►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
Thank
you
folks,
we
do
have
a
quorum
and
you
have
been
distributed
the
minutes
of
the
previous
meeting.
I
would
entertain
the
motion
to
approve
and
or
if
you
have
any
comments.
A
We
have
a
motion
and
a
second
any
discussion
on
the
approval
of
the
minutes,
all
in
favor,
say
aye,
aye
and
in
opposition
the
eyes
have
it.
Thank
you,
mr
boone.
We're
going
to
get
started
with
you
before
mr
boone
starts.
He
has
been
nominated
to
to
be
our
interim
city
manager,
and
I
want
to
tell
you
chris
how
proud
we
are
of
you
doing
so,
and
I
know
in
the
meantime
you
will
do
the
best
job
ever
so
congratulations.
D
You
thank
you
just
don't
leave
us
hanging
out,
I'm
here.
Oh!
Thank
you
all
right.
Well,
I
appreciate
that.
So
the
first
item
on
the
regular
agenda
is
pz
2022-15
and
it's
a
request
to
abandon
a
portion
of
a
city
street
right-of-way
at
55-55
college.
D
Nathan,
rivers
is
requesting
the
abandonment
of
a
portion
of
the
right-of-way
at
this
location.
Structures
were
built
in
the
1970s
without
the
knowledge
of
the
right-of-way
and
subsequent
surveyor.
Surveys,
rather
of
the
property,
did
not
show
this
right
away
upon
transfer
of
ownership.
This
year,
a
platt
dated
1931
was
discovered,
showing
the
right-of-way
as
the
right-of-way
has
not
been
developed
as
a
street,
and
adjacent
businesses
have
structures
in
the
right-of-way.
Currently,
the
new
owner
would
like
to
abandon
the
right-of-way.
D
Retaining
the
entire
right-of-way
as
an
easement
would
still
leave
encroachments.
However,
so
the
applicant
has
submitted
a
proposed
utility
easement
to
take
care
of
the
existing
utility
lines
within
this
area,
and
let
me
go
ahead
and
show
this
is
the
area
in
question
outlined
in
red
there
on
college
street.
D
And
you,
as
you
can
see,
the
buildings
clearly
have
been
built
within
this
proposed
right-of-way.
It
does
look
like
it
was
planted
at
some
point
back
in
the
20s
or
30s
to
be
a
street,
but
clearly
the
street
was
never
never
developed,
and
this
is
showing
the
you
can
see.
The
in
the
hash
line
is
the
width
of
the
right
of
way,
but
then
you
can
also
see
the
location
of
the
existing
utility
lines.
D
And
so,
based
on
this
application
staff
is
recommending
approval
of
the
abandonment
of
the
right-of-way
with
the
retention
of
the
proposed
easement,
and
we
would.
We
would
recommend
approval
again
subject
to
the
applicant
as
we
are
now
requiring
providing
an
appraisal,
title
commitment
and
then
payment
to
the
city
for
the
property
in
question
before
the
item
is,
is
brought
to
city
council.
But
with
that
are
there
any
questions
of
staff
is.
D
A
A
E
E
We
purchased
the
property
at
five
five,
five
five
college
street
last
year.
It
also
comes
with
a
property
955
lindbergh
on
the
map.
There
there's
actually
three
buildings
on
the
property:
we've
outrun
our
building,
that's
on
23rd
street
at
the
moment,
so
we're
looking
at
moving
our
business
here.
We
we'd
like
to
invest
about
a
million
and
a
half
dollars
in
improving
these
properties,
but
to
do
so
we'd
like
to
make
sure
that
the
existing
building
is
safe
from
any
future
planned
work
from
the
city.
E
A
Yeah,
it's
kind
of
strange
that
they
had
an
utility
in
the
middle,
the
the
right
away
that
they
issued.
So
I
can
understand
that
mr
rivers,
do
you
understand
that
the
city
requires
you
to
appraise
the
the
property
and
go
through
that
motion
with
them?
Yes,.
A
They've
agreed
to
that
perfect
any
questions
for
the
gentleman.
A
C
D
The
second
and
final
item
on
the
regular
agenda
is
file
pz,
20
2231,
and
it's
to
consider
a
request
for
approval
of
the
preliminary
plat
of
seven
stars
phase.
One
beaumont,
jefferson,
county
texas,
joe
patty
of
arsenal,
wilson
and
cole,
has
requested
preliminary
plaid
approval
of
seven
stars
phase.
One.
The
project
is
located
on
the
north
side
of
the
8500
block
of
state
highway
105,
the
6.51
acre
development
is
a
21
lot
single
family
residential
subdivision.
D
All
lots
will
front
on
santa
drive
a
50
foot
wide
right
away
with
a
newly
constructed
27
foot
wide
pavement
street
and
let
me
go
ahead
and
show
you
on
the
on
the
screen.
You
can
see
phase
one
is
that
section
that
is
along
105,
but
we've
gone
ahead
and
shown
you
the
conceptual
plan
for
the
entire
subdivision
and
I'll
also
point
out
in
your
staff
report.
There
was
some
requests
for
waivers
to
the
street
wits,
especially
of
kareem
drive.
That's
the
drive
that
comes
off
105..
D
D
It
is
now
being
proposed
to
be
a
60
foot
right
away
with
37
foot
pavement
with,
which
is
a
minor
collector
drive
street
standard,
so
in
other
words,
as
the
entrance
of
the
subdivision,
it
needs
to
be
a
little
bit
wider
than
what
was
originally
proposed.
