►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
C
A
Well,
good
afternoon,
gentlemen,
ladies
and
Gentlemen
by
the
power
of
rested
in
me
and
approval
from
Mr
perigi
we're
going
to
start
having
some
fun.
This
is
the
City
of
Beaumont
joint
public
hearing
of
the
planning
and
zoning
and
city
of
city
council
meeting,
and
my
name
is
Cena.
Nejat
I
have
the
privilege
of
chairing
the
meeting.
A
Great
all
of
you,
the
members
of
the
committee,
have
been
given
the
minutes
of
the
last
meeting.
I
would
look
for
a
motion
to
approve
if
there
is
no
changes
or
recommendations.
Motion.
A
We
have
a
motion
and
a
second
to
approve
any
discussion,
all
in
favor,
say
aye
aye
and
in
opposition
the
ice
habit.
Thank
you
for
those
of
you
audience.
Please
make
sure
that
you
have
your
phone
on
silence,
if
you
please
and
when
it
comes
for
you
to
come
and
speak,
please
make
sure
that
you
comply
with
the
three
minutes
time
limit
for
your
presentation.
With
that
said,
we're
going
to
get
started
with
the
first
item
of
the
regular
meeting,
pz2023-203.
F
Good
afternoon,
the
first
item
is
for
an
abandonment
of
portions
of
South
Archie
and
Home
Street.
The
City
of
Beaumont
is
requesting
to
abandon
the
rights
away
once
abandoned.
An
exchange
of
this
property
has
been
arranged
to
provide
additional
parking
for
the
event
center
and
Lakeside
Center
Center
Point
is
asking
for
a
blanket.
A
utility
easement
on
these
properties
and
all
items
were
sent
to
very
interested
about
party
I.
Do
have
some
slides
for
you.
F
F
I
have
some
photos
of
Those
portions
of
the
right
away
just
to
skim
through
this
is
South
Street.
This
is
also
South
Street.
F
F
We
send
every
application
for
abandonment
to
all
interested
properties,
parties
which
would
include
the
utility
companies.
Anyone
who
might
have
utilities
located
in
them
and
Center
Point
did
respond,
saying
they
have
utilities
and
portions
of
I
think
South
Street.
They
said,
and
they
were
just
asking
for
an
easement
and
we
were
planning
to
retain
all
of
these
as
a
blanket
Utah
to
Eastman
I
believe
anyway.
So.
A
So
it
doesn't
have
it
in
here.
Well
great,
we
heard
from
the
staff
and
is
in
regard
with
the
abandonment
portion
of
the
streets
and
with
that
said,
I'll
look
for
emotion,.
G
Clarify
public
hearing
would
be
where
it's
with
you
know
if
it
requires
discussion,
but
you
do
have
to
ask
if
there's
someone
who
wants
to
speak
for
or
against
just
as
a
matter
of
practice.
G
H
There
we
go.
My
name
is
Edward
Brown
I'm,
with
the
city
of
Walmart
water
utilities,
department
at
1315,
Langham,
Drive,
perfect,
we're
just
wanting
a
clarification
for
that
easement
blanket
easement,
because
the
city
also
has
a
water
utilities
within
homes
and
South
Street.
G
G
If
the
purpose
is
to
be
used
for
utilities,
yes,
it
needs
to
be
called
a
utility
easement
and
it's
defined
what
what
agencies
have
access
to
it.
So
if
it's
just
going
to
be
typically,
our
utility
easements
do
involve
Center,
Point
and
other
other
utilities
just
for
the
ease
of
of
it.
But
if
it's
a
water
line,
sewer
line.
A
So
the
condition
would
would
I
guess
I'm.
Assuming
would
read
an
easement
for
the
Center
Point
City
of
Beaumont
and
into
Jeep.
Perhaps
so
you
can
catch
all
of
them.
I
Good
afternoon
Molly,
Villarreal
city,
engineer,
801,
Main,
Street,
Beaumont
I
believe
it'd
be
more
proper
to
retain
a
general
utility
easement
for
this
abandonment
request,
so
we
would
give
up.
We
would
abandon
the
right
away,
but
retain
the
general
utilities
which
I
think
that's
how
it
normal
it's
a
normal
process.
G
G
D
A
Thank
you
very
much
so
you're
going
to
amend
this
to
with
one
condition.
A
J
A
Thank
you.
Okay.
Now
that
we
had
the
discussion
out
of
our
way
and
everybody
understands
she
is
going
to
change
the
text
and
with
that
I
would
call
for
a
vote
all
in
favor,
say
aye.
