►
From YouTube: City of Beaumont - City Council October 16, 2018 part 2
Description
City Council October 16, 2018 Part 2 (Live Stream)
This meeting was interrupted by YouTube downtime and it was split into two parts. Disclaimer: A small part of the meeting was not recorded to video but you can request a copy of Audio through our City Clerk.
A
A
B
But
so
the
the
taxes
still
have
an
escalator
there.
I
mean
there
that's
what
was
approved
by
the
voters
and
everything
on
the
property,
but
the
fond
debt
service
will
not
escalate.
So
all
that's
gonna
be
levy.
There
are
taxes
that
are
sufficient
to
pay
the
debt
service
on
the
ponds
plus
the
administration
of
the
deck.
So
there's
not
an
anticipation
that
the
levies
on
property
owners
will
increase
2%
each
year.
They
should
be
a
flat
levy.
B
B
The
the
New
Deal
does
not
go
out
longer
than
the
existing
debt
on
the
property,
so,
instead
of
instead
of
doing
a
30-year
bond,
you
like
you're
gonna,
the
next
to
that
we're
doing
our
30-year
bond
deals.
Cuz,
there's
new
CFDs.
This
one
is
only
gonna,
have
a
20-year
bond
deal
to
match
what
was
outstanding,
because
this
is
one
of
the
older
project
areas
and
came
in
four
seasons,
and
the
attacks
have
been
levy.
Therefore,
a
considerable
amount
of
time.
Okay,.
A
F
That's
where
Martinez,
let
me
clarify
I'm,
looking
back
at
the
the
presentation
and
I
think
this
may
address
a
couple
of
comments
by
counsel.
The
average
debt
service
looks
like
it's
a
little
over
three
hundred
thousand
dollars
a
year
and,
as
mr.
four-bath
had
stated,
it
is
in
fact
flat.
Heidi
just
came
over
and
shared
with
Katie
and
I
that
the
total
debt
service
is
4.2
million.
That
includes
the
transaction
before
you
today
as
well.
The
prior
issues
were
really
small.
The
other
thing
I
want
to
add
it's.
You
know
from
our
review.
F
A
G
A
G
Shall
look
on
the
the
POS
a--'s
particular
the
packets
page
160
of
678,
but
you'll
see
the
description
of
authorized
facilities
so
there's
about
twelve
point.
Seven,
almost
four
point:
eight
million
dollars
have
identified
eligible
facilities
for
reimbursement
pursuant
to
acquisition
agreement
that
we've
negotiated
with
Caleb
Mannion.
So
this
bond
issue
is
significantly
lower
than
the
total
value
of
those
projects
for
which
they
were
eligible
for
reimbursement.
G
So
we
had
Pago
dollars
that
we
applied
to
part
of
that
balance
and
then
we've
got
the
balance
of
the
bond
issuances
through
7b
and
then
in
the
next
issue
is
seventy.
But
if
you
look
at
table
one
on
the
POS,
which
is
on
page
155,
what
you'll
see
is
the
first
column
is
or
the
years
a
debt
service
years.
G
You
have
the
estimated
annual
assigned
tax,
that's
basically
the
cap
of
the
taxes
that
could
be
assessed
on
the
properties,
and
you
can
see
that
for
2019.
That's
about
four
and
forty-one
thousand
dollars
with
the
escalator
that
grows
to
six
hundred
and
fifty
five
thousand
and
then
you'll
see
the
second
or
the
third
column
shows
that
the
actual
annual
special
tax
with
the
10%
coverage
is
361
625
and
that's
through
the
entire
life
to
the
term
of
these
bonds.
G
A
If
there
are
no
other
questions
by
council,
I
will
recommend
that
we
waive
the
full
reading
and
adopt
by
title
only
a
resolution
of
the
City
Council,
the
city
of
Beaumont
Riverside,
County
California,
acting
as
the
legislative
body
of
the
city
of
Beaumont,
community
facilities,
district
number,
90,
3-1
authorizing
the
issuance
of
special
tax
bonds
series,
2018
series,
8
improvement
area,
number
7b
and
an
aggregate
principal
amount
not
to
exceed
three
million
dollars
and
approving
certain
documents
in
taking
certain
other
actions
in
connection
therewith.
Does.
D
A
I
I
I
I
H
F
You,
mr.
pardon
this
is
a
similar
presentation.
There
are
some
nuances
between
7b,
70
and
80.
One
of
the
obvious
on
this
is
this
is
mr.
four
method
stay.
