
but
it
also
states
that
in
no
instance
just
beneath
that,
so
then
we
have
that
where
you've
got
this
kind
of
going
back
to
that,
you
know,
question
about
primers
accessories
and
the
relationships
and
there's
square
footage
and
their
sizes.
So
it
all
balances
out.
The
area
of
the
unit
in
D
speaks
to
the
combined
square
footage
of
those
two
adus
and
its
relationship
to
the
primary
structure
that
they
cannot
exceed
it.
So.
B
Foot
house
and
you
can
have
two
adus-
you
can
have
two
1000
foot
80s
or
just
shy
one.
So
that's
kind
of
what
that
section
is
reaching.
So
really
what
we're
reintroducing
is
reintroducing
the
allowability
of
what
would
have
been
the
carriage
house,
but
instead
of
having
two
moving
Parts
we're
just
we're
just
bringing
back
an
Adu
and
we're
just
having
it
as
an
acreage
requirement.
I
don't
believe
there
was
an
eight
requirement
before
it
was
just
yeah
right,
so
we
believe
it's
being
more
responsible
by
having
that
acreage
requirement.
A
So
let
me
ask
a
question:
people
I
know
in
one
Island
community
they
build
guest
houses,
sometimes
before
they
build
the
primary
house
as
a
means
of
you
know,
just
temporizing
the
the
relocation
and
setting
up
that
way.
That
would
be
an
accessory
dwelling
under
the
old
code,
but
under
the
new
code,
if
they
were
within
30
feet
of
the
main
structure,
it
could
be
part
of
the
main
structure
correct,
in
other
words,
they've
already
built
the
guest
house.
Now
they
wanted
to
make
it
part
of
the.
B
Main
structure,
as
long
as
it
was
built
under
the
primary
setbacks,
which
it
probably
was
if
it
was
built
first,
that
they
could
go
back
and
combine
it
and
meet
this
and
connect
it
match
it,
and
it
would
just
be
part
of
the
primary
and
that
if
they
had
more
room,
then
they
could
go
build
an
Adu
somewhere
else
on
the
line.
Okay,
but.
B
Okay,
so
does
anybody
have
any
questions
and
kind
of
see
right
there
about
just
the
idea
of
three
acres
you
allowed
one.
If
you
have
more
than
three
acres
now
you
get
to
that,
we
think
that's
pretty
clear.
E
My
question
is:
does
this
it
doesn't
seem
to
discount
or
change
any
of
the
regulations
under
family
compounds?
No,
this.
E
But
it
doesn't
create
any
conflict
with
that
I
mean
this
seemed
very
clear
to
me.
Yeah.
B
No,
it
does
okay,
no
great,
so
then
in
the
in
the
standpoint
of
D1.
So
here
what
you
have
there
is
that
there's
really
enough
and
Rob
it
might
have
Rob
jump
in
on
this
one.
A
little
bit
is
that
when
it
comes
to
the
previous
languages,
we're
called
back
is
that
you
could
you
you
had
a
size
limitation
of
1
000
square
feet.
B
D
B
Driven
by
a
footprint
and
less
by
a
square
footage,
so
that's
the
difference
there,
so
you
can
go
off
of
a
number
or
you
can
go
off
a
style,
a
little
bit
more
flexibility
for
people.
It's
all
it's
providing
if
we're
not
taking
anything
to
anybody
which
provides
more
options
and
then
the
you
know
in
all
transact
zones,
Carousel
see
that
that
was
already
there.
B
So
we
just
took
what
was
in
two
about
the
carriage
house
and
just
added
it
into
one
to
provide
there
an
opportunity,
the
size
of
that
based
off
of
the
footprint.
If
you
had
a
one
and
two
story,
if
allowed,
you
could
get
larger
than
one
thousand
square
feet,
so
that's
part
of
it.
So
you
could
do
the
1000
or
you
could
go
with
that
style
and
get
a
little
bit
larger
of
a
unit.
B
But
you're
still
going
to
be
regulated,
I
would
say:
go
back
to
area
of
unit
where
we
talked
about
its
relationship
to
the
primary.
So
we
can
you,
can
you
can
you're
at
some
point
in
time
you're
going
to
hit
the
ceiling,
so
it
just
provide
some
opportunity
of
the
Carriage
House
type.
That's
all
it
is
doing
it's
something.
That's
already
in
the
code.
We
just
put
it
in
that
section
as
well
and
then
under
H
rental.
B
It's
just
that
language
is
in
there
accessory
dueling.
It
should
not
be
at
least
or
rented
for
10
it's
less
than
30
consecutive
days
that
was
kind
of
in
there,
pretty
short-term
rental.
As
you
all
know,
we
adopted
short-term
rentals.
So
what
we
have
done
now
is
we
have
added,
unless
approved
following
the
process
for
short-term
rentals,
just
to
make
that
very
clear
section.
B
E
Always
on
H
and
we've
had
this
discussion
before.
Is
you
know,
enforcement
and
codes
people
I
mean
you
can
do
it's
always
going
to
be
a
problem?
We.
B
B
Big
big
issue
I'm
trying
to
control
it,
because
when
we
have
laws
at
least
we
have
some
type
of
enforcement
mechanism.
That
does
not
mean
people
are
going
to
follow
them.
G
E
B
B
Okay,
so
is
there
any,
you
know,
I
just
want
to
I
know
this
we
get
on
this,
or
do
we
want
to
move
on?
This
makes
sense.
Yeah.
B
Here
this
is
where
we
had,
and
this
kind
of
goes
back
to
where
Rob
was
saying
when
you
have
the
guest
house
and
all
that
really
it
kind
of
read.
