►
Description
Meeting agenda can be found at: https://mccmeetings.blob.core.usgovcloudapi.net/blufftonsc-pubu/MEET-Agenda-1fd78579e1904c6bbdefbe8670c4341f.pdf
A
B
B
A
A
A
E
D
A
F
A
E
B
A
In
your
garden
and
your
family,
so
just
for
those
of
you
new
to
this,
we
we
acknowledge
our
students
of
the
month,
so
every
cluster
picks
a
student
out
of
the
whole
entire
cluster
from
kindergarten
to
high
school,
and
we
have
12
or
13,
probably
14,
000
kids
in
our
clusters,
so
I
think
it's
a
big
deal
when,
when
there's
one
chosen
from
all
those
students
and
your
she
won
this
over
perseverance.
So
is
there
anyone
that
wants
to
speak
about
his
perseverance
is
his
only.
G
A
G
He
has
a
rare
form
of
epilepsy,
called
scna
and
it's
a
genetic
form
of
epilepsy,
and
we
are
very
thankful
for
what
what
he
has
become,
as
well
as
a
young
man
in
kindergarten,
and
he
has
very
severe
seizures
and
it
causes
a
few
issues
with
gross
and
fine
motor
skills,
but
he
is
always
trying
to
do
this.
This
is
his
twin
sister
Ruby,
his
older
sister
Lila,
and
he
is
always
trying
to
keep
up
with
her
and
he
never
gives
up.
He
wants
to
do
everything
that
she
does
and
she
he
is.
G
Always
most
of
the
time,
happy
I
think
he's
five
years
old,
so
he
is
most
of
the
time
with
a
smile
on
his
face,
you
can
find
him
goofing
around
laughing
dancing
and
singing
and
doing
all
kinds
of
things
and
we're
just
so
thankful
that
we
have
all
of
our
children
in
our
life
and
yeah
he's.
Definitely
special
well.
A
And
you
can
frame
it.
The
best
thing
is
that
cooling
we
do
not
give
these
out
to
Capri
buttons
and
you
can
talk
to
Chief
babkowitz
about
these
coins
and
if
you
never
want
him
to
come
to
your
school
and
talk
about
these
coins,
he
will
come
so
this
is
for
you
and
only
okay,
so
you
can
collect
those
and
I
love,
seeing
the
People
video
and
smiling.
So
it
sounds
like
all
three:
don't
teach
you're
welcome
all
right.
F
A
F
I
I
I
The
idea
of
the
voucher
programs
and
jurisdictional
needs
specific
to
Bluffton
the
piece
that
is
kind
of
accelerating
fast,
because
Community
Works
has
done
this
elsewhere
as
existing
product
is
the
developer
piece
so
really
working
with
developers
to
understand
who
might
be
interested
in
developing,
affordable
housing
within
the
town
and
then
their
products.
Their
loan
products
are
related
to
I
know
them
their
loan
products
are
related
to
you
know,
giving
opportunities
to
developers
to
build
affordable
housing
here.
I
I
Again,
most
of
them
are
around.
How
are
we
prioritizing
the
products
and
the
pipeline?
But
what
I'm
really
trying
to
make
sure
remains
in
every
meeting
is
remembering
the
people
that
we
are
serving
and
what
the
true
picture
is
of
Beaufort
and
Jasper
County,
and
that
affordable
housing
isn't
just
about
giving
developer
incentives
so
that
we
can
build
affordable
housing.
It's
about
creating
housing
opportunities
that
are
available
to
the
people
who
live
here,
and
it's
about
thinking
about
the
entire
Continuum
of
affordable
housing.
I
I
You
want
to
live
with
your
sister,
her
husband
and
her
three
kids
and
your
family.
So
now
there's
couple
households
within
a
household
and
that
is
also
not
optimal.
So
how
are
we
focused
on
helping
the
folks
that
you've
helped
through
the
neighborhood
assistance
program
that
self-help
and
deep
well
helps
by
making
sure
that
people
who
own
a
home
can
stay
in
that
home
and
making
sure
that
it's
safe
and
dry?
I
So
those
are
the
things
that
I
keep
bringing
to
the
table
for
this
board
so
that
we're
not
just
focused
on
the
pipeline
and
the
products
and
the
priorities.
But
we're
also
thinking
that
one
of
the
priorities
is
indeed
the
people,
so
I
feel
like
to
be
completely
Frank.
And
maybe
this
is
why
you
place
me
on
the
sport
I'm
a
little
bit
of
the
pop
star
in
the
room
and
I'm
proud
to
be
that,
but
I
don't
think
we
can
lose
sight
of
the
fact
that
we're
talking
about
our
residents.
A
A
L
A
D
A
Minutes,
regardless
of
whether
the
person
is
speaking
on
their
behalf
or
as
an
agent
for
others,
meeting
attendees
may
not
donate
transfer,
yield
or
get
all
or
any
portion
of
their
speaking
time
to
another
person.
All
public
comments
are
be
conducted
from
the
podium
and
directed
to
this
Council
as
a
whole
and
not
to
any
member
thereof.
All
speakers
shall
be
mindful
and
respectful
of
those
participating
in
or
present
at
the
meeting.
They
shall
be
expected
to
be
civil
in
their
language
and
shall
refrain
from
comment.
L
D
A
Abstain
or
indecent
remarks
or
disruptive
actions,
you
shall
confine
your
comments
to
the
jurisdiction
of
this
Council,
and
this
is
not
a
period
where
you
promote
advertised
Awards,
businesses,
Services,
Goods
or
candidates
for
public
office.
Anyone
that
violates
these
rules
will
be
ruled
out
of
order,
and
this
is
pursuant
to
our
section
2.49.
A
I
D
M
A
D
A
A
A
A
The
rules
Miss
really
is
here
and
we
would
love
for
her
to
come
up.
What,
from
what
I've
seen
is
really
when
she
speaks,
is
very
respectful
and
she
puts
out
the
issues
of
the
day
she
is
here.
She
cannot
yield
or
transfer
her
time
to
you
if
she
does
then
you're
speaking
for
her
and
you're
not
going
to
be
able
to
speak
your
public
comment,
those
are
our
rules.
Okay,
so,
okay.
L
N
You're
not
gonna,
be
allowed
to
violate
your
power
of
attorney
you're,
not
going
to
be
allowed
to
do
that
and
I'm
going
to
make
my
three-minute
comment,
and
if
you
don't
want
to
hear
my
comment
or
my
comment
from
us
really,
you
could
certainly
leave
the
room
yourself
I'm
not
going
to
leave
the
room
this.
This
is
not
your
house,
it's
our
house,
you
serve
us,
you
serve
the
citizens,
we
don't
serve.
