►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
C
B
B
Alright
folks,
my
watch
says
6:00
6:30,
so
we're
gonna
get
started
here.
First
thing:
I
need
to
be
sure
everyone
hears
and
understands
if
you
are
not
sitting
in
a
seat.
You're
sitting
on
the
floor,
you're
leaning
up
against
the
wall
whatever,
if
it's
not
in
a
seat,
you're
gonna,
have
to
go
to
our
overflow
area,
which
is
the
gym.
We
have
been
advised
by
our
fire,
marshal
that
we
cannot
have
the
room
overcrowded
and
our
access
our
egress
blocked.
So
please,
if
you
can
move
to
the
library,
I
would
I'm
sorry.
B
The
gymnasium
I
would
appreciate
it
next.
So
welcome
to
the
ninth
meeting
of
the
middle
school
boundary
adjustment,
Advisory
Committee
before
we
begin
I
want
to
announce
that
all
middle
school
boundary
adjustment
committee
meetings
are
being
live-streamed
on
the
district
YouTube
channel.
A
link
is
posted
on
our
boundary
adjustment
web
page
and
it's
also
shared
on
the
district's,
Facebook
and
Twitter
feeds.
The
advisory
committees
are
all
open
to
the
public
and
all
materials
are
available
to
the
public
through
posting
of
those
materials
on
the
district's
web
page.
B
As
many
of
you
know,
my
name
is
Steven
sparks
I'm,
the
administrator
for
long-range
planning
and
I'll
be
facilitating
the
advisor
committee
meetings
throughout
this
process,
as
we
do
for
every
meeting.
I
want
to
remind
us
all
about
the
expectations
for
the
meeting.
We
assume
best
intentions.
We
will
all
want
the
best
for
all
of
our
students.
We
listen
intently
to
understand
better.
We
are
open
to
considering
new
ideas,
we
remain
open
to
influence
and
are
not
judgmental.
We
will
consider
all
options.
B
There
are
no
bad
questions,
our
interactions
will
be
done
with
respect
and
we
will
respect
of
the
opposing
viewpoints.
As
I
have
said
at
every
meeting,
these
expectations
apply
to
everyone
in
the
room,
so
we
are
not
going
to
have
disruptions
from
the
audience
we
are
going
to
do
the
signs
or
other
attention-getting
disruptions.
B
B
The
committee's
questions,
comments,
suggestions
and,
ultimately,
their
recommendation
will
be
for
the
benefit
of
all
students
in
the
desk
in
the
district
and
I
remind
everyone
that
the
committee's
eventual
action
will
be
a
recommendation
to
superintendent
grouting
superintendent
with
the
board
will
be
making
this
decision
so
before
we
get
going.
I
wanted
to
remind
everybody
about
how
public
testimony
is
going
to
work,
we'll
be
drawing
names
randomly
from
across
elementary
school
boundaries.
If
your
name
is
called,
you
will
be
the
person
providing
the
testimony,
not
another
person.
B
If
you
as
an
audience,
want
to
have
a
single
representative
to
speak
for
this
given
area,
then
we
expect
to
have
a
single
yellow
card
from
that
attendance
area.
We
will
stop
taking
yellow
cards
for
public
testimony
and
ten
minutes
so
call
it
6:45.
If
you
want
to
testify,
please
fill
out
a
yellow
card
in
and
submit
it
with
my
assistant
Debbie,
so
as
reminders.
I
want
to
remind
us
all
why
we're
here
for
the
these
are
the
board
objectives.
We
need
to
create
a
new
boundary
for
the
timberland
area
school.
B
We
need
to
reduce
the
number
of
students
at
Stiller
to
approximately
90
percent
of
the
permanent
capacity
we
need.
We
want
to
balance
enrollments
at
all
the
other
middle
schools
and
we
are
able
to
consider
minor
amendments
to
other
attendance
boundaries
going
along
with
our
board
objectives.
We
do
have
these
factors
from
policy
JC,
which
the
committee
will
be
evaluating.
These
factors
are
student
body,
composition,
current
and
future
availability
of
space
at
a
school
feeder
patterns
from
elementary
middle
to
high
school
and
neighborhood
proximity
and
accessibility.
B
B
So
tonight
we're
going
to
be
talking
about
one
map,
the
at
the
February
13th
meeting.
The
committee
directed
us
to
return
with
revisions
to
the
working
map
and
we
have
the
one
map
that
we're
going
to
talk
about
tonight.
So
that's
the
map
that
I
will
go
into
the
changes
in
the
map
here
in
just
a
minute.
My
recommendation
tonight
for
the
committee
is
to
get
to
a
preliminary
consensus
on
all
the
middle
school
attendance
boundaries
as
we
proceed
here
this
evening.
I
will
be
asking
for
votes
of
the
Committee
on
ideas.
B
It
will
be
a
hand.
Raise
vote,
will
record
it
if
we
have
a
majority
good,
we
move
on.
If
we
don't
have
a
majority.
Well,
we'll
have
a
negative
majority.
In
that
case
and
we'll
be
able
to
move
on
yeah.
The
committee
is
unable
to
reach
a
preliminary
consensus
on
the
boundaries
this
evening.
We
can
return
at
the
end
of
the
meeting
and
talk
about
an
additional
meeting
for
the
committee
to
have
so.
B
We
will
come
back
to
that
if
we
need
to
so
talking
about
math
a
or
taught
math
a
just
the
working
map
here.
Since
the
last
meeting,
we've
made
a
few
changes
and
I'll
ask
Robert
to
point
them
out
to
you
with
the
laser
pointer,
so
we've
eliminated
the
elementary
to
middle
school,
splits
at
Greenway,
Raleigh,
Park
and
William
Walker.
We
realigned
the
current
Nancy
brow
split
to
follow
Shoals
Ferry
Road
at
Barnes.
B
It
follows
the
high
school
boundary,
the
current
high
school
boundary
split
and
what
this
means
for
dual
language
is
teaching
and
learning
it's
going
to
have
to
create
a
process
whereby
dual
language
students
will
be
able
to
go
to
Cedar,
Park
and
then
to
be
written
high
school.
The
dual
language
numbers.
B
B
The
other
amendments
here
all
of
Springville
is
noted.
As
a
tendon
pending
stoller,
all
of
Finley
is
noted
to
attend
Timberland
all
of
Rock
Creek
is
noted
to
attend
Meadow
Park.
Now
from
this,
we
have
a
number
of
issues
that
we
want
to
bring
to
your
attention.
We
do
have
capacity
issues
at
Meadow
Stoller
in
Whitford
in
2021.
B
We
have
capacity
issues
at
Stoller
in
2025,
nor
and
this
map
does
not
lower
our
free
reduced
lunch
rates
at
five
Oaks
Mountain
View
or
with
hurt
so
I
have
a
couple
of
things.
I
wanted
to
share
with
you
in
specific
to
the
Stoller
discussion
that
I
would
like
for
you
to
start
with
first
off
about
sumo
sumo,
as
we
heard
last
time
is
a
program
and
it's
a
program
because
there
are
specific
criteria
for
participation
in
the
program.
B
This
is
different
from
an
option
program
where
there
is
no
eligibility
criteria
and
a
lottery
is
used
for
student
selection.
The
placement
of
suma
programs
is
driven
by
proximity
capacity
and
creating
programs
of
a
size
that
offer
the
full
complement
of
math
courses
to
meet
the
needs
of
students.
So
our
bottom
line
here
tonight
is
teaching
and
learning
leadership
will
make
the
decision
on
the
placement
of
suma
programs
you
all
have
than
looking
at
this,
and
it
is
relevant
to
your
discussion
in
terms
of
how
to
deal
with
the
middle
school
boundaries.
B
We've
received
a
fair
amount
of
public
comment
concerning
the
projections
for
2025,
especially
in
the
Springville
elementary
school
area,
where
student
growth
is
projected
to
continue.
Psu
developed,
a
long-range
forecast
for
us
in
the
spring
of
2019,
and
that
forecast
was
used
to
guide
this
project
as
we're
sending
you
that
information.
Our
projections
closely
match
the
PSU
forecast
at
each
elementary
school,
taking
into
account
the
actual
enrollment
that
has
showed
up
at
those
schools.
So
the
actual
enrollment
at
Springville
elementary
was
higher
than
what
yes
he
predicted
or
projected
in
2019.
B
B
Lastly,
about
Finley
transportation
at
the
February
13th
meeting
I,
provided
you
a
memorandum
comparing
bus
routes
for
Finley
Elementary,
so
that
was
a
four
routes
that
go
to
fin
that
go
to
stoller
now
and
what
their
time
distance
and
cost
would
be
if
they
went
to
Timberland
for
the
areas
that
are
walkable
in
the
Finley
area,
we're
anticipating,
for
example,
the
area
that
is
directly
across
from
Stoller
and
north
of
the
creek.
That
is
one
route
of
approximately
50
writers.
B
The
distance
is
about
four
point
one
miles
the
time
for
the
ride
is
approximately
18
minutes
30
seconds
and
the
cost
is
approximately
ten
thousand
two
hundred
dollars.
There
are
other
routes
that
would
be
needed,
such
as
the
area
immediately
east
of
Stoller
and
north
of
Laidlaw
Roe,
Laidlaw
Road,
and
that
the
area's
down
in
the
southwest
corner
of
the
Finley
attendance
area.
However,
we're
anticipating
that
as
a
as
a
guide
that
the
numbers
that
I
provided
to
you
just
now
about
that,
one
area
will
be
approximately
the
same.
B
There
will
be
variations,
of
course,
but
it
will
be
approximately
the
same.
So
I
have
some
other
comments
as
we
move
forward,
but
for
the
Springville
question,
I'd
like
to
go
ahead
and
open
it
up
for
discussion
as
we
normally
do,
we
will
have
you
put
your
name
tent
up
on
its
end,
to
note
that
you
want
to
speak,
but
my
recommendation
for
you
here
tonight
to
start
is
the
question
of
Stoller
and
what
will
its
attendants
boundary
be?
B
F
So
I'll
just
reiterate
what
I
said:
any
email
most
community
members
last
night
that
I'm
generally
satisfied
with
the
boundaries
it
appears
here.
As
I
mentioned,
we
we've
allowed
for
and
I
take
it.
This
is
our
where
we
stand
this
issue.
The
teaching-learning
will
have
the
option
to
move
the
similar
program
in
its
entirety,
down
to
Timberland
I,
think
I
noted
via
email.
F
It's
not
clear
to
me
that
it
would
make
a
lot
of
sense
to
do
it
at
2021
if
that
were
to
happen
to
have
Stoller
at
88%
at
that
point
in
and
Timberland
at
104,
but
but
it
there's
a
number
of
variables,
gonna
happen
between
21,
21
and
25,
and
it
does
fall
into
place.
We've
got
that
option.
Of
course.
That
means
as
we
as
we
continue
to
talk
about
the
Timberland
battery.
F
We
need
to
make
sure
that
there's
space
to
potentially
receive
those
students
but
yeah
that
so
that's
that's
my
feeling
on
that
I
think
taking
into
account
some
of
the
comments
we
heard
from
the
the
Findlay
area,
I
would
like
to
potentially
revisit
the
idea.
