►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
Here,
thank
you
all
right,
so,
first
item
of
business
is
the
approval
of
the
minutes
for
a
meeting
that
was
held
June
1st
2023..
Those
were
distributed
to
the
members
of
this
group
earlier
and
I'm.
Looking
forward
to
some
comments
or
emotions.
A
Is
there
a
second
a
second
real
seconds,
all
in
favor,
say
aye
aye
and
you
pose
same
sign.
Okay
minutes
are
approved
so
now
next
part
of
the
routine
is
for
anybody
who
wants
to
speak
for
or
against
or
otherwise
make
any
comment
whatsoever.
A
During
this
meeting
stand
up,
raise
your
right
hand
be
sworn
so
that
we
get
all
of
that
out
of
the
way
at
one
time.
A
You
all
right,
we
are
sitting
as
four.
You
need
four
to
pass
and
and
approve
a
variance
or
an
exception,
since
there
is
a
matter
of
that
is
fairly
routine.
That's
item
number
three
in
the
agenda:
I'm
gonna,
pull
that
up
out
of
order
and
handle
that
first
and
so,
let's
pull
up
file.
A
Pz
2023-255
request
for
variance
to
front
yard
setbacks
for
Jennifer
Smith
at
2375,
Irving
Avenue
come
up
if
well,
let's
get
to
let's
get
the
staff
report
first
and
let
them
roll
through
that
and
then
then
you
come
on
up
okay.
So
if
you
would
ma'am.
C
They're
very
sensitive
I
forget
that
Jennifer
Smith
of
Tegrity
homes
LLC,
is
requesting
a
variance
for
the
property
located
at
2375
Irving
Avenue
last
month.
Variances
for
both
sides
and
rear
of
the
property
were
approved.
The
property
is
owned
RMH
and
requires
a
minimal
minimum
front
back
set
back
of
25
feet.
The
applicant
is
requesting
that
front
yard
set
back
to
be
reduced
to
20
feet
for
a
new
house
to
allow
wiggle
room
to
adjust
the
location
of
the
structure
as
needed
as
discussed
last
month.
C
This
will
be
a
home
provided
through
the
Texas
General
land
office,
homeowners
assistance
program
for
Disaster
Recovery,
the
lift
that
they
have
on
the
side
as
opposed
to
a
ramp
for
Ada
Falls
within
the
proper
setbacks
on
their
site
plan,
but
it
it
was
right
on
the
line
and
I
believe
that's
why
they're
asking
for
this
setback?
Additionally,
so
I
can
show
you
the
a
couple
of
slides.
The
property
in
question
is
outlined
in
red.
C
This
is
the
setback
and
or
the
site
plan
rather
showing
I
think
the
new
setbacks,
as
approved
last
month,
as
well
as
they're,
asking
for
a
20-foot
setback
as
opposed
to
a
25
foot
setback
on
the
front
off
of
Stanton
Street.
C
C
The
new
house
will
also
face
the
side
street,
but
the
orientation
of
the
light
lot
is
towards
Stanton
and
that's
why
we
call
that
the
front
property
setback
so
when
you're
looking
at
this
photo
on
the
left
hand
side
of
the
photo.
That
is
the
setback
that
they're
looking
for.
In
addition
to
the
other
three,
we
email
notices
to
Property,
Owners,
36
notices
and
I've,
received
none
in
favor
or
an
opposition.
C
It
was
but
it's
within
it's,
it's
25,
the
lift
can
be
in
the
setback.
Let
me
put
it
that
way:
we
allow
the
lift
to
be
in
that
setback
and
the
25
foot
setback.
So
we
weren't
worried
about
it,
but
they
are
concerned
about
it
and
I
think
they
want
to
make
sure
that
in
case
anything
changes,
they've
they've,
gotten
that
variance
for
it,
but
he's
here
I
think
he
can
speak
to
it
more.
Yes,.
A
Like
if
there's
any
questions
from
Dina
look,
if
not
then
come
speak
to
us,
go
ahead
and
say
your
name
one
more
time
tell
us
your
address
one
more
time:
Todd.
E
Dewalt
28
310
Hollow,
Springs,
Lane,
Spring,
Texas,
all
right
director
for
integrity
homes.
The
only
reason
we're
asking
for
this.
The
current
house
sets
over
the
20
foot
it's
18.8
and
19.3
feet.