You
I
think
you
all
are
confused
about
who
serves.
A
F
A
N
E
N
K
G
D
K
A
N
Sir
okay,
so
so
our
new
Republican
Club
will
ask
the
top
hard
questions.
The
current
officials
to
fully
answer
example,
Perry,
passing
itself,
though,
when
you
comply
to
Foy
and
the
law
or
not,
we
don't
want
lawyer
political
answers
or
Wars
no
answer.
Taxpayers
elect
officials
based
on
a
very
simple
reason
and
guiding
principle.
They
agree
to
comply
to
their
campaign,
promises
and
agree
to
approve,
spend
and
guard
our
tax
money
like
their
own
family
money,
not
continue
to
vote
for
illegal
tax
use
and
long
violations
with
no
transparency.
N
Please
pay
attention
Miss
silica
and
show
me
respect
like
I.
Do
you
this
is
not
funny
money
or
a
game
of
Monopoly.
Our
tax
money
is
hard
to
earn
real
money.
I
look
forward
to
seeing
more
people
attend
all
our
Council
meetings
to
speak
or
clap
for
others
who
support
and
share
the
facts.
Fcwatchdog.Com.
N
N
A
N
N
F
N
N
D
N
H
D
N
A
A
N
C
N
N
N
C
J
N
J
So
in
January,
I
was
found
to
miss
Bluffton
and
I
am
reaching
in
South
Carolina
in
June,
and
so
with
them
in
South,
Carolina,
Ms
America
organization.
We
have
the
opportunity
to
pick
a
social
impact
this
year,
and
so
my
social
impact
initiative
is
calling
a
timeout
which
is
Raising
awareness
and
ending
the
stigma
of
mental
health
struggles
and
athletes,
and
so
growing
up
I
was
a
dancer.
I've
been
dancing
since
I
was
three
years
old
and
I'm.
Now
on
the
dance
team
at.
J
J
That
no
one
really
talks
about
it.
You
see
it
with
some
of
the
Olympic
level,
athletes
and
mobiles
Michael
Phelps,
but
no
one's
talking
about
it
with
people,
my
age
and
so
that's
my
goal
serving
Bluffton
this
year
is
to
get
into
the
schools
talk
to
the
student
athletes,
get
it
started
at
a
young
age
that
we
have
to
practice
proper
mental
health,
especially
athletes,
because
we're
not
always
strong
and
we're
not
always
people
who
can
always
entertain
the
citizens.
So
what
that's?
Really?
What
I
want
to
do?
E
E
No
I'm
just
very
saddened
that
you
guys
had
to
experience
this
show
that
just
went
on
in
there
I
don't
think
this
was
something
that
just
came
up
tonight.
In
fact,
I
know
it
didn't.
It's
been
brewing
for
the
last
eight
or
nine
ten
years
that
I
know
of
so
we
we
don't
normally
have
to
experience
the
rest
of
the
matter.
So
thank
you
for
understanding
the.
B
That
I
gave
earlier
shows
that
everybody
doesn't
listen
on
a
Prayer
or
even
want
to
be
civil
enough
to
respect
those
that
around
you
so
again,
I'd
like
to
apologize
now
and
I
think
that
my
gotta
be
principle
about
prayer
and
being
a
and
being
a
man
of
faith
is
disappointing
to
me
as
well.
Thank
you.
D
E
Think
we're
all
taken
aback
tonight
and
yes,
we're
it's
unfortunate
that
this
is
part
of
our
civil
society.
Today
we
work
hard
to
let
everybody
have
a
free
time.
The
three
minutes
to
speak
we've
always
acknowledged
that
we
realize
it's
our
job
to
hear
it.
But
what
we're
hearing
is
not
actually
three
minutes
to
make
a
comment:
it's
a
three-minute
assault
and.
E
This
is
what
we've
had
to
listen
to,
but
those
who
don't
know
what's
going
on
need
to
understand:
it's
not
just
a
town
of
love
and
it's
under
assault
by
Mr
Hoagland.
It's
also
the
town
of
Hilton
Head
and
other
communities,
Myrtle,
Beach,
Charleston
and
so
forth,
and
so
on.
Even
the
legislators
at
the
State
House
and
the
state
supreme
court
all
have
been
under
assault
by
Mr
Hoagland.
E
So
the
moment
you,
those
of
you
sitting
in
the
audience
tonight
that
have
never
held
the
public
office,
the
moment
that
you
run
for
public
office
and
step
across
that
threshold
and
Mr
hoagland's
eyes,
you
become
a
criminal
in
a
crook.
So
again,
if
you
didn't
know
this,
I
wanted
to
share
this
with
everybody
in
the
room
and
I
hope
to
share
it
again,
going
forward
into
the
future
a
lot
of
people
don't
know
what
is
transpiring
is
intentional.
A
I
can't
we're
sorry,
we
overlooked
the
public
comment.
Actually
we're
very
proud
of
you.
I'm
not
gonna,
repeat
everything,
but
don't
let
this
give
you
a
bad
taste
in
your
amount
to
involved,
because
our
town
we've
got
a
new,
affordable
housing.
Now
right
here,
don't
let
it
change
your
mind.
We're
a
wonderful
town
and
I
think
we
open
ourselves
up
to
as
much
advice
and
criticism
as
we
do
with
us,
but
we
can
all
do
it
together.
A
So
please
don't
think
twice
if
you
want
to
be
on
the
border
permission
or
if
you're
running
for
Council
or
whatever
you
want
to
do
anywhere.
It
is
a
privilege
to
sit
here
and
I
know
myself.
I
know
what
I've
done
and
I
look
in
the
mirror.
Every
night
and
I
sleep
pretty
darn
well,
because
I
think
I
do
the
best
for
this
town
as
the
rest
of
these.
So
thank
you.
Thank
you.
Mr
King
I
can
make
one
comment.
L
L
Prior
to
the
meeting
being
called
to
order,
I
asked
Mr
Hogan
if
I
could
speak
with
him
for
a
moment.
I
went
back
into
the
little
conference
room
behind
Matthias
here
with
the
intention
of
explaining
to
him
that
he
had
was
limited
to
three
minutes
whether
he
had
a
power
of
attorney.
Whether
someone
was
going
to
try
to
give
him
three
minutes
of
what
he
would
be
eliminated
for
three
minutes.
He
cut
me
off
and
said
the
Only
Rule.
A
K
We
have
the
quarter
ending
December
31st
Apex
applications
presented
for
consideration.
There
were
three
applicants:
this
quarter,
Palmetto
blocks
Conservancy
the
directory
Club
of
Hilton,
Head
or
I'm;
sorry
at
Bluffton,
all-time,
left
in
merchant
Society
for
a
total
of
64
000
being
requested
for
a
tax
funds.