I
had
on
possibly
doing
an
elementary-school
swap
to
mitigate
some
of
the
the
longest
commute
that
the
Findlay
population
might
have,
but
that
should
be.
You
know
again,
it's
roughly
and
even
swap
in
terms
of
numbers.
B
G
One
is
in
last
meeting
I.
Think
Monica
floated
this
idea
of
allowing
folks
but
I
right
across
Stoller
Oakridge
estates.
Instead
of
doing
the
making
them
go
and
elementary
boundary
adjustment
and
putting
them
in
Jacob
allowing
them
to
go
to
Stoller
and
I
work.
What
is
the
possibility
of
that
and
the
reason
I
say
that
is
because
I
know
the
board
members
and
but
an
arrant
superintendent
there.
They
have
made
unilateral
decisions
in
pass.
G
B
If
the
committee
were
to
decide
that
a
portion
of
Finley
or
the
conversely,
a
portion
of
any
other
attendance
area
should
go
to
Stoller
and
I'll
just
pick
on
the
Finley
example
right
now,
if
that
was
the
will
of
the
committee,
I
would
suggest
to
you
that
a
recommendation
to
also
amend
the
elementary
school
boundary
to
add
that
area
Whismur
would
be
a
sensible
recommendation
to
make.
We
have
heard
a
lot
of
testimony
about
Finley,
not
wanting
to
be
split
up.
B
The
other
issue
there
to
think
of
that
applies
to
all
splits.
Is
the
I,
don't
know
the
right
term.
So
I
look
at
my
principal
colleagues,
but
I
think
it's
called
a
fly
up
where
you
are
in
fifth
grade.
Looking
at
okay,
hey
you're,
now
going
to
go
to
middle
school,
having
the
staff
at
the
elementary
school
and
at
the
middle
school,
no
okay,
who
we're
dealing
with
so
having
that
clean
feeder
also
helps
that
process.
H
Just
I
think
I
would
say
then,
after
review
I
agree
with
Jason
that
I,
like
the
map
as
its
drawn,
but
I
would
like
us
to
figure
out
how
we
could
move,
as
you
were
recommended
that
already
suggested
that
walking
area
of
Finley
to
yzma
and
I
see
that
there
is
probably
a
load
balancing
issue
there
and
I'm
not
quite
sure.
How
would
resolve
that.
But
I
do
think.
That
is
a
recommendation
that
we
should
consider.
B
So,
for
everyone's
understanding
and
I'd,
like
all
of
the
committee
members,
to
take
a
look
at
the
the
grit
code
map
that
you
have
on
the
desk,
let's
be
sure
we're
talking
about
the
same
areas.
So
looking
at
the
2021
net.
Sixth,
through
eighth
grade
students
map
the
group,
the
grade
codes
will
be
from
going
from
west
to
east
would
be
the
one
that
has
a
1024
in
a
four.
Those
are
the
three
grade
codes
that
are
immediately
north
of
Bronson,
Creek
and
south
of
Laidlaw
Road.
G
E
I
B
B
J
Well,
I,
in
theory
like
this
map,
I,
don't
think
that
we
have
solved
the
priorities
here.
We
are
looking
at
solar
at
a
hundred
and
thirty
percent
of
capacity
in
2025
I
think
we're
fooling
ourselves.
If
we
think
that
we're
going
to
be
able
to
automatically
move
Summa,
I,
actually
think.
As
a
committee,
we
may
need
to
look
at
creating
a
dual
proposition
to
the
board
of
hey.
This
works.
J
If
you
can
move
Summa
to
the
schools
where
it
can
fill
in
the
gap,
but
I
think
we
need
to
do
a
little
bit
more
of
that
hard
work.
Looking
at
these
grid
codes
and
really
getting
that
attendance
down
with
the
net
resident
students
outside
of
that
I
also,
don't
think
we
fixed
the
Oak
Hills
issue.
That
I
think
would
be
a
fairly
easy
fix.
I'd
like
to
see
us
do
that
as
well.
So.
B
K
I,
concur
with
Charisse
I
think
that
the
numbers,
the
the
objectives
from
the
board
were
to
look
at
solar
and
try
to
get
solar
to
90%
at
2021,
and
that
was
to
accommodate
future
growth.
I
do
not
believe
that
we
are
meeting
that
objective
with
this
map
and
I
agree
that
with
Charisse
that
I'd
like
to
look,
we
might
need
to
make
some
really
tough
decisions
to
relieve
that
overcrowding.
Okay,.
K
Had
noticed
the
same
thing
with
the
with
the
numbers
at
a
Stoller
with
this
particular
map
and
agree
with
Cherise
and
Christy
that
this
map
I
don't
think,
works
a
hundred
percent
we're
not
meeting
that
reduction
in
students
and
we're
gonna
be
at
the
same
place
in
2025.
If
you
keep
it
like
this,
okay.
L
B
Our
key
issue
here
are
the
two
objectives
about
Timberland
installer
I'd,
like
for
us
to
stay
focused
on
Stoller
and,
as
we
can
come
back
to
the
Oak
Hills
question
for
Timberland
I'm,
more
than
happy
to
do
that,
and
if
we
need
to
revisit
the
Stoller
discussion,
we
can
do
that
as
well.
This
will
not
be
a
wanted
done,
type
of
thing,
Michelle,
I,.
K
Really
wanted
to
be
okay
with
this
Stoller
boundaries,
but
it
does
make
me
really
uneasy,
particularly
because
the
Westview
boundaries
in
what
three
years
were
overcrowded
and
there's
already
an
issue
at
Westview.
I.
Don't
want
to
do
that
again,
I
hate
to
introduce
a
split
but
I
don't
see
a
way
around
it.
If
Sato
and
Jacob
Whismur
going
into
Stoller
I
think
we
have
to
introduce
the
split
into
Springville.
Okay,.
B
G
I
think
one
comment
said:
the
map
people
look
at
it
without
this,
someone
versus
does
me
they'd
only
21,
objector
I
do
agree
with
Michele
like
20
25.
We
don't
have
a
concrete
number
to
a
grito
and
we
don't
have
1231
it's
high
or
low
and
I
think
there
is
no
clear
indication
and
the
committee,
whether
we
are
by
majority
disagreeing
to
that
number
or
not
so
I,
think
it's
fair
to
call
for
a
vote
without
the
sumo
numbers
in
here
and
let
the
learning
department
decide
later
on.
Okay,.
B
B
So
we
excuse
me,
we
showed
a
map.
The
numbers
are
kind
of
blending
together
right
now,
where
it
was
the
southern
portion
of
Sato.
That's
called
the
pirate
part
neighborhood
that
was
identified.
The
committee
did
not
embrace
that
particular
split,
so
it
fell
to
the
side.
So
here's
what
I'm
proposed
to
do.
Given
the
discussion-
that's
just
happening.
I'm
gonna
call
a
question
on
whether
to
proceed
with
the
map,
as
it
is
understanding
the
difficulties
of
capacity
and
the
other
question
is,
if
not
then
move
the
discussion
to
what
would
be
a
solution
for
Stoller.
B
B
No
leaves
there
perfect.
Okay,
so
first
question
here
for
tonight,
and
this
is
going
to
be
a
hands
of
vote.
Robert
and
David
will
help
me
count.
9
is
a
majority
for
a
decision.
So
first
question
is:
do
we
proceed
with
the
math
as
shown
right
now,
where
all
of
the
spring,
we'll
all
of
sato
all
of
the
whismur
goes
to
Stoller?
B
H
B
B
B
So
we
are
assuming
only
general
ed
students,
teaching
and
learning
will
decide
where
silver
will
go.
So
you
can
make
a
recommendation.
The
committee
committee
recommendation
about
what
you
think
should
happen
with
Summa,
but
ultimately
it
will
be
their
decision
all
right,
so
I
see
a
vote
of
5.
Now
let
me
ask
the
inverse
of
the
question:
are
you
ready
to
instead
consider
a
map
where
someone
some
school,
whether
it's
Springville,
Sato
or
Whismur,
will
be
a
split
and
that
would
be
moving
forward
as
a
discussion?
We're
not.
B
J
B
I
got
the
idea.
I
got
from
the
first
question
that
only
five
of
the
committee,
which
is
not
a
majority,
wants
to
proceed
with
the
map
that's
published
in
up
on
the
screen
that
the
question
is.
Does
a
majority
of
the
committee
want
to
proceed
with
a
different
map
which
includes
a
split
in
one
of
those
three
elementary
school
attendance
areas
which
we
will
have
to
discuss
so
yeah?
My
Steve.
O
I
wanted
to
clarify
this
Summa
thing
again,
because
it
really
changes
how
I
vote
and
view
this
thing.
I
think
what
you're
telling
us
is.
We
should
assume
that
Summa
is
going
to
stay.
Maybe
it'll
stay,
maybe
it'll
go,
but
for
purposes
of
meeting
the
objectives
put
forth
to
us
90%.
We
should
assume
that
it's
going
to
stay
is
that
an
accurate
assumption,
I.
B
Think
I
think
the
assumption
that
you
need
to
make
is
general
add
students
if
Summa
can
stay
based
on
the
capacity
proximity
and
size
of
programs,
as
I
noted
earlier,
then,
teaching
and
learning
can
decide
to
retain
the
program
in
that
school.
But
again
that
will
be
a
decision
of
teaching
and
learning
leadership
and
for
our
purposes
here
consider
the
general
ed
students
so.
B
O
B
B
P
B
F
You
know
at
their
discretion
to
make
the
best
decision
about
you
know
overall
capacity
I
mean
I,
think
that's
where
maybe
people
are
stuck
on
it's
like
are
we
are
we
sentencing
ourselves
to
the
hundred
and
thirty
percent,
or
is
the
eighty
eight
percent
still
a
possibility
and
I
think
I
think
if
we
can
set
along
a
work,
the
extent
that
we
have,
if
the
recommendation
is
all
we
have
let's
put
that
forward?
If
I
don't
know
if
that
changes
people's
thoughts,
but
it
may.
M
K
G
A
couple
of
points
and
just
to
be
crystal
clear:
we
are
going
to
look
at
net
resident
students
for
a
boundary
recommendation
and
then,
like
this
umar
happened.
Whichever
way
that's
wrong
right
and
they
do
your
second
question
now.
Can
you
have
win
that
by
saying
either
split,
Elementary's
or
elementary
boundary
adjustment,
because
that's
also
possible?
That's
correct,
okay,.
P
B
So
that
is
a
fair
question.
Let's
come
to
that
when
we
address
that
issue
with
with
Finley
I'm
happy
to
answer
those
questions,
Monica,
are
you
asking
okay
and
Matt
all
right,
so
Jason
suggested
a
revisit
to
that
first,
action
with
Jason
look
make
sure
I
understand
that
it
would
be
boundaries
as
they
are
with
no
Summa
program
at
start.
Is
that
correct,
correct.
P
While
taking
the
vote
I,
why
we
don't
have
20-25
objective
side
from
BSD
I
do
like
to
highlight
a
data
point
which
is
the
current
stoller
boundary,
and
we
were
given
this
data
in
the
first
meeting,
general
IDI
is
12
23.
