►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
C
B
A
All
right,
good
afternoon
again,
we
have
two
sets
of
minutes
of
meetings
of
may
16
and
june
27th.
They
have
been
sent
to
all
the
members
and
if
you
do
not
have
any
revisions,
comments
or
suggestions,
I
would
ask
for
a
motion
to
approve
those
into
the
record.
E
A
F
A
In
opposition
the
eyes
have
it.
Thank
you
good
afternoon,
ladies
we're
gonna
get
started
with
pz2022264.
E
Is
a
request
made
by
chris
rhodes
for
an
approval
of
a
preliminary
plot
of
mustang
cat
sales
and
service
center?
This
is
a
20.13
acre
development
which
will
house
a
new
equipment,
sales
and
maintenance
facility
for
mustang
cat.
The
property
meets
industrial
lot,
size
requirements
and
water
sewer
will
be
provided
by
an
extension
of
the
city's
facilities.
E
The
applicant
wishes
to
extend
south
4th
street's
pavement
within
the
existing
platted
right-of-way
to
access
rear
driveway
to
their
property.
A
cul-de-sac
is
required
as
part
of
this
extension.
There
is
no
room
within
the
existing
right-of-way
for
a
cul-de-sac
that
meets
all
city
standards.
Therefore,
mustang
cat
is
plotting
the
property
due
planning
the
property
to
dedicate
additional
right-of-way
for
the
cul-de-sac.
E
The
proposed
roadway
extension
is
not
shown
on
the
plot.
The
sub
subdivision,
ordinance,
section
26.02.002
part.
A
subsection
seven
requires
the
proposed
roadway
extension
and
cul-de-sac
that
must
be
shown
with
principal
dimensions.
Please
specify
whether
the
dimensions
is
face
to
face
of
curb
or
back
to
back
of
curve.
Additionally,
curb
inlets
are
not
shown
on
the
plot
section.
E
A
All
right,
perfect,
okay!
Thank
you
very
much.
There
is
no
questions
for
the
staff
and
we
don't
have
public
comments
on
this.
So
I
would
ask
for
a
motion.
Please.
D
C
A
In
opposition
guys
have
it
thank
you.
We're
going
to
go
to
pz2022266.
E
File,
pz2022-266
is
a
request
made
by
tom
rowe
of
mark
whiteley
and
associates.
They
wish
to
combine
two
and
a
half
lots
into
two
larger
tracks
of
land
the
property
owner.
Mr
reynoso
intends
to
build
single,
a
family
home
on
each
lot.
This
repla
will
allow
future
homes
to
have
more
acreage
and
sizeable
street
frontages
to
jerry
drive
planning
staff
recommends
approval
with
the
following
conditions:
number
one:
water
and
sanitary
sewer
utilities
shall
go
to
the
rear
of
the
property
along
woodlawn
avenue.
G
Good
afternoon
palm
road
mark
whiteland
associates
655
lane
on
unit
14
here
in
baltimore
demi,
pretty
much
explained
it.
This
gentleman
wishes
to
build
two
new
homes
in
the
north
end
of
town
and
just
reconfiguring
those
lots
and
actually
kind
of
changing
the
direction
that
subdivision
originally
faced.
Woodlawn
he's
actually
wanting
to
face
house
to
face
jerry,
but
so
the
division
was
to
give
a
little
bit
more
width
for
the
development.
The
two
new
homes.
A
And
you
already
have
the
easements
drawn
on
your.
A
Perfect.
Thank
you
very
much,
sir.
Any
questions.
Folks
before
I
let
him
go.
Okay.
Is
there
anybody
in
the
audience
that
would
like
to
speak
for
or
against
this
case.
A
None
is
hurt,
so
we
close
the
public
hearing,
we've
heard
from
the
staff
and
the
applicant,
mr
rowe,
and
it
appears
to
be
a
simple
realignment
of
the
property.
So
I
would
look
for
a
motion
motion.
C
F
A
E
File,
pc2022-279
is
a
request
made
by
scott
bracken
of
access
surveyors
for
approval
of
a
replat
of
section
5
lots
1
through
8,
section
6
lot,
3a
through
10a
and
part
of
water
edge
within
the
crescent
on
walden
subdivision
phase
one.
This
phase
of
the
crescent
on
walden
was
originally
filed
for
record
in
2005..
E
It
was
later
discovered
that
water
edge,
a
private
street,
was
not
constructed
within
the
boundaries
of
the
platted
right-of-way
section
26.02.003,
section
c
part
5,
states,
building
lines
and
easements
shall
be
shown
and
shall
be
defined
by
dimensions
due
to
an
existing
water
line
that
runs
along
the
eastern
edge
of
section
5
lot,
8a
and
section
6
lot,
10a
a15
exclusive
utility
easement
will
need
to
be
dedicated
to
the
city.