This
is
a
30-year
transaction.
It
does
have
a
reduction
in
the
special
tax.
This
is
a
10%
reduction.
The
prior
bond,
the
7b
bond,
had
25,
as
you
recall,
that
was
for
two
purposes:
one
Pago
and
there
was
a
reduction
in
tax
rate
slightly
above
two,
and
they
moved
it
down
below
two
to
get
to
the
25.
F
This
reduction
as
I
understand
it
is
a
reduction
in
Pago
going
forward.
Also,
this
is
also
eliminates
the
2%
escalator,
this
transaction
and
the
way
this
CFD
specifically
was
structured.
It
had
a
maximum
bond
indebtedness
of
20
million
and
with
80
it
was
25,
so
they
always
use
similar
numbers
with
with
each
one.
As
you
see
here,
this
is
also
I
think
a
final
lien,
with
the
maturity
of
2048
of
3
million
seven
hundred
eighty
thousand
dollars
so
similar
to
the
prior
questions
asked
by
the
council.
No
other
debt
will
be
incurred.
J
J
This
results
in
a
paramount
of
approximately
three
point:
seven
eight
million,
which
results
in
project
funds
of
about
3.2
million.
Again
we
have
a
debt
service
reserve
fund
that
is
structured
for
cash
and
approximately
two
hundred
and
eleven
thousand
one
hundred
fifty
dollars
in
delivery
date,
expenses
which
are
cost
of
issuance
and
underwriters
discount.
J
One
thing
that
I
should
point
out
is
that
the
underwriters
discount
is
typically
structured
on
a
per
bond
basis.
So,
as
the
para
mountain
goes
up,
the
actual
dollar
amount
will
go
up.
However,
I
will
say
that
on
the
smaller
deal
7b
we
actually
had
a
little
higher
per
bond
cost
simply
because
it
was
so
small
and
we
reduced
it
here
slightly
on
a
per
bond
basis.
To
accommodate
for
the
larger
par
size.
J
J
This
slide
shows
the
debt
service
broken
out
between
principal
and
interest,
and
you
can
see
how
it
goes
out
to
9
148
and
that
it
is
in
fact
level
and
7d.
We
are
going
to
be
doing
this
transaction
under
the
same
schedule
as
7b.
The
intent
is
to
print
the
preliminary
offering
statement
tomorrow
subject
to
approval
tonight,
and
we
will
be
pricing
the
7b
and
7d
bonds
on
the
same
day
and
closing
the
Hana
same
thing
so
with
that
I
will
turn
it
over
for
questions.
Thank
you.
B
D
B
One
clarification
is
one
in
my
in
my
fault
for
not
catching
this
on
the
presentation
earlier.
7
D,
as
in
David
here,
did
not
have
an
escalating
attacks.
Ever
it's
a
flat
tax.
It
was
one
of
the
few
ones
that
actually
had
a
flat
tax,
not
an
escalating
so
7
d
them
seven
doing
right
now
we're
doing
right
now,
yeah,
so
debt
service
is
level
the
taxes
level.
It
doesn't
go
up.
Two
percent
okay,
thank.
A
D
Where
I'd
like
to
move
to
waive
the
full
reading
and
adopt
the
title,
only
a
resolution
of
the
City
Council
city
of
Beaumont,
Riverside,
County
California,
acting
as
a
legislative
body
of
the
city
of
Beaumont
community
facilities,
district
number,
90,
3-1
authorizing
the
issuance
of
its
improvement
areas.
Number
70,
2018
special
tax
bonds
in
an
aggregate
principal
amount
not
to
exceed
four
million
$250,000
in
approving
certain
documents
and
taking
certain
other
actions
in
connection
therewith.
I
C
I
F
Evening,
once
again,
we're
gonna
start
this.
This
presentation
off
a
little
bit
differently.
This
one
involves
a
reimbursement
through
the
CFD
for
Part
D.
As
the
council's
aware,
there
was
a
an
agreement
with
party
that
was
made
a
little
while
back
I'm
gonna
have
mr.
four-bath
come
up
and
kind
of
set
the
tone
for
that
agreement
because,
as
you'll
see
in
the
slides
going
forward,
some
of
those
specific
issues
will
be
revealed.
B
Thank
you,
Thank
You,
mr.
Boucher,
so
just
real
quick
on
this
there's
two
separate
actions
for
you
tonight
on
this
item.
There's
one
is
an
action
by
the
City
Council
I'm.