Today
the
map
we
are
looking
at
net
resident
students
with
1231,
so
it's
actually
seven
students
more-
is
that
my
interpretation
correct.
K
It
was
my
understanding
that
suma
students
are
bust
through
their
neighborhood
school
and
then
they
board
a
Summa
bus
to
the
Summa
school,
so
in
other
words,
students
from
Springville,
Sato
and
Jacob
lysmer
would
travel
to
their
travel
to
Stoller
and
then
board
a
bus
and
travel
to
Timberland.
Is
that
correct?
Mr.
Q
The
short
answer
is,
it
depends
right
now
we
have
one
school
that
we
do
that
with
because
of
where
the
kids
are
down
in
for
Meadow
Park,
but
we
have
other
places
that
we
do
it
directly.
They
don't
do
that.
So
the
answer
your
question
is
I.
Can't
give
you
an
answer
until
we
find
out
where
all
the
pigs
drop
into.
Obviously
our
goal
would
be
a
direct
busing
issue
so
that
there's
no
delay
and
everybody
gets
a
school
at
nine,
oh
five
or
nine
ten,
and
that
would
be
our
goal.
B
D
B
B
R
B
As
we
talked
about
earlier
when
we're
talking
about
the
great
cover
only
talking
about
the
Oakridge
estate
area
right
here
immediately
south
as
school
and
everybody
I'm
gonna
ask-
is
everybody
agree,
moving
forward
talking
about
walkable
family,
we're
talking
about
the
Oak
Ridge
estate,
neighborhood
immediately
south
of
Stoller?
Does
anybody
have
a
different
idea
about
that?
Please
raise
your
hand
the
card,
something
all
right,
that's
understood.
B
B
K
B
J
B
K
B
G
B
G
B
Okay,
so
the
question
the
decision
point
before
you
right
now
for
Stoller,
and
this
is
only
the
Stoller
all
of
Springville,
all
of
Saco
all
of
Whismur,
including
the
Oak
Ridge
Estates
neighborhood,
south
of
Stoller
middle
school
being
enrolled
or
being
feeding
Stoller
middle
school.
That
is
the
proposal.
That
is
the
decision.
Point
also
is
also
recognizing
that
suma
would
not
be
at
Staller
all
right
hands.
Please.
If
you
agree
with
that.
B
So
here
is
the
next
question:
if
the
committee
is
not
ready
to
consider
a
complete
feeder
at
four
Stoller
at
Springville,
Sato
and
Whismur,
and
is
not
at
this
point,
whether
there's
a
boundary
adjustment
or
it's
a
split
Finley,
if
that
is
not
the
middle
school
boundary
map.
My
next
question,
for
you
is
okay.
F
In
some
sense
is
related,
but
I
think
we
almost
need
a
bit
of
a
discussion.
I
I
think
we
anticipated
picking
up
a
vote
from
the
previous
one
and
we
lost
two
so
for
the
three
people
who
sort
of
had
different
thoughts.
I
think
if
we
understand
why
that
is,
maybe
we
can
see
if
there's
some
other
adjustments
that
need
to
be
making.
We
can
get
across
that
line.
Yeah.
I
B
O
You
Steve
I
think,
generally
speaking,
come
from
the
proposition
that
math,
a
or
whatever
it
is
tonight
as
presented.
I
was
in
support
of
I
also,
would
support
I'm
picking
up
some
of
the
the
closer
kids
to
Finley,
but
now
that
you
say
sue
may
or
may
not
be
there.
That's
a
big
deal,
and
that
is
the
genesis
of
my
consternation
is
to
help
best
to
proceed.
If
we
could
simply
say
suit
was
moving
I
think
this
is
an
easy
vote.
O
Would
you
tell
me
you
don't
know,
and
the
district
doesn't
know
then
I
think
we're
in
a
position
where
I
have
to
assume
it's
staying
and
then
I
have
to
look
at
the
90
percent,
objective
of
which
we're
nowhere
close
unless
we
start
splitting
up
portions
of
Springville,
which
I
desperately
don't
want
to
do,
but
if
that
is
what
the
district
is
saying,
we
have
to
do.
Then
I'm
prepared
to
do
that.
So.
B
J
Again,
my
concern
with
looking
at
Stoller
with
the
projections
that
we
have
to
2025
and
I
understand
that
the
JC
is
really
pushing
to
2021.
But
the
fact
that
this
data
is
being
given
to
us
at
every
meeting
tells
me
it's
of
a
concern
to
the
district
in
some
way,
shape
or
form
because
we're
looking
at
it
and
even
taking
Zuma
out
of
stoller
in
2025
we're
not
there
we're
not
even
close
and
I
can't
in
good
conscience
vote
for
that.
K
Was
actually
going
to
bring
up
the
same
point,
Cherise
did
is
that
with
the
map,
as
is
in
2025,
were
still
over
capacity,
even
with
Sumer
gone,
and
then
you
want
to
add
more
walkers
to
that
or
the
walking
zone.
To
that,
that's
adding
even
more,
which
is
going
to
put
us
even
more
over
our
objective,
which
is
why
I
didn't
vote
for
this
exact
map.
P
P
Unfortunately,
the
conference
this
year
is
by
invite
only
due
to
the
large
number
of
students
and
inability
to
meet
all
of
you,
and
this
is
stemming
from
the
general
education
sitting
at
Hart
1225
as
of
today,
but
in
2025
in
a
map
that
we
are
still
looking
at
12:31,
so
I'm
not
sure
how
the
teachers
situation
is
going
to
change
installer,
given
this
in
25
1.
So
whichever
school
ends
up
installer
I
think
it
is
a
question
of
academic
excellence
for
the
children
and
I'm
concerned
about
that.
K
I've
share
a
lot
of
the
similar
concerns
from
Jennifer
and
Cherise.
My
other
concern
is:
if
we
go
move,
don't
move
suma
out
of
stoller
thinking
that
we're
going
to
solve
these
number,
these
enrollment
problems.
What
will
prevent
children
who
are
eligible
for
Summa,
saying
I,
want
to
stay
at
Stoller
I
would
rather
give
up
Summa,
then
we're
back
right
back
to
where
we
were
at
the
beginning.
M
So
I
think
the
the
question
that
Jason
brought
up
was
to
at
least
get
some
explanation
as
to
why
we
lost
those
votes.
We're
kind
of
losing
track
of
that
I
feel.
So
if
we
could
do
that,
that
would
be
great,
I
think
and
then
move
to
the
next
question,
which
I
think
will
help
us
move
forward.
So
I
heard
I.
Think
everybody's
comments
are
great
and
we've
kind
of
repeating
them,
but
really
we
wanted
to
just
see
how
we
lost
the
votes.
Sure
Oh.
B
F
Call
out
something
that
did
the
email
so
I
again
with
this
proposal,
if
summer
comes
out
in
in
25,
we'll
be
at
90%
of
total
capacity
Hey
we
reach
consensus
on
Whitford.
That
was
it
105,
so
I
just
don't
understand
the
the
strong
resistance
to
it
again
in
let's
well,
I
I
won't
even
go
that
route.
I
mean
there's
just
a
disconnect
there.
That
doesn't
seem
quite
right
right
to
me
and
again
we're
talking
about
moving
throughout
and
having
as
it
stands
today.
Timberland
over
100
also
I
mean
I.
F
Think
we've
got
a
got,
a
reckon
I
did
there.
There
is
space
there.
Of
course,
it's
not
ideal
that
it's
an
portables
but
again
compared
to
introducing
that
a
significant,
elementary
school
split
with
all
the
related
complications.
I
just
think
it's
I
think
it's
the
best
thing
and
but
main
point
I'm
trying
to
make
is
that
it's
we're
not
being
consistent.
If
that's
the
reason
we're
not
doing
it.
J
K
I
K
Another
consideration
is
that
there
are
only
20
Summa
kids
that
live
within
Whitford,
and
so
all
the
rest
of
the
Sumer
kids
are
coming
from
somewhere
else.
So
it's
kind
of
a
different
discussion
than
the
hundred
and
what
200,
whatever
it
is
living
in
stoller
I,
feel
like
the
Whitford
program
might
be
more
easily
moved
around,
because
you've
got
20
kids
here
or
20
kids
here
or
20
kids
here,
they're
all
coming
in
from
somewhere
I.
M
B
B
B
Okay,
so
we
are
at
a
point
where
the
map,
as
shown,
is
not
acceptable
to
a
majority
of
the
committee.
We
are
also
at
a
point
where
the
map
has
shown,
plus
the
walkable
part
of
headline
that
small
neighborhood
is
also
not
acceptable.
Those
two
questions
too
Maps,
also
with
no
summa,
are
not
getting
a
majority.
So
so
next
question
I'm
going
back
to.
If
not
those
maps,
then
are
you
as
a
committee
wanting
to
either
a
start
talking
about
splits
or
be
you
have
a
different
solution?
F
Okay,
well
in
hopes
this
may
help
those
concerned
with
the
total
numbers
that
stoller
I
might
suggest
to
amend
the
bit
about
the
the
Findlay
reassignment
to
include
as
we
move
kids
from
Findlay
Whismur.
We
counter
balance
out
with
that
grid
code
of
46
at
the
southern
end
was
worth
in
the
Findlay,
so
we're
talking
about
essentially
a
swap
of
elementary
elementary
populations.
It
looks
like
it
would
slightly.
O
D
H
H
Just
to
the
committee's
point,
I
am
strongly
voting
each
time
for
the
vote
that
we've
had.
Is
that
there's
only
two
other
options
and
that's
to
do
some
tough
splits
in
areas
that
we
don't
hear.
A
lot
of
voices
from
that
I
believe
strongly
should
stay
at
stoller
and/or
move
Springville
to
five
oaks,
which
I'm
not
in
support
of
so
I,
think
we
have
to
either
do
one
or
the
other
or
do
what
we've
already
voted
on.
G
In
the
three
elementary
bunk
is
what
I
would
like
to
propose
as
a
falling
so
like
what
John
said
if
I'm
going
to
look
at
this
relates
in
a
different
way,
I'm
going
to
look
at
it
in
a
way
that
we
can
do
elementary
boundary
adjustment,
the
part
of
spring
will
that
it's
south
of
spring
will
row.
That's
actually
poverty
area
and,
like
John,
said
matter
beta
voice,
never
heard
so
doing.
The
split
there
might
be
a
difficult
one.
G
The
south
part
of
sato
is
also
in
poverty
area.
Doing
this
plate.
There
will
also
be
a
difficult
on
difficult
decision
to
take.
The
south
part
of
Jacob
is
more
like
Steve.
You
just
said,
as
missus
diversity
that'll
be
difficult
to.
So
what
I
would
like
to
point
to
is
we
have
heard
from
friendly
working
parents
I
want
to
say
Erica,
Frankel
and
Ricky
Brock
from
the
Bronson
Creek
neighborhood.
G
So
let
me
do
my
I
can
only
get
one
of
the
other,
so
this
is
the
friendly
walking
neighborhood
that
we
got
feedback
from
that
struggles
walking.
So
for
a
moment,
if
you
think
there
is
no
boundary.