The
goal
of
this
replat
is
to
correct
the
right-of-way
boundaries
to
encompass
where
water
edge
was
constructed.
E
Planning
staff
recommends
approval
with
the
following
conditions:
number
one
add
a
15
exclusive
water,
water
utility
easement
to
be
dedicated
to
the
city
along
the
eastern
edge
of
section
5
lot,
a
and
section
6
lot,
10.
number
2.
Additionally,
it
was
realized,
after
staff
distributed
the
report
that
there
will
need
to
be
a
second
condition,
that
is
to
add
a
label
stating
private
road
and
utility
easements
along
water's
edge.
I'm
sorry
water
edge
to
show
that
this
street
is
to
remain
private.
E
This
is
zoomed
out
to
show
the
area
where
it's
situated
along
walden.
E
54
notices
were
mailed
to
property
owners.
Within
the
subdivision.
We
received
zero
letters
in
favor
and
zero
in
opposition.
F
A
A
G
A
G
G
So
some
of
the
lots
that
I've
served
I've
surveyed
a
couple
of
those
houses
on
that
street
and
I'm
glad
they're
correcting
it
now,
because
no
one
in
the
past
would
and
there's
actually
some
monumentation
of
the
original
right-of-way,
and
it
is
very
true
that
it
it
shifted
in
there,
and
so
some
homes
have
been
bought
and
sold,
and
on
surveys
we
did
we
kind
of
showed
where
the
right
of
way
was
by
the
originally
recorded
plat
versus
kind
of
where
the
street
is
today,
but
that's
kind
of
the
history.
G
Just
so
you
know
going
backwards.
They
tried
to
do
a
reply
years
ago,
but
the
firm
do
it
and
the
developer
something
happened,
and
so,
if
you
can
approve
this
and
fix
this
for
these
homeowners,
that's
gonna
be
a
great
deal,
because
this
that
whole
little
section
of
that
development
has
been
messed
up.
Well,.
G
A
It
looks
like
with
the
aerial
photographer
good,
also
let
the
record
show
that
the
surveyors
take
up
for
each
other.
So
that's
good
all
right.
Thank
you,
sir.
Thank
you.
Is
there
anybody
in
the
audience
that
would
like
to
speak
for
or
against
this
case
now,
and
it's
hurt
so
we'll
close,
the
public
hearing
we've
heard
from
the
staff
also
they
survey
here
and
the
explanation
of
what
has
happened
in
the
past.
With
that,
I
asked
for
a
motion
motion.
D
A
A
A
A
Well
good
afternoon,
ladies
and
gentlemen,
by
popular
demand,
we're
back
and
we're
going
to
have
the
honorable,
madam
mayor,
get
us
started.
B
B
F
G
A
Thank
you,
ma'am
we're
going
to
get
started
with
pz2022-216.
Please.
D
Ball
pz
2022-216
is
a
request
for
bnsf
from
bnsf
for
a
specific
use
permit
to
allow
a
new
railroad
spur
south
of
bannon
street
and
east
of
4th
street.
This
item
was
tabled
at
an
earlier
meeting.
There
was
some
question
I
think
about
where
a
wall
or
berm
would
fit.
We
were
requesting
a
berm
or
wall
or
some
sort
of
screening
and.
D
Sound
mitigation-
I
guess,
for
the
residential
properties
there
to
the
the
west
of
this
new
spur
to
help
protect
them
from
noise,
and
since
then,
bnsf
has
done
some
studies
and
he's
presented
us
with
some.
D
And
this
is
a
new
drawing
that
he
presented
to
us,
showing
where
they're
going
to
incorporate
an
eight
foot
tall
berm
along
that
west
edge
of
the
new
track
for
the
majority
of
the
distance
of
the
track.
There
will
be
a
section
of
the
track
see
if
I
can
get
the
mouse
to
work,
sit
up
there,
okay,
so
this
section
right
here
will
be
a
wall.
D
And
these
are
homes
to
the
west
southwest
south
and
west
south.
This
is
property
to
the
east,
and
then
we
get
to
some
of
these
rail
crossings
that
we
were
talking.
There
are
a
number
that
we
found
on
bnsf's
line
in
southern
california,
and
this
is
just
a
couple
of
slides.
I
have
to
show
existing
at-grade
pedestrian
crossings
that
they
have
on
their
rail
line
there
in
california,
this
one's
in
san
clemente.
D
A
Good,
if
you
don't
mind,
go
back
to
your
first
slide
of
the
revised
drawing
there's
a
section
you
show
as
a
wall,
and
would
there
not
be
landscaping
next
to
that
wall.
A
D
You
know
actually
that
area
is
extra
where
we're
requiring
the
berm
is
up
through
here.
