►
From YouTube: Beaufort County Council Public Facilities Committee meeting Monday, September 19, 2022 3:00 PM
Description
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - September 22, 2022
5. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION OF THIS MEETING HAS BEEN PUBLISHED, POSTED, AND DISTRIBUTED IN
COMPLIANCE WITH THE SOUTH CAROLINA FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT
6. CITIZEN COMMENTS - (ANYONE who wishes to speak during the Citizen Comment portion of the
meeting will limit their comments to no longer than three (3) minutes ( a total of 15 minutes ) and will
address Council in a respectful manner appropriate to the decorum of the meeting, refraining from the
use of profane, abusive, or obscene language)
7. DIVISION UPDATE FROM ASSISTANT COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR, JARED FRALIX
AGENDA ITEMS
8. US 21 WIDENING AND BEAUFORT HIGH SCHOOL ACCESS REALIGNMENT ALTERNATIVES
9. BROAD RIVER FISHING PIER UPDATE
10. RECOMMEND APPROVAL TO AWARD RFQ#062222E ON-CALL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT/CEI SERVICES
11. RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT FAA AIP GRANT 50 FOR HILTON HEAD ISLAND AIRPORT (HXD) TERMINAL CONSTRUCTION PROJECT. (FISCAL IMPACT: FAA AIP Grant 50 is in the amount County Council Agenda – Beaufort County, SC of $11,626,638. The AIP grant requires a local sponsor contribution in the amount of $1,162,663.80 (10%). That airport portion is built into the project budget)
12. RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF A MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT WITH THE TOWN OF HILTON HEAD ON THE US 278 CORRIDOR PROJECT
13. RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE APPOINTMENT OF ARTHUR HANDMAN TO THE LOWCOUNTRY
REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY FOR A PARTIAL TERM WITH AN EXPIRATION DATE OF 2024
EXECUTIVE SESSION
14. PURSUANT TO S.C. CODE SEC. 30-4-70 (A)(2): DISCUSSION OF NEGOTIATIONS INCIDENT TO PROPOSED CONTRACTUAL ARRANGEMENTS AND PROPOSED PURCHASE/ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY (1505 NORTH STREET)
15. PURSUANT TO S.C. CODE SEC. 30-4-70 (A)(2): DISCUSSION OF NEGOTIATIONS INCIDENT TO PROPOSED CONTRACTUAL ARRANGEMENTS AND PROPOSED EXCHANGE/PURCHASE/ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY (70 Baygall Road, 152 William Hilton Pkwy, 150 William Hilton Pkwy, 68 Helmsman Way, 43 Jenkins Road)
16. MATTERS ARISING OUT OF EXECUTIVE SESSION
17. CHAIRMAN'S WRAP UP
18. ADJOURNMENT
A
Facilities,
Beaufort
County,
Monday,
September,
19th
and
first
of
all,
procedurally
we've
gone
beyond
the
number
of
people
that
we
can
have
in
the
room
for
the
fire
code.
So
there's
room
for
about
15
people
in
the
executive
conference
room.
You
can
watch
it
on
TV.
The
door
will
be
open
and
we
can
live
with
one
row
of
people
that
have
their
backs
to
the
wall
all,
but
it
asks
anybody
that
can't
do
those
two
things
to
actually
move
into
the
hall
and
you
can
watch
the
meeting
from
there.
A
B
A
A
D
A
A
First
item
is
the
approval
of
the
agenda
and
a
couple
of
comments
about
it.
If
there's
no
objection,
what
I
would
like
to
do
is
take
the
Beaufort
High
access
piece
first,
since
so
many
of
you
are
here
for
that
in
deference
to
your
time
and
what
I'd
like
to
do
is
actually
tee
up.
The
discussion
get
a
few
preliminary
comments
from
Council
and
then
have
the
public
discussion
on
that
particular
item
and
I.
A
Think
that
will
give
away
for
people
that
are
speaking
to
kind
of
get
a
sense
of
what's
on
the
table
and
where
we're
headed,
and
that
may
help
with
the
comments,
then
we'll
come
back
and
conclude
our
discussion
and
take
any
action
that
we
we
think
we
need
to
take
and
I'll
do
a
similar
thing
for
the
278
and
since
people
are
only
here
for
those
two
items,
we'll
have
the
public
comments
associated
with
each
of
those
at
the
time
that
we
discuss
them.
So
with
that
in
mind,
I'd
look
for
approval
of
the
agenda.
D
A
A
A
Any
discussion
Corrections
seeing
none
stands
approved
without
objection.
We'll
skip
down
to
item
number
eight
now,
which
is
the
high
school
access
piece
which
which
you're
all
here
for,
or
at
least
most
of
you
are-
and
let
me
give
a
little
background
on
I
think
where
we
are,
and
hopefully
this
will
help
focus
our
discussion.
It
kind
of
goes
like
this.
It's
something
that's
been
hanging
around
for
a
long
time.
It
was
suggested
that
we
take
it
up
at
our
summer,
public
facilities
meetings,
and
so
we
had
two
during
the
summer
and
the
first
one.
A
There
was
a
lot
of
discussion
and
we
zeroed
in
on
the
two
Alternatives,
which
were
called
four
and
five
as
the
ones
that
seem
to
be
the
most
plausible
or
recommended
at
that
point
in
time
and
those
kind
of
came
in
from
the
southeast
part
off
of
I.
Guess
it's
ladies
Island
Drive
to
the
high
school
complex.
A
So
we
we
as
Council,
clearly
understand
the
amount
of
pushback
that
there
has
been
to
that
so-called
alternative
zero,
which
would
widen
from
the
three
to
the
four
lanes.
Now,
if
we
look
at
the
the
money
as
I
understand
it,
if
we
had
done
four
and
five,
the
amount
of
money
that
was
needed
was
in
the
range
of
I
think
seven,
eight
million
dollars
something
like
that,
whichever
one
we
might
have
done,
the
numbers
that
I've
heard
if
we
were
doing
alternative
zero,
starts
to
be
in
the
12
to
15
million
dollar
type.
A
Which,
as
we
were,
leading
up
to
this
meeting,
it
kind
of
said
if
we
don't
have
support
for
any
of
the
options,
a
significant
support
and
we
don't
and
we
have
a
great
deal
of
pushback
from
options
that
are
on
the
table
and
they're
expensive,
and
we
don't
have
the
money
at
this
point
to
do
it.
The
better
thing
for
us
to
do
may
be
to
do
none
of
the
Alternatives,
but
take
up
the
individual
improvements
on
kind
of
a
running
basis
like
we
would
normally
do
in
in
the
course
of
our
business.
A
So
to
me,
I
think
where
we're
kind
of
headed
is
a
debate
of
whether
or
not
we
should
not
do
whether
we
should
probably
not
do
any
of
the
ones
but
take
the
individual
actions
up
and
do
courses
as
we
go
forward
now.
Let
me
call
on
a
Jared,
if
I
might
at
this
point
in
time
to
build
on
that
a
little
bit
if
you
can
as
to
if
we
didn't
do
anything,
what
would
we,
what
are
the
kind
of
things
that
would
be
happening
as
we
went
forward
at
this
point
in
time.
G
G
When
really
we
call
it
zero,
but
it
had
been
looked
at
a
little
bit
prior
to
as
kind
of
alternative
one
with
a
few
modifications
staff
was
tasked
with
at
that
time
to
come
back
and
say:
okay,
if
we
widen
it
to
the
North,
there's,
there's
a
certain
amount
of
costs
and
impacts
if
we
widen
it
to
the
South
to
make
the
fourth
Lane
there's
a
different
amount
of
impacts
and
costs,
or
if
we
split
the
wide
into
the
North
and
the
South.
So
we
kind
of
have
three
iterations
of
that
same
alternative.
G
So
we've
since
done
that
homework,
we've
got
the
costs
and
the
impacts
and
Jennifer
braggle
she'll,
be
here
in
just
a
second
behind
me.
She's
our
program
manager
for
the
sales
tax
program
and
working
with
our
Design
Consultants
on
the
project
she'll
be
able
to
discuss
a
little
bit
more
detail.
What
those
are
if
we
choose
to
move
forward
with
none
of
the
above
options,
that's
not
to
say
that,
and
that's
really
specifically
from
the
bridge
Woods
Memorial
Bridge
to
ladies
Island
Drive
to
the
Walgreens
intersection.
G
So
there
would
be
no
traffic
improvements
through
that
section
and
no
additional
access
improvements
to
the
high
school.
So
no
coming
out
to
ladies
Island
Drive
on
the
Southeast
portion.
If
we
did
none
of
the
above
options,
that's
not
to
say
that
we
still
can't
do
some
some
pedestrian
and
access
pathway,
accommodations,
some
potential,
Street,
Aesthetics
and
even
underground
and
power
for
resiliency
and
different
things
of
that
nature.
So
then,
the
rest
of
the
project
would
remain
so.
G
The
improvements
to
four
lane
the
highway
on
21
all
the
way
from
the
ladies
Island
intersection
at
Walgreens
out
past
Walmart.
That
would
still
remain,
as
well
as
the
improvements
on
north
and
south
of
21
on
Sam's
Point
from
Miller
grab
West
down
to
Ruda
boy.
So
those
improvements
would
remain
also
the
additional
access
projects,
the
Hazel
farm
and
gay,
as
well
as
the
Middle
School
improvements,
the
airport,
Frontage
Road
Improvement
and
the
sunset
and
Miller
Drive
those
improvements.
All
that
would
remain
so.
G
What
we're
really
talking
about
is
whether
we
do
anything
on
that
one
section
from
Walgreens
back
to
the
bridge
and
provide
any
additional
access
to
the
school
as
it
is
today.