Sorry,
the
first
action
is
the
City
Council,
acting
on
so
on
behalf
of
proving
the
acquisition
agreement
with
party
homes.
The
second
action
is
the
city
council
act
and
has
a
legislative
body
of
59
3-1
on
approving
the
issuance
of
bonds
by
improving
area
ie.
B
So
just
a
quick
reminder
here
from
where
we've
been
with
party.
If
you
remember
you
know
back
you
know,
two
or
three
years
ago
there
was
a
big
dispute
with
party
and
the
city
in
terms
of
the
city,
not
timely,
issuing
bonds
for
the
party
and
not
giving
credits
dissolving
impact
fees
etc
as
their
as
party
alleges.
That
was
required
in
connection
with
that.
B
The
the
city
and
party
entered
into
a
settlement
agreement
that,
among
other
things,
required
party
to
advance
certain
funds
on
schedule
to
the
city
to
be
used
in
order
to
pay
for
facilities
that
were
eligible
to
finance
and
development
impact
fee
program
and
an
example
that
was
six
and
half
million
dollars,
or
six
million
dollars.
I
was
advanced
by
party
to
be
used
in
connection
on
the
wastewater
treatment
plan.
B
So
in
connection
with
the
settlement
agreement,
the
city
agreed
to
use
best
efforts
to
come
forward
and
issue
bonds
on
behalf
of
some
of
the
remaining
improvement
areas
and
additional
CFDs.
That
party
has
in
the
Sundance
project
area.
So
this
is
sort
of
the
next
step
in
that
process
to
come
forward
and
approve
the
issuance
of
bonds
for
eight
years
and
Edward
as
part
of
the
settlement
agreement.
You
know
the
the
city
didn't
like
it,
but
you
know
we.
B
F
Thank
you
miss
for
bath.
This
transaction
is
a
little
different
than
the
prior
two
is
for
many
reasons,
some
of
which
mister
for
Bath
has
pointed
out.
This
transaction
looks
very
similar
to
what
you
would
typically
see
with
a
CFD,
that's
somewhat
active
in
a
full
reimbursement,
which
is
what
the
council
really
is
trying
to
move
forward
towards.
So
here
most
of
the
improvements
have
been
completed,
sewer
water,
storm
drains
utilities
and
some
roads,
I've
I
think
some
of
the
backup
for
that
work
has
already
been
submitted
to
the
staff
for
review.
F
Koster
goes
through
the
presentation,
it's
a
little
under
12
million
dollars,
which
is
quite
a
bit
larger
than
the
other
two
that
you've
seen
before,
and
this
would
be
more
of
a
traditional
CFD
that
you
would
see
and
I
know
that
some
of
the
council's
has
asked
us
about
the
average
debt
service
is
included
in
here
and
we'll
go
through
that
in
the
staff
report.
This
also
had
a
maximum
debts
of
maximum
bond
issuance
of
25
million
assigned
to
it
when
was
created.
F
J
Okay,
I'll
try
not
to
repeat
some
of
the
things
that
mr.
Bush
already
said,
so
this
has
been
structured
to
provide
110
debt
service
coverage
from
special
tax
revenues,
net
of
30,000
in
priority
admin
slightly
larger
than
the
other
two
transactions.
We
already
talked
about
the
escalator
on
this
again:
no
additional
debt.
This
will
be
the
one
and
only
series
for
this
improvement
area.
J
We
expect
to
get
just
slightly
under
12
million
in
par
and
eleven
point:
six
million
in
proceeds
again,
a
cash
funded
debt
service
reserve
fund
and
approximately
354
thousand
in
cost
of
issuance,
and
you
can
see
in
that
last
column.
The
debt
service
which
s
raised
here
is
the
breakdown
of
the
cost
of
issuance
similar
in
scope.
As
we've
seen
before
that
the
354
represents
the
fact
that
the
par
amount
is
larger,
I
do
want
to
go
back
and
point
out
in
this
case
that
you'll
see
the
miscellaneous
line-item.
We
have
refined
that
number.
J
J
J
This
slide
shows
you
that
escalation
in
the
debt
service
over
time
broken
out
by
principle
and
interest
again
30-year
debt
and
for
this
improvement
area
we
are
going
to
stagger
it
by
just
a
couple
of
days
from
7b
and
7d.
We
anticipate
being
able
to
print
the
preliminary
offering
statement
by
Friday
of
this
week,
and
then
we
will
be
pricing.
The
bonds
on
October,
the
30th
and
closing
two
weeks
later
on
November
the
13th.