Currently
we're
gonna
have
it
further
away
from
the
Stanton
Street
than
it
currently
is,
but
we
just
wanted
to
make
sure
we
were
safe
with
this
as
we
go
to
get
in
there
and
we
start
to
put
those
pilings
in.
We
have
had
to
adjust
them
in
the
past,
depending
on
what
we
find
underground.
Okay,.
E
A
650
by
62.,
so
it's
it's
a
less
than
standard
size
law.
Yes,
sir!
Okay,
that's
what
we
need
in
the
record,
any
other
questions
for
the
witness
anything
else
you
want
to
sell
us.
If
not
yes,
sir
okay!
Thank
you
so
much.
Thank
you
all
right.
Gentlemen.
A
A
A
Okay,
that's
that's
the
request
as
I
understand
it,
we're
good
with
that.
Okay!
Is
there
a
discussion
about
that
or
emotion.
A
A
F
A
Thank
you,
man,
okay,
you're,
granted,
10
days
and
you're
up
and
running
all
right,
we're
still
missing
one.
Our
concern
is
I,
don't
know,
there's
going
to
be
a
problem,
but
your
choice,
though
all
right.
Well
then,
we'll
we'll
wait
for
a
moment.
Here's
the
deal!
If
you
only
have
four
of
us,
you
need
unanimity.
A
A
A
We're
reconvened
after
a
recess,
Mr
Hilliard's
with
us
and
we're
calling
for
consideration
file,
pz
2023-230.,
let's
handle
them
one
at
a
time
because
we'll
vote
on
them
one
at
a
time,
but
let's
hear
the
evidence
for
both
right
now
and
then
just
carry
it
over
to
the
second
okay.
A
A
C
C
C
I
wanted
to
submit
them
together,
but,
as
one
is
a
special
exception
and
one
is
a
variance,
they
had
to
to
submit
them
separately
so,
along
the
South
edge
of
this
I'm.
Sorry
I'm,
going
to
back
up
the
property
backs
up
to
an
existing
apartment.
Complex
property
to
the
east
was
granted
a
similar
variance
in
2017.
C
along
the
South
edge
of
the
multi-family
property.
There's
a
20
foot
wide
Entergy
easement.
This
easement
contains
overhead
power
lines.
The
trees
are
not
allowed
within
30
feet
of
overhead
power
lines
according
to
our
ordinance,
so
it
would
not
be
allowed
in
the
landscape
buffer
if
there
was
one
anyway,
so
they
would
the.
What
would
happen
is
the
landscape
buffer
would
end
up
being
just
a
10
foot
wide
green
strip
with
no
trees
in
it.
C
So
what
they're
asking
for
is
a
variance
to
that
10
foot
wide
grass
strip
along
the
property
line
along
the
north
edge
of
their
property
line
next
to
the
apartments
I
did
notice
that
they
have
placed
their
parking
away
from
that
property
line.
They've
turned
it
towards
the
back
of
the
building
so
as
I
guess
not
to
have
the
vehicles
actually
maybe
headlights
as
much
facing
into
the
property.
C
C
C
Not
a
shared
shopping
center
would
be
138
parking
spaces,
the
project
design
once
they
have.
If
they
are
granted,
the
variants
will
have
150
parking
spaces
for
the
variants
they
are
required
to.
They
bear
the
burden
of
proof
to
demonstrate
that
they
meet
all
three
conditions
necessary
for
approval
for
the
special
exception.
It's
considered
a
deviation
from
the
requirements
of
the
zoning
ordinance
and
the
three
conditions
are
not
required.
C
C
And
this
is
a
shot
a
little
bit
closer,
just
to
show
it's
undeveloped,
but
you
can
see
kind
of
that
utility
easement
along
the
south
side
of
the
apartment
complex
to
the
north
and
how
it's
been
pretty
much
left
feral
and
they
have
a
fence
on
their
side
of
that
utility
easement.
All
the
way
across.
C
C
It
no
and
I
have
talked
to
our
public
works
department
and
they've
said
they
won't
have
a
problem
with
the
concrete
in
that
easement.
As
long
as
there
are
joints
at
the
edge
of
the
easement
so
that
if
they
need
to
get
in
there
and
work
on
something
they're,
only
tearing
up
the
concrete
over
the
easement
itself,
and
that's
all
that
the
property
owner
would
have
to
replace
then,
is
that
that's
directly
over
the
easement.