So
joe
patty
has
amended
the
preliminary
plat
to
reflect
that.
D
D
The
next
thing
I
would
like
to
address
is
the
question
of
the
sidewalk,
so
the
applicant
had
requested
a
sidewalk
waiver
and,
as
you
know,
sidewalks
are
are
requested
for
new
subdivisions,
especially
along
major
arterial
streets,
and
I
think
the
app
the
developer
has
no
issue
with
the
sidewalk
requirements
within
the
subdivision.
D
But
there
was
a
question
about
the
sidewalk
along
105
and,
if
out
there
on
the
ground,
there
actually
is
a
sidewalk
immediately
to
the
west
of
this
property
along
105,
but
the
developers
had
requested
not
to
develop,
install
a
sidewalk
rather
along
this
portion
of
105..
Now
the
staff
is
recommending
that
we
do
require
the
sidewalk
subject
to
txdot
approval,
because
right
now,
there's
I
think
the
developer
and
txdot
has
a
concern
of
continuing
the
sidewalk
right
along
105.
D
As
mentioned,
there
is
sidewalk
immediately
to
the
west
on
the
other
side
of
deerfield
subdivision,
which
is
that
subdivision.
That's
existing
immediately
to
the
east.
There
is
a
school,
and
so
again,
while
most
you
know
most
students
are,
you
know
either
take
the
bus
or
their
parents,
or
you
know,
drive
to
schools.
You
know
having
a
sidewalk
there,
you
know
would
be
a
good
option.
So
again
we
are
recommending
that
they
provide
it
subject
to
text
dot
approval
so
that
if
txdot
does
end
up
objecting,
that's
not
required.
D
So
having
said
that,
one
other
thing
I
would
mention
kind
of
regard
related
to
sidewalks
is:
let
me
go
back
to
the
overall.
If
you
look
at
the
overall
subdivision,
there
is
a
a
bisd
property
to
the
north.
That's
I
believe
the
ag
education
center
up
there.
So
it's
not
currently
a
school
and
we
have
no.
D
We
we
don't
think,
or
we
have
no
indication
that
it's
going
to
be
turned
into
a
school.
However,
with
it
being
bisd
property
and
with
the
amount
of
development
in
this
area.
There's
considerable
development.
Obviously
here
proposed
there's
development
on
tolliver
road,
which
is
just
south
of
here
several
new
multi-family
complexes,
and
so
we
don't
in
the
future.
D
So,
having
said
all
that
staff
is
recommending
approval
of
phase
one
subject
to
one
condition,
instead
of
the
four
outlined
in
your
report,
which
is
provide
a
sidewalk
along
state,
highway
105,
either
on
private
property
or
in
the
right
right-of-way.
With
permission
from
tech
stock
and
add
the
following
note
to
the
plat
that,
if
lots
are
not
developed
within
five
years
of
the
recordation
of
the
final
plat,
the
current
property
owner
shall
be
shall
construct
the
sidewalk
and
that's
in
accordance
with
the
current
ordinance
for
within
the
subdivision.
D
G
Question
clarification:
yes,
when
you're
asking
about
the
sidewalks
on
kareem,
but
are
you
also
stating
that
we
have
to
have
a
sidewalk
on
105.
D
H
I
don't
have
any
really
any
other
comments.
Other
than
about
the
sidewalk
and
friday
I
got
an
email.
We've
had
some
ongoing
correspondence
with
txdot.
We
were
originally
told
back
in
december
that
they
weren't
going
to
allow
sidewalks
in
their
right-of-way
anymore,
and
I
talked
with
with
the
staff
about
that,
and
then
we
had
a
meeting
last
week
and
I
had
sent
a
letter
to
the
permitting
department
and
she
sent
me
an
email
stating
that
she
had
forwarded
it
to
the.
H
The
new
area
engineer,
dave,
collins
and
friday:
I
got
an
email
from
them
stating
that
for
the
sidewalk
there
can
be
a
tie-in
to
the
existing
sidewalk
in
the
tech
stock
right
away.
But
when
this,
but
when
but
then
the
subdivision
sidewalk
will
need
to
be
placed
on
the
developer's
property
for
the
utility
installation.
It'll,
of
course
be
in
the
right
of
way.
So
they're
saying
they
don't
want
it
on
their
right
away,
and
I
mean
there's
been
some
back
and
forth.
H
You
know
I
guess
my
concern
is
putting
a
public
sidewalk
in
the
rear
backyards
of
some
lots.
I
mean
I
don't
know
of
any
place.
That's
ever
happened
in
the
city
of
bubba.
H
J
H
Required
to
put
sidewalks
in
and
that's
been
since
the
sidewalk
ordinance
was
implemented,
so
that's
been
in
the
last
six
years.
Those
two
have
gone
in
and
now
you
know
we're
getting
tagged
with
putting
in
a
sidewalk
if
those
had
been
putting
in.
I
wouldn't
be
standing
here
today.
I
don't
have
an
issue
with
it.
I
understand
it,
but
you
know
when
I
get
cited,
what
the
community
is
looking
for
in
terms
of
circulation
for
pedestrians,
and
then
you
don't
require
the
people
next
door.
It
just
doesn't
send
a
real,
clear
message.