D
It's
just
one
question:
I,
don't
know
who's,
probably
Michaels,
probably
the
best
one
to
answer
disk,
so
the
first
one
we
did
tonight
had
already
had
a
reduction
in
the
pay-go
or
the
percent.
That's
correct,
okay,
the
second
one
is
first
issuance.
So
there's
no,
but
there
was
a
there's,
a
10%
reduction
in
their
payments,
correct,
correct
and
on
this
one
I
think.
F
D
F
Think
it
is
I
think
the
way
we've
approached
it
if
I
remember
correctly
and
the
same
manager
can
correct
me
I
believe
when
we
were
looking
at
each
CFD.
That's
when
we
were
looking
at
the
Pago
amounts
to
structure
the
bonds
with
the
pay-go
amounts.
Okay,
so,
as
you've
heard,
the
max
taxes
have
been
levied
for
the
year
the
next
year,
you'll
see
all
the
reductions
in.
D
F
One
other
thing:
you've
talked
a
little
bit
about
refinancing
and
the
2%
you
know.
Obviously
8e
will
have
a
call
provision
at
the
Year
10
as
well
and
if
there's
a
chance
to
refinance
and
then
that's
when
we
would
look
at
the
2%
of
scare,
like
we
have
the
others
to
try
and
take
it
out,
so
every
opportunity
that
I
think
is
presented
to
the
city
that
should
be
looked
at
as
an
opportunity
to
take
that
out
and
that
when
that
would
occur.
Okay,
thank
you.
B
Come
front
what
if
I
could
just
clarify
one
of
the
first
things
for
use?
You
asked
about
the
services
tax
for
Public
Safety
on
80
and
again
that
was
not
available
because
there's
residential
property
owners
in
there,
but
as
part
of
the
settlement
agreement
with
Party
Party
at
that
time,
agreed
to
put
the
public
services
special
tax
on
CFD,
2016
and
16-3,
which
how
many
units.
G
B
D
A
A
Okay,
with
that
I
am
going
to
make
a
motion
to
adopt
by
title
only
a
resolution
of
the
City
Council
of
the
city
of
Boulder,
authorizing
the
execution
of
delivery
of
an
acquisition
agreement
relating
to
improvement
area
number
8
of
community
facilities,
district
number,
93,
1,
the
city
of
Beaumont
and
approving
certain
documents
and
taking
certain
other
actions
in
connection
therewith.
Do
I
have
to
do
the
second
one
separately
or
can
I
say
and.
D
A
A
resolution
the
City
Council
of
the
city
of
Beaumont,
Riverside,
County
California,
acting
as
the
legislative
body
of
the
city
of
Beaumont,
community
facilities,
district
number,
93,
one
improvement
area,
aetyi
authorizing
the
issuance
of
its
special
tax
bond
series,
2018
and
a
principal
amount
not
to
exceed
14
million
dollars
and
improving
certain
documents
and
taking
certain
other
actions
in
connection
therewith.
Do
I
have
a
second.
K
A
M
M
M
K
G
Mayor,
so
this
is
the
first
of
several
green
meant
so
even
worked
out
to
bring
to
council
when
we
did
the
development
impact
the
date
with
our
last
major
update
in
2017.
If
you
remember,
we
restructured
the
city's
development
impact
these
as
they
pertain
to
public
parks,
so
the
development
impact
fee
included
a
fee
for
regional
parks.
G
We
entered
into
a
settlement
agreement
with
the
Parks
and
Rec
district,
where
they've
established
their
own
regional
park
feet
so
they're
off
collecting
that
when
we
went
to
that
update,
we
also
look
to
establish
fees
for
some
community
parks
and
for
neighborhood
parks,
and
so
we
established
some
fees
pursuant
to
both
of
those
types
of
park
facilities.
One
of
the
key
things
we
were
concerned
about
was
all
projects,
and
particularly
some
infill
projects
that
are
developing,
making
sure
that
they're
helping
to
address
our
outdoor
park
Mark
Rocha
needs.
G
When
you
look
at
party,
particularly
the
Sundance
project,
it
was
conditioned
upon
approval
of
providing
neighborhood
and
community
parks,
and
so,
if
you
look
at
the
balance
of
the
project,
they
have
a
budget
of
about
forty
four
million
dollars
for
park.
Improvements
which
is
in
excess
of
about
six
point,
seven
six
point:
eight
million
dollars
of
park
fees
that
would
otherwise
be
generated
according
to
our
development
impact
fee
schedule,
as
amended
as
I've
described.