This
is
where
the
properties
are
located
for
the
rezoning
just
through
this
area,
so
they're
proposing
this
as
above
and
beyond
what
we've
asked
for.
H
A
G
A
A
Good
jeff,
any
additional
information
you
want
to
give
us.
J
No,
I
think
adina
said
it
very
well
we're
proposing
a
berm
and
landscaping
where
there's
not
existing
trees.
We're
gonna
try
to
save
as
many
trees
as
we
can,
because
that's
probably
the
best
cover
okay
and
then,
like
she
said
we're
gonna
go
down
down
below
forsyth
street.
I
that
guy
on
the
corner
there
I
didn't,
we
didn't
want
to
take
any
more
property
from
him
and
so
that
that
berm
would
have
messed
that
up
and
so
we're
proposing
kind
of
a
wall.
J
And
then
then
a
berm
on
down
so
is.
F
J
I'm
not
in
that
position
there.
So
on
that
third
issue,
I
think
we
were
supposed
to
keep
those
separate.
I
think
janelle
davis
had
called
you
and
supposed
to
keep
those
separate.
I
think
you
guys
have
been
talking
with
tim
hooyah
on
that
stuff
too,
so
I
think
you're,
hopefully
getting
close
to
working
that
out,
but.
D
Yes,
sir,
we
have
discussed
it
with
them
and
what
our
understanding
is.
We're
being
told
that
this
should
not
be
connected
to
the
specific
use
permit.
But
when
we
request
the
at-grade
crossings,
bnsf
is
attaching
the
this
crossing
to
other
crossings
in
town
and
asking
us
to
eliminate
other
crossings
in
town.
A
K
J
I'm
in
the
engineering
department-
and
this
is
my
project
and
I
do
expansion
projects,
tim
huya
he's
my
public
projects
manager
and
he
has.
J
Crossings,
the
overpasses,
the
underpasses
anything
that
deals
with
the
city,
county,
state
and
great
crossings
so
is.
A
A
All
right
so
counselor
can
we
add
a
new
condition
where
the
third
one
would
be
the
three
third
item
and
pass
it
on
to
amicable
resolution
by
the
legal
and
the
planning
office
and
approve
the
rest
of
it.
So.
I
A
A
F
J
A
Can
he
can
commit
the
rest
of
the
railroad.
A
Right
so
we
can
suggest
a
amount
motion
to
to
take
the
first
two
option
and
then
then
the
third
one
upon
approval
of
the
of
the
planning
and
zoning
right
yes
or
planning
office.
A
Straight
to
you,
I
can
just
say
upon
approval
of
the
planning
office:
okay,.
A
C
Are
we
still
adding
that
tree
line
to
that
concrete
wall.
J
That
I
do
not
know,
I,
I
don't
think
we
were
told
that
there's
a
noise
issue.
I
think
it
was
more
of
a
sight
issue,
and
so
I
know
that
I
know
dirt
or
berm
would
probably
mitigate
sound
more
than
a
wall,
but
that's
and.
J
J
A
berm
across
there,
so
I
we
put
a
put
a
wall
out
there.
It's
like
110
foot
or
something
like
that.
Precast
concrete
about
eight
foot
tall
panels
that
are
put
in
there.
A
C
A
All
right,
so
we
know
what
the
motion
is
going
to
be,
and
we
added
item
number
four
to
add
the
trees
next
to
the
wall.
So,
let's
go.
I
would
entertain
the
motion
so
move
for
approval.
I.
D
D
A
I
would
make
a
motion
to
accept
item
number
one
two
and
four,
which
is
an
added
criteria
for
adding
trees
next
to
the
wall,
and
the
condition
number
three
would
be
contentions
upon:
approval
of
the
city
planning
office.
A
Have
a
second
and
any
discussion
all
in
favor,
say
aye.
H
C
A
F
E
E
E
The
new
construction
will
have
two
bedrooms
or
will
have
a
two-bedroom
dwelling
unit
combined
with
the
law
office.
The
living
quarters
will
be
located
behind
the
law
office
on
the
northeast
side
of
the
building,
and
it
will
be
used
24
hours
seven
days
a
week
and
the
activities
involved
are
those
of
daily
living,
such
as
bathing
sleeping
eating,
cooking
laundry,
socializing
and
relaxing.
E
This
district
does
not
require
off-street
parking
or
building
setbacks.
The
contractor
began
to
form
the
foundation
without
the
benefit
of
an
approved,
sup
or
building
permit.
However,
they
have
since
applied
for
the
appropriate
building
permits
and
await
the
outcomes
of
council
residential
uses
within
the
downtown
planning
area.
May
bolster
economic
activity
hereafter
due
to
an
increase
of
pedestrian
traffic
staff,
recommends
approval
with
the
following
conditions.