K
K
D
A
H
A
D
E
A
A
D
A
K
J
D
A
A
K
Yes,
so
we're
actually
going
to
do
another
Workshop
and
planned
for
the
for
the
summer
and
hopefully
we'll
be
able
to
get
those.
You
know
whoever
wants
to
come
in
and
ask
questions
and
kind
of
see
what
all
is
entailed
with
the
application.
So
we're
hoping
to
get
a
good
turnout
for
that.
We
do
try
and
put.
We
do
Post
everything
in
the
newspapers
and
we
try
and
post
on
social
media,
but
we'll
look
at
ramping
that
up
as
well.
That's.
A
A
D
A
Thank
you
next
number,
two:
under
formal
items,
consideration
of
ordinance
amending
to
town
left
in
2023
budget
to
provide
percentage
versus
certain
funds
and
allocate
source
of
revenue
for
said
funds.
This
is
second
reading
there
weren't
any
changes
from
the
first
reading.
Do
you
all
have
questions
or
any
other
concerns
over.
E
A
O
Evening,
good
evening,
Marion
Town
Council.
Thank
you
very
much.
So,
as
you
just
stated
this,
this
application
is
before
you
for
the
village
of
hadir,
also
known
as
seagrass
station.
From
an
aerial
standpoint,
you
can
see
I've
highlighted
the
the
property
in
yellow
surrounding
it
is
properties,
that's
owned
by
Beaufort
County,
there's
portions
of
the
okatee,
the
headwaters
and
then
Sun
City
to
the
West.
O
Here
is
just
another
aerial,
so
you
can
kind
of
see
the
the
property
what's
not
shown
is
that
there
is
an
apartment
complex
that
this
is
an
older
aerial.
So
just
just
note
that
the
area
right
here
that
I'm
highlighting
is
where
the
Crown
at
170
apartment
complex,
is
located.
I
wanted
to
highlight
a
couple
of
items
here:
first
off
the
property:
that's
in
essence
to
the
South
is
owned
by
Beaufort
County,
that's
formerly
the
Kent
Estates,
which
was
a
property
that
was
extinguished.
O
The
development
rights
are
then
put
in
the
the
density
bank
and
that
property
is
currently
zoned
preserved
behind
it.
You
have
property
also
owned
by
Beaufort
County
and
that's
the
okatee
regional
park,
and
that
is
part
of
the
Buckwalter
PUD
Bayer
Park,
even
further
off
Sun
City
down
here
and
then
just
some
of
the
adjacent
properties
have
a
mixed
use,
designation
that
are
in
the
county
again
from
the
material.
You
can
see
that
we
have
the
County
Properties
surrounding
this.
O
This
is
a
copy
of
the
existing
master
plan,
I'm
going
to
just
kind
of
run
through
these
quickly.
Here
the
applicant
is
proposing
to
make
some
modifications
to
this
plan,
and
then
here
the
first
of
the
first
modification
is
the
removal
of
the
road
that
I
have
shown
here.
This
is
the
existing
plan
of
a
proposed
Road
they're,
proposing
to
just
just
bring
that
line
a
little
bit
higher
for
that
for
the
color.
What
will
happen
is
the
overall
density.
That's
in
this
PUD
is
not
changing.
O
So,
even
though
the
lines
on
this
paper
show
that
it
is
increasing,
they
have
there's
a
total
of
four
hundred
and
four
thousand
square
feet
of
commercial
density
rights
associated
with
Village
overdeer.
So
that
number
does
not
change.
Each
of
these
properties
have
rights
that
are
designated
to
it.
I
don't
have
that
the
number
for
this
property
right
off
top
my
head,
but
they
are
not
allowed
to
go
over
the
square
footage
that
they've
already
been
allocated
for
what
this
does.
Is
it
it?
O
The
applicant
would
no
longer
just
have
a
proposed
road,
but
as
this
site
were
developed,
they
would
still
provide
an
internal
circulation,
so
it
would
be
in
the
form
of
a
driveway.
It
could
be
a
drive
through
the
parking
lot,
but
not
necessarily
a
two-lane
road
that
you
would
see
on
the
existing
plan
and
then
the
other
item
is
specifically
for
the
applicant
is
looking
to
to
remove
the
vehicular
access
point
again.
O
You
can
see
on
the
existing
master
plan
that
there
was
a
a
write-in
write
out
only
on
Highway
170
to
access
the
commercial
development
and
then
ultimately,
into
the
residential
portion
of
the
development
they're,
requesting
that
this
be
a
vehicular
emergency
gated
access.
Only
also
this
was
not
in
the
staff
report
and
it's
from
speaking
with
the
applicant
very
recently.
They
are
amenable
to
providing
a
pedestrian
slash
bike
access
through
a
portion
of
their
property.
O
O
This
is
a
schematic
of
the
site
plan
that
the
applicant
is
proposing
again.
This
is
not
necessarily
this
site
plan
just
just
by
reviewing
this,
and
if
there's
this
master
plan
was
approved.
That
does
not
approve
this
site
plan,
but
it
gives
you
a
visual
to
see
that
Highway
70
is
here
at
the
top
of
the
the
page.
O
O
O
foreign
was
proposing
these
amendments.
We
asked
them
to
make
some
updates
to
this
master
plan
to
reflect
what's
actually
out
there
right
now,
so
I'm
going
to
go
through
these
one
at
a
time.
So
the
first
item
was
I'll
start
with
over
here.
This
is
to
the
north
of
the
development.
The
previous
plan
showed
a
connection
to
that
adjacent
property.
That's
in
the
county,
the
one
I
refer
to
as
the
regional
commercial
development.
O
O
E
H
E
O
Around
the
back
of
it-
okay,
yes,
sir,
yes,
sir,
so
that
was
that
was
item
number
one
that
we
had
requested
for
them
to
make
uptakes
too
item
number
two
previous
plans
showed
park
space
that
was
carved
off
similar
to
what
you
see
on
the
existing
plan
that
park
space
has
been
incorporated
into
the
design
of
the
apartment
complex.
So
there's
walking
trails,
there's
recreational
uses
in
there.
O
D
O
Was
I
kind
of
blown
it
up
right
here?
This
road
right
here
initially
like
we'd,
come
across
into
what
was
Kent
Estates
at
the
time
and
since
Kent's
Estates
was
extinguished,
the
property
turned
to
preserve
the
need
for
that
road
was
was,
was
no
longer
there.
I
also
wanted
to
to
point
out
that,
currently
on
the
property,
our
two
Beaufort
County
stormwater
ponds.
