►
From YouTube: Bellevue City Council Meeting - September 6, 2022
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
Thank
you,
councilmember
Barksdale.
Could
you
please
leave
us
in
the
tags.
A
Indivisible
with
liberty
and
justice
for
all
right,
okay,
we
have
three
proclamations
tonight,
the
first
one,
actually
we'll
start
with
the
welcoming
week,
Proclamation,
which
is
going
to
be
read
by
council,
member
Lee
and
I.
Have
it
here
as
a
hard
copy
this
council
member?
C
Racial
inequality
and
discriminatory
treatment
against
residents
who
were
born
in
another
country
are
black
indigenous
other
people
of
color,
lgbtqia,
plus
latinx
and
other
identities,
and
whereas
to
capitalize
on
diversity
as
an
asset.
Our
community
must
strive
to
create
a
culture
and
environment
that
and
that
ensure
everyone
can
belong
and
strive.
C
A
D
Now,
therefore,
I
on
behalf
of
Lynn
Robinson,
mayor
of
the
city
of
Bellevue
Washington
and
on
behalf
of
the
city
council,
do
hereby
Proclaim
September
2022
as
hunger,
action
and
awareness
month
in
the
city
of
Bellevue
and
strongly
urge
all
residents
to
join
area
food
banks
in
Sharing
what
they
can
to
support
our
neighbors
who
are
hungry.
Thank
you.
A
E
and
whereas
it
is
essential
for
all
vehicle
Riders
to
become
more
aware
of
the
inherent
risks
and
safety
imperatives
involved
with
driving
a
car.
And
it
is
the
responsibility
of
people
driving
to
understand
the
power
they
have
when
behind
the
wheel
and
whereas
urging
all
citizens
of
our
community
to
become
aware
of
the
potential
danger
involved
in
operating
an
automobile
and
for
people
driving
and
riding
in
vehicles
alike,
to
partake
in
and
support
safe
driving
habits.
A
G
F
Name
is
ishika
binu
and
I'm,
a
senior
at
Interlake,
High,
School,
and
so
the
issue
I'm
here
to
talk
about
is
safe,
driving,
so
Nationwide
we
experience
at
least
5.2
million
collisions
and
out
of
that
at
least
38
000
of
those
result
in
fatalities
and
one
of
the
major
causes
of
these
car
collisions
is
distracted.
Driving.
G
Another
big
issue
related
to
fatalities
in
cars
is
the
fact
that
many
people
in
our
nation
don't
use
seat
belts.
In
fact,
almost
10
percent
of
people
Nationwide,
don't
wear
their
seatbelt
and
51
of
passengers
who
were
killed
were
not
restrained
by
it.
In
addition,
another
issue
is
drowsy
driving
with
as
many
as
a
hundred
thousand
accidents
occurring
due
to
this
issue,.
F
As
I
previously
mentioned,
distracted
driving
is
the
number
one
reason
for
car
collisions.
Other
reasons
are
uninformed
drivers,
who
are
unaware
of
the
power
they
have
behind
the
wheel,
and
these
are
usually
teenagers
or
new
drivers
who
aren't
as
experienced
another
root
cause
is
drunk
drivers,
drunk
drivers
are
impaired
and
therefore
their
decision
making
and
their
reaction
time
is
reduced.
G
G
So
there's
several
things
that
all
of
us
can
do
to
drive
more
safely.
One
is
to
not
text
while
driving,
since
this
leads
to
more
distraction,
and
even
a
second
of
inattention
can
cause
an
accident.
Another
thing
we
can
do
is
to
not
drive
all
under
the
influence
of
drugs
or
alcohol,
as
this
impairs
the
Judgment
coordination
and
reaction
time
also
to
always
wear
a
seatbelt
while
driving.
G
G
A
A
A
A
B
Thank
you
mayor
this
evening.
There
are
a
total
of
six
speakers
signed
up
for
oral
Communications
and
I
will
remind
the
public
that
oral
Communications
is
for
a
period
of
no
more
than
30
minutes.
Each
speaker
will
be
allowed
up
to
three
minutes
to
speak
and
only
three
persons
are
permitted
to
speak
to
one
side
of
any
particular
topic.
B
In
addition
tonight
there
is
a
public
hearing
later
on
the
council's
agenda
and
that
public
hearing
is
related
to
resolution
10133
and
is
related
to
the
public
benefit
rating
system.
The
council
can
only
hear
comments
on
that
public
hearing
underneath
the
public
hearing
agenda
item,
if
you
have
signed
up
incorrectly
for
oral
Communications
I
will
stop
you
and
ask
you
to
move
to
the
public
hearing
the
at
this
point.
I'll
call
our
first
speaker
for
oral
Communications,
which
is
Sarah
Powers,
who
I
believe
is
joining
us
in
person.
Yes,
thank
you.
H
Hello,
my
name
is
Sarah
Powers
I
am
here
to
talk
about
trees
and
tree
policy
for
Bellevue
I
was
born
and
raised
in
Washington
I've
lived
in
Bellevue
for
the
last
23
years.
What
brought
me
to
Bellevue
was
a
lot
of
things.
My
friends
talked
about.
Schools
were
the
number
one
and
a
couple
of
these
council
members
actually
helped
me
in
raising
my
two
kids
with
my
spouse
in
different
ways.
Councilwoman
Zahn
was
a
girl
scout
leader,
for
my
daughter
and
I
was
with
a
councilwoman
Robinson
Robertson
at
Summerset
on
the
PTA
executive
Council.
H
So
a
lot
of
good
memories
in
this
city.
We've
lived
in
two
different
areas.
Since
we've
lived
here,
we
were
in
tamashanter
area
and
then
in
2004
we
moved
to
our
current
home
in
cougar
Hills
and
unlike
previous
times
in
our
city,
we
had
choices
when
we
bought
our
house
in
2004,
and
we
had
three
houses
we
liked
and
and
the
one
we
nicknamed.
The
tree
house
is
what
we
ultimately
bought.
H
H
Wildfires
took
out
a
great
number
of
our
trees,
so
I've
had
a
lot
of
focus
on
trees.
In
my
life,
I
bought
a
house
with
trees
and,
in
the
short
time,
I
feel
like
I've
lived
in
Bellevue.
There's
been
a
lot
of
changes
with
the
trees.
10
minute
walk
from
my
house,
we've
had
pretty
significant
stands
of
trees,
taken
down
all
50-year
plus
size
trees
and
even
in
my
neighborhood
across
the
street,
new
neighbors
moved
in
the
first
Windstorm
hit.
That
can
be
a
scary
thing.
H
If
you
haven't
lived
under
big
trees,
branches
came
down
and
they
took
out
all
of
their
trees
and
then
ended
up
moving
a
you
know
shortly.
Afterward
I
I
feel
like
there's
just
some
education
people
need
about
trees
and
how
to
live
with
trees
and
by
updating
the
policies
that
Bellevue
has.
That
could
do
a
lot
towards
saving
the
canopy,
because
I've
really
seen
a
significant
change.
I'm
in
my
neighborhood
I
support,
the
I
forgot
their
name
trees
for
livability
there.
H
H
B
I
B
I
Right,
I
will
start
over.
So
thank
you
and
good
evening.
My
name
is
Steve
fantel
and
I
live
in
the
Somerset
West
neighborhood
on
behalf
of
Bellevue
green
and
clean
and
overdue.
I
would
like
to
urge
you
to
include
funding
for
an
adopt-a-street
program
for
Bellevue
in
the
upcoming
budget.
As
residents
of
Bellevue,
we
all
value
the
Beloved,
trees
and
Gardens
that
our
city
in
a
park
is
known,
for
we
want
our
city
to
remain
green
and
clean
for
ourselves
and
for
our
children
into
the
future.
I
However,
Bellevue
has
a
real
litter
problem:
plastic,
wrappers
and
bottles
fast,
food
packaging
and
cigarette
butts
have
become
commonplace
throughout
our
city,
and
this
has
to
stop.
Over
the
past
several
decades.
Bellevue
has
experienced
rapid
growth
and
diversification
with
the
increase
in
population
and
prosperity
has
come
an
unwelcome
increase
in
litter
throughout
the
city.
As
as
an
example.
Just
this
very
past
weekend,
I
picked
up
over
450
items
in
just
45
minutes
over
a
two
block
stretch
of
sidewalk
on
110th
Avenue
Northeast,
just
North
of
city
hall.
I
I
I
request
that
the
city
of
Bellevue
follow
the
lead
of
our
neighbors
in
Seattle,
Kirkland,
Newcastle,
Kent,
SeaTac,
Tacoma,
and
so
many
other
cities
and
counties
across
our
state
and
Across
the
Nation.
By
creating
an
adopt-a-street
program
to
tackle
the
litter
problem
in
our
city
through
partnering
citizens
with
government
businesses,
Civic
and
Faith
organizations
and
schools,
we
can
all
work
together
to
make
a
difference
in
our
community.
Adopt
a
street
will
help
keep
our
streets
and
public
right-of-way
litter-free
through
regular,
scheduled
cleanups
by
engaging
already
and
willing
volunteer
labor
pool
in
the
process.
I
We
will
encourage
private
property
owners
to
do
the
same
through
leading
by
example.
Adopt
a
street
is
an
affordable,
inclusive
program
for
promoting
Community
Pride
by
strengthening
neighborhood
bonds.
It
is
also
consistent
with
the
city's
environmental
stewardship
plan
with
regard
to
materials,
management,
waste
reduction
and
natural
systems.
I
support,
green
I
support
a
green
and
clean
Bellevue
I
support
adopt
a
street
and
I
urge.
You
to
do
the
same,
so
please
fund
an
adopt
a
street
program
for
Bellevue
with
the
upcoming
budget.
Thank
you
very
much
for
your
time,
foreign.
J
Psychopath
so
my
name,
Alex
Zimmerman
and
I
once
speak
about
local
fascism,
I'm
all
sick
man.
You
know
what
this
means
so,
maybe
stupid.
So
something
happened
when
you
want
to
interrupt
me.
Let
me
know
so:
I
can
change
something
different
about
fascism,
President,
Biden,
absolutely
right.
50
percentage,
American
is
a
pure
fascist,
with
Nazi
gestapo
principle
and
I.
Give
you
couple
examples,
so
you
know
about
what
is
I'm
talking,
Seattle
console
when
you
speak,
give
us
only
one
minute:
you
never
show
us
faces.
J
It's
still,
my
friend
here
you
know
what
is
mean
black
guy.
We
present
today
in
Seattle
council.
Is
this
only
one
because
I
spoke
around
in
every
places
everybody
saw
us
faces.
It
give
us
minimum
two
minutes.
Seattle
doing
this
for
last
five
months
and
I
go
in
Seattle
every
week.
Approximately
five
speeches
it
never
show
faces.
I
make
doesn't
complain,
never
happen
a
president
a
worse.
You
know
what
this
means:
she's,
a
mentally
sick
for
25
years,
elect
only
because
she's
have
a
50
percentage.
J
American
Indian
blood
is
a
stupid
decision,
classic
example
right
now
about
what
is
you
talking
about
poor
food
for
poor
people?
I,
give
you
another
example:
sound
transistry
is
a
pine
system
for
100
billion
dollars.
Couple
dozen
billion
dollars
per
right
now
look
what
they
did
with
Bellevue
right
now.
35
here
I
live
here,
nice
beautiful
city.
We
have
a
straight
line:
a
train
like
we're
in
in
big
big
city
like
New,
York
or
Moscow,
or
Toyota
in
Japan,
so
situation
very
simple
right
now
we
spent
a
hundred
billion
dollars
who
never
give
us
up.
J
One
penny
profit
see
here
six
billion
dollars
right
now,
100
million
and
everybody
talk
yeah.
We
never
will
be
have
a
profit.
It's
about
food
for
poor
people.
Another
question
what
is
very
interesting
about
driving
more
people
in
Bellevue,
more
accident
macrosophil
bring
35
000,
maybe
more,
maybe
less
so
right
now,
Bellevue
start
be
like
I,
don't
know
what
is
cockroaches
Bank,
you
know
Ken.
You
know
what
this
means.
How
can
be
good
driving
experience
when
half
population
is
come
from
Jungle
and
I?
Look!
What
is
driving
around
make
me
scared.
J
B
K
There's
going
to
be
beautiful,
art
associated
with
it,
and
the
community
has
really
come
around
to
make
this
dream
a
reality
and
again,
I
want
to
thank
you
for
all
the
decisions
you've
had
to
step
into
the
countless
hours
that
you
have
spent
trying
to
make
this
project
a
success
for
the
whole
community
and
again
I
just
want
to
thank
you
for
that.
Thank
you
for
all
you've
done
and
encourage
you
to
extend
the
ordinance.
K
L
You
so
much
good
evening,
mayor
Deputy,
Mayor
and
council
members.
I
hope
that
you
enjoyed
the
August
break.
I
did
and
during
that
time,
I
attended
the
comp
plan.
Deep
dive
on
access,
which
was
mostly
about
transportation
and
I,
was
very
glad
to
see.
It
was
well
attended.
I
recognized
a
lot
of
Bellevue
neighborhood
leaders
and
engaged
citizens,
but
I
also
was
a
little
bit
disappointed
to
find
out
that
we
had
people
from
Seattle
in
attendance.
L
L
So
you
know
we're
told
that
this
comp
plan
is
supposed
to
be.
Our
update
is
supposed
to
be
we're
encouraged
as
Bellevue
residents
and
business
owners
and
to
to
give
our
input.
L
But
what
I
see
repeatedly
is
that
we
have
special
interest
groups
that
come
in
I
watched
that
Deep
dive
being
shopped
online
by
Future
wise,
which
is
a
Statewide
group,
complete
streets,
Bellevue
I
have
no
idea,
which
particular
group
this
young
man
is
affiliated
with,
but
he
was
with
a
group
of
young
people
and
when
I
talked
to
Brook,
Broad
and
Tara
Johnson
about
this
and
asked
them
hey,
you
know
I
thought
this
was
supposed
to
be.
You
know
a
Bellevue
process
and
I
was
told
that
anyone
who
lives
works.
L
You
know,
owns
a
business
or
just
comes
here
to
play,
can
give
input,
and
you
know
I,
don't
mind
people
coming
here
to
play.
But
when
you
don't
live
here
and
you
come
in
and
you
drive
the
conversation,
I
mean
we
saw
that
happen
with
the
shelter
sighting.