If
this
fart
has
trouble
walking
the
park
next
to,
it
is
going
to
see
the
same
terrain
without
the
same
problem.
G
So
given
a
choice
of
making
splits
on
fault
area
here
here
here,
what
I
would
recommend
as
a
part
of
Jacob,
which
is
this
one
that
feeds
too
friendly
and
close
to
Timberland,
that
will
give
ease
of
numbers
in
2025
will
potentially
bring
us
down
to
below
1200
and
because
there
is
actually
no
2020
for
a
target.
I
think
one
classroom
below
what
we
have
today
might
be
a
good
go.
Thomson.
B
So
let
me
paraphrase
what
you
just
said
out
of
Jack
you're,
suggesting
that
the
committee
discussed
as
a
potential
split
for
the
Stoller
middle
school
area
is
that
the
easternmost
part
of
Jacob
whismur's
attendance
boundary
be
removed
from
the
Stoller
feeding
pattern
and
made
part
of
the
fiddly.
And
it's.
D
K
The
only
issue
I
have
with
that
proposal
is
that
those
neighbourhoods
that
you're
planning
to
swap
show
a
declining
enrollment
in
from
2021
to
2025.
So
before
trying,
if
many
of
us
are
having
issues
with
the
2025
growth
I,
don't
know
that
that's
really
going
to
get
us
there,
because
those
areas
actually
help
Stoller
in
the
sense
of
the
declining
growth,
Thank.
P
D
K
I
G
So
the
area
next
to
it,
which
is
unfriendly
today
we
heard
from
them
a
few
few
emails,
Mehta
sniffle
to
walk
so
just
before
I.
Let
you
talk
back
I'm,
sorry,
Finley
does
elseways
there's
about
200
below
capacity,
that's
one
and
device
right,
it's
walkable
to
Jacob,
but
if
we
were
to
make
a
call
on
splits
between
poverty
or
not
man,
how
would
go
with
this
one?
All
the
other
options
are
possible
and.
H
That
was
my
second
question,
because
I
agree
you
just
bring
up.
Maybe
one
split
that
I
didn't
see
that
I
would
consider,
because
all
the
others
I
think
are
off
the
table
in
my
opinion,
so
do
we
know,
can
we
confirm
that
the
free
and
reduced
lunch
and
diversity
of
numbers
in
there
wouldn't
be
significantly
different?
If
we
move
that
out
of
solar,
that's.
B
E
So
Finley
is
permanent
capacity
is
703
and
call
at
seven
hundred
years.
Enrollment
is
six
thirty.
Six,
that
is
a
decline
from
last
year
of
685
and
Finley
is
projected
to
decline
gradually
over
the
next
few
years,
so
based
on
that
Finley
could
could
receive
additional
students
from
Jacob
Whismur
without
sending
students
to
Jacob
Whismur
Jacob
Whismur
is
above
its
permanent
capacity
as
of
this
year,
so
anything
added
to
Jacob
Weisberg
needs
to
be
offset.
P
D
B
D
B
Whismur
now
I'm
also
going
to
ask
the
question,
as
Robert
suggested
in
terms
of
swaps
but
I'm,
going
to
follow
that
up
that
question
up.
So
the
first
question
is
the
split
that
Abba
jet
had
it
suggested.
The
next
question
will
be
the
split
that
Jason
suggested,
which
would
be
a
swap
with
the
Oak
Ridge
and
the
southern
part
of
Jacob
Whismur.
Okay,
so
first
question
asked
this
portion
of
Jacob
Whismur
over
here
on
the
east
side
would
be
removed
from
Jacob
Whismur
added
to
Finley
and
would
then
feed
into
Timberland
and
not
Stoller.
B
L
D
M
B
That
was
gonna,
be
my
next
question.
Sorry,
so
we
could,
let's
move
them
all
together.
Okay,
so
let's
be
clear,
we're
talking
about
in
this
case,
three
moves
all
right
number
one:
the
area
south
of
Stoller,
the
Oak
Ridge
Estates
that
would
be
moved
to
Jacob
Whismur,
the
area
east
of
Stoller
and
the
eastern
part
of
Jacob
lysmer
would
move
to
Finley
and
then
the
southern
most
grid
code
in
the
Jacob,
Whismur
tenets
area
and
I'm.
Talking
about
this
area
right
here
would
move
out
of
Whismur
and
into
Finley
any
questions
on
that
Jason
Steve.
F
Mike,
quick
math
tells
me
that
if
we
do
all
three
based
on
the
numbers,
Robert
just
mentioned
for
Finley,
we've
overflowed
Findlay
I,
think
the
the
two
blue
ones
going
going
yellow
are
too
large
in
comparison
to
the
ones
going
the
other
direction,
but
but
happy
to
be
corrected
if
I'm
wrong,
I'm,
just
taking
the
numbers
here
and
doubling
them.
So.
D
B
B
All
of
the
map
would
be
olives
Springville
all
of
Sato.
We
will
move
the
eastern
part
of
Jacob
Whismur
Finley.
We
would
move
the
southern
part
of
Whismur
Finley
and
we
would
do
the
Oak
Ridge
Estates
area
moved
out
of
Finley
Whismur,
and
that
would
be
your
feeder
pattern
for
Stoller
any
questions
before
we
do
the
vote
going
once
twice.
B
L
B
B
I'm
sorry,
Jill,
okay,
Bill's
asked
for
a
repeat
of
the
question:
all
of
Springville
all
of
SOT:
oh
no
Summa,
this
part
of
Whismur
going
to
Finley
that
part
of
Whismur
going
to
Finley
and
when
I
say
that
I'm
talking
about
the
east
side
of
Whismur
and
the
south
side
of
Whismur
recall
on
the
hands.
On
the
vote
of
that,
okay
I
see
five
on
that.
G
Steve
one
comment:
I
think:
instead
of
just
stating
the
option
and
approximate
number
of
production
in
2025
Robert,
we
can
just
add
those
I
think
that's
where
the
confusion
might
be
coming
from.
If
we
are
doing
this
wops,
but
what's
impact
for
20-25
is
not
clear
and
I
mean
if
you
remove
the
south
part,
let's
gonna
get
it
down
to
close
to
hundred
kids.
D
P
Real
hard
feedback
online
from
the
Jacob
is
my
parents
I
think
it
was
in
the
today's
comments
about
the
feeder
pattern
when
they
go
to
Stoller
and
then
move
on
to
the
high
school
sunset.
So
at
this
place,
that
is
being
suggested.
I
feel
like
that
percentage
will
go
down
further
when
they
do.
You
know
they're
all
together,
installer
and
then
they
move
on
to
the
high
school.
It
is
the
same
problem
we
are
having
with
Oak
Hill.
It's
just
feels
to
me,
like
you're,
transferring
or
enlarging
the
problem
area.
P
B
So
I'm
not
seeing
a
clearly
not
a
consensus
here
on
splits,
as
suggested
by
Jason
and
Abba
Chet.
I've
also
heard
that
and
John
talked
about
split
at
Springville
as
unacceptable.
So
let
me
try
and
rephrase
this
without
creating
a
boundary,
but
talking
about
is
the
committee
willing
to
look
at
splits
at
the
following
schools:
I'm
not
saying
we're
going
to
do
it
I'm
not
saying
we
are.
We
have
a
map
for
you
to
consider.
What
I
am
saying
is.
B
If
you
are
willing
to
consider
those
those
splits,
we
will
bring
something
forward
to
you
for
your
consideration,
understand
or
understood
rather,
okay.
So,
first
Sato
is
the
committee
willing
to
consider
without
understanding
where
it
would
go?
Is
the
committee
willing
to
consider
a
split
of
the
Sato
area
out
of
feeding
stoller?
That
is
a
binary?
Yes,
no
question
so
hands.
Please.
B
So
please
raise
your
hands
again
because
I
counted,
eight
I
just
want
to
be
sure
one,
two,
three,
four
okay,
so
we're
willing
to
consider
a
split
at
Sato.
All
right
next
question:
is
the
committee
willing
to
consider
a
split
at
Springville
again
same
understanding?
We
don't
know
if
we
don't
have
a
map,
we
don't
know
what
it
would
be,
but
we
would
have
to
bring
something
all
right.
We
have
a
majority
of
that.
B
Okay,
then
let
me
rephrase
the
whismur
because
of
what
we
I
want
to
be
clear,
that
you
are
not
willing
to
there.
You
are
you're,
not
you
are,
or
you
aren't
willing
to
consider
a
any
split
at
at
Jacob
Whismur.
Now
what
I'm
saying
split,
I
mean
split
and
that's
what
we're
going
to
show
you,
but
the
committee
can
turn
around.
We
will
look
at
what
it
means
to
do
a
boundary
adjustment
as
well,
but
I
want
to
be
clear.
We
will
bring
to
you
a
map
that
will
show
splits.
B
B
O
Yes,
Thank
You
Steven.
In
first
point
of
fact
they,
the
facilitation
of
the
meeting
tonight,
is
excellent.
I
think
it's
much
more
efficient
and
I
appreciate
the
work
that
you've
done
to
prepare
tonight.
Thank
you.
Secondly,
I
guess:
I
think
it
makes
them
sense
to
we're.
Gonna
have
to
come
up
with
some
other
ideas
here,
but
I'm
curious
from
the
committee
themselves.
What
for
those
that
are
not
in
favor
of
some
of
the
suggestions
we've
made,
what
is
it
that
is
the
hang-up?
Is
it
the
25
to
25
number
I?
J
J
They
are
the
sole
elementary
school
huge
bunch
of
Timberland
tiny,
a
little
bit
of
Meadow
Park
right
and
so
in
looking
at
that,
would
it
make
sense,
knowing
that
Jacob
was
marine?
Finley
have
the
largest
populations
of
suma
and
I?
Don't
like
this,
because
it
takes
no
injury.
School
outside
of
they're
very
local
school,
so
bear
with
me.
But
if
we
move
all
of
Jacob
was
murder
Timberland
right
keep
them
in
with
their
middle
school.
They
feed
directly
to
high
school
together.
Suma
students
in
Finley
and
Jacob
Wisner
go
to
soo
much
taller.
B
B
So
the
bit
of
Stoller
that
northern
bit
of
Stoller
I'm
sorry
back
up
the
northern
bit
of
Whismur
would
be
goading
with
feed
to
Stoller.
The
remainder
of
Whismur
would
go
to
Timberland.
Okay,
we're
gonna
hold
on
that
for
now,
because
we
have
a
only
a
few
more
minutes
before
we
go
to
public
testimony.
N
Think
I'm
going
to
suggest
something
equally
drastic
I
think
looking
at
the
2021
numbers
by
grid
code
and
also
the
2025,
you
can
see
that
the
areas
we
are
considering
thus
far
seem
to
be
areas
that
are
going
to
reduce
in
population.
So
to
me
it
seems
like
we
are
packing
up
the
wrong
tree.
I
think
the
hard
decision
we
have
to
make
and
I
think
we've
seen
the
indecision
of
the
committee
moving
forward
with
you
know
these
plates
and
trying
to
reconcile
still
at
90%
I.
