►
From YouTube: Bellevue Council Meeting - June. 28, 2021
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
C
B
A
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Okay.
We
have
a
proclamation
tonight,
council
members
on,
could
you
please
read
the
parks
and
recreation
month
proclamation.
E
And
whereas
people
with
disabilities
benefit
from
opportunities
and
choices
for
recreation.
Socialization
and
learning
to
facilitate
participation
in
the
life
of
our
community.
And
whereas
parks
and
recreation
programs
also
enhance
the
community's
economic
prosperity
through
increased
property
values
and
tourism.
The
attraction
and
retention
of
businesses
and
crime
reduction.
E
And
whereas
our
parks
and
natural
areas
ensure
the
ecological
beauty
of
our
community
and
provide
a
place
for
children
and
adults
to
connect
with
nature
and
recreate
outdoors.
And
whereas
bellevue's
parks,
trails
and
natural
areas
have
seen
a
significant
increase
in
use
during
the
pandemic.
As
residents
have
sought
outdoor
opportunities
to
stay,
active
and
healthy.
A
Thank
you,
council
members
on
so
tonight
we
have
a
couple
of
modifications
to
our
agenda.
Our
first
is
item
8f
resolution.
9962
is
going
to
be
pulled
from
tonight's
consent
calendar
and
will
be
brought
back
to
a
future
meeting
and,
in
addition,
the
city
manager
would
like
to
report
back
on
a
few
items.
So
deputy
mayor,
do
you
have
a
motion.
C
I
certainly
do
I
moved
to
approve
the
agenda
amended
to
remove
item
8f
resolution
9962
from
the
consent
agenda
and
add
an
update
from
the
city
manager
on
the
city
manager
report
to
address
the
cooling
centers
reopening
of
city
hall
and
the
eviction
moratorium.
Okay,.
A
B
F
B
F
F
First,
the
goals
and
policies
of
the
plan
are
drafted,
so
they
can
be
applied
to
any
sub-neighborhood
in
northwest
bellevue.
Clearly,
the
single-family
areas
of
north
town
should
have
different
goals
and
policies
than
the
office
complexes
along
the
112th
northeast
and
the
multifamily
dwelling
areas
of
maidenbrower
one
size
does
not
fit
all.
Second.
Northwest
bellevue
should
retain
its
single-family
residence
areas,
which
currently
take
up
over
half
of
our
geographical
area.
F
F
Unfortunately,
proposed
plan
policies,
snw,
24
and
snw
25
encourage
a
mix
of
how
housing
typologies
within
both
lower
and
higher
intensity
districts,
and
they
also
recommend
the
city
explore
introducing
detached
accessory
dwelling
units.
I
oppose
detached
accessory
dwelling
use
in
single-family
resident
neighborhoods
of
north
town.
F
In
addition,
because
dadus
are
now
being
considered
for
the
single
family
neighborhoods
of
north
belle
northwest
bellevue,
it
would
accomplish
better
and
fairer
city
planning
if
at
this
time
such
changes
should
also
be
considered
for
all
bellevue
single-family
neighborhood,
family
neighborhoods,
including
somerset,
wilberton
lake
hills,
new
newbert,
newport
hills
and
others.
F
Finally,
I
believe
more
persons
in
north
westville
will
oppose
dadus
than
favor
them.
I
wanted
to
just
mention
a
few
points
that
are
made
in
the
northwest
comment.
Summary
one
said:
don't
subdivide
residential
properties
or
rezone
residential
areas.
Another
said
we
need
you
to
leave
us
alone.
Another
said
like
way
like
the
way
it
is
and
finally
one
said
note
nope
to
the
backyard
cottages.
People
would
price
them
as
high
as
they
could
and
they
would
not
be
more
affordable.
H
H
So,
if
you
can
look
at
our
table,
we
would
appreciate
that,
as
you
give
staff
direction
to
proceed,
we
would
appreciate
your
inclusion
of
our
requests
from
table
1
of
our
625
letter
in
council's
direction
to
staff
again,
thank
you
to
council
and
staff
in
your
efforts
to
drafting
this
amendment
and
we
look
forward
to
working
with
you
on
the
final
iteration
of
the
code
in
the
next
few
months.
Thank
you
very
much.
B
I
So
much
good
evening,
my
name
is
tram
tran
larsen
and
I'm
the
community
engagement
manager
at
the
housing
justice
project.
We
provide
free
legal
aid
to
low-income
renters
facing
eviction
in
king
county.
I'm
calling
tonight
to
encourage
this
council
to
reconsider
their
delay
of
enacting
a
local
moratorium
or
furthering
tenant
protections.
I
don't
typic.
I
typically
have
something
prepared,
but
tonight
I
don't
because
I
was
disappointed,
but
not
necessarily
surprised
that
this
council
removed
this
item
from
their
agenda
tonight
after
governor
inslee
announced
the
bridge
moratorium.
I
I
think
this
was
done
in
haste
because
we
do
not
know
the
exact
language
around
the
proclamation
inslee
made
it
very
clear
that
it
is
not
an
extension
of
the
current
moratorium
and
it
will
be
far
more
restrictive,
therefore
offering
much
fewer
protections
to
tenants
as
a
whole.
Being
that
we
don't
know
what
that
is
going
to
look
like
and
the
language
is
pretty
vague
and
what
it
means
for
rental
assistance
programs
to
be
operational
before
landlords
are
able
to
evict.
I
I
think
this
was
a
pretty
poor
decision
on
council's
part
to
not
even
discuss
this
any
further,
and
I
would
really
like
to
remind
folks
that
there
is
a
reason
that
we
have
local
governments
who
are
responsible
to
their
constituents
and
issues
that
they
face
excusing
yourself
from
passing
further
protections,
because
state
legislation
provided
some
is
a
cop-out.
Frankly,
bellevue
residents
are
evicted
similar
to
seattle,
residents
to
kenmore,
kirkland
and
bereans,
and
these
cities
all
took
it
upon
themselves
to
expend
their
local
moratorium
and
enact
stronger
tenant
protections.
I
I
am
asking
this
council
to
reconsider
and
you
know
talk
about
tenant
protections
and
extending
your
local
moratorium,
and
if
it
is
duplicative,
that's
fine,
you
know
that'll,
it's
it
doesn't
hurt,
but
if
it's
not,
you
are
providing
protections
that
your
residents
and
constituents
need
that
the
moratorium
likely
does
not
cover.
J
J
J
We
wouldn't
be
where
we
are
today,
and
I
want
to
extend
my
acknowledgement
to
the
council
and
hope
they
will
continue
to
be
involved
through
this
process.
We'd
also
like
to
thank
the
planning
department
that
has
been
very
responsive
and
worked
diligently
to
make
all
of
this
successfully
come
to
completion
for
our
stakeholders.
J
Most
importantly,
I
want
to
thank
wake
properties
for
bringing
forward
a
vision
of
the
cac
that
is
consistent
with
the
envelope
that
was
envisioned
for
this
area,
and
this
is
critical
in
the
linchpin
to
the
success
of
this
district
and
the
members
of
the
cac
fully
supported.
This
weak
properties
is
based
upon
a
feasibility
that
essential
to
development,
it's
built
upon
15.5
acres
and
it
will
provide
a
landmark
entry
into
value
and
sound
transit,
and
we
fully
endorse
their
request
that
they
made
to
the
city
council.
J
Our
site
was
selected
to
support
these
facilities
in
a
structure
today
that
is
non-conforming,
we're
not
a
commercial
area,
but
a
destination
community.
For
those
who
wish
to
belong.
Our
mission
is
to
support
the
future
interest
of
these
resources
with
potential
development
of
the
small
remaining
property.
J
This
costly
undertaking
must
build
upon
the
character
and
needs
of
this
community
because
of
the
unique
non-conforming
nature
of
our
existing
facility.
We
ask
that
any
code
amendments
not
result
in
changes
to
our
existing
building
expansion
in
the
club
should
be
exempt
from
code
requirements
that
are
inconsistent
with
our
business
and
facilities.
J
Feasibility
must
be
supported
by
market-driven
alternatives.
Mandatory
housing
is
inconsistent
with
our
business
and
other
needs
of
the
community.
We
encourage
the
council
to
support
the
requests
of
the
stakeholders
and
feasibility
to
move.
This
forward
is
critical
that
we
keep
all
all
of
this
in
play,
so
we
can
move
forward
effectively.
J
B
K
Okay
hi,
my
name
is
matt
gleason,
I'm
an
organizer
with
the
transit
writers
union
and
I'm
also
a
renter
during
the
pandemical
worker
in
bellevue.
K
I'm
here
today
to
talk
about
the
dropping
of
the
renter
protections
from
from
today's
meeting,
I'm
just
very
concerned
about
that.
I
I
think
that
the
bridge
that
inslee
has
proposed,
though
the
details
aren't
out
it
sounds
like
a
lot
of
people
could
definitely
fall
through
the
cracks
specifically
how
it
says
that
it
just
requires
counties
to
have
an
operational
rental
assistance
program,
but
it
seems
like
it
could
very
well
expire
once
money
starts
going
out
and
leave
tons
and
tons
of
people
vulnerable
to
eviction.
K
K
B
And
thank
you,
mr
gleason
or
mr
gleason,
and
at
this
point
I
would
ask
that
is
the
end
of
our
pre-registered
list.
Is
there
anyone
else
connected
to
this
call
who
would
like
to
make
communication
to
the
council?
If
so,
please
use
the
raise
hand,
function
or
star
9.
If
you
are
connected
with
a
phone
and
I
see
two
additional
hands
first,
I
saw
the
housing
development
consortium.
L
I
thank
you
good
evening,
mayor
robinson
and
council
members.
I
am
patience:
malava
director
of
government
relations
and
policy
at
the
housing
development
consortium
of
seattle,
king
county.
I
am
excited
to
offer
continued
support
for
the
consensus
package
of
the
housing
roundtable
that
has
shaped
the
mfte
program,
update
that
the
city
is
working
on.
I
also
want
to
underscore
that
this
collaborative
approach
that
has
led
to
the
current
solutions
presented
in
the
ordinance
that
is
now
the
mfta
so
far
would
not
have
come
together
without
the
strong
encouragement
of
the
mayor.
L
B
B
No
no
problem.
Thank
you.
I
do
see
one
additional
hand
for
oral
communication
and
that
is
liliana
godinez,
miss
gunines.
Can
you
hear
me.
M
M
M
Some
of
these
families
were
already
living
on
the
edge
of
you
know:
one
crisis
away
from
ending
completely
homeless
and
in
the
streets.
I
have
also
seen
an
increase
in
need
for
rental
assistance,
along
with
child
care
and
food
services
or
resources.
M
Finally,
I
have
seen
an
increase,
a
need
for
legal
resources
and
mediation
services
to
assist
renters
and
landlords
and
coming
up
with
repayment
plans
so
that
this
debt
that
they
have
or
amount
that
they
own
doesn't
remain
on
the
records
which
can
impact
their
ability
to
rent
in
the
future.
M
I
think
there's
three
important
keys
to
to
remember
when
discussing
rental
moratoriums,
in
particular
those
that
are
local
to
our
community
one.
I
think
it's
important
to
have
a
strong
rental
moratorium
that
gives
you
know
our
government
and
local
non-profits
times
and
families
the
opportunity
to
access
emergency
funds
that
are
available
for
rental
assistance.
M
I
think
it's
also
important
to
have
legal
counsel
in
place
for
both
renters
and
landlords
alike
to
ensure
that
all
matters
of
back
to
rent
are
resolved
amicably
and
also
it
is
important
that
families
and
renters
do
not
continue
to
be
penalized
with
excessive
fees
as
a
result
of
missed
payments
or
incomplete
payments
as
a
result
of
the
pandemic
again
through
no
fault
of
their
own.
So
I
appreciate
your
time
and
thank
you
so
much
for
this
opportunity.
B
Thank
you
miss
gorinas.
At
this
point,
I
would
make
one
final
call
out
for
oral
communication.
If
there
is
anyone
connected
to
this
call,
who
would
like
to
make
oral
comments?
Please
use
the
raise
hand,
function
or
star
nine
if
connected
with
a
phone.
A
Okay,
thank
you
very
much.
I
just
want
to
announce
that
councilmember
bark
steele
lost
his
connection,
probably
due
to
some
systems
problems
with
the
heat,
and
so
he
is
trying
to
find
a
way
to
either
call
in
or
go
to
city
hall
and
use
the
connect
connections
there.
So
we
hope
to
have
him
back
with
us
momentarily
in
the
meantime,
we're
on
to
the
report
of
our
city
manager,
mr
miyake.
N
Good
evening,
mayor
and
mayor
robinson
and
council
members,
I
have
three
items
to
report
on
under
the
city
manager's
report,
as
was
alluded
to
by
deputy
mayor
newinghouse.
The
first
item
is
is
to
let
the
council
know
and
alert
the
council,
that
of
the
opening
up
of
city
hall.
I
wanted
to
alert
the
council
on
viewing
public
that
we
are
planning
to
open
city
hall
on
july.
6..
Opening
up
city
hall
will
be
a
a
phased
in
over
time
to
full
in-person
service
and
hours.
N
N
Last
week
I
informed
the
council
that
staff
would
be
back
tonight
responding
to
these
requests.
As
a
reminder,
the
eviction
war
torment
request
was
premised
on
the
governor,
not
extending
the
statewide
moratorium
moratorium
and
since
then
the
governor
has
announced
that
he
plans
to
extend
the
moratorium
as
of
last
week.
So
I
wanted
to
both
the
council
and
doing
public
to
know
and
understand
why
there
were
no
materials
in
your
packet
this
evening.
N
P
O
O
Here
is
a
brief
look
at
the
subjects
I'd
like
to
cover
in
fairly
quick
order.
O
And
I
don't
have
to
tell
you:
it's
been
hot
out
there,
we've
had
record
temperatures
saturday
sunday
and
today
we
did
reach
100
degrees
or
greater
on
three
consecutive
days,
for
the
first
time
since
we've
been
recording,
this
sort
of
weather
going
back
to
1894.
O
sunday
was
actually
the
hottest
day
ever
recorded
in
seattle,
and
we
surpassed
that
at
1
10
p.m.
Today,
and
if
you
notice
on
the
chart,
the
blue
color
is
our
normal
mid
70s
temperatures
and
and
the
orange
color
is
what
we've
actually
been
experiencing
and
you'll
notice
a
red
flag
below
today.
That's
a
red
flag
warning,
which
means
the
national
weather
service
has.
Let
us
know
that
we're
at
extreme
risk
for
fire
danger
and
fire
spread.
O
O
We
had
a
really
interesting
situation
at
the
bradenwood
senior
apartments
where
that
building
is
situated
in
a
manner
that
the
third
floor
residents
were
really
having
a
tough
time
due
to
heat
and
western
exposure,
and
our
cares
advocates
were
able
to
get
out
there
and
actually
tin,
foil
the
windows
to
reflect
a
little
bit
of
the
heat
energy.
So
we
were
lucky
to
be
able
to
help
in
that
way.
O
It
really
picked
up
on
sunday
with
three
dozen
visitors
and,
of
course
the
centers
are
still
open
today,
so
we
don't
have
the
totals
for
today,
but
we've
seen
a
steady
increase
in
that
usage
regarding
our
beaches
and
parks.
The
beginning
of
our
lifeguarding
capability
coincided
with
the
beginning
of
the
heat
on
saturday,
so
anatai,
newcastle
and
maidenbower
bay
were
all
open
with
lifeguard
capability
on
the
26th
and
as
of
the
26th
guards,
will
be
stationed
at
the
larger
beaches
and
will
remain
through
our
normal
swim
season.
O
O
All
the
public-facing
crews
in
the
city
have
been
equipped
to
monitor
the
situation
they
encounter.
They've
all
been
distributed.
Cold
water
and
gatorade
able
to
hand
out
to
people
that
they
encounter
city
leadership
has
had
ongoing
coordinated
coordination
meetings
focused
on
public
messaging
outreach
efforts,
extending
our
cooling
center
capability,
really
all
aspects
of
heat,
preparation
and
response.
O
Our
carers
advocates,
who
are
our
masters
of
social
work.
Students
actually
came
in
on
the
weekend
and
did
extra
volunteer
hours
to
conduct
that
outreach
with
seniors
in
apartments
without
air
conditioning
handed
out
a
lot
of
gatorade
and
water
really
lucky
to
be
able
to
do
that
as
also
our
seacat
pilot,
which
is
our
coordination
with
bellevue
police.
O
Those
teams
were
also
out
there
doing
some
advocacy
and
our
crossroads
community
center
staff
and
our
parks
operations
staff
opened
facilities
over
the
weekend,
facilities
that
would
not
have
otherwise
been
open
and
stand
ready
to
continue
that
effort
as
needed.
Thank
you,
mayor
robinson,
for
the
opportunity
to
brief
you
this
evening.
A
A
Okay,
thank
you.
I've
got
a
good
news
story
here.
A
A
Q
Bringing
a
lot
of
experience
to
us
and
very
very
excited
about
bellevue
and
families
here
and
been
here
for
some
time,
and
she
has
a
strong
passion
for
giving
back
to
the
community
and
she's
going
to
be
a
great
asset
to
to
the
both
the
commission
itself
and
to
the
city,
and
we
were
in
strong
agreement
for
this
candidate,
both
the
staff
and
and
the
chair
of
the
commission
and
myself,
and
so
please
to
nominate
her
and
ask
for
your
affirmation.
Q
Can't
read
my
own
handwriting
to
the
arts
commission
for
for
your
term.
C
A
E
Yes,
I
am
nominating
cassidy
guillen
petro
for
the
parks
and
community
services
board.
She
is
just
so
excited
to
serve
on
the
parks
board.
E
I'm
just
very
excited
to
serve
on
the
board,
and
one
of
the
questions
that
we
added
this
year
to
our
to
our
interview
process
was
the
fact
that,
on
the
council,
we
had
added
as
part
of
our
vision,
sustainability,
innovation
and
equity.
E
So
each
of
the
candidates
was
asked
that
question
and
I
thought
that
in
all
three
of
those
areas
that
she
was
very
thoughtful
in
how
she
might
bring
those
elements
into
our
parks
board,
especially
as
we
embark
on
our
parks
and
open
space
planning
coming
up,
and
so
it
was
a
unanimous
decision
and
I'd
like
to
make
a
motion
that
we
appoint
cassidy
kim
petro
to
the
parks
and
community
services
board
to
serve
a
four-year
term.
Expiring
may
31.
A
A
N
Yes,
scott
good
evening,
robinson
council,
members
in
front
of
you
is
a
public
hearing
on
the
multi-family
housing
property
tax
tax
exemption,
which
is
northern,
cementing
chapter
4.5
to
the
bellevue
city
code
and
just
by
way
background.
The
council
launched
an
update
to
the
city's
existing
multi-family
tax
exemption
program
in
october
of
2020.