D
Yeah,
I
would
just
echo
what
mr
patty
was
saying:
there
have
been
some
back
and
forth
with
txdot
recently
we
did
get
an
indication
at
some
point
that
they
were
not
going
to
allow
sidewalks
within
their
right
of
way
anymore,
which
we
were
a
little
taken
aback
by,
and
so
that
conversation
is
going
on
currently,
and
so
I
know
that
they're
kind
of
caught
in
the
middle
of
this.
That's
why
our
recommendation
is
that
provide
the
sidewalks
subject
to
text
dot
approval
and
that
way
we
can.
A
I
can
understand
that,
so
I
think
the
the
condition
would
be
changed
to
sidewalk
would
be
required
upon
written
approval
or
deny
rejection
of
the
text
out
right.
D
I
think
if
we
just
just
say,
provide
as
written
provided
sidewalk
along
state
highway
105
and
then
maybe
delete
either
in
the
private
property
phrase
and
just
say
in
the
right
of
way
with
permission
from
text
dot
and
then
continue
on
with
the
rest
of
that,
because
the
rest
of
it's
related
more
to
interior
of
the
sub
subdivision.
But
again
I
think
if
we
word
it
that
way.
A
A
C
A
Okay,
is
there
a
second
second,
we
have
a
motion
and
second
any
discussion.
All
in
favor
say
aye.
C
A
In
opposition
nice
habit.
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
mr
paddy.
This
concludes
our
regular
meeting
and
now
the
honorable
mayor
is
going
to
get
us
started
on
the
joint
meeting
with
the
city
council.
Madam
mayor.
K
B
A
D
I
think,
for
the
sake
of
the
new
members
and
the
audience,
the
way
subdivisions
typically
work-
and
we
just
talked
about
it
here
when
we
were
looking
at
seven
stars-
is
the
way
subdivisions
are
typically
developed.
Is
a
developer
will
come
in
and
plan
a
subdivision
and
of
course
they
bring
the
plat
to
this
body
and
we
have
certain
standards
in
terms
of
the
streets,
the
drainage,
the
water,
the
sewer,
etc.
D
Okay,
then
the
developer
is
able
to
record
the
plat
and
and
begin
selling
lots
and
building
houses,
okay,
and
so,
as
a
result,
those
streets
are
public,
so
they're
either
maintained
by
the
city
and
the
city
or
by
the
county
out
in
the
county.
The
issue
is,
we
do
have
some
streets
in
the
city
that
are
private,
and
this
is
the
case
where
this
property
was
developed
and
we'll
talk
a
little
bit
about
this
soon
developed
a
long
time
ago
on
private,
basically
private
drives
so
probably
a
good
way
to
think
about
this
development.
D
Even
though
it's
single
family
with
different
owners
is
it's
almost
like
a
gated
community
without
gates,
it
just
happened
to
be
developed.
You
know
a
long
long
time
ago,
without
the
benefit
of
it,
the
roads
and
the
infrastructure
ever
being
public
so
and
cities
all
over.
The
country
are
faced
with
this
right,
and
so
what
happens
is
as
infrastructure
ages.
D
I
will
say:
typically
what
happens?
Is
most
cities
ordinances?
They
say
you
know
they
they'll,
do
an
assessment
of
the
quality,
the
condition
of
the
infrastructure
and
then
require
that
it
be
brought
up
to
a
certain
standards.
Okay,
or
in
some
cases
they
the
city
or
county,
they
may
essentially
finance
those
improvements.
Okay,
through
a
tax
or
through
a
special
assessment.
D
And
so
that's
kind
of
where
we
at
where
we're
at
with
this
project
and
I'll
I'll
go
through
the
staff
report
in
just
a
second.
But
I
wanted
to
give
you
that
overall
history
and
regarding
the
the
conveyance
guidelines
that
we're
going
to
talk
about
here
I'll
go
ahead
and
read
to
you
the
procedure,
I'll
summarize
the
procedure.
So
again,
a
private
drive
subdivision.
D
You
have
to
have
the
majority
of
the
owners
that
want
to
apply
and
convey
the
private
drives
to
public.
So
that's
obviously
been
submitted.
We'll
talk
about
that
in
a
second
and
then
what
happens
is
the
public
works
director
will
inspect
the
street
and
infrastructure
to
determine
the
condition
which
we'll
talk
about
here
in
a
second
and
now.
We're
at
this
point
currently,
which
is
the
planning
commission,
will
review
the
proposal
and
make
a
recommendation
to
the
city
council
city
council
shall
thereafter
determine
whether
or
not
to
accept
or
reject
the
infrastructure.
D
But
with
that
lat
this,
this,
this
application
actually
came
back,
came
before
the
planning
commission,
as
you
recall
back
in
october
of
last
year,
and
at
that
time,
engineering
upon
their
review,
conducted
the
survey
and
analysis
of
the
streets
and
drainage
infrastructure,
and
they
found
that
the
entire
pavement
is
in
very
poor
condition
and
requires
a
full
rehabilitation.
D
The
ditches
had
been
poorly
maintained
and
not
graded
properly
to
drain
with
driveway
culverts
that
were
not
set
properly.
The
condition
of
water
and
sewer
lines
was
unknown
again.
At
the
october
planning
and
zoning
meeting
after
some
discussion,
the
planning
commission
requested
a
more
thorough
investigation
of
the
drainage,
water
and
sewer
situation
and
minimum
improvements
needed
to
for
acceptance
of
the
neighborhood.