With
the
faith
groups
that
came
in
and
drowned
out,
bellevue's
own
residence.
We
saw
that
in
Newport
Hills
Park
planning
with
the
Renton
and
Newcastle
dog
owners
that
came
in
and
drown
out,
Newport
Hills
residents
and
I'm
just
wondering
why
this
continues
to
happen.
L
So
you
know
the
the
name
of
the
the
newsletter
that
goes
out
from
the
city
is
it's
your
city
and
I
have
to
ask?
Is
it?
Is
it
our
city,
so
I
respectfully
request
that
the
staff
be
required
to
find
out
where
these
people
are
from
what
groups
they're
affiliated
with
and
then
to
separate
out
their
input
from
actual
Bellevue
residents
and
business
owners,
because
it
is
being
presented
to
you
as
if
it's
our
own
residence
input
and
I'm,
just
not
okay
with
it
and
by
there
are
a
lot
of
the
other
neighborhood
leaders.
M
Thank
you
Council.
My
name
is,
and
I
live
in
Bellevue
with
my
family,
I
moved
to
Bellevue
in
2001
to
work
at
Microsoft,
so
I
moved
from
Bengaluru
as
City
in
Southeastern
India,
so
Bengaluru
was
also
called
The.
Garden
City
of
India,
so
I
grew
up
amongst
large
trees,
lining
our
streets
and
surrounding
the
homes.
So
when
I
moved
to
Washington
and
to
Bellevue
I
knew
this
is
where
I
belonged
and
I've
laid
here
for
over
two
decades
now
so
and
enjoying
every
bit
of
it.
M
So
the
reason
I
mentioned
both
Bengaluru
as
well
as
the
trees,
is
that
recently
I'm,
seeing
as
the
city
grows,
the
development
flourishes.
It's
important
that
we
respect
our
large
trees.
We
we
see
the
trees
remaining
continue
to
flourish
as
well.
M
So
I
have
a
personal
experience
that
when
I
used
to
visit
India
every
two
years
or
so
from
Bellevue
since
2008,
every
visit
upon
visit
I
used
to
see
a
significant
loss
of
trees
in
so-called
the
Garden
City
of
India.
It
used
to
disappoint
me
quite
a
bit.
Only
till
recently
is
when
citizens
and
other
agencies
have
started
making
the
situation
better.
M
In
that
city
in
India,
but
I
feel
we
were
late
when
I
look
at
some
of
the
value
development
happening
and
the
loss
of
trees
I'm
worried.
So
when
I
was
worried
about
this
problem,
I
came
across
the
trees
for
livability
initiative,
which
is
a
great
study
and
a
great
initiative
and
a
support.
M
The
recommendations
in
the
trees
for
livability
tree
code
study
and
I
request
the
council
to
consider
the
court
study
and
I
look
forward
to
seeing
recommendations
back
from
the
land
use
to
enhance
our
three
code
measures
protector,
believes
trees
and
ensure
both
the
city
development,
as
well
as
the
trees
flourish
in
a
beautiful
city.
Thank
you
very
much
for
listening.
Thank
you.
N
Good
evening,
council
members,
can
you
hear
me:
okay,
go
foreign
founder
of
Emerald
City,
Collective,
first
downtown
Seattle
medical
dispensary
in
2010..
I
am
also
the
vice
president
of
black
excellence
in
cannabis,
a
non-profit
organization
fighting
for
inclusion
in
the
billion
dollar
cannabis
industry.
N
First
I'd
like
to
say
how
great
it
is
to
see
such
a
diverse
city
of
Bellevue
Council
growing
up
in
Seattle
Renton.
It
was
very
scary
to
visit
Bellevue
as
an
African-American
I
felt.
We
were
never
accepted
here
in
the
city
of
Bellevue
today.
I
no
longer
feel
this
way.
My
mother
now
works
in
Bellevue.
We
are
here
this
evening
to
speak
about
social
equity
and
cannabis
city
of
Bellevue.
Being
most
diverse
city
in
Washington
state
we
think
is
very
important
for
Bellevue
to
join
city
of
Seattle
in
creating
a
social
equity
and
cannabis
program.
N
P
Good
afternoon,
mayor
and
council
member,
my
name
is
Peter.
Manning
I
am
president
of
black
accents
and
cannabis,
and
we
are
aware
that
there
is
currently
no
black
owned
stores,
Cannabis
stores
in
Bellevue,
the
state
of
Washington,
is
getting
ready
to
issue
our
social
security
license.
We
are
looking
to
see
if
Bellevue
is
willing
to
host
two
or
if
one
black
owned
store
here
in
the
city
of
Bellevue.
That
is
why
we're
here
we
would
like
to
acquire
some
contact,
or
so
we
can
discuss
contacts
with
someone
here
in
Bellevue.
B
Foreign
thank
you
and
that
does
reach
the
end
of
our
pre-registered
list.
We
do
have
a
few
moments
left
if
there
is
anyone
who
would
like
to
make
comment
to
the
council
this
evening,
please
raise
your
hand
if
you're
joining
us
here
in
Chambers
or
use
the
raise
hand
function
if
you're
joining
us
via
Zoom.
A
Go
say
to
Mr:
Manning
I
have
open
Office
hours.
So
if
you
contact
staff,
if
you
want
to
schedule
a
meeting
with
me
or
any
of
the
council
members
you're
welcome
to
do
that.
A
Q
Sure
sure
thank
you,
mayor
and
council
members.
I
have
three
items
to
report
on
this
evening
with
respect
to
the
manager's
report
and
since
you
just
did
mention
the
Rock
and
Roll
Marathon,
why
don't
we
take
that?
One
on
first
joining
us
this
evening
is
Jesse
canado
director
of
Economic
Development,
whose
department
and
staff
was
involved
in
working
with
visit
Bellevue
on
the
Rock
and
Roll
Marathon
he's
coming
to
give
you
a
quick
update.
R
Mayor
Deputy,
Mayor
Deputy
mayor's,
not
here,
mayor
and
Council,
we're
here
to
present
some
preliminary
reports
from
this
last
weekend's
successful
hosting
of
The
Rock
and
Roll
Marathon.
R
You
know
by
all
accounts
it
was
a
huge
success
for
the
city
for
Iron
Man,
for
our
Runners
and
for
the
broad
Community
again
bellevue's,
first
time
hosting
the
Saint
Jude
Rock
and
Roll
Marathon.
After
a
three-year
Hiatus
in
Washington
state,
they
were
very
happy
to
be
able
to
find
a
city
that
was
as
eager
to
partner
with
them
as
Bellevue,
so
we
did
host
the
half
marathon
and
the
5K,
not
the
full
Marathon,
yet
so
consider
this
a
pilot
for
hosting
the
larger
marathon
in
the
future.
R
Over
the
weekend
we
had
over
6
000
residents,
6
000
Runners,
not
residents,
six
thousand
Runners
across
the
13.1
miles,
including
council
members
on
apparently
I
saw
many
of
them
running
right
past
my
own
house
on
Sunday
morning.
That
was
not
intentional.
It
was
definitely
a
one
city
effort
from
an
organizational
perspective.
More
than
8
apartments
in
the
city
contributed
to
the
organization,
coordination
and
collaborative
partnership
with
with
Iron
Man,
which
was
led
largely
by
our
special
events
committee
out
of
parks.
R
There
were,
of
course,
13
stations
from
Medical
Services
and
water
along
the
Route
and
over
140
Bellevue
police
officers
participating
across
the
week
the
weekend
to
help
ensure
a
safe
and
very
comfortable
experience
for
all
of
our
visitors,
and
we
I
did
want
to
highlight
the
staff
in
multiple
departments
that
put
in
extra
effort
to
reach
out
to
all
of
our
residents,
businesses
and
other
visitors
to
promote
awareness
of
the
of
the
marathon
and
the
ability
to
either
participate
or
ensure
that
there
was
as
much
information
as
possible
about
the
impacts
across
the
community.
R
Of
course,
we
couldn't
reach
everybody.
This
is
the
first
time
we're
hosting
an
event
this
large
in
a
while,
but
we
did
definitely
lean
into
our
core
values
of
exceptional
public
service
and
stewardship.
As
we
brought
this
event
to
the
community
For
the
First
Time
by
all
accounts
from
Iron
Man,
they
were
very
pleased
with
Bellevue
and
the
feedback
we've
received
so
far
has
been
overwhelmingly
positive
from
our
visitors
and
our
residents.
R
Again,
we
did
get
some
complaints
and
there
were
some
issues
across
the
weekend,
but
largely
we
have
bills
were
able
to
be
dealt
with
in
terms
of
economic
benefit.
We
anticipate
again
preliminary
numbers.
I
will
be
back
in
a
couple
of
weeks
with
some
some
more
refined
numbers,
but
approximately
3.1
million
dollars
in
direct
spending
by
the
participants
in
the
Rock
and
Roll
Marathon
on
items
including
lodging
Transportation
food
and
beverage,
and
space
rentals,
so
3.1
million
in
direct
spending.
R
R
Our
hotel
industry
was
very
happy
to
see
the
occupancy
rate
reach
80
percent,
which
is
a
very,
very
healthy
number
for
Bellevue,
and
hopefully
lots
of
tot
coming
back
to
us
for
that,
and
then
we
were
able
to
highlight
Bellevue
to
4
500
out
of
town
guests,
plus
their
family
members
and
friends
who
came
to
support
them
across
across
the
event
it
highlighted
bellevue's,
Parks
shops
and
local
restaurants
and
our
ability
to
host
large
events
successfully
and
comfortably.
R
As
I've
mentioned,
there
were
some
complaints
overall,
a
low
volume
for
an
event
of
this
size
for
Bellevue.
We
have
we're
working
on
responding
to
those
residents,
who've
reached
out
to
us
with
issues,
and
of
course
we
know
we
can
always
do
better.
So
we've
cataloged
those
issues
and
we'll
be
documenting
those
Lessons
Learned,
as
we
think
about
how
we
can
host
rock
and
roll
or
other
events
in
the
future
here
in
Bellevue,
with
as
much
success
or
more
so
that
is
our
preliminary
report.
Thank
you.
Q
Thank
you
Jesse.
So
the
second
item
I,
have
on
the
manager's
report
this
evening
is
a
report
on
our
2022
neighborhood
walks
that
occurred
this
past
summer.
Many
of
you
attended
those
walks
joining
us
this
evening
is
Mark
heilman,
neighborhood
Outreach
manager,
with
our
Community
Development
Department,
to
provide
the
Council
on
the
viewing
public
of
with
an
overview
of
where
we
went
and
what
we
heard
mark.
S
Thanks
Brad
well,
thank
you,
mayor,
Robinson
and
Council
for
the
opportunity
to
provide
you
a
very
brief
overview
of
this
year's
walks
at
the
direction
of
the
city
manager.
Over
the
past
six
years,
neighborhood
walks
have
allowed
for
informal
two-way
conversations
between
the
community
and
with
City
staff
in
Residence
neighborhoods.
They
really
have
provided
an
opportunity
for
residents
to
share
their
lived
experience
with
their
own
visuals
in
places
that
they
deeply
deeply
cherish.
S
S
So
if
someone
would
like
to
join
us
at
the
end
of
their
driveway
or
at
their
apartment,
complex
multi-family
Community,
we
would
very
much
enjoy
having
them
visit
with
us
and,
and
they
have
done
that
this
year
we
had
tremendous
support
from
the
various
Association
officers
in
promoting
the
walks
and
helping
us
with
some
ideas
of
things
that
they
wanted
to
see
and
to
be
able
to
share.
S
In
the
Eastgate
area.
We
enjoyed
one
of
the
recent
examples
of
very
successful
Civic
engagement
and
the
effective
work
between
City
leadership,
staff
and
residents.
We
walked
and
enjoyed
the
enhancements
to
Newport
Way,
which
benefit
many
pedestrians
and
bicyclists
and
was
first
prompted
by
Resident
concern
for
safety
and
was
Advanced
with
their
advocacy
for
the
enhancements.
S
Many
of
those
folks
were
with
us
on
the
evening
of
the
walk
as
well
in
Wilburton,
a
walk
that
we
probably
should
have.
We
I
should
have
shortened
just
a
little
bit.
Residents
expressed
great
appreciation
for
Wilburton
Hill
Park,
and
we
did
walk
the
entire
perimeter
of
the
park
in
a
couple
of
spots
in
the
neighborhoods
off
to
the
side
of
that.
During
this
walk,
we
learned
more
about
the
neighborhood's
history
of
apple
orchards
and
horse
ranches.
S
Of
course,
we
experienced
a
unique
natural
environment
and
several
residents
shared
their
gratitude
for
the
openness
and
connections
with
their
with
their
neighbors
and
fire
chief
Hagen
also
discussed
a
new
vehicle
that
has
been
provided
to
the
fire
department
to
battle
Urban
wildfires,
Lake
Hills
and,
as
we
visited
in
Lake
Hills
for
our
fourth
and
final
walk,
we
had
our
largest
turnout
and
a
large
number
of
residents
who
have
lived
in
the
area
less
than
five
years.
In
fact,
the
the
folks
who
are
raising
their
hands
and
their
folks
on
the
other
side
as
well.
S
So
during
each
walk,
residents
expressed
profound
gratitude
for
their
Community
for
our
community
and
the
relationships
in
their
neighborhood,
and
we
certainly
enjoy
sharing
their
neighborhoods
with
them
and
greatly
enjoy
that
we
were
able
to
be
back
with
them.
After
a
couple
of
years
of
being
very
challenging,
it
was
great
to
visit
with
them
in
person.
So
thank
you
so
much.
We
love
being
able
to
do
this
with
you
and
with
other
staff.
S
Q
Program,
thank
you,
Mark.
The
last
item
I'd
like
to
just
comment
on
is
item
HC,
which
is
currently
included
on
your
consent
agenda
this
evening,
and
this
item
HC
authorizes
the
city
to
accept
approximately
nine
hundred
thousand
dollars
in
federal
funding
to
support
the
community
crisis
assistance
team
program.
This
is
a
really
a
good
news
story
because
it
comes
in
a
time
when
we
could
use
the
funding.
Q
A
Is
there
a
motion
to
approve
the
consent
calendar
all
those
in
favor,
say
aye
aye
any
opposed?
Okay,
we
have
a
public
hearing
tonight,
Mr
Miyaki.
Would
you
like
to
introduce
this
please.
Q
Sure
thank
you,
mayor
council
members.