So
that's
that's
the
information
we
have
teed
up
and
if
you'd
like
I,
can
invite
Jennifer
and
she
can
kind
of
give
you
the
details
of
those
analysis
that
we
did.
H
So
once
again,
we've
got
a
PowerPoint
presentation
and
I'm
going
to
kind
of
walk
you
through
what
Jared
just
discussed
with
the
PowerPoint
and
that's
going
to
start
off
with
the
21
Corridor,
but
there's
a
background
once
again.
If
you
click
on
about
the
third
slide
down
the
overall
map,
go
up,
one
sorry
go
up,
one
slide
go
up
two
slides
there
we
go
so
as
Jared
mentioned,
these
were
all
the
original
projects
that
were
part
of
the
ladies
Island
Corridor
traffic
improvements
on
the
ballot
referendum.
H
With
this
one
project
there
are
actually
and
we've
accounted
for
a
couple
of
displacements.
These
three
displacements
would
actually
be
on
all
improvements
here.
The
reason
being
is:
there's
a
needs
property
at
the
corner
of
Yeomans
and
Sea
Island
Parkway.
It's
actually
in
the
present
right-of-way
now
so
I've
taken
the
assumption
that
when
it
goes
through
the
process
in
coordination
with
scdot
scdot
may
require
them
to
be
relocated
regardless,
just
because
it
shows
up
on
the
plans
that
way
it
shows
up
in
the
County.
H
H
So
with
this,
what
we
concentrated
on
was
obviously
between
Woods
Memorial
Bridge
to
Sam's
Point,
but
we
did
look
at
the
right-of-way
on
all
of
it.
We
looked
at
the
project
cost
for
all
of
it
and
all
of
it
being
ladies
Island
Drive
Sam's
Point
and
Sea
Island
Parkway
from
the
main
intersection
going
east.
H
So
alternates
two
through
four
actually
look
at
widening
the
corridor
from
Woods
Memorial
Bridge
to
Sam's
Point
alternate
if
you'll
click
on
the
next
slide
alternate
two,
this
one
actually
considered
doing
more
of
the
widening
to
the
north
and
showing
the
potential
displacements
here
so
again,
it's
you've
got
some
potential
displacements
access
management
standards
being
Incorporated
alternate
three,
which
is
the
next
line
down
that
one
looks
at
widening
about
the
center
line.
So
when
you
widen
about
the
center
line,
we
get
no
cost
savings
from
construction.
H
What
I
mean
by
that
is
you're
hitting
the
curb
and
gutter
drainage,
both
sides
of
the
road.
So
when
I
get
to
the
end-
and
you
see
a
slight
difference
in
why
this
one's
a
little
bit
more
expensive
is
because
well
we're
replacing
all
the
carbon
gutter
all
the
drainage.
Both
sides
of
the
road
alternate
four
looked
at
widening
to
the
South
Side.
More
and
again,
it
shows
up
now
one
thing
we
did
look
at
when
we
got
into
the
estimates.
H
If
the
high
school
traffic
is
realigned
on
a
different
route,
then
we
would
convert
that
entrance
to
right
and
right
out.
School
traffic
is
shifted
from
21
the
business
section
again
we've
minimized
displacements
here
we've
got
some
access
management
standards
within,
of
course,
we're
increasing
the
bicycle.
Pedestrian
facilities
in
this
Beaufort
High
School
is
not
realigned
and
we
still
proceed
with
this
you're
we're
already
over
capacity
for
the
section
and
it's
going.
The
congestion
is
going
to
increase,
we
keep
the
traffic
here
and
then
we
don't
have
any
additional
connectivity
for
this
section.
H
So,
two
through
four
we're
not
doing
the
Beaufort
High
School
realignment
we're
going
to
keep
the
traffic
for
the
school
within
this
segment
from
Woods
Memorial
Bridge
to
802..
We've
got
increased
access
management
throughout
the
corridor,
we're
still
improving
the
bicycle
and
pedestrian
facilities,
but
we've
increased
displacements
because
we
are
going
to
impact
more
buildings
and
businesses
here
and
you'll
see
later
on.
H
Why
there
is
a
range
between
three
five
to
nine
for
this
so
and
then
again
we
don't
have
the
increased
connectivity
with
another
road
by
eliminate
the
realignment
so
with
the
realignment
again.
This
is
the
School
attendance
area.
It's
all
of
ladies
Island,
all
of
the
outer
sea
Islands,
plus
a
portion
of
the
town
of
Port
Royal.
H
These
are
all
the
options
we
consider
and
we've
kind
of
narrowed
it
down
to
what
you've
already
seen
before,
which
is
four
and
five
four
would
be
a
brand
new
roadway
that
comes
across
from
Yeomans
over
to
ladies
Island
Drive.
It
aligns
with
hazel
Farm
Road,
which
would
then
connect
with
gay
back
over
to
Sea
Island
Parkway.
We
create
one
intersection.
It
brings
the
traffic
in
for
the
school
directly
to
the
school.
H
We
actually
still
create
Improvement
along
a
portion
of
kichi
road
back
to
the
school's
entrance
back
to
Sea
Island
to
the
business
section
of
21.
But
it's
converted
to
railing
right
out
on
21
business.
We
are
doing
bicycle
and
pedestrian
facilities
on
all
of
these,
so
we're
improving
the
connectivity
there
to
the
school
for
any
kids
that
need
to
walk
and
the
other
component
is.
H
We've
tried
to
minimize
impacts
to
Crystal
Lake
Parks,
but
we
are
still
getting
one
parcel
there
and
where
you
have
the
curse
right
there,
so
all
the
other
Parcels
we
are
not
touching,
except
that
one
so
then
alternate
five,
which
everybody
has
said.
Let's
get
over
to
Ruda
boy,
this
actually
looked
at
creating
a
smoother
transition
from
Carolyn
drive
to
Rude
Boy,
creating
more
of
a
through
movement
and
the
connectivity
to
Hazel
Farm
Road
back
around
it's
a
longer
project,
we're
also
still
hitting
Crystal
Lake
Park
and
at
Crystal
Lake
Park.
I
H
J
Question
real
quick:
can
you
go
back?
One
slide,
please
Brad!
Thank
you.
You
see
how
you
run
that
red
line
right
over
the
top
of
the
Crystal
Lake
Park
Welcome
Center.
Why
couldn't
you
move
that
to
the
existing
intersection
and
have
it
have
it
move
down
a
little
bit?
Why
does
the
new
Rude
Boy
entrance
have
to
be
there
instead
of
where
it
currently
is.
H
We're
creating
that
smoother
transition
for
a
single
intersection.
If
we
stay
with
existing
rooted
boy
trying
to
come
across,
we
could
potentially
impact
the
bank
existing
Caroline
Drive
going
around
the
football
field.
If
you
stay
on
the
existing
roadway,
it's
290
degree
curves
to
a
T
intersection,
so
we're
trying
to
make
the
alignment
smoother,
because,
if
you're,
if
you've
got
opposing
traffic
coming
up
and
putting
more
traffic
from
Hazel
Farm
down
there,
you
want
to
make
sure
it's
a
very
smooth
transition.
There.
J
H
H
J
J
J
Why
couldn't
we
just
extend
through
that
one
property
we're
already
taking?
Probably
half
of
it,
extend
it
straight
down
to
Ruda
boy
and
make
a
left-hand
turn
onto
Ruda
boy
and
then
go
straight
across
we're
preserving
you
know
the
momentum
of
traffic
I
can
I
can
see
your
concern
about
Crossing
overhead
at
a
relatively
odd
angle,
but
I
think
it
reserves
an
asset
that
we've
already
grown
to
love
with
Crystal
Lake
Park
welcome
center
and
that
whole
the
whole
park.
H
Right,
so
that's
right
now,
where
the
boy
is
actually
a
skewed
in
our
section
and
what
you're
talking
about
with
this
is
again
you're
being
skewed
this
way
for
traffic.
That's
trying
to
go
this
way,
some
of
them
when
you
try
and
put
a
curve
in
to
make
it
the
smooth
transition.
Now
we're
not
going
to
be
in
compliance
with
standards
between
the
curve
to
that
intersection.
H
At
the
same
moment,
we're
trying
to
go
the
opposite
direction
back
around
the
Hazel
farm,
so
you've
got
to
work
all
of
it
together
in
there
I
understand
what
you're
saying
with
okay
we're
almost
there,
but
the
more
we
bring
it
away.
The
worse
it
actually
gets
on
meeting
standards.
So
we're
we're
in
compliance
with
the
angle
Crossing
ladies
Island
Drive,
and
bringing
these
two
plus
with
those
curves
in
the
distance
to
that
new.
A
H
I'm
gonna
go
off
a
memory
here
alternate
one:
it's
actually
around
42
million
dollars
again.
This
is
entire
project
cost
and
what
I
mean
by
that
is
it's
not
just
the
section
from
Woods
Memorial
Bridge
of
data
to
it
includes
21
going
east
to
capture
this
section
going
out
towards
Walmart.
It's
also
ladies
Island
Drive
Sam's
Point
SC,
802,
Sam's
Point,
so
we're
going
from
rutaboy
to
Miller
Drive
West
on
both
of
those
two
corridors.
So
the
entire
project
costs
are
42
million
this.
H
It
seems
the
right
way
for
everything
this
and
all
of
these
include
underground
and
relocating
utilities,
as
well,
plus
the
construction
plus
the
engineering
fees
that
we've
already
gotten
into
it
for
what's
been
approved
today.
So
with
alternate
one,
you
know
you're
looking
at
42
with
three
displacements
with.