N
This
program
allows
for
a
tax
exemption
for
developers
in
exchange
for
providing
affordable
housing
staff
as
a
part
of
the
update
process
have
been
working
hard
with
partnerships
with
stakeholder
community,
as
well
as
to
develop
a
program
that
increases
utilization
and
furthers
city
policy
objectives.
This
topic
was
last
in
front
of
council
on
may
24th,
where
council
provided
direction
to
prepare
for
a
public
hearing
on
a
package
of
updates
to
the
mft
program.
N
So
joining
us
this
evening
is
emile
king
assistant
director,
as
well
as
elizabeth
duret,
both
from
the
community
development
department,
with
that
our
turnover
to
emile
king
as
well
as
elizabeth.
R
I
thank
you
for
the
introduction
city
manager,
miyaki
and
good
evening,
mayor
robinson,
deputy
mayor
newman
house
and
members
of
council
I'd
like
to
offer
up
a
few
introductory
comments
in
advance
of
the
public
hearing
tonight.
Tonight
is
a
significant
milestone
in
our
ongoing
work
on
affordable
housing.
The
multifamily
tax
exemption
program
is
a
very
important
part
of
bellevue's
strategy
to
produce
more
affordable
housing
within
the
city.
As
the
city
manager
mentioned,
it
does
allow
for
a
market-based
approach
to
help
meet
our
significant,
affordable
housing
needs.
R
The
existing
mfte
program
is
being
revised
to
first
and
foremost,
increase
production
of
affordable
housing,
while
also
furthering
city
policy.
Objectives
relating
to
affordable
housing
council
has
had
thoughtful
policy
discussions
at
three
study
sessions
to
date.
On
the
numerous
facets
of
the
mfte
program,
we've
also
had
a
very
robust,
ongoing
stakeholder
engagement
process
that
has
helped
get
the
code
to
this
point.
We're
now
ready
to
conduct
a
public
sharing
with
the
ultimate
goal
of
adopting
the
revised
program
provisions.
R
As
with
all
our
new
code
provisions,
we
will
be
monitoring
the
mfde
program,
moving
forward
and
report
back
to
council
during
our
bi-annual
update
on
affordable
housing.
I'd
like
to
now
hand
things
over
to
elizabeth
duret
the
program
or
excuse
me,
the
project
manager
to
run
through
a
few
introductory
slides
in
advance
of
the
hearing.
S
Thank
you
emil.
As
emil
said,
we
will
have
a
very
short
presentation
today
so
good
evening,
good
evening.
Everyone
I
will
walk
through
this
and
then
we'll
get
on
to
the
public
hearing.
S
So
today
we
are
looking
for
holding
the
the
public
hearing
and
then
potentially
we
could
adopt
an
ordinance
which
was
drafted
up,
which
would
amend
chapter
452,
which
is
the
mfte
code,
I'll
just
briefly
be
going
through
the
overall
schedule,
a
summary
of
the
outreach
we've
done
today,
the
the
update
elements
themselves
and
then
our
plan
for
implementation
once
adopted,
if
adopted
so
here's
the
schedule.
This
is
very
similar
to
what
you've
seen
throughout
the
process.
S
S
We
are
now
today
ready
for
public
hearing,
which
is
required
by
state
law
and
and
local
code
as
well
on
the
geographic
expansion,
but
we
have
chosen
to
include
the
program
as
a
whole
so
that
we
can
get
robust
public
engagement
throughout
the
process.
We
have
gained
one
written
communications
to
date
so
far.
S
We
we
did
post
notice
as
required
two
weeks
ago
and
one
week
ago,
as
well
for
the
public
hearing
tonight
and-
and
you
can
see
on
here,
that
we
have
a
public
hearing
shown
today-
we
could
adopt
today,
but
but
we
could
also
adopt
in
july
if
changes
are
proposed
to
the
ordinance
that
that
was
posted
alongside
the
public
hearing
materials.
S
So
this
is
a
slide
you
have
all
seen
before,
so
I'm
going
to
go
through
it
really
quickly.
This
is
just
a
summary
of
the
outreach
we've
done.
We've
talked
with
dozens
of
different
developers.
Who've
worked
on
projects
in
bellevue
to
understand
how
they
use
the
mfte
program
and
what
they
would
like
to
see.
We've
worked
very
closely
with
the
bellevue
chamber
meeting
with
them
at
least
monthly,
often
more
frequently,
we've
also
worked
with
htc
and
with
the
bda
as
well.
So
a
very
varied
group
of
stakeholders
have
been
part
of
this
process.
S
S
A
lot
of
parts
of
the
program
are
not
suggesting
being
changed,
but
those
areas
are,
and
so
we'll
go
through
kind
of
the
existing
program
pieces
that
are
not
being
proposed
to
change
and
then
we'll
go
through
the
proposed
changes
at
a
really
high
level.
So
the
the
tax
exemption
is
a
12-year
tax
exemption
on
the
residential
improvements
of
of
a
project
and
in
exchange,
their
20
of
the
units
are
offered
as
affordable.
S
Our
current
program
does
not
change
any
of
that.
That's
that's
a
tied
to
state
law
as
well.
S
So
all
those
things
are
are
proposed
to
remain
the
same,
but
we
are
looking
at
changing
the
affordability
levels
that
that
are
the
baseline
as
well
as
the
locations
where
that
that
would
be
permitted
and
we're
also
looking
at
minorly
tweaking
our
requirement
that
all
projects
include
at
least
15
of
the
units
at
two
bedrooms
or
larger.
S
So
we'll
walk
through
those
really
quickly.
You
can
see
the
map
on
the
right
you've
seen
but
before
this
just
shows
today
in
pink
and
red,
where
we
currently
have
multi-family
zoning
and
where
we
are
proposing.
Therefore,
broadening
the
locations
where
the
mft
program
could
be
used.
It's
worth
noting
that
this
just
shows
the
map
today,
but
the
way
that
the
code
is
written
up
would
allow
this
to
change
over
time.
S
S
The
baseline
would
change
to
80
ami
in
the
proposed
ordinance,
but
for
those
units
that
overlap
with
the
land
use
code
incentives
and
are
really
double
counted,
those
would
be
at
15
ami
deeper,
which
would
be
65
ami.
S
We
also,
as
I
mentioned,
have
an
existing
requirement
that
fifteen
percent
of
the
units
be
at
two
bedrooms
are
larger
to
allow
for
for
more
family
size
units.
We
are
amending
that
slightly
in
the
proposed
ordinance
that
that
would
allow
for
alternatives
for
those
projects
that
do
not
meet
that
requirement.
They
could
choose
to
either
offer
more
units
at
that
same
affordability
level,
so
it
would
go
up
to
25
of
the
units
instead
of
20
of
the
units
or
they
could
choose
to
offer
deeper
affordability.
S
We
also
are
proposing
an
introduction
of
two
new
tenant
benefits.
The
first
would
be
a
discount
on
parking
stalls
outside
of
downtown
area,
so
in
downtown
there
would
be
no
discount
on
parking
in
in
an
area
that
has
very
great
access
to
transit,
but
in
all
other
areas
of
the
city
there
would
be
a
requirement
that
the
owner
offer
a
30
discount
on
the
market
rate
price
of
parking
to
mfte
tenants.
S
The
other
tenant
benefit
is
rent
stabilization,
and
this
is
a
little
bit
complicated.
But
it's
kind
of
like
rent
control
in
a
sense
for
mfte
tenants
where
you
you
try
to
limit
the
unexpectedly
large
rent
hikes
that
you
sometimes
see
when,
when
the
market
is
really
great
and
so
in
instances
where
the
rents
would
otherwise
be
be
raising
faster
than
three
percent
annually.
This
caps,
that
for
for
any
mft
tenants
that
are
renewing
their
their
leases
to
only
three
percent
annually.
S
It
does
allow
for
kind
of
a
catch-up
provision
in
those
years
where
it's
not
growing
as
quickly
so
that
the
the
owners
can
start.
You
know
catching
up
with
the
amount
that
they
actually
receive
from
from
affordable
tenants,
allowing
them
to
increase
those
rents
up
to
three
percent
until
they
catch
up
to
the
the
otherwise
kind
of
standard,
affordable
rents.
S
So
this
last
slide
just
goes
over
kind
of
some
of
our
implementation
plan.
Once
adopted,
these
changes
would
still
need
kind
of
other
continued
you'd
work
and
making
sure
that
you
know
everything
we've
put
into
this
update,
really
benefits
the
the
city
and
and
really
sees
that
that
increase
in
affordable
housing
that
we
are
looking
for.
So
we're
going
to
make
sure
we
update
all
of
our
kind
of
packet,
materials
and
and
website
all
of
those
public-facing
documents
will
get
updated.
S
We
will
create
additional
material
for
understanding
about
all
of
our
affordable
housing
incentives
and
and
how
they
overlap
with
with
one
another
so
that
that's
very
clear,
we're
also
going
to
become
very
proactive
in
reaching
out
to
mfte
or
potential
mfte
project
so
that
we
make
sure
you
know
no
project
slips
through
the
cracks.
S
We'll
also
be
monitoring
and
reporting
back
on
all
of
these
things
to
make
sure
that
that
we
are
meeting
what
what
council
intends,
and
so
we
will
be
reporting
back
twice
a
year
at
that
affordable
housing
strategy,
update,
we'll
we'll
be
able
to
track
information
like
you
know
how
many
mfte
units,
where
we're
seeing,
but
also
things
like
you
know
how
much
parking
is
actually
being
utilized
both
in
downtown
and
outside
of
downtown.
S
Other
details
like
that
will
also
be
tracking,
we'll
also
be
updating
our
you
know,
contract
and
covenant
and
kind
of
looking
at
some
of
the
administrative
costs
of
of
this
increased
use
of
affordable
housing.
S
So
lots
of
of
work
to
be
done,
but
it'll
it'll
be
great
to
get
this
on
the
table
and
really
get
the
message
out
to
developers
that
this
is
is
a
great
new
option
so
again,
just
a
repeat
of
the
direction
here
to
hold
a
public
hearing
and
potentially
adopt
the
ordinance.
So
I'm
gonna
with
that
hand
it
back
over
to
you.
Thank
you.
A
A
B
T
B
T
Hi,
my
name
is
abby
dewees
and
I'm
a
land
use
attorney
at
hillis
clark,
but
I'm
here
tonight
on
behalf
of
naop,
the
commercial
real
estate
development
association,
who
is
the
leading
organization
for
developers,
owners
and
investors
of
office,
industrial
retail
and
mixed
use
real
estate.
We
have
thousands
of
members
in
washington
and
across
the
puget
sound
region.
Thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
comment.
We
strongly
support
the
changes
to
the
mfte
ordinance
council
is
considering
tonight.
T
The
changes
to
the
ami
thresholds,
coupled
with
the
rent
stabilization
measure
and
the
parking
discount,
create
a
workable
program
for
tenants
and
developers
alike.
With
all
the
jobs
headed
to
bellevue,
the
city
will
need
additional
workforce
housing.
So
we
applaud
this
step
to
help
meet
the
future
demand.
T
We
also
support
the
minor
clarifying
amendments
proposed
by
the
chamber.
We
asked
the
council
to
adopt
these
amendments
with
the
broader
ordinance.
Thank
you
to
staff
who
work
closely
with
the
stakeholder
group,
of
which
we
are
a
part
in
order
to
craft
the
ordinance,
and
these
suggested
changes.
Special
thanks
is
definitely
owed
to
emil
elizabeth
and
mack.
It
has
been
a
great
partnership
that
we
hope
to
replicate
and
build
upon
in
the
future.
T
Last
we
wanted
to
emphasize
that
this
is
a
great
first
step,
but
that
additional
work
is
needed
with
the
east
main
and
wilberton
resounds
and
in
the
bell
red
and
downtown
lookbox
to
reduce
code
barriers
and
pave
the
way
for
additional
housing
production
in
bellevue.
We
look
forward
to
diving
into
those
efforts.
T
B
U
U
The
affordable
housing
initiative
consists
of
a
750
million
dollar
investment
but
perhaps
more
importantly,
a
commitment
to
work
with
local
governments,
communities,
non-profits
and
businesses
to
adopt
practical,
inclusive
and
responsible
policies
that
will
result
result
in
more
housing
options
for
people
across
income
levels
as
jobs
grow
across
the
east
side.
We
need
to
ensure
the
people
who
work
here
can
live
here
too.
U
It
requires
all
of
us
to
work
together
with
focus
and
urgency,
along
with
strong
leadership
from
the
bellevue
chamber.
We
are
proud
to
be
part
of
a
growing
coalition
called
the
eastside
housing
roundtable.
A
group
of
private
sector
and
non-profit
organizations
focused
on
increasing,
affordable
housing
in
bellevue.
U
U
Our
hope
is
that,
as
bellevue
prepares
for
several
years
of
unprecedented
growth,
utilization
of
this
program
will
result
in
hundreds
of
new
below
market,
affordable
homes.
The
nurses
day
care
workers,
restaurant
managers,
teachers,
firefighters
and
police
officers
who
will
live
in
these
homes
are
the
backbone
of
what
make
our
communities
great.
U
U
We
know
this
legislation
is
only
the
beginning
and
has
bellevue
so
well
articulated
in
its
affordable
housing
plan.
We
have
so
much
more
work
ahead
of
us.
Your
partnership,
addressing
this
housing
and
affordability,
crisis
head-on,
is
commendable
and
we're
so
proud
to
be
part
of
this
great
city.
Thank
you
all
for
what
you
have
done
and
will
continue
to
do
to
help
keep
bellevue
affordable.
Thank
you.
B
L
You
good
evening,
mayor
robinson
and
council
members,
I
am
patience,
malaba,
director
of
government
relations
and
policy
at
the
housing
development
consortium
of
seattle,
king
county.
We
are
a
membership
association
of
more
than
190,
affordable
housing
providers
working
across
the
region
to
ensure
that
all
people
live
with
dignity
in
safe,
healthy
and
affordable
homes.
L
I
am
excited
to
offer
continued
support
for
the
consensus
package
of
the
east
side,
housing
roundtable
that
has
shaped
the
mfte
program
that
is
before
you
today.
I
also
want
to
underscore
that
our
collaborative
approach
that
has
gotten
us
to
this
point
would
not
have
come
together
without
the
strong
encouragement
of
the
mayor.
So
on
behalf
of
our
sector,
I
want
to
thank
you,
mayor,
council
and
staff
for
the
work
you've
done
on
housing,
affordability
and
production.
B
V
Great
thank
you
good
evening,
mayor
robinson,
deputy
mayor
newman
house
and
members
of
the
council.
My
name
is
jared
axelrod
and
I
lead
local
public
policy
and
external
affairs
for
amazon.
I
wanted
to
speak
in
support
of
ordinance
6582,
which
would
update
the
city's
multi-family
tax
exemption
program.
V
But
we
also
firmly
believe
that
government
must
do
its
part
to
drive
affordable
housing
strategies,
which
is
why
we
are
pleased
and
appreciative
to
see
the
council
considering
these
updates
to
the
mfte
program.
This
evening.
We
support
the
revised
mfte
ordinance
in
front
of
you
this
evening
and
believe
that
the
compromises
that
have
been
made
within
it
will
allow
us
to
make
larger
strides
to
meet
bellevue's
housing
demand.
I'd
like
to
thank
the
council,
all
of
you
for
your
focus
on
this
important
subject
and
for
shaping
a
policy
that
will
produce
more
affordable
housing
development.
V
We
know
that
we
have
much
more
work
to
do
to
address
housing
challenges
in
bellevue
and
across
the
region,
and
we
are
excited
to
partner
with
you
to
create
more
affordable
workforce
housing
near
jobs
and
transportation,
to
ensure
that
every
person
has
safe,
dignified
and
affordable
housing.
Thank
you.
W
Thank
you
for
the
record.
This
is
joe
fain,
I'm
proud
to
serve
as
the
president
and
ceo
of
the
bellevue
chamber.
The
bellevue
chamber
strongly
supports
this
proposal,
bringing
forward
before
you
tonight
and
are
very
excited
about
the
next
phase
of
work
to
help
promote
the
use
of
this
new
mfte
program.
W
I
would
be
remiss
if
I
did
not
profusely
thank
staff,
in
particular
elizabeth
emil
and
mack
elizabeth
remarked
earlier
about
the
frequency
of
meetings
that
she
had
with
the
chamber
and
our
team.
That
is
certainly
no
understatement.
They
have
absolutely
done
an
extraordinary
job
of
outreach
and
of
working
in
the
minute
details
to
craft
a
compromise
that
can
be
really
beneficial
for
all
parties.
W
We're
excited
what
this
partnership
represents,
bringing
together
the
chamber,
developers,
the
housing,
roundtable
city
staff
and,
of
course,
each
of
you,
the
members
of
the
bellevue
city
council,
and
the
vision
you
have
for
growing,
affordable
housing
in
bellevue,
as
has
been
referenced
by
previous
speakers.
This
morning,
I
submitted
a
small
package
of
six
amendments
to
provide
some
minor
clarifications
that
should
help
with
the
implementation
process,
and
I
again
want
to
thank
staff
for
their
help
in
reviewing
and
perfecting
those
suggestions.
W
Finally,
I
want
to
thank
the
leadership
of
mayor
robinson
on
this
matter
is
very
clear
for
all
of
us
that
without
her
and
the
council's
pushing
these
matters,
we
may
not
be
where
we
are
at
this
great
place
today.
I
look
forward
to
working
with
each
of
you
on
these
issues
in
the
future
and
I'm
very
pleased
to
support
this
package
today.
Thank
you.
X
I
share
this
work
with
you
to
let
you
know
that
our
support
is
well
informed
and
shares
your
confidence
and
excitement
that
this
mfte
update
is
heading
in
the
right
direction.
Well
done
and
kudos
to
staff.
Well
done
to
all
the
external
partners
from
the
private
sector
to
the
non-profit
housing
providers.
X
B
Y
Yes,
thank
you.
Thank
you.
Your
time
begins
good
evening
mayor
robinson,
deputy
mayor
newen,
heiss,
council,
members
and
staff.
My
name
is
meegan
altimore
and
I
am
the
director
of
community
services
and
operational
excellence
at
hope,
link
as
well
as
hopelink's
representative
with
the
east
side,
housing
roundtable,
I'm
testifying
tonight
in
support
of
the
revised
mfte
ordinance,
first
and
foremost
like
the
other
speakers
tonight.
I
would
really
like
to
thank
you
and
the
city
staff
for
the
collaborative
approach
you've
taken
in
getting
to
this
ordinance
revision.
Y
Y
As
many
of
you
may
know,
hopelink
is
a
non-profit
serving
king
and
snohomish
counties
that
employs
350
staff
members
utilizes
nearly
4
000
volunteers
in
a
typical
year,
and
helps
nearly
65
000
people
annually,
including
more
than
six
thousand
bellevue
residents.
Housing.