Tonight's
public
hearing
concerns
an
application
to
classify
a
portion
of
private
property
and
the
Bridal
Trails
neighborhood
as
open
space
as
Allowed
by
King
County's
Public
benefit
rating
system
program,
also
known
as
the
pbrs
here
tonight,
to
provide
some
background
information
on
the
pbrs
program
and
to
review
your
details
of
the
application,
our
Nick
Whipple,
who
is
our
code
and
policy
planning
manager
from
our
development
services
department,
he's
also
joined
by
chiznet
Hannah's
Consulting
attorney
for
development
services
department,
as
well
with
that
I
will
turn
over
to
you.
A
T
Thank
you
mayor.
Thank
you,
city
manager,
Miyaki
good
evening,
mayor
council
members,
I'm,
trishna,
tanas
and
with
development
services
I'm
here
with
Nick
Whipple,
we
will
be
presenting
this
public
reading.
Assist
public
benefit
rating
system
or
pbrs
for
short
with
us,
is
also
Megan.
Kim
who's
joining
us
remotely.
She
is
with
King
County
she's.
The
staff
person
administering
this
program
for
them
and
she'll
be
available
to
answer
any
questions
that
you
may
have
at
the
Q
a
so
tonight.
Let's
see
is
it.
T
We
will
start
with
the
context
of
this
item,
we'll
go
through
the
the
program
itself,
as
well
as
the
the
act
that
in
the
RCW.
That
is
the
statute
that
authorizes
this
program.
We
will
then
go
through
the
tamiri
and
osterguard
application
and
the
review
process
for
this
application.
We'll
explain
the
King
County
approval
of
the
application
and
we'll
explain
the
city
review
process,
including
the
criteria
and
factors
to
be
considered
and
we'll
return
back
to
the
staff
recommendation
for
Action
tonight.
T
T
This
is
a
voluntary
program
and
in
exchange
for
providing
this
public
benefit
on
their
land,
the
property
owners
get
a
property
tax
benefit.
The
pbrs
program
uses
a
point
system
to
rate
how
properties
features
and
improvements
meet
the
criteria
in
the
program
and
in
the
act
and
based
on
this
point
system,
the
approved
classification
would
allow
land
to
be
assessed
at
its
current
use
or
in
this
case
open
space
rather
than
valuing
it
at
its
highest
and
best
use,
in
other
words,
as
you'll
hear
later.
T
T
The
other
enrolled
pbrs
properties
shown
here
is
in
in
purple,
were
approved
into
the
program
prior
to
the
area's
annexation
into
Bellevue.
This
application
tonight
was
submitted
by
dimiri
and
ostergaard
and
since
their
property
is
in
located
in
Bellevue,
the
city
and
King
County
are
joined.
Granting
authorities
on
this
application,
so
both
the
city
and
the
county
must
take
action
on
this
application
to
either
approve
approve
with
conditions
or
deny
the
application.
T
The
county
has
already
held
their
public
hearing
and
has
imposed,
as
improved,
has
approved
the
application,
with
certain
condition
conditions
which
we'll
go
through
in
a
little
bit
more
detail.
If
the
city
acts
in
the
same
way,
meaning
that
it
approves
the
application
and
impose
those
same
conditions,
the
application
will
be
approved
and
it
will
go
into
effect
the
next
tax
year
so
2023..
T
But
if
the
council
imposes
a
different
condition
or
a
new
condition,
we
would
need
to
return
to
King
County
for
their
review
and
potentially
additional
action.
And
if
Council
decides
to
deny
the
application.
This
denial
must
be
in
writing
and
must
include
the
reasons
for
why
the
city
is
denying
the
application
and
why
that
why?
Approval
isn't
supported
by
the
record.
U
Thank
you
trisna
and
good
evening,
mayor
and
Council.
So
as
trisner
noted,
tamiri
and
ostergaard
are
the
applicants
for
this
pbrs
application
and
they
submitted
their
application
in
December
of
2021..
U
So,
to
provide
some
context
around
the
property
here,
so
in
yellow
we've
highlighted
the
pbrs
application
site.
So
that's
the
temerian
Oster
guard
property.
It
is
within
Bridal
Trails,
it's
a
property
that
is
along
the
100
foot,
PSC
transmission
line
corridor
and
the
property
is
within
the
Trails
End.
Excuse
me:
let
me
go
back
one.
It's
within
the
Trails
End
subdivision,
which
established
a
30-foot
Bridal,
Trail
easement.
So
that's
shown
there
in
kind
of
that
oranges,
orangish
color.
U
U
U
The
site
is
currently
built
with
a
single
family
home
that
was
constructed
in
1966.,
so
of
the
1.38
Acre
Site
King
County
through
their
decision,
approved
.23
acres
for
enrollment
in
the
pbrs
program
and
that's
the
eligible
portion.
That's
highlighted
in
red
on
the
site
plan
and
then
in
the
text
on
the
left
of
the
site
plan
picture.
U
So
the
the
0.23
Acres
was
allowed
outright
in
the
program
and
the
county
also
provided
that
section,
A
and
section
B
shown
on
the
site
plan
could
qualify
for
other
pbrs
categories
and
those
other
sections
could
be
enrolled
into
the
pbrs
program,
subject
to
conditions
which
we'll
we'll
go
into
detail
about,
and
then
the
maximum
land
area
that
would
be
eligible
for
enrollment
in
the
pbrs
program
is
1.1
Acres.
U
So
the
county
found
that
enrollment
was
warranted
because
of
the
open
space
resources
associated
with
the
property
which
include
public
Recreation
access
or
excuse
me,
public,
Recreation,
Area
and
unlimited
Public
Access,
so
public
Recreation
Area
is
essentially
land.
That's
devoted
to
providing
active
or
passive
recreation
use
and
to
be
eligible.
The
land
must
be
open
to
the
General
Public
and
for
unlimited
Public
Access.
That
does
mean
year-round
access
by
the
general
public
allowed,
with
without
special
arrangements
with
the
property
owner
and
because
of
these
open
space
resources.
U
The
property
is
entitled
to
10
points
in
the
pbrs
program,
which
equates
to
a
50
percent
tax
reduction
for
the
eligible
.23
acres
and
So,
based
on
an
eligible
50
reduction
of
the
annual
property
taxes.
For
the
0.23
acres
of
land,
the
property
taxes
would
be
reduced
by
approximately
278
dollars
and
according
to
King
County
assessor's
office,
the
city
receives
approximately
10.3
percent
of
this
tax
amount,
and
so
therefore,
the
city
would
receive
approximately
28.67
Less
in
annual
tax
revenue
specific
to
this
properties
reduction
and
then
acreage.
U
So
the
county
concluded
that
the
property
could
obtain
10
additional
points
by
meeting
requirements
for
the
categories
of
resource
restoration
and
urban,
open
space
and
resource
restoration
means
that
the
enrolled
portions
have
to
be
restored
to
Native
vegetation,
and
so
the
owner
must
provide
a
planting
plan
to
remove
and
replace
the
grass.
That
was
in
that
last
site
plan
that
you
saw
and
the
non-native
vegetation
and
the
planting
plan
must
be
agreed
upon
by
the
property
owner
and
easement
holders
and
then
approved
by
both
the
city
and
King
County.
U
So
once
the
Landscaping
is
actually
installed,
the
property
owner
has
to
provide
yearly
monitoring
for
at
least
five
years
following
enrollment
to
the
pbrs
program
and
then
for
the
urban
open
space
category.
This
just
means
land,
that's
located
within
the
boundaries
of
a
city
and
that's
predominantly
native
vegetation,
and
so
at
the
minimum
requirement
for
enrollment
of
urban
open
spaces
at
least
one
acre
or
there
can
be
enrollment
of
at
least
a
half
acre
if
it
meets
very
specific
criteria.
U
So
if
the
maximum
20
points
are
awarded
through
the
pbrs
program,
that
would
result
in
a
70
reduction
for
the
enrolled
land,
and
what
we've
done
here
is
made
an
assumption
that
the
entire
1.1
Acres
would
be
enrolled
in
the
pbrs
program
and
they
would
be
conforming
to
the
conditions
and
with
that
situation,
the
annual
tax
reduction
would
be
approximately
4
298
dollars
less
for
this
specific
property
and
for
the
city
that
would
result
in
443
dollars.
Less
in
annual
taxes,
tax
revenue.
U
Foreign,
so
this
is
the
evaluation
criteria
that's
contained
in
the
act.
The
council
must
consider
the
resulting
Revenue
loss
or
tax
shift
when
deciding
to
approve
or
deny
or
approve
with
conditions
a
pbrs
application.
The
council
may
also
consider
other
criteria
so
benefits
to
the
general
welfare
which
are
contained
under
the
list.
B
and
some
of
those
include
enhanced
Recreation
opportunities,
conservation
of
natural
resources
and
protection
of
native
plant
habitat,
just
to
name
a
few.
Not
all
of
the
criteria
from
section
B
need
to
be
met
for
approval
of
the
application.
U
U
So
the
city
and
King
County
staff
did
conduct
a
joint
site
visit
and
worked
cooperatively
to
review
the
application
and
the
relevant
criteria,
and
with
that
staff
does
recommend
approval
of
the
application
consistent
with
King
County's
approval
and
conditions,
and
just
to
explain
what
that
would
mean.
That's
approval
of
0.23
acres
of
land
into
the
pbrs
program
for
the
2023
tax
year
and
then
the
enrolled
land
would
receive
50
tax
reduction,
which
results
in
a
revenue
impact
for
the
city
of
approximately
28
dollars
per
year.
U
And
then,
if
the
plan
is
approved,
they
would
need
to
install
the
landscaping
and
appropriate
permits
to
begin
that
monitoring
process.
And
this
conditional
approval
would
allow
for
a
70
tax
reduction
to
the
enrolled
land
and
depending
on
conformance
with
approval
conditions.
We
estimate
that
to
be
a
revenue
impact
for
the
city
of
approximately
443
dollars
per
year,.
A
D
B
Yes,
thank
you
mayor.
There
are
two
speakers
signed
up
for
the
public
hearing
this
evening
and
before
I
call
their
names.
I
will
also
mention
that
there
was
a
written
comment
that
is
included
in
your
desk
packet
for
this
evening,
with
that
we
will
get
the
timer
ready
to
go
and
I'll
call
our
first
Speaker,
who
is
Heidi
Dean.
L
Thanks
Charmaine
good
evening,
you
know
tonight's
public
hearing
was
a
bit
of
a
surprise.
L
We
were
the
the
public
notified
going
into
a
long
weekend.
This
is
something
that's
brand
new
to
Bellevue,
it's
brand
new
to
all
of
us,
and
we
really
don't
have
any
information
on
this
program
how
it
works.
L
You
know
I
I've,
just
listened
now
to
the
presentation
and
was
reading
all
of
the
information,
but
you
know
I'm
kind
of
wondering
about
a
study
session
on
this,
because
this
is
something
that
now
has
impact
not
just
for
Bridal
Trails,
where
this
particular
property
is
located,
but
you
know
for
around
the
city
where
people
can
declare
this
and
how
does
this
work?
We
literally
know
nothing
about
this,
since
this
is
new
to
Bellevue
to
be
involved
in
the
decision
process.
L
On
this
you
know
what
are,
what
are
the
consequences
intended
or
otherwise
and
I
I
just
was
looking
at
the
property
on
personal
viewer,
and
you
know
it.
It
seems
to
be
surrounded
by
other
properties,
private
properties,
homes
and
I.
I
did
hear
something
about
Trail
a
trail
system
and
that
sort
of
thing,
but
it
would
seem
to
to
me
that,
in
order
to
access
this
piece
of
property,
you
would
have
to
cut
through
other
people's
private
property
to
get
to
it.
L
L
You
know
to
be
able
to
use
as
public
space,
but
yeah
you've
got
to
cut
through
my
neighbor's
yards
to
get
there
so
I'm
I'm,
not
here
to
say,
I,
oppose
or
support
I'm
just
here
to
say
that
it's
I
would
really
ask
that
the
council
not
make
a
decision
tonight
and
ask
for
more
information
and
give
the
public
a
chance
to
weigh
in
because
we
knew
nothing
about
this
and
it.
You
know
I
think
we
deserve
that.
So
thank
you
very
much.
B
V
So
I
was
alerted
to
this
by
the
agenda
and
I
think
that
that's
basically
the
whole
problem
here
is
that
the
public
really
didn't
hear
about
this
I'm,
not
sure
where
it
was
posted
other
than
the
agenda
for
public
hearing
is
supposed
to
be
two
weeks
out.
I
didn't
couldn't
find
it.
I
searched
for
the
parcel
number
on
the
website
of
of
and
I
couldn't
find
the
website
of
King,
County
and
I
couldn't
find
anything
and
I
searched
the
permit
permit
bulletin
and
I
searched
the
permits
and
I
couldn't
find
anything.
V
V
There's
the
size
of
a
lot
is
is
is
questionable.
Like
Heidi
said,
the
the
fact
that
the
public
freedom
is
a
is
a
lot
surrounded
by
other
Lots.
So
it's
just
there's
a
lot
of
things
that
I'm
not
sure
what
goes
into
this,
including
the
buildable
footprint.
So
if
we
have
a
buildable
footprint,
you
know
that
didn't
seem
to
be
considered
as
part
of
this
space
evaluation.
V
Also,
one
of
the
things
that
could
be
concerned
is
how
how
these
spaces
will
be
maintained
and,
like
Heidi,
said
what
the
unintensive
consequences
are.
It's
just
I,
don't
have
enough
information
right
now,
and
you
know
just
seeing
this
over
the
weekend,
I
wasn't
able
to
get.
You
know,
but
contact
somebody
easily
to
get
information,
and
it's
just
that's.
Basically,
my
concern
is
that
we
just
don't
know
enough
to
know
enough.
V
This
could
be
a
good
thing,
could
be
a
bad
thing.
I
just
don't
know,
but
it
is
an
awful
lot
of
money
over
all
time
when
you're
considering
how
much
it
doesn't
sound
like
much
money
for
one
single
person
that
if
this
became
a
trend
in
Bridal
Trails,
because
it
was
useful
to
save
on
taxes,
how
much
would
that
be?
And
you
know
it's
not
not
a
dollar
sign
issue
as
much
as
a
percentage
issue,
and
it's
just
not
clear
to
me
alert
all
the
things
about
this.