D
D
Replacing
the
existing
four
inch
sewer
main
with
a
six
inch
line.
The
estimated
cost
would
be
forty
five
thousand
dollars
and
then
finally,
rehabilitation
of
the
asphalt
roads.
The
estimated
cost
of
the
road
improvement
would
be
two
hundred
and
twelve
thousand
dollars
and
going
on
comments
again
from
different
departments
in
review
of
this
application.
D
But,
having
said
that,
let
me
let
me
go
ahead
and
show
the
slides
again.
You
can
see
the
it's
kind
of
an
h
pattern
coming
off
of
wes
calder,
and
this
is
an
old
aerial
photograph
I
think
from
the
1938.
D
D
D
D
D
G
The
on
this
here
I
noticed
that
it
said
private
road,
so
they're
trying
to
go
from
a
private
road
to
a
public
road,
yes,
sir,
and
what
about
the
emergency
emergency
vehicles
that
do
they
go
use
these
roads
as
they
are
now.
D
D
D
Two
of
those
have
been,
I
believe,
formally
accepted,
because
in
the
assessment
of
the
existing
infrastructure
they
were
in
a
condition
that
was,
I
mean
there
were
some
problems
that
were
identified,
but
nothing
critical,
so
the
conditions
of
the
street,
the
condition
of
the
drainage
weren't,
really
an
issue,
I
think
all
their
water
and
sewer
was
already
set
up
to
have
individual
meters.
If
I'm
not
mistaken,
now,
there's
a
third
subdivision,
I
believe
it's
wood
park
and
they
had
more
significant
issues
and.
D
We
are
as
a
condition
of
approval.
There
were
things
required
that
we're
still
trying
to
work
out
with
them
to
resolve,
so
it
has
not
been
accepted
as
of
now
but
again,
the
way
cities
typically
handle
these
types
of
conversions
is
a
couple
different
ways.
One
is
either
they
just
don't
accept
them
because
they
get
asked
that
quite
frequently
or
they
say
you've
got
to
bring
the
infrastructure
up
to
a
certain
standard.
D
Then
we'll
accept
it
or
again,
a
third
option
which
would
be
you
have
to
either
finance
the
improvements
or
come
up
with
a
mechanism
whereby
the
city
may
do
some
of
the
work,
but
you've
got
to
essentially
finance
it
and
that
that
can
possibly
be
done
in
several
ways
might
be
special
tax
or
something
like
that.
But
that's
kind
of
that
could
be
a
third
option.
D
D
D
D
Let's
let
me
read
it
again:
the
water
system
requires
replacement
either
before
or
immediately
after
acceptance
of
the
road
rights
of
way.
This
is
to
improve
the
fire
protection
to
the
development
and
to
eliminate
the
multitude
of
services
running
from
an
extensive
bank
of
meters
in
the
west
calder
right
away.
Current
estimate
is
170
thousand
to
install
water,
main
service
connection
and
water
meters
and
fire
hydrants,
so
essentially
converting
the
private
system
to
a
public.
D
Well,
so
again,
they
kind
of
categorize
with
immediate
needs
which
needs
to
be
done
before
the
conversion
can
happen
is
the
way
I
understood
it.
Immediate
needs
urgent
work
installing
of
the
manholes,
and
then
the
balance
would
be
more
like
the
improvement
of
the
drainage
and
the
improvement
of
the
streets,
which
could
be
done
could
be
done
at
a
later
date.
N
N
That
is,
that
is
what
they're
really
asking
for,
because
when
it
rains
out,
there
they've
got
flooding
and
it
makes
it
impossible,
they're
working
with
the
water
system
being
as
it
is,
as
it's
been
forever,
so
that
the
categorization
of
immediate
need
is
more
from
a
good
city
administration
standpoint
than
what
the
citizens
are
actually
coming
before
you
and
asking
about
today.
But
I
don't
want
to
put.
K
F
F
A
O
My
name
is
scott
holloman.
I
live
at
2499,
west
calder
road,
the
very
end
of
the
one
on
bottom.
There
is
where
I
live,
and
the
drainage
has
been
an
issue
for
a
long
time
and
the
roads
which
we
skipped
over
a
little
bit
of
the
history.
O
So
this
portion
of
beaumont
was
annexed
after
this
development
was
here,
okay
and
there
was
no
checks
and
balances
in
place
at
the
time
to
make
this
right
like.
If
you
were
to
build
a
subdivision
in
beaumont
now
they
would
force
you
to
do
the
roads.
The
correct
way
that
have
to
be
the
right
width,
you'd
have
to
have
the
drainage
and
the
meters
and
everything
done
correctly.
O
That
was
not
in
place
in
1938
right,
so
the
problem
lies
now
that
the
owners
of
these
prop
of
these
roads
have
been
deceased
for
over
a
decade.
Okay,
so
there's
no
way
to
hold
them
accountable,
okay,
so
the
city
and
the
owners
at
some
point
should
have
addressed
this,
but
it
wasn't
addressed
and
therefore,
now,
four
years
ago
I
go
to
buy
my
home
and
know
nothing
about
this
being
private
there.
You
know
no
maintenance
other
than
the
condition
of
the
road.
O
You
know
that
it's
in
bad
shape
and
one
of
the
real
issues
is.
