►
From YouTube: Bellevue Council Meeting April. 26, 2021
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Everybody
welcome
to
the
regular
bellevue
city
council
meeting
for
april
26
2021,
I'm
happy
to
announce
that
I
saw
the
first
12
ducklings
that
have
hatched
at
the
downtown
park
and
they
all
made
it
safely
into
the
water
today.
So
we're
moving
on
to
spring
city
clerk.
Do
you
have?
Can
you
do
the
roll
call?
Please.
C
C
D
A
G
Sure
thank
you,
mayor
city
of
bellevue
proclamation,
whereas
the
city
of
bellevue
has
adopted
a
goal
of
integrating
the
natural
and
built
environments
to
create
a
sustainable
urban
habitat
and
whereas
bellevue
is
dedicated
to
offering
educational
opportunities
that
provide
greater
environmental
awareness,
appreciation
and
stewardship
of
our
natural,
cultural
and
historical
resources.
A
A
B
Mayor
there
are
no
pre-registered
speakers
this
evening.
However,
I
do
see
one
member
from
the
public
connected.
If
you
would
like
to
make
comment
during
oral
communications,
please
use
the
raise
hand
function
at
this
time.
G
A
D
Thanks
mayor
and
council
members,
the
study
session
topic
for
tonight
is
a
briefing
on
king
county
county-wide
planning
policies
up
an
update
and
just
by
way
of
background,
the
king
county,
county-wide
planning
policies
create
a
shared
framework
for
managing
the
world
for
all
the
jurisdictions
of
king
county
and
the
planning
policy.
Information
that
you'll
be
shared
with
these
teams
is
really
important,
because
this
will
in
many
ways
impact
the
way
the
city
grows.
D
H
Thank
you
very
much
good
evening.
Council.
Tonight's
presentation
is
the
briefing
and
update
on
the
county
wide
planning
policies
or,
as
we
refer
to
them,
the
cpps,
and
what
we're
doing
is
we're
updating
the
2012
policies
and
they're
being
updated,
because
the
puget,
sound
regional
council,
as
you
know,
has
adopted
a
new
plan
called
vision.
H
2050,
which
is
an
update
of
the
previous
plan,
and
these
policies
in
the
cpps
need
to
be
updated
to
create
new
entries
and
new
policies
that
align
with
psrc's
vision,
20
2050
and
the
policies
as
brad
said,
are
very
significant
because
they
will
impact
the
way
that
bellevue
can
grow
and
deal
with
jobs
and
housing.
H
And
tonight
we
have
with
us
two
king
county
staff,
members.
One
is
karen
wolf
she's
a
senior
policy
analyst
with
king
county,
and
we
have
rebecca
maskin,
who
is
a
demographic
planner
with
king
county
tonight?
What
we're
going
to
do
is
kind
of
the
kickoff
for
what
will
be
a
role
the
council
will
play
in
the
update
of
these
plan.
Policies
rather
they'll,
be
in
tonight's
update
will
have
information
in
it.
That
includes
the
background
of
how
did
we
get
to
this?
What
are
the
cpps?
How
do
they
fit?
H
What
is
all
this
about
and
they'll
talk
about
the
growth
management
act
and
how
it
started
this
whole
process
and
the
the
topics
that
are
covered
in
these
policies
are
growth,
transportation,
land
use,
jobs,
housing,
environment
and
other
topics
that
are
really
critical
to
how
the
city
will
grow
and
develop
and
plan
to
accommodate
growth.
There's
no
council
required
action
this
evening.
I
Presentation
well,
first
of
all,
thank
you
very
much
to
mayor
and
and
the
city
council
for
inviting
us
to
come
tonight
to
talk
to
you
about
the
county
white
planning
policies.
It's
something
we're
very
passionate
about
and
we
love
when
we
can
share
this
information
with
others
and
as
as
joyce
said,
we're
gonna
give
a
quick
sort
of
you
know:
planning
gmail.
I
You
know
101
and
give
you
some
information
on
the
growth
management
planning,
council
and
then
we'll
go
into
some
of
the
substance
of
the
county
white
planning
policies
and
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over
to
rebecca
to
go
into
a
little
more
detail
about
the
targets
themselves.
Then
we'll
talk
about
our
schedule
going
forward
and
you
know
plenty
of
time
for
questions
and
answers,
hopefully
so
with
that
just
again
a
refresher.
I
So
this
a
diagram
that
we
hope
can
you
know
sort
of
visually
show
you
where
we
are
in
the
planning
process.
So
you
know
the
state
growth
management
act
was
adopted
in
1990
and
it
has
requirements
for
the
four
counties
of
pugets
of
psrc,
and
so
that's,
king
pierce,
snohomish
and
kitsap
counties
to
create
multi-county
planning
policies
and
that's
vision.
2050
and
many
of
you
have
participated
either
currently
or
previously
on
a
on
a
board
of
the
puget
sun,
regional
council.
I
So
you're
familiar
with
that
process
and
the
the
multi-county
planning
policies
under
vision,
2050
were
adopted.
Just
this
past
fall
that
set
new
requirements,
as
joyce
said,
for
the
county,
white
planning
policies,
and
so
that's
where
we
come
in
so
we're
kind
of
that
bridge
between
the
multi-county
planning
policies
and
the
comprehensive
plans
that
all
jurisdictions
will
be
in
in
king
county
and
many
other
counties,
but
but
talking
about
king
county
will
be
required
to
adopt
by
june
30th
of
2024..
I
The
comprehensive
plans
again
lead
to
regulatory
changes
through
your
zoning
code
and
then
that
becomes
evidence
on
the
ground
through
development
and
construction,
and
so
you
can
see
all
these
layers
relate
to
each
other.
Sorry
about
that.
Okay
next
slide.
Sorry-
and
I
could
actually
probably
turn
this
over
to
councilmember
robertson,
to
give
this,
tell
you
tell
you
about
this
slide.
I
She
has
been
a
very
much
cherished
member
of
the
growth
management
planning
council
for
for
many
years,
we're
grateful
for
her
participation
and,
in
fact
I
think,
councilmember
robertson
and
the
executive
constantino,
the
only
two
members
currently
on
the
growth
management
planning
council,
who
were
here
when
we
updated
the
cpps
in
2012,
so
we're
grateful
for
her
participation
for
sure,
so
the
growth
natural
planning
council
or
is
the
gnpc
as
we
refer
to
it,
was
established
in
1992
right
after
the
state
growth
management
act
and
it
was
done
via
interlocal
agreement.
I
It's
convened
by
the
county
executive
has
members
representing
the
king
county
council,
the
city
of
seattle,
the
sound
cities,
association
and
bellevue
started
out.
Well,
you
guys
know
the
history.
Nonetheless,
bellevue
has
its
own
seat.
In
addition
to
sound
city's
representatives,
we
also
have
ex-officio
members
representing
special
purpose
districts,
school
districts
in
the
port
of
seattle
and
the
the
role
of
the
growth
management
planning
council
is
to
oversee
the
development
of
the
county
white
planning
policies,
and
this
includes
the
urban
growth
area,
growth
targets
and
and
many
topics
that
cross
jurisdictional
lines.