F
F
A
visit
shipment
Incorporated
requests
a
waiver
of
the
sidewalk
requirement
for
the
restaurant
to
be
located
at
3120,
Washington
Boulevard,
if
approved,
the
request
would
allow
the
sidewalk
to
be
waived
along
6th
Street
engineering
staff
has
reviewed
the
request
for
the
sidewalk
waiver
and
they
state
that
Mr
King's
letter
does
not
provide
an
engineering
reason
for
which
a
sidewalk
cannot
be
constructed
along
6th
Street.
That
coverts
will
need
to
be
installed
in
the
existing
open,
ditch
to
accommodate
the
proposed
sidewalk.
F
Installing
culverts
has
proven
to
be
feasible
by
the
existing
Culvert
and
surface
Inlet
located
in
the
Southeast
corner
of
the
property.
The
existing
open
ditch
serves
as
a
relatively
small
drainage
area.
Therefore,
installing
culverts
is
not
anticipated
to
negatively
impact
the
overall
drainage,
so
planning
staff
recommends
denial
of
the
request
and
I
do
have
just
a
couple
of
photos.
F
For
you,
like
I,
said
the
the
property
in
question
is
outlined
in
red,
and
the
proposed
sidewalk
would
be
along
the
east
edge
of
that
red
area,
West
edge
of
6th
Street,
and
it
was
raining
tarantially
that
day.
So
this
is
the
best
photo.
I
could
get,
but
I
did
get
a
street
view
that
might
show
you
a
little
better
wear
that
sidewalk
would
go
and
it
would
be
there
along
the
edge
of
Sixth
Street,
that
you
see
to
the
left
side
of
the
photo.
A
A
You
is
the
applicant
in
the
audience.
K
A
All
right,
so
you
you
do
understand
the
the
denial
by
the
by
the
city.
Do
you
have
anything
else
that
you
want
to
add.
K
Yes,
sir,
and
just
just
the
the
property
itself
that
that
side
of
the
right
away,
it's
about
115
linear
feet
of
that
in
his
current
condition
that
the
sidewalk
would
have
to
Bridge
Over
the
ditch
itself.
So
that's
a
over
100
feet
of
linear
feet
of
pipe
that
has
to
be
installed,
plus
the
concrete.
On
top
all.
A
K
A
It's
it's
kind
of
unfortunate
that
it's
going
to
cost
you
that
much,
but
I
was
hoping
that
you
find
an
engineering
reason
for
it
for
and
for
that
reason,
I'm
I'm,
not
sure
how
we
can
help
you,
but
anyway.
Thank
you
very
much.
Okay!
Thank
you.
Sir
we've
heard,
let's
see,
and
this
one
doesn't
require
public.
A
All
right,
so
this
would
be
the
same
as
as
a
public
comment
right.
Okay,
so
is
there
anybody
that
would
like
to
speak
for
or
against
this
case
good
afternoon,
sir?
How
are
you
today.
M
Washington
Boulevard
all
right.
Okay,
they
told
me
in
the
original
meeting
that
to
apply
for
a
waiver
for
the
sidewalk
and
I.
Didn't
go,
get
your
engineer
and
give
me
three
reasons
why
you
shouldn't
have
it
there
and
Vincent
Shipman
gave
him
three
reasons
and
it
it
leads
to
Nowhere
at
least
to
nowhere
and
there's
no
curving
Gutter
and
there's
no
sidewalk
on
any
any
of
the
streets.
M
Fifth,
sixth,
seventh,
eight,
nine,
ten,
there's
no
sidewalk
on
any
of
the
side
streets
and
anyway,
I
was
thinking
that
what
is
it
my
responsibility
to
put
the
culverts
and
and
in
the
curb
or
is
the
city
going
to
curb
and
gutter?
And
then
I
put
the
gutter
I
mean
the
sidewalk.
A
I
Now,
good
afternoon,
the
ordinance
does
require
for
the
new
development
that
the
developer
be
responsible
for
making
those
improvements
to
serve
their
development
and
to
meet
the
letter
of
the
ordinance.
Therefore,
our
waiver,
our
response
to
his
request
for
waiver,
is
based
on
the
ordinance.
Of
course.
I
The
council
and
the
commission
are
certainly
able
to
overrule
us,
but
we
have
to
base
our
response
on
the
ordinance
as
it's
currently
written,
so
the
city
would
not
plan
to
install
any
curb
and
gutter
that
would
require
a
complete
rebuild
of
the
road,
but
to
fill
in
that
ditch
with
a
culvert.
M
I
mean
my
drainage
and
everything
is
fine.
I
had
10
loads
of
dirt
and
half
George
came
out
there,
and
but
it's
got
a
grade
on
it.
Everything
draining
into
that
ditch.
You
know
and,
like
I
said,
she
went
out
there
when
it
was
raining.
Water
wasn't
sitting
and
just.
M
I,
just
don't
think
it's
it's
fair!