H
So
these
are
the
differences
there
and
then,
of
course,
alternate
four
and
five
for
Beaver
High
School
8
to
16.
again,
the
16
million
includes
having
to
rebuild
the
infrastructure
at
Crystal,
Lake
Park
for
hitting
the
building
and
the
parking
lot
and
and
everything
there
plus
it's
actually
more
roadway
improvements,
because
we're
going
a
longer
distance
with
it
yeah.
E
H
H
For
this
one
that
doesn't
include
those
so
we're
looking
for
money
regardless
when
you
go
back
to
the
original
study
and
the
30
million
that
was
put
forth,
and
you
look
at
the
fine
print
for
all
those
estimates.
In
the
back
of
the
study,
they
did
not
include
any
right-of-way
on
any
of
their
projects.
They
didn't
include
utilities.
So,
regardless
we're
looking
for
money,
we've
got
a
some
of
us
later
this
week,
have
a
meeting
to
discuss
a
potential
grant
that
will
be
coming
out
here
soon
through
scdot.
G
So
maybe
just
to
summarize
so,
basically
all
the
different
options
if
we
do
nothing
and
just
work
on
the
main
line,
we're
at
42
million
dollars,
plus
the
other
roads,
the
sunset
Miller
Hazel,
Hazel
farm
and
gay,
and
such
all
the
options
on
21,
whether
we
ride
in
four
lanes
on
the
the
section
between
meridian
and
back
up
to
Walgreens,
it's
the
roughly
eight
or
nine
million
dollars
option
four,
which
is
the
one
going
through
Crystal
Lake
to
the
north.
That's
about
eight
million
dollars
in
option.
G
Five
is
going
to
the
South
to
Ruda
boy,
which
is
about
16
million
dollars.
So
the
costs
are
the
same
all
except
option.
Five
option:
five
is
the
most
expensive.
The
difference
is
how
many
impacts,
what
type
of
impacts
that
you
have
every
one
of
them
has
an
impact,
just
a
different
impact,
and
then,
lastly,
if
you
do
nothing
and
just
go
with
the
base
model
at
42
million,
the
impact
is
the
traffic
ability.
So
you
don't
gain
any
traffic
improvements
on
that
section,
but
capacity
improvements.
G
So
you
don't
you
you,
you
meet
some
of
the
goals,
but
not
all
of
the
goals.
So
it's
just
a
matter
of
the
the
those
are
kind
of
where
we
are
in
the
process
and
the
options
that
are
available
and
if
I
don't
say
it
I
know,
Eric
could
probably
say
it
in
a
little
bit.
But
we
are
at
the
point
from
the
staff
level
that
there
needs
to
be
a
decision
to
staff
for
us
to
move
forward.
G
A
A
That
would,
and
all
the
other
options
would
cost
more
and
the
question
of
before
us
as
a
council
is,
would
we
want
to
vote
for
any
of
those
to
substitute
for
the
ladies
Island
plan,
which
is
approved
by
the
voters,
am
I
simplifying
that
too
much
I
think
that's
pretty
Square.
Okay,
Eric
did
I
see
you
wanted
to
speak.
K
Well,
I,
don't
know
that
we
can
go
that
far
to
say:
do
nothing
that
implements
the
Lady's
Island
plan,
but
you
know
I
I
would
have
to
refer
deferred
to
Rob
Merchant,
our
planning
director
on
that
particular
item.
We
just
need
you
all
to
do
something
right
to
tell
us
what
you
need
to
do
want
us
to
do,
because
we've
studied
this
to
death.
We've
allocated
a
lot
of
County
resources
here
and
we've
made
zero
progress
on
this
issue.
L
L
Think
and
as
long
as
we
keep
debating
that
it's
just
going
to
drag
on
and
on
it's
going
to
make
a
lot
of
people
uncomfortable,
it's
not
going
to
be
it's
not
going
to
be
productive,
so
at
the
appropriate
time,
I'll
be
happy
to
make
them
right.
We
take
more
action
with
respect
to
the
Buford
High
School
intersection
that
we
move
on
to
the
other.
Seven
projects:
okay,.
A
M
M
N
N
Also
the
fact
that
if
these
traffic
circles
could
be
evaluated,
that
they
actually
have
residential
homes
that
are
actually
going
into
them
if
y'all
are
familiar
with
most
of
them,
I've
never
seen
a
traffic
circle
where
residential
homes
are
actually
in
the
circle
itself,
which
is
supposed
to
be
for
traffic
calming
to
begin
with,
and
those
are
the
things
that
we
would
ask.
That
would
be
considered
in
the
engineering
of
these
circles
that
maybe
are
not
the
best
option,
which
would
lower
costs.
Also
just
that
so,
okay.
O
Hello
I
have
been
living
in
Beaufort
County
for
31
years,
my
husband
and
I
own
commercial
property
on
Sea
Island
Parkway.
That
would
be
impacted
if
it's
widened
to
four
lanes,
it
makes
no
sense
to
bottleneck
up
the
bridge.
What
I
think
we
need
to
do
is
look
for
a
long-term
solution,
not
something
that's
going
to
last
for
just
a
couple
years,
but
look
5
10
20
years
down
the
road.
How
are
we
going
to
get
less
traffic
off
of
Highway,
21
and
802.
O
and
I
only
see
this
happening
with
a
bypass
alternative,
Road
I
think
this
is
something
that
County
Council
needs
to
look
at.
I
think
we
need
to
move
forward
and
look
at
the
future,
because
Beaufort
will
only
continue
to
develop
and
putting
a
Band-Aid
on
a
gushing
wound
will
not
help.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
Thank
you.
Father.
P
Hi
I'm
Father
Andrew
Trapp,
with
St
Peter's,
Catholic,
church
and
I.
Definitely
don't
envy
y'all,
because
I
know
as
a
pastor.
You
can't
please
everybody.
It's
a
bad
situation
to
be
in,
but
again,
basically
the
same
concerns
this
this
option.
Four
cutting
along
the
side
of
Crystal
Lake
would
cut
right
through
the
back
portion
of
our
property,
and
it
looks
like,
as
far
as
we
could
tell,
would
cut
off
part
of
our
stock
school
soccer
field.
P
You
know
where
our
kids
play
and
it's
that's
very
alarming
to
us
and
also
it's
kind
of
frustrating
again,
because
we
like
y'all,
said
you
did
a
lot
of
development,
a
lot
of
investigation
preparing
for
this,
but
last
meeting
you
all
said
that
you
just
had
talked
to
the
high
school
finally
and
that
they
didn't
they
weren't
in
favor
of
that
option.
You
would
think
that
that
would
have
been
part
of
the
preparation.
P
Well,
no
one
has
reached
out
from
the
county
to
talk
to
us
to
hear
our
concerns
as
a
church
as
a
school,
and
we
would
we
would
love
to
be
part
of
that
process
and
as
of
right
now,
from
the
little
we
do
know,
we'd
be
very
much
opposed
to
a
road
cutting
right
through
the
back
porch
of
our
property.
So
thank
you
good.
D
Thank
you
all
for
giving
me
a
chance
to
speak,
but
I
just
want
to
talk
about
not
only
the
widening
of
Highway
21
but
Sunset
the
traffic
circle,
ideas
and
things
like
that.
I
don't
represent
anyone
and
you
do
but
I
do
feel
like
I
speak
for
a
lot
of
friends
here
that
call
the
low
country
home
I
just
want
to
ask
a
couple
of
questions
about
why.
Why
is
this
body
even
entertaining
widening
a
mile
of
the
highway?
Why
are
we
waiting
to
wanting
to
spend
Millions
a
lot
of
millions?
D
What
was
that
40
something
million
on
a
stretch
of
road
that
few
use
when
we
talk
about
Sunset
and
they
don't
the
the
speeding
problem
that
people
complain
about?
There
is
not
really
there.
Why
do
we
consider
destroying
so
many
businesses
that
literally
call
21
their
front
door?
There's
a
lot
of
them
in
here
that
are
going
to
lose
either
their
front
parking
lot
their
side
parking
lot
or
both
when
you
look
at
higher
ground
and
Butler
look
directly
across
the
street
from
each
other.
D
D
Why
do
we
fight
for
more
Langs
to
Saint
Helena,
to
support
Public,
Safety
and
evacuations
when
we've
reduced
Highway
21
back
to
one
lane
in
each
Direction
at
Walmart?
Why
do
we
agree
to
to
Whitehall
property
when
we
now
see
that
the
priority
is
them
building
a
neighborhood
and
not
our
access
to
a
park.
D
D
Why
are
we
talking
about
traffic
circles
and
raising
medians
when
everybody's
answer
is
the
traffic
is,
is,
is
a
traffic
circle
when
potholes
can
be
fixed
a
lot
more
effectively
we're
focusing
on
a
section
of
road
where
a
fatal?
When
we
talk
about
Sunset,
we
were
talking
about
a
section
of
road
where
a
fatal
accident
hasn't
occurred
in
a
decade
or
where
a
sidewalks
are
already
in
place.
D
If
you
could,
if
you
devoted
one
tenth
of
what
we're
talking
about
spending
I'm.
Sorry,
sir,
if
we're
talking
about
spending
one
tenth
of
what
y'all
are
talking
about
spending
and
paying
the
Sheriff's
Office
to
go
out
there
and
Patrol
it
for
overtime,
we'd,
probably
get
a
lot
more
people,
we
probably
get
a
lot
more
people
slowing
down
and
we
would
reduce
the
problem
areas.
D
Q
Q
It
creates
bottlenecks.
Businesses
and
residents
are
going
to
be
displaced,
one
that
comes
to
mind.
Butler
Marine.
They
move
to
create
so
Crystal
Park
can
be
created
and
then
now
they're
being
threatened
again,
not
right.
Another
thing
is
the
ladies
Island
village
plan.