Affordability
at
all
levels
is
a
top
priority
for
hopelink's
board
and
leadership
to
support
the
residents
that
we
serve
as
well
as
our
workforce,
both
both
paid
and
volunteer.
Y
We're
excited
to
continue
to
partner
with
the
city
of
bellevue
to
identify
new
solutions
to
this
crisis,
and
we
see
this
revision
as
a
very
positive
step
forward.
The
revised
ordinance
is
a
powerful
step
in
increasing
the
production
of
affordable
units
for
all
middle-income
households
in
bellevue,
and
we're
particularly
happy
about
the
provision
that
caps
rent
increases
annually
for
returning
mfte
tenants.
This
allows
continuity
planning
and
security
for
households
that
are
on
tight
budgets
in
this
competitive
housing
market.
Y
B
At
this
point,
I
would
like
to
mention
for
the
record
that
the
council
did
receive
two
emails
that
were
part
of
your
desk
packet
related
to
this
public
hearing,
and
also,
at
this
point,
I'd
like
to
ask
if
there's
anyone
else
connected
to
this
call
who
would
like
to
make
comment
during
this
public
hearing?
Please
use
the
raise
hand,
function
or
star9
if
you
are
connected
with
the
phone.
A
A
Q
Q
I
also
think
and
and
appreciate
the
additions
that
the
bellevue
chamber
and
others
in
the
eastside
group
have
put
together
the
amendments.
To
that
I
think
it.
You
know
we
come
a
long
ways
in
a
short
time
period.
Q
Actually,
when
you
look
at
this
and-
and
this
is-
we've
talked
about
mtft
for
some
time
and
putting
in
place,
and
we
made
some
little
starts
and
one
of
the
key
things
in
looking
at
the
affordable
housing
strategy
that
we
adopted
in
2017
was
finding
ways
to
actually
incentivize
the
community
builders
financers
ordinary
people
to
move
things
forward
and
we
put
it
in
place
and
fortunately,
because
the
changes
since
2017
have
been
so
dramatic
that
they're
really
putting
a
lot
of
pressure
on
us
and
the
community
in
the
business
community.
Q
The
community
as
a
whole
has
come
together
and
said,
as
jane
broom
said.
This
is
something
we
have
to
do.
We
have
a
huge
task
ahead
of
us,
so
I'm
very
excited
to
have
these
new.
You
know
reworking
the
property
tax
exemption
exemption,
the
aspects
to
it,
the
way
it's
been
thoughtfully,
designed
and
again
with
the,
and
I
would
include
the
the
the
additions
that
asked
for
by
the
gilbert
chamber.
Q
C
Thank
you,
mayor,
yeah,
great
kudos,
all
around,
and
I
want
to
start
with
with
staff
and
I'm
glad
and
thankful
that
so
many
of
our
speakers
during
the
public
hearing
process
called
out
our
staff
of
mcmill
and
liz
and
many
many
others
that
were
integral
into
this.
So
thank
you
for
those
for
those
kind
comments.
C
I
just
also
want
to
say
kudos
to
my
colleagues
for
moving
this
forward
so
quickly
and
for
all
understanding
that
the
critical
role
that
affordable
housing,
workforce
housing
plays
in
in
in
bellevue-
and
I
know
we
all
understand
that,
but
actually
getting
done
getting
things
done
and
getting
significant
legislation
done
like
this.
This
update
is
significant.
Our
job
is
not
done.
We
still
have
more
to
do,
but
this
is
a
big
piece
of
it
and
it
was
a
big
piece,
as
councilman
stokes
mentioned,
with
our
affordable
housing
strategy.
C
So
I
am
just
so
proud
to
be
here
today
that
we're
able
to
to
move
this
forward.
We
were
able
to
make
a
dent
in
in
the
affordable,
housing
and
yeah
so
proud
to
be
a
part
of
this
and
move
this
for
today.
I
am
in
in
favor
of
adding
the
the
the
chambers
amendments.
I
do
think
they're
thoughtful
and
will
help
with
the
implementation.
C
With
this
I
do
have
two
quick
questions
that
I
think
I
know
the
answers
to
already,
but
I
just
wanted
to
verify
before
we
move
this
forward.
So
one
one
of
the
questions
from
the
specially
was
matt
jack
mentioned
the
tracking.
C
I
think
we
already
have
that
in
place
emil
in
terms
of
tracking
the
success,
as
we
usually
do
with
a
lot
of
different
programs,
but
if
you
could
speak
to
that
just
quickly
and
then
also
a
question
that
that
I
just
thought
about
in
terms
of
how
we're
going
to
promote
this
mfte,
this
program
is
so
great.
On
the
other
hand,
it's
only
going
to
be
as
great
as
people
know
about
it.
C
So
how
do
we
make
sure
that
we
be
sure
to
notify
all
developers
that
this
program
has
been
has
been
revamped?
The
incentive
is
much
stronger
and
encourage
them
to
take
advantage
of
it.
R
R
Some
of
the
items
that
we
will
be
monitoring
moving
forward
will
be
obviously
the
number
of
affordable
units.
We're
also
going
to
look
at
how
the
expansion
of
the
geographic
area
is
playing
out.
So
we'll
look
at
units
overall
in
the
city
based
on
their
geography
and
all
of
the
other
elements
that
elizabeth
illuminated
on
the
changes
will
actually
be
monitoring,
those
from
the
parking
to
the
ami
levels
to
amount
overlapping.
R
R
Our
thought
is,
we
would
report
back
to
council
as
part
of
our
biannual
update,
that
we
already
have
on
the
calendar
and
it
has
come
up
if
we
needed
to
have
something
in
the
code
to
actually
have
us
do
the
monitoring
and
our
our
thought
is
staff?
Is
we
don't
need
something
in
the
code
that
says
go
monitor?
I
think
we
would
be
doing
that
anyway.
R
S
S
Having
those
conversations
early,
making
sure
that
we
understand
you
know
the
the
pros
and
cons
to
developers
of
the
new
program
and
kind
of
what
their
thought
process
is,
and
so,
in
order
to
do
that,
we've
been
developing
kind
of
a
new
process
of
just
how
we
interact
with
with
developers
and
how
early
we
can
kind
of
talk
to
them
about
mfte,
as
well
as
just
kind
of
all
of
our
actual
outreach
materials.
S
C
Okay,
fantastic
thank
you
for
that.
So
again,
yeah
happy
to
move
this
forward
and
in
favor
of
adding
the
chambers
amendments
and-
and
again
I
just
wanted
to
give
a
shout
out
just
to
the
collaborative
nature
of
this
in
terms
of
the
affordable
housing
advocates.
The
organizations
involved,
such
as
the
the
the
chamber
bda,
such
as
the
the
different
companies
involved,
with
that
we
heard
today
and
the
developers
etc
such
a
great
collaborative
effort
and
again
happy
to
happy
to
move
this
forward.
Thank
you,
mayor.
A
E
You
council,
members
on
yeah,
so
I'm
gonna
pile
on
here
from
my
other
two
council
members.
Thank
you
so
much
matt,
camille,
elizabeth
and
all
of
the
collaboration
and
partnership.
You
know
a
couple
of
the
statements
made
earlier
about
that.
We
are
in
a
housing
crisis
and
we
need
to
find
ways
to
keep
housing
affordable
and
we
need
to
move
with
more
urgency.
So
I
am
happy
to
support
this
because
to
me
having
an
mfte
program,
but
it
not
being
used,
doesn't
actually
build
housing.
E
E
E
One
is
the
amendment
number
one
where
it
talks
about
if
hud
no
longer
publishes
the
median
family
income
figures,
do
we
is
this
something
we
would
normally
do
that
if
we're
going
to
change
rules
that
we
would
have
a
public
comment
opportunity.
I'm
just
trying
to
understand
whether
the
proposal
is
something
we
wouldn't
normally
do
and
that's
why
we
want
to
add
this
to
code
or
if,
when
we
do
something
like
that,
we
would
always
have
a
public
comment
opportunity.
E
So
that's
one
question,
and
maybe
I
just
asked
my
couple
and
and
then
the
second
one
on
amendment
two
it
says
no
later
than
and
then
sixty
calendar
days
after
was
there
is
sixty
days
magical.
E
E
So
was
there
a
reason
why
we
picked
60
days
and
so
that
those
were
my
two
questions
thanks.
R
R
So,
on
the
the
amendment
number
one
that
talks
about
a
scenario
where
housing
and
urban
development
or
hud
was
no
longer
providing
the
ami
levels,
it's
it's
not
likely
that
that's
going
to
happen,
so
it
is
a
small
percentage
chance,
but
we
think
if
it
did
happen
and
we
did
need
to
come
up
with
a
kind
of
our
own
ami
level,
it
is
important
enough
that
it
would
probably
warrant
a
public
comment
period.
R
So
it's
a
probably
low
percentage
chance
it's
going
to
happen,
but
what
the
ami
levels
are
and
the
rents
are
a
pretty
significant
thing,
just
kind
of
looking
back
at
all
the
math
that
goes
into
it.
So
staff
does
not
feel
it's
an
an
issue
having
the
the
comment
period
for
something
like
this,
provided
it
is
a
bit
of
an
anomaly
and
I'd
like
to
hand
it
over
to
elizabeth
to
answer
your
second
question.
Please.
S
Yes,
so
I
think
you
were
asking
about
the
60-day
calendar
days,
it's
kind
of
an
amendment,
so
that's
really
based
on
just
giving
a
little
bit
more
time
for
the
baseline
deadline.
You
know,
I
think
that
it's
it's
worth
pointing
out
that
our
code
already
allows
flexibility
in
that
in
that
deadline.
So
we
we
do
allow
with
the
submission
of
a
letter
to
the
director
that
you
know
an
extension
to
that.
Initial
deadline
could
be
provided,
and
that
has
has
occurred
in
the
past
and
so
there's
already
quite
a
bit
of
flexibility
there.
S
It's
really
just
kind
of
enough
to
to
give
that
time,
while
also
allowing
enough
time
between
you
know
those
60
days
passing
and
when
the
building
is
basically
complete
and
kind
of
leases
are,
being
you
know,
written
up
and
that
this
kind
of
needs
to
be
finalized
to
get
all
of
the
information
across
you
know,
make
sure
the
contract
and
covenant
gets
covered
all
of
those
details.
So
it's
really
just
finding
a
balance
between
all
those
different
timeline
elements.
E
Okay,
so
I
guess
my
question
was:
is
60
days
sufficient,
then
for
all
the
things
you're
talking
about,
since
this
is
somewhat
of
an
arbitrary
number
of
days.
Or
are
we
saying
that
that
the
proposal
by
the
chamber
means
that
they've
already
collaborated
and
the
60
days
is
sufficient?
E
S
Yeah,
a
lot
of
the
things
I
was
mentioning
would
happen
after
those
60
days,
but
before
the
building
is
complete
and
so
60
days
is
certainly
enough
kind
of
to
you
know,
but
by
the
time
the
applicant,
the
the
permit
is
issued
most
you
know,
owners
will
will
know
whether
they
want
to
use
mft
or
not,
but
in
some
instances
having
a
little
bit
of
extra
time
will
just
help,
and
so
60
days
is
really
intended
to
help.
In
those
instances.
P
Thanks
well,
I
wholeheartedly
agree
with
the
cheering
and
celebrating
of
staff
and
partnership.
When
we
work
together,
we
can
do
amazing
things
so
really
pleased
that
the
community
came
together
with
the
staff
and
the
council
to
come
up
with
the
just
right,
just
right
proposal.
So
I
I
I
had
a
wait
before
I
begin.
P
Let
me
just
share
with
the
council
something
that's
really
relevant
and
it's
going
to
be
relevant
to
this
topic
and
many
other
topics
when
it
comes
to
growth
in
bellevue,
and
that
is
last
week,
the
growth
management
planning
council,
as
supported
by
an
advocate
for
bellevue,
passed
the
new
countywide
planning
policies
and
growth
targets,
which
included
growth
targets
for
bellevue
of
35
000,
new
housing
units
and
70
000
new
jobs
by
2044..
P
So
this
is
a
really
important
step
in
helping
us
realize
some
of
those
housing
units,
particularly
with
regard
to
affordable
units.
So
that's
one
more
reason
why
I'm
so
happy
with
this
ordinance.
I
absolutely
support
the
revisions
and
refinements.
If
you
will
that
the
chamber
put
together,
I
did
have
one
more
slight
revision.
That
was
a
really
more
of
a
clarification
to
their
amendment
number
five.
P
It
talks
about
the
rent
increases
for
existing
tenants
are
not
you,
they
can't
reset
it.
It's
subject
to
the
three
percent
and
if
they're
in
a
similar
size
type
of
unit,
it
doesn't
say
similar
size
type
of
affordable
unit.
So
if
this
is
read
by
someone
who
doesn't
know
the
expectations,
they
might
think
that
we
are
locking
down
rent
for
the
market
rate
units
as
well.
So
I
would
support
the
chambers
proposed
changes
with
the
addition
of
affordable
before
between
type
of
and
unit
in
their
tracked
change
version.
P
So
my
question
for
staff
is
whether
we
can
adopt
this
tonight.
I
know
it
can
come
back,
but
since
we
have
the
written
revisions
in
front
of
us
would
if
we
wanted
to
make
a
motion
to
adopt
the
ordinance
with
the
revisions
in
the
chamber,
plus
my
little
tiny
tweak.
Could
we
then
get
this
put
to
bed
tonight.
R
I
can
go
ahead
and
start
that
answer
and
then
I
would
like
some
potential
follow-up
from
the
city
clerk.
So
we
we
did
write
the
agenda
memo
with
a
few
different
options
and
option.
Two
would
be
the
option
that
I
think
you're
asking
about
councilmember
robertson,
which
would
be
hold
the
public
hearing
and
then
move
to
amend
the
ordinance
to
reflect
minor
changes
within
the
scope
of
this
effort
and
adopt
the
ordinance
as
amended
tonight.
R
So
we
wrote
up
this
memo
clearly
before
we
got
the
the
chambers
correspondence
staff
is
fully
in
support
of
the
chamber's
suggestions
and
we
don't
see
any
issue
with
your
suggested
amendment.
So
I
think
it
does
I'd
like
some
some
clarification
from
the
city
clerk.
If
these
would
be
viewed
as
so-called
minor
minor
amendments,
they
are
clear
in
nature
and
they
do
have
staff
support.
So
I
can
leave
it
with
that.
A
P
Z
All
right,
thank
you,
mayor,
so
echo
the
sentiments
around
the
collaboration
and
appreciate
everybody
working
together
so
and
also
that
you
know,
given
that
the
previous
program
wasn't
working
the
need
to
revisit
to
get
more
affordable
units
built
building
on
that
jack's
question
around
having
a
goal.
R
Sure
so
that
councilmember
barksdale
we
did
set,
we
did
have
a
I'm
going
to
call
it
a
rough
estimate,
slash
target
of
110
to
160
units
expected
with
the
update
and
that
would
including
overlapping
units.
So
I
think,
as
we
kind
of
flesh
out
our
monitoring
and
and
metrics,
we
can
easily
put
some
targets
in
there
as
well.
Consistent
with
your
comments
and
and
mr
jack's
comments,.
R
Yeah,
so
the
as
part
as
part
of
the
new
provisions
that
relate
directly
to
tenants
so
something
like
the
the
parking
provisions
we'll
be
working
with
arch
on
how
to
get
the
word
out
on
those
on
those
provisions
so
that
they're
knowledgeable
along
with
the
building
managers,
so
that
we
can
have
full
compliance
of
those
those
new
provisions.
R
I
know
you
have
you've
also
been
interested
in
staff
thinking
about
qualitative
feedback
loops
with
affordable
housing
tenants.
So
staff
is
thinking
about
that
in
mfte
and
other
affordable
projects
it
is
it
can.
It
can
be
a
bit
more
time
consuming
to
do
the
qualitative
analysis,
as
you
know,
so
we're
trying
to
do
some
smart
metrics
that
would
cover
both
land
use
incentive
units
as
well
as
mfte
units.
R
So
we
would
have
more
to
report
on
that
in
the
in
the
coming
months
and
and
then
mayor,
I
just
wanted
to
note
when
charmaine
gives
her
feedback
we
do
have
kathy
girdle
on
the
phone
would
be
good
to
check
in
too
on
kind
of
the
definition
of
minor
changes
as
well.
So
I'll
turn
it
back
over
to
you,
mayor,
yeah,.
A
Very
good,
okay,
councilmember
lee.
D
Thank
you,
madam
mayor.
Well,
this
is
a
good
story.
Bellevue
is
a
very
desirable
place
to
live
54
years
ago.
I
wanted
to
come
to
bellevue
to
live
and
when
people
want
to
live
here,
it's
a
supply
and
demand
right.
That's
not.
You
know
housing
for
people
who
want
to
be
living
here
and
my
wife
and
I
we
have
to
work
with
professionals
but
raise
the
family.
I
mean
we
made
it.
Luckily,
we
work
hard.
D
I
make
a
lot
of
sacrifices
and
this
has
continued
and
it's
a
wonderful
thing
because
of
all
the
things
that
you
know
we
all
know
I
don't
need
to
go
over,
but
first
of
all,
before
I
go
into
a
little
more,
I
want
to
say
kudo
to
the
staff
as
all
the
kinds
of
members
made
and
but
I
don't
want
to
say
too
much-
I
don't
want
to
spoil
them.
You
know
I've
been
here
long
enough.
They
know
how
I
feel
about
them,
so
kudos
good
job.
D
So
this
has
continued
and
we
have
become
a
new
bedroom
community
50
some
years
ago,
and
now
we
are
actually
a
urban
center
people
are
working
here.
So
we
got
a
lot
more
people
coming
living
here
and
we're
very
fortunate.
You
know
people
continue
to
do
so
because
we're
being
able
to
maintain
the
quality
of
life
and
the
amazon's
company,
25,
000,
more
and
other
folks
economy,
so
it's
really
becoming
a
a
crisis
and
so
affordable
housing
has
always
been
a
problem
because
of
supply
and
demand.
So
but
now
it's
a
crisis.
D
I'm
really
happy
that
the
city
council
is
now
addressing
this
issue,
we're
looking
at
it,
even
though
we
know
we
know
it's
been
happening.
So
I'm
happy,
I'm
really
glad
that
we
are
coming
with
a
solution,
because
we
have
wonderful
private
public
partners.
We
work
with
users
as
well.
We
have
people
who
understand
not
to
create
housing.
D
You
know
we
can
talk
our
facebook,
but
if
there's
no
housing
built
nothing
much,
we
can
do
and
I
think
the
city
has
done
a
great
job
at
keeping
the
costs
low,
cutting
regulations
if
possible
being
efficient
and
effective.
I
think
we
did
all,
but
it's
not
enough,
so
what
we
witnessed
before
with
chamber
with
3da
with
developers
with
you,
know,
business
coming
to
us
and
they
realize
there's
a
problem,
a
situation
we
need
to
work
on,
so
they
have
helped
they've
really
been
stepping
up,
and
it's
really
great.