V
If,
if
our
goal,
if
their
goal
for
in
our
current
policy,
is
it
taken
into
account
that,
for
example,
easement
Open
Spaces
is
open
space
when
it's,
you
know
actually
used
by
an
easement,
doesn't
make
sense
to
me?
Okay,
so,
rather
than
go
on
rambling
I'll
cut
it
off
for
now.
Thank
you.
B
Thank
you,
Miss
Johnston,
that's
the
end
of
our
pre-registered
public
hearing
list.
If
there's
anyone
joining
us
here
in
council
chambers
that
would
like
to
make
a
comment
related
to
this
public
hearing.
Please
raise
your
hand
if
anyone
joining
us
online
would
also
like
to
make
a
comment.
Please
use
the
raise
hand,
function.
A
Okay,
so
councilmember
lee
is
there
a
motion
to
close
the
public
hearing,
all
those
in
favor
say:
aye
aye
any
opposed;
okay,
let's
open
it
up
to
council
comment
and
questions
council
member
Robertson.
Let's
start
with
you.
W
W
I
think
this
is
a
new
process
for
me.
I,
don't
really
know
where
to
begin.
I
guess
I'll
begin
with
a
question
of
what
is
the
scope
of
council's
role
and
Authority
I
did
hear
I,
think
Nick
or
trism.
One
of
you
say
we
can't
be
arbitrary
and
capricious
it's
always
a
good
goal.
W
Is
this
a
quadrant
additional
matter?
Do
we
have
to
base
it
on
the
statutory
Provisions
I
mean
we've
never
done
one
of
these
before
what
is
our
role
and
how
much
discretion,
most
importantly,
how
much
discretion
do
we
have.
T
Thank
you,
councilmember
Robert
Center
for
that
question.
As
I
noted
earlier,
it
is
it's
a
legislative
process,
so
it
is
not
a
quasi-judicial
action
that
you
will
be
asked
to
take
here.
T
The
factors
for
consideration,
I
think
Nick
had
that
slide
up,
and
we
can
certainly
pop
that
up
again,
if
it's
helpful,
the
city
must
consider
the
implications,
the
fiscal
implications
of
and
impacts
of
this
application,
but
there's
a
whole
series
of
other
criteria,
including
the
benefits
that
the
public
would
have
via
getting
an
open
space
resource
in
the
city.
T
T
W
T
That's
a
consideration
in
terms
of
the
overall
fiscal
impact.
That
is
something
that
could
be
there.
It
is.
It
is
a
new
process,
as
you
noted
it's.
The
first
application
for
Bellevue,
so
I
understand
that
there's
some
questions
here
for
for
all
of
us.
We
are
happy
to
provide
whatever
answers
that
we
have
now
or
if
Council
wishes
us
to
chase
down
anything
further,
we
can
do
that
too.
W
W
The
value
of
the
open
space-
that's
something
that's
very
interesting
to
me.
If
this
1.1
plus
0.23
acres
are
in
added
into
the
program,
would
all
of
the
1.33
Acres
have
to
be
open
to
the
public
24
7.
U
U
Three
yeah,
and
so
the
two
categories
that
King
County
is
recommending
for
conditional
approval
relate
to
Urban
open
space,
which
would
not
have
an
easement
requirement
necessarily
for
for
it
to
be
open
to
the
public
at
least
I'm.
Not
that
that's
not
my
understanding
and
and
Megan
can't
or
yeah
making.
Kim
is
also
on
the
line.
U
She
might
be
able
to
address
that
too,
and
then
the
other
piece
was
resource
restoration,
and
so
that
was
just
making
sure
that
whatever
land
is
enrolled
into
the
program
is
predominantly
native
vegetation
and
any
invasive
or
non-native
species
are
eradicated
for
it
to
be
eligible
for
enrollment.
In
the
program.
W
W
U
Without
those
penalties,
without.
W
The
penalties
so
on
the
open
space-
it's
they
don't
have
to
allow
the
public
in.
So
if
someone
wants
to
have
a
really
nice
that
they're
on
a
two
acre
lot
their
home
takes,
you
know
the
footprint
of
their
home
takes
up.
You
know,
quarter
of
an
acre
or
it'll,
be
like
a
tenth
of
an
acre,
so
1.9
Acres.
They
do
a
beautiful
native
restoration,
Woodland
blah
blah
blah.
They
could
then
get
without
having
to
let
anybody
in
just
making
sure
they
have
really
high
quality
native
vegetation.
U
Yes,
it
would
not
be
required
as
far
as
I'm
aware
for
the
public
to
have
access,
okay,
okay,
but
it
would
be
preserving
it
as
open
space
rather
than
converting
it
to
the
more
high
intensity
use.
It's.
C
We
heard
what
you
know:
the
public
Testament
he
was
and
I
agree
with
them
100.
This
is
the
first
time
I've
been
in
the
concert
for
28
years,
never
faces
situation.
So,
in
order
to
do
that,
we
need
to
know
what
are
the
conditions
and
I
think
the
council
member
Robinson
articulated
very
well,
but
it's
just
the
tip
tip
of
the
iceberg.
We
don't
know
you
know
number
one
and
if
we
do,
we
want
to
know
what
the
merits
of
these
conditions
are
and
when
you
know
what
the
conditions
are,
what
can
they
be
up?
C
I
do
when
you
know
the
specific
property
how
it's
going
to
impact
and
affect
the
criteria
we
we
set,
it's
not
set
by
us.
It's
said
by
I,
don't
think
County
or
state
I,
don't
know,
I
think
we
need
to
at
least
if
we
don't
set
it.
We
at
least
need
to
know
what
they
are
and
how
they
impact
the
project,
the
goal
that
we
set
for
ourselves.
So
a
lot
of
questions
unanswered
and
a
number
of
council
member
mentioned
one
that
I
heard
and
I
think
it's
important
is
what
impact
is
physically.
C
We're
talking
about
you
know
a
few
dollars
four
hundred
dollars
each
property
and
how
many
other
properties
will
be
impacted
if
every
home
in
Bellevue
I
can
reduce
my
tax
by
four
hundred
dollars.
What's
the
physical
impact,
so
when
we
say
that
the
stuff
is
Green,
Park,
no
great
impact,
this
is
a
issue
we're
setting
up
for
precedence
for
all
the
properties
in
Bellevue.
C
So
it's
not
just
this
property
alone,
so
I
think
the
consequence
is
very
significant,
and
so
we
do
need
a
study
session
on
this
topic.
If
we
think
it's
important
and
I
believe
it
probably
is
because
we
already
have
some
of
these
goal,
setting
our
own
objectives
right,
I
mean
we
can
the
question:
is
you
know
what
what
benefit
do
we
get?
What's
the
cost
of
getting
with
benefit?
None
of
this
answered
well
look
at
one
particular
tract,
and
we
cannot
make
decision
on
this
particular
one
without
knowing
what
the
impact.
C
Well,
the
answer
when
the
question
the
public
raised
is
it:
what's
the
notice
I
noticed
that
the
hearing
notice
was
published
in
Seattle,
Times,
August
22nd,
but
I
sympathize
with
their
question.
I
didn't
know
about
this
until
you
know
until
the
the
meeting
agenda
and
so
wow
this
is
something
new
completely
get
out
in
the
cold.
So
my
question
is
what
what
is
the
physical
impact?
You
know
if
we
have
done
it,
if
we
do
consider
the
future
or
what
is
our
limitation
do.
C
T
So
this
slide
does
show
the
fiscal
impact
for
this
property
and
council
member
Lee.
You
write.
It
is
not
for
all
properties
that
may
be
eligible.
We
did
look
at
preliminary
maps
that
as
to
how
many
Parcels
may
be
similarly
situated
next
to
a
trail
like
this
GIS
identified,
259
properties
that
may
be
eligible
and
I
say
that
maybe
in
an
underlying
way
not
all
will
qualify.
There
may
be
already
improvements
on
that
parcel.
T
There
may
be
a
single
family
home
sitting
on
there
and
or
other
improvements
associated
with
single-family
homes,
so
play
structures
or
accessory
structures.
Things
like
that
and
it's
unknown
how
many
Property
Owners
will
actually
apply
for
this
program.
As
I
noted
earlier,
this
the
act
itself,
the
open
space
taxation
Act
was
enacted
in
1970
and
we
in
the
city.
Now
there
are
five
Parcels
that
are
enrolled
since
that
time,
and
this
is
of
course
the
first
application
with
with
the
city
for
property
within
the
city
of
Bellevue.
T
So,
but
if
there
are
additional
property
owners
who
wishes
to
apply,
it's
just
impossible
for
us
to
predict
what
that
number
may
be,
they
would
have
to
go
through
the
same
process
that
we're
going
through
now,
with
applying
for
enrollment
reclassification
of
their
land
into
the
pbrs
program.
Getting
it
through
King
County,
as
well
as
the
city
of
Bellevue,.
A
Okay,
I'll
we'll
come
back
around.
Thank
you,
I'm
gonna,
I
think
councilmember
Lee
made
a
good
point,
which
is
a
question
to
me,
is
what
is
the
public
benefit
versus
the
city,
Revenue
impact?
And
so
when
I
look
at
the
map,
I
don't
see
a
huge
public
benefit
myself.
There's
no
access
to
this
there's
private
homes.
A
All
around
this
property
and
I,
don't
see
any
way
for
people
to
physically
impact
it
there's
no
visual
access
to
it,
except
for
the
Neighbors
there,
so
I
I,
just
I
can't
it
doesn't
seem
like
a
fair
trade-off
to
me.
However,
the
0.23
Acres
that
the
PSC
is
is
using.
That
is
now
unbuildable
because
they
have
their
power
lines
over
it.
Does
the
property
owner
receive
any
compensation
from
PSE
annually
in
order
to
use
that
land
for
their
power
lines.
A
E
So
I
I'm
really
glad
that
we're
having
this
conversation,
because
you
know-
although
this
is
a
new
process
to
Bellevue,
what
I
see
is
that
it
has
gone
through
this
process
five
times
before
before
the
property
got
annexed
before
Bellevue
and
I
want
to
make
sure
you
said
that
Megan
with
the
county
is
on
online,
because
I
would
like
to
understand.
E
There
was
some
comment
made
earlier
about
whether
there
was
a
criteria
and
in
the
packet
you
on
page
11,
do
show
the
criteria.
So
is
this
the
actual
established
criteria?
So
it
isn't
something
that
moves
around.
This
is
the
criteria
that's
used
to
make
the
determination
about
what
areas
are
approved
and
because
yeah
I
guess
that
would
be
my
first
question
this
right
here.
X
I
am
hi,
my
name
is
Megan
Kim
I'm
with
the
King
County
pbrs
program,
and
so
this
one
thing
I
want
to
speak
to
you
first.
Thank
you,
mayor
and
council
members
for
having
me,
but
I
do
want
to
speak
to
the
access.
There
is
quite
an
extensive
easement
through
all
those
properties,
those
neighbors.
It's
not
landlocked.
It
might
be
perceived
to
be
landlocked
from
an
aerial
photo,
but
in
the
1950s
There
Was
An
established
easement
and
there's
actually
an
easement
map
that
I
had
submitted
to
Nicholas
a
few
hours
before
this
meeting.
X
Anyways
and
then
going
back
to
the
question:
yes,
so
that
area
that
Bridal
Trail
easement,
it
is
not
landlocked,
it
goes
from
Northeast
40th
Street,
which
is
on
the
south.
It
goes
north
and
then
it
continues
North
outside
of
this
screen
and
it
heads
both
West
and
East.
If
you
follow
it,
West
it
exits
onto
I.
X
Think
that's
132nd
at
Northeast,
which
I
walked
so
I
have
have
walked
the
entirety
of
that
there
is
no
barriers
and
it
is
well
used
by
landowners
at
the
time
or
people
in
the
neighborhood.
Okay,.
E
So
and
yes,
so
then
it
is
publicly
accessible
and
publicly
accessible,
and
you
know
what
I
keep
thinking
about
when
we
talk
about
the
benefit
is
how
much
money
does
it
cost
for
us
to
actually
purchase
open
space
for
our
use?
So
it
sounds
like
what
this
program
does.
Is
it
allows
privately
owned
property
if
those
Property
Owners
want
to
raise
their
hand
and
make
part
of
that
property
publicly
accessible
and
available
and
I
want
to
make
sure
that
I
understand
and
there's
also
some
rules
around
protecting
streams
stream
corridors
Wetlands?
Does
that
it's
does?
E
X
X
Conserving
and
preserving
natural
resources
we
do
have,
which
makes
it
confusing
is
that
we
do
have
categories
like
the
one
that
these
landos
are
going
for,
that
allow
for
Public
Access.
It
does
not
mandate
that
everybody
who
comes
into
pbrs
has
Public
Access
or
allows
for
Public
Access.
We
do
reward.
There
is
an
incentive
to
have
Trails
in
the
PBS
program
to
allow
for
that.
But
it's
not
a
requirement,
and
there
are
19
different
categories
in
each
category
has
its
own
requirements.
X
X
Yes,
that's
more
handled
at
the
Department
of
Assessments
level.
My
job
is
to
analyze
up
the
properties,
meeting
the
requirements
of
the
19,
adding
the
points
up
and
then
the
actual
administration
of
the
finances
goes
through
the
Department
of
Assessments
at
King,
County,
and
so
then
they're
the
ones
who
do
the
tax,
roll
reductions
and
the
fine
the
financial
impact.
They
would
have
more
information
about
that.
X
It's
not
an
arbitrary
process.
No,
it's
so
the
way
that
this
property-
if
it
if
the
property
has
no
more
building
potential,
it
would
be
at
a
proportional
savings.
So
the
excluded
area,
the
home
site,
is
going
to
be
evaluated
at
the
market
rate,
so
ineligible
portion
on
this
map.
That's
going
to
be
all
that
acreage
is
going
to
stay
at
market
value
highest
and
best
use
the
areas
to
the
West
section,
A
B
and
the
eligible
portion.
That
area
is
going
to
be
subject
to
the
percentage
reduction.
X
So
right
now
eligible
portion
is
a
very
small
portion
of
the
property
right
now
that
0.23
Acres
that
would
be
reduced
to
50
percent
and,
if
a
be
an
ineligible
portion
that
would
stay
at
the
market
value.
X
E
D
You
know
this
is
I
I,
don't
want
to
say
it
it's
unfortunate.
We
we
started
off
with.