We
need
to
take
a
step
back
and
look
at
that
and
really
look
at
the
Village
plan.
Try
to
go
in
that
direction.
A
lot
of
people
spend
a
lot
of
time
on
that
city
council
before
I
was
on
there.
Q
Finally,
playgrounds
going
through
a
playground,
we
need
to
create
more
playgrounds,
not
less
I
feel
like
there's
sacred
ground
and
those
funds,
especially
sacred
I
just,
and
so
you
know
that
you'd
even
think
about
going
through
a
playground.
But
anyway,
thank
you
for
allowing
me
to
speak
and
I
know.
You
got
a
tough
decision
ahead
and,
like
I
said,
please
look
at
the
ladies
Island
village
plan.
That's
really
the
best
way
to
go.
A
L
A
J
J
L
Sure
I'm
happy
too
Brian
I
said
my
motion
is
that
we
that
we
move
to
my
motion
is
that
we
take
no
action
with
respect
to
the
intersection
of
Beaufort
High
School
and
Highway
21,
which
was
one
of
the
nod
projects,
which
is
what
we've
been
dealing
with
for
the
last
several
months.
Take
no
action
with
respect
to
that
that
I
died
by
so
doing
you're,
saying
we're
not
going
to
do
option
four
option:
five
or
option
zero
I.
Think
that
needs
to
be
clarified
that
we're
not
still
debating
that
one.
L
A
A
A
A
Great
question
is
from
York:
how
would
we,
if
we
do,
what
we're
talking
about?
How
would
we
address
the
increasing
traffic
on
21.,
Jared
I,
don't
know
if
I'm
putting
you
on
the
spot,
but
you
answer
that
I'm
sorry
York
asked
whether
if
we
go
with
what's
motioned,
how,
how
would
we
be
addressing
the
increasing
traffic
on
21.
if.
G
G
One
possible
way
based
off
a
comment.
It's
not
an
immediate
way,
but
potential
long-term
way
is
to
coordinate
with
lats
and
there's
been
studies
before,
but
you
continue
to
search
for
another
option,
a
third
bridge
to
ladies
Island.
That
would
be
one
way,
but
that
is
that
that's
definitely
not
an
immediate
way,
a
short-term
way,
no
fun
in
way,
but
it
would
be
an
alternate
way.
G
One
question
I
would
ask
for
Council
just
to
clarify
on
the
motion
is
the
new
nothing
in
regards
to
Beaufort
High
School.
We
would
would
that
motion
include
that
we
still
do
the
improvements
on
ladies
Island
Drive
from
Ruda
boy
and
son
to
Miller,
as
well
as
21
from
from
Walgreens
out
to
Walmart,
just
not
the
section
from
Walgreens
back
to.
G
Emotions,
okay
and
then
also
second
secondary
question
of
that.
So
that's
doing
no
traffic
improvements
with
The
Pedestrian
and
bicycle
improvements
or
aesthetic
components
or
utility
components.
Would
that
be
something
that
would
still
be
considered
in
that
section,
as
well
as
the
rest
of
the
section?
Yes
yeah,
and
there
may
be
some
easement
slash
right
away
components
associated
with
that
not
as
much,
but
we
would
be
able
to
come
back
to
at
a
later
date
the
council
to
share
what
those
improvements
would
entail.
As
far
as
impact.
A
K
And
also
just
just
for
the
record,
I
would
like
to
state
that
the
alternative
for
an
additional
road
with
a
third
bridge
that
would
violate
ladies
Island
plan.
The
ladies
Island
plan
a
lot
of
things
about
transportation
in
this
area.
Ladies
Island
plan,
but
that
would
be
one
of
them.
The
ladies
Island
plan
specifically
speaks
to
trying
to
postpone
the
need
for
a
third
bridge
for
as
long
as
possible.
Okay,
so.
A
A
Okay,
so
we
basically
have
ten
four
and
one
against
I
believe
everybody's
on
board.
Oh
we're
not
right,
so
nine
and
one
nine
and
one
so
the
motion
carries
9-1
as
as
we've
previously
stated,
and
that
will
take
us
forward
doesn't
mean
we
won't
continue
to
work
the
work,
the
issues
but
in
terms
of
this
particular
issue,
I
view
it
as
resolved
for
the
time
being,
I'm
sure.
All
of
you
don't
want
to
stay
for
the
rest
of
your
meeting,
although
you're
welcome
to.
A
G
's
been
working
with
the
engineers
on
this,
but
just
so
everybody's
up
to
date,
so
Broad
River
fishing,
pier
this
was
discussed
some
time
ago.
I,
probably
was
it
earlier
this
year,
so
last
year
in
November
it
was
discussed
and
basically
what
we
have
is
a
a
drying
Pier.
Basically
it's
in
its
stage
of
cancer
and
we're
just
managing
how
we
treat
that
bridge
or
that
fishing
pier
each
year.
We
do
an
inspection
to
see
how
much
concrete
falls
off
and
that's
how
we
measure
how
how
quickly
it's
dying.
G
So
it's
there's
a
public
safety
issue
there
at
some
point,
we've
got
to
deal
with
it
and
demo
that
bridge
or
rehab
it
in
some
shape.
There
are
several
options
that
were
presented
in
November,
with
the
option
that
that
County,
Council
selected
and
gave
staff
direction
is
to
replace
the
demo
of
the
bridge,
replace
the
bridge
with
right.
Now
the
the
fishing
pier
is
1800
foot
in
length
and
then
replace
the
bridge
with
a
900
foot
Pier.
G
I
Thank
you
afternoon,
chairman
and
the
rest
of
the
committee.
Just
to
give
you
guys
a
recap
from
the
November
2020
meeting,
the
alternative
F
hybrid
was
outlined
in
the
McSweeney
report.
That
was
a
pro
voted
on
without
objections,
and
we
started
to
move
on
into
what
we
consider
the
the
meat
of
the
project.
So
to
say,
phase
one
was
is,
is
currently
underway
with
surveying
and
soul.
Borings
is
complete.
This
phase,
one
just
to
remind
you
guys,
is
with
the
a
H
Tax
of
114
K
to
move
forward.
I
In
addition,
the
mythometry,
which
is
this
survey
that
happens
or
the
sounding
that
happens
in
the
river,
is
complete.
Grant
research
is
complete
at
this
time.
We
could
not
find
any
grant
opportunities,
soil,
borings
and
the
investigation
is
complete
as
well.
The
engineer
has
also
completed
the
pile
analysis
as
well.
We've
started
preliminary
engineering
calculations
to
date
and,
in
addition,
we've
started
talking
to
all
the
Regulatory
Agencies,
which
includes
DNR
DHEC
and
as
well
as
dot
OCR
Army
Corps
of
Engineers
for
permitting
process
just
to
start
the
process.
I
In
addition,
we've
done
some
of
the
structural
engineering
and
looking
at
all
that-
and
we've
started
talking
with
emergency
services
to
how
to
accommodate
how
we
can
get
an
emergency
vehicle
as
opposed
to
pedestrian
loads.
We
have
came
up
with
the
concept
of
including
a
UTV
on
site
and
we'll
house
that
in
kind
of
a
garage
or
secured
area
and
that'll
kind
of
meet
the
needs
for,
if
there's
any
emergency
response
out
on
the
pier
and
so
forth,
and
so
on.
I
So
this
layout
is
the
one
that
we
are
recommending
for
you
guys
to
take
a
vote
on
at
this
point.
This
option
completely
gets
us
out
of
the
D.O.T
right-of-way.
It
also
has
the
best
parking
layout
and
it's
also
in
a
location
where
we
won't
get
any
of
the
impacts
from
the
scour
or
the
wave
action
from
the
existing
structure.
So
a
minimal
minimal
degradation
to
this
potentially
new,
pier,
which
would
obviously
keep
it
in
life
in
service
longer.
I
A
couple
things
that
are
kind
of
in
the
planning
stages
is
a
demo
with
the
site
contractor
or
potential
site
contractor
we're
also
looking
at
determination
of
the
quantities
for
the
new,
pier
we're.
Also
looking
at
the
demolition
volume
to
be
completed,
and
one
of
the
current
plans
that
we're
looking
at
is
to
use
the
existing
substructure
of
of
the
pier
the
piles
and
the
caps
and
to
lay
it
around
the
new
fishing
area,
to
create
some
habitat
environment
and
for
a
new
fish
to
maybe
what
not
and
maybe
help
growth
that
and
Foster.
I
Some
of
that.
We
plan
to
drag
out
the
superstructure
onto
the
high
side
or
up
on
the
hill,
look
to
re,
crush
the
concrete
and
recycle
the
seal,
the
steel
and
then
use
the
crushed
concrete
to
build
up
some
of
the
parking
areas
we've
moved
forward
in
some
of
this
project.
That's
all
going
to
reduce
our
costs
and
for
transportation
and
whatnot
to
to
move
out
of
the
site,
so
this
plant
kind
of
has
potential
to
offer
considerable
Savings
in
both
the
demo
and
then
the
new
construction.
So
that's
just
something
to
consider
moving
forward.
I
This
plan
also
is
looking
at
the
phase
two,
which
would
then
be
the
new
peer
construction
final
permitting
process,
as
I
talked
about
it
with
the
agencies
that
I
listed
and
then
determining
the
construction
estimate
and
then
finally,
the
peer
Demolition,
and
that
would
be
kind
of
phase
two,
which
is
currently
funded
by
a
h
tax.
So
at
this
time,
I'm
recommending
moving
forward
with
those
said
phase
two
components
as
well
as
the
new
pair
as
outlined
up
on
the
board
one.
Yes,
sir,
and
entertain
any
questions.
