►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
B
A
C
C
A
B
E
E
F
A
B
G
First
item
is
preliminary
plat
approval
of
the
Meadows
Subdivision
phase
for
West
Belmont
Jefferson
County
Texas,
troit
Whitehead
of
Schaumburg
and
pulk
has
requested
to
preliminary
plat
approval
of
the
meadow
subdivision
phase
for
West
this
thirteen
point:
oh
seven
for
acre
development
will
extend
west
sage
and
meadow
run
streets
and
consists
of
35
residential
lots.
All
Lots
meet
the
requirements
for
a
residential
lot.
Water
and
Sewer
will
be
provided
by
an
extension
of
the
city's
facilities
and
I've
got
the
the
proposed
preliminary
plat
is
up
on
the
screen.
G
There
I
believe
that's
the
only
one
we
have
on
the
slideshow,
but
this
is
roughly
at
the
it's
at
the
north
west
corner
of
Dishman
and
Keith.
There's
an
existing
subdivision
Meadows
there.
This
is
this
unit,
is
immediately
south
of
the
existing
development
in
your
packet
are
a
number
of
conditions
requested
by
the
engineering
and
water
department
and
based
on
the
proposed
staff,
is
recommending
approval
of
this
preliminary
plat
subject
to
those
conditions
included
in
the
staff
memorandum
and
with
that
I
do
believe.
Mr.
Whitehead
is
in
the
audience
any.
C
I'm
Troy
Whitehead
with
Schaumburg
and
Polk
88
65
College
Street,
and
we
are
working
on
the
proposed
development
for
the
developer.
I
know,
Chris
mentioned
the
conditions
that
city
staff
had
and
all
of
those
items
have
been
addressed
and
will
be
submitted
with
construction
plans
for
approval
in
a
day
or
so.
B
A
H
B
G
Sir
okay,
the
next
item
is
to
consider
request
for
preliminary
plat
approval
for
outpost
industrial
park,
Jefferson
County,
Texas,
Robert,
Belvoir
of
SNR
consulting,
has
requested
preliminary
plat
approval
of
outpost
industrial
park.
This
fourteen
point
six,
nine
six
acre
twelve
lot.
Industrial
development
is
mostly
located
within
the
city
of
Beaumont's
extraterritorial
jurisdiction.
G
G
In
general,
staff
is
not
opposed
to
the
waiver.
However,
it
has
come
up
in
the
workshop
regarding
the
size
of
the
cul-de-sac,
especially
given
the
industrial
nature
of
the
development
and,
as
such,
staff
is
recommending
approval
of
the
proposed
preliminary
plat,
with
the
waivers
subject
to
the
following
condition
that
the
applicant
provide
adequate
right
away
and
pavement
dimensions
for
the
proposed
cul-de-sac
and
that
they
be
approval.
Subject
to
the
city
and
county
engineer
with
that.
Are
there
any
questions
of
staff.
B
F
I
I
B
B
I
I
There
was
a
60-foot
right
away
issue
according
to
Molly's
comments
in
the
diagram
she
said
due
to
the
size
of
the
Lots.
It's
not
light
industrial,
it's
more
like
commercial
and
therefore
she,
you
know,
come
on
improved
the
twenty
seven
foot
back
to
back
of
the
roadway
and
it
only
required
a
fifty
foot
right
away.
B
F
I
B
G
G
I
More
thing,
Molly
said
because
it's
in
the
ETJ
you
know
they
could
use
a
flexible
base
pavement
or
asphalt,
but
we
are
designing
it
to
80,000.
Pound
keeps
a
load,
you
know
concrete
pavement,
lime,
stabilization
and
so
forth
per
the
geotechnical
we're
not
trying
to
go
with
the
minimum
payment.
That's.
B
B
For
the
gentlemen,
no,
okay,
all
right!
Thank
you,
so
I'm
ready
for
a
motion
and
the
the
clarification
would
be
that
if
the
Commission
chooses
to
approve
this,
we
need
to
make
sure
that
the
the
engineering
complies
with
the
requirement
that
the
city
of
Beaumont
and
the
Jefferson
County,
and
also
the
the
road
shall
be
design,
as
per
recommended
by
the
geotechnical
engineer,
for
the
required
load.
Now,
with
that,
our
entertain
a
motion,
I.
B
F
D
J
G
G
The
new
building
will
provide
an
additional
five
thousand
square
feet
of
space.
Let
me
go
ahead
and
show
you.
The
site
in
question
is
outlined
in
red
and
you'll
see
here
it's
at
the
intersection
of
MLK
and
long,
and
this
is
an
aerial
view
looking
towards
the
north
of
the
site
and
the
let's
see:
here's
the
proposed
site
plan,
here's
the
subject:
property,
the
subject
property.
G
This
is
looking
south
across
the
railroad
subject:
property
here,
looking
towards
the
east,
subject:
property
and
looking
south
one
thing:
I'll
go
ahead
and
point
out
is,
in
the
previous,
an
amended
specific
use
permit.
There
was
a
condition
for
a
six-foot
wide
landscaping
strip
along
the
west
side
of
the
parking
area
and
in
the
picture
here
and
again
we're
on
in
okay,
looking
eastward
it
required
there
be
a
landscaping
strip
right
there
behind
the
the
light
pole.