These
ponds
are
designed
to
collect
runoff
of
170,
as
well
as
higher
up
to
clean
the
water
before
it
hits
the
headwaters
to
the
okatee.
O
This
at
their
January
25th
meeting
and
the
the
recommendation
was
to
approve
with
replacing
that
residential
Road
connection
that
we
refer
to
from
Y
and
Z
with
the
Gated
emergency
access
and
then
to
remove
that
road
from
from
X.
However,
it
still
will
allow
for
that
connectivity
between
them,
just
not
necessarily
in
that
single
two-lane
road
format
that
we've
seen
from
a
review
criteria.
I
met
all
the
review
criteria,
I'm
happy
to
go
over.
O
If
you
have
specific
questions
about
either
one
of
them,
your
actions
are
to
approve,
approve
the
conditions
or
to
deny
the
request
through
a
process.
Again,
we've
been
talking
with
the
applicants
since
September
of
last
year
and
then
we're
here
this
evening,
I'm
able
to
answer
any
questions
and
Mr
Nester
is
representing
the
applicant.
He
is
here
to
answer
any
questions
you
may
have
for
him.
E
I
would
say
for
me
going
forward
when
we
reference,
because
we're
always
asking
does
developers
to
go
talk
to
the
property
owners
so
going
forward
when
we
do
something
like
this,
when
I
see
68
I
have
to
ask
myself
68
of
what,
in
other
words,
I,
don't
know
how
many
residents
that
live
in
the
place,
if
say,
that's
200,
but
you
could
have
only
10,
say
favorably
and
68
of
that.
If.
E
E
I
mean,
frankly,
the
connection
that's
being
requested
to
be
turned
into
emergency
would
have
been
a
good
access
for
the
property
owners
in
there
and
take
some
some
wear
and
tear
off
the
front
road,
which
was
one
of
their
concerns
going
in
and
out,
but
that's
their.
You
know,
that's
their
property.
They
can,
if
that's
their
opinion
and
so
be
it.
But
I
would
like
to
know
that
eventually
there's
another
access.
You
know
egress
Ingress
somewhere.
O
A
O
O
O
The
the
applicant
currently
has
that
project
or
that
property
under
contract
now
timing,
wise
I'm,
not
sure
how
they're
they're
planning
that's
a
question
for
them,
but
as
this
property
X
develops,
this
connection
would
then
come
online.
So
this
connection
here,
that's
now
your
second
access
point
for
for
the
entire
development.
O
M
E
O
E
For
commercial
to
residential
involved
in
this
master
plan,
yes,
sir
good,
when
what
I'm
looking
at
just
food
for
thought,
what
we've
got
here
I
understand
why
they
don't
want
to
put
the
road
in
the
middle
there
where
it's
you
know.
Originally,
it
was
supposed
to
go,
but
we
also
have
these
other
two
Parcels
I,
probably
don't
want
to
do
exactly
what
was
drawn
up
the
way
it's
drawn
up
now
too.
O
A
About
that
just
so
you
know
we
talk
about
it
in
public
whenever
we
like
we're
dealing
with
this
road
removal,
but
council
did
not
vote
on
the
removal
of
the
two
access
points,
North
and
South.
So
we
all
know
now
different
people
that
this
book
were
Council
because
I
don't
think
Council
literally
moved
those
two
access
points
going
north
and
itself
on
this
I.
Don't
know
why
we're
taking
a
road
from
a
property?
That's
an
applicant
is
trying
to
change
and
he
hasn't
even
closed
on
it.
A
D
A
It's
a
precedent:
Like
Larry
said
that
when
whoever
owns
W
is
gonna
say
well,
you
did
it
for
X
I'm.
On
the
same
thing,
there
is
no
red
light
at
that
road,
I'm,
not
sure
I'm
asking
a
question,
but
there's
no
red
light
and
the
first
accident
that
happens.
It's
Sun,
City
and
seagrass
everyone
back.
There
can't
get
out.
O
H
O
A
A
Q
Q
A
P
M
Q
And
first
I'd
like
to
say
thank
you
for
what
you
all
do
and
I'm
sorry
that
you
have
to
deal
with
what
you
have
to
deal
with.
It
was
an
awful.
It
was
awful
a
lot
nicer
watching
young
Mr
Fisher
than
it
was
watching
the
antagonist
so
I'm,
sorry
that
you
have
to
deal
with
that.
We
very
much
appreciate
your
service
and
what
you
do
for
this
community.
Q
One
of
the
one
of
the
things
I
like
the
council
to
consider
here
is
that
you're
not
eliminating
the
opportunity
for
a
road
you're,
eliminating
the
requirement
for
a
road
when
we
went
initially
a
year
ago
and
spoke
with
staff
about
this
project,
Mr
eichardt
appropriately
said.
Well,
you
got
to
look
at
a
master
plan.
Remember
that
there's
there's
an
interconnectivity,
Port
piece
here
and
the
town
council's
very
concerned
about
interconnectivity,
and
we
recognize
that
we
recognize
that
as
benefit
and
a
purpose
to
interconnectivity.
Q
It's
a
life,
safety
and
health
concern
that
the
council
wants
for
all
of
its
for
communities,
I.
Think,
as
you
saw
in
Mr
icon's
presentation.
This
is
a
little
bit
of
an
island,
that's
sitting
out
there
and
that
and
in
your
staff
report,
you'll
note
that
it
was
originally
conceived
in
the
early
2000s
when
Kent
Estates
was
a
another
PUD
which
was
adjacent
to
it
and
it
was
going
to
be
a
different
kind
of
community
than
it
has
developed
into
23
years
later.
Q
But
listening
to
what
Mr,
eichardt
and
staff
said,
we
said
well,
the
first
thing
we
have
to
do
is
we
have
to
build
a
road.
We
have
to
talk
to
the
people
who
we
have
to
connect
the
road
to,
and
so
we
did.
We
went
to
that
Community.
We
spoke
with
the
board
of
directors.
The
board
of
directors
said
appropriately
we're
not
going
to
make
this
decision
we're
going
to
put
it
to
our
membership
and
the
answer
to
Mr
wood.
Your
question
there's
a
letter
in
the
packet.
Q
It's
in
this
in
this
in
in
the
staff
report,
there's
a
letter
that
was
submitted
that
came
from
the
single-family
residential
property
owners
assigned
by
the
president,
and
it
said
that
they
undertook
a
survey
of
the
members
and
68
of
the
membership.
So
it
wasn't
68
of
the
people
who
responded.
It
was
68
of
the
people
of
the
membership
said
we
don't
want
a
road
now,
full
disclosure
we
had.
We
had
offered
the
light
safety
alternative
that
we
would
construct
a
drive
and
put
an
emergency
gate.