I
I
30
percent
of
the
jurisdictions
representing
70
percent
of
the
population
within
a
90-day
period,
approving
the
county,
away,
planning
policies
or
amendments
to
the
policies
and
then
the
ratified
and
become
law,
and
we'll
talk
a
little
bit
more
about
that
later
on.
I
So
what
are
the
county-wide
planning
policies?
Well,
they're.
You
know
setting
broad
policy
guidance
for
the
comprehensive
plans
of
the
county
and
the
cities.
It
establishes
the
urban
growth
boundary
and
you
can
see
the
urban
growth
brownie
on
the
illustrative
map
on
your
left.
That's
that
white,
red
squiggly
line
and
it
establishes
a
criteria
for
amending
that
boundary,
establishes
growth
targets,
criteria
for
defining
urban
centers
in
the
manufacturing,
industrial,
centers
and
again,
policies
that
are
of
across
jurisdictional
boundaries
like
and
the
environmental
issues
and
transportation
and
so
on.
I
So
why
are
we
updating
the
county-wide
planning
policies
now?
Well,
as
joyce
mentioned,
you
know,
vision,
2050
was
just
adopted
that
set
new
requirements
for
us
and
we
have
new
growth
targets
so
and
those
growth
targets
become
the
land
use
assumptions
of
your
comprehensive
plans,
which
again
are
due
in
2024.
I
We
also
use
the
countywide
planning
policies
to
provide
guidance
to
those
comprehensive
plans
so
that
the
comprehensive
plans
of
all
the
cities
in
the
county
work
together
and
not
at
cross
purposes
for
each
other.
And
then
we
also
want
to
account
further
policy
and
legislative
changes
that
have
happened
since
2012,
such
as
sound
transit
3,
for
example,
and
taken
policy
recommendations
from
the
growth
management
planning
council's
affordable
housing
committee
and
we're
all
dealing
with
the
challenges
of
affordable
housing.
I
So
we're
going
to
talk
quickly
about
some
of
the
key
themes
in
each
of
the
chapters
that
make
up
the
substantive
chapters
of
the
county
right
planning
policy,
so
not
the
the
framework
policies
rather,
but
we're
going
to
focus
just
here
on
some
just
broad
themes
and
we
can
go
into
any
more
detail.
You
would
like
so
on
the
environment
again
we're
looking
at
issues
that
cross
jurisdictional
boundaries.
I
Of
course,
climate
change
is
one
of
those,
and
so
we
have
many
new
policies
in
the
environment
chapter
that
deal
with
climate
change,
updating
our
greenhouse
gas
reduction
goals.
I
Talking
about
the
importance
of
our
natural
resources,
we
have
policies
on
urban
trees,
just
as
your
plaque
proclamation
just
addressed,
and
the
importance
of
parks
and
trails
and
so
on,
and
so
and
again
in
each
of
our
chapters.
One
of
the
themes
that
you'll
be
seeing,
which
the
growth
management
planning
council
asked
us
back
in
june
to
establish
as
a
guiding
principle
is
equity
and
social
justice,
as
we
do
look
for
updates
in
each
of
our
chapters,
but
to
be
able
to
look
through
these
updates
through
an
equity
lens.
I
J
Karen,
so
the
development
patterns
chapter
is
home
for
many
changes
within
the
kind
of
planning
policies,
as
there
are
a
number
of
our
topics
in
the
scope
that
touch
on
this
chapter.
So
it
contains
things
everything
from
land
use
to
growth
targets
and
how
we
all
get
together
to
change
the
urban
growth
area
boundary
to
urban
design.
J
J
We're
connecting
the
past
kind
of
segregating
housing
and
land
use
policies
to
current
inequities
that
we
see
among
different
race
and
ethnicity
groups,
including
different
health
disparities,
that
different
groups
experience
and
finally,
we're
setting
a
new
set
of
growth
targets
to
assist
in
the
2024
comprehensive
plan
update
as
karen
outlined.
So
I'm
going
to
go
into
a
little
bit
more
depth
about
our
target
setting
process.
J
So,
as
the
targets
are
a
part
of
the
county
wide
planning
policies,
they
are
a
policy
statement
about
the
number
of
housing
units
and
jobs
that
each
jurisdiction
is
using
for
a
basis
to
plan
in
their
24.
Our
2024
comprehensive
plan
update
we
set
targets
collaboratively
in
king
county,
so
all
the
cities
work
together.
J
This
is
a
top-down
kind
of
process
that
we
use
immediately
to
create
the
growth
targets,
so
we
have
a
start
with
a
regional
forecast
and
break
it
down
using
the
regional
growth
strategy
in
vision
2050
to
king
county
and
to
each
of
the
regional
geographies,
and
that
is
what
is
the
core
of
this
slide,
presenting
the
amount
of
housing
and
jobs
that
each
of
the
vision,
2050,
regional,
geographies,
metro,
cities,
core
cities
etc
will
be
planning
for,
and
bellevue
of
course,
is
a
metro
city
with
with
the
city
of
seattle.
J
So
our
our
conversations
to
split
up
the
approximately
135
000
housing
units
and
a
224
000
jobs
for
the
metro
cities
was
a
little
less
complicated
in
some
of
our
other
jurisdiction
groups
and
here's
how
the
conversations
for
growth
targets
sorted
out
amongst
the
metro
cities,
so
kind
of
key
themes
for
these
jurisdictions.
In
our
conversations
about
how
to
apportion
the
growth
target,
we're
really
related
to
jobs.
J
Housing
balance
both
seattle
and
bellevue,
are
our
job
centers
as
you're,
well
aware,
and
both
very
concerned
about
their
role
within
the
housing
crisis
that
we're
currently
experiencing
and
making
sure
that
we
want
to
create
a
diversity
of
housing
options
in
close
proximity
to
these
job
centers.
So,
if
you're,
paying
very
close
attention,
you'll
see
that,
because
of
this
factor
that
the
housing
unit
total
is
a
bit
higher
than
originally
allocated
to
this
group.
J
And
that
is
largely
because
these
cities
feel
they
have
a
large
role
in
accommodating
housing
growth
and
want
to
make
sure
is
more
commensurate
with
the
amount
of
job
growth
that
we
are
anticipating
over
the
next
20
25
years.
J
Stopping
setting
the
growth
targets
aside
for
a
second,
I
will
cover
some
of
the
changes
that
are
included
in
the
draft
countywide
planning
policies
in
the
housing
chapter.
So
the
key
driving
event
for
changes
to
the
housing
chapter
are
related
to
the
work
that
countywide
we
have
done
related
to
the
regional,
affordable
housing
task
force.
So
a
action
plan
that
came
out
at
the
end
of
that
process
was
insightful
and
guiding
our
update
of
the
housing
policies
when
there's
pretty
much
a
complete
overall
overhaul
of
this
chapter
from
the
2012
cbps.
J
So
in.