I
E
G
So
so
what
this
motion
would
be
is
to
move
forward
with
this
alternative
and
apply
for
so
right
now.
What
we
have
funded
is
preliminary
phase
one.
So
all
this
due
diligence
works
and
the
preliminary
design
layout,
this
would
be.
We
would
apply
for
phase
two
for
the
final
engineering
design
and
a
H
Tax,
which
is
about
230
000,
so
we'll
make
that
application
and
based
off
this
alternative
design
it.
G
As
you
see,
however,
what
we
do
not
have
and
what's
not
part
of
this
motion-
and
it
can
be
a
later
determination-
is
the
construction
of
this,
so
the
construction
as
we
talked
about
last
year.
This
is
probably
in
the
eight
million
dollar
range
during
the
final
design
and
Analysis,
we'll
have
updated
cost
estimate
performed.
But
all
this
motion
will
be
is
for
us
to
proceed
with
the
final
design
and
then
we'll
come
back
to
council
as
we're
nearing
the
in
the
design
to
say
all
right.
G
R
I
And
this
is,
we
are
looking
at
about
900
about
half
the
size,
but
at
half
half
the
limb
yeah,
it's
half
the
length
that
puts
us
out
it
puts
us
out.
This
current
proposed
pair
puts
us
out
to
a
favorable
fishing
condition,
because
there's
some
flats
that
are
kind
of
at
the
base
of
the
at
the
base
of
the
proposed
and
the
existing
Pier,
so
it'd
be
optimal
for
folks
that
fish
well.
R
That
that's
the
point
I
was
getting
to
it
because
at
low
tide,
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
the
care
is
actually
just
covering
the
the
mud
and
and
if
you
don't
extend
it
out
any
further
than
I'm
I'm
I'm
concerned
that
on
low
tide,
half
of
this
pier
is
not
going
to
be
usable
for
fishing,
but
I'm.
Gonna.
Leave
that
up
to
the
experts.
I
A
G
G
A
G
K
A
Okay,
fair
enough,
so
so
the
motion
is
to
move
it
forward.
Preliminary
engineering
get
it
done,
and
staff
will
figure
out
the
best
way
to
finance
the
balance
of
the
engineering.
Are
we
okay
with
that
anybody?
Disagree.
Any
objections
to
this
any
other
comments,
seeing
none
the
stands
approved
without
objection.
S
So
part
of
the
budget
amendment
we're
using
a
and
H
Tax
funds,
which
has
to
go
through
an
ordinance
which
three
ratings,
the
greetings
in
a
public
hearing
which
we're
already
going
to
do
for
use
for
the
for
to
redo
the
it's
all
joy
landing
and
to
for
peer
improvements
and
Lighting
in
the
pocket
park.
So
you
could
add
this:
they
wouldn't
have
to
apply
it.
We
could
just
tack
it
on
there
and
they
they
can
go
ahead
and
get
this
thing
done
and
get
this
pier
done.
G
So
this
is
very
similar
to
what
we've
already
done
before
on
two
other
contracts,
with
traffic
and
with
Transportation,
so
in
advance
of
the
would-be
sales
tax
Transportation
sales
tax,
but
just
in
general
operating
is
the
standard
for
us
to
help.
Expeditionally
expeditiously
execute
work,
so
this
is
for
construction
management
and
CEI,
which
is
basically
Inspection
Services
during
the
life
of
a
project,
construction
of
a
project.
So
we
put
out
a
solicitation
in
may.
G
So
we
have
five
companies,
fnme
Consultants,
HDR
engineering,
ice,
the
infrastructure
consultant
in
engineering
meet
and
hunt
and
sepi
engineering
and
construction
that
were
qualified
as
the
highest
ranked
proposers,
and
so
we
would
offer
them
a
contract
and
then
they
would
be
basically
on
the
Shelf
until
the
project
and
then
at
a
time
of
a
project
like
the
other
contracts,
we
would
get
a
proposal
and
come
back
with
a
proposal,
scope
and
feedback
to
council
for
award
pending
procurement,
the
the
cost
of
the
project.
However,
that
cost
was
so.
G
M
G
There
is
one
two
three
that
have
an
office
in
Beaufort
County:
none
of
them
are
headquartered
in
Beaufort
County.
All
of
them
have
a
major.
Some
of
them
are
international
national
firms.
Some
of
them
are
Southeast.
Some
are
a
little
bit
smaller.
All
of
them
have
major
operations
in
South,
Carolina,
I
think,
if
not
all
most
all
of
them
have
done
work
in
Beaufort,
County
and,
like
I,
said
three
of
them
have
a
satellite
office
in
Beaufort
County.
A
T
A
T
This
is
the
the
second
grant
that
we've
talked
about
for
so
long
that
the
fa
had
had
said
that
was
was
coming
for
the
terminal
project,
so
the
total
is
11
million.
Six
hundred
twenty
six
thousand
six
hundred
thirty
eight
dollars.
The
reason
it's
not
10
million
straight
is
that
there
was
some
each
year
there's
a
couple
of
different
types
of
grants
available
to
the
airport
and
there's
been
some
grant
money
basically
saved
in
our
account
that
gets
applied
to
this.
T
So
there's,
what's
called
entitlement
money
and
discretionary
money,
that's
in
here
there's
10
million
discretionary
and
the
1.626
in
in
entitlement
money,
so
that
has
been
offered
by
the
FAA
and
it's
actually
gone
through
the
acceptance
process
with
staff,
because
it's
an
electronic
process,
but
it
does
need
to
come
to
you
and
then
on
the
council
for
the
resolution
to
accept
it.
Formality.
A
A
Seeing
not
any
objections
seeing
none
John
you're
approved
to
accept
that.
Thank
you
use
it
wisely,
as
we
certainly
will.
Thank
you,
okay.
This
brings
us
to
the
other
major
item
that
we
had
on
the
agenda,
which
has
to
do
with
the
agreement
with
the
town
of
Hilton
Head
on
a
memo
of
understanding,
memo
of
agreement
on
the
U.S,
278,
Corridor
project
and
I
think
I
might
take
a
minute
and
I
like
do
the
same
thing.
A
I
did
with
the
Sea
Island
piece
is
talk
a
little
bit
about
where
we
are
get
some
preliminary
discussion
going
here,
get
comments
from
those
folks
that
are
here
that
want
to
comment
and
then
we'll
come
back
and
see
what
action
it
is
that
we
we
want
to
take
but
kind
of
a
summary
I.
Think
of
where
we
are
there's
been
a
long
process.
A
You
know
we've
we're
at
a
point
now,
where
we're
in
the
fifth
year
about
two
and
a
half
about
two
times
what
it
took
to
get
from
Pearl
Harbor
to
D-Day
put
it
in
time
perspective
and
it's
a
complicated
process.
There's
a
federal
NEPA
process
that
was,
people
wanted
to
have
an
independent
review.
So
you
know
that
was
done,
a
company
called
HDR
and
there
were
some
good
things
that
came
out
of
it
that
were
accepted
and
rolled
into
the
project.
There
were
some
things
that
maybe
people
thought
differently.
A
There
was
a
land
planning
exercise
that
the
town
undertook
with
a
company
called
mksk
came
forward
with
26
recommendations,
and
my
sense
of
those
recommendations
are
that
basically,
all
basically
been
resolved
a
lot
of
them.
Some
of
them
don't
apply
to
the
project,
but
many
of
them
are
being
included
in
the
design
portion.
A
There's
an
agreement
to
work
on
it
together,
the
and
the
the
only
one
of
major
consequence
that
we
had
debate
on
was
whether
it
be
a
single
span
or
a
double
span.
So-Called
splitting
the
bridge,
which
ended
up
in
a
25
million
dollar
cost
in
my
understanding,
is
the
town
has
backed
away
from
that.
So
there's
no
disagreement
with
the
single
Spin
and
there's
agreement
to
that.
The
project
needs
to
look
at
going
down
as
far
as
Gumtree,
which
is
the
next
intersection
down
from
from
Stoney.
A
A
They
have
to
go
to
Federal
Highway
and
get
a
get
approval
for
this
thing,
and
we
find
ourselves
nationally
and
in
this
project
in
an
inflationary
spiral.
We
first
started
talking
about
the
independent
review.
Last
April
we
didn't
know
we
had
any
cost
problems,
although
we
speculated
we
might,
but
now
I
think
we
know
that
we
have
at
least
a
30
million
dollar
shortfall.
A
As
a
second
piece,
which
is
what's
called
adaptive,
signals-
and
this
is
where
you
take
computers
and
use
them
to
manage
the
signals,
and
so
you
find
yourself
not
at
a
red
light
and
nobody's
going
the
opposite
way
so
that
the
computer
can
manage
to
get
more
traffic
through
Works,
particularly
well
when
you're
off
off
peak
and
in
fact,
they've
been
doing
a
fair
amount
of
that
over
time.
If
you,
if
you
look
at
the
intersections
on
Hilton
Head,
as
in
total,
the
intersection
delays
were
actually
about
50
percent
higher
10
years
ago.
A
A
A
So
in
terms
of
the
second
review,
it's
it's
something
that
I
support,
I,
think
it
honors
Senator
Davis,
and
what
he's
been
wanting
to
see
happen
in
discussions
that
that
he's
LED
it's
heavily
in
the
in
this
in
the
Stony
area,
but
it
will
extend
to
a
much
much
wider
area
and
there's
perhaps
a
couple
things
that
can
be
resolved.
You
know,
as
it
goes
forward.
A
One
is
there's
always
been
a
concern
about
what
the
growth
rate
is
going
to
be,
you
know,
and
obviously
they
have
to
project
the
growth
rate
in
order
to
design
it.
On
the
other
hand,
many
people
believe
the
island
as
it
is
it
built
up.
