►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
D
A
All
right,
good
afternoon
again
we
had
the
sad
news
of
our
good
friend
and
the
long
time
councilman
mr
w8
passes
wl
paid
passing
this
last
weekend
and
I
would
like
to
offer
a
moment
of
silence.
A
A
Thank
you
very
much.
We
have
sent
out
the
the
minutes
of
the
meeting
of
the
may
17
2021.
A
E
A
In
opposition
the
eyes
have
it
we're
going
to
get
started
with
our
regular
meeting
agenda?
Mr
boone.
F
The
first
item
on
the
regular
meeting
is
file
pz
2021-138
and
it's
to
consider
a
request
for
a
re-platt
of
block
27
in
the
west,
one
half
block
of
34
beaumont
improvement
company
into
lots.
1-4
joyce,
wilson,
edition,
beaumont,
jefferson,
county
texas,
and
these
proposed
lots
are
located
approximately
at
38.70
through
3970
meter,
road
cali,
wittmeyer
of
fitz
and
shipment
inc
has
submitted
a
request
for
approval
of
this
replat.
F
The
purpose
of
the
platt
is
to
evenly
divide
the
track
into
four
evenly
sized
buildable
residential
lots,
and
you
can
see
the
the
proposed
slots
there
in
front
of
you.
That's
the
only
slide.
I've
got.
F
Residential
replat,
we
have
sent
out
19
notices
to
surrounding
property
owners.
We
received
zero
in
favor.
We
did
receive
one
response
in
opposition
from
a
caesar
anthony
or
should
say
anthony
j
caesar
at
3755
maida
and
simply
responded
that
they
were
not
in
favor
of
the
request.
Without
additional
comment,
however,
based
on
the
proposed
plat
staff
has
found
that
it
meets
the
minimum
requirements
of
the
subdivision.
Regulations
and
staff
is
recommending
approval
of
the
proposed
plat.
A
G
The
gentleman
who
had
a
opposition
on
this
is
his
name
listed
on
the
property
owners.
I
didn't
see
that.
F
G
A
Is
the
applicant
in
the
audience.
C
A
Afternoon
ma'am,
would
you
come
by
and
give
us
any
other
information
if
you
have
any.
C
C
A
We
now
open
the
floor
to
public
comments.
Is
there
anybody
in
the
audience
that
would
like
to
comment
for
or
against
this
case.
A
C
A
F
Let's
see
pz
2021
161
is
a
preliminary
plat
for
the
kingswood
place,
subdivision
phases
2
through
5.,
danielle,
dotson,
fitz
and
shipman
has
requested
preliminary
plaid
approval
of
kingswood
play
subdivision
phases
2
through
five.
This
26.52
acre
development
will
connect
kingswood,
drive
to
mentor
drive
and
consist
of
119
residential
lots
and.
F
And
show
you
again
this
this
plait's
probably
harder
to
read
than
the
last
with
119
lots,
but
you
can
see
the
the
proposed
preliminary
plat
and
let
me
show
you
this
is
an
aerial
vicinity
map
that
kind
of
shows
you
where
the
subdivision
ends
up
you
can
see.
F
Minor
drive
is
to
the
north,
it
it
it's
the
one
that
kind
of
hooks
from
the
north
down
to
the
south
connecting
into
the
proposed
subdivision
I'll
zoom.
In
a
little
bit,
you
can
read
the
street
name,
kingswood
beaumont,
and
so
you
can
see
the
area
outlined
in
red
is
where
the
proposed
subdivision
is
located.
F
Kingswood
and
having
said
that
in
the
if
in
the
staff
report,
we've
got
some
text
in
here
out
of
the
subdivision,
regulations
and
I'll
go
ahead
and
read
that
to
you
now
section
26.02.0287
of
the
regs
say
the
proposed
plan
of
subdivision
shall
show
how
the
streets
and
easement
the
subdivision
will
connect
with
those
in
the
surrounding
subdivision.