That
I
should
do
the
city's
job
putting
covers
under
there.
I
can
see
the
sidewalk,
but
then
the
sidewalk
leads
to
nowhere,
and
there
are
no
sidewalks
on
any
of
the
number
streets
off
of
Washington
Boulevard.
None.
They
got
it
on
Fourth
and
11th.
That's
it
and
all
the
other
side
streets
have
no
sidewalks.
A
I
understand,
thank
you,
Molly
anything
else
from
you,
sir
awesome
again,
I
I
very
well
understand
your
your
condition.
Your
situation
is
that's
how
the
ordinance
reading
and
for
us
to
be
able
to
improve
we're
going
to
have
to
start
somewhere,
and
this
started
a
couple
of
three
years
ago
and
a
lot
of
people
like
you
get
caught
where
they
have
to
build
sidewalks
that
there's
no
matching
into
it.
On
the
other
side,.
M
A
You
thank
you
very
much,
sorry
that
you
have
to
be
out
that
money
we've
heard
from
the
applicant
and
also
the
city
and.
A
All
right
folks,
we've
heard
from
the
city
and
also
the
applicant
and
the
city
engineer,
and
with
that
I
would
look
out
for
motion.
L
A
F
Pc
2022
Dash.
Thank
you
2023.
Sorry,
227
is
a
request
by
Richard
Bartz
Whiteley
infrastructure
group
requesting
approval
of
a
reclat
of
Lot
36
in
the
lots,
36a
and
36B
Glen
Oaks
Edition
Beaumont
Jefferson,
County
Texas.
The
purpose
of
the
Plaid
is
to
transfer
approximately
0.2
Acres,
located
at
the
rear
of
4675
Glen
Oaks
Circle
to
4645
Glen,
Oaks
Circle,
the
property
to
be
transferred
borders.
F
The
rear
of
the
two
lots
in
between
those
two
properties
and
plain
staff
recommends
approval
of
the
request
and
I
have
some
slides
in
the
pipeline
that
you
can
see
or
the
map
the
property
outlined
in
red
is
the
subject
property,
as
you
can
see.
Currently
it's
attached
to
that
more
Northern,
piece
of
property
that
rear
piece
and
on
the
plat
they're,
drawing
a
line
straight
back
on
that
piece
of
property
and
then
attaching
it
to
the
property
to
the
South,
the
portion
of
the
rear.
F
N
Fine,
it
has
been
a
while
so
Tom
Rowe
with
Wiley
infrastructure
group,
655
Langham
Unit
14
Beaumont
Texas
Adina.
Can
you
go
back
to
that?
First,
one
sure
there's
a
little
bit
easier.
So
there's
a
Dina
talked
about
that
first
track.
If
you
see,
is
kind
of
unusual
the
way
it
wrapped
around
behind
the
subdivision,
the
owner
of
that
wishes
to
convey
to
the
owner
of
Lot
36
at
peace.
So
it's
kind
of
straightened
up
an
odd
shaped
piece
of
property,
but
they
had
reached
some
an
agreement
so
there's
existing
homes
or
existing
utilities.
N
F
Pc
2023-242
is
a
request
to
vacate
Pates
estate,
Mr
Mrs
Pate,
intended
to
build
on
the
divided
portion
of
the
property
in
the
future,
but
did
not
realize
that
they
would
require
be
required
to
pay
taxes
separately.
In
the
meantime,
therefore,
they're
asking
to
cancel
the
plat
and
re-establish
the
property
as
it
exists
prior
to
the
recordation
in
the
plaid
and
the
plot
was
filed,
September
27
2019..
F
They
both
signed
the
letter
for
the
request
and
staff,
recommends
approval
of
the
request
and
you
can
see
on
the
screen.
The
property
outlined
in
red
are
the
two
pieces
that
the
plat
divided
the
property
into
back
in
2019,
and
here
you
have
a
shot
of
the
actual
plat
that
divided
the
property,
and
this
is
what
they
wish
to
vacate.
C
A
Any
questions
all
right,
let's
see,
is
the
applicant
in
the
audience
no
great,
and
this
doesn't
require
public
hearing.
So
with
that
I
would
look
for
emotion,.
A
D
F
F
Number.
Two
final
plans
must
be
provided
with
the
location
of
the
equipment
that
will
be
used
at
The,
Establishment
and
number
three.
All
current
barcodes
will
be
applied,
IFC
2021,
including
possible
requirement
of
a
fire
sprinkler
system.
This
is
an
assembly
occupancy
which
has
some
of
the
strictest
fire
codes.
F
F
This
is
a
site
plan,
it
is
flipped
upside
down,
so
the
building
on
the
left
hand,
side
of
your
screen
is
the
actual
building
where
the
for
the
proposed
business
will
be
located,
and
this
is
a
little
closer
picture.