Population
has
been
roughly
level
for
the
last
20
years
and
talents
projections
is
it'll,
go
up,
I,
think
it's
20
percent
in
the
next
20
years,
and
the
other
is
I.
Think
the
lats
design
looks
at
in
their
long-range
plant
has
parallel
access
roads
on
either
side
of
278.
A
A
So
in
other
words
they
could,
it
can
occur
within
the
timeline
that
we
need
to
do
the
do
the
bridges
there'll
be
some
good
ideas
coming
out
of
the
second
review
and
they
can
be
incorporated
and
I.
Don't
see
anybody
arguing
for
delaying
moving
the
engine,
the
EA
or
the
environmental
assessment
forward
to
wait
for
the
independent
review,
because,
basically,
what
it
would
be
doing
is
perhaps
adding
50
60
million
to
the
cost
for
something
that
may
or
may
not
change
in
terms
of
a
major
way
of
doing
it.
A
K
You
did
pretty
well.
The
one
thing
I
will
say
is
that
some
of
you
received
an
email
today
regarding
a
memorandum
agreement
that
was
sent
out
by
the
town
late
last
week
before
they
had
our
updated
one.
They've
asked
for
us
today
to
send
them
the
official
version
that
is
recommended
out
of
this
committee
today.
K
Basically,
the
old
mou
stated
that,
in
exchange
for
the
independent
review,
the
county
would
expect
Municipal
consent
on
the
project.
We've
changed
that
language
now
to
say
that
we'll
deal
with
the
Miss,
we
don't,
we
don't
address
Municipal
consent,
meaning
we'll
deal
with
it
at
the
appropriate
time
down
the
road.
But
we
do
ask
for
the
town
to
make
a
statement
to
agree
to
allow
us
to
continue
with
the
submittal
of
the
environmental
documents.
F
R
K
Everything
else
we've
worked
with
the
we've
worked
with
Tony
Hilton,
Head,
Island,
Mark,
Orlando,
again
Mark
and
I.
We
have
a
great
working
relationship,
he's
a
great
asset
for
the
island,
as
is
Josh
Gruber
and
is
Sean
colon.
We
have
worked
with
them
to
craft,
an
agreement
that
we
think
that
benefits
the
town
benefits
to
project
but
at
the
same
time
allows
County
and
Dot
to
move
forward,
and
we
can,
if
we
get
the
Moa
done
it's.
My
understanding.
K
A
G
So
the
the
Moa
I've
been
working
with
with
Town
staff
tomorrow,
I'll
actually
go
to
County
Our
Town
council
meeting
they'll
be
taking
up
the
they're.
Not
let
me
see
they're
not
necessarily
taking
up
the
Moa
to
vote
on
it,
but
they
will
be
listening
to
it
and
then
I
believe
they're
taking
it
up
in
October,
so
they'll
just
be
discussing
it
tomorrow,
they'll
they
they're
going
to
wait
until
County
Council
adopts
it
at
County
council
meeting,
not
just
at
public
facilities
committing
but
I'm
going
to
go
there
tomorrow.
G
They
had
previously
a
couple
weeks
ago
had
sent
an
MOA
to
the
county
for
us
to
review
and
and
adopt
that's
what
we
used
as
the
starting
point
to
to
go
back
and
forth
with
staff.
So
staff
is
coordinated,
but
their
Town
staff
wants
to
coordinate
with
their
council
at
at
the
meeting
tomorrow.
I'll
be
attending
that,
and
also
speak
to
the
behalf
on
why
certain
certain
items
were
changed
or
not
changed.
E
G
So
that
our
goal
is
to
submit
the
most
fully
vetted
environmental
assessment,
where
we
can
all
stand
behind
comfortably
and
we
feel
like
our
best
opportunity
is
if
everybody
agrees
in
some
format
and
this
being
the
Moa
that
we're
working
together
on
the
project
and
Dot
has
been
a
great
resource
and
and
providing
guidance
on
this
process
to
us,
and
they
feel
the
same.
Rest
assured
that
if
we
develop
this
document
and
all
agree
towards
it,
that
puts
the
best
foot
forward
for
us
to
be
successful
in
receiving
a
Fonzie
back.
G
R
E
C
G
A
V
Also
talking
to
the
other
Council
County
council
members
is
that
we
feel
that
the
wool
is
getting
pulled
over
our
eyes
and
people
are
going
to
end
up
with
egg
on
their
face.
First
and
foremost,
the
independent
review
that
happened
earlier
was
not
a
truly
independent
review.
So
now
we
are
asking
for
a
truly
independent
review
and
that
process
is
apparently
going
very
slow
to
find
an
entity
that
needs
to
do
that.
A
truly
independent
review
will
only
strengthen
the
way
forward,
so
before
anything
else
gets
decided
upon.
V
V
What
I
don't
see
when
I
go
into
a
county
meeting
like
here
is
people
taking
notes,
people
speak,
but
it
doesn't
get
recorded.
It
doesn't
get
taken
in
and
I
want
to
tell
you
that
we
are
serious
about
this.
There
are
10
000
people
on
Hilton
Head
and
in
the
area
that
say
wait.
Let's
have
that
independent,
truly
independent
review,
but
nothing
happens.
You
still
ignore
it.
You
still
are
trying
to
formulate
an
mou
that
slams
towards
the
county,
whereas
the
mou
was
made
to
be
a
joint
effort
between
the
town
and
the
county.
V
Now
I
see
Mr
chairman
you're,
wearing
a
shirt
from
the
the
the
county.
Our
mayor,
who
has
a
shirt
of
the
town.
There
is
a
sense
of
Pride
and
there's
a
sense
of
Pride
with
you
to
do
things
right
and
not
to
rush
off
blind
and
deaf,
because
we
want
to
get
things
done.
There
is
time
to
do
it.
Nobody
has
told
us
that
we
are
under
a
dead
deadline.
So
let's
do
it
the
right
way
as
simple
as
that,
tomorrow
we
have
a
town,
council,
meeting
and
I.
V
W
Yes,
thank
you.
Jesse
White,
on
behalf
of
the
coastal
conservation,
League
I,
I
guess
I
would
just
start
by
echoing
some
of
dedrick's
concerns.
I,
think
this
project
of
its
scale
and
magnitude
requires
Co-op
a
lot
of
cooperation
and
it's
in
the
best
interests
of
the
county
and
the
town
to
be
on
the
same
page
and
working
together
towards
a
better
project.
We
have
concerns
with
moving
forward
with
the
the
NEPA
signing
off
on
the
NEPA
analysis.
W
Without
doing
this
independent
review,
it
creates
a
perception
that
the
NEPA
analysis
is
not
as
meaningful
as
it's
intended
to
be
and
that
it's
more
of
a
box
to
check
off,
as
opposed
to
a
real
review
of
the
direct,
indirect
and
cumulative
impacts
of
the
project,
which
is
what
it's
intended.
Without
that
truly
independent
review.
F
A
A
A
If
nothing
comes
out
of
that,
that
changes
the
project,
nothing
is
lost
if
it
turned
out
that
we
really
ought
to
do
something
different,
we're
still
no
worse
off
to
restart
and
do
whatever
came
out
of
the
study
at
that
point
in
time.
So,
in
other
words,
if
there
was
a
better
route
than
the
current
Bridges,
then
you
end
up
start
over
again
anyway.
So
I
I
think
that's!
The
issue
is:
do
we
risk
maybe
50
million
dollars
in
cost
overrun
in
order
to
take
a
look
at
this
study
so
anyway?
Any
further
comments?
G
About
that,
if
you
want
to
overlook
and
bypass
it,
I
understand
that
too
no
we'd
like
to
hear
from
you
all
right,
I'll
just
go
over
a
few
things
that
don't
make
it
to
the
agenda
just
so.
You
get
a
full
flavor
of.
What's
going
on
the
staff
level
transportation,
we
held
a
public
meeting
on
Sunset
Boulevard
on
September
7th,
so
a
little
over
a
week
ago
to
discuss
safety
alternatives
on
the
segment
beyond
the
sales
tax.
So
sales
tax
goes
from
Sea,
Island,
Parkway
up
to
Miller
Drive
and
then
that's
the
olive
Sunset.
G
So
this
was
additional
concerns
that
we've
had
from
the
citizens
about
speeding
and
safety
issues.
So
we
had
hired
a
consultant
to
take
a
look
at
those
options.
They
had
a
number
of
options
that
actually
coordination
with
representative
Erickson
and
others.
We
there
was
a
petition
sent
to
D.O.T
to
lower
the
speed
limit
from
35
to
30.,
which
allowed
us
to
use
more
traffic
common
opportunities,
and
so
our
design
consultant
came
up
with
four
different
options.
We
had
a
good
public
meeting.
People
came
discussed.
G
G
We
talked
about
in
the
budget
amendment
to
move
forward
on
some
of
those
design
safety
improvements,
but
as
we
taught
that
the
meeting
we
do
not
have
any
funding
set
for
it
to
implement
whatever
is
designed
out
of
that
project,
so
that'll
be
for
future
discussion,
but
all
in
all
it
was
a
really
well
received
meeting
and
there
was
good
public
input
that
you're
going
to
use
in
the
design.
Also
in
transportation,
staff
is
working
with
lats
and
their
staff
in
developing
a
regional,
its
architecture
plan.
I
know
that
sounds
Greek.
G
It
is
a
little
bit
Greek
to
me
myself,
even
but
its
is
intelligent,
Transportation
Systems,
so
this
is
a
connected
as
our
world
gets,
smarter
and
and
Technologies
are
improved.
