►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Would
you
would
you
turn
the
phone
volume
down
down
yeah
a
little
bit?
You
don't
have
to
pick
it
up
just
in
there
volume
switch
on
the
bottom
yeah
and
then
we'll.
If
she
wants
to
speak
up
or
something
maybe
she'll
text
you,
but
otherwise,
we'll
just
we'll
try
not
to
bother
unless
we
have
a
question
to
ask
all
right.
So
let's
call
the
meeting
to
order
if
you
would
call
a
roll
and
let's
see
where
we
stand.
Okay,.
A
Ordinarily,
we
would
sit
as
a
group
of
five
as
if
we're
sitting
as
a
group
of
five,
you
can
lose
a
vote
and
still
win
your
case,
because
you
need
four
out
of
five
votes
to
win.
If
we're
sitting
with
a
quorum
and
we
have
four
people,
you
can't
lose
a
vote.
You
have
to
have
unanimity
in
order
to
win.
C
A
Just
go
forward,
so
if
you
want
to
be
off
the
agenda,
speak
up
now
or
forever
hold
your
peace,
otherwise
we're
going
forward
we're
going
to
make
decisions,
but
if
you
want
to
great
no
problem,
no,
no
foul,
you
won't
go
forward,
then
just
sit
quiet
or
tell
us
so
and
if
you
don't
say
anything
we're
just
going
to
press
forward.
Okay,
everybody
good
all
right.
A
So
what
we're
going
to
do
now
is
we're
going
to
look
at
the
minutes
of
the
meeting
we
held
july
1st
and
if
the
group
has
seen
that
and
has
some
commentary
or
motion
to
make.
I
would
appreciate
that.
A
A
second
all
right:
we
have
a
motion,
a
second
to
approve
the
minutes,
all
in
favor,
say
aye
aye
any
opposed
all
right,
we're,
whereupon
what
we
do
generally
now
is
anybody
that
wants
to
speak
for
against
or
say
anything
at
all
in
the
meeting
that
has
anything
to
do
with
any
of
the
items
on
the
agenda
should
stand,
raise
your
right
hand
and
swear
or
affirm.
So
we
get
everybody
sworn
in
at
one
time
and
we
don't
have
to
deal
with
that
again.
We
get
it
out
of
the
way
now.
A
D
Okay,
okay,
pz
2021-226
is
a
request
for
a
special
exception
to
the
minimum
side
yard
setback
requirement
for
the
property
located
at
885
powell.
This
request
is
considered
a
special
exception
because
the
side
yard
setback
was
established
prior
to
the
or
the
house
was
established
prior
to
the
adoption
of
the
ordinance.
This
home
was
built
in
1962
per
appraisal
district.
The
appraisal
district
was
originated
in
1962,
so
the
that
that
home
may
be
older
than
1962..
D
D
So
looking
here,
this
is
brooklyn
street
coming
down
powell
street
right
here.
This
is
the
structure
in
question
right
here.
I've
highlighted
both
of
these
lots
because
this
house
sits
on
both
of
these
lots
currently
and
jackson.
Street
is
above.
This
is,
I
believe,
the
charlton
pollard
elementary
school.
D
This
is
the
site
plan
that
they
provided,
so
the
existing
property
line
is
going
straight
through
885
powell
right
here.
What
they
are
proposing
to
do
is
move
this
property
line
the
existing
one
to
here
and
then
the
water
closet
that
juts
out
right
here.
D
I've
measured
the
closest
point
of
the
house
up
here
and
that
measured
to
be
about
like
three
feet
and
change
away
from
the
property,
but
really
the
one
that
we
have
to
pay
attention
to
is
the
1.89
feet
away,
and
then
this
is
the
house
or
the
subject
property
so
right
now
the
existing
property
line
goes
through
right
about
here,
and
then
this
is
in
between
where
they're
trying
to
adjust
the
property.
E
D
They
own
both
properties,
so
originally
they
had
applied
for
this
as
a
special
exception
as
well.
However,
I
discussed
it
with
the
director
and
technically
this
top
story
here
it
is
less
than
50
of
the
entire
bottom
story
or
bottom
floor.
So
with
that
being
less
than
50
percent
and
the
house
being
5.88
feet
away,
it's
considered
a
one
and
a
half
which
it
would
meet
that
one
story
setback.
So
it
was
fine.
So
we
had
we
pulled
it
from
the
agenda.
A
Is
this
currently
pending
and
planning
and
zoning,
or
are
we
waiting
for
the
special
exception
before
going
there.
D
Special
exception
first,
then
minor
plot,
so
the
minor
plot
doesn't
have
well.
In
this
case,
the
minor
plot
will
be
going
to
the
planning
commission
because
they're
the
front
street
frontage
basically
is
going
to
be
a
little
bit
smaller
than
50
feet,
which
is
the
minimum,
so
they
have
to
go
before
them
for
that.
But
this
lot
line
here
we're
just
waiting
for
the
special
exception
on
that.
A
All
right
comments
from
surrounding
property
owners;
anyway,
no.
A
Any
other
questions
to
witness
all
right.
Thank
you,
ma'am.
Who
else
wants
to
speak
to
this
this
issue
and
this
request,
if
you
come
up
state
your
full
name
and
your
relationship
to
the
property
and
then
tell
us
whatever
you
want
to
tell
us.
C
Thank
you.