E
E
This
the
bird's
eye
view
this
is
the
subject
property
and
to
the
northeast.
You
can
see
that
they
began
forming
up
the
boards.
No
concrete
has
been
poured
yet
further
northeast
property
to
the
north
east
and
southeast
to
the
south
to
the
southwest,
and
we
do
have
the
applicant
present.
21
notices
were
mailed
to
property
owners
within
200
feet
of
the
property.
We
received
zero
letters
in
favor
and
one
in
opposition.
E
The
one
in
opposition
was
circled,
no
and
then
a
note
to
the
side
saying
unless
they
know
what
they're
moving
next
to
and
they're
they're
wanting
to
become
a
large
church
with
1
000
members.
E
E
E
K
A
None
great,
thank
you
very
much,
we'll
close
that
now
we're
going
to
go
to
the
new
one,
any
other
questions
for
the
young,
lady,
no,
no
and
the
applicant
is
in
the
audience.
Yes,.
L
I'm
aware
of
the
church
there,
the
pastor
has
my
cell
phone
number.
He
wanted
to
buy
the
land
at
one
point
asked
him
for
a
price
and
he
never
got
back
to
me.
So
I
started
on
the
project
the
reason
the
forms
got
started.
I
was
talking
to
mr
bo
hansen.
It's
hanson
right,
mr
hanson
upstairs,
and
he
was
saying
we
could
do
a
slab-only
permit.
I
related
that
to
my
we
could
do
a
slab-only
permit
and
get
started.
I
related
that
to
my
contractor
and
he
heard.
L
It's
so
the
next
day
I
I
called
the
city
because
there's
an
existing
there's,
some
existing
foundation
there
and
I
was
calling
the
city
to
see
if
we
could
or
could
not
use
that
and
so
immediately
made
the
city
aware
that
we'd
started
without
a
permit.
I
come
by
monday.
I
see
the
red
tag
and
I
text
my
contractor
what's
going
on
and
I
figured
out
subsequently
that
he
heard
let's
get
started.
Okay,.
L
It's
I'd
like
to
rent
it
out,
but
I
also
might
live
there
depending
on
my
perfect
circumstances.
Okay,.
A
Great
any
questions
for
the
gentlemen:
how.
L
About
parking,
so
technically
I
don't
need
any
under
the
code,
but
there
is
plenty
of
parking
available.
I
mean
like
it's,
not
my
parking,
but
the
parking
lot
next
to
it.
There's
a
restrictive
easement
over
the.
If
you
see
the
there's
like
basically
three
sections
of
that
parking
lot,
there
they're
owned
by
three
different
individuals
and
there's
an
easement
over
the
two
larger
ones
of
access,
so
no
one
can
build
anything
there.
L
They
could
all
get
together
and
block
it
off
if
they
want
to,
but
they'd
have
to
coordinate
action
on
that
one
and
I'm
not
even
sure
if
they
could
get
hold
of
the
third
guy.
So
well,
I
don't
I
can't
say
people
can
park
there
and
you
know
stop
someone
from
stopping
them.
People
park
there
all
the
time.
Right
now,
whenever
I've
gone
down
to
the
municipal
courthouse
to
get
permits
for
street
closings
and
things
for
a
friend
of
mine,
I've
always
parked
there.
L
L
D
L
L
Yeah
they'd
each
be
there
there's
it's
32
feet
by
60
feet,
divided
by
the
two
two
units
evenly
so
they're,
both
920
square
feet.
If
I'm
doing,
if
I'm
remembering
my
math
right
so
you're.
L
L
L
L
A
K
Here,
representing
angel's
drywall
and
a
m
property
management
that
owns
part
of
the
lot,
that's
in
the
parking
we
would
like
to
move
in
favor
of
saying
no,
unless
some
kind
of
negotiation
can
be
made
with
us
and
the
owner
in
regards
to
our
trailer.
That's
in
that
parking
area.
A
Sure,
but
but
the
construction
of
this
building
is
not
going
to
hamper
your
trailers
being
there
right.
No!
Okay,
thank
you.
Is
there
anybody
else
that
would
like.
No,
no
sir,
is
there
anybody
else
that
would
like
to
speak
for
or
against
this
case
none
is
heard.
Well,
mr
vernon,
you
had
a
comment
about
the
trailer.
That's
in
the
back.
You
can
respond
to
that
now.
A
You're
good,
perfect,
everybody's
happy.
I
like
that
great
we
have
heard
from
the
staff
the
applicant
and
also
one
of
the
neighbors.
So
with
that
I'm
looking,
there
is
a
condition
and
we're
looking
for
a
motion
motion.
C
A
Perfect
any
discussion
all
in
favor
say
aye.