D
We
have
a
blast,
and
you
know
this
is
a
wonderful
project.
The
multi-family
tax
exam
program,
because
it
encourages
a
market
solution
encourages
people
can
build
the
developers
that
want
to
build.
It
makes
sense
for
them
to
be
physically
sustainable,
and
I
think
this
is
great
and
they
are
able
to
talk.
D
You
know
to
all
the
partners
partners,
the
people
who
need
the
service
and
it
makes
sense,
and
so
it's
going
to
work
out
it's
going
to
continue
and
I
think
the
one
sector
you
know
that
we
have
taken
for
granted
is
not
stepping
up
and
talk,
but
I
believe
that
we
represent
them
as
city
council
members,
we
represent
the
public,
the
community
realizes.
Also,
this
is
a
desirable
place.
It's
more
expensive
than
we
it
to
be.
D
The
supply
is
going
to
be
not
giving
up
the
demand
and
people
who
are
like
myself
live
here
for
50
years.
Eventually,
it's
going
to
be,
you
know,
I
might
work.
You
know,
live
on
the
flex
income.
We
need
to
figure
out
how
to
continue
to
be
able
to
still
enjoy
the
quality
of
life,
and
I'm
used
to
here
all
my
life,
and
so
so
there's
a
merits
of
housing
that
requirement
that
we
need
to
provide
to
keep
us
the
the
way
it
is
and
consistent
with
the
values
value
of
qualitative
life.
D
What
we
value
to
be
for
our
families
for
the
future
generations.
You
know
for
our
kids
that
are
being
raised
here
now
they
are
somewhere
else
now,
they're
coming
back
as
high-tech
employees.
So
this
is
a
myriad
of
things
and
people
who
working
out
city,
you
know
because
people
who
don't
get
to
live
here
they
create
a
lot
of
other
environment
problems,
traffic
transition,
all
that
stuff-
and
so
I
think,
by
addressing
this
very
essential
question
of
providing
adequate
housing.
D
It's
a
major
major
major
challenge,
but
we
are
taking
a
real
great
start
by
solving
it
because
of
the
punishments
involved,
and
I
think
this
is
really
consistent
with
bellevue's
value,
because
it's
for
us
it's
to
solve
our
dilemma,
our
problems.
So
I
think
hopefully
you
know
we
the
public,
you
know
they
are
not
here.
They
are
not
talking
against
it.
That's
wonderful!
All
we're
hearing
is
hey.
This
is
a
great
program,
we're
working
hard
kudos
to
everybody,
so
I'm
really
happy
to
be
able
to
represent
the
public.
D
I
think
all
the
council
members
do
and
we
are
having
great
partners
we're
working
together.
We
come
up
with
solutions,
that's
good
for
everyone
and
physically
it's
going
to
work
and
sustainable,
so
I
agree
to
it.
I
support
it
and
the
amendment
that's
providing
you
know
we'll
look
at
it
think
about
a
little
more,
but
something
like
you
know,
the
city
staff
agrees
with
it
and
unless
we
find
some
fatal
flaws,
you
know
I
would
support
it
as
well.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you
so
yeah,
I'm
I'm
very
very
pleased
with
the
work
that's
being
presented
to
us
tonight.
This
is
a
a
collaborative
effort,
it's
tailor-made
for
bellevue
and
it's
innovative
and
I'm
excited
to
implement
it
and
really
hope
that
we
see
the
results.
We
can't
waste
any
time.
We
need
to
get
that
affordable
housing
going.
A
So
I
I'm
confident
that
this
is
a
good
effort
from
our
council
and
from
our
staff
and
from
our
our
community
partners,
and
so
I'm
very
supportive
of
it.
I
did
want
to
make
a
few
tweaks
to
the
clarifying
amendments
that
were
offered
on
number
four.
Five
and
six.
A
It
says
number
four
provides
greater
clarity
around
the
definition
of
unit
sizes
and
I'd
like
to
say
greater
clarity
and
consistency
with
the
city's
definition
of
unit
sizes,
so
that
we're
actually
basing
this
on
the
city's
definition
and
that
would
go
with
number
five
as
well
provides
greater
clarity
and
consistency
with
cities.
A
Consistency
with
the
city
around
the
definition
of
of
comparable
and
then
councilmember
robertson's,
affordable
unit
and
then
number
six
would
be
clarifies
the
definition
of
market
rate
park
in
parking
for
the
purposes
of
calculating
the
mfte
parking
discount
consistent
with
the
city
of
bellevue's
definition.
A
So
I
don't
know
if
I've
just
made
this
too
complicated
to
pass
tonight,
and
but
I
think
that
before
we
go
into
that,
we
should
get
an
idea
if
any.
If
there's
support
for
the
changes
that
I'm
offering
here
and
councilmember
robertson's
adding
affordable
to
the
unit
on
number
five
as
well.
So
can
I
get
some
head
nods
or
shakes
if
you're,
okay,
with
okay
councilmember
robertson,
can.
P
A
I'm
so
on
amendment
number
four:
okay:
this
applies
to
four
five
and
six,
so
amendment
number
four
says
provide
greater
clarity
and
then
I
would
add
and
consistency
with
the
city's
definition
of
unit
sizes
as
it
relates
to
proportional
unit
mix.
A
Explanation,
I'm
looking
at
a
an
email.
I
got
so
it's
a
little
bit
of
a
different
version
of
what
you're
looking
at.
P
A
B
P
R
R
We
have
the
strike
draft
that
is
up
on
the
screen
and
those
are
sections
of
the
actual
mfte
code
that
show
the
chamber
suggested
edit.
So
we
do
need
to
make
sure
that
there's
full
understanding
and
agreement
on
anything,
that's
in
this
document
and
adopted.
So
if
you're
going
to
make
any
changes
to
the
document
that
charmaine
has
up
on
the
screen,
we
need
to
be
crystal
clear
if
we're
going
to
do
anything
tonight.
Well,.
A
Let
me
ask
you
something:
I'm
trying
to
make
this
these
new
definitions
consistent
with
the
cities,
and
so
is,
if
you're
comfortable,
that
it
is
consistent
with
the
city's
already
already
definitions.
I
don't
want
to
have
affordable
unit
size,
redefined.
R
Yeah
we
did
we
we
have
looked
over
this
language,
and
staff
are
comfortable
with
the
language
as
as
written
if
there,
if
there
were
edits
that
you
were
desiring
based
on
the
summaries
that
the
chamber
sent
over,
which
was
the
email
that
kind
of
I'm
going
to
say,
described
this
attachment,
then
that
would
require
more
work.
That
probably
would
be
better
suited,
not
happening
kind
of
on
the
fly
just
prior
to
adoption.
So
that
would
be.
AA
A
Okay,
well,
I'm
comfortable
with
that.
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
it
wasn't
just
an
open
definition,
and
so
I
hear
support
what
about?
Can
we
get
feedback
from
the
council?
I
need
to
see
everybody
again
there
we
go
on
council
member
robertson's
proposal
to
add
affordable
to
amendment
five.
Are
there
head
nods
or
shakes
for
adding
that
councilmember
stokes.
Q
A
Okay,
just
want
to
make
sure
and
then
and
then
we
have
a
request
for
tracking
success,
checking
to
see
that
we're
meeting
a
goal.
I
know
that
the
county
is
putting
forward
goals
for
our
cities,
and
I
know
our
city
has
our
own
goal.
So
there's
a
request
for
that
and
I
like
this
idea
of
checking
for
tenant
experience
and
maybe
that's
something
we
can
ask
arch
to
look
into
for
us.
A
So
can
we
include
council,
member
robertson's
change
and
then
these
two
things
that
council
member
bark
still
asks
for
it
doesn't
go
into
the
into
the
the
proposed
amendments,
but
just
as
a
direction.
R
Yeah
so
yeah
it
yeah
in
summary,
councilmember
robertson
would
like
to
add
the
the
word
affordable
between
unit
and
by
doing
that
you
would
capitalize
affordable
unit.
If
that's
a
that's
kind
of
a
code
code
writing
detail,
but
the
affordable
unit
is
kind
of
a
term
of
art
and
yeah
we're.
R
We
are
clear
about
the
the
interest
and
direction
to
do
monitoring
and
metrics,
so
we
don't
need
to
do
a
code
ad
for
that,
but
that
would
be
work
that
we'd
be
doing
moving
forward,
so
we're
on
the
same
page
on
that
front
as
well.
All
right.
A
Perfect
all
right
are
there
any
more
comments
or
questions?
If
you
raise
your
hand
I'll
see
you
not
seeing
any,
is
there
a
motion
to
move
to
make
the
amendments
and
approve
this
ordinance.
A
C
Moved
to
adopt
ordinance
65-82
amended
to
reflect
the
six
amendments
as
put
forward
by
the
bellevue
chamber,
including
the
clarifying
comments
by
mayor
robinson
and
councilmember
robertson.
Q
A
A
Okay!
With
that
we're
going
to
take
a
celebratory
break
and
we're
going
to
come
back
at
five
to
eight,
so
7
55..
I
will
see
you.
A
A
So
we
do
have
a
quorum
here.
So
let's,
let's
go
ahead
onto
the
street
vacation,
not
summer
vacation.
Can
you
go
ahead
and
introduce
mr
miyake.
N
Yes,
ma'am
american
council
members.
The
public
hearing
in
front
of
you
this
evening
is
on
a
requested
vacation
of
a
dead-end
portion
of
southeast
first
street
between
bellevue
way
and
105th
avenue
southeast
this
street
vacation
is
being
requested
as
part
of
a
redevelopment
on
the
adjacent
properties.
AB
R
AB
AB
So
it's
been
a
while,
since
our
last
street
vacation
a
couple
of
years,
so
I'll
provide
an
overview
of
the
process
and
the
procedure.
So
a
street
vacation
is
a
formal
process
by
which
count
the
city
can
abandon
a
public
road
right-of-way,
which
then
reverts
by
operation
of
law
to
private
property.
The
process
is
dictated
by
state
law
and
city
code.
The
process
starts
with
an
adjoining
owner
filing
a
petition
to
vacate
the
road
city
staff,
then
review
the
petition
to
ensure
that
it's
complete
and
that
no
city
departments
have
an
objection
to
the
vacation.
AB
City
code
provides
specific
criteria
for
council
to
consider
when
making
their
decision
to
proceed,
if
affirmed
the
first
four
criteria
on
this
list
would
support
moving
forward
with
the
vacation,
and
these
are
whether
the
vacation
will
better
serve
the
public
good.
Whether
the
street
is
no
longer
required
for
public
use,
whether
the
cost
of
maintaining
the
road
is
greater
than
the
public
benefit
of
keeping
the
road
and
whether
a
different
route
for
the
road
would
be
more
beneficial
to
the
public.
AB
Weighing
against
these
factors.
Councils
should
also
consider
the
bottom
two,
which
are
whether
conditions
may
change
in
the
future,
such
that
the
road
would
serve
a
better
public
purpose
than
it
does
today,
and
whether
or
not
any
of
the
adjoining
owners
adjoining
to
the
vacation
area
oppose
the
street
vacation
I'll
put
this
slide
back
up
following
the
public
hearing
and
highlight
the
factors
that
staff
believe
are
most
pertinent
to
council's
decision
and
when
council
makes
its
motion
to
give
staff
direction,
they
should
call
out
this
right
specific
criteria
that
factored
into
their
decision.
AB
The
portion
of
southeast
1st
street,
that
is
the
subject
of
tonight's
hearing,
is
located
adjacent
to
the
property
at
100
bellevue
way,
southeast
near
the
intersection
of
bellevue
way
in
main
street,
and
this
slide
shows
the
specific
area
to
be
vacated
in
red.
The
right
of
way
for
southeast
first
street
used
to
extend
through
to
the
east
to
105th
avenue
southeast,
but
that
east
portion
of
the
road
was
vacated
in
1965,
leaving
this
as
an
unimproved
dead-end
road.
AB
This
segment
of
the
right-of-way
presently
serves
as
a
private
driveway
between
the
adjoining
parcels
to
the
north
and
south,
as
well
as
the
driveway
to
the
property
located
to
the
northeast,
and
the
petitioner
owns
all
three
of
these
parcels
and
plans
to
incorporate
the
vacated
road
into
their
development
of
the
adjoining
property
staff.
Do
not
have
any
plans
to
improve
this
segment
of
the
road
right-of-way
for
the
public
use
in
future
in
the
future,
and
over
the
years
the
city
has
received
requests
from
the
surrounding
owners
to
perform
maintenance
on
the
road
right-of-way.
AB
AB
If
council
approves
moving
forward
with
the
vacation
staff
will
bring
back
an
ordinance
for
final
approval
following
satisfaction
of
several
conditions,
an
easement
will
need
to
be
put
on
title
to
ensure
continued
access
to
the
parcel
to
the
northeast
of
the
vacation
area.
The
petitioner
will
also
need
to
execute
easements
with
the
franchise
utilities
that
are
in
the
vacation
area
or
they'll
need
to
relocate.
The
utilities
out
of
the
area
and
they'll
also
need
to
pay
the
city
for
the
appraised.
Fair
market
value
of
the
vacation
area.
AB
A
Well,
I
think
I
think
we'll
open
the
public
hearing
and
listen
to
any
comments
close
it
and
then
ask
for
any
questions
or
comments
from
council.
So
are
you
ready
for
that?
Yes,
okay,
deputy
mayor,
could
you
make
a
motion?
Please
certainly.
B
Thank
you
mayor.
There
are
no
pre-registered
speakers
for
this
public
hearing,
although
I
will
mention
for
the
record
that
you
did
receive
one
written
comment
for
the
public
hearing
which
was
included
in
your
desk
packet.
So
this
time
I
would
ask
if
there
is
anyone
connected
to
this
call?
Who
would
like
to
make
a
comment
during
this
public
hearing?
Please
raise
your
hand
or
use
star
nine
if
connected
with
the
phone.
A
Second,
all
those
in
favor
say
aye
aye
aye
any
opposed.
Okay.
Are
there
any
comments
or
questions
on
this
go
ahead
and
raise
your
hand
if
you
have
one
okay,
I'm
not
seeing
any.
So.
Is
there
a
motion
to
direct
staff
to
draft
legislation
approving
the
requested
street
vacation.
C
Certainly
mayor,
I
moved
to
direct
staff
to
prepare
legislation
for
adoption
at
a
future
meeting
approving
the
street
vacation
of
a
portion
of
southeast
first
between
bellevue
way,
southeast
and
105th
avenue
southeast.
Finding
that
the
street
is
no
longer
required
for
public
use
and
the
public
benefit
of
retaining
the
street
does
not
justify
the
cost
of
maintenance.
A
N
Oh
good
evening,
mayor
council
members,
the
first
item
on
your
study
session
agenda
this
evening
is
a
an
informational
briefing
on
the
harborview
medical
center,
which
is
a
comprehensive
healthcare
facility
which
is
owned
by
king
county
tonight.
You'll
hear
from
interim
chief
executive
officer
summer
coawino,
hawini,
wally
and
harborview
board
of
trustees,
president
stephanie
payne
about
harborview's
services
and
response
to
the
copen
19
pandemic.
N
Again,
we
will
hear
from
the
interim
chief
executive,
as
well
as
the
president
of
the
harborview
board
of
trustees,
with
that
I
was
going
to
turn
it
over
to
lacy
jane
for
any
additional
comments
she
may
want
to
make
before
we
turn
it
over
to
our
guest.
AC
Good
evening,
council,
I
had
no
additional
comments
from
me
tonight.
I
am
very
much
looking
forward
to
hearing
from
summer
and
stephanie
on
this
item.
Thank
you.
AD
You
so
much
mayor,
robinson,
council
members.
I
want
to
say
a
special
thank
you
to
all
of
you
for
giving
us
an
opportunity
to
talk
to
you
a
little
bit
about
harborview.
What's
happened
over
the
last
year
and
what
is
going
on
in
the
future
of
harborview.
I
also
want
to
take
a
moment
to
thank
councilmember
stokes
for
seeing
us
do
the
same
presentation
at
the
regional
policy
committee
for
king
county
and
asking
us
also
to
come
here
so
very
privileged
and
humbled
to
be
able
to
talk
about
harborview
again.
AD
AD
My
counterparts
tonight
are
stephanie
fain,
our
board
president
and
oh
sorry,
stephanie
vaynerboard,
president.
Okay,
next
slide,
I
was
waiting
for
the
next
slide
to
pop
up.
I
apologize
okay
again,
thank
you
for
welcoming
us
to
this
pr
to
this
meeting.
We're
gonna
talk
a
little
bit
today
about
our
overlake
partnership.
AD
That
happened
recently,
the
vote
we're
going
to
talk
about
harborview's
response
to
the
covet
19
pandemic,
our
initial
response
vaccines
and
how
we
really
worked
on
equity
and
community
partnerships
throughout
this
pandemic.
And
then
I'm
going
to
talk
to
you.
Lastly,
about
our
behavioral
health
institute
as
behavioral
health
continues
to
be
one
of
the
greatest
crises
we
see
and
something
that
is
near
and
dear
to
everyone,
particularly
as
you've
been
talking
tonight
about
housing
crises
and
different
things
like
that.
AD
The
behavioral
health
institute
has
a
lot
on
the
horizon
for
helping
individuals
in
marginalized
populations.
AD
AD
Okay,
so,
first
of
all,
as
you
all
know,
not
only
are
we
living
through
the
greatest
heat
wave
we've
ever
had
here
in
in
the
region,
and
I
will
have
to
say
I'm
in
my
office
here
at
harborview
and
we
are
in
pretty
dire
straits
right
now.
We
have
shut
down
most
of
our
power,
so
we
can
conserve,
and
that
includes
my
office.
So
there
is
no
air
conditioning
and
there
is
no
fan
going
so
very
hot
this
evening.
AD
So
not
only
are
we
living
through
this
heat
crisis,
but
we've
lived
through
the
greatest
public
health
crisis
of
our
lifetime,
cobia
19.
and
the
harborview's
mission
for
providing
healthcare.
AD
The
most
vulnerable
has
never
been
more
important,
not
only
to
this
area,
to
the
region
county,
but
to
the
state
and
to
the
nation
as
I'll
talk
about,
as
we
really
were
at
the
forefront
of
the
pandemic
response,
I
again
would
be
remiss
if
I
didn't
pause
and
say
the
success,
though
of
harborview
throughout
this
pandemic
and
just
in
general,
is
really
because
of
the
strong
partnerships
and
the
many
organizations
and
entities
that
support
harborview.