There's
residents
have
been
here
for
50
years
that
have
paid
property
taxes
every
single
year
and
a
portion
of
that
property
taxes
goes
to
streets
and
drainage
and
they
take
that
money
and
go
fix
other
people's
roads
and
drainage.
Because
that's
private,
you
know
we
never
really
wanted
a
private.
O
It's
not
what
we
were
looking
for.
We
don't
have
gates
up
or
anything
like
that.
In
fact,
the
private
sign
that
you
seen
in
the
picture
was
only
put
there
because
of
the
poor
condition
of
the
roads.
You
don't
want
other
people
driving
down
there
and
tearing
them
up
even
worse.
You
know
what
I
mean,
because
a
lot
of
us
are
spending
money
on
filler
to
fill
potholes
and
everything
else.
You
know,
and
today
is
the
first
time
I
heard
the
finance.
O
I
was
never
brought
up
as
an
option
before,
but
so
today
was
the
first
time.
I
heard
that
I
realize
it's
a
lot
of
money,
but
we
are
tax,
paying
citizens
and
half
of
our
residents
are
retired
over
over
65
years
of
age.
If
they
were,
if
their
homes
were
to
flood,
they
lose
everything
you
know,
but
yet
we
still
pay
them
taxes
every
single
year.
You
know
with
nothing
done
out
there.
O
The
only
other
thing
that
I
can
say
is,
I
know
they've
done
a
bunch
of
research
on
it
and
I
I
realized
that
the
cost
is
immense,
but
for
50
years
taxes
have
been
paid
out
there
without
representation.
We
don't
have
anybody
fixing
it,
and
at
this
point
we
don't
know
where
to
go
from
here.
O
I
would
venture
to
say
if
this,
if
there
was
no
houses
out
there,
we
probably
wouldn't
have
a
problem.
You
know,
they'd
come
out,
accept
the
roads
rebuild
them
because
boy
we
got
new
tax
money
coming
in,
but
this
tax
money's
been
there
for
50
years
and
it
just
hasn't
been
addressed.
I
appreciate
it.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
C
O
C
A
F
D
Well,
the
commission
can
recommend
it.
They
can,
you
know,
recommend
to
move
forward
or
recommend
denial
at
the
end
of
the
day.
It's
just
a
recommendation.
The
city
council
would
ultimately
have
to
make
the
decision
as
to
whether
or
not
to
deny
the
request
or
approve
it
as
is
or
approve
it
with.
As
we
talked
about
some
sort
of
some
sort
of.
D
You
know
whether
it's
a
special
assessment
or
some
kind
of
scheme,
whether
to
finance
you
know
the
improvements
and
then
again
that's
going
to
take
some
additional
work
to
determine
okay,
exactly
what
what
has
to
be
done
and
what
can
be
done.
You
know
over
time.
So
and
again
I
not
a
lot
of
guidance.
It's
just
this.
This
policy,
it
just
simply
says
the
commission-
should
recommend,
make
a
recommendation.
A
D
The
problem,
of
course,
is
if
you
don't,
you
know,
start
building
up
that
maintenance
and
repair
fund
when
your
infrastructure
starts
to
go
downhill
in
20,
30,
40,
50
years
now
you
know
what
do
you
do
and
so
that's
you
know,
that's
kind
of
been
the
situation
lately
where
some
of
these
have
been
coming
forward,
but
I
would
say
this
one
is
a
little
bit
it's
different,
so
it
wasn't
planned
like
this.
As
far
as
I
can
tell.
N
D
D
I
don't
know
the
history,
but
usually
if
what
typically
happens
for
an
annexation
is
it's
county
maintained,
and
so,
when
a
city
annexes,
that's
really,
of
course,
a
discretionary
business
decision
really
by
the
city
as
to
say
you
know,
does
it
make
sense
for
the
city
you
know
to
annex
any
area
and
so
to
some
extent
it's
a
business
decision,
and
so
you
know
that
that's
part
of
the
calculus
is
to
say
you
know,
but
again,
once
you
annex
well,
once
you
annex,
then
you're
kind
of
we,
the
city
are
on
the
hook
for
at
least
some
kind
of
minimum
standard,
and
I
will
say
that
since
amelia
since
amelia
was
annexed,
I
think
this.
D
D
Own
community
annexed
and
brought
into
the
city
of
omaha,
so
I'm
just
trying
to
in
my
mind
discern
that
difference,
and
I
don't
really
see
one
well.
My
thought
is
and
again
I
I'm
not
that
familiar
with
with
the
annexation
of
amelia,
but
my
thought
is,
it
was
public,
maybe
county
maintained
or
the
community
maintained
it
was
public
was,
is
my
guess
in
the
same
way,
you
know
if
there's
a
private
drive
subdivision
in
the
county,
currently
that
we
annex
it
doesn't
automatically
convert
from
private
to
public.
A
No
sir,
we
do
not
have
a
public
comment.
I'm
sorry.
G
One
question
yes,
going
back
to
what
I
was
asking
about
earlier:
is
there
did
they
have
a?
What
is
the
urgent
need?
I
think
councilman
getz
kind
of
made
that
that
assessment
that
if
they
can't
get
the
whole
package,
is
there
any
part
of
the
package,
that's
most
needed
that
can
be
brought
back
or
to
work
on
or
towards
because.