G
So,
pursuant
to
that
ordinance,
they
do
have
the
right
to
have
consideration
for
the
actual
improvements
that
have
been
made
and
are
being
contemplated
for
the
project.
So
what
this
agreement
would
do
since
party
has
exceeded
its
requirements
under
the
Quimby
ordinance
and
has
exceeded
the
value
that
was
otherwise
specified
in
the
impact
they'd
be
able
to
get
credit
for
permits
that
are
being
made
in
addition
to
that
or
permits
that
have
been
made.
In
addition
to
that,
they've
also
been
assessed.
G
Additional
development
impact
fees,
since
we
didn't
have
an
acquisition
agreement
in
place
or
if
you
create
an
agreement
in
place
for
this
particular
item,
so
staffs
recommendation
would
be
to
approve
this
a
park
fee
agreement,
since
the
actual
improvements
being
made
today
exceed
the
value,
the
impact
fees
that
they
would
ever
wanted
to
be
assessed
and
they
meet
and
actually
exceed
the
Quimby
requirements.
We
have
established.
A
A
D
G
Looking
at
providing
a
credit
against
the
development
impact
fees
for
community
and
neighborhood
parks,
pursuant
to
the
revised
development
impact
fee
again,
the
impact
fee
and
these
particular
Peck
fees
for
parks
were
not
in
existence
at
the
time
that
this
project
was
approved
by
the
city
and
the
specific
plan
was
approved.
Oh
the
specific
plan
did
specify
that
they
had
to
provide
for
Park
and
Recreation
open
spaces.
G
So
we
we
do
have
some
funds
that
have
been
collected
pursuant
to
the
development
of
PEG
fees,
so
this
would
provide
for
a
credit
for
the
improvements
had
already
been
made
against
the
impact
fees.
It
would
also
provide
for
a
reimbursement
of
the
fees
that
have
been
collected
since
this
park,
improve
myself
and.
G
D
E
G
So
the
project
was
approved,
a
condition
that
approval
was
that
they
had
to
make
community
neighborhood
park
improvements,
so
they
they've
done
that
on
the
existing
phases.
In
addition
to
that,
there's
another
schedule
of
park
improvements
to
be
made,
such
as
a
community
center
in
the
senior
housing
project
and
some
parks
and
open
spaces
improvements
within
the
SoCal
Greenbelt
area,
so
trail
improvements
and
some
additional
parks
and
amenity
centers
that
have
been
constructed
in
a
plan
to
be
constructed.
So
all
those
were
specified
and
conditioned
with
the
approval
of
a
plan.
G
We
revised
our
impact
fees
in
2017
that
removed
the
regional
park
facility,
which
we
were
collecting
that
fee
and
then
that
was
being
applied
to
the
regional
park
needs
so
that
fee
we
removed
and
then
the
recreation
of
Parks
District
established
that
regional
park
fee
there.
We
then
adopted
a
community
park
and
neighborhood
park
fee,
and
so
that
was
a
new
fee.
So
after
that
fee
went
into
effect,
we
started
collecting
that
on
Lots
within
Sundance,
and
so
so
that's
the
part
that
we're.
G
G
G
E
K
C
H
C
A
A
M
K
C
E
So,
basically,
if
you
would
mirror
all
right,
so
this
popped
up
back
when
I
was
clerk
and
it
was
something
that
wasn't
of
course,
top
top
priority,
so
I
didn't
bring
it
up,
wait
back
then,
but
basically
I
wanted
to
see
if
council
agreed
with
my
modification
request,
so
that
we
can
get
the
ordinance
changed
modified
by
the
beginning
of
the
new
year.
This
is
my
request
to
its
modification
would
go
calendar
year
instead
of
the
way
it's
worded
now.
That's
kind,
why
I
wanted
it
brought
up?
So
basically,
my
concern
really
was.
E
The
ER
is
a
section
a
where
it
reads
that
we
shall
have
no
more
often
than
once,
every
six
months
and
as
I
look
at
that
it
just
doesn't
seem
to
be
feasible
to
any
resident
to
have
to
wait
six
months
before
they
can
have
another
yard
sale,
because
the
way
it's
written
is
if
I
want
to
clean
out
my
garage
in
July
that
I
want
to
hold
another
one
for
some
Christmas
money.
I
can't
do
it
in
December,
because
it's
within
the
six
months,
if
I'm
reading
it
correctly.
Yes.