So
today
they
don't
today
they
have
loan
access.
Q
They
have
one
access
point:
we're
providing
them
an
opportunity
to
have
that.
Second,
access
point
that
second
emergency
access
point.
So
when
the
when
fire
vehicles,
police
vehicles,
some
ambulances
and
other
Emergency
Services,
come
to
the
gate,
they
press
their
button
and
the
gate
opens
up
where's
that
at
Walter
I'm
trying
to
yes,
sir,
that
would
be
it.
A
Q
Tumor,
what
we,
what
we're
asking
not
to
construct
but
we're
asking
that
to
construct,
is
a
50
foot,
wide
two-lane
road
built
to
South,
Carolina
Department
of
transfer
station
standards
with
buffers
and
setbacks
off
the
road,
as
would
be
required
based
on
the
master
plan
that
is
currently
approved.
What
we'd
like
to
do
is
develop
the
entire
site
without
a
road
in
the
middle
of
it,
but
understanding
the
purpose
of
that
road,
or
at
least
a
portion
of
the
purpose
of
that
road.
Q
When
the
council
approved
the
master
plan
initially
was
to
provide
that
secondary
access.
Another
access
point,
but
that's
why
we
asked
the
community
and
the
community
said
we
don't
we
don't
want
the
access
point
well,
68
of
the
communities
that
we
don't
want
the
access
point,
but
we
would
like
emergency
access
and,
and
the
applicant
has
said
we
will
construct
the
emergency
access,
we'll
build
it
for
you.
We
will
build
the
gate
and
if
you
see
in
the
diagram
here
here
and
I,
think
it's
their
Hager
Road
ends.
Q
It
doesn't
go
to
the
property
line,
so
the
pavement
stops
and
the
the
payment
stops
before
the
property
line,
and
that's
one
of
the
one
of
the
detriments
to
what
happened
to
this
community.
It
was
master
planned
and
there
was
a
lot
of
activity
and
there
was
one
developer.
23
years
later,
the
developers
of
Bank
holding
remnants
of
what
the
developer
entity
was
and
and
that
so
a
property
owner
came
in
and
purchased
this
property,
but
we
we
don't
have
the
permission
of
the
single-family
residential
owners
to
make
the
connection.
Q
If,
if
Town
Council
says
we,
like
the
old
master
plan,
we're
going
to
keep
that
master
plan,
our
only
option
is
to
construct
a
road
that
is
going
to
end
at
the
property
line.
We
can't
force
the
single
family
Property
Owners,
to
construct
a
road.
We
can't
force
them
to
connect
to
our
property
and
I.
Think
that
that's
the
distinction
of
it
and
again
is
appropriate
for
that
kind
of
interconnectivity.
But
once
the
developer
is
gone
and
hasn't
constructed
that
once
there
are
two
separate
owners,
you
can't
force
those
two
owners,
the
only
yes,
sir.
Q
Well,
Mr
Hamilton,
based
on
the
survey
the
survey
question
to
the
members
was:
do
you
want
a
through
Road
or
do
you
want
the
applicant
to
build
an
emergency
game?
So
the
the
members
in
that
single
family
community
were
asked
a
question?
Do
you
want
a
road
connecting
170
through
Hager
Hager
road
to
provide
access
to
the
community,
or
do
you
want
a
crash
gate?
Do
you
want
an
emergency
gate
only
spreads.
Q
A
Q
Road,
well,
we
don't
have
any
permission
to
tie
in
the
Rope
Mr
tumor
that
we
don't.
We
would
have
to
get
an
easement
from
the
Property
Owners
Association
in
order
for
us
to
actually
make
the
connection.
So,
if
Town
Council
says
we're
not
going
to
remove
that
road,
you
have
to
build
the
50
foot
wide
two-lane
road.
Q
A
But
you've
got
the
same
exact
problem
when
you
come
before
us
when
you
have
to
build
that
other
Road
and
say
the
same
thing
Walter,
because
your
line
shows
it
that
I
went
out
there,
it's
the
same
stub
out
of
the
pool.
So
now
the
property
owner's
gonna
be
yes,
we
want
to
know
I
mean
I,
don't
know
how
the
questions
were
praying
we
know
better.
E
Q
I
I
turned
him
as
a
finger,
but
the
the
master
plan
authorizes
construction
and
it
requires
con
the
construction
it
doesn't
allow
one
landowner
to
enter
onto
the
property
of
another
nor
I
think
does
is
it?
Is
it
I
I,
don't
know
how
the
council
can
go
to
the
single
family,
Property
Owners,
Association
and
say
now
that
a
road
this
road
has
been
connected.
Q
You
have
to
you
have
to
make
make
the
connection
I,
don't
I,
don't
know
how
technically
that
happens,
and
they
are
going
to
have
they're
still
in
existing
writing
and
write
out
and
mayor
to
your
point.
That
could
be
a
condition
we
you
know
that
could
be
a
condition
we're
going
to
remove
one.
That's
you
know.
We
have
two
points
that
are
without
I.
Don't
know
what
the
distance
is.
I
think
it's
Pro
approximately
a
thousand
feet:
Mr
Turner
could
probably
see
you
know,
there's
a
write-in
and
there's
another
right
in
and
I
think.
B
Q
Q
A
borrow
Mr
eicher's
computer
if
I
can
figure
it
out,
there's
a
cursor
here,
so
this
is
a
write-in
right
out
and
so
the
Bluffton
Parkway
NHC
to
the
South
to
the
South
that
traffic
comes
down
here
and
if
you
live
in
the
single,
if
you
live
in
the
apartments
you're
going
to
come
in
you're
going
to
go
this
way
or
you're
going
to
go
this
way.
This
access
point
is
not
going
to
be
your
point.
A
Q
They
might
yes,
yes,
ma'am
they
might
exactly,
but
to
leave.
If
they're
going
south,
they
have
to
come
out
the
main
access,
because
there's
a
median
that
runs
all
along
highway
170..
So
this
medium
there's
a
median
that
exists
there,
that
that
that
will
not
allow
traffic
to
come
out
and
go
this
way.
A
Q
Q
D
C
Q
Road
on
our
property
doesn't
work,
it's
somewhat
redundant,
also
yeah,
but
but
I
would
ask
mayor
to
your
to
your
to
your
question.
I
mean
right
now
we're
looking
at
a
master
plan,
two
50-foot
wide
roads
that
that
make
this
interconnection
and
we
just.
We
think
that
having
two
is
more
than
more
than
is
required.
Q
Q
I'd
be
upset,
I
would
be
upset,
I
wouldn't
want
suddenly
to
have
where
I
have
right.
Now
the
people
who
go
to
the
single
family
community.