This
is
a
connected
traffic
system
that
deals
with
signal
lightings
that
we
just
talked
about
synchronization
of
signals,
overhead
message
boards,
whether
we
use
those
or
those
are
something
that
would
be
worthwhile
in
the
county
to
manage
traffic,
a
traffic
Management
Center
on
how
we
assess
traffic
remotely
and
even
the
introduction
of
smart
vehicles
and
Technologies
along
the
way.
So
before
we
can
Implement
projects.
G
Heaven
Knows
we've
been
working
on
that
project
for
a
long
time,
I'll
be
glad
when
it's
completely
finished,
but
we
are
getting
to
a
milestone
so
we're
working
with
the
city
building
department
now
and
closing
in
on
a
certificate
of
occupancy,
so
we'll
be
able
to
occupy
all
three
floors,
and
we
expect
that
by
the
end
of
October
as
well
so
start
moving
people
in
there.
However,
the
second
floor,
we
are
going
to
continue
with
developing
some
Renovations
on
the
second
floor,
to
move
broadcasting
and
some
expanded
services
for
magistrate
in
there.
G
So
the
third
floor
will
be
open
for
it
to
move
in
and
we'll
be
coordinating
with
the
magistrate
about
about
the
first
floor,
what
type
of
needs
and
uses
they
want
to
accommodate,
but
it'll
be
open.
The
first
floor,
the
Overflow
and
the
the
second
conference
room
or
open
space
for
the
for
the
Magistrate
on
the
site.
Second
floor
would
not
be
finished
yet
so
we'll
coordinate
with
the
Magistrate
on
that
so
Public
Works
boat
Landings.
G
G
There
still
opportunity
for
folks
to
make
comments
online,
so
we
can
fold
that
into
our
plan
and
still
targeting
the
first
of
January
February
for
a
completed
master
plan
that
we'll
be
able
to
present
on
that
and
then.
Lastly,
is
broadband.
We've
got
a
lot
of
interest
Lately
from
various
internet
service
providers,
some
existing
some
new
internet
service,
actually
two
internet,
two
new
ones
interested
in
doing
business
in
in
Beaufort,
County
and
specifically
in
our
rural
areas.
So
we've
been
working
with
I.T
department
on
that
coordinating
with
some
different
entities.
G
We've
written
a
couple
of
support
letters
for
grants
that
they're
applying
for
and
we
coordinate
with
them,
as
specifically
with
some
of
our
Opera
funds,
if
there's
an
opportunity
to
leverage
those
to
make
sure
that
we
hit
all
the
areas
but
a
lot
of
interest
and
a
lot
of
service
providers
just
Broadband
in
general.
The
reason
again
not
to
mention
this
to,
but
not
to
reiterate
this
more
than
it
needs
to
be.
G
But
we
didn't
obligate
a
lot
of
funds
inside
of
arpa
for
Broadband,
because
there's
a
lot
of
funding
coming
from
the
federal
government
that
funding
is
coming
through
the
internet
service
providers.
So
there
may
be
an
opportunity
where
we
can
pair
up
with
them.
But
the
fact
that
we've
got
the
ones
locally,
they're
industry,
plus
some
outside
ones,
is
very
promising
that
we're
going
to
fix
our
Broadband
holes
within
the
county.
So
that
is
my
report
and
I'm
gladly
answering
questions
to
that.
So
any.
A
Questions
for
Jared,
thank
you
as
always,
and
when
you
have
need
to
a
point
of
Mr
Arthur
Henman
to
the
Lowcountry
Regional
Transportation
authority
to
fill
a
partial
term
through
2024.
Look
for
a
motion
to
approve
that.
Thank
you.
Second,
second,
okay,
any
objection
seeing
none
that
stands
approved
without
objection.
We
have
a
need
to
go
into
executive
session
for
two
items.
One
has
to
do
with
potential
acquisition,
purchase
of
1505
North
Street
and
the
other
one
has
to
do
with
some
land
swaps,
with
the
town
of
Hilton.
E
A
B
X
Fort
Fremont
closes
out
a
350
Year
Legacy
of
coastal
fortifications
in
Port
Royal
sound
beginning
in
the
mid
16th
century.
It
also
represents
the
closing
chapter
of
America's
coastal
defense
system
before
the
dawn
of
air
power.
Fort
Fremont
is
some
an
example
of
the
most
advanced
military
technology
of
its
time.
It
would
parallel
the
B-17
and
aircraft
carrier
of
World
War
II.
The
F-35
of
today
Fort
Fremont
was
an
important
part
of
the
Beaufort
culture
very
similar
to
Paris
Island
and
the
Marine
Corps
Air
Base.
Today.
Y
They
called
the
navigational
Point
La
Punta
de
Santa
Eleni,
the
point
of
Saint
Helena,
and
what
the
Spanish
explorers
discovered
is
that
Port
Royal
sound
is
a
unique
piece
of
geography.
It's
the
deepest
natural
Harbor
south
of
the
Chesapeake
Bay,
possibly
south,
of
New
York,
the
channel
into
Port
Royal
sound.
This
I
find
a
remarkable
geological
fact.
Y
It
became
the
first
capital
of
Florida
and
they
explored
the
back
country
from
this
location
for
more
than
a
century,
with
the
object
of
building
a
highway
from
This
Magnificent
Harbor
to
Mexico
City.
So
the
sound
was
known
to
the
Spaniards.
It
was
known
to
the
French,
who
actually
got
here
first
and
followed
and
created
the
first
Protestant
colony
in
the
New
World
on
Paris
Island
over
my
shoulder
and
that
colony
was
a
failure.
The
Spaniards
replaced
them.
Y
It
was
part
of
Spanish
Florida
when
the
English
arrived
150
years
later,
and
this
was
became
as
a
consequence,
a
Battleground
in
the
18th
century,
between
Spanish
interests
in
Florida
and
Saint
Augustine
and
the
English
colony
in
Carolina
and
in
Charleston
and
back
and
forth.
These
wars
went
many
of
them,
Naval
Wars,
many
of
them,
employing
as
all
the
sailors
Knew
by
then
the
magic
of
Port
Royal
South.
When
the
Civil
War
came,
Confederates
defended
the
harbor,
but
it
was
basically
indefensible
against
large
Naval
forces.
Y
in
a
four-hour
Cannon
Aid,
which
would
have
been
deafening
from
where
we're
sitting
Was
Heard
for
miles
from
Savannah.
Nearly
to
Charleston
it
was
called
The
Day
of
the
big
gun
shoot
during
the
Civil
War.
This
Harbor
that
we're
looking
at
was
filled
with
ships.
It
would
be
hundreds
of
ships
in
this
Harbor
there
was
a
thousand
foot
dock
with
a
railroad
on
top
off
of
Hilton
Head.
Y
Z
After
the
Civil
War
we're
going
to
see
a
massive
change
in
technology,
that's
going
to
revolutionize
the
military.
During
the
Civil
War,
we
had
Ironclad
ships,
we
had
rifled
cannons,
but
they
were
all
made
out
of
iron
and
they
were
not
terribly
effective,
but
its
technology
is
going
to
change
after
the
Civil
War.
We're
going
to
see
steel
produced
and
steel
is
much
harder.
So
now
we
have
a
new
materials
to
make
armor
out
of
for
ships.
So
we
can
have
these
armored
ships
made
with
steel
and
much
more
resistance.
Z
A
shot
because
I
have
steel.
I
can
make
stronger
barrels
for
my
guns.
I
can
rifle
and
machine
these
much
better
and
the
rifling
is
the
spirals
that
are
cutting
the
barrel
allows
it
to
shoot
further
with
more
accuracy,
and
we
can
also
now
have
breech
loading
guns
that
can
lock
from
behind.
So
I
can
load
my
gun
from
behind
I
don't
have
to
go.
Have
the
whole
black
powder
muzzle
loading
Cannon
head
before
now?
Z
I
can
fire
much
more
rapidly
if
I
compare
the
gun
of
1890
to
The
Guns
of
1860
for
the
same
caliber,
the
same
diameter
gun
the
1990
gun
will
be
able
to
fire.
Projectile
is
four
times:
heavier
can
shoot
it
three
times
further,
can
put
it
in
with
greater
precision
and
can
put
it
through
much
more
armor
than
anything
we
had
in
1860s
World
difference.
Z
A
military
historian,
ER
Lewis
would
say
that
the
change
between
the
Civil,
War
and
1890
in
artillery
technology
was
the
greatest
that
would
be
seen
since
invention
of
artillery
in
the
14th
century
to
the
introduction
of
the
nuclear
projectile
in
the
1950s.
So
there's
been
a
huge
change
in
gun
technology.
At
the
same
time,
it's
not
just
the
steel
but
also
the
powder
that
fires.
These
guns
is
different.
We
have
new
chemical
makeup
and
so
like
cordite
is
invented
now
and
it's
still
a
widely
used
military
explosive.
Z
Even
today,
smokeless
power
is
invented
during
this
period
of
time,
and
it's
not
just
chemical
composition,
but
it's
the
details
of
how
you
make
the
grain
how
fast
they
burn.
So
much
like
the
skill
of
firing.
A
solid
rocket,
solid
fuel
rocket,
it's
that
same
kind
of
technology
has
been
developed
in
these
gunpowder
and
this
new
powder.
So
our
weapons
of
this
day
are
much
much
greater.
They
would
be
the
great
killing
machines
of
World
War
One,
most
of
the
casualties
on
the
battlefields,
World
War
one
would
come
from
artillery.
Z
Z
They
are
now
equipped
with
these
fine
long
range
guns
and
they
now
become
the
dominant
threat
of
the
late
19th
early
20th
century.
This
is
the
threat.
The
French
and
English
would
bombard
cities
like
Cairo
and
reduce
them
to
Rubble
because
they
were
unable
to
defend
them.