E
But
it
just
seems
to
me
to
be
ridiculous:
to
have
to
wait
another
six
months
to
have
another
one.
So
what
I'm
proposing
is
staying
within
the
two
for
the
year?
We
don't
want
to
turn
it
into
a
city
yard,
sale.
So
I
do
want
to
a
year,
but
I
want
to
change
the
wording
to
two
within
a
calendar
year.
So
you
can
have
it
where
they
want
it.
If
they
wanted
in
July
only
one
in
December
fine,
they
wanted
an
April
in
July.
E
That's
fine,
but
I
shouldn't
have
to
be
constricted
to
wait
six
months
before
another,
because
if
I
do
it
in
November,
then
I
gotta
went
to
the
following
year
and
it
just
it
just
seems
cumbersome.
So
all
I
want
to
do
is
modify
the
wording
to
say
no
more
than
twice
within
a
calendar
year
and
it's
that.
E
I'm
a
big
deal
they
sell
have
to
wait
once
they
get
that
hole
through
year
before
they
can
do
it
again.
So
it
will
it
will.
You
can
go
November
December,
January
February.
You
got
your
four
in
a
row,
but
there's
still
only
five
days
only
and
then
after
that
February
after
we
March
April,
May
June
July
August
affair,
all
the
way
to
the
end
of
the
month.
Anyway,
you've
already
done
your
two
at
the
beginning
of
the
year.
E
D
Know
I
would
think
the
purpose
of
this
ordinance
was
to
make
sure
you
didn't
have
someone
doing
a
yard
sale
every
weekend
right
and
that's
all
so.
No
I
agree
that
we
should
be
more
flexible
on
on
that
I'm.
Even
you
know,
I'm
more
concerned
about
the
time
frame
in
between
them
rather
than
the
number
per
year.
You
know,
so
you
know
that
maybe
you
can
look
at
some
other
ordinance.
D
E
D
E
D
A
D
D
O
H
O
Thank
You
Marion,
Council
Corey
tonight
don't
have
much
in
terms
of
legislative
update
because
the
state's
out
of
session
and
the
federal
government
are
still
working
on
passing
their
funding
bills.
Well,
we
are
working
on
at
City.
Hall
is
our
2019
legislative
platform.
So
that's
where
we're
gonna
be
looking
at
the
purpose
of
what
moments
gonna
be
doing
statewide
and
federally
our
guiding
principles
and
policy
statements
that
we
want
to
put
together.
O
It's
gonna
identify
key
areas
that
we
want
towns
in
to
focus
on
within
the
state
at
the
federal
level,
so
we're
gonna
take
a
crack
at
these
and
the
city
manager
level,
as
well
as
the
department
heads
and
once
we
refine
that
list,
we
will
be
sitting
down
with
City
Council,
probably
in
about
three
or
four
weeks
or
so,
and
we'll
start
going
over
this
legislative
platform
with
all
of
you
and
then
we'll
have
that
ready
to
go
as
we
hit
the
new
legislative
session
January.
So
that's
all
I
have
for
you
today,
I.
D
We've
spent
a
couple
million
dollars
already
on
designing
studies
and
we're
at
a
crossroads
where
we're
about
ready
to
authorize
more
Union
Pacific
is
required
by
federal
law
to
provide
public
access
to
their
systems,
but
they
can
put
all
sorts
of
rules
and
conditions
on
it,
and
so
it's
in
question.
But
the
ad
hoc
committee
gave
instruction
to
staff
to
continue
to
move
forward
and
to
look
at
options
to.
D
Encourage
Union
Pacific
to
reconsider
at
the
same
time,
looking
at
cost
estimates
for
alternatives.
So
long
story
short
that
project
probably
is
in
question
and
I,
know
a
lot
of
communities
and
a
lot
of
people
have
hoped
for
and
counted
on
that
project.
So
just
that's
all
I
had
so
we
need
to
be
aware
of
that
and
when
we
get
an
opportunity
with
our
our
Congress
people
in
our
city
in
our
state
legislatures,
to
continue
to
push
forward
on
that.
So
that's
all
I
have
I'm
sorry.
D
A
Tracking
the
rail
progress
in
keeping
up
to
date
and
they
call
Union,
Pacific,
etc
and
they've
been
raising
concerns
for
a
while
now
that
the
rails
are
so
heavily
used
now
for
Freight
and
that
the
timing
or
the
speed
of
the
rails
for
Freight
is
never
gonna
match
the
speed.