The
one
on
the
right
there
outlined
in
blue
is
where
the
the
building
that
would
be
used.
F
F
F
Yes,
sir,
whenever
you
measure
for
eat,
maybe
for
alcohol
consumption,
it
would
go
to
the
street
and
down
to
the
street
corner
and
then
across
the
street
and
then
back
down
the
street
and
then
to
the
hospital
so
and
it
only
has
to
be
300
feet.
Yeah.
A
B
A
P
Yes,
sir
hello,
how
you
doing
my
name
is
Dylan
we're
on
30
35,
College
Street,
and
this
is
Yuri
I'm
just
translating
here
for
him.
P
Well,
the
plan
is
to
create
a
lounge
where
everybody,
like
you
know
you
haven't,
come
in
like
after
a
long
meeting
enjoy
yourself
have
a
couple
drinks
smoke
some
hook
and
smoke
a
cigar
whatever
you
want
to
do,
you
know
and
to
answer
your
question:
the
plan
is
not
to
make
any
food
at
the
moment,
but
if
business
goes
and
we
get
approved
and
everything
goes
well,
we
want
to
have
like
some
type
of
food
truck
outside.
P
A
Yep
you
guys
from
Beaumont
here
you
live
here.
P
A
P
A
I
was
going
to
say
that's
kind
of
close
to
another
one
like
it
so
you're
going
to
be
serving
alcohol
and
have
you
talked
to
your
neighbors
any?
Is
there
any
conflict,
anybody's
upset.
P
Q
P
You
guys
are
going
to
have
live,
live
music,
we're
gonna,
have
DJs
and
hopefully
bands
as
well.
Q
Q
P
R
P
F
I
have
a
comment,
a
question
Adina
you
mentioned
that
they
would
be
able
to
smoke
cigars
or
something
to
that
effect.
Okay,
that's
the
first
we're
hearing
and
that
you
may
need
to
check
with
the
fire
department,
okay
on
what
the
requirements,
if,
if
it's
allowed
at
all
and
what
you
would
be
required
to
do
for
any
kind
of
smoking.
Okay,.
A
Thank
you,
sir.
You
did
a
great
job
translating
wow.
Thank
you
appreciate
it
for
those
on
the
commission,
I'd
like
to
add
number
four
in
the
conditions,
as
they
would
have
one
licensed
security
person
during
the
week
and
as
many
as
two
I,
don't
want
to
say
three
as
two
during
the
weekend's
minimum
right.
A
Two
during
the
weekends,
okay,
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
they
have
some
real
security
and
also
smoking
will
be
per
approval
from
the
fire
marshal
foreign.
A
A
None
is
her,
so
we
close
the
public
hearing,
we've
heard
from
the
staff
and
also
the
the
applicant.
We
added
two
conditions:
one
to
have
peace
officers,
One
Peace
officer.
Do
you
end
the
week
in
the
time
of
operation,
a
minimum
two
on
weekends
during
the
operation
of
the
club
and
the
fifth
one
is
that
smoking
would
be
per
approval
from
the
fire
marshal
City
of
Beaumont.
With
that
said,
I
would
entertain
the
motion.
A
A
F
Pz
2023-169
is
a
request
to
rezone
the
property
from
residential
single
family
to
RMH,
residential,
multiple
family
dwelling,
highest
density
or
a
more
restrictive
District.
The
applicable
Vishnu
Vandana
is
requesting
approval
for
the
rezoning
for
the
property
located
just
north
of
2360
South
Major
Drive.
The
applicant
intends
to
construct
an
apartment
complex
containing
100
150
units,
although
majority
of
the
neighboring
properties
are
either
vacant
or
occupied
by
single-family
homes.
Major
Drive
is
a
major
arterial
and
this
area
is
recognized
as
a
neighborhood
growth
unit.
F
I've
received
zero
responses
in
favor
and
three
in
opposition.
We
did
send
out
19
notices
to
Property
Owners
within
200
feet
and
I
have
photos
for
you.
The
property
outlined
in
red
is
the
subject:
property.
F
And
this
is
the
submitted
just
the
basic
idea
of
what
they
plan
to
do.
As
far
as
the
apartment,
complex.
F
F
B
I'm
sorry,
what
was
the
excuse
me?
What
was
that
reasoning
again.
A
Okay,
the
applicant's
not
in
the
audience,
let's
go
ahead
and
go
to
the
public
here
and
show
now,
if
there's
negative
against
the
property,
how
we're
going
to
resolve
that
I'm.
G
Assuming
that
the
property
or
applicant
was
given
adequate
notice
to
be
here,
so
they
could,
you
could
still
vote
and
if
they
chose
to
appeal
it
then
you
could.