Why
didn't
we
hear
about
this
before
and
everything
I
think,
that's
something
that
I
wish
we
could
rewind
and
start
over,
but
that
should
not
get
in
the
way
of
actually
getting
to
a
good
decision
on
this.
I
do
think
that
I
don't
have
any
problems.
We
want
to
push
it
back
to
another
week,
but
I
I'm.
Looking
at
this
can
I
see
all
the
12
options
there.
Do
you
have
that
one
put
up
please.
D
I
mean
that's
the
whole.
We
started
out
missing
the
whole
point
of
this,
and
that's
that's
something
possibly
because
we
didn't
have
enough
time
to
talk
talk
it
through
so,
but
each
of
those
things
are
are
very
important
actions,
and
this
is
a
I
think
actually
a
very
Innovative
way
to
get
people
to
actually
do
things
like
this.
That
are
important.
D
It
reminds
me
of
and
I
can't
think
of
the
name
of
it
exactly,
but
in
King
County
in
the
in
the
rural
areas,
there's
there's
long
been
a
program
for
people
who
can
who
will
put
their
portions
of
land
into
keeping
the
trees
or
doing
other
things,
and
then
they
get
payment
for
it.
A
small
amount,
it's
a
rebate
in
effect
and
that
it's
it's
not.
D
This
is
pretty
much
like
that,
and
it's
been
a
very
successful
operation
to
get
people
to
keep
property
to
take
care
of
the
of
the
rivers,
and
that
kind
of
you
know
the
streams
and
all
those
kind
of
things
there's
a
lot.
This
is
not
just
a
new
idea,
it's
not
something!
That's
not
done
in
a
lot
of
places,
and
you
know,
even
if
we
had
100
people
doing
this,
it's
only
forty
four
thousand
dollars
and
you
couldn't
pay.
D
Forty
four
thousand
dollars
will
not
get
you
much
done
in
these
kind
of
areas
if
we
were
actually
paying
somebody
to
do
it.
So
it's
it's
interesting
that
people
are
into
maybe
the
reason
not
too
many
people
have
done
it,
because
it's
not
a
lot
of
money.
But
if
somebody
comes
along
and
wants
to
do
conserve
or
enhance
natural,
cultural
or
Scenic
resources
and
get
this
rebate,
we
should
be
very
appreciative
of
the
fact
they're
doing
that
so
I
I
think
it's
a
good
idea
of
and
but
I
do
think.
D
Maybe
we
need
some
time
to
just
work
on
it
and
get
through
on
this.
But
if
we
had
to
take
a
vote
tonight,
I'd
say
I
would
agree
to
it,
but
I
do
think
we
need
to
work
through
this
and
make
sure
we
all
understand
this
and
and
the
public
understands,
because
again
protecting
resources
of
unique
or
critical
Wildlife
native
plant
habitat.
It's
it's
something
we
talk
about
all
the
time.
We
want
people
to
do
this
and
this
is
a
pretty
inexpensive
way
to
get
that
done.
So.
D
Well,
I,
no
because
I
think
they've
laid
it
all
out
pretty
well,
if
you
go
through
all
this
material
and
I
think
that
in
what
I'm
saying
is
this?
What
your
concept
of
the
con
of
the
program
is
is
am
I
accurate
in
saying
this
is
this
is
what
it's
designed
to
do.
T
Yeah,
do
you
want
to
add
any
more
to
that?
That's
my
understanding.
The
program
is
really
to
is
that
exchange
of
providing
that
protection
of
resources
in
exchange
for
some
benefits
in
your
taxes,
in
the
property
owners
taxes,
but
Megan.
X
Yeah,
it's
an
incentive
program.
It
incentivizes
landowners
who
are
on
private
property
to
conserve
and
preserve
their
natural
resources
that
cities
and
counties
would
not
be
able
to
potentially
do
otherwise.
So
I
think
you
hit
that
pretty
much
well
on
the
head
and
something
to
consider
is
that
it's
not
a
hundred
percent
up
to
date,
but
our
database
says
that
we
have
about
14
200
Acres
already
in
pbrs
within
King.
County
includes
our
cities
as
well,
and
we
have
about
2220
parcels
and
that's
about
1
667
owners
that
we
work
with.
X
So
it's
it
feels
very
new
to
Bellevue,
because
it
is.
It
is
not
particularly
new
to
the
pbrs
staff
and
the
landowners
that
we
work
with
in
some
of
the
maybe
more
rural
areas,
so
we're
pretty
well
established
program.
It
just
feels
I
think
new,
because
it's
not
super
prevalent
in
Bellevue,
but
we
have
properties
in
Kenmore
and
Seattle
Issaquah
Black
Diamond.
So
we
have
worked
in
cities
before.
Y
I
think
the
points
around
the
preservation
have
already
been
stated
and
the
cost
that
it
that
we
would
incur
if
we
were
to
develop
similarly
Parks.
Similarly,
I
guess
I
would
just
point
out
that
I
would
support
the
entire
program
just
because
the
the
two
conditional
Parts
already
have
to
come
back
for
review
and
approval,
but
I
think
this
is
an
opportunity
for
continuing
what
we've
been
talking
about
in
terms
of
environmental
stewardship
and
tree
preservation.
So
I
would
support
moving
forward
with
the
program
just
in
general.
Thank
you.
W
In
general,
I
tend
to
agree
with
the
mayor
about
that
point,
three
being
the
most
appropriate
portion,
the
I
I
have
maybe
some
questions
or
some
concerns.
The
PSC
piece
can't
be
developed
in
that
easement
I
mean
people
walk
the
power
lines,
all
the
time.
Well,
I
think
all
the
time
and
you
can't
grow
anything
under
them.
You
can
grow
some
low
things,
but
you
can't
really
grow
things
because
they
can
interfere
with
the
power
lines
and
PSC
controls
that
easement.
X
Question
yeah
I
can
take
that
one,
so
there
probably
is
and
I
we
would
have
to
check
with
the
Department
of
Assessments,
but
yes,
there's,
probably
some
sort
of
percentage
reduction
for
properties
that
have
power
line,
easements
or
other
kinds
of
easements
on
their
property.
X
But
you
landowners
can
work
with
power
line
companies
to
come
up
with
restoration
plans
and
they
have
planting
plans
with
approval,
which
is
why
it's
written
the
way
it
is
in
the
staff
report
that
they
would
have.
The
approval
is
that
through
a
planting
list,
that's
native
to
Washington,
if
it's
under
I
think
25
feet
15
feet
whatever
it
is,
they
would
be
able
to
restore
that
portion
of
the
property
to
Native
vegetation
and
it
would
no
longer
be
grass
all
right
and
yeah,
so
they
would
be
the
ones
to
approve
it's.
X
Not
unheard
of.
It
has
happened
on
some
properties,
but.
W
It's
not
very
usual,
so
it's
uncommon.
Yes,.
W
The
one
of
the
other
factors
is
that
they
are
reducing
the
their
ability
to
develop
the
property,
but
this
property
zoned
R1,
and
it's
less
than
two
acres
in
size,
which
means
it
can
hold
a
single
family
home
which
is
what's
on
it
now.
Granted
they
could
make
that
single
family
home
bigger.
They
could
increase
the
footprint,
but
so
it
doesn't
seem
to
me
plus
the
Bridal
Trails
has
tree
preservation.
W
I,
don't
really
know
what
the
property
owner
is
giving
up
on
that,
but
they
would
have
to
put
a
lot
of
money
in
to
do
Restorations
under
the
conditional
approvals.
The
portion
that
has
the
actually
actual
Trail
easement
on
it.
That's
open
to
the
public
now
and
people
can
use
it
right
and
that
would
remain
the
same
yes.
So
it
seems
to
me
that
that
would
be
the
most
appropriate
section
to
allow
this
to
go
forward
with
and
not
the
two
conditional
portions,
because
those
are
not
open
to
the
public.
I.
W
Also,
very
much
worry
about
the
impacts
over
time
with
those
additional
259
properties
that
may
be
eligible
to
the
city's
property
tax
base
and
I
think
that
this
is
also
one
of
those
situations
where
the
desire
to
have
really
valuable,
Land
open
space
is
at
intention.
If
you
will,
with
the
need
to
have
Redevelopment
where
there's
space
to
do
it,
because
we
need
a
lot
more
housing
in
Bellevue.
W
So
if
the
council
starts
doing
this
for
the
259
properties,
we're
not
only
reducing
our
tax
base
but
we're
reducing
the
ability
to
add
more
housing
in
the
city,
so
I
don't
know
that
I,
that's
something
I
really
want
to
do,
but
I
would
support
the
0.23
where
there
is
an
Open,
Space
Trail.
It
seems
like
if
it's
accessible
to
the
public,
that
is
worth
a
tax
reduction.
W
If
people
want
to
landscape
a
native,
we
should
teach
them
how
to
do
it.
I
know:
there's
information
where
we
do.
We
encourage
that,
but
it's
just
for
their
own
benefit.
It's
not
for
the
public
for
them
to
have
the
native
vegetation
in
their
yard
and
also
reduce
their
costs
of
maintaining
their
Landscaping.
So
I
don't
know
that
I'm
too
keen
on
the
other
two
Parcels.
Thank
you,
council,
member
Lee,.
C
I
have
a
difficulty
of
juice
and
pig
which
one
to
prove
which
one's
not
approved,
but
on
the
basis
of
what
we've
seen
we're
presented
thing
I
agree
with
the
mayor
and
the
you
know,
councilman
Robertson,
that
this
is
a
small
chunk
that
probably
will
be
most
likely
because
we
do
know
the
criteria
you
included.
Lots
of
them
are
good
stuff
in
most
of
them,
probably
are.
Maybe
all
of
them
are.
They
all
sounds
great,
something
that
we
support,
however,
I
think
in
order
to
be
effective,
we
need
to
do
it
intentionally.
C
We
need
to
know,
what's
the
plan,
how
does
it
fit
in
the
overall
scheme
that
we
have,
for
you
know
doing
all
the
good
things
that's
included
in
criteria.
We
have
no,
we
have
no
idea,
you
know
it
sounds
good,
but
it
has
to
fit
right.
You
know
just
because
somebody
said
well:
I
want
to
reduce
my
property
tax,
so
I
want
to
give
something
away
to
meet
that
criteria.
We
don't
know
what
it's
going
to
do.
Anything
like
because
remember,
Robinson
mentioned
the
259
pieces
do.
C
Are
we
going
to
each
one
we're
going
to
examine
them
and
I?
Even
today,
when
we
talk
about
this,
I
have
no
idea
how
this
piece
is
consistent
with
King
County's
plan.
How
does
it
you
know
fit
into
obvious
plan
so
really
we're
making
decisions
piecemeal?
It's
like
like
spots
only
we're
zoning
laws.
Don't
do
this
at
all.
While
this
fits
the
criteria,
of
course
it
does
then
it
happens.
C
You
can't
do
that
and
I
I
believe
that
yeah,
you
know
we
we
talk
about
examples,
housing
versus
open
space,
we've
got
big
big
push
for
housing.
We
need
more
housing
now,
on
the
other
hand,
well,
let's
have
more
open
space.
Yes,
we
need
to
preserve
both,
but
how
do
we
do
that?
We
cannot
do
it
successfully
by
choosing
pick
up
pieces
and
then
say
we
are
doing
it.
No,
it's
got
to
be
intentional.
It's
got
to
be
planned.
It's
got
to
fit
into
our
discussion.
C
You
know
when
we
look
at
this
criteria,
even
the
criteria
itself.
You
know
we
haven't
really
gone
into
it.
We
haven't
we're
giving
a
list
of
them.
You
know
that
long.
So
we
you
know
I,
we
may
have
conversations
we
may
decide.
Some
are
not
that
good.
Let
me
ask
some
that
should
be
added
to
and
so
I
don't
think
you
know.
Bellevue
hasn't
been
doing
this
because
I've
been
in
about.
You
has
a
real
conscientious
citizen
resident
based
that
we
volunteer
to
do
the
right
thing
you
know.
C
But
now,
if
we
say
well,
we
don't
want
to
do
it
unless
we
got
some
Financial
benefit
unless
we
get
paid
and
that's
how
tax
got
reduced
I
don't
mean
that
this
is
necessarily
the
case.
We're
looking
at
but
I'm
trying
to
say
is
we're
opening
up
the
door
for
things
that
is
not
going
to
be
conducive
to
like
we
do.
We
have
an
open
space.
C
Okay,
we
have
climate
change,
but
we're
very
much
change,
we're
doing
it,
but
that's
not
just
pick
and
choosing
do
it
spot
wise,
so
I
I,
you
know
I
hope
we
don't
make
decision
based
on
incomplete
information,
inadequate
information
and
piecemeal
method,
so
I
will
not
support
it.
But
if
we
do
I
hope
that
you
go
to,
you
know
the
minimum,
but
I
hope
that
we
don't
make
decision
that
way.
We
make
decision
based
on
complete
information
and
planning
and
public
transparency
and
climate.
This
has
great
impact.
Thank
you.
A
All
right
so
I
don't
have
any
further
questions
myself,
I'm
still
pretty
comfortable
with
the
0.23
and
I
haven't
heard
anything
that
convinces
me
of
the
other
two
Parcels.
To
be
honest
with
you,
council
members
on.
E
Listen
to
the
discussion
about
the
conditional
approval
of
the
two
Parcels
I
guess,
the
question
I
would
have
is
if
we
approved
the
recommendation,
as
is,
does
this
come
back
to
us
once
the
conditional
approval
piece
has
been
evaluated
and
the
reason
I
ask
this
is
because
there
this
gives
us
the
opportunity
in
this
parcel,
which
is
the
only
one
we're
evaluating
right
here,
the
ability
to
have
planting
and
Restoration
in
the
PSE
easement,
which,
without
this
that
area
may
not
actually
have
any
trees.
E
T
That's
correct
council
member
is
on
so
the
conditional
approval
area.
This
is
the
not
the
0.23,
but
the
in
the
map.
You'll
see
it's
a
section,
A
and
B
I
believe
it's
called.
Those
will
require
respiration.
So
there's
a
that's
why
it's
conditionally
approved
the
property
owner
would
have
to
go
in
there
and,
as
Nick
mentioned
earlier,
replace
what
is
there
now,
which
is
grass
with
a
native
species,
and
things
like
that.
T
All
of
that
and
it's
part
of
the
the
staff
report
and
the
conditions
within
the
staff
report
that
King
County
has
produced
and
prepared
to
your
question
earlier
about
whether
this
goes
back
to
council.