F
Just
piggyback
you
know
what
Michael
said:
I
would
love
to
hear
from
the
folks
who've
not
vote
for
the
solutions
before
it's
essentially
a
hard
bathroom.
What
is
it
you
want
to
see,
because
if
they're
gonna
go
and
create
Maps
I'd
like
it
to
least
scope
it
to
a
number,
I
mean
how
much
more
do
you
want
to
see
she
dropped
out?
Cuz
I'd
rather
have
those
maps
to
be
targeted
to
that
solution
than
not.
K
K
Answer
the
question
is
one
of
the
folks:
I
haven't
voted
yes
quite
often
tonight,
but
it
is
that
Springville
and
thought
of
both
have
the
highest
projection
for
increasing
their
cut
in
their
in
their
numbers.
So
having
them,
what
number
do
I
want
to
see?
I
want
to
see
either
some
of
that
go
to
another
school
and
not
both
of
those
schools.
And
what
do
you
want
to
see?
I
don't
understand
the
question.
F
They're
saying
you
know,
they're
gonna
devise
a
map
and
I
think
what
people
are
reacting
to
is
the
percentage
that's
attached
to
the
20-25
number
I.
Basically,
I.
Ask
you:
what's
the
number
that's
gonna
get
give
a
yes
vote,
all
right,
Siva,
I'm,
gonna,
just
add
one
thing:
I'll
put
my
tent
back
down.
I
I
think
this
may
be
an
opportunity
for
you
to
chat
with
the
rest
of
the
district
staff,
potentially
the
board.
What
we're
running
into
is
the
the
interpret
the
interpretation
you
gave
us
of
the
board's
objective.
F
D
S
I
have
been
been
voting,
yes,
a
lot
tonight
and
I
think
or
will
actually
know
why.
Ivan
alright,
okay,
I,
do
know
why
I've
not
been
voting
yes,
but
but
a
lot
of
this
when
you've
been
giving
asking
as
a
question,
the
stipulation
has
been
that
all
the
schools
are
not
split
and
I
definitely
do
not
think
that
even
with
the
whole
grid
grid
code,
switch-up
that
we
see
here
I
definitely
agree
with
that.
But
I
don't
think
that
we
can
like.
S
S
Don't
think
that
having
solar
just
be
a
Westview
feeding
school
is
good
for
a
whole
diversity
that
we're
trying
to
approach
so
again,
I'm,
not
exactly
sure
where
I'd
want
to
see
that
split
in
Springville,
but
I
definitely
think
that
we
need
that's
something.
No,
we
need
to
do
if
we're
actually
going
to
be
able
to
get
90%
that
stoller.
N
Ritsuko,
okay,
yeah
I,
wanted
to
echo
some
of
things.
She
said,
I
think
best-case
scenario:
we
have
to
split
Springville
and
was
kissing
area.
We
have
to
move
Springville
out
I
think
we
saw
a
map
like
that
before
we
consolidated
to
this
and
in
that
map
I
forgotten
what
it
was
called,
but
I
was
seeing
to
see
through
one
or
something
and
one
of
those
variations.
We
did
see
that
we
could
achieve
ninety
percent,
a
stola
in
2021
with
spring
they've
been
out.
K
So
I
have
a
suggestion
to
make
it's
another
elementary
school
swap
between
Rock,
Creek
and
Springville.
So
the
area
that
I
am
considering
here
is
on
the
east
side.
It's
the
farthest
from
Stoller
there,
where
we
see
the
numbers
28
and
38,
and
these
are
right
next
to
Rock
Creek.
These
can
improve
the
property
numbers.
That's
dollar,
I!
Think
and
please
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
and
perhaps
we
can
swap
these
with
the
ones
that
are
on
the
west,
the
east
side
of
that
peninsula,
at
the
8
and
the.
K
C
K
B
P
So
I
do
actually
relate
to
the
desire
of
all
the
presence
of
not
splitting
the
school
and
the
kids
being
intact.
The
feeder
patterns
policy,
TT
factors
so
with
all
that
said,
I
actually
want
to
consider
Teresa's
feedback
as
ironic
as
my
sound
I
do
want
to
consider.
Jacob
is
now
moving
to
Timberland
in
exchange
of
keeping
suma
at
Stoller
with
Saito
and
spring.
Will
only
can
we
take
notes
on
it,
maybe
not
be
popular,
but
you
think
about
it.
It
will
work
in
terms
of
the
JC
policy
factors.
D
M
So,
just
to
kind
of
go
back
to
the
split
we
know
we
have
hard
decisions
to
make
I'm,
not
understanding
why
the
extreme
focus
on
Springville,
when
there
are
clearly
other
opportunities
at
sato
and
the
whismur
thing.
The
other
thing
I
just
wanted
to
mention
is
that
we
do
hear
a
lot
of
the
feedback
and
we've
heard
it
at
the
table
tonight
about
the
the
fact
that
these
committees
are
these
communities
are
so
tight-knit.
We've
also
heard
a
lot
of
the
feedback
that
school
boundaries
don't
define
a
community,
so
I
think.
M
J
And
this
is
really
just
an
answer
to
the
question
of
what
I
personally
want
to
see
in
order
to
vote.
Yes,
I
mean
it
really
needs
to
be
95
percent
or
lower
in
2025.
For
me,
I'm
permanent,
because
that's
what's
in
our
policy
and
the
policy
truly
calls
for
90,
but
for
me
to
have
an
idea
that
that
growth
area
is
not
going
to
really
blow
out
of
control.
It
really
needs
to
look
at
95
for
me
and
we
take
it.
Thank
you
for
that
feedback
that
real-time
you're
experienced
appreciate
it.
B
Okay,
so
we're
going
to
close
the
committees
discussion
at
this
point.
Clearly
we're
not
going
to
have
consensus.
Clearly
we
need
to
come
back
for
another
meeting.
We
will
talk
about
that
after
public
testimony
and
so
at
this
point,
I'm
going
to
call
our
folks
who
are
here
to
testify
this
evening.
We
have
a
number
of
cards.
We
have
13
schools
represented
this
evening,
so
those
schools
will
be
invited
to
come
up
and
speak.
We
have
10
seats
up
here.
B
T
B
K
Okay
can
I
begin
hello
committee
members,
my
name
is
Piper
wood
and
I
have
a
sixth
grader
in
Summa
and
dual
language
at
Meadow
Park
and
a
second
grader
at
allo
Huber
in
two-way
immersion
I'm
concerned
that
the
aloha
huber
community
has
not
been
adequately
considered
during
the
boundary
adjustment
process.
So
far
here
are
some
of
the
issues
that
concern
me
most
around
1/3
of
a
lo
Huber
students
are
in
the
to
immersion
program.
K
I,
do
not
know
if
you're
aware
of
this,
but
currently
a
low
Huber's
middle
school
does
not
offer
a
Spanish
Dual
Language
Program
for
the
middle
school
tweeze
students.
Unless
this
changes,
the
tweeze
students
at
a
low
e
Hueber
will
need
to
attend
another
school
in
order
to
continue
indoor
language.
If
the
dual
language
pathways
in
the
district
are
meant
to
be
12,
K
12,
how
will
the
aloha
huber
students
be
accommodated
if
they
are
slated
to
go
to
five
Oaks,
where
there's
no
Dual
Language
Program?
These?
K
Will
these
students
be
allowed
to
attend
middle
parks
to
a
language
program?
Second,
Aloha
Huber
has
925
students
and
79%
of
them
qualify
for
free
and
reduced
lunch.
Second,
only
to
William
Walker
at
95
percent,
many
Aloha
cuber
families
are
experiencing
poverty
and
food
and
housing
insecurity.
So
why
aren't
moral
Oh
Huber
parents
here
tonight
to
voice
their
concerns
because
they
work
more
than
one
job
lack
adequate
childcare
or
have
insufficient
transportation
to
be
able
to
attend
these
meetings?
K
Who
will
be
more
impacted
by
changes
in
transportation,
walkability
or
school
poverty
levels
and
demographics?
The
poor
students
whose
parents
don't
even
have
a
car
or
affluent
families
who
can
drive
their
kids
to
school
or
even
move
to
a
different
neighborhood
if
they're
really
set
on
having
their
kids
at
a
certain
school?
K
This
may
be
too
little
too
late,
but
I
implore
you
to
prioritize
the
impact
of
these
boundary
decisions
on
the
low-income
families
in
the
district,
like
those
at
a
low
Huber,
as
these
children
will
be
disproportionately
impacted
and
are
at
greatest
risk
of
not
graduating
if
the
boundary
adjustments
are
not
equitable.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
U
Hello
I'm,
a
parent
of
two
children
at
the
Barnes
immersion
program.
My
concern
was
that
the
proposed
map
split
Barnes
into
two
middle
schools.
This
is
no
longer
the
case
and
I.
Thank
you
for
that.
However,
today's
map
summary
was
the
first
time
I
heard
about
moving
at
Twi
metal
pop
from
metal
Park
to
Cedar
Park.
All
of
barns
will
be
two-way
immersion
in
five
years.
If
you're
going
to
send
nearly
all
of
Barnes
fifth
graders
to
Cedar
Park
in
2025,
why
draw
the
lines?
U
Otherwise,
if
the
lines
may
not
be
redrawn,
please
include
two-way
immersion
on
the
estimated
attendance
options
off
site.
This
makes
a
lot
of
sense
from
what
I
just
heard
about
Aloha
Cubert
Park
as
well.
I
had
no
other
requests
for
my
Barnes
parents
or
my
fellow
Barnes
parents,
part
of
this
meaning.
My
next
two
comments
are
as
the
parent
of
the
district.
First,
the
committee
has
been
making
maps
that
imply
continuity
of
neighborhoods.
This
is
this:
is
a
rough
map
I
made
that
just
blocks
out
the
deletes
large
areas
of
parks
and
commercial
areas?
U
U
I
T
Hi
there
committee
members
so
first
of
all,
I
want
to
say
thank
you
for
all
the
time
and
effort
you've
put
into
this
and
you're
super
brave
to
be
in
the
middle
of
the
crossfire
of
all
these
concerned.
Parents
and
I
just
I
know
it's
a
thankless
job,
but
I
want
to
say
thank
you
just
first
of
all.
Secondly,
you
know
I
have
a
daughter
at
Bonnie
slope.
My
other
daughter
also
went
to
Bonnie
slope
and
as
far
as
I
know,
we
don't
have
any
bunny
slope
parents
on
this
committee.
T
So
we're
really
super
trusting
you
guys
to
make
fair
great
decisions
and
I
would
say
by
and
large,
the
committee's
wisdom
has
been
really
pretty
good
and
the
really
crazy
ideas
have
been
pushed
out
and
I
want
to
say.
Thank
you
to
the
folks
that
have
done
that.
Also
sometimes
it
seems
like
these
crazier
plans
come
back
and
I
would
encourage
the
committee
not
to
continue
sort
of
endless
pushing
for
the
same
ideas
once
the
vote
has
been
made.