AD
So,
first
of
all
to
the
king,
county,
executive
and
council
king
county
voters,
as
they
have
supported
us
through
this
bond
process
that
you're
going
to
hear
about
tonight,
which
is
going
to
allow
harborview
to
take
a
large
sum
of
capital
funds
that
we
would
never
have
been
able
to
have
and
build
infrastructure
to
support
the
region
not
only
as
our
level
one
trauma
center
for
the
region
and
for
a
four-state
radius,
but
as
also
as
our
infectious
disease
epicenter
right.
AD
So
this
this
bond
has
really
allowed
us
to
provide
the
type
of
infrastructure
and
resources
that
our
region
will
have
will
need.
If
and
when,
and
I
think
we're
more
on
the
win
realm
now.
The
next
pandemic
becomes
apparent,
our
board
of
trustees,
our
labor
partners,
uw
medicine
and
then
most
of
all,
our
heart
review
staff
and
providers
who
give
tirelessly
to
the
mission
and
to
the
patients
and
population
we
serve
next
slide.
AD
AD
Overlake
is
our
level
three
trauma
center,
but
more,
even
more
importantly,
overlake
is
is
a
part
of
the
infrastructure
of
the
king
of
king
county's
disaster
medical
coordination
center,
and
that
really
is
the
infrastructure
which
harborview
partners
with
the
rest
of
the
state
to
ensure
whenever
we
have
some
type
of
disaster
now,
typically,
we've
always
thought
of
that
in
a
natural
or
man-made
disaster.
AD
Most
recently,
it
was
a
a
pandemic
infectious
disease
disaster,
but
overlake
and
harborview
partner,
and
what
happens
is
if
something
happens
to
harborview
and
we
are
not
able
to
be
the
point
to
distribute
all
patients
across
the
region
to
ensure
all
patients
get
care
and
the
hospitals
are
equally
loaded
level
loaded
over
lake
takes
takes
on
that
role,
so
really
important,
really
key
collaboration.
We
do
a
ton
of
drills
together
and
we
really
focus
a
lot
on
working
closely
with
both
our
ed
doctors
and
our
specialty
physicians.
AD
I
would
also
like
to
say
that
our
really
important
trauma
infrastructure
that
we
have
here
in
the
state
of
washington,
which
has
incredible
outcomes.
Overlake
was
at
the
table
with
harborview
when
that
was
created,
so
very
proud
to
say
that
overlake
plays
a
key
role
and,
and
we
definitely
appreciate
the
support
they
give
us
next
slide.
AD
So
I'm
going
to
pause
a
minute
and
allow
stephanie
fain
our
board.
President
and
then
kelly
carroll,
our
special
director
in
the
executive
constantine's
office,
to
provide
us
with
an
update
on
where
we
are
with
the
bond
and
kind
of
what
the
next
steps
are
and
how
the
county
is
partnering
with
harborview
in
this
process.
AE
AE
As
you
can
imagine,
there
are
many
activities
that
need
to
take
place
in
order
to
execute
a
capital
bond,
a
capital
improvement
project
of
this
magnitude.
Leslie
harper
miles
was
recently
hired
as
the
bond
program
office
director
and
is
leading
this
effort.
Leslie
was
hoping
to
join
us
tonight,
but
could
not
attend
so,
as
you
heard,
kelly
carroll
fortunately,
is
available
to
be
to
answer
your
specific
questions
about
the
bond
program.
AE
The
top
priority
is
ensuring
that
operations
at
harborview
continue
with
minimal
disruption
during
the
years
of
construction
ahead.
The
overarching
project
management,
rfp
selection
process
has
begun
and
we
expect
a
firm
to
be
on
board
by
early
fall.
Other
steps
and
activities
include
developing
robust
community
engagement
and
small
business
plans.
AE
AE
AE
My
apologies-
we
are
multitasking
here
tonight,
so
this
committee
includes
representatives
from
the
executive's
office,
the
king
county
council,
harborview
and
uw
medicine
leadership
and
the
harborview
board
of
trustees.
Our
first
meeting
took
place
on
may
13th
and
we
expect
to
meet
quarterly
through
2022,
as
the
foundational
elements
are
set
up
to
support.
The
multiple
phases
of
design
and
construction
meetings
will
be
more
frequent
as
projects
get
underway,
and
if
there
are
no
questions
about
the
bond
program,
I
will
turn
it
back
over
to
summer
to
talk
about
the
clinical
planning
process.
Thank
you.
AD
Thank
you,
stephanie
and
feel
free
to
interrupt
me.
Anytime.
Kelly
will
stay
on
with
me
and,
as
I
talk
about
clinical
strategic
planning,
we'll
be
talking
about
further
bond
stuff,
so
feel
free
any
time
to
interrupt
with
questions
for
kelly
next
slide.
AD
Please,
okay,
so
the
future
of
harborview,
so
as
the
county
led
by
leslie
and
kelly
on
the
our
work,
is
working
really
hard
on
the
infrastructure
piece
of
the
bond
and
the
planning,
harborview
and
uw
medicine
are
working
very
diligently
on
figuring
out
and
looking
at
our
clinical
strategic
planning
process
for
having
this
new
infrastructure.
AD
So
really
looking
at
what
the
community
needs.
Both
internal
and
external
stakeholders
really
figuring
out
what
it
is
that
the
community
needs
from
harborview
in
order
to
ensure
that
the
health
of
the
public
and
the
health
of
the
most
marginalized
mission
population
that
we
serve
in
king
county
is
taken
care
of
not
just
three
years
from
now,
four
years
now,
five
years
from
now,
but
20
years
from
now.
So
how
do
we
use
this
money
to
ensure
that
the
infrastructure
we
build
at
harborview
will
last?
AD
We
are
also
getting
input
and
participation
from
frontline
staff
and
providers.
Most
importantly,
as
I
said,
this
money
will
be
used
for
single
patient
rooms
and
a
new
bed
tower
with
a
new,
state-of-the-art,
world-class
emergency
department
as
a
level
one
trauma
center.
AD
However,
you
can
only
imagine
during
the
pandemic.
It
really
limits
us
in
our
numbers
of
beds
when
you
have
double
patient
rooms,
and
you
have
somebody
with
an
infectious
disease,
you
can
only
put
one
in
into
that
room
right.
You
can't
put
double
patients
in
so
we
are
working
to
increase
our
capacity
through
the
creation
of
40
new
single
patient
rooms,
we're
going
to
do
this
within
three
phases
and
we're
funding
this
through
75
million
of
harborview's
own
capital,
our
own
operating
dollars.
So
a
big,
a
big
push
for
harborview.
AD
As
you
all
know,
we
we
we
function
off
a
very
slim
margin,
but
extremely
important
in
order
to
be
able
to
provide
what
the
community
needs
in
the
meantime,
while
we're
working
to
build
the
new
infrastructure
with
the
bond
next
slide.
AD
Okay,
I
want
to
talk
about
covid
and
what
happened
over
the
last
year
and
kind
of
harbor
views
role
that
we
played,
but
also
just
kind
of
what
happened
in
the
community.
So
if
we
think
about
the
pandemic
response,
harborview
was
one
of
the
first.
I
remember
the
first
call
that
came
in
from
the
nursing
home
that
was
first
impacted.
We
were
still
we
were
all
sitting
in
our
emergency
operations
center
at
harborview
and
listening
to
that,
first
call
for
help
as
the
disaster
management
control
center.
So
we
were
really
there
from
the
beginning.
AD
We
we
provided
the
first
strike
teams
that
went
into
homes
as
individuals
were
coming
off
of
planes
and
other
suspected
individuals
of
possible
cova.
19
exposures
were
happening
next
slide,
so
as
part
of
our
coveted
response.
Initially,
we
mobilized
very
quickly,
just
like
all
the
other
hospitals
did.
The
one.
The
one
confounding
thing
that
harborview
needed
to
do
was
to
ensure
that
we
not
only
continue
to
play
our
part
as
a
level
one
trauma
center,
but
also
take
care
of
the
pandemic
patients.
AD
AD
AD
AD
I
will
have
to
say
that
we
have
had
this
up
since
last
april
and
we
probably
have
never
been
as
busy
as
we
are
over
the
last
two
weeks,
and
that
is
not
with
cobin
patients,
that
is,
with
the
health
care
system
being
completely
overloaded
likely
with
delayed
health
care
and
now
the
heat
wave.
We
are
staffing
it
24
7,
ensuring
that
we're
helping,
particularly
rural
hospitals,
be
able
to
get
patients
in
to
higher
level
facilities
like
an
over
lake
or
a
uwmc
or
harborview
to
get
care.
AD
AD
So,
lastly,
for
for
covid
the
initial
response
I
just
kind
of
wanted
to
focus
on
on
our
own
very
own,
dr
john
lynch,
you
probably
all
saw
him
on
the
news.
Very
often
he
really
was
the
the
first
resource
and
the
first
infectious
disease
expert
in
the
country.
AD
That
was
on
point
because
he
was
the
one
seeing
a
lot
of
the
first
responses
and
he
led
this
response
for
uw
medicine
and
was
sat
at
the
table
at
the
state
level,
and
he
is
our
infectious
disease
chief
at
harborview
and
so
very
near
and
dear
to
our
hearts
and
also
an
incredible
individual
from
the
panamanic
perspective.
He
won
big
awards
at
the
university
of
washington
level
for
how
he
responded
during
this
pandemic.
Next
slide,
we
saw
some
hope.
AD
We
saw
some
hope
in
december
and
january
when
vaccines
came
out
just
like
all
the
other
hospitals.
All
of
a
sudden,
there
was
some
hope
on
the
horizon.
You
can
see
pictures
of
exciting
things,
but
also
staff
being
extremely
overwhelmed
by
having
that
first
shot
go
in,
but
we
again
utilized
our
resources
with
an
equity
forefront.
AD
Our
vaccine
approach
has
been
multimodal.
So
we
not
only
offer
vaccines
within
our
footprint
of
our
hospital
to
those
that
are
most
marginalized
and
to
the
general
population,
but
we
also
have
mobile
vaccine
teams.
We
have
community
vaccine
clinics
and
we
have
specialized
clinics
at
harborview
targeting
different
ethnic
backgrounds.
Different
patients
with
different
languages,
things
that
that
need
are
individuals
that
need
more
of
a
reach
out
and
a
pull
to
help
them
get
the
education.
They
need
to
see
the
safety
in
the
vaccine
next
slide.
AD
We've
also
had
a
lot
of
support
from
donors
and
I'm
very
thankful.
The
paul
allen
foundation
and
the
mariners
have
really
helped
us.
This
has
been
a
pretty
costly
endeavor
for
us
to
have
this
equity
effort
on
our
mobilization
through
vaccinations.
We
have
a
lot
of
strike
teams
that
are
out
every
day
in
what
we
call
vaccination
deserts.
AD
To
date,
we
have
administered
over
350
000.
This
is
as
of
june
24th
as
uw
medicine
and
harborview
alone,
as
you
can
see
how
many
we've
administered,
I
think,
more
importantly,
though,
we're
almost
at
the
8
000
mark
for
our
mobile
vaccination
program,
which,
if
you
could
imagine
you
only
get
about
50
to
75
people
every
time
you
go
out
there.
So
that's
a
lot
of
work
to
capture
populations
that
we
really
need
to
make
sure
taken
care
of
next
slide.
AD
We
also
are
partnering
with
the
executive's
office,
along
with
some
of
our
labor
partners,
seiu
1199,
on
behavioral
health,
apprenticeship
programs.
We
are
developing
the
curriculum
why
our
labor
partners
are
the
ones
out
there
helping
deliver
it.
AD
We
have
a
very
big
footprint
in
the
emergency
response
for
suicide
prevention
and
then,
lastly,
we
have
launched
a
specialized
treatment
for
early
psychosis
program,
which
is
new
at
harborview
and
is
serving.
You
know,
we're
on
track
to
serve
almost
200
percent
more
over
this
past
year
than
we
did
in
previous
years.
AD
So
some
really
incredible
work
and
incredible
partnerships
going
on
continue
to
need
more
of
a
footprint
and
and
continue
to
need
all
all
the
community
to
be
focused
on
how
we
ensure
we're
helping
the
behavioral
health
community
next
slide.
A
A
You
provide
amazing
services
to
our
community,
and
I
just
want
to
thank
you
for
that
and
for
the
great
work
that
you
do
for
the
whole
region.
Absolutely
thank
you
for
acknowledging
that
council
members
on.
E
E
I
understand
that
last
month
you
got
approval
from
cparb
to
hire
progressive
design
builders,
so
I
wish
you
all
the
best
to
get
that
project
underway
like
it's
going
to
finish
in
the
end
of
so
we
look
forward
to
hearing
about
that
successful
project
and
then
my
question
is:
I
love
the
apprenticeship
pipeline
for
behavioral
health.
E
What
I
was
curious
about
is
whether
there
is
a
potential
partnership
with
bellevue
college
for
students
that
might
be
able
to
develop
a
program
in
behavioral
health.
I
know
that
they
have
a
really
popular
nursing
program
that
other
countries
have
wanted
to
learn
about
that's
unique
to
bobby
college.
So
I
just
wondered
if
the
behavioral
health
piece
is
an
is
one
that
there's
a
potential
partnership
or
if
you've
already
contemplated
that.
AD
AF
Good
evening,
council
members
good
evening,
madam
mayor,
thank
you
for
that
question.
Council
member.
I
am
pleased
to
say
we
would
be
delighted
and
when
I
say
we,
it's
a
very
large
consortium
of
folks
and
groups
involved
in
developing
the
behavioral
health
apprenticeship
and
I'd
be
happy
to
facilitate
connections
with
bellevue
college
and
the
multi-employer
training
fund,
which
is
the
the
backbone
organization
developing
this.
We
are
excited
to
partner
with
any
college
that
wants
to
step
up.
A
Any
other
comments
or
questions.
Oh
man,
yes,
councilmember,
stokes,.
Q
Yeah
I
just
wanted
to
thank
you
very
much.
I
I
was
this
is
exciting
and
you
came
a
lot
quicker
than
I
thought
you'd
be
able
to.
So
that's
good.
It's
good
timing,
yeah!
This
we're
just
all
very
excited
about,
and
it's
been
a
good
great
learning
lesson
about
what
our
hospitals
do
in
this
pandemic
and
in
conjunction
with
our
firefighters
and
and
all
the
responders
and
everything
how
it
all
just
it
seamlessly
fits
together.
Q
We
have
a
great
system,
and
it's
because
of
you
know
the
things
you're
doing
I
mean
the
attitude
of
working
together
and
reaching
out,
and
just
talking
about
the
colleges
and
everything
is,
is
fantastic,
so
we
just
have
a
great
network
and
we're
you
know
as
we're
saying
we're
really
proud
to
be
part
of
that
and
to
have
a
great
hospital
here
and
to
know-
and
I
just
and
I
thought
I
bet
a
lot
of
people-
don't
know
how
much
you
know
how
overlake
is
connected
with
harborview
and
how
it
all
fits
in.
Q
So
I
think
it's
just
fascinating
and
I
really
appreciate
your
coming
and
and
talking
to
us
about
it
and
and
helping
us
understand
and
we'll
keep
supporting
moving
forward
on
this.
Thank
you.
Thank.
AD
You
so
much
council
member
one
additional
thing
is
fire
chief
hagan
is
very
close
to
many
individuals
at
harborview
and
is
a
great
partner
also
so.
A
Good
great,
thank
you
thanks
for
the
presentation
and
for
joining
us
tonight.
Thank
you.
Okay,
I'm
going
to
move
on
because
we've
got
a
lot
of
more
work
ahead
of
us.
D
Just
want
to
say
that
how
about
you
it's
a
tremendous
responsibility.
You
know
you're
our
regional
hospital
to
take
care
of
lots
of
emergencies,
and
we
have
you
know
we
have
reputation,
we
don't
we
don't
turn
back
anybody.
You
don't,
and
you
know
we
completely
sort
of
depend
on
you
without
really
appreciating.
D
So
I
want
to
make
sure
you
know.
I
appreciate
you
coming
to
us
and
what
the
you
know
you
support
to
the
region
and
the
community
hospital
like
overlay.
Obviously
it's
very
important.
D
You
know
without
you,
you
know
it
would
be
very
challenging
another
personal
level,
because
my
wife
worked
for
university
of
washington
hospital
for
40
years.
So
she
has
a
lot
of
connection.
You
know,
laboratory
medicine.
So
with
half
of
you,
lots
of
doctors
and
administrators
and
all
sorts.
So
we
recognize
the
important
role
that
you
play.
So
thank
you.
A
N
Sure,
good
evening,
robinson,
council
members
tonight
staff
will
be
introducing
a
complete
draft
of
the
land
use
code
amendment
which
will
create
a
new
part
in
the
land
use
code
for
the
east
main
station
area
staff
has
prepared
this
draft
code
based
on
council
vision
and
policies
in
the
comp
plan
for
east
maine,
as
well
as
council
direction
from
last
july.
N
N
N
Joining
us
this
evening
are
mike
brennan
director
trisnatanus,
consulting
attorney
both
from
the
development
services,
department
and
emile
king
assistant,
director
of
community
development
department.
With
that
I'll
go
ahead
and
turn
it
over
to
you
mike.
G
Thank
you,
mr
miyaki,
good
evening,
I'm
mayor,
robinson,
deputy
mayor
newman
house
and
council
members,
as
mr
miyaki
mentioned,
we
are
here
this
evening
to
introduce
a
complete
draft
of
the
land
use
code,
amendments
for
the
east
maine
planning
area.
The
draft
included
in
tonight's
agenda
packet
is
aligned
with
the
vision
and
policy
direction
that
the
council
has
provided
and
it
sets
the
path
for
future
transit
oriented
development
near
the
east.
Maine
light
rail
station,
a
significant
public
investment
next
slide,
please.
G
So
tonight
we
are
seeking
council
direction
on
two
in
two
areas.
First,
as
mr
miaki
mentioned,
we
are
asking
the
council
to
direct
staff
to
set
the
public
hearing.
That
is
a
required
step
in
the
land
use
code,
amendment
process
and
with
the
goal
of
holding
that
hearing
before
the
council
goes
on
august
break.
So
we
want
to
keep
this
moving
along
as
quickly
as
we
can
and
next.
G
Secondly,
we
are
asking
the
council
to
identify
the
topic
areas
of
the
code
where
staff
can
provide
you
with
additional
information
to
assist
in
your
deliberations
at
the
upcoming
study
sessions,
and
the
plan
is
to
begin
those
study
sessions.
Following
the
public
hearing
and
do
those
in
sequence
as
quickly
as
we
can
bring
the
information
back
to
the
council
next
slide,
please.
G
So
the
agenda
for
tonight's
presentation
very
quickly
is
really
to
discuss
quickly
an
overview
of
where
we
are
in
the
in
the
process
of
the
timeline.
I
will
get
a
review
of
the
outreach
that
was
conducted
during
the
co-development
process
and
an
overview
of
the
vision
of
the
east,
main
transit,
oriented
development
area
and
a
description
of
the
code,
topics
and
goals
that
make
up
the
east
main
landis
code
amendments
and,
finally,
a
summary
of
the
requests
from
stakeholders
for
revisions
to
the
draft
next
slide.