According
with
that
there's
a
general
redefinition
of
what
county-wide
need
is
for
affordable
homes
based
on
the
concept
of
removing
households
that
are
cost
burden.
Those
are
that
are
paying
at
least
30
of
their
income
on
housing.
So
that
definition
permeates
the
chapter
and
the
kind
of
affordable
housing
goals
that
we
are
reaching
for.
J
The
policies
are
kind
of
reconfigured
to
guide
cities
through
a
kind
of
four-step
plan
to
plan,
implement
and
monitor
and
adjust
any
policy
or
plans
as
necessary
to
deliver
affordable
housing
and
set
affordable
housing
goals
for
their
own
jurisdiction
and,
finally,
related
to
that
kind
of
continuous
improvement
approach.
There's
a
significant
piece
of
monitoring
and
data
reporting
flowing
up
to
a
kind
of
county-wide
housing
dashboard
that
we'll
be
reporting
in
closer
time.
It's
closer
to
real
time
about
our
county's
success
or
our
shortcomings
and
achieving
those
affordable
housing
goals
into
the
future.
J
So
those
are
some
of
the
key
highlights
for
the
housing
chapter
and
I
will
turn
it
back
over
to
karen
to
talk
about
the
economy.
Chapter
great.
I
Thanks
so
much
rebecca
again,
keeping
with
our
you
know
direction
to
look
at
the
economy
through
an
equity
lens.
I
We
are,
in
addition
to
you
know,
supporting
manufacturing
jobs
and
middle-wage
jobs,
and
that's
sort
of
the
current
term
of
our
for
family
wage
jobs
is
we're
now
calling
them
middle-wage
jobs
and
trying
to
use
that
terminology
consistent
throughout
the
region.
But
we're
also
talking
about
supporting
you
know
a
very
you
know:
supportive
environment
for
locally
owned
women,
owned
and
bipark.
So
so
black
indonesia,
indigenous
people
of
color,
owned
businesses
and
understanding
that
these
locally
owned
businesses
really
do
create
the
heart
of
our
communities
and
establish
that
cultural
identity.
I
And
you
know
in
the
past,
we
really
just
sort
of
talked
about
jobs
without
really
looking
at
the
people
and
and
those
people
who
own
the
businesses
and
hire
locally.
And
that's
what
we're
trying
to
do
with
this
sort
of
renewed
focus
in
the
economy.
Chapter
to
look
at
reducing
disparities
in
income
and
employment
opportunities
and
again,
a
way
to
do
that
is
to
foster
locally
owned
businesses.
Locally
owned
businesses
tend
to
hire
locally.
I
So
if
we
can
again
foster
a
supportive
environment
within
our
communities,
we
feel
that
in
the
long
run,
we'll
be
able
to
create
a
lot
more
opportunity
and
then
our
last
substantive
chapter
is.
Oh
sorry,
we've
got
two
more
sorry.
Sorry,
transportation
can't
forget
transportation
and
again
looking
at
an
equitable
transportation
system
throughout
the
county,
improving
the
system
you
know,
so
it
works
for
everybody,
especially
what
we
call
captive
riders
right.
I
This
chapter
really
links
closely
with
our
environment
chapter
and
our
goals
to
reduce
greenhouse
gases.
Now,
last
but
not
least,
is
our
public
facilities
and
services.
Chapter
and
again,
this
is
where
we're
linking
this
chapter
really
in
a
lot
of
ways
to
development
patterns
and
so
and
and
with
the
environment
chapter
in
terms
of
reducing
greenhouse
gas
emissions.
I
We've
just
you
know,
talked
a
lot
about
expanding
broadband
internet
to
all
households
and
businesses
throughout
the
county.
We
used
to
think
that
the
lack
of
broadband
was
just
out
in
the
rural
area,
but
with
covid.
We
found
know
that
it's
actually
there's
pockets
of
the
urban
area
as
well,
that
don't
have
access
to
broadband,
and
so
we
policies
supporting
that,
and
you
know,
access
to
all
public
facilities
and
services.
I
We
have
some
low-income
areas
in
unincorporated
urban
king
county
that
are
still
on
septic
systems,
and
you
know
need
to
look
at
you
know
eventually
bringing
sewers
in,
for
example,
and
the
other
change
in
this
chapter
is
linking
it
to
make
sure
that
we're
prepared
for
natural
disasters.
So,
looking
at
the
recently
adopted
hazard
mitigation
plan
of
king
county,
which
bellevue
participated
in
and
is
a
member
of
that
coalition
to
look
at
make
sure
that,
at
a
county-wide
level
that
we
are
prepared
and
resilient
for
any
potential
disasters.
I
I
The
changes
in
the
policies
between
the
version
they
approved
in
march
and
the
changes
that
staff
is
suggesting
be
made
based
on
public
comment,
and
then
it
goes
to
the
back
to
the
growth
management
planning
council
on
june
23rd,
for
what
we
hope
is
their
final
approval
and
moving
it
on
to
the
king
county
council,
who
will
spend
the
summer
reviewing
and
again
hoping
for
adoption
by
the
king
county
council
sometime
in
the
third
quarter.
I
So
that
it
can
go
out
to
the
cities
back
out
to
you
for
ratification
and
then
to
the
puget
sound
regional
council
by
for
certification
by
the
end
of
the
year,
as
required
in
the
county
in
multi-county
planning
policies
again,
the
comment
period
is
we're
in
the
middle
of
it
now
goes
on
well,
actually
another
week
or
so,
and
here
are
links
to
the
websites
and
a
link
for
to
provide
comments.
A
Thank
you
very
much
for
that
presentation.
I
think
every
council
member
has
had
a
hand
in
in
this
work
somehow
some
way,
but
I
do
want
to
thank
councilmember
robertson
for
representing
bellevue,
so
well
been
a
big
part
of
this.
So
I
will,
I
can
see
everybody
hold
on
almost
come,
see
everybody
and
I
will
call
on
you.
If
you
have
questions
or
comments
councilmember
robertson,
do
you
want
to
start
us
off
and
then
I'll
go
to
councilmember
parksdale.
K
Sure
thank
you
mayor
and
thank
you,
ms
wolf
and
ms
maskin
for
coming
tonight
to
bring
the
council
up
to
date
on
what's
happening.
I
think
it's
really
important.
You
know
I
I've
been
on
this
committee
since
20
since
january
2010,
and
so
it's
been
a
long
time
as
our
second
go
around
countywide
planning
policies,
but
I
really
my
role
is
to
represent
bellevue
and,
as
directed
you
know,
as
policy
adopted
by
the
city
council.
K
So
that's
why
I
wanted
to
make
sure
that
the
council
one
gets
a
briefing
now
and
two
we'll
get
an
up-to-date
or
any
revisions
on
later
on,
but
well
ahead
of
when
we
have
to
ratify.
So
I
I'm
glad
to
have
you
come
tonight
and
bring
my
colleagues
the
information
of
what
we're
doing.
It's
been
a
really
busy
intensive
effort
on
behalf
of
the
staff
and
the
electeds
on
the
gmpc,
but
it's
been
really
great
conversation.