They
are
people
who
live
there
and
people
who
are
visiting
there.
So
anybody
who's
going
to
that.
The
majority
of
people
who
are
going
there
are
going
there
with
a
purpose
connecting
this
and
forcing
the
connection
of
this
road
results
in
a
in
a
pass
through.
We.
K
A
P
I
would
be
more
interested
in
being
respectful
to.
It
seems
what
the
POA
is
requesting,
because
it's
not
it
seems
what
you're
telling
us
they're
not
against
having
an
emergency
access
road,
but
they
are
against
having
a
road
that
gives
full
through
access
to
the
public
to
their
community.
And
if
the
majority
of
the
stakeholders
there
and
not
just
68
and
10,
but
68
of
the
entire
membership,
has
voiced
that.
That
is
something
that
seems
to
be
considered.
Because
that's
the
conversation
here
correct
the
access
or.
D
H
E
A
A
E
Mean
again,
I
made
my
point
a
minute
ago:
I
think
that
I,
don't
I,
can't
speak
for
the
property
owners.
I
personally
would
have
said,
put
a
gate
there
as
a
connection
between
the
two
give
us
Ingress
egress.
If
the
property
owners
want
to
give
to
their
property
would
have
made
the
most
sense
to
me,
but.
E
A
Don't
know
what
the
question
was
asked:
we
don't
know
how
the
questions
real
quick
stay
here,
but
what
were
your
Alternatives
I'm
curious
because,
while
you're
doing
it,
we
did
vote
on
this,
but
we
voted
on
it
with
Roe
there.
So
I,
don't
know
why
it
changed.
All
of
a
sudden
when
we
voted
on
the
master
plan,
the
road
was
part
of
them
asked
the.
O
D
O
To
include
the
now
Encompass
health
care,
so
that
was
the
last
time
we
had
Amendment
to
the
plan.
So
initially,
when
speaking
with
the
applicant
I
stated
to
to
follow
the
plan,
follow
the
plan
that
we
have
in
place
right
now
to
construct
the
road.
So
that
was
the
number
one
solution
and
path
of
least
resistance
from
there.
The
discussion
was
maybe
to
adjust
the
road
to
curve
it
to
where
it
would
go
closer
to
where
that
buffer
is
and
then
still
provide.
O
A
I
think
we're
going
to
set
a
precedent
for
the
rest
of
the
story
or
tell
him
to
her
year.
The
proposed
that
actually,
the
existing
master
plan
doesn't
even
show
the
dip
on
the
purple
side
the
crown
side
on
their
map.
It
shows
that
they
have
more
than
what
our
amount
says
so
I'm
confused
over
that
I
just
think
getting
rid
of
proposed
roads
going
north
and
south
as
you
come
in
the
verdier.
A
Just
if
we
wouldn't
have
had
those
roads,
50
of
those
homes
would
have
been
approved,
just
go
back
to
what
was
approved
based
on
what
was
promised
and
I.
Don't
like
it.
We've
made
mistakes,
I
told
you
one
mistake:
I
made
was
pushing
and
asking
culture
when
it
was
asked
to
put
a
gate
in
a
show
Hall
and
not
going
to
stop
our
interconnectivity
all
the
way
up.
All
the
way
up,
because
now
Pinecrest
I
mean
it's
just
a
mess
and
there's
no
real
life.
A
Q
And
I
think
I
understand
that
the
Emergency
Services
can
get
through
those
kind
of
gates
for
any
for
any
reason
they
want.
But
ma'am
I
appreciate
the
overall
concern.
I
I
can
the
concern
about
setting
presidents
and
other
communities
as
well
as
this,
but
I
think
that
what
we're
looking
at
is
either
providing
emergency
access
or
providing
a
road
that
does
that
that
dead
ends,
that
does
that
does
not
get
constructed
and
to
address
the
the
concerns
about
the
a
future
condition
approval
on.
A
Q
So
if
that
road
goes
away,
the
property
line
is
where
the
property
line
is,
and
there
would
be
buffers
and
setbacks
off
of
that
property
line
for
the
commercial
development,
and
it
would
just
be
a
through
driveway.
It
wouldn't
be
a
two-lane
road.
It
would,
it
would
be
built
to
town
standards,
but
it
wouldn't
be
built
to
South
Carolina
Highway
Department
standards.
Q
Well,
that's
a
zoning
District
ma'am!
That's
that's
a
that's
a
zoning
line,
that's
not
necessarily
a
proper
property
line.
So
from
that
property
line
and
and
I
think
that
Kevin
was
reported
that
that's
the
zoning
line,
but
from
the
property
line.
When
you're
looking
at
a
subdivision
plaque,
you
would
you
would
be
buffering
and
setbacking
off
of
that
property
line
still
with
with
the
road
that
sits
there,
you're
buffering
and
set
packing
off
of
the
road
and
then
on
the
other
side,
you're
buffering
and
setbacking
off
off
of
the
road.
Q
O
L
O
That
item,
that
was
the
the
actual
land
that
was
purchased
for
Crown
170..
Their
property
line
went
all
the
way
you
can
see.
There's
a
tiny
little
little
points
right
there.
It
went
all
the
way
to
this
point,
so
the
applicant
as
they
were
just
moving
forward.
They
just
they
just
brought
the
purple
designation
all
the
way
down
to
this
point,
so
that
was
one
of
those
item
says
I
was
referring
to
is
to
make
that
right
here
is
where
what
we
can
do
is
we'd.
O
O
O
Had
staff
so
my
principal
planner,
Dan
Frazier,
he
was
the
one
that
he
met
with
both
the
the
president
of
the
POA,
as
well
as
the
Management
Group
and
then
was
able
to
go
through
and
and
reiterate
what
was
provided
or
just
to
confirm
what
was
provided
by
the
applicant
that
they
do
not
want.
They
did
not
want
that
full
access
point
and
they
are
okay
with
the
emergency
access.
O
Know
they
do
it
as
as
someone
that
lives
in
the
community
similar
to
that,
then
then
they
could
have
to
start
taking
the
ownership
of
you
know
they
have
to
have
the
fobs.
They
have
to
have
the
key
cards.
They
have
to
have
all
of
those
items.
They
they
run
into
the
gates.
They
have
to
repair
the
gates.
So
that's
an
added
expense
that
I'm,
assuming
that
they're
not
looking
to
have
and
having
that
access.
L
We
would
have
I
would
have
to
look
at
and
Walter
may
know.
I
want
you
to
talk.
The
original
developer
is
no
longer
in
existence.
The
bank
has
it
I
assume
that
the
bank
took
a
declaration
of
the
declared
rights
and
the
developer
rights.
You
may
be
able
to
force
the
bank
to
complete
that
six
to
ten
feet
or
whatever
it
is.