G
D
Well,
I
think
you
know
the
immediate
need
for
the
city
to
take
it
over,
as
public,
I
think,
is
that
170
is
basically
to
get
the
water
service
in
order.
Because
again,
I
think
what
I'm
hearing
is
that
well,
I
could
just
stay
like
it
is,
and
maybe
we'll
do
it
over
time,
but
you've
got
private
lines
that
are
running
across
property.
D
They
really
need
to
those
lines
need
to
be
within
the
right-of-way
under
the
street
and
again
as
count
as
chairman
najard
pointed
out,
you
don't
want
to
you,
know
repave
the
street
and
then
have
to
move
the
lines
and
and
dig
up
the
street.
You
know
after
that,
so
the
proper
thing
to
do
would
be
move
forward
with
the
water,
and
then
you
know
how
soon
the
streets
and
drainage
need
to
be
done.
That's
you
know
again,
that's
negotiable.
A
D
A
O
First,
off
I'm
a
surveyor
by
trade
utilities,
don't
go
under
roads;
usually
they
go
in
the
easement
on
the
outside
of
the
roads,
which
is.
O
O
Right,
our
main
concern
is
about
the
drainage
and
the
roads.
Okay,
we've
had
our
own
utility
line,
our
own
water
lines
running
down.
You
know
on
the
opposite
side
of
the
ditch
out
of
the
right
way
of
the
road
you
know,
so
we've
had
them
running
there
for
some
of
them.
50
years
you
know,
so
I
mean
if,
if
the
city
was
going
to
vote
to
take
it
over
yeah,
I
would
understand
that.
Yes,
the
plumbing
would
be
the
first
thing
because
then,
then
you
could
do
above
the
plumbing.
O
D
It
might
be
getting
a
little
bit,
but
this
issue
obviously
has
been
building
for
80
years.
So
I
would
kind
of
echo
that
thought,
maybe
that,
because
we
talked
a
little
bit
about
something
new
which
is
you
know
what
you
know,
perhaps
what
could
the
city
live
with,
and
how
can
you
know
we,
the
city
and
or
the
neighbors
pay
for
that
and
so
maybe
good
just
to
table,
and
then
we
can.
We
can
have
an
additional
conversation
with
with
that.
A
I
I
just
don't
want
to
deny
these
folks
the
right
to
improve
their
neighbors
neighborhood,
so
any
other
discussion
from
anybody.
A
N
A
A
D
D
Let's
see,
the
applicant
is
also
proposing
to
have
a
12
by
60
outdoor
patio
area
next
to
the
building
where
they
plan
to
host
game
nights,
karaoke
and
live
music.
This
could
be
problematic
due
to
the
residential
properties
directly
across
old
boath
road
and,
as
such,
staff
is
recommending
a
sound
barrier
be
provided
to
protect
the
residents
to
the
west
from
loud,
music,
etc.
D
D
D
D
The
building
in
question
is
actually
to
well
that's
the
building
in
question,
but
this
is
a
actually
an
adjacent
building
here,
but
that
gives
you
an
idea
of
the
space
between
the
two
buildings
where
the
proposed
drive-through
and
seating
area
is
proposed
to
go.
This
is
a
view
to
the
north
due
to
the
northwest
across
old
boats,
the
view
to
the
west
and
the
southwest.
D
And
based
on
the
application,
let's
see
we
did
send
out,
I
should
point
out:
we
sent
out
eight
notices
to
area
property
owners.
We
received
zero
in
favor
and
zero
in
opposition,
but
based
on
the
application,
staff
is
recommending
approval
subject
to
the
following
two
conditions:
number
one
provide
an
eight
foot
sound
barrier
along
the
entire
west
side
of
the
outdoor
patio
and
number
two.
The
layout
and
design
of
the
drive-through
and
patio
needs
to
be
pro
needs
to
provide
adequate
protection
to
the
pedestrians
and
patrons
from
vehicles
and
finals.
D
L
D
D
A
D
Yes,
so
again,
that
was
a
concern
and
that's
why
we
didn't
want
to.
We
didn't
want
to
necessarily
eliminate
the
outdoor
seating
area,
and
so
we
thought
in
order
to
mitigate
that
risk,
that
we
have
some
bollards.
We
have
some
striping,
you
know
some
drive-throughs
have
that
you
know
like
sonic,
there
might
be
a
drive
through
and
you
might
have
a
pedestrian
crossing
and
so
again
I
think
it
needs
to
be
subject
to
the
traffic
engineer
to
try
to
make
it
as
safe
as
possible,
but
it
is
a
concern.
D
A
M
K
And
we've
had
so
many
problems
in
the
past
with
rate
occasions
on
11th
street
being
in
the
residential
area,
we've
had.
D
A
Neighborhood
and
one
of
the
things
that
I'm
really
sensitive
to,
I
do
not
want
to
create
a
condition
that
would
we
waste
policing
money
when
people
going
out
there
for
noise
and
vagrants
and
cans
on
the
road
and
all
that
good
stuff
that,
unfortunately,
that
comes
with
the
territory
and-
and
we
just
spend
a
lot
of
our
policing
having
to
respond
to
some
of
these
things.
But
that's
my
opinion.
Any
questions
for.
A
Okay,
let's
see
the
applicant's
not
here
and
we
do
open
this
for
public
hearing.
Is
there
anybody
in
the
audience
that
would
like
to
speak
for
or
against
this
case.