K
We've
had
some
workshops,
we've
had
some
small
group
discussions
and
we've
really
coalesced
around
a
lot
of
things,
one,
as
with
many
of
the
policy
work,
we're
doing
on
a
region,
we're
doing
an
equity
forward
approach.
A
lot
of
the
county-wide
planning
policies
and
that's
very
consistent
with
bellevue's
approach
to
things.
Many
of
the
cpps
are
very
consistent
with
what
bellevue's
already
doing,
particularly
with
regard
to
transportation
and
the
environment.
K
We've
had
a
lot
of
discussion
and
transportation,
particularly
around
safety
on
conduct
and
connectivity,
which
I
know
is
really
important
to
this
council.
I
think
the
growth
and
centers
approach
is
very
good
and
consistent
with
a
lot
of
what
the
city's
doing
and
our
growth
numbers.
I
you
know,
as
you
could
see,
by
the
growth
numbers
the
core,
not
the
core,
the
metro
cities
which
bellevue
and
seattle
are
the
only
two-
are
going
to
take
a
lot
of
the
bulk
of
that
growth
and
we're
planning
for
it.
K
So
that's
and
it's
very
consistent
with
our
planning
efforts.
The
housing,
I
think,
got
a
lot
more
vetting
and
conversation
this
time
around.
I
wanted
to
make
sure
that
I
called
out
the
mayor
for
being
on
the
king
county,
affordable
housing
committee.
That's
the
group
that
did
the
work
that
delivered
that
section
of
the
cpps
to
the
growth
management
planning,
council
and
council
member
stokes
was
on
the
king
county,
affordable
housing
task
force
which
that
work
led
to
the
work
of
the
affordable
housing
committee
that
the
mayor
was
on.
K
So
I
mean
this
is
really
as
mayor
said,
this
is
really
built
on
each
other
one
open
issue:
it
was
in
the
packet
that
is
up
to
discussion
that
the
housing
committee
kind
of
kicked
to
the
gmpc
is
the
issue
of
data
collection,
analysis
and
monitoring
requirements.
We
had
some
discussion
about
that.
The
issue
is
that,
if
it's
too
burdensome
on
the
smaller
cities,
they
may
not,
especially
in
a
time
of
down
budgets,
but
they
may
not
have
the
capacity
or
the
staff
or
the
budget
to
do
that.
K
Much
monitoring,
so
whether
that
should
be
something
the
county
does
or
something
that's
put
to.
The
individual
cities
is
still
an
open
discussion.
There's
also
been
discussions
about
the
differences
across
jurisdictions.
All
one
thing.
I
think
that
the
county
representatives
have
meaning
that
city
representatives
on
this
task
force
or
on
the
gnpc
have
really
coalesced
around
is
that
we
do
have
a
problem
with
housing.
We
don't
have
enough.
K
We
have
a
missing
middle,
we
need
more,
affordable
housing,
but
how
that
comes
to
pass
where
some
cities,
their
their
market
rate,
housing,
is
affordable,
housing
and
some
cities,
like
bellevue,
has
to
put
so
much
effort
in
and
use
every
tool
in
the
toolbox
to
get
enough,
affordable
housing
because
our
market
rate
housing
is
just
not
affordable.
So
there
was
just
there's
been
a
lot
of
discussion
around
that
so
and
finally,
another
component
that
the
cities
have
been
talking
about
is
on
this,
and
other
committees
is
the
ground
bargain.
K
If
we're
gonna
take
this
growth,
are
we
gonna
get
the
services
or
the
help
with
the
infrastructure
to
feed
the
growth?
That's
been
a
discussion
on
the
regional
transit
committee,
but
it
ties
to
the
growth
management
planning,
council
and
some
of
the
representatives
on
the
regional
transit
committee
are
also
on
the
growth
management
plan.
Council
and
they're.
Saying
wait
a
second.
We
don't
necessarily
want
to
take
this
growth
if
we're
not
going
to
have
the
bus
service.
So
that's
been
a
discussion.
K
That's
been
going
on
around
this,
but
overall,
I
think
that
the
canada
planning
policies
are
in
really
good
shape.
I
hope
we
get
a
lot
of
positive
comments
from
the
public.
Our
staff
and
county
staff
and
other
staff
have
worked
really
hard
on
them.
Trying
to
make
them
reflect
the
really
the
regional
growth
expectations
for
the
county.
K
So
I
think
I
think
they've
done
a
good
job
and
they're
in
very
good
shape
right
now
and
would
really
love
to
hear
from
my
colleagues
any
input
you
have
on
them,
because
I
am
always
happy
to
take
this
council's
policy
input
into
the
committee
that
I
serve
on.
So
thanks
thank.
A
You
councilmember
councilmember
barksdale.
L
All
right,
thank
you,
mayor
and
rebecca,
and
karen
thanks
for
being
here.
I
just
wanted
to
say
I
appreciate
the
equity
lens
and
the
framework
glad
to
see
it
called
out
explicitly
in
areas
where,
where
it
surfaced,
such
as
in
the
women
in
bai,
paco
and
pop
shops,
so
I
won't
go
through
the
entire
list,
but
where
you
applied
it,
I
appreciate
it.
L
I
had
a
question
in
terms
of
housing:
is
there
any
intention
to
break
out
housing
targets
or
any
guidance
or
recommendations
for
breaking
out
housing
targets
by
ami
I
gave
in
the
cities?
I
saw
it
in
the
strategies,
but
I
didn't
know
if
it
was
going
to
be
part
of
the
targets
and
then
my
second
question
or
thought
is
on
the
point
that
council
member
robertson
raised
around
the
cities
that
can't
don't
have
the
capacity
to
collect
data.
I
Yeah,
okay!
Well,
thank
you
for
both
those
questions
so
interesting.
You
asked
about
the
housing
targets
by
ami
and
mayor
robinson.
You
know
who
serves
on
the
affordable
housing
committee.
I
You
know,
may
may
have
additional
information,
but
the
that
was
considered
and
it
was
felt
that
it
the
the
approach
that
the
affordable
housing
committee
took
and
the
gnpc
is
is
has
you
know
accepting
in
in
this
public
review
draft,
is
to
identify
the
need
and
that,
rather
than
set
targets
that
could
be
debated
within
each
city
and
and
and
you
know
what
level
each
city
would
have
to
be
at
and
so
on,
but
rather
to
establish
the
need
county
wide,
and
then
you
know
through
the
monitoring,
so
they
kind
of
work
together.
I
Right
then
be
able
to
assess
the
ability
of
the
county
as
a
whole
to
meet
that
need,
and
so
that's
why
the
monitoring
is
so
robust,
and
so
in
the
past
the
current
county
web
planning
policies
that
were
adopted
in
2012,
I
mean
the
policies
are
great.
All
the
intentions
are
there,
but
we're
still
in
a
housing
crisis
and
and
so
what
the
affordable
housing
committee
felt
was
really.
The
most
important
piece
of
this
missing
piece
was
the
accountability
and
that's
where
the
data
collection
comes
in.