It
would
not
if
Council
does
approve
this,
as
is
it
would.
We
would
simply
have
that
agreement
run
up.
The
agreement
would
include
other
things
that
the
property
owners
would
need
to
agree
to
in
order
to
be
enrolled
into
this
program
and
to
execute
on
those
conditions,
but
they
would
not.
E
L
E
E
Correct
okay,
so
if
we
voted
on
this,
as
is
then
we
actually
are
not
approving
the
conditional
piece,
because
if
the
owner
does
not
follow
through,
then
it
reverts
back
to
the
0.23
which
I
understand.
My
colleagues
are
concerned
about
the
conditional
one
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I
understand
it
correctly,
because,
based
on
that
understanding,
I'm
inclined
to
approve,
as
is
thank
you.
O
D
I
think
it's
to
me:
it's
there's
a
lot
of
smoke
and
mirrors
going
on,
but
the
reality
is
that
these
things
we're
looking
at
these
12
or
so
are
things
we
talk
about.
I
think
we
have
most
of
those
in
our
plans
about
different
things,
and
it's
it's
basically,
when
you
look
at
it,
they're
going
to
have
to
do
those
things
to
not
get
the
the
tax
break,
which
is
a
tiny
amount.
I
mean
even
it's
200.
D
It's
only
it's
a
lot
of
people
and
a
lot
of
work
done,
and
it's
not
that
much
and
we're
asking
we're
basically,
in
effect,
giving
them
a
little
opportunity
to
have
some
finances
to
do
this
stuff
too.
I
mean
it's
it's
to
me.
D
It's
a
really
effective
and
Innovation
Way
to
do
something
like
this
and
we're
we're
spending
more
time
and
energy,
and
if
we
keep
going
on
on
this
thing,
we're
going
to
spend
more
than
we
would
lose
on
the
tax
base
for
this
property
right
now
in
the
next
couple
of
weeks,.
D
Is
it
well
one?
We
could
go
back
and
get
them
and
see
it.
The
idea
that
somehow
or
other
we
don't
know
by
at
least
one
person
how
what
we're
doing
or
what
this
means
in
these
12
things.
We
don't
know
if
that's
the
right
ones,
what
we're
doing
it's
awful
and
it's
not
going
to
happen,
and
we
shouldn't
do
this,
because
this
is
something
that
we
can't
figure
out
well,.
D
That
there,
okay,
okay,
thank
you.
This
is
a
very
important
thing.
So
if
we
get
a
little
bit,
you
know
I'm,
not
the
only
one
who
gets
a
little
bit
up
on
these
things.
You
know
that
so
I
I
just
think
that
this
is
not
a
difficult
decision
and
it's
a
good
thing
to
do
and
as
as
councilman
said,
let's
go
ahead,
approve
it
as
presented
to
us
and
then,
if
the
conditional
things
work
out,
that'll
be
great.
If
it
doesn't,
it
doesn't.
A
Okay,
I
have
one
more
question
for
Megan
is:
is
there
any
kind
of
like
checking
up
on
this
later,
like
five
years
from
now,
to
see
that
somebody
hasn't
made
it
their
their
personal
property
again
that
it's
still
I
guess
it
doesn't
have
to
have
Public
Access?
That
was
in
the
Criterion
section
right.
A
X
Pbrs
stuff,
we
are
the
ones
that
are
basically
our
monitoring
plan.
Is
we
try
to
do
every
seven
years?
There's
only
two
staff
members,
my
you're
meeting,
half
the
staff,
my
other
colleague
is
Bill
Bernstein
and
we
go
through
and
whether
it's
either
aerial
photography
or
if
the
property
sells
or
in
person
and
just
doing
site
visits
with
them.
X
So
we
have
and
also
a
landowner
monitoring
report
on
our
website
that
we
host
for
landowners
to
self-monitor
to
kind
of
alleviate
the
burden,
and
so
yes,
especially
a
property
like
this,
where
there's
such
an
extensive
restoration
project,
that's
going
to
be
quite
considerable,
with
the
county,
approving
the
city
approving
and
also
the
easement
holders,
approving
I
think
we
would
all
be
very
comfortable
by
the
end
of
this
that
the
work
would
be
completed
since
there'll,
be
so
many
different
entities
with
eyes
on
this
one.
So.
A
When
the
prob,
if
and
when
the
property
does
sell,
let's
say
it
sells
three
years
from
now:
does
it
retain
that
same
status
or
could
the
new
owner
tear
down
the
house
and
and
build
a
big
house
in
sections
a
or
I
guess,
not
a
or
section
B.
X
That's
a
great
question:
we
process
about
100
sales
a
year
and
it's
really
going
to
be
dependent
on
I
guess,
what's
legally
allowed
in
the
city
of
Bellevue,
for
a
landowner
to
do
and
build.
If
they
wanted
to
remove
open
space
to
build
a
larger
house,
they
would
have
to
pay
the
compensating
taxes
if
it's
under
10
years.
If
the
landowner
sells
under
10
years,
it
would
be
up
to
the
last
seven
years
in
interest
and
a
20
penalty.
X
If
it's
after
10
years
to
remove
that
portion,
it
would
be,
and
it's
in
compliance
it
would
be
up
to
the
last
seven
years
and
an
interest
in
the
20
penalty
will
be
waived
whether
or
not
they
could
build.
The
house
would
be
up
to
the
Bellevue
codes
and
it's
likely
that
they
would
also
lose
percentage
points
and
have
a
lower.
They
might
lose
out
on
that
Urban
open
space
category,
so
the
percentage
would
decrease.
X
O
C
Y
Yeah,
the
full
from
staff.
W
W
X
Resistant
language
is
from
the
1950s,
which
is
why
some
of
the
in
the
report,
that
is,
that
Nick,
has
submitted
with
the
other
information
here.
It
talks
about
how
the
1950
easement
doesn't
quite
meet
the
standards
of
2022
pbrs
staff
in
the
water
and
land
Resources
Division,
to
get
some
of
the
other
categories
that
other
Trail
properties
could
potentially
depending
on
what
was
in
the
trail
easement.
It's
pretty
vague,
just
based
off
of
you
know
when
the
easement,
so
it
is
a
recorded
easement,
it's
in
perpetuity.
It's
just.
X
It
doesn't
talk
about
the
user
groups.
It
doesn't
have
a
lot
more
information
that
we
require.
W
Okay
and
I
just
was
looking
at
the
report.
It
says
the
trail
there's
no
agreement
between
the
owner
and
King
County
to
maintain
the
trail,
nor
does
it
provide
linkage
between
the
trails
with
the
County's
Regional
Trail
system,
which
are
required
for
an
award
of
this
category.
Therefore,
this
category
cannot
be
recommended
by
the
staff
and
King
County
denied
Award
of
this
category
following
their
public
hearing.
A
Is
actually
I
think
if
I'm
I
think
that
this
is
a
horse
trail
that
this
is
an
unofficial,
equestrian
Trail
through
Bridal
Trails?
Okay,
that
some
homeowners
are
actually
thinking
about
because
they're
not
into
horses,
building
their
yard
into
and
it
would
break
up
the
equestrian
Trail
I
know
that's
a
very
valued
Trail
actually
from
by
some
of
the
new
neighborhood.
W
So,
from
my
perspective,
I'll
be
done
in
a
second
council
member
Lee.
From
my
perspective,
if
we
Grant
this
eligible
portion,
I
think
we
should
condition
it
on
cleaning
up
the
easement
and
granting
a
newer,
cleaner
easement
to
allow
in
perpetuity
public
Trail
access
there
and
to
allow
people
AKA
the
city
or
the
county
onto
the
property
to
maintain
the
trail.
W
That
seems
to
me
to
be
a
really
appropriate
condition
if
we
want
to
allow
this
eligible
portion.
If
we
are
going
to
vote
tonight,
I
would
ask
that
we
vote
on
the
eligible
portion,
section,
A
and
section
B
separately,
because
it
seems
like
we
have
a
potentially
have
a
three
three
split
on
some
of
the
issues
so
or
we
put
this
off
and
vote
at
a
later
date.
C
Amen
question
is
based
on
what
council
member
Robert
had
mentioned.
If
we
propose
a
condition
with
some
other
vacations,
would
the
land
owner
be
automatically
accepting
it
or
do
they
have
opportunity
to
withdraw
the
application.
U
So
if
the
conditions
are
different
than
the
conditions
that
King
County
issued
in
their
decision
than
the
modified
condition
or
additional
conditions
would
have
to
go
back
to
King
County,
if
they're
in
agreement
with
those
conditions,
then
that
we
would
proceed
in
the
process,
it
would
not
be
coming
back
to
the
city
council.
C
X
Oh
well,
they
can
always
withdraw
so
if
they're
unhappy,
with
the
conditions
that
are
being
brought
to
them
at
any
point,
they
can
withdraw
their
application
and
they
won't
know
they
won't
be
stuck.
They
will
have
the
ability
to
withdraw
okay.
C
I
just
wanted
a
mixed
statement
that
you
know
with
all
the
questions
asked.
I
know
the
statistician
made
I
think
they're
all
great
great
magician,
great
ideas
right.
It's
all
getting
to
the
point
of
a
better
discussion
and
better
process
and
better
conclusion
you
know,
and
but
we
are
just
getting
into
it.
C
I
have
no
idea
what
other
ideas
may
come
up
with
I,
even
though
any
idea,
maybe
one
of
the
tickets
into
this
further
asking
staff
more
questions
like
they
just
presented
there'll,
be
more
ideas,
come
up
with
so
I,
don't
like
to
make
decisions
based
on
incomplete
information.
Working
podcasts
I
would
like
to
know
exactly
what
we
got.
So,
if
my
you
know,
council
member
so
suggested
that
by
asking
too
many
questions
by
asking
questions
about
whatever
that's
presented
or
presenting
The
public's
interest-
and
that
is
a
smoky
mirror,
I
wear
that
with
a.
A
Thank
you.
Let's
see
who
are
you
on
to
me?
Okay,
so
this
is
a
good
discussion,
actually
I'm
feeling
stronger
about
the
other
portions.
To
be
honest
with
you,
I
do
like
councilmember
Robertson's
idea
of
requiring
that
the
eligible
portion
be
allow
access,
make
sure
that
that
portion
does
allow
access
as
a
trail,
if
it
doesn't
already
I,
think
that's
fair,
so
yeah
I'm
I'm
more
open
to
the
other
two
sections,
especially
with
the
information
that
Megan
provided
me.
D
Hang
on
that's
interesting
to
look
at
that
is
going
back
to
the
original.
Maybe
you
got
staff
to
kind
of
go
over
it
again,
but
is
the
the
eligible
portion
strictly
restricted
to
having
a
trail
through
that
or
I
mean
technically
they
could
do
any
of
those
12
things
to
get
approval.
D
Have
you
set
it
up
so
that
it
if
it,
if
they
don't
put
a
trail,
they
don't
get
the
they
can't
participate.
They.
X
Don't
have
to
have
the
trail
easement
in
the
sense
that
they,
okay,
so
there's
the
they're
getting
the
public
Recreation,
so
the
public
recreates
they
they
walk.
They
hike.
However,
you
would
like
you
know
they
passively
come
through
here.
There's
also
horseback
Riders,
so
we're
looking
at
it
not
from
a
trail
easement,
because
the
trail
easement
that
they
currently
have
does
not
meet
the
standards
of
water
and
land.
X
There
is
an
easement,
it's
already
potentially
protected
in
perpetuity.
It
just
doesn't
have
the
documentation
that
someone
today
writing
an
easement
would
write,
and
so
from
that
Willard
staff
decided
to
say
you
know
what
we'll
give
you
Public
Access
and
we
will
give
you
the
public
Recreation.
X
That's
a
10
percent
I
would
be
it's
an
interesting
idea
to
offer
the
cat,
if
you're,
going
to
offer
the
condition
that
it
needs
to
come
up
to
2022
standards,
that
being
the
trail
easement,
then
we
would
potentially
need
to
investigate
that
now
they
do
qualify
for
those
Trail
categories
and
that's
a
35
and
that's
a
90
reduction.
That's
a
35
Point
and
that's
a
90
reduction.
O
X
X
The
big
benefit
for
that
I,
don't
know
what
the
process
would
be
we're
doing
this
backwards.
Usually
we
have
the
city
go
through
the
legislative
process
and
then
the
county
goes
so
that
we
can
kind
of
work
these
things
out.
In
this
instance,
we
have
something:
that's
kind
of
gone
backwards,
so
a
little
bit
Uncharted
Territory
here,
but
we
could
work
potentially
with
our
Council
and
see,
but.
A
O
E
Recommendation
that's
in
more
detail
in
our
attachment
because
it
does
talk
about
the
consequences
for
non-compliance
and
the
failure
to
meet
penalties
and
taxes
and
interest
Provisions.
So
to
me,
I'm
satisfied
that
the
the
the
remedy
for
non-compliance
is
in
place
and
I'm
prepared
to
support
the
recommendation.
That's
in
front
of
us
thanks
councilmember
bergsdale.
A
Okay,
I'm
going
to
ask
the
council
if
they
would
feel
comfortable
if
we
didn't
vote
on
this
tonight-
and
we
ask
the
Bridal
Trails
neighborhood
association
to
have
a
way
in
on
this,
because
this
trail
that
we're
talking
about
in
the
eligible
portion
I
think
this
is
an
opportunity
for
them
to
decide
if
they
want
to
work
with
the
county
and
re
kind
of
make
this
an
official,
equestrian,
Trail
or
not,
because
at
this
point
a
neighbor
next
to
them
can
plant
into
that
trail.
And
then
it's
an
incomplete
Trail.
A
T
Yeah,
we
can
definitely
reach
out
to
see
whether
they're
interested
in
providing
comments
at
our
whatever
the
next
meeting
that
we
schedule
on
this
or.
A
Can
you
give
me
a
head
nod
if
you're,
okay,
with
this,
of
bringing
it
back
with
more
input
from
the
community?
A
B
Sorry,
a
die
is
counted
in
the
negative,
so
it
would
fail.
W
Tied
it
fails,
but
you
were
just
asking
for
a
head
nod
to
postpone
in
addition
to
that
information,
I
would
like
to
I'd
like
to
get
more
information
about
the
trail,
I'd
like
to
get
more
information
about
the
long-term
impact
to
the
Bellevue
tax
base,
based
on
the
presidential
value
of
this.