Please.
G
So
the
current,
where
we
are
currently
in
the
timeline,
is
reflected
in
the
text
box
with
study
session
number
three,
and
it
shows
key
milestones
in
the
overall
process
since
the
beginning
of
last
year.
I'll
note
here
that
there's
been
a
extensive
amount
of
discussion
with
stakeholders
that
led
up
to
both
the
publication
of
the
draft
late
last
year
and
then
subsequent
amendments
up
to
and
including
the
most
recent
version
that
is
before
the
council
this
evening.
G
The
text
box
also
shows
that
we
have
a
couple
of
items
that
we
are
looking
for.
Your
direction
on,
as
I
as
I
noted
regarding
the
public
hearing
and
direction
on
topics
also
study
sessions.
As
you
look
ahead
on
this
timeline,
future
study
sessions
are
really
at
the
discretion
of
the
council.
G
We
want
to
continue
to
provide
the
council
with
the
information
you
need
for
your
deliberations
to
reach
a
place
where
you're
comfortable
moving
to
the
final
adoption
process
and
again
we
are
hoping
to
understand
where
your
interests
are
this
evening,
so
we
can
provide
you
that
information
I'll
hand
it
over
here
to
emil
king
and
he'll,
discuss
the
outreach
outreach.
That's
been
conducted
for
the
east
maine
landis
code,
as
well
as
some
elements
of
the
vision
for
this
area.
R
Thank
you
mike
I'd
like
to
please
go
into
some
detail
on
the
outreach
and
engagement
conducted
so
far
for
the
east
main
luca.
During
the
luca
process,
we've
engaged
with
property
owners
within
the
east
main
tod
area.
This
has
included
wig
properties,
bellevue
athletic
club
and
j
j
bellevue
who
owned
land
just
east
of
the
bellevue
club.
This
interaction
has
been
very
beneficial
to
help
sort
out
some
of
the
outstanding
issues
and
also
identify
those
issues
where
additional
work
may
be
desired
by
council.
R
We've
also
fielded
questions
in
formal
and
informal
settings
from
the
business
community
and
others
in
bellevue
about
east
maine.
There
is
considerable
interest
in
east
maine
regarding
where
it
stands
in
the
process
and
how
it
will
springboard
to
other
tod
work
in
the
city.
As
with
all
our
major
projects,
staff
is
continuing
to
update
the
east
main
webpage
to
inform
the
public
about
this
luca
next
slide.
R
Please
it's
important
to
reiterate
the
vision
for
the
east
main
tod
area,
the
goals
and
policies
adopted
by
council
in
2019
call
for
creating
a
new
urban
neighborhood
terms,
such
as
vibrant
livable,
memorable
are
used
in
the
plan.
This
area
will
benefit
greatly
from
the
regional
light
rail
investment
that
is
planned
to
open
for
service
just
two
years
from
now.
The
vision
for
east
maine
as
a
tod
neighborhood,
is
to
have
a
range
of
uses.
Those
mentioned
specifically
in
the
plan
or
a
variety
of
housing
choices,
offices,
hotel
and
supporting
commercial
uses.
R
R
The
direction
was
to
use
the
downtown
olb
south
land
use
code
as
the
starting
place
for
the
east
named
luca
and
be
consistent
with
the
east
main
comprehensive
plan
policies
that
were
adopted
in
2019
oob
south
is
the
area
north
of
east
maine
within
downtown
bellevue.
That's
bordered
by
main
street
northeast
4th
and
112th,
and
405.
R
R
R
Third
to
expand
the
definition
of
active
uses
which
are
the
ground
level
uses
that
help
enliven
the
pedestrian
environment
and,
finally,
that
parkin
that
the
parking
which
is
governed
by
minimums
and
maximums,
that
we
reduce
the
minimum
parking
ratios
and
also
allow
the
same
maximums
as
the
downtown
next
slide.
Please,
east
maine
provides
a
opportunity
to
marry
together
zoning
increases
for
properties
within
the
station
area,
with
the
public
benefits
that
are
going
to
further
some
of
the
city's
policy
objectives.
R
R
For
this
graphic
we're
showing
an
example
for
office
uses
of
having
a
current
allowable
far
of
0.5,
you
can
see
that
in
the
dark
blue
section
there
for
residential,
it's
roughly
0.75,
far
about
30
units
per
acre
that
are
allowed
so,
as
included
in
the
east
main
draft,
we
have
proposed
a
base
far.
That
is
above
what
the
current
fars
are:
we're
proposing
a
base,
far
of
2.5
for
non-resident
non-residential
development
and
3.5
far
for
residential
development.
R
This
level
of
development
would
be
of
a
scale
to
further
the
economic
development
interest
of
the
city
deliver
on
the
housing
needs
we
faced
and
also
capitalized
on
the
east
link
investment.
So
you
can
see
the
included
was
base
far
in
the
medium
color
green,
or
are
they
elements
that
come
along
with
development
at
the
base,
far
with
the
up
zone
and
as
we
talk
about
the
maximum
fars
so
in
this
example,
five
f.a.r
for
non-residential
and
five
for
residential?
R
The
items
that
we're
listing
out
in
the
lighter
color
green
are
the
amenities
and
the
draft
code
at
the
top
tier
or
most
important
level,
and
these
include
affordable
housing,
child
care,
open
space
and
potential
streets.
So
with
that
I'd
like
to
hand
things
over
to
trisna
to
continue
with
the
presentation.
Thank
you.
AG
Thank
you
emil
good
evening,
mayor
robinson,
deputy
mayor
and
council
members,
so
for
the
next
these
two
slides
I'd
like
to
explain
and
clarify
the
role
of
the
various
documents
in
the
process.
The
progression
is
from
a
very
high
level
in
the
comprehensive
plan
down
to
the
specific
design
details
in
development,
application
and
review.
AG
So
the
comprehensive
plan
sets
the
vision
and
policies.
The
priorities
are
high
level
and
broad
in
nature.
It's
intentionally
flexible,
so
that
there
is
room
for
the
land
use
code
to
maneuver
and
be
responsive
to
those
vision
and
priorities
that
have
been
set.
The
land
use
code
in
turn
is
more
specific.
AG
So
as
an
example
here
in
the
context
of
affordable
housing,
we
have
a
policy
that
says
that
we
should
establish
a
land
use
incentive
system
that
prioritizes,
affordable
housing.
So
the
top
priority
in
the
land
use
code
to
implement
this
policy.
AG
The
amenity
system
and
incentive
system
has
a
focus
on
affordable
housing,
so
it
would
say
a
residential
development
would
earn
75
or
more
of
the
project's
amenity
points
from
affordable
housing
and
in
the
development
application
or
proposal
that
we
would
review.
Then
the
developer
would
propose
a
certain
amount
of
square
feet
of
residential
development.
AG
Certain
amount
of
affordable
housing
development
to
earn
a
certain
amount
of
bonus,
floor
area
so
based
on
that
framework
and
how
the
land
use
code
fits
into
the
overall
process
and
if
you
as
you've,
just
heard
from
mr
from
emil,
we
are
introducing
to
council
tonight
a
draft
code
for
east
main
that
includes
requirements,
standards
and
guidelines
that
implement
the
overall
vision
and
priorities
for
east
maine.
AG
We
have
categorized
these
requirements,
standards
and
guidelines
into
three
topics:
urban
form,
housing
and
code
structure
under
urban
form.
We
have
requirements,
standards
and
guidelines
to
achieve
walkable
blocks,
to
emphasize
pedestrian-friendly
and
scaled
environment,
to
focus
on
neighborhood
serving
uses
as
emil
mentioned
earlier,
and
to
include
pedestrian
and
bicycle
paths
and
accessibility,
as
well
as
vehicular
connection
and
connectivity
to
the
future.
AG
The
draft
code
also
includes
requirements,
standards
and
guidelines
for
housing,
related
vision
and
priorities,
such
as
minimum
housing
requirement
and
a
higher
base
density,
as
emil
talked
about
earlier
for
residential
development
again
to
ensure
that
a
variety
of
housing
sizes-
and
it
also
addresses
different
income
levels
and
affordable
housing,
is
a
priority
in
the
draft
code.
AG
The
draft
code
is
has
also
been
written
as
part
of
the
overall
land
use
code,
with
consistency
in
how
the
framework
of
that
code,
as
well
as
with
other
city
codes
and
processes,
in
other
words,
the
requirements,
standards
and
guidelines
in
the
draft
code,
have
been
written
so
that
they
can
be
successfully
administered
by
development
services
staff.
In
order
to
achieve
the
built
outcome
that
council
has
set
as
its
vision
for
east
maine.
AG
AG
Our
read
of
these
requests
is
that
we
need
further
direction
from
council,
which
is
why
there
are
not
yet
in
the
draft
code
within
the
urban
form
category.
The
requests
include:
increasing
the
maximum
building
height,
eliminating
step,
backs
and
reduction
in
floor
plates
for
residential
towers
below
80
feet
and
expanding
the
exceptions
for
block
size
requirements
for
housing.
AG
Stakeholders
are
looking
to
reduce
the
minimum
housing
requirement
to
accept
condominiums
as
affordable
at
a
hundred
percent
ami
and
then
to
allow
fee
and
moo
instead
of
building
affordable
housing
on
site
and,
lastly,
under
code
structure,
the
requests
are
to
expand
the
exceptions
for
non-conforming
uses
and
to
add
the
use
of
development
agreements
to
depart
or
vary
or
receive
something
that
is
not
in
the
code.
AG
So
with
that,
I
will
turn
it
back
to
mike
mike.
Thank.
G
G
As
you
begin
your
deliberations
and
explore
the
code,
the
land
used
code
can
be
kind
of
a
complicated
and
confusing
thing,
and
we
want
to
make
sure
we're
providing
you
the
information
so
that
you
develop
an
understanding
of
this
particular
land
use
code,
amendment
where
you're
comfortable,
making
that
final
decision
on
the
adoption.
G
So
looking
for
any
any
information
you
can
provide
us
this
evening
and
not
foreclosing
on
future
requests
for
information,
say
following
the
public
hearing,
but
if
we
can
get
a
running
start
on
some
of
the
organizing
and
collecting
of
any
work
that
you
we
need
to
have
done
for
information.
We
want
to
get
going
on
that.
So,
with
that
I'll
hand,
it
back
to
the
mayor.
A
Okay,
thank
you.
So
there's
a
lot
of
material
here
and
really
what
we're
just
looking
for
is
at
the
end
of
this
discussion.
Can
we
advance
this
to
a
public
hearing
on
the
land
use
code
amendment,
and
can
we
identify
some
topics
here
that
staff
can
can
have
a
discussion
with
us
on
yeah?
Mr
miyaki
is
your
hand
up?
A
No
okay,
you
just
maybe
that's
my
pointer,
sorry,
okay!
So
I'm
thinking
that
there
there
can
be
a
lot
of
discussion
here,
but
we
don't
need
to
be
redundant.
If
somebody
has
already
represented
a
point
of
view,
I
think
that's
sufficient
to
have
staff
bring
it
back,
so
I
would
weigh
in
if
something
hasn't
been
mentioned
yet
that
you
want
to
have
one
of
these
brought
back.
Why
don't
we
do
you
think
mike?
A
It
would
be
helpful
to
take
these
one
by
one
and
determine
whether
or
not
we're
comfortable
with
the
proposed
adjustments
or
if
we
want
to
have
you
come
back
and
discuss
it
further.
G
Let
us
know-
and
we
would
organize
those
and
set
up
that
conversation
for
the
council
if
there
are
other
topics
that
the
council
outside
of
those
requests,
that
the
council
would
be
interested
in
learning
more
about
that's
introduced
in
this
code.
We're
happy
to
do
that
as
well.
I
do
know
that
a
lot
of
the
focus
will
probably
be
on
discussion
of
requested
changes,
so
we
need.
Maybe
you
could
start
there
or
is
there
a
subset
or
the
collective
whole?
A
A
All
right
is
everybody
good
with
that?
Okay,
so
are.
Is
there
anybody
who
wants
to
comment
on
whether
they
want
staff
to
bring
back
number
one
to
discuss
or
have
an
opinion
on
that?
Yes,
councilmember
robertson,.
P
Yes,
so
I
just
I'd
like
to
step
back
for
a
second
to
talk
about
why
I
suspected
we
need
you
know
we,
as
we
just
did
the
mfte,
and
we
heard
from
the
people
at
the
public
hearing.
We
need
a
lot
more
housing.
We
also
have
growth
targets
for
jobs,
and
this
site,
particularly
the
north
end
of
this
site,
is
right
across
from
my
rail
station,
and
we
need
to
make
sure
that
it
is
developed
to
help
the
city
achieve
its
vision
for
growth.
P
P
That's
really
going
to
affect
almost
no
one
as
long
as
it
doesn't
affect
the
neighbors
across
the
street,
because
it's
got
a
freeway
on
the
other
side
and
really
provide
the
the
capacity
for
the
jobs
and
the
housing
that
we're
looking
for
and
we're
so
lucky
in
bellevue
that
we
have.
This
among
the
many
opportunities
that
are
presented
to
us,
so
I
think
that
if
we
do
not
increase
the
height
allowance
here,
we
will
not
get
the
residential
we
need.
We
will
not
get
the
office
we
need.
P
We
will
not-
and
you
know
remember
far-
decides
how
dense
a
site
is
height
height
combined
with
far
decides
how
much
open
space
there's
going
to
be
between
the
density.
So
if
we
have
a
higher
height
limit,
we're
going
to
have
a
lot
more
open
space,
we're
going
to
have
visual
space
between
the
towers,
so
to
me,
making
the
height
higher
makes
a
whole
lot
of
difference,
and
I
I
really
would
like
to
see
the
council
give
direction
on
this
this
and
far
tonight
at
least
not
direction.
P
But
what
we're
willing
to
how
big
we're
willing
to
explore,
because
staff
may
need
to
there
is
a
determination
of
non-significance
under
cipa
issued
for
this
plan,
but
they
may
need
to
adjust
the
checklist
and
maybe
issue
a
new
one
or
maybe
do
an
addendum
and
that's
going
to
take
probably
and
staff
can
weigh
in
probably
90
days
or
so
to
go
through
it.
P
I
won't
repeat
these
comments
on
other
topics,
but
yes,
I
think
we
should
look
at
a
max
height
of
400
421
mechanical,
the
125
to
145,
with
mechanical
in
the
middle
area
and
the
70
to
90
in
the
near
112th
area,
as
proposed
by
the
whigs,
and
I'd
like
to
make
sure
that
that's
something
that
we
can
adopt
in
a
timely
manner.
So
we
need
to
reopen
cpa.
Let's.
A
Say.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Okay.
Is
there
anybody
else
who
wants
to
add
to
that
councilmember
stokes.
Q
Yeah,
I
think
I
would
like
to
add
that
too,
I
think
yes
go.
Big
is
I'm
trying
to
figure
out?
I
think
we
need
to
figure
out
what
going
big
is
and
what
it
means,
but
I
I
would
like
us
to
take
a
look
at
that
and
also
consider
the
recommendation
in
green
here
tied
to
one
thing
that
we're
going
to
get
to
somewhere
along
the
way,
but
I
want
to
talk
about
this
first.
Q
This
is
tod.
We
just
got
through
talking
about
affordable
housing.
We
have
we've
had
this
huge
response
from
the
total
community
in
the
business
community,
and
everybody
knows
we
really
have
to
address
that
issue
and
we
need
to
do
it
everywhere
everywhere
we
can
so
I'm
willing
to
look
at.
I
don't
think
going
to
max
height
that
we
have
at
the
beginning
is,
is
the
limit,
but
my
my
concern
what
I
really
want
to
find
out
more
about,
in
particular
in
terms
of
what
do
we
get
from
going
another
100
feet,
or
so.
Q
Well,
I
think
that
you
know
it's
just
it's.
This
whole
situation
of
what
are
the
benefits
and
and
if,
if
400
or
or
300
is
something
we
can
do
and
cepa
is
and
appreciate,
robertson
mentioning
that
that
we
have
to
look
at
that,
but
I
just
I
think
by
itself.
Q
Keeping
these
in
our
own
bucket
is
not
necessarily
the
best
way
to
approach
this,
so
I'm
looking
at
how
can
we
get
something
that
continues
that
really
makes
the
the
the
the
vision
they
have
and
I've
I've
always
along
the
line
thought
that
this
this
particular
property
has
great
opportunities
for
us,
but
it's
not
just
how
much
can
the
developer
do?
How
much
can
we
put
on
that
land?
Q
You
know
we
can
go
600.
You
know
if
we're
playing
like
we're
downtown,
so
you
know
we
had
to
struggle
to
get
from.
We
had
to
go
through
the
whole
process
to
get
from
400
feet
to
600
feet
downtown,
so
there
is,
and
you
have
to
be
within
the
terms
of
the
of
the
comprehensive
plan.
Q
We
have
to
have
look
at
the
land
use
code,
all
these
factors,
but
I
I
think
that
this
is
an
area
and
a
couple
of
these
other
pieces
in
here
where
the
council
and
the
city
has
a
very
strong
commitment
to
doing
something
and
that's
called
the
firm.
You
know
affordable
housing
and
that's
where
I
really
want
to
go
big,
and
if
we
don't
do
it,
there
won't
be
any
homes.
Q
So
I'm
willing
to
look
at
this
and
I'd
really
like
to
look
at
how
we
can
approach
that
I'm
willing
to
go
to
300
feet,
but
going
further
than
that,
and
I
still
think
there
has
to
be
affordable
housing,
but
going
further
than
that
to
me
is
going
to
depend
on
how
we
can
make
this
property
be
a
real
tod
property,
how
it
can
fit
in
with
affordable
housing
and
how
it's
going
to
have
an
impact
on
other
developments
that
are
coming
up,
we're
going
to
go
across
wilburton,
and
we
have
to
realize
that
whatever
we
do
here
is
going
to
be
looked
at
as
as
a
base
other
places.
Q
So
I
think
we
have
to
do
this
really
well
and
and
make
something
that
really
satisfies
everybody,
and
I
think
we
can
get
there
if
we're
all
willing
to
sit
down
and
talk
about
it,
but
not
just
kick
something
out
just
because
we
don't
like
it
or
we
don't
want
to
go
there.
So
I'm
I'm
willing
to
add
this
frankly
I'd
I
would.
I
would
like
to
have.
Have
you
come
back
on
all
of
these
and
look
at
these
we'll.
A
We'll
we'll
take
it
by
one
by
one,
but
obviously
I
got
your
input
and
I'm
I'm
gonna
just
interject
here
I
like
what
council
member
stokes
is
saying:
how
do
how
do
we
trigger
these
increased
heights
and
I'd
like
to
look
at
how
eighty
percent
ami
or
even
more
affordable
triggers
it?