What
I'm.
L
L
Was
willing
to
handle
the
six
to
ten
feet
or
whatever
it
is
of
construction
to
join
it
predicated
and
conditioned
upon
the
POA,
giving
them
an
easement
to
do
that?
That
would
solve
the
problem,
but
going
back
and
forcing
the
original
applicant
who's
gone
or
the
successor
to
do
it
at
this
point,
probably
is
in
the
hands
of
the
POA,
and
what
we
would
end
up
doing
is
aggravating
a
whole
bunch
of
resonance.
L
Q
Mayor
if
I
may
answer
Mr
Wood's
question,
if
you
look
in
that
the
first
paragraph
of
that
letter,
the
the
author
of
The
Letter,
knew
because
that
this
connection
was
through
parcels,
Y
and
Z,
so
they
knew
which
which
writing
right
out.
They
were
talking
about
as
I,
understand
it
and
that
that's
part
of
their
letter.
They
they
knew
where,
which
is
that
Hager
Road,
that's
what
they
don't
want,
and
it's
Hager
road
that
stopped
short
of
the
property
line.
Thank.
E
O
They
are
I
believe
that
there's
only
there's,
not
many
and
and
what's
left
are
the
affordable
units,
nine
units,
nine
units,
so
they're
almost
built
down.
That's
what
you're
saying
yes,
sir,
for
the
residential
portion
of
it,
sir
okay
Brown.
It
is
the
sea
Grass
Station,
the
stable
family
in
the
town,
homes
that
are
there
and
the
hotel,
which
counted
for
half
a
unit
for
each
room.
E
Q
I
mean
just
kind
of
yes,
sir,
it
would
be
only
off
of
170..
It
would
only
be
it
would
be
that
right
in
right
out,
but
instead
of
that
people
went
right
away
on
the
property,
it's
going
to
be
a
driver.
So
we're
not
this
app.
This
development,
the
YZ
development,
would
not
be
using
the
main
entrance
to
seagrass
station.
Q
Q
Mr
tumor
to
answer
your
question:
all
all
traffic
that
is
entering
onto
parcel
Y
and
Z
would
be
from
South
Carolina
Highway
170
directly
onto
the
property
at
the
location
of
that
that
the
arrow
that
circled
in
yellow-
so
that's
where
all
the
all
the
traffic
would
be
there
would
be
no
no
access
points
from
the
single
family,
residential
none
from
the
old
Kent
Estates
development
and
not
across
yeah.
That's
the
only
place
there
could
be
access,
so
we
would
have
to
get
him.
M
E
Mean
I'm
just
we
pushed
on
all
of
these
because
one
of
the
most
common
things
we
get
complaints
about
too
many
houses,
not
enough
roads.
You
know
just
too
many
cars
too
many
trips
every
day,
trying
to
get
your
kids
out
to
go
to
school
and
you're,
going
to
sit
there,
whether
it's
a
light
or
waiting
on
traffic
and
I
deal
with
it.
Every
day.
I
take
my
grandkids
to
school
and
I'm.
Telling
you
it
is
a
mess,
has
points
you
have
to
get
in
or
get
out.
H
P
Here
is
we've
been
very
adamant
and
vocal
and
accountable
to
have
communication
as
well
as
Insight
from
the
POA
or
the
residents
being
affected
by
whatever
the
projects
are
so
listening
to
it.
A
lot
before
I
said
in
terms
of
what
was
the
direct
question
before
we
got
the
response
that
we
see
here
in
our
packets
I'd
be
interested
to
know
that
too,
but
seeing
what
we
have
to
rely
on
here,
they've
been
vocal
in
that
so
I
guess
our
question
becomes
in
our
who's,
going
to
assumed
those
responsibilities.
P
E
A
P
I'm,
just
saying
like
we
have
to
have
consistency
with
that
that,
in
whatever
Direction
the
residents
go,
I
think
the
PS
Council
to
have
to
set
the
the
standard
in
terms
of
if
it
defines
logic,
what
do
we
do
in
in
intervention
in
terms
of
are
we
then
going
to
assume
the
liabilities
that
come
from
saying
despite
strike
developer?
Who
was
supposed
to
do
something
that
didn't
sorry,
you
know
now
it's
now
it's
not
to
us
because
of
it.
It
may
become
a
problem.
What
do
we
do
then?.
E
So
personally,
I
think
the
square
footage
of
the
property
that
the
access
were
put
there
for
intentional
reason,
with
the
density
considered
back
there,
everyone
just
put
there
for
convenience.
It
was
also
intending
for
it
to
join
the
property
to
the
side
of
it.
Right
I
mean
when
this
thing
was
I
mean
Kevin.
Help
me
here.
D
A
E
Well,
let
me
ask
mayor:
instead
of
voting,
to
kill
this
project,
this
is
so
much
work
has
been
put
into
it.
How
can
we
approach
this?
Where
maybe
it
comes
back
to
Forest
or
some
condition?
I,
don't
know?
How
can
we
do
it
because
I
don't
think
I've
never
understood
is
when
the
project
is
voted
down.
How
long
before
they
can
return.
P
Or
just
get
councils
thought
process
on
it
so
going
to
accomplishment
what
said,
would
it
be
possible
to
table
further
discussion
on
this
until
we
either
meet
from
the
representative
of
the
POA
to
be
able
to
explain
what
would
happen
and
their
request
did
not
have
this
this
road,
like
what
the
what
the
liabilities
and
for
them
would
be
in
terms
of
if
it's
a
little
bit
of
clarity
here
and
understanding
or
making
sure
that
they
understand?
What's
what's
going
on
with
that
request?
Well,.
B
D
H
B
Sure
there
is
connectivity,
that's
what
that's!
That
was
always
Our
intention,
whether
when
it's
possible
there's
connectivity,
so
right
and
emergency
I
mean
at
the
fire
department.
I
agree
with
you.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
there's
a
lot
of
places
together
that
they
that
they
don't
feel
like
we're
telling
them
they
have
to
build
it.
P
H
P
Really
benefit
us
in
a
sense
if
the
emergency
access
goes
there.
That
is
one
sense
of
the
of
the
connection,
but
going
back
to
what
mayor
Soka
said,
if
we
do
away
with
it
now
and
they're
going
to
come
back
and
say
well,
we
do
want
it
when
that
middle
property
gets
developed.
I'm
also
saying
have
a
conversation.
H
P
P
A
A
They're
fine
with
emergency
gate,
so
that
means
you'd
have
to
pave
the
road
to
their
Road
and
add
that
connection
at
170.,
which,
if
the
and
I
think
they're
going
to
be
well
aware,
is
it
with
this
Council
and
y'all?