W
A
Y
W
They
only
themselves
use
I,
don't
see
a
huge
public
benefit
to
that,
and
it
seems
to
me
a
bit
of
a
giveaway
on
the
taxes
for
encouraging
someone
just
to
make
their
own
yard
really
nice
on
the
public
access
I'd
like
I'd,
like
more
information
on
that
I,
the
eligible
portion,
if
it's
a
trail
that
can
be
kept
in
perpetuity,
I'd
be
supportive
of
that,
but
otherwise
can't
support
this
I!
Think
it's
it's
not
the
time
and
I
also
think
it's
rather
ungracious.
W
C
Absolutely
I
like
to
make
a
statement.
Yes,
I
completely
agree
with
the
councilmember
Robertson,
as
I
mentioned
before
you
know,
we
don't
make
decisions
haphazardly
with
like
a
company
information,
and
this
is
I
said
you
mentioned
generational
thing,
and
you
know
this
as
we
find.
As
we
start
talking
more,
we
are
finding
more
information
come
on.
Let's
give
the
chance.
What's
the
rush,
so
I
will
completely
vote
against
this,
not
because
we
don't
believe
in
this.
It's
absolutely
good
thing
all
the
criteria,
but
we're
going
to
do
it
right.
A
Thank
you.
I
will
just
say
that
when
we're
talking
about
the
possibility
of
allowing
adus
and
dads
in
all
our
neighborhoods,
this
decision,
if
we
were
to
approve
this
tonight,
would
totally
negate
the
possibility
of
that
on
this
property
without
a
lot
of
a
lot
more
money
for
the
developer.
Any
other
comments
or
questions.
X
Sorry
I
do
this
is
Megan
I
I
think
it
was
councilmember
Robertson.
There
are
19
different
categories:
okay,.
A
If
anybody
would
like
to
hear
Megan's
explanation,
they
can
ask
for
it,
but
I'm
going
to
let
councilmember
Barksdale
continue.
Y
I
am
interested
in
Megan's
perspective
being
familiar
with
pbrs
I'll,
just
say
before
that
that
I
I
think
in
terms
of
preventing
housing,
if
the,
if
the
owner
doesn't
intend
to
develop
the
property
already
I,
don't
know
that
that's
necessarily
just
prevents
them,
or
you
know,
creates
an
objection
to
that
or
counter
to
that
I
think
it's
already
been
made
that
this
isn't
really
a
new
program
and
staff
has
had
a
chance
to
look
at
it
and
and
sort
of
vet
the
program
within
the
context
of
Bellevue,
so
I'm,
confident
in
that
and
I
think
it
aligns
with
our
environmental
stewardship
goals.
A
X
This
program
would
not
just
it's
not
going
to
just
benefit
people
who
want
to
do
a
planting
to
make
their
properties
nice.
They
would
have
to
legitimately
meet
one
of
the
19
different
criterias,
possibly
with
the
bonus
categories
that
we
have
for
like
resource
restoration
or
something
like
that,
they
would
have
to
be
at
least
a
five
point
minimum
that
they
would
have
to
meet
for
at
like
whether
it
is
going
to
be
aquifer
protection.
Do
are
they
stream
side?
Is
it
historic?
X
Are
they
buffering
open
space,
whether
it's
public
land
or
another
property,
located
it
or
located
with
pbrs?
So
it's
I
I,
don't
have
the
same,
worry
that
you
know.
Properties
are
just
going
to
be
coming
in
because
it
would
have
to
have
a
legitimate
reason
to
be
evaluated
for
pbrs
and
there's
a
620
application
fee
for
people
to
come
in
so
I
wouldn't
expect
a
lot
of
people
to
want
to
do.
X
You
know
pay
that
money
and
not
get
the
benefit,
and
now
speaking
to
the
Adu
and
the
Adu,
if
the,
if
Bellevue
allowed
for
them
to
build
an
Adu,
you
know
the
ineligible
portion
for
pbrs
wise.
They
can
do
what
they
please,
as
long
as
it's
legally
allowed
in
Bellevue,
if
they're
going
to
want
to
put
something
in
the
open
space,
that's
when
they're
going
to
run
into
issues
with
either
the
cat
like
we
talked
about
earlier,
either
the
cat
a
category
will
get
removed.
X
So
there
will
be
a
percentage
reduction
in
savings,
but
also
they'll
have
to
pay
to
remove
that
acreage,
that's
impacted!
So
there
is
the
fine.
There
will
be
Financial
repercussions
for
you
know
going
into
the
open
space.
Okay,.
E
And
so
I
was
just
thinking
about
some
of
the
comments
made
and
and
I
just
want
to
be
clear.
The
the
19
categories
are
established
within
this
act
and
then
each
property
is
evaluated
within
those
categories.
So
are
we're
not
actually
setting
precedent
any
differently
than
what's
in
the
19
categories?
Is
that
correct?
E
That's
correct,
Council
member's
on,
so
the
question
then
becomes
whether
we're
interpreting
the
19
categories
correctly
or
not,
because
I
I
hear
concern
about
whether
decisions
that
are
made
are
based
in
established
criteria,
whether
we're
going
to
set
precedence
and
isn't
the
precedent
set
as
part
of
the
1970
Act
of
these
19
categories
and
the
criteria.
A
D
U
E
A
W
Make
a
motion
to
have
this
come
back
with
answers
to
our
questions
at
another
date.
Since
it
failed,
we
didn't
pass.
Yes,
you
may
make
a
motion.
Okay,
can
you
make
a
motion
to
I
move
to
have
this
come
back
at
a
later
date
with
answers
to
the
questions
and
if
we
can
get
it
input
from
the
neighborhood
association.
A
A
Q
Topic
tonight
relates
to
the
for
approval
of
a
period
for
the
temporary
Public
Safety
facilities
and
it's
a
proposed
land
use
code
which
would
allow
the
director
of
development
services
to
Grant
multiple
extensions
to
approval
for
the
temporary
Public
Safety
facilities,
who
are
appropriate
up
for
Council
consideration
this
evening
for
Council
is
for
Council
to
enter
a
finding
of
necessity
to
process
this
land
use
code,
Amendment
and
direct
staff
to
prepare
the
proposed
land
use
code
Amendment
for
public
hearing
so
joining
us
this
evening,
once
again
is
Nick
Weber
our
code
and
policy
planning
manager
as
well
as
Matthew
Menard
senior
planner
Nick.
U
Great
thank
you
and
good
evening
again,
mayor
Robinson
and
Council.
We
are
here
tonight
as
a
city
manager,
Miyaki
mentioned
to
talk
about
temporary
Public,
Safety
facilities
and
a
land
use
code.
Amendment
related
to
that
and
with
me
making
his
debut
this
evening
is
Matthew
Menard
senior
planner
in
development
services.
He
joined
the
city
back
in
March,
so
we're
happy
to
have
him
here.
U
So
tonight,
staff
is
recommending
that
Council
enter
finding
of
necessity
to
retain
processing
of
this
land
use
code,
Amendment
and
then
direct
staff
to
schedule.
The
public
hearing
so
for
our
meeting
tonight,
we'll
be
covering
some
information
about
what
a
temporary
Public
Safety
facility
is.
We'll
also
talk
about
the
objectives
and
components
of
this
land
use
code,
Amendment
and
then
the
process
to
adoption
before
ending
with
the
ask
of
council.
Z
You
Nick
good
evening,
mayor
members
of
council,
as
Nick
mentioned,
I
will
start
with
a
general
overview
of
what
a
temporary
Public
Safety
facility
is
in
sort
of
broad
terms.
It's
a
facility
that
provides
services
during
a
declared
natural
disaster
or
unforeseen
emergency
circumstance.
When
we
say
declared,
we
mean
it
must
be
declared
officially
by
the
city
manager.
So
he
has
to
issue
that
declaration.
Z
There's
two
examples
recently,
one
which
is
currently
operating
that
you
can
see
in
the
picture
on
the
slide
there,
which
is
the
overnight
Men's
Shelter
at
Lincoln
Center
and
it's
been
operated
by
cfh.
The
other
one
is
a
temporary
Public
Safety
facility
at
Red
Lion
that
was
in
operation
during
the
covid
pandemic,
also
related
to
homelessness.
Z
Currently,
the
code
allows
the
DSD
director,
so
the
development
services
director
won
24-month
initial
approval
period
and
then
one
12-month
extension
to
that
approval
period.
So
a
total
of
a
36
month
period
of
approval
for
those
temporary
Public
Safety
facilities.
They
are
exempt
from
discretionary
land
use
approvals
and
many
facets
of
the
land
use
code.
I
should
note
that
the
director,
when
approving
them,
can
put
conditions
on
that
approval
to
make
sure
that
they're
consistent
with
the
surrounding
neighborhood.
Z
Here
we
go
so
the
objectives
of
this
Luca
should
be
noted.
This
update
is
Administrative
only
so
it
only
affects
the
approval
criteria
doesn't
affect
any
of
the
other
requirements
or
exemptions
of
the
temporary
Public
Safety
facilities.
The
overall
goal
is
to
ensure
that,
in
an
emergency
circumstance
of
greater
than
36
months,
there's
continuity
of
those
emergency
services,
so
we're
not
forcing
operations
to
move
or
breaking
up
time
periods
which
they
can
operate.
Z
It
also
does
allow
that
overnight
facility
at
Lincoln
Center
to
continue
operating
their
original
approval
was
in
2019,
so
they're
coming
to
the
end
of
their
36
month
period
in
December
there,
as
we
heard
from
public
comments,
they're
expecting
to
complete
their
shelter
in
early
2023.
So
to
fill
that
Gap,
we
would
need
to
change
this
section
of
code
to
allow
them
to
continue
to
operate
at
Lincoln
Center,
so
the
proposed
Luca
there's
our
vision
to
the
start,
State
or
the
approval
date
of
that
operational
period.
Z
Currently
it's
from
date
of
operations,
so
36
months
from
that
original
date
of
operation,
we
are
suggesting
that
the
change
be
to
the
date
of
approval.
It's
more
consistent
with
other
sections
of
the
land
use
code
and
it
does
make
sure
that
we
have
that
paper
trail
of
knowing
when
that
exact
date
is
that
it's
approved.
Z
The
other
change
is
to
allow
multiple,
12-month
extensions,
rather
than
that
single
12-month
extension,
to
allow
again
for
a
greater
period
to
make
sure
that
there's
continuity
of
services
throughout
that
emergency
period.
If
that
does
last
for
greater
than
36
months
the
process
for
this,
it
is
a
process
for
legislative
action
that
will
include
a
notice
of
application
and
also
public
hearing
joint
notice.
If
this
is
moved
on
to
a
public
hearing
will
be
issued
in
the
weekly
bulletin
and
then
a
nose
of
public
hearing
will
be
issued
in
the
Seattle
Times.
Z
There
are
two
points
for
public
input,
one
being
tonight,
which
we
did
here
at
Republic
input
this
evening
and
then
one
at
the
public
hearing
which
that
date
will
be
to
be
decided
and
again
to
reiterate
the
recommended
direction.
We
are
asking
that
you
all
find
enter
a
finding
necessity,
just
to
make
sure
that
the
cfh
facility
can
continue
to
operate
again.
That
approval
runs
out
in
December
of
this
year
and
then
direct
staff
to
schedule
the
public
hearing
and
with
that
I
will
hand
it
back
to
you,
mayor.
U
And
so
councilmember
Stokes,
the
current
code
does
have
the
date
of
commencement
of
operations
as
the
start
period
and
just
to
sync
it
up
and,
as
Matthew
noted,
be
more
consistent
with
how
we
measure
duration
in
the
land
use
code,
it's
typically
from
the
date
that
the
director
issues
their
approval
or
decision
as
that
more
logical
kind
of
start
time,
so
the
difference
would
just
be.
We
have
a
better
record
as
to
exactly
when
that's
that
clock
begins.
U
Could
potentially,
since
it
may
take
a
little
bit
of
time,
I
guess
for
commencement
of
operations
to
begin
as
compared
to
the
date
of
approval.
D
U
Yes,
it
would
give
the
director
authority
to
extend
up
to
12
months
multiple
times
and
as
long
as
that,
emergency
circumstance
persists.
W
Councilmember
Robertson,
so
as
it
is
today,
the
first
approval
period
I'm
not
seeing
it
here
is
oh
two
years
and
then
additional
12
months
extension
with
no
limit
is
proposed.
So
let
me
just
start
first
welcome
Matthew
to
the
to
the
city,
council
and
first
I,
absolutely
support
doing
a
finding
a
necessity.
I
think
we
need
to
process
this
in
full
transparency
to
share
staff
where
I'm
thinking
about
this
is
I,
think
this
is
really
appropriate
and
when
it
comes
up,
I
think
that
it's
something
we
should
do.
W
We
want
to
make
sure
that
the
men's
shelter
continue
to
operate
until
the
ribbon,
cutting
and
Co
is
issued
and
people
are
moving
into
that
facility.
That
said,
I'm
a
little
uncomfortable
with
an
unlimited
number
of
extensions,
so
I
would
like
to
have
staff
think
about
when,
because
this
land
use
code
will
be
for
all
different
kinds
of
facilities
until
it's
changed
by
Council,
which
we
know
we
don't
update
our
land
use
code.
W
Very
often,
I
would
like
to
have
something
in
place
where,
after
60
months,
if
it's
going
to
be
extended
again,
they
have,
they
might
get.
Another
extension
conditioned
on
applying
and
going
through
the
permitting
process.
At
some
point
it
becomes
permanent
under
NEPA
I
think
it
was
which
is
National.
Environmental,
protect,
Policy,
Act
production,
Act,
an
impact
for
24
months
is
considered
permanent
or
12
months
is
considered
permanent.
So
at
some
point
this
has
to
be
considered
kind
of
permanent
and
they
should
have
to
go
through
the
regulations
rather
than
as
an
emergency.
W
To
me,
five
years
seems
48
months
to
60
months
seems
to
be
the
right
right
trigger,
so
I'd
like
to
get
some
staff
input
on
that
when
it
comes
back.
Is
this
I
guess?
My
question
also
is:
what
is
the
schedule
for
this
coming
to
council
for
action?
Has
this
already
been
sent
to
Commerce
for
expedited
review?
W
What
you
know
when
do
we
need
to
pass
this
to
allow
the
30-day
trigger
to
not
you
know
if
we
don't
pass
it
until
30
days
or
more
or
fewer
towards
the
expiration
of
the
current
use,
then
they
can't
meet
the
30-day
notice
to
extend.