Because,
frankly,
a
hundred
percent
ami
is
not
what
I
define
as
affordable
housing.
A
It
is
more
affordable
than
120
ami,
but
that
to
me
is
not
enough
of
a
give
back
to
trigger
increased
heights,
so
I
would
like
staff
to
look
at
how
we
can
get
80
ami,
affordable
housing
in
there
and
trigger
some
of
the
benefits
of
that
which
would
be
increased
height
in
my
mind,
as
long
as
the
cepa
allows
it,
who?
What
other
comments
or
questions
are
the
council
members
on.
E
I
agree
with
both
your
comments
and
council
members
jokes.
We
we
want
to
encourage,
affordable,
housing
and
and
really
incent
for
that
and
I'm
willing
to
go
to
much
higher
heights
in
order
to
get
that,
but
it
is.
I
also
agree
that
it
we
need
to
make
sure
that
the
very
values
and
the
guiding
principles
that
we
establish
for
this
to
be
a
tod
neighborhood.
That
is
walkable
and
you
know
really
a
neighborhood
that's
connected
with
with
affordable,
actually
market
rate
and
affordable
housing.
E
D
Thanks,
I
agree
with
what
councilmember
robertson
said,
but
I
want
to
add
on
a
little
bit
of
perspective
and
also
what's
been
just
talked
about.
D
What
I
agree
with
trans
members
robertson
is
that
this
is
a
major
opportunity
for
us
with
such
a
big
piece
of
land,
and
I
think
the
stakeholder
proponent
has
mentioned
the
opportunity
of
a
gateway
and
tod
is
a
tremendous
opportunity.
Also,
I
mean
we
look
at
the
the
light
rail
main
stage
main
street
station.
We
look
at
certified,
we
look
at
the
station
itself
and
we
look
at
the
entrance
into
bellevue.
D
It's
just
great
opportunity
and
I
think
the
surrey
down
neighborhood
is
really
you
know
getting
to
appreciate
this,
and
so
what
they
are
proposing,
basically,
is
you
know
to
accomplish
all
the
ghosts
you
talk
about
makes
a
lot
of
sense.
You
know
affordable
housing,
housing,
more
housing,
but
without
the
project,
that's
not
going
to
mean
housing.
D
D
A
D
Then
the
proposed
enemies
actually
make
sense
because
they
are
producing
the
height.
You
know
facing
112,
which
is,
and
also
we're
asking
for
open
space
and
by
the
way
that
they
propose
is
give
you
a
big
open
space
right
facing
the
train,
tod
and
they're,
proposing
tod
residential.
They
are
you
know,
but
except
they
said
well,
we
can
make
it
with
lower
height.
Why
not?
I
don't
care
long
higher
or
higher
lower
height
as
long
as
they
provide
residential
units
as
long
we
can
provide
them
because
it's
economically
feasible.
B
A
D
Through
this,
this
multi-family,
you
know
tax
exam,
that's
what
it
is.
The
builders
developers
partners
are
willing
to
work
together
so
that
they're
willing
to
build
the
buildings
units
if
they're
not
going
to
be.
This
is
not
kind
of
feasible
we're
just
talking
we're
going
to
have
a
piece
of
acres
of
land
sitting
there.
That's
not
going
to
happen,
so
I
agree
with
customer
robertson
will
to
do
whatever
they're
requesting
all
the
details.
We
can
work
out.
It
will
happen.
Okay,
that's.
A
C
Thank
you
mayor.
If
I
could,
I
just
feel
like
we're
getting
just
a
little
bit
off
track
on
this
and.
C
C
Okay,
so
next
thing
I
just
want
to
mention
is
that
the
great
collaboration
between
actually
these
three
different
stakeholders
to
get
to
some
collaborative
decisions
on
those
areas
in
green
and
that's
fantastic,
I
think
the
ones
that
are
in
yellow.
I
think
we
should
bring
all
that
back
or
if
my
colleagues
have
additional
questions
or
follow
up
on
that,
certainly
they
should
be
reaching
out
to
reaching
out
to
staff,
but
I
think
all
of
those
we
should
bring
back
and
have
robust
discussions
on.
C
In
addition
to
that,
I
what
I
saw
a
slight
difference
between
kind
of
some
of
the
outstanding
issues
that
staff
outline
versus
some
of
the
outstanding
issues.
I
think
some
of
the
stakeholders
have.
There
seemed
to
be
a
little
bit
of
a
difference
in
terms
of
number
of
issues
and
what
those
issues
are.
C
I
think
it'd
be
great
to
have
all
of
those
on
the
on
the
table
before
we
move
this
forward
and
by
the
way,
the
the
the
initial
question
here
is:
absolutely
I'm
ready
to
move
this
forward
to
get
to
a
public
hearing.
We
definitely
want
to
do
that
sooner
than
later,
and
I
appreciate
you
pushing
that
to
get
that
done
before
the
before
the
summer
break,
and
I
have
a
couple
of
other
things.
C
I'd
love
to
see
us
also
look
into
as
well
the
next
time
when
we
do
get
into
this
a
little
bit
deeper.
Regarding
the
the
sipa
study,
as
well
as
the
height
that
council
member
robertson,
stokes
had
mentioned
already
and
then
the
some
of
the
other
codes
in
terms
of
downtown
compared
to
to
bell
red,
and
then
you
know,
raising
the
non-residential
far
and
maximizing
density,
as
this
is
tod.
After
all,
okay,.
J
A
Let's,
let's
go
to
I'll,
let
you
speak
first
on
the
next
on
number
four,
and
if
and
you
can
start,
if
you
want
to
have
staff
bring
that
back
and
what
you
would
like
them
to
look
at
for
that
one.
C
A
Okay,
does
anybody
else
have
a
particular
comment
that
on
number
four
request,
because
I'm
okay,
council
members
on
go
ahead.
E
You
know
my
my
comment
is
somewhat
number
four,
but
it's
more
broad
that
on
those
ones
where
it
is
not
recommended
by
staff
as
the
change,
I
would
like
to
better
understand
how
it
how
it
deviates
from
our
guiding
principles
and
our
vision.
So
I
can
better
understand
what
it
is
that
we're
voting
for,
because
this
talks
a
little
bit
about
the
what
it
may
do.
E
A
We
think
it
looks
great
and
then
they
sell
and
the
developer
comes
in
and
does
something
different
with
the
increased
far
with
the
increased
height,
I
want
to
make
sure
that
you
know
it.
This
is
my
opinion.
I
am
interested
in
providing
an
opportunity
for
this
developer
to
do
what
they
are
proposing
to
do,
but
I
am
not
interested
in
giving
carte
blanc
to
a
new
developer
who
they
might
sell
to
to
do
something
entirely
different
that
doesn't
fit
with.
A
You
know
the
vision
that
we
have
here,
so
you
don't
have
to
answer
that
tonight,
but
I'd
like
in
more
information
on
that
and
then
councilmember
robertson.
P
You
make
a
really
good
point.
I
guess
one
cross
check
that
would
be
very
useful
as
we
move
along
is
whether-
and
I
think
we've
all
seen
the
wigs
preferred
site
plan,
which
is
a
beautiful,
beautiful
proposal.
P
I'd
like
a
cross-check
on
what,
if
anything
in
the
code
as
we
move
along,
would
prohibit
that
or
would
confirm
it.
I
think
that
that
would
that's
a
great
idea.
P
I
I
raised
my
hand
to
say
that
on
the
number
four
I
would
like
to
see
both
the
wig's
request
worked
up,
because
the
way
the
code
is
written
now
you
can
go
80
feet
high
with
no
step
back,
but
then,
as
soon
as
you're
81
feet,
all
of
a
sudden,
the
40
feet
between
40
and
80
have
to
be
scooched
in
and
if
and
therefore
you
have
less
floor
area,
and
maybe
you
don't
even
have
as
much
if
you
go
another
40
depending
on
the
size.
P
So
what
we
want
is
we
want
more
housing.
We
want
more
affordable
housing
to
the
extent
that
that
can
be
used
for
affordable
housing
and
modulation
can
be
done
another
way
and
I
think
the
design
review
requirements
in
the
code
as
drafted
by
the
way
kudos
to
staff.
The
code
is
really
really
close,
but
you
know
I'd
like
to
see
that,
because
that's
taking
away
floor
area
from
housing
so-
and
I
guess
the
instead
of
go
big
and
or
go
home-
it's
go
big
to
have
more
homes.
Yes,.
A
A
Let's
do
seven
any
comments
or
question:
do
you
want
to
have
that
one
brought
back
and
if
so,
what
do
you
want
to
have
discussed?
Okay,
councilmember
robertson?
I.
P
G
So,
yes,
that
could
be
the
recommendation.
I
might
suggest
something
that
might
help
a
little
bit.
We
could
organize
kind
of
the
future
council
discussions
around
there's.
Clearly,
housing
is
an
issue
and
a
number
of
these
has
been
mentioned,
affect
housing
and
the
ability
to
provide
housing
or
the
requirement
even
to
provide
housing.
G
So
we
could
do
set
up
a
presentation
that
talks
about
the
housing
elements,
including
those
recommended
changes,
so
we
would
bring
back
all
of
these
changes
in
in
a
in
an
organized
fashion,
because
I'm
I'm
assuming
from
what
I'm
reading
here
that
the
council
is
going
to
be
interested
in
talking
about
all
of
those
that
are
listed
in
in
yellow
here,
the
green
ones.
We
could
package
up
as
well
and
just
go
through
those
very
quickly
and
say
this
is
what
the
this
is,
the
outcome
and
just
do
a
head
nod
on
those
look.
G
We
can
probably
dispatch
those
fairly
quickly,
but
I
think
it's
important
just
to
understand
just
what
the
changes
are.
So
you
understand
what
we're
putting
in
the
draft
code.
On
that
way,
we
can
move,
I
think,
relatively
quickly
to
the
the
big
lifts
which
is
around
housing.
It's
about
the
urban
form
that
councilmember
robertson
was
just
talking
about,
and
the
pros
and
cons
of
making
those
adjustments.
If
the
council
chooses
to
do
so,.
A
I
think
you're
getting
from
some
good
feedback
from
the
council.
That's
talking
about
specifics
about
the
80
percent
ami,
the
market
rate,
housing
walkability,
open
space
guiding
principles.
I
mean
this
is
this
is
good
information,
because
then
you
have
some
idea
of
what
to
bring
back
to
us,
so
I'm
trying
not
to
drag
on
and
on
here,
but
I
I
appreciate
the
conversation.
P
E
So
I
just
want
to
confirm
number
seven
is
about
a
bike
path,
so
staff
is
saying
that,
because
of
the
topography
and
the
steepness,
we
we
are
saying
no
bike
path,
but
there
would
be
other
pathways
near
adjacent
to
these
properties
so
that
you
would,
if
you
were
a
bicyclist,
you
would
still
be
able
to
get
around,
but
that
we
aren't
actually
requiring
anything
through
the
properties.
Is
that
right
just
want
to
make
sure
I
was
clear
about
what
this
is
actually
saying.
G
Right
so
there
is
a
topography
challenge
here,
so
the
pedestrian
path
between-
and
this
would
be,
an
east
west
running
pedestrian
path.
So
it
would
divide
the
site,
provide
easy
access
between
112th
and
114th.
G
We
wouldn't
require
bicycle
access
there
because
of
that
topography,
but
bike
access
along
112
along
the
prelocated
street
and
along
the
main
street
slip
ramp
would
be
where
bicycles
would
travel
as
well
as
across
the
street
on
the
multi-purpose
path
that
runs
adjacent
to
the
light
rail
station.
A
A
We're
okay
with
staffs!
Well
it
I
think
we
do
want
to
bring
that
one
back
mike,
but
we
won't.
I
guess
we're
not
gonna
count
comment
on
it.
How
about?
Okay?
I'm
gonna
come
back
to
the
bellevue
club.
Okay,
let's
just
do
the
wig
property
first,
so
number,
two
wigs
recommendation.
Number
two
request:
does
that
anybody
have
a
comment
or
anything
on
that
one
that
will
be
coming
back.
Yes,
deputy
mayor,
yes,.
A
Yeah
and
yes:
okay,
how
about
number
five
we've
already.
T
E
A
C
A
Wig
three
we're
gonna
do
bellevue
club
after
okay,
so
wig
three,
are
you
okay
with
staff
recommendation,
or
you
want
to
have
a
conversation
on
that?
I'm,
okay
with
staff
recommendation.
Q
Yeah,
yes,
can
I
just
ask
one
thing:
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
it's
clear,
because
there's
several
of
these
provisions
through
a
da
which
I
think
is
a
great
idea.
I
wish
we
would
have
done
a
da
five
years
ago,
but
all
of
those
I
think,
should
bring
back,
but
we
also
need
to
kind
of
know
why.
I
think
it
would
be
helpful.
AG
A
A
A
Is
there
any
comments
or
questions
on
that
bring
back
as
council
member
stokes.
Q
Q
I
don't
see
any
interconnectivity
between
the
two
and
if
we
could
concentrate
on
the
wigs
and
get
that
done
and
then
bring
the
bellevue
club
things
back,
because
it's
this
switching
back
and
forth,
and
it's
like.
Why
is
it
there?
Why
is
it
not
there
we're
talking
about
two
different
things
and
two
different
treatments,
so
I'd
like
to
understand
why
we
can't
split
these
and
and
be
more
efficient
on
it
and
maybe
understand
it
better,
because
it
does
kind
of
confuse
things.
A
Mike,
can
you
do
you
want
to
answer
that
now
or
do
you
want
to
bring.
G
That
so
I
I
can,
I
can
try.
So
there
is.
There
are
some
relationships
so
on
some,
like
the
non-conforming
uses
exception
that
they're
looking
for
there
are
some
issues
around
exempting
housing
that
has
been
a
request
by
the
bellevue
club,
so
there
I
think,
where
there
are
relationships,
it
might
be
efficient
to
do
them
together,
but
there
are
some
that
stand
by
themselves.
I
I
agree
with
that
as
well,
but.
G
A
So
that's
a
good
answer
for
why
we're
doing
this
now
so
bellevue
club
six,
that's
already
kind
of
taken
care
of
as
I
understand
so
we
don't
really
need
to
discuss
that
one
any
further
right
mike
I
mean
you
can
bring
it
back.
A
P
The
goal
of
the
non-conforming
use
rules
was
to
allow
the
businesses
that
were
there
to
stay,
but
the
other
goal
was
to
eventually
see
a
redevelopment
and
have
those
light
industrial
uses
go
away
and
have
the
mixed
use
with
the
residential
business
and
stuff.
I
don't
feel
that
way
about
the
bellevue
club.
The
bellevue
club
is,
I
mean,
I'm
not
a
member
the
bell,
but
the
bellevue
club
is
an
amenity
as
the
downtown
densifies
and
the
whole
city
grows.
P
It's
gonna
only
have
more
importance
and
be
more
relevant,
so
I
would
personally
like
to
see
it
so
that,
if
the
the
athletic
facilities,
you
know
with
the
meeting
spaces
and
stuff
that
are
that
are
part
of
that
and
the
hotel
uses
of
the
bellevue
club.
If
they
want
to
grow
those
if
they
want
to
double
the
size,
go
for
it,
invest
in
it
make
it
better.
P
Just
meet
the
requirements
for
the
performance
standards
and
the
designs
like
the
setbacks
and
the
heights
and
the
far
I
don't
think
we
should
start
requiring
them
to
change
their
use
because
they
want
to
expand
their
use.
It's
not
a
use.
I
want
to
see
go
away,
so
that's
woven
into
a
lot
of
these,
but
I'd
like
to
see
the
code
at
least
have
us
discuss
changing
the
code
so
that
that
use
can
stay
because
I'd
like
it
to
stay
forever,
it's
going
to
be
needed.
The
death.
A
So
you
know
if
they
decide
to
mow
down
the
bellevue
club
as
an
athletic
facility
and
turn
it
into
a
you
know,
office
tower
or
whatever
all
of
a
sudden
that
triggers
everything,
but
as
long
as
it
means
continues
in
the
use
that
it's
designed
to
be
it's
a
business.
You
know
it's
like
it's
like
a
child
care
business
and
if
they
were
to
expand
all
of
a
sudden
that
would
trigger
all
these
things,
and
I
I
don't
want
to
see
that
happen
either.
A
We
can
never
create
a
bellevue
club
again
in
bellevue
because
of
the
property
prices
here,
and
I
I
just
don't
want
to
confine
them
so
much
that
it
doesn't
make
sense
for
them
to
continue
that
business
and
they
can't
ever
expand
it
without
triggering
something.
So
that's
my
opinion,
so
council
members
on
and
then
council
member
lee.
E
So
I
agree
with
the
discussion
about
the
bellevue
club
and
and
the
the
function
it
serves
for
our
community.
My
question
is
more
around
consistency
of
non-conforming
use.
I
remember
what
was
it
a
couple
years
ago
we
were
talking
about
the
nursery
it
was
a
non-conforming
use,
so
does
if
we
start
to
look
at
this
differently.
E
Does
that
mean
that
we
are
looking
at
other
non-conforming
uses
in
the
same
way,
I'm
just
trying
to
understand
what
kind
of
precedence
this
might
set
and
being
really
clear
about
what
worried
about
what
that
might
be.
I'm
not
making
any
judgments.
I'm
just
asking
the
question
from
the
standpoint
of
understanding.
A
D
Thank
you
very
much.
I
agree
with
the
councilman
robertson
and
the
mayor.
It's
been
around
for
40
years,
and
you
know
surprisingly,
I'm
not
a
member
either,
but
they
still
have
the
original
funding.
Member
300
of
them
or
more
still
remain,
and
it
provides
a
purpose
very
specific
purpose
like
you
talked
about,
so
I
believe
that
you
know:
there's
no
reason
to
change
it,
and
so
it
has
the
you
know
he
serves
the
community
specifically.
A
So
councilmember
robertson
kind
of
did
an
overarching
thing
that
covers
all
the
bellevue
club
recommendations
here.
This
is
so
is
that
and
does
anybody
not
agree
with
looking
at
it
that
way
go
ahead?
Councilmember
stokes.
Q
I'm
not
answering
that
the
ques
answer
to
your
question
is
not
to
same
one.
I
want
to
address
okay,
I
do
think
bifurcating.
This
will
be
more
effective
and
efficient
and
we
can
keep
focused
on
what
we're
doing.
I
agree
with
what
has
been
said.
Okay,
thank.
C
In
just
rereading
this
mayor,
I'd
like
to
request
that
staff
also
bring
back
wig
number
six,
the
the
the
d.a
for
the
catalyst
or
special
amenity.
Okay,
see
some
discrepancies.
There,
I
think,
could
be
worthwhile
having
a
conversation
on.
Thank
you.
E
On
the
bellevue
club,
I
just
want
to
be
clear,
so
we
talked
about
as
long
as
they
continue
to
be
there
as
a
business
and
if
they
expand
and
stay
within
that
particular
business.