That's
required
for
the
commuter
train
traffic,
so
they've
been
concerned
and
I
just
share
this
with
you,
because
it's
been
coming
up
in
their
discussions
too,
and
they
don't
do
anything
official.
But
there
are
contact.
Point
and
they've
been
raising
concerns
about
that.
A
D
G
C
I
You
know
I'm
glad
that
I,
you
know
the
barrio
district
they're
so
happy
about
the
you
know.
We
gave
them
a
chance
to
discuss
how
what
they're
concerned
and
they're
up.
You
know
their
roads
and
everything
in
there.
They're,
very
thankful
and-
and
so
them
are
this
Sunday
the
church
and
they
said
I.
Thank
them
so
much
to
to
listen
to
us.
That's
why
they
wrote
a
a
nice
article
and
record.
E
C
The
strategic
plan
it
was
kicked
off
in
economic
development
committee.
It's
exciting
there
to
finally
get
that
off
the
ground
and
get
that
moving
forward.
We
have
stakeholders,
I,
think
I've
already
been
identified
and
looks
like
we're
ready
to
get
moving
on
it
so
what's
happening.
The
other
thing
that
councilmember
Wade
has
made
me
aware
of
is
this
is
potentially
our
last
meeting,
so
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
staff
knows
how
much
I've
appreciated
them
and
having
them.
Welcome
me
here
and
putting
up
with
wait
a
second.
C
M
C
A
I
want
I
want
to
take
a
minute
to
read
a
letter.
I
got.
We
had
a
a
citizen
in
the
community
who
had
been
expressing
great
concern
over
some
activity
that
was
harming
her
property
and
just
becoming
a
nuisance
with
one
of
the
park
areas
that
was
near
her
house
so
and
she
had
a
lot
of
complaints
legitimately
so
and
she
really
needed
to
be
heard.
So
I
got
a
letter
today
from
her
or
copied
on
a
letter
to
Chiefs
to
lease
I'm
impressed
and
overwhelmed
by
your
concern
and
responsiveness
to
this
situation.
A
My
fear
and
frustration
is
being
replaced
with
admiration
and
appreciation
for
the
job.
You
do
I,
truly
appreciate
you
following
up
not
only
to
ensure
the
safety
for
me,
my
family
and
my
neighbors,
but
for
working
with
the
football
program
to
implement
measures
and
awareness
to
mitigate
the
chance
for
future
occurrences.
Please
extend
my
appreciation
to
the
football
program
as
well.
I
understand.
A
There
is
only
so
much
control
and
organization
can
have
in
a
public
place
and
their
gesture
will
not
be
forgotten,
so
that
is
from
resident,
Marla
Christensen,
and
thank
you
so
much
for
handling
it
so
professionally
that
we
get
letters
like
that.
I
very
much
appreciate
that.
That's
all
I
have
to
say
I
can't
say
anything
better
than
that
economic
development
update.
O
Thank
You
Marion
council
before
I
start.
The
update
I
do
hope
that
all
Council
members
that
are
running
for
reelection
do
show
up
the
next
two
meetings,
because
there
is
a
couple
important
items
on
the
November
sixth
meeting,
that
I
will
need
a
quorum
for
so
please
come
to
those
so
for
the
Economic
Development
Committee
elect
Mayor,
Pro,
Tem,
Martinez
and
councilmember
Lara
did
state.
We
had
the
kickoff
for
the
strategic
plan.
The
idea
was
to
make
sure
that
the
economic
development
committee
understood
kind
of
what
the
overview
of
the
program
is.
O
What
steps
are
gonna
be
taken
at
the
committee
level,
as
well
as
the
economic
summit
meetings
that
we're
gonna
be
scheduling
and
then,
ultimately,
all
of
those
things
fall
to
City
Council
to
modify
and
improve
the
plan
at
the
very
end.
So
that
said,
we
completed
our
first
iteration
of
the
stakeholder
list.
I
think
I
sent
out
probably
like
nine
emails
today
to
identified
stakeholders
and
those
across
the
gamut
between
department
heads
here
at
City
Hall,
some
of
our
major
stakeholders
within
different
agencies
within
the
city.
O
So
like
the
park,
rec
district,
Beaumont,
Cherry,
Valley,
Water,
Pass,
Water
Agency,
the
Library
District
Highland,
Springs
Resort,
we
included
all
the
medical
facilities,
so
epic
and
Beaver
Loma
Linda
San
Gorgonio,
Pass
Hospital,
the
boards
on
the
CEO
at
the
hospital,
and
then
we
went
through
and
identified
major
developers
within
the
city.