So
how
are
we
on
schedule
to
make
that
timing
to
make
it
so
that
they
can
apply
and
to
what
is
that
timing.
U
Thanks
for
the
question,
in
short,
yes,
we
are
on
schedule
to
meet
that
time.
We
have
submitted
a
request
of
Commerce
to
expedite
the
review
of
this
land
use
code
Amendment,
and
we
are
also
tentatively
scheduled
for
the
end
of
this
month
to
bring
this
back
for
public
hearing
to
allow
enough
time
for
the
approval
of
the
ordinance
in
order
for
cfh
to
also
continue
operations.
Okay,.
W
U
A
You,
yes,
so
I'm,
just
gonna,
say
I'm,
really
appreciative
of
this
of
the
ability
to
pass
this,
because
it
means
a
seamless
transition
from
the
temporary
shelter
to
the
permanent,
shelter
and
I
think
that's
critical
for
the
success
of
the
people
involved
in
terms
of
after
a
certain
point
it
becoming
permanent.
It's
the
criteria
for
having
the
temporary
Public
Safety
facilities
indicate
to
me
that
there
are
certain
I
know.
The
fire
codes
are
involved.
A
I
know,
there's
a
lot
of
things
involved
that
get
waived
or
that
are
considered
when
it
comes
to
a
temporary
emergency
facility
like
this
and
I'm,
not
sure
that
I'd
be
comfortable
just
making
that
a
permanent
thing.
So
I
would
like
to
bring
more
information
back
on
the
impacts
of
doing
that
recommendation,
any
other
comments
or
questions
or
want
to
yes,.
W
I
think
maybe
I
wasn't
speaking
as
clearly
as
I
thought.
What
I
didn't
what
I
didn't
mean
was
a
temper
of
temporary
emergency
use
becomes
permanent.
W
A
Yep
thanks
that
would
be
good
to
have
more
clarification,
any
other
okay.
Would
someone
like
to
make
the
motion.
A
W
A
U
Great
excuse
me
thank
you
and
and
good
evening
again,
so
a
very
similar
process
set
up
with
this
item
tonight.
So
this
is,
as
the
city
manager
Miyaki
mentioned,
a
study
session
regarding
our
in-home
family
child
care
regulations
in
the
land
use
code.
This
Luca
is
in
response
to
State
Law
changes
that
became
effective
earlier
this
year
and
then
joining
me
tonight
is
Caleb
Miller,
Senior
planner
and
development
services.
U
So
this
evening
we
are,
we
are
seeking
direction
for
Council
to
find
make
a
finding
a
necessity
to
retain
processing
of
this
Luca.
The
Luca
is
a
relatively
small
change
and
it's
intended
to
conform
to
recent
changes
in
state
law,
so
staff
is
recommending
that
Council
enter
a
finding
of
necessity
to
retain
processing
for
those
reasons
and
direct
staff
to
schedule
the
public
hearing.
AA
AA
It
also
states
that
they
cannot
provide
care
for
a
period
of
more
than
24
hours
in
the
definition
as
well,
and
the
land
use
code
requirements
do,
however,
point
to
the
state
licensing
requirements
established
by
the
department
of
children,
youth
and
families
or
dcyf
last
year
in
2021,
the
Washington
State
Legislature
adopted
Senate
Bill
5237,
and
it
was
signed
by
the
governor.
AA
This
bill
included
various
different
Provisions
related
to
child
care
and
early
learning,
but,
and
all
of
these
were
intended
to
expand
Child
Care
capacity
and
access
in
the
state
in
response
to
the
covid-19
pandemic
and
the
effects
that
it
had
on
child
care.
AA
AA
The
waiver
rules
and
procedures
were
codified
by
dcyf
in
January
of
this
year
and
these
things
like
they
account
for
things
like
the
floor
area
of
the
house,
the
step
to
Children
ratios
licensing
experience
and
so
on.
Before
granting
that
waiver.
AA
AA
The
Luca
also
revises
the
particular
use
requirements
for
family
child
care
homes,
to
a
update
references
that
were
outdated
to
State
agencies
and
codes,
and
then
also
to
clean
up
other
code
references
within
the
latest
code
as
needed.
Besides,
these
changes,
all
other
City
requirements
that
apply
to
family
child
care
homes
will
remain.
There
are
no
other
proposed
changes
as
part
of
this
Luca.
AA
In
terms
of
the
process,
this
will
follow
the
process
for
legislative
requirements.
These
include
a
required
notice
of
application,
and
public
hearing
should
Council
direct
staff
to
schedule
the
public
hearing.
This
will
be
issued
later
this
week.
We
do
have
hearing
tentatively
scheduled
for
the
end
of
this
month
as
well.
AA
AA
And
so
with
that
staff
are
seeking
Council
direction
to
enter
a
finding
of
necessity
for
Council
to
process
this
Luca
and
then
direct
staff
to
schedule.
The
public
hearing
and
I'll
pass
it
back
to
the
mayor.
AB
Are
you
talking
about
the
lead,
12.
talk
about
the
12
wave,
a
waiver
of
more
than
12.?
We
think
it
is
likely
the
city's
preempted.
W
Here:
okay,
that's
that's
good
to
know,
and
then
does
the
city
have
any
role
in
the
waiver
process,
for
example,
if
a
single-family
home
wants
to
have
24
children
and
the
vehicle
trips
are
going
to
severely
impact
the
neighborhood.
Does
the
city
have
a
role
in
the
licensing
decision
to
give
the
waiver.
AA
W
Because
I
really
do
appreciate
the
idea
of
expanding
child
care,
but
putting
them
in
single-family
neighborhoods
that
try
the
traffic
impacts,
which
makes
potentially
other
neighborhood
kids
less
safe,
serve
that
it's
a
pretty
big
business
if
you
have
above
12
children
being
served
in
a
home
as
a
daycare
anyway.
But
that
said,
and
if
any
of
this
information
you
turn
out
to
have
more
information
when
this
comes
to
public
care
and
please
provide
it,
I
do
support
having
a
finding
necessity
here
and
going
ahead
and
processing
this
thanks.
Okay,.
Y
Is
you've
probably
heard
me
comment
before
on
Mom
and
Pop
Child
Care,
Facilities
I
think
this
is
important
because
I
think
for
many
of
our
residents
it's
easier
to
hand
off
between
parents
or
guardians
or
whatever
closer
to
their
home,
as
opposed
to
closer
to
where
they
work,
which
may
be
in
sort
of
a
Tod
area.
So
I'm
excited
about
this
coming
forward
and
looking
forward
to
getting
this
through.
A
And
I'll
just
say
that
we
know
that
there's
a
real
shortage
of
child
care
in
our
city
and
that
at
a
big
deterrent
for
working
parents
to
be
able
to
go
to
work
if
they
have
family
responsibility.
So
this
I
support
and
I
will
be
voting
to
approve
the
motion.
Is
there
any
other?
Yes,
council
members
on.
E
E
AA
AA
D
A
A
second
all,
those
in
favor
say
aye
aye,
any
opposed.
Okay
that
passes
even
the
notes.
We
have
an
ordinance
Mr
Miyake.
Thank
you.
Thank.
Q
You
thank
you
Mary
council
member
I'm
under
item
12,
a
we
have
ordinance
6674,
adding
a
new
section
to
chapter
3.34,
the
Bellevue
city
code,
prohibiting
police
assistance
with
Interstate
abortion
related
investigations.
Q
This
matter
has
been
in
front
of
the
council
under
Council
business
at
one
time
where
information
was
requested
on
this
and
joining
us
this
evening
is
Kathy
gerla,
our
City
attorney
as
well
as
Melissa
chin,
while
working
with
Kathy
within
the
police
department.
So
with
that
I
will
turn
it
over
to
you.
AB
Thank
you,
Mr
Miyake,
good
evening,
mayor
and
council
members,
August
1st.
As
you
may
remember,
the
council
voted
to
approve
councilmember
Robertson's
request
to
have
the
city
attorney's
office.
Do
some
research
into
whether
there's
a
legally
available
option
for
the
council
to
prevent
use
of
Bellevue
Police
Department
resources
to
support
and
cooperate
with
an
out-of-state
investigation
involving
abortion
related
conduct?
So
we
have
done
that
work
and
are
back
to
give
a
brief
staff
report
on
the
on
the
results
and
an
option
that
we
believe
is
legally
available
to
the
council.
AB
AC
All
right,
thank
you
good
evening,
mayor
Robinson
and
council
members.
The
city
attorney's
office
returns
this
evening
after
being
asked
at
the
August
1st
council
meeting
to
research
and
provide
the
council
with
potential
options
that
it
may
take
to
limit
the
use
of
Bellevue,
Police,
Department
resources
to
enforce
other
or
to
otherwise
cooperate
without
a
state
investigations
based
on
another
State's
law.
That
is
inconsistent
with
the
State
of
Washington's
protections
for
the
right
to
choose
abortion
and
provide
abortion
related
care
to
provide
you
with
a
short
legal
history.
AC
The
result
of
the
Dobbs
decision
means
that,
with
the
absence
of
a
federal
constitutional
right
to
an
abortion,
individual
states
now
have
the
full
power
to
establish
abortion
rights
or
abortion
restrictions.
Since
the
job's
decision,
several
states
have
restricted
or
banned
reproductive
health
services.
AC
The
legislature
also
set
public
policy
of
Washington
that
every
pregnant
individual
has
the
fundamental
right
to
choose
or
refuse
to
have
an
abortion
under
Washington
law.
Abortions
are
lawful,
if
performed
by
certain
medical
practitioners,
either
one
prior
to
viability
of
the
fetus
or
to
protect
the
life
or
health
of
the
pregnant
individual.
AC
Given
Washington
allows
for
abortions.
In
these
two
scenarios,
other
states
laws
have
criminalized
what
the
state
has
deemed
an
exercise
of
a
fundamental
right
for
an
example.
Another
state
may
have
criminalized
receiving
an
abortion
at
any
point
during
pregnancy,
because
that
state
does
not
recognize
a
fundamental
right
to
choose
or
refuse
an
abortion.
This
means
the
Bellevue
Police
Department
staff
may
be
asked
by
out-of-state
law
enforcement
agencies
to
cooperate
with
out-of-state
criminal
investigations
concerning
enforcement
of
those
States
criminal
laws
that
are
more
restrictive
than
Washington
law.
AC
AC
The
ordinance
would
prohibit
the
police
department
from
providing
any
resources,
cooperation
or
assistance
whatsoever
to
any
out-of-state
law
enforcement
agency,
public
entity
or
private
party.
If
the
matter
being
investigated
concerns
abortion,
related
conduct
or
other
reproductive
health
care
or
services
that
are
lawful
in
Washington,
unless
required
to
act
by
Washington,
state
or
federal
law.
Without
such
ordinance,
the
police
department
would
have
the
discretion
to
cooperate
with
out-of-state
investigators.
AC
Examples
of
such
prohibited
acts
under
this
ordinance
could
include
cooperating
with
a
subpoena
or
search
warrant
or
court
order
from
an
out-of-state
police
agency
that
has
not
been
issued
by
a
Washington
Court,
arresting
or
detaining
a
person
without
a
Washington
state
court
order
or
providing
information
or
initiating
an
inquiry
into
City
or
law
enforcement
databases.
At
the
request
of
an
out-of-state
law
enforcement
agency,
absent
and
official
public
records
request.
AC
Now,
nothing
in
this
ordinance
would
prohibit
the
Bellevue
Police
Department
from
fulfilling
its
mandatory
obligations
under
Washington
or
federal
laws.
City
legislative
bodies
do
not
have
the
power
to
amend,
federal
or
state
laws
that
establish
mandated
obligations
for
police
to
act,
so
this
ordinance
would
not
restrict
such
actions.
AC
As
previously
pointed
out
by
a
few
council
members,
several
other
jurisdictions
have
issued
similar
approaches
to
restricting
the
respective
law
enforcement
agencies
from
cooperating
with
out-of-state
investigators.
Such
agencies
include
the
Washington
State
Patrol,
the
King
County
Sheriff's
Office
Seattle,
Police,
Department
and
Port
of
Seattle
Police.
AC
W
Thank
you.
First
I
really
appreciate
staffs,
very
quick,
thorough
work
and
clever
approach
to
putting
this
in
the
code.
I
think
it's
a
really
smart
approach.
I
also
appreciate
council's
unanimous
support
for
this
initiative
when
I
brought
it
forward
last
month.
W
I
will
support.
Of
course,
the
passage
of
this
ordinance
and
I
would
ask
for
the
privilege
of
making
the
motion
to
do
so.
The
benefit
this
brings
to
Bellevue
is
that
one
it
brings
the
state
law
chapter
902
RCW,
into
implementation
in
Bellevue.
W
It
also
makes
sure
that
we
are
not
using
resources
for
something
I
find
a
violation
of
of
the
rights
of
a
pregnant
individual,
the
violation
of
the
rights
of
the
doctor-patient
relationship
and
to
enforce
laws
which
I
believe
are
incredibly
repugnant,
which
is
criminalizing
women's
right
to
control
their
own
bodies.
W
In
addition,
because
because
the
ordinance
is
written
includes
the
unless
required
by
Washington
state
or
federal
law,
it
expresses
clear
policy
without
risking
any
of
our
Law
Enforcement
Officers
violating
the
law
they
they
will
comply
with
the
law,
which
includes
the
Washington
law,
which
protects
women's
fundamental
right
to
choose
abortion
and
to
make
that
care
between
her
and
her
doctors.
So
with
that
said,
thank
you
so
much.
Thank
you.
Council
I
hope
that
this
passes
I
think
it
will
demonstrate
our
commitment
to
freedom
for
all
individuals
in.
E
Yeah
I
do
thank
you
for
moving
forward
with
this,
so
quickly.
I,
fully
support
this
ordinance
and
I
am
glad
that
we
are
being
very
visible
and
forthright
about
where
we
stand
and
supporting
the
right
to
choose.
Thanks.
A
Ordinance
6674,
second,
all
those
in
favor
say
aye
aye
any
opposed.
Okay
that
passes.
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank
you.
So
next
week
we
will
not
have
a
meeting
it's
canceled,
because
Council
will
be
involved
in
a
diversity,
Equity
inclusion,
training
program,
so
our
next
council
meeting
will
be
on
September
the
20th.
Thank
you
very
much.
We
are
adjourned.