F
F
You
might
have
curved
streets,
and
so
this
section
speaks
to
that
as
to
how
you
want
to
basically
design
to
these
kinds
of
principles,
and
so
in
this
section
of
the
regulation,
it
talks
about
the
neighborhood,
what
they
call
the
neighborhood
unit
concept
that
refers
back
to
the
comprehensive
plan
and
the
comprehensive
plan
refers
to
the
neighborhood
unit,
which
is
simply,
if
you
might
think,
of
a
residential
neighborhood.
F
So
an
enclosed
neighborhood
that
may
or
may
not
have
a
elementary
school,
that's
kind
of
the
original
idea,
and
then
it
have
enough
population
just
to
support
an
elementary
school.
F
But
anyway,
I
bring
all
that
up
to
say
that
in
this
section
that
I
referenced
in
the
staff
report
is
that
the
subdivision
plat
shall
provide
for
logical
extension
of
a
budding
and
proposed
utilities
and
drainage,
easements
and
improvements
in
order
to
provide
for
system
continuity
and
promote
future
development.
So
the
question
becomes,
and-
and
I'll
also
mention
that
if,
if
you
go
back
to
the
comprehensive
plan,
it
is
a
guide
and
if
you
read
the
text
to
the
subdivision
regulations,
these
are
general
design
principles.
F
So
it's
not
a
hard
and
fast
rule
that
this.
Having
said
all
that,
it's
not
a
hard
and
fast
rule.
This
subdivision
connects
to
beaumont,
but
we
felt
like
because
of
the
way
it's
described
in
both
the
subregs,
as
well
as
the
comprehensive
plan
that
the
developer
at
least
provided
reason
as
to
why
it
not
connect
and
again
there's
no
hard
and
fast
rule.
It's
simply
a
question
of
what
is
reasonable
and
what
makes
sense.
F
Furthermore,
based
on
everything
proposed
and
review.
Furthermore,
we
are
recommending
approval
of
this
plat
again
subject
to
that
connection
or
justification
for
not
doing
so
condition.
Two
is
the
legend:
will
need
to
be
updated
to
include
f,
o
mhsl
and
bsl
number
three
water
mains
between
two
lots
must
be
cased
and
a
10
foot
exclusive
water
line.
Easement
shall
be
dedicated
if
the
water
main
is
not
cased,
then
a
20
foot
exclusive
water
line,
easement
must
be
dedicated.
D
A
Say:
connect
trevor
trays
to
bomb
on
drive
or
provide
justification
for
not
doing
so.
I
don't
think
that
we're
in
a
position
to
sit
here
and
listen
to
back
and
forth
about
justification.
F
F
There
can
be
an
art
it
has
to
be
reasonable
as
to
whether
or
not
we
should
require
it
to
be
connected
to
beaumont.
Having
said
that,
we
did
not
have
the
benefit
of
public
notices
going
out
response
from
feet.
You
know
neighbors,
so,
in
other
words,
the
idea
is
if
some
neighbors
showed
up
from
beaumont
drive
and
said
and
requested
that
it
be
connected.
We
would
have
the
benefit
of
those
comments.
As
of
now,
we
don't
have
any
responses,
the
same
thing
for
the
other
streets.
F
In
addition,
we
didn't
have
the
benefit
of
the
justification
from
the
applicant,
which
again
I
feel
like
the
commission
should
hear
the
reason
why
the
staff
is
even
bringing
it
up
and
then
also
hear
from
the
applicant
as
to
the
justification,
because
at
the
end
of
the
day,
it's
not
a
hard
and
fast
rule
that
they
have
to
connect
it's
just.
It
needs
to
be
looked
at
in
a
reasonable
fashion
to
determine
whether
or
not
it
should
be
connected.
F
H
Correct,
yes,
sir,
and
there's
a
couple
of
reasons
why
we
didn't
connect
to
beaumont
drive.
One
of
the
reasons
was
when
we
read
the
ordinance
it
stated
for
to
promote
the
future
development
of
the
adjacent
areas.
Well,
after
this
section
is
built
out,
you
know,
there's
a
railroad
track
on
one
side
and
then
surrounding
it
is
already
an
existing
neighborhood
development.
So
this
is
the
future
development.
There
would
be
no
more
development
from
here.
H
On
the
other
reason
was
we
looked
at
connecting
trevor
to
beaumont
drive
and
when
we
did
that,
due
to
the
proximity
of
the
property
line
on
the
west
side,
the
right
of
way
of
beaumont
drive
is
close
enough
to
that
route.