My
name
is
richard
faust,
I'm
with
faust,
engineering
and
surveying
5550,
east
texas,
freeway,
sweet
o
in
the
beautiful
city
of
beaumont
texas,
with
surveyors
that
surveyed
the
property
originally
and
found
the
encroachment
worked
with
planning
and
zoning
to
figure
out
the
best
way
to
do
this.
C
We
look
at
several
ways
of
doing
this,
but
if
we
didn't
hold
with
the
50
feet
along
powell
street,
then
both
lots
would
be
out
of
of
compliance,
and
so
when
working
with
playing
and
zoning,
we
felt
the
best
way
to
do.
This
was
to
make
the
890
jackson
street
compliant,
and
the
885
powell
would
just
have
to
be
what
it
is.
C
A
A
Does
anybody
else
want
to
speak
for
against
or
otherwise
make
a
comment
on
this?
This
issue?
That's
on
our
agenda
today:
okay,
hearing!
None!
What
comments
do
we
have
from
the
crew
up
here?
A
Okay,
all
right,
would
you
call
the
role
please
and
we'll
have
that
as
our
vote?
Okay,.
A
Okay,
we're
passed
technically,
you've
got
a
10
day.
Wait.
I
wouldn't
worry
about
it
too
much
all
right.
You
might
want
to
talk
to
miss
laney
at
the
end
of
this
all
right.
Next
up,
we
have
a
second
issue
on
the
agenda,
which
is
pz,
2021-20229,
7185
tram,
road
special
exception
to
reduce
off
street
parking,
similar
to
those
that
we've
heard
before
for
the
same
type
of
business.
D
Pz2021-229
is
a
request
for
a
special
exception
to
reduce
the
off-street
parking
requirements
for
the
property
located
at
7185
tram
road.
The
special
exception
section
28.02.005
c
allows
a
waiver
to
the
off-street
parking
when
the
board
finds
the
requirement
is
unnecessary
for
the
proposed
use
of
the
building,
for
which
the
request
applies.
D
The
a
e
plan
coordinator
states
that
the
store
averages
around
50
to
20
transactions
per
hour.
He
assured
that
the
requested
35
parking
spaces
would
accommodate
the
customer
flow
rate
during
the
regular
business
hours
and
peak
christmas
season
by
strict
compliance
with
the
city
of
beaumont
zoning
regulations.
D
D
And
then
this
is
the
picture
so
on
this
side
is
by
the
wood
road,
and
then
this
is
tram
road
right
here
and
it's
right
across
the
street
from
the
snow
cone
stand.
A
Right
yeah,
any
other
questions
for
the
witness.
No,
no,
all
right!
Thank
you,
ma'am.
If
you'd
step
up,
are
you,
mr
ferrelli.
A
Okay,
well,
here's
you've
not
appeared
before
us
before
no.
E
E
B
E
E
We've
been
down
this
road
well,
my
name
is
john
white,
I'm
with
capital
growth,
the
developers,
what
we,
what
we
see
most
often
is
like
she
said
before.
The
transactions
are
very
minimal.
I've
never
seen
more
than
ten
nine
ten
cars
at
any
given
time
at
the
dollar
general.
E
The
transactions,
obviously
they're
they're
about
285
a
day,
and
you
got
about
2
000
transactions
a
week.
We
in
our
thinking.
If
we're
able
to
reduce
this
parking,
we
would
have
more
room
for
retention,
some
water
retention
and
more
room
for
landscaping
to
beautify
this
area
right.
A
E
E
C
A
E
A
There's
anybody
else
in
the
room
that
wants
to
speak
up,
talk
about
this
or
say
anything.
Mr
faust,
I
saw
your
name
on
the
survey
on
the
property
description.
C
My
name
is
richard
faust,
with
faust,
engineering
and
surveying
address
is
5550
east
texas,
freeway
sweet
oak
in
the
beautiful
city
of
beaumont
texas
and,
as
you
said,
we
did.
The
original
survey
on
the
property
also
represented
the
property
owner
in
getting
it
rezoned,
and
it
just
so
happened
that
we
are
here.
At
the
same
time,
this.
E
C
Planned
okay,
but
I
do
want
to
make
one
comment
when
we
were
doing
the
rezoning
and
looking
at
putting
an
rv
park
in
there.
Dd6
in
the
city
had
some
pretty
stringent
requirements
for
detention,
because
this
area
has
some
flooding
issues.
C
A
I
understand
that's
a
good,
that's
a
good
argument
for
having
fewer
parking
spaces
and
you
know
beyond.
I
got
to
tell
you
all
we
can
do
is
say
yes
or
no,
you
get
them
or
you
don't
or
you
can
do
fewer
you
don't,
but
I
I
would
strongly
urge
that
you
look
strong
that
the
owners
recognize
that
flooding
potential
and
the
the
water
holding
that
happens
in
the
properties
around
there,
that
they
seriously
look
at
drainage,
water,
detention
and
and
that
they're
careful
if
their
surrounding
properties
that
they
follow
a
drainage
plan.
A
A
A
A
B
A
A
All
right
that
clears
the
current
agenda,
there's
a
question
of
whether
or
not
we
have
any
other
business
we
need
to
handle
and
hearing
none
I'll
entertain
a
motion
to
adjourn
which
I'll
make
myself
all
in
favor,
say:
aye.