Major
businesses
within
the
city
and
probably
a
whole
group
that
I'm,
oh
yeah,
education,
so
I'd,
say
I
knew
there
was
one
group.
O
I
was
missing
him
like
that,
doesn't
seem
like
a
comprehensive
list,
so
the
education
establishments,
obviously
Beaumont
unified,
Malick's
hands,
Jacinto
Community,
College
crafts
in
and
we
reached
out
to
UC
Riverside
as
well.
I
think
that's
a
good
idea,
but
if
you
look
through
it,
that's
Oh,
Riverside,
County
economic
development
as
well
as
workforce
development
boards
through
Riverside
County,
so
I
sent
those
out.
Probably
four
o'clock,
4:30
or
so
I
already
have
ten
people
that
have
said
we
are
definitely
signing
up
for
all
three
meetings.
So
that's
good
news.
O
At
least
we
have
ten
that'll
show
up.
We
expect
a
lot
more
of
my
colleagues
that
I've
worked
with
for
a
while
to
hopefully
be
able
to
attend.
So
that's
good
news
for
us
as
more
things
go
on
we'll,
let
you
know
throughout
the
process,
but
that's
really
the
the
meat
of
what
we
discussed
at
the
economic
development
committee
and
we're
looking
forward
to
working
on
this
project
going
forward.
I
can
answer
any
questions.
Thank
you.
I
have.
A
O
K
O
They
I
think
that
we
can
definitely
invite
the
stakeholders,
like
the
residents,
as
well
as
the
HOAs
and
those
types
of
things
to
other
workshops,
but
they
said
for
the
stakeholder
meetings
for
the
summit.
They
really
need
the
business
people
to
get
an
idea
of
of
what's
working
with
them.
What
businesses
will
help
them,
where
their
employees
or
where
their
business
is
sit
within
this
regional
economy?
So
I
think
that's
one
of
the
reasons
that
they
weren't
on
the
list.
Okay,.
A
Well,
my
question
kind
of
comes
from.
You
went
to
education
and
you
went
to
water
and
you
went
to
so
I
those
weren't
businesses,
so
I
thought
you
were
spreading
it
out
a
bit
more
than
that.
So,
okay
and
my
second
question
is
so-
do
need
the
City
Council
members
who
are
not
running
for
election
to
be
at
your
agency.
Definitely.
D
C
A
A
L
A
E
L
Just
briefly,
I
just
wanted
to
go
back
to
an
earlier
comment,
because
I
think
it's
incumbent
upon
me
to
correct
inaccurate
and
false
information.
That's
provided
in
these
meetings.
There
was
a
speaker
that
spoke
earlier
this
evening
and
suggested
that
the
number
of
lawsuits
that
the
city
is
a
defendant
in
is
being
somehow
hidden
in
some
way,
and
that
is
not
only
a
misleading
statement.
It
is
a
false
statement.
L
The
City
Council
has
kept
informed
on
all
litigation
matters
that
the
city
is
involved
in
the
number
of
cases,
as
the
council
knows
that
are
pending
against
the
city
has
been
reduced
substantially
over
the
last
two
and
a
half
years.
Perhaps
the
speaker
earlier
this
evening
is
disappointed
that
the
number
of
active
lawsuits
against
the
city
have
declined
so
significantly
there.
L
You
know
there's
just
a
handful
of
cases
that
are
actively
pending
and
and
that
have
been
served
on
the
city,
but
we
we
make
it
our
business
to
make
sure
that
the
council
is
informed
as
to
what's
going
on
in
terms
of
any
litigation
and
understand
that
once
a
case
is
filed
and
it
is
served
on
the
city-
and
you
know
we
have
these
meetings
every
two
weeks
and
time
permits,
then
we
get
it,
we
get
it
on
the
agenda.
We
bring
it
to
your
attention
and
deal
with
it.
A
G
Wow
we
have
some
very
exciting
events
to
remind
everybody
of
tomorrow.
We
have
our
two
by
two
kickoff
with
the
Mohawk
Valley
Water
District.
So
to
begin
the
discussion,
that's
about
rias
water
and
how
we're
going
to
try
to
deploy
that.
So
our
two
by
two
representatives
are
Mayor,
Carol
and
Councilman
white.
So
so
I
think
the
election
is
until
November
6,
so
Kevin
white
must
show
up
tomorrow
evening
and
then
October
31st.
We
do
have
the
groundbreaking
at
10:00
a.m.
for
the
sewer
plant.