I
So
you
are
correct
that
some
of
the
smaller
cities,
kind
of
you
know
were
kind
of
surprised
at
that
they
bulked
at
that
responsibility
and
our
housing
staff
is
working
very
closely
with
the
planning
directors.
I
Now
you
know,
on
a
ongoing
basis,
to
revise
that
and
to
identify
a
lot
of
the
data
is
already
being
collected.
It's
required
for
federal
reporting
and
so
on,
and
some
of
it
is
being
collected
at
the
county-wide
level,
and
so
the
county
is
working
with
the
cities
to
show
what
they're
already
collecting
what
the
county
can
collect.
I
And
then
maybe
there
are
still
some
items
that
will
just
have
to
be
optional,
but
you
know
clearly
bellevue
in
seattle
and
and
king
county
do
a
robust
reporting
of
affordable
housing,
and
we
understand
that
not
every
city
can
do
that.
L
A
That
this
is
just
the
second
year
of
the
affordable
housing
committee
and
it
took
us
this
long
to
get
our
feet
on
the
ground
and
just
start
rowing
in
the
same
direction.
There
were
a
million
conversations
on
what
does
80
ami
mean
to
bellevue
versus
to
auburn,
and
it's
a
county-wide
number.
So
it's
it's
very
different
right.
A
I
mean
we're
going
to
be,
as
karen
said,
the
dashboard
is
going
to
be
coming
out
soon
and
that's
going
to
look
at
all
the
tools
that
are
available
to
the
cities
and
who's
using
what
and
that's
going
to
be
really
revealing,
and
it's
going
to
provide
cities
with
a
tool
kit
of
what
they
can
do
to
achieve
the
different
levels
of
affordability
in
their
cities,
and
there
will
be
accountability
there,
and
then
we
can
start
drilling
into
what
you're
talking
about.
That
probably
will
be
the
next
step.
A
Any
other
questions
or
comments.
I
see
council
member
stokes
and
then
council
members
on.
G
Yeah,
thank
you
for,
for
this
really
comprehensive
presentation.
That's
you
know
when
you
think
about
the
the
task
and
all
the
different
areas
that
go
into
it's
just
monumental.
Isn't
it
it's
just
you
have
to
take
a
piece
at
a
time
yeah.
I
appreciate
the
comments
about
the
affordable
housing
piece
and
the
the
process
we've
gone
through.
It
was
interesting
and
that
was
in
2017..
G
You
you're
talking
about
something
in
2012,
which
was
a
precursor
to
that.
I
think,
but
you
know,
and
and
2017's
not
that
far
back,
but
it's
it's
like
in
a
different
galaxy
now
in
a
sense,
but
I
am
it's
interesting.
The
last
comments
were
made.
It
seems
that
the
the
conversation
the
committee
have
moved
a
little
was
a
little
bit
because
we
haven't
really
got
any
briefings
on
that
and
I'm
not
sure
about
how
it
all
goes
together.
G
So
I
need
to
look
more
into
that,
but
one
of
the
things
with
other
cities.
Besides,
you
know
a
handful
who
are
really
working
on
affordable
housing,
the
others
we
have
really
good
conversations
about.
How
can
they
help
and
how
they
can
they
get
involved,
and
one
of
them
is-
and
it
sounds
to
me-
and
I'm
just
maybe
you
know
listening
to
just
what
was
presented.
Is
that
we've
kind
of
gone
and
taken
an
attitude?
G
Well,
these
other
cities
really
can't
do
anything,
towns
and
all,
and
so
we're
going
to
focus
on
the
bigger
cities,
and
I
I
think
that
misses
an
opportunity
and
what
we
talked
about
doing
was
having
ways
to
help
cities
who
need
who
need
assistance
in
how
do
you
make
planning
changes?
What
is
necessary?
How
do
you
go
about
doing
this
because
the
biggest
thing
they
raised
was
well?
We
can't
do
that.
G
I
think
the
cities
they're
just
a
lot
of
us,
because
they
they
don't
have
the
resources
or
they
think
they
don't,
and
they
don't
have
the
the
the
knowledge
and
the
information
that
that
kind
of
limits,
our
overall
ability
to
actually
achieve
the
goals
so
be
interesting.
Seeing
some
more
you
know,
learning
more
about
that.
G
The
other
thing
that's
I
want
to
ask
in
listening
to
this
whole
piece-
and
this
is
what's
so
hard
in
doing
planning
that
takes
multi
years
is,
I
think
we
all
agree
that
we're
not
in
the
same
situation.
We
were
two
years
ago
that
things
have
changed
so
dramatically
and
will
be
changing
with
the
covet
impact
and
planning
your
own
planning
is
being
changed
and
our
own
focus
and
all
so.
G
I'm
just
curious
as
how
much
you
know
that
is
being
taken
into
account,
and
I
know
it's
difficult
because
you
have
to
build
these
things
over.
You
know
a
year's
time
and
then
you,
you
can't
just
keep
revising
the
policies,
but
I'm
just
curious
as
to
what
impact
are
you
seeing
with
the
changes
in
covet
and
the
changes
in
the
even
with
going
to
cities
and
how
where
people
are
working
and
the
growth
bellevue's
facing
a
growth?
G
That
probably
will
make
your
the
the
projections
be
seen
as
as
a
little
a
kind
of
low?
In
the
long
run?
You
know
55
000,
more
jobs,
I
don't
by
50
50
that
doesn't
seem
that
seems
really
really
conservative
and
for
planning.
So
I'm
just
curious
about
how
much
you're,
taking
into
account
and
how
nimble.
G
Are
you
in
terms
of
looking
at
how
things
have
changed
in
just
a
few
years
from
where
it
was
at
the
time
that
this
whole
process
started
yeah,
I
mean
it's
a
huge
task,
so
it's
hard
to
keep
it
all
in
line,
but
you
do
want
to
have
something
projecting
out
to
50
50,
that's
going
to
be
really
more
inspirational,
rather
than
just
kind
of
a
bookmark,
as
you
can
go
through.
I
Well,
thank
you
for
both
questions.
I'm
going
to
address
your
first
question
first
and
then
turn
it
over
to
rebecca
to
talk
about
covid,
and
I
apologize.
If
I
I
provided
misinformation
when
we
talk
about
responsibilities
of
or
the
ability
of
seattle
and
bellevue
and
king
county,
that's
on
the
monitoring
aspect
of
it,
the
data
collection,
but
we
have
policies
that
clearly
direct
all
cities
and
identify
all
cities
of
having
a
responsibility
in
providing
affordable
housing.
I
So
not
just
the
bigger
cities
but
understanding
that
it's
the
bigger
cities
that
have
the
resources
available
to
do
that.
Monitoring
and
also
psrc,
is
in
the
middle
of
developing
a
housing
strategy
which
is
going
to
provide
a
lot
of
those
tools
and
information
and
guidance,
as
is
the
state
department
of
commerce,
and
so
we
there
will
be
a
lot
of
resources
out
there,
especially
for
the
smaller
cities
that
don't
have.