To
that
property
line,
that
we
actually
lost
several
lots
when
we
tried
to
connect
that
too
so
putting
the
cul-de-sac
in
allowed
us
to
get
a
couple
more
lots
in
that
area.
So
those
were
the
two
reasons
that
we,
from
an
engineering
standpoint
we're
requesting
the
cul-de-sac
instead
of
connecting
to
beaumont
drive.
A
Mr
dawson,
that
sounds
like
an
economical
reason,
not
an
engineering
reason
you're
losing
some
locks.
That's
that's.
A
A
H
Well,
you
know
the
reason
why
we
we
we
weren't
going
to
go
back
and
negotiate
with
the
people,
the
the
property
next
door.
Other
property
owners
are
not
the
property
owner
that
owns
the
development
right
now
I
understand,
and
then
you
know
the
utility
extensions.
We
are
looping
the
water
lines,
we're
looping
actually
back
to
beaumont
drive
through
easements,
so
we
are
continuing
water
through
the
subdivision
back
to
beaumont
drive
to
connect
the
actual
utilities.
H
H
H
The
fire
hydrants-
I
don't
know
the
exact
exact
number
off
the
top
of
my
head,
but
we
spaced
them
at
the
minimum.
500
feet
actually
they're
a
lot
less
than
500
feet,
just
the
way
that
the
layout
worked
per
the
city,
fire
marshal
requirement.
F
The
thing
I
would
comment
is,
I
think
you
know
some
good
points
were
made.
In
other
words,
this
is
not,
for
example,
the
western
or
northern
boundary
the
city,
where
the
idea
would
be
further
development
would
push
out.
So
I
think
that's
valid.
The
other
is,
as
mentioned,
the
proposed
loop.
There
is
to
a
collector
standard
and
the
idea
behind
a
collector
is
you
obviously
collect
the
local
residential
traffic
to
a
collector
which
takes
it
out
to
the
major
arterial,
because
again,
this
is
kind
of
infill
development.
You've
got
a
railroad
track,
as
mentioned.
F
There
won't
be
opportunity
for
again
the
kind
of
ideal
neighborhood
growth
boundary
plan
and
I'll
also
mention
that,
in
the
text,
description
of
a
neighborhood
growth
that
we
keep
referring
to
which
again
the
subdivision
refers
to
it-
does
refer
to
curvilinear
streets
with
cul-de-sac
patterns.
So
just
having
the
cul-de-sac
in
and
of
itself
is
not
necessarily.
D
A
A
All
right,
thank
you
very
much.
We've
heard
from
the
applicant
and
also
the
the
staff
and
the
staff
does
agree
with
their
idea
of
not
connecting
beaumont
to
trevor,
and
with
that
I
would
look
for
motion.
F
F
F
Due
to
the
proximity
of
the
new
fire
station,
the
fire
department
is
requesting
that
a
knox
gate
system
be
installed
for
emergency
access,
and
I
will
say
that
we
have
had
in
the
run-up
to
this
application.
The
city
staff,
especially
fire
department,
has
been
in
meetings
and
discussions
with
fitz
and
shipman,
as
well
as
bisd,
to
make
sure
that
there's
no
negative
impact
on
the
closing
of
this
portion
of
cottonwood
so
based
on
this
staff,
is
recommending
approval
of
the
application
subject
to
the
following
conditions.
F
Number
one
retain
existing
utility
easement
for
the
water
line.
Number
two
gates
will
require
installation
of
a
nox
gate
system
and
then
finally
condition
number
three.
If
approved,
applicants
shall
obtain
an
appraisal
and
title
commitment
for
the
property
to
be
abandoned
at
their
expense
appraisal,
and
title
commitment
must
be
submitted
to
the
planning
office,
along
with
the
proof
that
the
payment
has
been
arranged
prior
to
the
item
being
placed
on
the
city
council
agenda
and
again
you'll
recognize
that
comment
from
our
recent
abandonments,
which
is
required.
A
H
I
A
All
right,
ladies
and
gentlemen,
we've
heard
from
the
staff
and
the
the
applicant
entertaining
motion.