A
Fantastic
we're
going
to
open
the
floor
for
public
hearing.
Is
there
anybody
in
the
audience
that
would
like
to
speak
for
or
against
this
case.
A
A
Comments
from
from
the
neighbors-
and
we
have
a
drawing
in
here,
I-
was
hoping
that
the
applicant
would
be
here.
They
have
one
trash
location
and
whoever
is
in
the
back
part
of
this
property.
Gonna
have
to
walk
798
feet
with
the
trash
to
put
it
in
there
and
the
turning
radius
at
the
very
back.
You
can't
turn
the
truck
in
the
back,
but
anyway,
those
are
engineering
items
that
could
be
resolved
by
the
engineering
department.
With
that
said,
we
go
to
a
vote.
A
A
F
Pc
2023-1991
is
a
request
to
allow
a
gaming
facility
in
The
gcmd,
General
commercial,
multiple,
family,
Divine
District
at
a
property
at
39,
North
11th,
Street,
Suite,
B,
Courtney
Watson
is
requesting
to
install
14
gaming
machines
at
this
location.
The
hours
of
operation
would
be
10
a.m
to
10
P.M
Monday
through
Sunday
plans
are
to
staff
this
location
with
one
full-time,
employee,
One
Security
person.
F
It
should
be
noted
that
Gaming
facilities
that
have
five
or
fewer
machines
tend
to
be
considered
accessory
in
nature
when
part
of
a
primary
use
and
as
such,
tend
to
result
in
fewer
negative
impacts
on
surrounding
land
uses.
However,
larger
game
rooms,
with
dozens
of
machines
take
on
the
scale
of
a
small
casino
and,
as
a
result,
require
careful
consideration
as
their
location
and
compatibility
with
the
surrounding
land
uses.
Some
of
these
considerations
include
compatibility
with
other
land
uses,
noise
and
traffic,
as
well
as
safety
considerations.
F
As
such
proximity
to
Parks
schools
and
especially
residential
uses,
should
be
carefully
considered
in
the
review
of
The
Gaming
facilities.
This
property
is
in
close
proximity,
two
bisd's
alternative
cancer
campus
at
88,
Jaguar
and
Lily
at
the
valley.
Missionary
Baptist
Church
is
located
at
2856,
smart
Street
Additionally.
The
shared
parking
lot
has
44
existing
legal
spaces
for
the
shopping
plaza
and
the
proposed
gaming
facility
would
require
25
to
30
of
those
spaces.
An
additional
26
spaces
are
shown
on
the
site
plan,
but
overhang
the
city
right-of-way
and
are
not
legal.
F
F
We've
sent
out
23
notices
to
Property
Owners
within
200
feet,
I
received
zero
in
favor
and
two
in
opposition
of
the
two
in
opposition,
one
of
them
just
States
they're,
not
in
favor.
The
other
does
give
a
reason
they
State
these
types
of
businesses
cause
property
damages
within
the
with
their
customers.
F
This
is
site
plan.
You
can
see
how
the
property,
the
property
line,
cuts
across
all
the
parking
spaces
that
border
11th
Street.
So
only
a
small
portion
of
those
parking
spaces
is
actually
on
the
property,
which
is
a
requirement
for
it
to
be
counted
towards
the
required
parking.
F
F
B
F
The
measurements
for
a
gaming
facility
are
property
line
to
property
line
as
opposed
to
for
alcohol.
It
tends
to
be
like
down
the
right-of-way,
and
you
have
to
go
from
door
to
door
that
sort
of
thing
for
a
gaming
facility.
It's
300
feet
from
property
line,
to
property
line
for
a
church
that
they
cannot
be
allowed,
and
that's
not
stating
that
it's
recommended
it's
just.
That
would
be
that
the
law
that
we
could
absolutely
not
consider
it
and.
B
F
Q
Be
okay,
thank
you
can
I
add
on
with
that
understand
about
the
situation
with
the
church
and
the
school,
but
I'm
thinking
that
you're,
saying
that
one
of
the
main
priorities
would
be
is
the
parking
situation
in
this
particular
environment
I'm,
not
sure
how
many
occupants
this
will
require
annual
parking.
F
I
believe
part
of
our
issue
was
that
we
never
received
what
we
considered
a
suitable
site
or
floor
plan
showing
exactly
what
portion
of
these
buildings
is
going
to
be
used
for
the
gaming
facility,
which
is
how
we
have
to
calculate
the
parking.
So
that's
the
reason
whenever
they
stayed
it's
between
25
to
30
spaces.
F
It's
as
close
as
engineering
could
get
to
generalize
what
the
parking
requirements
would
be
for
this
location
and,
as
is
a
strip
center,
they
have
shared
parking.