You
know
the
large.
I
You
know,
staff
of
experts,
that
you
know,
for
example,
that
that
bellevue
has
and
seattle
and
redmond,
for
example,
some
of
the
the
larger
cities.
And
so
when
we
talk
about
the
what
the
larger
cities
can
do,
the
responsibility
is
really
more
on
the
data
collection
side
and
that
understanding.
So
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
that-
and
I
hope
I
didn't
misspeak
earlier
so
and
then
kovid.
We
get
this
question
a
lot
and
rebecca's
got
a
great
response.
So
I'm
going
to
let.
J
H
J
Yes,
so
we
all
know,
kopak
krobet
has
impacted
our
lives
in
present
tense
and
we
suspect
that
it
will
in
the
future.
What
we
don't
have.
A
great
sense
of
right
now
is
how
long
the
trends
that
we
are
currently
experiencing
are
going
to
keep
going
in
the
past
and
really
what
the
impact
is
going
to
be
on
our
planning
framework.
J
So
you,
knowing
that
we,
our
forecast,
was
made
several
years
ago
before
cloven
was
even
in
inkling.
We
we
are
sticking
to
this,
given
that
it
is
a
longer
range
projection
going
out
to
2050
and
our
targets
going
to
2044.
J
recognize
that
this
is
an
iterative
process.
So
we
do
do
growth
targeting
and
revising
kind
of
our
growth.
J
Every
10
years,
or
so
that
will
definitely
happen
in
the
next
eight
to
ten
years,
and
even
before
that
even
the
vorkovid.
We
actually
knew
that
that
ofm
the
office
of
financial
management
that
creates
the
population
projections
that
we
need
to
accommodate
in
our
planning.
Their
next
projection
will
come
out
in
2022,
and
that
has
been
a
part
of
our
schedule.
So
we
do
have
a
opportunity
kind
of
built
in
in
the
near
term
to
take
a
look
at
our
targets,
at
least
on
the
population.
G
Okay,
good,
I
appreciate
that
yeah.
It
was
on
the
the
psoc
executive
committee
a
couple
years
and
we
talked
about
that
and
I
think
it
would
help
to
when
you're
going
out
talking
to
councils.
A
lot
of
a
lot
of
us
have
some
information,
a
lot
of
us.
Don't
the
public
doesn't
have
as
much
system
it's
not
something
we
do
now
and
then
2050.
We
look
at
it
again.
It's
I
think,
talking
about
that
ongoing
process
and
updating
would
be
very
helpful
to
get
get.
G
F
Members
done
yes,
thank
you
for
coming
and
giving
that
very
thorough
presentation,
and
thank
you,
councilmember
robertson,
for
all
your
work
all
these
years.
F
So
having
that
that
added
to
the
cpp,
I
think
will
be
really
important.
So
I
really
appreciate
that
and
then
I
also
agree
about
data
collection,
and
I
actually
think
that
from
a
county
perspective,
it
would
make
more
sense
to
have
that
at
least
the
dashboard
itself
and
the
elements
in
it
consolidated,
because
one
of
the
challenges
that
I
think
we
always
have
if
each
city
is
doing
their
own
is
is
the
same
definition
for
terms.
And
so
when
you
try
to
then
aggregate
the
data
it
can
be
really
challenging
to
understand.
F
What's
going
on,
so
I
would
really
just
urge
that
to
the
degree
we
can
have
that
that
back
of
house
consolidated,
then,
hopefully,
cities
are
able
to
just
feed
information
if
they
don't
have
the
capacity
with
their
staff
and
that'll
be
important.
F
I
I
like
the
suggestion
from
councilmember
barksdale
about
separating
the
housing
by
ami
levels.
So
we
as
we
look
at
the
different
funding
sources
for
ami,
we
can
better
target
what
we're
trying
to
do
and
thank
you
for
letting
us
know
about
the
2022
population
growth
projections,
because
I
do
think
that,
like
council
member
stokes
talked
about
you
know,
as
we
have
amazon
coming
and
we're
trying
to
build
more
affordable
housing.
F
Thank
you
mayor
for
serving
on
that
committee
that
we
expect
that
we're
going
to
start
turning
around
the
idea
or
not
even
the
idea
that
what's
happening
now
is
90
of
the
workers.
Don't
live
in
bellevue.
So
as
we
turn
that
around.
I
think
that
we
want
to
make
sure
that
those
projections
reflect
what
policy
changes
that
we're
making
in
our
city.
That
looks
at
that,
and
then
I
guess.
F
Lastly,
I
would
just
like
to
highlight
that
you
know:
affordable
housing
and
transportation
is
so
key
because
we
have
been
adopting
policies
about
reducing
the
level
of
parking
for
affordable
housing
near
transit,
so
to
the
degree
that
those
two
are
intertwined
and
are
reflected
in
in
the
planning
work.
We
won't
get
ourselves
into
a
place
where
we're
trying
to
plan
for
abundant
housing
and
affordable
housing
throughout
our
city,
relying
on
frequent
transit
networks
just
to
have
that
fall
out
of
the
bottom
and
then
we're
we're
stuck
with
not
being
able
to
implement
our
policy.
A
Any
more
comments
or
questions
I
will
okay
conrad
I'll
call
on
you
in
just
a
moment,
councilmember
lee.
I
will
just
say
that
I
really
agree
with
what
council
member
design
just
said
about
the
percentage
of
people
who
work
in
a
city
and
where
they
live.
A
We,
as
she
said
only
this
is
opposite
of
what
she
said,
but
it's
the
same
statistic.
Only
10
of
the
people
who
work
downtown
live
in
bellevue
in
downtown
bellevue
live
in
bellevue
so
that
you
can
imagine
that
tremendous
commute
that
everybody
is
taking,
and
I
don't
hear
that
discussed
enough
at
the
regional
level
and
we're
kind
of
like
planning
for
big
commutes,
and
I
really
like
to
start
planning
for
people
living
where
they
work
and
working
where
they
live.
More.
A
So
just
a
thought:
let's
see,
councilmember
lee,
you
want
to
speak.
C
Thanks
for
the
briefing
this
is
a
very
important
topic.
Obviously,
growth
management
and
I
thank
councilman
robertson,
representing
the
city,
doing
good
work,
and
but
this
is
a
tremendous
job
that
was,
you
know,
suggested
by
others
earlier
you
know,
but
I'm
sure
it's
in
good
hands.
There
are
different
people
sitting
on
different
committees.
You
know
working
towards
this
overall
goal,
so
I,
if
we
have
to
start
talking
about
this,
you
know
we
probably
have
to
spend
hours
to
you
know
to
to
give
our
input
and
all
that
stuff.
C
So
I
would
not
go
there,
but
I
do
have
a
couple
questions
the
biggest
but,
of
course,
we're
all
interesting,
I'm
interested
too,
because
everything
else
we
do
you
know
has
to
be
based
on
the
projection
and
what
it
goes
into.
How
else
can
be
done?
Well
depends
on
the
people
who
are
on
the
committee
and
the
staff
and
our
representative.