That's
the
lighter,
color
pole
there.
G
G
This
is
the
beauty
of
the
south
and
a
view
to
the
east,
and
so
based
on
this
application
staff
is
recommending
approval
subject
to
the
following
conditions:
number
one
provide
a
six
foot
wide
landscape
strip
along
the
west
side
of
the
parking
lot
between
the
two
driveways
as
per
city
of
Beaumont
ordinance
requirements.
Those
are
the
that's
the
landscape
strip
on
the
parking
lot.
That
I
was
referring
to
number
two
provide
an
8
foot,
tall,
wood
or
masonry
screening
fence
along
the
east
property
line.
G
3
show
sidewalk
on
the
site
plan
and
one
other
condition
is
resolved
issues
with
the
property
line
to
the
south.
During
our
review
of
this
site
plan,
it
appeared
that
there
may
be
a
discrepancy
of
the
property
line,
as
it's
shown
on
the
on
the
site
plan
and
depending
upon
whether
or
not
it's
accurate,
would
affect
the
parking
or
could
affect
the
parking
so
we're.
We
believe
the
applicant
is
aware
of
this
and
they're
working
to
resolve
it,
but
we
just
wanted
to
make
it
a
condition
that
they
resolve
those
issues.
G
B
B
J
G
Honest
to
the
South
yeah,
but
the
reason
for
our
request
for
the.
Let
me
see
yeah
we're
recommending
provide
a
six-foot
wide
landscaping
strip
along
the
west
side
of
the
parking
lot
between
the
two
driveways
as
per
city
of
Beaumont.
So
if
you
look
at
the
two
driveways
there
we're
basically
the
red
line
there
between
the
two
driveways.
If
you
go
back
to
the
2007
site
plan
that
was
supposed
to
be
landscaped
and
it
never
was.
B
A
G
Well,
no,
it's
it's
proposed.
It
was
what
was
originally
proposed,
but
when
we
started
looking
at
the
property
lines
in
the
proposed
site
plan,
it
didn't
match
up.
So
we
reached
out
to
the
applicant
and
said:
look,
this
looks
like
it's
not
matching
up,
and
so
apparently
they've
submitted
a
revised
set
site
plan,
which
is
this
is
what's
in
front
of
you.
So.
B
G
This
this
is
all
commercial
here
long,
so
there's
not
a
required
buffer.
What
we're
asking
for
is
a
buffer
on
if
you
look
how
the
property
line
splits
that
driveway
we're
asking
for
a
landscape
buffer
in
that
little
half
parking
space
they're
going
up
to
this
to
the
to
the
next
driveway,
because
that's
that's
what
was
requested
and
approved
back
in
2007.
B
H
No
sir
they're
pretty
much
covered
it
real
good
because,
like
mr.
Venus
said,
you
know
that
when
they
surveyed
that
property
house
engineering,
they
didn't
find
the
markers
exactly
what
they
were
supposed
to.
So
we're
gonna,
put
bumpers
automobile.
You
know
car
bumpers
to
keep
it
from
going
to
the
adjacent
property
other
than
that
everything
looks
fine.
Okay,.
H
H
B
There
anybody
in
the
audience
that
would
like
to
speak
for
or
against
I
guess,
there's
nobody
in
the
audience,
I
just
have
to
say
it
anyway.
So
we
would
close
the
public
hearing
and
we've
heard
from
the
staff
and
the
the
applicant,
and
he
does
understand
the
the
requirements
from
the
city.
So
I
will
entertain
a
motion.
A
F
H
G
All
right,
the
final
item
on
today's
agenda
is
file
2,
4,
1,
7
P,
and
it's
to
consider
a
specific
use
permit
to
allow
a
recreational
vehicle
RV
park
in
an
Li
light.
Industrial
district
at
54,
97,
finet,
RMP
brothers
LLC
is
requested
a
specific
use
permit
to
construct
an
RV
park
at
this
location.
The
proposed
RV
park
will
have
60
separate
Lots
an
office
and
Clubhouse
will
provide
laundry
facilities,
showers
and
restrooms.
G
G
And
this
is
to
the
east
there's
a
residential
neighborhood
that
backs
up
to
the
property
and,
let's
see
we
did
send
out
25
notices
to
adjacent
property
owners
and
have
received
zero
in
favor
and
zero
in
opposition
staff
is
recommending
approval
of
this
proposed
RV
park.
Subject
to
the
following
condition.
This
project
will
require
an
approved
drainage
plan
and
will
require
an
adequate
detention
basin,
/
drainage,
district,
6
requirements
and
with
that
are
there
any
questions
of
staff.
B
B
K
B
K
Tension
point,
I
think
doesn't
I
do
not
know
much
about
it,
but
the
designer
or
the
architect
it
claims.
There
is
a
way
that
you
can
put
it
under
the
road.
There
is
a
technology
new
technology.
They
had
done
it.
Somebody
else
over
here,
I'm,
not
sure,
but
he
can
be
of
he
can
explain
it
there
in
more
detail.
Okay,.