So
there's
a
certain
number
of
parking
spaces
that
have
to
be
available
to
each
of
the
uses
in
the
Strip
Center.
Not
just
for
this
use
and
that's
why,
whenever
he
states
that,
for
the
overall
shopping
center
there's
only
31
percent
of
the
minimum
required
parking,
that's
what
he's
taking
into
consideration!
And,
yes,
you
are
right.
A
Councilor,
this
brings
up
another
question:
are
these
parking
spots
illegal
and
they
have?
We
have
to
do
something
about
them
or
they're,
going
to
be
grandfathered.
A
S
Afternoon,
Brandon
bellier
traffic
engineer,
801,
Main
Street.
S
This
is
a
very
old
shopping
center,
which
is
most
likely
the
reason
all
of
those
overhang,
the
right-of-way
If
This
Were
to
if
this
entire
shopping
center
were
to
ever
get
purchased
and
redone
entirely.
That's
when
we
would
go
and
enforce
the
restricted
parking
along
that
right
away.
If
it's
one
or
two
tenants
at
a
time
in
the
just
existing
Center
they're
gonna
be
okay,
it's
not
presenting
a
major
safety
hazard
as
of
right.
Now,
all.
A
Right,
thank
you.
Okay,
we've
heard
from
the
staff
and
also
the
traffic
engineer,
and
any
questions
for
any
of
them
is
the
applicant
in
the
audience
good
afternoon.
Man.
A
And
hello
hi.
T
My
name
is
Tiffany
Guillory
I'm
a
tenant.
Actually,
in
that
same
shopping,
complex
on
11th
street
plaza
we
have
a
39
North
11th
Street
Suite
C,
so
we
will
be
right
next
door
to
them.
We
have.
G
A
Oh
Miss.
A
Right,
Miss
Watson,
what
age
people
gonna
be
work
come
into
this
place.
A
C
A
Okay,
I
see
that
you
say
no
monetary
prices
would
be
awarded
right.
Why
aren't
you
here
a
couple
of
three
meetings
ago
and
you
said
you're
going
to
give
her
money.
A
You
were
okay,
I
I,
just
want
to
make
sure
is,
is
I'm
talking
to
the
same
people,
and
you
have
you
stated
that
there's
some
parking
in
the
back
all
right.
Any
questions
for
the
lady.
Yes,.
A
C
G
So
when
an
business
is
in
its
existing
business
and
they
have
fewer
facts,
fewer
less
than
five
is
considered
an
accessory
used.
So
it's
not
an
accessory
use
when
it's
a
sole
purpose
to
operate
as
a
game
room,
regardless
of
how
many
machines
they
have.
So
if
you,
if
it's
a
game
room
with
no
other
occupants
and
use
it's
just
a
game
room
regardless,
if
it
has
one
machine
or
ten.
G
Yeah
yeah,
it's
an
existing
shopping
center,
so
it
has
a
I
think
in
that
particular
shopping
center,
boutiques,
salons,
barber
shops
or
stuff
other.
Just
in
that
shopping
strip.
There's
a
hair
store
and
there's
several
other
businesses
in
that
shopping
center.
That
will
require
I.
Think
it's
Zone,
General
yep!
There
you
go.
L
Sorry
what
say
it
again,
two.
A
Thank
you
very
much.
Ma'am.
Okay.
Now
we're
going
to
open
the
floor
for
public
hearing,
so
anybody
who
wants
to
speak
for
or
against
this
project
good
afternoon
now
you
can
tell
us
what
you
want
to
tell
us
if
you
would
state
your
name
and
address
with
the
record.
Please.
U
U
We
do
feel
that
it
would
actually
be
an
added
benefit
that
they
would
be
there
because
it
would
bring
extra
traffic
and
so
we're
not
opposed,
and
when
it
comes
to
the
parking
and
like
literally
four
of
the
spaces,
that's
leased
out
is
all
been
leased
out
for
just
storage,
so
there's
actually
they
are
they've,
been
purchased
and
they're
paid
for
monthly,
but
there's
no
tenants
that
are
there
that
are
that.
Have
customers.
A
A
Now
and
this
hurts
will
be
close
to
public
hearing
we've
heard
from
the
staff
and
also
heard
from
the
applicant.
There
is
a
parking
issue
at
the
at
the
site
and
with
that
I
would
look
and
the
city
staff
has
denied
the
request.
So
with
that
I'll
look
for
a
motion.
J
A
F
2023-205
is
a
request
for
a
specific
use
permit
to
allow
a
duplex
in
residential
single
family
Zoni
District
loan
dong,
representing
can
Tran
is
requesting
a
specific
use
permit
to
allow
duplex
at
10720
Sherwood
Drive.