C
My
question
is
once
why
you
show
the
I
just
lost
it.
Let
me
see
if
I
can
get
it
back.
C
Oh
yeah,
a
countrywide
and
regional
geography
allocation.
You
show
2019
2024
growth,
metro
and
core.
Now,
could
you
tell
me
about
what
cities
represent
metro,
seattle,
bellevue
and
how
about
core
and
what's
hdt
yeah?
Could
you
explain
that
give
me
some
sense
of
what
we're
looking
at
metro?
Of
course
it's
important,
obviously
because
they
represent
the
big
big
population.
Big
housing.
J
Happy
to
answer
that,
so
our
core
cities
are
a
group
of
cities
that
have
regional
designated
centers,
so
it
includes
places
like
redmond
and
renton
issaquah
tucuela
seatac
places
that
are
kind
of
our
larger
job
centers
around
the
county
and
have
these
centers.
J
J
J
Stands
for
high
capacity
transit
communities,
and
so
these
are
places
that
are
generally
smaller
than
the
core
cities,
but
are
have
existing
or
planned
major
transit
like
a
light
rail
station
in
their
future.
So
they
are
places
that
maybe
don't
quite
have
those
levels
of
growth
that
the
core
cities
do
right
now,
but
they
will
very
shortly.
J
So
these
are
places
like
mercer,
island
or
shoreline
or
des
moines
to
the
south.
The
places
that
are
planning
for
for
light
rail
or
bus,
rapid
transit,
don't
necessarily
have
it
yet.
Newcastle
and
woodenville
are
also
high-capacity
transit
communities
that
are
kind
of
on
that
bus,
rapid
transit
side
of
things.
A
A
Great.
Thank
you.
G
A
D
Yes,
thank
you
mayor
council
members.
We
are
bringing
you
this
back
as
a
result
of
the
direction
we
received
you
back
on
april
5th,
with
that,
I'm
turning
it
over
to
mike
brennan
director
of
development
service
department
for
brief
staff
report.
Before
you
take
action
mike.
N
Great,
thank
you,
mr
miyaki
good
evening,
mayor
robinson,
deputy
mayor,
newman
house
and
members
of
the
council
also
with
me
tonight
this
evening.
Are
president
candace
the
consulting
attorney
and
christina
gallant,
senior,
planner
and
development
services
next
slide.
Please.
We
are
here
this
evening
requesting
council's
final
action
on
ordinance
number
6575.
N
It's
a
land
use
code,
amendment
that
lowers
the
minimum
parking
required
for
residential
parking
or
residential
projects.
Excuse
me
in
areas
that
have
frequent
transit
service.
This
was,
as
mr
miyaki
mentioned
before
the
council
on
april
5th,
where
the
council
provided
direction
to
return
with
the
final
ordinance.
This
is
the
ordinance
that
was
recommended
by
the
planning
commission
for
final
action
on
by
the
council.
Next
slide.
N
Please
so
also
tonight,
just
a
real
quick
overview,
we'll
provide
a
brief
staff
report
just
outlining
the
recommendations
that
are
in
this
land
use
code,
amendment
the
anticipated
outcomes
that
this
code
amendment
creates
briefly
overview.
Brief
overview
of
the
public
engagement,
which
you
heard
most
about
in
the
april
5th
meeting,
and
then
this
is
a
process
for
legislative
action.
So
we'll
show
you
where
we
are
in
the
final
steps
of
that
process
and
then
again
turning
to
counsel
for
your
final
action
on
the
ordinance.
O
Thank
you
mike
good
evening,
now
walk
through
a
brief
summary
of
the
components
of
the
recommended
luca
at
a
high
level.
This
land
use
code
amendment
would
amend
section,
2020,
general
development
requirements,
2025
special
and
overlay
districts
and
2050
definitions
to
establish
lower
minimum
parking
requirements
for
certain
housing
developments
near
frequent
transit
service
next
slide.
Please
now
a
reminder
of
the
criteria,
so
we
have
recommended
a
two-tiered
system
for
frequency
in
the
lower
frequency
category,
which
would
be
stops
with
service
between
two
to
four
times
per
hour.
O
A
quarter
mile
radius
will
apply,
and
in
that
area
only
permanent,
affordable
housing
would
be
eligible
for
reduced
minimum
parking
requirements,
and
that
would
be
a
permanent
as
opposed
to
housing
units
that
are
affordable
from
a
tar,
a
time
limited
period
which
is
more
consistent
with
the
way
our
land
use
code,
references,
affordable,
housing
and
in
the
more
frequent
tier
those
are
stops
with
service
at
least
four
times
per
hour.
We
have
also
included
future
light.
Rail
or
bus.
Rapid
transit
stops
opening
within
two
years.
O
Now
here
we
see
the
map
of
what
those
stops
are
at
the
moment
and
the
radius
distances
a
few
additional
nodes.
While
we'll
be
updating
this
map
regularly
at
least
annually,
it
will
be
the
responsibility
of
the
applicant
to
provide
documentation
of
service
availability
and
we're
working
on
preparing
some
materials
to
guide
that
for
applicants.
O
Permit
application
or
land
use
approval
to
help
account
for
cases
where
there
could
be
substantial
changes
to
service
mid-year
after
a
map
update
and
finally,
because
we
have
to
use
the
radius
approach
consistent
with
state
law,
the
director
may
determine
that
service
is
not
available
when
there
is
a
physical
impediment
making
it
impossible
to
get
to
for
a
pedestrian
to
get
to
the
nearest
eligible
stop
within
a
half
mile
next
slide,
and
now
we
have
proposed
some
reduced
minimum
ratios
for
eligible
development.
O
As
a
reminder,
of
course,
all
developers,
including
affordable
and
senior
housing
developers,
may
still
provide
more
parking
than
is
required.
This
would
just
reduce
the
minimum
and
same
frequency
tiers
apply
in
the
lower
frequency
tier
for
affordable
housing,
reduced
minimum.
We
is
0.75
spaces
per
unit
again
permanent,
affordable
housing
is
the
only
use
that's
eligible
in
this
tier,
the
higher
frequency
tier
for
affordable
housing.
The
ratio
drops
to
0.5
spaces
per
unit
or
0.25
for
very
small
units
serving
households
at
60,
median
income
and
below
for
market
rate
multifamily.
O
The
minimum
is
point,
seven
five
spaces
per
unit
and
the
minimum
is
removed
for
parking
serving
residents
of
senior
housing.
We
can
still
require
parking
for
staff
and
visitors
of
those
of
those
housing
types
next
slide
and
a
final
component
which
is
related,
but
has
some
slight
differences.
O
We
have
changed
off-street
parking
requirements
for
adus.
This
is
consistent
with
a
separate
rcw
also
implemented
last
year,
so
the
luca
would
remove
off
street
requirements
for
new
adus
located
within
a
quarter
mile
of
a
stop
with
service
at
least
four
times
per
hour.
That's
the
higher
frequency
tier,
but
with
a
smaller
radius.
Here
as
the
off-street
requirements
would
be
removed,
we
have
included
a
future
light.