T
If
there's
no
new
information,
sometimes
it
feels
like
there's
a
lot
of
rehash
on
these,
but
I'd
say
you
know
the
really
the
majority
of
that's
come
out
of
this
process
is
really
making
good
choices
and
and
I'm
thankful
for
that,
with
no
representation
from
Bonnie
slope
on
this
committee,
we're
counting
on
you
and
I
really
appreciate
the
effort
you're
putting
in
please
keep
that
up
and
don't
let
the
crazy
plans
come
back
in.
Thank
you.
Thank.
D
V
I
am
a
parent
of
children
who
attend
Cooper
Mountain
elementary
and
Mountain
View
middle
school
and
I
love.
Both
schools,
I
have
I
love
the
teachers
and
the
staff
they
have
been
great
for
my
kids,
however,
I
feel
deeply
the
importance
of
speaking
out
for
Mountain
View
middle
school
tonight.
As
we
are
discussing
boundaries
and
reducing
the
overcrowding
of
some
of
the
middle
schools
in
the
North
District.
We
must
also
consider
a
different
kind
of
overcrowding
in
Mountain
View
middle.
V
According
to
the
Oregon
school
report
card,
Mountain
View
middle
school
has
the
highest
rates
of
students
living
in
poverty
and
called
qualifying
for
free
reduced
lunch
with
any
at
any
six
to
eight
middle
school.
In
the
district,
the
61%
of
students
qualifying
for
free
reduced
lunch.
The
school
is
experiencing
a
crowding
of
poverty.
We
aren't
seeing
at
other
schools
in
the
district
when
you
concentrate
poverty
in
one
school.
V
It
leads
to
lower
test
scores,
fewer
resources
for
students,
and
it
negatively
affects
the
ability
for
these
kids
to
receive
an
equitable
education
compared
to
their
kids
or
their
peers
at
higher
income
school
sociology
research
shows
an
improvement
of
scores
with
minority
families
when
poverty
is
not
concentrated,
while
we
don't
be
any
declines
and
scores
of
performance
of
middle
class
students
and
any
and
all
boundary
decisions.
The
poverty
in
Mountain,
View
middles
should
be
addressed
with
boundary
adjustments,
and
this
next
part
is
probably
not
popular
with
my
mountain
families.
V
But
one
way
to
do
this
is
to
change
feeder
school
so
that
all
of
Hooper
Mountain
elementary
with
only
18%,
free
or
reduced
lunch
feeds
into
Mountain
View
middle
school.
If
Shay
Halen
was
64
percent
or
free,
reduced
lunch
to
move
to
Highland
Park
with
only
31
percent,
free
or
reduced
lunches
would
even
out
the
poverty
levels
in
the
two
schools
making
a
chance
for
more
equitable
education
opportunities
for
students
in
the
district.
The
district
must
find
a
way
to
draw
boundaries
to
make
the
concentration
of
poverty
lower.
Now,
thank.
I
X
Hi
Steve
hi
there
committee
members
thanks
a
lot
for
your
time
tonight
to
discuss
about
scoop
down
their
conditions
sitting
here
are
all
the
parents.
We
understand
that
we
do
care
about
our
children,
family.
We
do
care
about
our
neighborhood,
so
we
all
want
to
work
out
a
best
solution.
So
first
of
all,
I
want
to
raise
a
plug
concern.
X
So
I
just
heard
a
couple:
parents
from
South,
Beaverton,
School
District
that
their
children
need
to
go
to
school
and
they
don't
have
a
good
way
to
communicate,
commute
to
schools
because
there
are
financial
situations,
so
I
hope.
That's
the
whole
committee
to
make
you
think
about
that
and
address
these
issues.
X
X
Y
Good
evening,
everyone,
my
name,
is
Ryan
and
the
father
of
three
one.
Fourth
in
one
fifth
at
Whismur
and
one
freshman
at
sunset,
when
moving
from
Stoller
to
sunset,
I
almost
lost
all
a
one
friend
to
us
view.
This
made
the
transition
extremely
difficult
with
days
of
eating
lunch
by
himself
skipping
school
events,
because
no
kid
wants
to
go
alone
and
often
being
the
odd
man
out
in
picking
project
teams
high
school
at
a
time
when
strong
social
networks
significantly
influence
academic
achievement.
Y
Success
is
a
team
effort
in
being
alone
and
isolated
is
a
significant
disadvantage.
So
this
brings
me
to
the
latest
map.
Today.
Stoller
is
an
equitable
four
to
one
percent
feeder
into
Sunset.
Jacob
Whismur
is
already
split
between
West
View.
In
sunset,
however,
this
was
mitigated
by
having
Finley
by
removing
family.
Stoller's
representation
is
slashed
from
four
to
one
percent
to
an
anemic
17
percent.
To
further
compound
the
issue,
some
suggest
removing
suma
from
Stoller
Jacob
whismur's
fifth
grade
class.
Y
This
year
has
50
percent
tumor
eligible
kids,
so
this
proposal
is
particularly
devastating
to
our
community
by
reducing
the
feeder
percentage
to
a
single
digit.
We
understand
some
committees
must
sacrifice
to
make
the
numbers
work.
However,
slashing
the
feeder
pattern
from
41
percent
to
a
single
digit
place
an
outside
burden
on
our
community
for
reference,
Oak
Hill
does
at
14%
situation.
Everyone
recognizes
must
be
fixed.
We
urge
the
committee
to
make
things
right
for
them
input
oakley,
easton
timberland.
We
also
urge
the
committee
to
learn
from
past
mistakes
and
not
repeat
this
for
Jacob
Whizzer.
Y
We
request
serious
consideration
to
bring
back,
welcome
to
me
to
improve
the
17%
feeder
pattern
if
it
cannot
be
improved
and
please
just
don't
make
it
any
worse,
it's
not
acceptable
for
kids
to
end
up
isolated
in
high
school
for
the
in
compassionate
insensitive
design.
Please
keep
100%
of
Jacob
with
our
kids
together
at
Stoller.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
I
Z
Hello,
my
name
is
Kevin
and
I
represent
the
Mackay
families
that
attend
Conestoga,
currently
and
first
of
all,
I
just
want
to
say
thank
you
for
listening
to
our
community's
feedback
and
making
adjustments
to
the
map.
Accordingly,
we
appreciate
that
and
secondly,
we
were
pleased
that
none
of
the
decisions
today
impacted
our
area,
so
we
would
just
ask
that
as
we
move
forward,
that
is
that
we
are
not
impacted
and
you
guys
keep
us
in
mind
so,
but
that
I'll
yield
back
the
time.
Thank.
W
Thirteen
students
a
quarter
of
a
school
bus,
half
of
an
elementary
class,
not
even
two-thirds
of
a
percent
of
the
2141
students
at
sunset.
Apparently
that
is
an
acceptable
feeder
pattern.
This
committee
is
aware
of
the
oke
health
problem
admits.
It
is
a
problem
and
somehow
is
okay,
perpetuating
that
problem,
and
it's
only
going
to
get
worse.
W
The
other
sunset
bound
feeder
into
the
only
try
feeding
school
in
this
map.
Meadow
Park
is
Barnes.
This
year,
Barnes
produced
the
SC's
first
ever
100%
bilingual
kindergarten
class.
Some
maintains
the
deep
roots
of
the
Dual
Language
Program.
In
six
years,
Byrnes
will
produce
BS
news.
First,
ever
100%
bilingual
school
Oak
Hills
admires
the
unparalleled
work
being
done
at
Barnes.
However,
this
work
changes
the
nature
of
Barnes
an
option
school
when
filling
out
the
dual
language
application.
W
You
read
the
family
commitment
it
seats
will
make
an
effort
to
remain
in
the
program
through
12th
grade
a
signed,
familial
commitment
for
your
child
to
remain
in
the
dual
in
the
dual
language
program
through
12th
grade
the
high
schools
that
provide
the
dual
language
program
are
aloha,
Beaverton
and
Selfridge.
Sunset
is
not
on
that
list
by
2025.
W
This
map
Falls
vastly
short
of
three
of
your
four
objectives:
Bill
Timberland
feeder
patterns
and
utilization
of
space
at
school
mile
park
at
107
percent
capacity,
while
Timberland
sits
at
88
with
128
vacant
seats.
This
map
keeps
Meadow
Park
as
the
only
try
feeder
in
the
district
remedy.
All
and
move
your
Timberland
boundary
a
half
mile
to
the
west
and
include
sunset
bounds.
Oak
Hill.
AA
T
AA
Name
is
Eric,
Johnson
I
have
a
fourth
grader
at
Ridgewood
and
one
will
be
in
kindergarten
next
year.
We've
spent
a
lot
of
time
talking
about
having
too
many
kids
at
one
school,
it
seems
like
Cedar
Park
is
barely
going
to
have
any
kids
left
in
this
particular
map.
It
seems
like
there's
a
loss
of
over
fifty
percent.
AA
AA
It
looks
like
there
was
a
portion
of
Raleigh
Park
that
had
been
part
of
Cedar
that
had
been
taken
back,
it
seems
like
potentially,
would
make
more
sense
to
just
put
all
the
Raleigh
Park
in
Cedar
as
well
to
keep
those
numbers
a
little
higher
I
think
worth
60%
capacity,
potentially
at
one
point
anyway,
I
don't
have
much
else
to
add
I've
just
concerned.
We
spent
so
much
time
talking
about
too
many
kids
in
a
school.
We
should
probably
think
about
not
having
enough
in
other
ones
we're.
Thank
you.
Thank.
X
AB
AB
One
of
the
things
that's
important
is
listen
to
the
whole
community
and
not
only
those
that
speak
up
or
are
largely
present,
as
one
of
the
prior
speaker
said,
there's
a
reason
why
some
parents
are
not
here,
I
think
the
map
you
show
today
is
better
than
one
of
the
prior
maps
that
you
showed
regarding
Rock
Creek,
in
which
you
moved
only
Rock
Creek
out
of
the
area.
I.
AB
Think
such
a
change
is
not
okay,
it
really
disturbs
the
area,
so
I
think
this
map
from
that
point
of
view,
is
better
for
Rock
Creek,
as
well
as
for
the
receiving
schools.
Please
keep
feeding
schools
together
as
much
as
possible,
so
moving
Rock
Creek
with
Bethany
with
Oak
Hills.
That's
a
good
decision,
don't
split
the
small
communities
and,
like
I,
said
it's
a
not
necessarily
the
whole
audience.
That's
here
present
that
has
an
equal
voice.
Rock
Creek
in
itself
is
already
a
small
community.
AB
AC
Thank
You
committee
for
giving
me
this
opportunity.
I,
am
because
part
of
a
parent
of
two
girls,
one
was
in
our
fourth
grade
in
SATA
school
one
was
gone
through
her
first
two
years
of
schooling
at
Springville
and
was
one
fine
day.
Two
years
ago
was
told
to
go
to
a
completely
new
school
saddle
and
make
complete
emotional
and
social
adjustments,
and
then
I
have
another
little
one,
we're
yet
to
start
school
and
hopefully
will
not
have
to
go
through
the
ordeal
that
her
older
sister
did
when
we
are
a
community.
AC
What
is
the
first
thing?
We
practice?
No
child
gets
left
behind,
and
no
community
should
get
split
everything
that
I
have
seen
or
heard
since
October
and
faced
in
the
last
couple
of
years
that
my
older
daughter
has
been
absolutely
contrary
to
this
basic
thought.