The
property
is
located
within
the
residential
single
family
zoning
district
and
as
such,
a
two-family
dwelling
requires
a
specific
use.
Permit.
The
structure
will
be
one
story
with
two
units
for
a
combined
total
of
2420
square
feet.
F
F
F
A
V
You,
okay,
my
name
is
Tian
Tran
and
the
address
is
10720
Sherwood
Drive.
V
V
A
There
is
a
garage
at
the
end
of
that
driveway
in
there.
Yes,
sir,
okay,
perfect.
So
at
least
two
two,
yes,
okay,
good
good.
Any
questions
for
the
gentleman.
A
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
We
opened
the
floor
for
public
hearing.
Is
they
like
to
speak
for
or
against
this
case
good
afternoon,
gentlemen,
one
at
a
time?
How
are
you
this
afternoon,
sir?
Well,
thank
you.
Well,.
O
O
There
has
been
no
variance
to
single
family
occupancy
and
I
see
no
reason
to
open
the
door
now
for
commercial
property.
This
is
single
family.
By
having
commercial
property,
you
open
the
door
for
other
people
to
apply
for
variances
on
the
single
family,
Edition
its
own
single
family.
There's
no
reason
to
change
that.
This
is
a
very
old
old
Edition.
O
A
lot
of
elderly
people
live
here.
We
don't
need
commercial
application.
This
will
lead
to
Future
people
applying
for
mobile
homes,
RV
parks
Etc.
It
needs
to
stay
as
it
is
now.
Zoned
single
family
only
I'll
be
entertaining
any
questions.
If
you
have
any,
oh
I
do
have
one
question
any
of
you
live
there
in
the
pine
bio
States,
so
it
won't
affect
your
property
value,
but
it
will
ours.
If
you
approve
this
zoning
change,
I
have
any
questions.
I'll
answer
them
for
you.
You
said
you
lived
there
for
a
long
time.
O
No
there's
none
that
I'm
aware
of
on
my
deed,
it
doesn't
say
anything
but
single
family
dwellings,
and
if
you
approve
a
commercial
application
which
a
duplex
is
commercial,
you
open
the
door
for
all
kinds
of
other
requests
for
variances,
which
I'm
totally
against,
and
everybody
in
the
neighborhood
should
have
the
opportunity.
But
you
only
notified
people
within
200
feet
of
the
property.
Everybody
in
the
neighborhood
should
be
involved.
Approximately
10
years
ago
there
was
a
a
home
builder
that
put
modular
homes.
O
I,
don't
know
if
you
know
what
that
is,
but
it's
trailer
houses
without
wheels
and
it
was
approved
and
it
shouldn't
have
been,
but
it
was.
This
is
the
same
basic
thing
that
you're
trying
to
do
again
is
put
in
commercial
property
I'm
against
it.
100
it's
going
to
devalue
our
properties
by
having
commercial
properties.
J
My
name
is
Donald
Fowler
I
live
at
106,
80
Sherwood,
which
is
right
by
that
place.
I
believe
I
actually
helped
Mr
train
get
unstuck
when
he
pulled
his
truck
in
there.
Okay,
oh
right
to
the
north
of
that
house,
a
man
bought
the
house
from
the
people.
I
bought
my
house
from
32
years
ago,
and
he
has
had
nothing
but
trouble
from
renters.
The
house
has
been
broken
into
when
it's.
J
It
takes
them
two
or
three
months
to
get
it
fixed
up,
because
people
break
in
while
he's
trying
to
fix
it
up
because
he
doesn't
live
there.
The
project
that
Mr
O'quinn
talked
about
the
modular
homes,
the
people
that
own
those
those
modular
homes
they
had
98
properties
out
there
there
were.
That
was
just
going
to
be
an
experiment
and
the
experiment
failed
because
they
couldn't
sell
them.
They
couldn't
rent
them
out
the
people's
property
on
both
sides
of
them.
Property
values
went
down,
they
finally
sold
them.
J
It
took
about
five
years
for
them
to
sell
those
modular
homes.
They
got
flooded
out
during
Harvey.
They
got
flooded
out
during
Imelda
they've
got
flooded
out
several
times.
I,
don't
need
any
more
trouble
than
I've
already
got
on
my
property.
Like
I,
said
I've
been
there
32
years,
it
takes
forever
to
get
police
out
there.
J
J
A
Thank
you
for
coming
by.
Is
there
anybody
else
in
the
audience
that
would
like
to
speak
for
or
against
this
case,
we're
close
to
public
hearing
Mr
Quinn
I.
Believe
was
it
yes,
sir?
Oh
no
I'm,
sorry,
the
other
gentleman
Mr
Trent.
Well,
you
had
some
negative
comments
about
your
project,
so
you
have
a
chance
to
come
back
and
either
explain
or
give
us
a
remedy.