You
know
legally
permitted
that
and
that
that,
even
when
they're
located
on
the
same
property
regarding
whether
it
be
a
principal
or
the
Adu,
so
technically,
what
this
is
doing
now
is
being
that
we're
allowing
additional
adus
to
be
entered
were
allowed
to
be
permanent
on
property.
We're
putting
in
here
that
you
can't
it's
not
just
Unlimited
adus
on
property.
You
can
have
them.
F
D
F
Would
add
to
this
that
accessory
dwelling
units
are
often
their
kind
of
couched
as
the
term
a
type
of
affordable
housing,
because
it's
introducing
an
apartment
in
you
know
which
are
often
single-family
neighborhoods
and
the
minute
you
start
converting
those
adus
into
short-term
rentals
you're
completely,
if
anything,
you're
you're
only
adding
to
the
problems
for
affordable
housing.
So
this
I
think
this
kind
of
it
limits
it
to
one.
F
So
it
means,
if
you
you
know,
if
you
did
have
a
single
family
house
and
you
created
an
accessory
dwelling
unit
in
a
way
that
becomes
a
source
of
income
for
the.
For
you
know,
if
the
person
who
lives
in
the
property
versus
you
know
something
kind
of
done
speculatively
right
to
allow
as
many
short-term.
B
Rentals
yeah
I
mean
this
is
this
is
at
the
same
time
we're
trying
to
provide
some
flexibilities,
we're
adding
in
more
use
of
land,
but
we're
we're
saying.
But
if
you're
going
to
do
this
be
responsible,
you
know
we're
looking
at
affordable
housing,
we're
looking
at
more
of
the
use
of
land
and
that's
kind
of
where
all
these
kind
of
work
together,
I
kind
of
provide
some
some
opportunity
but
limitations
and
address
opportunities
for
possible,
affordable
housing
in
certain
areas.
E
I
won't
do
you
feel
that
this
particularly
General
standards
lines
up
well,
and
would
you
call
with
Municipal
ordinances
about
the
sdrps
and
accessory
buildings?
I
know
the
lot
size
is,
you
know
really
dramatically
different,
but
is
there
a
way
I
mean
is
the
county?
Would
the
county
be
perceived
as
being
more
flexible
than
municipalities
in
their
in
this
new
language
or
less
or
it's
apples
and
oranges?
You.
B
Know
I
it's
hard
to
speak
because
I
think
like
going
back
to
the
short-term
rentals
I
have
so
many
different
things
like
whether
caps
how
there's
uses
different
things
but
for
the
for
the
purposes
of
accounting's
purpose,
I
can
tell
you.
This
is
the
right
thing
to
do
yeah
in
regards
to,
if
you
agree
with
the
other
two
things:
okay,
yeah.
A
One
of
the
things
we
always
wrestle
with
is
the
differences
between
how
the
municipalities
do
things
in
the
codes
versus
the
county
doesn't
and
I
think
we're
always
looking
for
ways
to
blend
so
that
people
don't
get
confused
of
you
know
what
I
live
in
the
county.
I
live
in
the
evening,
so
I
can
do
it
here.
I
can't
do
it
here
and
you
get
into
all
those
arguments.
A
So
I
think
I,
guess
I'm
going
to
ask
you:
did
you
do
a
review
of
what
the
municipal
municipalities
are
doing
in
Beaufort
County
as
a
regards
to
these
particular
standards
for.
B
B
We're
not
in
the
municipal
business
we're
in
the
county
business
we're
in
the
unincorporated
County
Business
our
code
shouldn't
be
a
municipal
code,
otherwise
we'd
be
developing
like
municipality.
We
need
to
provide
areas
if
we
have
transects
near
them.
We
need
to
encourage
municipalities
to
Annex
when
it's
appropriate
I
wish.
Of
course,
we
had
state
laws
that
require
them
to
follow
our
County
conference
plan.
That's.
B
To
us
comparing
ourselves
to
municipalities
on
every
issue,
I,
don't
think
that's
I,
don't
think.
That's
good
planning,
I
think
I.
Think
it's
appropriate
sometimes,
but
not
when
we're
dealing
with
things
that
are
oftentimes
related
to
what
we've
been
talking
about
are
typically
larger
lot
style
type
stuff,
as
municipalities
are
I
mean
there
could
be,
but
they're,
usually
smaller,
lots
more
dense,
more
urban
style
development.
B
F
I
I'll
add
to
that.
You
mentioned
apples
and
oranges
and
I
think
that
that's
also
the
case
because
the
city
of
Beaufort
town
of
Port,
Royal,
regulate
short-term
rentals,
very
differently
and
then
Hilton
Head
is
an
entirely
different
type
of
community
as
well
I
mean
they're.
You
know
a
resort
community,
so
you
know-
and
this
is
really
building
off
our
existing
policies
that
we
adopted
several
years
ago.
This
is
just
kind
of
closing
a
loophole
for,
for
you
know
what
this
might
open
up
in
terms
of
introducing
a
new,
an
additional
accessory
dwelling.
B
C
I
moved
that
we
accept
the
proposal
of
these
text
amendments
with
the
one
single
Amendment
to
the
adding
of
a
word
property.
Yes,.
G
B
B
A
E
A
F
G
E
A
B
D
E
I
A
D
B
D
A
Nothing
further
to
report.
Is
there
any
other
business
you
would
like
to
discuss?
If
not
move
for
a
journal
me
I'd
be
I'm.
The
meeting
is
adjourned.