C
C
A
You
would
enter
into
a
discussion
with
the
with
the
applicant
and
we're
going
to
table
this
at
this
time.
That.
F
C
A
They
need
no
position
the
eyes.
Have
it,
mr
boone,
I'm
sorry
putting
you
through
this,
but
you
signed
up
for
it
right.
D
All
right,
so
this
item,
pz2022
28,
is
to
consider
a
request
for
specific
use
permit
to
allow
an
adult
daycare
in
an
rmh
residential
multi-family
dwelling
high
density
district
at
the
property
at
1945.
Sarah
jelana
martin
is
requesting
a
specific
use
permit
to
allow
an
adult
daycare
at
this
site.
D
This
property
received
permission
and
operated
as
an
adult
daycare
from
1986
until
around
2016..
According
to
our
records
from
2017
to
2021,
a
suga
mama's
sweets
shop
occupied
this
location.
According
to
our
records.
Miss
martin
would
like
to
re-establish
this
property
as
an
adult
daycare.
Hours
are
proposed
to
be
7
a.m,
to
6
p.m.
Monday,
through
friday,
breakfast
lunch
and
snacks
will
be
provided.
D
In
addition,
landscaping
would
also
needed
to
be
provided
as
well
as
buffer
requirements
on
all
sides
to
buffer
the
use
from
adjacent
residential
uses.
In
addition,
as
this
property
has
not
been
an
adult
daycare
in
several
years,
the
fire
department
will
need
to
inspect
the
property,
and
all
deficiencies
must
be
corrected.
D
D
D
View
to
the
north
northeast
east,
you
to
the
southeast
due
to
the
south
and
staff,
did
send
31
notices
to
area
property
owners.
We
received
zero
in
favor
and
zero
in
opposition
staff
is
recommending
approval
of
the
application
subject
to
the
following
condition
that
if
and
when
public
works
excuse
me
read
the
wrong
one.
D
The
following
conditions
rather
number
one
parking
must
be
brought
up
to
city
and
ada
standards.
Number
two
landscaping
must
meet
city
requirements.
If
the
parking
lot
is
expanded
and
screening
is
required
along
the
east,
south
and
west
property
lines,
number
three:
the
property
must
meet
all
requirements
by
water
utilities,
for
water
and
sanitary
sewer
improvements,
including
any
requirements
by
the
city's
backflow,
pre-treatment
and
or
fog,
fat
soils
and
grease
program
and
then
finally
condition.
Number
four
property
must
be
brought
into
compliance
with
the
city
fire
department
without
any
questions
of
staff.
A
Thank
you,
mr
boone.
Thank
you
any
questions
for
mr
bill
and
miss
martin.
Yes,
good
afternoon
to
you
ma'am.
How
are
you
would
you
please
give
us
any
additional
information
that
you
might
have
first
state
your
name
and
address
for
the
record.
P
No
additional
information,
he
pretty
much
stated
everything
that
was
needed.
It's
prior,
it's
been
a
day
care
center
adult
day
care
center
prior.
So
I
don't
think
it
should
be
a
problem
and
I'm
willing
to
bring
it
up
to
whatever
standards.
P
P
Because
my
mom
about
two
years
ago.
F
P
P
P
I
B
A
I
A
P
P
A
F
Moore
my
address
is
59.90
along.
Q
With
I'm
representing
my
mother,
who
lives
right
in
front
of
that
property,
one
street
over
I'm
very
familiar
with
it,
as
councilman
uriel
stated.
I
just
had
a
question
because
I
remember
when
there
was
other
uses
before
it
became
the
daycare
daycare
facility
for
adults.
It
used
to
be
oic
office
operations
prior
to
that.
But
the
question
I
had
basically
was
the
staff.
Q
I
mean
I'm
hoping
that
you
all
are
not
going
to
create
a
hardship
on
the
folks,
that's
trying
to
open
it
up
with
the
parking,
because
I'm
not
really
sure
what
you're
going
to
do
with
the
parking.
It
is
residential
and
you're.
Talking
about
the
landscape,
you
know,
and
it's
hoping
that
you
will
take
into
consideration
what
it
is
they're
trying
to
do,
and
not
burden
or
really
over
tax
them
with
excessive
means
and
turn
to
the
park.
Q
It
may
not
be
an
issue,
but
I
just
hope
that
staff
will
be
sensitive
to
what
they're
trying
to
do
where
it's
located
and
as
they
did
the
need
is
there.
I
have
a
mother's
89
years
old
now,
so
I
know
a
lot
about
what
you're
talking
about
and
I'm
here
basically
representing
our
property
today.
A
A
C
A
D
Yes,
sir,
this
case
is
to
consider
a
request
for
specific
use
permit
to
allow
a
health
care
training
facility
in
an
rcrh
residential
conservation.
Revitalization,
historic
district
at
2005
broadway
tunnel
of
fleur
is
requesting
a
specific
use
permit
to
allow
the
healthcare
training
facility
at
this
location.
D
Students
will
be
trained
as
nurse
aides
to
provide
care
for
the
elderly.
Hours
of
operation
are
proposed
to
be
monday
through
friday.
9
a.m
to
9
30
p.m.
Hands-On
training
will
be
conducted
at
a
local
nursing
home.
The
parking
lot
for
this
property
is
paved
across.
Let
me
go
ahead
and
show
you.