V
Okay,
quality
of
renters,
so
a
part
of
our
lease
contract.
We
would
do
a
extensive
background
check
to
make
sure
our
odd
winners
is
eligible
and
make
sure
that
they
follow
all
the
rules
like
a
normal
residential
Personnel
would
follow
as
far
as
tax.
V
It
would
be
no
different
than
me
building
a
house
and
selling
it.
If
he's
worried,
he
mentioned
about
wearing
raising
taxes.
Yes,
it
probably
will,
but
it's
no
different
than
me.
Building
a
house
and
selling
it
and
I
think
that
it
will
raise
everybody's
property,
which
is,
you
know,
make
their
property
more
valuable
to
me.
So.
A
Q
Ahead
and
I
think
you
kind
of
answered,
because
I
was
going
to
ask
you
I
know
in
a
duplex,
there
are
people
who
build
them
and
live
in
it
and
rent
the
other
side
out
and
I'm
from
what
you
just
said.
This
is
Tech
pretty
much
you
just
bringing
both
sides
out
right,
okay
and
I
guess.
My
other
question
would
be
because
I
wanted
a
clarification.
I
was
under
the
impression
that
duplex
can
still
be
a
sync
under
single
family.
E
So
do
you
have
any
other,
like
rental
properties?
No
sir
yeah.
A
Thank
you,
sir.
Thank
you
Okay.
So
we've
heard
from
the
applicants
we
heard
from
the
staff
we
heard
from
two
of
the
neighbors
one
lives
400
feet
away:
one
lives
right
next
or
across
the
street
and
they
are
worried
about
the
negative
conditions
with
the
duplex.
With
that
said,
I
will
look
for
a
motion.
A
F
F
Troy
hatch
is
requesting
approval
for
the
rezoning
from
gcmd
to
commercial
manufacturing
for
the
property
at
5194
size,
Street,
Mr,
hatch,
owner
of
hatches,
Towing
and
Recovery.
Llc
recently
purchased
the
property.
The
property
was
being
used
as
a
vehicle
storage
facility,
but
had
not
been
permitted
for
that
use.
Mr
hatch
assumed
the
use
was
legal
and,
fortunately,
a
vehicle
storage
facility
is
not
permitted
in
General
commercial,
multiple
family
dwelling,
Zoning
for
storage
of
more
than
10
vehicles
when
applying
for
the
required
certificate
of
occupancy,
Mr
hatch
discovered
several
issues
with
the
property.
F
First
and
foremost
the
zoning,
which
would
not
allow
him
to
store
the
number
of
vehicles
he's.
He
planned.
The
property
to
the
north
was
rezoned
to
commercial
Manufacturing
in
2001
and
is
currently
used
as
a
vehicle
storage
facility
property
to
the
West
is
zoned
heavy
industrial
and
the
property.
The
proposed
vehicle
storage
facility
would
be
required
to
meet
all
existing
zoning
ordinance
requirements.
F
F
F
F
A
A
Okay,
any
questions
for
Athena
is
the
applicant
in
the
audience
good
afternoon,
sir.
A
W
W
If
someone
gets
in
a
wreck,
we
pick
it
up,
bring
it
to
the
yard,
it
stores
the
vehicle,
they
come
pick
it
up
or
the
insurance
or
we
take
it
to
a
body
shop
or
whatever
it
may
be
when
I'm,
through
with
the
the
notice
of
the
vehicle.
If
it
turns
into
my
vehicle,
it
is
taken
to
a
different
site,
it
does
not
stay
there.
W
Sir,
the
only
thing
would
be
parked
outside
is
customers,
and
one
or
two
tow
trucks
sits
there
at
the
time
the
building's
not
gonna
be
occupied.
B
G
A
All
right,
I'd
like
to
add
a
condition
to
here.
If
you
don't
mind
before
we
vote,
I
like
to
make
sure
that
we
do
not
have
any
cars
parked
outside
the
fence
on
a
permanent
basis,
as
a
storage
I
understand,
he
has
tow
trucks
and
customers,
but
not
as
permanent
parking.
Okay.
That
would
be
condition
number
one
with
that
said,
any
other
questions
for
the
gentleman.
A
A
Now
this
hurts
so
we
have
heard
from
the
applicant
he's
bought
this
Place.
There
is
fencing
around
the
neighbor
by
the
aerial
photograph,
is
parking
all
sorts
of
stuff
in
that
property
and
he's
going
to
keep
all
the
cars
that
are
going
to
be
permanently
or
long-term
stored
within
the
fence
line.
So
with
that,
I
would
ask
for
a
motion
with
condition
number
one
that
says
he
would
not
be
parking
stored,
Vehicles
outside
the
fence
line
motion.