My
daughter's
spent
her
kindergarten
and
first-grade
in
Springville,
hoping
for
everlasting
friendships.
At
the
end
of
her
first
grade,
she,
with
a
number
of
other
kids
of
our
community,
were
unwillingly,
moved
over
to
a
new
school
fatto
note
that
we
share
a
common
wall
with
kids
who
are
going
to
spring.
AC
Well,
yes,
a
common
wall.
It
was
an
emotional
moment
for
kids
and
parents
alike
on
both
sides
of
the
wall.
We
have
continued,
making
them
participate
in
activities
together,
such
as
FLL
sports,
etc.
With
the
friends
across
the
wall,
so
one
fine
day
a
couple
of
years
later,
they
could
be
reunited
in
the
same
school.
AC
I
would
like
to
add
that
my
daughter
is
on
track
to
get
into
Summa
program,
but
I
have
categorically
asked
her,
and
she
is
clear
that
she
would
select
her
friends
over
Summa
and
be
parents
agree
with
her
as
someone
who
has
not
gone
through
the
educational
system.
Here,
it
pains
for
me
to
see
that
we
have
already
started
to
separate
kids
on
the
basis
of
their
educational
intelligence
rather
than
emotional
intelligence.
The
committee's
needs
to
come
together
in
support
of
a
solution
that
will
not
isolate
or
marginalize
marginalize
any
of
our
kids.
AC
This
includes
not
just
keeping
the
communities
together,
but
also
ensuring
that
there
is
a
proper
student
split,
an
appropriate
mix
with
regards
to
the
school
teachers.
So
we
look
out
for
the
interests
of
all
kids,
not
kids,
of
one
community.
In
closing,
I
would
like
to
request
to
not
separate
Chateau
from
it
Western
neighbors
Springville,
whom
they
are
closely
intertwined
with
and
additionally
a
lot
of
committee
members
talked
about
numbers,
but
there
was
nothing
to
show
on
the
screen
to
the
larger
participation
here,
which
was
intriguing
to
me,
sir.
Okay,.
AD
Well,
I
guess
my
shirt
says
it
all:
I'm,
a
single
parent,
but
I
come
here
representing
not
just
my
school,
but
a
majority
of
Bethany.
What
I
have,
in
my
hand,
is
about
300
families
who
have
come
here
without
borders.
Matt.
You
said
that
we,
we
are
a
community
not
with
the
borders
that
are
on
the
map.
This.
This
petition
here
contains
people
from
satto,
Findlay,
Springville
and
Roderick,
and
we
have
fundamental
principles
that
we
want
to
come
together
here.
We
do
not
want
any
split
in
our
communities.
Keep
our
communities
together.
AD
Please
consider
the
distance
that
people
have
to
travel
in
going
to
their
middle
school.
Please
consider
giving
a
neighbor
in
Rock
Creek
in
Bethany
to
Rock
Creek,
to
go
into
the
another
middle
school
and
even
though
I
represent
Bethany
I
want
to
give
a
note
to
East
Oak
Hills
to
give
them
a
friend
in
sunset.
Peter.
AD
Most
of
all,
this
same
community
who
has
come
together
is
kind
of
dumbfounded
with
the
whole
conversation
that
has
happened
today,
because
when
we
walked
in
when
these
maps
are
released,
we
looked
at
them
and
said
this
is
a
fair
map.
It
met
a
majority
of
the
criteria
you
remove
Summa
or
the
first
one,
its
88%
in
2021
in
2025,
it's
a
hundred
and
fourteen
percent
that
does
not
warrant
us
coming
back
here
again
to
do
the
boundaries
its
13%.
There
are
many
different
ways
we
can
solve
that
problem.
AD
Please
do
not
submit
any
of
the
communities.
Please
keep
our
northern
neighbors
together.
Please
treat
us
without
borders
and
we
want
the
Bethany
community
to
be
together
like
it
was,
for
the
boundary
adjustment
process
was
done
as
one
community
and
right
now
it
feels
like
we're,
not
one
community.
We
are
trying
really
hard
really
really
hard
to
be
together.
We
love
everybody
here.
Jacob
is
where
we
love
you
too.
It's
not
abroad
waters.
AE
Thank
you
first
and
foremost,
I
want
to
thank
all
of
you
for
volunteering.
Your
time
to
work
on
this
monumental
task.
I
appreciate
that
you've
explored
different
scenarios
and
weighted
the
impact
of
transportation
costs,
continuity,
feasibility
and
capacity
projections.
There
are
things
that
I
really
like
about
this
map.
Most
importantly,
Tara
Linda
will
attend
Timberland
with
other
sunset.
AE
Theatres,
such
as
Cedar,
Mill,
bonny
slope
and
Finley
I'd,
like
you
to
consider
moving
East
Oak
Hills
sunset
bound
students
into
the
Timberland
community
as
well,
so
they
can
begin
to
form
friendships
from
sixth
grade
until
graduation,
there's
only
about
20
students
or
less
per
grade,
and
this
could
alleviate
some
of
the
forecasted
overcrowding.
As
the
map
is
shown
with
Meadow
Park.
The
fact
of
the
matter
is
the
Northwest
region
of
the
district's.
Exponential
growth
cannot
be
supported
by
Stoller
alone,
just
place.
AE
Removing
suma
from
Stoller
doesn't
make
any
sense.
Many
of
the
Asuma
students
live
within
walking
distance
and
hour
later
slated
to
go
on
to
West
View
uprooting
these
kids
busing
them
to
Timberland
being
displaced
among
sunset,
bound
students
for
three
years
and
then
transferring
back
to
west
vo
doesn't
sound
or
is
not
continuous,
feasible,
efficient
or
ideal.
Westview
needs
to
have
a
Sumer
program
at
one
of
their
local
middle
schools.
Stoller's
established
program
should
serve
its
local
community
and
retain
suma
moving
stone.
AE
Moving
solar
Asuma
puts
Timberland
over
capacity
on
day
one
as
we
approach
a
final
recommendation.
The
committee
is
often
questioned
what
their
priorities
are
supposed
to
be.
The
community
has
has
told
you
loud
and
clear
that
a
main
priority
is
for
them
to
reconcile.
Please
split
feeders,
ensuring
student
success
with
continuity.
One
way
to
help
north
of
26
is
to
move
East,
Oak
Hill
sunset
bounce
students
to
Timberland
and
not
split
Jacob
Whismur
by
removing
solar
zuma-zuma
program.
AE
D
I
B
B
Obviously
it's
going
to
take
time
because
we
did
not
get
to
a
decision
point
here
this
evening
we
will
be
at
Mountain
View
middle
school
on
the
12th.
At
that
meeting,
we're
going
to
be
bringing
you
more
materials
based
on
the
discussion
this
evening,
there's
been
a
number
of
there's
been
a
robust
conversation
should
always
say
one
thing
that
I
do
want
to
note,
and
particularly
to
the
folks
who
have
talked
about
Oak
Hills.
We
do
have
I,
have
information
on
Oak
Hills,
with
the
hope
that
we
would
get
to
that
this
evening.
B
We
didn't
so
we
will
bring
you
that
data
on
March
12th,
so
you
will
have
that
in
front
of
you
and
you
can
understand
the
you
know,
moving
then
around
what
that
would
do
to
two
Timberland
in
terms
of
moving
forward
and
what
you're
going
to
see
our
goal
here
is
to
not
have
the
row
of
six
to
eight
maps
behind
us.
That's
not
going
to
help
anybody.
What
we
will
do
is
we
will
have
graphics
of
specific
targeted
of
ebbets.
The
question
that
I
have
for
you
and
I
want.
B
D
B
Now
we
have
heard
earlier
this
evening
that
you
are
willing
to
consider
splits
at
the
three
schools
in
the
north,
the
Springville,
Sato
and
Whismur,
in
addressing
the
concern
of
Stoller
the
capacity
issue,
based
on
the
testimony
that
you
heard
here
this
evening
and
your
time
of
reflection.
Since
we
call
the
questions
earlier,
does
anybody
have
any
additional
questions
or
specific
direction?
They
want
us
to
consider
and
then
ask
the
committee
to
see
if
their
support
in
moving
forward
with
a
specific
request.
J
K
I
don't
know
if
you're
able
to
pull
up
maps
see
from
our
last
meeting,
but
there
was
a
drastic
change
to
Meadow
Park.
That
sort
of
took
me
a
little
bit
by
surprise
and
I.
Don't
know
if
I
just
wasn't
listening
closely
at
the
end,
but
working
that
see
I
would
kind
of
like
to
see
Meadow,
Park
and
Mountain
View
from
that
map
going
forward.
I
think
it
does
a
better
job
with
them,
equity
and
contiguous
boundary.
B
D
O
So,
since
we're
asking
for
other
ideas,
I
do
agree
with
the
concept
that
Rock
Creek
should
go
with
one
of
its
neighbors,
so
I'd
like
to
see
Rock
Creek
and
Bethany
at
five
Oaks
I'd
like
to
see
the
East
Oak
Hills
over
at
Timberland
in
the
West
Oak
Hills
with
the
Bethany
Rock
Creek
neighbors
I
could
go
on
with
other
ideas,
but
that
might
get
you
complicated.
I'll
leave
it
at
that.
Okay,.
D
K
100%
agreement
and
all
three
comments
so
kill,
split
and
Matt
see
Meadow
Park,
so
I
I
brought
this
up
early
on
and
kind
of
waiting
for
public
to
speak.
The
dual
language
continues
to
be
a
concern
for
me:
we've
heard
from
both
Aloha
Aloha
Hoover
and
Barnes
that
I
really
think
we
need
to
keep
those
schools
with
the
language
immersion
I'm
confused
at
the
comment
early
on
that
dual
language
would
move
from
Meadow
Park
to
Cedar
Park.
P
P
If
the
rest
of
the
committee
agrees,
the
other
change
I
would
ask
for
the
East
Oak
Hills
to
go
to
Timberland
and
I
would
also
ask
for
ruff
a
view
of
Rock
Creek
and
part
of
their
Spring
will
go
to
5ox
I
also:
request
aloha
Huber
split
between
Mountain
View
and
Cedar
Park,
given
the
emphasis
on
dual
language.
It
makes
sense
for
some
of
the
population
to
be
unique
to
see
the
park.
If
that's
where
the
program
is
offered,
if
it
makes
sense,
maybe
Bounce
elementary
also
take
some
of
that
dual
language.
Kids.
R
P
D
G
G
A
G
Worked
for
last
couple
of
meetings
to
close
those
right,
so
I
think
going
back
to
splits,
saying:
let's
make
the
numbers
work
it's
backwards
in
my
mind:
no
okay,
so
we
voted
on
this
map.
Now
the
only
other
map
that
is
not
a
splits,
let's
see
2001
so
I,
would
say:
let's
bring
that
back
and
see
where
we
go
with
that
right,
but
but
just
to
comment
on
the
numbers.
G
We
discussed
this
one
of
the
meetings
that
if
you
take
the
2025
night
resident
population
and
divide
by
total
permanent
capacity,
the
district
mean
is
90
percent
and
you
are
going
to
go
to
100
percent
for
use
of
permanent
capacity.