But
since
this
is
a
land
use
code
for
the
east
main
area,
if
sometime
in
the
future
that
property
is
sold
for
other
uses,
then
the
underlying
code
would
still
apply.
E
So
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we
are
accounting
for
that
in
our
underlying
code,
so
that,
just
like
one
of
you
commented
about
the
other
property
that
if
it
was
ever
sold,
we
want
to
make
sure
that
the
underlying
code
reflects
the
guiding
principles
and
the
vision
that
we
have.
So
I'm
asking
the
question
about
whether
we
still
need
to
account
for
some
of
these
comments,
because
if
the
use
was
ever
to
change,
then
it
would,
it
would
revert
back
to
the
underlying
code.
So
that's
a
good
point.
N
Yeah
hey.
Thank
you
mayor,
I'm
I
was
wondering
mike.
Can
you
actually
articulate
what
we
should
be?
What
do
you
believe
we're
being
directed
to
bring
back
on
the
bellevue
club.
G
This
is
we
would.
We
would
need
to
explore
the
different
options
to
try
to
reach
that
interest.
As
far
as
how
we
structure
the
code
responding
to
councilmember
zhang's
comments,
it
is
achievable,
but
I
mean
there
are
probably
a
couple
of
paths
that
we
would
have
to
explore
to
get
you
there.
N
G
Yeah,
I
I
think
I
think
what
we
need
to
bring
back
is
some
information
to
help
the
council
understand
the
different
options
and
and
the
consequence
of
the
options
right,
there's
a
broad
vision.
That's
been
established
for
the
east
main
area.
This
would
be
something
that
preserves
an
existing
use.
That's
not
entirely
aligned
with
that
as
in
an
expanded
form.
But
that
being
said,
the
council
can
certainly
provide
us
alternate
direction
here
and
we
will
do
what
we
can
to
get
you
where
you're
trying
to
go.
A
So
any
more
comments
or
questions
do
staff?
Do
you
have
a
dutch
deputy
mayor?
Did
you
want
to
say
something?
Okay,.
A
G
Yes,
a
quick
response
to
your
question.
I
I
did
hear
support
for
the
public
hearing,
so
we'll
work
to
schedule
that
at
the
earliest
date
that
we
can,
we
can
make
that
work
and
then,
as
far
as
the
direction,
we
are
clearly
going
to
be
bringing
back
information
on
the
requested
amendments.
We
got
some
feedback
tonight
that
will
help
us
try
to
frame
those
when
we
bring
them
back.
So
we
appreciate,
I
do
appreciate
that
so
we'll.
I
think
I
think
from
our
combination
of
notes.
G
A
C
Mayor,
I
was
just
saying
if
we
needed
a
motion
for
for
this
or
not
for
the
to
address.
A
Yeah
we
do
okay,
we
do
need
a
direction
here.
So
would
you
like
to
make
a
motion.
P
G
So
we
certainly
will
whatever
the
council
decisions
are.
We
will
find
the
procedural
path
that
gets
us
to
the
end
as
quickly
as
we
can,
but
without
having
the
information
on
that
direction.
It's
hard
for
us
to
do
that
analysis,
but
we
we
will.
G
Yeah
we'll
look
at
how
we
organize
this.
With
that
in
mind,
it's
a
it
can
be
a
collection
of
changes
that
can
cause
that
so
we'll
try
to.
I
understand
I
understand
the
goal:
let's
get
this
to
the
finish
line
as
quickly
as
if
we
can
and
let's
deal
with
the
procedural
process
side
of
this
as
quickly
as
we
can
along
that
path.
So
let
us
think
about
how
we
organize
this
when
we
bring
that
back
with
with
that
interest
in
one.
Thank
you
mike.
N
I'm
just
contemplating
it
back.
A
Okay,
good,
so
we
have
one
more
thing:
we
have
regional
issues
and
I'm
just
going
to
say
we
can
ask
questions
tonight,
no
problem,
but
you're
also
going
to
have
a
whole
week
to
think
about
this
and
submit
any
questions
by
email
to
staff,
because
this
will
come
back
to
us
so
go
ahead.
Mr
miyake.
N
AC
Good
evening
mayor
deputy
mayor
members
of
council
tonight,
we're
joined
by
a
very
special
guest,
brianna
murray
vice
president
at
gordon
thomas
honeywell,
governmental
relations
and,
as
you
know,
briana
has
been
a
great
advocate
for
bellevue's
priorities
in
our
state
legislative
efforts
for
many
years,
and
she
is
going
to
give
us
an
overview
of
the
state
legislative
session
and
how
bellevue's
priorities
fared
during
that
process
and
then
assistant
city
attorney,
matt
mcfarland
will
give
us
a
heads
up
about
some
implementation
efforts
that
will
be
coming
up
shortly,
as
mayor
referred
to.
AA
Wonderful,
thank
you
lacey,
jane
and
good
evening,
mayor
and
council
members.
I
am
your
state
lobbyist
and
appreciate
having
the
opportunity
to
give
you
a
briefing
on
the
recent
legislative
session
that
concluded
on
april
25th.
You
all
received
a
comprehensive
written
report
from
me
that
goes
into
much
greater
detail
than
we'll
be
able
to
cover
this
evening.
I
encourage
you
to
refer
to
that
report
for
detailed
for
detailed
information
tonight,
I'm
going
to
provide
just
a
brief
overview.
AA
The
2021
legislative
session
was
a
105
day
session,
a
long
legislative,
traditional
long
legislative
session,
and
it
was
conducted
almost
entirely
virtually
in
many
ways.
This
was
a
historic
legislative
session
and
one
of
those
reasons
is
that
it
was
almost
entirely
virtual.
There
was
a
lot
of
activity
that
occurred
over
that
105
days.
AA
Most
significantly,
though
334
bills
passed
into
law.
This
is
close
to
what
we
would
see
in
an
average
year.
It's
just
about
30
bills,
shy
of
what
we
see
in
an
average
year.
So,
despite
the
virtual
format,
the
legislature
took
a
lot
of
action.
Some
of
the
large
highlights
are
that
they
enacted
a
low
carbon
fuel
standard.
A
cap
and
trade
proposal,
capital
gains
tax
and
much
more,
which
I'll
go
into
more
detail
on.
AA
There
were
a
lot
of
concerns
that
the
state
was
going
to
be
facing
pandemic
related
revenue
shortfalls
and
would
need
to
make
significant
budget
cuts,
but
over
the
course
of
the
legislative
session,
not
only
to
did
the
economy
rebound
to
pre-pandemic
levels,
but
the
the
federal
government
approved
the
american
rescue
plan
act,
which
infused
4.25
billion
dollars
in
federal
funds
into
the
state's
budgets
that
resulted
in
the
legislature
passing
the
largest
operating
and
capital
budget
budgets
that
it
has
in
recent
history,
so
very
significant
investments.
AA
The
exception
to
this
is
the
transportation
budget,
which
is
an
area
that
we
spend
a
lot
of
time
advocating
on
behalf
of
the
city
transportation.
Related
revenues
continue
to
stay
at
an
all-time
low
throughout
the
entire
legislative
session
and
there's
still
no
predictable
return
in
sight.
As
far
as
returning
to
pre-pandemic
levels,
our
advocacy
in
the
transportation
arena
focused
on
in
two
different
areas.
AA
The
first
area
is
continuing
to
deliver
projects
along
the
405
corridor,
specifically
the
north
end
improvements
that
were
already
committed
to
be
funded
with
bonded
toll
revenues
throughout
the
pandemic.
When
toll
revenues
declined,
it
created
a
delay
in
when
bonding
against
those
toll.
Revenues
could
occur
and
resulted
in
a
delay
to
the
project.
AA
The
project
would
be
completed
prior
to
bus,
rapid
transit
being
deployed
on
the
corridor
representative
wanda
anna
slatter
and
representative
davina
dorr
joined
us
in
some
extremely
strong
advocacy,
so
that
federal
funding
was
allocated
to
backfill
a
portion
of
the
lost
toll
revenues
and
there
were
several
budget
provisos
that
were
included
directing
washdock
to
explore
different
solutions
for
the
2022
legislature
to
consider
so
good
progress
on
that
issue,
but
certainly
more
work
to
be
done.
AA
The
second
area
we
focused
on
in
transportation
was
advocating
for
additional
projects
to
receive
funding.
We
partnered
with
the
bellevue
chamber
to
prioritize
six
key
projects
that
are
key
to
the
economic
growth
of
the
city
and
key
to
the
city,
accommodating
the
significant
amount
of
growth
you
all
are
anticipating
in
the
next
few
years.
AA
The
in
order
to
fund
new
projects,
the
legislature
does
need
to
adopt
an
additive
transportation
revenue
package,
while
they
spent
many
hours
many
meetings,
many
public
hearings
on
the
discussion
of
a
transportation
revenue
package
and
they
ultimately
failed
to
pass
one.
This
session
in
the
package
proposals
that
were
released,
three
of
our
requested
projects
were
allocated
funding
in
both
the
house
and
the
senate.
So
175
million
was
included
for
the
520
124
avenue
project.
AA
AA
They
could
wait
until
2023
to
adopt
a
transportation
package
and
we're
actively
following
those
conversations
in
addition
to
transportation,
the
legislature
tackled
affordable
housing
and
homelessness
with
a
strong
zealousness,
and
they
made
historic
investments
in
rental
assistance,
the
housing
trust
fund,
rapid
housing
acquisition
and,
more
most,
notably
in
this
arena.
AA
In
addition
to
significant
funding
investments,
the
legislature
made
a
lot
of
policy
changes.
I
want
to
highlight
four
in
particular.
The
first
is
that
they
approved
house
bill
1070,
which
authorizes
the
city
to
use
1590
sales
tax
funds
for
acquisition,
rather
than
just
construction
of
affordable
housing.
AA
Second
is
senate
bill
5160.
This
bill
puts
forward
a
process
that
will
occur
once
the
eviction
moratoria
ends.
AA
AA
AA
I
believe
that
once
I'm
done
presenting
we're
going
to
go
into
those
two
bills
in
a
bit
more
detail,
I'll
just
note
that
the
city
will
be
required
to
adopt
code
changes
as
a
result
of
these
bills
passing,
and
I
would
know
that
without
our
strong
advocacy,
the
code
changes
that
you
would
be
having
to
make
would
be
far
more
significant
than
what
you're
going
to
need
to
make
under
the
the
final
versions
of
the
bill.
AA
Some
of
the
highlights
include
establishing
for
a
duty
for
an
officer
to
intervene
if
another
officer
is
engaging
in
excessive
force,
banning
of
neck
restraints,
choke
holds
and
no
knock
warrants
and
strong
restrictions
on
the
use
of
tear
gas
and
vehicular
pursuits
again,
those
are
just
some
highlights
and
much
more
change
to
occur
there.
The
legislature
did
allocate
20
million
dollars
of
one-time
funding
statewide
with
an
allocation
to
cities
of
four
dollars
per
capita
in
order
to
implement
the
changes
in
the
police
reform
bills.
AA
AA
AA
I
would
note
that
we
work
as
a
team.
I
rely
a
lot
on
the
expertise
of
city
staff
as
they
review
bills,
but
also
rely
so
heavily
on
our
partnership
with
our
state
legislators
in
the
41st
and
48th
senator
wellman,
senator
cooter,
representative
thai
representative
sen,
representative,
slatter
and
representative
wallen
are
are
such
strong
partners
to
us
and
given
given
how
important
bellevue
is
to
the
region
and
to
the
state.
AA
I
will
conclude
there
and
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions
you
may
have
or
or
allow
matt
to
carry
on
the
presentation.
AC
AH
Certainly
good
evening,
mayor
deputy
mayor
and
council
members,
so
I
am
here
to
talk
about
two
specific
bills
that
will
affect
the
city's
land
use
code.
The
first
bill
is
senate
bill
5235
and
senate
bill.
5235
addresses
local
authority
to
regulate
the
number
of
unrelated
persons
living
in
a
dwelling
unit
or
home,
and
under
this
bill,
cities
may
only
limit
the
number
of
unrelated
persons
living
in
a
home
based
on
occupant
load
per
square
foot
and
or
health
and
safety
provisions
established
by
the
building
code
or
city
ordinances.
AH
AH
The
bad
news
is
this:
state
law
goes
into
effect
on
july
25th,
so
we
are
anticipating
that
we
will
bring
back
interim
official
controls
relatively
quickly
next
month
in
order
to
address
the
changes
that
we'll
need
to
make
to
the
land
use
code
with
respect
to
this
senate
bill-
and
I
do
want
to
point
out
just
with
this
brief
introduction
that
I'm
giving
tonight,
I
do
want
to
point
out
that
this
bill
accepted
short-term
rentals
and
transient
lodging
and
the
city
may
still
regulate
those
separately.
AH
So
what
this
bill
really
goes
to
is
city
regulation
of
the
number
of
unrelated
people
living
together.
The
other
bill
that
passed
that's
going
to
require
quick
action
by
the
city
before
the
effective
date
is
house
bill.
1220
and
house
bill
1220
addresses
municipal
regulation
of
supportive
housing,
transitional
housing,
emergency
housing
and
indoor
emergency
shelters,
so
this
bill
states
that
cities
must
allow
transitional
housing
and
permanent
supportive
housing
in
zones
where
the
city
allows
residential
units
or
hotels.
AH
But
once
again,
the
state
is
mandating
that
the
cities
allow
transitional
housing
and
permanent
supportive
housing,
where
the
city
allows
residential
units
for
hotels
and
indoor,
emergency,
shelter
and
emergency
housing
in
zones
where
hotels
are
allowed.
So
development
services
will
bring
back
an
interim
official
control
to
amend
the
land.
The
land
use
code
to
address
this
state
mandated
provision
in
house
bill
1220
as
well.
AH
But
the
main
reason
that
we're
introducing
these
separately
is
because
of
the
effective
dates
at
the
end
of
july,
and
we
wanted
to
let
council
know,
with
respect
to
these
specific
land
use
bills,
that
we
will
be
bringing
back
two
interim
official
controls
next
month.
AH
Is
actually
broken
up
with
respect
to
those
the
transitional
housing
and
the
supportive
housing
regulations
are
july.
25Th,
the
emergency
housing
and
the
indoor
emergency
shelter
are
in
september.
That's
when
those
become
effective,
but
we
do
intend
to
address
all
of
these
with
one
interim
official
control
and
try
to
meet
the
july
date
for
all
of
them.
We're
gonna
we're
gonna,
have
two
separate
official
interim
official
controls,
one
for
52
35,
one
for
12
20,
but
we're
going
to
take
all
four
of
those
12
20
mandates
and
put
them
into
one
interim
official
control.
AH
P
Thank
you:
when
will
you
be
briefing
ebcc.
AH
That's
a
good
question.
I
don't
think
we've
talked
about
that
quite
yet,
but
since
we
are
going
to
bring
these
back
and
that's
a
good
point
also
because
these
are
city-wide
mandates.
So
when
we
bring
these
back
to
counsel
with
the
proposed
interim
official
controls,
I
can
certainly
give
an
update
on
the
ebcc
briefing
as
well,
and
I
can
also
reach
out
to
you
councilmember
robertson,
as
the
ebcc
liaison
as
we
talk
about
that
internally
as
well.
Not.
P
AH
That
that's
a
very
good
point
and
I
think
I
apologize,
but
I
think
we
were
aware
of
that
step,
but
we
didn't
think
about
the
dates
for
that
step.
Yet.
A
Any
other
comments
or
questions
on
this
so
tell
me
your
timeline,
so
you're
going
to
come
back
on
the
12th
is
that
right
july
12th.
I'm.
AH
Going
to
defer
to
the
clerk's
office
here
because
they
know
your
schedule
better
than
I
do,
but
but
I
think
the
the
anticipated
schedule
is
to
bring
back
the
interim
official
controls
and
to
try
to
bring
the
city
into
compliance
as
soon
as
possible
and
then
to
hold
the
public
hearing.
AH
That's
required
within
60
days
before
the
council
recess
in
august,
and-
and
I
did
I
do
want
to
point
out
that
one
thing
council
has
been
very
successful
at
doing
at
least
while
I've
been
working
with
the
city
is
being
very
nimble
with
these
interim
official
controls
and
then
being
very
mindful
of
the
public
comment
and
also
the
the
larger
policy
discussions
with
the
permanent
regulations
and
I've
seen
council
a
number
of
times
bring
the
city
into
compliance
immediately
with
an
interim
official
control
and
then
have
the
deeper
discussion
and
the
public
comment
through
that
public
hearing
process
that
occurs
and
that's
what
development
services
and
the
city
attorney's
office
is
is
anticipating.
AH
Is
that
we,
the
interim
official
controls,
are
interim
and
that
we
would
use
that
process
to
facilitate
the
larger
discussion
on
all
of
these
items.
But,
but
because
of
the
july
25th
date,
if
the
city
clerk
could
could
give
exact
dates,
I
do
know
we're
treating
that
as
our
deadline
here.
B
AH
E
Mike
my
comment
wasn't
related
to
these
two
bills
and
the
interim
control
more
of
rihanna's
comments,
because
we
did
hear
that
on
the
eviction
moratorium
that
perhaps
the
more
narrow
version
that's
passed
by
the
governor
may
not
quite
bridge
the
gap
so
to
get
to
the
5160,
tenant
protection
and
landlord
assistance
money.
E
So
if
there
is
more
information
on
that,
I
think
it
would
be
helpful
to
to
hear
that
information,
because
certainly
we
we
don't
want
to
have
an
eviction
crisis
in
our
community
where,
where,
as
we're
trying
to
address
homelessness,
that
we
have
even
more
people
getting
evicted.
E
So
that's
one
of
my
comments
and
then
the
other
one
and
you
didn't
comment
on
it,
but
I
noticed
in
the
packet
5287,
which
is
the
mfte
extension
for
an
additional
12
years,
and
I
just
wondered
if,
since
we
are
modifying
our
mfte,
is
that
additional
12-year
something
we
can
do
later
on
or
because
it
looks
like
now?
It's
allowed
beyond
the
first
12
years.
AA
Great
questions
council
members
on
so
on
the
first
one
regarding
the
eviction
moratoria.
I
last
that
I
heard
we
are
waiting
for
details
on
the
specifics
and
the
governor's
proclamation.
I'll
be
honest.
I
am
technically
on
vacation
today,
so
we
could
have
received
more
details
today
and
I
miss
to
them,
but
I'll,
ask
my
staff
to
double
check
and
follow
up
with
city
staff
on
the
second
bill,
the
mfte
bill.
AA
AA
I
hope
that
clarifies
and
answers
your
question
and
I
would
defer
to
your
your
city,
staff
and
legal
team
to
interpret
the
the
details
of
that,
and
they
probably
don't
have
that
handy
tonight,
but
but
that
was
certainly
the
legislative
intent
behind
the
bill.