So
this
is
how
the
world
was
seeing
the
threat
from
this
new
technology.
Big
battleships,
are
the
threat
of
the
era
and
new
guns
and
fortifications
on
the
ground
or
what
you
have
to
have
to
defend
against
them.
Y
One
of
the
most
important
and
first
things
that
happened
after
the
Civil
War
is
they
built
a
railroad
to
Port
Royal
sound
which
didn't
exist.
It
was
the
first
connection
of
the
sea
Islands
to
the
mainland.
The
advantage
of
that
railroad
is
it
brought
cold,
Port
Royal
South.
So
when
the
coal
was
delivered,
the.
Z
Navy
followed
in
1872,
Robert
Smalls
was
in
the
South
Carolina
legislature
and
he
pushed
through
a
resolution
to
the
Secretary
of
War,
calling
for
them
to
put
a
Navy
station
on
Paris
Island
and
eventually
he
would
go
into
Congress
where
he
would
continue
his
support
for
a
Navy
station.
Here
in
the
Beaufort
Port
Royal
area.
They
eventually
opened
a
Navy
station
here
and
a
cooling
station.
Y
They
created
in
the
1890s
on
Paris
Island,
the
largest
Dry
Dock
in
the
United
States.
This
is
the
period
when
the
U.S
Navy
was
switching
from
sail
to
steam.
All
the
Navies
of
the
world
need
the
coaling
station.
This
was
the
principal
Kohli
station
because
of
the
railroad
for
the
Caribbean
and
South
American
U.S
fleets.
This
would
be
the.
Z
Biggest
Dry
Dock
south
of
Norfolk-
in
fact,
it
is
the
only
Dry
Dock
south
of
Norfolk
Virginia,
that's
capable
of
taking
these
new
modern
battleships
to
these
new
modern
armored
Cruisers.
So
this
becomes
at
this
point
a
strategic
Navy
Basin
that
it
provides
coal
and
it
provides
a
top-line
support
to
the
ships
and
they
can
repair
the
hulls
of
even
the
biggest
ships
in
the
U.S
Navy.
Z
Following
Civil
War
National
strategy
and
emphasis
in
the
United
States
shifted
from
to
recovery
from
war,
and
all
of
our
Coastal
fortifications
went
into
neglect.
The
military
was
busy
taming,
the
west
and
Coastal
defenses
became
something
that
was
no
longer
important
and
the
rest
of
the
world
technology
is
moving
forward
and
they're
developing
these
battleships
they're
developing
new
high
quality
artillery,
and
this
is
going
on
worldwide
and
in
1885
president
Grover
Cleveland
appointed
the
Endicott
board.
Z
This
was
headed
by
secretary
War,
Endicott,
William
Endicott,
and
the
board
would
meet
initial
report
in
1886
and
they
said
the
conditions
of
our
Coastal
defenses
were
just
unbearably
cannot
be
allowed
to
stay
like
that,
and
they
made
recommendations
for
fortification
and
improvements.
They
identified
29
places
that
needed
fortifications
and
11
of
which
were
critical
in
that
list
of
29,
Savannah
and
Charleston
on
the
list.
But
Beaufort
is
not
on
the
list.
They'll
take
international
events
to
bring
Beaufort
into
the
play
of
modern
Fort
technology.
Y
So
the
USS
Maine
was
here
on
patrol
and
in
the
harbor
and
while
they
were
in
the
harbor
several
times,
they
entertained
the
local
population.
So
the
merchants
and
the
social
leaders
and
the
political
leaders
of
Beaufort
were
invited
to
come,
have
lunch
with
the
captain
of
the
ship.
Captain
sigsby
and
the
officers
got
to
know
the
people.
The
people
got
to
know
the
officers.
The
crew,
which
was
large,
would
go
ashore
on
payday
and
make
friends
with
everybody
in
town.
Z
At
that
point,
somebody
in
the
war
department
realized
that
we
had
this
big
Dry
Dock,
the
only
Dry
Dock
in
the
South
that
could
take
on
and
repair
these
big
Capital
ships
that
were
in
our
Navy
we're
going
to
start
operations
against
a
power
in
the
Caribbean,
and
this
fort
was
totally
undefended
and
that's
what
put
Fort
Fremont
on
the
map
we
had
to
have
a
fort
here
to
defend
the
coaling
station,
and
especially
this
big
Dry
Dock,
as
well
as
this
fine
Harbor.
That's
here.
Y
And,
of
course,
that
event,
which
killed
300
or
more
Sailors
on
the
ship
was
very
much
followed
by
the
local
news
media
and
very
much
lamented
by
the
many
friends
that
the
crew
had
made
here.
The
destruction
of
the
USS
Maine
was
a
personal
matter
to
Beaufort
and
to
Port
Royal
South
and
of
course
it
was
the
Spanish-American
War
and
the
attempt
to
defend
this
Harbor
again,
which
led
to
the
creation
of
Fort
Fremont.
The
United
States
declared
war
on
Spain
in
in
April
1898.
Y
Z
By
early
may,
we
had
temporary
batteries
in
place
here,
submarine
mines
were
in
place
and
in
the
summer
they
would
actually
place
the
mines
across
the
Beaufort
river.
Behind
me,
the
temporary
batteries
were
a
temporary
expedient.
They
were
located
to
my
left
about
a
thousand
yards.
They've
immediately
began
construction
of
what
would
become
Fort
Fremont,
the
large
batteries
with
the
house
of
large
guns
battery
four
Nance,
the
rapid
fire
guns.
The
smaller
battery
was
completed
by
June
of
1898.
Y
A
C
First,
one
I
I
move
that
we
recommend
to
council
to
authorize
the
County
Administrator
to
enter
into
a
purchase
and
sale
agreement
with
the
town
of
Hilton
Head
for
the
sale
and
purchase
of
real
property
consisting
of
68
Helms
Helmsman
way.
43
Jenkins,
Road,
70,
Bagel,
Road
and
152
Hilton
Head
Parkway.
A
AA
AA
Can
you
hear
me
yeah
the
properties
in
which
the
county
owned
are
70,
Bagel,
Road
and
152
William
Hilton
Parkway?
These
properties
are
the
location
of
some
parks
that
the
county
currently
owns.
We
would
be
deeding
those
over
to
the
town
of
Hilton
Head.
The
town
of
Hilton
Head
in
return
will
be
deeding
to
us,
a
portion
of
Helens
and
way
property
that
they
own.
That
is
located
underneath
the
flyover,
in
addition
to
that,
they'd
also
be
providing
us.
AA
AA
A
A
AA
5505
North
Street
is
a
property
adjacent
to
two
other
lots
that
the
county
acquired
last
January
I
believe
this
property
is
located
right
behind
the
courthouse
that
is
potentially
our
in
the
near
future,
going
to
be
occupied
by
the
sheriff's
department,
and
it
consists
of
0.3
acres
and
the
sales
of
the
proceeds
from
the
sale
are
going
to
be
used
at
the
South
Side
park
by
the
city
of
Beaufort.
Okay,.
F
A
L
J
J
U
A
Just
one
comment
from
me:
as
the
Germans
wrap
up
one
one
of
the
things
that
we
have
open,
that
we'd
like
to
tidy
up
before
year
end
is
the
facilities
plan
that
was
done,
I
guess
a
year
year
and
a
half
ago,
and
so
we're
going
to
have
a
discussion
at
the
October
PFC.
But
it's
something
you
may
want
to
refresh
your
memories
on
ahead
of
time
and
if
you
don't
have
the
plan
I'm
sure
we
can
get
you
a
copy
of
that,
but
essentially
there's
two
pieces
to
the
potential
discussion.
A
One
is,
as
the
Consultants
put
it
together.
There
were
kind
of
three
Alternatives
that
or
possibilities,
so
we
can
zero
in
on
on
those.
That
would
be
good
for
us
as
a
council
to
weigh
in
beforehand
and
the
other,
it's
kind
of
led
to
a
possible
discussion
that
we've
been
having
on
an
alternative
way
to
finance
some
of
these
types
of
things.
L
Dude
man
I
make
too
quick
announcements
which
have
nothing
to
do
with
the
public
facilities.
Number
one
is
September
is
the
is
Leukemia
awareness
month
and
well.
Carol
and
Harley
Russ
are
hosting
a
blood
drive
this
Saturday
September
24th
from
10
a.m,
to
4
P.M
at
51,
Sunset
Boulevard,
ladies
Island,
and
the
second
thing
I
want
to
mention
is
when
we
were
talking
about
the
the
setback
or
the
lack
of
setback
on
the
on
the
Butler
Marine
I
made
this
statement.
L
I
just
made
this
statement
many
times,
actually
that
that
that
was
at
the
instance
of
the
city
of
Beaufort
and
I've,
since
learned
that
that
that
was
not
entirely
true,
because
it
wasn't
annexed,
it
was
annexed
in
the
city
of
Buford.
After
the
setback
had
already
been
established,
the
setback
was
was
as
a
result
of
an
agreement
between
Beaufort
County
and
the
City
of
Beaufort
some
years
ago,
and
that's
so
I
I
was
misspoke.
I
said
it
was
actually
City
Buford
and
Beaver
County
jointly
did
it
thank.
A
You
we'll
leave
it
out
of
the
minutes
that
you
misspoke
okay,
well,
one
of
the
quickly
I
forgot
to
mention
we're
in
the
c5c
C
Island
a
Parkway
discussion
in
in
separate
conversations
with
both
Eric
and
with
Stephen
Murray.
It
appears
that
there's
some
agreement.
We
ought
to
do
with
charette
of
some
sort
work
through
the
details
and
the
the
city
and
the
county
would
maybe
go
50
50
on
the
cost
of
that
thing,
we.