A
C
F
A
A
A
C
Tell
it
looks
like
the
whole
Park
kind
of
skewed
on
here.
They
don't
quite
line
up
with
the
aerial
photography,
but
the
property
on
the
west
end
looks
like
their
their
concrete's
a
little
further
to
the
South,
so
I
think
they
probably
provided
the
10
foot
wide
landscape
buffer,
but
I
think
they
had
more
room
moving
down
away
from
because
they're
on
that
corner.
B
Along
the
front,
we'll
still
have
the
landscape
requirements
will
be
met
along
the
front
with.
C
C
We
did
send
notifications
to
14
Property
Owners
within
200
feet
and
I
haven't
received
any
responses
in
favor
or
in
opposition.
Okay,.
A
G
G
So
that's
my
stamp
For
Better
or
For
Worse,
so
not
to
rehash,
but
basically
the
ordinance
requires
a
10-foot
buffer
between
commercial
property
and
residential
property
and
in
that
buffer
we
have
to
plant
trees.
G
We
want
to
follow
the
spirit
of
the
ordinance,
but
there's
no
sense
of
having
a
10
foot
wide
strip
of
dirt
back
there,
at
least
in
my
opinion,
for
a
buffer
that
just
isn't
going
to
function
as
it's
supposed
to
so.
A
After
that,
if
we
were
to
word
this
as
what
you're,
just
in
plain
language,
what
you're
requesting
what
I
understand
is
that
you
are
requesting
a
variance
to
the
perimeter
Landscaping
requirements
to
eliminate
that
requirement
across
the
back
of
the
property
on
the
North
Boundary
of
the
property.
Yes,.
G
A
And
as
to
the
Mr
Rose
question,
when
we
rolled
well
back
up
to
a
second
to
the
storm,
sewer
easement,
if
you
already
worked
out
a
deal
where
you're
putting
some
type
of
East-West
expansion
joint
just
to
separate
out
the
concrete.
Or
what
are
you
doing
with.
G
A
As
to
Mr
Rose
question
about
the
and
I
think,
I
saw
something
like
that
in
your
in
your
narrative
that
you
sent
in
with
the
file
that
you'd
already
worked
out.
The
the
looks
to
me
like
the
peninsula
is
pretty
much
where
you
need
them
for
breaks
and
and
curb
cuts.
Yes,
sir,
okay
and
that's
all
standard
is
the
only
question
as
to
the
number
of
parking
spaces
is
to
reduce
off
street
parking
requirements
from
those
required
by
the
ordinance
to
what.
G
G
A
The
you
don't
know
it's
not
the
building's,
not
built
you
don't
have
tenants
lined
up
already.
I
presume
right.
That's
correct!
Yes,
okay!
So
we're
not
talking
about
knowing
traffic
rates
and
those
kinds
of
things.
That's.
G
G
F
C
So
if
you
just
have
a
retail
store
sitting
by
itself,
your
parking
requirements
can
be
a
little
different
than
if
you're,
in
a
in
a
shopping
center,
with
a
bunch
of
different
stores
that
are
sharing
parking
and
because
of
the
shared
parking.
This
proposed
development
would
require
165
parking
spaces.
If
you
were
talking
about
the
same
amount
of
retail
but
individual
shopping,
you
know
spots,
then
it
would
really
only
it
would
be
less
it'd,
be
138
parking
spaces,
yeah.
A
The
proportion
of
ADA
handicap
spaces
you
still
have
to
keep
it
in
proportion
to
the
other
parts
and
and-
and
incidentally
this
it
looks
to
me
like
there
are
two
buildings
in
large
part,
because
there's
a
storm
sewer
easement
between
them
is
that
did.
Would
you
have
put
one
building
here
or
would
you've
always
had
two
buildings?
If
you
hadn't
had
the
storm,
seweries
I'm
certainly
would
have
put
one
building.
I
think
you
probably
would
have
okay,
but.
G
I
just
think
150
is
a
good
count
for
this
size
project
and
we
have
parked
as
many
cars
as
we
soon
possibly
Park
on
that
piece
of
land.
Okay,
thank
you.
Thank.
A
B
B
A
Sorry
all
right
next
up,
pz
2023-253
is
the
request
for
a
special
exception
to
reduce
off-street
parking
requirements
from
that
required
by
the
ordinance,
whichever
might
apply
to
150
spaces
for
this
property
in
this
development.