Just
can't
set
the
president
to
move
on
now.
I
can't
vote
on
this
because
of
you
cutting
off
that
road
on
X,
I
I.
Just
don't
think.
Q
That's
proper
to
cut
that
road
out.
I
think
Mr,
wood
and
Miss
Fraser
suggested
either
postponing
to
set
those
conditions
or
have
those
discussions
with
the
Property
Owners,
Association
or
mayor
to
condition
this
approval
that
look
at
this,
the
connection
to
the
name
of
that
road
is
Augustine
Road.
We
would
have
to
that
that
we
can't
ask
for
Augustine
Road
tonight.
Q
We
can't
be
standing
here
six
months
from
now
or
a
year
from
now
saying:
oh,
please,
we
don't
want
to
connect
to
Augustine
Road.
You
can
make
that
a
condition
that
we
can't
come
back
to
do
it
or
we
can
go
back
to
the
Property
Owners
Association
and
try
to
have
a
different
conversation
with
them.
If
we
postpone
this
today,
but.
A
Just
to
let
you
know
if
they're
saying
another
one
they're
most
likely
going
to
say
no
to
the
other
and
they
were
in
the
same
home
having
a
home
between
and
you're,
not
I.
Just
wish
I'll
put
your
round
peg
in
the
round
hole
you
know,
and
it
frustrates
staff.
I
mean
it's
here
for
a
purpose.
The
density
is
there
for
purpose,
but
three
access
points
and
you're
just
causing
all
of
us
to
get
frustrated
and
I
appreciate
it
just
and
you
brought
it
to
us
designed
with
the
rubbish.
A
E
Q
Q
A
A
Do
you
know
what
are
your
thoughts
because
right
now,
I
can't
fight
I'm,
sorry,
I,
just
can't
cut
out
connect
the
roads
and
I
love
all
of
y'all
that
are
on
board
with
this,
but
they've
been
there
since
2000
and
whatever
and
nothing's
ever
changed,
but
you
bought
the
property,
knowing
that
was
in
them
expected
and
I.
Don't
want
to
get
rid
of
all
the
same
road
I
think
we're
confused
on
who
owns
the
north
side,
because
some
maps
have
purple
some
don't
have
purple
too
much.
E
Q
A
We
all
know
how
hard
it
is
to
get
projects
approved,
but
it's
not
our
fault
this
time,
because
we
laid
out
the
ground
rules
and
nobody
wanted
to
do
it.
So
please
know
we're
not
y'all
throwing
this
at
us.
I
wish
this
wouldn't
come
before,
but
it
did
and
I
think
we.
We
all
lived
in
breathed
communities
without
infrastructure
and
no
people
who
live
in
Crown
are
not
going
to
take
that
first
strike.
A
The
easiest
right
take
first
left
and
I
know
we're
gonna
same
situation
with
the
proposed
Road
bypass.
So
I
just
want
you
to
know.
I
said
it
and
I
know
the
property
owners
are
Dreadful
over
it.
I've
got
the
emails.
They
are
very
worried
that
they're
going
to
get
right
up
to
their
Community.
The
way
we
allowed
extended
say-
and
you
know
and
I
told
them-
keep
an
eye
because
it's
coming
forward.
A
O
If
you
so
choose
to
move
that
way,
I'd
I'd
ask
that
maybe
a
representative
from
Town
Council
would
would
be
with
staff
just
one
representative.
So
that
way
they
can
then
come
back
to
the
entire
group
to
be
able
to
to
provide
that.
You
know
kind
of
just
like
a
follow-up
to
you
know.
Once
we
have
these
meetings
to
truly
understand
what
the
community
wants
and.
B
E
All
right
I
propose
that
the
project
under
consideration
regarding
the
master
plan
for
Village
at
Vernier
within
the
village
of
earlier
plan
unit
development,
to
remove
the
previous,
previously
approved
residential
access
point
that
the
town
manager
meet
with
the
Property
Owners
Association,
to
express
council's
concerns
of
eliminating
and
replacing
with
an
emergency
road.
Only
the
road
on
the
master
plan
on
Parcels
y
and
z.
E
M
A
A
A
R
R
This
is
approved
within
the
amended
budget
for
2023,
and
so
the
request
is
that
Town
Council
authorize
the
town
manager
to
go
ahead
and
execute
this
particular
contract
with
Jordan
Construction,
with
a
20
contingency
again,
realizing
that
we've
been
running
into
in
these
older
areas,
unidentified
utilities
that
sometimes
need
to
be
relocated.
That's
the
higher
contingency
allowance
request.
R
Next
steps,
then,
would
be
move
forward
with
Zeke
who
emailed
me
today
asking
what
the
status
of
this
was.
He
was
anxious
to
get
going
on
it
and
he
would
go
ahead
and
set
forth
the
schedule
we
are
proposing
and
really
hoping
that
we
can
get
this
completed
by
the
end
at
least
phase
two
of
this
fiscal
year
is
we
have
a
319
Grant
associated
with
it,
for
the
lateral
line
connections.
R
E
So
I
guess
we're
in
the
market
where,
when
you
can
only
get
one
bidder,
the
other
thing
is
when
y'all
are
dealing
with
something
like
this,
where
you're
dealing
with
only
one
bidder,
which
is
your
hands,
do
you
do
any?
Do
you
carry
any
forward
to
any
kind
of
cost
analysis
from
an
engineering
perspective?
I
I
noticed
on
this
one.
The
1136
feet
is
1232
a
foot
and
I'm
not
saying
that's
an
outlandish
price.
I
wouldn't
have
a
way
of
knowing
that.
But
do
you
kind
of.
K
A
R
Are
yes,
sir?
There
are
a
couple
of
factors
that
tie
into
this
this
high
response
higher
than
higher
than
engineer
estimated
response
from
our
design
Engineers
again,
based
back
on
the
cost.
When
we
last
completed
a
sewer
project
was
perchard
Street
and
we've
had
a
couple
of
years
in
between
that,
even
with
trying
to
allocate
additional
costs
for
price
increases.
R
Some
of
these
some
of
these
costs
have
just
gone
on
exponentially
on
material.
So
there's
that
piece
of
it.
The
major
driver
of
this
is
saving
that
huge
80
plus
inch
Live
Oak
on
Bridge
Street
with
doing
I.
Think
it's
a
16
inch
I
can't
remember,
I!
Think
it's
400
foot
directional
bore
underneath
it,
that
is
the
Lion's
Share
of
it,
and
we've
tried
to
exhaust
all
options
for
design
Alternatives
with
Beaufort
Jasper
water
Sewer
Authority,
including
asking
for
a
private
easement
from
an
adjacent
property.