The
applicants
they're.
D
D
Okay,
so
outline
here
in
red
is
the
proposed
facility,
and
you
can
see
this
is
in
old
town
and
so
there's
an
alleyway
that
runs
basically
splits
the
property.
D
Moreover,
if
and
when
the
city's
public
works
department
needs
access
to
the
alleyway,
the
approach
may
need
to
be
moved
to
private
property
along
4th
street,
where
the
city
engineering,
wherever
the
city
engineer,
sees
fit.
So
again.
Just
addressing
that
concern
and
you'll
see
here,
here's
the
subject
building
and
here
you
can
see
the
parking
lot
and
again
it's
using
the
existing
alleyway.
So
if
and
when
it
becomes
an
issue,
we
just
want
to
have
that
condition
in
there,
so
that
we
could
address
it.
D
This
is
a
view
again,
the
subject
property
the
view
to
the
west,
to
the
northwest,
the
north
east,
also
to
the
east,
to
the
south
southwest
and
west
okay,
we
did
send
31
notices
to
area
property
owners.
We
received
zero
responses
in
favor
and
zero
responses
in
opposition,
but
staff
is
recommending
approval
subject
to
the
one
condition
that
if
and
when
public
works
needs
access
to
the
alleyway.
A
R
R
R
I
have
two
offerings
one
offering
is
an
accelerated
course,
which
will
be
two
weeks
and
then
I
have
a
full-time
offering,
which
is
four
weeks.
R
R
It's
myself
starting
out
and
as
I
grow,
I
will
employ
more.
I
have
some
prn
instructors
in
my
back
pocket.
R
R
A
F
R
K
K
R
Have
day
and
evening
classes
to
you
know
according
to
their
schedules?
Yes,
so
I
want
to
try
to
meet
the
needs
of
everybody.
Yes,.
A
To
you,
thank
you.
Is
there
anybody
in
the
audience
that
would
like
to
speak
for
or
against
this
case
now
he's
heard.
So
we
closed
the
public
hearing
we
heard
from
the
applicant
and
also
the
city,
and
there
is
one
condition
about
moving
the
right
away
or
I'm
sorry,
the
alleyway
or
the
approach,
I'm
sorry
at
the
owner's
cost.
If
and
when
is
needed
other
than
that,
I
will
look
for
a
motion
motion.
A
C
A
D
Final
case
is
pz202248,
which
is
to
consider
a
request
to
re-zone
a
property
from
nc
neighborhood,
commercial
and
rmh
residential
multi-family
dwelling
highest
density
to
gcmd2,
general
commercial,
multi-family
dwelling
district
2
and
a
specific
use
permit
to
allow
a
mini
storage
facility
at
60,
30
and
60
40
concord,
road,
concord,
mini
storage.
Llc
would
like
to
rezone
the
property
in
question
and
is
also
requesting
a
specific
use
permit
to
allow
the
mini
storage
facility
at
this
location.
D
The
property
is
currently
split:
zoned,
nc
and
rmh.
The
applicant
states
that
the
plans
are
to
build
a
190
unit,
self-serve
personal
storage
unit
development.
The
property
would
be
gated
with
a
keypad
entry.
An
office
will
also
be
located
on
site.
The
property
would
be
accessible,
24
hours
a
day,
seven
days
a
week.
D
D
I
should
say
that
if,
if
the
rezoning
is
approved,
the
minimum
size,
setback
in
gcmd
is
20
feet
and
the
minimum
rear
setback
in
gcmd
is
15
feet.
The
site
plan
in
question
shows
15
on
the
side
instead
of
20
and
10
in
the
rear,
instead
of
the
instead
of
the
20.
So
we
would
ask
for
the
applicant
to
consider
that
factor
and
then
also,
let
me
go
back
to
the
zone.
You
can
see.
D
There's
residential
property
to
the
east
as
well
as
to
the
north,
so
a
10
foot
wide
buffer,
as
well
as
an
eight-foot
wooden
fence,
would
be
required
along
the
residential
boundaries
and
also
one
final
point
regarding
the
site
plan.
Before
I
go
on
is
the
fire
department
has
expressed
some
concern
regarding
access
to
the
rear
of
the
buildings,
but
would
like
to
work
with
the
applicant
to
make
those
minor
changes.
J
D
M
I'm
samuel
fountain
s,
r
engineers,
87
north
ih-10,
suite
215.
the
issue
with
the
fire
code.
We've
we've
already
got
that
handled
all
the
buildings
are
going
to
be
split
to
where
we
have
150
foot
access
all
the
way
around
it,
basically
providing
the
breezeway
into
it.
We
haven't
went
through
pre-development
on
this
project,
yet
because
we
wanted
to
make
sure
we
could
get
it
through
zoning
planning
and
zoning
before
we
wasted
anybody
else's
time
on
a
pre-development
meeting
that
wasn't
needed
and
everything
with
the
sidewalks.
M
Yes,
we
we're
good
placing
the
sidewalks
back
when
we
adjust
everything
the
sit
back
lines
and
everything
yeah
we're.
Yes,
we're
good
fixing,
correcting
everything
that
needs
to
be
corrected,
because
if
you
look
at
the
site
plan,
there's
areas
that
we
have
a
60-foot
drive
area
in
between
the
two
buildings,
so
we
have
plenty
of
room
to
shift
stuff
around.