Rail
or
bus.
P
Thank
you
christina
good
evening,
mayor
deputy
mayor
council
member
city
manager
miaki,
so
I
will
walk
through
some
information
on
anticipated
outcomes
and
then
provide
a
quick
summary
of
our
public
engagement
and
the
process
that
we've
gone
through
for
this
manuscript
amendment.
So
with
this
ordinance
we
will
be
furthering
the
city's
affordable
housing
strategy,
which
of
course,
is
the
document
where
the
city
memorialized
its
commitment
to
create
affordable
housing
opportunities
in
bellevue.
P
P
P
So
for
this
ordinance
the
planning
commission
held
two
study
sessions
on
january
13th
and
then
27th.
The
planning
commission
also
held
the
required
public
hearing
on
february
24th
and
after
the
public
hearing
and
deliberation,
the
planning
commission
decided
to
recommend
this
luca
to
council
without
modification.
P
As
noted
earlier,
council
was
introduced
to
this
luca
on
april
5th,
and
the
next
night
staff
went
to
the
ebcc
on
april
6
for
the
ebcc
courtesy
hearing
the
ebcc
considered
written
testimony
as
well
as
had
discussion
after
the
hearing,
the
abcc
discussed
the
objectives
of
the
luca
and
its
conformance
to
its
conformance
action
for
the
land
use
code
to
state
statutes,
as
well
as
advancing
action
actions
within
the
affordable
housing
strategy.
P
The
ebcc
deliberated
on
various
components
of
deluca,
as
well
as
discuss
potential
impacts
of
this
luca
on
the
epcc
jurisdictional
area.
Tonight,
of
course,
we
are
here
for
action
to
ask
council
for
to
take
action
on
this
luca
ordinance.
If
council
does
adopt
the
ordinance,
the
epcc
will
hold
a
public
hearing
and
make
an
approval
disapproval
decision
on
may
4th.
P
We
have
planned
the
schedule
with
the
interim
official
controls
expiration
on
may
18th
in
mind.
So
with
that,
I
want
to
close
the
staff's
presentation
with
asking
council
to
adopt
ordinance
number
6575.
P
Question
of
course,
so
if
the
ebcc
does
not
adopt
or
approve
this
ordinance,
then
the
ordinance
would
not
be
valid
within
their
jurisdictional
area.
The
default
is
that
they
would
be
then
be
under
the
old
regulations,
which,
of
course,
would
be
out
of
compliance
with
state
regulations.
P
N
Regulations,
I
I
think
on
that
question
mayor
as
prisoner
noted,
we
would
probably
need
to
defer
that
to
the
city
attorney
to
respond
since,
and
I
don't
know
if
nick
is
prepared
to
respond
to
that
this
evening,
but
I'll
let
him
respond.
M
Thank
you
mayor.
As
tristan
had
indicated,
it
would
be
one
portion
of
the
city
that
would
have
an
issue
with
that,
and
that
is
something
that
I
would
have
to
look
further
into
to
get
back
to
you.
With
regard
to
the
specific
answer
to
that
question,.
A
Okay,
all
right
any
any
other
comments
or
questions
on
this
before
we
put
this
up
for
a
vote
not
seeing
any,
is
there
a
motion
to
adopt
ordinance,
65-75,
actually.
E
That's
okay!
Thank
you,
mayor
yeah,
just
a
quick
question
on
those
same
lines
there
for
you
tristan,
thank
you
for
the
presentation,
but
were
there
any
themes
during
the
ebcc
hearing?
That
would
would
make
us
believe
that
there
would
be
any
cause
for
concern
about
the
ebcc
not
moving
forward
with
this
in
their
jurisdiction.
E
During
that
that
courtesy
hearing.
P
Thank
you
deputy
mayor,
so
the
ebcc,
as
I
noted,
held
a
pretty
robust
discussion
on
the
pros.
P
They
did
know
some
of
the
potential
impacts
that
they
felt
may
result
from
the
reduced
parking
in
terms
of
having
spillover
onto
neighboring
single-family
neighborhoods.
They,
I
think
there
were
questions
around
the
applicability
of
this
particular
luca,
whether
I
think
we
noted
that
it
would
apply
to
certain
a
new
development.
It
would
not
be
interactive
and
apply
to
existing
development.
There
were
some
concerns
raised
during
the
courtesy
hearing
discussion
about
kind
of
looking
at
existing
conditions
and
the
potential
of
reducing
parking
in
those
existing
development,
which
would
not
actually
be
accurate.
P
E
Then
one
follow-up
question
to
that.
I
think
more
directed
to
to
mike,
if
there,
if
there
is
a
spillover
effect
or
neighborhoods,
are
being
adversely
impacted,
what
is
the
recourse
for
for
residents
if
they
are
seeing
seeing
that
spillover
effect
of
more
cars
in
their
neighborhood
or
unable
to
park
et
cetera?
Will
this
be
complaint
based
if
they
have
issues
in
their
neighborhood
or
and
then
also
on
top
of
that?
How
often
would
we
reassess
if
we
are
noticing
some
trends
that
are
are
negatively
affecting
neighborhoods
as
well.
N
Yes,
deputy
mayor
the
good
questions,
so
yes,
it
would
generally
be
complaint
based.
We
don't
usually
go
back
to
projects
to
do
a
study
on
on
how
they're
performing,
but
we
do
have
a
lot
of
community
members
that
are
keeping
an
eye
on
things
out
there
and
let
us
know
when
they're
not
going
the
way
they
think
they
should
so
we
would.
N
We
would
do
that
if
we
note
that
there's
violations
to
the
conditions
that
of
the
permit
under
the
permit
that
was
issued,
we
would
make
them
correct,
though,
so,
if,
for
whatever
reason,
the
parking
was
not
being
appropriately
allocated
or
was
being
blocked
off
for
some
purpose,
then
we
would
make
them
correct.
That
worst
case
scenario
is.
We
do
have
some
neighborhoods
that
are
close
to
the
urban
centers
that
have
residential
parking
zones
that
get
implemented
to
minimize
spillover
parking
that
might
occur
into
those
close
proximity
neighborhoods.
N
So
there
are
some
tools,
I
think,
to
manage
that.
But
again
we
are
certainly
relying
on
the
the
developers
to
right-size
their
parking.
These
are
the
minimums
they
don't
necessarily
have
to
build
to
the
minimum,
but
it
gives
them
the
ability
to
to
lower
those,
and
we
are
experiencing
a
higher
level
of
transit
use
in
the
city
and
availability,
particularly
with
light
rail
coming
so
we'll
probably
undoubtedly
see
a
reduction
in
the
need
for
vehicles
and
fewer
people
that
will
need
to
have
a
parking
space,
as
the
city
continues
to
grow.
N
A
Second,
all
those
in
favor
say
aye
aye
any
opposed.
Okay,
the
ordinance
passes
we're
at
the
end
of
our
meeting.
Thank
you.
Everybody
have
a
good
rest
of
the
evening
and
we
will
see
you
soon
meeting
adjourned.