So
it's
almost
unrealistic
to
say:
stoller
should
be
at
95
in
2025,
because
that
will
force
us
to
do
unnatural,
splits
and
I.
I
just
cannot
buy
that,
and
no
so
like
Jason
was
pointing
out
I
think
some
hard
decisions
are
to
be
made,
but
again
I
would
say.
G
If
we
have
to
consider
two
maps,
one
would
be
two
days
and
the
other
one
will
be
2.1
and
I
thought
you
are
going
to
take
today's
map
when
you're
doing
the
splits.
But
now
knowing
what
you
just
said,
I'll
take
back
my
vote
on
site
Oh,
so
I
don't
want
to
see
satisfied
I
think
there
was
a
deadlock
so
like
just
get
that
out.
I
don't
want
to
see
too
many
splits.
Let's
start
with
2.1
entire
spring.
G
G
There
was
a
comment
today
about
Cooper
mountain
elementary
feeding
into
Mountain
View
entirely
and
the
part
of
Salem
that
feeds
in
Mountain
View,
fitting
into
Highland
Park.
So
I'm
not
asking
you
to
make
a
new
map.
What
I'm
asking
is?
Should
that
happen?
What
would
be
the
free
and
reduced
lunch
changes
in
Mountain,
View
and
Highland
Park?
So
Martinez
47%
an
island
park
was
much
below
the
average
does
that
get
closer
to
each
other
and
with
the
space
created
may
we
can
put
Highland
Park
Zoo
minder.
P
G
D
N
Yeah
so
I
think
I'm.
Looking
at
the
maps
we
have
with
us
the
map
we
have
today,
I
think
it's
it's
a
good
map.
Although
we've
seen
a
loft
which
Bacchus
I
forget
I'm
the
numbers.
What
what
I
just
want
to
know
is
is
the
district
willing
to
consider
portables,
first
Ola,
maybe
just
Ola
and
norrisville
in
the
district
beyond
2025.
N
B
The
committee
cannot
get
to
a
decision
point
without
using
portables.
You
can
make
that
recommendation
that
you've
tried
it
every
different
way
and
you
just
can't
get
there
for
different
reasons,
whatever
they
baby,
and
that
is
a
recommendation
that
you
can
provide
whether
or
not
that
gets
implemented
is
the
question.
But
if
you
have
looked
at
it
every
single
way
that
you
think
you
can
and
he
can't
get
there,
that's
a
recommendation
that.
N
You
need
to
make,
and
the
reason
I
say
that
is
because
I
think
this
is
perhaps
the
best
math
we
can
do
when
it
comes
to
keeping
the
communities
together.
Every
other
variation
we're
going
to
have
so
so
every
other
operation
we're
going
to
have
I,
think
the
map,
through
the
maps
e
2.1
I,
think
it
does
a
better
job
in
terms
of
permanent
capacity
in
stole
at
ninety
percent
and
all
those.
But
a
map
doesn't
really
look
as
pretty
as
this
in
terms
of
keeping
the
community
together.
N
So
if
the
114
percent,
as
you
mean
some
assume
I,
was
taking
two
Timberland,
that's
something
we
can
forgive
and
say:
okay,
we're
just
going
to
use
portables,
then
I
think
this
is
a
good
map.
The
only
addition
I
would
just
like
to
see-
or
the
only
original
like
to
see-
is
the
eastern
okie
problem,
and
that
would
mean
recommending
a
change
to
the
iSchool
boundary,
whether
that
means
shifting
from
the
boundaries
or
Jacob
Whismur
accommodates
the
demo
cues
in
West,
View
or,
however,
one
stone
to
that.
I
think
that
we
could
afford.
Okay.
H
Charlotte
thanks
Steven
and
thanks
everyone
for
your
public
testimony.
I
thought
it
was
all
excellent.
Thank
you
and
thanks
for
the
committee
for
continued,
have
tough
dialogue,
I,
really
appreciate
and
respect
all
of
you
for
the
dialogue
that
we're
having
I
do
want
to
say,
though,
I
agree
strongly
with
a
budget
that
I
would
rather
not
see
more
splits
rather
than
having
a
marginally
over
capacity
Stoller
to
the
goal.
I
I,
don't
I,
don't
think
that
makes
a
lot
of
sense
to
me.
H
F
Just
read
it
what
I
said
earlier
just
hearing
the
last
testimonies
that
I
ever
nay
do
you
think
we
need
some
clarification
so
we're
all
using
the
same?
Measuring
stick
because
clearly
we're
not.
There
seems
to
be
a
lot
of
confusion
about
90%
when
I
think
alot
of
us
were
quite
clear.
It
was
21,
but
if
we're,
if
someone's
name
aiming
for
95
percent
in
25,
that's
really
now
we're
talking
about
more
like
70
in
21.
It's
just
we're
going
to
need
some
specific
set
of
directives.
F
F
We
can
judge
for
ourselves
what
the
what
the
moves
are
and
I
would
put
it
to
the
folks
who
weren't
willing
to
vote
today
come
on
come
to
the
next
meeting
with
a
proposal
send
it
send
it
via
email,
but
you've
got
the
numbers
right
here,
pick
something
that's
gonna
meet
your
target
and
let's
go,
but
I
do
think.
We
need
some
clarification
to
make
people
more
comfortable.
R
Okay,
I,
don't
like
the
splits
in
the
elementary
school
but
I
agree
with
India.
I
would
like
to
see
a
law
Huber
part
just
switch
between
Mountain,
View
and
metal
part,
because
some
of
those
kids
they
go
to
a
lawyer
part
can
look
out
the
window
and
see
Mountain
View.
They
could
just
walk
right
across
the
street,
so
I
would
like
the
scene.
Maybe
something
else
play
Lynette.
D
K
I
just
want
to
say
that
I
totally
agree
with
everything.
Jason
said:
I
am
now
feeling
a
little
worried
about
the
progress,
we're
making
I
think
we
are
about
to
really
discuss
every
single
thing
we
discuss
in
October
and
I.
Think
we
are
in
a
good
point.
We
can
move
forward,
please,
let's
think
twice
before
we
go
back
because
time
is
running
and-
and
we
have
discussed
many
of.
K
M
So,
just
echoing
a
lot
of
what
we're
hearing
I
did
agree
with
Jason
as
well.
I
really
do
believe
that
we
have
what
we
need
and
we
are
going
right
back
to
whether
you
put
them
up
there
or
put
them
on
easels,
where
we've
got
way
too
many
maps
we're
hearing
a
lot
of
people
saying
that
and
can
we
propose
before
we
leave
tonight
that
we
vote
whether
or
not
we
just
stick
with
this
map.
I.
O
Thanks
Steve
I
joined
what
Jason
is
saying.
We
do
not
need
to
see
another
map.
We
have
more
than
enough
information
to
make
a
decision.
We
have
one
map
up
there.
We
can
all
talk
about
like
you
did
tonight,
I
thought
it
was
fantastic,
the
differ
ways
we
could
massage
it
and
keep
voting
until
we
reach
some
sort
of
consensus,
and/or
majority
vote.
O
If
you
bring
five
more
maps
in
yeah,
we're
gonna,
be
here
next
year
and
half
this
committee
isn't
gonna
come
back
right,
so
we've
got
to
get
a
handle
on
this
and
there
needs
to
be
clear
leadership.
The
reality
is
this:
we've
been
given
several
pieces
of
a
puzzle,
but
not
all
of
them.
Not
all
of
these
pieces
are
going
to
fit
together
and
I.
Think
some
members
of
this
community
and
this
committee
think
that
there's
going
to
be
an
answer
that
this
puzzle
is
going
to
create
this
perfect
picture.
O
B
So
let
me
try
and
summarize
here
I
have
a
number
of
questions
that
I'm
going
to
ask
and
I
think
there
is
clear
direction
on
a
number
and
there
are
not
on
others
before
I
move
on
to
that
I
want
to
be
clear:
I
am
not
proposing
to
come
with
I
forget
the
number
you
well
we're
not
coming
with
12
maps.
We
are.
We
are
coming
with
one
map.
What
we
will
provide
to
you
in
your
materials
are
data,
for
you
to
you
know,
understand
on
the
different
choices.
B
Okay,
so
the
one
map
we're
going
to
start
I'm.
Sorry
we're
going
to
start
off
of
the
map
that
you
saw
tonight.
Okay,
there
will
be
changes
based
on
what
you
tell
us
that
what
you
want
to
see
but,
as
Mike
just
said,
a
lot
of
these
different
options.
You've
already
seen
in
different
maps
going
back
to
November,
December,
and
so
where
I
have
no
interest
and
I
know
you
do
have
not
any
interest
in
going
backwards,
but
this
is
information
that
we
have.
B
B
A
B
N
F
I
can
jump
jump
in
here.
I
I
looked
at
this
exaction
earlier,
the
it's
a
great
looking
boundary
to
have
Rock
Creek,
Bethany,
West,
Oak,
Hills,
al
monic,
McKinley,
Beaver,
acres,
2021.
It
doesn't
work
at
all
2025,
it
actually
works
perfectly.
But
but
it's
it's
it's
one
of
those
areas.
It's
gonna
drop
by
like
three
or
four
hundred
in
that
four-year
gap.
That's
the.
F
B
D
B
I
B
P
D
K
D
B
B
D
D
B
D
B
B
For
data
I
did
hear
about
the
you
know,
I
think
Cherise
and
others
were
talking
about
95
percent
in
terms
of
2025.
That
is
not
consistent.
That
is
not
a
part
of
our
objectives
for
the
board.
The
board
objectives
was
approximately
90
and
we
are
using
that
for
2021
if
you
as
a
board
or
as
a
committee
rather
want
to
have
that
discussion
in
terms
of
what
the
numbers
should
be
in
2025
you're
welcome
to
have
that.
But
that
is
not
something
that
we're
going
to
bring
forward
to
you.
As
you
know,
data
analysis.
B
G
P
My
concern
is
exactly
what
a
beauty
products
I,
don't
think
numbers
going
to
account.
We
shouldn't
be
wasting
time,
trying
to
put
these
two
schools
together
when
a
low
Hubert
their
same
concern
when
you
feed
RC
in
Rock,
Creek
and
percentage
of
Springville
into
five
rocks
along
with
a
lawyer,
but
we've
seen
a
map
with
that
comment.
Paucity,
that's
correct,
so
I
would
express
the
committee
to
reconsider
the
voting
on
allow
Huber.
For
those
reasons
please,
okay,.
B
L
K
B
B
D
B
Right
I
am
going
to
close
the
proceedings
here.
I
want
to
call
attention
to
that.
We
are
going
to
be
at
mountains,
view
on
March
12th,
to
put
on
your
calendar.
We
had
reserved
a
date
in
early
April.
I
will
send
that
around
to
you
for
internal
discussion,
I'd
like
for
you
to
go
home
and
be
with
your
families,
and
I
will
send
that
out
to
you
tomorrow
we
can
have
a
digital
meeting
in
terms
of
your
availability
on
those
dates
which
we
will
then
advertise
to
everybody.