E
A
Opposition
the
eyes
have
it.
Thank
you,
ladies
and
gentlemen.
This
completes
our
regular
meeting
now
we're
going
to
start
our
planning
and
zoning
and
city
council
meeting,
and
I
want
you
to
know
that
this
is
a
historical
event
for
our
commission.
A
For
the
first
time
we
have
the
longest
serving
female
mayor
in
town
being
with
us,
and
the
first
african-american
elected
mayor
for
city
of
beaumont.
That
is
prison
with
us.
I'll
congratulate
you,
mrs
mouton.
A
A
Madam
mayor,
we
have
remembered
our
colleague
mr
pate
previously
and
my
condolences
to
all
of
his
friends
and
and
colleagues
with
that,
the
floor
is
yours.
Thank
you.
I
do
believe
we.
J
J
Comes
to
florida,
council
and
before
I
turn
it
back
over
to
you
chairman,
I
just
want
to
say
this
is
my
last
planning
and
zoning
meeting,
and
I
want
to
thank
you
all
for
your
service.
Everyone
doesn't
realize
how
much
time
it
takes
for
the
volunteers
that
served
on
all
of
our
boards
and
commissions,
and
I
just
want
to
thank
you
for
your
time
and
your
efforts
today
and
in
the
past
many
years
for
those
of
you
who
have
been
on
for
a
long
time.
So,
thank
you
so.
J
A
A
D
D
F
Good
afternoon,
our
one
and
only
item
on
the
joint
meeting
is
pz2021-162
and
it's
to
consider
a
request
for
a
specific
use
permit
to
allow
a
church
in
an
rcr
residential
conservation,
revitalization,
historic
district.
This
is
the
property
at
2453.
Broadway,
welding
smith
is
requesting
the
specific
use
permit
to
establish
a
church
at
this
location.
F
F
F
F
F
However,
based
on
the
application
staff
is
recommending
approval
subject
to
the
following
conditions:
number
one
to
update
the
site
plan
to
show
the
proposed
parking
layout
with
dimensions
to
meet
city
requirements
and
number
two
to
re-stripe
the
parking
at
the
building.
Again,
we
believe
it
is
pay.
It
is
paved
it's
just
not
properly
striped,
but
with
that
are
there
any
questions
of
staff?
A
K
We
have
we
currently
are
a
congregation
that
formerly
before
well
before
covet.
We
rendered
the
middle
space
of
the
dahlia
pharmacy
and
we
were
there
for
several
years
having
church
services
we
plan
to
have
a
home
church,
not
a
church
with
a
steeple
type
church.
Our
goal,
we
have
a
small
congregation
between
10
and
20,
regularly
attend
it's
a
very
small
congregation,
but
our
real
mission
is
to
reach
out
to
the
homeless
and
the
hungry
in
our
community.
K
Three
of
the
families
in
our
congregation
live
in
the
historic
district,
so
we're
sensitive
to
the
importance
of
sustaining
and
maintaining
good
value
for
the
people
who
live
there.
But
we're
also
concerned
that
there
are
many
people
who
are
really
very
unfortunate
when
we
had
our
services
in
the
dalio
pharmacy
building.
K
K
K
C
D
K
K
Our
outreach
really
to
the
homeless
has
been
where
we
go
where
they
are.
I
included
a
letter
in
the
application.
At
one
point,
we
had
been
connected
with
tan
healthcare
to
go
with
them
when
they
would
go
out
into
the
area
to
provide
health
care,
we
would
we
would
go
and
provide
food,
we
would
go
and
with
our
clothing
and
stuff
that
we
were
able
to
give
to
them.
So
we
try
to
work
with
other
people
in
the
community
as
well,
but
we
don't.
Those
are
our
only
at
this
time
church
services.
K
Obviously,
if
people
would
want
to
meet
on
an
evening
or
something
like
that
for
for
a
prayer,
service
or
a
class,
we
would
look
to
some
expansion.
But
we
we're
not
a
we're
not
going
to
have
things
every
day
all
day.
That
sort
of
thing
it
will
be
a
house
of
worship
and
also
a
place
for
us
to
have
supplies
that
we
can
give
to
those
in
need.